test: add regression test for Sym.simp eta-reduction (#13416)

This PR adds a direct regression test for issue #13416. It exercises
`Std.HashMap.getElem_insert`, whose `dom` argument is a lambda closing
over pattern variables, and checks that the discrimination tree lookup
finds the theorem once the target's `dom` lambda is eta-reduced.

Closes #13416

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

src/Init/Data/Nat/Basic.lean

@@ -59,9 +59,9 @@ Examples:
 * `Nat.repeat f 3 a = f <| f <| f <| a`
 * `Nat.repeat (· ++ "!") 4 "Hello" = "Hello!!!!"`
 -/
-@[specialize, expose] def repeat {α : Type u} (f : α → α) : (n : Nat) → (a : α) → α
+@[specialize, expose] def «repeat» {α : Type u} (f : α → α) : (n : Nat) → (a : α) → α
   | 0,      a => a
-  | succ n, a => f (repeat f n a)
+  | succ n, a => f («repeat» f n a)
 
 /--
 Applies a function to a starting value the specified number of times.
@@ -1221,9 +1221,9 @@ theorem not_lt_eq (a b : Nat) : (¬ (a < b)) = (b ≤ a) :=
 theorem not_gt_eq (a b : Nat) : (¬ (a > b)) = (a ≤ b) :=
   not_lt_eq b a
 
-@[csimp] theorem repeat_eq_repeatTR : @repeat = @repeatTR :=
+@[csimp] theorem repeat_eq_repeatTR : @«repeat» = @repeatTR :=
   funext fun α => funext fun f => funext fun n => funext fun init =>
-  let rec go : ∀ m n, repeatTR.loop f m (repeat f n init) = repeat f (m + n) init
+  let rec go : ∀ m n, repeatTR.loop f m («repeat» f n init) = «repeat» f (m + n) init
     | 0,      n => by simp [repeatTR.loop]
     | succ m, n => by rw [repeatTR.loop, succ_add]; exact go m (succ n)
   (go n 0).symm

src/Init/Data/Order/LemmasExtra.lean

@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ public theorem IsLinearOrder.of_ord {α : Type u} [LE α] [Ord α] [LawfulOrderO
 /--
 This lemma derives a `LawfulOrderLT α` instance from a property involving an `Ord α` instance.
 -/
-public instance LawfulOrderLT.of_ord (α : Type u) [Ord α] [LT α] [LE α] [LawfulOrderOrd α]
+public theorem LawfulOrderLT.of_ord (α : Type u) [Ord α] [LT α] [LE α] [LawfulOrderOrd α]
     (lt_iff_compare_eq_lt : ∀ a b : α, a < b ↔ compare a b = .lt) :
     LawfulOrderLT α where
   lt_iff a b := by
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ public instance LawfulOrderLT.of_ord (α : Type u) [Ord α] [LT α] [LE α] [Law
 /--
 This lemma derives a `LawfulOrderBEq α` instance from a property involving an `Ord α` instance.
 -/
-public instance LawfulOrderBEq.of_ord (α : Type u) [Ord α] [BEq α] [LE α] [LawfulOrderOrd α]
+public theorem LawfulOrderBEq.of_ord (α : Type u) [Ord α] [BEq α] [LE α] [LawfulOrderOrd α]
     (beq_iff_compare_eq_eq : ∀ a b : α, a == b ↔ compare a b = .eq) :
     LawfulOrderBEq α where
   beq_iff_le_and_ge := by
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ public instance LawfulOrderBEq.of_ord (α : Type u) [Ord α] [BEq α] [LE α] [L
 /--
 This lemma derives a `LawfulOrderInf α` instance from a property involving an `Ord α` instance.
 -/
-public instance LawfulOrderInf.of_ord (α : Type u) [Ord α] [Min α] [LE α] [LawfulOrderOrd α]
+public theorem LawfulOrderInf.of_ord (α : Type u) [Ord α] [Min α] [LE α] [LawfulOrderOrd α]
     (compare_min_isLE_iff : ∀ a b c : α,
         (compare a (min b c)).isLE ↔ (compare a b).isLE ∧ (compare a c).isLE) :
     LawfulOrderInf α where
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ public instance LawfulOrderInf.of_ord (α : Type u) [Ord α] [Min α] [LE α] [L
 /--
 This lemma derives a `LawfulOrderMin α` instance from a property involving an `Ord α` instance.
 -/
-public instance LawfulOrderMin.of_ord (α : Type u) [Ord α] [Min α] [LE α] [LawfulOrderOrd α]
+public theorem LawfulOrderMin.of_ord (α : Type u) [Ord α] [Min α] [LE α] [LawfulOrderOrd α]
     (compare_min_isLE_iff : ∀ a b c : α,
         (compare a (min b c)).isLE ↔ (compare a b).isLE ∧ (compare a c).isLE)
     (min_eq_or : ∀ a b : α, min a b = a ∨ min a b = b) :
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ public instance LawfulOrderMin.of_ord (α : Type u) [Ord α] [Min α] [LE α] [L
 /--
 This lemma derives a `LawfulOrderSup α` instance from a property involving an `Ord α` instance.
 -/
-public instance LawfulOrderSup.of_ord (α : Type u) [Ord α] [Max α] [LE α] [LawfulOrderOrd α]
+public theorem LawfulOrderSup.of_ord (α : Type u) [Ord α] [Max α] [LE α] [LawfulOrderOrd α]
     (compare_max_isLE_iff : ∀ a b c : α,
         (compare (max a b) c).isLE ↔ (compare a c).isLE ∧ (compare b c).isLE) :
     LawfulOrderSup α where
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ public instance LawfulOrderSup.of_ord (α : Type u) [Ord α] [Max α] [LE α] [L
 /--
 This lemma derives a `LawfulOrderMax α` instance from a property involving an `Ord α` instance.
 -/
-public instance LawfulOrderMax.of_ord (α : Type u) [Ord α] [Max α] [LE α] [LawfulOrderOrd α]
+public theorem LawfulOrderMax.of_ord (α : Type u) [Ord α] [Max α] [LE α] [LawfulOrderOrd α]
     (compare_max_isLE_iff : ∀ a b c : α,
         (compare (max a b) c).isLE ↔ (compare a c).isLE ∧ (compare b c).isLE)
     (max_eq_or : ∀ a b : α, max a b = a ∨ max a b = b) :

