Compare commits

...

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Kim Morrison
a8d323db33 merge 2024-12-16 13:54:38 +11:00
Kim Morrison
155813a396 finish lemmas 2024-12-16 13:52:25 +11:00
Kim Morrison
49ad9d1821 . 2024-12-15 22:19:51 +11:00
Kim Morrison
a3588d9a70 . 2024-12-15 22:19:42 +11:00
Kim Morrison
63dea907aa merge master 2024-12-15 21:36:03 +11:00
Kim Morrison
195a93c22d Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into range_step_pos 2024-12-15 21:34:29 +11:00
Kim Morrison
0c010eb8fb fix 2024-12-15 21:34:07 +11:00
Kim Morrison
8af9462e9a chore: require 0 < Range.step 2024-12-15 18:25:39 +11:00
13 changed files with 697 additions and 500 deletions

View File

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ The integers, with addition, multiplication, and subtraction.
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Cast
import Init.Data.Nat.Div
import Init.Data.Nat.Div.Basic
set_option linter.missingDocs true -- keep it documented
open Nat

View File

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Nat.Div
import Init.Data.Nat.Div.Basic
/-!
# Notation for `List` literals.

View File

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Nat.Basic
import Init.Data.Nat.Div
import Init.Data.Nat.Div.Basic
import Init.Data.Nat.Dvd
import Init.Data.Nat.Gcd
import Init.Data.Nat.MinMax

View File

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Nat.Basic
import Init.Data.Nat.Div
import Init.Data.Nat.Div.Basic
import Init.Coe
namespace Nat

