Compare commits

..

12 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Leonardo de Moura
41fcf900be chore: missing prelude 2024-02-25 11:05:11 -08:00
Leonardo de Moura
9daaadb154 chore: update stage0 2024-02-25 11:01:37 -08:00
Leonardo de Moura
de9ca6031a fix: command_code_action initialization 2024-02-25 11:01:37 -08:00
Leonardo de Moura
0e66401766 chore: builtin_command_code_action for #guard_msgs 2024-02-25 11:01:37 -08:00
Leonardo de Moura
cbf846bdca chore: update stage0 2024-02-25 11:01:37 -08:00
Leonardo de Moura
bb3df22e01 feat: add builtin_command_code_action attribute 2024-02-25 11:01:37 -08:00
Leonardo de Moura
212855c20b chore: code_action_provider => builtin_code_action_provider 2024-02-25 11:01:37 -08:00
Leonardo de Moura
fd379f8165 chore: remove workaround 2024-02-25 11:01:36 -08:00
Leonardo de Moura
793cb2b8e3 chore: update stage0 2024-02-25 11:01:36 -08:00
Leonardo de Moura
a64918d1fb chore: move command_code_action attribute syntax to Init 2024-02-25 11:01:36 -08:00
Leonardo de Moura
294df76a30 chore: initialize => builtin_initialize 2024-02-25 11:01:36 -08:00
Scott Morrison
b2620aea8f chore: upstream Std.CodeAction.*
Remove tactic_code_action

rearrange

oops

.

add tests

import file

Update src/Lean/Elab/Tactic/GuardMsgs.lean

Co-authored-by: David Thrane Christiansen <david@davidchristiansen.dk>

Update src/Lean/Elab/Tactic/GuardMsgs.lean

Co-authored-by: David Thrane Christiansen <david@davidchristiansen.dk>

fix namespace

move GuardMsgs

cleanup
2024-02-25 11:01:36 -08:00
2712 changed files with 11662 additions and 59497 deletions

View File

@@ -9,15 +9,9 @@ assignees: ''
### Prerequisites
Please put an X between the brackets as you perform the following steps:
* [ ] Check that your issue is not already filed:
https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues
* [ ] Reduce the issue to a minimal, self-contained, reproducible test case.
Avoid dependencies to Mathlib or Batteries.
* [ ] Test your test case against the latest nightly release, for example on
https://live.lean-lang.org/#project=lean-nightly
(You can also use the settings there to switch to “Lean nightly”)
* [ ] Put an X between the brackets on this line if you have done all of the following:
* Check that your issue is not already [filed](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues).
* Reduce the issue to a minimal, self-contained, reproducible test case. Avoid dependencies to mathlib4 or std4.
### Description
@@ -39,8 +33,8 @@ Please put an X between the brackets as you perform the following steps:
### Versions
[Output of `#eval Lean.versionString`]
[OS version, if not using live.lean-lang.org.]
[Output of `#eval Lean.versionString` or of `lean --version` in the folder that the issue occured in]
[OS version]
### Additional Information

View File

@@ -1,57 +0,0 @@
name: Check for stage0 changes
on:
merge_group:
pull_request:
jobs:
check-stage0-on-queue:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
ref: ${{ github.event.pull_request.head.sha }}
filter: blob:none
fetch-depth: 0
- name: Find base commit
if: github.event_name == 'pull_request'
run: echo "BASE=$(git merge-base origin/${{ github.base_ref }} HEAD)" >> "$GITHUB_ENV"
- name: Identify stage0 changes
run: |
git diff "${BASE:-HEAD^}..HEAD" --name-only -- stage0 |
grep -v -x -F $'stage0/src/stdlib_flags.h\nstage0/src/lean.mk.in' \
> "$RUNNER_TEMP/stage0" || true
if test -s "$RUNNER_TEMP/stage0"
then
echo "CHANGES=yes" >> "$GITHUB_ENV"
else
echo "CHANGES=no" >> "$GITHUB_ENV"
fi
shell: bash
- if: github.event_name == 'pull_request'
name: Set label
uses: actions/github-script@v7
with:
script: |
const { owner, repo, number: issue_number } = context.issue;
if (process.env.CHANGES == 'yes') {
await github.rest.issues.addLabels({ owner, repo, issue_number, labels: ['changes-stage0'] }).catch(() => {});
} else {
await github.rest.issues.removeLabel({ owner, repo, issue_number, name: 'changes-stage0' }).catch(() => {});
}
- if: env.CHANGES == 'yes'
name: Report changes
run: |
echo "Found changes to stage0/, please do not merge using the merge queue." | tee "$GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY"
# shellcheck disable=SC2129
echo '```' >> "$GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY"
cat "$RUNNER_TEMP/stage0" >> "$GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY"
echo '```' >> "$GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY"
- if: github.event_name == 'merge_group' && env.CHANGES == 'yes'
name: Fail when on the merge queue
run: exit 1

View File

@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ on:
tags:
- '*'
pull_request:
types: [opened, synchronize, reopened, labeled]
merge_group:
schedule:
- cron: '0 7 * * *' # 8AM CET/11PM PT
@@ -40,18 +41,12 @@ jobs:
steps:
- name: Run quick CI?
id: set-quick
# We do not use github.event.pull_request.labels.*.name here because
# re-running a run does not update that list, and we do want to be able to
# rerun the workflow run after settings the `full-ci` label.
run: |
if [ "${{ github.event_name }}" == 'pull_request' ]
then
echo "quick=$(gh api repos/${{ github.repository_owner }}/${{ github.event.repository.name }}/pulls/${{ github.event.pull_request.number }} --jq '.labels | any(.name == "full-ci") | not')" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
else
echo "quick=false" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
fi
env:
GH_TOKEN: ${{ github.token }}
quick: ${{
github.event_name == 'pull_request' && !contains( github.event.pull_request.labels.*.name, 'full-ci')
}}
run: |
echo "quick=${{env.quick}}" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
- name: Configure build matrix
id: set-matrix
@@ -59,10 +54,7 @@ jobs:
with:
script: |
const quick = ${{ steps.set-quick.outputs.quick }};
console.log(`quick: ${quick}`);
// use large runners outside PRs where available (original repo)
// disabled for now as this mostly just speeds up the test suite which is not a bottleneck
// let large = ${{ github.event_name != 'pull_request' && github.repository == 'leanprover/lean4' }} ? "-large" : "";
console.log(`quick: ${quick}`)
let matrix = [
{
// portable release build: use channel with older glibc (2.27)
@@ -70,7 +62,7 @@ jobs:
"os": "ubuntu-latest",
"release": false,
"quick": false,
"shell": "nix develop .#oldGlibc -c bash -euxo pipefail {0}",
"shell": "nix-shell --arg pkgsDist \"import (fetchTarball \\\"channel:nixos-19.03\\\") {{}}\" --run \"bash -euxo pipefail {0}\"",
"llvm-url": "https://github.com/leanprover/lean-llvm/releases/download/15.0.1/lean-llvm-x86_64-linux-gnu.tar.zst",
"prepare-llvm": "../script/prepare-llvm-linux.sh lean-llvm*",
"binary-check": "ldd -v",
@@ -84,7 +76,7 @@ jobs:
"os": "ubuntu-latest",
"release": true,
"quick": true,
"shell": "nix develop .#oldGlibc -c bash -euxo pipefail {0}",
"shell": "nix-shell --arg pkgsDist \"import (fetchTarball \\\"channel:nixos-19.03\\\") {{}}\" --run \"bash -euxo pipefail {0}\"",
"llvm-url": "https://github.com/leanprover/lean-llvm/releases/download/15.0.1/lean-llvm-x86_64-linux-gnu.tar.zst",
"prepare-llvm": "../script/prepare-llvm-linux.sh lean-llvm*",
"binary-check": "ldd -v",
@@ -106,8 +98,7 @@ jobs:
// exclude seriously slow tests
"CTEST_OPTIONS": "-E 'interactivetest|leanpkgtest|laketest|benchtest'"
},
// TODO: suddenly started failing in CI
/*{
{
"name": "Linux fsanitize",
"os": "ubuntu-latest",
"quick": false,
@@ -115,10 +106,10 @@ jobs:
"CMAKE_OPTIONS": "-DLEAN_EXTRA_CXX_FLAGS=-fsanitize=address,undefined -DLEANC_EXTRA_FLAGS='-fsanitize=address,undefined -fsanitize-link-c++-runtime' -DSMALL_ALLOCATOR=OFF -DBSYMBOLIC=OFF",
// exclude seriously slow/problematic tests (laketests crash)
"CTEST_OPTIONS": "-E 'interactivetest|leanpkgtest|laketest|benchtest'"
},*/
},
{
"name": "macOS",
"os": "macos-13",
"os": "macos-latest",
"release": true,
"quick": false,
"shell": "bash -euxo pipefail {0}",
@@ -129,7 +120,7 @@ jobs:
},
{
"name": "macOS aarch64",
"os": "macos-13",
"os": "macos-latest",
"release": true,
"quick": false,
"cross": true,
@@ -162,7 +153,7 @@ jobs:
"quick": false,
"cross": true,
"cross_target": "aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu",
"shell": "nix develop .#oldGlibcAArch -c bash -euxo pipefail {0}",
"shell": "nix-shell --arg pkgsDist \"import (fetchTarball \\\"channel:nixos-19.03\\\") {{ localSystem.config = \\\"aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu\\\"; }}\" --run \"bash -euxo pipefail {0}\"",
"llvm-url": "https://github.com/leanprover/lean-llvm/releases/download/15.0.1/lean-llvm-x86_64-linux-gnu.tar.zst https://github.com/leanprover/lean-llvm/releases/download/15.0.1/lean-llvm-aarch64-linux-gnu.tar.zst",
"prepare-llvm": "../script/prepare-llvm-linux.sh lean-llvm-aarch64-* lean-llvm-x86_64-*"
},
@@ -260,7 +251,7 @@ jobs:
runs-on: ${{ matrix.os }}
defaults:
run:
shell: ${{ matrix.shell || 'nix develop -c bash -euxo pipefail {0}' }}
shell: ${{ matrix.shell || 'nix-shell --run "bash -euxo pipefail {0}"' }}
name: ${{ matrix.name }}
env:
# must be inside workspace
@@ -285,18 +276,18 @@ jobs:
uses: cachix/install-nix-action@v18
with:
install_url: https://releases.nixos.org/nix/nix-2.12.0/install
if: runner.os == 'Linux' && !matrix.cmultilib
if: matrix.os == 'ubuntu-latest' && !matrix.cmultilib
- name: Install MSYS2
uses: msys2/setup-msys2@v2
with:
msystem: clang64
# `:p` means prefix with appropriate msystem prefix
pacboy: "make python cmake:p clang:p ccache:p gmp:p git zip unzip diffutils binutils tree zstd:p tar"
if: runner.os == 'Windows'
if: matrix.os == 'windows-2022'
- name: Install Brew Packages
run: |
brew install ccache tree zstd coreutils gmp
if: runner.os == 'macOS'
if: matrix.os == 'macos-latest'
- name: Setup emsdk
uses: mymindstorm/setup-emsdk@v12
with:
@@ -320,13 +311,13 @@ jobs:
run: |
# open nix-shell once for initial setup
true
if: runner.os == 'Linux'
if: matrix.os == 'ubuntu-latest'
- name: Set up core dumps
run: |
mkdir -p $PWD/coredumps
# store in current directory, for easy uploading together with binary
echo $PWD/coredumps/%e.%p.%t | sudo tee /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern
if: runner.os == 'Linux'
if: matrix.os == 'ubuntu-latest'
- name: Build
run: |
mkdir build
@@ -391,14 +382,8 @@ jobs:
cd build/stage1
ulimit -c unlimited # coredumps
# exclude nonreproducible test
ctest -j4 --progress --output-junit test-results.xml --output-on-failure ${{ matrix.CTEST_OPTIONS }} < /dev/null
ctest -j4 --output-on-failure ${{ matrix.CTEST_OPTIONS }} < /dev/null
if: (matrix.wasm || !matrix.cross) && needs.configure.outputs.quick == 'false'
- name: Test Summary
uses: test-summary/action@v2
with:
paths: build/stage1/test-results.xml
# prefix `if` above with `always` so it's run even if tests failed
if: always() && (matrix.wasm || !matrix.cross) && needs.configure.outputs.quick == 'false'
- name: Check Test Binary
run: ${{ matrix.binary-check }} tests/compiler/534.lean.out
if: ${{ !matrix.cross && needs.configure.outputs.quick == 'false' }}
@@ -431,7 +416,7 @@ jobs:
- name: CCache stats
run: ccache -s
- name: Show stacktrace for coredumps
if: ${{ failure() && runner.os == 'Linux' }}
if: ${{ failure() && matrix.os == 'ubuntu-latest' }}
run: |
for c in coredumps/*; do
progbin="$(file $c | sed "s/.*execfn: '\([^']*\)'.*/\1/")"
@@ -441,7 +426,7 @@ jobs:
# shared libs
#- name: Upload coredumps
# uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3
# if: ${{ failure() && runner.os == 'Linux' }}
# if: ${{ failure() && matrix.os == 'ubuntu-latest' }}
# with:
# name: coredumps-${{ matrix.name }}
# path: |
@@ -460,10 +445,9 @@ jobs:
name: Build matrix complete
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
needs: build
# mark as merely cancelled not failed if builds are cancelled
if: ${{ !cancelled() }}
if: ${{ always() }}
steps:
- if: contains(needs.*.result, 'failure')
- if: contains(needs.*.result, 'failure') || contains(needs.*.result, 'cancelled')
uses: actions/github-script@v7
with:
script: |

View File

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ jobs:
- name: Verify .lean files start with a copyright header.
run: |
FILES=$(find ./src -type d \( -path "./src/lake/examples" -o -path "./src/lake/tests" \) -prune -o -type f -name "*.lean" -exec perl -ne 'BEGIN { $/ = undef; } print "$ARGV\n" if !m{\A/-\nCopyright}; exit;' {} \;)
FILES=$(find . -type d \( -path "./tests" -o -path "./doc" -o -path "./src/lake/examples" -o -path "./src/lake/tests" -o -path "./build" -o -path "./nix" \) -prune -o -type f -name "*.lean" -exec perl -ne 'BEGIN { $/ = undef; } print "$ARGV\n" if !m{\A/-\nCopyright}; exit;' {} \;)
if [ -n "$FILES" ]; then
echo "Found .lean files which do not have a copyright header:"
echo "$FILES"

View File

@@ -76,13 +76,7 @@ jobs:
nix build $NIX_BUILD_ARGS .#cacheRoots -o push-build
- name: Test
run: |
nix build --keep-failed $NIX_BUILD_ARGS .#test -o push-test || (ln -s /tmp/nix-build-*/source/src/build/ ./push-test; false)
- name: Test Summary
uses: test-summary/action@v2
with:
paths: push-test/test-results.xml
if: always()
continue-on-error: true
nix build $NIX_BUILD_ARGS .#test -o push-test
- name: Build manual
run: |
nix build $NIX_BUILD_ARGS --update-input lean --no-write-lock-file ./doc#{lean-mdbook,leanInk,alectryon,test,inked} -o push-doc

View File

@@ -126,22 +126,24 @@ jobs:
if [ "$NIGHTLY_SHA" = "$MERGE_BASE_SHA" ]; then
echo "The merge base of this PR coincides with the nightly release"
BATTERIES_REMOTE_TAGS="$(git ls-remote https://github.com/leanprover-community/batteries.git nightly-testing-"$MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY")"
MATHLIB_REMOTE_TAGS="$(git ls-remote https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4.git nightly-testing-"$MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY")"
if [[ -n "$BATTERIES_REMOTE_TAGS" ]]; then
echo "... and Batteries has a 'nightly-testing-$MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY' tag."
if [[ -n "$MATHLIB_REMOTE_TAGS" ]]; then
echo "... and Mathlib has a 'nightly-testing-$MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY' tag."
MESSAGE=""
if [[ -n "$MATHLIB_REMOTE_TAGS" ]]; then
echo "... and Mathlib has a 'nightly-testing-$MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY' tag."
else
echo "... but Mathlib does not yet have a 'nightly-testing-$MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY' tag."
MESSAGE="- ❗ Mathlib CI can not be attempted yet, as the \`nightly-testing-$MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY\` tag does not exist there yet. We will retry when you push more commits. If you rebase your branch onto \`nightly-with-mathlib\`, Mathlib CI should run now."
fi
else
echo "... but Batteries does not yet have a 'nightly-testing-$MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY' tag."
MESSAGE="- ❗ Batteries CI can not be attempted yet, as the \`nightly-testing-$MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY\` tag does not exist there yet. We will retry when you push more commits. If you rebase your branch onto \`nightly-with-mathlib\`, Batteries CI should run now."
echo "... but Mathlib does not yet have a 'nightly-testing-$MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY' tag."
MESSAGE="- ❗ Mathlib CI can not be attempted yet, as the \`nightly-testing-$MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY\` tag does not exist there yet. We will retry when you push more commits. If you rebase your branch onto \`nightly-with-mathlib\`, Mathlib CI should run now."
fi
STD_REMOTE_TAGS="$(git ls-remote https://github.com/leanprover/std4.git nightly-testing-"$MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY")"
if [[ -n "$STD_REMOTE_TAGS" ]]; then
echo "... and Std has a 'nightly-testing-$MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY' tag."
MESSAGE=""
else
echo "... but Std does not yet have a 'nightly-testing-$MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY' tag."
MESSAGE="- ❗ Std CI can not be attempted yet, as the \`nightly-testing-$MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY\` tag does not exist there yet. We will retry when you push more commits. If you rebase your branch onto \`nightly-with-mathlib\`, Std CI should run now."
fi
else
@@ -149,9 +151,7 @@ jobs:
echo "but 'git merge-base origin/master HEAD' reported: $MERGE_BASE_SHA"
git -C lean4.git log -10 origin/master
git -C lean4.git fetch origin nightly-with-mathlib
NIGHTLY_WITH_MATHLIB_SHA="$(git -C lean4.git rev-parse "origin/nightly-with-mathlib")"
MESSAGE="- ❗ Batteries/Mathlib CI will not be attempted unless your PR branches off the \`nightly-with-mathlib\` branch. Try \`git rebase $MERGE_BASE_SHA --onto $NIGHTLY_WITH_MATHLIB_SHA\`."
MESSAGE="- ❗ Std/Mathlib CI will not be attempted unless your PR branches off the \`nightly-with-mathlib\` branch. Try \`git rebase $MERGE_BASE_SHA --onto $NIGHTLY_SHA\`."
fi
if [[ -n "$MESSAGE" ]]; then
@@ -223,27 +223,27 @@ jobs:
description: description,
});
# We next automatically create a Batteries branch using this toolchain.
# Batteries doesn't itself have a mechanism to report results of CI from this branch back to Lean
# Instead this is taken care of by Mathlib CI, which will fail if Batteries fails.
# We next automatically create a Std branch using this toolchain.
# Std doesn't itself have a mechanism to report results of CI from this branch back to Lean
# Instead this is taken care of by Mathlib CI, which will fail if Std fails.
- name: Cleanup workspace
if: steps.workflow-info.outputs.pullRequestNumber != '' && steps.ready.outputs.mathlib_ready == 'true'
run: |
sudo rm -rf ./*
# Checkout the Batteries repository with all branches
- name: Checkout Batteries repository
# Checkout the Std repository with all branches
- name: Checkout Std repository
if: steps.workflow-info.outputs.pullRequestNumber != '' && steps.ready.outputs.mathlib_ready == 'true'
uses: actions/checkout@v3
with:
repository: leanprover-community/batteries
repository: leanprover/std4
token: ${{ secrets.MATHLIB4_BOT }}
ref: nightly-testing
fetch-depth: 0 # This ensures we check out all tags and branches.
- name: Check if tag exists
if: steps.workflow-info.outputs.pullRequestNumber != '' && steps.ready.outputs.mathlib_ready == 'true'
id: check_batteries_tag
id: check_std_tag
run: |
git config user.name "leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot"
git config user.email "leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot@users.noreply.github.com"
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ jobs:
if git ls-remote --heads --tags --exit-code origin "nightly-testing-${MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY}" >/dev/null; then
BASE="nightly-testing-${MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY}"
else
echo "This shouldn't be possible: couldn't find a 'nightly-testing-${MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY}' tag at Batteries. Falling back to 'nightly-testing'."
echo "This shouldn't be possible: couldn't find a 'nightly-testing-${MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY}' tag at Std. Falling back to 'nightly-testing'."
BASE=nightly-testing
fi
@@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ jobs:
else
echo "Branch already exists, pushing an empty commit."
git switch lean-pr-testing-${{ steps.workflow-info.outputs.pullRequestNumber }}
# The Batteries `nightly-testing` or `nightly-testing-YYYY-MM-DD` branch may have moved since this branch was created, so merge their changes.
# The Std `nightly-testing` or `nightly-testing-YYYY-MM-DD` branch may have moved since this branch was created, so merge their changes.
# (This should no longer be possible once `nightly-testing-YYYY-MM-DD` is a tag, but it is still safe to merge.)
git merge "$BASE" --strategy-option ours --no-commit --allow-unrelated-histories
git commit --allow-empty -m "Trigger CI for https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/${{ steps.workflow-info.outputs.pullRequestNumber }}"
@@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ jobs:
git switch -c lean-pr-testing-${{ steps.workflow-info.outputs.pullRequestNumber }} "$BASE"
echo "leanprover/lean4-pr-releases:pr-release-${{ steps.workflow-info.outputs.pullRequestNumber }}" > lean-toolchain
git add lean-toolchain
sed -i "s/require batteries from git \"https:\/\/github.com\/leanprover-community\/batteries\" @ \".\+\"/require batteries from git \"https:\/\/github.com\/leanprover-community\/batteries\" @ \"nightly-testing-${MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY}\"/" lakefile.lean
sed -i "s/require std from git \"https:\/\/github.com\/leanprover\/std4\" @ \".\+\"/require std from git \"https:\/\/github.com\/leanprover\/std4\" @ \"nightly-testing-${MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY}\"/" lakefile.lean
git add lakefile.lean
git commit -m "Update lean-toolchain for testing https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/${{ steps.workflow-info.outputs.pullRequestNumber }}"
else

View File

@@ -1,31 +0,0 @@
name: Restart by label
on:
pull_request_target:
types:
- unlabeled
- labeled
jobs:
restart-on-label:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
if: contains(github.event.label.name, 'full-ci')
steps:
- run: |
# Finding latest CI workflow run on current pull request
# (unfortunately cannot search by PR number, only base branch,
# and that is't even unique given PRs from forks, but the risk
# of confusion is low and the danger is mild)
run_id=$(gh run list -e pull_request -b "$head_ref" --workflow 'CI' --limit 1 \
--limit 1 --json databaseId --jq '.[0].databaseId')
echo "Run id: ${run_id}"
gh run view "$run_id"
echo "Cancelling (just in case)"
gh run cancel "$run_id" || echo "(failed)"
echo "Waiting for 10s"
sleep 10
echo "Rerunning"
gh run rerun "$run_id"
shell: bash
env:
head_ref: ${{ github.head_ref }}
GH_TOKEN: ${{ github.token }}
GH_REPO: ${{ github.repository }}

View File

@@ -78,10 +78,6 @@ add_custom_target(update-stage0
COMMAND $(MAKE) -C stage1 update-stage0
DEPENDS stage1)
add_custom_target(update-stage0-commit
COMMAND $(MAKE) -C stage1 update-stage0-commit
DEPENDS stage1)
add_custom_target(test
COMMAND $(MAKE) -C stage1 test
DEPENDS stage1)

View File

@@ -6,40 +6,17 @@
/.github/ @Kha @semorrison
/RELEASES.md @semorrison
/src/Init/IO.lean @joehendrix
/src/kernel/ @leodemoura
/src/lake/ @tydeu
/src/Lean/Compiler/ @leodemoura
/src/Lean/Data/Lsp/ @mhuisi
/src/Lean/Elab/Deriving/ @semorrison
/src/Lean/Elab/Tactic/ @semorrison
/src/Lean/Language/ @Kha
/src/Lean/Meta/Tactic/ @leodemoura
/src/Lean/Parser/ @Kha
/src/Lean/PrettyPrinter/ @Kha
/src/Lean/PrettyPrinter/Delaborator/ @kmill
/src/Lean/Server/ @mhuisi
/src/Lean/Widget/ @Vtec234
/src/Init/Data/ @semorrison
/src/Init/Data/Array/Lemmas.lean @digama0
/src/Init/Data/List/Lemmas.lean @digama0
/src/Init/Data/List/BasicAux.lean @digama0
/src/Init/Data/Array/Subarray.lean @david-christiansen
/src/Lean/Elab/Tactic/RCases.lean @digama0
/src/Init/RCases.lean @digama0
/src/Lean/Elab/Tactic/Ext.lean @digama0
/src/Init/Ext.lean @digama0
/src/Lean/Elab/Tactic/Simpa.lean @digama0
/src/Lean/Elab/Tactic/NormCast.lean @digama0
/src/Lean/Meta/Tactic/NormCast.lean @digama0
/src/Lean/Meta/Tactic/TryThis.lean @digama0
/src/Lean/Elab/Tactic/SimpTrace.lean @digama0
/src/Lean/Elab/Tactic/NoMatch.lean @digama0
/src/Lean/Elab/Tactic/ShowTerm.lean @digama0
/src/Lean/Elab/Tactic/Repeat.lean @digama0
/src/Lean/Meta/Tactic/Repeat.lean @digama0
/src/Lean/Meta/CoeAttr.lean @digama0
/src/Lean/Elab/GuardMsgs.lean @digama0
/src/Lean/Elab/Tactic/Guard.lean @digama0
/src/Init/Guard.lean @digama0
/src/Lean/Server/CodeActions/ @digama0
/src/runtime/io.cpp @joehendrix

View File

@@ -22,4 +22,4 @@ Please read our [Contribution Guidelines](CONTRIBUTING.md) first.
# Building from Source
See [Building Lean](https://lean-lang.org/lean4/doc/make/index.html) (documentation source: [doc/make/index.md](doc/make/index.md)).
See [Building Lean](https://lean-lang.org/lean4/doc/make/index.html).

View File

@@ -8,162 +8,9 @@ This file contains work-in-progress notes for the upcoming release, as well as p
Please check the [releases](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/releases) page for the current status
of each version.
v4.9.0 (development in progress)
v4.7.0 (development in progress)
---------
* Functions defined by well-founded recursion are now marked as
`@[irreducible]`, which should prevent expensive and often unfruitful
unfolding of such definitions.
Existing proofs that hold by definitional equality (e.g. `rfl`) can be
rewritten to explictly unfold the function definition (using `simp`,
`unfold`, `rw`), or the recursive function can be temporariliy made
semireducible (using `unseal f in` before the command) or the function
definition itself can be marked as `@[semireducible]` to get the previous
behavor.
v4.8.0
---------
* **Executables configured with `supportInterpreter := true` on Windows should now be run via `lake exe` to function properly.**
The way Lean is built on Windows has changed (see PR [#3601](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3601)). As a result, Lake now dynamically links executables with `supportInterpreter := true` on Windows to `libleanshared.dll` and `libInit_shared.dll`. Therefore, such executables will not run unless those shared libraries are co-located with the executables or part of `PATH`. Running the executable via `lake exe` will ensure these libraries are part of `PATH`.
In a related change, the signature of the `nativeFacets` Lake configuration options has changed from a static `Array` to a function `(shouldExport : Bool) → Array`. See its docstring or Lake's [README](src/lake/README.md) for further details on the changed option.
* Lean now generates an error if the type of a theorem is **not** a proposition.
* Importing two different files containing proofs of the same theorem is no longer considered an error. This feature is particularly useful for theorems that are automatically generated on demand (e.g., equational theorems).
* Functional induction principles.
Derived from the definition of a (possibly mutually) recursive function, a **functional induction principle** is created that is tailored to proofs about that function.
For example from:
```
def ackermann : Nat → Nat → Nat
| 0, m => m + 1
| n+1, 0 => ackermann n 1
| n+1, m+1 => ackermann n (ackermann (n + 1) m)
```
we get
```
ackermann.induct (motive : Nat → Nat → Prop) (case1 : ∀ (m : Nat), motive 0 m)
(case2 : ∀ (n : Nat), motive n 1 → motive (Nat.succ n) 0)
(case3 : ∀ (n m : Nat), motive (n + 1) m → motive n (ackermann (n + 1) m) → motive (Nat.succ n) (Nat.succ m))
(x x : Nat) : motive x x
```
It can be used in the `induction` tactic using the `using` syntax:
```
induction n, m using ackermann.induct
```
* The termination checker now recognizes more recursion patterns without an
explicit `termination_by`. In particular the idiom of counting up to an upper
bound, as in
```
def Array.sum (arr : Array Nat) (i acc : Nat) : Nat :=
if _ : i < arr.size then
Array.sum arr (i+1) (acc + arr[i])
else
acc
```
is recognized without having to say `termination_by arr.size - i`.
* Shorter instances names. There is a new algorithm for generating names for anonymous instances.
Across Std and Mathlib, the median ratio between lengths of new names and of old names is about 72%.
With the old algorithm, the longest name was 1660 characters, and now the longest name is 202 characters.
The new algorithm's 95th percentile name length is 67 characters, versus 278 for the old algorithm.
While the new algorithm produces names that are 1.2% less unique,
it avoids cross-project collisions by adding a module-based suffix
when it does not refer to declarations from the same "project" (modules that share the same root).
PR [#3089](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3089).
* Attribute `@[pp_using_anonymous_constructor]` to make structures pretty print like `⟨x, y, z⟩`
rather than `{a := x, b := y, c := z}`.
This attribute is applied to `Sigma`, `PSigma`, `PProd`, `Subtype`, `And`, and `Fin`.
* Now structure instances pretty print with parent structures' fields inlined.
That is, if `B` extends `A`, then `{ toA := { x := 1 }, y := 2 }` now pretty prints as `{ x := 1, y := 2 }`.
Setting option `pp.structureInstances.flatten` to false turns this off.
* Option `pp.structureProjections` is renamed to `pp.fieldNotation`, and there is now a suboption `pp.fieldNotation.generalized`
to enable pretty printing function applications using generalized field notation (defaults to true).
Field notation can be disabled on a function-by-function basis using the `@[pp_nodot]` attribute.
* Added options `pp.mvars` (default: true) and `pp.mvars.withType` (default: false).
When `pp.mvars` is false, expression metavariables pretty print as `?_` and universe metavariables pretty print as `_`.
When `pp.mvars.withType` is true, expression metavariables pretty print with a type ascription.
These can be set when using `#guard_msgs` to make tests not depend on the particular names of metavariables.
[#3798](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3798) and
[#3978](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3978).
* Hovers for terms in `match` expressions in the Infoview now reliably show the correct term.
* Added `@[induction_eliminator]` and `@[cases_eliminator]` attributes to be able to define custom eliminators
for the `induction` and `cases` tactics, replacing the `@[eliminator]` attribute.
Gives custom eliminators for `Nat` so that `induction` and `cases` put goal states into terms of `0` and `n + 1`
rather than `Nat.zero` and `Nat.succ n`.
Added option `tactic.customEliminators` to control whether to use custom eliminators.
Added a hack for `rcases`/`rintro`/`obtain` to use the custom eliminator for `Nat`.
[#3629](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3629),
[#3655](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3655), and
[#3747](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3747).
* The `#guard_msgs` command now has options to change whitespace normalization and sensitivity to message ordering.
For example, `#guard_msgs (whitespace := lax) in cmd` collapses whitespace before checking messages,
and `#guard_msgs (ordering := sorted) in cmd` sorts the messages in lexicographic order before checking.
PR [#3883](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3883).
* The `#guard_msgs` command now supports showing a diff between the expected and actual outputs. This feature is currently
disabled by default, but can be enabled with `set_option guard_msgs.diff true`. Depending on user feedback, this option
may default to `true` in a future version of Lean.
Breaking changes:
* Automatically generated equational theorems are now named using suffix `.eq_<idx>` instead of `._eq_<idx>`, and `.def` instead of `._unfold`. Example:
```
def fact : Nat → Nat
| 0 => 1
| n+1 => (n+1) * fact n
theorem ex : fact 0 = 1 := by unfold fact; decide
#check fact.eq_1
-- fact.eq_1 : fact 0 = 1
#check fact.eq_2
-- fact.eq_2 (n : Nat) : fact (Nat.succ n) = (n + 1) * fact n
#check fact.def
/-
fact.def :
∀ (x : Nat),
fact x =
match x with
| 0 => 1
| Nat.succ n => (n + 1) * fact n
-/
```
* The coercion from `String` to `Name` was removed. Previously, it was `Name.mkSimple`, which does not separate strings at dots, but experience showed that this is not always the desired coercion. For the previous behavior, manually insert a call to `Name.mkSimple`.
* The `Subarray` fields `as`, `h₁` and `h₂` have been renamed to `array`, `start_le_stop`, and `stop_le_array_size`, respectively. This more closely follows standard Lean conventions. Deprecated aliases for the field projections were added; these will be removed in a future release.
* The change to the instance name algorithm (described above) can break projects that made use of the auto-generated names.
* `Option.toMonad` has been renamed to `Option.getM` and the unneeded `[Monad m]` instance argument has been removed.
v4.7.0
---------
* `simp` and `rw` now use instance arguments found by unification,
rather than always resynthesizing. For backwards compatibility, the original behaviour is
available via `set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false`.
[#3507](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3507) and
[#3509](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3509).
* When the `pp.proofs` is false, now omitted proofs use `⋯` rather than `_`,
which gives a more helpful error message when copied from the Infoview.
The `pp.proofs.threshold` option lets small proofs always be pretty printed.
@@ -171,10 +18,6 @@ v4.7.0
* `pp.proofs.withType` is now set to false by default to reduce noise in the info view.
* The pretty printer for applications now handles the case of over-application itself when applying app unexpanders.
In particular, the ``| `($_ $a $b $xs*) => `(($a + $b) $xs*)`` case of an `app_unexpander` is no longer necessary.
[#3495](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3495).
* New `simp` (and `dsimp`) configuration option: `zetaDelta`. It is `false` by default.
The `zeta` option is still `true` by default, but their meaning has changed.
- When `zeta := true`, `simp` and `dsimp` reduce terms of the form
@@ -183,7 +26,7 @@ v4.7.0
the context. For example, suppose the context contains `x := val`. Then,
any occurrence of `x` is replaced with `val`.
See [issue #2682](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2682) for additional details. Here are some examples:
See issue [#2682](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2682) for additional details. Here are some examples:
```
example (h : z = 9) : let x := 5; let y := 4; x + y = z := by
intro x
@@ -224,7 +67,7 @@ v4.7.0
```
* When adding new local theorems to `simp`, the system assumes that the function application arguments
have been annotated with `no_index`. This modification, which addresses [issue #2670](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2670),
have been annotated with `no_index`. This modification, which addresses issue [#2670](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2670),
restores the Lean 3 behavior that users expect. With this modification, the following examples are now operational:
```
example {α β : Type} {f : α × β → β → β} (h : ∀ p : α × β, f p p.2 = p.2)
@@ -238,180 +81,76 @@ v4.7.0
In both cases, `h` is applicable because `simp` does not index f-arguments anymore when adding `h` to the `simp`-set.
It's important to note, however, that global theorems continue to be indexed in the usual manner.
* Improved the error messages produced by the `decide` tactic. [#3422](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3422)
* Improved auto-completion performance. [#3460](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3460)
* Improved initial language server startup performance. [#3552](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3552)
* Changed call hierarchy to sort entries and strip private header from names displayed in the call hierarchy. [#3482](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3482)
* There is now a low-level error recovery combinator in the parsing framework, primarily intended for DSLs. [#3413](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3413)
* You can now write `termination_by?` after a declaration to see the automatically inferred
termination argument, and turn it into a `termination_by …` clause using the “Try this” widget or a code action. [#3514](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3514)
* A large fraction of `Std` has been moved into the Lean repository.
This was motivated by:
1. Making universally useful tactics such as `ext`, `by_cases`, `change at`,
`norm_cast`, `rcases`, `simpa`, `simp?`, `omega`, and `exact?`
available to all users of Lean, without imports.
2. Minimizing the syntactic changes between plain Lean and Lean with `import Std`.
3. Simplifying the development process for the basic data types
`Nat`, `Int`, `Fin` (and variants such as `UInt64`), `List`, `Array`,
and `BitVec` as we begin making the APIs and simp normal forms for these types
more complete and consistent.
4. Laying the groundwork for the Std roadmap, as a library focused on
essential datatypes not provided by the core langauge (e.g. `RBMap`)
and utilities such as basic IO.
While we have achieved most of our initial aims in `v4.7.0-rc1`,
some upstreaming will continue over the coming months.
* The `/` and `%` notations in `Int` now use `Int.ediv` and `Int.emod`
(i.e. the rounding conventions have changed).
Previously `Std` overrode these notations, so this is no change for users of `Std`.
There is now kernel support for these functions.
[#3376](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3376).
* `omega`, our integer linear arithmetic tactic, is now availabe in the core langauge.
* It is supplemented by a preprocessing tactic `bv_omega` which can solve goals about `BitVec`
which naturally translate into linear arithmetic problems.
[#3435](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3435).
* `omega` now has support for `Fin` [#3427](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3427),
the `<<<` operator [#3433](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3433).
* During the port `omega` was modified to no longer identify atoms up to definitional equality
(so in particular it can no longer prove `id x ≤ x`). [#3525](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3525).
This may cause some regressions.
We plan to provide a general purpose preprocessing tactic later, or an `omega!` mode.
* `omega` is now invoked in Lean's automation for termination proofs
[#3503](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3503) as well as in
array indexing proofs [#3515](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3515).
This automation will be substantially revised in the medium term,
and while `omega` does help automate some proofs, we plan to make this much more robust.
* The library search tactics `exact?` and `apply?` that were originally in
Mathlib are now available in Lean itself. These use the implementation using
lazy discrimination trees from `Std`, and thus do not require a disk cache but
have a slightly longer startup time. The order used for selection lemmas has
changed as well to favor goals purely based on how many terms in the head
pattern match the current goal.
* The `solve_by_elim` tactic has been ported from `Std` to Lean so that library
search can use it.
* New `#check_tactic` and `#check_simp` commands have been added. These are
useful for checking tactics (particularly `simp`) behave as expected in test
suites.
* Previously, app unexpanders would only be applied to entire applications. However, some notations produce
functions, and these functions can be given additional arguments. The solution so far has been to write app unexpanders so that they can take an arbitrary number of additional arguments. However this leads to misleading hover information in the Infoview. For example, while `HAdd.hAdd f g 1` pretty prints as `(f + g) 1`, hovering over `f + g` shows `f`. There is no way to fix the situation from within an app unexpander; the expression position for `HAdd.hAdd f g` is absent, and app unexpanders cannot register TermInfo.
This commit changes the app delaborator to try running app unexpanders on every prefix of an application, from longest to shortest prefix. For efficiency, it is careful to only try this when app delaborators do in fact exist for the head constant, and it also ensures arguments are only delaborated once. Then, in `(f + g) 1`, the `f + g` gets TermInfo registered for that subexpression, making it properly hoverable.
[#3375](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3375)
Breaking changes:
* `Lean.withTraceNode` and variants got a stronger `MonadAlwaysExcept` assumption to
fix trace trees not being built on elaboration runtime exceptions. Instances for most elaboration
monads built on `EIO Exception` should be synthesized automatically.
* The `match ... with.` and `fun.` notations previously in Std have been replaced by
`nomatch ...` and `nofun`. [#3279](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3279) and [#3286](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3286)
Other improvements:
* several bug fixes for `simp`:
* we should not crash when `simp` loops [#3269](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3269)
* `simp` gets stuck on `autoParam` [#3315](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3315)
* `simp` fails when custom discharger makes no progress [#3317](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3317)
* `simp` fails to discharge `autoParam` premises even when it can reduce them to `True` [#3314](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3314)
* `simp?` suggests generated equations lemma names, fixes [#3547](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3547) [#3573](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3573)
* fixes for `match` expressions:
* fix regression with builtin literals [#3521](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3521)
* accept `match` when patterns cover all cases of a `BitVec` finite type [#3538](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3538)
* fix matching `Int` literals [#3504](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3504)
* patterns containing int values and constructors [#3496](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3496)
* improve `termination_by` error messages [#3255](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3255)
* fix `rename_i` in macros, fixes [#3553](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3553) [#3581](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3581)
* fix excessive resource usage in `generalize`, fixes [#3524](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3524) [#3575](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3575)
* an equation lemma with autoParam arguments fails to rewrite, fixing [#2243](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2243) [#3316](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3316)
* `add_decl_doc` should check that declarations are local [#3311](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3311)
* instantiate the types of inductives with the right parameters, closing [#3242](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3242) [#3246](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3246)
* New simprocs for many basic types. [#3407](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3407)
Lake fixes:
* Warn on fetch cloud release failure [#3401](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3401)
* Cloud release trace & `lake build :release` errors [#3248](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3248)
v4.6.1
---------
* Backport of [#3552](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3552) fixing a performance regression
in server startup.
v4.6.0
---------
* Add custom simplification procedures (aka `simproc`s) to `simp`. Simprocs can be triggered by the simplifier on a specified term-pattern. Here is an small example:
```lean
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Simp.BuiltinSimprocs.Nat
```lean
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Simp.BuiltinSimprocs.Nat
def foo (x : Nat) : Nat :=
x + 10
def foo (x : Nat) : Nat :=
x + 10
/--
The `simproc` `reduceFoo` is invoked on terms that match the pattern `foo _`.
-/
simproc reduceFoo (foo _) :=
/- A term of type `Expr → SimpM Step -/
fun e => do
/-
The `Step` type has three constructors: `.done`, `.visit`, `.continue`.
* The constructor `.done` instructs `simp` that the result does
not need to be simplied further.
* The constructor `.visit` instructs `simp` to visit the resulting expression.
* The constructor `.continue` instructs `simp` to try other simplification procedures.
All three constructors take a `Result`. The `.continue` contructor may also take `none`.
`Result` has two fields `expr` (the new expression), and `proof?` (an optional proof).
If the new expression is definitionally equal to the input one, then `proof?` can be omitted or set to `none`.
-/
/- `simp` uses matching modulo reducibility. So, we ensure the term is a `foo`-application. -/
unless e.isAppOfArity ``foo 1 do
return .continue
/- `Nat.fromExpr?` tries to convert an expression into a `Nat` value -/
let some n ← Nat.fromExpr? e.appArg!
| return .continue
return .done { expr := Lean.mkNatLit (n+10) }
```
We disable simprocs support by using the command `set_option simprocs false`. This command is particularly useful when porting files to v4.6.0.
Simprocs can be scoped, manually added to `simp` commands, and suppressed using `-`. They are also supported by `simp?`. `simp only` does not execute any `simproc`. Here are some examples for the `simproc` defined above.
```lean
example : x + foo 2 = 12 + x := by
set_option simprocs false in
/- This `simp` command does not make progress since `simproc`s are disabled. -/
fail_if_success simp
simp_arith
example : x + foo 2 = 12 + x := by
/- `simp only` must not use the default simproc set. -/
fail_if_success simp only
simp_arith
example : x + foo 2 = 12 + x := by
/--
The `simproc` `reduceFoo` is invoked on terms that match the pattern `foo _`.
-/
simproc reduceFoo (foo _) :=
/- A term of type `Expr → SimpM Step -/
fun e => do
/-
`simp only` does not use the default simproc set,
but we can provide simprocs as arguments. -/
simp only [reduceFoo]
simp_arith
The `Step` type has three constructors: `.done`, `.visit`, `.continue`.
* The constructor `.done` instructs `simp` that the result does
not need to be simplied further.
* The constructor `.visit` instructs `simp` to visit the resulting expression.
* The constructor `.continue` instructs `simp` to try other simplification procedures.
example : x + foo 2 = 12 + x := by
/- We can use `-` to disable `simproc`s. -/
fail_if_success simp [-reduceFoo]
simp_arith
```
The command `register_simp_attr <id>` now creates a `simp` **and** a `simproc` set with the name `<id>`. The following command instructs Lean to insert the `reduceFoo` simplification procedure into the set `my_simp`. If no set is specified, Lean uses the default `simp` set.
```lean
simproc [my_simp] reduceFoo (foo _) := ...
```
All three constructors take a `Result`. The `.continue` contructor may also take `none`.
`Result` has two fields `expr` (the new expression), and `proof?` (an optional proof).
If the new expression is definitionally equal to the input one, then `proof?` can be omitted or set to `none`.
-/
/- `simp` uses matching modulo reducibility. So, we ensure the term is a `foo`-application. -/
unless e.isAppOfArity ``foo 1 do
return .continue
/- `Nat.fromExpr?` tries to convert an expression into a `Nat` value -/
let some n ← Nat.fromExpr? e.appArg!
| return .continue
return .done { expr := Lean.mkNatLit (n+10) }
```
We disable simprocs support by using the command `set_option simprocs false`. This command is particularly useful when porting files to v4.6.0.
Simprocs can be scoped, manually added to `simp` commands, and suppressed using `-`. They are also supported by `simp?`. `simp only` does not execute any `simproc`. Here are some examples for the `simproc` defined above.
```lean
example : x + foo 2 = 12 + x := by
set_option simprocs false in
/- This `simp` command does not make progress since `simproc`s are disabled. -/
fail_if_success simp
simp_arith
example : x + foo 2 = 12 + x := by
/- `simp only` must not use the default simproc set. -/
fail_if_success simp only
simp_arith
example : x + foo 2 = 12 + x := by
/-
`simp only` does not use the default simproc set,
but we can provide simprocs as arguments. -/
simp only [reduceFoo]
simp_arith
example : x + foo 2 = 12 + x := by
/- We can use `-` to disable `simproc`s. -/
fail_if_success simp [-reduceFoo]
simp_arith
```
The command `register_simp_attr <id>` now creates a `simp` **and** a `simproc` set with the name `<id>`. The following command instructs Lean to insert the `reduceFoo` simplification procedure into the set `my_simp`. If no set is specified, Lean uses the default `simp` set.
```lean
simproc [my_simp] reduceFoo (foo _) := ...
```
* The syntax of the `termination_by` and `decreasing_by` termination hints is overhauled:
@@ -550,7 +289,7 @@ v4.6.0
and hence greatly reduces the reliance on costly structure eta reduction. This has a large impact on mathlib,
reducing total CPU instructions by 3% and enabling impactful refactors like leanprover-community/mathlib4#8386
which reduces the build time by almost 20%.
See [PR #2478](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2478) and [RFC #2451](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2451).
See PR [#2478](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2478) and RFC [#2451](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2451).
* Add pretty printer settings to omit deeply nested terms (`pp.deepTerms false` and `pp.deepTerms.threshold`) ([PR #3201](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3201))
@@ -569,7 +308,7 @@ Other improvements:
* produce simpler proof terms in `rw` [#3121](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3121)
* fuse nested `mkCongrArg` calls in proofs generated by `simp` [#3203](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3203)
* `induction using` followed by a general term [#3188](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3188)
* allow generalization in `let` [#3060](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3060), fixing [#3065](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/3065)
* allow generalization in `let` [#3060](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3060, fixing [#3065](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/3065)
* reducing out-of-bounds `swap!` should return `a`, not `default`` [#3197](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3197), fixing [#3196](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/3196)
* derive `BEq` on structure with `Prop`-fields [#3191](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3191), fixing [#3140](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/3140)
* refine through more `casesOnApp`/`matcherApp` [#3176](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3176), fixing [#3175](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3175)

9
default.nix Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
# used for `nix-shell https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/archive/master.tar.gz -A nix`
{ nix = (import ./shell.nix {}).nix; } //
(import (
fetchTarball {
url = "https://github.com/edolstra/flake-compat/archive/c75e76f80c57784a6734356315b306140646ee84.tar.gz";
sha256 = "071aal00zp2m9knnhddgr2wqzlx6i6qa1263lv1y7bdn2w20h10h"; }
) {
src = ./.;
}).defaultNix

View File

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
open Batteries
open Std
open Lean
inductive BoolExpr where

View File

@@ -89,6 +89,5 @@
- [Testing](./dev/testing.md)
- [Debugging](./dev/debugging.md)
- [Commit Convention](./dev/commit_convention.md)
- [Release checklist](./dev/release_checklist.md)
- [Building This Manual](./dev/mdbook.md)
- [Foreign Function Interface](./dev/ffi.md)

View File

@@ -75,28 +75,26 @@ The github repository will automatically update stage0 on `master` once
If you have write access to the lean4 repository, you can also also manually
trigger that process, for example to be able to use new features in the compiler itself.
You can do that on <https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/actions/workflows/update-stage0.yml>
You can do that on <https://github.com/nomeata/lean4/actions/workflows/update-stage0.yml>
or using Github CLI with
```
gh workflow run update-stage0.yml
```
Leaving stage0 updates to the CI automation is preferable, but should you need
to do it locally, you can use `make update-stage0-commit` in `build/release` to
update `stage0` from `stage1` or `make -C stageN update-stage0-commit` to
update from another stage. This command will automatically stage the updated files
and introduce a commit,so make sure to commit your work before that.
If you rebased the branch (either onto a newer version of `master`, or fixing
up some commits prior to the stage0 update, recreate the stage0 update commits.
The script `script/rebase-stage0.sh` can be used for that.
The CI should prevent PRs with changes to stage0 (besides `stdlib_flags.h`)
from entering `master` through the (squashing!) merge queue, and label such PRs
with the `changes-stage0` label. Such PRs should have a cleaned up history,
with separate stage0 update commits; then coordinate with the admins to merge
your PR using rebase merge, bypassing the merge queue.
Leaving stage0 updates to the CI automation is preferrable, but should you need
to do it locally, you can use `make update-stage0` in `build/release`, to
update `stage0` from `stage1`, `make -C stageN update-stage0` to update from
another stage, or `nix run .#update-stage0-commit` to update using nix.
Updates to `stage0` should be their own commits in the Git history. So should
you have to include the stage0 update in your PR (rather than using above
automation after merging changes), commit your work before running `make
update-stage0`, commit the updated `stage0` compiler code with the commit
message:
```
chore: update stage0
```
and coordinate with the admins to not squash your PR.
## Further Bootstrapping Complications

View File

@@ -53,59 +53,10 @@ In the case of `@[extern]` all *irrelevant* types are removed first; see next se
Its runtime value is either a pointer to an opaque bignum object or, if the lowest bit of the "pointer" is 1 (`lean_is_scalar`), an encoded unboxed natural number (`lean_box`/`lean_unbox`).
* A universe `Sort u`, type constructor `... → Sort u`, or proposition `p : Prop` is *irrelevant* and is either statically erased (see above) or represented as a `lean_object *` with the runtime value `lean_box(0)`
* Any other type is represented by `lean_object *`.
Its runtime value is a pointer to an object of a subtype of `lean_object` (see the "Inductive types" section below) or the unboxed value `lean_box(cidx)` for the `cidx`th constructor of an inductive type if this constructor does not have any relevant parameters.
Its runtime value is a pointer to an object of a subtype of `lean_object` (see respective declarations in `lean.h`) or the unboxed value `lean_box(cidx)` for the `cidx`th constructor of an inductive type if this constructor does not have any relevant parameters.
Example: the runtime value of `u : Unit` is always `lean_box(0)`.
#### Inductive types
For inductive types which are in the fallback `lean_object *` case above and not trivial constructors, the type is stored as a `lean_ctor_object`, and `lean_is_ctor` will return true. A `lean_ctor_object` stores the constructor index in the header, and the fields are stored in the `m_objs` portion of the object.
The memory order of the fields is derived from the types and order of the fields in the declaration. They are ordered as follows:
* Non-scalar fields stored as `lean_object *`
* Fields of type `USize`
* Other scalar fields, in decreasing order by size
Within each group the fields are ordered in declaration order. **Warning**: Trivial wrapper types still count toward a field being treated as non-scalar for this purpose.
* To access fields of the first kind, use `lean_ctor_get(val, i)` to get the `i`th non-scalar field.
* To access `USize` fields, use `lean_ctor_get_usize(val, n+i)` to get the `i`th usize field and `n` is the total number of fields of the first kind.
* To access other scalar fields, use `lean_ctor_get_uintN(val, off)` or `lean_ctor_get_usize(val, off)` as appropriate. Here `off` is the byte offset of the field in the structure, starting at `n*sizeof(void*)` where `n` is the number of fields of the first two kinds.
For example, a structure such as
```lean
structure S where
ptr_1 : Array Nat
usize_1 : USize
sc64_1 : UInt64
ptr_2 : { x : UInt64 // x > 0 } -- wrappers don't count as scalars
sc64_2 : Float -- `Float` is 64 bit
sc8_1 : Bool
sc16_1 : UInt16
sc8_2 : UInt8
sc64_3 : UInt64
usize_2 : USize
ptr_3 : Char -- trivial wrapper around `UInt32`
sc32_1 : UInt32
sc16_2 : UInt16
```
would get re-sorted into the following memory order:
* `S.ptr_1` - `lean_ctor_get(val, 0)`
* `S.ptr_2` - `lean_ctor_get(val, 1)`
* `S.ptr_3` - `lean_ctor_get(val, 2)`
* `S.usize_1` - `lean_ctor_get_usize(val, 3)`
* `S.usize_2` - `lean_ctor_get_usize(val, 4)`
* `S.sc64_1` - `lean_ctor_get_uint64(val, sizeof(void*)*5)`
* `S.sc64_2` - `lean_ctor_get_float(val, sizeof(void*)*5 + 8)`
* `S.sc64_3` - `lean_ctor_get_uint64(val, sizeof(void*)*5 + 16)`
* `S.sc32_1` - `lean_ctor_get_uint32(val, sizeof(void*)*5 + 24)`
* `S.sc16_1` - `lean_ctor_get_uint16(val, sizeof(void*)*5 + 28)`
* `S.sc16_2` - `lean_ctor_get_uint16(val, sizeof(void*)*5 + 30)`
* `S.sc8_1` - `lean_ctor_get_uint8(val, sizeof(void*)*5 + 32)`
* `S.sc8_2` - `lean_ctor_get_uint8(val, sizeof(void*)*5 + 33)`
### Borrowing
By default, all `lean_object *` parameters of an `@[extern]` function are considered *owned*, i.e. the external code is passed a "virtual RC token" and is responsible for passing this token along to another consuming function (exactly once) or freeing it via `lean_dec`.
@@ -160,15 +111,6 @@ if (lean_io_result_is_ok(res)) {
lean_io_mark_end_initialization();
```
In addition, any other thread not spawned by the Lean runtime itself must be initialized for Lean use by calling
```c
void lean_initialize_thread();
```
and should be finalized in order to free all thread-local resources by calling
```c
void lean_finalize_thread();
```
## `@[extern]` in the Interpreter
The interpreter can run Lean declarations for which symbols are available in loaded shared libraries, which includes `@[extern]` declarations.

View File

@@ -1,229 +0,0 @@
# Releasing a stable version
This checklist walks you through releasing a stable version.
See below for the checklist for release candidates.
We'll use `v4.6.0` as the intended release version as a running example.
- One week before the planned release, ensure that someone has written the first draft of the release blog post
- `git checkout releases/v4.6.0`
(This branch should already exist, from the release candidates.)
- `git pull`
- In `src/CMakeLists.txt`, verify you see
- `set(LEAN_VERSION_MINOR 6)` (for whichever `6` is appropriate)
- `set(LEAN_VERSION_IS_RELEASE 1)`
- (both of these should already be in place from the release candidates)
- It is possible that the `v4.6.0` section of `RELEASES.md` is out of sync between
`releases/v4.6.0` and `master`. This should be reconciled:
- Run `git diff master RELEASES.md`.
- You should expect to see additons on `master` in the `v4.7.0-rc1` section; ignore these.
(i.e. the new release notes for the upcoming release candidate).
- Reconcile discrepancies in the `v4.6.0` section,
usually via copy and paste and a commit to `releases/v4.6.0`.
- `git tag v4.6.0`
- `git push $REMOTE v4.6.0`, where `$REMOTE` is the upstream Lean repository (e.g., `origin`, `upstream`)
- Now wait, while CI runs.
- You can monitor this at `https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/actions/workflows/ci.yml`,
looking for the `v4.6.0` tag.
- This step can take up to an hour.
- If you are intending to cut the next release candidate on the same day,
you may want to start on the release candidate checklist now.
- Go to https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/releases and verify that the `v4.6.0` release appears.
- Edit the release notes on Github to select the "Set as the latest release".
- Copy and paste the Github release notes from the previous releases candidate for this version
(e.g. `v4.6.0-rc1`), and quickly sanity check.
- Next, we will move a curated list of downstream repos to the latest stable release.
- For each of the repositories listed below:
- Make a PR to `master`/`main` changing the toolchain to `v4.6.0`
- Update the toolchain file
- In the Lakefile, if there are dependencies on specific version tags of dependencies that you've already pushed as part of this process, update them to the new tag.
If they depend on `main` or `master`, don't change this; you've just updated the dependency, so it will work and be saved in the manifest
- Run `lake update`
- The PR title should be "chore: bump toolchain to v4.6.0".
- Merge the PR once CI completes.
- Create the tag `v4.6.0` from `master`/`main` and push it.
- Merge the tag `v4.6.0` into the `stable` branch and push it.
- We do this for the repositories:
- [lean4checker](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4checker)
- No dependencies
- Note: `lean4checker` uses a different version tagging scheme: use `toolchain/v4.6.0` rather than `v4.6.0`.
- Toolchain bump PR
- Create and push the tag
- Merge the tag into `stable`
- [Batteries](https://github.com/leanprover-community/batteries)
- No dependencies
- Toolchain bump PR
- Create and push the tag
- Merge the tag into `stable`
- [ProofWidgets4](https://github.com/leanprover-community/ProofWidgets4)
- Dependencies: `Batteries`
- Note on versions and branches:
- `ProofWidgets` uses a sequential version tagging scheme, e.g. `v0.0.29`,
which does not refer to the toolchain being used.
- Make a new release in this sequence after merging the toolchain bump PR.
- `ProofWidgets` does not maintain a `stable` branch.
- Toolchain bump PR
- Create and push the tag, following the version convention of the repository
- [Aesop](https://github.com/leanprover-community/aesop)
- Dependencies: `Batteries`
- Toolchain bump PR including updated Lake manifest
- Create and push the tag
- Merge the tag into `stable`
- [doc-gen4](https://github.com/leanprover/doc-gen4)
- Dependencies: exist, but they're not part of the release workflow
- Toolchain bump PR including updated Lake manifest
- Create and push the tag
- There is no `stable` branch; skip this step
- [import-graph](https://github.com/leanprover-community/import-graph)
- Toolchain bump PR including updated Lake manifest
- Create and push the tag
- There is no `stable` branch; skip this step
- [Mathlib](https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4)
- Dependencies: `Aesop`, `ProofWidgets4`, `lean4checker`, `Batteries`, `doc-gen4`, `import-graph`
- Toolchain bump PR notes:
- In addition to updating the `lean-toolchain` and `lakefile.lean`,
in `.github/workflows/build.yml.in` in the `lean4checker` section update the line
`git checkout toolchain/v4.6.0` to the appropriate tag,
and then run `.github/workflows/mk_build_yml.sh`. Coordinate with
a Mathlib maintainer to get this merged.
- Push the PR branch to the main Mathlib repository rather than a fork, or CI may not work reliably
- Create and push the tag
- Create a new branch from the tag, push it, and open a pull request against `stable`.
Coordinate with a Mathlib maintainer to get this merged.
- [REPL](https://github.com/leanprover-community/repl)
- Dependencies: `Mathlib` (for test code)
- Note that there are two copies of `lean-toolchain`/`lakefile.lean`:
in the root, and in `test/Mathlib/`. Edit both, and run `lake update` in both directories.
- Toolchain bump PR including updated Lake manifest
- Create and push the tag
- Merge the tag into `stable`
- Merge the release announcement PR for the Lean website - it will be deployed automatically
- Finally, make an announcement!
This should go in https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113486-announce, with topic `v4.6.0`.
Please see previous announcements for suggested language.
You will want a few bullet points for main topics from the release notes.
Link to the blog post from the Zulip announcement.
- Make sure that whoever is handling social media knows the release is out.
## Optimistic(?) time estimates:
- Initial checks and push the tag: 30 minutes.
- Note that if `RELEASES.md` has discrepancies this could take longer!
- Waiting for the release: 60 minutes.
- Fixing release notes: 10 minutes.
- Bumping toolchains in downstream repositories, up to creating the Mathlib PR: 30 minutes.
- Waiting for Mathlib CI and bors: 120 minutes.
- Finalizing Mathlib tags and stable branch, and updating REPL: 15 minutes.
- Posting announcement and/or blog post: 20 minutes.
# Creating a release candidate.
This checklist walks you through creating the first release candidate for a version of Lean.
We'll use `v4.7.0-rc1` as the intended release version in this example.
- Decide which nightly release you want to turn into a release candidate.
We will use `nightly-2024-02-29` in this example.
- It is essential that Batteries and Mathlib already have reviewed branches compatible with this nightly.
- Check that both Batteries and Mathlib's `bump/v4.7.0` branch contain `nightly-2024-02-29`
in their `lean-toolchain`.
- The steps required to reach that state are beyond the scope of this checklist, but see below!
- Create the release branch from this nightly tag:
```
git remote add nightly https://github.com/leanprover/lean4-nightly.git
git fetch nightly tag nightly-2024-02-29
git checkout nightly-2024-02-29
git checkout -b releases/v4.7.0
```
- In `RELEASES.md` remove `(development in progress)` from the `v4.7.0` section header.
- Our current goal is to have written release notes only about major language features or breaking changes,
and to rely on automatically generated release notes for bugfixes and minor changes.
- Do not wait on `RELEASES.md` being perfect before creating the `release/v4.7.0` branch. It is essential to choose the nightly which will become the release candidate as early as possible, to avoid confusion.
- If there are major changes not reflected in `RELEASES.md` already, you may need to solicit help from the authors.
- Minor changes and bug fixes do not need to be documented in `RELEASES.md`: they will be added automatically on the Github release page.
- Commit your changes to `RELEASES.md`, and push.
- Remember that changes to `RELEASES.md` after you have branched `releases/v4.7.0` should also be cherry-picked back to `master`.
- In `src/CMakeLists.txt`,
- verify that you see `set(LEAN_VERSION_MINOR 7)` (for whichever `7` is appropriate); this should already have been updated when the development cycle began.
- `set(LEAN_VERSION_IS_RELEASE 1)` (this should be a change; on `master` and nightly releases it is always `0`).
- Commit your changes to `src/CMakeLists.txt`, and push.
- `git tag v4.7.0-rc1`
- `git push origin v4.7.0-rc1`
- Now wait, while CI runs.
- You can monitor this at `https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/actions/workflows/ci.yml`, looking for the `v4.7.0-rc1` tag.
- This step can take up to an hour.
- Once the release appears at https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/releases/
- Edit the release notes on Github to select the "Set as a pre-release box".
- Copy the section of `RELEASES.md` for this version into the Github release notes.
- Use the title "Changes since v4.6.0 (from RELEASES.md)"
- Then in the "previous tag" dropdown, select `v4.6.0`, and click "Generate release notes".
- This will add a list of all the commits since the last stable version.
- Delete anything already mentioned in the hand-written release notes above.
- Delete "update stage0" commits, and anything with a completely inscrutable commit message.
- Briefly rearrange the remaining items by category (e.g. `simp`, `lake`, `bug fixes`),
but for minor items don't put any work in expanding on commit messages.
- (How we want to release notes to look is evolving: please update this section if it looks wrong!)
- Next, we will move a curated list of downstream repos to the release candidate.
- This assumes that there is already a *reviewed* branch `bump/v4.7.0` on each repository
containing the required adaptations (or no adaptations are required).
The preparation of this branch is beyond the scope of this document.
- For each of the target repositories:
- Checkout the `bump/v4.7.0` branch.
- Verify that the `lean-toolchain` is set to the nightly from which the release candidate was created.
- `git merge origin/master`
- Change the `lean-toolchain` to `leanprover/lean4:v4.7.0-rc1`
- In `lakefile.lean`, change any dependencies which were using `nightly-testing` or `bump/v4.7.0` branches
back to `master` or `main`, and run `lake update` for those dependencies.
- Run `lake build` to ensure that dependencies are found (but it's okay to stop it after a moment).
- `git commit`
- `git push`
- Open a PR from `bump/v4.7.0` to `master`, and either merge it yourself after CI, if appropriate,
or notify the maintainers that it is ready to go.
- Once this PR has been merged, tag `master` with `v4.7.0-rc1` and push this tag.
- We do this for the same list of repositories as for stable releases, see above.
As above, there are dependencies between these, and so the process above is iterative.
It greatly helps if you can merge the `bump/v4.7.0` PRs yourself!
- For Batteries/Aesop/Mathlib, which maintain a `nightly-testing` branch, make sure there is a tag
`nightly-testing-2024-02-29` with date corresponding to the nightly used for the release
(create it if not), and then on the `nightly-testing` branch `git reset --hard master`, and force push.
- Make an announcement!
This should go in https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113486-announce, with topic `v4.7.0-rc1`.
Please see previous announcements for suggested language.
You will want a few bullet points for main topics from the release notes.
Please also make sure that whoever is handling social media knows the release is out.
- Begin the next development cycle (i.e. for `v4.8.0`) on the Lean repository, by making a PR that:
- Updates `src/CMakeLists.txt` to say `set(LEAN_VERSION_MINOR 8)`
- Removes `(in development)` from the section heading in `RELEASES.md` for `v4.7.0`,
and creates a new `v4.8.0 (in development)` section heading.
## Time estimates:
Slightly longer than the corresponding steps for a stable release.
Similar process, but more things go wrong.
In particular, updating the downstream repositories is significantly more work
(because we need to merge existing `bump/v4.7.0` branches, not just update a toolchain).
# Preparing `bump/v4.7.0` branches
While not part of the release process per se,
this is a brief summary of the work that goes into updating Batteries/Aesop/Mathlib to new versions.
Please read https://leanprover-community.github.io/contribute/tags_and_branches.html
* Each repo has an unreviewed `nightly-testing` branch that
receives commits automatically from `master`, and
has its toolchain updated automatically for every nightly.
(Note: the aesop branch is not automated, and is updated on an as needed basis.)
As a consequence this branch is often broken.
A bot posts in the (private!) "Mathlib reviewers" stream on Zulip about the status of these branches.
* We fix the breakages by committing directly to `nightly-testing`: there is no PR process.
* This can either be done by the person managing this process directly,
or by soliciting assistance from authors of files, or generally helpful people on Zulip!
* Each repo has a `bump/v4.7.0` which accumulates reviewed changes adapting to new versions.
* Once `nightly-testing` is working on a given nightly, say `nightly-2024-02-15`, we:
* Make sure `bump/v4.7.0` is up to date with `master` (by merging `master`, no PR necessary)
* Create from `bump/v4.7.0` a `bump/nightly-2024-02-15` branch.
* In that branch, `git merge --squash nightly-testing` to bring across changes from `nightly-testing`.
* Sanity check changes, commit, and make a PR to `bump/v4.7.0` from the `bump/nightly-2024-02-15` branch.
* Solicit review, merge the PR into `bump/v4,7,0`.
* It is always okay to merge in the following directions:
`master` -> `bump/v4.7.0` -> `bump/nightly-2024-02-15` -> `nightly-testing`.
Please remember to push any merges you make to intermediate steps!

