spacing

.github/workflows/check-prelude.yml

@@ -1,26 +0,0 @@
-name: Check for modules that should use `prelude`
-
-on: [pull_request]
-
-jobs:
-  check-prelude:
-    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
-    steps:
-      - name: Checkout
-        uses: actions/checkout@v4
-        with:
-          # the default is to use a virtual merge commit between the PR and master: just use the PR
-          ref: ${{ github.event.pull_request.head.sha }}
-          sparse-checkout: src/Lean
-      - name: Check Prelude
-        run: |
-          failed_files=""
-          while IFS= read -r -d '' file; do
-            if ! grep -q "^prelude$" "$file"; then
-              failed_files="$failed_files$file\n"
-            fi
-          done < <(find src/Lean -name '*.lean' -print0)
-          if [ -n "$failed_files" ]; then
-            echo -e "The following files should use 'prelude':\n$failed_files"
-            exit 1
-          fi

.github/workflows/ci.yml

@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ jobs:
                 "os": "ubuntu-latest",
                 "release": false,
                 "quick": false,
-                "shell": "nix develop .#oldGlibc -c bash -euxo pipefail {0}",
+                "shell": "nix-shell --arg pkgsDist \"import (fetchTarball \\\"channel:nixos-19.03\\\") {{}}\" --run \"bash -euxo pipefail {0}\"",
                 "llvm-url": "https://github.com/leanprover/lean-llvm/releases/download/15.0.1/lean-llvm-x86_64-linux-gnu.tar.zst",
                 "prepare-llvm": "../script/prepare-llvm-linux.sh lean-llvm*",
                 "binary-check": "ldd -v",
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ jobs:
                 "os": "ubuntu-latest",
                 "release": true,
                 "quick": true,
-                "shell": "nix develop .#oldGlibc -c bash -euxo pipefail {0}",
+                "shell": "nix-shell --arg pkgsDist \"import (fetchTarball \\\"channel:nixos-19.03\\\") {{}}\" --run \"bash -euxo pipefail {0}\"",
                 "llvm-url": "https://github.com/leanprover/lean-llvm/releases/download/15.0.1/lean-llvm-x86_64-linux-gnu.tar.zst",
                 "prepare-llvm": "../script/prepare-llvm-linux.sh lean-llvm*",
                 "binary-check": "ldd -v",
@@ -98,8 +98,7 @@ jobs:
                 // exclude seriously slow tests
                 "CTEST_OPTIONS": "-E 'interactivetest|leanpkgtest|laketest|benchtest'"
               },
-              // TODO: suddenly started failing in CI
-              /*{
+              {
                 "name": "Linux fsanitize",
                 "os": "ubuntu-latest",
                 "quick": false,
@@ -107,7 +106,7 @@ jobs:
                 "CMAKE_OPTIONS": "-DLEAN_EXTRA_CXX_FLAGS=-fsanitize=address,undefined -DLEANC_EXTRA_FLAGS='-fsanitize=address,undefined -fsanitize-link-c++-runtime' -DSMALL_ALLOCATOR=OFF -DBSYMBOLIC=OFF",
                 // exclude seriously slow/problematic tests (laketests crash)
                 "CTEST_OPTIONS": "-E 'interactivetest|leanpkgtest|laketest|benchtest'"
-              },*/
+              },
               {
                 "name": "macOS",
                 "os": "macos-latest",
@@ -154,7 +153,7 @@ jobs:
                 "quick": false,
                 "cross": true,
                 "cross_target": "aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu",
-                "shell": "nix develop .#oldGlibcAArch -c bash -euxo pipefail {0}",
+                "shell": "nix-shell --arg pkgsDist \"import (fetchTarball \\\"channel:nixos-19.03\\\") {{ localSystem.config = \\\"aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu\\\"; }}\" --run \"bash -euxo pipefail {0}\"",
                 "llvm-url": "https://github.com/leanprover/lean-llvm/releases/download/15.0.1/lean-llvm-x86_64-linux-gnu.tar.zst https://github.com/leanprover/lean-llvm/releases/download/15.0.1/lean-llvm-aarch64-linux-gnu.tar.zst",
                 "prepare-llvm": "../script/prepare-llvm-linux.sh lean-llvm-aarch64-* lean-llvm-x86_64-*"
               },
@@ -252,7 +251,7 @@ jobs:
     runs-on: ${{ matrix.os }}
     defaults:
       run:
-        shell: ${{ matrix.shell || 'nix develop -c bash -euxo pipefail {0}' }}
+        shell: ${{ matrix.shell || 'nix-shell --run "bash -euxo pipefail {0}"' }}
     name: ${{ matrix.name }}
     env:
       # must be inside workspace
@@ -383,14 +382,8 @@ jobs:
           cd build/stage1
           ulimit -c unlimited # coredumps
           # exclude nonreproducible test
-          ctest -j4 --progress --output-junit test-results.xml --output-on-failure ${{ matrix.CTEST_OPTIONS }} < /dev/null
+          ctest -j4 --output-on-failure ${{ matrix.CTEST_OPTIONS }} < /dev/null
         if: (matrix.wasm || !matrix.cross) && needs.configure.outputs.quick == 'false'
-      - name: Test Summary
-        uses: test-summary/action@v2
-        with:
-          paths: build/stage1/test-results.xml
-        # prefix `if` above with `always` so it's run even if tests failed
-        if: always() && (matrix.wasm || !matrix.cross) && needs.configure.outputs.quick == 'false'
       - name: Check Test Binary
         run: ${{ matrix.binary-check }} tests/compiler/534.lean.out
         if: ${{ !matrix.cross && needs.configure.outputs.quick == 'false' }}
@@ -417,8 +410,7 @@ jobs:
         run: |
           cd build
           ulimit -c unlimited # coredumps
-          # clean rebuild in case of Makefile changes
-          make update-stage0 && rm -rf ./stage* && make -j4
+          make update-stage0 && make -j4
         if: matrix.name == 'Linux' && needs.configure.outputs.quick == 'false'
       - name: CCache stats
         run: ccache -s
@@ -452,10 +444,9 @@ jobs:
     name: Build matrix complete
     runs-on: ubuntu-latest
     needs: build
-    # mark as merely cancelled not failed if builds are cancelled
-    if: ${{ !cancelled() }}
+    if: ${{ always() }}
     steps:
-    - if: contains(needs.*.result, 'failure')
+    - if: contains(needs.*.result, 'failure') ||  contains(needs.*.result, 'cancelled')
       uses: actions/github-script@v7
       with:
         script: |

.github/workflows/nix-ci.yml

@@ -6,7 +6,6 @@ on:
     tags:
       - '*'
   pull_request:
-    types: [opened, synchronize, reopened, labeled]
   merge_group:
 
 concurrency:
@@ -77,13 +76,7 @@ jobs:
           nix build $NIX_BUILD_ARGS .#cacheRoots -o push-build
       - name: Test
         run: |
-          nix build --keep-failed $NIX_BUILD_ARGS .#test -o push-test || (ln -s /tmp/nix-build-*/source/src/build/ ./push-test; false)
-      - name: Test Summary
-        uses: test-summary/action@v2
-        with:
-          paths: push-test/test-results.xml
-        if: always()
-        continue-on-error: true
+          nix build $NIX_BUILD_ARGS .#test -o push-test
       - name: Build manual
         run: |
           nix build $NIX_BUILD_ARGS --update-input lean --no-write-lock-file ./doc#{lean-mdbook,leanInk,alectryon,test,inked} -o push-doc

.github/workflows/pr-release.yml

@@ -126,19 +126,21 @@ jobs:
           if [ "$NIGHTLY_SHA" = "$MERGE_BASE_SHA" ]; then
             echo "The merge base of this PR coincides with the nightly release"
 
-            STD_REMOTE_TAGS="$(git ls-remote https://github.com/leanprover/std4.git nightly-testing-"$MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY")"
             MATHLIB_REMOTE_TAGS="$(git ls-remote https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4.git nightly-testing-"$MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY")"
 
+            if [[ -n "$MATHLIB_REMOTE_TAGS" ]]; then
+              echo "... and Mathlib has a 'nightly-testing-$MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY' tag."
+              MESSAGE=""
+            else
+              echo "... but Mathlib does not yet have a 'nightly-testing-$MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY' tag."
+              MESSAGE="- ❗ Mathlib CI can not be attempted yet, as the \`nightly-testing-$MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY\` tag does not exist there yet. We will retry when you push more commits. If you rebase your branch onto \`nightly-with-mathlib\`, Mathlib CI should run now."
+            fi
+
+            STD_REMOTE_TAGS="$(git ls-remote https://github.com/leanprover/std4.git nightly-testing-"$MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY")"
+
             if [[ -n "$STD_REMOTE_TAGS" ]]; then
               echo "... and Std has a 'nightly-testing-$MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY' tag."
               MESSAGE=""
-
-              if [[ -n "$MATHLIB_REMOTE_TAGS" ]]; then
-                echo "... and Mathlib has a 'nightly-testing-$MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY' tag."    
-              else
-                echo "... but Mathlib does not yet have a 'nightly-testing-$MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY' tag."
-                MESSAGE="- ❗ Mathlib CI can not be attempted yet, as the \`nightly-testing-$MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY\` tag does not exist there yet. We will retry when you push more commits. If you rebase your branch onto \`nightly-with-mathlib\`, Mathlib CI should run now."
-              fi
             else
               echo "... but Std does not yet have a 'nightly-testing-$MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY' tag."
               MESSAGE="- ❗ Std CI can not be attempted yet, as the \`nightly-testing-$MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY\` tag does not exist there yet. We will retry when you push more commits. If you rebase your branch onto \`nightly-with-mathlib\`, Std CI should run now."
@@ -149,9 +151,7 @@ jobs:
             echo "but 'git merge-base origin/master HEAD' reported: $MERGE_BASE_SHA"
             git -C lean4.git log -10 origin/master
 
-            git -C lean4.git fetch origin nightly-with-mathlib 
-            NIGHTLY_WITH_MATHLIB_SHA="$(git -C lean4.git rev-parse "nightly-with-mathlib")"
-            MESSAGE="- ❗ Std/Mathlib CI will not be attempted unless your PR branches off the \`nightly-with-mathlib\` branch. Try \`git rebase $MERGE_BASE_SHA --onto $NIGHTLY_WITH_MATHLIB_SHA\`."
+            MESSAGE="- ❗ Std/Mathlib CI will not be attempted unless your PR branches off the \`nightly-with-mathlib\` branch. Try \`git rebase $MERGE_BASE_SHA --onto $NIGHTLY_SHA\`."
           fi
 
           if [[ -n "$MESSAGE" ]]; then

CMakeLists.txt

@@ -78,10 +78,6 @@ add_custom_target(update-stage0
   COMMAND $(MAKE) -C stage1 update-stage0
   DEPENDS stage1)
 
-add_custom_target(update-stage0-commit
-  COMMAND $(MAKE) -C stage1 update-stage0-commit
-  DEPENDS stage1)
-
 add_custom_target(test
   COMMAND $(MAKE) -C stage1 test
   DEPENDS stage1)

CODEOWNERS

@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@
 /src/Lean/Data/Lsp/ @mhuisi
 /src/Lean/Elab/Deriving/ @semorrison
 /src/Lean/Elab/Tactic/ @semorrison
-/src/Lean/Language/ @Kha
 /src/Lean/Meta/Tactic/ @leodemoura
 /src/Lean/Parser/ @Kha
 /src/Lean/PrettyPrinter/ @Kha

RELEASES.md

@@ -8,119 +8,9 @@ This file contains work-in-progress notes for the upcoming release, as well as p
 Please check the [releases](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/releases) page for the current status
 of each version.
 