View File

@@ -1,418 +1,8 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Copyright (c) 2024 Lean FRO, LLC. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
prelude
import Init.WF
import Init.WFTactics
import Init.Data.Nat.Basic
namespace Nat
/--
Divisibility of natural numbers. `a b` (typed as `\|`) says that
there is some `c` such that `b = a * c`.
-/
instance : Dvd Nat where
dvd a b := Exists (fun c => b = a * c)
theorem div_rec_lemma {x y : Nat} : 0 < y y x x - y < x :=
fun ypos, ylex => sub_lt (Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le ypos ylex) ypos
@[extern "lean_nat_div"]
protected def div (x y : @& Nat) : Nat :=
if 0 < y y x then
Nat.div (x - y) y + 1
else
0
decreasing_by apply div_rec_lemma; assumption
instance instDiv : Div Nat := Nat.div
theorem div_eq (x y : Nat) : x / y = if 0 < y y x then (x - y) / y + 1 else 0 := by
show Nat.div x y = _
rw [Nat.div]
rfl
def div.inductionOn.{u}
{motive : Nat Nat Sort u}
(x y : Nat)
(ind : x y, 0 < y y x motive (x - y) y motive x y)
(base : x y, ¬(0 < y y x) motive x y)
: motive x y :=
if h : 0 < y y x then
ind x y h (inductionOn (x - y) y ind base)
else
base x y h
decreasing_by apply div_rec_lemma; assumption
theorem div_le_self (n k : Nat) : n / k n := by
induction n using Nat.strongRecOn with
| ind n ih =>
rw [div_eq]
-- Note: manual split to avoid Classical.em which is not yet defined
cases (inferInstance : Decidable (0 < k k n)) with
| isFalse h => simp [h]
| isTrue h =>
suffices (n - k) / k + 1 n by simp [h, this]
have hK, hKN := h
have hSub : n - k < n := sub_lt (Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le hK hKN) hK
have : (n - k) / k n - k := ih (n - k) hSub
exact succ_le_of_lt (Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt this hSub)
theorem div_lt_self {n k : Nat} (hLtN : 0 < n) (hLtK : 1 < k) : n / k < n := by
rw [div_eq]
cases (inferInstance : Decidable (0 < k k n)) with
| isFalse h => simp [hLtN, h]
| isTrue h =>
suffices (n - k) / k + 1 < n by simp [h, this]
have _, hKN := h
have : (n - k) / k n - k := div_le_self (n - k) k
have := Nat.add_le_of_le_sub hKN this
exact Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le (Nat.add_lt_add_left hLtK _) this
@[extern "lean_nat_mod"]
protected def modCore (x y : @& Nat) : Nat :=
if 0 < y y x then
Nat.modCore (x - y) y
else
x
decreasing_by apply div_rec_lemma; assumption
@[extern "lean_nat_mod"]
protected def mod : @& Nat @& Nat Nat
/-
Nat.modCore is defined by well-founded recursion and thus irreducible. Nevertheless it is
desirable if trivial `Nat.mod` calculations, namely
* `Nat.mod 0 m` for all `m`
* `Nat.mod n (m+n)` for concrete literals `n`
reduce definitionally.
This property is desirable for `Fin n` literals, as it means `(ofNat 0 : Fin n).val = 0` by
definition.
-/
| 0, _ => 0
| n@(_ + 1), m =>
if m n -- NB: if n < m does not reduce as well as `m ≤ n`!
then Nat.modCore n m
else n
instance instMod : Mod Nat := Nat.mod
protected theorem modCore_eq_mod (n m : Nat) : Nat.modCore n m = n % m := by
show Nat.modCore n m = Nat.mod n m
match n, m with
| 0, _ =>
rw [Nat.modCore]
exact if_neg fun hlt, hle => Nat.lt_irrefl _ (Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le hlt hle)
| (_ + 1), _ =>
rw [Nat.mod]; dsimp
refine iteInduction (fun _ => rfl) (fun h => ?false) -- cannot use `split` this early yet
rw [Nat.modCore]
exact if_neg fun _hlt, hle => h hle
theorem mod_eq (x y : Nat) : x % y = if 0 < y y x then (x - y) % y else x := by
rw [Nat.modCore_eq_mod, Nat.modCore_eq_mod, Nat.modCore]
def mod.inductionOn.{u}
{motive : Nat Nat Sort u}
(x y : Nat)
(ind : x y, 0 < y y x motive (x - y) y motive x y)
(base : x y, ¬(0 < y y x) motive x y)
: motive x y :=
div.inductionOn x y ind base
@[simp] theorem mod_zero (a : Nat) : a % 0 = a :=
have : (if 0 < 0 0 a then (a - 0) % 0 else a) = a :=
have h : ¬ (0 < 0 0 a) := fun h₁, _ => absurd h₁ (Nat.lt_irrefl _)
if_neg h
(mod_eq a 0).symm this
theorem mod_eq_of_lt {a b : Nat} (h : a < b) : a % b = a :=
have : (if 0 < b b a then (a - b) % b else a) = a :=
have h' : ¬(0 < b b a) := fun _, h₁ => absurd h₁ (Nat.not_le_of_gt h)
if_neg h'
(mod_eq a b).symm this
@[simp] theorem one_mod_eq_zero_iff {n : Nat} : 1 % n = 0 n = 1 := by
match n with
| 0 => simp
| 1 => simp
| n + 2 =>
rw [mod_eq_of_lt (by exact Nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ rfl)]
simp only [add_one_ne_zero, false_iff, ne_eq]
exact ne_of_beq_eq_false rfl
@[simp] theorem Nat.zero_eq_one_mod_iff {n : Nat} : 0 = 1 % n n = 1 := by
rw [eq_comm]
simp
theorem mod_eq_sub_mod {a b : Nat} (h : a b) : a % b = (a - b) % b :=
match eq_zero_or_pos b with
| Or.inl h₁ => h₁.symm (Nat.sub_zero a).symm rfl
| Or.inr h₁ => (mod_eq a b).symm if_pos h₁, h
theorem mod_lt (x : Nat) {y : Nat} : y > 0 x % y < y := by
induction x, y using mod.inductionOn with
| base x y h₁ =>
intro h₂
have h₁ : ¬ 0 < y ¬ y x := Decidable.not_and_iff_or_not.mp h₁
match h₁ with
| Or.inl h₁ => exact absurd h₂ h₁
| Or.inr h₁ =>
have hgt : y > x := gt_of_not_le h₁
have heq : x % y = x := mod_eq_of_lt hgt
rw [ heq] at hgt
exact hgt
| ind x y h h₂ =>
intro h₃
have _, h₁ := h
rw [mod_eq_sub_mod h₁]
exact h₂ h₃
@[simp] protected theorem sub_mod_add_mod_cancel (a b : Nat) [NeZero a] : a - b % a + b % a = a := by
rw [Nat.sub_add_cancel]
cases a with
| zero => simp_all
| succ a =>
exact Nat.le_of_lt (mod_lt b (zero_lt_succ a))
theorem mod_le (x y : Nat) : x % y x := by
match Nat.lt_or_ge x y with
| Or.inl h₁ => rw [mod_eq_of_lt h₁]; apply Nat.le_refl
| Or.inr h₁ => match eq_zero_or_pos y with
| Or.inl h₂ => rw [h₂, Nat.mod_zero x]; apply Nat.le_refl
| Or.inr h₂ => exact Nat.le_trans (Nat.le_of_lt (mod_lt _ h₂)) h₁
@[simp] theorem zero_mod (b : Nat) : 0 % b = 0 := by
rw [mod_eq]
have : ¬ (0 < b b = 0) := by
intro h₁, h₂
simp_all
simp [this]
@[simp] theorem mod_self (n : Nat) : n % n = 0 := by
rw [mod_eq_sub_mod (Nat.le_refl _), Nat.sub_self, zero_mod]
theorem mod_one (x : Nat) : x % 1 = 0 := by
have h : x % 1 < 1 := mod_lt x (by decide)
have : (y : Nat) y < 1 y = 0 := by
intro y
cases y with
| zero => intro _; rfl
| succ y => intro h; apply absurd (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h) (Nat.not_lt_zero y)
exact this _ h
theorem div_add_mod (m n : Nat) : n * (m / n) + m % n = m := by
rw [div_eq, mod_eq]
have h : Decidable (0 < n n m) := inferInstance
cases h with
| isFalse h => simp [h]
| isTrue h =>
simp [h]
have ih := div_add_mod (m - n) n
rw [Nat.left_distrib, Nat.mul_one, Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_left_comm, ih, Nat.add_comm, Nat.sub_add_cancel h.2]
decreasing_by apply div_rec_lemma; assumption
theorem div_eq_sub_div (h₁ : 0 < b) (h₂ : b a) : a / b = (a - b) / b + 1 := by
rw [div_eq a, if_pos]; constructor <;> assumption
theorem mod_add_div (m k : Nat) : m % k + k * (m / k) = m := by
induction m, k using mod.inductionOn with rw [div_eq, mod_eq]
| base x y h => simp [h]
| ind x y h IH => simp [h]; rw [Nat.mul_succ, Nat.add_assoc, IH, Nat.sub_add_cancel h.2]
theorem mod_def (m k : Nat) : m % k = m - k * (m / k) := by
rw [Nat.sub_eq_of_eq_add]
apply (Nat.mod_add_div _ _).symm
@[simp] protected theorem div_one (n : Nat) : n / 1 = n := by
have := mod_add_div n 1
rwa [mod_one, Nat.zero_add, Nat.one_mul] at this
@[simp] protected theorem div_zero (n : Nat) : n / 0 = 0 := by
rw [div_eq]; simp [Nat.lt_irrefl]
@[simp] protected theorem zero_div (b : Nat) : 0 / b = 0 :=
(div_eq 0 b).trans <| if_neg <| And.rec Nat.not_le_of_gt