View File

@@ -4,16 +4,16 @@ def ack : Nat → Nat → Nat
| 0, y => y+1
| x+1, 0 => ack x 1
| x+1, y+1 => ack x (ack (x+1) y)
termination_by x y => (x, y)
termination_by ack x y => (x, y)
def sum (a : Array Int) : Int :=
let rec go (i : Nat) :=
if _ : i < a.size then
if i < a.size then
a[i] + go (i+1)
else
0
termination_by a.size - i
go 0
termination_by go i => a.size - i
set_option pp.proofs true
#print sum.go

View File

@@ -4,42 +4,43 @@ open Lean Meta
def ctor (mvarId : MVarId) (idx : Nat) : MetaM (List MVarId) := do
/- Set `MetaM` context using `mvarId` -/
mvarId.withContext do
withMVarContext mvarId do
/- Fail if the metavariable is already assigned. -/
mvarId.checkNotAssigned `ctor
checkNotAssigned mvarId `ctor
/- Retrieve the target type, instantiateMVars, and use `whnf`. -/
let target mvarId.getType'
let target getMVarType' mvarId
let .const declName us := target.getAppFn
| throwTacticEx `ctor mvarId "target is not an inductive datatype"
let .inductInfo { ctors, .. } getConstInfo declName
| throwTacticEx `ctor mvarId "target is not an inductive datatype"
if idx = 0 then
throwTacticEx `ctor mvarId "invalid index, it must be > 0"
throwTacticEx `ctor mvarId "invalid index, it must be > 0"
else if h : idx - 1 < ctors.length then
mvarId.apply (.const ctors[idx - 1] us)
apply mvarId (.const ctors[idx - 1] us)
else
throwTacticEx `ctor mvarId "invalid index, inductive datatype has only {ctors.length} contructors"
throwTacticEx `ctor mvarId "invalid index, inductive datatype has only {ctors.length} contructors"
open Elab Tactic
elab "ctor" idx:num : tactic =>
elab "ctor" idx:num : tactic =>
liftMetaTactic (ctor · idx.getNat)
example (p : Prop) : p := by
example (p : Prop) : p := by
ctor 1 -- Error
example (h : q) : p q := by
example (h : q) : p q := by
ctor 0 -- Error
exact h
example (h : q) : p q := by
example (h : q) : p q := by
ctor 3 -- Error
exact h
example (h : q) : p q := by
example (h : q) : p q := by
ctor 2
exact h
example (h : q) : p q := by
example (h : q) : p q := by
ctor 1
exact h -- Error
exact h -- Error

View File

@@ -5,15 +5,15 @@ open Lean Meta
def ex1 (declName : Name) : MetaM Unit := do
let info getConstInfo declName
IO.println s!"{declName} : {← ppExpr info.type}"
if let some val := info.value? then
if let some val := info.value? then
IO.println s!"{declName} : {← ppExpr val}"
#eval ex1 ``Nat
def ex2 (declName : Name) : MetaM Unit := do
let info getConstInfo declName
trace[Meta.debug] "{declName} : {info.type}"
if let some val := info.value? then
if let some val := info.value? then
trace[Meta.debug] "{declName} : {val}"
#eval ex2 ``Add.add
@@ -30,9 +30,9 @@ def ex3 (declName : Name) : MetaM Unit := do
trace[Meta.debug] "{x} : {← inferType x}"
def myMin [LT α] [DecidableRel (α := α) (·<·)] (a b : α) : α :=
if a < b then
if a < b then
a
else
else
b
set_option trace.Meta.debug true in
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ set_option trace.Meta.debug true in
def ex4 : MetaM Unit := do
let nat := mkConst ``Nat
withLocalDeclD `a nat fun a =>
withLocalDeclD `a nat fun a =>
withLocalDeclD `b nat fun b => do
let e mkAppM ``HAdd.hAdd #[a, b]
trace[Meta.debug] "{e} : {← inferType e}"
@@ -66,17 +66,15 @@ open Elab Term
def ex5 : TermElabM Unit := do
let nat := Lean.mkConst ``Nat
withLocalDeclD `a nat fun a => do
withLocalDeclD `a nat fun a => do
withLocalDeclD `b nat fun b => do
let ab mkAppM ``HAdd.hAdd #[a, b]
let abStx exprToSyntax ab
let aStx exprToSyntax a
let stx `(fun x => if x < 10 then $abStx + x else x + $aStx)
let stx `(fun x => if x < 10 then $( exprToSyntax ab) + x else x + $( exprToSyntax a))
let e elabTerm stx none
trace[Meta.debug] "{e} : {← inferType e}"
let e := mkApp e (mkNatLit 5)
let e whnf e
trace[Meta.debug] "{e}"
set_option trace.Meta.debug true in
#eval ex5

View File

@@ -4,16 +4,16 @@ def ack : Nat → Nat → Nat
| 0, y => y+1
| x+1, 0 => ack x 1
| x+1, y+1 => ack x (ack (x+1) y)
termination_by x y => (x, y)
termination_by ack x y => (x, y)
def sum (a : Array Int) : Int :=
let rec go (i : Nat) :=
if _ : i < a.size then
if i < a.size then
a[i] + go (i+1)
else
0
termination_by a.size - i
go 0
termination_by go i => a.size - i
set_option pp.proofs true
#print sum.go

View File

@@ -277,13 +277,14 @@ theorem BinTree.find_insert (b : BinTree β) (k : Nat) (v : β)
. by_cases' key < k
cases h; apply ihr; assumption
theorem BinTree.find_insert_of_ne (b : BinTree β) (ne : k k') (v : β)
theorem BinTree.find_insert_of_ne (b : BinTree β) (h : k k') (v : β)
: (b.insert k v).find? k' = b.find? k' := by
let t, h := b; simp
induction t with simp
| leaf =>
intros le
exact Nat.lt_of_le_of_ne le ne
intros
have_eq k k'
contradiction
| node left key value right ihl ihr =>
let .node hl hr bl br := h
specialize ihl bl

View File

@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
src = inputs.mdBook;
cargoDeps = drv.cargoDeps.overrideAttrs (_: {
inherit src;
outputHash = "sha256-CO3A9Kpp4sIvkT9X3p+GTidazk7Fn4jf0AP2PINN44A=";
outputHash = "sha256-1YlPS6cqgxE4fjy9G8pWrpP27YrrbCDnfeyIsX81ZNw=";
});
doCheck = false;
});

View File

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Platform-Specific Setup
- [Windows (msys2)](msys2.md)
- [Windows (WSL)](wsl.md)
- [macOS (homebrew)](osx-10.9.md)
- Linux/macOS/WSL via [Nix](https://nixos.org/nix/): Call `nix develop` in the project root. That's it.
- Linux/macOS/WSL via [Nix](https://nixos.org/nix/): Call `nix-shell` in the project root. That's it.
Generic Build Instructions
--------------------------

View File

@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ data type containing several important pieces of information. First and foremost
current player, and it has a random generator.
-/
open Batteries (HashMap)
open Std (HashMap)
abbrev TileIndex := Nat × Nat -- a 2D index
inductive TileState where

105
flake.lock generated
View File

@@ -1,31 +1,12 @@
{
"nodes": {
"flake-compat": {
"flake": false,
"locked": {
"lastModified": 1673956053,
"narHash": "sha256-4gtG9iQuiKITOjNQQeQIpoIB6b16fm+504Ch3sNKLd8=",
"owner": "edolstra",
"repo": "flake-compat",
"rev": "35bb57c0c8d8b62bbfd284272c928ceb64ddbde9",
"type": "github"
},
"original": {
"owner": "edolstra",
"repo": "flake-compat",
"type": "github"
}
},
"flake-utils": {
"inputs": {
"systems": "systems"
},
"locked": {
"lastModified": 1710146030,
"narHash": "sha256-SZ5L6eA7HJ/nmkzGG7/ISclqe6oZdOZTNoesiInkXPQ=",
"lastModified": 1656928814,
"narHash": "sha256-RIFfgBuKz6Hp89yRr7+NR5tzIAbn52h8vT6vXkYjZoM=",
"owner": "numtide",
"repo": "flake-utils",
"rev": "b1d9ab70662946ef0850d488da1c9019f3a9752a",
"rev": "7e2a3b3dfd9af950a856d66b0a7d01e3c18aa249",
"type": "github"
},
"original": {
@@ -37,11 +18,11 @@
"lean4-mode": {
"flake": false,
"locked": {
"lastModified": 1709737301,
"narHash": "sha256-uT9JN2kLNKJK9c/S/WxLjiHmwijq49EgLb+gJUSDpz0=",
"lastModified": 1676498134,
"narHash": "sha256-u3WvyKxOViZG53hkb8wd2/Og6muTecbh+NdflIgVeyk=",
"owner": "leanprover",
"repo": "lean4-mode",
"rev": "f1f24c15134dee3754b82c9d9924866fe6bc6b9f",
"rev": "2c6ef33f476fdf5eb5e4fa4fa023ba8b11372440",
"type": "github"
},
"original": {
@@ -50,35 +31,34 @@
"type": "github"
}
},
"libgit2": {
"lowdown-src": {
"flake": false,
"locked": {
"lastModified": 1697646580,
"narHash": "sha256-oX4Z3S9WtJlwvj0uH9HlYcWv+x1hqp8mhXl7HsLu2f0=",
"owner": "libgit2",
"repo": "libgit2",
"rev": "45fd9ed7ae1a9b74b957ef4f337bc3c8b3df01b5",
"lastModified": 1633514407,
"narHash": "sha256-Dw32tiMjdK9t3ETl5fzGrutQTzh2rufgZV4A/BbxuD4=",
"owner": "kristapsdz",
"repo": "lowdown",
"rev": "d2c2b44ff6c27b936ec27358a2653caaef8f73b8",
"type": "github"
},
"original": {
"owner": "libgit2",
"repo": "libgit2",
"owner": "kristapsdz",
"repo": "lowdown",
"type": "github"
}
},
"nix": {
"inputs": {
"flake-compat": "flake-compat",
"libgit2": "libgit2",
"lowdown-src": "lowdown-src",
"nixpkgs": "nixpkgs",
"nixpkgs-regression": "nixpkgs-regression"
},
"locked": {
"lastModified": 1711102798,
"narHash": "sha256-CXOIJr8byjolqG7eqCLa+Wfi7rah62VmLoqSXENaZnw=",
"lastModified": 1657097207,
"narHash": "sha256-SmeGmjWM3fEed3kQjqIAO8VpGmkC2sL1aPE7kKpK650=",
"owner": "NixOS",
"repo": "nix",
"rev": "a22328066416650471c3545b0b138669ea212ab4",
"rev": "f6316b49a0c37172bca87ede6ea8144d7d89832f",
"type": "github"
},
"original": {
@@ -89,33 +69,16 @@
},
"nixpkgs": {
"locked": {
"lastModified": 1709083642,
"narHash": "sha256-7kkJQd4rZ+vFrzWu8sTRtta5D1kBG0LSRYAfhtmMlSo=",
"lastModified": 1653988320,
"narHash": "sha256-ZaqFFsSDipZ6KVqriwM34T739+KLYJvNmCWzErjAg7c=",
"owner": "NixOS",
"repo": "nixpkgs",
"rev": "b550fe4b4776908ac2a861124307045f8e717c8e",
"rev": "2fa57ed190fd6c7c746319444f34b5917666e5c1",
"type": "github"
},
"original": {
"owner": "NixOS",
"ref": "release-23.11",
"repo": "nixpkgs",
"type": "github"
}
},
"nixpkgs-old": {
"flake": false,
"locked": {
"lastModified": 1581379743,
"narHash": "sha256-i1XCn9rKuLjvCdu2UeXKzGLF6IuQePQKFt4hEKRU5oc=",
"owner": "NixOS",
"repo": "nixpkgs",
"rev": "34c7eb7545d155cc5b6f499b23a7cb1c96ab4d59",
"type": "github"
},
"original": {
"owner": "NixOS",
"ref": "nixos-19.03",
"ref": "nixos-22.05-small",
"repo": "nixpkgs",
"type": "github"
}
@@ -138,11 +101,11 @@
},
"nixpkgs_2": {
"locked": {
"lastModified": 1710889954,
"narHash": "sha256-Pr6F5Pmd7JnNEMHHmspZ0qVqIBVxyZ13ik1pJtm2QXk=",
"lastModified": 1686089707,
"narHash": "sha256-LTNlJcru2qJ0XhlhG9Acp5KyjB774Pza3tRH0pKIb3o=",
"owner": "NixOS",
"repo": "nixpkgs",
"rev": "7872526e9c5332274ea5932a0c3270d6e4724f3b",
"rev": "af21c31b2a1ec5d361ed8050edd0303c31306397",
"type": "github"
},
"original": {
@@ -157,23 +120,7 @@
"flake-utils": "flake-utils",
"lean4-mode": "lean4-mode",
"nix": "nix",
"nixpkgs": "nixpkgs_2",
"nixpkgs-old": "nixpkgs-old"
}
},
"systems": {
"locked": {
"lastModified": 1681028828,
"narHash": "sha256-Vy1rq5AaRuLzOxct8nz4T6wlgyUR7zLU309k9mBC768=",
"owner": "nix-systems",
"repo": "default",
"rev": "da67096a3b9bf56a91d16901293e51ba5b49a27e",
"type": "github"
},
"original": {
"owner": "nix-systems",
"repo": "default",
"type": "github"
"nixpkgs": "nixpkgs_2"
}
}
},

View File

@@ -2,9 +2,6 @@
description = "Lean interactive theorem prover";
inputs.nixpkgs.url = "github:NixOS/nixpkgs/nixpkgs-unstable";
# old nixpkgs used for portable release with older glibc (2.27)
inputs.nixpkgs-old.url = "github:NixOS/nixpkgs/nixos-19.03";
inputs.nixpkgs-old.flake = false;
inputs.flake-utils.url = "github:numtide/flake-utils";
inputs.nix.url = "github:NixOS/nix";
inputs.lean4-mode = {
@@ -20,41 +17,14 @@
# inputs.lean4-mode.follows = "lean4-mode";
#};
outputs = { self, nixpkgs, nixpkgs-old, flake-utils, nix, lean4-mode, ... }@inputs: flake-utils.lib.eachDefaultSystem (system:
outputs = { self, nixpkgs, flake-utils, nix, lean4-mode, ... }@inputs: flake-utils.lib.eachDefaultSystem (system:
let
pkgs = import nixpkgs {
inherit system;
# for `vscode-with-extensions`
config.allowUnfree = true;
};
# An old nixpkgs for creating releases with an old glibc
pkgsDist-old = import nixpkgs-old { inherit system; };
# An old nixpkgs for creating releases with an old glibc
pkgsDist-old-aarch = import nixpkgs-old { localSystem.config = "aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu"; };
lean-packages = pkgs.callPackage (./nix/packages.nix) { src = ./.; inherit nix lean4-mode; };
devShellWithDist = pkgsDist: pkgs.mkShell.override {
stdenv = pkgs.overrideCC pkgs.stdenv lean-packages.llvmPackages.clang;
} ({
buildInputs = with pkgs; [
cmake gmp ccache
lean-packages.llvmPackages.llvm # llvm-symbolizer for asan/lsan
# TODO: only add when proven to not affect the flakification
#pkgs.python3
];
# https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/60919
hardeningDisable = [ "all" ];
# more convenient `ctest` output
CTEST_OUTPUT_ON_FAILURE = 1;
} // pkgs.lib.optionalAttrs pkgs.stdenv.isLinux {
GMP = pkgsDist.gmp.override { withStatic = true; };
GLIBC = pkgsDist.glibc;
GLIBC_DEV = pkgsDist.glibc.dev;
GCC_LIB = pkgsDist.gcc.cc.lib;
ZLIB = pkgsDist.zlib;
GDB = pkgsDist.gdb;
});
in {
packages = lean-packages // rec {
debug = lean-packages.override { debug = true; };
@@ -79,10 +49,7 @@
};
defaultPackage = lean-packages.lean-all;
# The default development shell for working on lean itself
devShells.default = devShellWithDist pkgs;
devShells.oldGlibc = devShellWithDist pkgsDist-old;
devShells.oldGlibcAArch = devShellWithDist pkgsDist-old-aarch;
inherit (lean-packages) devShell;
checks.lean = lean-packages.test;
}) // rec {

View File

@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ rec {
installPhase = ''
mkdir -p $out/bin $out/lib/lean
mv bin/lean $out/bin/
mv lib/lean/*.{so,dylib} $out/lib/lean
mv lib/lean/*.so $out/lib/lean
'';
meta.mainProgram = "lean";
});
@@ -170,17 +170,16 @@ rec {
ln -sf ${lean-all}/* .
'';
buildPhase = ''
ctest --output-junit test-results.xml --output-on-failure -E 'leancomptest_(doc_example|foreign)' -j$NIX_BUILD_CORES
ctest --output-on-failure -E 'leancomptest_(doc_example|foreign)' -j$NIX_BUILD_CORES
'';
installPhase = ''
mkdir $out
mv test-results.xml $out
touch $out
'';
};
update-stage0 =
let cTree = symlinkJoin { name = "cs"; paths = [ Init.cTree Lean.cTree ]; }; in
writeShellScriptBin "update-stage0" ''
CSRCS=${cTree} CP_C_PARAMS="--dereference --no-preserve=all" ${src + "/script/lib/update-stage0"}
CSRCS=${cTree} CP_C_PARAMS="--dereference --no-preserve=all" ${src + "/script/update-stage0"}
'';
update-stage0-commit = writeShellScriptBin "update-stage0-commit" ''
set -euo pipefail

View File

@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ with builtins; let
# make local "copy" so `drv`'s Nix store path doesn't end up in ccache's hash
ln -s ${drv.c}/${drv.cPath} src.c
# on the other hand, a debug build is pretty fast anyway, so preserve the path for gdb
leanc -c -o $out/$oPath $leancFlags -fPIC ${if debug then "${drv.c}/${drv.cPath} -g" else "src.c -O3 -DNDEBUG -DLEAN_EXPORTING"}
leanc -c -o $out/$oPath $leancFlags -fPIC ${if debug then "${drv.c}/${drv.cPath} -g" else "src.c -O3 -DNDEBUG"}
'';
};
mkMod = mod: deps:

View File

@@ -1,28 +0,0 @@
import Lean.Util.Profiler
/-!
Usage:
```sh
lean --run ./script/collideProfiles.lean **/*.lean.json ... > merged.json
```
Merges multiple `trace.profiler.output` profiles into a single one while deduplicating samples with
the same stack. This is useful for building cumulative profiles of medium-to-large projects because
Firefox Profiler cannot handle hundreds of tracks and the deduplication will also ensure that the
profile is small enough for uploading.
As ordering of samples is not meaningful after this transformation, only "Call Tree" and "Flame
Graph" are useful for such profiles.
-/
open Lean
def main (args : List String) : IO Unit := do
let profiles args.toArray.mapM fun path => do
let json IO.FS.readFile path
let profile IO.ofExcept $ Json.parse json
IO.ofExcept <| fromJson? profile
-- NOTE: `collide` should not be interpreted
let profile := Firefox.Profile.collide profiles
IO.println <| Json.compress <| toJson profile

View File

@@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
#!/bin/bash
# https://chat.openai.com/share/7469c7c3-aceb-4d80-aee5-62982e1f1538
# Output CSV Header
echo '"Issue URL","Title","Days Since Creation","Days Since Last Update","Total Reactions","Assignee","Labels"'
# Get the current date in YYYY-MM-DD format
today=$(date +%Y-%m-%d)
# Fetch only open issues (excluding PRs and closed issues) from the repository 'leanprover/lean4'
issues=$(gh api repos/leanprover/lean4/issues --paginate --jq '.[] | select(.pull_request == null and .state == "open") | {url: .html_url, title: .title, created_at: (.created_at | split("T")[0]), updated_at: (.updated_at | split("T")[0]), number: .number, assignee: (.assignee.login // ""), labels: [.labels[].name] | join(",")}')
# Process each JSON object
echo "$issues" | while IFS= read -r issue; do
# Extract fields from JSON
url=$(echo "$issue" | jq -r '.url')
title=$(echo "$issue" | jq -r '.title')
created_at=$(echo "$issue" | jq -r '.created_at')
updated_at=$(echo "$issue" | jq -r '.updated_at')
issue_number=$(echo "$issue" | jq -r '.number')
assignee=$(echo "$issue" | jq -r '.assignee')
labels=$(echo "$issue" | jq -r '.labels')
# Calculate days since creation and update using macOS compatible date calculation
days_since_created=$(( ($(date -jf "%Y-%m-%d" "$today" +%s) - $(date -jf "%Y-%m-%d" "$created_at" +%s)) / 86400 ))
days_since_updated=$(( ($(date -jf "%Y-%m-%d" "$today" +%s) - $(date -jf "%Y-%m-%d" "$updated_at" +%s)) / 86400 ))
# Fetch the total number of reactions for each issue
reaction_data=$(gh api repos/leanprover/lean4/issues/$issue_number/reactions --paginate --jq 'length' 2>&1)
if [[ $reaction_data == *"Not Found"* ]]; then
total_reactions="Error fetching reactions"
else
total_reactions=$reaction_data
fi
# Format output as CSV by escaping quotes and delimiting with commas
echo "\"$url\",\"${title//\"/\"\"}\",\"$days_since_created\",\"$days_since_updated\",\"$total_reactions\",\"$assignee\",\"$labels\""
done

View File

@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
This directory contains various scripts that are *not* meant to be called
directly, but through other scripts or makefiles.

View File

@@ -1,19 +0,0 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Script internal to `./script/rebase-stage0.sh`
# Determine OS type for sed in-place editing
SED_CMD=("sed" "-i")
if [[ "$OSTYPE" == "darwin"* ]]
then
# macOS requires an empty string argument with -i for in-place editing
SED_CMD=("sed" "-i" "")
fi
if [ "$STAGE0_WITH_NIX" = true ]
then
"${SED_CMD[@]}" '/chore: update stage0/ s,.*,x nix run .#update-stage0-commit,' "$1"
else
"${SED_CMD[@]}" '/chore: update stage0/ s,.*,x make -j32 -C build/release update-stage0 \&\& git commit -m "chore: update stage0",' "$1"
fi

View File

@@ -25,8 +25,6 @@ cp -L llvm/bin/llvm-ar stage1/bin/
# dependencies of the above
$CP llvm/lib/lib{clang-cpp,LLVM}*.so* stage1/lib/
$CP $ZLIB/lib/libz.so* stage1/lib/
# general clang++ dependency, breaks cross-library C++ exceptions if linked statically
$CP $GCC_LIB/lib/libgcc_s.so* stage1/lib/
# bundle libatomic (referenced by LLVM >= 15, and required by the lean executable to run)
$CP $GCC_LIB/lib/libatomic.so* stage1/lib/
@@ -62,7 +60,7 @@ fi
# use `-nostdinc` to make sure headers are not visible by default (in particular, not to `#include_next` in the clang headers),
# but do not change sysroot so users can still link against system libs
echo -n " -DLEANC_INTERNAL_FLAGS='-nostdinc -isystem ROOT/include/clang' -DLEANC_CC=ROOT/bin/clang"
echo -n " -DLEANC_INTERNAL_LINKER_FLAGS='-L ROOT/lib -L ROOT/lib/glibc ROOT/lib/glibc/libc_nonshared.a -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-Bstatic -lgmp -lunwind -Wl,-Bdynamic -Wl,--no-as-needed -fuse-ld=lld'"
echo -n " -DLEANC_INTERNAL_LINKER_FLAGS='-L ROOT/lib -L ROOT/lib/glibc ROOT/lib/glibc/libc_nonshared.a -Wl,--as-needed -static-libgcc -Wl,-Bstatic -lgmp -lunwind -Wl,-Bdynamic -Wl,--no-as-needed -fuse-ld=lld'"
# when not using the above flags, link GMP dynamically/as usual
echo -n " -DLEAN_EXTRA_LINKER_FLAGS='-Wl,--as-needed -lgmp -Wl,--no-as-needed'"
# do not set `LEAN_CC` for tests

View File

@@ -1,24 +0,0 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# This script rebases onto the given branch/commit, and updates
# all `chore: update stage0` commits along the way.
# Whether to use nix or make to update stage0
if [ "$1" = "-nix" ]
then
export STAGE0_WITH_NIX=true
shift
fi
# Check if an argument is provided
if [ "$#" -eq 0 ]; then
echo "Usage: $0 [-nix] <options to git rebase -i>"
exit 1
fi
REPO_ROOT=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)
# Run git rebase in interactive mode, but automatically edit the todo list
# using the defined GIT_SEQUENCE_EDITOR command
GIT_SEQUENCE_EDITOR="$REPO_ROOT/script/lib/rebase-editor.sh" git rebase -i "$@"

27
shell.nix Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
let
flake = (import ./default.nix);
flakePkgs = flake.packages.${builtins.currentSystem};
in { pkgs ? flakePkgs.nixpkgs, pkgsDist ? pkgs }:
# use `shell` as default
(attribs: attribs.shell // attribs) rec {
shell = pkgs.mkShell.override {
stdenv = pkgs.overrideCC pkgs.stdenv flakePkgs.llvmPackages.clang;
} (rec {
buildInputs = with pkgs; [
cmake gmp ccache
flakePkgs.llvmPackages.llvm # llvm-symbolizer for asan/lsan
];
# https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/60919
hardeningDisable = [ "all" ];
# more convenient `ctest` output
CTEST_OUTPUT_ON_FAILURE = 1;
} // pkgs.lib.optionalAttrs pkgs.stdenv.isLinux {
GMP = pkgsDist.gmp.override { withStatic = true; };
GLIBC = pkgsDist.glibc;
GLIBC_DEV = pkgsDist.glibc.dev;
GCC_LIB = pkgsDist.gcc.cc.lib;
ZLIB = pkgsDist.zlib;
GDB = pkgsDist.gdb;
});
nix = flake.devShell.${builtins.currentSystem};
}

View File

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ endif()
include(ExternalProject)
project(LEAN CXX C)
set(LEAN_VERSION_MAJOR 4)
set(LEAN_VERSION_MINOR 9)
set(LEAN_VERSION_MINOR 7)
set(LEAN_VERSION_PATCH 0)
set(LEAN_VERSION_IS_RELEASE 0) # This number is 1 in the release revision, and 0 otherwise.
set(LEAN_SPECIAL_VERSION_DESC "" CACHE STRING "Additional version description like 'nightly-2018-03-11'")
@@ -315,12 +315,6 @@ endif()
string(APPEND TOOLCHAIN_STATIC_LINKER_FLAGS " ${LEAN_CXX_STDLIB}")
string(APPEND TOOLCHAIN_SHARED_LINKER_FLAGS " ${LEAN_CXX_STDLIB}")
# in local builds, link executables and not just dynlibs against C++ stdlib as well,
# which is required for e.g. asan
if(NOT LEAN_STANDALONE)
string(APPEND CMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS " ${LEAN_CXX_STDLIB}")
endif()
# flags for user binaries = flags for toolchain binaries + Lake
string(APPEND LEANC_STATIC_LINKER_FLAGS " ${TOOLCHAIN_STATIC_LINKER_FLAGS} -lLake")
@@ -507,18 +501,24 @@ string(REGEX REPLACE "^([a-zA-Z]):" "/\\1" LEAN_BIN "${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/bin")
# (also looks nicer in the build log)
file(RELATIVE_PATH LIB ${LEAN_SOURCE_DIR} ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib)
# set up libInit_shared only on Windows; see also stdlib.make.in
if(${CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME} MATCHES "Windows")
set(INIT_SHARED_LINKER_FLAGS "-Wl,--whole-archive ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib/temp/libInit.a.export ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/runtime/libleanrt_initial-exec.a -Wl,--no-whole-archive -Wl,--out-implib,${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib/lean/libInit_shared.dll.a")
if(${CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME} MATCHES "Darwin")
string(APPEND INIT_SHARED_LINKER_FLAGS " -Wl,-force_load,${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib/lean/libInit.a -Wl,-force_load,${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/runtime/libleanrt_initial-exec.a")
else()
string(APPEND INIT_SHARED_LINKER_FLAGS " -Wl,--whole-archive -lInit ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/runtime/libleanrt_initial-exec.a -Wl,--no-whole-archive")
if(${CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME} MATCHES "Windows")
string(APPEND INIT_SHARED_LINKER_FLAGS " -Wl,--out-implib,${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib/lean/libInit_shared.dll.a")
endif()
endif()
if(${CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME} MATCHES "Darwin")
set(LEANSHARED_LINKER_FLAGS "-Wl,-force_load,${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib/lean/libInit.a -Wl,-force_load,${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib/lean/libLean.a -Wl,-force_load,${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib/lean/libleancpp.a ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/runtime/libleanrt_initial-exec.a ${LEANSHARED_LINKER_FLAGS}")
elseif(${CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME} MATCHES "Windows")
set(LEANSHARED_LINKER_FLAGS "-Wl,--whole-archive ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib/temp/libLean.a.export -lleancpp -Wl,--no-whole-archive -lInit_shared -Wl,--out-implib,${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib/lean/libleanshared.dll.a")
string(APPEND LEANSHARED_LINKER_FLAGS " -Wl,-force_load,${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib/lean/libLean.a -Wl,-force_load,${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib/lean/libleancpp.a")
else()
set(LEANSHARED_LINKER_FLAGS "-Wl,--whole-archive -lInit -lLean -lleancpp -Wl,--no-whole-archive ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/runtime/libleanrt_initial-exec.a ${LEANSHARED_LINKER_FLAGS}")
string(APPEND LEANSHARED_LINKER_FLAGS " -Wl,--whole-archive -lLean -lleancpp -Wl,--no-whole-archive")
if(${CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME} MATCHES "Windows")
string(APPEND LEANSHARED_LINKER_FLAGS " -Wl,--out-implib,${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib/lean/libleanshared.dll.a")
endif()
endif()
string(APPEND LEANSHARED_LINKER_FLAGS " -lInit_shared")
if (${CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME} MATCHES "Emscripten")
# We do not use dynamic linking via leanshared for Emscripten to keep things
@@ -591,13 +591,9 @@ endif()
if(PREV_STAGE)
add_custom_target(update-stage0
COMMAND bash -c 'CSRCS=${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib/temp script/lib/update-stage0'
COMMAND bash -c 'CSRCS=${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib/temp script/update-stage0'
DEPENDS make_stdlib
WORKING_DIRECTORY "${LEAN_SOURCE_DIR}/..")
add_custom_target(update-stage0-commit
COMMAND git commit -m "chore: update stage0"
DEPENDS update-stage0)
endif()
# use Bash version for building, use Lean version in bin/ for tests & distribution

View File

@@ -33,5 +33,3 @@ import Init.SizeOfLemmas
import Init.BinderPredicates
import Init.Ext
import Init.Omega
import Init.MacroTrace
import Init.Grind

View File

@@ -21,9 +21,9 @@ macro_rules
/-! ## if-then-else -/
@[simp] theorem if_true {_ : Decidable True} (t e : α) : ite True t e = t := if_pos trivial
@[simp] theorem if_true {h : Decidable True} (t e : α) : ite True t e = t := if_pos trivial
@[simp] theorem if_false {_ : Decidable False} (t e : α) : ite False t e = e := if_neg id
@[simp] theorem if_false {h : Decidable False} (t e : α) : ite False t e = e := if_neg id
theorem ite_id [Decidable c] {α} (t : α) : (if c then t else t) = t := by split <;> rfl
@@ -37,6 +37,15 @@ theorem apply_ite (f : α → β) (P : Prop) [Decidable P] (x y : α) :
f (ite P x y) = ite P (f x) (f y) :=
apply_dite f P (fun _ => x) (fun _ => y)
/-- Negation of the condition `P : Prop` in a `dite` is the same as swapping the branches. -/
@[simp] theorem dite_not (P : Prop) {_ : Decidable P} (x : ¬P α) (y : ¬¬P α) :
dite (¬P) x y = dite P (fun h => y (not_not_intro h)) x := by
by_cases h : P <;> simp [h]
/-- Negation of the condition `P : Prop` in a `ite` is the same as swapping the branches. -/
@[simp] theorem ite_not (P : Prop) {_ : Decidable P} (x y : α) : ite (¬P) x y = ite P y x :=
dite_not P (fun _ => x) (fun _ => y)
@[simp] theorem dite_eq_left_iff {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {B : ¬ P α} :
dite P (fun _ => a) B = a h, B h = a := by
by_cases P <;> simp [*, forall_prop_of_true, forall_prop_of_false]
@@ -63,16 +72,3 @@ theorem ite_some_none_eq_none [Decidable P] :
@[simp] theorem ite_some_none_eq_some [Decidable P] :
(if P then some x else none) = some y P x = y := by
split <;> simp_all
-- This is not marked as `simp` as it is already handled by `dite_eq_right_iff`.
theorem dite_some_none_eq_none [Decidable P] {x : P α} :
(if h : P then some (x h) else none) = none ¬P := by
simp only [dite_eq_right_iff]
rfl
@[simp] theorem dite_some_none_eq_some [Decidable P] {x : P α} {y : α} :
(if h : P then some (x h) else none) = some y h : P, x h = y := by
by_cases h : P <;> simp only [h, dite_cond_eq_true, dite_cond_eq_false, Option.some.injEq,
false_iff, not_exists]
case pos => exact fun h_eq Exists.intro h h_eq, fun h_exists => h_exists.2
case neg => exact fun h_false _ h_false

View File

@@ -15,13 +15,6 @@ namespace Classical
noncomputable def indefiniteDescription {α : Sort u} (p : α Prop) (h : x, p x) : {x // p x} :=
choice <| let x, px := h; x, px
/--
Given that there exists an element satisfying `p`, returns one such element.
This is a straightforward consequence of, and equivalent to, `Classical.choice`.
See also `choose_spec`, which asserts that the returned value has property `p`.
-/
noncomputable def choose {α : Sort u} {p : α Prop} (h : x, p x) : α :=
(indefiniteDescription p h).val
@@ -132,15 +125,16 @@ theorem byContradiction {p : Prop} (h : ¬p → False) : p :=
/-- The Double Negation Theorem: `¬¬P` is equivalent to `P`.
The left-to-right direction, double negation elimination (DNE),
is classically true but not constructively. -/
@[simp] theorem not_not : ¬¬a a := Decidable.not_not
@[scoped simp] theorem not_not : ¬¬a a := Decidable.not_not
@[simp low] theorem not_forall {p : α Prop} : (¬ x, p x) x, ¬p x := Decidable.not_forall
@[simp] theorem not_forall {p : α Prop} : (¬ x, p x) x, ¬p x := Decidable.not_forall
theorem not_forall_not {p : α Prop} : (¬ x, ¬p x) x, p x := Decidable.not_forall_not
theorem not_exists_not {p : α Prop} : (¬ x, ¬p x) x, p x := Decidable.not_exists_not
theorem forall_or_exists_not (P : α Prop) : ( a, P a) a, ¬ P a := by
rw [ not_forall]; exact em _
theorem exists_or_forall_not (P : α Prop) : ( a, P a) a, ¬ P a := by
rw [ not_exists]; exact em _
@@ -153,22 +147,8 @@ theorem not_and_iff_or_not_not : ¬(a ∧ b) ↔ ¬a ¬b := Decidable.not_an
theorem not_iff : ¬(a b) (¬a b) := Decidable.not_iff
@[simp] theorem imp_iff_left_iff : (b a b) a b := Decidable.imp_iff_left_iff
@[simp] theorem imp_iff_right_iff : (a b b) a b := Decidable.imp_iff_right_iff
@[simp] theorem and_or_imp : a b (a c) a b c := Decidable.and_or_imp
@[simp] theorem not_imp : ¬(a b) a ¬b := Decidable.not_imp_iff_and_not
@[simp] theorem imp_and_neg_imp_iff (p q : Prop) : (p q) (¬p q) q :=
Iff.intro (fun (a : _ _) => (Classical.em p).rec a.left a.right)
(fun a => And.intro (fun _ => a) (fun _ => a))
end Classical
/- Export for Mathlib compat. -/
export Classical (imp_iff_right_iff imp_and_neg_imp_iff and_or_imp not_imp)
/-- Extract an element from a existential statement, using `Classical.choose`. -/
-- This enables projection notation.
@[reducible] noncomputable def Exists.choose {p : α Prop} (P : a, p a) : α := Classical.choose P

View File

@@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ Helper definition used by the elaborator. It is not meant to be used directly by
This is used for coercions between monads, in the case where we want to apply
a monad lift and a coercion on the result type at the same time.
-/
@[coe_decl] abbrev Lean.Internal.liftCoeM {m : Type u Type v} {n : Type u Type w} {α β : Type u}
@[inline, coe_decl] def Lean.Internal.liftCoeM {m : Type u Type v} {n : Type u Type w} {α β : Type u}
[MonadLiftT m n] [ a, CoeT α a β] [Monad n] (x : m α) : n β := do
let a liftM x
pure (CoeT.coe a)
@@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ Helper definition used by the elaborator. It is not meant to be used directly by
This is used for coercing the result type under a monad.
-/
@[coe_decl] abbrev Lean.Internal.coeM {m : Type u Type v} {α β : Type u}
@[inline, coe_decl] def Lean.Internal.coeM {m : Type u Type v} {α β : Type u}
[ a, CoeT α a β] [Monad m] (x : m α) : m β := do
let a x
pure (CoeT.coe a)

View File

@@ -20,29 +20,8 @@ def Functor.discard {f : Type u → Type v} {α : Type u} [Functor f] (x : f α)
export Functor (discard)
/--
An `Alternative` functor is an `Applicative` functor that can "fail" or be "empty"
and a binary operation `<|>` that “collects values” or finds the “left-most success”.
Important instances include
* `Option`, where `failure := none` and `<|>` returns the left-most `some`.
* Parser combinators typically provide an `Applicative` instance for error-handling and
backtracking.
Error recovery and state can interact subtly. For example, the implementation of `Alternative` for `OptionT (StateT σ Id)` keeps modifications made to the state while recovering from failure, while `StateT σ (OptionT Id)` discards them.
-/
-- NB: List instance is in mathlib. Once upstreamed, add
-- * `List`, where `failure` is the empty list and `<|>` concatenates.
class Alternative (f : Type u Type v) extends Applicative f : Type (max (u+1) v) where
/--
Produces an empty collection or recoverable failure. The `<|>` operator collects values or recovers
from failures. See `Alternative` for more details.
-/
failure : {α : Type u} f α
/--
Depending on the `Alternative` instance, collects values or recovers from `failure`s by
returning the leftmost success. Can be written using the `<|>` operator syntax.
-/
orElse : {α : Type u} f α (Unit f α) f α
instance (f : Type u Type v) (α : Type u) [Alternative f] : OrElse (f α) := Alternative.orElse
@@ -51,15 +30,9 @@ variable {f : Type u → Type v} [Alternative f] {α : Type u}
export Alternative (failure)
/--
If the proposition `p` is true, does nothing, else fails (using `failure`).
-/
@[always_inline, inline] def guard {f : Type Type v} [Alternative f] (p : Prop) [Decidable p] : f Unit :=
if p then pure () else failure
/--
Returns `some x` if `f` succeeds with value `x`, else returns `none`.
-/
@[always_inline, inline] def optional (x : f α) : f (Option α) :=
some <$> x <|> pure none

View File

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import Init.Control.Lawful.Basic
import Init.Control.Lawful
/-!
The Exception monad transformer using CPS style.
@@ -18,7 +18,6 @@ namespace ExceptCpsT
def run {ε α : Type u} [Monad m] (x : ExceptCpsT ε m α) : m (Except ε α) :=
x _ (fun a => pure (Except.ok a)) (fun e => pure (Except.error e))
set_option linter.unusedVariables false in -- `s` unused
@[always_inline, inline]
def runK {ε α : Type u} (x : ExceptCpsT ε m α) (s : ε) (ok : α m β) (error : ε m β) : m β :=
x _ ok error

View File

@@ -4,5 +4,373 @@ Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sebastian Ullrich, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro
-/
prelude
import Init.Control.Lawful.Basic
import Init.Control.Lawful.Instances
import Init.SimpLemmas
import Init.Control.Except
import Init.Control.StateRef
open Function
@[simp] theorem monadLift_self [Monad m] (x : m α) : monadLift x = x :=
rfl
class LawfulFunctor (f : Type u Type v) [Functor f] : Prop where
map_const : (Functor.mapConst : α f β f α) = Functor.map const β
id_map (x : f α) : id <$> x = x
comp_map (g : α β) (h : β γ) (x : f α) : (h g) <$> x = h <$> g <$> x
export LawfulFunctor (map_const id_map comp_map)
attribute [simp] id_map
@[simp] theorem id_map' [Functor m] [LawfulFunctor m] (x : m α) : (fun a => a) <$> x = x :=
id_map x
class LawfulApplicative (f : Type u Type v) [Applicative f] extends LawfulFunctor f : Prop where
seqLeft_eq (x : f α) (y : f β) : x <* y = const β <$> x <*> y
seqRight_eq (x : f α) (y : f β) : x *> y = const α id <$> x <*> y
pure_seq (g : α β) (x : f α) : pure g <*> x = g <$> x
map_pure (g : α β) (x : α) : g <$> (pure x : f α) = pure (g x)
seq_pure {α β : Type u} (g : f (α β)) (x : α) : g <*> pure x = (fun h => h x) <$> g
seq_assoc {α β γ : Type u} (x : f α) (g : f (α β)) (h : f (β γ)) : h <*> (g <*> x) = ((@comp α β γ) <$> h) <*> g <*> x
comp_map g h x := (by
repeat rw [ pure_seq]
simp [seq_assoc, map_pure, seq_pure])
export LawfulApplicative (seqLeft_eq seqRight_eq pure_seq map_pure seq_pure seq_assoc)
attribute [simp] map_pure seq_pure
@[simp] theorem pure_id_seq [Applicative f] [LawfulApplicative f] (x : f α) : pure id <*> x = x := by
simp [pure_seq]
class LawfulMonad (m : Type u Type v) [Monad m] extends LawfulApplicative m : Prop where
bind_pure_comp (f : α β) (x : m α) : x >>= (fun a => pure (f a)) = f <$> x
bind_map {α β : Type u} (f : m (α β)) (x : m α) : f >>= (. <$> x) = f <*> x
pure_bind (x : α) (f : α m β) : pure x >>= f = f x
bind_assoc (x : m α) (f : α m β) (g : β m γ) : x >>= f >>= g = x >>= fun x => f x >>= g
map_pure g x := (by rw [ bind_pure_comp, pure_bind])
seq_pure g x := (by rw [ bind_map]; simp [map_pure, bind_pure_comp])
seq_assoc x g h := (by simp [ bind_pure_comp, bind_map, bind_assoc, pure_bind])
export LawfulMonad (bind_pure_comp bind_map pure_bind bind_assoc)
attribute [simp] pure_bind bind_assoc
@[simp] theorem bind_pure [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : m α) : x >>= pure = x := by
show x >>= (fun a => pure (id a)) = x
rw [bind_pure_comp, id_map]
theorem map_eq_pure_bind [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α β) (x : m α) : f <$> x = x >>= fun a => pure (f a) := by
rw [ bind_pure_comp]
theorem seq_eq_bind_map {α β : Type u} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : m (α β)) (x : m α) : f <*> x = f >>= (. <$> x) := by
rw [ bind_map]
theorem bind_congr [Bind m] {x : m α} {f g : α m β} (h : a, f a = g a) : x >>= f = x >>= g := by
simp [funext h]
@[simp] theorem bind_pure_unit [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] {x : m PUnit} : (x >>= fun _ => pure ) = x := by
rw [bind_pure]
theorem map_congr [Functor m] {x : m α} {f g : α β} (h : a, f a = g a) : (f <$> x : m β) = g <$> x := by
simp [funext h]
theorem seq_eq_bind {α β : Type u} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (mf : m (α β)) (x : m α) : mf <*> x = mf >>= fun f => f <$> x := by
rw [bind_map]
theorem seqRight_eq_bind [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : m α) (y : m β) : x *> y = x >>= fun _ => y := by
rw [seqRight_eq]
simp [map_eq_pure_bind, seq_eq_bind_map, const]
theorem seqLeft_eq_bind [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : m α) (y : m β) : x <* y = x >>= fun a => y >>= fun _ => pure a := by
rw [seqLeft_eq]; simp [map_eq_pure_bind, seq_eq_bind_map]
/--
An alternative constructor for `LawfulMonad` which has more
defaultable fields in the common case.
-/
theorem LawfulMonad.mk' (m : Type u Type v) [Monad m]
(id_map : {α} (x : m α), id <$> x = x)
(pure_bind : {α β} (x : α) (f : α m β), pure x >>= f = f x)
(bind_assoc : {α β γ} (x : m α) (f : α m β) (g : β m γ),
x >>= f >>= g = x >>= fun x => f x >>= g)
(map_const : {α β} (x : α) (y : m β),
Functor.mapConst x y = Function.const β x <$> y := by intros; rfl)
(seqLeft_eq : {α β} (x : m α) (y : m β),
x <* y = (x >>= fun a => y >>= fun _ => pure a) := by intros; rfl)
(seqRight_eq : {α β} (x : m α) (y : m β), x *> y = (x >>= fun _ => y) := by intros; rfl)
(bind_pure_comp : {α β} (f : α β) (x : m α),
x >>= (fun y => pure (f y)) = f <$> x := by intros; rfl)
(bind_map : {α β} (f : m (α β)) (x : m α), f >>= (. <$> x) = f <*> x := by intros; rfl)
: LawfulMonad m :=
have map_pure {α β} (g : α β) (x : α) : g <$> (pure x : m α) = pure (g x) := by
rw [ bind_pure_comp]; simp [pure_bind]
{ id_map, bind_pure_comp, bind_map, pure_bind, bind_assoc, map_pure,
comp_map := by simp [ bind_pure_comp, bind_assoc, pure_bind]
pure_seq := by intros; rw [ bind_map]; simp [pure_bind]
seq_pure := by intros; rw [ bind_map]; simp [map_pure, bind_pure_comp]
seq_assoc := by simp [ bind_pure_comp, bind_map, bind_assoc, pure_bind]
map_const := funext fun x => funext (map_const x)
seqLeft_eq := by simp [seqLeft_eq, bind_map, bind_pure_comp, pure_bind, bind_assoc]
seqRight_eq := fun x y => by
rw [seqRight_eq, bind_map, bind_pure_comp, bind_assoc]; simp [pure_bind, id_map] }
/-! # Id -/
namespace Id
@[simp] theorem map_eq (x : Id α) (f : α β) : f <$> x = f x := rfl
@[simp] theorem bind_eq (x : Id α) (f : α id β) : x >>= f = f x := rfl
@[simp] theorem pure_eq (a : α) : (pure a : Id α) = a := rfl
instance : LawfulMonad Id := by
refine' { .. } <;> intros <;> rfl
end Id
/-! # ExceptT -/
namespace ExceptT
theorem ext [Monad m] {x y : ExceptT ε m α} (h : x.run = y.run) : x = y := by
simp [run] at h
assumption
@[simp] theorem run_pure [Monad m] (x : α) : run (pure x : ExceptT ε m α) = pure (Except.ok x) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_lift [Monad.{u, v} m] (x : m α) : run (ExceptT.lift x : ExceptT ε m α) = (Except.ok <$> x : m (Except ε α)) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_throw [Monad m] : run (throw e : ExceptT ε m β) = pure (Except.error e) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_bind_lift [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : m α) (f : α ExceptT ε m β) : run (ExceptT.lift x >>= f : ExceptT ε m β) = x >>= fun a => run (f a) := by
simp[ExceptT.run, ExceptT.lift, bind, ExceptT.bind, ExceptT.mk, ExceptT.bindCont, map_eq_pure_bind]
@[simp] theorem bind_throw [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α ExceptT ε m β) : (throw e >>= f) = throw e := by
simp [throw, throwThe, MonadExceptOf.throw, bind, ExceptT.bind, ExceptT.bindCont, ExceptT.mk]
theorem run_bind [Monad m] (x : ExceptT ε m α)
: run (x >>= f : ExceptT ε m β)
=
run x >>= fun
| Except.ok x => run (f x)
| Except.error e => pure (Except.error e) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem lift_pure [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (a : α) : ExceptT.lift (pure a) = (pure a : ExceptT ε m α) := by
simp [ExceptT.lift, pure, ExceptT.pure]
@[simp] theorem run_map [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α β) (x : ExceptT ε m α)
: (f <$> x).run = Except.map f <$> x.run := by
simp [Functor.map, ExceptT.map, map_eq_pure_bind]
apply bind_congr
intro a; cases a <;> simp [Except.map]
protected theorem seq_eq {α β ε : Type u} [Monad m] (mf : ExceptT ε m (α β)) (x : ExceptT ε m α) : mf <*> x = mf >>= fun f => f <$> x :=
rfl
protected theorem bind_pure_comp [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α β) (x : ExceptT ε m α) : x >>= pure f = f <$> x := by
intros; rfl
protected theorem seqLeft_eq {α β ε : Type u} {m : Type u Type v} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : ExceptT ε m α) (y : ExceptT ε m β) : x <* y = const β <$> x <*> y := by
show (x >>= fun a => y >>= fun _ => pure a) = (const (α := α) β <$> x) >>= fun f => f <$> y
rw [ ExceptT.bind_pure_comp]
apply ext
simp [run_bind]
apply bind_congr
intro
| Except.error _ => simp
| Except.ok _ =>
simp [map_eq_pure_bind]; apply bind_congr; intro b;
cases b <;> simp [comp, Except.map, const]
protected theorem seqRight_eq [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : ExceptT ε m α) (y : ExceptT ε m β) : x *> y = const α id <$> x <*> y := by
show (x >>= fun _ => y) = (const α id <$> x) >>= fun f => f <$> y
rw [ ExceptT.bind_pure_comp]
apply ext
simp [run_bind]
apply bind_congr
intro a; cases a <;> simp
instance [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] : LawfulMonad (ExceptT ε m) where
id_map := by intros; apply ext; simp
map_const := by intros; rfl
seqLeft_eq := ExceptT.seqLeft_eq
seqRight_eq := ExceptT.seqRight_eq
pure_seq := by intros; apply ext; simp [ExceptT.seq_eq, run_bind]
bind_pure_comp := ExceptT.bind_pure_comp
bind_map := by intros; rfl
pure_bind := by intros; apply ext; simp [run_bind]
bind_assoc := by intros; apply ext; simp [run_bind]; apply bind_congr; intro a; cases a <;> simp
end ExceptT
/-! # Except -/
instance : LawfulMonad (Except ε) := LawfulMonad.mk'
(id_map := fun x => by cases x <;> rfl)
(pure_bind := fun a f => rfl)
(bind_assoc := fun a f g => by cases a <;> rfl)
instance : LawfulApplicative (Except ε) := inferInstance
instance : LawfulFunctor (Except ε) := inferInstance
/-! # ReaderT -/
namespace ReaderT
theorem ext {x y : ReaderT ρ m α} (h : ctx, x.run ctx = y.run ctx) : x = y := by
simp [run] at h
exact funext h
@[simp] theorem run_pure [Monad m] (a : α) (ctx : ρ) : (pure a : ReaderT ρ m α).run ctx = pure a := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_bind [Monad m] (x : ReaderT ρ m α) (f : α ReaderT ρ m β) (ctx : ρ)
: (x >>= f).run ctx = x.run ctx >>= λ a => (f a).run ctx := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_mapConst [Monad m] (a : α) (x : ReaderT ρ m β) (ctx : ρ)
: (Functor.mapConst a x).run ctx = Functor.mapConst a (x.run ctx) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_map [Monad m] (f : α β) (x : ReaderT ρ m α) (ctx : ρ)
: (f <$> x).run ctx = f <$> x.run ctx := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_monadLift [MonadLiftT n m] (x : n α) (ctx : ρ)
: (monadLift x : ReaderT ρ m α).run ctx = (monadLift x : m α) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_monadMap [MonadFunctor n m] (f : {β : Type u} n β n β) (x : ReaderT ρ m α) (ctx : ρ)
: (monadMap @f x : ReaderT ρ m α).run ctx = monadMap @f (x.run ctx) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_read [Monad m] (ctx : ρ) : (ReaderT.read : ReaderT ρ m ρ).run ctx = pure ctx := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_seq {α β : Type u} [Monad m] (f : ReaderT ρ m (α β)) (x : ReaderT ρ m α) (ctx : ρ)
: (f <*> x).run ctx = (f.run ctx <*> x.run ctx) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_seqRight [Monad m] (x : ReaderT ρ m α) (y : ReaderT ρ m β) (ctx : ρ)
: (x *> y).run ctx = (x.run ctx *> y.run ctx) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_seqLeft [Monad m] (x : ReaderT ρ m α) (y : ReaderT ρ m β) (ctx : ρ)
: (x <* y).run ctx = (x.run ctx <* y.run ctx) := rfl
instance [Monad m] [LawfulFunctor m] : LawfulFunctor (ReaderT ρ m) where
id_map := by intros; apply ext; simp
map_const := by intros; funext a b; apply ext; intros; simp [map_const]
comp_map := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [comp_map]
instance [Monad m] [LawfulApplicative m] : LawfulApplicative (ReaderT ρ m) where
seqLeft_eq := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [seqLeft_eq]
seqRight_eq := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [seqRight_eq]
pure_seq := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [pure_seq]
map_pure := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [map_pure]
seq_pure := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [seq_pure]
seq_assoc := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [seq_assoc]
instance [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] : LawfulMonad (ReaderT ρ m) where
bind_pure_comp := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [LawfulMonad.bind_pure_comp]
bind_map := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [bind_map]
pure_bind := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp
bind_assoc := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp
end ReaderT
/-! # StateRefT -/
instance [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] : LawfulMonad (StateRefT' ω σ m) :=
inferInstanceAs (LawfulMonad (ReaderT (ST.Ref ω σ) m))
/-! # StateT -/
namespace StateT
theorem ext {x y : StateT σ m α} (h : s, x.run s = y.run s) : x = y :=
funext h
@[simp] theorem run'_eq [Monad m] (x : StateT σ m α) (s : σ) : run' x s = (·.1) <$> run x s :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem run_pure [Monad m] (a : α) (s : σ) : (pure a : StateT σ m α).run s = pure (a, s) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_bind [Monad m] (x : StateT σ m α) (f : α StateT σ m β) (s : σ)
: (x >>= f).run s = x.run s >>= λ p => (f p.1).run p.2 := by
simp [bind, StateT.bind, run]
@[simp] theorem run_map {α β σ : Type u} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α β) (x : StateT σ m α) (s : σ) : (f <$> x).run s = (fun (p : α × σ) => (f p.1, p.2)) <$> x.run s := by
simp [Functor.map, StateT.map, run, map_eq_pure_bind]
@[simp] theorem run_get [Monad m] (s : σ) : (get : StateT σ m σ).run s = pure (s, s) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_set [Monad m] (s s' : σ) : (set s' : StateT σ m PUnit).run s = pure (, s') := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_modify [Monad m] (f : σ σ) (s : σ) : (modify f : StateT σ m PUnit).run s = pure (, f s) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_modifyGet [Monad m] (f : σ α × σ) (s : σ) : (modifyGet f : StateT σ m α).run s = pure ((f s).1, (f s).2) := by
simp [modifyGet, MonadStateOf.modifyGet, StateT.modifyGet, run]
@[simp] theorem run_lift {α σ : Type u} [Monad m] (x : m α) (s : σ) : (StateT.lift x : StateT σ m α).run s = x >>= fun a => pure (a, s) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_bind_lift {α σ : Type u} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : m α) (f : α StateT σ m β) (s : σ) : (StateT.lift x >>= f).run s = x >>= fun a => (f a).run s := by
simp [StateT.lift, StateT.run, bind, StateT.bind]
@[simp] theorem run_monadLift {α σ : Type u} [Monad m] [MonadLiftT n m] (x : n α) (s : σ) : (monadLift x : StateT σ m α).run s = (monadLift x : m α) >>= fun a => pure (a, s) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_monadMap [Monad m] [MonadFunctor n m] (f : {β : Type u} n β n β) (x : StateT σ m α) (s : σ)
: (monadMap @f x : StateT σ m α).run s = monadMap @f (x.run s) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_seq {α β σ : Type u} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : StateT σ m (α β)) (x : StateT σ m α) (s : σ) : (f <*> x).run s = (f.run s >>= fun fs => (fun (p : α × σ) => (fs.1 p.1, p.2)) <$> x.run fs.2) := by
show (f >>= fun g => g <$> x).run s = _
simp
@[simp] theorem run_seqRight [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : StateT σ m α) (y : StateT σ m β) (s : σ) : (x *> y).run s = (x.run s >>= fun p => y.run p.2) := by
show (x >>= fun _ => y).run s = _
simp
@[simp] theorem run_seqLeft {α β σ : Type u} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : StateT σ m α) (y : StateT σ m β) (s : σ) : (x <* y).run s = (x.run s >>= fun p => y.run p.2 >>= fun p' => pure (p.1, p'.2)) := by
show (x >>= fun a => y >>= fun _ => pure a).run s = _
simp
theorem seqRight_eq [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : StateT σ m α) (y : StateT σ m β) : x *> y = const α id <$> x <*> y := by
apply ext; intro s
simp [map_eq_pure_bind, const]
apply bind_congr; intro p; cases p
simp [Prod.eta]
theorem seqLeft_eq [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : StateT σ m α) (y : StateT σ m β) : x <* y = const β <$> x <*> y := by
apply ext; intro s
simp [map_eq_pure_bind]
instance [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] : LawfulMonad (StateT σ m) where
id_map := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp[Prod.eta]
map_const := by intros; rfl
seqLeft_eq := seqLeft_eq
seqRight_eq := seqRight_eq
pure_seq := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp
bind_pure_comp := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp; apply LawfulMonad.bind_pure_comp
bind_map := by intros; rfl
pure_bind := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp
bind_assoc := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp
end StateT
/-! # EStateM -/
instance : LawfulMonad (EStateM ε σ) := .mk'
(id_map := fun x => funext <| fun s => by
dsimp only [EStateM.instMonadEStateM, EStateM.map]
match x s with
| .ok _ _ => rfl
| .error _ _ => rfl)
(pure_bind := fun _ _ => rfl)
(bind_assoc := fun x _ _ => funext <| fun s => by
dsimp only [EStateM.instMonadEStateM, EStateM.bind]
match x s with
| .ok _ _ => rfl
| .error _ _ => rfl)
(map_const := fun _ _ => rfl)
/-! # Option -/
instance : LawfulMonad Option := LawfulMonad.mk'
(id_map := fun x => by cases x <;> rfl)
(pure_bind := fun x f => rfl)
(bind_assoc := fun x f g => by cases x <;> rfl)
(bind_pure_comp := fun f x => by cases x <;> rfl)
instance : LawfulApplicative Option := inferInstance
instance : LawfulFunctor Option := inferInstance