-v4.8.0 (development in progress)
+v4.7.0 (development in progress)
 ---------
 
-* **Executables configured with `supportInterpreter := true` on Windows should now be run via `lake exe` to function properly.**
-
-  The way Lean is built on Windows has changed (see PR [#3601](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3601)). As a result, Lake now dynamically links executables with `supportInterpreter := true` on Windows to `libleanshared.dll` and `libInit_shared.dll`. Therefore, such executables will not run unless those shared libraries are co-located with the executables or part of `PATH`. Running the executable via `lake exe` will ensure these libraries are part of `PATH`.
-
-  In a related change, the signature of the `nativeFacets` Lake configuration options has changed from a static `Array` to a function `(shouldExport : Bool) → Array`. See its docstring or Lake's [README](src/lake/README.md) for further details on the changed option.
-
-* Lean now generates an error if the type of a theorem is **not** a proposition.
-
-* Importing two different files containing proofs of the same theorem is no longer considered an error. This feature is particularly useful for theorems that are automatically generated on demand (e.g., equational theorems).
-
-* Funcitonal induction principles.
-
-  Derived from the definition of a (possibly mutually) recursive function, a **functional induction principle** is created that is tailored to proofs about that function.
-
-  For example from:
-  ```
-  def ackermann : Nat → Nat → Nat
-    | 0, m => m + 1
-    | n+1, 0 => ackermann n 1
-    | n+1, m+1 => ackermann n (ackermann (n + 1) m)
-  ```
-  we get
-  ```
-  ackermann.induct (motive : Nat → Nat → Prop) (case1 : ∀ (m : Nat), motive 0 m)
-    (case2 : ∀ (n : Nat), motive n 1 → motive (Nat.succ n) 0)
-    (case3 : ∀ (n m : Nat), motive (n + 1) m → motive n (ackermann (n + 1) m) → motive (Nat.succ n) (Nat.succ m))
-    (x x : Nat) : motive x x
-  ```
-
-  It can be used in the `induction` tactic using the `using` syntax:
-  ```
-  induction n, m using ackermann.induct
-  ```
-
-* The termination checker now recognizes more recursion patterns without an
-  explicit `termination_by`. In particular the idiom of counting up to an upper
-  bound, as in
-  ```
-  def Array.sum (arr : Array Nat) (i acc : Nat) : Nat :=
-    if _ : i < arr.size then
-      Array.sum arr (i+1) (acc + arr[i])
-    else
-      acc
-  ```
-  is recognized without having to say `termination_by arr.size - i`.
-
-* Attribute `@[pp_using_anonymous_constructor]` to make structures pretty print like `⟨x, y, z⟩`
-  rather than `{a := x, b := y, c := z}`.
-  This attribute is applied to `Sigma`, `PSigma`, `PProd`, `Subtype`, `And`, and `Fin`.
-
-* Now structure instances pretty print with parent structures' fields inlined.
-  That is, if `B` extends `A`, then `{ toA := { x := 1 }, y := 2 }` now pretty prints as `{ x := 1, y := 2 }`.
-  Setting option `pp.structureInstances.flatten` to false turns this off.
-
-* Option `pp.structureProjections` is renamed to `pp.fieldNotation`, and there is now a suboption `pp.fieldNotation.generalized`
-  to enable pretty printing function applications using generalized field notation (defaults to true).
-  Field notation can be disabled on a function-by-function basis using the `@[pp_nodot]` attribute.
-
-* Added options `pp.mvars` (default: true) and `pp.mvars.withType` (default: false).
-  When `pp.mvars` is false, metavariables pretty print as `?_`,
-  and when `pp.mvars.withType` is true, metavariables pretty print with a type ascription.
-  These can be set when using `#guard_msgs` to make tests not rely on the unique ids assigned to anonymous metavariables.
-  [#3798](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3798).
-
-* Added `@[induction_eliminator]` and `@[cases_eliminator]` attributes to be able to define custom eliminators
-  for the `induction` and `cases` tactics, replacing the `@[eliminator]` attribute.
-  Gives custom eliminators for `Nat` so that `induction` and `cases` put goal states into terms of `0` and `n + 1`
-  rather than `Nat.zero` and `Nat.succ n`.
-  Added option `tactic.customEliminators` to control whether to use custom eliminators.
-  [#3629](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3629) and
-  [#3655](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3655).
-
-Breaking changes:
-
-* Automatically generated equational theorems are now named using suffix `.eq_<idx>` instead of `._eq_<idx>`, and `.def` instead of `._unfold`. Example:
-```
-def fact : Nat → Nat
-  | 0 => 1
-  | n+1 => (n+1) * fact n
-
-theorem ex : fact 0 = 1 := by unfold fact; decide
-
-#check fact.eq_1
--- fact.eq_1 : fact 0 = 1
-
-#check fact.eq_2
--- fact.eq_2 (n : Nat) : fact (Nat.succ n) = (n + 1) * fact n
-
-#check fact.def
-/-
-fact.def :
-  ∀ (x : Nat),
-    fact x =
-      match x with
-      | 0 => 1
-      | Nat.succ n => (n + 1) * fact n
--/
-```
-
-* The coercion from `String` to `Name` was removed. Previously, it was `Name.mkSimple`, which does not separate strings at dots, but experience showed that this is not always the desired coercion. For the previous behavior, manually insert a call to `Name.mkSimple`.
-
-v4.7.0
----------
-
-* `simp` and `rw` now use instance arguments found by unification,
-  rather than always resynthesizing. For backwards compatibility, the original behaviour is
-  available via `set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false`.
-  [#3507](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3507) and
-  [#3509](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3509).
-
 * When the `pp.proofs` is false, now omitted proofs use `⋯` rather than `_`,
   which gives a more helpful error message when copied from the Infoview.
   The `pp.proofs.threshold` option lets small proofs always be pretty printed.
@@ -128,10 +18,6 @@ v4.7.0
 
 * `pp.proofs.withType` is now set to false by default to reduce noise in the info view.
 
-* The pretty printer for applications now handles the case of over-application itself when applying app unexpanders.
-  In particular, the ``| `($_ $a $b $xs*) => `(($a + $b) $xs*)`` case of an `app_unexpander` is no longer necessary.
-  [#3495](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3495).
-
 * New `simp` (and `dsimp`) configuration option: `zetaDelta`. It is `false` by default.
   The `zeta` option is still `true` by default, but their meaning has changed.
   - When `zeta := true`, `simp` and `dsimp` reduce terms of the form
@@ -140,7 +26,7 @@ v4.7.0
     the context. For example, suppose the context contains `x := val`. Then,
     any occurrence of `x` is replaced with `val`.
 
-  See [issue #2682](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2682) for additional details. Here are some examples:
+  See issue [#2682](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2682) for additional details. Here are some examples:
   ```
   example (h : z = 9) : let x := 5; let y := 4; x + y = z := by
     intro x
@@ -181,7 +67,7 @@ v4.7.0
   ```
 
 * When adding new local theorems to `simp`, the system assumes that the function application arguments
-  have been annotated with `no_index`. This modification, which addresses [issue #2670](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2670),
+  have been annotated with `no_index`. This modification, which addresses issue [#2670](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2670),
   restores the Lean 3 behavior that users expect. With this modification, the following examples are now operational:
   ```
   example {α β : Type} {f : α × β → β → β} (h : ∀ p : α × β, f p p.2 = p.2)
@@ -195,180 +81,76 @@ v4.7.0
   In both cases, `h` is applicable because `simp` does not index f-arguments anymore when adding `h` to the `simp`-set.
   It's important to note, however, that global theorems continue to be indexed in the usual manner.
 
-* Improved the error messages produced by the `decide` tactic. [#3422](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3422)
-
-* Improved auto-completion performance. [#3460](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3460)
-
-* Improved initial language server startup performance. [#3552](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3552)
-
-* Changed call hierarchy to sort entries and strip private header from names displayed in the call hierarchy. [#3482](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3482)
-
-* There is now a low-level error recovery combinator in the parsing framework, primarily intended for DSLs. [#3413](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3413)
-
-* You can now write `termination_by?` after a declaration to see the automatically inferred
-  termination argument, and turn it into a `termination_by …` clause using the “Try this” widget or a code action. [#3514](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3514)
-
-* A large fraction of `Std` has been moved into the Lean repository.
-  This was motivated by:
-  1. Making universally useful tactics such as `ext`, `by_cases`, `change at`,
-    `norm_cast`, `rcases`, `simpa`, `simp?`, `omega`, and `exact?`
-    available to all users of Lean, without imports.
-  2. Minimizing the syntactic changes between plain Lean and Lean with `import Std`.
-  3. Simplifying the development process for the basic data types
-     `Nat`, `Int`, `Fin` (and variants such as `UInt64`), `List`, `Array`,
-     and `BitVec` as we begin making the APIs and simp normal forms for these types
-     more complete and consistent.
-  4. Laying the groundwork for the Std roadmap, as a library focused on
-     essential datatypes not provided by the core langauge (e.g. `RBMap`)
-     and utilities such as basic IO.
-  While we have achieved most of our initial aims in `v4.7.0-rc1`,
-  some upstreaming will continue over the coming months.
-
-* The `/` and `%` notations in `Int` now use `Int.ediv` and `Int.emod`
-  (i.e. the rounding conventions have changed).
-  Previously `Std` overrode these notations, so this is no change for users of `Std`.
-  There is now kernel support for these functions.
-  [#3376](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3376).
-
-* `omega`, our integer linear arithmetic tactic, is now availabe in the core langauge.
-  * It is supplemented by a preprocessing tactic `bv_omega` which can solve goals about `BitVec`
-    which naturally translate into linear arithmetic problems.
-    [#3435](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3435).
-  * `omega` now has support for `Fin` [#3427](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3427),
-    the `<<<` operator [#3433](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3433).
-  * During the port `omega` was modified to no longer identify atoms up to definitional equality
-    (so in particular it can no longer prove `id x ≤ x`). [#3525](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3525).
-    This may cause some regressions.
-    We plan to provide a general purpose preprocessing tactic later, or an `omega!` mode.
-  * `omega` is now invoked in Lean's automation for termination proofs
-    [#3503](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3503) as well as in
-    array indexing proofs [#3515](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3515).
-    This automation will be substantially revised in the medium term,
-    and while `omega` does help automate some proofs, we plan to make this much more robust.
-
-* The library search tactics `exact?` and `apply?` that were originally in
-  Mathlib are now available in Lean itself.  These use the implementation using
-  lazy discrimination trees from `Std`, and thus do not require a disk cache but
-  have a slightly longer startup time.  The order used for selection lemmas has
-  changed as well to favor goals purely based on how many terms in the head
-  pattern match the current goal.
-
-* The `solve_by_elim` tactic has been ported from `Std` to Lean so that library
-  search can use it.
-
-* New `#check_tactic` and `#check_simp` commands have been added.  These are
-  useful for checking tactics (particularly `simp`) behave as expected in test
-  suites.
-
-* Previously, app unexpanders would only be applied to entire applications. However, some notations produce
-  functions, and these functions can be given additional arguments. The solution so far has been to write app unexpanders so that they can take an arbitrary number of additional arguments. However this leads to misleading hover information in the Infoview. For example, while `HAdd.hAdd f g 1` pretty prints as `(f + g) 1`, hovering over `f + g` shows `f`. There is no way to fix the situation from within an app unexpander; the expression position for `HAdd.hAdd f g` is absent, and app unexpanders cannot register TermInfo.
-
-  This commit changes the app delaborator to try running app unexpanders on every prefix of an application, from longest to shortest prefix. For efficiency, it is careful to only try this when app delaborators do in fact exist for the head constant, and it also ensures arguments are only delaborated once. Then, in `(f + g) 1`, the `f + g` gets TermInfo registered for that subexpression, making it properly hoverable.
-
-  [#3375](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3375)
-
 Breaking changes:
 * `Lean.withTraceNode` and variants got a stronger `MonadAlwaysExcept` assumption to
   fix trace trees not being built on elaboration runtime exceptions. Instances for most elaboration
   monads built on `EIO Exception` should be synthesized automatically.
-* The `match ... with.` and `fun.` notations previously in Std have been replaced by
-  `nomatch ...` and `nofun`. [#3279](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3279) and [#3286](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3286)
-
-
-Other improvements:
-* several bug fixes for `simp`:
-  * we should not crash when `simp` loops [#3269](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3269)
-  * `simp` gets stuck on `autoParam` [#3315](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3315)
-  * `simp` fails when custom discharger makes no progress [#3317](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3317)
-  * `simp` fails to discharge `autoParam` premises even when it can reduce them to `True` [#3314](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3314)
-  * `simp?` suggests generated equations lemma names, fixes [#3547](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3547) [#3573](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3573)
-* fixes for `match` expressions:
-  * fix regression with builtin literals [#3521](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3521)
-  * accept `match` when patterns cover all cases of a `BitVec` finite type [#3538](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3538)
-  * fix matching `Int` literals [#3504](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3504)
-  * patterns containing int values and constructors [#3496](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3496)
-* improve `termination_by` error messages [#3255](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3255)
-* fix `rename_i` in macros, fixes [#3553](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3553) [#3581](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3581)
-* fix excessive resource usage in `generalize`, fixes [#3524](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3524) [#3575](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3575)
-* an equation lemma with autoParam arguments fails to rewrite, fixing [#2243](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2243) [#3316](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3316)
-* `add_decl_doc` should check that declarations are local [#3311](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3311)
-* instantiate the types of inductives with the right parameters, closing [#3242](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3242) [#3246](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3246)
-* New simprocs for many basic types. [#3407](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3407)
-
-Lake fixes:
-* Warn on fetch cloud release failure [#3401](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3401)
-* Cloud release trace & `lake build :release` errors [#3248](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3248)
-
-v4.6.1
----------
-* Backport of [#3552](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3552) fixing a performance regression
-  in server startup.
 
 v4.6.0
 ---------
 
 * Add custom simplification procedures (aka `simproc`s) to `simp`. Simprocs can be triggered by the simplifier on a specified term-pattern. Here is an small example:
-  ```lean
-  import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Simp.BuiltinSimprocs.Nat
+```lean
+import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Simp.BuiltinSimprocs.Nat
 
-  def foo (x : Nat) : Nat :=
-    x + 10
+def foo (x : Nat) : Nat :=
+  x + 10
 
-  /--
-  The `simproc` `reduceFoo` is invoked on terms that match the pattern `foo _`.
-  -/
-  simproc reduceFoo (foo _) :=
-    /- A term of type `Expr → SimpM Step -/
-    fun e => do
-      /-
-      The `Step` type has three constructors: `.done`, `.visit`, `.continue`.
-      * The constructor `.done` instructs `simp` that the result does
-        not need to be simplied further.
-      * The constructor `.visit` instructs `simp` to visit the resulting expression.
-      * The constructor `.continue` instructs `simp` to try other simplification procedures.
-
-      All three constructors take a `Result`. The `.continue` contructor may also take `none`.
-      `Result` has two fields `expr` (the new expression), and `proof?` (an optional proof).
-       If the new expression is definitionally equal to the input one, then `proof?` can be omitted or set to `none`.
-      -/
-      /- `simp` uses matching modulo reducibility. So, we ensure the term is a `foo`-application. -/
-      unless e.isAppOfArity ``foo 1 do
-        return .continue
-      /- `Nat.fromExpr?` tries to convert an expression into a `Nat` value -/
-      let some n ← Nat.fromExpr? e.appArg!
-        | return .continue
-      return .done { expr := Lean.mkNatLit (n+10) }
-  ```
-  We disable simprocs support by using the command `set_option simprocs false`. This command is particularly useful when porting files to v4.6.0.
-  Simprocs can be scoped, manually added to `simp` commands, and suppressed using `-`. They are also supported by `simp?`. `simp only` does not execute any `simproc`. Here are some examples for the `simproc` defined above.
-  ```lean
-  example : x + foo 2 = 12 + x := by
-    set_option simprocs false in
-      /- This `simp` command does not make progress since `simproc`s are disabled. -/
-      fail_if_success simp
-    simp_arith
-
-  example : x + foo 2 = 12 + x := by
-    /- `simp only` must not use the default simproc set. -/
-    fail_if_success simp only
-    simp_arith
-
-  example : x + foo 2 = 12 + x := by
+/--
+The `simproc` `reduceFoo` is invoked on terms that match the pattern `foo _`.
+-/
+simproc reduceFoo (foo _) :=
+  /- A term of type `Expr → SimpM Step -/
+  fun e => do
     /-
-    `simp only` does not use the default simproc set,
-    but we can provide simprocs as arguments. -/
-    simp only [reduceFoo]
-    simp_arith
+    The `Step` type has three constructors: `.done`, `.visit`, `.continue`.
+    * The constructor `.done` instructs `simp` that the result does
+      not need to be simplied further.
+    * The constructor `.visit` instructs `simp` to visit the resulting expression.
+    * The constructor `.continue` instructs `simp` to try other simplification procedures.
 