theorem le_div_iff_mul_le (k0 : 0 < k) : x y / k x * k y := by
induction y, k using mod.inductionOn generalizing x with
(rw [div_eq]; simp [h]; cases x with | zero => simp [zero_le] | succ x => ?_)
| base y k h =>
simp only [add_one, succ_mul, false_iff, Nat.not_le, Nat.succ_ne_zero]
refine Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ (Nat.le_add_left ..)
exact Nat.not_le.1 fun h' => h k0, h'
| ind y k h IH =>
rw [Nat.add_le_add_iff_right, IH k0, succ_mul,
Nat.add_sub_cancel (x*k) k, Nat.sub_le_sub_iff_right h.2, Nat.add_sub_cancel]
protected theorem div_div_eq_div_mul (m n k : Nat) : m / n / k = m / (n * k) := by
cases eq_zero_or_pos k with
| inl k0 => rw [k0, Nat.mul_zero, Nat.div_zero, Nat.div_zero] | inr kpos => ?_
cases eq_zero_or_pos n with
| inl n0 => rw [n0, Nat.zero_mul, Nat.div_zero, Nat.zero_div] | inr npos => ?_
apply Nat.le_antisymm
apply (le_div_iff_mul_le (Nat.mul_pos npos kpos)).2
rw [Nat.mul_comm n k, Nat.mul_assoc]
apply (le_div_iff_mul_le npos).1
apply (le_div_iff_mul_le kpos).1
(apply Nat.le_refl)
apply (le_div_iff_mul_le kpos).2
apply (le_div_iff_mul_le npos).2
rw [Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_comm n k]
apply (le_div_iff_mul_le (Nat.mul_pos kpos npos)).1
apply Nat.le_refl
theorem div_mul_le_self : (m n : Nat), m / n * n m
| m, 0 => by simp
| _, _+1 => (le_div_iff_mul_le (Nat.succ_pos _)).1 (Nat.le_refl _)
theorem div_lt_iff_lt_mul (Hk : 0 < k) : x / k < y x < y * k := by
rw [ Nat.not_le, Nat.not_le]; exact not_congr (le_div_iff_mul_le Hk)
@[simp] theorem add_div_right (x : Nat) {z : Nat} (H : 0 < z) : (x + z) / z = (x / z) + 1 := by
rw [div_eq_sub_div H (Nat.le_add_left _ _), Nat.add_sub_cancel]
@[simp] theorem add_div_left (x : Nat) {z : Nat} (H : 0 < z) : (z + x) / z = (x / z) + 1 := by
rw [Nat.add_comm, add_div_right x H]
theorem add_mul_div_left (x z : Nat) {y : Nat} (H : 0 < y) : (x + y * z) / y = x / y + z := by
induction z with
| zero => rw [Nat.mul_zero, Nat.add_zero, Nat.add_zero]
| succ z ih => rw [mul_succ, Nat.add_assoc, add_div_right _ H, ih]; rfl
theorem add_mul_div_right (x y : Nat) {z : Nat} (H : 0 < z) : (x + y * z) / z = x / z + y := by
rw [Nat.mul_comm, add_mul_div_left _ _ H]
@[simp] theorem add_mod_right (x z : Nat) : (x + z) % z = x % z := by
rw [mod_eq_sub_mod (Nat.le_add_left ..), Nat.add_sub_cancel]
@[simp] theorem add_mod_left (x z : Nat) : (x + z) % x = z % x := by
rw [Nat.add_comm, add_mod_right]
@[simp] theorem add_mul_mod_self_left (x y z : Nat) : (x + y * z) % y = x % y := by
match z with
| 0 => rw [Nat.mul_zero, Nat.add_zero]
| succ z => rw [mul_succ, Nat.add_assoc, add_mod_right, add_mul_mod_self_left (z := z)]
@[simp] theorem add_mul_mod_self_right (x y z : Nat) : (x + y * z) % z = x % z := by
rw [Nat.mul_comm, add_mul_mod_self_left]
@[simp] theorem mul_mod_right (m n : Nat) : (m * n) % m = 0 := by
rw [ Nat.zero_add (m * n), add_mul_mod_self_left, zero_mod]
@[simp] theorem mul_mod_left (m n : Nat) : (m * n) % n = 0 := by
rw [Nat.mul_comm, mul_mod_right]
protected theorem div_eq_of_lt_le (lo : k * n m) (hi : m < (k + 1) * n) : m / n = k :=
have npos : 0 < n := (eq_zero_or_pos _).resolve_left fun hn => by
rw [hn, Nat.mul_zero] at hi lo; exact absurd lo (Nat.not_le_of_gt hi)
Nat.le_antisymm
(le_of_lt_succ ((Nat.div_lt_iff_lt_mul npos).2 hi))
((Nat.le_div_iff_mul_le npos).2 lo)
theorem sub_mul_div (x n p : Nat) (h₁ : n*p x) : (x - n*p) / n = x / n - p := by
match eq_zero_or_pos n with
| .inl h₀ => rw [h₀, Nat.div_zero, Nat.div_zero, Nat.zero_sub]
| .inr h₀ => induction p with
| zero => rw [Nat.mul_zero, Nat.sub_zero, Nat.sub_zero]
| succ p IH =>
have h₂ : n * p x := Nat.le_trans (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ (le_succ _)) h₁
have h₃ : x - n * p n := by
apply Nat.le_of_add_le_add_right
rw [Nat.sub_add_cancel h₂, Nat.add_comm]
rw [mul_succ] at h₁
exact h₁
rw [sub_succ, IH h₂, div_eq_sub_div h₀ h₃]
simp [Nat.pred_succ, mul_succ, Nat.sub_sub]
theorem mul_sub_div (x n p : Nat) (h₁ : x < n*p) : (n * p - (x + 1)) / n = p - ((x / n) + 1) := by
have npos : 0 < n := (eq_zero_or_pos _).resolve_left fun n0 => by
rw [n0, Nat.zero_mul] at h₁; exact not_lt_zero _ h₁
apply Nat.div_eq_of_lt_le
focus
rw [Nat.mul_sub_right_distrib, Nat.mul_comm]
exact Nat.sub_le_sub_left ((div_lt_iff_lt_mul npos).1 (lt_succ_self _)) _
focus
show succ (pred (n * p - x)) (succ (pred (p - x / n))) * n
rw [succ_pred_eq_of_pos (Nat.sub_pos_of_lt h₁),
fun h => succ_pred_eq_of_pos (Nat.sub_pos_of_lt h)] -- TODO: why is the function needed?
focus
rw [Nat.mul_sub_right_distrib, Nat.mul_comm]
exact Nat.sub_le_sub_left (div_mul_le_self ..) _
focus
rwa [div_lt_iff_lt_mul npos, Nat.mul_comm]
theorem mul_mod_mul_left (z x y : Nat) : (z * x) % (z * y) = z * (x % y) :=
if y0 : y = 0 then by
rw [y0, Nat.mul_zero, mod_zero, mod_zero]
else if z0 : z = 0 then by
rw [z0, Nat.zero_mul, Nat.zero_mul, Nat.zero_mul, mod_zero]
else by
induction x using Nat.strongRecOn with
| _ n IH =>
have y0 : y > 0 := Nat.pos_of_ne_zero y0
have z0 : z > 0 := Nat.pos_of_ne_zero z0
cases Nat.lt_or_ge n y with
| inl yn => rw [mod_eq_of_lt yn, mod_eq_of_lt (Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left yn z0)]
| inr yn =>
rw [mod_eq_sub_mod yn, mod_eq_sub_mod (Nat.mul_le_mul_left z yn),
Nat.mul_sub_left_distrib]
exact IH _ (sub_lt (Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le y0 yn) y0)
theorem div_eq_of_lt (h₀ : a < b) : a / b = 0 := by
rw [div_eq a, if_neg]
intro h₁
apply Nat.not_le_of_gt h₀ h₁.right
protected theorem mul_div_cancel (m : Nat) {n : Nat} (H : 0 < n) : m * n / n = m := by
let t := add_mul_div_right 0 m H
rwa [Nat.zero_add, Nat.zero_div, Nat.zero_add] at t
protected theorem mul_div_cancel_left (m : Nat) {n : Nat} (H : 0 < n) : n * m / n = m := by
rw [Nat.mul_comm, Nat.mul_div_cancel _ H]
protected theorem div_le_of_le_mul {m n : Nat} : {k}, m k * n m / k n
| 0, _ => by simp [Nat.div_zero, n.zero_le]
| succ k, h => by
suffices succ k * (m / succ k) succ k * n from
Nat.le_of_mul_le_mul_left this (zero_lt_succ _)
have h1 : succ k * (m / succ k) m % succ k + succ k * (m / succ k) := Nat.le_add_left _ _
have h2 : m % succ k + succ k * (m / succ k) = m := by rw [mod_add_div]
have h3 : m succ k * n := h
rw [ h2] at h3
exact Nat.le_trans h1 h3
@[simp] theorem mul_div_right (n : Nat) {m : Nat} (H : 0 < m) : m * n / m = n := by
induction n <;> simp_all [mul_succ]
@[simp] theorem mul_div_left (m : Nat) {n : Nat} (H : 0 < n) : m * n / n = m := by
rw [Nat.mul_comm, mul_div_right _ H]
protected theorem div_self (H : 0 < n) : n / n = 1 := by
let t := add_div_right 0 H
rwa [Nat.zero_add, Nat.zero_div] at t
protected theorem div_eq_of_eq_mul_left (H1 : 0 < n) (H2 : m = k * n) : m / n = k :=
by rw [H2, Nat.mul_div_cancel _ H1]
protected theorem div_eq_of_eq_mul_right (H1 : 0 < n) (H2 : m = n * k) : m / n = k :=
by rw [H2, Nat.mul_div_cancel_left _ H1]
protected theorem mul_div_mul_left {m : Nat} (n k : Nat) (H : 0 < m) :
m * n / (m * k) = n / k := by rw [ Nat.div_div_eq_div_mul, Nat.mul_div_cancel_left _ H]
protected theorem mul_div_mul_right {m : Nat} (n k : Nat) (H : 0 < m) :
n * m / (k * m) = n / k := by rw [Nat.mul_comm, Nat.mul_comm k, Nat.mul_div_mul_left _ _ H]
theorem mul_div_le (m n : Nat) : n * (m / n) m := by
match n, Nat.eq_zero_or_pos n with
| _, Or.inl rfl => rw [Nat.zero_mul]; exact m.zero_le
| n, Or.inr h => rw [Nat.mul_comm, Nat.le_div_iff_mul_le h]; exact Nat.le_refl _
end Nat
import Init.Data.Nat.Div.Basic
import Init.Data.Nat.Div.Lemmas