View File

@@ -1,169 +0,0 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sebastian Ullrich, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro
-/
prelude
import Init.SimpLemmas
import Init.Meta
open Function
@[simp] theorem monadLift_self [Monad m] (x : m α) : monadLift x = x :=
rfl
/--
The `Functor` typeclass only contains the operations of a functor.
`LawfulFunctor` further asserts that these operations satisfy the laws of a functor,
including the preservation of the identity and composition laws:
```
id <$> x = x
(h ∘ g) <$> x = h <$> g <$> x
```
-/
class LawfulFunctor (f : Type u Type v) [Functor f] : Prop where
map_const : (Functor.mapConst : α f β f α) = Functor.map const β
id_map (x : f α) : id <$> x = x
comp_map (g : α β) (h : β γ) (x : f α) : (h g) <$> x = h <$> g <$> x
export LawfulFunctor (map_const id_map comp_map)
attribute [simp] id_map
@[simp] theorem id_map' [Functor m] [LawfulFunctor m] (x : m α) : (fun a => a) <$> x = x :=
id_map x
/--
The `Applicative` typeclass only contains the operations of an applicative functor.
`LawfulApplicative` further asserts that these operations satisfy the laws of an applicative functor:
```
pure id <*> v = v
pure (·∘·) <*> u <*> v <*> w = u <*> (v <*> w)
pure f <*> pure x = pure (f x)
u <*> pure y = pure (· y) <*> u
```
-/
class LawfulApplicative (f : Type u Type v) [Applicative f] extends LawfulFunctor f : Prop where
seqLeft_eq (x : f α) (y : f β) : x <* y = const β <$> x <*> y
seqRight_eq (x : f α) (y : f β) : x *> y = const α id <$> x <*> y
pure_seq (g : α β) (x : f α) : pure g <*> x = g <$> x
map_pure (g : α β) (x : α) : g <$> (pure x : f α) = pure (g x)
seq_pure {α β : Type u} (g : f (α β)) (x : α) : g <*> pure x = (fun h => h x) <$> g
seq_assoc {α β γ : Type u} (x : f α) (g : f (α β)) (h : f (β γ)) : h <*> (g <*> x) = ((@comp α β γ) <$> h) <*> g <*> x
comp_map g h x := (by
repeat rw [ pure_seq]
simp [seq_assoc, map_pure, seq_pure])
export LawfulApplicative (seqLeft_eq seqRight_eq pure_seq map_pure seq_pure seq_assoc)
attribute [simp] map_pure seq_pure
@[simp] theorem pure_id_seq [Applicative f] [LawfulApplicative f] (x : f α) : pure id <*> x = x := by
simp [pure_seq]
/--
The `Monad` typeclass only contains the operations of a monad.
`LawfulMonad` further asserts that these operations satisfy the laws of a monad,
including associativity and identity laws for `bind`:
```
pure x >>= f = f x
x >>= pure = x
x >>= f >>= g = x >>= (fun x => f x >>= g)
```
`LawfulMonad.mk'` is an alternative constructor containing useful defaults for many fields.
-/
class LawfulMonad (m : Type u Type v) [Monad m] extends LawfulApplicative m : Prop where
bind_pure_comp (f : α β) (x : m α) : x >>= (fun a => pure (f a)) = f <$> x
bind_map {α β : Type u} (f : m (α β)) (x : m α) : f >>= (. <$> x) = f <*> x
pure_bind (x : α) (f : α m β) : pure x >>= f = f x
bind_assoc (x : m α) (f : α m β) (g : β m γ) : x >>= f >>= g = x >>= fun x => f x >>= g
map_pure g x := (by rw [ bind_pure_comp, pure_bind])
seq_pure g x := (by rw [ bind_map]; simp [map_pure, bind_pure_comp])
seq_assoc x g h := (by simp [ bind_pure_comp, bind_map, bind_assoc, pure_bind])
export LawfulMonad (bind_pure_comp bind_map pure_bind bind_assoc)
attribute [simp] pure_bind bind_assoc
@[simp] theorem bind_pure [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : m α) : x >>= pure = x := by
show x >>= (fun a => pure (id a)) = x
rw [bind_pure_comp, id_map]
theorem map_eq_pure_bind [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α β) (x : m α) : f <$> x = x >>= fun a => pure (f a) := by
rw [ bind_pure_comp]
theorem seq_eq_bind_map {α β : Type u} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : m (α β)) (x : m α) : f <*> x = f >>= (. <$> x) := by
rw [ bind_map]
theorem bind_congr [Bind m] {x : m α} {f g : α m β} (h : a, f a = g a) : x >>= f = x >>= g := by
simp [funext h]
@[simp] theorem bind_pure_unit [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] {x : m PUnit} : (x >>= fun _ => pure ) = x := by
rw [bind_pure]
theorem map_congr [Functor m] {x : m α} {f g : α β} (h : a, f a = g a) : (f <$> x : m β) = g <$> x := by
simp [funext h]
theorem seq_eq_bind {α β : Type u} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (mf : m (α β)) (x : m α) : mf <*> x = mf >>= fun f => f <$> x := by
rw [bind_map]
theorem seqRight_eq_bind [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : m α) (y : m β) : x *> y = x >>= fun _ => y := by
rw [seqRight_eq]
simp [map_eq_pure_bind, seq_eq_bind_map, const]
theorem seqLeft_eq_bind [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : m α) (y : m β) : x <* y = x >>= fun a => y >>= fun _ => pure a := by
rw [seqLeft_eq]; simp [map_eq_pure_bind, seq_eq_bind_map]
/--
An alternative constructor for `LawfulMonad` which has more
defaultable fields in the common case.
-/
theorem LawfulMonad.mk' (m : Type u Type v) [Monad m]
(id_map : {α} (x : m α), id <$> x = x)
(pure_bind : {α β} (x : α) (f : α m β), pure x >>= f = f x)
(bind_assoc : {α β γ} (x : m α) (f : α m β) (g : β m γ),
x >>= f >>= g = x >>= fun x => f x >>= g)
(map_const : {α β} (x : α) (y : m β),
Functor.mapConst x y = Function.const β x <$> y := by intros; rfl)
(seqLeft_eq : {α β} (x : m α) (y : m β),
x <* y = (x >>= fun a => y >>= fun _ => pure a) := by intros; rfl)
(seqRight_eq : {α β} (x : m α) (y : m β), x *> y = (x >>= fun _ => y) := by intros; rfl)
(bind_pure_comp : {α β} (f : α β) (x : m α),
x >>= (fun y => pure (f y)) = f <$> x := by intros; rfl)
(bind_map : {α β} (f : m (α β)) (x : m α), f >>= (. <$> x) = f <*> x := by intros; rfl)
: LawfulMonad m :=
have map_pure {α β} (g : α β) (x : α) : g <$> (pure x : m α) = pure (g x) := by
rw [ bind_pure_comp]; simp [pure_bind]
{ id_map, bind_pure_comp, bind_map, pure_bind, bind_assoc, map_pure,
comp_map := by simp [ bind_pure_comp, bind_assoc, pure_bind]
pure_seq := by intros; rw [ bind_map]; simp [pure_bind]
seq_pure := by intros; rw [ bind_map]; simp [map_pure, bind_pure_comp]
seq_assoc := by simp [ bind_pure_comp, bind_map, bind_assoc, pure_bind]
map_const := funext fun x => funext (map_const x)
seqLeft_eq := by simp [seqLeft_eq, bind_map, bind_pure_comp, pure_bind, bind_assoc]
seqRight_eq := fun x y => by
rw [seqRight_eq, bind_map, bind_pure_comp, bind_assoc]; simp [pure_bind, id_map] }
/-! # Id -/
namespace Id
@[simp] theorem map_eq (x : Id α) (f : α β) : f <$> x = f x := rfl
@[simp] theorem bind_eq (x : Id α) (f : α id β) : x >>= f = f x := rfl
@[simp] theorem pure_eq (a : α) : (pure a : Id α) = a := rfl
instance : LawfulMonad Id := by
refine' { .. } <;> intros <;> rfl
end Id
/-! # Option -/
instance : LawfulMonad Option := LawfulMonad.mk'
(id_map := fun x => by cases x <;> rfl)
(pure_bind := fun x f => rfl)
(bind_assoc := fun x f g => by cases x <;> rfl)
(bind_pure_comp := fun f x => by cases x <;> rfl)
instance : LawfulApplicative Option := inferInstance
instance : LawfulFunctor Option := inferInstance

View File

@@ -1,248 +0,0 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sebastian Ullrich, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro
-/
prelude
import Init.Control.Lawful.Basic
import Init.Control.Except
import Init.Control.StateRef
open Function
/-! # ExceptT -/
namespace ExceptT
theorem ext [Monad m] {x y : ExceptT ε m α} (h : x.run = y.run) : x = y := by
simp [run] at h
assumption
@[simp] theorem run_pure [Monad m] (x : α) : run (pure x : ExceptT ε m α) = pure (Except.ok x) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_lift [Monad.{u, v} m] (x : m α) : run (ExceptT.lift x : ExceptT ε m α) = (Except.ok <$> x : m (Except ε α)) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_throw [Monad m] : run (throw e : ExceptT ε m β) = pure (Except.error e) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_bind_lift [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : m α) (f : α ExceptT ε m β) : run (ExceptT.lift x >>= f : ExceptT ε m β) = x >>= fun a => run (f a) := by
simp[ExceptT.run, ExceptT.lift, bind, ExceptT.bind, ExceptT.mk, ExceptT.bindCont, map_eq_pure_bind]
@[simp] theorem bind_throw [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α ExceptT ε m β) : (throw e >>= f) = throw e := by
simp [throw, throwThe, MonadExceptOf.throw, bind, ExceptT.bind, ExceptT.bindCont, ExceptT.mk]
theorem run_bind [Monad m] (x : ExceptT ε m α)
: run (x >>= f : ExceptT ε m β)
=
run x >>= fun
| Except.ok x => run (f x)
| Except.error e => pure (Except.error e) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem lift_pure [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (a : α) : ExceptT.lift (pure a) = (pure a : ExceptT ε m α) := by
simp [ExceptT.lift, pure, ExceptT.pure]
@[simp] theorem run_map [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α β) (x : ExceptT ε m α)
: (f <$> x).run = Except.map f <$> x.run := by
simp [Functor.map, ExceptT.map, map_eq_pure_bind]
apply bind_congr
intro a; cases a <;> simp [Except.map]
protected theorem seq_eq {α β ε : Type u} [Monad m] (mf : ExceptT ε m (α β)) (x : ExceptT ε m α) : mf <*> x = mf >>= fun f => f <$> x :=
rfl
protected theorem bind_pure_comp [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α β) (x : ExceptT ε m α) : x >>= pure f = f <$> x := by
intros; rfl
protected theorem seqLeft_eq {α β ε : Type u} {m : Type u Type v} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : ExceptT ε m α) (y : ExceptT ε m β) : x <* y = const β <$> x <*> y := by
show (x >>= fun a => y >>= fun _ => pure a) = (const (α := α) β <$> x) >>= fun f => f <$> y
rw [ ExceptT.bind_pure_comp]
apply ext
simp [run_bind]
apply bind_congr
intro
| Except.error _ => simp
| Except.ok _ =>
simp [map_eq_pure_bind]; apply bind_congr; intro b;
cases b <;> simp [comp, Except.map, const]
protected theorem seqRight_eq [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : ExceptT ε m α) (y : ExceptT ε m β) : x *> y = const α id <$> x <*> y := by
show (x >>= fun _ => y) = (const α id <$> x) >>= fun f => f <$> y
rw [ ExceptT.bind_pure_comp]
apply ext
simp [run_bind]
apply bind_congr
intro a; cases a <;> simp
instance [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] : LawfulMonad (ExceptT ε m) where
id_map := by intros; apply ext; simp
map_const := by intros; rfl
seqLeft_eq := ExceptT.seqLeft_eq
seqRight_eq := ExceptT.seqRight_eq
pure_seq := by intros; apply ext; simp [ExceptT.seq_eq, run_bind]
bind_pure_comp := ExceptT.bind_pure_comp
bind_map := by intros; rfl
pure_bind := by intros; apply ext; simp [run_bind]
bind_assoc := by intros; apply ext; simp [run_bind]; apply bind_congr; intro a; cases a <;> simp
end ExceptT
/-! # Except -/
instance : LawfulMonad (Except ε) := LawfulMonad.mk'
(id_map := fun x => by cases x <;> rfl)
(pure_bind := fun a f => rfl)
(bind_assoc := fun a f g => by cases a <;> rfl)
instance : LawfulApplicative (Except ε) := inferInstance
instance : LawfulFunctor (Except ε) := inferInstance
/-! # ReaderT -/
namespace ReaderT
theorem ext {x y : ReaderT ρ m α} (h : ctx, x.run ctx = y.run ctx) : x = y := by
simp [run] at h
exact funext h
@[simp] theorem run_pure [Monad m] (a : α) (ctx : ρ) : (pure a : ReaderT ρ m α).run ctx = pure a := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_bind [Monad m] (x : ReaderT ρ m α) (f : α ReaderT ρ m β) (ctx : ρ)
: (x >>= f).run ctx = x.run ctx >>= λ a => (f a).run ctx := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_mapConst [Monad m] (a : α) (x : ReaderT ρ m β) (ctx : ρ)
: (Functor.mapConst a x).run ctx = Functor.mapConst a (x.run ctx) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_map [Monad m] (f : α β) (x : ReaderT ρ m α) (ctx : ρ)
: (f <$> x).run ctx = f <$> x.run ctx := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_monadLift [MonadLiftT n m] (x : n α) (ctx : ρ)
: (monadLift x : ReaderT ρ m α).run ctx = (monadLift x : m α) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_monadMap [MonadFunctor n m] (f : {β : Type u} n β n β) (x : ReaderT ρ m α) (ctx : ρ)
: (monadMap @f x : ReaderT ρ m α).run ctx = monadMap @f (x.run ctx) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_read [Monad m] (ctx : ρ) : (ReaderT.read : ReaderT ρ m ρ).run ctx = pure ctx := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_seq {α β : Type u} [Monad m] (f : ReaderT ρ m (α β)) (x : ReaderT ρ m α) (ctx : ρ)
: (f <*> x).run ctx = (f.run ctx <*> x.run ctx) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_seqRight [Monad m] (x : ReaderT ρ m α) (y : ReaderT ρ m β) (ctx : ρ)
: (x *> y).run ctx = (x.run ctx *> y.run ctx) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_seqLeft [Monad m] (x : ReaderT ρ m α) (y : ReaderT ρ m β) (ctx : ρ)
: (x <* y).run ctx = (x.run ctx <* y.run ctx) := rfl
instance [Monad m] [LawfulFunctor m] : LawfulFunctor (ReaderT ρ m) where
id_map := by intros; apply ext; simp
map_const := by intros; funext a b; apply ext; intros; simp [map_const]
comp_map := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [comp_map]
instance [Monad m] [LawfulApplicative m] : LawfulApplicative (ReaderT ρ m) where
seqLeft_eq := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [seqLeft_eq]
seqRight_eq := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [seqRight_eq]
pure_seq := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [pure_seq]
map_pure := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [map_pure]
seq_pure := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [seq_pure]
seq_assoc := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [seq_assoc]
instance [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] : LawfulMonad (ReaderT ρ m) where
bind_pure_comp := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [LawfulMonad.bind_pure_comp]
bind_map := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [bind_map]
pure_bind := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp
bind_assoc := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp
end ReaderT
/-! # StateRefT -/
instance [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] : LawfulMonad (StateRefT' ω σ m) :=
inferInstanceAs (LawfulMonad (ReaderT (ST.Ref ω σ) m))
/-! # StateT -/
namespace StateT
theorem ext {x y : StateT σ m α} (h : s, x.run s = y.run s) : x = y :=
funext h
@[simp] theorem run'_eq [Monad m] (x : StateT σ m α) (s : σ) : run' x s = (·.1) <$> run x s :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem run_pure [Monad m] (a : α) (s : σ) : (pure a : StateT σ m α).run s = pure (a, s) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_bind [Monad m] (x : StateT σ m α) (f : α StateT σ m β) (s : σ)
: (x >>= f).run s = x.run s >>= λ p => (f p.1).run p.2 := by
simp [bind, StateT.bind, run]
@[simp] theorem run_map {α β σ : Type u} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α β) (x : StateT σ m α) (s : σ) : (f <$> x).run s = (fun (p : α × σ) => (f p.1, p.2)) <$> x.run s := by
simp [Functor.map, StateT.map, run, map_eq_pure_bind]
@[simp] theorem run_get [Monad m] (s : σ) : (get : StateT σ m σ).run s = pure (s, s) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_set [Monad m] (s s' : σ) : (set s' : StateT σ m PUnit).run s = pure (, s') := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_modify [Monad m] (f : σ σ) (s : σ) : (modify f : StateT σ m PUnit).run s = pure (, f s) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_modifyGet [Monad m] (f : σ α × σ) (s : σ) : (modifyGet f : StateT σ m α).run s = pure ((f s).1, (f s).2) := by
simp [modifyGet, MonadStateOf.modifyGet, StateT.modifyGet, run]
@[simp] theorem run_lift {α σ : Type u} [Monad m] (x : m α) (s : σ) : (StateT.lift x : StateT σ m α).run s = x >>= fun a => pure (a, s) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_bind_lift {α σ : Type u} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : m α) (f : α StateT σ m β) (s : σ) : (StateT.lift x >>= f).run s = x >>= fun a => (f a).run s := by
simp [StateT.lift, StateT.run, bind, StateT.bind]
@[simp] theorem run_monadLift {α σ : Type u} [Monad m] [MonadLiftT n m] (x : n α) (s : σ) : (monadLift x : StateT σ m α).run s = (monadLift x : m α) >>= fun a => pure (a, s) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_monadMap [Monad m] [MonadFunctor n m] (f : {β : Type u} n β n β) (x : StateT σ m α) (s : σ)
: (monadMap @f x : StateT σ m α).run s = monadMap @f (x.run s) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_seq {α β σ : Type u} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : StateT σ m (α β)) (x : StateT σ m α) (s : σ) : (f <*> x).run s = (f.run s >>= fun fs => (fun (p : α × σ) => (fs.1 p.1, p.2)) <$> x.run fs.2) := by
show (f >>= fun g => g <$> x).run s = _
simp
@[simp] theorem run_seqRight [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : StateT σ m α) (y : StateT σ m β) (s : σ) : (x *> y).run s = (x.run s >>= fun p => y.run p.2) := by
show (x >>= fun _ => y).run s = _
simp
@[simp] theorem run_seqLeft {α β σ : Type u} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : StateT σ m α) (y : StateT σ m β) (s : σ) : (x <* y).run s = (x.run s >>= fun p => y.run p.2 >>= fun p' => pure (p.1, p'.2)) := by
show (x >>= fun a => y >>= fun _ => pure a).run s = _
simp
theorem seqRight_eq [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : StateT σ m α) (y : StateT σ m β) : x *> y = const α id <$> x <*> y := by
apply ext; intro s
simp [map_eq_pure_bind, const]
apply bind_congr; intro p; cases p
simp [Prod.eta]
theorem seqLeft_eq [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : StateT σ m α) (y : StateT σ m β) : x <* y = const β <$> x <*> y := by
apply ext; intro s
simp [map_eq_pure_bind]
instance [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] : LawfulMonad (StateT σ m) where
id_map := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp[Prod.eta]
map_const := by intros; rfl
seqLeft_eq := seqLeft_eq
seqRight_eq := seqRight_eq
pure_seq := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp
bind_pure_comp := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp; apply LawfulMonad.bind_pure_comp
bind_map := by intros; rfl
pure_bind := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp
bind_assoc := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp
end StateT
/-! # EStateM -/
instance : LawfulMonad (EStateM ε σ) := .mk'
(id_map := fun x => funext <| fun s => by
dsimp only [EStateM.instMonad, EStateM.map]
match x s with
| .ok _ _ => rfl
| .error _ _ => rfl)
(pure_bind := fun _ _ => rfl)
(bind_assoc := fun x _ _ => funext <| fun s => by
dsimp only [EStateM.instMonad, EStateM.bind]
match x s with
| .ok _ _ => rfl
| .error _ _ => rfl)
(map_const := fun _ _ => rfl)

View File

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ import Init.Control.Except
universe u v
instance : ToBool (Option α) := Option.isSome
instance : ToBool (Option α) := Option.toBool
def OptionT (m : Type u Type v) (α : Type u) : Type v :=
m (Option α)

View File

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import Init.Control.Lawful.Basic
import Init.Control.Lawful
/-!
The State monad transformer using CPS style.

View File

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Authors: Leonardo de Moura
Notation for operators defined at Prelude.lean
-/
prelude
import Init.Tactics
import Init.Meta
namespace Lean.Parser.Tactic.Conv
@@ -156,6 +156,7 @@ match [a, b] with
simplifies to `a`. -/
syntax (name := simpMatch) "simp_match" : conv
/-- Executes the given tactic block without converting `conv` goal into a regular goal. -/
syntax (name := nestedTacticCore) "tactic'" " => " tacticSeq : conv
@@ -201,7 +202,7 @@ macro (name := anyGoals) tk:"any_goals " s:convSeq : conv =>
with inaccessible names to the given names.
* `case tag₁ | tag₂ => tac` is equivalent to `(case tag₁ => tac); (case tag₂ => tac)`.
-/
macro (name := case) tk:"case " args:sepBy1(caseArg, "|") arr:" => " s:convSeq : conv =>
macro (name := case) tk:"case " args:sepBy1(caseArg, " | ") arr:" => " s:convSeq : conv =>
`(conv| tactic' => case%$tk $args|* =>%$arr conv' => ($s); all_goals rfl)
/--
@@ -210,7 +211,7 @@ has been solved after applying `tac`, nor admits the goal if `tac` failed.
Recall that `case` closes the goal using `sorry` when `tac` fails, and
the tactic execution is not interrupted.
-/
macro (name := case') tk:"case' " args:sepBy1(caseArg, "|") arr:" => " s:convSeq : conv =>
macro (name := case') tk:"case' " args:sepBy1(caseArg, " | ") arr:" => " s:convSeq : conv =>
`(conv| tactic' => case'%$tk $args|* =>%$arr conv' => $s)
/--

View File

@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ which applies to all applications of the function).
-/
@[simp] def inline {α : Sort u} (a : α) : α := a
theorem id_def {α : Sort u} (a : α) : id a = a := rfl
theorem id.def {α : Sort u} (a : α) : id a = a := rfl
/--
`flip f a b` is `f b a`. It is useful for "point-free" programming,
@@ -165,7 +165,6 @@ whose first component is `a : α` and whose second component is `b : β a`
It is sometimes known as the dependent sum type, since it is the type level version
of an indexed summation.
-/
@[pp_using_anonymous_constructor]
structure Sigma {α : Type u} (β : α Type v) where
/-- Constructor for a dependent pair. If `a : α` and `b : β a` then `⟨a, b⟩ : Sigma β`.
(This will usually require a type ascription to determine `β`
@@ -191,7 +190,6 @@ which can cause problems for universe level unification,
because the equation `max 1 u v = ?u + 1` has no solution in level arithmetic.
`PSigma` is usually only used in automation that constructs pairs of arbitrary types.
-/
@[pp_using_anonymous_constructor]
structure PSigma {α : Sort u} (β : α Sort v) where
/-- Constructor for a dependent pair. If `a : α` and `b : β a` then `⟨a, b⟩ : PSigma β`.
(This will usually require a type ascription to determine `β`
@@ -679,7 +677,7 @@ You can prove theorems about the resulting element by induction on `h`, since
theorem Eq.substr {α : Sort u} {p : α Prop} {a b : α} (h₁ : b = a) (h₂ : p a) : p b :=
h₁ h₂
@[simp] theorem cast_eq {α : Sort u} (h : α = α) (a : α) : cast h a = a :=
theorem cast_eq {α : Sort u} (h : α = α) (a : α) : cast h a = a :=
rfl
/--
@@ -739,16 +737,13 @@ theorem beq_false_of_ne [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] {a b : α} (h : a ≠ b) : (a ==
section
variable {α β φ : Sort u} {a a' : α} {b b' : β} {c : φ}
/-- Non-dependent recursor for `HEq` -/
noncomputable def HEq.ndrec.{u1, u2} {α : Sort u2} {a : α} {motive : {β : Sort u2} β Sort u1} (m : motive a) {β : Sort u2} {b : β} (h : HEq a b) : motive b :=
theorem HEq.ndrec.{u1, u2} {α : Sort u2} {a : α} {motive : {β : Sort u2} β Sort u1} (m : motive a) {β : Sort u2} {b : β} (h : HEq a b) : motive b :=
h.rec m
/-- `HEq.ndrec` variant -/
noncomputable def HEq.ndrecOn.{u1, u2} {α : Sort u2} {a : α} {motive : {β : Sort u2} β Sort u1} {β : Sort u2} {b : β} (h : HEq a b) (m : motive a) : motive b :=
theorem HEq.ndrecOn.{u1, u2} {α : Sort u2} {a : α} {motive : {β : Sort u2} β Sort u1} {β : Sort u2} {b : β} (h : HEq a b) (m : motive a) : motive b :=
h.rec m
/-- `HEq.ndrec` variant -/
noncomputable def HEq.elim {α : Sort u} {a : α} {p : α Sort v} {b : α} (h₁ : HEq a b) (h₂ : p a) : p b :=
theorem HEq.elim {α : Sort u} {a : α} {p : α Sort v} {b : α} (h₁ : HEq a b) (h₂ : p a) : p b :=
eq_of_heq h₁ h₂
theorem HEq.subst {p : (T : Sort u) T Prop} (h₁ : HEq a b) (h₂ : p α a) : p β b :=
@@ -1114,6 +1109,9 @@ theorem eta (a : {x // p x}) (h : p (val a)) : mk (val a) h = a := by
cases a
exact rfl
instance {α : Type u} {p : α Prop} {a : α} (h : p a) : Inhabited {x // p x} where
default := a, h
instance {α : Type u} {p : α Prop} [DecidableEq α] : DecidableEq {x : α // p x} :=
fun a, h₁ b, h₂ =>
if h : a = b then isTrue (by subst h; exact rfl)
@@ -1305,6 +1303,7 @@ gen_injective_theorems% Fin
gen_injective_theorems% Array
gen_injective_theorems% Sum
gen_injective_theorems% PSum
gen_injective_theorems% Nat
gen_injective_theorems% Option
gen_injective_theorems% List
gen_injective_theorems% Except
@@ -1312,12 +1311,6 @@ gen_injective_theorems% EStateM.Result
gen_injective_theorems% Lean.Name
gen_injective_theorems% Lean.Syntax
theorem Nat.succ.inj {m n : Nat} : m.succ = n.succ m = n :=
fun x => Nat.noConfusion x id
theorem Nat.succ.injEq (u v : Nat) : (u.succ = v.succ) = (u = v) :=
Eq.propIntro Nat.succ.inj (congrArg Nat.succ)
@[simp] theorem beq_iff_eq [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] (a b : α) : a == b a = b :=
eq_of_beq, by intro h; subst h; exact LawfulBEq.rfl
@@ -1410,9 +1403,9 @@ theorem false_imp_iff (a : Prop) : (False → a) ↔ True := iff_true_intro Fals
theorem true_imp_iff (α : Prop) : (True α) α := imp_iff_right True.intro
@[simp high] theorem imp_self : (a a) True := iff_true_intro id
@[simp] theorem imp_self : (a a) True := iff_true_intro id
@[simp] theorem imp_false : (a False) ¬a := Iff.rfl
theorem imp_false : (a False) ¬a := Iff.rfl
theorem imp.swap : (a b c) (b a c) := Iff.intro flip flip
@@ -1598,7 +1591,7 @@ protected def mk' {α : Sort u} [s : Setoid α] (a : α) : Quotient s :=
The analogue of `Quot.sound`: If `a` and `b` are related by the equivalence relation,
then they have equal equivalence classes.
-/
theorem sound {α : Sort u} {s : Setoid α} {a b : α} : a b Quotient.mk s a = Quotient.mk s b :=
def sound {α : Sort u} {s : Setoid α} {a b : α} : a b Quotient.mk s a = Quotient.mk s b :=
Quot.sound
/--
@@ -2037,8 +2030,4 @@ class LawfulCommIdentity (op : ααα) (o : outParam α) [hc : Commuta
left_id a := Eq.trans (hc.comm o a) (right_id a)
right_id a := Eq.trans (hc.comm a o) (left_id a)
instance : Commutative Or := fun _ _ => propext or_comm
instance : Commutative And := fun _ _ => propext and_comm
instance : Commutative Iff := fun _ _ => propext iff_comm
end Std

View File

@@ -14,7 +14,6 @@ import Init.Data.String
import Init.Data.List
import Init.Data.Int
import Init.Data.Array
import Init.Data.Array.Subarray.Split
import Init.Data.ByteArray
import Init.Data.FloatArray
import Init.Data.Fin

View File

@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ def norm [info : ContextInformation α] (ctx : α) (e : Expr) : List Nat :=
let xs := if info.isComm ctx then sort xs else xs
if info.isIdem ctx then mergeIdem xs else xs
noncomputable def List.two_step_induction
theorem List.two_step_induction
{motive : List Nat Sort u}
(l : List Nat)
(empty : motive [])

View File

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ import Init.Data.Fin.Basic
import Init.Data.UInt.Basic
import Init.Data.Repr
import Init.Data.ToString.Basic
import Init.GetElem
import Init.Util
universe u v w
namespace Array
@@ -31,7 +31,6 @@ def ofFn {n} (f : Fin n → α) : Array α := go 0 (mkEmpty n) where
go (i : Nat) (acc : Array α) : Array α :=
if h : i < n then go (i+1) (acc.push (f i, h)) else acc
termination_by n - i
decreasing_by simp_wf; decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
/-- The array `#[0, 1, ..., n - 1]`. -/
def range (n : Nat) : Array Nat :=
@@ -44,7 +43,7 @@ instance : EmptyCollection (Array α) := ⟨Array.empty⟩
instance : Inhabited (Array α) where
default := Array.empty
@[simp] def isEmpty (a : Array α) : Bool :=
def isEmpty (a : Array α) : Bool :=
a.size = 0
def singleton (v : α) : Array α :=
@@ -53,15 +52,13 @@ def singleton (v : α) : Array α :=
/-- Low-level version of `fget` which is as fast as a C array read.
`Fin` values are represented as tag pointers in the Lean runtime. Thus,
`fget` may be slightly slower than `uget`. -/
@[extern "lean_array_uget", simp]
@[extern "lean_array_uget"]
def uget (a : @& Array α) (i : USize) (h : i.toNat < a.size) : α :=
a[i.toNat]
instance : GetElem (Array α) USize α fun xs i => i.toNat < xs.size where
getElem xs i h := xs.uget i h
instance : LawfulGetElem (Array α) USize α fun xs i => i.toNat < xs.size where
def back [Inhabited α] (a : Array α) : α :=
a.get! (a.size - 1)
@@ -307,7 +304,6 @@ def mapM {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {m : Type v → Type w} [Monad m] (f : α
else
pure r
termination_by as.size - i
decreasing_by simp_wf; decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
map 0 (mkEmpty as.size)
@[inline]
@@ -380,7 +376,6 @@ def anyM {α : Type u} {m : Type → Type w} [Monad m] (p : α → m Bool) (as :
else
pure false
termination_by stop - j
decreasing_by simp_wf; decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
loop start
if h : stop as.size then
any stop h
@@ -461,13 +456,24 @@ def findRev? {α : Type} (as : Array α) (p : α → Bool) : Option α :=
@[inline]
def findIdx? {α : Type u} (as : Array α) (p : α Bool) : Option Nat :=
let rec loop (j : Nat) :=
if h : j < as.size then
if p as[j] then some j else loop (j + 1)
else none
termination_by as.size - j
decreasing_by simp_wf; decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
loop 0
let rec loop (i : Nat) (j : Nat) (inv : i + j = as.size) : Option Nat :=
if hlt : j < as.size then
match i, inv with
| 0, inv => by
apply False.elim
rw [Nat.zero_add] at inv
rw [inv] at hlt
exact absurd hlt (Nat.lt_irrefl _)
| i+1, inv =>
if p as[j] then
some j
else
have : i + (j+1) = as.size := by
rw [ inv, Nat.add_comm j 1, Nat.add_assoc]
loop i (j+1) this
else
none
loop as.size 0 rfl
def getIdx? [BEq α] (a : Array α) (v : α) : Option Nat :=
a.findIdx? fun a => a == v
@@ -561,7 +567,6 @@ def isEqvAux (a b : Array α) (hsz : a.size = b.size) (p : αα → Bool) (
else
true
termination_by a.size - i
decreasing_by simp_wf; decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
@[inline] def isEqv (a b : Array α) (p : α α Bool) : Bool :=
if h : a.size = b.size then
@@ -666,7 +671,6 @@ def indexOfAux [BEq α] (a : Array α) (v : α) (i : Nat) : Option (Fin a.size)
else indexOfAux a v (i+1)
else none
termination_by a.size - i
decreasing_by simp_wf; decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
def indexOf? [BEq α] (a : Array α) (v : α) : Option (Fin a.size) :=
indexOfAux a v 0
@@ -709,7 +713,6 @@ def popWhile (p : α → Bool) (as : Array α) : Array α :=
else
as
termination_by as.size
decreasing_by simp_wf; decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
def takeWhile (p : α Bool) (as : Array α) : Array α :=
let rec go (i : Nat) (r : Array α) : Array α :=
@@ -722,38 +725,35 @@ def takeWhile (p : α → Bool) (as : Array α) : Array α :=
else
r
termination_by as.size - i
decreasing_by simp_wf; decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
go 0 #[]
/-- Remove the element at a given index from an array without bounds checks, using a `Fin` index.
This function takes worst case O(n) time because
it has to backshift all elements at positions greater than `i`.-/
def feraseIdx (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) : Array α :=
if h : i.val + 1 < a.size then
let a' := a.swap i.val + 1, h i
let i' : Fin a'.size := i.val + 1, by simp [a', h]
a'.feraseIdx i'
def eraseIdxAux (i : Nat) (a : Array α) : Array α :=
if h : i < a.size then
let idx : Fin a.size := i, h;
let idx1 : Fin a.size := i - 1, by exact Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.pred_le i) h;
let a' := a.swap idx idx1
eraseIdxAux (i+1) a'
else
a.pop
termination_by a.size - i.val
decreasing_by simp_wf; exact Nat.sub_succ_lt_self _ _ i.isLt
termination_by a.size - i
theorem size_feraseIdx (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) : (a.feraseIdx i).size = a.size - 1 := by
induction a, i using Array.feraseIdx.induct with
| @case1 a i h a' _ ih =>
unfold feraseIdx
simp [h, a', ih]
| case2 a i h =>
unfold feraseIdx
simp [h]
def feraseIdx (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) : Array α :=
eraseIdxAux (i.val + 1) a
/-- Remove the element at a given index from an array, or do nothing if the index is out of bounds.
This function takes worst case O(n) time because
it has to backshift all elements at positions greater than `i`.-/
def eraseIdx (a : Array α) (i : Nat) : Array α :=
if h : i < a.size then a.feraseIdx i, h else a
if i < a.size then eraseIdxAux (i+1) a else a
def eraseIdxSzAux (a : Array α) (i : Nat) (r : Array α) (heq : r.size = a.size) : { r : Array α // r.size = a.size - 1 } :=
if h : i < r.size then
let idx : Fin r.size := i, h;
let idx1 : Fin r.size := i - 1, by exact Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.pred_le i) h;
eraseIdxSzAux a (i+1) (r.swap idx idx1) ((size_swap r idx idx1).trans heq)
else
r.pop, (size_pop r).trans (heq rfl)
termination_by r.size - i
def eraseIdx' (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) : { r : Array α // r.size = a.size - 1 } :=
eraseIdxSzAux a (i.val + 1) a rfl
def erase [BEq α] (as : Array α) (a : α) : Array α :=
match as.indexOf? a with
@@ -770,7 +770,6 @@ def erase [BEq α] (as : Array α) (a : α) : Array α :=
else
as
termination_by j.1
decreasing_by simp_wf; decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
let j := as.size
let as := as.push a
loop as j, size_push .. j.lt_succ_self
@@ -810,7 +809,7 @@ where
rfl
go (i : Nat) (hi : i as.size) : toListLitAux as n hsz i hi (as.data.drop i) = as.data := by
induction i <;> simp [getLit_eq, List.get_drop_eq_drop, toListLitAux, List.drop, *]
cases i <;> simp [getLit_eq, List.get_drop_eq_drop, toListLitAux, List.drop, go]
def isPrefixOfAux [BEq α] (as bs : Array α) (hle : as.size bs.size) (i : Nat) : Bool :=
if h : i < as.size then
@@ -824,7 +823,6 @@ def isPrefixOfAux [BEq α] (as bs : Array α) (hle : as.size ≤ bs.size) (i : N
else
true
termination_by as.size - i
decreasing_by simp_wf; decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
/-- Return true iff `as` is a prefix of `bs`.
That is, `bs = as ++ t` for some `t : List α`.-/
@@ -846,7 +844,6 @@ private def allDiffAux [BEq α] (as : Array α) (i : Nat) : Bool :=
else
true
termination_by as.size - i
decreasing_by simp_wf; decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
def allDiff [BEq α] (as : Array α) : Bool :=
allDiffAux as 0
@@ -862,7 +859,6 @@ def allDiff [BEq α] (as : Array α) : Bool :=
else
cs
termination_by as.size - i
decreasing_by simp_wf; decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
@[inline] def zipWith (as : Array α) (bs : Array β) (f : α β γ) : Array γ :=
zipWithAux f as bs 0 #[]

View File

@@ -48,7 +48,6 @@ where
let b f as[i]
go (i+1) acc.val.push b, by simp [acc.property] hlt
termination_by as.size - i
decreasing_by decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
@[inline] private unsafe def mapMonoMImp [Monad m] (as : Array α) (f : α m α) : m (Array α) :=
go 0 as

View File

@@ -21,8 +21,6 @@ theorem eq_of_isEqvAux [DecidableEq α] (a b : Array α) (hsz : a.size = b.size)
subst heq
exact absurd (Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le high low) (Nat.lt_irrefl j)
termination_by a.size - i
decreasing_by decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
theorem eq_of_isEqv [DecidableEq α] (a b : Array α) : Array.isEqv a b (fun x y => x = y) a = b := by
simp [Array.isEqv]
@@ -39,7 +37,6 @@ theorem isEqvAux_self [DecidableEq α] (a : Array α) (i : Nat) : Array.isEqvAux
case inl h => simp [h, isEqvAux_self a (i+1)]
case inr h => simp [h]
termination_by a.size - i
decreasing_by decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
theorem isEqv_self [DecidableEq α] (a : Array α) : Array.isEqv a a (fun x y => x = y) = true := by
simp [isEqv, isEqvAux_self]