-  example : x + foo 2 = 12 + x := by
-    /- We can use `-` to disable `simproc`s. -/
-    fail_if_success simp [-reduceFoo]
-    simp_arith
-  ```
-  The command `register_simp_attr <id>` now creates a `simp` **and** a `simproc` set with the name `<id>`. The following command instructs Lean to insert the `reduceFoo` simplification procedure into the set `my_simp`. If no set is specified, Lean uses the default `simp` set.
-  ```lean
-  simproc [my_simp] reduceFoo (foo _) := ...
-  ```
+    All three constructors take a `Result`. The `.continue` contructor may also take `none`.
+    `Result` has two fields `expr` (the new expression), and `proof?` (an optional proof).
+     If the new expression is definitionally equal to the input one, then `proof?` can be omitted or set to `none`.
+    -/
+    /- `simp` uses matching modulo reducibility. So, we ensure the term is a `foo`-application. -/
+    unless e.isAppOfArity ``foo 1 do
+      return .continue
+    /- `Nat.fromExpr?` tries to convert an expression into a `Nat` value -/
+    let some n ← Nat.fromExpr? e.appArg!
+      | return .continue
+    return .done { expr := Lean.mkNatLit (n+10) }
+```
+We disable simprocs support by using the command `set_option simprocs false`. This command is particularly useful when porting files to v4.6.0.
+Simprocs can be scoped, manually added to `simp` commands, and suppressed using `-`. They are also supported by `simp?`. `simp only` does not execute any `simproc`. Here are some examples for the `simproc` defined above.
+```lean
+example : x + foo 2 = 12 + x := by
+  set_option simprocs false in
+    /- This `simp` command does not make progress since `simproc`s are disabled. -/
+    fail_if_success simp
+  simp_arith
+
+example : x + foo 2 = 12 + x := by
+  /- `simp only` must not use the default simproc set. -/
+  fail_if_success simp only
+  simp_arith
+
+example : x + foo 2 = 12 + x := by
+  /-
+  `simp only` does not use the default simproc set,
+  but we can provide simprocs as arguments. -/
+  simp only [reduceFoo]
+  simp_arith
+
+example : x + foo 2 = 12 + x := by
+  /- We can use `-` to disable `simproc`s. -/
+  fail_if_success simp [-reduceFoo]
+  simp_arith
+```
+The command `register_simp_attr <id>` now creates a `simp` **and** a `simproc` set with the name `<id>`. The following command instructs Lean to insert the `reduceFoo` simplification procedure into the set `my_simp`. If no set is specified, Lean uses the default `simp` set.
+```lean
+simproc [my_simp] reduceFoo (foo _) := ...
+```
 
 * The syntax of the `termination_by` and `decreasing_by` termination hints is overhauled:
 
@@ -507,7 +289,7 @@ v4.6.0
   and hence greatly reduces the reliance on costly structure eta reduction. This has a large impact on mathlib,
   reducing total CPU instructions by 3% and enabling impactful refactors like leanprover-community/mathlib4#8386
   which reduces the build time by almost 20%.
-  See [PR #2478](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2478) and [RFC #2451](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2451).
+  See PR [#2478](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2478) and RFC [#2451](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2451).
 
 * Add pretty printer settings to omit deeply nested terms (`pp.deepTerms false` and `pp.deepTerms.threshold`) ([PR #3201](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3201))
 
@@ -526,7 +308,7 @@ Other improvements:
 * produce simpler proof terms in `rw` [#3121](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3121)
 * fuse nested `mkCongrArg` calls in proofs generated by `simp` [#3203](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3203)
 * `induction using` followed by a general term [#3188](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3188)
-* allow generalization in `let` [#3060](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3060), fixing [#3065](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/3065)
+* allow generalization in `let` [#3060](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3060, fixing [#3065](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/3065)
 * reducing out-of-bounds `swap!` should return `a`, not `default`` [#3197](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3197), fixing [#3196](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/3196)
 * derive `BEq` on structure with `Prop`-fields [#3191](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3191), fixing [#3140](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/3140)
 * refine through more `casesOnApp`/`matcherApp` [#3176](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3176), fixing [#3175](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3175)

default.nix

@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+# used for `nix-shell https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/archive/master.tar.gz -A nix`
+{ nix = (import ./shell.nix {}).nix; } //
+(import (
+  fetchTarball {
+    url = "https://github.com/edolstra/flake-compat/archive/c75e76f80c57784a6734356315b306140646ee84.tar.gz";
+    sha256 = "071aal00zp2m9knnhddgr2wqzlx6i6qa1263lv1y7bdn2w20h10h"; }
+) {
+  src =  ./.;
+}).defaultNix

doc/SUMMARY.md

@@ -89,6 +89,5 @@
 - [Testing](./dev/testing.md)
 - [Debugging](./dev/debugging.md)
 - [Commit Convention](./dev/commit_convention.md)
-- [Release checklist](./dev/release_checklist.md)
 - [Building This Manual](./dev/mdbook.md)
 - [Foreign Function Interface](./dev/ffi.md)

doc/dev/bootstrap.md

@@ -81,8 +81,20 @@ or using Github CLI with
 gh workflow run update-stage0.yml
 ```
 
-Leaving stage0 updates to the CI automation is preferable, but should you need to do it locally, you can use `make update-stage0-commit` in `build/release` to update `stage0` from `stage1` or `make -C stageN update-stage0-commit` to update from another stage.
-This command will automatically stage the updated files and introduce a commit, so make sure to commit your work before that. Then coordinate with the admins to not squash your PR so that stage 0 updates are preserved as separate commits.
+Leaving stage0 updates to the CI automation is preferrable, but should you need
+to do it locally, you can use `make update-stage0` in `build/release`, to
+update `stage0` from `stage1`, `make -C stageN update-stage0` to update from
+another stage, or `nix run .#update-stage0-commit` to update using nix.
+
+Updates to `stage0` should be their own commits in the Git history. So should
+you have to include the stage0 update in your PR (rather than using above
+automation after merging changes), commit your work before running `make
+update-stage0`, commit the updated `stage0` compiler code with the commit
+message:
+```
+chore: update stage0
+```
+and coordinate with the admins to not squash your PR.
 