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,437 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import Init.WF
import Init.WFTactics
import Init.Data.Nat.Basic
namespace Nat
/--
Divisibility of natural numbers. `a b` (typed as `\|`) says that
there is some `c` such that `b = a * c`.
-/
instance : Dvd Nat where
dvd a b := Exists (fun c => b = a * c)
theorem div_rec_lemma {x y : Nat} : 0 < y y x x - y < x :=
fun ypos, ylex => sub_lt (Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le ypos ylex) ypos
@[extern "lean_nat_div"]
protected def div (x y : @& Nat) : Nat :=
if 0 < y y x then
Nat.div (x - y) y + 1
else
0
decreasing_by apply div_rec_lemma; assumption
instance instDiv : Div Nat := Nat.div
theorem div_eq (x y : Nat) : x / y = if 0 < y y x then (x - y) / y + 1 else 0 := by
show Nat.div x y = _
rw [Nat.div]
rfl
def div.inductionOn.{u}
{motive : Nat Nat Sort u}
(x y : Nat)
(ind : x y, 0 < y y x motive (x - y) y motive x y)
(base : x y, ¬(0 < y y x) motive x y)
: motive x y :=
if h : 0 < y y x then
ind x y h (inductionOn (x - y) y ind base)
else
base x y h
decreasing_by apply div_rec_lemma; assumption
theorem div_le_self (n k : Nat) : n / k n := by
induction n using Nat.strongRecOn with
| ind n ih =>
rw [div_eq]
-- Note: manual split to avoid Classical.em which is not yet defined
cases (inferInstance : Decidable (0 < k k n)) with
| isFalse h => simp [h]
| isTrue h =>
suffices (n - k) / k + 1 n by simp [h, this]
have hK, hKN := h
have hSub : n - k < n := sub_lt (Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le hK hKN) hK
have : (n - k) / k n - k := ih (n - k) hSub
exact succ_le_of_lt (Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt this hSub)
theorem div_lt_self {n k : Nat} (hLtN : 0 < n) (hLtK : 1 < k) : n / k < n := by
rw [div_eq]
cases (inferInstance : Decidable (0 < k k n)) with
| isFalse h => simp [hLtN, h]
| isTrue h =>
suffices (n - k) / k + 1 < n by simp [h, this]
have _, hKN := h
have : (n - k) / k n - k := div_le_self (n - k) k
have := Nat.add_le_of_le_sub hKN this
exact Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le (Nat.add_lt_add_left hLtK _) this
@[extern "lean_nat_mod"]
protected def modCore (x y : @& Nat) : Nat :=
if 0 < y y x then
Nat.modCore (x - y) y
else
x
decreasing_by apply div_rec_lemma; assumption
@[extern "lean_nat_mod"]
protected def mod : @& Nat @& Nat Nat
/-
Nat.modCore is defined by well-founded recursion and thus irreducible. Nevertheless it is
desirable if trivial `Nat.mod` calculations, namely
* `Nat.mod 0 m` for all `m`
* `Nat.mod n (m+n)` for concrete literals `n`
reduce definitionally.
This property is desirable for `Fin n` literals, as it means `(ofNat 0 : Fin n).val = 0` by
definition.
-/
| 0, _ => 0
| n@(_ + 1), m =>
if m n -- NB: if n < m does not reduce as well as `m ≤ n`!
then Nat.modCore n m
else n
instance instMod : Mod Nat := Nat.mod
protected theorem modCore_eq_mod (n m : Nat) : Nat.modCore n m = n % m := by
show Nat.modCore n m = Nat.mod n m
match n, m with
| 0, _ =>
rw [Nat.modCore]
exact if_neg fun hlt, hle => Nat.lt_irrefl _ (Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le hlt hle)
| (_ + 1), _ =>
rw [Nat.mod]; dsimp
refine iteInduction (fun _ => rfl) (fun h => ?false) -- cannot use `split` this early yet
rw [Nat.modCore]
exact if_neg fun _hlt, hle => h hle
theorem mod_eq (x y : Nat) : x % y = if 0 < y y x then (x - y) % y else x := by
rw [Nat.modCore_eq_mod, Nat.modCore_eq_mod, Nat.modCore]
def mod.inductionOn.{u}
{motive : Nat Nat Sort u}
(x y : Nat)
(ind : x y, 0 < y y x motive (x - y) y motive x y)
(base : x y, ¬(0 < y y x) motive x y)
: motive x y :=
div.inductionOn x y ind base
@[simp] theorem mod_zero (a : Nat) : a % 0 = a :=
have : (if 0 < 0 0 a then (a - 0) % 0 else a) = a :=
have h : ¬ (0 < 0 0 a) := fun h₁, _ => absurd h₁ (Nat.lt_irrefl _)
if_neg h
(mod_eq a 0).symm this
theorem mod_eq_of_lt {a b : Nat} (h : a < b) : a % b = a :=
have : (if 0 < b b a then (a - b) % b else a) = a :=
have h' : ¬(0 < b b a) := fun _, h₁ => absurd h₁ (Nat.not_le_of_gt h)
if_neg h'
(mod_eq a b).symm this
@[simp] theorem one_mod_eq_zero_iff {n : Nat} : 1 % n = 0 n = 1 := by
match n with
| 0 => simp
| 1 => simp
| n + 2 =>
rw [mod_eq_of_lt (by exact Nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ rfl)]
simp only [add_one_ne_zero, false_iff, ne_eq]
exact ne_of_beq_eq_false rfl
@[simp] theorem Nat.zero_eq_one_mod_iff {n : Nat} : 0 = 1 % n n = 1 := by
rw [eq_comm]
simp
theorem mod_eq_sub_mod {a b : Nat} (h : a b) : a % b = (a - b) % b :=
match eq_zero_or_pos b with
| Or.inl h₁ => h₁.symm (Nat.sub_zero a).symm rfl
| Or.inr h₁ => (mod_eq a b).symm if_pos h₁, h
theorem mod_lt (x : Nat) {y : Nat} : y > 0 x % y < y := by
induction x, y using mod.inductionOn with
| base x y h₁ =>
intro h₂
have h₁ : ¬ 0 < y ¬ y x := Decidable.not_and_iff_or_not.mp h₁
match h₁ with
| Or.inl h₁ => exact absurd h₂ h₁
| Or.inr h₁ =>
have hgt : y > x := gt_of_not_le h₁
have heq : x % y = x := mod_eq_of_lt hgt
rw [ heq] at hgt
exact hgt
| ind x y h h₂ =>
intro h₃
have _, h₁ := h
rw [mod_eq_sub_mod h₁]
exact h₂ h₃
@[simp] protected theorem sub_mod_add_mod_cancel (a b : Nat) [NeZero a] : a - b % a + b % a = a := by
rw [Nat.sub_add_cancel]
cases a with
| zero => simp_all
| succ a =>
exact Nat.le_of_lt (mod_lt b (zero_lt_succ a))
theorem mod_le (x y : Nat) : x % y x := by
match Nat.lt_or_ge x y with
| Or.inl h₁ => rw [mod_eq_of_lt h₁]; apply Nat.le_refl
| Or.inr h₁ => match eq_zero_or_pos y with
| Or.inl h₂ => rw [h₂, Nat.mod_zero x]; apply Nat.le_refl
| Or.inr h₂ => exact Nat.le_trans (Nat.le_of_lt (mod_lt _ h₂)) h₁
@[simp] theorem zero_mod (b : Nat) : 0 % b = 0 := by
rw [mod_eq]
have : ¬ (0 < b b = 0) := by
intro h₁, h₂
simp_all
simp [this]
@[simp] theorem mod_self (n : Nat) : n % n = 0 := by
rw [mod_eq_sub_mod (Nat.le_refl _), Nat.sub_self, zero_mod]
theorem mod_one (x : Nat) : x % 1 = 0 := by
have h : x % 1 < 1 := mod_lt x (by decide)
have : (y : Nat) y < 1 y = 0 := by
intro y
cases y with
| zero => intro _; rfl
| succ y => intro h; apply absurd (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h) (Nat.not_lt_zero y)
exact this _ h
theorem div_add_mod (m n : Nat) : n * (m / n) + m % n = m := by
rw [div_eq, mod_eq]
have h : Decidable (0 < n n m) := inferInstance
cases h with
| isFalse h => simp [h]
| isTrue h =>
simp [h]
have ih := div_add_mod (m - n) n
rw [Nat.left_distrib, Nat.mul_one, Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_left_comm, ih, Nat.add_comm, Nat.sub_add_cancel h.2]
decreasing_by apply div_rec_lemma; assumption
theorem div_eq_sub_div (h₁ : 0 < b) (h₂ : b a) : a / b = (a - b) / b + 1 := by
rw [div_eq a, if_pos]; constructor <;> assumption
theorem mod_add_div (m k : Nat) : m % k + k * (m / k) = m := by
induction m, k using mod.inductionOn with rw [div_eq, mod_eq]
| base x y h => simp [h]
| ind x y h IH => simp [h]; rw [Nat.mul_succ, Nat.add_assoc, IH, Nat.sub_add_cancel h.2]
theorem mod_def (m k : Nat) : m % k = m - k * (m / k) := by
rw [Nat.sub_eq_of_eq_add]
apply (Nat.mod_add_div _ _).symm
theorem mod_eq_sub_mul_div {x k : Nat} : x % k = x - k * (x / k) := mod_def _ _
theorem mod_eq_sub_div_mul {x k : Nat} : x % k = x - (x / k) * k := by
rw [mod_eq_sub_mul_div, Nat.mul_comm]
@[simp] protected theorem div_one (n : Nat) : n / 1 = n := by
have := mod_add_div n 1
rwa [mod_one, Nat.zero_add, Nat.one_mul] at this
@[simp] protected theorem div_zero (n : Nat) : n / 0 = 0 := by
rw [div_eq]; simp [Nat.lt_irrefl]
@[simp] protected theorem zero_div (b : Nat) : 0 / b = 0 :=
(div_eq 0 b).trans <| if_neg <| And.rec Nat.not_le_of_gt
theorem le_div_iff_mul_le (k0 : 0 < k) : x y / k x * k y := by
induction y, k using mod.inductionOn generalizing x with