View File

@@ -5,11 +5,9 @@ Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Nat.MinMax
import Init.Data.Nat.Lemmas
import Init.Data.List.Lemmas
import Init.Data.Fin.Basic
import Init.Data.Array.Mem
import Init.TacticsExtra
/-!
## Bootstrapping theorems about arrays
@@ -21,13 +19,6 @@ namespace Array
attribute [simp] data_toArray uset
@[simp] theorem singleton_def (v : α) : singleton v = #[v] := rfl
@[simp] theorem toArray_data : (a : Array α) a.data.toArray = a
| l => ext' (data_toArray l)
@[simp] theorem data_length {l : Array α} : l.data.length = l.size := rfl
@[simp] theorem mkEmpty_eq (α n) : @mkEmpty α n = #[] := rfl
@[simp] theorem size_toArray (as : List α) : as.toArray.size = as.length := by simp [size]
@@ -138,7 +129,6 @@ where
simp [aux (i+1), map_eq_pure_bind]; rfl
· rw [List.drop_length_le (Nat.ge_of_not_lt _)]; rfl
termination_by arr.size - i
decreasing_by decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
@[simp] theorem map_data (f : α β) (arr : Array α) : (arr.map f).data = arr.data.map f := by
rw [map, mapM_eq_foldlM]
@@ -148,8 +138,7 @@ where
simp [H]
@[simp] theorem size_map (f : α β) (arr : Array α) : (arr.map f).size = arr.size := by
simp only [ data_length]
simp
simp [size]
@[simp] theorem pop_data (arr : Array α) : arr.pop.data = arr.data.dropLast := rfl
@@ -196,869 +185,3 @@ theorem anyM_stop_le_start [Monad m] (p : α → m Bool) (as : Array α) (start
theorem mem_def (a : α) (as : Array α) : a as a as.data :=
fun | .mk h => h, Array.Mem.mk
/-! # get -/
@[simp] theorem get_eq_getElem (a : Array α) (i : Fin _) : a.get i = a[i.1] := rfl
theorem getElem?_lt
(a : Array α) {i : Nat} (h : i < a.size) : a[i]? = some (a[i]) := dif_pos h
theorem getElem?_ge
(a : Array α) {i : Nat} (h : i a.size) : a[i]? = none := dif_neg (Nat.not_lt_of_le h)
@[simp] theorem get?_eq_getElem? (a : Array α) (i : Nat) : a.get? i = a[i]? := rfl
theorem getElem?_len_le (a : Array α) {i : Nat} (h : a.size i) : a[i]? = none := by
simp [getElem?_ge, h]
theorem getD_get? (a : Array α) (i : Nat) (d : α) :
Option.getD a[i]? d = if p : i < a.size then a[i]'p else d := by
if h : i < a.size then
simp [setD, h, getElem?]
else
have p : i a.size := Nat.le_of_not_gt h
simp [setD, getElem?_len_le _ p, h]
@[simp] theorem getD_eq_get? (a : Array α) (n d) : a.getD n d = (a[n]?).getD d := by
simp only [getD, get_eq_getElem, get?_eq_getElem?]; split <;> simp [getD_get?, *]
theorem get!_eq_getD [Inhabited α] (a : Array α) : a.get! n = a.getD n default := rfl
@[simp] theorem get!_eq_getElem? [Inhabited α] (a : Array α) (i : Nat) : a.get! i = (a.get? i).getD default := by
by_cases p : i < a.size <;> simp [getD_get?, get!_eq_getD, p]
/-! # set -/
@[simp] theorem getElem_set_eq (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) (v : α) {j : Nat}
(eq : i.val = j) (p : j < (a.set i v).size) :
(a.set i v)[j]'p = v := by
simp [set, getElem_eq_data_get, eq]
@[simp] theorem getElem_set_ne (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) (v : α) {j : Nat} (pj : j < (a.set i v).size)
(h : i.val j) : (a.set i v)[j]'pj = a[j]'(size_set a i v pj) := by
simp only [set, getElem_eq_data_get, List.get_set_ne _ h]
theorem getElem_set (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) (v : α) (j : Nat)
(h : j < (a.set i v).size) :
(a.set i v)[j]'h = if i = j then v else a[j]'(size_set a i v h) := by
by_cases p : i.1 = j <;> simp [p]
@[simp] theorem getElem?_set_eq (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) (v : α) :
(a.set i v)[i.1]? = v := by simp [getElem?_lt, i.2]
@[simp] theorem getElem?_set_ne (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) {j : Nat} (v : α)
(ne : i.val j) : (a.set i v)[j]? = a[j]? := by
by_cases h : j < a.size <;> simp [getElem?_lt, getElem?_ge, Nat.ge_of_not_lt, ne, h]
/-! # setD -/
@[simp] theorem set!_is_setD : @set! = @setD := rfl
@[simp] theorem size_setD (a : Array α) (index : Nat) (val : α) :
(Array.setD a index val).size = a.size := by
if h : index < a.size then
simp [setD, h]
else
simp [setD, h]
@[simp] theorem getElem_setD_eq (a : Array α) {i : Nat} (v : α) (h : _) :
(setD a i v)[i]'h = v := by
simp at h
simp only [setD, h, dite_true, getElem_set, ite_true]
@[simp]
theorem getElem?_setD_eq (a : Array α) {i : Nat} (p : i < a.size) (v : α) : (a.setD i v)[i]? = some v := by
simp [getElem?_lt, p]
/-- Simplifies a normal form from `get!` -/
@[simp] theorem getD_get?_setD (a : Array α) (i : Nat) (v d : α) :
Option.getD (setD a i v)[i]? d = if i < a.size then v else d := by
by_cases h : i < a.size <;>
simp [setD, Nat.not_lt_of_le, h, getD_get?]
/-! # ofFn -/
@[simp] theorem size_ofFn_go {n} (f : Fin n α) (i acc) :
(ofFn.go f i acc).size = acc.size + (n - i) := by
if hin : i < n then
unfold ofFn.go
have : 1 + (n - (i + 1)) = n - i :=
Nat.sub_sub .. Nat.add_sub_cancel' (Nat.le_sub_of_add_le (Nat.add_comm .. hin))
rw [dif_pos hin, size_ofFn_go f (i+1), size_push, Nat.add_assoc, this]
else
have : n - i = 0 := Nat.sub_eq_zero_of_le (Nat.le_of_not_lt hin)
unfold ofFn.go
simp [hin, this]
termination_by n - i
@[simp] theorem size_ofFn (f : Fin n α) : (ofFn f).size = n := by simp [ofFn]
theorem getElem_ofFn_go (f : Fin n α) (i) {acc k}
(hki : k < n) (hin : i n) (hi : i = acc.size)
(hacc : j, hj : j < acc.size, acc[j] = f j, Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le hj (hi hin)) :
haveI : acc.size + (n - acc.size) = n := Nat.add_sub_cancel' (hi hin)
(ofFn.go f i acc)[k]'(by simp [*]) = f k, hki := by
unfold ofFn.go
if hin : i < n then
have : 1 + (n - (i + 1)) = n - i :=
Nat.sub_sub .. Nat.add_sub_cancel' (Nat.le_sub_of_add_le (Nat.add_comm .. hin))
simp only [dif_pos hin]
rw [getElem_ofFn_go f (i+1) _ hin (by simp [*]) (fun j hj => ?hacc)]
cases (Nat.lt_or_eq_of_le <| Nat.le_of_lt_succ (by simpa using hj)) with
| inl hj => simp [get_push, hj, hacc j hj]
| inr hj => simp [get_push, *]
else
simp [hin, hacc k (Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le hki (Nat.le_of_not_lt (hi hin)))]
termination_by n - i
@[simp] theorem getElem_ofFn (f : Fin n α) (i : Nat) (h) :
(ofFn f)[i] = f i, size_ofFn f h :=
getElem_ofFn_go _ _ _ (by simp) (by simp) nofun
/-- # mkArray -/
@[simp] theorem mkArray_data (n : Nat) (v : α) : (mkArray n v).data = List.replicate n v := rfl
@[simp] theorem getElem_mkArray (n : Nat) (v : α) (h : i < (mkArray n v).size) :
(mkArray n v)[i] = v := by simp [Array.getElem_eq_data_get]
/-- # mem -/
theorem mem_data {a : α} {l : Array α} : a l.data a l := (mem_def _ _).symm
theorem not_mem_nil (a : α) : ¬ a #[] := nofun
/-- # get lemmas -/
theorem getElem?_mem {l : Array α} {i : Fin l.size} : l[i] l := by
erw [Array.mem_def, getElem_eq_data_get]
apply List.get_mem
theorem getElem_fin_eq_data_get (a : Array α) (i : Fin _) : a[i] = a.data.get i := rfl
@[simp] theorem ugetElem_eq_getElem (a : Array α) {i : USize} (h : i.toNat < a.size) :
a[i] = a[i.toNat] := rfl
theorem getElem?_eq_getElem (a : Array α) (i : Nat) (h : i < a.size) : a[i]? = a[i] :=
getElem?_pos ..
theorem get?_len_le (a : Array α) (i : Nat) (h : a.size i) : a[i]? = none := by
simp [getElem?_neg, h]
theorem getElem_mem_data (a : Array α) (h : i < a.size) : a[i] a.data := by
simp only [getElem_eq_data_get, List.get_mem]
theorem getElem?_eq_data_get? (a : Array α) (i : Nat) : a[i]? = a.data.get? i := by
by_cases i < a.size <;> simp_all [getElem?_pos, getElem?_neg, List.get?_eq_get, eq_comm]; rfl
theorem get?_eq_data_get? (a : Array α) (i : Nat) : a.get? i = a.data.get? i :=
getElem?_eq_data_get? ..
theorem get!_eq_get? [Inhabited α] (a : Array α) : a.get! n = (a.get? n).getD default := by
simp [get!_eq_getD]
@[simp] theorem back_eq_back? [Inhabited α] (a : Array α) : a.back = a.back?.getD default := by
simp [back, back?]
@[simp] theorem back?_push (a : Array α) : (a.push x).back? = some x := by
simp [back?, getElem?_eq_data_get?]
theorem back_push [Inhabited α] (a : Array α) : (a.push x).back = x := by simp
theorem get?_push_lt (a : Array α) (x : α) (i : Nat) (h : i < a.size) :
(a.push x)[i]? = some a[i] := by
rw [getElem?_pos, get_push_lt]
theorem get?_push_eq (a : Array α) (x : α) : (a.push x)[a.size]? = some x := by
rw [getElem?_pos, get_push_eq]
theorem get?_push {a : Array α} : (a.push x)[i]? = if i = a.size then some x else a[i]? := by
match Nat.lt_trichotomy i a.size with
| Or.inl g =>
have h1 : i < a.size + 1 := by omega
have h2 : i a.size := by omega
simp [getElem?, size_push, g, h1, h2, get_push_lt]
| Or.inr (Or.inl heq) =>
simp [heq, getElem?_pos, get_push_eq]
| Or.inr (Or.inr g) =>
simp only [getElem?, size_push]
have h1 : ¬ (i < a.size) := by omega
have h2 : ¬ (i < a.size + 1) := by omega
have h3 : i a.size := by omega
simp [h1, h2, h3]
@[simp] theorem get?_size {a : Array α} : a[a.size]? = none := by
simp only [getElem?, Nat.lt_irrefl, dite_false]
@[simp] theorem data_set (a : Array α) (i v) : (a.set i v).data = a.data.set i.1 v := rfl
theorem get_set_eq (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) (v : α) :
(a.set i v)[i.1] = v := by
simp only [set, getElem_eq_data_get, List.get_set_eq]
theorem get?_set_eq (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) (v : α) :
(a.set i v)[i.1]? = v := by simp [getElem?_pos, i.2]
@[simp] theorem get?_set_ne (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) {j : Nat} (v : α)
(h : i.1 j) : (a.set i v)[j]? = a[j]? := by
by_cases j < a.size <;> simp [getElem?_pos, getElem?_neg, *]
theorem get?_set (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) (j : Nat) (v : α) :
(a.set i v)[j]? = if i.1 = j then some v else a[j]? := by
if h : i.1 = j then subst j; simp [*] else simp [*]
theorem get_set (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) (j : Nat) (hj : j < a.size) (v : α) :
(a.set i v)[j]'(by simp [*]) = if i = j then v else a[j] := by
if h : i.1 = j then subst j; simp [*] else simp [*]
@[simp] theorem get_set_ne (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) {j : Nat} (v : α) (hj : j < a.size)
(h : i.1 j) : (a.set i v)[j]'(by simp [*]) = a[j] := by
simp only [set, getElem_eq_data_get, List.get_set_ne _ h]
theorem getElem_setD (a : Array α) (i : Nat) (v : α) (h : i < (setD a i v).size) :
(setD a i v)[i] = v := by
simp at h
simp only [setD, h, dite_true, get_set, ite_true]
theorem set_set (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) (v v' : α) :
(a.set i v).set i, by simp [i.2] v' = a.set i v' := by simp [set, List.set_set]
private theorem fin_cast_val (e : n = n') (i : Fin n) : e i = i.1, e i.2 := by cases e; rfl
theorem swap_def (a : Array α) (i j : Fin a.size) :
a.swap i j = (a.set i (a.get j)).set j.1, by simp [j.2] (a.get i) := by
simp [swap, fin_cast_val]
theorem data_swap (a : Array α) (i j : Fin a.size) :
(a.swap i j).data = (a.data.set i (a.get j)).set j (a.get i) := by simp [swap_def]
theorem get?_swap (a : Array α) (i j : Fin a.size) (k : Nat) : (a.swap i j)[k]? =
if j = k then some a[i.1] else if i = k then some a[j.1] else a[k]? := by
simp [swap_def, get?_set, getElem_fin_eq_data_get]
@[simp] theorem swapAt_def (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) (v : α) :
a.swapAt i v = (a[i.1], a.set i v) := rfl
-- @[simp] -- FIXME: gives a weird linter error
theorem swapAt!_def (a : Array α) (i : Nat) (v : α) (h : i < a.size) :
a.swapAt! i v = (a[i], a.set i, h v) := by simp [swapAt!, h]
@[simp] theorem data_pop (a : Array α) : a.pop.data = a.data.dropLast := by simp [pop]
@[simp] theorem pop_empty : (#[] : Array α).pop = #[] := rfl
@[simp] theorem pop_push (a : Array α) : (a.push x).pop = a := by simp [pop]
@[simp] theorem getElem_pop (a : Array α) (i : Nat) (hi : i < a.pop.size) :
a.pop[i] = a[i]'(Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le (a.size_pop hi) (Nat.sub_le _ _)) :=
List.get_dropLast ..
theorem eq_empty_of_size_eq_zero {as : Array α} (h : as.size = 0) : as = #[] := by
apply ext
· simp [h]
· intros; contradiction
theorem eq_push_pop_back_of_size_ne_zero [Inhabited α] {as : Array α} (h : as.size 0) :
as = as.pop.push as.back := by
apply ext
· simp [Nat.sub_add_cancel (Nat.zero_lt_of_ne_zero h)]
· intros i h h'
if hlt : i < as.pop.size then
rw [get_push_lt (h:=hlt), getElem_pop]
else
have heq : i = as.pop.size :=
Nat.le_antisymm (size_pop .. Nat.le_pred_of_lt h) (Nat.le_of_not_gt hlt)
cases heq; rw [get_push_eq, back, size_pop, get!_eq_getD, getD, dif_pos h]; rfl
theorem eq_push_of_size_ne_zero {as : Array α} (h : as.size 0) :
(bs : Array α) (c : α), as = bs.push c :=
let _ : Inhabited α := as[0]
as.pop, as.back, eq_push_pop_back_of_size_ne_zero h
theorem size_eq_length_data (as : Array α) : as.size = as.data.length := rfl
@[simp] theorem size_swap! (a : Array α) (i j) :
(a.swap! i j).size = a.size := by unfold swap!; split <;> (try split) <;> simp [size_swap]
@[simp] theorem size_reverse (a : Array α) : a.reverse.size = a.size := by
let rec go (as : Array α) (i j) : (reverse.loop as i j).size = as.size := by
rw [reverse.loop]
if h : i < j then
have := reverse.termination h
simp [(go · (i+1) j-1, ·), h]
else simp [h]
termination_by j - i
simp only [reverse]; split <;> simp [go]
@[simp] theorem size_range {n : Nat} : (range n).size = n := by
unfold range
induction n with
| zero => simp [Nat.fold]
| succ k ih =>
rw [Nat.fold, flip]
simp only [mkEmpty_eq, size_push] at *
omega
@[simp] theorem reverse_data (a : Array α) : a.reverse.data = a.data.reverse := by
let rec go (as : Array α) (i j hj)
(h : i + j + 1 = a.size) (h₂ : as.size = a.size)
(H : k, as.data.get? k = if i k k j then a.data.get? k else a.data.reverse.get? k)
(k) : (reverse.loop as i j, hj).data.get? k = a.data.reverse.get? k := by
rw [reverse.loop]; dsimp; split <;> rename_i h₁
· have := reverse.termination h₁
match j with | j+1 => ?_
simp at *
rw [(go · (i+1) j)]
· rwa [Nat.add_right_comm i]
· simp [size_swap, h₂]
· intro k
rw [ getElem?_eq_data_get?, get?_swap]
simp [getElem?_eq_data_get?, getElem_eq_data_get, List.get?_eq_get, H, Nat.le_of_lt h₁]
split <;> rename_i h₂
· simp [ h₂, Nat.not_le.2 (Nat.lt_succ_self _)]
exact (List.get?_reverse' _ _ (Eq.trans (by simp_arith) h)).symm
split <;> rename_i h₃
· simp [ h₃, Nat.not_le.2 (Nat.lt_succ_self _)]
exact (List.get?_reverse' _ _ (Eq.trans (by simp_arith) h)).symm
simp only [Nat.succ_le, Nat.lt_iff_le_and_ne.trans (and_iff_left h₃),
Nat.lt_succ.symm.trans (Nat.lt_iff_le_and_ne.trans (and_iff_left (Ne.symm h₂)))]
· rw [H]; split <;> rename_i h₂
· cases Nat.le_antisymm (Nat.not_lt.1 h₁) (Nat.le_trans h₂.1 h₂.2)
cases Nat.le_antisymm h₂.1 h₂.2
exact (List.get?_reverse' _ _ h).symm
· rfl
termination_by j - i
simp only [reverse]; split
· match a with | [] | [_] => rfl
· have := Nat.sub_add_cancel (Nat.le_of_not_le _)
refine List.ext <| go _ _ _ _ (by simp [this]) rfl fun k => ?_
split; {rfl}; rename_i h
simp [ show k < _ + 1 _ from Nat.lt_succ (n := a.size - 1), this] at h
rw [List.get?_eq_none.2 _, List.get?_eq_none.2 (a.data.length_reverse _)]
/-! ### foldl / foldr -/
-- This proof is the pure version of `Array.SatisfiesM_foldlM`,
-- reproduced to avoid a dependency on `SatisfiesM`.
theorem foldl_induction
{as : Array α} (motive : Nat β Prop) {init : β} (h0 : motive 0 init) {f : β α β}
(hf : i : Fin as.size, b, motive i.1 b motive (i.1 + 1) (f b as[i])) :
motive as.size (as.foldl f init) := by
let rec go {i j b} (h₁ : j as.size) (h₂ : as.size i + j) (H : motive j b) :
(motive as.size) (foldlM.loop (m := Id) f as as.size (Nat.le_refl _) i j b) := by
unfold foldlM.loop; split
· next hj =>
split
· cases Nat.not_le_of_gt (by simp [hj]) h₂
· exact go hj (by rwa [Nat.succ_add] at h₂) (hf j, hj b H)
· next hj => exact Nat.le_antisymm h₁ (Nat.ge_of_not_lt hj) H
simpa [foldl, foldlM] using go (Nat.zero_le _) (Nat.le_refl _) h0
-- This proof is the pure version of `Array.SatisfiesM_foldrM`,
-- reproduced to avoid a dependency on `SatisfiesM`.
theorem foldr_induction
{as : Array α} (motive : Nat β Prop) {init : β} (h0 : motive as.size init) {f : α β β}
(hf : i : Fin as.size, b, motive (i.1 + 1) b motive i.1 (f as[i] b)) :
motive 0 (as.foldr f init) := by
let rec go {i b} (hi : i as.size) (H : motive i b) :
(motive 0) (foldrM.fold (m := Id) f as 0 i hi b) := by
unfold foldrM.fold; simp; split
· next hi => exact (hi H)
· next hi =>
split; {simp at hi}
· next i hi' =>
exact go _ (hf i, hi' b H)
simp [foldr, foldrM]; split; {exact go _ h0}
· next h => exact (Nat.eq_zero_of_not_pos h h0)
/-! ### map -/
@[simp] theorem mem_map {f : α β} {l : Array α} : b l.map f a, a l f a = b := by
simp only [mem_def, map_data, List.mem_map]
theorem mapM_eq_mapM_data [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α m β) (arr : Array α) :
arr.mapM f = return mk ( arr.data.mapM f) := by
rw [mapM_eq_foldlM, foldlM_eq_foldlM_data, List.foldrM_reverse]
conv => rhs; rw [ List.reverse_reverse arr.data]
induction arr.data.reverse with
| nil => simp; rfl
| cons a l ih => simp [ih]; simp [map_eq_pure_bind, push]
theorem mapM_map_eq_foldl (as : Array α) (f : α β) (i) :
mapM.map (m := Id) f as i b = as.foldl (start := i) (fun r a => r.push (f a)) b := by
unfold mapM.map
split <;> rename_i h
· simp only [Id.bind_eq]
dsimp [foldl, Id.run, foldlM]
rw [mapM_map_eq_foldl, dif_pos (by omega), foldlM.loop, dif_pos h]
-- Calling `split` here gives a bad goal.
have : size as - i = Nat.succ (size as - i - 1) := by omega
rw [this]
simp [foldl, foldlM, Id.run, Nat.sub_add_eq]
· dsimp [foldl, Id.run, foldlM]
rw [dif_pos (by omega), foldlM.loop, dif_neg h]
rfl
termination_by as.size - i
theorem map_eq_foldl (as : Array α) (f : α β) :
as.map f = as.foldl (fun r a => r.push (f a)) #[] :=
mapM_map_eq_foldl _ _ _
theorem map_induction (as : Array α) (f : α β) (motive : Nat Prop) (h0 : motive 0)
(p : Fin as.size β Prop) (hs : i, motive i.1 p i (f as[i]) motive (i+1)) :
motive as.size
eq : (as.map f).size = as.size, i h, p i, h ((as.map f)[i]) := by
have t := foldl_induction (as := as) (β := Array β)
(motive := fun i arr => motive i arr.size = i i h2, p i arr[i.1])
(init := #[]) (f := fun r a => r.push (f a)) ?_ ?_
obtain m, eq, w := t
· refine m, by simpa [map_eq_foldl] using eq, ?_
intro i h
simp [eq] at w
specialize w i, h h
simpa [map_eq_foldl] using w
· exact h0, rfl, nofun
· intro i b m, eq, w
refine ?_, ?_, ?_
· exact (hs _ m).2
· simp_all
· intro j h
simp at h
by_cases h' : j < size b
· rw [get_push]
simp_all
· rw [get_push, dif_neg h']
simp only [show j = i by omega]
exact (hs _ m).1
theorem map_spec (as : Array α) (f : α β) (p : Fin as.size β Prop)
(hs : i, p i (f as[i])) :
eq : (as.map f).size = as.size, i h, p i, h ((as.map f)[i]) := by
simpa using map_induction as f (fun _ => True) trivial p (by simp_all)
@[simp] theorem getElem_map (f : α β) (as : Array α) (i : Nat) (h) :
((as.map f)[i]) = f (as[i]'(size_map .. h)) := by
have := map_spec as f (fun i b => b = f (as[i]))
simp only [implies_true, true_implies] at this
obtain eq, w := this
apply w
simp_all
/-! ### mapIdx -/
-- This could also be prove from `SatisfiesM_mapIdxM`.
theorem mapIdx_induction (as : Array α) (f : Fin as.size α β)
(motive : Nat Prop) (h0 : motive 0)
(p : Fin as.size β Prop)
(hs : i, motive i.1 p i (f i as[i]) motive (i + 1)) :
motive as.size eq : (Array.mapIdx as f).size = as.size,
i h, p i, h ((Array.mapIdx as f)[i]) := by
let rec go {bs i j h} (h₁ : j = bs.size) (h₂ : i h h', p i, h bs[i]) (hm : motive j) :
let arr : Array β := Array.mapIdxM.map (m := Id) as f i j h bs
motive as.size eq : arr.size = as.size, i h, p i, h arr[i] := by
induction i generalizing j bs with simp [mapIdxM.map]
| zero =>
have := (Nat.zero_add _).symm.trans h
exact this hm, h₁ this, fun _ _ => h₂ ..
| succ i ih =>
apply @ih (bs.push (f j, by omega as[j])) (j + 1) (by omega) (by simp; omega)
· intro i i_lt h'
rw [get_push]
split
· apply h₂
· simp only [size_push] at h'
obtain rfl : i = j := by omega
apply (hs i, by omega hm).1
· exact (hs j, by omega hm).2
simp [mapIdx, mapIdxM]; exact go rfl nofun h0
theorem mapIdx_spec (as : Array α) (f : Fin as.size α β)
(p : Fin as.size β Prop) (hs : i, p i (f i as[i])) :
eq : (Array.mapIdx as f).size = as.size,
i h, p i, h ((Array.mapIdx as f)[i]) :=
(mapIdx_induction _ _ (fun _ => True) trivial p fun _ _ => hs .., trivial).2
@[simp] theorem size_mapIdx (a : Array α) (f : Fin a.size α β) : (a.mapIdx f).size = a.size :=
(mapIdx_spec (p := fun _ _ => True) (hs := fun _ => trivial)).1
@[simp] theorem size_zipWithIndex (as : Array α) : as.zipWithIndex.size = as.size :=
Array.size_mapIdx _ _
@[simp] theorem getElem_mapIdx (a : Array α) (f : Fin a.size α β) (i : Nat)
(h : i < (mapIdx a f).size) :
haveI : i < a.size := by simp_all
(a.mapIdx f)[i] = f i, this a[i] :=
(mapIdx_spec _ _ (fun i b => b = f i a[i]) fun _ => rfl).2 i _
/-! ### modify -/
@[simp] theorem size_modify (a : Array α) (i : Nat) (f : α α) : (a.modify i f).size = a.size := by
unfold modify modifyM Id.run
split <;> simp
theorem get_modify {arr : Array α} {x i} (h : i < arr.size) :
(arr.modify x f).get i, by simp [h] =
if x = i then f (arr.get i, h) else arr.get i, h := by
simp [modify, modifyM, Id.run]; split
· simp [get_set _ _ _ h]; split <;> simp [*]
· rw [if_neg (mt (by rintro rfl; exact h) _)]
/-! ### filter -/
@[simp] theorem filter_data (p : α Bool) (l : Array α) :
(l.filter p).data = l.data.filter p := by
dsimp only [filter]
rw [foldl_eq_foldl_data]
generalize l.data = l
suffices a, (List.foldl (fun r a => if p a = true then push r a else r) a l).data =
a.data ++ List.filter p l by
simpa using this #[]
induction l with simp
| cons => split <;> simp [*]
@[simp] theorem filter_filter (q) (l : Array α) :
filter p (filter q l) = filter (fun a => p a q a) l := by
apply ext'
simp only [filter_data, List.filter_filter]
@[simp] theorem mem_filter : x filter p as x as p x := by
simp only [mem_def, filter_data, List.mem_filter]
theorem mem_of_mem_filter {a : α} {l} (h : a filter p l) : a l :=
(mem_filter.mp h).1
/-! ### filterMap -/
@[simp] theorem filterMap_data (f : α Option β) (l : Array α) :
(l.filterMap f).data = l.data.filterMap f := by
dsimp only [filterMap, filterMapM]
rw [foldlM_eq_foldlM_data]
generalize l.data = l
have this : a : Array β, (Id.run (List.foldlM (m := Id) ?_ a l)).data =
a.data ++ List.filterMap f l := ?_
exact this #[]
induction l
· simp_all [Id.run]
· simp_all [Id.run]
split <;> simp_all
@[simp] theorem mem_filterMap (f : α Option β) (l : Array α) {b : β} :
b filterMap f l a, a l f a = some b := by
simp only [mem_def, filterMap_data, List.mem_filterMap]
/-! ### empty -/
theorem size_empty : (#[] : Array α).size = 0 := rfl
theorem empty_data : (#[] : Array α).data = [] := rfl
/-! ### append -/
theorem push_eq_append_singleton (as : Array α) (x) : as.push x = as ++ #[x] := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_append {a : α} {s t : Array α} : a s ++ t a s a t := by
simp only [mem_def, append_data, List.mem_append]
theorem size_append (as bs : Array α) : (as ++ bs).size = as.size + bs.size := by
simp only [size, append_data, List.length_append]
theorem get_append_left {as bs : Array α} {h : i < (as ++ bs).size} (hlt : i < as.size) :
(as ++ bs)[i] = as[i] := by
simp only [getElem_eq_data_get]
have h' : i < (as.data ++ bs.data).length := by rwa [ data_length, append_data] at h
conv => rhs; rw [ List.get_append_left (bs:=bs.data) (h':=h')]
apply List.get_of_eq; rw [append_data]
theorem get_append_right {as bs : Array α} {h : i < (as ++ bs).size} (hle : as.size i)
(hlt : i - as.size < bs.size := Nat.sub_lt_left_of_lt_add hle (size_append .. h)) :
(as ++ bs)[i] = bs[i - as.size] := by
simp only [getElem_eq_data_get]
have h' : i < (as.data ++ bs.data).length := by rwa [ data_length, append_data] at h
conv => rhs; rw [ List.get_append_right (h':=h') (h:=Nat.not_lt_of_ge hle)]
apply List.get_of_eq; rw [append_data]
@[simp] theorem append_nil (as : Array α) : as ++ #[] = as := by
apply ext'; simp only [append_data, empty_data, List.append_nil]
@[simp] theorem nil_append (as : Array α) : #[] ++ as = as := by
apply ext'; simp only [append_data, empty_data, List.nil_append]
theorem append_assoc (as bs cs : Array α) : as ++ bs ++ cs = as ++ (bs ++ cs) := by
apply ext'; simp only [append_data, List.append_assoc]
/-! ### extract -/
theorem extract_loop_zero (as bs : Array α) (start : Nat) : extract.loop as 0 start bs = bs := by
rw [extract.loop]; split <;> rfl
theorem extract_loop_succ (as bs : Array α) (size start : Nat) (h : start < as.size) :
extract.loop as (size+1) start bs = extract.loop as size (start+1) (bs.push as[start]) := by
rw [extract.loop, dif_pos h]; rfl
theorem extract_loop_of_ge (as bs : Array α) (size start : Nat) (h : start as.size) :
extract.loop as size start bs = bs := by
rw [extract.loop, dif_neg (Nat.not_lt_of_ge h)]
theorem extract_loop_eq_aux (as bs : Array α) (size start : Nat) :
extract.loop as size start bs = bs ++ extract.loop as size start #[] := by
induction size using Nat.recAux generalizing start bs with
| zero => rw [extract_loop_zero, extract_loop_zero, append_nil]
| succ size ih =>
if h : start < as.size then
rw [extract_loop_succ (h:=h), ih (bs.push _), push_eq_append_singleton]
rw [extract_loop_succ (h:=h), ih (#[].push _), push_eq_append_singleton, nil_append]
rw [append_assoc]
else
rw [extract_loop_of_ge (h:=Nat.le_of_not_lt h)]
rw [extract_loop_of_ge (h:=Nat.le_of_not_lt h)]
rw [append_nil]
theorem extract_loop_eq (as bs : Array α) (size start : Nat) (h : start + size as.size) :
extract.loop as size start bs = bs ++ as.extract start (start + size) := by
simp [extract]; rw [extract_loop_eq_aux, Nat.min_eq_left h, Nat.add_sub_cancel_left]
theorem size_extract_loop (as bs : Array α) (size start : Nat) :
(extract.loop as size start bs).size = bs.size + min size (as.size - start) := by
induction size using Nat.recAux generalizing start bs with
| zero => rw [extract_loop_zero, Nat.zero_min, Nat.add_zero]
| succ size ih =>
if h : start < as.size then
rw [extract_loop_succ (h:=h), ih, size_push, Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_min_add_left,
Nat.sub_succ, Nat.one_add, Nat.one_add, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (Nat.sub_pos_of_lt h)]
else
have h := Nat.le_of_not_gt h
rw [extract_loop_of_ge (h:=h), Nat.sub_eq_zero_of_le h, Nat.min_zero, Nat.add_zero]
@[simp] theorem size_extract (as : Array α) (start stop : Nat) :
(as.extract start stop).size = min stop as.size - start := by
simp [extract]; rw [size_extract_loop, size_empty, Nat.zero_add, Nat.sub_min_sub_right,
Nat.min_assoc, Nat.min_self]
theorem get_extract_loop_lt_aux (as bs : Array α) (size start : Nat) (hlt : i < bs.size) :
i < (extract.loop as size start bs).size := by
rw [size_extract_loop]
apply Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le hlt
exact Nat.le_add_right ..
theorem get_extract_loop_lt (as bs : Array α) (size start : Nat) (hlt : i < bs.size)
(h := get_extract_loop_lt_aux as bs size start hlt) :
(extract.loop as size start bs)[i] = bs[i] := by
apply Eq.trans _ (get_append_left (bs:=extract.loop as size start #[]) hlt)
· rw [size_append]; exact Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le hlt (Nat.le_add_right ..)
· congr; rw [extract_loop_eq_aux]
theorem get_extract_loop_ge_aux (as bs : Array α) (size start : Nat) (hge : i bs.size)
(h : i < (extract.loop as size start bs).size) : start + i - bs.size < as.size := by
have h : i < bs.size + (as.size - start) := by
apply Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h
rw [size_extract_loop]
apply Nat.add_le_add_left
exact Nat.min_le_right ..
rw [Nat.add_sub_assoc hge]
apply Nat.add_lt_of_lt_sub'
exact Nat.sub_lt_left_of_lt_add hge h
theorem get_extract_loop_ge (as bs : Array α) (size start : Nat) (hge : i bs.size)
(h : i < (extract.loop as size start bs).size)
(h' := get_extract_loop_ge_aux as bs size start hge h) :
(extract.loop as size start bs)[i] = as[start + i - bs.size] := by
induction size using Nat.recAux generalizing start bs with
| zero =>
rw [size_extract_loop, Nat.zero_min, Nat.add_zero] at h
omega
| succ size ih =>
have : start < as.size := by
apply Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.le_add_right start (i - bs.size))
rwa [ Nat.add_sub_assoc hge]
have : i < (extract.loop as size (start+1) (bs.push as[start])).size := by
rwa [ extract_loop_succ]
have heq : (extract.loop as (size+1) start bs)[i] =
(extract.loop as size (start+1) (bs.push as[start]))[i] := by
congr 1; rw [extract_loop_succ]
rw [heq]
if hi : bs.size = i then
cases hi
have h₁ : bs.size < (bs.push as[start]).size := by rw [size_push]; exact Nat.lt_succ_self ..
have h₂ : bs.size < (extract.loop as size (start+1) (bs.push as[start])).size := by
rw [size_extract_loop]; apply Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h₁; exact Nat.le_add_right ..
have h : (extract.loop as size (start + 1) (push bs as[start]))[bs.size] = as[start] := by
rw [get_extract_loop_lt as (bs.push as[start]) size (start+1) h₁ h₂, get_push_eq]
rw [h]; congr; rw [Nat.add_sub_cancel]
else
have hge : bs.size + 1 i := Nat.lt_of_le_of_ne hge hi
rw [ih (bs.push as[start]) (start+1) ((size_push ..).symm hge)]
congr 1; rw [size_push, Nat.add_right_comm, Nat.add_sub_add_right]
theorem get_extract_aux {as : Array α} {start stop : Nat} (h : i < (as.extract start stop).size) :
start + i < as.size := by
rw [size_extract] at h; apply Nat.add_lt_of_lt_sub'; apply Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h
apply Nat.sub_le_sub_right; apply Nat.min_le_right
@[simp] theorem get_extract {as : Array α} {start stop : Nat}
(h : i < (as.extract start stop).size) :
(as.extract start stop)[i] = as[start + i]'(get_extract_aux h) :=
show (extract.loop as (min stop as.size - start) start #[])[i]
= as[start + i]'(get_extract_aux h) by rw [get_extract_loop_ge]; rfl; exact Nat.zero_le _
@[simp] theorem extract_all (as : Array α) : as.extract 0 as.size = as := by
apply ext
· rw [size_extract, Nat.min_self, Nat.sub_zero]
· intros; rw [get_extract]; congr; rw [Nat.zero_add]
theorem extract_empty_of_stop_le_start (as : Array α) {start stop : Nat} (h : stop start) :
as.extract start stop = #[] := by
simp [extract]; rw [Nat.sub_min_sub_right, Nat.sub_eq_zero_of_le h, Nat.zero_min,
extract_loop_zero]
theorem extract_empty_of_size_le_start (as : Array α) {start stop : Nat} (h : as.size start) :
as.extract start stop = #[] := by
simp [extract]; rw [Nat.sub_min_sub_right, Nat.sub_eq_zero_of_le h, Nat.min_zero,
extract_loop_zero]
@[simp] theorem extract_empty (start stop : Nat) : (#[] : Array α).extract start stop = #[] :=
extract_empty_of_size_le_start _ (Nat.zero_le _)
/-! ### any -/
-- Auxiliary for `any_iff_exists`.
theorem anyM_loop_iff_exists (p : α Bool) (as : Array α) (start stop) (h : stop as.size) :
anyM.loop (m := Id) p as stop h start = true
i : Fin as.size, start i i < stop p as[i] = true := by
unfold anyM.loop
split <;> rename_i h₁
· dsimp
split <;> rename_i h₂
· simp only [true_iff]
refine start, by omega, by dsimp; omega, by dsimp; omega, h₂
· rw [anyM_loop_iff_exists]
constructor
· rintro i, ge, lt, h
have : start i := by rintro rfl; omega
exact i, by omega, lt, h
· rintro i, ge, lt, h
have : start i := by rintro rfl; erw [h] at h₂; simp_all
exact i, by omega, lt, h
· simp
omega
termination_by stop - start
-- This could also be proved from `SatisfiesM_anyM_iff_exists` in `Batteries.Data.Array.Init.Monadic`
theorem any_iff_exists (p : α Bool) (as : Array α) (start stop) :
any as p start stop i : Fin as.size, start i.1 i.1 < stop p as[i] := by
dsimp [any, anyM, Id.run]
split
· rw [anyM_loop_iff_exists]; rfl
· rw [anyM_loop_iff_exists]
constructor
· rintro i, ge, _, h
exact i, by omega, by omega, h
· rintro i, ge, _, h
exact i, by omega, by omega, h
theorem any_eq_true (p : α Bool) (as : Array α) :
any as p i : Fin as.size, p as[i] := by simp [any_iff_exists, Fin.isLt]
theorem any_def {p : α Bool} (as : Array α) : as.any p = as.data.any p := by
rw [Bool.eq_iff_iff, any_eq_true, List.any_eq_true]; simp only [List.mem_iff_get]
exact fun i, h => _, i, rfl, h, fun _, i, rfl, h => i, h
/-! ### all -/
theorem all_eq_not_any_not (p : α Bool) (as : Array α) (start stop) :
all as p start stop = !(any as (!p ·) start stop) := by
dsimp [all, allM]
rfl
theorem all_iff_forall (p : α Bool) (as : Array α) (start stop) :
all as p start stop i : Fin as.size, start i.1 i.1 < stop p as[i] := by
rw [all_eq_not_any_not]
suffices ¬(any as (!p ·) start stop = true)
i : Fin as.size, start i.1 i.1 < stop p as[i] by
simp_all
rw [any_iff_exists]
simp
theorem all_eq_true (p : α Bool) (as : Array α) : all as p i : Fin as.size, p as[i] := by
simp [all_iff_forall, Fin.isLt]
theorem all_def {p : α Bool} (as : Array α) : as.all p = as.data.all p := by
rw [Bool.eq_iff_iff, all_eq_true, List.all_eq_true]; simp only [List.mem_iff_get]
constructor
· rintro w x r, rfl
rw [ getElem_eq_data_get]
apply w
· intro w i
exact w as[i] i, (getElem_eq_data_get as i.2).symm
theorem all_eq_true_iff_forall_mem {l : Array α} : l.all p x, x l p x := by
simp only [all_def, List.all_eq_true, mem_def]
/-! ### contains -/
theorem contains_def [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {as : Array α} : as.contains a a as := by
rw [mem_def, contains, any_def, List.any_eq_true]; simp [and_comm]
instance [DecidableEq α] (a : α) (as : Array α) : Decidable (a as) :=
decidable_of_iff _ contains_def
/-! ### swap -/
open Fin
@[simp] theorem get_swap_right (a : Array α) {i j : Fin a.size} : (a.swap i j)[j.val] = a[i] :=
by simp only [swap, fin_cast_val, get_eq_getElem, getElem_set_eq, getElem_fin]
@[simp] theorem get_swap_left (a : Array α) {i j : Fin a.size} : (a.swap i j)[i.val] = a[j] :=
if he : ((Array.size_set _ _ _).symm j).val = i.val then by
simp only [he, fin_cast_val, get_swap_right, getElem_fin]
else by
apply Eq.trans
· apply Array.get_set_ne
· simp only [size_set, Fin.isLt]
· assumption
· simp [get_set_ne]
@[simp] theorem get_swap_of_ne (a : Array α) {i j : Fin a.size} (hp : p < a.size)
(hi : p i) (hj : p j) : (a.swap i j)[p]'(a.size_swap .. |>.symm hp) = a[p] := by
apply Eq.trans
· have : ((a.size_set i (a.get j)).symm j).val = j.val := by simp only [fin_cast_val]
apply Array.get_set_ne
· simp only [this]
apply Ne.symm
· assumption
· apply Array.get_set_ne
· apply Ne.symm
· assumption
theorem get_swap (a : Array α) (i j : Fin a.size) (k : Nat) (hk: k < a.size) :
(a.swap i j)[k]'(by simp_all) = if k = i then a[j] else if k = j then a[i] else a[k] := by
split
· simp_all only [get_swap_left]
· split <;> simp_all
theorem get_swap' (a : Array α) (i j : Fin a.size) (k : Nat) (hk' : k < (a.swap i j).size) :
(a.swap i j)[k] = if k = i then a[j] else if k = j then a[i] else a[k]'(by simp_all) := by
apply get_swap
@[simp] theorem swap_swap (a : Array α) {i j : Fin a.size} :
(a.swap i j).swap i.1, (a.size_swap ..).symm i.2 j.1, (a.size_swap ..).symm j.2 = a := by
apply ext
· simp only [size_swap]
· intros
simp only [get_swap']
split
· simp_all
· split <;> simp_all
theorem swap_comm (a : Array α) {i j : Fin a.size} : a.swap i j = a.swap j i := by
apply ext
· simp only [size_swap]
· intros
simp only [get_swap']
split
· split <;> simp_all
· split <;> simp_all
end Array

View File

@@ -27,20 +27,13 @@ theorem sizeOf_lt_of_mem [SizeOf α] {as : Array α} (h : a ∈ as) : sizeOf a <
cases as with | _ as =>
exact Nat.lt_trans (List.sizeOf_get ..) (by simp_arith)
@[simp] theorem sizeOf_getElem [SizeOf α] (as : Array α) (i : Nat) (h : i < as.size) :
sizeOf (as[i]'h) < sizeOf as := sizeOf_get _ _
/-- This tactic, added to the `decreasing_trivial` toolbox, proves that
`sizeOf arr[i] < sizeOf arr`, which is useful for well founded recursions
over a nested inductive like `inductive T | mk : Array T → T`. -/
macro "array_get_dec" : tactic =>
`(tactic| first
-- subsumed by simp
-- | with_reducible apply sizeOf_get
-- | with_reducible apply sizeOf_getElem
| (with_reducible apply Nat.lt_trans (sizeOf_get ..)); simp_arith
| (with_reducible apply Nat.lt_trans (sizeOf_getElem ..)); simp_arith
)
| apply sizeOf_get
| apply Nat.lt_trans (sizeOf_get ..); simp_arith)
macro_rules | `(tactic| decreasing_trivial) => `(tactic| array_get_dec)
@@ -50,10 +43,9 @@ provided that `a ∈ arr` which is useful for well founded recursions over a nes
-- NB: This is analogue to tactic `sizeOf_list_dec`
macro "array_mem_dec" : tactic =>
`(tactic| first
| with_reducible apply Array.sizeOf_lt_of_mem; assumption; done
| with_reducible
apply Nat.lt_trans (Array.sizeOf_lt_of_mem ?h)
case' h => assumption
| apply Array.sizeOf_lt_of_mem; assumption; done
| apply Nat.lt_trans (Array.sizeOf_lt_of_mem ?h)
case' h => assumption
simp_arith)
macro_rules | `(tactic| decreasing_trivial) => `(tactic| array_mem_dec)

View File

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ namespace Array
-- TODO: remove the [Inhabited α] parameters as soon as we have the tactic framework for automating proof generation and using Array.fget
def qpartition (as : Array α) (lt : α α Bool) (lo hi : Nat) : Nat × Array α :=
if h : as.size = 0 then (0, as) else have : Inhabited α := as[0]'(by revert h; cases as.size <;> simp) -- TODO: remove
if h : as.size = 0 then (0, as) else have : Inhabited α := as[0]'(by revert h; cases as.size <;> simp [Nat.zero_lt_succ]) -- TODO: remove
let mid := (lo + hi) / 2
let as := if lt (as.get! mid) (as.get! lo) then as.swap! lo mid else as
let as := if lt (as.get! hi) (as.get! lo) then as.swap! lo hi else as
@@ -27,7 +27,6 @@ def qpartition (as : Array α) (lt : αα → Bool) (lo hi : Nat) : Nat ×
let as := as.swap! i hi
(i, as)
termination_by hi - j
decreasing_by all_goals simp_wf; decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
loop as lo lo
@[inline] partial def qsort (as : Array α) (lt : α α Bool) (low := 0) (high := as.size - 1) : Array α :=

View File

@@ -9,46 +9,29 @@ import Init.Data.Array.Basic
universe u v w
structure Subarray (α : Type u) where
array : Array α
as : Array α
start : Nat
stop : Nat
start_le_stop : start stop
stop_le_array_size : stop array.size
@[deprecated Subarray.array (since := "2024-04-13")]
abbrev Subarray.as (s : Subarray α) : Array α := s.array
@[deprecated Subarray.start_le_stop (since := "2024-04-13")]
theorem Subarray.h₁ (s : Subarray α) : s.start s.stop := s.start_le_stop
@[deprecated Subarray.stop_le_array_size (since := "2024-04-13")]
theorem Subarray.h₂ (s : Subarray α) : s.stop s.array.size := s.stop_le_array_size
h₁ : start stop
h₂ : stop as.size
namespace Subarray
def size (s : Subarray α) : Nat :=
s.stop - s.start
theorem size_le_array_size {s : Subarray α} : s.size s.array.size := by
let {array, start, stop, start_le_stop, stop_le_array_size} := s
simp [size]
apply Nat.le_trans (Nat.sub_le stop start)
assumption
def get (s : Subarray α) (i : Fin s.size) : α :=
have : s.start + i.val < s.array.size := by
apply Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le _ s.stop_le_array_size
have : s.start + i.val < s.as.size := by
apply Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le _ s.h₂
have := i.isLt
simp [size] at this
rw [Nat.add_comm]
exact Nat.add_lt_of_lt_sub this
s.array[s.start + i.val]
s.as[s.start + i.val]
instance : GetElem (Subarray α) Nat α fun xs i => i < xs.size where
getElem xs i h := xs.get i, h
instance : LawfulGetElem (Subarray α) Nat α fun xs i => i < xs.size where
@[inline] def getD (s : Subarray α) (i : Nat) (v₀ : α) : α :=
if h : i < s.size then s.get i, h else v₀
@@ -57,7 +40,7 @@ abbrev get! [Inhabited α] (s : Subarray α) (i : Nat) : α :=
def popFront (s : Subarray α) : Subarray α :=
if h : s.start < s.stop then
{ s with start := s.start + 1, start_le_stop := Nat.le_of_lt_succ (Nat.add_lt_add_right h 1) }
{ s with start := s.start + 1, h₁ := Nat.le_of_lt_succ (Nat.add_lt_add_right h 1) }
else
s
@@ -65,7 +48,7 @@ def popFront (s : Subarray α) : Subarray α :=
let sz := USize.ofNat s.stop
let rec @[specialize] loop (i : USize) (b : β) : m β := do
if i < sz then
let a := s.array.uget i lcProof
let a := s.as.uget i lcProof
match ( f a b) with
| ForInStep.done b => pure b
| ForInStep.yield b => loop (i+1) b
@@ -83,27 +66,27 @@ instance : ForIn m (Subarray α) α where
@[inline]
def foldlM {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {m : Type v Type w} [Monad m] (f : β α m β) (init : β) (as : Subarray α) : m β :=
as.array.foldlM f (init := init) (start := as.start) (stop := as.stop)
as.as.foldlM f (init := init) (start := as.start) (stop := as.stop)
@[inline]
def foldrM {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {m : Type v Type w} [Monad m] (f : α β m β) (init : β) (as : Subarray α) : m β :=
as.array.foldrM f (init := init) (start := as.stop) (stop := as.start)
as.as.foldrM f (init := init) (start := as.stop) (stop := as.start)
@[inline]
def anyM {α : Type u} {m : Type Type w} [Monad m] (p : α m Bool) (as : Subarray α) : m Bool :=
as.array.anyM p (start := as.start) (stop := as.stop)
as.as.anyM p (start := as.start) (stop := as.stop)
@[inline]
def allM {α : Type u} {m : Type Type w} [Monad m] (p : α m Bool) (as : Subarray α) : m Bool :=
as.array.allM p (start := as.start) (stop := as.stop)
as.as.allM p (start := as.start) (stop := as.stop)
@[inline]
def forM {α : Type u} {m : Type v Type w} [Monad m] (f : α m PUnit) (as : Subarray α) : m PUnit :=
as.array.forM f (start := as.start) (stop := as.stop)
as.as.forM f (start := as.start) (stop := as.stop)
@[inline]
def forRevM {α : Type u} {m : Type v Type w} [Monad m] (f : α m PUnit) (as : Subarray α) : m PUnit :=
as.array.forRevM f (start := as.stop) (stop := as.start)
as.as.forRevM f (start := as.stop) (stop := as.start)
@[inline]
def foldl {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : β α β) (init : β) (as : Subarray α) : β :=
@@ -150,25 +133,15 @@ variable {α : Type u}
def toSubarray (as : Array α) (start : Nat := 0) (stop : Nat := as.size) : Subarray α :=
if h₂ : stop as.size then
if h₁ : start stop then
{ array := as, start := start, stop := stop,
start_le_stop := h₁, stop_le_array_size := h₂ }
else
{ array := as, start := stop, stop := stop,
start_le_stop := Nat.le_refl _, stop_le_array_size := h₂ }
if h₁ : start stop then
{ as := as, start := start, stop := stop, h₁ := h₁, h₂ := h₂ }
else
{ as := as, start := stop, stop := stop, h₁ := Nat.le_refl _, h₂ := h₂ }
else
if h₁ : start as.size then
{ array := as,
start := start,
stop := as.size,
start_le_stop := h₁,
stop_le_array_size := Nat.le_refl _ }
else
{ array := as,
start := as.size,
stop := as.size,
start_le_stop := Nat.le_refl _,
stop_le_array_size := Nat.le_refl _ }
if h₁ : start as.size then
{ as := as, start := start, stop := as.size, h₁ := h₁, h₂ := Nat.le_refl _ }
else
{ as := as, start := as.size, stop := as.size, h₁ := Nat.le_refl _, h₂ := Nat.le_refl _ }
@[coe]
def ofSubarray (s : Subarray α) : Array α := Id.run do

View File

@@ -1,71 +0,0 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Lean FRO, LLC. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Thrane Christiansen
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Array.Basic
import Init.Data.Array.Subarray
import Init.Omega
/-
This module contains splitting operations on subarrays that crucially rely on `omega` for proof
automation. Placing them in another module breaks an import cycle, because `omega` itself uses the
array library.
-/
namespace Subarray
/--
Splits a subarray into two parts.
-/
def split (s : Subarray α) (i : Fin s.size.succ) : (Subarray α × Subarray α) :=
let i', isLt := i
have := s.start_le_stop
have := s.stop_le_array_size
have : i' s.stop - s.start := Nat.lt_succ.mp isLt
have : s.start + i' s.stop := by omega
have : s.start + i' s.array.size := by omega
have : s.start + i' s.stop := by
simp only [size] at isLt
omega
let pre := {s with
stop := s.start + i',
start_le_stop := by omega,
stop_le_array_size := by assumption
}
let post := {s with
start := s.start + i'
start_le_stop := by assumption
}
(pre, post)
/--
Removes the first `i` elements of the subarray. If there are `i` or fewer elements, the resulting
subarray is empty.
-/
def drop (arr : Subarray α) (i : Nat) : Subarray α where
array := arr.array
start := min (arr.start + i) arr.stop
stop := arr.stop
start_le_stop := by
rw [Nat.min_def]
split <;> simp only [Nat.le_refl, *]
stop_le_array_size := arr.stop_le_array_size
/--
Keeps only the first `i` elements of the subarray. If there are `i` or fewer elements, the resulting
subarray is empty.
-/
def take (arr : Subarray α) (i : Nat) : Subarray α where
array := arr.array
start := arr.start
stop := min (arr.start + i) arr.stop
start_le_stop := by
have := arr.start_le_stop
rw [Nat.min_def]
split <;> omega
stop_le_array_size := by
have := arr.stop_le_array_size
rw [Nat.min_def]
split <;> omega

View File

@@ -1,13 +1,12 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Lean FRO, LLC. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joe Hendrix, Wojciech Nawrocki, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro, Alex Keizer, Harun Khan, Abdalrhman M Mohamed
Authors: Joe Hendrix, Wojciech Nawrocki, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro, Alex Keizer
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Fin.Basic
import Init.Data.Nat.Bitwise.Lemmas
import Init.Data.Nat.Power2
import Init.Data.Int.Bitwise
/-!
We define bitvectors. We choose the `Fin` representation over others for its relative efficiency
@@ -34,8 +33,7 @@ structure BitVec (w : Nat) where
O(1), because we use `Fin` as the internal representation of a bitvector. -/
toFin : Fin (2^w)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-12")]
protected abbrev Std.BitVec := _root_.BitVec
@[deprecated] abbrev Std.BitVec := _root_.BitVec
-- We manually derive the `DecidableEq` instances for `BitVec` because
-- we want to have builtin support for bit-vector literals, and we
@@ -74,9 +72,6 @@ protected def toNat (a : BitVec n) : Nat := a.toFin.val
/-- Return the bound in terms of toNat. -/
theorem isLt (x : BitVec w) : x.toNat < 2^w := x.toFin.isLt
@[deprecated isLt (since := "2024-03-12")]
theorem toNat_lt (x : BitVec n) : x.toNat < 2^n := x.isLt
/-- Theorem for normalizing the bit vector literal representation. -/
-- TODO: This needs more usage data to assess which direction the simp should go.
@[simp, bv_toNat] theorem ofNat_eq_ofNat : @OfNat.ofNat (BitVec n) i _ = .ofNat n i := rfl
@@ -129,20 +124,13 @@ section Int
/-- Interpret the bitvector as an integer stored in two's complement form. -/
protected def toInt (a : BitVec n) : Int :=
if 2 * a.toNat < 2^n then
a.toNat
else
(a.toNat : Int) - (2^n : Nat)
if a.msb then Int.ofNat a.toNat - Int.ofNat (2^n) else a.toNat
/-- The `BitVec` with value `(2^n + (i mod 2^n)) mod 2^n`. -/
protected def ofInt (n : Nat) (i : Int) : BitVec n := .ofNatLt (i % (Int.ofNat (2^n))).toNat (by
apply (Int.toNat_lt _).mpr
· apply Int.emod_lt_of_pos
exact Int.ofNat_pos.mpr (Nat.two_pow_pos _)
· apply Int.emod_nonneg
intro eq
apply Nat.ne_of_gt (Nat.two_pow_pos n)
exact Int.ofNat_inj.mp eq)
protected def ofInt (n : Nat) (i : Int) : BitVec n :=
match i with
| Int.ofNat x => .ofNat n x
| Int.negSucc x => BitVec.ofNatLt (2^n - x % 2^n - 1) (by omega)
instance : IntCast (BitVec w) := BitVec.ofInt w
@@ -619,14 +607,4 @@ section normalization_eqs
@[simp] theorem zero_eq : BitVec.zero n = 0#n := rfl
end normalization_eqs
/-- Converts a list of `Bool`s to a big-endian `BitVec`. -/
def ofBoolListBE : (bs : List Bool) BitVec bs.length
| [] => 0#0
| b :: bs => cons b (ofBoolListBE bs)
/-- Converts a list of `Bool`s to a little-endian `BitVec`. -/
def ofBoolListLE : (bs : List Bool) BitVec bs.length
| [] => 0#0
| b :: bs => concat (ofBoolListLE bs) b
end BitVec

View File

@@ -5,7 +5,6 @@ Authors: Harun Khan, Abdalrhman M Mohamed, Joe Hendrix
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.BitVec.Folds
import Init.Data.Nat.Mod
/-!
# Bitblasting of bitvectors
@@ -71,8 +70,24 @@ private theorem testBit_limit {x i : Nat} (x_lt_succ : x < 2^(i+1)) :
_ x := testBit_implies_ge jp
private theorem mod_two_pow_succ (x i : Nat) :
x % 2^(i+1) = 2^i*(x.testBit i).toNat + x % (2 ^ i):= by
rw [Nat.mod_pow_succ, Nat.add_comm, Nat.toNat_testBit]
x % 2^(i+1) = 2^i*(x.testBit i).toNat + x % (2 ^ i):= by
apply Nat.eq_of_testBit_eq
intro j
simp only [Nat.mul_add_lt_is_or, testBit_or, testBit_mod_two_pow, testBit_shiftLeft,
Nat.testBit_bool_to_nat, Nat.sub_eq_zero_iff_le, Nat.mod_lt, Nat.two_pow_pos,
testBit_mul_pow_two]
rcases Nat.lt_trichotomy i j with i_lt_j | i_eq_j | j_lt_i
· have i_le_j : i j := Nat.le_of_lt i_lt_j
have not_j_le_i : ¬(j i) := Nat.not_le_of_lt i_lt_j
have not_j_lt_i : ¬(j < i) := Nat.not_lt_of_le i_le_j
have not_j_lt_i_succ : ¬(j < i + 1) :=
Nat.not_le_of_lt (Nat.succ_lt_succ i_lt_j)
simp [i_le_j, not_j_le_i, not_j_lt_i, not_j_lt_i_succ]
· simp [i_eq_j]
· have j_le_i : j i := Nat.le_of_lt j_lt_i
have j_le_i_succ : j < i + 1 := Nat.succ_le_succ j_le_i
have not_j_ge_i : ¬(j i) := Nat.not_le_of_lt j_lt_i
simp [j_lt_i, j_le_i, not_j_ge_i, j_le_i_succ]
private theorem mod_two_pow_add_mod_two_pow_add_bool_lt_two_pow_succ
(x y i : Nat) (c : Bool) : x % 2^i + (y % 2^i + c.toNat) < 2^(i+1) := by
@@ -159,43 +174,4 @@ theorem add_eq_adc (w : Nat) (x y : BitVec w) : x + y = (adc x y false).snd := b
theorem allOnes_sub_eq_not (x : BitVec w) : allOnes w - x = ~~~x := by
rw [ add_not_self x, BitVec.add_comm, add_sub_cancel]
/-! ### Negation -/
theorem bit_not_testBit (x : BitVec w) (i : Fin w) :
getLsb (((iunfoldr (fun (i : Fin w) c => (c, !(x.getLsb i)))) ()).snd) i.val = !(getLsb x i.val) := by
apply iunfoldr_getLsb (fun _ => ()) i (by simp)
theorem bit_not_add_self (x : BitVec w) :
((iunfoldr (fun (i : Fin w) c => (c, !(x.getLsb i)))) ()).snd + x = -1 := by
simp only [add_eq_adc]
apply iunfoldr_replace_snd (fun _ => false) (-1) false rfl
intro i; simp only [ BitVec.not, adcb, testBit_toNat]
rw [iunfoldr_replace_snd (fun _ => ()) (((iunfoldr (fun i c => (c, !(x.getLsb i)))) ()).snd)]
<;> simp [bit_not_testBit, negOne_eq_allOnes, getLsb_allOnes]
theorem bit_not_eq_not (x : BitVec w) :
((iunfoldr (fun i c => (c, !(x.getLsb i)))) ()).snd = ~~~ x := by
simp [allOnes_sub_eq_not, BitVec.eq_sub_iff_add_eq.mpr (bit_not_add_self x), negOne_eq_allOnes]
theorem bit_neg_eq_neg (x : BitVec w) : -x = (adc (((iunfoldr (fun (i : Fin w) c => (c, !(x.getLsb i)))) ()).snd) (BitVec.ofNat w 1) false).snd:= by
simp only [ add_eq_adc]
rw [iunfoldr_replace_snd ((fun _ => ())) (((iunfoldr (fun (i : Fin w) c => (c, !(x.getLsb i)))) ()).snd) _ rfl]
· rw [BitVec.eq_sub_iff_add_eq.mpr (bit_not_add_self x), sub_toAdd, BitVec.add_comm _ (-x)]
simp [ sub_toAdd, BitVec.sub_add_cancel]
· simp [bit_not_testBit x _]
/-! ### Inequalities (le / lt) -/
theorem ult_eq_not_carry (x y : BitVec w) : x.ult y = !carry w x (~~~y) true := by
simp only [BitVec.ult, carry, toNat_mod_cancel, toNat_not, toNat_true, ge_iff_le, decide_not,
Nat.not_le, decide_eq_decide]
rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (by omega)]
omega
theorem ule_eq_not_ult (x y : BitVec w) : x.ule y = !y.ult x := by
simp [BitVec.ule, BitVec.ult, decide_not]
theorem ule_eq_carry (x y : BitVec w) : x.ule y = carry w y (~~~x) true := by
simp [ule_eq_not_ult, ult_eq_not_carry]
end BitVec

View File

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Lean FRO, LLC. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joe Hendrix, Harun Khan
Authors: Joe Hendrix
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.BitVec.Lemmas
@@ -48,51 +48,6 @@ private theorem iunfoldr.eq_test
intro i
simp_all [truncate_succ]
theorem iunfoldr_getLsb' {f : Fin w α α × Bool} (state : Nat α)
(ind : (i : Fin w), (f i (state i.val)).fst = state (i.val+1)) :
( i : Fin w, getLsb (iunfoldr f (state 0)).snd i.val = (f i (state i.val)).snd)
(iunfoldr f (state 0)).fst = state w := by
unfold iunfoldr
simp
apply Fin.hIterate_elim
(fun j (p : α × BitVec j) => (hj : j w)
( i : Fin j, getLsb p.snd i.val = (f i.val, Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le i.isLt hj (state i.val)).snd)
p.fst = state j)
case hj => simp
case init =>
intro
apply And.intro
· intro i
have := Fin.size_pos i
contradiction
· rfl
case step =>
intro j s, v ih hj
apply And.intro
case left =>
intro i
simp only [getLsb_cons]
have hj2 : j.val w := by simp
cases (Nat.lt_or_eq_of_le (Nat.lt_succ.mp i.isLt)) with
| inl h3 => simp [if_neg, (Nat.ne_of_lt h3)]
exact (ih hj2).1 i.val, h3
| inr h3 => simp [h3, if_pos]
cases (Nat.eq_zero_or_pos j.val) with
| inl hj3 => congr
rw [ (ih hj2).2]
| inr hj3 => congr
exact (ih hj2).2
case right =>
simp
have hj2 : j.val w := by simp
rw [ ind j, (ih hj2).2]
theorem iunfoldr_getLsb {f : Fin w α α × Bool} (state : Nat α) (i : Fin w)
(ind : (i : Fin w), (f i (state i.val)).fst = state (i.val+1)) :
getLsb (iunfoldr f (state 0)).snd i.val = (f i (state i.val)).snd := by
exact (iunfoldr_getLsb' state ind).1 i
/--
Correctness theorem for `iunfoldr`.
-/
@@ -103,11 +58,4 @@ theorem iunfoldr_replace
iunfoldr f a = (state w, value) := by
simp [iunfoldr.eq_test state value a init step]
theorem iunfoldr_replace_snd
{f : Fin w α α × Bool} (state : Nat α) (value : BitVec w) (a : α)
(init : state 0 = a)
(step : (i : Fin w), f i (state i.val) = (state (i.val+1), value.getLsb i.val)) :
(iunfoldr f a).snd = value := by
simp [iunfoldr.eq_test state value a init step]
end BitVec