 ## Further Bootstrapping Complications
 

doc/dev/ffi.md

@@ -111,15 +111,6 @@ if (lean_io_result_is_ok(res)) {
 lean_io_mark_end_initialization();
 ```
 
-In addition, any other thread not spawned by the Lean runtime itself must be initialized for Lean use by calling
-```c
-void lean_initialize_thread();
-```
-and should be finalized in order to free all thread-local resources by calling
-```c
-void lean_finalize_thread();
-```
-
 ## `@[extern]` in the Interpreter
 
 The interpreter can run Lean declarations for which symbols are available in loaded shared libraries, which includes `@[extern]` declarations.

doc/dev/release_checklist.md

@@ -1,201 +0,0 @@
-# Releasing a stable version
-
-This checklist walks you through releasing a stable version.
-See below for the checklist for release candidates.
-
-We'll use `v4.6.0` as the intended release version as a running example.
-
-- One week before the planned release, ensure that someone has written the first draft of the release blog post
-- `git checkout releases/v4.6.0`
-  (This branch should already exist, from the release candidates.)
-- `git pull`
-- In `src/CMakeLists.txt`, verify you see
-  - `set(LEAN_VERSION_MINOR 6)` (for whichever `6` is appropriate)
-  - `set(LEAN_VERSION_IS_RELEASE 1)`
-  - (both of these should already be in place from the release candidates)
-- It is possible that the `v4.6.0` section of `RELEASES.md` is out of sync between
-  `releases/v4.6.0` and `master`. This should be reconciled:
-  - Run `git diff master RELEASES.md`.
-  - You should expect to see additons on `master` in the `v4.7.0-rc1` section; ignore these.
-    (i.e. the new release notes for the upcoming release candidate).
-  - Reconcile discrepancies in the `v4.6.0` section,
-    usually via copy and paste and a commit to `releases/v4.6.0`.
-- `git tag v4.6.0`
-- `git push origin v4.6.0`
-- Now wait, while CI runs.
-  - You can monitor this at `https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/actions/workflows/ci.yml`,
-    looking for the `v4.6.0` tag.
-  - This step can take up to an hour.
-  - If you are intending to cut the next release candidate on the same day,
-    you may want to start on the release candidate checklist now.
-- Go to https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/releases and verify that the `v4.6.0` release appears.
-  - Edit the release notes on Github to select the "Set as the latest release".
-  - Copy and paste the Github release notes from the previous releases candidate for this version
-    (e.g. `v4.6.0-rc1`), and quickly sanity check.
-- Next, we will move a curated list of downstream repos to the latest stable release.
-  - For each of the repositories listed below:
-    - Make a PR to `master`/`main` changing the toolchain to `v4.6.0`.
-      The PR title should be "chore: bump toolchain to v4.6.0".
-      Since the `v4.6.0` release should be functionally identical to the last release candidate,
-      which the repository should already be on, this PR is a no-op besides changing the toolchain.
-    - Once this is merged, create the tag `v4.6.0` from `master`/`main` and push it.
-    - Merge the tag `v4.6.0` into the stable branch.
-  - We do this for the repositories:
-    - [lean4checker](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4checker)
-      - `lean4checker` uses a different version tagging scheme: use `toolchain/v4.6.0` rather than `v4.6.0`.
-    - [Std](https://github.com/leanprover-community/repl)
-    - [ProofWidgets4](https://github.com/leanprover-community/ProofWidgets4)
-      - `ProofWidgets` uses a sequential version tagging scheme, e.g. `v0.0.29`,
-        which does not refer to the toolchain being used.
-      - Make a new release in this sequence after merging the toolchain bump PR.
-      - `ProofWidgets` does not maintain a `stable` branch.
-    - [Aesop](https://github.com/leanprover-community/aesop)
-    - [Mathlib](https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4)
-      - In addition to updating the `lean-toolchain` and `lakefile.lean`,
-        in `.github/workflows/build.yml.in` in the `lean4checker` section update the line
-        `git checkout toolchain/v4.6.0` to the appropriate tag,
-        and then run `.github/workflows/mk_build_yml.sh`.
-    - [REPL](https://github.com/leanprover-community/repl)
-      - Note that there are two copies of `lean-toolchain`/`lakefile.lean`:
-        in the root, and in `test/Mathlib/`.
-  - Note that there are dependencies between these packages:
-    you should update the lakefile so that you are using the `v4.6.0` tag of upstream repositories
-    (or the sequential tag for `ProofWidgets4`), and run `lake update` before committing.
-  - This means that this process is sequential; each repository must have its bump PR merged,
-    and the new tag pushed, before you can make the PR for the downstream repositories.
-    - `lean4checker` has no dependencies
-    - `Std` has no dependencies
-    - `Aesop` depends on `Std`
-    - `ProofWidgets4` depends on `Std`
-    - `Mathlib` depends on `Aesop`, `ProofWidgets4`, and `lean4checker` (and transitively on `Std`)
-    - `REPL` depends on `Mathlib` (this dependency is only for testing).
-- Merge the release announcement PR for the Lean website - it will be deployed automatically
-- Finally, make an announcement!
-  This should go in https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113486-announce, with topic `v4.6.0`.
-  Please see previous announcements for suggested language.
-  You will want a few bullet points for main topics from the release notes.
-  Link to the blog post from the Zulip announcement.
-  Please also make sure that whoever is handling social media knows the release is out.
-
-## Optimistic(?) time estimates:
-- Initial checks and push the tag: 30 minutes.
-- Note that if `RELEASES.md` has discrepancies this could take longer!
-- Waiting for the release: 60 minutes.
-- Fixing release notes: 10 minutes.
-- Bumping toolchains in downstream repositories, up to creating the Mathlib PR: 30 minutes.
-- Waiting for Mathlib CI and bors: 120 minutes.
-- Finalizing Mathlib tags and stable branch, and updating REPL: 15 minutes.
-- Posting announcement and/or blog post: 20 minutes.
-
-# Creating a release candidate.
-
-This checklist walks you through creating the first release candidate for a version of Lean.
-
-We'll use `v4.7.0-rc1` as the intended release version in this example.
-
-- Decide which nightly release you want to turn into a release candidate.
-  We will use `nightly-2024-02-29` in this example.
-- It is essential that Std and Mathlib already have reviewed branches compatible with this nightly.
-  - Check that both Std and Mathlib's `bump/v4.7.0` branch contain `nightly-2024-02-29`
-    in their `lean-toolchain`.
-  - The steps required to reach that state are beyond the scope of this checklist, but see below!
-- Create the release branch from this nightly tag:
-    ```
-    git remote add nightly https://github.com/leanprover/lean4-nightly.git
-    git fetch nightly tag nightly-2024-02-29
-    git checkout nightly-2024-02-29
-    git checkout -b releases/v4.7.0
-    ```
-- In `RELEASES.md` remove `(development in progress)` from the `v4.7.0` section header.
-- Our current goal is to have written release notes only about major language features or breaking changes,
-  and to rely on automatically generated release notes for bugfixes and minor changes.
-  - Do not wait on `RELEASES.md` being perfect before creating the `release/v4.7.0` branch. It is essential to choose the nightly which will become the release candidate as early as possible, to avoid confusion.
-  - If there are major changes not reflected in `RELEASES.md` already, you may need to solicit help from the authors.
-  - Minor changes and bug fixes do not need to be documented in `RELEASES.md`: they will be added automatically on the Github release page.
-  - Commit your changes to `RELEASES.md`, and push.
-  - Remember that changes to `RELEASES.md` after you have branched `releases/v4.7.0` should also be cherry-picked back to `master`.
-- In `src/CMakeLists.txt`,
-  - verify that you see `set(LEAN_VERSION_MINOR 7)` (for whichever `7` is appropriate); this should already have been updated when the development cycle began.
-  - `set(LEAN_VERSION_IS_RELEASE 1)` (this should be a change; on `master` and nightly releases it is always `0`).
-  - Commit your changes to `src/CMakeLists.txt`, and push.
-- `git tag v4.7.0-rc1`
-- `git push origin v4.7.0-rc1`
-- Now wait, while CI runs.
-  - You can monitor this at `https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/actions/workflows/ci.yml`, looking for the `v4.7.0-rc1` tag.
-  - This step can take up to an hour.
-- Once the release appears at https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/releases/
-  - Edit the release notes on Github to select the "Set as a pre-release box".
-  - Copy the section of `RELEASES.md` for this version into the Github release notes.
-  - Use the title "Changes since v4.6.0 (from RELEASES.md)"
-  - Then in the "previous tag" dropdown, select `v4.6.0`, and click "Generate release notes".
-  - This will add a list of all the commits since the last stable version.
-    - Delete anything already mentioned in the hand-written release notes above.
-    - Delete "update stage0" commits, and anything with a completely inscrutable commit message.
-    - Briefly rearrange the remaining items by category (e.g. `simp`, `lake`, `bug fixes`),
-      but for minor items don't put any work in expanding on commit messages.
-  - (How we want to release notes to look is evolving: please update this section if it looks wrong!)
-- Next, we will move a curated list of downstream repos to the release candidate.
-  - This assumes that there is already a *reviewed* branch `bump/v4.7.0` on each repository
-    containing the required adaptations (or no adaptations are required).
-    The preparation of this branch is beyond the scope of this document.
-  - For each of the target repositories:
-    - Checkout the `bump/v4.7.0` branch.
-    - Verify that the `lean-toolchain` is set to the nightly from which the release candidate was created.
-    - `git merge origin/master`
-    - Change the `lean-toolchain` to `leanprover/lean4:v4.7.0-rc1`
-    - In `lakefile.lean`, change any dependencies which were using `nightly-testing` or `bump/v4.7.0` branches
-      back to `master` or `main`, and run `lake update` for those dependencies.
-    - Run `lake build` to ensure that dependencies are found (but it's okay to stop it after a moment).
-    - `git commit`
-    - `git push`
-    - Open a PR from `bump/v4.7.0` to `master`, and either merge it yourself after CI, if appropriate,
-      or notify the maintainers that it is ready to go.
-    - Once this PR has been merged, tag `master` with `v4.7.0-rc1` and push this tag.
-  - We do this for the same list of repositories as for stable releases, see above.
-    As above, there are dependencies between these, and so the process above is iterative.
-    It greatly helps if you can merge the `bump/v4.7.0` PRs yourself!
-  - For Std/Aesop/Mathlib, which maintain a `nightly-testing` branch, make sure there is a tag
-    `nightly-testing-2024-02-29` with date corresponding to the nightly used for the release
-    (create it if not), and then on the `nightly-testing` branch `git reset --hard master`, and force push.
-- Make an announcement!
-  This should go in https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113486-announce, with topic `v4.7.0-rc1`.
-  Please see previous announcements for suggested language.
-  You will want a few bullet points for main topics from the release notes.
-  Please also make sure that whoever is handling social media knows the release is out.
-- Begin the next development cycle (i.e. for `v4.8.0`) on the Lean repository, by making a PR that:
-  - Updates `src/CMakeLists.txt` to say `set(LEAN_VERSION_MINOR 8)`
-  - Removes `(in development)` from the section heading in `RELEASES.md` for `v4.7.0`,
-    and creates a new `v4.8.0 (in development)` section heading.
-
-## Time estimates:
-Slightly longer than the corresponding steps for a stable release.
-Similar process, but more things go wrong.
-In particular, updating the downstream repositories is significantly more work
-(because we need to merge existing `bump/v4.7.0` branches, not just update a toolchain).
-
-# Preparing `bump/v4.7.0` branches
-
-While not part of the release process per se,
-this is a brief summary of the work that goes into updating Std/Aesop/Mathlib to new versions.
-
-Please read https://leanprover-community.github.io/contribute/tags_and_branches.html
-
-* Each repo has an unreviewed `nightly-testing` branch that
-  receives commits automatically from `master`, and
-  has its toolchain updated automatically for every nightly.
-  (Note: the aesop branch is not automated, and is updated on an as needed basis.)
-  As a consequence this branch is often broken.
-  A bot posts in the (private!) "Mathlib reviewers" stream on Zulip about the status of these branches.
-* We fix the breakages by committing directly to `nightly-testing`: there is no PR process.
-  * This can either be done by the person managing this process directly,