(rw [div_eq]; simp [h]; cases x with | zero => simp [zero_le] | succ x => ?_)
| base y k h =>
simp only [add_one, succ_mul, false_iff, Nat.not_le, Nat.succ_ne_zero]
refine Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ (Nat.le_add_left ..)
exact Nat.not_le.1 fun h' => h k0, h'
| ind y k h IH =>
rw [Nat.add_le_add_iff_right, IH k0, succ_mul,
Nat.add_sub_cancel (x*k) k, Nat.sub_le_sub_iff_right h.2, Nat.add_sub_cancel]
protected theorem div_div_eq_div_mul (m n k : Nat) : m / n / k = m / (n * k) := by
cases eq_zero_or_pos k with
| inl k0 => rw [k0, Nat.mul_zero, Nat.div_zero, Nat.div_zero] | inr kpos => ?_
cases eq_zero_or_pos n with
| inl n0 => rw [n0, Nat.zero_mul, Nat.div_zero, Nat.zero_div] | inr npos => ?_
apply Nat.le_antisymm
apply (le_div_iff_mul_le (Nat.mul_pos npos kpos)).2
rw [Nat.mul_comm n k, Nat.mul_assoc]
apply (le_div_iff_mul_le npos).1
apply (le_div_iff_mul_le kpos).1
(apply Nat.le_refl)
apply (le_div_iff_mul_le kpos).2
apply (le_div_iff_mul_le npos).2
rw [Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_comm n k]
apply (le_div_iff_mul_le (Nat.mul_pos kpos npos)).1
apply Nat.le_refl
theorem div_mul_le_self : (m n : Nat), m / n * n m
| m, 0 => by simp
| _, _+1 => (le_div_iff_mul_le (Nat.succ_pos _)).1 (Nat.le_refl _)
theorem div_lt_iff_lt_mul (Hk : 0 < k) : x / k < y x < y * k := by
rw [ Nat.not_le, Nat.not_le]; exact not_congr (le_div_iff_mul_le Hk)
theorem pos_of_div_pos {a b : Nat} (h : 0 < a / b) : 0 < a := by
cases b with
| zero => simp at h
| succ b =>
match a, h with
| 0, h => simp at h
| a + 1, _ => exact zero_lt_succ a
@[simp] theorem add_div_right (x : Nat) {z : Nat} (H : 0 < z) : (x + z) / z = (x / z) + 1 := by
rw [div_eq_sub_div H (Nat.le_add_left _ _), Nat.add_sub_cancel]
@[simp] theorem add_div_left (x : Nat) {z : Nat} (H : 0 < z) : (z + x) / z = (x / z) + 1 := by
rw [Nat.add_comm, add_div_right x H]
theorem add_mul_div_left (x z : Nat) {y : Nat} (H : 0 < y) : (x + y * z) / y = x / y + z := by
induction z with
| zero => rw [Nat.mul_zero, Nat.add_zero, Nat.add_zero]
| succ z ih => rw [mul_succ, Nat.add_assoc, add_div_right _ H, ih]; rfl
theorem add_mul_div_right (x y : Nat) {z : Nat} (H : 0 < z) : (x + y * z) / z = x / z + y := by
rw [Nat.mul_comm, add_mul_div_left _ _ H]
@[simp] theorem add_mod_right (x z : Nat) : (x + z) % z = x % z := by
rw [mod_eq_sub_mod (Nat.le_add_left ..), Nat.add_sub_cancel]
@[simp] theorem add_mod_left (x z : Nat) : (x + z) % x = z % x := by
rw [Nat.add_comm, add_mod_right]
@[simp] theorem add_mul_mod_self_left (x y z : Nat) : (x + y * z) % y = x % y := by
match z with
| 0 => rw [Nat.mul_zero, Nat.add_zero]
| succ z => rw [mul_succ, Nat.add_assoc, add_mod_right, add_mul_mod_self_left (z := z)]
@[simp] theorem mul_add_mod_self_left (a b c : Nat) : (a * b + c) % a = c % a := by
rw [Nat.add_comm, Nat.add_mul_mod_self_left]
@[simp] theorem add_mul_mod_self_right (x y z : Nat) : (x + y * z) % z = x % z := by
rw [Nat.mul_comm, add_mul_mod_self_left]
@[simp] theorem mul_add_mod_self_right (a b c : Nat) : (a * b + c) % b = c % b := by
rw [Nat.add_comm, Nat.add_mul_mod_self_right]
@[simp] theorem mul_mod_right (m n : Nat) : (m * n) % m = 0 := by
rw [ Nat.zero_add (m * n), add_mul_mod_self_left, zero_mod]
@[simp] theorem mul_mod_left (m n : Nat) : (m * n) % n = 0 := by
rw [Nat.mul_comm, mul_mod_right]
protected theorem div_eq_of_lt_le (lo : k * n m) (hi : m < (k + 1) * n) : m / n = k :=
have npos : 0 < n := (eq_zero_or_pos _).resolve_left fun hn => by
rw [hn, Nat.mul_zero] at hi lo; exact absurd lo (Nat.not_le_of_gt hi)
Nat.le_antisymm
(le_of_lt_succ ((Nat.div_lt_iff_lt_mul npos).2 hi))
((Nat.le_div_iff_mul_le npos).2 lo)
theorem sub_mul_div (x n p : Nat) (h₁ : n*p x) : (x - n*p) / n = x / n - p := by
match eq_zero_or_pos n with
| .inl h₀ => rw [h₀, Nat.div_zero, Nat.div_zero, Nat.zero_sub]
| .inr h₀ => induction p with
| zero => rw [Nat.mul_zero, Nat.sub_zero, Nat.sub_zero]
| succ p IH =>
have h₂ : n * p x := Nat.le_trans (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ (le_succ _)) h₁
have h₃ : x - n * p n := by
apply Nat.le_of_add_le_add_right
rw [Nat.sub_add_cancel h₂, Nat.add_comm]
rw [mul_succ] at h₁
exact h₁
rw [sub_succ, IH h₂, div_eq_sub_div h₀ h₃]
simp [Nat.pred_succ, mul_succ, Nat.sub_sub]
theorem mul_sub_div (x n p : Nat) (h₁ : x < n*p) : (n * p - (x + 1)) / n = p - ((x / n) + 1) := by
have npos : 0 < n := (eq_zero_or_pos _).resolve_left fun n0 => by
rw [n0, Nat.zero_mul] at h₁; exact not_lt_zero _ h₁
apply Nat.div_eq_of_lt_le
focus
rw [Nat.mul_sub_right_distrib, Nat.mul_comm]
exact Nat.sub_le_sub_left ((div_lt_iff_lt_mul npos).1 (lt_succ_self _)) _
focus
show succ (pred (n * p - x)) (succ (pred (p - x / n))) * n
rw [succ_pred_eq_of_pos (Nat.sub_pos_of_lt h₁),
fun h => succ_pred_eq_of_pos (Nat.sub_pos_of_lt h)] -- TODO: why is the function needed?
focus
rw [Nat.mul_sub_right_distrib, Nat.mul_comm]
exact Nat.sub_le_sub_left (div_mul_le_self ..) _
focus
rwa [div_lt_iff_lt_mul npos, Nat.mul_comm]
theorem mul_mod_mul_left (z x y : Nat) : (z * x) % (z * y) = z * (x % y) :=
if y0 : y = 0 then by
rw [y0, Nat.mul_zero, mod_zero, mod_zero]
else if z0 : z = 0 then by
rw [z0, Nat.zero_mul, Nat.zero_mul, Nat.zero_mul, mod_zero]
else by
induction x using Nat.strongRecOn with
| _ n IH =>
have y0 : y > 0 := Nat.pos_of_ne_zero y0
have z0 : z > 0 := Nat.pos_of_ne_zero z0
cases Nat.lt_or_ge n y with
| inl yn => rw [mod_eq_of_lt yn, mod_eq_of_lt (Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left yn z0)]
| inr yn =>
rw [mod_eq_sub_mod yn, mod_eq_sub_mod (Nat.mul_le_mul_left z yn),
Nat.mul_sub_left_distrib]
exact IH _ (sub_lt (Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le y0 yn) y0)
theorem div_eq_of_lt (h₀ : a < b) : a / b = 0 := by
rw [div_eq a, if_neg]
intro h₁
apply Nat.not_le_of_gt h₀ h₁.right
protected theorem mul_div_cancel (m : Nat) {n : Nat} (H : 0 < n) : m * n / n = m := by
let t := add_mul_div_right 0 m H
rwa [Nat.zero_add, Nat.zero_div, Nat.zero_add] at t
protected theorem mul_div_cancel_left (m : Nat) {n : Nat} (H : 0 < n) : n * m / n = m := by
rw [Nat.mul_comm, Nat.mul_div_cancel _ H]
protected theorem div_le_of_le_mul {m n : Nat} : {k}, m k * n m / k n
| 0, _ => by simp [Nat.div_zero, n.zero_le]
| succ k, h => by
suffices succ k * (m / succ k) succ k * n from
Nat.le_of_mul_le_mul_left this (zero_lt_succ _)
have h1 : succ k * (m / succ k) m % succ k + succ k * (m / succ k) := Nat.le_add_left _ _
have h2 : m % succ k + succ k * (m / succ k) = m := by rw [mod_add_div]
have h3 : m succ k * n := h
rw [ h2] at h3
exact Nat.le_trans h1 h3
@[simp] theorem mul_div_right (n : Nat) {m : Nat} (H : 0 < m) : m * n / m = n := by
induction n <;> simp_all [mul_succ]
@[simp] theorem mul_div_left (m : Nat) {n : Nat} (H : 0 < n) : m * n / n = m := by
rw [Nat.mul_comm, mul_div_right _ H]
protected theorem div_self (H : 0 < n) : n / n = 1 := by
let t := add_div_right 0 H
rwa [Nat.zero_add, Nat.zero_div] at t
protected theorem div_eq_of_eq_mul_left (H1 : 0 < n) (H2 : m = k * n) : m / n = k :=
by rw [H2, Nat.mul_div_cancel _ H1]
protected theorem div_eq_of_eq_mul_right (H1 : 0 < n) (H2 : m = n * k) : m / n = k :=
by rw [H2, Nat.mul_div_cancel_left _ H1]
protected theorem mul_div_mul_left {m : Nat} (n k : Nat) (H : 0 < m) :
m * n / (m * k) = n / k := by rw [ Nat.div_div_eq_div_mul, Nat.mul_div_cancel_left _ H]
protected theorem mul_div_mul_right {m : Nat} (n k : Nat) (H : 0 < m) :
n * m / (k * m) = n / k := by rw [Nat.mul_comm, Nat.mul_comm k, Nat.mul_div_mul_left _ _ H]
theorem mul_div_le (m n : Nat) : n * (m / n) m := by
match n, Nat.eq_zero_or_pos n with
| _, Or.inl rfl => rw [Nat.zero_mul]; exact m.zero_le
| n, Or.inr h => rw [Nat.mul_comm, Nat.le_div_iff_mul_le h]; exact Nat.le_refl _
end Nat