View File

@@ -1,8 +1,7 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Lean FRO, LLC. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joe Hendrix, Harun Khan, Alex Keizer, Abdalrhman M Mohamed,
Authors: Joe Hendrix
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Bool
@@ -30,48 +29,26 @@ theorem eq_of_toNat_eq {n} : ∀ {i j : BitVec n}, i.toNat = j.toNat → i = j
@[bv_toNat] theorem toNat_ne (x y : BitVec n) : x y x.toNat y.toNat := by
rw [Ne, toNat_eq]
theorem toNat_lt (x : BitVec n) : x.toNat < 2^n := x.toFin.2
theorem testBit_toNat (x : BitVec w) : x.toNat.testBit i = x.getLsb i := rfl
@[simp] theorem getLsb_ofFin (x : Fin (2^n)) (i : Nat) :
getLsb (BitVec.ofFin x) i = x.val.testBit i := rfl
@[simp] theorem getLsb_ge (x : BitVec w) (i : Nat) (ge : w i) : getLsb x i = false := by
@[simp] theorem getLsb_ge (x : BitVec w) (i : Nat) (ge : i w) : getLsb x i = false := by
let x, x_lt := x
simp
apply Nat.testBit_lt_two_pow
have p : 2^w 2^i := Nat.pow_le_pow_of_le_right (by omega) ge
omega
@[simp] theorem getMsb_ge (x : BitVec w) (i : Nat) (ge : w i) : getMsb x i = false := by
rw [getMsb]
simp only [Bool.and_eq_false_imp, decide_eq_true_eq]
omega
theorem lt_of_getLsb (x : BitVec w) (i : Nat) : getLsb x i = true i < w := by
if h : i < w then
simp [h]
else
simp [Nat.ge_of_not_lt h]
theorem lt_of_getMsb (x : BitVec w) (i : Nat) : getMsb x i = true i < w := by
if h : i < w then
simp [h]
else
simp [Nat.ge_of_not_lt h]
theorem getMsb_eq_getLsb (x : BitVec w) (i : Nat) : x.getMsb i = (decide (i < w) && x.getLsb (w - 1 - i)) := by
rw [getMsb]
theorem getLsb_eq_getMsb (x : BitVec w) (i : Nat) : x.getLsb i = (decide (i < w) && x.getMsb (w - 1 - i)) := by
rw [getMsb]
by_cases h₁ : i < w <;> by_cases h₂ : w - 1 - i < w <;>
simp only [h₁, h₂] <;> simp only [decide_True, decide_False, Bool.false_and, Bool.and_false, Bool.true_and, Bool.and_true]
· congr
omega
all_goals
apply getLsb_ge
omega
-- We choose `eq_of_getLsb_eq` as the `@[ext]` theorem for `BitVec`
-- somewhat arbitrarily over `eq_of_getMsg_eq`.
@[ext] theorem eq_of_getLsb_eq {x y : BitVec w}
@@ -95,7 +72,7 @@ theorem eq_of_getMsb_eq {x y : BitVec w}
else
have w_pos := Nat.pos_of_ne_zero w_zero
have r : i w - 1 := by
simp [Nat.le_sub_iff_add_le w_pos]
simp [Nat.le_sub_iff_add_le w_pos, Nat.add_succ]
exact i_lt
have q_lt : w - 1 - i < w := by
simp only [Nat.sub_sub]
@@ -104,13 +81,7 @@ theorem eq_of_getMsb_eq {x y : BitVec w}
have q := pred w - 1 - i, q_lt
simpa [q_lt, Nat.sub_sub_self, r] using q
-- This cannot be a `@[simp]` lemma, as it would be tried at every term.
theorem of_length_zero {x : BitVec 0} : x = 0#0 := by ext; simp
@[simp] theorem toNat_zero_length (x : BitVec 0) : x.toNat = 0 := by simp [of_length_zero]
@[simp] theorem getLsb_zero_length (x : BitVec 0) : x.getLsb i = false := by simp [of_length_zero]
@[simp] theorem getMsb_zero_length (x : BitVec 0) : x.getMsb i = false := by simp [of_length_zero]
@[simp] theorem msb_zero_length (x : BitVec 0) : x.msb = false := by simp [BitVec.msb, of_length_zero]
@[simp] theorem of_length_zero {x : BitVec 0} : x = 0#0 := by ext; simp
theorem eq_of_toFin_eq : {x y : BitVec w}, x.toFin = y.toFin x = y
| _, _, _, _, rfl => rfl
@@ -118,17 +89,12 @@ theorem eq_of_toFin_eq : ∀ {x y : BitVec w}, x.toFin = y.toFin → x = y
@[simp] theorem toNat_ofBool (b : Bool) : (ofBool b).toNat = b.toNat := by
cases b <;> rfl
@[simp] theorem msb_ofBool (b : Bool) : (ofBool b).msb = b := by
cases b <;> simp [BitVec.msb]
theorem ofNat_one (n : Nat) : BitVec.ofNat 1 n = BitVec.ofBool (n % 2 = 1) := by
rcases (Nat.mod_two_eq_zero_or_one n) with h | h <;> simp [h, BitVec.ofNat, Fin.ofNat']
theorem ofBool_eq_iff_eq : (b b' : Bool), BitVec.ofBool b = BitVec.ofBool b' b = b' := by
decide
@[simp] theorem not_ofBool : ~~~ (ofBool b) = ofBool (!b) := by cases b <;> rfl
@[simp, bv_toNat] theorem toNat_ofFin (x : Fin (2^n)) : (BitVec.ofFin x).toNat = x.val := rfl
@[simp] theorem toNat_ofNatLt (x : Nat) (p : x < 2^w) : (x#'p).toNat = x := rfl
@@ -146,13 +112,10 @@ theorem getLsb_ofNat (n : Nat) (x : Nat) (i : Nat) :
getLsb (x#n) i = (i < n && x.testBit i) := by
simp [getLsb, BitVec.ofNat, Fin.val_ofNat']
@[simp, deprecated toNat_ofNat (since := "2024-02-22")]
theorem toNat_zero (n : Nat) : (0#n).toNat = 0 := by trivial
@[simp, deprecated toNat_ofNat] theorem toNat_zero (n : Nat) : (0#n).toNat = 0 := by trivial
@[simp] theorem getLsb_zero : (0#w).getLsb i = false := by simp [getLsb]
@[simp] theorem getMsb_zero : (0#w).getMsb i = false := by simp [getMsb]
@[simp] theorem toNat_mod_cancel (x : BitVec n) : x.toNat % (2^n) = x.toNat :=
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt x.isLt
@@ -170,35 +133,21 @@ theorem msb_eq_getLsb_last (x : BitVec w) :
· simp [BitVec.eq_nil x]
· simp
@[bv_toNat] theorem getLsb_last (x : BitVec w) :
x.getLsb (w-1) = decide (2 ^ (w-1) x.toNat) := by
rcases w with rfl | w
· simp
· simp only [Nat.zero_lt_succ, decide_True, getLsb, Nat.testBit, Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub,
@[bv_toNat] theorem getLsb_last (x : BitVec (w + 1)) :
x.getLsb w = decide (2 ^ w x.toNat) := by
simp only [Nat.zero_lt_succ, decide_True, getLsb, Nat.testBit, Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub,
Nat.sub_zero, Nat.and_one_is_mod, Bool.true_and, Nat.shiftRight_eq_div_pow]
rcases (Nat.lt_or_ge (BitVec.toNat x) (2 ^ w)) with h | h
· simp [Nat.div_eq_of_lt h, h]
· simp only [h]
rw [Nat.div_eq_sub_div (Nat.two_pow_pos w) h, Nat.div_eq_of_lt]
· decide
· have : BitVec.toNat x < 2^w + 2^w := by simpa [Nat.pow_succ, Nat.mul_two] using x.isLt
omega
rcases (Nat.lt_or_ge (BitVec.toNat x) (2 ^ w)) with h | h
· simp [Nat.div_eq_of_lt h, h]
· simp only [h]
rw [Nat.div_eq_sub_div (Nat.two_pow_pos w) h, Nat.div_eq_of_lt]
· decide
· have : BitVec.toNat x < 2^w + 2^w := by simpa [Nat.pow_succ, Nat.mul_two] using x.isLt
omega
@[bv_toNat] theorem getLsb_succ_last (x : BitVec (w + 1)) :
x.getLsb w = decide (2 ^ w x.toNat) := getLsb_last x
@[bv_toNat] theorem msb_eq_decide (x : BitVec w) : BitVec.msb x = decide (2 ^ (w-1) x.toNat) := by
@[bv_toNat] theorem msb_eq_decide (x : BitVec (w + 1)) : BitVec.msb x = decide (2 ^ w x.toNat) := by
simp [msb_eq_getLsb_last, getLsb_last]
theorem toNat_ge_of_msb_true {x : BitVec n} (p : BitVec.msb x = true) : x.toNat 2^(n-1) := by
match n with
| 0 =>
simp [BitVec.msb, BitVec.getMsb] at p
| n + 1 =>
simp [BitVec.msb_eq_decide] at p
simp only [Nat.add_sub_cancel]
exact p
/-! ### cast -/
@[simp, bv_toNat] theorem toNat_cast (h : w = v) (x : BitVec w) : (cast h x).toNat = x.toNat := rfl
@@ -214,59 +163,6 @@ theorem toNat_ge_of_msb_true {x : BitVec n} (p : BitVec.msb x = true) : x.toNat
@[simp] theorem msb_cast (h : w = v) (x : BitVec w) : (cast h x).msb = x.msb := by
simp [BitVec.msb]
/-! ### toInt/ofInt -/
/-- Prove equality of bitvectors in terms of nat operations. -/
theorem toInt_eq_toNat_cond (i : BitVec n) :
i.toInt =
if 2*i.toNat < 2^n then
(i.toNat : Int)
else
(i.toNat : Int) - (2^n : Nat) := by
unfold BitVec.toInt
split <;> omega
theorem toInt_eq_toNat_bmod (x : BitVec n) : x.toInt = Int.bmod x.toNat (2^n) := by
simp only [toInt_eq_toNat_cond]
split
case inl g =>
rw [Int.bmod_pos] <;> simp only [Int.ofNat_emod, toNat_mod_cancel]
omega
case inr g =>
rw [Int.bmod_neg] <;> simp only [Int.ofNat_emod, toNat_mod_cancel]
omega
/-- Prove equality of bitvectors in terms of nat operations. -/
theorem eq_of_toInt_eq {i j : BitVec n} : i.toInt = j.toInt i = j := by
intro eq
simp [toInt_eq_toNat_cond] at eq
apply eq_of_toNat_eq
revert eq
have _ilt := i.isLt
have _jlt := j.isLt
split <;> split <;> omega
theorem toInt_inj (x y : BitVec n) : x.toInt = y.toInt x = y :=
Iff.intro eq_of_toInt_eq (congrArg BitVec.toInt)
theorem toInt_ne (x y : BitVec n) : x.toInt y.toInt x y := by
rw [Ne, toInt_inj]
@[simp] theorem toNat_ofInt {n : Nat} (i : Int) :
(BitVec.ofInt n i).toNat = (i % (2^n : Nat)).toNat := by
unfold BitVec.ofInt
simp
theorem toInt_ofNat {n : Nat} (x : Nat) :
(BitVec.ofNat n x).toInt = (x : Int).bmod (2^n) := by
simp [toInt_eq_toNat_bmod]
@[simp] theorem toInt_ofInt {n : Nat} (i : Int) :
(BitVec.ofInt n i).toInt = i.bmod (2^n) := by
have _ := Nat.two_pow_pos n
have p : 0 i % (2^n : Nat) := by omega
simp [toInt_eq_toNat_bmod, Int.toNat_of_nonneg p]
/-! ### zeroExtend and truncate -/
@[simp, bv_toNat] theorem toNat_zeroExtend' {m n : Nat} (p : m n) (x : BitVec m) :
@@ -284,12 +180,6 @@ theorem toInt_ofNat {n : Nat} (x : Nat) :
else
simp [n_le_i, toNat_ofNat]
theorem zeroExtend'_eq {x : BitVec w} (h : w v) : x.zeroExtend' h = x.zeroExtend v := by
apply eq_of_toNat_eq
rw [toNat_zeroExtend, toNat_zeroExtend']
rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
exact Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le x.isLt (Nat.pow_le_pow_right (Nat.zero_lt_two) h)
@[simp, bv_toNat] theorem toNat_truncate (x : BitVec n) : (truncate i x).toNat = x.toNat % 2^i :=
toNat_zeroExtend i x
@@ -308,64 +198,18 @@ theorem zeroExtend'_eq {x : BitVec w} (h : w ≤ v) : x.zeroExtend' h = x.zeroEx
apply eq_of_toNat_eq
simp
/-- Moves one-sided left toNat equality to BitVec equality. -/
theorem toNat_eq_nat (x : BitVec w) (y : Nat)
: (x.toNat = y) (y < 2^w (x = y#w)) := by
apply Iff.intro
· intro eq
simp at eq
have lt := x.isLt
simp [eq] at lt
simp [eq, lt, x.isLt]
· intro eq
simp [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt, eq]
/-- Moves one-sided right toNat equality to BitVec equality. -/
theorem nat_eq_toNat (x : BitVec w) (y : Nat)
: (y = x.toNat) (y < 2^w (x = y#w)) := by
rw [@eq_comm _ _ x.toNat]
apply toNat_eq_nat
@[simp] theorem getLsb_zeroExtend' (ge : m n) (x : BitVec n) (i : Nat) :
getLsb (zeroExtend' ge x) i = getLsb x i := by
simp [getLsb, toNat_zeroExtend']
@[simp] theorem getMsb_zeroExtend' (ge : m n) (x : BitVec n) (i : Nat) :
getMsb (zeroExtend' ge x) i = (decide (i m - n) && getMsb x (i - (m - n))) := by
simp only [getMsb, getLsb_zeroExtend', gt_iff_lt]
by_cases h₁ : decide (i < m) <;> by_cases h₂ : decide (i m - n) <;> by_cases h₃ : decide (i - (m - n) < n) <;>
by_cases h₄ : n - 1 - (i - (m - n)) = m - 1 - i
all_goals
simp only [h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄]
simp_all only [ge_iff_le, decide_eq_true_eq, Nat.not_le, Nat.not_lt, Bool.true_and,
Bool.false_and, Bool.and_self] <;>
(try apply getLsb_ge) <;>
(try apply (getLsb_ge _ _ _).symm) <;>
omega
@[simp] theorem getLsb_zeroExtend (m : Nat) (x : BitVec n) (i : Nat) :
getLsb (zeroExtend m x) i = (decide (i < m) && getLsb x i) := by
simp [getLsb, toNat_zeroExtend, Nat.testBit_mod_two_pow]
@[simp] theorem getMsb_zeroExtend_add {x : BitVec w} (h : k i) :
(x.zeroExtend (w + k)).getMsb i = x.getMsb (i - k) := by
by_cases h : w = 0
· subst h; simp [of_length_zero]
simp only [getMsb, getLsb_zeroExtend]
by_cases h₁ : i < w + k <;> by_cases h₂ : i - k < w <;> by_cases h₃ : w + k - 1 - i < w + k
<;> simp [h₁, h₂, h₃]
· congr 1
omega
all_goals (first | apply getLsb_ge | apply Eq.symm; apply getLsb_ge)
<;> omega
@[simp] theorem getLsb_truncate (m : Nat) (x : BitVec n) (i : Nat) :
getLsb (truncate m x) i = (decide (i < m) && getLsb x i) :=
getLsb_zeroExtend m x i
theorem msb_truncate (x : BitVec w) : (x.truncate (k + 1)).msb = x.getLsb k := by
simp [BitVec.msb, getMsb]
@[simp] theorem zeroExtend_zeroExtend_of_le (x : BitVec w) (h : k l) :
(x.zeroExtend l).zeroExtend k = x.zeroExtend k := by
ext i
@@ -378,18 +222,11 @@ theorem msb_truncate (x : BitVec w) : (x.truncate (k + 1)).msb = x.getLsb k := b
(x.truncate l).truncate k = x.truncate k :=
zeroExtend_zeroExtend_of_le x h
@[simp] theorem truncate_cast {h : w = v} : (cast h x).truncate k = x.truncate k := by
apply eq_of_getLsb_eq
simp
theorem msb_zeroExtend (x : BitVec w) : (x.zeroExtend v).msb = (decide (0 < v) && x.getLsb (v - 1)) := by
rw [msb_eq_getLsb_last]
simp only [getLsb_zeroExtend]
cases getLsb x (v - 1) <;> simp; omega
theorem msb_zeroExtend' (x : BitVec w) (h : w v) : (x.zeroExtend' h).msb = (decide (0 < v) && x.getLsb (v - 1)) := by
rw [zeroExtend'_eq, msb_zeroExtend]
/-! ## extractLsb -/
@[simp]
@@ -437,18 +274,6 @@ protected theorem extractLsb_ofNat (x n : Nat) (hi lo : Nat) :
rw [ testBit_toNat, getLsb, getLsb]
simp
@[simp] theorem getMsb_or {x y : BitVec w} : (x ||| y).getMsb i = (x.getMsb i || y.getMsb i) := by
simp only [getMsb]
by_cases h : i < w <;> simp [h]
@[simp] theorem msb_or {x y : BitVec w} : (x ||| y).msb = (x.msb || y.msb) := by
simp [BitVec.msb]
@[simp] theorem truncate_or {x y : BitVec w} :
(x ||| y).truncate k = x.truncate k ||| y.truncate k := by
ext
simp
/-! ### and -/
@[simp] theorem toNat_and (x y : BitVec v) :
@@ -463,18 +288,6 @@ protected theorem extractLsb_ofNat (x n : Nat) (hi lo : Nat) :
rw [ testBit_toNat, getLsb, getLsb]
simp
@[simp] theorem getMsb_and {x y : BitVec w} : (x &&& y).getMsb i = (x.getMsb i && y.getMsb i) := by
simp only [getMsb]
by_cases h : i < w <;> simp [h]
@[simp] theorem msb_and {x y : BitVec w} : (x &&& y).msb = (x.msb && y.msb) := by
simp [BitVec.msb]
@[simp] theorem truncate_and {x y : BitVec w} :
(x &&& y).truncate k = x.truncate k &&& y.truncate k := by
ext
simp
/-! ### xor -/
@[simp] theorem toNat_xor (x y : BitVec v) :
@@ -490,11 +303,6 @@ protected theorem extractLsb_ofNat (x n : Nat) (hi lo : Nat) :
rw [ testBit_toNat, getLsb, getLsb]
simp
@[simp] theorem truncate_xor {x y : BitVec w} :
(x ^^^ y).truncate k = x.truncate k ^^^ y.truncate k := by
ext
simp
/-! ### not -/
theorem not_def {x : BitVec v} : ~~~x = allOnes v ^^^ x := rfl
@@ -509,12 +317,12 @@ theorem not_def {x : BitVec v} : ~~~x = allOnes v ^^^ x := rfl
| y+1 =>
rw [Nat.succ_eq_add_one] at h
rw [ h]
rw [Nat.testBit_two_pow_sub_succ (isLt _)]
rw [Nat.testBit_two_pow_sub_succ (toNat_lt _)]
· cases w : decide (i < v)
· simp at w
simp [w]
rw [Nat.testBit_lt_two_pow]
calc BitVec.toNat x < 2 ^ v := isLt _
calc BitVec.toNat x < 2 ^ v := toNat_lt _
_ 2 ^ i := Nat.pow_le_pow_of_le_right Nat.zero_lt_two w
· simp
@@ -527,30 +335,6 @@ theorem not_def {x : BitVec v} : ~~~x = allOnes v ^^^ x := rfl
@[simp] theorem getLsb_not {x : BitVec v} : (~~~x).getLsb i = (decide (i < v) && ! x.getLsb i) := by
by_cases h' : i < v <;> simp_all [not_def]
@[simp] theorem truncate_not {x : BitVec w} (h : k w) :
(~~~x).truncate k = ~~~(x.truncate k) := by
ext
simp [h]
omega
/-! ### cast -/
@[simp] theorem not_cast {x : BitVec w} (h : w = w') : ~~~(cast h x) = cast h (~~~x) := by
ext
simp_all [lt_of_getLsb]
@[simp] theorem and_cast {x y : BitVec w} (h : w = w') : cast h x &&& cast h y = cast h (x &&& y) := by
ext
simp_all [lt_of_getLsb]
@[simp] theorem or_cast {x y : BitVec w} (h : w = w') : cast h x ||| cast h y = cast h (x ||| y) := by
ext
simp_all [lt_of_getLsb]
@[simp] theorem xor_cast {x y : BitVec w} (h : w = w') : cast h x &&& cast h y = cast h (x &&& y) := by
ext
simp_all [lt_of_getLsb]
/-! ### shiftLeft -/
@[simp, bv_toNat] theorem toNat_shiftLeft {x : BitVec v} :
@@ -568,19 +352,6 @@ theorem not_def {x : BitVec v} : ~~~x = allOnes v ^^^ x := rfl
cases h₁ : decide (i < m) <;> cases h₂ : decide (n i) <;> cases h₃ : decide (i < n)
all_goals { simp_all <;> omega }
@[simp] theorem getMsb_shiftLeft (x : BitVec w) (i) :
(x <<< i).getMsb k = x.getMsb (k + i) := by
simp only [getMsb, getLsb_shiftLeft]
by_cases h : w = 0
· subst h; simp
have t : w - 1 - k < w := by omega
simp only [t]
simp only [decide_True, Nat.sub_sub, Bool.true_and, Nat.add_assoc]
by_cases h₁ : k < w <;> by_cases h₂ : w - (1 + k) < i <;> by_cases h₃ : k + i < w
<;> simp [h₁, h₂, h₃]
<;> (first | apply getLsb_ge | apply Eq.symm; apply getLsb_ge)
<;> omega
theorem shiftLeftZeroExtend_eq {x : BitVec w} :
shiftLeftZeroExtend x n = zeroExtend (w+n) x <<< n := by
apply eq_of_toNat_eq
@@ -589,7 +360,7 @@ theorem shiftLeftZeroExtend_eq {x : BitVec w} :
· simp
rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
rw [Nat.shiftLeft_eq, Nat.pow_add]
exact Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right x.isLt (Nat.two_pow_pos _)
exact Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right (BitVec.toNat_lt x) (Nat.two_pow_pos _)
· omega
@[simp] theorem getLsb_shiftLeftZeroExtend (x : BitVec m) (n : Nat) :
@@ -600,26 +371,6 @@ theorem shiftLeftZeroExtend_eq {x : BitVec w} :
<;> simp_all
<;> (rw [getLsb_ge]; omega)
@[simp] theorem getMsb_shiftLeftZeroExtend (x : BitVec m) (n : Nat) :
getMsb (shiftLeftZeroExtend x n) i = getMsb x i := by
have : n i + n := by omega
simp_all [shiftLeftZeroExtend_eq]
@[simp] theorem msb_shiftLeftZeroExtend (x : BitVec w) (i : Nat) :
(shiftLeftZeroExtend x i).msb = x.msb := by
simp [shiftLeftZeroExtend_eq, BitVec.msb]
theorem shiftLeft_shiftLeft {w : Nat} (x : BitVec w) (n m : Nat) :
(x <<< n) <<< m = x <<< (n + m) := by
ext i
simp only [getLsb_shiftLeft, Fin.is_lt, decide_True, Bool.true_and]
rw [show i - (n + m) = (i - m - n) by omega]
cases h₂ : decide (i < m) <;>
cases h₃ : decide (i - m < w) <;>
cases h₄ : decide (i - m < n) <;>
cases h₅ : decide (i < n + m) <;>
simp at * <;> omega
/-! ### ushiftRight -/
@[simp, bv_toNat] theorem toNat_ushiftRight (x : BitVec n) (i : Nat) :
@@ -640,76 +391,11 @@ theorem append_def (x : BitVec v) (y : BitVec w) :
@[simp] theorem getLsb_append {v : BitVec n} {w : BitVec m} :
getLsb (v ++ w) i = bif i < m then getLsb w i else getLsb v (i - m) := by
simp only [append_def, getLsb_or, getLsb_shiftLeftZeroExtend, getLsb_zeroExtend']
simp [append_def]
by_cases h : i < m
· simp [h]
· simp [h]; simp_all
@[simp] theorem getMsb_append {v : BitVec n} {w : BitVec m} :
getMsb (v ++ w) i = bif n i then getMsb w (i - n) else getMsb v i := by
simp [append_def]
by_cases h : n i
· simp [h]
· simp [h]
theorem msb_append {x : BitVec w} {y : BitVec v} :
(x ++ y).msb = bif (w == 0) then (y.msb) else (x.msb) := by
rw [ append_eq, append]
simp [msb_zeroExtend']
by_cases h : w = 0
· subst h
simp [BitVec.msb, getMsb]
· rw [cond_eq_if]
have q : 0 < w + v := by omega
have t : y.getLsb (w + v - 1) = false := getLsb_ge _ _ (by omega)
simp [h, q, t, BitVec.msb, getMsb]
@[simp] theorem truncate_append {x : BitVec w} {y : BitVec v} :
(x ++ y).truncate k = if h : k v then y.truncate k else (x.truncate (k - v) ++ y).cast (by omega) := by
apply eq_of_getLsb_eq
intro i
simp only [getLsb_zeroExtend, Fin.is_lt, decide_True, getLsb_append, Bool.true_and]
split
· have t : i < v := by omega
simp [t]
· by_cases t : i < v
· simp [t]
· have t' : i - v < k - v := by omega
simp [t, t']
@[simp] theorem truncate_cons {x : BitVec w} : (cons a x).truncate w = x := by
simp [cons]
@[simp] theorem not_append {x : BitVec w} {y : BitVec v} : ~~~ (x ++ y) = (~~~ x) ++ (~~~ y) := by
ext i
simp only [getLsb_not, getLsb_append, cond_eq_if]
split
· simp_all
· simp_all; omega
@[simp] theorem and_append {x₁ x₂ : BitVec w} {y₁ y₂ : BitVec v} :
(x₁ ++ y₁) &&& (x₂ ++ y₂) = (x₁ &&& x₂) ++ (y₁ &&& y₂) := by
ext i
simp only [getLsb_append, cond_eq_if]
split <;> simp [*]
@[simp] theorem or_append {x₁ x₂ : BitVec w} {y₁ y₂ : BitVec v} :
(x₁ ++ y₁) ||| (x₂ ++ y₂) = (x₁ ||| x₂) ++ (y₁ ||| y₂) := by
ext i
simp only [getLsb_append, cond_eq_if]
split <;> simp [*]
@[simp] theorem xor_append {x₁ x₂ : BitVec w} {y₁ y₂ : BitVec v} :
(x₁ ++ y₁) ^^^ (x₂ ++ y₂) = (x₁ ^^^ x₂) ++ (y₁ ^^^ y₂) := by
ext i
simp only [getLsb_append, cond_eq_if]
split <;> simp [*]
theorem shiftRight_shiftRight {w : Nat} (x : BitVec w) (n m : Nat) :
(x >>> n) >>> m = x >>> (n + m) := by
ext i
simp [Nat.add_assoc n m i]
/-! ### rev -/
theorem getLsb_rev (x : BitVec w) (i : Fin w) :
@@ -732,11 +418,6 @@ theorem getMsb_rev (x : BitVec w) (i : Fin w) :
let x, _ := x
simp [cons, toNat_append, toNat_ofBool]
/-- Variant of `toNat_cons` using `+` instead of `|||`. -/
theorem toNat_cons' {x : BitVec w} :
(cons a x).toNat = (a.toNat <<< w) + x.toNat := by
simp [cons, Nat.shiftLeft_eq, Nat.mul_comm _ (2^w), Nat.mul_add_lt_is_or, x.isLt]
@[simp] theorem getLsb_cons (b : Bool) {n} (x : BitVec n) (i : Nat) :
getLsb (cons b x) i = if i = n then b else getLsb x i := by
simp only [getLsb, toNat_cons, Nat.testBit_or]
@@ -751,15 +432,6 @@ theorem toNat_cons' {x : BitVec w} :
have p2 : i - n 0 := by omega
simp [p1, p2, Nat.testBit_bool_to_nat]
@[simp] theorem msb_cons : (cons a x).msb = a := by
simp [cons, msb_cast, msb_append]
@[simp] theorem getMsb_cons_zero : (cons a x).getMsb 0 = a := by
rw [ BitVec.msb, msb_cons]
@[simp] theorem getMsb_cons_succ : (cons a x).getMsb (i + 1) = x.getMsb i := by
simp [cons, Nat.le_add_left 1 i]
theorem truncate_succ (x : BitVec w) :
truncate (i+1) x = cons (getLsb x i) (truncate i x) := by
apply eq_of_getLsb_eq
@@ -771,30 +443,6 @@ theorem truncate_succ (x : BitVec w) :
have j_lt : j.val < i := Nat.lt_of_le_of_ne (Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ j.isLt) j_eq
simp [j_eq, j_lt]
theorem eq_msb_cons_truncate (x : BitVec (w+1)) : x = (cons x.msb (x.truncate w)) := by
ext i
simp
split <;> rename_i h
· simp [BitVec.msb, getMsb, h]
· by_cases h' : i < w
· simp_all
· omega
@[simp] theorem not_cons (x : BitVec w) (b : Bool) : ~~~(cons b x) = cons (!b) (~~~x) := by
simp [cons]
@[simp] theorem cons_or_cons (x y : BitVec w) (a b : Bool) :
(cons a x) ||| (cons b y) = cons (a || b) (x ||| y) := by
ext i; cases i using Fin.succRecOn <;> simp <;> split <;> rfl
@[simp] theorem cons_and_cons (x y : BitVec w) (a b : Bool) :
(cons a x) &&& (cons b y) = cons (a && b) (x &&& y) := by
ext i; cases i using Fin.succRecOn <;> simp <;> split <;> rfl
@[simp] theorem cons_xor_cons (x y : BitVec w) (a b : Bool) :
(cons a x) ^^^ (cons b y) = cons (xor a b) (x ^^^ y) := by
ext i; cases i using Fin.succRecOn <;> simp <;> split <;> rfl
/-! ### concat -/
@[simp] theorem toNat_concat (x : BitVec w) (b : Bool) :
@@ -819,21 +467,6 @@ theorem getLsb_concat (x : BitVec w) (b : Bool) (i : Nat) :
@[simp] theorem getLsb_concat_succ : (concat x b).getLsb (i + 1) = x.getLsb i := by
simp [getLsb_concat]
@[simp] theorem not_concat (x : BitVec w) (b : Bool) : ~~~(concat x b) = concat (~~~x) !b := by
ext i; cases i using Fin.succRecOn <;> simp [*, Nat.succ_lt_succ]
@[simp] theorem concat_or_concat (x y : BitVec w) (a b : Bool) :
(concat x a) ||| (concat y b) = concat (x ||| y) (a || b) := by
ext i; cases i using Fin.succRecOn <;> simp
@[simp] theorem concat_and_concat (x y : BitVec w) (a b : Bool) :
(concat x a) &&& (concat y b) = concat (x &&& y) (a && b) := by
ext i; cases i using Fin.succRecOn <;> simp
@[simp] theorem concat_xor_concat (x y : BitVec w) (a b : Bool) :
(concat x a) ^^^ (concat y b) = concat (x ^^^ y) (xor a b) := by
ext i; cases i using Fin.succRecOn <;> simp
/-! ### add -/
theorem add_def {n} (x y : BitVec n) : x + y = .ofNat n (x.toNat + y.toNat) := rfl
@@ -847,41 +480,19 @@ Definition of bitvector addition as a nat.
.ofFin x + y = .ofFin (x + y.toFin) := rfl
@[simp] theorem add_ofFin (x : BitVec n) (y : Fin (2^n)) :
x + .ofFin y = .ofFin (x.toFin + y) := rfl
theorem ofNat_add {n} (x y : Nat) : (x + y)#n = x#n + y#n := by
@[simp] theorem ofNat_add_ofNat {n} (x y : Nat) : x#n + y#n = (x + y)#n := by
apply eq_of_toNat_eq ; simp [BitVec.ofNat]
theorem ofNat_add_ofNat {n} (x y : Nat) : x#n + y#n = (x + y)#n :=
(ofNat_add x y).symm
protected theorem add_assoc (x y z : BitVec n) : x + y + z = x + (y + z) := by
apply eq_of_toNat_eq ; simp [Nat.add_assoc]
instance : Std.Associative (α := BitVec n) (· + ·) := BitVec.add_assoc
protected theorem add_comm (x y : BitVec n) : x + y = y + x := by
simp [add_def, Nat.add_comm]
instance : Std.Commutative (α := BitVec n) (· + ·) := BitVec.add_comm
@[simp] protected theorem add_zero (x : BitVec n) : x + 0#n = x := by simp [add_def]
@[simp] protected theorem zero_add (x : BitVec n) : 0#n + x = x := by simp [add_def]
instance : Std.LawfulIdentity (α := BitVec n) (· + ·) 0#n where
left_id := BitVec.zero_add
right_id := BitVec.add_zero
theorem truncate_add (x y : BitVec w) (h : i w) :
(x + y).truncate i = x.truncate i + y.truncate i := by
have dvd : 2^i 2^w := Nat.pow_dvd_pow _ h
simp [bv_toNat, h, Nat.mod_mod_of_dvd _ dvd]
@[simp, bv_toNat] theorem toInt_add (x y : BitVec w) :
(x + y).toInt = (x.toInt + y.toInt).bmod (2^w) := by
simp [toInt_eq_toNat_bmod]
theorem ofInt_add {n} (x y : Int) : BitVec.ofInt n (x + y) =
BitVec.ofInt n x + BitVec.ofInt n y := by
apply eq_of_toInt_eq
simp
/-! ### sub/neg -/
@@ -920,19 +531,10 @@ theorem sub_toAdd {n} (x y : BitVec n) : x - y = x + - y := by
theorem add_sub_cancel (x y : BitVec w) : x + y - y = x := by
apply eq_of_toNat_eq
have y_toNat_le := Nat.le_of_lt y.isLt
have y_toNat_le := Nat.le_of_lt y.toNat_lt
rw [toNat_sub, toNat_add, Nat.mod_add_mod, Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_sub_assoc y_toNat_le,
Nat.add_sub_cancel_left, Nat.add_mod_right, toNat_mod_cancel]
theorem sub_add_cancel (x y : BitVec w) : x - y + y = x := by
rw [sub_toAdd, BitVec.add_assoc, BitVec.add_comm _ y,
BitVec.add_assoc, sub_toAdd, add_sub_cancel]
theorem eq_sub_iff_add_eq {x y z : BitVec w} : x = z - y x + y = z := by
apply Iff.intro <;> intro h
· simp [h, sub_add_cancel]
· simp [h, add_sub_cancel]
theorem negOne_eq_allOnes : -1#w = allOnes w := by
apply eq_of_toNat_eq
if g : w = 0 then
@@ -942,13 +544,6 @@ theorem negOne_eq_allOnes : -1#w = allOnes w := by
have r : (2^w - 1) < 2^w := by omega
simp [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt q, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt r]
theorem neg_eq_not_add (x : BitVec w) : -x = ~~~x + 1 := by
apply eq_of_toNat_eq
simp only [toNat_neg, ofNat_eq_ofNat, toNat_add, toNat_not, toNat_ofNat, Nat.add_mod_mod]
congr
have hx : x.toNat < 2^w := x.isLt
rw [Nat.sub_sub, Nat.add_comm 1 x.toNat, Nat.sub_sub, Nat.sub_add_cancel (by omega)]
/-! ### mul -/
theorem mul_def {n} {x y : BitVec n} : x * y = (ofFin <| x.toFin * y.toFin) := by rfl
@@ -975,15 +570,6 @@ instance : Std.Associative (fun (x y : BitVec w) => x * y) := ⟨BitVec.mul_asso
instance : Std.LawfulCommIdentity (fun (x y : BitVec w) => x * y) (1#w) where
right_id := BitVec.mul_one
@[simp, bv_toNat] theorem toInt_mul (x y : BitVec w) :
(x * y).toInt = (x.toInt * y.toInt).bmod (2^w) := by
simp [toInt_eq_toNat_bmod]
theorem ofInt_mul {n} (x y : Int) : BitVec.ofInt n (x * y) =
BitVec.ofInt n x * BitVec.ofInt n y := by
apply eq_of_toInt_eq
simp
/-! ### le and lt -/
@[bv_toNat] theorem le_def (x y : BitVec n) :
@@ -1013,34 +599,4 @@ protected theorem lt_of_le_ne (x y : BitVec n) (h1 : x <= y) (h2 : ¬ x = y) : x
simp
exact Nat.lt_of_le_of_ne
/-! ### intMax -/
/-- The bitvector of width `w` that has the largest value when interpreted as an integer. -/
def intMax (w : Nat) : BitVec w := (2^w - 1)#w
theorem getLsb_intMax_eq (w : Nat) : (intMax w).getLsb i = decide (i < w) := by
simp [intMax, getLsb]
theorem toNat_intMax_eq : (intMax w).toNat = 2^w - 1 := by
have h : 2^w - 1 < 2^w := by
have pos : 2^w > 0 := Nat.pow_pos (by decide)
omega
simp [intMax, Nat.shiftLeft_eq, Nat.one_mul, natCast_eq_ofNat, toNat_ofNat, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h]
/-! ### ofBoolList -/
@[simp] theorem getMsb_ofBoolListBE : (ofBoolListBE bs).getMsb i = bs.getD i false := by
induction bs generalizing i <;> cases i <;> simp_all [ofBoolListBE]
@[simp] theorem getLsb_ofBoolListBE :
(ofBoolListBE bs).getLsb i = (decide (i < bs.length) && bs.getD (bs.length - 1 - i) false) := by
simp [getLsb_eq_getMsb]
@[simp] theorem getLsb_ofBoolListLE : (ofBoolListLE bs).getLsb i = bs.getD i false := by
induction bs generalizing i <;> cases i <;> simp_all [ofBoolListLE]
@[simp] theorem getMsb_ofBoolListLE :
(ofBoolListLE bs).getMsb i = (decide (i < bs.length) && bs.getD (bs.length - 1 - i) false) := by
simp [getMsb_eq_getLsb]
end BitVec

View File

@@ -29,8 +29,6 @@ instance (p : Bool → Prop) [inst : DecidablePred p] : Decidable (∃ x, p x) :
| _, isTrue hf => isTrue _, hf
| isFalse ht, isFalse hf => isFalse fun | true, h => absurd h ht | false, h => absurd h hf
@[simp] theorem default_bool : default = false := rfl
instance : LE Bool := (. .)
instance : LT Bool := (!. && .)
@@ -50,225 +48,85 @@ theorem ne_false_iff : {b : Bool} → b ≠ false ↔ b = true := by decide
theorem eq_iff_iff {a b : Bool} : a = b (a b) := by cases b <;> simp
@[simp] theorem decide_eq_true {b : Bool} [Decidable (b = true)] : decide (b = true) = b := by cases b <;> simp
@[simp] theorem decide_eq_false {b : Bool} [Decidable (b = false)] : decide (b = false) = !b := by cases b <;> simp
@[simp] theorem decide_true_eq {b : Bool} [Decidable (true = b)] : decide (true = b) = b := by cases b <;> simp
@[simp] theorem decide_false_eq {b : Bool} [Decidable (false = b)] : decide (false = b) = !b := by cases b <;> simp
@[simp] theorem decide_eq_true {b : Bool} : decide (b = true) = b := by cases b <;> simp
@[simp] theorem decide_eq_false {b : Bool} : decide (b = false) = !b := by cases b <;> simp
@[simp] theorem decide_true_eq {b : Bool} : decide (true = b) = b := by cases b <;> simp
@[simp] theorem decide_false_eq {b : Bool} : decide (false = b) = !b := by cases b <;> simp
/-! ### and -/
@[simp] theorem and_self_left : (a b : Bool), (a && (a && b)) = (a && b) := by decide
@[simp] theorem and_self_right : (a b : Bool), ((a && b) && b) = (a && b) := by decide
@[simp] theorem not_and_self : (x : Bool), (!x && x) = false := by decide
@[simp] theorem and_not_self : (x : Bool), (x && !x) = false := by decide
/-
Added for confluence with `not_and_self` `and_not_self` on term
`(b && !b) = true` due to reductions:
1. `(b = true !b = true)` via `Bool.and_eq_true`
2. `false = true` via `Bool.and_not_self`
-/
@[simp] theorem eq_true_and_eq_false_self : (b : Bool), (b = true b = false) False := by decide
@[simp] theorem eq_false_and_eq_true_self : (b : Bool), (b = false b = true) False := by decide
theorem and_comm : (x y : Bool), (x && y) = (y && x) := by decide
instance : Std.Commutative (· && ·) := and_comm
theorem and_left_comm : (x y z : Bool), (x && (y && z)) = (y && (x && z)) := by decide
theorem and_right_comm : (x y z : Bool), ((x && y) && z) = ((x && z) && y) := by decide
/-
Bool version `and_iff_left_iff_imp`.
theorem and_or_distrib_left : (x y z : Bool), (x && (y || z)) = ((x && y) || (x && z)) := by
decide
Needed for confluence of term `(a && b) ↔ a` which reduces to `(a && b) = a` via
`Bool.coe_iff_coe` and `a → b` via `Bool.and_eq_true` and
`and_iff_left_iff_imp`.
-/
@[simp] theorem and_iff_left_iff_imp : (a b : Bool), ((a && b) = a) (a b) := by decide
@[simp] theorem and_iff_right_iff_imp : (a b : Bool), ((a && b) = b) (b a) := by decide
@[simp] theorem iff_self_and : (a b : Bool), (a = (a && b)) (a b) := by decide
@[simp] theorem iff_and_self : (a b : Bool), (b = (a && b)) (b a) := by decide
/-! ### or -/
@[simp] theorem or_self_left : (a b : Bool), (a || (a || b)) = (a || b) := by decide
@[simp] theorem or_self_right : (a b : Bool), ((a || b) || b) = (a || b) := by decide
@[simp] theorem not_or_self : (x : Bool), (!x || x) = true := by decide
@[simp] theorem or_not_self : (x : Bool), (x || !x) = true := by decide
/-
Added for confluence with `not_or_self` `or_not_self` on term
`(b || !b) = true` due to reductions:
1. `(b = true !b = true)` via `Bool.or_eq_true`
2. `true = true` via `Bool.or_not_self`
-/
@[simp] theorem eq_true_or_eq_false_self : (b : Bool), (b = true b = false) True := by decide
@[simp] theorem eq_false_or_eq_true_self : (b : Bool), (b = false b = true) True := by decide
/-
Bool version `or_iff_left_iff_imp`.
Needed for confluence of term `(a || b) ↔ a` which reduces to `(a || b) = a` via
`Bool.coe_iff_coe` and `a → b` via `Bool.or_eq_true` and
`and_iff_left_iff_imp`.
-/
@[simp] theorem or_iff_left_iff_imp : (a b : Bool), ((a || b) = a) (b a) := by decide
@[simp] theorem or_iff_right_iff_imp : (a b : Bool), ((a || b) = b) (a b) := by decide
@[simp] theorem iff_self_or : (a b : Bool), (a = (a || b)) (b a) := by decide
@[simp] theorem iff_or_self : (a b : Bool), (b = (a || b)) (a b) := by decide
theorem or_comm : (x y : Bool), (x || y) = (y || x) := by decide
instance : Std.Commutative (· || ·) := or_comm
theorem or_left_comm : (x y z : Bool), (x || (y || z)) = (y || (x || z)) := by decide
theorem or_right_comm : (x y z : Bool), ((x || y) || z) = ((x || z) || y) := by decide
/-! ### distributivity -/
theorem and_or_distrib_left : (x y z : Bool), (x && (y || z)) = (x && y || x && z) := by decide
theorem and_or_distrib_right : (x y z : Bool), ((x || y) && z) = (x && z || y && z) := by decide
theorem or_and_distrib_left : (x y z : Bool), (x || y && z) = ((x || y) && (x || z)) := by decide
theorem or_and_distrib_right : (x y z : Bool), (x && y || z) = ((x || z) && (y || z)) := by decide
theorem and_or_distrib_right : (x y z : Bool), ((x || y) && z) = ((x && z) || (y && z)) := by
decide
theorem and_xor_distrib_left : (x y z : Bool), (x && xor y z) = xor (x && y) (x && z) := by decide
theorem and_xor_distrib_right : (x y z : Bool), (xor x y && z) = xor (x && z) (y && z) := by decide
theorem and_xor_distrib_right : (x y z : Bool), (xor x y && z) = xor (x && z) (y && z) := by
decide
/-- De Morgan's law for boolean and -/
@[simp] theorem not_and : (x y : Bool), (!(x && y)) = (!x || !y) := by decide
theorem not_and : (x y : Bool), (!(x && y)) = (!x || !y) := by decide
/-- De Morgan's law for boolean or -/
@[simp] theorem not_or : (x y : Bool), (!(x || y)) = (!x && !y) := by decide
theorem and_eq_true_iff (x y : Bool) : (x && y) = true x = true y = true :=
Iff.of_eq (and_eq_true x y)
theorem and_eq_true_iff : (x y : Bool), (x && y) = true x = true y = true := by decide
theorem and_eq_false_iff : (x y : Bool), (x && y) = false x = false y = false := by decide
/-
New simp rule that replaces `Bool.and_eq_false_eq_eq_false_or_eq_false` in
Mathlib due to confluence:
/-! ### or -/
Consider the term: `¬((b && c) = true)`:
@[simp] theorem not_or_self : (x : Bool), (!x || x) = true := by decide
1. Reduces to `((b && c) = false)` via `Bool.not_eq_true`
2. Reduces to `¬(b = true ∧ c = true)` via `Bool.and_eq_true`.
@[simp] theorem or_not_self : (x : Bool), (x || !x) = true := by decide
theorem or_comm : (x y : Bool), (x || y) = (y || x) := by decide
1. Further reduces to `b = false c = false` via `Bool.and_eq_false_eq_eq_false_or_eq_false`.
2. Further reduces to `b = true → c = false` via `not_and` and `Bool.not_eq_true`.
-/
@[simp] theorem and_eq_false_imp : (x y : Bool), (x && y) = false (x = true y = false) := by decide
theorem or_left_comm : (x y z : Bool), (x || (y || z)) = (y || (x || z)) := by decide
@[simp] theorem or_eq_true_iff : (x y : Bool), (x || y) = true x = true y = true := by decide
theorem or_right_comm : (x y z : Bool), ((x || y) || z) = ((x || z) || y) := by decide
@[simp] theorem or_eq_false_iff : (x y : Bool), (x || y) = false x = false y = false := by decide
theorem or_and_distrib_left : (x y z : Bool), (x || (y && z)) = ((x || y) && (x || z)) := by
decide
/-! ### eq/beq/bne -/
theorem or_and_distrib_right : (x y z : Bool), ((x && y) || z) = ((x || z) && (y || z)) := by
decide
/--
These two rules follow trivially by simp, but are needed to avoid non-termination
in false_eq and true_eq.
-/
@[simp] theorem false_eq_true : (false = true) = False := by simp
@[simp] theorem true_eq_false : (true = false) = False := by simp
/-- De Morgan's law for boolean or -/
theorem not_or : (x y : Bool), (!(x || y)) = (!x && !y) := by decide
-- The two lemmas below normalize terms with a constant to the
-- right-hand side but risk non-termination if `false_eq_true` and
-- `true_eq_false` are disabled.
@[simp low] theorem false_eq (b : Bool) : (false = b) = (b = false) := by
cases b <;> simp
theorem or_eq_true_iff : (x y : Bool), (x || y) = true x = true y = true := by decide
@[simp low] theorem true_eq (b : Bool) : (true = b) = (b = true) := by
cases b <;> simp
@[simp] theorem true_beq : b, (true == b) = b := by decide
@[simp] theorem false_beq : b, (false == b) = !b := by decide
@[simp] theorem beq_true : b, (b == true) = b := by decide
instance : Std.LawfulIdentity (· == ·) true where
left_id := true_beq
right_id := beq_true
@[simp] theorem beq_false : b, (b == false) = !b := by decide
@[simp] theorem true_bne : (b : Bool), (true != b) = !b := by decide
@[simp] theorem false_bne : (b : Bool), (false != b) = b := by decide
@[simp] theorem bne_true : (b : Bool), (b != true) = !b := by decide
@[simp] theorem bne_false : (b : Bool), (b != false) = b := by decide
instance : Std.LawfulIdentity (· != ·) false where
left_id := false_bne
right_id := bne_false
@[simp] theorem not_beq_self : (x : Bool), ((!x) == x) = false := by decide
@[simp] theorem beq_not_self : (x : Bool), (x == !x) = false := by decide
@[simp] theorem not_bne_self : (x : Bool), ((!x) != x) = true := by decide
@[simp] theorem bne_not_self : (x : Bool), (x != !x) = true := by decide
/-
Added for equivalence with `Bool.not_beq_self` and needed for confluence
due to `beq_iff_eq`.
-/
@[simp] theorem not_eq_self : (b : Bool), ((!b) = b) False := by decide
@[simp] theorem eq_not_self : (b : Bool), (b = (!b)) False := by decide
@[simp] theorem beq_self_left : (a b : Bool), (a == (a == b)) = b := by decide
@[simp] theorem beq_self_right : (a b : Bool), ((a == b) == b) = a := by decide
@[simp] theorem bne_self_left : (a b : Bool), (a != (a != b)) = b := by decide
@[simp] theorem bne_self_right : (a b : Bool), ((a != b) != b) = a := by decide
@[simp] theorem not_bne_not : (x y : Bool), ((!x) != (!y)) = (x != y) := by decide
@[simp] theorem bne_assoc : (x y z : Bool), ((x != y) != z) = (x != (y != z)) := by decide
instance : Std.Associative (· != ·) := bne_assoc
@[simp] theorem bne_left_inj : (x y z : Bool), (x != y) = (x != z) y = z := by decide
@[simp] theorem bne_right_inj : (x y z : Bool), (x != z) = (y != z) x = y := by decide
/-! ### coercision related normal forms -/
theorem beq_eq_decide_eq [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] [DecidableEq α] (a b : α) :
(a == b) = decide (a = b) := by
cases h : a == b
· simp [ne_of_beq_false h]
· simp [eq_of_beq h]
@[simp] theorem not_eq_not : {a b : Bool}, ¬a = !b a = b := by decide
@[simp] theorem not_not_eq : {a b : Bool}, ¬(!a) = b a = b := by decide
@[simp] theorem coe_iff_coe : (a b : Bool), (a b) a = b := by decide
@[simp] theorem coe_true_iff_false : (a b : Bool), (a b = false) a = (!b) := by decide
@[simp] theorem coe_false_iff_true : (a b : Bool), (a = false b) (!a) = b := by decide
@[simp] theorem coe_false_iff_false : (a b : Bool), (a = false b = false) (!a) = (!b) := by decide
/-! ### beq properties -/
theorem beq_comm {α} [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] {a b : α} : (a == b) = (b == a) :=
(Bool.coe_iff_coe (a == b) (b == a)).mp (by simp [@eq_comm α])
theorem or_eq_false_iff : (x y : Bool), (x || y) = false x = false y = false := by decide
/-! ### xor -/
theorem false_xor : (x : Bool), xor false x = x := false_bne
@[simp] theorem false_xor : (x : Bool), xor false x = x := by decide
theorem xor_false : (x : Bool), xor x false = x := bne_false
@[simp] theorem xor_false : (x : Bool), xor x false = x := by decide
theorem true_xor : (x : Bool), xor true x = !x := true_bne
@[simp] theorem true_xor : (x : Bool), xor true x = !x := by decide
theorem xor_true : (x : Bool), xor x true = !x := bne_true
@[simp] theorem xor_true : (x : Bool), xor x true = !x := by decide
theorem not_xor_self : (x : Bool), xor (!x) x = true := not_bne_self
@[simp] theorem not_xor_self : (x : Bool), xor (!x) x = true := by decide
theorem xor_not_self : (x : Bool), xor x (!x) = true := bne_not_self
@[simp] theorem xor_not_self : (x : Bool), xor x (!x) = true := by decide
theorem not_xor : (x y : Bool), xor (!x) y = !(xor x y) := by decide
theorem xor_not : (x y : Bool), xor x (!y) = !(xor x y) := by decide
theorem not_xor_not : (x y : Bool), xor (!x) (!y) = (xor x y) := not_bne_not
@[simp] theorem not_xor_not : (x y : Bool), xor (!x) (!y) = (xor x y) := by decide
theorem xor_self : (x : Bool), xor x x = false := by decide
@@ -278,11 +136,13 @@ theorem xor_left_comm : ∀ (x y z : Bool), xor x (xor y z) = xor y (xor x z) :=
theorem xor_right_comm : (x y z : Bool), xor (xor x y) z = xor (xor x z) y := by decide
theorem xor_assoc : (x y z : Bool), xor (xor x y) z = xor x (xor y z) := bne_assoc
theorem xor_assoc : (x y z : Bool), xor (xor x y) z = xor x (xor y z) := by decide
theorem xor_left_inj : (x y z : Bool), xor x y = xor x z y = z := bne_left_inj
@[simp]
theorem xor_left_inj : (x y z : Bool), xor x y = xor x z y = z := by decide
theorem xor_right_inj : (x y z : Bool), xor x z = xor y z x = y := bne_right_inj
@[simp]
theorem xor_right_inj : (x y z : Bool), xor x z = xor y z x = y := by decide
/-! ### le/lt -/
@@ -360,159 +220,22 @@ def toNat (b:Bool) : Nat := cond b 1 0
theorem toNat_le (c : Bool) : c.toNat 1 := by
cases c <;> trivial
@[deprecated toNat_le (since := "2024-02-23")]
abbrev toNat_le_one := toNat_le
@[deprecated toNat_le] abbrev toNat_le_one := toNat_le
theorem toNat_lt (b : Bool) : b.toNat < 2 :=
Nat.lt_succ_of_le (toNat_le _)
@[simp] theorem toNat_eq_zero (b : Bool) : b.toNat = 0 b = false := by
cases b <;> simp
@[simp] theorem toNat_eq_one (b : Bool) : b.toNat = 1 b = true := by
@[simp] theorem toNat_eq_one (b : Bool) : b.toNat = 1 b = true := by
cases b <;> simp
/-! ### ite -/
@[simp] theorem if_true_left (p : Prop) [h : Decidable p] (f : Bool) :
(ite p true f) = (p || f) := by cases h with | _ p => simp [p]
@[simp] theorem if_false_left (p : Prop) [h : Decidable p] (f : Bool) :
(ite p false f) = (!p && f) := by cases h with | _ p => simp [p]
@[simp] theorem if_true_right (p : Prop) [h : Decidable p] (t : Bool) :
(ite p t true) = (!(p : Bool) || t) := by cases h with | _ p => simp [p]
@[simp] theorem if_false_right (p : Prop) [h : Decidable p] (t : Bool) :
(ite p t false) = (p && t) := by cases h with | _ p => simp [p]
@[simp] theorem ite_eq_true_distrib (p : Prop) [h : Decidable p] (t f : Bool) :
(ite p t f = true) = ite p (t = true) (f = true) := by
cases h with | _ p => simp [p]
@[simp] theorem ite_eq_false_distrib (p : Prop) [h : Decidable p] (t f : Bool) :
(ite p t f = false) = ite p (t = false) (f = false) := by
cases h with | _ p => simp [p]
/-
`not_ite_eq_true_eq_true` and related theorems below are added for
non-confluence. A motivating example is
`¬((if u then b else c) = true)`.
This reduces to:
1. `¬((if u then (b = true) else (c = true))` via `ite_eq_true_distrib`
2. `(if u then b c) = false)` via `Bool.not_eq_true`.
Similar logic holds for `¬((if u then b else c) = false)` and related
lemmas.
-/
@[simp]
theorem not_ite_eq_true_eq_true (p : Prop) [h : Decidable p] (b c : Bool) :
¬(ite p (b = true) (c = true)) (ite p (b = false) (c = false)) := by
cases h with | _ p => simp [p]
@[simp]
theorem not_ite_eq_false_eq_false (p : Prop) [h : Decidable p] (b c : Bool) :
¬(ite p (b = false) (c = false)) (ite p (b = true) (c = true)) := by
cases h with | _ p => simp [p]
@[simp]
theorem not_ite_eq_true_eq_false (p : Prop) [h : Decidable p] (b c : Bool) :
¬(ite p (b = true) (c = false)) (ite p (b = false) (c = true)) := by
cases h with | _ p => simp [p]
@[simp]
theorem not_ite_eq_false_eq_true (p : Prop) [h : Decidable p] (b c : Bool) :
¬(ite p (b = false) (c = true)) (ite p (b = true) (c = false)) := by
cases h with | _ p => simp [p]
/-
Added for confluence between `if_true_left` and `ite_false_same` on
`if b = true then True else b = true`
-/
@[simp] theorem eq_false_imp_eq_true : (b:Bool), (b = false b = true) (b = true) := by decide
/-
Added for confluence between `if_true_left` and `ite_false_same` on
`if b = false then True else b = false`
-/
@[simp] theorem eq_true_imp_eq_false : (b:Bool), (b = true b = false) (b = false) := by decide
/-! ### cond -/
theorem cond_eq_ite {α} (b : Bool) (t e : α) : cond b t e = if b then t else e := by
cases b <;> simp
theorem cond_eq_if : (bif b then x else y) = (if b then x else y) := cond_eq_ite b x y
@[simp] theorem cond_not (b : Bool) (t e : α) : cond (!b) t e = cond b e t := by
cases b <;> rfl
@[simp] theorem cond_self (c : Bool) (t : α) : cond c t t = t := by cases c <;> rfl
/-
This is a simp rule in Mathlib, but results in non-confluence that is difficult
to fix as decide distributes over propositions. As an example, observe that
`cond (decide (p ∧ q)) t f` could simplify to either:
* `if p ∧ q then t else f` via `Bool.cond_decide` or
* `cond (decide p && decide q) t f` via `Bool.decide_and`.
A possible approach to improve normalization between `cond` and `ite` would be
to completely simplify away `cond` by making `cond_eq_ite` a `simp` rule, but
that has not been taken since it could surprise users to migrate pure `Bool`
operations like `cond` to a mix of `Prop` and `Bool`.
-/
theorem cond_decide {α} (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (t e : α) :
cond (decide p) t e = if p then t else e := by
simp [cond_eq_ite]
@[simp] theorem cond_eq_ite_iff (a : Bool) (p : Prop) [h : Decidable p] (x y u v : α) :
(cond a x y = ite p u v) ite a x y = ite p u v := by
simp [Bool.cond_eq_ite]
@[simp] theorem ite_eq_cond_iff (p : Prop) [h : Decidable p] (a : Bool) (x y u v : α) :
(ite p x y = cond a u v) ite p x y = ite a u v := by
simp [Bool.cond_eq_ite]
@[simp] theorem cond_eq_true_distrib : (c t f : Bool),
(cond c t f = true) = ite (c = true) (t = true) (f = true) := by
decide
@[simp] theorem cond_eq_false_distrib : (c t f : Bool),
(cond c t f = false) = ite (c = true) (t = false) (f = false) := by decide
protected theorem cond_true {α : Type u} {a b : α} : cond true a b = a := cond_true a b
protected theorem cond_false {α : Type u} {a b : α} : cond false a b = b := cond_false a b
@[simp] theorem cond_true_left : (c f : Bool), cond c true f = ( c || f) := by decide
@[simp] theorem cond_false_left : (c f : Bool), cond c false f = (!c && f) := by decide
@[simp] theorem cond_true_right : (c t : Bool), cond c t true = (!c || t) := by decide
@[simp] theorem cond_false_right : (c t : Bool), cond c t false = ( c && t) := by decide
@[simp] theorem cond_true_same : (c b : Bool), cond c c b = (c || b) := by decide
@[simp] theorem cond_false_same : (c b : Bool), cond c b c = (c && b) := by decide
/-# decidability -/
protected theorem decide_coe (b : Bool) [Decidable (b = true)] : decide (b = true) = b := decide_eq_true
@[simp] theorem decide_and (p q : Prop) [dpq : Decidable (p q)] [dp : Decidable p] [dq : Decidable q] :
decide (p q) = (p && q) := by
cases dp with | _ p => simp [p]
@[simp] theorem decide_or (p q : Prop) [dpq : Decidable (p q)] [dp : Decidable p] [dq : Decidable q] :
decide (p q) = (p || q) := by
cases dp with | _ p => simp [p]
@[simp] theorem decide_iff_dist (p q : Prop) [dpq : Decidable (p q)] [dp : Decidable p] [dq : Decidable q] :
decide (p q) = (decide p == decide q) := by
cases dp with | _ p => simp [p]
end Bool
export Bool (cond_eq_if)
/-! ### cond -/
theorem cond_eq_if : (bif b then x else y) = (if b then x else y) := by
cases b <;> simp
/-! ### decide -/

View File

@@ -52,13 +52,9 @@ def get : (a : @& ByteArray) → (@& Fin a.size) → UInt8
instance : GetElem ByteArray Nat UInt8 fun xs i => i < xs.size where
getElem xs i h := xs.get i, h
instance : LawfulGetElem ByteArray Nat UInt8 fun xs i => i < xs.size where
instance : GetElem ByteArray USize UInt8 fun xs i => i.val < xs.size where
getElem xs i h := xs.uget i h
instance : LawfulGetElem ByteArray USize UInt8 fun xs i => i.val < xs.size where
@[extern "lean_byte_array_set"]
def set! : ByteArray (@& Nat) UInt8 ByteArray
| bs, i, b => bs.set! i b
@@ -199,18 +195,6 @@ instance : ToString ByteArray := ⟨fun bs => bs.toList.toString⟩
/-- Interpret a `ByteArray` of size 8 as a little-endian `UInt64`. -/
def ByteArray.toUInt64LE! (bs : ByteArray) : UInt64 :=
assert! bs.size == 8
(bs.get! 7).toUInt64 <<< 0x38 |||
(bs.get! 6).toUInt64 <<< 0x30 |||
(bs.get! 5).toUInt64 <<< 0x28 |||
(bs.get! 4).toUInt64 <<< 0x20 |||
(bs.get! 3).toUInt64 <<< 0x18 |||
(bs.get! 2).toUInt64 <<< 0x10 |||
(bs.get! 1).toUInt64 <<< 0x8 |||
(bs.get! 0).toUInt64
/-- Interpret a `ByteArray` of size 8 as a big-endian `UInt64`. -/
def ByteArray.toUInt64BE! (bs : ByteArray) : UInt64 :=
assert! bs.size == 8
(bs.get! 0).toUInt64 <<< 0x38 |||
(bs.get! 1).toUInt64 <<< 0x30 |||
@@ -220,3 +204,15 @@ def ByteArray.toUInt64BE! (bs : ByteArray) : UInt64 :=
(bs.get! 5).toUInt64 <<< 0x10 |||
(bs.get! 6).toUInt64 <<< 0x8 |||
(bs.get! 7).toUInt64
/-- Interpret a `ByteArray` of size 8 as a big-endian `UInt64`. -/
def ByteArray.toUInt64BE! (bs : ByteArray) : UInt64 :=
assert! bs.size == 8
(bs.get! 7).toUInt64 <<< 0x38 |||
(bs.get! 6).toUInt64 <<< 0x30 |||
(bs.get! 5).toUInt64 <<< 0x28 |||
(bs.get! 4).toUInt64 <<< 0x20 |||
(bs.get! 3).toUInt64 <<< 0x18 |||
(bs.get! 2).toUInt64 <<< 0x10 |||
(bs.get! 1).toUInt64 <<< 0x8 |||
(bs.get! 0).toUInt64

View File

@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ Sends a message on an `Channel`.
This function does not block.
-/
def Channel.send (ch : Channel α) (v : α) : BaseIO Unit :=
def Channel.send (v : α) (ch : Channel α) : BaseIO Unit :=
ch.atomically do
let st get
if st.closed then return

View File

@@ -4,7 +4,9 @@ Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Leonardo de Moura, Robert Y. Lewis, Keeley Hoek, Mario Carneiro
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Nat.Div
import Init.Data.Nat.Bitwise.Basic
import Init.Coe
open Nat
@@ -13,40 +15,17 @@ namespace Fin
instance coeToNat : CoeOut (Fin n) Nat :=
fun v => v.val
/--
From the empty type `Fin 0`, any desired result `α` can be derived. This is simlar to `Empty.elim`.
-/
def elim0.{u} {α : Sort u} : Fin 0 α
| _, h => absurd h (not_lt_zero _)
/--
Returns the successor of the argument.
The bound in the result type is increased:
```
(2 : Fin 3).succ = (3 : Fin 4)
```
This differs from addition, which wraps around:
```
(2 : Fin 3) + 1 = (0 : Fin 3)
```
-/
def succ : Fin n Fin n.succ
| i, h => i+1, Nat.succ_lt_succ h
variable {n : Nat}
/--
Returns `a` modulo `n + 1` as a `Fin n.succ`.
-/
protected def ofNat {n : Nat} (a : Nat) : Fin n.succ :=
a % (n+1), Nat.mod_lt _ (Nat.zero_lt_succ _)
/--
Returns `a` modulo `n` as a `Fin n`.
The assumption `n > 0` ensures that `Fin n` is nonempty.
-/
protected def ofNat' {n : Nat} (a : Nat) (h : n > 0) : Fin n :=
a % n, Nat.mod_lt _ h
@@ -56,15 +35,12 @@ private theorem mlt {b : Nat} : {a : Nat} → a < n → b % n < n
have : n > 0 := Nat.lt_trans (Nat.zero_lt_succ _) h;
Nat.mod_lt _ this
/-- Addition modulo `n` -/
protected def add : Fin n Fin n Fin n
| a, h, b, _ => (a + b) % n, mlt h
/-- Multiplication modulo `n` -/
protected def mul : Fin n Fin n Fin n
| a, h, b, _ => (a * b) % n, mlt h
/-- Subtraction modulo `n` -/
protected def sub : Fin n Fin n Fin n
| a, h, b, _ => (a + (n - b)) % n, mlt h
@@ -194,3 +170,9 @@ theorem val_add_one_le_of_lt {n : Nat} {a b : Fin n} (h : a < b) : (a : Nat) + 1
theorem val_add_one_le_of_gt {n : Nat} {a b : Fin n} (h : a > b) : (b : Nat) + 1 (a : Nat) := h
end Fin
instance [GetElem cont Nat elem dom] : GetElem cont (Fin n) elem fun xs i => dom xs i where
getElem xs i h := getElem xs i.1 h
macro_rules
| `(tactic| get_elem_tactic_trivial) => `(tactic| apply Fin.val_lt_of_le; get_elem_tactic_trivial; done)

View File

@@ -12,7 +12,6 @@ import Init.Data.Nat.Linear
loop (x : α) (i : Nat) : α :=
if h : i < n then loop (f x i, h) (i+1) else x
termination_by n - i
decreasing_by decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
/-- Folds over `Fin n` from the right: `foldr 3 f x = f 0 (f 1 (f 2 x))`. -/
@[inline] def foldr (n) (f : Fin n α α) (init : α) : α := loop n, Nat.le_refl n init where

View File

@@ -23,7 +23,6 @@ def hIterateFrom (P : Nat → Sort _) {n} (f : ∀(i : Fin n), P i.val → P (i.
have p : i = n := (or_iff_left g).mp (Nat.eq_or_lt_of_le ubnd)
_root_.cast (congrArg P p) a
termination_by n - i
decreasing_by decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
/--
`hIterate` is a heterogenous iterative operation that applies a

View File

@@ -11,9 +11,6 @@ import Init.ByCases
import Init.Conv
import Init.Omega
-- Remove after the next stage0 update
set_option allowUnsafeReducibility true
namespace Fin
/-- If you actually have an element of `Fin n`, then the `n` is always positive -/
@@ -62,8 +59,7 @@ theorem mk_val (i : Fin n) : (⟨i, i.isLt⟩ : Fin n) = i := Fin.eta ..
@[simp] theorem val_ofNat' (a : Nat) (is_pos : n > 0) :
(Fin.ofNat' a is_pos).val = a % n := rfl
@[deprecated ofNat'_zero_val (since := "2024-02-22")]
theorem ofNat'_zero_val : (Fin.ofNat' 0 h).val = 0 := Nat.zero_mod _
@[deprecated ofNat'_zero_val] theorem ofNat'_zero_val : (Fin.ofNat' 0 h).val = 0 := Nat.zero_mod _
@[simp] theorem mod_val (a b : Fin n) : (a % b).val = a.val % b.val :=
rfl
@@ -545,7 +541,7 @@ theorem pred_mk {n : Nat} (i : Nat) (h : i < n + 1) (w) : Fin.pred ⟨i, h⟩ w
{a b : Fin (n + 1)} {ha : a 0} {hb : b 0}, a.pred ha = b.pred hb a = b
| 0, _, _, ha, _ => by simp only [mk_zero, ne_eq, not_true] at ha
| i + 1, _, 0, _, _, hb => by simp only [mk_zero, ne_eq, not_true] at hb
| i + 1, hi, j + 1, hj, ha, hb => by simp [ext_iff, Nat.succ.injEq]
| i + 1, hi, j + 1, hj, ha, hb => by simp [ext_iff]
@[simp] theorem pred_one {n : Nat} :
Fin.pred (1 : Fin (n + 2)) (Ne.symm (Fin.ne_of_lt one_pos)) = 0 := rfl
@@ -606,7 +602,6 @@ A version of `Fin.succRec` taking `i : Fin n` as the first argument. -/
@Fin.succRecOn (n + 1) i.succ motive zero succ = succ n i (Fin.succRecOn i zero succ) := by
cases i; rfl
/-- Define `motive i` by induction on `i : Fin (n + 1)` via induction on the underlying `Nat` value.
This function has two arguments: `zero` handles the base case on `motive 0`,
and `succ` defines the inductive step using `motive i.castSucc`.
@@ -615,12 +610,8 @@ and `succ` defines the inductive step using `motive i.castSucc`.
@[elab_as_elim] def induction {motive : Fin (n + 1) Sort _} (zero : motive 0)
(succ : i : Fin n, motive (castSucc i) motive i.succ) :
i : Fin (n + 1), motive i
| i, hi => go i hi
where
-- Use a curried function so that this is structurally recursive
go : (i : Nat) (hi : i < n + 1), motive i, hi
| 0, hi => by rwa [Fin.mk_zero]
| i+1, hi => succ i, Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ hi (go i (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt hi))
| 0, hi => by rwa [Fin.mk_zero]
| i+1, hi => succ i, Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ hi (induction zero succ i, Nat.lt_of_succ_lt hi)
@[simp] theorem induction_zero {motive : Fin (n + 1) Sort _} (zero : motive 0)
(hs : i : Fin n, motive (castSucc i) motive i.succ) :
@@ -692,12 +683,11 @@ and `cast` defines the inductive step using `motive i.succ`, inducting downwards
termination_by n + 1 - i
decreasing_by decreasing_with
-- FIXME: we put the proof down here to avoid getting a dummy `have` in the definition
try simp only [Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub]
exact Nat.add_sub_add_right .. Nat.sub_lt_sub_left i.2 (Nat.lt_succ_self i)
@[simp] theorem reverseInduction_last {n : Nat} {motive : Fin (n + 1) Sort _} {zero succ} :
(reverseInduction zero succ (Fin.last n) : motive (Fin.last n)) = zero := by
rw [reverseInduction]; simp
rw [reverseInduction]; simp; rfl
@[simp] theorem reverseInduction_castSucc {n : Nat} {motive : Fin (n + 1) Sort _} {zero succ}
(i : Fin n) : reverseInduction (motive := motive) zero succ (castSucc i) =
@@ -802,20 +792,15 @@ protected theorem mul_one (k : Fin (n + 1)) : k * 1 = k := by
protected theorem mul_comm (a b : Fin n) : a * b = b * a :=
ext <| by rw [mul_def, mul_def, Nat.mul_comm]
instance : Std.Commutative (α := Fin n) (· * ·) := Fin.mul_comm
protected theorem mul_assoc (a b c : Fin n) : a * b * c = a * (b * c) := by
apply eq_of_val_eq
simp only [val_mul]
rw [ Nat.mod_eq_of_lt a.isLt, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt b.isLt, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt c.isLt]
simp only [ Nat.mul_mod, Nat.mul_assoc]
instance : Std.Associative (α := Fin n) (· * ·) := Fin.mul_assoc
protected theorem one_mul (k : Fin (n + 1)) : (1 : Fin (n + 1)) * k = k := by
rw [Fin.mul_comm, Fin.mul_one]
instance : Std.LawfulIdentity (α := Fin (n + 1)) (· * ·) 1 where
left_id := Fin.one_mul
right_id := Fin.mul_one
protected theorem mul_zero (k : Fin (n + 1)) : k * 0 = 0 := by simp [ext_iff, mul_def]

View File

@@ -58,13 +58,9 @@ def get? (ds : FloatArray) (i : Nat) : Option Float :=
instance : GetElem FloatArray Nat Float fun xs i => i < xs.size where
getElem xs i h := xs.get i, h
instance : LawfulGetElem FloatArray Nat Float fun xs i => i < xs.size where
instance : GetElem FloatArray USize Float fun xs i => i.val < xs.size where
getElem xs i h := xs.uget i h
instance : LawfulGetElem FloatArray USize Float fun xs i => i.val < xs.size where
@[extern "lean_float_array_uset"]
def uset : (a : FloatArray) (i : USize) Float i.toNat < a.size FloatArray
| ds, i, v, h => ds.uset i v h

View File

@@ -11,4 +11,3 @@ import Init.Data.Int.DivModLemmas
import Init.Data.Int.Gcd
import Init.Data.Int.Lemmas
import Init.Data.Int.Order
import Init.Data.Int.Pow