src/Init/While.lean

@@ -10,13 +10,14 @@ public import Init.Core
 
 public section
 
-/-!
-# Notation for `while` and `repeat` loops.
--/
-
 namespace Lean
 
-/-! # `repeat` and `while` notation -/
+/-!
+# `while` and `repeat` loop support
+
+The parsers for `repeat`, `while`, and `repeat ... until` are
+`@[builtin_doElem_parser]` definitions in `Lean.Parser.Do`.
+-/
 
 inductive Loop where
   | mk
@@ -32,23 +33,20 @@ partial def Loop.forIn {β : Type u} {m : Type u → Type v} [Monad m] (_ : Loop
 instance [Monad m] : ForIn m Loop Unit where
   forIn := Loop.forIn
 
-syntax "repeat " doSeq : doElem
+-- The canonical parsers for `repeat`/`while`/`repeat ... until` live in `Lean.Parser.Do`
+-- as `@[builtin_doElem_parser]` definitions. We register the expansion macros here so
+-- they are available to `prelude` files in `Init`, which do not import `Lean.Elab`.
 
 macro_rules
   | `(doElem| repeat%$tk $seq) => `(doElem| for%$tk _ in Loop.mk do $seq)
 
-syntax "while " ident " : " termBeforeDo " do " doSeq : doElem
-
 macro_rules
   | `(doElem| while%$tk $h : $cond do $seq) =>
     `(doElem| repeat%$tk if $h:ident : $cond then $seq else break)
 
-syntax "while " termBeforeDo " do " doSeq : doElem
-
 macro_rules
-  | `(doElem| while%$tk $cond do $seq) => `(doElem| repeat%$tk if $cond then $seq else break)
-
-syntax "repeat " doSeq ppDedent(ppLine) "until " term : doElem
+  | `(doElem| while%$tk $cond do $seq) =>
+    `(doElem| repeat%$tk if $cond then $seq else break)
 
 macro_rules
   | `(doElem| repeat%$tk $seq until $cond) =>

src/Lean/Compiler/LCNF/EmitC.lean

@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ def emitLns [EmitToString α] (as : List α) : EmitM Unit :=
   emitLn "}"
   return ret
 