-    or by soliciting assistance from authors of files, or generally helpful people on Zulip!
-* Each repo has a `bump/v4.7.0` which accumulates reviewed changes adapting to new versions.
-* Once `nightly-testing` is working on a given nightly, say `nightly-2024-02-15`, we:
-  * Make sure `bump/v4.7.0` is up to date with `master` (by merging `master`, no PR necessary)
-  * Create from `bump/v4.7.0` a `bump/nightly-2024-02-15` branch.
-  * In that branch, `git merge --squash nightly-testing` to bring across changes from `nightly-testing`.
-  * Sanity check changes, commit, and make a PR to `bump/v4.7.0` from the `bump/nightly-2024-02-15` branch.
-  * Solicit review, merge the PR into `bump/v4,7,0`.
-* It is always okay to merge in the following directions:
-  `master` -> `bump/v4.7.0` -> `bump/nightly-2024-02-15` -> `nightly-testing`.
-  Please remember to push any merges you make to intermediate steps!

doc/examples/bintree.lean

@@ -277,13 +277,14 @@ theorem BinTree.find_insert (b : BinTree β) (k : Nat) (v : β)
     . by_cases' key < k
       cases h; apply ihr; assumption
 
-theorem BinTree.find_insert_of_ne (b : BinTree β) (ne : k ≠ k') (v : β)
+theorem BinTree.find_insert_of_ne (b : BinTree β) (h : k ≠ k') (v : β)
         : (b.insert k v).find? k' = b.find? k' := by
   let ⟨t, h⟩ := b; simp
   induction t with simp
   | leaf =>
-    intros le
-    exact Nat.lt_of_le_of_ne le ne
+    intros
+    have_eq k k'
+    contradiction
   | node left key value right ihl ihr =>
     let .node hl hr bl br := h
     specialize ihl bl

doc/flake.nix

@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
         src = inputs.mdBook;
         cargoDeps = drv.cargoDeps.overrideAttrs (_: {
           inherit src;
-          outputHash = "sha256-CO3A9Kpp4sIvkT9X3p+GTidazk7Fn4jf0AP2PINN44A=";
+          outputHash = "sha256-1YlPS6cqgxE4fjy9G8pWrpP27YrrbCDnfeyIsX81ZNw=";
         });
         doCheck = false;
       });

doc/make/index.md

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Platform-Specific Setup
 - [Windows (msys2)](msys2.md)
 - [Windows (WSL)](wsl.md)
 - [macOS (homebrew)](osx-10.9.md)
-- Linux/macOS/WSL via [Nix](https://nixos.org/nix/): Call `nix develop` in the project root. That's it.
+- Linux/macOS/WSL via [Nix](https://nixos.org/nix/): Call `nix-shell` in the project root. That's it.
 
 Generic Build Instructions
 --------------------------

flake.lock

@@ -1,31 +1,12 @@
 {
   "nodes": {
-    "flake-compat": {
-      "flake": false,
-      "locked": {
-        "lastModified": 1673956053,
-        "narHash": "sha256-4gtG9iQuiKITOjNQQeQIpoIB6b16fm+504Ch3sNKLd8=",
-        "owner": "edolstra",
-        "repo": "flake-compat",
-        "rev": "35bb57c0c8d8b62bbfd284272c928ceb64ddbde9",
-        "type": "github"
-      },
-      "original": {
-        "owner": "edolstra",
-        "repo": "flake-compat",
-        "type": "github"
-      }
-    },
     "flake-utils": {
-      "inputs": {
-        "systems": "systems"
-      },
       "locked": {
-        "lastModified": 1710146030,
-        "narHash": "sha256-SZ5L6eA7HJ/nmkzGG7/ISclqe6oZdOZTNoesiInkXPQ=",
+        "lastModified": 1656928814,
+        "narHash": "sha256-RIFfgBuKz6Hp89yRr7+NR5tzIAbn52h8vT6vXkYjZoM=",
         "owner": "numtide",
         "repo": "flake-utils",
-        "rev": "b1d9ab70662946ef0850d488da1c9019f3a9752a",
+        "rev": "7e2a3b3dfd9af950a856d66b0a7d01e3c18aa249",
         "type": "github"
       },
       "original": {
@@ -37,11 +18,11 @@
     "lean4-mode": {
       "flake": false,
       "locked": {
-        "lastModified": 1709737301,
-        "narHash": "sha256-uT9JN2kLNKJK9c/S/WxLjiHmwijq49EgLb+gJUSDpz0=",
+        "lastModified": 1676498134,
+        "narHash": "sha256-u3WvyKxOViZG53hkb8wd2/Og6muTecbh+NdflIgVeyk=",
         "owner": "leanprover",
         "repo": "lean4-mode",
-        "rev": "f1f24c15134dee3754b82c9d9924866fe6bc6b9f",
+        "rev": "2c6ef33f476fdf5eb5e4fa4fa023ba8b11372440",
         "type": "github"
       },
       "original": {
@@ -50,35 +31,34 @@
         "type": "github"
       }
     },
-    "libgit2": {
+    "lowdown-src": {
       "flake": false,
       "locked": {
-        "lastModified": 1697646580,
-        "narHash": "sha256-oX4Z3S9WtJlwvj0uH9HlYcWv+x1hqp8mhXl7HsLu2f0=",
-        "owner": "libgit2",
-        "repo": "libgit2",
-        "rev": "45fd9ed7ae1a9b74b957ef4f337bc3c8b3df01b5",
+        "lastModified": 1633514407,
+        "narHash": "sha256-Dw32tiMjdK9t3ETl5fzGrutQTzh2rufgZV4A/BbxuD4=",
+        "owner": "kristapsdz",
+        "repo": "lowdown",
+        "rev": "d2c2b44ff6c27b936ec27358a2653caaef8f73b8",
         "type": "github"
       },
       "original": {
-        "owner": "libgit2",
-        "repo": "libgit2",
+        "owner": "kristapsdz",
+        "repo": "lowdown",
         "type": "github"
       }
     },
     "nix": {
       "inputs": {
-        "flake-compat": "flake-compat",
-        "libgit2": "libgit2",
+        "lowdown-src": "lowdown-src",
         "nixpkgs": "nixpkgs",
         "nixpkgs-regression": "nixpkgs-regression"
       },
       "locked": {
-        "lastModified": 1711102798,
-        "narHash": "sha256-CXOIJr8byjolqG7eqCLa+Wfi7rah62VmLoqSXENaZnw=",
+        "lastModified": 1657097207,
+        "narHash": "sha256-SmeGmjWM3fEed3kQjqIAO8VpGmkC2sL1aPE7kKpK650=",
         "owner": "NixOS",
         "repo": "nix",
-        "rev": "a22328066416650471c3545b0b138669ea212ab4",
+        "rev": "f6316b49a0c37172bca87ede6ea8144d7d89832f",
         "type": "github"
       },
       "original": {
@@ -89,33 +69,16 @@
     },
     "nixpkgs": {
       "locked": {
-        "lastModified": 1709083642,
-        "narHash": "sha256-7kkJQd4rZ+vFrzWu8sTRtta5D1kBG0LSRYAfhtmMlSo=",
+        "lastModified": 1653988320,
+        "narHash": "sha256-ZaqFFsSDipZ6KVqriwM34T739+KLYJvNmCWzErjAg7c=",
         "owner": "NixOS",
         "repo": "nixpkgs",
-        "rev": "b550fe4b4776908ac2a861124307045f8e717c8e",
+        "rev": "2fa57ed190fd6c7c746319444f34b5917666e5c1",
         "type": "github"
       },
       "original": {
         "owner": "NixOS",
-        "ref": "release-23.11",
-        "repo": "nixpkgs",
-        "type": "github"
-      }
-    },
-    "nixpkgs-old": {
-      "flake": false,
-      "locked": {
-        "lastModified": 1581379743,
-        "narHash": "sha256-i1XCn9rKuLjvCdu2UeXKzGLF6IuQePQKFt4hEKRU5oc=",
-        "owner": "NixOS",
-        "repo": "nixpkgs",
-        "rev": "34c7eb7545d155cc5b6f499b23a7cb1c96ab4d59",
-        "type": "github"
-      },
-      "original": {
-        "owner": "NixOS",
-        "ref": "nixos-19.03",
+        "ref": "nixos-22.05-small",
         "repo": "nixpkgs",
         "type": "github"
       }
@@ -138,11 +101,11 @@
     },
     "nixpkgs_2": {
       "locked": {
-        "lastModified": 1710889954,
-        "narHash": "sha256-Pr6F5Pmd7JnNEMHHmspZ0qVqIBVxyZ13ik1pJtm2QXk=",
+        "lastModified": 1686089707,
+        "narHash": "sha256-LTNlJcru2qJ0XhlhG9Acp5KyjB774Pza3tRH0pKIb3o=",
         "owner": "NixOS",
         "repo": "nixpkgs",
-        "rev": "7872526e9c5332274ea5932a0c3270d6e4724f3b",
+        "rev": "af21c31b2a1ec5d361ed8050edd0303c31306397",
         "type": "github"
       },
       "original": {
@@ -157,23 +120,7 @@
         "flake-utils": "flake-utils",
         "lean4-mode": "lean4-mode",
         "nix": "nix",
-        "nixpkgs": "nixpkgs_2",
-        "nixpkgs-old": "nixpkgs-old"
-      }
-    },
-    "systems": {
-      "locked": {
-        "lastModified": 1681028828,
-        "narHash": "sha256-Vy1rq5AaRuLzOxct8nz4T6wlgyUR7zLU309k9mBC768=",
-        "owner": "nix-systems",
-        "repo": "default",
-        "rev": "da67096a3b9bf56a91d16901293e51ba5b49a27e",
-        "type": "github"
-      },
-      "original": {
-        "owner": "nix-systems",
-        "repo": "default",
-        "type": "github"
+        "nixpkgs": "nixpkgs_2"
       }
     }
   },

flake.nix

@@ -2,9 +2,6 @@
   description = "Lean interactive theorem prover";
 
   inputs.nixpkgs.url = "github:NixOS/nixpkgs/nixpkgs-unstable";
-  # old nixpkgs used for portable release with older glibc (2.27)
-  inputs.nixpkgs-old.url = "github:NixOS/nixpkgs/nixos-19.03";
-  inputs.nixpkgs-old.flake = false;
   inputs.flake-utils.url = "github:numtide/flake-utils";
   inputs.nix.url = "github:NixOS/nix";
   inputs.lean4-mode = {
@@ -20,41 +17,14 @@
   #  inputs.lean4-mode.follows = "lean4-mode";
   #};
 
-  outputs = { self, nixpkgs, nixpkgs-old, flake-utils, nix, lean4-mode, ... }@inputs: flake-utils.lib.eachDefaultSystem (system:
+  outputs = { self, nixpkgs, flake-utils, nix, lean4-mode, ... }@inputs: flake-utils.lib.eachDefaultSystem (system:
     let
       pkgs = import nixpkgs {
         inherit system;
         # for `vscode-with-extensions`
         config.allowUnfree = true;
       };
-      # An old nixpkgs for creating releases with an old glibc
-      pkgsDist-old = import nixpkgs-old { inherit system; };
-      # An old nixpkgs for creating releases with an old glibc
-      pkgsDist-old-aarch = import nixpkgs-old { localSystem.config = "aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu"; };
-
       lean-packages = pkgs.callPackage (./nix/packages.nix) { src = ./.; inherit nix lean4-mode; };
-
-      devShellWithDist = pkgsDist: pkgs.mkShell.override {
-	  stdenv = pkgs.overrideCC pkgs.stdenv lean-packages.llvmPackages.clang;
-	} ({
-	  buildInputs = with pkgs; [
-	    cmake gmp ccache
-	    lean-packages.llvmPackages.llvm  # llvm-symbolizer for asan/lsan
-	    # TODO: only add when proven to not affect the flakification
-	    #pkgs.python3
-	  ];
-	  # https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/60919
-	  hardeningDisable = [ "all" ];
-	  # more convenient `ctest` output
-	  CTEST_OUTPUT_ON_FAILURE = 1;
-	} // pkgs.lib.optionalAttrs pkgs.stdenv.isLinux {
-	  GMP = pkgsDist.gmp.override { withStatic = true; };
-	  GLIBC = pkgsDist.glibc;
-	  GLIBC_DEV = pkgsDist.glibc.dev;
-	  GCC_LIB = pkgsDist.gcc.cc.lib;
-	  ZLIB = pkgsDist.zlib;
-	  GDB = pkgsDist.gdb;
-	});
     in {
       packages = lean-packages // rec {
         debug = lean-packages.override { debug = true; };
@@ -79,10 +49,7 @@
       };
       defaultPackage = lean-packages.lean-all;
 
-      # The default development shell for working on lean itself
-      devShells.default = devShellWithDist pkgs;
-      devShells.oldGlibc = devShellWithDist pkgsDist-old;
-      devShells.oldGlibcAArch = devShellWithDist pkgsDist-old-aarch;
+      inherit (lean-packages) devShell;
 
       checks.lean = lean-packages.test;
     }) // rec {

nix/bootstrap.nix

@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ rec {
     installPhase = ''
       mkdir -p $out/bin $out/lib/lean
       mv bin/lean $out/bin/
-      mv lib/lean/*.{so,dylib} $out/lib/lean
+      mv lib/lean/*.so $out/lib/lean
     '';
     meta.mainProgram = "lean";
   });
@@ -170,11 +170,10 @@ rec {
           ln -sf ${lean-all}/* .
         '';
         buildPhase = ''
-          ctest --output-junit test-results.xml --output-on-failure -E 'leancomptest_(doc_example|foreign)' -j$NIX_BUILD_CORES
+          ctest --output-on-failure -E 'leancomptest_(doc_example|foreign)' -j$NIX_BUILD_CORES
         '';
         installPhase = ''
-          mkdir $out
-          mv test-results.xml $out
+          touch $out
         '';
       };
       update-stage0 =

nix/buildLeanPackage.nix

@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ with builtins; let
       # make local "copy" so `drv`'s Nix store path doesn't end up in ccache's hash
       ln -s ${drv.c}/${drv.cPath} src.c
       # on the other hand, a debug build is pretty fast anyway, so preserve the path for gdb
-      leanc -c -o $out/$oPath $leancFlags -fPIC ${if debug then "${drv.c}/${drv.cPath} -g" else "src.c -O3 -DNDEBUG -DLEAN_EXPORTING"}
+      leanc -c -o $out/$oPath $leancFlags -fPIC ${if debug then "${drv.c}/${drv.cPath} -g" else "src.c -O3 -DNDEBUG"}
     '';
   };
   mkMod = mod: deps:

script/prepare-llvm-linux.sh

@@ -25,8 +25,6 @@ cp -L llvm/bin/llvm-ar stage1/bin/
 # dependencies of the above
 $CP llvm/lib/lib{clang-cpp,LLVM}*.so* stage1/lib/
 $CP $ZLIB/lib/libz.so* stage1/lib/
-# general clang++ dependency, breaks cross-library C++ exceptions if linked statically
-$CP $GCC_LIB/lib/libgcc_s.so* stage1/lib/
 # bundle libatomic (referenced by LLVM >= 15, and required by the lean executable to run)
 $CP $GCC_LIB/lib/libatomic.so* stage1/lib/
 
@@ -62,7 +60,7 @@ fi
 # use `-nostdinc` to make sure headers are not visible by default (in particular, not to `#include_next` in the clang headers),
 # but do not change sysroot so users can still link against system libs
 echo -n " -DLEANC_INTERNAL_FLAGS='-nostdinc -isystem ROOT/include/clang' -DLEANC_CC=ROOT/bin/clang"
-echo -n " -DLEANC_INTERNAL_LINKER_FLAGS='-L ROOT/lib -L ROOT/lib/glibc ROOT/lib/glibc/libc_nonshared.a -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-Bstatic -lgmp -lunwind -Wl,-Bdynamic -Wl,--no-as-needed -fuse-ld=lld'"
+echo -n " -DLEANC_INTERNAL_LINKER_FLAGS='-L ROOT/lib -L ROOT/lib/glibc ROOT/lib/glibc/libc_nonshared.a -Wl,--as-needed -static-libgcc -Wl,-Bstatic -lgmp -lunwind -Wl,-Bdynamic -Wl,--no-as-needed -fuse-ld=lld'"
 # when not using the above flags, link GMP dynamically/as usual
 echo -n " -DLEAN_EXTRA_LINKER_FLAGS='-Wl,--as-needed -lgmp -Wl,--no-as-needed'"