View File

@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ protected def neg (n : @& Int) : Int :=
```
-/
@[default_instance mid]
instance instNegInt : Neg Int where
instance : Neg Int where
neg := Int.neg
/-- Subtraction of two natural numbers. -/
@@ -173,13 +173,13 @@ inductive NonNeg : Int → Prop where
/-- Definition of `a ≤ b`, encoded as `b - a ≥ 0`. -/
protected def le (a b : Int) : Prop := NonNeg (b - a)
instance instLEInt : LE Int where
instance : LE Int where
le := Int.le
/-- Definition of `a < b`, encoded as `a + 1 ≤ b`. -/
protected def lt (a b : Int) : Prop := (a + 1) b
instance instLTInt : LT Int where
instance : LT Int where
lt := Int.lt
set_option bootstrap.genMatcherCode false in

View File

@@ -158,52 +158,4 @@ instance : Div Int where
instance : Mod Int where
mod := Int.emod
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem ofNat_ediv (m n : Nat) : ((m / n) : Int) = m / n := rfl
theorem ofNat_div (m n : Nat) : (m / n) = div m n := rfl
theorem ofNat_fdiv : m n : Nat, (m / n) = fdiv m n
| 0, _ => by simp [fdiv]
| succ _, _ => rfl
/-!
# `bmod` ("balanced" mod)
Balanced mod (and balanced div) are a division and modulus pair such
that `b * (Int.bdiv a b) + Int.bmod a b = a` and `b/2 ≤ Int.bmod a b <
b/2` for all `a : Int` and `b > 0`.
This is used in Omega as well as signed bitvectors.
-/
/--
Balanced modulus. This version of Integer modulus uses the
balanced rounding convention, which guarantees that
`m/2 ≤ bmod x m < m/2` for `m ≠ 0` and `bmod x m` is congruent
to `x` modulo `m`.
If `m = 0`, then `bmod x m = x`.
-/
def bmod (x : Int) (m : Nat) : Int :=
let r := x % m
if r < (m + 1) / 2 then
r
else
r - m
/--
Balanced division. This returns the unique integer so that
`b * (Int.bdiv a b) + Int.bmod a b = a`.
-/
def bdiv (x : Int) (m : Nat) : Int :=
if m = 0 then
0
else
let q := x / m
let r := x % m
if r < (m + 1) / 2 then
q
else
q + 1
end Int

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff

View File

@@ -6,12 +6,7 @@ Authors: Mario Carneiro
prelude
import Init.Data.Int.Basic
import Init.Data.Nat.Gcd
import Init.Data.Nat.Lcm
import Init.Data.Int.DivModLemmas
/-!
Definition and lemmas for gcd and lcm over Int
-/
namespace Int
/-! ## gcd -/
@@ -19,37 +14,4 @@ namespace Int
/-- Computes the greatest common divisor of two integers, as a `Nat`. -/
def gcd (m n : Int) : Nat := m.natAbs.gcd n.natAbs
theorem gcd_dvd_left {a b : Int} : (gcd a b : Int) a := by
have := Nat.gcd_dvd_left a.natAbs b.natAbs
rw [ Int.ofNat_dvd] at this
exact Int.dvd_trans this natAbs_dvd_self
theorem gcd_dvd_right {a b : Int} : (gcd a b : Int) b := by
have := Nat.gcd_dvd_right a.natAbs b.natAbs
rw [ Int.ofNat_dvd] at this
exact Int.dvd_trans this natAbs_dvd_self
@[simp] theorem one_gcd {a : Int} : gcd 1 a = 1 := by simp [gcd]
@[simp] theorem gcd_one {a : Int} : gcd a 1 = 1 := by simp [gcd]
@[simp] theorem neg_gcd {a b : Int} : gcd (-a) b = gcd a b := by simp [gcd]
@[simp] theorem gcd_neg {a b : Int} : gcd a (-b) = gcd a b := by simp [gcd]
/-! ## lcm -/
/-- Computes the least common multiple of two integers, as a `Nat`. -/
def lcm (m n : Int) : Nat := m.natAbs.lcm n.natAbs
theorem lcm_ne_zero (hm : m 0) (hn : n 0) : lcm m n 0 := by
simp only [lcm]
apply Nat.lcm_ne_zero <;> simpa
theorem dvd_lcm_left {a b : Int} : a lcm a b :=
Int.dvd_trans dvd_natAbs_self (Int.ofNat_dvd.mpr (Nat.dvd_lcm_left a.natAbs b.natAbs))
theorem dvd_lcm_right {a b : Int} : b lcm a b :=
Int.dvd_trans dvd_natAbs_self (Int.ofNat_dvd.mpr (Nat.dvd_lcm_right a.natAbs b.natAbs))
@[simp] theorem lcm_self {a : Int} : lcm a a = a.natAbs := Nat.lcm_self _
end Int

View File

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Deniz Aydin, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
prelude
import Init.Data.Int.Basic
import Init.Conv
import Init.NotationExtra
import Init.PropLemmas
namespace Int
@@ -137,16 +137,12 @@ protected theorem add_comm : ∀ a b : Int, a + b = b + a
| ofNat _, -[_+1] => rfl
| -[_+1], ofNat _ => rfl
| -[_+1], -[_+1] => by simp [Nat.add_comm]
instance : Std.Commutative (α := Int) (· + ·) := Int.add_comm
@[simp] protected theorem add_zero : a : Int, a + 0 = a
| ofNat _ => rfl
| -[_+1] => rfl
@[simp] protected theorem zero_add (a : Int) : 0 + a = a := Int.add_comm .. a.add_zero
instance : Std.LawfulIdentity (α := Int) (· + ·) 0 where
left_id := Int.zero_add
right_id := Int.add_zero
theorem ofNat_add_negSucc_of_lt (h : m < n.succ) : ofNat m + -[n+1] = -[n - m+1] :=
show subNatNat .. = _ by simp [succ_sub (le_of_lt_succ h), subNatNat]
@@ -157,7 +153,7 @@ theorem subNatNat_sub (h : n ≤ m) (k : Nat) : subNatNat (m - n) k = subNatNat
theorem subNatNat_add (m n k : Nat) : subNatNat (m + n) k = m + subNatNat n k := by
cases n.lt_or_ge k with
| inl h' =>
simp [subNatNat_of_lt h', sub_one_add_one_eq_of_pos (Nat.sub_pos_of_lt h')]
simp [subNatNat_of_lt h', succ_pred_eq_of_pos (Nat.sub_pos_of_lt h')]
conv => lhs; rw [ Nat.sub_add_cancel (Nat.le_of_lt h')]
apply subNatNat_add_add
| inr h' => simp [subNatNat_of_le h',
@@ -173,11 +169,12 @@ theorem subNatNat_add_negSucc (m n k : Nat) :
rw [subNatNat_sub h', Nat.add_comm]
| inl h' =>
have h₂ : m < n + succ k := Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h' (le_add_right _ _)
have h₃ : m n + k := le_of_succ_le_succ h₂
rw [subNatNat_of_lt h', subNatNat_of_lt h₂]
simp only [pred_eq_sub_one, negSucc_add_negSucc, succ_eq_add_one, negSucc.injEq]
rw [Nat.add_right_comm, sub_one_add_one_eq_of_pos (Nat.sub_pos_of_lt h'), Nat.sub_sub,
Nat.add_assoc, succ_sub_succ_eq_sub, Nat.add_comm n,Nat.add_sub_assoc (Nat.le_of_lt h'),
Nat.add_comm]
simp [Nat.add_comm]
rw [ add_succ, succ_pred_eq_of_pos (Nat.sub_pos_of_lt h'), add_succ, succ_sub h₃,
Nat.pred_succ]
rw [Nat.add_comm n, Nat.add_sub_assoc (Nat.le_of_lt h')]
protected theorem add_assoc : a b c : Int, a + b + c = a + (b + c)
| (m:Nat), (n:Nat), c => aux1 ..
@@ -191,16 +188,15 @@ protected theorem add_assoc : ∀ a b c : Int, a + b + c = a + (b + c)
| (m:Nat), -[n+1], -[k+1] => by
rw [Int.add_comm, Int.add_comm m, Int.add_comm m, aux2, Int.add_comm -[k+1]]
| -[m+1], -[n+1], -[k+1] => by
simp [Nat.add_comm, Nat.add_left_comm, Nat.add_assoc]
simp [add_succ, Nat.add_comm, Nat.add_left_comm, neg_ofNat_succ]
where
aux1 (m n : Nat) : c : Int, m + n + c = m + (n + c)
| (k:Nat) => by simp [Nat.add_assoc]
| -[k+1] => by simp [subNatNat_add]
aux2 (m n k : Nat) : -[m+1] + -[n+1] + k = -[m+1] + (-[n+1] + k) := by
simp
simp [add_succ]
rw [Int.add_comm, subNatNat_add_negSucc]
simp [Nat.add_comm, Nat.add_left_comm, Nat.add_assoc]
instance : Std.Associative (α := Int) (· + ·) := Int.add_assoc
simp [add_succ, succ_add, Nat.add_comm]
protected theorem add_left_comm (a b c : Int) : a + (b + c) = b + (a + c) := by
rw [ Int.add_assoc, Int.add_comm a, Int.add_assoc]
@@ -325,27 +321,6 @@ theorem toNat_sub (m n : Nat) : toNat (m - n) = m - n := by
· exact (Nat.add_sub_cancel_left ..).symm
· dsimp; rw [Nat.add_assoc, Nat.sub_eq_zero_of_le (Nat.le_add_right ..)]; rfl
/- ## add/sub injectivity -/
@[simp]
protected theorem add_right_inj (i j k : Int) : (i + k = j + k) i = j := by
apply Iff.intro
· intro p
rw [Int.add_sub_cancel i k, Int.add_sub_cancel j k, p]
· exact congrArg (· + k)
@[simp]
protected theorem add_left_inj (i j k : Int) : (k + i = k + j) i = j := by
simp [Int.add_comm k]
@[simp]
protected theorem sub_left_inj (i j k : Int) : (k - i = k - j) i = j := by
simp [Int.sub_eq_add_neg, Int.neg_inj]
@[simp]
protected theorem sub_right_inj (i j k : Int) : (i - k = j - k) i = j := by
simp [Int.sub_eq_add_neg]
/- ## Ring properties -/
@[simp] theorem ofNat_mul_negSucc (m n : Nat) : (m : Int) * -[n+1] = -(m * succ n) := rfl
@@ -356,7 +331,6 @@ protected theorem sub_right_inj (i j k : Int) : (i - k = j - k) ↔ i = j := by
protected theorem mul_comm (a b : Int) : a * b = b * a := by
cases a <;> cases b <;> simp [Nat.mul_comm]
instance : Std.Commutative (α := Int) (· * ·) := Int.mul_comm
theorem ofNat_mul_negOfNat (m n : Nat) : (m : Nat) * negOfNat n = negOfNat (m * n) := by
cases n <;> rfl
@@ -375,7 +349,6 @@ attribute [local simp] ofNat_mul_negOfNat negOfNat_mul_ofNat
protected theorem mul_assoc (a b c : Int) : a * b * c = a * (b * c) := by
cases a <;> cases b <;> cases c <;> simp [Nat.mul_assoc]
instance : Std.Associative (α := Int) (· * ·) := Int.mul_assoc
protected theorem mul_left_comm (a b c : Int) : a * (b * c) = b * (a * c) := by
rw [ Int.mul_assoc, Int.mul_assoc, Int.mul_comm a]
@@ -397,7 +370,7 @@ theorem ofNat_mul_subNatNat (m n k : Nat) :
| inl h =>
have h' : succ m * n < succ m * k := Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h (Nat.succ_pos m)
simp [subNatNat_of_lt h, subNatNat_of_lt h']
rw [sub_one_add_one_eq_of_pos (Nat.sub_pos_of_lt h), neg_ofNat_succ, Nat.mul_sub_left_distrib,
rw [succ_pred_eq_of_pos (Nat.sub_pos_of_lt h), neg_ofNat_succ, Nat.mul_sub_left_distrib,
succ_pred_eq_of_pos (Nat.sub_pos_of_lt h')]; rfl
| inr h =>
have h' : succ m * k succ m * n := Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ h
@@ -412,7 +385,7 @@ theorem negSucc_mul_subNatNat (m n k : Nat) :
| inl h =>
have h' : succ m * n < succ m * k := Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h (Nat.succ_pos m)
rw [subNatNat_of_lt h, subNatNat_of_le (Nat.le_of_lt h')]
simp [sub_one_add_one_eq_of_pos (Nat.sub_pos_of_lt h), Nat.mul_sub_left_distrib]
simp [succ_pred_eq_of_pos (Nat.sub_pos_of_lt h), Nat.mul_sub_left_distrib]
| inr h => cases Nat.lt_or_ge k n with
| inl h' =>
have h₁ : succ m * n > succ m * k := Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h' (Nat.succ_pos m)
@@ -428,12 +401,12 @@ protected theorem mul_add : ∀ a b c : Int, a * (b + c) = a * b + a * c
simp [negOfNat_eq_subNatNat_zero]; rw [ subNatNat_add]; rfl
| (m:Nat), -[n+1], (k:Nat) => by
simp [negOfNat_eq_subNatNat_zero]; rw [Int.add_comm, subNatNat_add]; rfl
| (m:Nat), -[n+1], -[k+1] => by simp [ Nat.left_distrib, Nat.add_left_comm, Nat.add_assoc]
| (m:Nat), -[n+1], -[k+1] => by simp; rw [ Nat.left_distrib, succ_add]; rfl
| -[m+1], (n:Nat), (k:Nat) => by simp [Nat.mul_comm]; rw [ Nat.right_distrib, Nat.mul_comm]
| -[m+1], (n:Nat), -[k+1] => by
simp [negOfNat_eq_subNatNat_zero]; rw [Int.add_comm, subNatNat_add]; rfl
| -[m+1], -[n+1], (k:Nat) => by simp [negOfNat_eq_subNatNat_zero]; rw [ subNatNat_add]; rfl
| -[m+1], -[n+1], -[k+1] => by simp [ Nat.left_distrib, Nat.add_left_comm, Nat.add_assoc]
| -[m+1], -[n+1], -[k+1] => by simp; rw [ Nat.left_distrib, succ_add]; rfl
protected theorem add_mul (a b c : Int) : (a + b) * c = a * c + b * c := by
simp [Int.mul_comm, Int.mul_add]
@@ -465,9 +438,6 @@ protected theorem sub_mul (a b c : Int) : (a - b) * c = a * c - b * c := by
| -[n+1] => show -[1 * n +1] = -[n+1] by rw [Nat.one_mul]
@[simp] protected theorem mul_one (a : Int) : a * 1 = a := by rw [Int.mul_comm, Int.one_mul]
instance : Std.LawfulIdentity (α := Int) (· * ·) 1 where
left_id := Int.one_mul
right_id := Int.mul_one
protected theorem mul_neg_one (a : Int) : a * -1 = -a := by rw [Int.mul_neg, Int.mul_one]
@@ -508,6 +478,10 @@ theorem eq_one_of_mul_eq_self_left {a b : Int} (Hpos : a ≠ 0) (H : b * a = a)
theorem eq_one_of_mul_eq_self_right {a b : Int} (Hpos : b 0) (H : b * a = b) : a = 1 :=
Int.eq_of_mul_eq_mul_left Hpos <| by rw [Int.mul_one, H]
protected theorem pow_succ (b : Int) (e : Nat) : b ^ (e+1) = (b ^ e) * b := rfl
protected theorem pow_succ' (b : Int) (e : Nat) : b ^ (e+1) = b * (b ^ e) := by
rw [Int.mul_comm, Int.pow_succ]
/-! NatCast lemmas -/
/-!

View File

@@ -187,17 +187,11 @@ protected theorem min_comm (a b : Int) : min a b = min b a := by
by_cases h₁ : a b <;> by_cases h₂ : b a <;> simp [h₁, h₂]
· exact Int.le_antisymm h₁ h₂
· cases not_or_intro h₁ h₂ <| Int.le_total ..
instance : Std.Commutative (α := Int) min := Int.min_comm
protected theorem min_le_right (a b : Int) : min a b b := by rw [Int.min_def]; split <;> simp [*]
protected theorem min_le_left (a b : Int) : min a b a := Int.min_comm .. Int.min_le_right ..
protected theorem min_eq_left {a b : Int} (h : a b) : min a b = a := by simp [Int.min_def, h]
protected theorem min_eq_right {a b : Int} (h : b a) : min a b = b := by
rw [Int.min_comm a b]; exact Int.min_eq_left h
protected theorem le_min {a b c : Int} : a min b c a b a c :=
fun h => Int.le_trans h (Int.min_le_left ..), Int.le_trans h (Int.min_le_right ..),
fun h₁, h₂ => by rw [Int.min_def]; split <;> assumption
@@ -207,7 +201,6 @@ protected theorem max_comm (a b : Int) : max a b = max b a := by
by_cases h₁ : a b <;> by_cases h₂ : b a <;> simp [h₁, h₂]
· exact Int.le_antisymm h₂ h₁
· cases not_or_intro h₁ h₂ <| Int.le_total ..
instance : Std.Commutative (α := Int) max := Int.max_comm
protected theorem le_max_left (a b : Int) : a max a b := by rw [Int.max_def]; split <;> simp [*]
@@ -217,12 +210,6 @@ protected theorem max_le {a b c : Int} : max a b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c ∧ b ≤ c :
fun h => Int.le_trans (Int.le_max_left ..) h, Int.le_trans (Int.le_max_right ..) h,
fun h₁, h₂ => by rw [Int.max_def]; split <;> assumption
protected theorem max_eq_right {a b : Int} (h : a b) : max a b = b := by
simp [Int.max_def, h, Int.not_lt.2 h]
protected theorem max_eq_left {a b : Int} (h : b a) : max a b = a := by
rw [ Int.max_comm b a]; exact Int.max_eq_right h
theorem eq_natAbs_of_zero_le {a : Int} (h : 0 a) : a = natAbs a := by
let n, e := eq_ofNat_of_zero_le h
rw [e]; rfl
@@ -449,576 +436,3 @@ theorem natAbs_of_nonneg {a : Int} (H : 0 ≤ a) : (natAbs a : Int) = a :=
theorem ofNat_natAbs_of_nonpos {a : Int} (H : a 0) : (natAbs a : Int) = -a := by
rw [ natAbs_neg, natAbs_of_nonneg (Int.neg_nonneg_of_nonpos H)]
/-! ### toNat -/
theorem toNat_eq_max : a : Int, (toNat a : Int) = max a 0
| (n : Nat) => (Int.max_eq_left (ofNat_zero_le n)).symm
| -[n+1] => (Int.max_eq_right (Int.le_of_lt (negSucc_lt_zero n))).symm
@[simp] theorem toNat_zero : (0 : Int).toNat = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem toNat_one : (1 : Int).toNat = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem toNat_of_nonneg {a : Int} (h : 0 a) : (toNat a : Int) = a := by
rw [toNat_eq_max, Int.max_eq_left h]
@[simp] theorem toNat_ofNat (n : Nat) : toNat n = n := rfl
@[simp] theorem toNat_ofNat_add_one {n : Nat} : ((n : Int) + 1).toNat = n + 1 := rfl
theorem self_le_toNat (a : Int) : a toNat a := by rw [toNat_eq_max]; apply Int.le_max_left
@[simp] theorem le_toNat {n : Nat} {z : Int} (h : 0 z) : n z.toNat (n : Int) z := by
rw [ Int.ofNat_le, Int.toNat_of_nonneg h]
@[simp] theorem toNat_lt {n : Nat} {z : Int} (h : 0 z) : z.toNat < n z < (n : Int) := by
rw [ Int.not_le, Nat.not_le, Int.le_toNat h]
theorem toNat_add {a b : Int} (ha : 0 a) (hb : 0 b) : (a + b).toNat = a.toNat + b.toNat :=
match a, b, eq_ofNat_of_zero_le ha, eq_ofNat_of_zero_le hb with
| _, _, _, rfl, _, rfl => rfl
theorem toNat_add_nat {a : Int} (ha : 0 a) (n : Nat) : (a + n).toNat = a.toNat + n :=
match a, eq_ofNat_of_zero_le ha with | _, _, rfl => rfl
@[simp] theorem pred_toNat : i : Int, (i - 1).toNat = i.toNat - 1
| 0 => rfl
| (n+1:Nat) => by simp [ofNat_add]
| -[n+1] => rfl
@[simp] theorem toNat_sub_toNat_neg : n : Int, n.toNat - (-n).toNat = n
| 0 => rfl
| (_+1:Nat) => Int.sub_zero _
| -[_+1] => Int.zero_sub _
@[simp] theorem toNat_add_toNat_neg_eq_natAbs : n : Int, n.toNat + (-n).toNat = n.natAbs
| 0 => rfl
| (_+1:Nat) => Nat.add_zero _
| -[_+1] => Nat.zero_add _
@[simp] theorem toNat_neg_nat : n : Nat, (-(n : Int)).toNat = 0
| 0 => rfl
| _+1 => rfl
/-! ### toNat' -/
theorem mem_toNat' : (a : Int) (n : Nat), toNat' a = some n a = n
| (m : Nat), n => by simp [toNat', Int.ofNat_inj]
| -[m+1], n => by constructor <;> nofun
/-! ## Order properties of the integers -/
protected theorem lt_of_not_ge {a b : Int} : ¬a b b < a := Int.not_le.mp
protected theorem not_le_of_gt {a b : Int} : b < a ¬a b := Int.not_le.mpr
protected theorem le_of_not_le {a b : Int} : ¬ a b b a := (Int.le_total a b).resolve_left
@[simp] theorem negSucc_not_pos (n : Nat) : 0 < -[n+1] False := by
simp only [Int.not_lt, iff_false]; constructor
theorem eq_negSucc_of_lt_zero : {a : Int}, a < 0 n : Nat, a = -[n+1]
| ofNat _, h => absurd h (Int.not_lt.2 (ofNat_zero_le _))
| -[n+1], _ => n, rfl
protected theorem lt_of_add_lt_add_left {a b c : Int} (h : a + b < a + c) : b < c := by
have : -a + (a + b) < -a + (a + c) := Int.add_lt_add_left h _
simp [Int.neg_add_cancel_left] at this
assumption
protected theorem lt_of_add_lt_add_right {a b c : Int} (h : a + b < c + b) : a < c :=
Int.lt_of_add_lt_add_left (a := b) <| by rwa [Int.add_comm b a, Int.add_comm b c]
protected theorem add_lt_add_iff_left (a : Int) : a + b < a + c b < c :=
Int.lt_of_add_lt_add_left, (Int.add_lt_add_left · _)
protected theorem add_lt_add_iff_right (c : Int) : a + c < b + c a < b :=
Int.lt_of_add_lt_add_right, (Int.add_lt_add_right · _)
protected theorem add_lt_add {a b c d : Int} (h₁ : a < b) (h₂ : c < d) : a + c < b + d :=
Int.lt_trans (Int.add_lt_add_right h₁ c) (Int.add_lt_add_left h₂ b)
protected theorem add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt {a b c d : Int} (h₁ : a b) (h₂ : c < d) :
a + c < b + d :=
Int.lt_of_le_of_lt (Int.add_le_add_right h₁ c) (Int.add_lt_add_left h₂ b)
protected theorem add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le {a b c d : Int} (h₁ : a < b) (h₂ : c d) :
a + c < b + d :=
Int.lt_of_lt_of_le (Int.add_lt_add_right h₁ c) (Int.add_le_add_left h₂ b)
protected theorem lt_add_of_pos_right (a : Int) {b : Int} (h : 0 < b) : a < a + b := by
have : a + 0 < a + b := Int.add_lt_add_left h a
rwa [Int.add_zero] at this
protected theorem lt_add_of_pos_left (a : Int) {b : Int} (h : 0 < b) : a < b + a := by
have : 0 + a < b + a := Int.add_lt_add_right h a
rwa [Int.zero_add] at this
protected theorem add_nonneg {a b : Int} (ha : 0 a) (hb : 0 b) : 0 a + b :=
Int.zero_add 0 Int.add_le_add ha hb
protected theorem add_pos {a b : Int} (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : 0 < a + b :=
Int.zero_add 0 Int.add_lt_add ha hb
protected theorem add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg {a b : Int} (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 b) : 0 < a + b :=
Int.zero_add 0 Int.add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le ha hb
protected theorem add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos {a b : Int} (ha : 0 a) (hb : 0 < b) : 0 < a + b :=
Int.zero_add 0 Int.add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt ha hb
protected theorem add_nonpos {a b : Int} (ha : a 0) (hb : b 0) : a + b 0 :=
Int.zero_add 0 Int.add_le_add ha hb
protected theorem add_neg {a b : Int} (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : a + b < 0 :=
Int.zero_add 0 Int.add_lt_add ha hb
protected theorem add_neg_of_neg_of_nonpos {a b : Int} (ha : a < 0) (hb : b 0) : a + b < 0 :=
Int.zero_add 0 Int.add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le ha hb
protected theorem add_neg_of_nonpos_of_neg {a b : Int} (ha : a 0) (hb : b < 0) : a + b < 0 :=
Int.zero_add 0 Int.add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt ha hb
protected theorem lt_add_of_le_of_pos {a b c : Int} (hbc : b c) (ha : 0 < a) : b < c + a :=
Int.add_zero b Int.add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt hbc ha
theorem add_one_le_iff {a b : Int} : a + 1 b a < b := .rfl
theorem lt_add_one_iff {a b : Int} : a < b + 1 a b := Int.add_le_add_iff_right _
@[simp] theorem succ_ofNat_pos (n : Nat) : 0 < (n : Int) + 1 :=
lt_add_one_iff.2 (ofNat_zero_le _)
theorem le_add_one {a b : Int} (h : a b) : a b + 1 :=
Int.le_of_lt (Int.lt_add_one_iff.2 h)
protected theorem nonneg_of_neg_nonpos {a : Int} (h : -a 0) : 0 a :=
Int.le_of_neg_le_neg <| by rwa [Int.neg_zero]
protected theorem nonpos_of_neg_nonneg {a : Int} (h : 0 -a) : a 0 :=
Int.le_of_neg_le_neg <| by rwa [Int.neg_zero]
protected theorem lt_of_neg_lt_neg {a b : Int} (h : -b < -a) : a < b :=
Int.neg_neg a Int.neg_neg b Int.neg_lt_neg h
protected theorem pos_of_neg_neg {a : Int} (h : -a < 0) : 0 < a :=
Int.lt_of_neg_lt_neg <| by rwa [Int.neg_zero]
protected theorem neg_of_neg_pos {a : Int} (h : 0 < -a) : a < 0 :=
have : -0 < -a := by rwa [Int.neg_zero]
Int.lt_of_neg_lt_neg this
protected theorem le_neg_of_le_neg {a b : Int} (h : a -b) : b -a := by
have h := Int.neg_le_neg h
rwa [Int.neg_neg] at h
protected theorem neg_le_of_neg_le {a b : Int} (h : -a b) : -b a := by
have h := Int.neg_le_neg h
rwa [Int.neg_neg] at h
protected theorem lt_neg_of_lt_neg {a b : Int} (h : a < -b) : b < -a := by
have h := Int.neg_lt_neg h
rwa [Int.neg_neg] at h
protected theorem neg_lt_of_neg_lt {a b : Int} (h : -a < b) : -b < a := by
have h := Int.neg_lt_neg h
rwa [Int.neg_neg] at h
protected theorem sub_nonpos_of_le {a b : Int} (h : a b) : a - b 0 := by
have h := Int.add_le_add_right h (-b)
rwa [Int.add_right_neg] at h
protected theorem le_of_sub_nonpos {a b : Int} (h : a - b 0) : a b := by
have h := Int.add_le_add_right h b
rwa [Int.sub_add_cancel, Int.zero_add] at h
protected theorem sub_neg_of_lt {a b : Int} (h : a < b) : a - b < 0 := by
have h := Int.add_lt_add_right h (-b)
rwa [Int.add_right_neg] at h
protected theorem lt_of_sub_neg {a b : Int} (h : a - b < 0) : a < b := by
have h := Int.add_lt_add_right h b
rwa [Int.sub_add_cancel, Int.zero_add] at h
protected theorem add_le_of_le_neg_add {a b c : Int} (h : b -a + c) : a + b c := by
have h := Int.add_le_add_left h a
rwa [Int.add_neg_cancel_left] at h
protected theorem le_neg_add_of_add_le {a b c : Int} (h : a + b c) : b -a + c := by
have h := Int.add_le_add_left h (-a)
rwa [Int.neg_add_cancel_left] at h
protected theorem add_le_of_le_sub_left {a b c : Int} (h : b c - a) : a + b c := by
have h := Int.add_le_add_left h a
rwa [ Int.add_sub_assoc, Int.add_comm a c, Int.add_sub_cancel] at h
protected theorem le_sub_left_of_add_le {a b c : Int} (h : a + b c) : b c - a := by
have h := Int.add_le_add_right h (-a)
rwa [Int.add_comm a b, Int.add_neg_cancel_right] at h
protected theorem add_le_of_le_sub_right {a b c : Int} (h : a c - b) : a + b c := by
have h := Int.add_le_add_right h b
rwa [Int.sub_add_cancel] at h
protected theorem le_sub_right_of_add_le {a b c : Int} (h : a + b c) : a c - b := by
have h := Int.add_le_add_right h (-b)
rwa [Int.add_neg_cancel_right] at h
protected theorem le_add_of_neg_add_le {a b c : Int} (h : -b + a c) : a b + c := by
have h := Int.add_le_add_left h b
rwa [Int.add_neg_cancel_left] at h
protected theorem neg_add_le_of_le_add {a b c : Int} (h : a b + c) : -b + a c := by
have h := Int.add_le_add_left h (-b)
rwa [Int.neg_add_cancel_left] at h
protected theorem le_add_of_sub_left_le {a b c : Int} (h : a - b c) : a b + c := by
have h := Int.add_le_add_right h b
rwa [Int.sub_add_cancel, Int.add_comm] at h
protected theorem le_add_of_sub_right_le {a b c : Int} (h : a - c b) : a b + c := by
have h := Int.add_le_add_right h c
rwa [Int.sub_add_cancel] at h
protected theorem sub_right_le_of_le_add {a b c : Int} (h : a b + c) : a - c b := by
have h := Int.add_le_add_right h (-c)
rwa [Int.add_neg_cancel_right] at h
protected theorem le_add_of_neg_add_le_left {a b c : Int} (h : -b + a c) : a b + c := by
rw [Int.add_comm] at h
exact Int.le_add_of_sub_left_le h
protected theorem neg_add_le_left_of_le_add {a b c : Int} (h : a b + c) : -b + a c := by
rw [Int.add_comm]
exact Int.sub_left_le_of_le_add h
protected theorem le_add_of_neg_add_le_right {a b c : Int} (h : -c + a b) : a b + c := by
rw [Int.add_comm] at h
exact Int.le_add_of_sub_right_le h
protected theorem neg_add_le_right_of_le_add {a b c : Int} (h : a b + c) : -c + a b := by
rw [Int.add_comm] at h
exact Int.neg_add_le_left_of_le_add h
protected theorem le_add_of_neg_le_sub_left {a b c : Int} (h : -a b - c) : c a + b :=
Int.le_add_of_neg_add_le_left (Int.add_le_of_le_sub_right h)
protected theorem neg_le_sub_left_of_le_add {a b c : Int} (h : c a + b) : -a b - c := by
have h := Int.le_neg_add_of_add_le (Int.sub_left_le_of_le_add h)
rwa [Int.add_comm] at h
protected theorem le_add_of_neg_le_sub_right {a b c : Int} (h : -b a - c) : c a + b :=
Int.le_add_of_sub_right_le (Int.add_le_of_le_sub_left h)
protected theorem neg_le_sub_right_of_le_add {a b c : Int} (h : c a + b) : -b a - c :=
Int.le_sub_left_of_add_le (Int.sub_right_le_of_le_add h)
protected theorem sub_le_of_sub_le {a b c : Int} (h : a - b c) : a - c b :=
Int.sub_left_le_of_le_add (Int.le_add_of_sub_right_le h)
protected theorem sub_le_sub_left {a b : Int} (h : a b) (c : Int) : c - b c - a :=
Int.add_le_add_left (Int.neg_le_neg h) c
protected theorem sub_le_sub_right {a b : Int} (h : a b) (c : Int) : a - c b - c :=
Int.add_le_add_right h (-c)
protected theorem sub_le_sub {a b c d : Int} (hab : a b) (hcd : c d) : a - d b - c :=
Int.add_le_add hab (Int.neg_le_neg hcd)
protected theorem add_lt_of_lt_neg_add {a b c : Int} (h : b < -a + c) : a + b < c := by
have h := Int.add_lt_add_left h a
rwa [Int.add_neg_cancel_left] at h
protected theorem lt_neg_add_of_add_lt {a b c : Int} (h : a + b < c) : b < -a + c := by
have h := Int.add_lt_add_left h (-a)
rwa [Int.neg_add_cancel_left] at h
protected theorem add_lt_of_lt_sub_left {a b c : Int} (h : b < c - a) : a + b < c := by
have h := Int.add_lt_add_left h a
rwa [ Int.add_sub_assoc, Int.add_comm a c, Int.add_sub_cancel] at h
protected theorem lt_sub_left_of_add_lt {a b c : Int} (h : a + b < c) : b < c - a := by
have h := Int.add_lt_add_right h (-a)
rwa [Int.add_comm a b, Int.add_neg_cancel_right] at h
protected theorem add_lt_of_lt_sub_right {a b c : Int} (h : a < c - b) : a + b < c := by
have h := Int.add_lt_add_right h b
rwa [Int.sub_add_cancel] at h
protected theorem lt_sub_right_of_add_lt {a b c : Int} (h : a + b < c) : a < c - b := by
have h := Int.add_lt_add_right h (-b)
rwa [Int.add_neg_cancel_right] at h
protected theorem lt_add_of_neg_add_lt {a b c : Int} (h : -b + a < c) : a < b + c := by
have h := Int.add_lt_add_left h b
rwa [Int.add_neg_cancel_left] at h
protected theorem neg_add_lt_of_lt_add {a b c : Int} (h : a < b + c) : -b + a < c := by
have h := Int.add_lt_add_left h (-b)
rwa [Int.neg_add_cancel_left] at h
protected theorem lt_add_of_sub_left_lt {a b c : Int} (h : a - b < c) : a < b + c := by
have h := Int.add_lt_add_right h b
rwa [Int.sub_add_cancel, Int.add_comm] at h
protected theorem sub_left_lt_of_lt_add {a b c : Int} (h : a < b + c) : a - b < c := by
have h := Int.add_lt_add_right h (-b)
rwa [Int.add_comm b c, Int.add_neg_cancel_right] at h
protected theorem lt_add_of_sub_right_lt {a b c : Int} (h : a - c < b) : a < b + c := by
have h := Int.add_lt_add_right h c
rwa [Int.sub_add_cancel] at h
protected theorem sub_right_lt_of_lt_add {a b c : Int} (h : a < b + c) : a - c < b := by
have h := Int.add_lt_add_right h (-c)
rwa [Int.add_neg_cancel_right] at h
protected theorem lt_add_of_neg_add_lt_left {a b c : Int} (h : -b + a < c) : a < b + c := by
rw [Int.add_comm] at h
exact Int.lt_add_of_sub_left_lt h
protected theorem neg_add_lt_left_of_lt_add {a b c : Int} (h : a < b + c) : -b + a < c := by
rw [Int.add_comm]
exact Int.sub_left_lt_of_lt_add h
protected theorem lt_add_of_neg_add_lt_right {a b c : Int} (h : -c + a < b) : a < b + c := by
rw [Int.add_comm] at h
exact Int.lt_add_of_sub_right_lt h
protected theorem neg_add_lt_right_of_lt_add {a b c : Int} (h : a < b + c) : -c + a < b := by
rw [Int.add_comm] at h
exact Int.neg_add_lt_left_of_lt_add h
protected theorem lt_add_of_neg_lt_sub_left {a b c : Int} (h : -a < b - c) : c < a + b :=
Int.lt_add_of_neg_add_lt_left (Int.add_lt_of_lt_sub_right h)
protected theorem neg_lt_sub_left_of_lt_add {a b c : Int} (h : c < a + b) : -a < b - c := by
have h := Int.lt_neg_add_of_add_lt (Int.sub_left_lt_of_lt_add h)
rwa [Int.add_comm] at h
protected theorem lt_add_of_neg_lt_sub_right {a b c : Int} (h : -b < a - c) : c < a + b :=
Int.lt_add_of_sub_right_lt (Int.add_lt_of_lt_sub_left h)
protected theorem neg_lt_sub_right_of_lt_add {a b c : Int} (h : c < a + b) : -b < a - c :=
Int.lt_sub_left_of_add_lt (Int.sub_right_lt_of_lt_add h)
protected theorem sub_lt_of_sub_lt {a b c : Int} (h : a - b < c) : a - c < b :=
Int.sub_left_lt_of_lt_add (Int.lt_add_of_sub_right_lt h)
protected theorem sub_lt_sub_left {a b : Int} (h : a < b) (c : Int) : c - b < c - a :=
Int.add_lt_add_left (Int.neg_lt_neg h) c
protected theorem sub_lt_sub_right {a b : Int} (h : a < b) (c : Int) : a - c < b - c :=
Int.add_lt_add_right h (-c)
protected theorem sub_lt_sub {a b c d : Int} (hab : a < b) (hcd : c < d) : a - d < b - c :=
Int.add_lt_add hab (Int.neg_lt_neg hcd)
protected theorem sub_lt_sub_of_le_of_lt {a b c d : Int}
(hab : a b) (hcd : c < d) : a - d < b - c :=
Int.add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt hab (Int.neg_lt_neg hcd)
protected theorem sub_lt_sub_of_lt_of_le {a b c d : Int}
(hab : a < b) (hcd : c d) : a - d < b - c :=
Int.add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le hab (Int.neg_le_neg hcd)
protected theorem add_le_add_three {a b c d e f : Int}
(h₁ : a d) (h₂ : b e) (h₃ : c f) : a + b + c d + e + f :=
Int.add_le_add (Int.add_le_add h₁ h₂) h₃
theorem exists_eq_neg_ofNat {a : Int} (H : a 0) : n : Nat, a = -(n : Int) :=
let n, h := eq_ofNat_of_zero_le (Int.neg_nonneg_of_nonpos H)
n, Int.eq_neg_of_eq_neg h.symm
theorem lt_of_add_one_le {a b : Int} (H : a + 1 b) : a < b := H
theorem lt_add_one_of_le {a b : Int} (H : a b) : a < b + 1 := Int.add_le_add_right H 1
theorem le_of_lt_add_one {a b : Int} (H : a < b + 1) : a b := Int.le_of_add_le_add_right H
theorem sub_one_lt_of_le {a b : Int} (H : a b) : a - 1 < b :=
Int.sub_right_lt_of_lt_add <| lt_add_one_of_le H
theorem le_of_sub_one_lt {a b : Int} (H : a - 1 < b) : a b :=
le_of_lt_add_one <| Int.lt_add_of_sub_right_lt H
theorem le_sub_one_of_lt {a b : Int} (H : a < b) : a b - 1 := Int.le_sub_right_of_add_le H
theorem lt_of_le_sub_one {a b : Int} (H : a b - 1) : a < b := Int.add_le_of_le_sub_right H
/- ### Order properties and multiplication -/
protected theorem mul_lt_mul {a b c d : Int}
(h₁ : a < c) (h₂ : b d) (h₃ : 0 < b) (h₄ : 0 c) : a * b < c * d :=
Int.lt_of_lt_of_le (Int.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right h₁ h₃) (Int.mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left h₂ h₄)
protected theorem mul_lt_mul' {a b c d : Int}
(h₁ : a c) (h₂ : b < d) (h₃ : 0 b) (h₄ : 0 < c) : a * b < c * d :=
Int.lt_of_le_of_lt (Int.mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h₁ h₃) (Int.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h₂ h₄)
protected theorem mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg {a b : Int} (ha : 0 < a) (hb : b < 0) : a * b < 0 := by
have h : a * b < a * 0 := Int.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left hb ha
rwa [Int.mul_zero] at h
protected theorem mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos {a b : Int} (ha : a < 0) (hb : 0 < b) : a * b < 0 := by
have h : a * b < 0 * b := Int.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right ha hb
rwa [Int.zero_mul] at h
protected theorem mul_nonneg_of_nonpos_of_nonpos {a b : Int}
(ha : a 0) (hb : b 0) : 0 a * b := by
have : 0 * b a * b := Int.mul_le_mul_of_nonpos_right ha hb
rwa [Int.zero_mul] at this
protected theorem mul_lt_mul_of_neg_left {a b c : Int} (h : b < a) (hc : c < 0) : c * a < c * b :=
have : -c > 0 := Int.neg_pos_of_neg hc
have : -c * b < -c * a := Int.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h this
have : -(c * b) < -(c * a) := by
rwa [ Int.neg_mul_eq_neg_mul, Int.neg_mul_eq_neg_mul] at this
Int.lt_of_neg_lt_neg this
protected theorem mul_lt_mul_of_neg_right {a b c : Int} (h : b < a) (hc : c < 0) : a * c < b * c :=
have : -c > 0 := Int.neg_pos_of_neg hc
have : b * -c < a * -c := Int.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right h this
have : -(b * c) < -(a * c) := by
rwa [ Int.neg_mul_eq_mul_neg, Int.neg_mul_eq_mul_neg] at this
Int.lt_of_neg_lt_neg this
protected theorem mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg {a b : Int} (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : 0 < a * b := by
have : 0 * b < a * b := Int.mul_lt_mul_of_neg_right ha hb
rwa [Int.zero_mul] at this
protected theorem mul_self_le_mul_self {a b : Int} (h1 : 0 a) (h2 : a b) : a * a b * b :=
Int.mul_le_mul h2 h2 h1 (Int.le_trans h1 h2)
protected theorem mul_self_lt_mul_self {a b : Int} (h1 : 0 a) (h2 : a < b) : a * a < b * b :=
Int.mul_lt_mul' (Int.le_of_lt h2) h2 h1 (Int.lt_of_le_of_lt h1 h2)
/- ## sign -/
@[simp] theorem sign_zero : sign 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem sign_one : sign 1 = 1 := rfl
theorem sign_neg_one : sign (-1) = -1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem sign_of_add_one (x : Nat) : Int.sign (x + 1) = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem sign_negSucc (x : Nat) : Int.sign (Int.negSucc x) = -1 := rfl
theorem natAbs_sign (z : Int) : z.sign.natAbs = if z = 0 then 0 else 1 :=
match z with | 0 | succ _ | -[_+1] => rfl
theorem natAbs_sign_of_nonzero {z : Int} (hz : z 0) : z.sign.natAbs = 1 := by
rw [Int.natAbs_sign, if_neg hz]
theorem sign_ofNat_of_nonzero {n : Nat} (hn : n 0) : Int.sign n = 1 :=
match n, Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hn with
| _, n, rfl => Int.sign_of_add_one n
@[simp] theorem sign_neg (z : Int) : Int.sign (-z) = -Int.sign z := by
match z with | 0 | succ _ | -[_+1] => rfl
theorem sign_mul_natAbs : a : Int, sign a * natAbs a = a
| 0 => rfl
| succ _ => Int.one_mul _
| -[_+1] => (Int.neg_eq_neg_one_mul _).symm
@[simp] theorem sign_mul : a b, sign (a * b) = sign a * sign b
| a, 0 | 0, b => by simp [Int.mul_zero, Int.zero_mul]
| succ _, succ _ | succ _, -[_+1] | -[_+1], succ _ | -[_+1], -[_+1] => rfl
theorem sign_eq_one_of_pos {a : Int} (h : 0 < a) : sign a = 1 :=
match a, eq_succ_of_zero_lt h with
| _, _, rfl => rfl
theorem sign_eq_neg_one_of_neg {a : Int} (h : a < 0) : sign a = -1 :=
match a, eq_negSucc_of_lt_zero h with
| _, _, rfl => rfl
theorem eq_zero_of_sign_eq_zero : {a : Int}, sign a = 0 a = 0
| 0, _ => rfl
theorem pos_of_sign_eq_one : {a : Int}, sign a = 1 0 < a
| (_ + 1 : Nat), _ => ofNat_lt.2 (Nat.succ_pos _)
theorem neg_of_sign_eq_neg_one : {a : Int}, sign a = -1 a < 0
| (_ + 1 : Nat), h => nomatch h
| 0, h => nomatch h
| -[_+1], _ => negSucc_lt_zero _
theorem sign_eq_one_iff_pos (a : Int) : sign a = 1 0 < a :=
pos_of_sign_eq_one, sign_eq_one_of_pos
theorem sign_eq_neg_one_iff_neg (a : Int) : sign a = -1 a < 0 :=
neg_of_sign_eq_neg_one, sign_eq_neg_one_of_neg
@[simp] theorem sign_eq_zero_iff_zero (a : Int) : sign a = 0 a = 0 :=
eq_zero_of_sign_eq_zero, fun h => by rw [h, sign_zero]
@[simp] theorem sign_sign : sign (sign x) = sign x := by
match x with
| 0 => rfl
| .ofNat (_ + 1) => rfl
| .negSucc _ => rfl
@[simp] theorem sign_nonneg : 0 sign x 0 x := by
match x with
| 0 => rfl
| .ofNat (_ + 1) =>
simp (config := { decide := true }) only [sign, true_iff]
exact Int.le_add_one (ofNat_nonneg _)
| .negSucc _ => simp (config := { decide := true }) [sign]
theorem mul_sign : i : Int, i * sign i = natAbs i
| succ _ => Int.mul_one _
| 0 => Int.mul_zero _
| -[_+1] => Int.mul_neg_one _
/- ## natAbs -/
theorem natAbs_ne_zero {a : Int} : a.natAbs 0 a 0 := not_congr Int.natAbs_eq_zero
theorem natAbs_mul_self : {a : Int}, (natAbs a * natAbs a) = a * a
| ofNat _ => rfl
| -[_+1] => rfl
theorem eq_nat_or_neg (a : Int) : n : Nat, a = n a = -n := _, natAbs_eq a
theorem natAbs_mul_natAbs_eq {a b : Int} {c : Nat}
(h : a * b = (c : Int)) : a.natAbs * b.natAbs = c := by rw [ natAbs_mul, h, natAbs]
@[simp] theorem natAbs_mul_self' (a : Int) : (natAbs a * natAbs a : Int) = a * a := by
rw [ Int.ofNat_mul, natAbs_mul_self]
theorem natAbs_eq_iff {a : Int} {n : Nat} : a.natAbs = n a = n a = -n := by
rw [ Int.natAbs_eq_natAbs_iff, Int.natAbs_ofNat]
theorem natAbs_add_le (a b : Int) : natAbs (a + b) natAbs a + natAbs b := by
suffices a b : Nat, natAbs (subNatNat a b.succ) (a + b).succ by
match a, b with
| (a:Nat), (b:Nat) => rw [ofNat_add_ofNat, natAbs_ofNat]; apply Nat.le_refl
| (a:Nat), -[b+1] => rw [natAbs_ofNat, natAbs_negSucc]; apply this
| -[a+1], (b:Nat) =>
rw [natAbs_negSucc, natAbs_ofNat, Nat.succ_add, Nat.add_comm a b]; apply this
| -[a+1], -[b+1] => rw [natAbs_negSucc, succ_add]; apply Nat.le_refl
refine fun a b => subNatNat_elim a b.succ
(fun m n i => n = b.succ natAbs i (m + b).succ) ?_
(fun i n (e : (n + i).succ = _) => ?_) rfl
· intro i n h
subst h
rw [Nat.add_comm _ i, Nat.add_assoc]
exact Nat.le_add_right i (b.succ + b).succ
· apply succ_le_succ
rw [ succ.inj e, Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_comm]
apply Nat.le_add_right
theorem natAbs_sub_le (a b : Int) : natAbs (a - b) natAbs a + natAbs b := by
rw [ Int.natAbs_neg b]; apply natAbs_add_le
theorem negSucc_eq' (m : Nat) : -[m+1] = -m - 1 := by simp only [negSucc_eq, Int.neg_add]; rfl
theorem natAbs_lt_natAbs_of_nonneg_of_lt {a b : Int}
(w₁ : 0 a) (w₂ : a < b) : a.natAbs < b.natAbs :=
match a, b, eq_ofNat_of_zero_le w₁, eq_ofNat_of_zero_le (Int.le_trans w₁ (Int.le_of_lt w₂)) with
| _, _, _, rfl, _, rfl => ofNat_lt.1 w₂
theorem eq_natAbs_iff_mul_eq_zero : natAbs a = n (a - n) * (a + n) = 0 := by
rw [natAbs_eq_iff, Int.mul_eq_zero, Int.sub_neg, Int.sub_eq_zero, Int.sub_eq_zero]
end Int

View File

@@ -1,44 +0,0 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Deniz Aydin, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Int.Lemmas
namespace Int
/-! # pow -/
protected theorem pow_zero (b : Int) : b^0 = 1 := rfl
protected theorem pow_succ (b : Int) (e : Nat) : b ^ (e+1) = (b ^ e) * b := rfl
protected theorem pow_succ' (b : Int) (e : Nat) : b ^ (e+1) = b * (b ^ e) := by
rw [Int.mul_comm, Int.pow_succ]
theorem pow_le_pow_of_le_left {n m : Nat} (h : n m) : (i : Nat), n^i m^i
| 0 => Nat.le_refl _
| i + 1 => Nat.mul_le_mul (pow_le_pow_of_le_left h i) h
theorem pow_le_pow_of_le_right {n : Nat} (hx : n > 0) {i : Nat} : {j}, i j n^i n^j
| 0, h =>
have : i = 0 := Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero h
this.symm Nat.le_refl _
| j + 1, h =>
match Nat.le_or_eq_of_le_succ h with
| Or.inl h => show n^i n^j * n from
have : n^i * 1 n^j * n := Nat.mul_le_mul (pow_le_pow_of_le_right hx h) hx
Nat.mul_one (n^i) this
| Or.inr h =>
h.symm Nat.le_refl _
theorem pos_pow_of_pos {n : Nat} (m : Nat) (h : 0 < n) : 0 < n^m :=
pow_le_pow_of_le_right h (Nat.zero_le _)
theorem natCast_pow (b n : Nat) : ((b^n : Nat) : Int) = (b : Int) ^ n := by
match n with
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 =>
simp only [Nat.pow_succ, Int.pow_succ, natCast_mul, natCast_pow _ n]
end Int

View File

@@ -8,5 +8,3 @@ import Init.Data.List.Basic
import Init.Data.List.BasicAux
import Init.Data.List.Control
import Init.Data.List.Lemmas
import Init.Data.List.Impl
import Init.Data.List.TakeDrop

View File

@@ -7,7 +7,6 @@ prelude
import Init.SimpLemmas
import Init.Data.Nat.Basic
import Init.Data.Nat.Div
set_option linter.missingDocs true -- keep it documented
open Decidable List
@@ -55,6 +54,15 @@ variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
namespace List
instance : GetElem (List α) Nat α fun as i => i < as.length where
getElem as i h := as.get i, h
@[simp] theorem cons_getElem_zero (a : α) (as : List α) (h : 0 < (a :: as).length) : getElem (a :: as) 0 h = a := by
rfl
@[simp] theorem cons_getElem_succ (a : α) (as : List α) (i : Nat) (h : i + 1 < (a :: as).length) : getElem (a :: as) (i+1) h = getElem as i (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h) := by
rfl
theorem length_add_eq_lengthTRAux (as : List α) (n : Nat) : as.length + n = as.lengthTRAux n := by
induction as generalizing n with
| nil => simp [length, lengthTRAux]
@@ -127,9 +135,6 @@ instance : Append (List α) := ⟨List.append⟩
| nil => rfl
| cons a as ih =>
simp_all [HAppend.hAppend, Append.append, List.append]
instance : Std.LawfulIdentity (α := List α) (· ++ ·) [] where
left_id := nil_append
right_id := append_nil
@[simp] theorem cons_append (a : α) (as bs : List α) : (a::as) ++ bs = a::(as ++ bs) := rfl
@@ -139,7 +144,6 @@ theorem append_assoc (as bs cs : List α) : (as ++ bs) ++ cs = as ++ (bs ++ cs)
induction as with
| nil => rfl
| cons a as ih => simp [ih]
instance : Std.Associative (α := List α) (· ++ ·) := append_assoc
theorem append_cons (as : List α) (b : α) (bs : List α) : as ++ b :: bs = as ++ [b] ++ bs := by
induction as with
@@ -454,7 +458,7 @@ contains the longest initial segment for which `p` returns true
and the second part is everything else.
* `span (· > 5) [6, 8, 9, 5, 2, 9] = ([6, 8, 9], [5, 2, 9])`
* `span (· > 10) [6, 8, 9, 5, 2, 9] = ([], [6, 8, 9, 5, 2, 9])`
* `span (· > 10) [6, 8, 9, 5, 2, 9] = ([6, 8, 9, 5, 2, 9], [])`
-/
@[inline] def span (p : α Bool) (as : List α) : List α × List α :=
loop as []
@@ -516,6 +520,11 @@ def drop : Nat → List α → List α
@[simp] theorem drop_nil : ([] : List α).drop i = [] := by
cases i <;> rfl
theorem get_drop_eq_drop (as : List α) (i : Nat) (h : i < as.length) : as[i] :: as.drop (i+1) = as.drop i :=
match as, i with
| _::_, 0 => rfl
| _::_, i+1 => get_drop_eq_drop _ i _
/--
`O(min n |xs|)`. Returns the first `n` elements of `xs`, or the whole list if `n` is too large.
* `take 0 [a, b, c, d, e] = []`
@@ -718,9 +727,9 @@ inductive lt [LT α] : List α → List α → Prop where
instance [LT α] : LT (List α) := List.lt
instance hasDecidableLt [LT α] [h : DecidableRel (α:=α) (·<·)] : (l₁ l₂ : List α) Decidable (l₁ < l₂)
| [], [] => isFalse nofun
| [], [] => isFalse (fun h => nomatch h)
| [], _::_ => isTrue (List.lt.nil _ _)
| _::_, [] => isFalse nofun
| _::_, [] => isFalse (fun h => nomatch h)
| a::as, b::bs =>
match h a b with
| isTrue h₁ => isTrue (List.lt.head _ _ h₁)

View File

@@ -5,7 +5,9 @@ Author: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Nat.Linear
import Init.Ext
import Init.Data.Array.Basic
import Init.Data.List.Basic
import Init.Util
universe u
@@ -13,157 +15,63 @@ namespace List
/-! The following functions can't be defined at `Init.Data.List.Basic`, because they depend on `Init.Util`,
and `Init.Util` depends on `Init.Data.List.Basic`. -/
/--
Returns the `i`-th element in the list (zero-based).
If the index is out of bounds (`i ≥ as.length`), this function panics when executed, and returns
`default`. See `get?` and `getD` for safer alternatives.
-/
def get! [Inhabited α] : (as : List α) (i : Nat) α
def get! [Inhabited α] : List α Nat α
| a::_, 0 => a
| _::as, n+1 => get! as n
| _, _ => panic! "invalid index"
/--
Returns the `i`-th element in the list (zero-based).
If the index is out of bounds (`i ≥ as.length`), this function returns `none`.
Also see `get`, `getD` and `get!`.
-/
def get? : (as : List α) (i : Nat) Option α
def get? : List α Nat Option α
| a::_, 0 => some a
| _::as, n+1 => get? as n
| _, _ => none
/--
Returns the `i`-th element in the list (zero-based).
def getD (as : List α) (idx : Nat) (a₀ : α) : α :=
(as.get? idx).getD a₀
If the index is out of bounds (`i ≥ as.length`), this function returns `fallback`.
See also `get?` and `get!`.
-/
def getD (as : List α) (i : Nat) (fallback : α) : α :=
(as.get? i).getD fallback
@[ext] theorem ext : {l₁ l₂ : List α}, ( n, l₁.get? n = l₂.get? n) l₁ = l₂
| [], [], _ => rfl
| a :: l₁, [], h => nomatch h 0
| [], a' :: l₂, h => nomatch h 0
| a :: l₁, a' :: l₂, h => by
have h0 : some a = some a' := h 0
injection h0 with aa; simp only [aa, ext fun n => h (n+1)]
/--
Returns the first element in the list.
If the list is empty, this function panics when executed, and returns `default`.
See `head` and `headD` for safer alternatives.
-/
def head! [Inhabited α] : List α α
| [] => panic! "empty list"
| a::_ => a
/--
Returns the first element in the list.
If the list is empty, this function returns `none`.
Also see `headD` and `head!`.
-/
def head? : List α Option α
| [] => none
| a::_ => some a
/--
Returns the first element in the list.
If the list is empty, this function returns `fallback`.
Also see `head?` and `head!`.
-/
def headD : (as : List α) (fallback : α) α
| [], fallback => fallback
def headD : List α α α
| [], a₀ => a₀
| a::_, _ => a
/--
Returns the first element of a non-empty list.
-/
def head : (as : List α) as [] α
| a::_, _ => a
/--
Drops the first element of the list.
If the list is empty, this function panics when executed, and returns the empty list.
See `tail` and `tailD` for safer alternatives.
-/
def tail! : List α List α
| [] => panic! "empty list"
| _::as => as
/--
Drops the first element of the list.
If the list is empty, this function returns `none`.
Also see `tailD` and `tail!`.
-/
def tail? : List α Option (List α)
| [] => none
| _::as => some as
/--
Drops the first element of the list.
def tailD : List α List α List α
| [], as₀ => as₀
| _::as, _ => as
If the list is empty, this function returns `fallback`.
Also see `head?` and `head!`.
-/
def tailD (list fallback : List α) : List α :=
match list with
| [] => fallback
| _ :: tl => tl
/--
Returns the last element of a non-empty list.
-/
def getLast : (as : List α), as [] α
| [], h => absurd rfl h
| [a], _ => a
| _::b::as, _ => getLast (b::as) (fun h => List.noConfusion h)
/--
Returns the last element in the list.
If the list is empty, this function panics when executed, and returns `default`.
See `getLast` and `getLastD` for safer alternatives.
-/
def getLast! [Inhabited α] : List α α
| [] => panic! "empty list"
| a::as => getLast (a::as) (fun h => List.noConfusion h)
/--
Returns the last element in the list.
If the list is empty, this function returns `none`.
Also see `getLastD` and `getLast!`.
-/
def getLast? : List α Option α
| [] => none
| a::as => some (getLast (a::as) (fun h => List.noConfusion h))
/--
Returns the last element in the list.
If the list is empty, this function returns `fallback`.
Also see `getLast?` and `getLast!`.
-/
def getLastD : (as : List α) (fallback : α) α
def getLastD : List α α α
| [], a₀ => a₀
| a::as, _ => getLast (a::as) (fun h => List.noConfusion h)
/--
`O(n)`. Rotates the elements of `xs` to the left such that the element at
`xs[i]` rotates to `xs[(i - n) % l.length]`.
* `rotateLeft [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] 3 = [4, 5, 1, 2, 3]`
* `rotateLeft [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] 5 = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]`
* `rotateLeft [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] = [2, 3, 4, 5, 1]`
-/
def rotateLeft (xs : List α) (n : Nat := 1) : List α :=
let len := xs.length
if len 1 then
@@ -174,13 +82,6 @@ def rotateLeft (xs : List α) (n : Nat := 1) : List α :=
let e := xs.drop n
e ++ b
/--
`O(n)`. Rotates the elements of `xs` to the right such that the element at
`xs[i]` rotates to `xs[(i + n) % l.length]`.
* `rotateRight [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] 3 = [3, 4, 5, 1, 2]`
* `rotateRight [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] 5 = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]`
* `rotateRight [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] = [5, 1, 2, 3, 4]`
-/
def rotateRight (xs : List α) (n : Nat := 1) : List α :=
let len := xs.length
if len 1 then
@@ -226,10 +127,9 @@ theorem sizeOf_lt_of_mem [SizeOf α] {as : List α} (h : a ∈ as) : sizeOf a <
over a nested inductive like `inductive T | mk : List T → T`. -/
macro "sizeOf_list_dec" : tactic =>
`(tactic| first
| with_reducible apply sizeOf_lt_of_mem; assumption; done
| with_reducible
apply Nat.lt_trans (sizeOf_lt_of_mem ?h)
case' h => assumption
| apply sizeOf_lt_of_mem; assumption; done
| apply Nat.lt_trans (sizeOf_lt_of_mem ?h)
case' h => assumption
simp_arith)
macro_rules | `(tactic| decreasing_trivial) => `(tactic| sizeOf_list_dec)
@@ -312,15 +212,6 @@ def mapMono (as : List α) (f : αα) : List α :=
Monadic generalization of `List.partition`.
This uses `Array.toList` and which isn't imported by `Init.Data.List.Basic`.
```
def posOrNeg (x : Int) : Except String Bool :=
if x > 0 then pure true
else if x < 0 then pure false
else throw "Zero is not positive or negative"
partitionM posOrNeg [-1, 2, 3] = Except.ok ([2, 3], [-1])
partitionM posOrNeg [0, 2, 3] = Except.error "Zero is not positive or negative"
```
-/
@[inline] def partitionM [Monad m] (p : α m Bool) (l : List α) : m (List α × List α) :=
go l #[] #[]
@@ -336,23 +227,4 @@ where
else
go xs acc₁ (acc₂.push x)
/--
Given a function `f : α → β ⊕ γ`, `partitionMap f l` maps the list by `f`
whilst partitioning the result it into a pair of lists, `List β × List γ`,
partitioning the `.inl _` into the left list, and the `.inr _` into the right List.
```
partitionMap (id : Nat ⊕ Nat → Nat ⊕ Nat) [inl 0, inr 1, inl 2] = ([0, 2], [1])