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Lean FRO. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
prelude
import Init.Omega
import Init.Data.Nat.Lemmas
/-!
# Further lemmas about `Nat.div` and `Nat.mod`, with the convenience of having `omega` available.
-/
namespace Nat
theorem lt_div_iff_mul_lt (h : 0 < k) : x < y / k x * k < y - (k - 1) := by
have t := le_div_iff_mul_le h (x := x + 1) (y := y)
rw [succ_le, add_one_mul] at t
have s : k = k - 1 + 1 := by omega
conv at t => rhs; lhs; rhs; rw [s]
rw [ Nat.add_assoc, succ_le, add_lt_iff_lt_sub_right] at t
exact t
theorem div_le_iff_le_mul (h : 0 < k) : x / k y x y * k + k - 1 := by
rw [le_iff_lt_add_one, Nat.div_lt_iff_lt_mul h, Nat.add_one_mul]
omega
-- TODO: reprove `div_eq_of_lt_le` in terms of this:
theorem div_eq_iff (h : 0 < k) : x / k = y x y * k + k - 1 y * k x := by
rw [Nat.eq_iff_le_and_ge, le_div_iff_mul_le h, Nat.div_le_iff_le_mul h]
theorem lt_of_div_eq_zero (h : 0 < k) (h' : x / k = 0) : x < k := by
rw [div_eq_iff h] at h'
omega
theorem div_eq_zero_iff_lt (h : 0 < k) : x / k = 0 x < k :=
lt_of_div_eq_zero h, fun h' => Nat.div_eq_of_lt h'
theorem div_mul_self_eq_mod_sub_self {x k : Nat} : (x / k) * k = x - (x % k) := by
have := mod_eq_sub_div_mul (x := x) (k := k)
have := div_mul_le_self x k
omega
theorem mul_div_self_eq_mod_sub_self {x k : Nat} : k * (x / k) = x - (x % k) := by
rw [Nat.mul_comm, div_mul_self_eq_mod_sub_self]
theorem lt_div_mul_self (h : 0 < k) (w : k x) : x - k < x / k * k := by
rw [div_mul_self_eq_mod_sub_self]
have : x % k < k := mod_lt x h
omega
end Nat