-def toHexDigit (c : Nat) : String :=
+def toDigit (c : Nat) : String :=
   String.singleton c.digitChar
 
 def quoteString (s : String) : String :=
@@ -221,7 +221,11 @@ def quoteString (s : String) : String :=
       else if c == '\"' then "\\\""
       else if c == '?' then "\\?" -- avoid trigraphs
       else if c.toNat <= 31 then
-        "\\x" ++ toHexDigit (c.toNat / 16) ++ toHexDigit (c.toNat % 16)
+        -- Use octal escapes instead of hex escapes because C hex escapes are
+        -- greedy: "\x01abc" would be parsed as the single escape \x01abc rather
+        -- than \x01 followed by "abc".  Octal escapes consume at most 3 digits.
+        let n := c.toNat
+        "\\" ++ toDigit (n / 64) ++ toDigit ((n / 8) % 8) ++ toDigit (n % 8)
       -- TODO(Leo): we should use `\unnnn` for escaping unicode characters.
       else String.singleton c)
     q;

src/Lean/Elab/BuiltinDo.lean

@@ -15,3 +15,4 @@ public import Lean.Elab.BuiltinDo.Jump
 public import Lean.Elab.BuiltinDo.Misc
 public import Lean.Elab.BuiltinDo.For
 public import Lean.Elab.BuiltinDo.TryCatch
+public import Lean.Elab.BuiltinDo.Repeat

src/Lean/Elab/BuiltinDo/Repeat.lean

@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+/-
+Copyright (c) 2026 Lean FRO, LLC. All rights reserved.
+Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
+Authors: Sebastian Graf
+-/
+module
+
+prelude
+public import Lean.Elab.BuiltinDo.Basic
+meta import Lean.Parser.Do
+import Lean.Elab.BuiltinDo.For
+
+public section
+
+namespace Lean.Elab.Do
+
+open Lean.Parser.Term
+
+/--
+Builtin do-element elaborator for `repeat` (syntax kind `Lean.Parser.Term.doRepeat`).
+
+Expands to `for _ in Loop.mk do ...`. A follow-up change will extend this
+elaborator to choose between `Loop.mk` and a well-founded `Repeat.mk` based on a
+configuration option.
+-/
+@[builtin_doElem_elab Lean.Parser.Term.doRepeat] def elabDoRepeat : DoElab := fun stx dec => do
+  let `(doElem| repeat%$tk $seq) := stx | throwUnsupportedSyntax
+  let expanded ← `(doElem| for%$tk _ in Loop.mk do $seq)
+  Term.withMacroExpansion stx expanded <|
+    withRef expanded <| elabDoElem ⟨expanded⟩ dec
+
+@[builtin_macro Lean.Parser.Term.doWhileH] def expandDoWhileH : Macro
+  | `(doElem| while%$tk $h : $cond do $seq) => `(doElem| repeat%$tk if $h:ident : $cond then $seq else break)
+  | _ => Macro.throwUnsupported
+
+@[builtin_macro Lean.Parser.Term.doWhile] def expandDoWhile : Macro
+  | `(doElem| while%$tk $cond do $seq) => `(doElem| repeat%$tk if $cond then $seq else break)
+  | _ => Macro.throwUnsupported
+
+@[builtin_macro Lean.Parser.Term.doRepeatUntil] def expandDoRepeatUntil : Macro
+  | `(doElem| repeat%$tk $seq until $cond) => `(doElem| repeat%$tk do $seq:doSeq; if $cond then break)
+  | _ => Macro.throwUnsupported
+
+end Lean.Elab.Do

src/Lean/Elab/Do/InferControlInfo.lean

@@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ partial def ofElem (stx : TSyntax `doElem) : TermElabM ControlInfo := do
     return thenInfo.alternative info
   | `(doElem| unless $_ do $elseSeq) =>
     ControlInfo.alternative {} <$> ofSeq elseSeq
+  -- For/Repeat
   | `(doElem| for $[$[$_ :]? $_ in $_],* do $bodySeq) =>
     let info ← ofSeq bodySeq
     return { info with  -- keep only reassigns and earlyReturn
@@ -136,6 +137,13 @@ partial def ofElem (stx : TSyntax `doElem) : TermElabM ControlInfo := do
       continues := false,
       breaks := false
     }
+  | `(doRepeat| repeat $bodySeq) =>
+    let info ← ofSeq bodySeq
+    return { info with
+      numRegularExits := if info.breaks then 1 else 0,
+      continues := false,
+      breaks := false
+    }
   -- Try
   | `(doElem| try $trySeq:doSeq $[$catches]* $[finally $finSeq?]?) =>
     let mut info ← ofSeq trySeq