 # do not set `LEAN_CC` for tests

shell.nix

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+let
+  flake = (import ./default.nix);
+  flakePkgs = flake.packages.${builtins.currentSystem};
+in { pkgs ? flakePkgs.nixpkgs, pkgsDist ? pkgs }:
+# use `shell` as default
+(attribs: attribs.shell // attribs) rec {
+  shell = pkgs.mkShell.override {
+    stdenv = pkgs.overrideCC pkgs.stdenv flakePkgs.llvmPackages.clang;
+  } (rec {
+    buildInputs = with pkgs; [
+      cmake gmp ccache
+      flakePkgs.llvmPackages.llvm  # llvm-symbolizer for asan/lsan
+    ];
+    # https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/60919
+    hardeningDisable = [ "all" ];
+    # more convenient `ctest` output
+    CTEST_OUTPUT_ON_FAILURE = 1;
+  } // pkgs.lib.optionalAttrs pkgs.stdenv.isLinux {
+    GMP = pkgsDist.gmp.override { withStatic = true; };
+    GLIBC = pkgsDist.glibc;
+    GLIBC_DEV = pkgsDist.glibc.dev;
+    GCC_LIB = pkgsDist.gcc.cc.lib;
+    ZLIB = pkgsDist.zlib;
+    GDB = pkgsDist.gdb;
+  });
+  nix = flake.devShell.${builtins.currentSystem};
+}

src/CMakeLists.txt

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ endif()
 include(ExternalProject)
 project(LEAN CXX C)
 set(LEAN_VERSION_MAJOR 4)
-set(LEAN_VERSION_MINOR 8)
+set(LEAN_VERSION_MINOR 7)
 set(LEAN_VERSION_PATCH 0)
 set(LEAN_VERSION_IS_RELEASE 0)  # This number is 1 in the release revision, and 0 otherwise.
 set(LEAN_SPECIAL_VERSION_DESC "" CACHE STRING "Additional version description like 'nightly-2018-03-11'")
@@ -501,18 +501,24 @@ string(REGEX REPLACE "^([a-zA-Z]):" "/\\1" LEAN_BIN "${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/bin")
 # (also looks nicer in the build log)
 file(RELATIVE_PATH LIB ${LEAN_SOURCE_DIR} ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib)
 
-# set up libInit_shared only on Windows; see also stdlib.make.in
-if(${CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME} MATCHES "Windows")
-  set(INIT_SHARED_LINKER_FLAGS "-Wl,--whole-archive ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib/temp/libInit.a.export ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/runtime/libleanrt_initial-exec.a -Wl,--no-whole-archive -Wl,--out-implib,${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib/lean/libInit_shared.dll.a")
+if(${CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME} MATCHES "Darwin")
+  string(APPEND INIT_SHARED_LINKER_FLAGS " -Wl,-force_load,${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib/lean/libInit.a -Wl,-force_load,${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/runtime/libleanrt_initial-exec.a")
+else()
+  string(APPEND INIT_SHARED_LINKER_FLAGS " -Wl,--whole-archive -lInit ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/runtime/libleanrt_initial-exec.a -Wl,--no-whole-archive")
+  if(${CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME} MATCHES "Windows")
+    string(APPEND INIT_SHARED_LINKER_FLAGS " -Wl,--out-implib,${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib/lean/libInit_shared.dll.a")
+  endif()
 endif()
 
 if(${CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME} MATCHES "Darwin")
-  set(LEANSHARED_LINKER_FLAGS "-Wl,-force_load,${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib/lean/libInit.a -Wl,-force_load,${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib/lean/libLean.a -Wl,-force_load,${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib/lean/libleancpp.a ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/runtime/libleanrt_initial-exec.a ${LEANSHARED_LINKER_FLAGS}")
-elseif(${CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME} MATCHES "Windows")
-  set(LEANSHARED_LINKER_FLAGS "-Wl,--whole-archive ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib/temp/libLean.a.export -lleancpp -Wl,--no-whole-archive -lInit_shared -Wl,--out-implib,${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib/lean/libleanshared.dll.a")
+  string(APPEND LEANSHARED_LINKER_FLAGS " -Wl,-force_load,${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib/lean/libLean.a -Wl,-force_load,${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib/lean/libleancpp.a")
 else()
-  set(LEANSHARED_LINKER_FLAGS "-Wl,--whole-archive -lInit -lLean -lleancpp -Wl,--no-whole-archive ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/runtime/libleanrt_initial-exec.a ${LEANSHARED_LINKER_FLAGS}")
+  string(APPEND LEANSHARED_LINKER_FLAGS " -Wl,--whole-archive -lLean -lleancpp -Wl,--no-whole-archive")
+  if(${CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME} MATCHES "Windows")
+    string(APPEND LEANSHARED_LINKER_FLAGS " -Wl,--out-implib,${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib/lean/libleanshared.dll.a")
+  endif()
 endif()
+string(APPEND LEANSHARED_LINKER_FLAGS " -lInit_shared")
 
 if (${CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME} MATCHES "Emscripten")
   # We do not use dynamic linking via leanshared for Emscripten to keep things
@@ -588,10 +594,6 @@ if(PREV_STAGE)
     COMMAND bash -c 'CSRCS=${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib/temp script/update-stage0'
     DEPENDS make_stdlib
     WORKING_DIRECTORY "${LEAN_SOURCE_DIR}/..")
-
-  add_custom_target(update-stage0-commit
-    COMMAND git commit -m "chore: update stage0"
-    DEPENDS update-stage0)
 endif()
 
 # use Bash version for building, use Lean version in bin/ for tests & distribution

src/Init.lean

@@ -33,4 +33,3 @@ import Init.SizeOfLemmas
 import Init.BinderPredicates
 import Init.Ext
 import Init.Omega
-import Init.MacroTrace

src/Init/ByCases.lean

@@ -21,9 +21,9 @@ macro_rules
 
 /-! ## if-then-else -/
 
-@[simp] theorem if_true {_ : Decidable True} (t e : α) : ite True t e = t := if_pos trivial
+@[simp] theorem if_true {h : Decidable True} (t e : α) : ite True t e = t := if_pos trivial
 
-@[simp] theorem if_false {_ : Decidable False} (t e : α) : ite False t e = e := if_neg id
+@[simp] theorem if_false {h : Decidable False} (t e : α) : ite False t e = e := if_neg id
 
 theorem ite_id [Decidable c] {α} (t : α) : (if c then t else t) = t := by split <;> rfl
 
@@ -37,6 +37,15 @@ theorem apply_ite (f : α → β) (P : Prop) [Decidable P] (x y : α) :
     f (ite P x y) = ite P (f x) (f y) :=
   apply_dite f P (fun _ => x) (fun _ => y)
 
+/-- Negation of the condition `P : Prop` in a `dite` is the same as swapping the branches. -/
+@[simp] theorem dite_not (P : Prop) {_ : Decidable P}  (x : ¬P → α) (y : ¬¬P → α) :
+    dite (¬P) x y = dite P (fun h => y (not_not_intro h)) x := by
+  by_cases h : P <;> simp [h]
+
+/-- Negation of the condition `P : Prop` in a `ite` is the same as swapping the branches. -/
+@[simp] theorem ite_not (P : Prop) {_ : Decidable P} (x y : α) : ite (¬P) x y = ite P y x :=
+  dite_not P (fun _ => x) (fun _ => y)
+
 @[simp] theorem dite_eq_left_iff {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {B : ¬ P → α} :
     dite P (fun _ => a) B = a ↔ ∀ h, B h = a := by
   by_cases P <;> simp [*, forall_prop_of_true, forall_prop_of_false]

src/Init/Classical.lean

@@ -125,15 +125,16 @@ theorem byContradiction {p : Prop} (h : ¬p → False) : p :=
 /-- The Double Negation Theorem: `¬¬P` is equivalent to `P`.
 The left-to-right direction, double negation elimination (DNE),
 is classically true but not constructively. -/
-@[simp] theorem not_not : ¬¬a ↔ a := Decidable.not_not
+@[scoped simp] theorem not_not : ¬¬a ↔ a := Decidable.not_not
 
-@[simp low] theorem not_forall {p : α → Prop} : (¬∀ x, p x) ↔ ∃ x, ¬p x := Decidable.not_forall
+@[simp] theorem not_forall {p : α → Prop} : (¬∀ x, p x) ↔ ∃ x, ¬p x := Decidable.not_forall
 
 theorem not_forall_not {p : α → Prop} : (¬∀ x, ¬p x) ↔ ∃ x, p x := Decidable.not_forall_not
 theorem not_exists_not {p : α → Prop} : (¬∃ x, ¬p x) ↔ ∀ x, p x := Decidable.not_exists_not
 
 theorem forall_or_exists_not (P : α → Prop) : (∀ a, P a) ∨ ∃ a, ¬ P a := by
   rw [← not_forall]; exact em _
+
 theorem exists_or_forall_not (P : α → Prop) : (∃ a, P a) ∨ ∀ a, ¬ P a := by
   rw [← not_exists]; exact em _
 
@@ -146,22 +147,8 @@ theorem not_and_iff_or_not_not : ¬(a ∧ b) ↔ ¬a ∨ ¬b := Decidable.not_an
 
 theorem not_iff : ¬(a ↔ b) ↔ (¬a ↔ b) := Decidable.not_iff
 
-@[simp] theorem imp_iff_left_iff  : (b ↔ a → b) ↔ a ∨ b := Decidable.imp_iff_left_iff
-@[simp] theorem imp_iff_right_iff : (a → b ↔ b) ↔ a ∨ b := Decidable.imp_iff_right_iff
-
-@[simp] theorem and_or_imp : a ∧ b ∨ (a → c) ↔ a → b ∨ c := Decidable.and_or_imp
-
-@[simp] theorem not_imp : ¬(a → b) ↔ a ∧ ¬b := Decidable.not_imp_iff_and_not
-
-@[simp] theorem imp_and_neg_imp_iff (p q : Prop) : (p → q) ∧ (¬p → q) ↔ q :=
-  Iff.intro (fun (a : _ ∧ _) => (Classical.em p).rec a.left a.right)
-            (fun a => And.intro (fun _ => a) (fun _ => a))
-
 end Classical
 
-/- Export for Mathlib compat. -/
-export Classical (imp_iff_right_iff imp_and_neg_imp_iff and_or_imp not_imp)
-
 /-- Extract an element from a existential statement, using `Classical.choose`. -/
 -- This enables projection notation.
 @[reducible] noncomputable def Exists.choose {p : α → Prop} (P : ∃ a, p a) : α := Classical.choose P

src/Init/Coe.lean

@@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ Helper definition used by the elaborator. It is not meant to be used directly by
 This is used for coercions between monads, in the case where we want to apply
 a monad lift and a coercion on the result type at the same time.
 -/
-@[coe_decl] abbrev Lean.Internal.liftCoeM {m : Type u → Type v} {n : Type u → Type w} {α β : Type u}
+@[inline, coe_decl] def Lean.Internal.liftCoeM {m : Type u → Type v} {n : Type u → Type w} {α β : Type u}
     [MonadLiftT m n] [∀ a, CoeT α a β] [Monad n] (x : m α) : n β := do
   let a ← liftM x
   pure (CoeT.coe a)
@@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ Helper definition used by the elaborator. It is not meant to be used directly by
 
 This is used for coercing the result type under a monad.
 -/
-@[coe_decl] abbrev Lean.Internal.coeM {m : Type u → Type v} {α β : Type u}
+@[inline, coe_decl] def Lean.Internal.coeM {m : Type u → Type v} {α β : Type u}
     [∀ a, CoeT α a β] [Monad m] (x : m α) : m β := do
   let a ← x
   pure (CoeT.coe a)

src/Init/Control/ExceptCps.lean

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
 Authors: Leonardo de Moura
 -/
 prelude
-import Init.Control.Lawful.Basic
+import Init.Control.Lawful
 
 /-!
 The Exception monad transformer using CPS style.
@@ -18,7 +18,6 @@ namespace ExceptCpsT
 def run {ε α : Type u} [Monad m] (x : ExceptCpsT ε m α) : m (Except ε α) :=
   x _ (fun a => pure (Except.ok a)) (fun e => pure (Except.error e))
 
-set_option linter.unusedVariables false in  -- `s` unused
 @[always_inline, inline]
 def runK {ε α : Type u} (x : ExceptCpsT ε m α) (s : ε) (ok : α → m β) (error : ε → m β) : m β :=
   x _ ok error

src/Init/Control/Lawful.lean

@@ -4,5 +4,373 @@ Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
 Authors: Sebastian Ullrich, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro
 -/
 prelude
-import Init.Control.Lawful.Basic
-import Init.Control.Lawful.Instances
+import Init.SimpLemmas
+import Init.Control.Except
+import Init.Control.StateRef
+
+open Function
+
+@[simp] theorem monadLift_self [Monad m] (x : m α) : monadLift x = x :=
+  rfl
+
+class LawfulFunctor (f : Type u → Type v) [Functor f] : Prop where
+  map_const          : (Functor.mapConst : α → f β → f α) = Functor.map ∘ const β
+  id_map   (x : f α) : id <$> x = x
+  comp_map (g : α → β) (h : β → γ) (x : f α) : (h ∘ g) <$> x = h <$> g <$> x
+
+export LawfulFunctor (map_const id_map comp_map)
+
+attribute [simp] id_map
+
+@[simp] theorem id_map' [Functor m] [LawfulFunctor m] (x : m α) : (fun a => a) <$> x = x :=
+  id_map x
+
+class LawfulApplicative (f : Type u → Type v) [Applicative f] extends LawfulFunctor f : Prop where
+  seqLeft_eq  (x : f α) (y : f β)     : x <* y = const β <$> x <*> y
+  seqRight_eq (x : f α) (y : f β)     : x *> y = const α id <$> x <*> y
+  pure_seq    (g : α → β) (x : f α)   : pure g <*> x = g <$> x
+  map_pure    (g : α → β) (x : α)     : g <$> (pure x : f α) = pure (g x)
+  seq_pure    {α β : Type u} (g : f (α → β)) (x : α) : g <*> pure x = (fun h => h x) <$> g
+  seq_assoc   {α β γ : Type u} (x : f α) (g : f (α → β)) (h : f (β → γ)) : h <*> (g <*> x) = ((@comp α β γ) <$> h) <*> g <*> x
+  comp_map g h x := (by
+    repeat rw [← pure_seq]
+    simp [seq_assoc, map_pure, seq_pure])
+
+export LawfulApplicative (seqLeft_eq seqRight_eq pure_seq map_pure seq_pure seq_assoc)
+
+attribute [simp] map_pure seq_pure
+
+@[simp] theorem pure_id_seq [Applicative f] [LawfulApplicative f] (x : f α) : pure id <*> x = x := by
+  simp [pure_seq]
+
+class LawfulMonad (m : Type u → Type v) [Monad m] extends LawfulApplicative m : Prop where
+  bind_pure_comp (f : α → β) (x : m α) : x >>= (fun a => pure (f a)) = f <$> x
+  bind_map       {α β : Type u} (f : m (α → β)) (x : m α) : f >>= (. <$> x) = f <*> x
+  pure_bind      (x : α) (f : α → m β) : pure x >>= f = f x
+  bind_assoc     (x : m α) (f : α → m β) (g : β → m γ) : x >>= f >>= g = x >>= fun x => f x >>= g
+  map_pure g x    := (by rw [← bind_pure_comp, pure_bind])
+  seq_pure g x    := (by rw [← bind_map]; simp [map_pure, bind_pure_comp])
+  seq_assoc x g h := (by simp [← bind_pure_comp, ← bind_map, bind_assoc, pure_bind])