View File

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Mario Carneiro
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Nat.Div
import Init.Data.Nat.Div.Basic
import Init.Meta
namespace Nat

View File

@@ -176,6 +176,9 @@ protected theorem add_pos_right (m) (h : 0 < n) : 0 < m + n :=
protected theorem add_self_ne_one : n, n + n 1
| n+1, h => by rw [Nat.succ_add, Nat.succ.injEq] at h; contradiction
theorem le_iff_lt_add_one : x y x < y + 1 := by
omega
/-! ## sub -/
protected theorem sub_one (n) : n - 1 = pred n := rfl
@@ -225,6 +228,9 @@ protected theorem sub_le_iff_le_add' {a b c : Nat} : a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b + c
protected theorem le_sub_iff_add_le {n : Nat} (h : k m) : n m - k n + k m :=
Nat.add_le_of_le_sub h, Nat.le_sub_of_add_le
theorem add_lt_iff_lt_sub_right {a b c : Nat} : a + b < c a < c - b := by
omega
protected theorem add_le_of_le_sub' {n k m : Nat} (h : m k) : n k - m m + n k :=
Nat.add_comm .. Nat.add_le_of_le_sub h

View File

@@ -1,83 +1,8 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Copyright (c) 2024 Lean FRO, LLC. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
prelude
import Init.Meta
import Init.Omega
namespace Std
-- We put `Range` in `Init` because we want the notation `[i:j]` without importing `Std`
-- We don't put `Range` in the top-level namespace to avoid collisions with user defined types
structure Range where
start : Nat := 0
stop : Nat
step : Nat := 1
step_pos : 0 < step
instance : Membership Nat Range where
mem r i := r.start i i < r.stop (i - r.start) % r.step = 0
namespace Range
universe u v
@[inline] protected def forIn' [Monad m] (range : Range) (init : β)
(f : (i : Nat) i range β m (ForInStep β)) : m β :=
let rec @[specialize] loop (b : β) (i : Nat)
(hs : (i - range.start) % range.step = 0) (hl : range.start i := by omega) : m β := do
if h : i < range.stop then
match ( f i hl, by omega, hs b) with
| .done b => pure b
| .yield b =>
have := range.step_pos
loop b (i + range.step) (by rwa [Nat.add_comm, Nat.add_sub_assoc hl, Nat.add_mod_left])
else
pure b
have := range.step_pos
loop init range.start (by simp)
instance : ForIn' m Range Nat inferInstance where
forIn' := Range.forIn'
-- No separate `ForIn` instance is required because it can be derived from `ForIn'`.
@[inline] protected def forM [Monad m] (range : Range) (f : Nat m PUnit) : m PUnit :=
let rec @[specialize] loop (i : Nat): m PUnit := do
if i < range.stop then
f i
have := range.step_pos
loop (i + range.step)
else
pure
have := range.step_pos
loop range.start
instance : ForM m Range Nat where
forM := Range.forM
syntax:max "[" withoutPosition(":" term) "]" : term
syntax:max "[" withoutPosition(term ":" term) "]" : term
syntax:max "[" withoutPosition(":" term ":" term) "]" : term
syntax:max "[" withoutPosition(term ":" term ":" term) "]" : term
macro_rules
| `([ : $stop]) => `({ stop := $stop, step_pos := Nat.zero_lt_one : Range })
| `([ $start : $stop ]) => `({ start := $start, stop := $stop, step_pos := Nat.zero_lt_one : Range })
| `([ $start : $stop : $step ]) => `({ start := $start, stop := $stop, step := $step, step_pos := by decide : Range })
| `([ : $stop : $step ]) => `({ stop := $stop, step := $step, step_pos := by decide : Range })
end Range
end Std
theorem Membership.mem.upper {i : Nat} {r : Std.Range} (h : i r) : i < r.stop := h.2.1
theorem Membership.mem.lower {i : Nat} {r : Std.Range} (h : i r) : r.start i := h.1
theorem Membership.mem.step {i : Nat} {r : Std.Range} (h : i r) : (i - r.start) % r.step = 0 := h.2.2
theorem Membership.get_elem_helper {i n : Nat} {r : Std.Range} (h₁ : i r) (h₂ : r.stop = n) :
i < n := h₂ h₁.2.1
macro_rules
| `(tactic| get_elem_tactic_trivial) => `(tactic| apply Membership.get_elem_helper; assumption; rfl)
import Init.Data.Range.Basic
import Init.Data.Range.Lemmas