src/Lean/Elab/Do/Legacy.lean

@@ -1782,6 +1782,10 @@ mutual
             doIfToCode doElem doElems
           else if k == ``Parser.Term.doUnless then
             doUnlessToCode doElem doElems
+          else if k == ``Parser.Term.doRepeat then
+            let seq := doElem[1]
+            let expanded ← `(doElem| for _ in Loop.mk do $seq)
+            doSeqToCode (expanded :: doElems)
           else if k == ``Parser.Term.doFor then withFreshMacroScope do
             doForToCode doElem doElems
           else if k == ``Parser.Term.doMatch then

src/Lean/Meta/ACLt.lean

@@ -175,6 +175,7 @@ where
     return !(← allChildrenLt a b)
 
   lpo (a b : Expr) : MetaM Bool := do
+    checkSystem "Lean.Meta.acLt"
     -- Case 1: `a < b` if for some child `b_i` of `b`, we have `b_i >= a`
     if (← someChildGe b a) then
       return true

src/Lean/Meta/Instances.lean

@@ -229,8 +229,33 @@ private partial def computeSynthOrder (inst : Expr) (projInfo? : Option Projecti
 
   return synthed
 
+def checkImpossibleInstance (c : Expr) : MetaM Unit := do
+  let cTy ← inferType c
+  forallTelescopeReducing cTy fun args ty => do
+    let argTys ← args.mapM inferType
+    let impossibleArgs ← args.zipIdx.filterMapM fun (arg, i) => do
+      let fv := arg.fvarId!
+      if (← fv.getDecl).binderInfo.isInstImplicit then return none
+      if ty.containsFVar fv then return none
+      if argTys[i+1:].any (·.containsFVar fv) then return none
+      return some m!"{arg} : {← inferType arg}"
+    if impossibleArgs.isEmpty then return
+    let impossibleArgs := MessageData.joinSep impossibleArgs.toList ", "
+    throwError m!"Instance {c} has arguments "
+      ++ impossibleArgs
+      ++ " that are impossible to infer. Those arguments are not instance-implicit and do not appear in another instance-implicit argument or the return type."
+
+def checkNonClassInstance (declName : Name) (c : Expr) : MetaM Unit := do
+  let type ← inferType c
+  forallTelescopeReducing type fun _ target => do
+    unless (← isClass? target).isSome do
+      unless target.isSorry do
+      throwError m!"instance `{declName}` target `{target}` is not a type class."
+
 def addInstance (declName : Name) (attrKind : AttributeKind) (prio : Nat) : MetaM Unit := do
   let c ← mkConstWithLevelParams declName
+  checkImpossibleInstance c
+  checkNonClassInstance declName c
   let keys ← mkInstanceKey c
   let status ← getReducibilityStatus declName
   unless status matches .reducible | .implicitReducible do

src/Lean/Meta/Sym/Eta.lean

@@ -9,19 +9,37 @@ public import Lean.Meta.Sym.ExprPtr
 public import Lean.Meta.Basic
 import Lean.Meta.Transform
 namespace Lean.Meta.Sym
+
+/--
+Returns `true` if `e` contains a loose bound variable with index in `[0, n)`
+This function assumes `n` is small. If this becomes a bottleneck, we should
+implement a version of `lean_expr_has_loose_bvar` that checks the range in one traversal.
+-/
+def hasLooseBVarsInRange (e : Expr) (n : Nat) : Bool :=
+  e.hasLooseBVars && go n
+where
+  go : Nat → Bool
+  | 0 => false
+  | i+1 => e.hasLooseBVar i || go i
+
 /--
 Checks if `body` is eta-expanded with `n` applications: `f (.bvar (n-1)) ... (.bvar 0)`.
-Returns `f` if so and `f` has no loose bvars; otherwise returns `default`.
+Returns `f` if so and `f` has no loose bvars with indices in the range `[0, n)`; otherwise returns `default`.
 - `n`: number of remaining applications to check
 - `i`: expected bvar index (starts at 0, increments with each application)
 - `default`: returned when not eta-reducible (enables pointer equality check)
 -/
-def etaReduceAux (body : Expr) (n : Nat) (i : Nat) (default : Expr) : Expr := Id.run do
-  match n with
-  | 0 => if body.hasLooseBVars then default else body
-  | n+1 =>
-    let .app f (.bvar j) := body | default
-    if j == i then etaReduceAux f n (i+1) default else default
+def etaReduceAux (body : Expr) (n : Nat) (i : Nat) (default : Expr) : Expr :=
+  go body n i
+where
+  go (body : Expr) (m : Nat) (i : Nat) : Expr := Id.run do
+    match m with
+    | 0 =>
+      if hasLooseBVarsInRange body n then default
+      else body.lowerLooseBVars n n
+    | m+1 =>
+      let .app f (.bvar j) := body | default
+      if j == i then go f m (i+1) else default
 