+
+export LawfulMonad (bind_pure_comp bind_map pure_bind bind_assoc)
+attribute [simp] pure_bind bind_assoc
+
+@[simp] theorem bind_pure [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : m α) : x >>= pure = x := by
+  show x >>= (fun a => pure (id a)) = x
+  rw [bind_pure_comp, id_map]
+
+theorem map_eq_pure_bind [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α → β) (x : m α) : f <$> x = x >>= fun a => pure (f a) := by
+  rw [← bind_pure_comp]
+
+theorem seq_eq_bind_map {α β : Type u} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : m (α → β)) (x : m α) : f <*> x = f >>= (. <$> x) := by
+  rw [← bind_map]
+
+theorem bind_congr [Bind m] {x : m α} {f g : α → m β} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : x >>= f = x >>= g := by
+  simp [funext h]
+
+@[simp] theorem bind_pure_unit [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] {x : m PUnit} : (x >>= fun _ => pure ⟨⟩) = x := by
+  rw [bind_pure]
+
+theorem map_congr [Functor m] {x : m α} {f g : α → β} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : (f <$> x : m β) = g <$> x := by
+  simp [funext h]
+
+theorem seq_eq_bind {α β : Type u} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (mf : m (α → β)) (x : m α) : mf <*> x = mf >>= fun f => f <$> x := by
+  rw [bind_map]
+
+theorem seqRight_eq_bind [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : m α) (y : m β) : x *> y = x >>= fun _ => y := by
+  rw [seqRight_eq]
+  simp [map_eq_pure_bind, seq_eq_bind_map, const]
+
+theorem seqLeft_eq_bind [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : m α) (y : m β) : x <* y = x >>= fun a => y >>= fun _ => pure a := by
+  rw [seqLeft_eq]; simp [map_eq_pure_bind, seq_eq_bind_map]
+
+/--
+An alternative constructor for `LawfulMonad` which has more
+defaultable fields in the common case.
+-/
+theorem LawfulMonad.mk' (m : Type u → Type v) [Monad m]
+    (id_map : ∀ {α} (x : m α), id <$> x = x)
+    (pure_bind : ∀ {α β} (x : α) (f : α → m β), pure x >>= f = f x)
+    (bind_assoc : ∀ {α β γ} (x : m α) (f : α → m β) (g : β → m γ),
+      x >>= f >>= g = x >>= fun x => f x >>= g)
+    (map_const : ∀ {α β} (x : α) (y : m β),
+      Functor.mapConst x y = Function.const β x <$> y := by intros; rfl)
+    (seqLeft_eq : ∀ {α β} (x : m α) (y : m β),
+      x <* y = (x >>= fun a => y >>= fun _ => pure a) := by intros; rfl)
+    (seqRight_eq : ∀ {α β} (x : m α) (y : m β), x *> y = (x >>= fun _ => y) := by intros; rfl)
+    (bind_pure_comp : ∀ {α β} (f : α → β) (x : m α),
+      x >>= (fun y => pure (f y)) = f <$> x := by intros; rfl)
+    (bind_map : ∀ {α β} (f : m (α → β)) (x : m α), f >>= (. <$> x) = f <*> x := by intros; rfl)
+    : LawfulMonad m :=
+  have map_pure {α β} (g : α → β) (x : α) : g <$> (pure x : m α) = pure (g x) := by
+    rw [← bind_pure_comp]; simp [pure_bind]
+  { id_map, bind_pure_comp, bind_map, pure_bind, bind_assoc, map_pure,
+    comp_map := by simp [← bind_pure_comp, bind_assoc, pure_bind]
+    pure_seq := by intros; rw [← bind_map]; simp [pure_bind]
+    seq_pure := by intros; rw [← bind_map]; simp [map_pure, bind_pure_comp]
+    seq_assoc := by simp [← bind_pure_comp, ← bind_map, bind_assoc, pure_bind]
+    map_const := funext fun x => funext (map_const x)
+    seqLeft_eq := by simp [seqLeft_eq, ← bind_map, ← bind_pure_comp, pure_bind, bind_assoc]
+    seqRight_eq := fun x y => by
+      rw [seqRight_eq, ← bind_map, ← bind_pure_comp, bind_assoc]; simp [pure_bind, id_map] }
+
+/-! # Id -/
+
+namespace Id
+
+@[simp] theorem map_eq (x : Id α) (f : α → β) : f <$> x = f x := rfl
+@[simp] theorem bind_eq (x : Id α) (f : α → id β) : x >>= f = f x := rfl
+@[simp] theorem pure_eq (a : α) : (pure a : Id α) = a := rfl
+
+instance : LawfulMonad Id := by
+  refine' { .. } <;> intros <;> rfl
+
+end Id
+
+/-! # ExceptT -/
+
+namespace ExceptT
+
+theorem ext [Monad m] {x y : ExceptT ε m α} (h : x.run = y.run) : x = y := by
+  simp [run] at h
+  assumption
+
+@[simp] theorem run_pure [Monad m] (x : α) : run (pure x : ExceptT ε m α) = pure (Except.ok x) := rfl
+
+@[simp] theorem run_lift  [Monad.{u, v} m] (x : m α) : run (ExceptT.lift x : ExceptT ε m α) = (Except.ok <$> x : m (Except ε α)) := rfl
+
+@[simp] theorem run_throw [Monad m] : run (throw e : ExceptT ε m β) = pure (Except.error e) := rfl
+
+@[simp] theorem run_bind_lift [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : m α) (f : α → ExceptT ε m β) : run (ExceptT.lift x >>= f : ExceptT ε m β) = x >>= fun a => run (f a) := by
+  simp[ExceptT.run, ExceptT.lift, bind, ExceptT.bind, ExceptT.mk, ExceptT.bindCont, map_eq_pure_bind]
+
+@[simp] theorem bind_throw [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α → ExceptT ε m β) : (throw e >>= f) = throw e := by
+  simp [throw, throwThe, MonadExceptOf.throw, bind, ExceptT.bind, ExceptT.bindCont, ExceptT.mk]
+
+theorem run_bind [Monad m] (x : ExceptT ε m α)
+        : run (x >>= f : ExceptT ε m β)
+          =
+          run x >>= fun
+                     | Except.ok x => run (f x)
+                     | Except.error e => pure (Except.error e) :=
+  rfl
+
+@[simp] theorem lift_pure [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (a : α) : ExceptT.lift (pure a) = (pure a : ExceptT ε m α) := by
+  simp [ExceptT.lift, pure, ExceptT.pure]
+
+@[simp] theorem run_map [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α → β) (x : ExceptT ε m α)
+    : (f <$> x).run = Except.map f <$> x.run := by
+  simp [Functor.map, ExceptT.map, map_eq_pure_bind]
+  apply bind_congr
+  intro a; cases a <;> simp [Except.map]
+
+protected theorem seq_eq {α β ε : Type u} [Monad m] (mf : ExceptT ε m (α → β)) (x : ExceptT ε m α) : mf <*> x = mf >>= fun f => f <$> x :=
+  rfl
+
+protected theorem bind_pure_comp [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α → β) (x : ExceptT ε m α) : x >>= pure ∘ f = f <$> x := by
+  intros; rfl
+
+protected theorem seqLeft_eq {α β ε : Type u} {m : Type u → Type v} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : ExceptT ε m α) (y : ExceptT ε m β) : x <* y = const β <$> x <*> y := by
+  show (x >>= fun a => y >>= fun _ => pure a) = (const (α := α) β <$> x) >>= fun f => f <$> y
+  rw [← ExceptT.bind_pure_comp]
+  apply ext
+  simp [run_bind]
+  apply bind_congr
+  intro
+  | Except.error _ => simp
+  | Except.ok _ =>
+    simp [map_eq_pure_bind]; apply bind_congr; intro b;
+    cases b <;> simp [comp, Except.map, const]
+
+protected theorem seqRight_eq [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : ExceptT ε m α) (y : ExceptT ε m β) : x *> y = const α id <$> x <*> y := by
+  show (x >>= fun _ => y) = (const α id <$> x) >>= fun f => f <$> y
+  rw [← ExceptT.bind_pure_comp]
+  apply ext
+  simp [run_bind]
+  apply bind_congr
+  intro a; cases a <;> simp
+
+instance [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] : LawfulMonad (ExceptT ε m) where
+  id_map         := by intros; apply ext; simp
+  map_const      := by intros; rfl
+  seqLeft_eq     := ExceptT.seqLeft_eq
+  seqRight_eq    := ExceptT.seqRight_eq
+  pure_seq       := by intros; apply ext; simp [ExceptT.seq_eq, run_bind]
+  bind_pure_comp := ExceptT.bind_pure_comp
+  bind_map       := by intros; rfl
+  pure_bind      := by intros; apply ext; simp [run_bind]
+  bind_assoc     := by intros; apply ext; simp [run_bind]; apply bind_congr; intro a; cases a <;> simp
+
+end ExceptT
+
+/-! # Except -/
+
+instance : LawfulMonad (Except ε) := LawfulMonad.mk'
+  (id_map := fun x => by cases x <;> rfl)
+  (pure_bind := fun a f => rfl)
+  (bind_assoc := fun a f g => by cases a <;> rfl)
+
+instance : LawfulApplicative (Except ε) := inferInstance
+instance : LawfulFunctor (Except ε) := inferInstance
+
+/-! # ReaderT -/
+
+namespace ReaderT
+
+theorem ext {x y : ReaderT ρ m α} (h : ∀ ctx, x.run ctx = y.run ctx) : x = y := by
+  simp [run] at h
+  exact funext h
+
+@[simp] theorem run_pure [Monad m] (a : α) (ctx : ρ) : (pure a : ReaderT ρ m α).run ctx = pure a := rfl
+
+@[simp] theorem run_bind [Monad m] (x : ReaderT ρ m α) (f : α → ReaderT ρ m β) (ctx : ρ)
+    : (x >>= f).run ctx = x.run ctx >>= λ a => (f a).run ctx := rfl
+
+@[simp] theorem run_mapConst [Monad m] (a : α) (x : ReaderT ρ m β) (ctx : ρ)
+    : (Functor.mapConst a x).run ctx = Functor.mapConst a (x.run ctx) := rfl
+
+@[simp] theorem run_map [Monad m] (f : α → β) (x : ReaderT ρ m α) (ctx : ρ)
+    : (f <$> x).run ctx = f <$> x.run ctx := rfl
+
+@[simp] theorem run_monadLift [MonadLiftT n m] (x : n α) (ctx : ρ)
+    : (monadLift x : ReaderT ρ m α).run ctx = (monadLift x : m α) := rfl
+
+@[simp] theorem run_monadMap [MonadFunctor n m] (f : {β : Type u} → n β → n β) (x : ReaderT ρ m α) (ctx : ρ)
+    : (monadMap @f x : ReaderT ρ m α).run ctx = monadMap @f (x.run ctx) := rfl
+
+@[simp] theorem run_read [Monad m] (ctx : ρ) : (ReaderT.read : ReaderT ρ m ρ).run ctx = pure ctx := rfl
+
+@[simp] theorem run_seq {α β : Type u} [Monad m] (f : ReaderT ρ m (α → β)) (x : ReaderT ρ m α) (ctx : ρ)
+    : (f <*> x).run ctx = (f.run ctx <*> x.run ctx) := rfl
+
+@[simp] theorem run_seqRight [Monad m] (x : ReaderT ρ m α) (y : ReaderT ρ m β) (ctx : ρ)
+    : (x *> y).run ctx = (x.run ctx *> y.run ctx) := rfl
+
+@[simp] theorem run_seqLeft [Monad m] (x : ReaderT ρ m α) (y : ReaderT ρ m β) (ctx : ρ)
+    : (x <* y).run ctx = (x.run ctx <* y.run ctx) := rfl
+
+instance [Monad m] [LawfulFunctor m] : LawfulFunctor (ReaderT ρ m) where
+  id_map    := by intros; apply ext; simp
+  map_const := by intros; funext a b; apply ext; intros; simp [map_const]
+  comp_map  := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [comp_map]
+
+instance [Monad m] [LawfulApplicative m] : LawfulApplicative (ReaderT ρ m) where
+  seqLeft_eq  := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [seqLeft_eq]
+  seqRight_eq := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [seqRight_eq]
+  pure_seq    := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [pure_seq]
+  map_pure    := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [map_pure]
+  seq_pure    := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [seq_pure]
+  seq_assoc   := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [seq_assoc]
+
+instance [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] : LawfulMonad (ReaderT ρ m) where
+  bind_pure_comp := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [LawfulMonad.bind_pure_comp]
+  bind_map       := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [bind_map]
+  pure_bind      := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp
+  bind_assoc     := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp
+
+end ReaderT
+
+/-! # StateRefT -/
+
+instance [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] : LawfulMonad (StateRefT' ω σ m) :=
+  inferInstanceAs (LawfulMonad (ReaderT (ST.Ref ω σ) m))
+
+/-! # StateT -/
+
+namespace StateT
+
+theorem ext {x y : StateT σ m α} (h : ∀ s, x.run s = y.run s) : x = y :=
+  funext h
+
+@[simp] theorem run'_eq [Monad m] (x : StateT σ m α) (s : σ) : run' x s = (·.1) <$> run x s :=
+  rfl
+
+@[simp] theorem run_pure [Monad m] (a : α) (s : σ) : (pure a : StateT σ m α).run s = pure (a, s) := rfl
+
+@[simp] theorem run_bind [Monad m] (x : StateT σ m α) (f : α → StateT σ m β) (s : σ)
+    : (x >>= f).run s = x.run s >>= λ p => (f p.1).run p.2 := by
+  simp [bind, StateT.bind, run]
+
+@[simp] theorem run_map {α β σ : Type u} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α → β) (x : StateT σ m α) (s : σ) : (f <$> x).run s = (fun (p : α × σ) => (f p.1, p.2)) <$> x.run s := by
+  simp [Functor.map, StateT.map, run, map_eq_pure_bind]
+
+@[simp] theorem run_get [Monad m] (s : σ)    : (get : StateT σ m σ).run s = pure (s, s) := rfl
+
+@[simp] theorem run_set [Monad m] (s s' : σ) : (set s' : StateT σ m PUnit).run s = pure (⟨⟩, s') := rfl
+
+@[simp] theorem run_modify [Monad m] (f : σ → σ) (s : σ) : (modify f : StateT σ m PUnit).run s = pure (⟨⟩, f s) := rfl
+
+@[simp] theorem run_modifyGet [Monad m] (f : σ → α × σ) (s : σ) : (modifyGet f : StateT σ m α).run s = pure ((f s).1, (f s).2) := by
+  simp [modifyGet, MonadStateOf.modifyGet, StateT.modifyGet, run]
+
+@[simp] theorem run_lift {α σ : Type u} [Monad m] (x : m α) (s : σ) : (StateT.lift x : StateT σ m α).run s = x >>= fun a => pure (a, s) := rfl
+
+@[simp] theorem run_bind_lift {α σ : Type u} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : m α) (f : α → StateT σ m β) (s : σ) : (StateT.lift x >>= f).run s = x >>= fun a => (f a).run s := by
+  simp [StateT.lift, StateT.run, bind, StateT.bind]
+
+@[simp] theorem run_monadLift {α σ : Type u} [Monad m] [MonadLiftT n m] (x : n α) (s : σ) : (monadLift x : StateT σ m α).run s = (monadLift x : m α) >>= fun a => pure (a, s) := rfl
+
+@[simp] theorem run_monadMap [Monad m] [MonadFunctor n m] (f : {β : Type u} → n β → n β) (x : StateT σ m α) (s : σ)
+    : (monadMap @f x : StateT σ m α).run s = monadMap @f (x.run s) := rfl
+
+@[simp] theorem run_seq {α β σ : Type u} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : StateT σ m (α → β)) (x : StateT σ m α) (s : σ) : (f <*> x).run s = (f.run s >>= fun fs => (fun (p : α × σ) => (fs.1 p.1, p.2)) <$> x.run fs.2) := by
+  show (f >>= fun g => g <$> x).run s = _
+  simp
+
+@[simp] theorem run_seqRight [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : StateT σ m α) (y : StateT σ m β) (s : σ) : (x *> y).run s = (x.run s >>= fun p => y.run p.2) := by