```
-/
@[inline] def partitionMap (f : α β γ) (l : List α) : List β × List γ := go l #[] #[] where
/-- Auxiliary for `partitionMap`:
`partitionMap.go f l acc₁ acc₂ = (acc₁.toList ++ left, acc₂.toList ++ right)`
if `partitionMap f l = (left, right)`. -/
@[specialize] go : List α Array β Array γ List β × List γ
| [], acc₁, acc₂ => (acc₁.toList, acc₂.toList)
| x :: xs, acc₁, acc₂ =>
match f x with
| .inl a => go xs (acc₁.push a) acc₂
| .inr b => go xs acc₁ (acc₂.push b)
end List

View File

@@ -40,13 +40,6 @@ Finally, we rarely use `mapM` with something that is not a `Monad`.
Users that want to use `mapM` with `Applicative` should use `mapA` instead.
-/
/--
Applies the monadic action `f` on every element in the list, left-to-right, and returns the list of
results.
See `List.forM` for the variant that discards the results.
See `List.mapA` for the variant that works with `Applicative`.
-/
@[inline]
def mapM {m : Type u Type v} [Monad m] {α : Type w} {β : Type u} (f : α m β) (as : List α) : m (List β) :=
let rec @[specialize] loop
@@ -54,42 +47,17 @@ def mapM {m : Type u → Type v} [Monad m] {α : Type w} {β : Type u} (f : α
| a :: as, bs => do loop as (( f a)::bs)
loop as []
/--
Applies the applicative action `f` on every element in the list, left-to-right, and returns the list of
results.
NB: If `m` is also a `Monad`, then using `mapM` can be more efficient.
See `List.forA` for the variant that discards the results.
See `List.mapM` for the variant that works with `Monad`.
**Warning**: this function is not tail-recursive, meaning that it may fail with a stack overflow on long lists.
-/
@[specialize]
def mapA {m : Type u Type v} [Applicative m] {α : Type w} {β : Type u} (f : α m β) : List α m (List β)
| [] => pure []
| a::as => List.cons <$> f a <*> mapA f as
/--
Applies the monadic action `f` on every element in the list, left-to-right.
See `List.mapM` for the variant that collects results.
See `List.forA` for the variant that works with `Applicative`.
-/
@[specialize]
protected def forM {m : Type u Type v} [Monad m] {α : Type w} (as : List α) (f : α m PUnit) : m PUnit :=
match as with
| [] => pure
| a :: as => do f a; List.forM as f
/--
Applies the applicative action `f` on every element in the list, left-to-right.
NB: If `m` is also a `Monad`, then using `forM` can be more efficient.
See `List.mapA` for the variant that collects results.
See `List.forM` for the variant that works with `Monad`.
-/
@[specialize]
def forA {m : Type u Type v} [Applicative m] {α : Type w} (as : List α) (f : α m PUnit) : m PUnit :=
match as with
@@ -103,27 +71,15 @@ def filterAuxM {m : Type → Type v} [Monad m] {α : Type} (f : α → m Bool) :
let b f h
filterAuxM f t (cond b (h :: acc) acc)
/--
Applies the monadic predicate `p` on every element in the list, left-to-right, and returns those
elements `x` for which `p x` returns `true`.
-/
@[inline]
def filterM {m : Type Type v} [Monad m] {α : Type} (p : α m Bool) (as : List α) : m (List α) := do
let as filterAuxM p as []
def filterM {m : Type Type v} [Monad m] {α : Type} (f : α m Bool) (as : List α) : m (List α) := do
let as filterAuxM f as []
pure as.reverse
/--
Applies the monadic predicate `p` on every element in the list, right-to-left, and returns those
elements `x` for which `p x` returns `true`.
-/
@[inline]
def filterRevM {m : Type Type v} [Monad m] {α : Type} (p : α m Bool) (as : List α) : m (List α) :=
filterAuxM p as.reverse []
def filterRevM {m : Type Type v} [Monad m] {α : Type} (f : α m Bool) (as : List α) : m (List α) :=
filterAuxM f as.reverse []
/--
Applies the monadic function `f` on every element `x` in the list, left-to-right, and returns those
results `y` for which `f x` returns `some y`.
-/
@[inline]
def filterMapM {m : Type u Type v} [Monad m] {α β : Type u} (f : α m (Option β)) (as : List α) : m (List β) :=
let rec @[specialize] loop
@@ -134,16 +90,6 @@ def filterMapM {m : Type u → Type v} [Monad m] {α β : Type u} (f : α → m
| some b => loop as (b::bs)
loop as.reverse []
/--
Folds a monadic function over a list from left to right:
```
foldlM f x₀ [a, b, c] = do
let x₁ ← f x₀ a
let x₂ ← f x₁ b
let x₃ ← f x₂ c
pure x₃
```
-/
@[specialize]
protected def foldlM {m : Type u Type v} [Monad m] {s : Type u} {α : Type w} : (f : s α m s) (init : s) List α m s
| _, s, [] => pure s
@@ -151,26 +97,10 @@ protected def foldlM {m : Type u → Type v} [Monad m] {s : Type u} {α : Type w
let s' f s a
List.foldlM f s' as
/--
Folds a monadic function over a list from right to left:
```
foldrM f x₀ [a, b, c] = do
let x₁ ← f c x₀
let x₂ ← f b x₁
let x₃ ← f a x₂
pure x₃
```
-/
@[inline]
def foldrM {m : Type u Type v} [Monad m] {s : Type u} {α : Type w} (f : α s m s) (init : s) (l : List α) : m s :=
l.reverse.foldlM (fun s a => f a s) init
/--
Maps `f` over the list and collects the results with `<|>`.
```
firstM f [a, b, c] = f a <|> f b <|> f c <|> failure
```
-/
@[specialize]
def firstM {m : Type u Type v} [Alternative m] {α : Type w} {β : Type u} (f : α m β) : List α m β
| [] => failure

View File

@@ -1,261 +0,0 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Array.Lemmas
/-!
## Tail recursive implementations for `List` definitions.
Many of the proofs require theorems about `Array`,
so these are in a separate file to minimize imports.
-/
namespace List
/-- Tail recursive version of `erase`. -/
@[inline] def setTR (l : List α) (n : Nat) (a : α) : List α := go l n #[] where
/-- Auxiliary for `setTR`: `setTR.go l a xs n acc = acc.toList ++ set xs a`,
unless `n ≥ l.length` in which case it returns `l` -/
go : List α Nat Array α List α
| [], _, _ => l
| _::xs, 0, acc => acc.toListAppend (a::xs)
| x::xs, n+1, acc => go xs n (acc.push x)
@[csimp] theorem set_eq_setTR : @set = @setTR := by
funext α l n a; simp [setTR]
let rec go (acc) : xs n, l = acc.data ++ xs
setTR.go l a xs n acc = acc.data ++ xs.set n a
| [], _ => fun h => by simp [setTR.go, set, h]
| x::xs, 0 => by simp [setTR.go, set]
| x::xs, n+1 => fun h => by simp [setTR.go, set]; rw [go _ xs]; {simp}; simp [h]
exact (go #[] _ _ rfl).symm
/-- Tail recursive version of `erase`. -/
@[inline] def eraseTR [BEq α] (l : List α) (a : α) : List α := go l #[] where
/-- Auxiliary for `eraseTR`: `eraseTR.go l a xs acc = acc.toList ++ erase xs a`,
unless `a` is not present in which case it returns `l` -/
go : List α Array α List α
| [], _ => l
| x::xs, acc => bif x == a then acc.toListAppend xs else go xs (acc.push x)
@[csimp] theorem erase_eq_eraseTR : @List.erase = @eraseTR := by
funext α _ l a; simp [eraseTR]
suffices xs acc, l = acc.data ++ xs eraseTR.go l a xs acc = acc.data ++ xs.erase a from
(this l #[] (by simp)).symm
intro xs; induction xs with intro acc h
| nil => simp [List.erase, eraseTR.go, h]
| cons x xs IH =>
simp [List.erase, eraseTR.go]
cases x == a <;> simp
· rw [IH]; simp; simp; exact h
/-- Tail recursive version of `eraseIdx`. -/
@[inline] def eraseIdxTR (l : List α) (n : Nat) : List α := go l n #[] where
/-- Auxiliary for `eraseIdxTR`: `eraseIdxTR.go l n xs acc = acc.toList ++ eraseIdx xs a`,
unless `a` is not present in which case it returns `l` -/
go : List α Nat Array α List α
| [], _, _ => l
| _::as, 0, acc => acc.toListAppend as
| a::as, n+1, acc => go as n (acc.push a)
@[csimp] theorem eraseIdx_eq_eraseIdxTR : @eraseIdx = @eraseIdxTR := by
funext α l n; simp [eraseIdxTR]
suffices xs acc, l = acc.data ++ xs eraseIdxTR.go l xs n acc = acc.data ++ xs.eraseIdx n from
(this l #[] (by simp)).symm
intro xs; induction xs generalizing n with intro acc h
| nil => simp [eraseIdx, eraseIdxTR.go, h]
| cons x xs IH =>
match n with
| 0 => simp [eraseIdx, eraseIdxTR.go]
| n+1 =>
simp [eraseIdx, eraseIdxTR.go]
rw [IH]; simp; simp; exact h
/-- Tail recursive version of `bind`. -/
@[inline] def bindTR (as : List α) (f : α List β) : List β := go as #[] where
/-- Auxiliary for `bind`: `bind.go f as = acc.toList ++ bind f as` -/
@[specialize] go : List α Array β List β
| [], acc => acc.toList
| x::xs, acc => go xs (acc ++ f x)
@[csimp] theorem bind_eq_bindTR : @List.bind = @bindTR := by
funext α β as f
let rec go : as acc, bindTR.go f as acc = acc.data ++ as.bind f
| [], acc => by simp [bindTR.go, bind]
| x::xs, acc => by simp [bindTR.go, bind, go xs]
exact (go as #[]).symm
/-- Tail recursive version of `join`. -/
@[inline] def joinTR (l : List (List α)) : List α := bindTR l id
@[csimp] theorem join_eq_joinTR : @join = @joinTR := by
funext α l; rw [ List.bind_id, List.bind_eq_bindTR]; rfl
/-- Tail recursive version of `filterMap`. -/
@[inline] def filterMapTR (f : α Option β) (l : List α) : List β := go l #[] where
/-- Auxiliary for `filterMap`: `filterMap.go f l = acc.toList ++ filterMap f l` -/
@[specialize] go : List α Array β List β
| [], acc => acc.toList
| a::as, acc => match f a with
| none => go as acc
| some b => go as (acc.push b)
@[csimp] theorem filterMap_eq_filterMapTR : @List.filterMap = @filterMapTR := by
funext α β f l
let rec go : as acc, filterMapTR.go f as acc = acc.data ++ as.filterMap f
| [], acc => by simp [filterMapTR.go, filterMap]
| a::as, acc => by simp [filterMapTR.go, filterMap, go as]; split <;> simp [*]
exact (go l #[]).symm
/-- Tail recursive version of `replace`. -/
@[inline] def replaceTR [BEq α] (l : List α) (b c : α) : List α := go l #[] where
/-- Auxiliary for `replace`: `replace.go l b c xs acc = acc.toList ++ replace xs b c`,
unless `b` is not found in `xs` in which case it returns `l`. -/
@[specialize] go : List α Array α List α
| [], _ => l
| a::as, acc => bif a == b then acc.toListAppend (c::as) else go as (acc.push a)
@[csimp] theorem replace_eq_replaceTR : @List.replace = @replaceTR := by
funext α _ l b c; simp [replaceTR]
suffices xs acc, l = acc.data ++ xs
replaceTR.go l b c xs acc = acc.data ++ xs.replace b c from
(this l #[] (by simp)).symm
intro xs; induction xs with intro acc
| nil => simp [replace, replaceTR.go]
| cons x xs IH =>
simp [replace, replaceTR.go]; split <;> simp [*]
· intro h; rw [IH]; simp; simp; exact h
/-- Tail recursive version of `take`. -/
@[inline] def takeTR (n : Nat) (l : List α) : List α := go l n #[] where
/-- Auxiliary for `take`: `take.go l xs n acc = acc.toList ++ take n xs`,
unless `n ≥ xs.length` in which case it returns `l`. -/
@[specialize] go : List α Nat Array α List α
| [], _, _ => l
| _::_, 0, acc => acc.toList
| a::as, n+1, acc => go as n (acc.push a)
@[csimp] theorem take_eq_takeTR : @take = @takeTR := by
funext α n l; simp [takeTR]
suffices xs acc, l = acc.data ++ xs takeTR.go l xs n acc = acc.data ++ xs.take n from
(this l #[] (by simp)).symm
intro xs; induction xs generalizing n with intro acc
| nil => cases n <;> simp [take, takeTR.go]
| cons x xs IH =>
cases n with simp [take, takeTR.go]
| succ n => intro h; rw [IH]; simp; simp; exact h
/-- Tail recursive version of `takeWhile`. -/
@[inline] def takeWhileTR (p : α Bool) (l : List α) : List α := go l #[] where
/-- Auxiliary for `takeWhile`: `takeWhile.go p l xs acc = acc.toList ++ takeWhile p xs`,
unless no element satisfying `p` is found in `xs` in which case it returns `l`. -/
@[specialize] go : List α Array α List α
| [], _ => l
| a::as, acc => bif p a then go as (acc.push a) else acc.toList
@[csimp] theorem takeWhile_eq_takeWhileTR : @takeWhile = @takeWhileTR := by
funext α p l; simp [takeWhileTR]
suffices xs acc, l = acc.data ++ xs
takeWhileTR.go p l xs acc = acc.data ++ xs.takeWhile p from
(this l #[] (by simp)).symm
intro xs; induction xs with intro acc
| nil => simp [takeWhile, takeWhileTR.go]
| cons x xs IH =>
simp [takeWhile, takeWhileTR.go]; split <;> simp [*]
· intro h; rw [IH]; simp; simp; exact h
/-- Tail recursive version of `foldr`. -/
@[specialize] def foldrTR (f : α β β) (init : β) (l : List α) : β := l.toArray.foldr f init
@[csimp] theorem foldr_eq_foldrTR : @foldr = @foldrTR := by
funext α β f init l; simp [foldrTR, Array.foldr_eq_foldr_data, -Array.size_toArray]
/-- Tail recursive version of `zipWith`. -/
@[inline] def zipWithTR (f : α β γ) (as : List α) (bs : List β) : List γ := go as bs #[] where
/-- Auxiliary for `zipWith`: `zipWith.go f as bs acc = acc.toList ++ zipWith f as bs` -/
go : List α List β Array γ List γ
| a::as, b::bs, acc => go as bs (acc.push (f a b))
| _, _, acc => acc.toList
@[csimp] theorem zipWith_eq_zipWithTR : @zipWith = @zipWithTR := by
funext α β γ f as bs
let rec go : as bs acc, zipWithTR.go f as bs acc = acc.data ++ as.zipWith f bs
| [], _, acc | _::_, [], acc => by simp [zipWithTR.go, zipWith]
| a::as, b::bs, acc => by simp [zipWithTR.go, zipWith, go as bs]
exact (go as bs #[]).symm
/-- Tail recursive version of `unzip`. -/
def unzipTR (l : List (α × β)) : List α × List β :=
l.foldr (fun (a, b) (al, bl) => (a::al, b::bl)) ([], [])
@[csimp] theorem unzip_eq_unzipTR : @unzip = @unzipTR := by
funext α β l; simp [unzipTR]; induction l <;> simp [*]
/-- Tail recursive version of `enumFrom`. -/
def enumFromTR (n : Nat) (l : List α) : List (Nat × α) :=
let arr := l.toArray
(arr.foldr (fun a (n, acc) => (n-1, (n-1, a) :: acc)) (n + arr.size, [])).2
@[csimp] theorem enumFrom_eq_enumFromTR : @enumFrom = @enumFromTR := by
funext α n l; simp [enumFromTR, -Array.size_toArray]
let f := fun (a : α) (n, acc) => (n-1, (n-1, a) :: acc)
let rec go : l n, l.foldr f (n + l.length, []) = (n, enumFrom n l)
| [], n => rfl
| a::as, n => by
rw [ show _ + as.length = n + (a::as).length from Nat.succ_add .., foldr, go as]
simp [enumFrom, f]
rw [Array.foldr_eq_foldr_data]
simp [go]
theorem replicateTR_loop_eq : n, replicateTR.loop a n acc = replicate n a ++ acc
| 0 => rfl
| n+1 => by rw [ replicateTR_loop_replicate_eq _ 1 n, replicate, replicate,
replicateTR.loop, replicateTR_loop_eq n, replicateTR_loop_eq n, append_assoc]; rfl
/-- Tail recursive version of `dropLast`. -/
@[inline] def dropLastTR (l : List α) : List α := l.toArray.pop.toList
@[csimp] theorem dropLast_eq_dropLastTR : @dropLast = @dropLastTR := by
funext α l; simp [dropLastTR]
/-- Tail recursive version of `intersperse`. -/
def intersperseTR (sep : α) : List α List α
| [] => []
| [x] => [x]
| x::y::xs => x :: sep :: y :: xs.foldr (fun a r => sep :: a :: r) []
@[csimp] theorem intersperse_eq_intersperseTR : @intersperse = @intersperseTR := by
funext α sep l; simp [intersperseTR]
match l with
| [] | [_] => rfl
| x::y::xs => simp [intersperse]; induction xs generalizing y <;> simp [*]
/-- Tail recursive version of `intercalate`. -/
def intercalateTR (sep : List α) : List (List α) List α
| [] => []
| [x] => x
| x::xs => go sep.toArray x xs #[]
where
/-- Auxiliary for `intercalateTR`:
`intercalateTR.go sep x xs acc = acc.toList ++ intercalate sep.toList (x::xs)` -/
go (sep : Array α) : List α List (List α) Array α List α
| x, [], acc => acc.toListAppend x
| x, y::xs, acc => go sep y xs (acc ++ x ++ sep)
@[csimp] theorem intercalate_eq_intercalateTR : @intercalate = @intercalateTR := by
funext α sep l; simp [intercalate, intercalateTR]
match l with
| [] => rfl
| [_] => simp
| x::y::xs =>
let rec go {acc x} : xs,
intercalateTR.go sep.toArray x xs acc = acc.data ++ join (intersperse sep (x::xs))
| [] => by simp [intercalateTR.go]
| _::_ => by simp [intercalateTR.go, go]
simp [intersperse, go]
end List

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff

View File

@@ -1,360 +0,0 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.List.Lemmas
import Init.Data.Nat.Lemmas
/-!
# Lemmas about `List.take`, `List.drop`, `List.zip` and `List.zipWith`.
These are in a separate file from most of the list lemmas
as they required importing more lemmas about natural numbers.
-/
namespace List
open Nat
/-! ### take -/
abbrev take_succ_cons := @take_cons_succ
@[simp] theorem length_take : (i : Nat) (l : List α), length (take i l) = min i (length l)
| 0, l => by simp [Nat.zero_min]
| succ n, [] => by simp [Nat.min_zero]
| succ n, _ :: l => by simp [Nat.succ_min_succ, length_take]
theorem length_take_le (n) (l : List α) : length (take n l) n := by simp [Nat.min_le_left]
theorem length_take_le' (n) (l : List α) : length (take n l) l.length :=
by simp [Nat.min_le_right]
theorem length_take_of_le (h : n length l) : length (take n l) = n := by simp [Nat.min_eq_left h]
theorem take_all_of_le {n} {l : List α} (h : length l n) : take n l = l :=
take_length_le h
@[simp]
theorem take_left : l₁ l₂ : List α, take (length l₁) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁
| [], _ => rfl
| a :: l₁, l₂ => congrArg (cons a) (take_left l₁ l₂)
theorem take_left' {l₁ l₂ : List α} {n} (h : length l₁ = n) : take n (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ := by
rw [ h]; apply take_left
theorem take_take : (n m) (l : List α), take n (take m l) = take (min n m) l
| n, 0, l => by rw [Nat.min_zero, take_zero, take_nil]
| 0, m, l => by rw [Nat.zero_min, take_zero, take_zero]
| succ n, succ m, nil => by simp only [take_nil]
| succ n, succ m, a :: l => by
simp only [take, succ_min_succ, take_take n m l]
theorem take_replicate (a : α) : n m : Nat, take n (replicate m a) = replicate (min n m) a
| n, 0 => by simp [Nat.min_zero]
| 0, m => by simp [Nat.zero_min]
| succ n, succ m => by simp [succ_min_succ, take_replicate]
theorem map_take (f : α β) :
(L : List α) (i : Nat), (L.take i).map f = (L.map f).take i
| [], i => by simp
| _, 0 => by simp
| h :: t, n + 1 => by dsimp; rw [map_take f t n]
/-- Taking the first `n` elements in `l₁ ++ l₂` is the same as appending the first `n` elements
of `l₁` to the first `n - l₁.length` elements of `l₂`. -/
theorem take_append_eq_append_take {l₁ l₂ : List α} {n : Nat} :
take n (l₁ ++ l₂) = take n l₁ ++ take (n - l₁.length) l₂ := by
induction l₁ generalizing n
· simp
· cases n
· simp [*]
· simp only [cons_append, take_cons_succ, length_cons, succ_eq_add_one, cons.injEq,
append_cancel_left_eq, true_and, *]
congr 1
omega
theorem take_append_of_le_length {l₁ l₂ : List α} {n : Nat} (h : n l₁.length) :
(l₁ ++ l₂).take n = l₁.take n := by
simp [take_append_eq_append_take, Nat.sub_eq_zero_of_le h]
/-- Taking the first `l₁.length + i` elements in `l₁ ++ l₂` is the same as appending the first
`i` elements of `l₂` to `l₁`. -/
theorem take_append {l₁ l₂ : List α} (i : Nat) :
take (l₁.length + i) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ ++ take i l₂ := by
rw [take_append_eq_append_take, take_all_of_le (Nat.le_add_right _ _), Nat.add_sub_cancel_left]
/-- The `i`-th element of a list coincides with the `i`-th element of any of its prefixes of
length `> i`. Version designed to rewrite from the big list to the small list. -/
theorem get_take (L : List α) {i j : Nat} (hi : i < L.length) (hj : i < j) :
get L i, hi = get (L.take j) i, length_take .. Nat.lt_min.mpr hj, hi :=
get_of_eq (take_append_drop j L).symm _ get_append ..
/-- The `i`-th element of a list coincides with the `i`-th element of any of its prefixes of
length `> i`. Version designed to rewrite from the small list to the big list. -/
theorem get_take' (L : List α) {j i} :
get (L.take j) i =
get L i.1, Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le i.2 (length_take_le' _ _) := by
let i, hi := i; rw [length_take, Nat.lt_min] at hi; rw [get_take L _ hi.1]
theorem get?_take {l : List α} {n m : Nat} (h : m < n) : (l.take n).get? m = l.get? m := by
induction n generalizing l m with
| zero =>
exact absurd h (Nat.not_lt_of_le m.zero_le)
| succ _ hn =>
cases l with
| nil => simp only [take_nil]
| cons hd tl =>
cases m
· simp only [get?, take]
· simpa only using hn (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h)
theorem get?_take_eq_none {l : List α} {n m : Nat} (h : n m) :
(l.take n).get? m = none :=
get?_eq_none.mpr <| Nat.le_trans (length_take_le _ _) h
theorem get?_take_eq_if {l : List α} {n m : Nat} :
(l.take n).get? m = if m < n then l.get? m else none := by
split
· next h => exact get?_take h
· next h => exact get?_take_eq_none (Nat.le_of_not_lt h)
@[simp]
theorem nth_take_of_succ {l : List α} {n : Nat} : (l.take (n + 1)).get? n = l.get? n :=
get?_take (Nat.lt_succ_self n)
theorem take_succ {l : List α} {n : Nat} : l.take (n + 1) = l.take n ++ (l.get? n).toList := by
induction l generalizing n with
| nil =>
simp only [Option.toList, get?, take_nil, append_nil]
| cons hd tl hl =>
cases n
· simp only [Option.toList, get?, eq_self_iff_true, take, nil_append]
· simp only [hl, cons_append, get?, eq_self_iff_true, take]
@[simp]
theorem take_eq_nil_iff {l : List α} {k : Nat} : l.take k = [] l = [] k = 0 := by
cases l <;> cases k <;> simp [Nat.succ_ne_zero]
@[simp]
theorem take_eq_take :
{l : List α} {m n : Nat}, l.take m = l.take n min m l.length = min n l.length
| [], m, n => by simp [Nat.min_zero]
| _ :: xs, 0, 0 => by simp
| x :: xs, m + 1, 0 => by simp [Nat.zero_min, succ_min_succ]
| x :: xs, 0, n + 1 => by simp [Nat.zero_min, succ_min_succ]
| x :: xs, m + 1, n + 1 => by simp [succ_min_succ, take_eq_take]; omega
theorem take_add (l : List α) (m n : Nat) : l.take (m + n) = l.take m ++ (l.drop m).take n := by
suffices take (m + n) (take m l ++ drop m l) = take m l ++ take n (drop m l) by
rw [take_append_drop] at this
assumption
rw [take_append_eq_append_take, take_all_of_le, append_right_inj]
· simp only [take_eq_take, length_take, length_drop]
omega
apply Nat.le_trans (m := m)
· apply length_take_le
· apply Nat.le_add_right
theorem take_eq_nil_of_eq_nil : {as : List α} {i}, as = [] as.take i = []
| _, _, rfl => take_nil
theorem ne_nil_of_take_ne_nil {as : List α} {i : Nat} (h: as.take i []) : as [] :=
mt take_eq_nil_of_eq_nil h
theorem dropLast_eq_take (l : List α) : l.dropLast = l.take l.length.pred := by
cases l with
| nil => simp [dropLast]
| cons x l =>
induction l generalizing x with
| nil => simp [dropLast]
| cons hd tl hl => simp [dropLast, hl]
theorem dropLast_take {n : Nat} {l : List α} (h : n < l.length) :
(l.take n).dropLast = l.take n.pred := by
simp only [dropLast_eq_take, length_take, Nat.le_of_lt h, take_take, pred_le, Nat.min_eq_left]
theorem map_eq_append_split {f : α β} {l : List α} {s₁ s₂ : List β}
(h : map f l = s₁ ++ s₂) : l₁ l₂, l = l₁ ++ l₂ map f l₁ = s₁ map f l₂ = s₂ := by
have := h
rw [ take_append_drop (length s₁) l] at this
rw [map_append] at this
refine _, _, rfl, append_inj this ?_
rw [length_map, length_take, Nat.min_eq_left]
rw [ length_map l f, h, length_append]
apply Nat.le_add_right
/-! ### drop -/
@[simp]
theorem drop_eq_nil_iff_le {l : List α} {k : Nat} : l.drop k = [] l.length k := by
refine' fun h => _, drop_eq_nil_of_le
induction k generalizing l with
| zero =>
simp only [drop] at h
simp [h]
| succ k hk =>
cases l
· simp
· simp only [drop] at h
simpa [Nat.succ_le_succ_iff] using hk h
theorem drop_length_cons {l : List α} (h : l []) (a : α) :
(a :: l).drop l.length = [l.getLast h] := by
induction l generalizing a with
| nil =>
cases h rfl
| cons y l ih =>
simp only [drop, length]
by_cases h₁ : l = []
· simp [h₁]
rw [getLast_cons' _ h₁]
exact ih h₁ y
/-- Dropping the elements up to `n` in `l₁ ++ l₂` is the same as dropping the elements up to `n`
in `l₁`, dropping the elements up to `n - l₁.length` in `l₂`, and appending them. -/
theorem drop_append_eq_append_drop {l₁ l₂ : List α} {n : Nat} :
drop n (l₁ ++ l₂) = drop n l₁ ++ drop (n - l₁.length) l₂ := by
induction l₁ generalizing n
· simp
· cases n
· simp [*]
· simp only [cons_append, drop_succ_cons, length_cons, succ_eq_add_one, append_cancel_left_eq, *]
congr 1
omega
theorem drop_append_of_le_length {l₁ l₂ : List α} {n : Nat} (h : n l₁.length) :
(l₁ ++ l₂).drop n = l₁.drop n ++ l₂ := by
simp [drop_append_eq_append_drop, Nat.sub_eq_zero_of_le h]
/-- Dropping the elements up to `l₁.length + i` in `l₁ + l₂` is the same as dropping the elements
up to `i` in `l₂`. -/
@[simp]
theorem drop_append {l₁ l₂ : List α} (i : Nat) : drop (l₁.length + i) (l₁ ++ l₂) = drop i l₂ := by
rw [drop_append_eq_append_drop, drop_eq_nil_of_le] <;>
simp [Nat.add_sub_cancel_left, Nat.le_add_right]
theorem drop_sizeOf_le [SizeOf α] (l : List α) (n : Nat) : sizeOf (l.drop n) sizeOf l := by
induction l generalizing n with
| nil => rw [drop_nil]; apply Nat.le_refl
| cons _ _ lih =>
induction n with
| zero => apply Nat.le_refl
| succ n =>
exact Trans.trans (lih _) (Nat.le_add_left _ _)
theorem lt_length_drop (L : List α) {i j : Nat} (h : i + j < L.length) : j < (L.drop i).length := by
have A : i < L.length := Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.le.intro rfl) h
rw [(take_append_drop i L).symm] at h
simpa only [Nat.le_of_lt A, Nat.min_eq_left, Nat.add_lt_add_iff_left, length_take,
length_append] using h
/-- The `i + j`-th element of a list coincides with the `j`-th element of the list obtained by
dropping the first `i` elements. Version designed to rewrite from the big list to the small list. -/
theorem get_drop (L : List α) {i j : Nat} (h : i + j < L.length) :
get L i + j, h = get (L.drop i) j, lt_length_drop L h := by
have : i L.length := Nat.le_trans (Nat.le_add_right _ _) (Nat.le_of_lt h)
rw [get_of_eq (take_append_drop i L).symm i + j, h, get_append_right'] <;>
simp [Nat.min_eq_left this, Nat.add_sub_cancel_left, Nat.le_add_right]
/-- The `i + j`-th element of a list coincides with the `j`-th element of the list obtained by
dropping the first `i` elements. Version designed to rewrite from the small list to the big list. -/
theorem get_drop' (L : List α) {i j} :
get (L.drop i) j = get L i + j, by
rw [Nat.add_comm]
exact Nat.add_lt_of_lt_sub (length_drop i L j.2) := by
rw [get_drop]
@[simp]
theorem get?_drop (L : List α) (i j : Nat) : get? (L.drop i) j = get? L (i + j) := by
ext
simp only [get?_eq_some, get_drop', Option.mem_def]
constructor <;> intro h, ha
· exact _, ha
· refine ?_, ha
rw [length_drop]
rw [Nat.add_comm] at h
apply Nat.lt_sub_of_add_lt h
@[simp] theorem drop_drop (n : Nat) : (m) (l : List α), drop n (drop m l) = drop (n + m) l
| m, [] => by simp
| 0, l => by simp
| m + 1, a :: l =>
calc
drop n (drop (m + 1) (a :: l)) = drop n (drop m l) := rfl
_ = drop (n + m) l := drop_drop n m l
_ = drop (n + (m + 1)) (a :: l) := rfl
theorem take_drop : (m n : Nat) (l : List α), take n (drop m l) = drop m (take (m + n) l)
| 0, _, _ => by simp
| _, _, [] => by simp
| _+1, _, _ :: _ => by simpa [Nat.succ_add, take_succ_cons, drop_succ_cons] using take_drop ..
theorem drop_take : (m n : Nat) (l : List α), drop n (take m l) = take (m - n) (drop n l)
| 0, _, _ => by simp
| _, 0, _ => by simp
| _, _, [] => by simp
| m+1, n+1, h :: t => by
simp [take_succ_cons, drop_succ_cons, drop_take m n t]
congr 1
omega
theorem map_drop (f : α β) :
(L : List α) (i : Nat), (L.drop i).map f = (L.map f).drop i
| [], i => by simp
| L, 0 => by simp
| h :: t, n + 1 => by
dsimp
rw [map_drop f t]
theorem reverse_take {α} {xs : List α} (n : Nat) (h : n xs.length) :
xs.reverse.take n = (xs.drop (xs.length - n)).reverse := by
induction xs generalizing n <;>
simp only [reverse_cons, drop, reverse_nil, Nat.zero_sub, length, take_nil]
next xs_hd xs_tl xs_ih =>
cases Nat.lt_or_eq_of_le h with
| inl h' =>
have h' := Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h'
rw [take_append_of_le_length, xs_ih _ h']
rw [show xs_tl.length + 1 - n = succ (xs_tl.length - n) from _, drop]
· rwa [succ_eq_add_one, Nat.sub_add_comm]
· rwa [length_reverse]
| inr h' =>
subst h'
rw [length, Nat.sub_self, drop]
suffices xs_tl.length + 1 = (xs_tl.reverse ++ [xs_hd]).length by
rw [this, take_length, reverse_cons]
rw [length_append, length_reverse]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_cons_drop : (l : List α) i, get l i :: drop (i + 1) l = drop i l
| _::_, 0, _ => rfl
| _::_, i+1, _ => get_cons_drop _ i, _
theorem drop_eq_get_cons {n} {l : List α} (h) : drop n l = get l n, h :: drop (n + 1) l :=
(get_cons_drop _ n, h).symm
theorem drop_eq_nil_of_eq_nil : {as : List α} {i}, as = [] as.drop i = []
| _, _, rfl => drop_nil
theorem ne_nil_of_drop_ne_nil {as : List α} {i : Nat} (h: as.drop i []) : as [] :=
mt drop_eq_nil_of_eq_nil h
/-! ### zipWith -/
@[simp] theorem length_zipWith (f : α β γ) (l₁ l₂) :
length (zipWith f l₁ l₂) = min (length l₁) (length l₂) := by
induction l₁ generalizing l₂ <;> cases l₂ <;>
simp_all [succ_min_succ, Nat.zero_min, Nat.min_zero]
/-! ### zip -/
@[simp] theorem length_zip (l₁ : List α) (l₂ : List β) :
length (zip l₁ l₂) = min (length l₁) (length l₂) := by
simp [zip]
end List

View File

@@ -16,7 +16,3 @@ import Init.Data.Nat.Power2
import Init.Data.Nat.Linear
import Init.Data.Nat.SOM
import Init.Data.Nat.Lemmas
import Init.Data.Nat.Mod
import Init.Data.Nat.Lcm
import Init.Data.Nat.Compare
import Init.Data.Nat.Simproc

View File

@@ -10,29 +10,6 @@ universe u
namespace Nat
/-- Compiled version of `Nat.rec` so that we can define `Nat.recAux` to be defeq to `Nat.rec`.
This is working around the fact that the compiler does not currently support recursors. -/
private def recCompiled {motive : Nat Sort u} (zero : motive zero) (succ : (n : Nat) motive n motive (Nat.succ n)) : (t : Nat) motive t
| .zero => zero
| .succ n => succ n (recCompiled zero succ n)
@[csimp]
private theorem rec_eq_recCompiled : @Nat.rec = @Nat.recCompiled :=
funext fun _ => funext fun _ => funext fun succ => funext fun t =>
Nat.recOn t rfl (fun n ih => congrArg (succ n) ih)
/-- Recursor identical to `Nat.rec` but uses notations `0` for `Nat.zero` and `· + 1` for `Nat.succ`.
Used as the default `Nat` eliminator by the `induction` tactic. -/
@[elab_as_elim, induction_eliminator]
protected abbrev recAux {motive : Nat Sort u} (zero : motive 0) (succ : (n : Nat) motive n motive (n + 1)) (t : Nat) : motive t :=
Nat.rec zero succ t
/-- Recursor identical to `Nat.casesOn` but uses notations `0` for `Nat.zero` and `· + 1` for `Nat.succ`.
Used as the default `Nat` eliminator by the `cases` tactic. -/
@[elab_as_elim, cases_eliminator]
protected abbrev casesAuxOn {motive : Nat Sort u} (t : Nat) (zero : motive 0) (succ : (n : Nat) motive (n + 1)) : motive t :=
Nat.casesOn t zero succ
/--
`Nat.fold` evaluates `f` on the numbers up to `n` exclusive, in increasing order:
* `Nat.fold f 3 init = init |> f 0 |> f 1 |> f 2`
@@ -137,9 +114,6 @@ instance : LawfulBEq Nat where
@[simp] protected theorem zero_add : (n : Nat), 0 + n = n
| 0 => rfl
| n+1 => congrArg succ (Nat.zero_add n)
instance : Std.LawfulIdentity (α := Nat) (· + ·) 0 where
left_id := Nat.zero_add
right_id := Nat.add_zero
theorem succ_add : (n m : Nat), (succ n) + m = succ (n + m)
| _, 0 => rfl
@@ -151,24 +125,19 @@ theorem add_succ (n m : Nat) : n + succ m = succ (n + m) :=
theorem add_one (n : Nat) : n + 1 = succ n :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem succ_eq_add_one (n : Nat) : succ n = n + 1 :=
theorem succ_eq_add_one (n : Nat) : succ n = n + 1 :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem add_one_ne_zero (n : Nat) : n + 1 0 := nofun
@[simp] theorem zero_ne_add_one (n : Nat) : 0 n + 1 := nofun
protected theorem add_comm : (n m : Nat), n + m = m + n
| n, 0 => Eq.symm (Nat.zero_add n)
| n, m+1 => by
have : succ (n + m) = succ (m + n) := by apply congrArg; apply Nat.add_comm
rw [succ_add m n]
apply this
instance : Std.Commutative (α := Nat) (· + ·) := Nat.add_comm
protected theorem add_assoc : (n m k : Nat), (n + m) + k = n + (m + k)
| _, _, 0 => rfl
| n, m, succ k => congrArg succ (Nat.add_assoc n m k)
instance : Std.Associative (α := Nat) (· + ·) := Nat.add_assoc
protected theorem add_left_comm (n m k : Nat) : n + (m + k) = m + (n + k) := by
rw [ Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_comm n m, Nat.add_assoc]
@@ -179,7 +148,7 @@ protected theorem add_right_comm (n m k : Nat) : (n + m) + k = (n + k) + m := by
protected theorem add_left_cancel {n m k : Nat} : n + m = n + k m = k := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => simp [succ_add, succ.injEq]; intro h; apply ih h
| succ n ih => simp [succ_add]; intro h; apply ih h
protected theorem add_right_cancel {n m k : Nat} (h : n + m = k + m) : n = k := by
rw [Nat.add_comm n m, Nat.add_comm k m] at h
@@ -212,19 +181,15 @@ theorem succ_mul (n m : Nat) : (succ n) * m = (n * m) + m := by
protected theorem mul_comm : (n m : Nat), n * m = m * n
| n, 0 => (Nat.zero_mul n).symm (Nat.mul_zero n).symm rfl
| n, succ m => (mul_succ n m).symm (succ_mul m n).symm (Nat.mul_comm n m).symm rfl
instance : Std.Commutative (α := Nat) (· * ·) := Nat.mul_comm
@[simp] protected theorem mul_one : (n : Nat), n * 1 = n :=
Nat.zero_add
@[simp] protected theorem one_mul (n : Nat) : 1 * n = n :=
Nat.mul_comm n 1 Nat.mul_one n
instance : Std.LawfulIdentity (α := Nat) (· * ·) 1 where
left_id := Nat.one_mul
right_id := Nat.mul_one
protected theorem left_distrib (n m k : Nat) : n * (m + k) = n * m + n * k := by
induction n with
induction n generalizing m k with
| zero => repeat rw [Nat.zero_mul]
| succ n ih => simp [succ_mul, ih]; rw [Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_assoc (n*m)]; apply congrArg; apply Nat.add_left_comm
@@ -240,14 +205,10 @@ protected theorem add_mul (n m k : Nat) : (n + m) * k = n * k + m * k :=
protected theorem mul_assoc : (n m k : Nat), (n * m) * k = n * (m * k)
| n, m, 0 => rfl
| n, m, succ k => by simp [mul_succ, Nat.mul_assoc n m k, Nat.left_distrib]
instance : Std.Associative (α := Nat) (· * ·) := Nat.mul_assoc
protected theorem mul_left_comm (n m k : Nat) : n * (m * k) = m * (n * k) := by
rw [ Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_comm n m, Nat.mul_assoc]
protected theorem mul_two (n) : n * 2 = n + n := by rw [Nat.mul_succ, Nat.mul_one]
protected theorem two_mul (n) : 2 * n = n + n := by rw [Nat.succ_mul, Nat.one_mul]
/-! # Inequalities -/
attribute [simp] Nat.le_refl
@@ -258,12 +219,12 @@ theorem lt_succ_of_le {n m : Nat} : n ≤ m → n < succ m := succ_le_succ
@[simp] protected theorem sub_zero (n : Nat) : n - 0 = n := rfl
theorem succ_sub_succ_eq_sub (n m : Nat) : succ n - succ m = n - m := by
@[simp] theorem succ_sub_succ_eq_sub (n m : Nat) : succ n - succ m = n - m := by
induction m with
| zero => exact rfl
| succ m ih => apply congrArg pred ih
@[simp] theorem pred_le : (n : Nat), pred n n
theorem pred_le : (n : Nat), pred n n
| zero => Nat.le.refl
| succ _ => le_succ _
@@ -296,7 +257,7 @@ theorem succ_sub_succ (n m : Nat) : succ n - succ m = n - m :=
theorem sub_add_eq (a b c : Nat) : a - (b + c) = a - b - c := by
induction c with
| zero => simp
| succ c ih => simp only [Nat.add_succ, Nat.sub_succ, ih]
| succ c ih => simp [Nat.add_succ, Nat.sub_succ, ih]
protected theorem lt_of_lt_of_le {n m k : Nat} : n < m m k n < k :=
Nat.le_trans
@@ -337,8 +298,7 @@ theorem eq_zero_or_pos : ∀ (n : Nat), n = 0 n > 0
protected theorem pos_of_ne_zero {n : Nat} : n 0 0 < n := (eq_zero_or_pos n).resolve_left
theorem lt.base (n : Nat) : n < succ n := Nat.le_refl (succ n)
@[simp] theorem lt_succ_self (n : Nat) : n < succ n := lt.base n
theorem lt_succ_self (n : Nat) : n < succ n := lt.base n
protected theorem le_total (m n : Nat) : m n n m :=
match Nat.lt_or_ge m n with
@@ -377,12 +337,6 @@ theorem le_add_right : ∀ (n k : Nat), n ≤ n + k
theorem le_add_left (n m : Nat): n m + n :=
Nat.add_comm n m le_add_right n m
protected theorem lt_add_left (c : Nat) (h : a < b) : a < c + b :=
Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h (Nat.le_add_left ..)
protected theorem lt_add_right (c : Nat) (h : a < b) : a < b + c :=
Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h (Nat.le_add_right ..)
theorem le.dest : {n m : Nat}, n m Exists (fun k => n + k = m)
| zero, zero, _ => 0, rfl
| zero, succ n, _ => succ n, Nat.add_comm 0 (succ n) rfl
@@ -472,9 +426,6 @@ protected theorem add_lt_add_left {n m : Nat} (h : n < m) (k : Nat) : k + n < k
protected theorem add_lt_add_right {n m : Nat} (h : n < m) (k : Nat) : n + k < m + k :=
Nat.add_comm k m Nat.add_comm k n Nat.add_lt_add_left h k
protected theorem lt_add_of_pos_right (h : 0 < k) : n < n + k :=
Nat.add_lt_add_left h n
protected theorem zero_lt_one : 0 < (1:Nat) :=
zero_lt_succ 0
@@ -500,137 +451,6 @@ protected theorem le_of_add_le_add_right {a b c : Nat} : a + b ≤ c + b → a
protected theorem add_le_add_iff_right {n : Nat} : m + n k + n m k :=
Nat.le_of_add_le_add_right, fun h => Nat.add_le_add_right h _
/-! ### le/lt -/
protected theorem lt_asymm {a b : Nat} (h : a < b) : ¬ b < a := Nat.not_lt.2 (Nat.le_of_lt h)
/-- Alias for `Nat.lt_asymm`. -/
protected abbrev not_lt_of_gt := @Nat.lt_asymm
/-- Alias for `Nat.lt_asymm`. -/
protected abbrev not_lt_of_lt := @Nat.lt_asymm
protected theorem lt_iff_le_not_le {m n : Nat} : m < n m n ¬ n m :=
fun h => Nat.le_of_lt h, Nat.not_le_of_gt h, fun _, h => Nat.lt_of_not_ge h
/-- Alias for `Nat.lt_iff_le_not_le`. -/
protected abbrev lt_iff_le_and_not_ge := @Nat.lt_iff_le_not_le
protected theorem lt_iff_le_and_ne {m n : Nat} : m < n m n m n :=
fun h => Nat.le_of_lt h, Nat.ne_of_lt h, fun h => Nat.lt_of_le_of_ne h.1 h.2
protected theorem ne_iff_lt_or_gt {a b : Nat} : a b a < b b < a :=
Nat.lt_or_gt_of_ne, fun | .inl h => Nat.ne_of_lt h | .inr h => Nat.ne_of_gt h
/-- Alias for `Nat.ne_iff_lt_or_gt`. -/
protected abbrev lt_or_gt := @Nat.ne_iff_lt_or_gt
/-- Alias for `Nat.le_total`. -/
protected abbrev le_or_ge := @Nat.le_total
/-- Alias for `Nat.le_total`. -/
protected abbrev le_or_le := @Nat.le_total
protected theorem eq_or_lt_of_not_lt {a b : Nat} (hnlt : ¬ a < b) : a = b b < a :=
(Nat.lt_trichotomy ..).resolve_left hnlt
protected theorem lt_or_eq_of_le {n m : Nat} (h : n m) : n < m n = m :=
(Nat.lt_or_ge ..).imp_right (Nat.le_antisymm h)
protected theorem le_iff_lt_or_eq {n m : Nat} : n m n < m n = m :=
Nat.lt_or_eq_of_le, fun | .inl h => Nat.le_of_lt h | .inr rfl => Nat.le_refl _
protected theorem lt_succ_iff : m < succ n m n := le_of_lt_succ, lt_succ_of_le
protected theorem lt_succ_iff_lt_or_eq : m < succ n m < n m = n :=
Nat.lt_succ_iff.trans Nat.le_iff_lt_or_eq
protected theorem eq_of_lt_succ_of_not_lt (hmn : m < n + 1) (h : ¬ m < n) : m = n :=
(Nat.lt_succ_iff_lt_or_eq.1 hmn).resolve_left h
protected theorem eq_of_le_of_lt_succ (h₁ : n m) (h₂ : m < n + 1) : m = n :=
Nat.le_antisymm (le_of_succ_le_succ h₂) h₁
/-! ## zero/one/two -/
theorem le_zero : i 0 i = 0 := Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero, fun | rfl => Nat.le_refl _
/-- Alias for `Nat.zero_lt_one`. -/
protected abbrev one_pos := @Nat.zero_lt_one
protected theorem two_pos : 0 < 2 := Nat.zero_lt_succ _
protected theorem ne_zero_iff_zero_lt : n 0 0 < n := Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.symm
protected theorem zero_lt_two : 0 < 2 := Nat.zero_lt_succ _
protected theorem one_lt_two : 1 < 2 := Nat.succ_lt_succ Nat.zero_lt_one
protected theorem eq_zero_of_not_pos (h : ¬0 < n) : n = 0 :=
Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero (Nat.not_lt.1 h)
/-! ## succ/pred -/
attribute [simp] zero_lt_succ
theorem succ_ne_self (n) : succ n n := Nat.ne_of_gt (lt_succ_self n)
theorem succ_le : succ n m n < m := .rfl
theorem lt_succ : m < succ n m n := le_of_lt_succ, lt_succ_of_le
theorem lt_succ_of_lt (h : a < b) : a < succ b := le_succ_of_le h
theorem succ_pred_eq_of_ne_zero : {n}, n 0 succ (pred n) = n
| _+1, _ => rfl
theorem eq_zero_or_eq_succ_pred : n, n = 0 n = succ (pred n)
| 0 => .inl rfl
| _+1 => .inr rfl
theorem succ_inj' : succ a = succ b a = b := (Nat.succ.injEq a b).to_iff
theorem succ_le_succ_iff : succ a succ b a b := le_of_succ_le_succ, succ_le_succ
theorem succ_lt_succ_iff : succ a < succ b a < b := lt_of_succ_lt_succ, succ_lt_succ
theorem pred_inj : {a b}, 0 < a 0 < b pred a = pred b a = b
| _+1, _+1, _, _ => congrArg _
theorem pred_ne_self : {a}, a 0 pred a a
| _+1, _ => (succ_ne_self _).symm
theorem pred_lt_self : {a}, 0 < a pred a < a
| _+1, _ => lt_succ_self _
theorem pred_lt_pred : {n m}, n 0 n < m pred n < pred m
| _+1, _+1, _, h => lt_of_succ_lt_succ h
theorem pred_le_iff_le_succ : {n m}, pred n m n succ m
| 0, _ => fun _ => Nat.zero_le _, fun _ => Nat.zero_le _
| _+1, _ => Nat.succ_le_succ_iff.symm
theorem le_succ_of_pred_le : pred n m n succ m := pred_le_iff_le_succ.1
theorem pred_le_of_le_succ : n succ m pred n m := pred_le_iff_le_succ.2
theorem lt_pred_iff_succ_lt : {n m}, n < pred m succ n < m
| _, 0 => nofun, nofun
| _, _+1 => Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff.symm
theorem succ_lt_of_lt_pred : n < pred m succ n < m := lt_pred_iff_succ_lt.1
theorem lt_pred_of_succ_lt : succ n < m n < pred m := lt_pred_iff_succ_lt.2
theorem le_pred_iff_lt : {n m}, 0 < m (n pred m n < m)
| 0, _+1, _ => fun _ => Nat.zero_lt_succ _, fun _ => Nat.zero_le _
| _+1, _+1, _ => Nat.lt_pred_iff_succ_lt
theorem le_pred_of_lt (h : n < m) : n pred m := (le_pred_iff_lt (Nat.zero_lt_of_lt h)).2 h
theorem le_sub_one_of_lt : a < b a b - 1 := Nat.le_pred_of_lt
theorem lt_of_le_pred (h : 0 < m) : n pred m n < m := (le_pred_iff_lt h).1
theorem exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero : {n}, n 0 Exists fun k => n = succ k
| _+1, _ => _, rfl
/-! # Basic theorems for comparing numerals -/
theorem ctor_eq_zero : Nat.zero = 0 :=
@@ -642,7 +462,7 @@ protected theorem one_ne_zero : 1 ≠ (0 : Nat) :=
protected theorem zero_ne_one : 0 (1 : Nat) :=
fun h => Nat.noConfusion h
@[simp] theorem succ_ne_zero (n : Nat) : succ n 0 :=
theorem succ_ne_zero (n : Nat) : succ n 0 :=
fun h => Nat.noConfusion h
/-! # mul + order -/
@@ -683,10 +503,10 @@ theorem eq_of_mul_eq_mul_right {n m k : Nat} (hm : 0 < m) (h : n * m = k * m) :
/-! # power -/
protected theorem pow_succ (n m : Nat) : n^(succ m) = n^m * n :=
theorem pow_succ (n m : Nat) : n^(succ m) = n^m * n :=
rfl
protected theorem pow_zero (n : Nat) : n^0 = 1 := rfl
theorem pow_zero (n : Nat) : n^0 = 1 := rfl
theorem pow_le_pow_of_le_left {n m : Nat} (h : n m) : (i : Nat), n^i m^i
| 0 => Nat.le_refl _
@@ -753,11 +573,6 @@ theorem succ_pred {a : Nat} (h : a ≠ 0) : a.pred.succ = a := by
theorem succ_pred_eq_of_pos : {n}, 0 < n succ (pred n) = n
| _+1, _ => rfl
theorem sub_one_add_one_eq_of_pos : {n}, 0 < n (n - 1) + 1 = n
| _+1, _ => rfl
@[simp] theorem pred_eq_sub_one : pred n = n - 1 := rfl
/-! # sub theorems -/
theorem add_sub_self_left (a b : Nat) : (a + b) - a = b := by
@@ -780,7 +595,7 @@ theorem zero_lt_sub_of_lt (h : i < a) : 0 < a - i := by
| zero => contradiction
| succ a ih =>
match Nat.eq_or_lt_of_le h with
| Or.inl h => injection h with h; subst h; rw [Nat.add_sub_self_left]; decide
| Or.inl h => injection h with h; subst h; rw [Nat.add_one, Nat.add_sub_self_left]; decide
| Or.inr h =>
have : 0 < a - i := ih (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h)
exact Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le this (Nat.sub_le_succ_sub _ _)
@@ -794,7 +609,7 @@ theorem sub_succ_lt_self (a i : Nat) (h : i < a) : a - (i + 1) < a - i := by
theorem sub_ne_zero_of_lt : {a b : Nat} a < b b - a 0
| 0, 0, h => absurd h (Nat.lt_irrefl 0)
| 0, succ b, _ => by simp only [Nat.sub_zero, ne_eq, not_false_eq_true]
| 0, succ b, _ => by simp
| succ a, 0, h => absurd h (Nat.not_lt_zero a.succ)
| succ a, succ b, h => by rw [Nat.succ_sub_succ]; exact sub_ne_zero_of_lt (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h)
@@ -812,7 +627,7 @@ theorem add_sub_of_le {a b : Nat} (h : a ≤ b) : a + (b - a) = b := by
protected theorem add_sub_add_right (n k m : Nat) : (n + k) - (m + k) = n - m := by
induction k with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih => simp [ Nat.add_assoc, succ_sub_succ_eq_sub, ih]
| succ k ih => simp [add_succ, add_succ, succ_sub_succ, ih]
protected theorem add_sub_add_left (k n m : Nat) : (k + n) - (k + m) = n - m := by
rw [Nat.add_comm k n, Nat.add_comm k m, Nat.add_sub_add_right]
@@ -925,7 +740,7 @@ protected theorem sub_pos_of_lt (h : m < n) : 0 < n - m :=
protected theorem sub_sub (n m k : Nat) : n - m - k = n - (m + k) := by
induction k with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih => rw [Nat.add_succ, Nat.sub_succ, Nat.add_succ, Nat.sub_succ, ih]
| succ k ih => rw [Nat.add_succ, Nat.sub_succ, Nat.sub_succ, ih]
protected theorem sub_le_sub_left (h : n m) (k : Nat) : k - m k - n :=
match m, le.dest h with

View File

@@ -51,26 +51,6 @@ instance : Xor Nat := ⟨Nat.xor⟩
instance : ShiftLeft Nat := Nat.shiftLeft
instance : ShiftRight Nat := Nat.shiftRight
theorem shiftLeft_eq (a b : Nat) : a <<< b = a * 2 ^ b :=
match b with
| 0 => (Nat.mul_one _).symm
| b+1 => (shiftLeft_eq _ b).trans <| by
simp [Nat.pow_succ, Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_left_comm, Nat.mul_comm]
@[simp] theorem shiftRight_zero : n >>> 0 = n := rfl
theorem shiftRight_succ (m n) : m >>> (n + 1) = (m >>> n) / 2 := rfl
theorem shiftRight_add (m n : Nat) : k, m >>> (n + k) = (m >>> n) >>> k
| 0 => rfl
| k + 1 => by simp [ Nat.add_assoc, shiftRight_add _ _ k, shiftRight_succ]
theorem shiftRight_eq_div_pow (m : Nat) : n, m >>> n = m / 2 ^ n
| 0 => (Nat.div_one _).symm
| k + 1 => by
rw [shiftRight_add, shiftRight_eq_div_pow m k]
simp [Nat.div_div_eq_div_mul, Nat.pow_succ, shiftRight_succ]
/-!
### testBit
We define an operation for testing individual bits in the binary representation

View File

@@ -6,10 +6,8 @@ Authors: Joe Hendrix
prelude
import Init.Data.Bool
import Init.Data.Int.Pow
import Init.Data.Nat.Bitwise.Basic
import Init.Data.Nat.Lemmas
import Init.Data.Nat.Simproc
import Init.TacticsExtra
import Init.Omega
@@ -25,13 +23,26 @@ namespace Nat
private theorem one_div_two : 1/2 = 0 := by trivial
private theorem two_pow_succ_sub_succ_div_two : (2 ^ (n+1) - (x + 1)) / 2 = 2^n - (x/2 + 1) := by
omega
if h : x + 1 2 ^ (n + 1) then
apply fun x => (Nat.sub_eq_of_eq_add x).symm
apply Eq.trans _
apply Nat.add_mul_div_left _ _ Nat.zero_lt_two
rw [ Nat.sub_add_comm h]
rw [Nat.add_sub_assoc (by omega)]
rw [Nat.pow_succ']
rw [Nat.mul_add_div Nat.zero_lt_two]
simp [show (2 * (x / 2 + 1) - (x + 1)) / 2 = 0 by omega]
else
rw [Nat.pow_succ'] at *
omega
private theorem two_pow_succ_sub_one_div_two : (2 ^ (n+1) - 1) / 2 = 2^n - 1 :=
two_pow_succ_sub_succ_div_two
private theorem two_mul_sub_one {n : Nat} (n_pos : n > 0) : (2*n - 1) % 2 = 1 := by
omega
match n with
| 0 => contradiction
| n + 1 => simp [Nat.mul_succ, Nat.mul_add_mod, mod_eq_of_lt]
/-! ### Preliminaries -/
@@ -50,10 +61,7 @@ noncomputable def div2Induction {motive : Nat → Sort u}
apply hyp
exact Nat.div_lt_self n_pos (Nat.le_refl _)
@[simp] theorem zero_and (x : Nat) : 0 &&& x = 0 := by
simp only [HAnd.hAnd, AndOp.and, land]
unfold bitwise
simp
@[simp] theorem zero_and (x : Nat) : 0 &&& x = 0 := by rfl
@[simp] theorem and_zero (x : Nat) : x &&& 0 = 0 := by
simp only [HAnd.hAnd, AndOp.and, land]
@@ -91,11 +99,6 @@ theorem testBit_to_div_mod {x : Nat} : testBit x i = decide (x / 2^i % 2 = 1) :=
| succ i hyp =>
simp [hyp, Nat.div_div_eq_div_mul, Nat.pow_succ']
theorem toNat_testBit (x i : Nat) :
(x.testBit i).toNat = x / 2 ^ i % 2 := by
rw [Nat.testBit_to_div_mod]
rcases Nat.mod_two_eq_zero_or_one (x / 2^i) <;> simp_all
theorem ne_zero_implies_bit_true {x : Nat} (xnz : x 0) : i, testBit x i := by
induction x using div2Induction with
| ind x hyp =>
@@ -191,6 +194,8 @@ theorem lt_pow_two_of_testBit (x : Nat) (p : ∀i, i ≥ n → testBit x i = fal
have test_false := p _ i_ge_n
simp only [test_true] at test_false
/-! ### testBit -/
private theorem succ_mod_two : succ x % 2 = 1 - x % 2 := by
induction x with
| zero =>
@@ -234,7 +239,7 @@ theorem testBit_two_pow_add_gt {i j : Nat} (j_lt_i : j < i) (x : Nat) :
rw [Nat.sub_eq_zero_iff_le] at i_sub_j_eq
exact Nat.not_le_of_gt j_lt_i i_sub_j_eq
| d+1 =>
simp [Nat.pow_succ, Nat.mul_comm _ 2, Nat.mul_add_mod]
simp [pow_succ, Nat.mul_comm _ 2, Nat.mul_add_mod]
@[simp] theorem testBit_mod_two_pow (x j i : Nat) :
testBit (x % 2^j) i = (decide (i < j) && testBit x i) := by
@@ -258,34 +263,37 @@ theorem testBit_two_pow_add_gt {i j : Nat} (j_lt_i : j < i) (x : Nat) :
exact Nat.lt_add_of_pos_right (Nat.two_pow_pos j)
simp only [hyp y y_lt_x]
if i_lt_j : i < j then
rw [Nat.add_comm _ (2^_), testBit_two_pow_add_gt i_lt_j]
rw [ Nat.add_comm _ (2^_), testBit_two_pow_add_gt i_lt_j]
else
simp [i_lt_j]
theorem testBit_one_zero : testBit 1 0 = true := by trivial
theorem not_decide_mod_two_eq_one (x : Nat)
: (!decide (x % 2 = 1)) = decide (x % 2 = 0) := by
cases Nat.mod_two_eq_zero_or_one x <;> (rename_i p; simp [p])
theorem testBit_two_pow_sub_succ (h₂ : x < 2 ^ n) (i : Nat) :
testBit (2^n - (x + 1)) i = (decide (i < n) && ! testBit x i) := by
induction i generalizing n x with
| zero =>
simp only [testBit_zero, zero_eq, Bool.and_eq_true, decide_eq_true_eq,
Bool.not_eq_true']
match n with
| 0 => simp [succ_sub_succ_eq_sub]
| 0 => simp
| n+1 =>
simp [not_decide_mod_two_eq_one]
-- just logic + omega:
simp only [zero_lt_succ, decide_True, Bool.true_and]
rw [Nat.pow_succ', decide_not, decide_eq_decide]
rw [Nat.pow_succ'] at h₂
omega
| succ i ih =>
simp only [testBit_succ]
match n with
| 0 =>
simp [decide_eq_false, succ_sub_succ_eq_sub]
simp only [pow_zero, succ_sub_succ_eq_sub, Nat.zero_sub, Nat.zero_div, zero_testBit]
rw [decide_eq_false] <;> simp
| n+1 =>
rw [Nat.two_pow_succ_sub_succ_div_two, ih]
· simp [Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff]
· omega
· rw [Nat.pow_succ'] at h₂
omega
@[simp] theorem testBit_two_pow_sub_one (n i : Nat) : testBit (2^n-1) i = decide (i < n) := by
rw [testBit_two_pow_sub_succ]
@@ -336,7 +344,7 @@ private theorem eq_0_of_lt_one (x : Nat) : x < 1 ↔ x = 0 :=
match x with
| 0 => Eq.refl 0
| _+1 => False.elim (not_lt_zero _ (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ p)))
(fun p => by simp [p])
(fun p => by simp [p, Nat.zero_lt_succ])
private theorem eq_0_of_lt (x : Nat) : x < 2^ 0 x = 0 := eq_0_of_lt_one x
@@ -344,7 +352,7 @@ private theorem eq_0_of_lt (x : Nat) : x < 2^ 0 ↔ x = 0 := eq_0_of_lt_one x
private theorem zero_lt_pow (n : Nat) : 0 < 2^n := by
induction n
case zero => simp [eq_0_of_lt]
case succ n hyp => simpa [Nat.pow_succ]
case succ n hyp => simpa [pow_succ]
private theorem div_two_le_of_lt_two {m n : Nat} (p : m < 2 ^ succ n) : m / 2 < 2^n := by
simp [div_lt_iff_lt_mul Nat.zero_lt_two]
@@ -369,7 +377,7 @@ theorem bitwise_lt_two_pow (left : x < 2^n) (right : y < 2^n) : (Nat.bitwise f x
simp only [x_zero, y_zero, if_neg]
have hyp1 := hyp (div_two_le_of_lt_two left) (div_two_le_of_lt_two right)
by_cases p : f (decide (x % 2 = 1)) (decide (y % 2 = 1)) = true <;>
simp [p, Nat.pow_succ, mul_succ, Nat.add_assoc]
simp [p, pow_succ, mul_succ, Nat.add_assoc]
case pos =>
apply lt_of_succ_le
simp only [ Nat.succ_add]
@@ -403,12 +411,12 @@ theorem and_pow_two_identity {x : Nat} (lt : x < 2^n) : x &&& 2^n-1 = x := by
/-! ### lor -/
@[simp] theorem zero_or (x : Nat) : 0 ||| x = x := by
@[simp] theorem or_zero (x : Nat) : 0 ||| x = x := by
simp only [HOr.hOr, OrOp.or, lor]
unfold bitwise
simp [@eq_comm _ 0]
@[simp] theorem or_zero (x : Nat) : x ||| 0 = x := by
@[simp] theorem zero_or (x : Nat) : x ||| 0 = x := by
simp only [HOr.hOr, OrOp.or, lor]
unfold bitwise
simp [@eq_comm _ 0]
@@ -439,8 +447,12 @@ theorem testBit_mul_pow_two_add (a : Nat) {b i : Nat} (b_lt : b < 2^i) (j : Nat)
cases Nat.lt_or_ge j i with
| inl j_lt =>
simp only [j_lt]
have i_def : i = j + succ (pred (i-j)) := by
rw [succ_pred_eq_of_pos] <;> omega
have i_ge := Nat.le_of_lt j_lt
have i_sub_j_nez : i-j 0 := Nat.sub_ne_zero_of_lt j_lt
have i_def : i = j + succ (pred (i-j)) :=
calc i = j + (i-j) := (Nat.add_sub_cancel' i_ge).symm
_ = j + succ (pred (i-j)) := by
rw [ congrArg (j+·) (Nat.succ_pred i_sub_j_nez)]
rw [i_def]
simp only [testBit_to_div_mod, Nat.pow_add, Nat.mul_assoc]
simp only [Nat.mul_add_div (Nat.two_pow_pos _), Nat.mul_add_mod]

View File

@@ -1,57 +0,0 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Mario Carneiro
-/
prelude
import Init.Classical
import Init.Data.Ord
/-! # Basic lemmas about comparing natural numbers
This file introduce some basic lemmas about compare as applied to natural
numbers.
-/
namespace Nat
theorem compare_def_lt (a b : Nat) :
compare a b = if a < b then .lt else if b < a then .gt else .eq := by
simp only [compare, compareOfLessAndEq]
split
· rfl
· next h =>
match Nat.lt_or_eq_of_le (Nat.not_lt.1 h) with
| .inl h => simp [h, Nat.ne_of_gt h]
| .inr rfl => simp
theorem compare_def_le (a b : Nat) :
compare a b = if a b then if b a then .eq else .lt else .gt := by
rw [compare_def_lt]
split
· next hlt => simp [Nat.le_of_lt hlt, Nat.not_le.2 hlt]
· next hge =>
split
· next hgt => simp [Nat.le_of_lt hgt, Nat.not_le.2 hgt]
· next hle => simp [Nat.not_lt.1 hge, Nat.not_lt.1 hle]
protected theorem compare_swap (a b : Nat) : (compare a b).swap = compare b a := by
simp only [compare_def_le]; (repeat' split) <;> try rfl
next h1 h2 => cases h1 (Nat.le_of_not_le h2)
protected theorem compare_eq_eq {a b : Nat} : compare a b = .eq a = b := by
rw [compare_def_lt]; (repeat' split) <;> simp [Nat.ne_of_lt, Nat.ne_of_gt, *]
next hlt hgt => exact Nat.le_antisymm (Nat.not_lt.1 hgt) (Nat.not_lt.1 hlt)
protected theorem compare_eq_lt {a b : Nat} : compare a b = .lt a < b := by
rw [compare_def_lt]; (repeat' split) <;> simp [*]
protected theorem compare_eq_gt {a b : Nat} : compare a b = .gt b < a := by
rw [compare_def_lt]; (repeat' split) <;> simp [Nat.le_of_lt, *]
protected theorem compare_ne_gt {a b : Nat} : compare a b .gt a b := by
rw [compare_def_le]; (repeat' split) <;> simp [*]
protected theorem compare_ne_lt {a b : Nat} : compare a b .lt b a := by
rw [compare_def_le]; (repeat' split) <;> simp [Nat.le_of_not_le, *]
end Nat

View File

@@ -10,13 +10,6 @@ import Init.Data.Nat.Basic
namespace Nat
/--
Divisibility of natural numbers. `a b` (typed as `\|`) says that
there is some `c` such that `b = a * c`.
-/
instance : Dvd Nat where
dvd a b := Exists (fun c => b = a * c)
theorem div_rec_lemma {x y : Nat} : 0 < y y x x - y < x :=
fun ypos, ylex => sub_lt (Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le ypos ylex) ypos
@@ -28,14 +21,14 @@ protected def div (x y : @& Nat) : Nat :=
0
decreasing_by apply div_rec_lemma; assumption
instance instDiv : Div Nat := Nat.div
instance : Div Nat := Nat.div
theorem div_eq (x y : Nat) : x / y = if 0 < y y x then (x - y) / y + 1 else 0 := by
show Nat.div x y = _
rw [Nat.div]
rfl
def div.inductionOn.{u}
theorem div.inductionOn.{u}
{motive : Nat Nat Sort u}
(x y : Nat)
(ind : x y, 0 < y y x motive (x - y) y motive x y)
@@ -82,39 +75,27 @@ decreasing_by apply div_rec_lemma; assumption
@[extern "lean_nat_mod"]
protected def mod : @& Nat @& Nat Nat
/-
Nat.modCore is defined by well-founded recursion and thus irreducible. Nevertheless it is
desireable if trivial `Nat.mod` calculations, namely
* `Nat.mod 0 m` for all `m`
* `Nat.mod n (m+n)` for concrete literals `n`
reduce definitionally.
This property is desirable for `Fin n` literals, as it means `(ofNat 0 : Fin n).val = 0` by
definition.
-/
/- This case is not needed mathematically as the case below is equal to it; however, it makes
`0 % n = 0` true definitionally rather than just propositionally.
This property is desirable for `Fin n`, as it means `(ofNat 0 : Fin n).val = 0` by definition.
Primarily, this is valuable because mathlib in Lean3 assumed this was true definitionally, and so
keeping this definitional equality makes mathlib easier to port to mathlib4. -/
| 0, _ => 0
| n@(_ + 1), m =>
if m n -- NB: if n < m does not reduce as well as `m ≤ n`!
then Nat.modCore n m
else n
| x@(_ + 1), y => Nat.modCore x y
instance instMod : Mod Nat := Nat.mod
instance : Mod Nat := Nat.mod
protected theorem modCore_eq_mod (n m : Nat) : Nat.modCore n m = n % m := by
show Nat.modCore n m = Nat.mod n m
match n, m with
| 0, _ =>
protected theorem modCore_eq_mod (x y : Nat) : Nat.modCore x y = x % y := by
cases x with
| zero =>
rw [Nat.modCore]
exact if_neg fun hlt, hle => Nat.lt_irrefl _ (Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le hlt hle)
| (_ + 1), _ =>
rw [Nat.mod]; dsimp
refine iteInduction (fun _ => rfl) (fun h => ?false) -- cannot use `split` this early yet
rw [Nat.modCore]
exact if_neg fun _hlt, hle => h hle
| succ x => rfl
theorem mod_eq (x y : Nat) : x % y = if 0 < y y x then (x - y) % y else x := by
rw [Nat.modCore_eq_mod, Nat.modCore_eq_mod, Nat.modCore]
def mod.inductionOn.{u}
theorem mod.inductionOn.{u}
{motive : Nat Nat Sort u}
(x y : Nat)
(ind : x y, 0 < y y x motive (x - y) y motive x y)
@@ -217,33 +198,13 @@ theorem le_div_iff_mul_le (k0 : 0 < k) : x ≤ y / k ↔ x * k ≤ y := by
induction y, k using mod.inductionOn generalizing x with
(rw [div_eq]; simp [h]; cases x with | zero => simp [zero_le] | succ x => ?_)
| base y k h =>
simp only [add_one, succ_mul, false_iff, Nat.not_le]
refine Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ (Nat.le_add_left ..)
simp [not_succ_le_zero x, succ_mul, Nat.add_comm]
refine Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ (Nat.le_add_right ..)
exact Nat.not_le.1 fun h' => h k0, h'
| ind y k h IH =>
rw [Nat.add_le_add_iff_right, IH k0, succ_mul,
rw [ add_one, Nat.add_le_add_iff_right, IH k0, succ_mul,
Nat.add_sub_cancel (x*k) k, Nat.sub_le_sub_iff_right h.2, Nat.add_sub_cancel]
protected theorem div_div_eq_div_mul (m n k : Nat) : m / n / k = m / (n * k) := by
cases eq_zero_or_pos k with
| inl k0 => rw [k0, Nat.mul_zero, Nat.div_zero, Nat.div_zero] | inr kpos => ?_
cases eq_zero_or_pos n with
| inl n0 => rw [n0, Nat.zero_mul, Nat.div_zero, Nat.zero_div] | inr npos => ?_
apply Nat.le_antisymm
apply (le_div_iff_mul_le (Nat.mul_pos npos kpos)).2
rw [Nat.mul_comm n k, Nat.mul_assoc]
apply (le_div_iff_mul_le npos).1
apply (le_div_iff_mul_le kpos).1
(apply Nat.le_refl)
apply (le_div_iff_mul_le kpos).2
apply (le_div_iff_mul_le npos).2
rw [Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_comm n k]
apply (le_div_iff_mul_le (Nat.mul_pos kpos npos)).1
apply Nat.le_refl
theorem div_mul_le_self : (m n : Nat), m / n * n m
| m, 0 => by simp
| m, n+1 => (le_div_iff_mul_le (Nat.succ_pos _)).1 (Nat.le_refl _)
@@ -305,7 +266,7 @@ theorem sub_mul_div (x n p : Nat) (h₁ : n*p ≤ x) : (x - n*p) / n = x / n - p
rw [mul_succ] at h₁
exact h₁
rw [sub_succ, IH h₂, div_eq_sub_div h₀ h₃]
simp [Nat.pred_succ, mul_succ, Nat.sub_sub]
simp [add_one, Nat.pred_succ, mul_succ, Nat.sub_sub]
theorem mul_sub_div (x n p : Nat) (h₁ : x < n*p) : (n * p - succ x) / n = p - succ (x / n) := by
have npos : 0 < n := (eq_zero_or_pos _).resolve_left fun n0 => by
@@ -346,50 +307,4 @@ theorem div_eq_of_lt (h₀ : a < b) : a / b = 0 := by
intro h₁
apply Nat.not_le_of_gt h₀ h₁.right
protected theorem mul_div_cancel (m : Nat) {n : Nat} (H : 0 < n) : m * n / n = m := by
let t := add_mul_div_right 0 m H
rwa [Nat.zero_add, Nat.zero_div, Nat.zero_add] at t
protected theorem mul_div_cancel_left (m : Nat) {n : Nat} (H : 0 < n) : n * m / n = m := by
rw [Nat.mul_comm, Nat.mul_div_cancel _ H]
protected theorem div_le_of_le_mul {m n : Nat} : {k}, m k * n m / k n
| 0, _ => by simp [Nat.div_zero, n.zero_le]
| succ k, h => by
suffices succ k * (m / succ k) succ k * n from
Nat.le_of_mul_le_mul_left this (zero_lt_succ _)
have h1 : succ k * (m / succ k) m % succ k + succ k * (m / succ k) := Nat.le_add_left _ _
have h2 : m % succ k + succ k * (m / succ k) = m := by rw [mod_add_div]
have h3 : m succ k * n := h
rw [ h2] at h3
exact Nat.le_trans h1 h3
@[simp] theorem mul_div_right (n : Nat) {m : Nat} (H : 0 < m) : m * n / m = n := by
induction n <;> simp_all [mul_succ]
@[simp] theorem mul_div_left (m : Nat) {n : Nat} (H : 0 < n) : m * n / n = m := by
rw [Nat.mul_comm, mul_div_right _ H]
protected theorem div_self (H : 0 < n) : n / n = 1 := by
let t := add_div_right 0 H
rwa [Nat.zero_add, Nat.zero_div] at t
protected theorem div_eq_of_eq_mul_left (H1 : 0 < n) (H2 : m = k * n) : m / n = k :=
by rw [H2, Nat.mul_div_cancel _ H1]
protected theorem div_eq_of_eq_mul_right (H1 : 0 < n) (H2 : m = n * k) : m / n = k :=
by rw [H2, Nat.mul_div_cancel_left _ H1]
protected theorem mul_div_mul_left {m : Nat} (n k : Nat) (H : 0 < m) :
m * n / (m * k) = n / k := by rw [ Nat.div_div_eq_div_mul, Nat.mul_div_cancel_left _ H]
protected theorem mul_div_mul_right {m : Nat} (n k : Nat) (H : 0 < m) :
n * m / (k * m) = n / k := by rw [Nat.mul_comm, Nat.mul_comm k, Nat.mul_div_mul_left _ _ H]
theorem mul_div_le (m n : Nat) : n * (m / n) m := by
match n, Nat.eq_zero_or_pos n with
| _, Or.inl rfl => rw [Nat.zero_mul]; exact m.zero_le
| n, Or.inr h => rw [Nat.mul_comm, Nat.le_div_iff_mul_le h]; exact Nat.le_refl _
end Nat

View File

@@ -5,10 +5,16 @@ Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Mario Carneiro
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Nat.Div
import Init.Meta
namespace Nat
/--
Divisibility of natural numbers. `a b` (typed as `\|`) says that
there is some `c` such that `b = a * c`.
-/
instance : Dvd Nat where
dvd a b := Exists (fun c => b = a * c)
protected theorem dvd_refl (a : Nat) : a a := 1, by simp
protected theorem dvd_zero (a : Nat) : a 0 := 0, by simp
@@ -91,42 +97,4 @@ protected theorem mul_div_cancel' {n m : Nat} (H : n m) : n * (m / n) = m :=
protected theorem div_mul_cancel {n m : Nat} (H : n m) : m / n * n = m := by
rw [Nat.mul_comm, Nat.mul_div_cancel' H]
@[simp] theorem mod_mod_of_dvd (a : Nat) (h : c b) : a % b % c = a % c := by
rw (config := {occs := .pos [2]}) [ mod_add_div a b]
have x, h := h
subst h
rw [Nat.mul_assoc, add_mul_mod_self_left]
protected theorem dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_left
(kpos : 0 < k) (H : k * m k * n) : m n := by
let l, H := H
rw [Nat.mul_assoc] at H
exact _, Nat.eq_of_mul_eq_mul_left kpos H
protected theorem dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_right (kpos : 0 < k) (H : m * k n * k) : m n := by
rw [Nat.mul_comm m k, Nat.mul_comm n k] at H; exact Nat.dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_left kpos H
theorem dvd_sub {k m n : Nat} (H : n m) (h₁ : k m) (h₂ : k n) : k m - n :=
(Nat.dvd_add_iff_left h₂).2 <| by rwa [Nat.sub_add_cancel H]
protected theorem mul_dvd_mul {a b c d : Nat} : a b c d a * c b * d
| e, he, f, hf =>
e * f, by simp [he, hf, Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_left_comm, Nat.mul_comm]
protected theorem mul_dvd_mul_left (a : Nat) (h : b c) : a * b a * c :=
Nat.mul_dvd_mul (Nat.dvd_refl a) h
protected theorem mul_dvd_mul_right (h: a b) (c : Nat) : a * c b * c :=
Nat.mul_dvd_mul h (Nat.dvd_refl c)
@[simp] theorem dvd_one {n : Nat} : n 1 n = 1 :=
eq_one_of_dvd_one, fun h => h.symm Nat.dvd_refl _
protected theorem mul_div_assoc (m : Nat) (H : k n) : m * n / k = m * (n / k) := by
match Nat.eq_zero_or_pos k with
| .inl h0 => rw [h0, Nat.div_zero, Nat.div_zero, Nat.mul_zero]
| .inr hpos =>
have h1 : m * n / k = m * (n / k * k) / k := by rw [Nat.div_mul_cancel H]
rw [h1, Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_div_cancel _ hpos]
end Nat

View File

@@ -1,47 +1,27 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Nat.Dvd
import Init.NotationExtra
import Init.RCases
namespace Nat
/--
Computes the greatest common divisor of two natural numbers.
This reference implementation via the Euclidean algorithm
is overridden in both the kernel and the compiler to efficiently
evaluate using the "bignum" representation (see `Nat`).
The definition provided here is the logical model
(and it is soundness-critical that they coincide).
The GCD of two natural numbers is the largest natural number
that divides both arguments.
In particular, the GCD of a number and `0` is the number itself:
```
example : Nat.gcd 10 15 = 5 := rfl
example : Nat.gcd 0 5 = 5 := rfl
example : Nat.gcd 7 0 = 7 := rfl
```
-/
@[extern "lean_nat_gcd"]
def gcd (m n : @& Nat) : Nat :=
if m = 0 then
n
else
gcd (n % m) m
termination_by m
decreasing_by simp_wf; apply mod_lt _ (zero_lt_of_ne_zero _); assumption
termination_by m
decreasing_by simp_wf; apply mod_lt _ (zero_lt_of_ne_zero _); assumption
@[simp] theorem gcd_zero_left (y : Nat) : gcd 0 y = y := by
rw [gcd]; rfl
@[simp] theorem gcd_zero_left (y : Nat) : gcd 0 y = y :=
rfl
theorem gcd_succ (x y : Nat) : gcd (succ x) y = gcd (y % succ x) (succ x) := by
rw [gcd]; rfl
theorem gcd_succ (x y : Nat) : gcd (succ x) y = gcd (y % succ x) (succ x) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem gcd_one_left (n : Nat) : gcd 1 n = 1 := by
rw [gcd_succ, mod_one]
@@ -54,17 +34,13 @@ theorem gcd_succ (x y : Nat) : gcd (succ x) y = gcd (y % succ x) (succ x) := by
-- `simp [gcd_succ]` produces an invalid term unless `gcd_succ` is proved with `id rfl` instead
rw [gcd_succ]
exact gcd_zero_left _
instance : Std.LawfulIdentity gcd 0 where
left_id := gcd_zero_left
right_id := gcd_zero_right
@[simp] theorem gcd_self (n : Nat) : gcd n n = n := by
cases n <;> simp [gcd_succ]
instance : Std.IdempotentOp gcd := gcd_self
theorem gcd_rec (m n : Nat) : gcd m n = gcd (n % m) m :=
match m with
| 0 => by have := (mod_zero n).symm; rwa [gcd, gcd_zero_right]
| 0 => by have := (mod_zero n).symm; rwa [gcd_zero_right]
| _ + 1 => by simp [gcd_succ]
@[elab_as_elim] theorem gcd.induction {P : Nat Nat Prop} (m n : Nat)
@@ -93,167 +69,4 @@ theorem dvd_gcd : k m → k n → k gcd m n := by
| H0 n => rw [gcd_zero_left]; exact kn
| H1 n m _ IH => rw [gcd_rec]; exact IH ((dvd_mod_iff km).2 kn) km
theorem dvd_gcd_iff : k gcd m n k m k n :=
fun h => let h₁, h₂ := gcd_dvd m n; Nat.dvd_trans h h₁, Nat.dvd_trans h h₂,
fun h₁, h₂ => dvd_gcd h₁ h₂
theorem gcd_comm (m n : Nat) : gcd m n = gcd n m :=
Nat.dvd_antisymm
(dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_right m n) (gcd_dvd_left m n))
(dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_right n m) (gcd_dvd_left n m))
instance : Std.Commutative gcd := gcd_comm
theorem gcd_eq_left_iff_dvd : m n gcd m n = m :=
fun h => by rw [gcd_rec, mod_eq_zero_of_dvd h, gcd_zero_left],
fun h => h gcd_dvd_right m n
theorem gcd_eq_right_iff_dvd : m n gcd n m = m := by
rw [gcd_comm]; exact gcd_eq_left_iff_dvd
theorem gcd_assoc (m n k : Nat) : gcd (gcd m n) k = gcd m (gcd n k) :=
Nat.dvd_antisymm
(dvd_gcd
(Nat.dvd_trans (gcd_dvd_left (gcd m n) k) (gcd_dvd_left m n))
(dvd_gcd (Nat.dvd_trans (gcd_dvd_left (gcd m n) k) (gcd_dvd_right m n))
(gcd_dvd_right (gcd m n) k)))
(dvd_gcd
(dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_left m (gcd n k))
(Nat.dvd_trans (gcd_dvd_right m (gcd n k)) (gcd_dvd_left n k)))
(Nat.dvd_trans (gcd_dvd_right m (gcd n k)) (gcd_dvd_right n k)))
@[simp] theorem gcd_one_right (n : Nat) : gcd n 1 = 1 := (gcd_comm n 1).trans (gcd_one_left n)
theorem gcd_mul_left (m n k : Nat) : gcd (m * n) (m * k) = m * gcd n k := by
induction n, k using gcd.induction with
| H0 k => simp
| H1 n k _ IH => rwa [ mul_mod_mul_left, gcd_rec, gcd_rec] at IH
theorem gcd_mul_right (m n k : Nat) : gcd (m * n) (k * n) = gcd m k * n := by
rw [Nat.mul_comm m n, Nat.mul_comm k n, Nat.mul_comm (gcd m k) n, gcd_mul_left]
theorem gcd_pos_of_pos_left {m : Nat} (n : Nat) (mpos : 0 < m) : 0 < gcd m n :=
pos_of_dvd_of_pos (gcd_dvd_left m n) mpos
theorem gcd_pos_of_pos_right (m : Nat) {n : Nat} (npos : 0 < n) : 0 < gcd m n :=
pos_of_dvd_of_pos (gcd_dvd_right m n) npos
theorem div_gcd_pos_of_pos_left (b : Nat) (h : 0 < a) : 0 < a / a.gcd b :=
(Nat.le_div_iff_mul_le <| Nat.gcd_pos_of_pos_left _ h).2 (Nat.one_mul _ Nat.gcd_le_left _ h)
theorem div_gcd_pos_of_pos_right (a : Nat) (h : 0 < b) : 0 < b / a.gcd b :=
(Nat.le_div_iff_mul_le <| Nat.gcd_pos_of_pos_right _ h).2 (Nat.one_mul _ Nat.gcd_le_right _ h)
theorem eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left {m n : Nat} (H : gcd m n = 0) : m = 0 :=
match eq_zero_or_pos m with
| .inl H0 => H0
| .inr H1 => absurd (Eq.symm H) (ne_of_lt (gcd_pos_of_pos_left _ H1))
theorem eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right {m n : Nat} (H : gcd m n = 0) : n = 0 := by
rw [gcd_comm] at H
exact eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left H
theorem gcd_ne_zero_left : m 0 gcd m n 0 := mt eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left
theorem gcd_ne_zero_right : n 0 gcd m n 0 := mt eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right
theorem gcd_div {m n k : Nat} (H1 : k m) (H2 : k n) :
gcd (m / k) (n / k) = gcd m n / k :=
match eq_zero_or_pos k with
| .inl H0 => by simp [H0]
| .inr H3 => by
apply Nat.eq_of_mul_eq_mul_right H3
rw [Nat.div_mul_cancel (dvd_gcd H1 H2), gcd_mul_right,
Nat.div_mul_cancel H1, Nat.div_mul_cancel H2]
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_left {m k : Nat} (n : Nat) (H : m k) : gcd m n gcd k n :=
dvd_gcd (Nat.dvd_trans (gcd_dvd_left m n) H) (gcd_dvd_right m n)
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_right {m k : Nat} (n : Nat) (H : m k) : gcd n m gcd n k :=
dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_left n m) (Nat.dvd_trans (gcd_dvd_right n m) H)
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left (m n k : Nat) : gcd m n gcd (k * m) n :=
gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_left _ (Nat.dvd_mul_left _ _)
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right (m n k : Nat) : gcd m n gcd (m * k) n :=
gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_left _ (Nat.dvd_mul_right _ _)
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left_right (m n k : Nat) : gcd m n gcd m (k * n) :=
gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_right _ (Nat.dvd_mul_left _ _)
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right_right (m n k : Nat) : gcd m n gcd m (n * k) :=
gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_right _ (Nat.dvd_mul_right _ _)
theorem gcd_eq_left {m n : Nat} (H : m n) : gcd m n = m :=
Nat.dvd_antisymm (gcd_dvd_left _ _) (dvd_gcd (Nat.dvd_refl _) H)
theorem gcd_eq_right {m n : Nat} (H : n m) : gcd m n = n := by
rw [gcd_comm, gcd_eq_left H]
@[simp] theorem gcd_mul_left_left (m n : Nat) : gcd (m * n) n = n :=
Nat.dvd_antisymm (gcd_dvd_right _ _) (dvd_gcd (Nat.dvd_mul_left _ _) (Nat.dvd_refl _))
@[simp] theorem gcd_mul_left_right (m n : Nat) : gcd n (m * n) = n := by
rw [gcd_comm, gcd_mul_left_left]
@[simp] theorem gcd_mul_right_left (m n : Nat) : gcd (n * m) n = n := by
rw [Nat.mul_comm, gcd_mul_left_left]
@[simp] theorem gcd_mul_right_right (m n : Nat) : gcd n (n * m) = n := by
rw [gcd_comm, gcd_mul_right_left]
@[simp] theorem gcd_gcd_self_right_left (m n : Nat) : gcd m (gcd m n) = gcd m n :=
Nat.dvd_antisymm (gcd_dvd_right _ _) (dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_left _ _) (Nat.dvd_refl _))
@[simp] theorem gcd_gcd_self_right_right (m n : Nat) : gcd m (gcd n m) = gcd n m := by
rw [gcd_comm n m, gcd_gcd_self_right_left]
@[simp] theorem gcd_gcd_self_left_right (m n : Nat) : gcd (gcd n m) m = gcd n m := by
rw [gcd_comm, gcd_gcd_self_right_right]
@[simp] theorem gcd_gcd_self_left_left (m n : Nat) : gcd (gcd m n) m = gcd m n := by
rw [gcd_comm m n, gcd_gcd_self_left_right]
theorem gcd_add_mul_self (m n k : Nat) : gcd m (n + k * m) = gcd m n := by
simp [gcd_rec m (n + k * m), gcd_rec m n]
theorem gcd_eq_zero_iff {i j : Nat} : gcd i j = 0 i = 0 j = 0 :=
fun h => eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left h, eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right h,
fun h => by simp [h]
/-- Characterization of the value of `Nat.gcd`. -/
theorem gcd_eq_iff (a b : Nat) :
gcd a b = g g a g b ( c, c a c b c g) := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
exact gcd_dvd_left _ _, gcd_dvd_right _ _, fun _ => Nat.dvd_gcd
· rintro ha, hb, hc
apply Nat.dvd_antisymm
· apply hc
· exact gcd_dvd_left a b
· exact gcd_dvd_right a b
· exact Nat.dvd_gcd ha hb
/-- Represent a divisor of `m * n` as a product of a divisor of `m` and a divisor of `n`. -/
def prod_dvd_and_dvd_of_dvd_prod {k m n : Nat} (H : k m * n) :
{d : {m' // m' m} × {n' // n' n} // k = d.1.val * d.2.val} :=
if h0 : gcd k m = 0 then
0, eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right h0 Nat.dvd_refl 0,
n, Nat.dvd_refl n,
eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left h0 (Nat.zero_mul n).symm
else by
have hd : gcd k m * (k / gcd k m) = k := Nat.mul_div_cancel' (gcd_dvd_left k m)
refine gcd k m, gcd_dvd_right k m, k / gcd k m, ?_, hd.symm
apply Nat.dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_left (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h0)
rw [hd, gcd_mul_right]
exact Nat.dvd_gcd (Nat.dvd_mul_right _ _) H
theorem gcd_mul_dvd_mul_gcd (k m n : Nat) : gcd k (m * n) gcd k m * gcd k n := by
let m', hm', n', hn', (h : gcd k (m * n) = m' * n') :=
prod_dvd_and_dvd_of_dvd_prod <| gcd_dvd_right k (m * n)
rw [h]
have h' : m' * n' k := h gcd_dvd_left ..
exact Nat.mul_dvd_mul
(dvd_gcd (Nat.dvd_trans (Nat.dvd_mul_right m' n') h') hm')
(dvd_gcd (Nat.dvd_trans (Nat.dvd_mul_left n' m') h') hn')
end Nat

View File

@@ -1,72 +0,0 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Nat.Gcd
import Init.Data.Nat.Lemmas
namespace Nat
/-- The least common multiple of `m` and `n`, defined using `gcd`. -/
def lcm (m n : Nat) : Nat := m * n / gcd m n
theorem lcm_comm (m n : Nat) : lcm m n = lcm n m := by
rw [lcm, lcm, Nat.mul_comm n m, gcd_comm n m]
instance : Std.Commutative lcm := lcm_comm
@[simp] theorem lcm_zero_left (m : Nat) : lcm 0 m = 0 := by simp [lcm]
@[simp] theorem lcm_zero_right (m : Nat) : lcm m 0 = 0 := by simp [lcm]
@[simp] theorem lcm_one_left (m : Nat) : lcm 1 m = m := by simp [lcm]
@[simp] theorem lcm_one_right (m : Nat) : lcm m 1 = m := by simp [lcm]
instance : Std.LawfulIdentity lcm 1 where
left_id := lcm_one_left
right_id := lcm_one_right
@[simp] theorem lcm_self (m : Nat) : lcm m m = m := by
match eq_zero_or_pos m with
| .inl h => rw [h, lcm_zero_left]
| .inr h => simp [lcm, Nat.mul_div_cancel _ h]
instance : Std.IdempotentOp lcm := lcm_self
theorem dvd_lcm_left (m n : Nat) : m lcm m n :=
n / gcd m n, by rw [ Nat.mul_div_assoc m (Nat.gcd_dvd_right m n)]; rfl
theorem dvd_lcm_right (m n : Nat) : n lcm m n := lcm_comm n m dvd_lcm_left n m
theorem gcd_mul_lcm (m n : Nat) : gcd m n * lcm m n = m * n := by
rw [lcm, Nat.mul_div_cancel' (Nat.dvd_trans (gcd_dvd_left m n) (Nat.dvd_mul_right m n))]
theorem lcm_dvd {m n k : Nat} (H1 : m k) (H2 : n k) : lcm m n k := by
match eq_zero_or_pos k with
| .inl h => rw [h]; exact Nat.dvd_zero _
| .inr kpos =>
apply Nat.dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_left (gcd_pos_of_pos_left n (pos_of_dvd_of_pos H1 kpos))
rw [gcd_mul_lcm, gcd_mul_right, Nat.mul_comm n k]
exact dvd_gcd (Nat.mul_dvd_mul_left _ H2) (Nat.mul_dvd_mul_right H1 _)
theorem lcm_assoc (m n k : Nat) : lcm (lcm m n) k = lcm m (lcm n k) :=
Nat.dvd_antisymm
(lcm_dvd
(lcm_dvd (dvd_lcm_left m (lcm n k))
(Nat.dvd_trans (dvd_lcm_left n k) (dvd_lcm_right m (lcm n k))))
(Nat.dvd_trans (dvd_lcm_right n k) (dvd_lcm_right m (lcm n k))))
(lcm_dvd
(Nat.dvd_trans (dvd_lcm_left m n) (dvd_lcm_left (lcm m n) k))
(lcm_dvd (Nat.dvd_trans (dvd_lcm_right m n) (dvd_lcm_left (lcm m n) k))
(dvd_lcm_right (lcm m n) k)))
instance : Std.Associative lcm := lcm_assoc
theorem lcm_ne_zero (hm : m 0) (hn : n 0) : lcm m n 0 := by
intro h
have h1 := gcd_mul_lcm m n
rw [h, Nat.mul_zero] at h1
match mul_eq_zero.1 h1.symm with
| .inl hm1 => exact hm hm1
| .inr hn1 => exact hn hn1
end Nat

View File

@@ -4,10 +4,10 @@ Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Mario Carneiro
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Nat.Dvd
import Init.Data.Nat.MinMax
import Init.Data.Nat.Log2
import Init.Data.Nat.Power2
import Init.Omega
/-! # Basic lemmas about natural numbers
@@ -19,6 +19,131 @@ and later these lemmas should be organised into other files more systematically.
-/
namespace Nat
/-! ### le/lt -/
protected theorem lt_asymm {a b : Nat} (h : a < b) : ¬ b < a := Nat.not_lt.2 (Nat.le_of_lt h)
protected abbrev not_lt_of_gt := @Nat.lt_asymm
protected abbrev not_lt_of_lt := @Nat.lt_asymm
protected theorem lt_iff_le_not_le {m n : Nat} : m < n m n ¬ n m :=
fun h => Nat.le_of_lt h, Nat.not_le_of_gt h, fun _, h => Nat.lt_of_not_ge h
protected abbrev lt_iff_le_and_not_ge := @Nat.lt_iff_le_not_le
protected theorem lt_iff_le_and_ne {m n : Nat} : m < n m n m n :=
fun h => Nat.le_of_lt h, Nat.ne_of_lt h, fun h => Nat.lt_of_le_of_ne h.1 h.2
protected theorem ne_iff_lt_or_gt {a b : Nat} : a b a < b b < a :=
Nat.lt_or_gt_of_ne, fun | .inl h => Nat.ne_of_lt h | .inr h => Nat.ne_of_gt h
protected abbrev lt_or_gt := @Nat.ne_iff_lt_or_gt
protected abbrev le_or_ge := @Nat.le_total
protected abbrev le_or_le := @Nat.le_total
protected theorem eq_or_lt_of_not_lt {a b : Nat} (hnlt : ¬ a < b) : a = b b < a :=
(Nat.lt_trichotomy ..).resolve_left hnlt
protected theorem lt_or_eq_of_le {n m : Nat} (h : n m) : n < m n = m :=
(Nat.lt_or_ge ..).imp_right (Nat.le_antisymm h)
protected theorem le_iff_lt_or_eq {n m : Nat} : n m n < m n = m :=
Nat.lt_or_eq_of_le, fun | .inl h => Nat.le_of_lt h | .inr rfl => Nat.le_refl _
protected theorem lt_succ_iff : m < succ n m n := le_of_lt_succ, lt_succ_of_le
protected theorem lt_succ_iff_lt_or_eq : m < succ n m < n m = n :=
Nat.lt_succ_iff.trans Nat.le_iff_lt_or_eq
protected theorem eq_of_lt_succ_of_not_lt (hmn : m < n + 1) (h : ¬ m < n) : m = n :=
(Nat.lt_succ_iff_lt_or_eq.1 hmn).resolve_left h
protected theorem eq_of_le_of_lt_succ (h₁ : n m) (h₂ : m < n + 1) : m = n :=
Nat.le_antisymm (le_of_succ_le_succ h₂) h₁
/-! ## zero/one/two -/
theorem le_zero : i 0 i = 0 := Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero, fun | rfl => Nat.le_refl _
protected abbrev one_pos := @Nat.zero_lt_one
protected theorem two_pos : 0 < 2 := Nat.zero_lt_succ _
theorem add_one_ne_zero (n) : n + 1 0 := succ_ne_zero _
protected theorem ne_zero_iff_zero_lt : n 0 0 < n := Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.symm
protected theorem zero_lt_two : 0 < 2 := Nat.zero_lt_succ _
protected theorem one_lt_two : 1 < 2 := Nat.succ_lt_succ Nat.zero_lt_one
protected theorem eq_zero_of_not_pos (h : ¬0 < n) : n = 0 :=
Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero (Nat.not_lt.1 h)
/-! ## succ/pred -/
attribute [simp] succ_ne_zero zero_lt_succ lt_succ_self Nat.pred_zero Nat.pred_succ Nat.pred_le
theorem succ_ne_self (n) : succ n n := Nat.ne_of_gt (lt_succ_self n)
theorem succ_le : succ n m n < m := .rfl
theorem lt_succ : m < succ n m n := le_of_lt_succ, lt_succ_of_le
theorem lt_succ_of_lt (h : a < b) : a < succ b := le_succ_of_le h
theorem succ_pred_eq_of_ne_zero : {n}, n 0 succ (pred n) = n
| _+1, _ => rfl
theorem eq_zero_or_eq_succ_pred : n, n = 0 n = succ (pred n)
| 0 => .inl rfl
| _+1 => .inr rfl
theorem succ_inj' : succ a = succ b a = b := succ.inj, congrArg _
theorem succ_le_succ_iff : succ a succ b a b := le_of_succ_le_succ, succ_le_succ
theorem succ_lt_succ_iff : succ a < succ b a < b := lt_of_succ_lt_succ, succ_lt_succ
theorem pred_inj : {a b}, 0 < a 0 < b pred a = pred b a = b
| _+1, _+1, _, _ => congrArg _
theorem pred_ne_self : {a}, a 0 pred a a
| _+1, _ => (succ_ne_self _).symm
theorem pred_lt_self : {a}, 0 < a pred a < a
| _+1, _ => lt_succ_self _
theorem pred_lt_pred : {n m}, n 0 n < m pred n < pred m
| _+1, _+1, _, h => lt_of_succ_lt_succ h
theorem pred_le_iff_le_succ : {n m}, pred n m n succ m
| 0, _ => fun _ => Nat.zero_le _, fun _ => Nat.zero_le _
| _+1, _ => Nat.succ_le_succ_iff.symm
theorem le_succ_of_pred_le : pred n m n succ m := pred_le_iff_le_succ.1
theorem pred_le_of_le_succ : n succ m pred n m := pred_le_iff_le_succ.2
theorem lt_pred_iff_succ_lt : {n m}, n < pred m succ n < m
| _, 0 => nofun, nofun
| _, _+1 => Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff.symm
theorem succ_lt_of_lt_pred : n < pred m succ n < m := lt_pred_iff_succ_lt.1
theorem lt_pred_of_succ_lt : succ n < m n < pred m := lt_pred_iff_succ_lt.2
theorem le_pred_iff_lt : {n m}, 0 < m (n pred m n < m)
| 0, _+1, _ => fun _ => Nat.zero_lt_succ _, fun _ => Nat.zero_le _
| _+1, _+1, _ => Nat.lt_pred_iff_succ_lt
theorem lt_of_le_pred (h : 0 < m) : n pred m n < m := (le_pred_iff_lt h).1
theorem le_pred_of_lt (h : n < m) : n pred m := (le_pred_iff_lt (Nat.zero_lt_of_lt h)).2 h
theorem exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero : {n}, n 0 k, n = succ k
| _+1, _ => _, rfl
/-! ## add -/
protected theorem add_add_add_comm (a b c d : Nat) : (a + b) + (c + d) = (a + c) + (b + d) := by
@@ -66,6 +191,15 @@ protected theorem add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le {a b c d : Nat} (hlt : a < b) (hle : c
a + c < b + d :=
Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.add_le_add_left hle _) (Nat.add_lt_add_right hlt _)
protected theorem lt_add_left (c : Nat) (h : a < b) : a < c + b :=
Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h (Nat.le_add_left ..)
protected theorem lt_add_right (c : Nat) (h : a < b) : a < b + c :=
Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h (Nat.le_add_right ..)
protected theorem lt_add_of_pos_right (h : 0 < k) : n < n + k :=
Nat.add_lt_add_left h n
protected theorem lt_add_of_pos_left : 0 < k n < k + n := by
rw [Nat.add_comm]; exact Nat.lt_add_of_pos_right
@@ -88,7 +222,7 @@ protected theorem add_pos_right (m) (h : 0 < n) : 0 < m + n :=
Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h (Nat.le_add_left ..)
protected theorem add_self_ne_one : n, n + n 1
| n+1, h => by rw [Nat.succ_add, Nat.succ.injEq] at h; contradiction
| n+1, h => by rw [Nat.succ_add, Nat.succ_inj'] at h; contradiction
/-! ## sub -/
@@ -137,14 +271,14 @@ protected theorem sub_le_iff_le_add' {a b c : Nat} : a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b + c
protected theorem le_sub_iff_add_le {n : Nat} (h : k m) : n m - k n + k m :=
Nat.add_le_of_le_sub h, Nat.le_sub_of_add_le
@[deprecated Nat.le_sub_iff_add_le (since := "2024-02-19")]
@[deprecated Nat.le_sub_iff_add_le]
protected theorem add_le_to_le_sub (n : Nat) (h : m k) : n + m k n k - m :=
(Nat.le_sub_iff_add_le h).symm
protected theorem add_le_of_le_sub' {n k m : Nat} (h : m k) : n k - m m + n k :=
Nat.add_comm .. Nat.add_le_of_le_sub h
@[deprecated Nat.add_le_of_le_sub' (since := "2024-02-19")]
@[deprecated Nat.add_le_of_le_sub']
protected theorem add_le_of_le_sub_left {n k m : Nat} (h : m k) : n k - m m + n k :=
Nat.add_le_of_le_sub' h
@@ -175,6 +309,8 @@ theorem add_lt_of_lt_sub' {a b c : Nat} : b < c - a → a + b < c := by
protected theorem sub_add_lt_sub (h₁ : m + k n) (h₂ : 0 < k) : n - (m + k) < n - m := by
rw [ Nat.sub_sub]; exact Nat.sub_lt_of_pos_le h₂ (Nat.le_sub_of_add_le' h₁)
theorem le_sub_one_of_lt : a < b a b - 1 := Nat.le_pred_of_lt
theorem sub_one_lt_of_le (h₀ : 0 < a) (h₁ : a b) : a - 1 < b :=
Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le (Nat.pred_lt' h₀) h₁
@@ -200,7 +336,6 @@ theorem succ_min_succ (x y) : min (succ x) (succ y) = succ (min x y) := by
| inr h => rw [Nat.min_eq_right h, Nat.min_eq_right (Nat.succ_le_succ h)]
@[simp] protected theorem min_self (a : Nat) : min a a = a := Nat.min_eq_left (Nat.le_refl _)
instance : Std.IdempotentOp (α := Nat) min := Nat.min_self
@[simp] protected theorem zero_min (a) : min 0 a = 0 := Nat.min_eq_left (Nat.zero_le _)
@@ -211,7 +346,6 @@ protected theorem min_assoc : ∀ (a b c : Nat), min (min a b) c = min a (min b
| _, 0, _ => by rw [Nat.zero_min, Nat.min_zero, Nat.zero_min]
| _, _, 0 => by rw [Nat.min_zero, Nat.min_zero, Nat.min_zero]
| _+1, _+1, _+1 => by simp only [Nat.succ_min_succ]; exact congrArg succ <| Nat.min_assoc ..
instance : Std.Associative (α := Nat) min := Nat.min_assoc
protected theorem sub_sub_eq_min : (a b : Nat), a - (a - b) = min a b
| 0, _ => by rw [Nat.zero_sub, Nat.zero_min]
@@ -251,21 +385,16 @@ protected theorem max_lt {a b c : Nat} : max a b < c ↔ a < c ∧ b < c := by
rw [ Nat.succ_le, Nat.succ_max_succ a b]; exact Nat.max_le
@[simp] protected theorem max_self (a : Nat) : max a a = a := Nat.max_eq_right (Nat.le_refl _)
instance : Std.IdempotentOp (α := Nat) max := Nat.max_self
@[simp] protected theorem zero_max (a) : max 0 a = a := Nat.max_eq_right (Nat.zero_le _)
@[simp] protected theorem max_zero (a) : max a 0 = a := Nat.max_eq_left (Nat.zero_le _)
instance : Std.LawfulIdentity (α := Nat) max 0 where
left_id := Nat.zero_max
right_id := Nat.max_zero
protected theorem max_assoc : (a b c : Nat), max (max a b) c = max a (max b c)
| 0, _, _ => by rw [Nat.zero_max, Nat.zero_max]
| _, 0, _ => by rw [Nat.zero_max, Nat.max_zero]
| _, _, 0 => by rw [Nat.max_zero, Nat.max_zero]
| _+1, _+1, _+1 => by simp only [Nat.succ_max_succ]; exact congrArg succ <| Nat.max_assoc ..
instance : Std.Associative (α := Nat) max := Nat.max_assoc
protected theorem sub_add_eq_max (a b : Nat) : a - b + b = max a b := by
match Nat.le_total a b with
@@ -341,32 +470,6 @@ protected theorem sub_max_sub_right : ∀ (a b c : Nat), max (a - c) (b - c) = m
| _, _, 0 => rfl
| _, _, _+1 => Eq.trans (Nat.pred_max_pred ..) <| congrArg _ (Nat.sub_max_sub_right ..)
protected theorem sub_min_sub_left (a b c : Nat) : min (a - b) (a - c) = a - max b c := by
omega
protected theorem sub_max_sub_left (a b c : Nat) : max (a - b) (a - c) = a - min b c := by
omega
protected theorem mul_max_mul_right (a b c : Nat) : max (a * c) (b * c) = max a b * c := by
induction a generalizing b with
| zero => simp
| succ i ind =>
cases b <;> simp [succ_eq_add_one, Nat.succ_mul, Nat.add_max_add_right, ind]
protected theorem mul_min_mul_right (a b c : Nat) : min (a * c) (b * c) = min a b * c := by
induction a generalizing b with
| zero => simp
| succ i ind =>
cases b <;> simp [succ_eq_add_one, Nat.succ_mul, Nat.add_min_add_right, ind]
protected theorem mul_max_mul_left (a b c : Nat) : max (a * b) (a * c) = a * max b c := by
repeat rw [Nat.mul_comm a]
exact Nat.mul_max_mul_right ..
protected theorem mul_min_mul_left (a b c : Nat) : min (a * b) (a * c) = a * min b c := by
repeat rw [Nat.mul_comm a]
exact Nat.mul_min_mul_right ..
-- protected theorem sub_min_sub_left (a b c : Nat) : min (a - b) (a - c) = a - max b c := by
-- induction b, c using Nat.recDiagAux with
-- | zero_left => rw [Nat.sub_zero, Nat.zero_max]; exact Nat.min_eq_right (Nat.sub_le ..)
@@ -401,11 +504,11 @@ protected theorem mul_min_mul_left (a b c : Nat) : min (a * b) (a * c) = a * min
/-! ### mul -/
@[deprecated Nat.mul_le_mul_left (since := "2024-02-19")]
@[deprecated Nat.mul_le_mul_left]
protected theorem mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left {a b c : Nat} : a b c * a c * b :=
Nat.mul_le_mul_left c
@[deprecated Nat.mul_le_mul_right (since := "2024-02-19")]
@[deprecated Nat.mul_le_mul_right]
protected theorem mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right {a b c : Nat} : a b a * c b * c :=
Nat.mul_le_mul_right c
@@ -415,6 +518,10 @@ protected theorem mul_right_comm (n m k : Nat) : n * m * k = n * k * m := by
protected theorem mul_mul_mul_comm (a b c d : Nat) : (a * b) * (c * d) = (a * c) * (b * d) := by
rw [Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_left_comm b]
protected theorem mul_two (n) : n * 2 = n + n := by rw [Nat.mul_succ, Nat.mul_one]
protected theorem two_mul (n) : 2 * n = n + n := by rw [Nat.succ_mul, Nat.one_mul]
theorem mul_eq_zero : {m n}, n * m = 0 n = 0 m = 0
| 0, _ => fun _ => .inr rfl, fun _ => rfl
| _, 0 => fun _ => .inl rfl, fun _ => Nat.zero_mul ..
@@ -478,7 +585,6 @@ protected theorem mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_lt {a b c d : Nat} (hac : a < c) (hbd : b
theorem succ_mul_succ (a b) : succ a * succ b = a * b + a + b + 1 := by
rw [succ_mul, mul_succ]; rfl
theorem mul_le_add_right (m k n : Nat) : k * m m + n (k-1) * m n := by
match k with
| 0 =>
@@ -513,6 +619,68 @@ protected theorem pos_of_mul_pos_right {a b : Nat} (h : 0 < a * b) : 0 < a := by
/-! ### div/mod -/
protected theorem div_le_of_le_mul {m n : Nat} : {k}, m k * n m / k n
| 0, _ => by simp [Nat.div_zero, n.zero_le]
| succ k, h => by
suffices succ k * (m / succ k) succ k * n from
Nat.le_of_mul_le_mul_left this (zero_lt_succ _)
have h1 : succ k * (m / succ k) m % succ k + succ k * (m / succ k) := Nat.le_add_left _ _
have h2 : m % succ k + succ k * (m / succ k) = m := by rw [mod_add_div]
have h3 : m succ k * n := h
rw [ h2] at h3
exact Nat.le_trans h1 h3
@[simp] theorem mul_div_right (n : Nat) {m : Nat} (H : 0 < m) : m * n / m = n := by
induction n <;> simp_all [mul_succ]
@[simp] theorem mul_div_left (m : Nat) {n : Nat} (H : 0 < n) : m * n / n = m := by
rw [Nat.mul_comm, mul_div_right _ H]
protected theorem div_self (H : 0 < n) : n / n = 1 := by
let t := add_div_right 0 H
rwa [Nat.zero_add, Nat.zero_div] at t
protected theorem mul_div_cancel (m : Nat) {n : Nat} (H : 0 < n) : m * n / n = m := by
let t := add_mul_div_right 0 m H
rwa [Nat.zero_add, Nat.zero_div, Nat.zero_add] at t
protected theorem mul_div_cancel_left (m : Nat) {n : Nat} (H : 0 < n) : n * m / n = m :=
by rw [Nat.mul_comm, Nat.mul_div_cancel _ H]
protected theorem div_eq_of_eq_mul_left (H1 : 0 < n) (H2 : m = k * n) : m / n = k :=
by rw [H2, Nat.mul_div_cancel _ H1]
protected theorem div_eq_of_eq_mul_right (H1 : 0 < n) (H2 : m = n * k) : m / n = k :=
by rw [H2, Nat.mul_div_cancel_left _ H1]
protected theorem div_div_eq_div_mul (m n k : Nat) : m / n / k = m / (n * k) := by
cases eq_zero_or_pos k with
| inl k0 => rw [k0, Nat.mul_zero, Nat.div_zero, Nat.div_zero] | inr kpos => ?_
cases eq_zero_or_pos n with
| inl n0 => rw [n0, Nat.zero_mul, Nat.div_zero, Nat.zero_div] | inr npos => ?_
apply Nat.le_antisymm
· apply (le_div_iff_mul_le (Nat.mul_pos npos kpos)).2
rw [Nat.mul_comm n k, Nat.mul_assoc]
apply (le_div_iff_mul_le npos).1
apply (le_div_iff_mul_le kpos).1
(apply Nat.le_refl)
· apply (le_div_iff_mul_le kpos).2
apply (le_div_iff_mul_le npos).2
rw [Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_comm n k]
apply (le_div_iff_mul_le (Nat.mul_pos kpos npos)).1
apply Nat.le_refl
protected theorem mul_div_mul_left {m : Nat} (n k : Nat) (H : 0 < m) :
m * n / (m * k) = n / k := by rw [ Nat.div_div_eq_div_mul, Nat.mul_div_cancel_left _ H]
protected theorem mul_div_mul_right {m : Nat} (n k : Nat) (H : 0 < m) :
n * m / (k * m) = n / k := by rw [Nat.mul_comm, Nat.mul_comm k, Nat.mul_div_mul_left _ _ H]
theorem mul_div_le (m n : Nat) : n * (m / n) m := by
match n, Nat.eq_zero_or_pos n with
| _, Or.inl rfl => rw [Nat.zero_mul]; exact m.zero_le
| n, Or.inr h => rw [Nat.mul_comm, Nat.le_div_iff_mul_le h]; exact Nat.le_refl _
theorem mod_two_eq_zero_or_one (n : Nat) : n % 2 = 0 n % 2 = 1 :=
match n % 2, @Nat.mod_lt n 2 (by decide) with
| 0, _ => .inl rfl
@@ -524,6 +692,12 @@ theorem le_of_mod_lt {a b : Nat} (h : a % b < a) : b ≤ a :=
theorem mul_mod_mul_right (z x y : Nat) : (x * z) % (y * z) = (x % y) * z := by
rw [Nat.mul_comm x z, Nat.mul_comm y z, Nat.mul_comm (x % y) z]; apply mul_mod_mul_left
@[simp] theorem mod_mod_of_dvd (a : Nat) (h : c b) : a % b % c = a % c := by
rw (config := {occs := .pos [2]}) [ mod_add_div a b]
have x, h := h
subst h
rw [Nat.mul_assoc, add_mul_mod_self_left]
theorem sub_mul_mod {x k n : Nat} (h₁ : n*k x) : (x - n*k) % n = x % n := by
match k with
| 0 => rw [Nat.mul_zero, Nat.sub_zero]
@@ -564,6 +738,12 @@ theorem pow_succ' {m n : Nat} : m ^ n.succ = m * m ^ n := by
@[simp] theorem pow_eq {m n : Nat} : m.pow n = m ^ n := rfl
theorem shiftLeft_eq (a b : Nat) : a <<< b = a * 2 ^ b :=
match b with
| 0 => (Nat.mul_one _).symm
| b+1 => (shiftLeft_eq _ b).trans <| by
simp [pow_succ, Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_left_comm, Nat.mul_comm]
theorem one_shiftLeft (n : Nat) : 1 <<< n = 2 ^ n := by rw [shiftLeft_eq, Nat.one_mul]
attribute [simp] Nat.pow_zero
@@ -678,10 +858,6 @@ protected theorem pow_lt_pow_iff_right {a n m : Nat} (h : 1 < a) :
/-! ### log2 -/
@[simp]
theorem log2_zero : Nat.log2 0 = 0 := by
simp [Nat.log2]
theorem le_log2 (h : n 0) : k n.log2 2 ^ k n := by
match k with
| 0 => simp [show 1 n from Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h]
@@ -702,22 +878,42 @@ theorem log2_self_le (h : n ≠ 0) : 2 ^ n.log2 ≤ n := (le_log2 h).1 (Nat.le_r
theorem lt_log2_self : n < 2 ^ (n.log2 + 1) :=
match n with
| 0 => by simp
| 0 => Nat.zero_lt_two
| n+1 => (log2_lt n.succ_ne_zero).1 (Nat.le_refl _)
/-! ### dvd -/
protected theorem eq_mul_of_div_eq_right {a b c : Nat} (H1 : b a) (H2 : a / b = c) :
a = b * c := by
rw [ H2, Nat.mul_div_cancel' H1]
theorem dvd_sub {k m n : Nat} (H : n m) (h₁ : k m) (h₂ : k n) : k m - n :=
(Nat.dvd_add_iff_left h₂).2 <| by rwa [Nat.sub_add_cancel H]
protected theorem div_eq_iff_eq_mul_right {a b c : Nat} (H : 0 < b) (H' : b a) :
a / b = c a = b * c :=
Nat.eq_mul_of_div_eq_right H', Nat.div_eq_of_eq_mul_right H
protected theorem mul_dvd_mul {a b c d : Nat} : a b c d a * c b * d
| e, he, f, hf =>
e * f, by simp [he, hf, Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_left_comm, Nat.mul_comm]
protected theorem div_eq_iff_eq_mul_left {a b c : Nat} (H : 0 < b) (H' : b a) :
a / b = c a = c * b := by
rw [Nat.mul_comm]; exact Nat.div_eq_iff_eq_mul_right H H'
protected theorem mul_dvd_mul_left (a : Nat) (h : b c) : a * b a * c :=
Nat.mul_dvd_mul (Nat.dvd_refl a) h
protected theorem mul_dvd_mul_right (h: a b) (c : Nat) : a * c b * c :=
Nat.mul_dvd_mul h (Nat.dvd_refl c)
@[simp] theorem dvd_one {n : Nat} : n 1 n = 1 :=
eq_one_of_dvd_one, fun h => h.symm Nat.dvd_refl _
protected theorem mul_div_assoc (m : Nat) (H : k n) : m * n / k = m * (n / k) := by
match Nat.eq_zero_or_pos k with
| .inl h0 => rw [h0, Nat.div_zero, Nat.div_zero, Nat.mul_zero]
| .inr hpos =>
have h1 : m * n / k = m * (n / k * k) / k := by rw [Nat.div_mul_cancel H]
rw [h1, Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_div_cancel _ hpos]
protected theorem dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_left
(kpos : 0 < k) (H : k * m k * n) : m n := by
let l, H := H
rw [Nat.mul_assoc] at H
exact _, Nat.eq_of_mul_eq_mul_left kpos H
protected theorem dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_right (kpos : 0 < k) (H : m * k n * k) : m n := by
rw [Nat.mul_comm m k, Nat.mul_comm n k] at H; exact Nat.dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_left kpos H
theorem pow_dvd_pow_iff_pow_le_pow {k l : Nat} :
{x : Nat}, 0 < x (x ^ k x ^ l x ^ k x ^ l)
@@ -741,6 +937,18 @@ theorem pow_dvd_pow_iff_le_right {x k l : Nat} (w : 1 < x) : x ^ k x ^ l ↔
theorem pow_dvd_pow_iff_le_right' {b k l : Nat} : (b + 2) ^ k (b + 2) ^ l k l :=
pow_dvd_pow_iff_le_right (Nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ rfl)
protected theorem eq_mul_of_div_eq_right {a b c : Nat} (H1 : b a) (H2 : a / b = c) :
a = b * c := by
rw [ H2, Nat.mul_div_cancel' H1]
protected theorem div_eq_iff_eq_mul_right {a b c : Nat} (H : 0 < b) (H' : b a) :
a / b = c a = b * c :=
Nat.eq_mul_of_div_eq_right H', Nat.div_eq_of_eq_mul_right H
protected theorem div_eq_iff_eq_mul_left {a b c : Nat} (H : 0 < b) (H' : b a) :
a / b = c a = c * b := by
rw [Nat.mul_comm]; exact Nat.div_eq_iff_eq_mul_right H H'
protected theorem pow_dvd_pow {m n : Nat} (a : Nat) (h : m n) : a ^ m a ^ n := by
cases Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le h
case intro k p =>
@@ -775,6 +983,10 @@ theorem shiftLeft_succ : ∀(m n), m <<< (n + 1) = 2 * (m <<< n)
rw [shiftLeft_succ_inside _ (k+1)]
rw [shiftLeft_succ _ k, shiftLeft_succ_inside]
@[simp] theorem shiftRight_zero : n >>> 0 = n := rfl
theorem shiftRight_succ (m n) : m >>> (n + 1) = (m >>> n) / 2 := rfl
/-- Shiftright on successor with division moved inside. -/
theorem shiftRight_succ_inside : m n, m >>> (n+1) = (m/2) >>> n
| m, 0 => rfl
@@ -790,9 +1002,19 @@ theorem shiftRight_succ_inside : ∀m n, m >>> (n+1) = (m/2) >>> n
| 0 => by simp [shiftRight]
| n + 1 => by simp [shiftRight, zero_shiftRight n, shiftRight_succ]
theorem shiftRight_add (m n : Nat) : k, m >>> (n + k) = (m >>> n) >>> k
| 0 => rfl
| k + 1 => by simp [add_succ, shiftRight_add, shiftRight_succ]
theorem shiftLeft_shiftLeft (m n : Nat) : k, (m <<< n) <<< k = m <<< (n + k)
| 0 => rfl
| k + 1 => by simp [ Nat.add_assoc, shiftLeft_shiftLeft _ _ k, shiftLeft_succ]
| k + 1 => by simp [add_succ, shiftLeft_shiftLeft _ _ k, shiftLeft_succ]
theorem shiftRight_eq_div_pow (m : Nat) : n, m >>> n = m / 2 ^ n
| 0 => (Nat.div_one _).symm
| k + 1 => by
rw [shiftRight_add, shiftRight_eq_div_pow m k]
simp [Nat.div_div_eq_div_mul, Nat.pow_succ, shiftRight_succ]
theorem mul_add_div {m : Nat} (m_pos : m > 0) (x y : Nat) : (m * x + y) / m = x + y / m := by
match x with

View File

@@ -4,7 +4,10 @@ Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import Init.Coe
import Init.ByCases
import Init.Data.Nat.Basic
import Init.Data.List.Basic
import Init.Data.Prod
namespace Nat.Linear
@@ -580,7 +583,7 @@ attribute [-simp] Nat.right_distrib Nat.left_distrib
theorem PolyCnstr.denote_mul (ctx : Context) (k : Nat) (c : PolyCnstr) : (c.mul (k+1)).denote ctx = c.denote ctx := by
cases c; rename_i eq lhs rhs
have : k 0 k + 1 1 := by intro h; match k with | 0 => contradiction | k+1 => simp [Nat.succ.injEq]
have : k 0 k + 1 1 := by intro h; match k with | 0 => contradiction | k+1 => simp; apply Nat.succ_ne_zero
have : ¬ (k == 0) (k + 1 == 1) = false := fun h => beq_false_of_ne (this (ne_of_beq_false (Bool.of_not_eq_true h)))
have : ¬ ((k + 1 == 0) = true) := fun h => absurd (eq_of_beq h) (Nat.succ_ne_zero k)
have : (1 == (0 : Nat)) = false := rfl

View File

@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Gabriel Ebner
-/
prelude
import Init.NotationExtra
import Init.Data.Nat.Linear
namespace Nat

Some files were not shown because too many files have changed in this diff Show More