 /--
 If `e` is of the form `(fun x₁ ... xₙ => f x₁ ... xₙ)` and `f` does not contain `x₁`, ..., `xₙ`,

src/Lean/Meta/Sym/Intro.lean

@@ -48,6 +48,8 @@ def introCore (mvarId : MVarId) (max : Nat) (names : Array Name) : SymM (Array F
     assignDelayedMVar auxMVar.mvarId! fvars mvarId'
     mvarId.assign val
   let finalize (lctx : LocalContext) (localInsts : LocalInstances) (fvars : Array Expr) (type : Expr) : SymM (Array Expr × MVarId) := do
+    if fvars.isEmpty then
+      return (#[], mvarId)
     let type ← instantiateRevS type fvars
     let mvar' ← mkFreshExprMVarAt lctx localInsts type .syntheticOpaque mvarDecl.userName
     let mvarId' := mvar'.mvarId!

src/Lean/Parser/Do.lean

@@ -273,6 +273,15 @@ with debug assertions enabled (see the `debugAssertions` option).
 @[builtin_doElem_parser] def doDebugAssert := leading_parser:leadPrec
   "debug_assert! " >> termParser
 
+@[builtin_doElem_parser] def doRepeat      := leading_parser
+  "repeat " >> doSeq
+@[builtin_doElem_parser] def doWhileH      := leading_parser
+  "while " >> ident >> " : " >> withForbidden "do" termParser >> " do " >> doSeq
+@[builtin_doElem_parser] def doWhile       := leading_parser
+  "while " >> withForbidden "do" termParser >> " do " >> doSeq
+@[builtin_doElem_parser] def doRepeatUntil := leading_parser
+  "repeat " >> doSeq >> ppDedent ppLine >> "until " >> termParser
+
 /-
 We use `notFollowedBy` to avoid counterintuitive behavior.
 

src/Std/Data/DHashMap/RawDecidableEquiv.lean

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ open Std.DHashMap.Internal
 
 namespace Std.DHashMap.Raw
 
-instance instDecidableEquiv {α : Type u} {β : α → Type v} [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] [Hashable α] [∀ k, BEq (β k)] [∀ k, LawfulBEq (β k)] {m₁ m₂ : Raw α β} (h₁ : m₁.WF) (h₂ : m₂.WF) : Decidable (m₁ ~m m₂) :=
+def instDecidableEquiv {α : Type u} {β : α → Type v} [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] [Hashable α] [∀ k, BEq (β k)] [∀ k, LawfulBEq (β k)] {m₁ m₂ : Raw α β} (h₁ : m₁.WF) (h₂ : m₂.WF) : Decidable (m₁ ~m m₂) :=
   Raw₀.decidableEquiv ⟨m₁, h₁.size_buckets_pos⟩ ⟨m₂, h₂.size_buckets_pos⟩ h₁ h₂
 
 end Std.DHashMap.Raw

src/Std/Data/DTreeMap/Raw/DecidableEquiv.lean

@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ open Std.DTreeMap.Internal.Impl
 
 namespace Std.DTreeMap.Raw
 
-instance instDecidableEquiv {α : Type u} {β : α → Type v} {cmp : α → α → Ordering} [TransCmp cmp] [LawfulEqCmp cmp] [∀ k, BEq (β k)] [∀ k, LawfulBEq (β k)] {t₁ t₂ : Raw α β cmp} (h₁ : t₁.WF) (h₂ : t₂.WF) : Decidable (t₁ ~m t₂) :=
+def instDecidableEquiv {α : Type u} {β : α → Type v} {cmp : α → α → Ordering} [TransCmp cmp] [LawfulEqCmp cmp] [∀ k, BEq (β k)] [∀ k, LawfulBEq (β k)] {t₁ t₂ : Raw α β cmp} (h₁ : t₁.WF) (h₂ : t₂.WF) : Decidable (t₁ ~m t₂) :=
   let : Ord α := ⟨cmp⟩;
   let : Decidable (t₁.inner ~m t₂.inner) := decidableEquiv t₁.1 t₂.1 h₁ h₂;
   decidable_of_iff _ ⟨fun h => ⟨h⟩, fun h => h.1⟩