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import Init.Meta
import Init.Omega
namespace Std
-- We put `Range` in `Init` because we want the notation `[i:j]` without importing `Std`
-- We don't put `Range` in the top-level namespace to avoid collisions with user defined types
structure Range where
start : Nat := 0
stop : Nat
step : Nat := 1
step_pos : 0 < step
instance : Membership Nat Range where
mem r i := r.start i i < r.stop (i - r.start) % r.step = 0
namespace Range
universe u v
/-- The number of elements in the range. -/
def size (r : Range) : Nat := (r.stop - r.start + r.step - 1) / r.step
@[inline] protected def forIn' [Monad m] (range : Range) (init : β)
(f : (i : Nat) i range β m (ForInStep β)) : m β :=
let rec @[specialize] loop (b : β) (i : Nat)
(hs : (i - range.start) % range.step = 0) (hl : range.start i := by omega) : m β := do
if h : i < range.stop then
match ( f i hl, by omega, hs b) with
| .done b => pure b
| .yield b =>
have := range.step_pos
loop b (i + range.step) (by rwa [Nat.add_comm, Nat.add_sub_assoc hl, Nat.add_mod_left])
else
pure b
have := range.step_pos
loop init range.start (by simp)
instance : ForIn' m Range Nat inferInstance where
forIn' := Range.forIn'
-- No separate `ForIn` instance is required because it can be derived from `ForIn'`.
@[inline] protected def forM [Monad m] (range : Range) (f : Nat m PUnit) : m PUnit :=
let rec @[specialize] loop (i : Nat): m PUnit := do
if i < range.stop then
f i
have := range.step_pos
loop (i + range.step)
else
pure
have := range.step_pos
loop range.start
instance : ForM m Range Nat where
forM := Range.forM
syntax:max "[" withoutPosition(":" term) "]" : term
syntax:max "[" withoutPosition(term ":" term) "]" : term
syntax:max "[" withoutPosition(":" term ":" term) "]" : term
syntax:max "[" withoutPosition(term ":" term ":" term) "]" : term
macro_rules
| `([ : $stop]) => `({ stop := $stop, step_pos := Nat.zero_lt_one : Range })
| `([ $start : $stop ]) => `({ start := $start, stop := $stop, step_pos := Nat.zero_lt_one : Range })
| `([ $start : $stop : $step ]) => `({ start := $start, stop := $stop, step := $step, step_pos := by decide : Range })
| `([ : $stop : $step ]) => `({ stop := $stop, step := $step, step_pos := by decide : Range })
end Range
end Std
theorem Membership.mem.upper {i : Nat} {r : Std.Range} (h : i r) : i < r.stop := h.2.1
theorem Membership.mem.lower {i : Nat} {r : Std.Range} (h : i r) : r.start i := h.1
theorem Membership.mem.step {i : Nat} {r : Std.Range} (h : i r) : (i - r.start) % r.step = 0 := h.2.2
theorem Membership.get_elem_helper {i n : Nat} {r : Std.Range} (h₁ : i r) (h₂ : r.stop = n) :
i < n := h₂ h₁.2.1
macro_rules
| `(tactic| get_elem_tactic_trivial) => `(tactic| apply Membership.get_elem_helper; assumption; rfl)

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Lean FRO, LLC. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Range.Basic
import Init.Data.List.Range
import Init.Data.List.Monadic
import Init.Data.Nat.Div.Lemmas
/-!
# Lemmas about `Std.Range`
We provide lemmas rewriting for loops over `Std.Range` in terms of `List.range'`.
-/
namespace Std.Range
/-- Generalization of `mem_of_mem_range'` used in `forIn'_loop_eq_forIn'_range'` below. -/
private theorem mem_of_mem_range'_aux {r : Range} {a : Nat} (w₁ : (i - r.start) % r.step = 0)
(w₂ : r.start i)
(h : a List.range' i ((r.stop - i + r.step - 1) / r.step) r.step) : a r := by
obtain j, h', rfl := List.mem_range'.1 h
refine by omega, ?_
rw [Nat.lt_div_iff_mul_lt r.step_pos, Nat.mul_comm] at h'
constructor
· omega
· rwa [Nat.add_comm, Nat.add_sub_assoc w₂, Nat.mul_add_mod_self_left]
theorem mem_of_mem_range' {r : Range} (h : x List.range' r.start r.size r.step) : x r := by
unfold size at h
apply mem_of_mem_range'_aux (by simp) (by simp) h
private theorem size_eq (r : Std.Range) (h : i < r.stop) :
(r.stop - i + r.step - 1) / r.step =
(r.stop - (i + r.step) + r.step - 1) / r.step + 1 := by
have w := r.step_pos
if i + r.step < r.stop then -- Not sure this case split is strictly necessary.
rw [Nat.div_eq_iff w, Nat.add_one_mul]
have : (r.stop - (i + r.step) + r.step - 1) / r.step * r.step
(r.stop - (i + r.step) + r.step - 1) := Nat.div_mul_le_self _ _
have : r.stop - (i + r.step) + r.step - 1 - r.step <
(r.stop - (i + r.step) + r.step - 1) / r.step * r.step :=
Nat.lt_div_mul_self w (by omega)
omega
else
have : (r.stop - i + r.step - 1) / r.step = 1 := by
rw [Nat.div_eq_iff w, Nat.one_mul]
omega
have : (r.stop - (i + r.step) + r.step - 1) / r.step = 0 := by
rw [Nat.div_eq_iff] <;> omega
omega
private theorem forIn'_loop_eq_forIn'_range' [Monad m] (r : Std.Range)
(init : β) (f : (a : Nat) a r β m (ForInStep β)) (i) (w₁) (w₂) :
forIn'.loop r f init i w₁ w₂ =
forIn' (List.range' i ((r.stop - i + r.step - 1) / r.step) r.step) init
fun a h => f a (mem_of_mem_range'_aux w₁ w₂ h) := by
have w := r.step_pos
rw [forIn'.loop]
split <;> rename_i h
· simp only [size_eq r h, List.range'_succ, List.forIn'_cons]
congr 1
funext step
split
· simp
· rw [forIn'_loop_eq_forIn'_range']
· have : (r.stop - i + r.step - 1) / r.step = 0 := by
rw [Nat.div_eq_iff] <;> omega
simp [this]
theorem forIn'_eq_forIn'_range' [Monad m] (r : Std.Range)
(init : β) (f : (a : Nat) a r β m (ForInStep β)) :
forIn' r init f =
forIn' (List.range' r.start r.size r.step) init (fun a h => f a (mem_of_mem_range' h)) := by
conv => lhs; simp only [forIn', Range.forIn']
simp only [size]
rw [forIn'_loop_eq_forIn'_range']
theorem forIn_eq_forIn_range' [Monad m] (r : Std.Range)
(init : β) (f : Nat β m (ForInStep β)) :
forIn r init f = forIn (List.range' r.start r.size r.step) init f := by
simp only [forIn, forIn'_eq_forIn'_range']
private theorem forM_loop_eq_forM_range' [Monad m] (r : Std.Range) (f : Nat m PUnit) :
forM.loop r f i = forM (List.range' i ((r.stop - i + r.step - 1) / r.step) r.step) f := by
have w := r.step_pos
rw [forM.loop]
split <;> rename_i h
· simp [size_eq r h, List.range'_succ, List.forM_cons]
congr 1
funext
rw [forM_loop_eq_forM_range']
· have : (r.stop - i + r.step - 1) / r.step = 0 := by
rw [Nat.div_eq_iff] <;> omega
simp [this]
theorem forM_eq_forM_range' [Monad m] (r : Std.Range) (f : Nat m PUnit) :
forM r f = forM (List.range' r.start r.size r.step) f := by
simp only [forM, Range.forM, forM_loop_eq_forM_range', size]
end Std.Range

View File

@@ -1,5 +1,3 @@
import Init.Data.Nat.Div
/-!
This tests that `0 : Fin (n + 1)` unfolds to `0 : Nat`, which is a property kept for backwards
compatibility with mathlib in Lean 3.