src/Std/Data/HashMap/RawDecidableEquiv.lean

@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ open Std.DHashMap.Raw
 
 namespace Std.HashMap.Raw
 
-instance instDecidableEquiv {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] [Hashable α] [BEq β] [LawfulBEq β] {m₁ m₂ : Raw α β} (h₁ : m₁.WF) (h₂ : m₂.WF) : Decidable (m₁ ~m m₂) :=
+def instDecidableEquiv {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] [Hashable α] [BEq β] [LawfulBEq β] {m₁ m₂ : Raw α β} (h₁ : m₁.WF) (h₂ : m₂.WF) : Decidable (m₁ ~m m₂) :=
   let : Decidable (m₁.1 ~m m₂.1) := DHashMap.Raw.instDecidableEquiv h₁.out h₂.out;
   decidable_of_iff _ ⟨fun h => ⟨h⟩, fun h => h.1⟩
 

src/Std/Data/HashSet/RawDecidableEquiv.lean

@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ open Std.HashMap.Raw
 
 namespace Std.HashSet.Raw
 
-instance instDecidableEquiv {α : Type u} [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] [Hashable α] {m₁ m₂ : Raw α} (h₁ : m₁.WF) (h₂ : m₂.WF) : Decidable (m₁ ~m m₂) :=
+def instDecidableEquiv {α : Type u} [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] [Hashable α] {m₁ m₂ : Raw α} (h₁ : m₁.WF) (h₂ : m₂.WF) : Decidable (m₁ ~m m₂) :=
   let : Decidable (m₁.1 ~m m₂.1) := HashMap.Raw.instDecidableEquiv h₁.out h₂.out;
   decidable_of_iff _ ⟨fun h => ⟨h⟩, fun h => h.1⟩
 

src/Std/Data/TreeMap/Raw/DecidableEquiv.lean

@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ open Std.DTreeMap.Raw
 
 namespace Std.TreeMap.Raw
 
-instance instDecidableEquiv {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {cmp : α → α → Ordering} [TransCmp cmp] [LawfulEqCmp cmp] [BEq β] [LawfulBEq β] {t₁ t₂ : Raw α β cmp} (h₁ : t₁.WF) (h₂ : t₂.WF) : Decidable (t₁ ~m t₂) :=
+def instDecidableEquiv {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {cmp : α → α → Ordering} [TransCmp cmp] [LawfulEqCmp cmp] [BEq β] [LawfulBEq β] {t₁ t₂ : Raw α β cmp} (h₁ : t₁.WF) (h₂ : t₂.WF) : Decidable (t₁ ~m t₂) :=
   let : Ord α := ⟨cmp⟩;
   let : Decidable (t₁.inner ~m t₂.inner) := DTreeMap.Raw.instDecidableEquiv h₁ h₂;
   decidable_of_iff _ ⟨fun h => ⟨h⟩, fun h => h.1⟩

src/Std/Data/TreeSet/Raw/DecidableEquiv.lean

@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ open Std.TreeMap.Raw
 
 namespace Std.TreeSet.Raw
 
-instance instDecidableEquiv {α : Type u} {cmp : α → α → Ordering} [TransCmp cmp] [LawfulEqCmp cmp] {t₁ t₂ : Raw α cmp} (h₁ : t₁.WF) (h₂ : t₂.WF) : Decidable (t₁ ~m t₂) :=
+def instDecidableEquiv {α : Type u} {cmp : α → α → Ordering} [TransCmp cmp] [LawfulEqCmp cmp] {t₁ t₂ : Raw α cmp} (h₁ : t₁.WF) (h₂ : t₂.WF) : Decidable (t₁ ~m t₂) :=
   let : Ord α := ⟨cmp⟩;
   let : Decidable (t₁.inner ~m t₂.inner) := TreeMap.Raw.instDecidableEquiv h₁ h₂;
   decidable_of_iff _ ⟨fun h => ⟨h⟩, fun h => h.1⟩