+  show (x >>= fun _ => y).run s = _
+  simp
+
+@[simp] theorem run_seqLeft {α β σ : Type u} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : StateT σ m α) (y : StateT σ m β) (s : σ) : (x <* y).run s = (x.run s >>= fun p => y.run p.2 >>= fun p' => pure (p.1, p'.2)) := by
+  show (x >>= fun a => y >>= fun _ => pure a).run s = _
+  simp
+
+theorem seqRight_eq [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : StateT σ m α) (y : StateT σ m β) : x *> y = const α id <$> x <*> y := by
+  apply ext; intro s
+  simp [map_eq_pure_bind, const]
+  apply bind_congr; intro p; cases p
+  simp [Prod.eta]
+
+theorem seqLeft_eq [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : StateT σ m α) (y : StateT σ m β) : x <* y = const β <$> x <*> y := by
+  apply ext; intro s
+  simp [map_eq_pure_bind]
+
+instance [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] : LawfulMonad (StateT σ m) where
+  id_map         := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp[Prod.eta]
+  map_const      := by intros; rfl
+  seqLeft_eq     := seqLeft_eq
+  seqRight_eq    := seqRight_eq
+  pure_seq       := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp
+  bind_pure_comp := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp; apply LawfulMonad.bind_pure_comp
+  bind_map       := by intros; rfl
+  pure_bind      := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp
+  bind_assoc     := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp
+
+end StateT
+
+/-! # EStateM -/
+
+instance : LawfulMonad (EStateM ε σ) := .mk'
+  (id_map := fun x => funext <| fun s => by
+    dsimp only [EStateM.instMonadEStateM, EStateM.map]
+    match x s with
+    | .ok _ _ => rfl
+    | .error _ _ => rfl)
+  (pure_bind := fun _ _ => rfl)
+  (bind_assoc := fun x _ _ => funext <| fun s => by
+    dsimp only [EStateM.instMonadEStateM, EStateM.bind]
+    match x s with
+    | .ok _ _ => rfl
+    | .error _ _ => rfl)
+  (map_const := fun _ _ => rfl)
+
+/-! # Option -/
+
+instance : LawfulMonad Option := LawfulMonad.mk'
+  (id_map := fun x => by cases x <;> rfl)
+  (pure_bind := fun x f => rfl)
+  (bind_assoc := fun x f g => by cases x <;> rfl)
+  (bind_pure_comp := fun f x => by cases x <;> rfl)
+
+instance : LawfulApplicative Option := inferInstance
+instance : LawfulFunctor Option := inferInstance

src/Init/Control/Lawful/Basic.lean

@@ -1,138 +0,0 @@
-/-
-Copyright (c) 2021 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
-Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-Authors: Sebastian Ullrich, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro
--/
-prelude
-import Init.SimpLemmas
-import Init.Meta
-
-open Function
-
-@[simp] theorem monadLift_self [Monad m] (x : m α) : monadLift x = x :=
-  rfl
-
-class LawfulFunctor (f : Type u → Type v) [Functor f] : Prop where
-  map_const          : (Functor.mapConst : α → f β → f α) = Functor.map ∘ const β
-  id_map   (x : f α) : id <$> x = x
-  comp_map (g : α → β) (h : β → γ) (x : f α) : (h ∘ g) <$> x = h <$> g <$> x
-
-export LawfulFunctor (map_const id_map comp_map)
-
-attribute [simp] id_map
-
-@[simp] theorem id_map' [Functor m] [LawfulFunctor m] (x : m α) : (fun a => a) <$> x = x :=
-  id_map x
-
-class LawfulApplicative (f : Type u → Type v) [Applicative f] extends LawfulFunctor f : Prop where
-  seqLeft_eq  (x : f α) (y : f β)     : x <* y = const β <$> x <*> y
-  seqRight_eq (x : f α) (y : f β)     : x *> y = const α id <$> x <*> y
-  pure_seq    (g : α → β) (x : f α)   : pure g <*> x = g <$> x
-  map_pure    (g : α → β) (x : α)     : g <$> (pure x : f α) = pure (g x)
-  seq_pure    {α β : Type u} (g : f (α → β)) (x : α) : g <*> pure x = (fun h => h x) <$> g
-  seq_assoc   {α β γ : Type u} (x : f α) (g : f (α → β)) (h : f (β → γ)) : h <*> (g <*> x) = ((@comp α β γ) <$> h) <*> g <*> x
-  comp_map g h x := (by
-    repeat rw [← pure_seq]
-    simp [seq_assoc, map_pure, seq_pure])
-
-export LawfulApplicative (seqLeft_eq seqRight_eq pure_seq map_pure seq_pure seq_assoc)
-
-attribute [simp] map_pure seq_pure
-
-@[simp] theorem pure_id_seq [Applicative f] [LawfulApplicative f] (x : f α) : pure id <*> x = x := by
-  simp [pure_seq]
-
-class LawfulMonad (m : Type u → Type v) [Monad m] extends LawfulApplicative m : Prop where
-  bind_pure_comp (f : α → β) (x : m α) : x >>= (fun a => pure (f a)) = f <$> x
-  bind_map       {α β : Type u} (f : m (α → β)) (x : m α) : f >>= (. <$> x) = f <*> x
-  pure_bind      (x : α) (f : α → m β) : pure x >>= f = f x
-  bind_assoc     (x : m α) (f : α → m β) (g : β → m γ) : x >>= f >>= g = x >>= fun x => f x >>= g
-  map_pure g x    := (by rw [← bind_pure_comp, pure_bind])
-  seq_pure g x    := (by rw [← bind_map]; simp [map_pure, bind_pure_comp])
-  seq_assoc x g h := (by simp [← bind_pure_comp, ← bind_map, bind_assoc, pure_bind])
-
-export LawfulMonad (bind_pure_comp bind_map pure_bind bind_assoc)
-attribute [simp] pure_bind bind_assoc
-
-@[simp] theorem bind_pure [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : m α) : x >>= pure = x := by
-  show x >>= (fun a => pure (id a)) = x
-  rw [bind_pure_comp, id_map]
-
-theorem map_eq_pure_bind [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α → β) (x : m α) : f <$> x = x >>= fun a => pure (f a) := by
-  rw [← bind_pure_comp]
-
-theorem seq_eq_bind_map {α β : Type u} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : m (α → β)) (x : m α) : f <*> x = f >>= (. <$> x) := by
-  rw [← bind_map]
-
-theorem bind_congr [Bind m] {x : m α} {f g : α → m β} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : x >>= f = x >>= g := by
-  simp [funext h]
-
-@[simp] theorem bind_pure_unit [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] {x : m PUnit} : (x >>= fun _ => pure ⟨⟩) = x := by
-  rw [bind_pure]
-
-theorem map_congr [Functor m] {x : m α} {f g : α → β} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : (f <$> x : m β) = g <$> x := by
-  simp [funext h]
-
-theorem seq_eq_bind {α β : Type u} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (mf : m (α → β)) (x : m α) : mf <*> x = mf >>= fun f => f <$> x := by
-  rw [bind_map]
-
-theorem seqRight_eq_bind [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : m α) (y : m β) : x *> y = x >>= fun _ => y := by
-  rw [seqRight_eq]
-  simp [map_eq_pure_bind, seq_eq_bind_map, const]
-
-theorem seqLeft_eq_bind [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : m α) (y : m β) : x <* y = x >>= fun a => y >>= fun _ => pure a := by
-  rw [seqLeft_eq]; simp [map_eq_pure_bind, seq_eq_bind_map]
-
-/--
-An alternative constructor for `LawfulMonad` which has more
-defaultable fields in the common case.
--/
-theorem LawfulMonad.mk' (m : Type u → Type v) [Monad m]
-    (id_map : ∀ {α} (x : m α), id <$> x = x)
-    (pure_bind : ∀ {α β} (x : α) (f : α → m β), pure x >>= f = f x)
-    (bind_assoc : ∀ {α β γ} (x : m α) (f : α → m β) (g : β → m γ),
-      x >>= f >>= g = x >>= fun x => f x >>= g)
-    (map_const : ∀ {α β} (x : α) (y : m β),
-      Functor.mapConst x y = Function.const β x <$> y := by intros; rfl)
-    (seqLeft_eq : ∀ {α β} (x : m α) (y : m β),
-      x <* y = (x >>= fun a => y >>= fun _ => pure a) := by intros; rfl)
-    (seqRight_eq : ∀ {α β} (x : m α) (y : m β), x *> y = (x >>= fun _ => y) := by intros; rfl)
-    (bind_pure_comp : ∀ {α β} (f : α → β) (x : m α),
-      x >>= (fun y => pure (f y)) = f <$> x := by intros; rfl)
-    (bind_map : ∀ {α β} (f : m (α → β)) (x : m α), f >>= (. <$> x) = f <*> x := by intros; rfl)
-    : LawfulMonad m :=
-  have map_pure {α β} (g : α → β) (x : α) : g <$> (pure x : m α) = pure (g x) := by
-    rw [← bind_pure_comp]; simp [pure_bind]
-  { id_map, bind_pure_comp, bind_map, pure_bind, bind_assoc, map_pure,
-    comp_map := by simp [← bind_pure_comp, bind_assoc, pure_bind]
-    pure_seq := by intros; rw [← bind_map]; simp [pure_bind]
-    seq_pure := by intros; rw [← bind_map]; simp [map_pure, bind_pure_comp]
-    seq_assoc := by simp [← bind_pure_comp, ← bind_map, bind_assoc, pure_bind]
-    map_const := funext fun x => funext (map_const x)
-    seqLeft_eq := by simp [seqLeft_eq, ← bind_map, ← bind_pure_comp, pure_bind, bind_assoc]
-    seqRight_eq := fun x y => by
-      rw [seqRight_eq, ← bind_map, ← bind_pure_comp, bind_assoc]; simp [pure_bind, id_map] }
-
-/-! # Id -/
-
-namespace Id
-
-@[simp] theorem map_eq (x : Id α) (f : α → β) : f <$> x = f x := rfl
-@[simp] theorem bind_eq (x : Id α) (f : α → id β) : x >>= f = f x := rfl
-@[simp] theorem pure_eq (a : α) : (pure a : Id α) = a := rfl
-
-instance : LawfulMonad Id := by
-  refine' { .. } <;> intros <;> rfl
-
-end Id
-
-/-! # Option -/
-
-instance : LawfulMonad Option := LawfulMonad.mk'
-  (id_map := fun x => by cases x <;> rfl)
-  (pure_bind := fun x f => rfl)
-  (bind_assoc := fun x f g => by cases x <;> rfl)
-  (bind_pure_comp := fun f x => by cases x <;> rfl)
-
-instance : LawfulApplicative Option := inferInstance
-instance : LawfulFunctor Option := inferInstance

src/Init/Control/Lawful/Instances.lean

@@ -1,248 +0,0 @@
-/-
-Copyright (c) 2021 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
-Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-Authors: Sebastian Ullrich, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro
--/
-prelude
-import Init.Control.Lawful.Basic
-import Init.Control.Except
-import Init.Control.StateRef
-
-open Function
-
-/-! # ExceptT -/
-
-namespace ExceptT
-
-theorem ext [Monad m] {x y : ExceptT ε m α} (h : x.run = y.run) : x = y := by
-  simp [run] at h
-  assumption
-
-@[simp] theorem run_pure [Monad m] (x : α) : run (pure x : ExceptT ε m α) = pure (Except.ok x) := rfl
-
-@[simp] theorem run_lift  [Monad.{u, v} m] (x : m α) : run (ExceptT.lift x : ExceptT ε m α) = (Except.ok <$> x : m (Except ε α)) := rfl
-
-@[simp] theorem run_throw [Monad m] : run (throw e : ExceptT ε m β) = pure (Except.error e) := rfl
-
-@[simp] theorem run_bind_lift [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : m α) (f : α → ExceptT ε m β) : run (ExceptT.lift x >>= f : ExceptT ε m β) = x >>= fun a => run (f a) := by
-  simp[ExceptT.run, ExceptT.lift, bind, ExceptT.bind, ExceptT.mk, ExceptT.bindCont, map_eq_pure_bind]
-
-@[simp] theorem bind_throw [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α → ExceptT ε m β) : (throw e >>= f) = throw e := by
-  simp [throw, throwThe, MonadExceptOf.throw, bind, ExceptT.bind, ExceptT.bindCont, ExceptT.mk]
-
-theorem run_bind [Monad m] (x : ExceptT ε m α)
-        : run (x >>= f : ExceptT ε m β)
-          =
-          run x >>= fun
-                     | Except.ok x => run (f x)
-                     | Except.error e => pure (Except.error e) :=
-  rfl
-
-@[simp] theorem lift_pure [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (a : α) : ExceptT.lift (pure a) = (pure a : ExceptT ε m α) := by
-  simp [ExceptT.lift, pure, ExceptT.pure]
-
-@[simp] theorem run_map [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α → β) (x : ExceptT ε m α)
-    : (f <$> x).run = Except.map f <$> x.run := by
-  simp [Functor.map, ExceptT.map, map_eq_pure_bind]
-  apply bind_congr
-  intro a; cases a <;> simp [Except.map]
-
-protected theorem seq_eq {α β ε : Type u} [Monad m] (mf : ExceptT ε m (α → β)) (x : ExceptT ε m α) : mf <*> x = mf >>= fun f => f <$> x :=
-  rfl
-
-protected theorem bind_pure_comp [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α → β) (x : ExceptT ε m α) : x >>= pure ∘ f = f <$> x := by
-  intros; rfl
-
-protected theorem seqLeft_eq {α β ε : Type u} {m : Type u → Type v} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : ExceptT ε m α) (y : ExceptT ε m β) : x <* y = const β <$> x <*> y := by
-  show (x >>= fun a => y >>= fun _ => pure a) = (const (α := α) β <$> x) >>= fun f => f <$> y
-  rw [← ExceptT.bind_pure_comp]
-  apply ext
-  simp [run_bind]
-  apply bind_congr
-  intro
-  | Except.error _ => simp
-  | Except.ok _ =>
-    simp [map_eq_pure_bind]; apply bind_congr; intro b;
-    cases b <;> simp [comp, Except.map, const]
-
-protected theorem seqRight_eq [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : ExceptT ε m α) (y : ExceptT ε m β) : x *> y = const α id <$> x <*> y := by
-  show (x >>= fun _ => y) = (const α id <$> x) >>= fun f => f <$> y
-  rw [← ExceptT.bind_pure_comp]
-  apply ext
-  simp [run_bind]
-  apply bind_congr
-  intro a; cases a <;> simp
-
-instance [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] : LawfulMonad (ExceptT ε m) where
-  id_map         := by intros; apply ext; simp
-  map_const      := by intros; rfl
-  seqLeft_eq     := ExceptT.seqLeft_eq
-  seqRight_eq    := ExceptT.seqRight_eq
-  pure_seq       := by intros; apply ext; simp [ExceptT.seq_eq, run_bind]
-  bind_pure_comp := ExceptT.bind_pure_comp
-  bind_map       := by intros; rfl
-  pure_bind      := by intros; apply ext; simp [run_bind]
-  bind_assoc     := by intros; apply ext; simp [run_bind]; apply bind_congr; intro a; cases a <;> simp
-
-end ExceptT
-
-/-! # Except -/
-
-instance : LawfulMonad (Except ε) := LawfulMonad.mk'
-  (id_map := fun x => by cases x <;> rfl)
-  (pure_bind := fun a f => rfl)
-  (bind_assoc := fun a f g => by cases a <;> rfl)
-
-instance : LawfulApplicative (Except ε) := inferInstance
-instance : LawfulFunctor (Except ε) := inferInstance
-
-/-! # ReaderT -/
-
-namespace ReaderT
-
-theorem ext {x y : ReaderT ρ m α} (h : ∀ ctx, x.run ctx = y.run ctx) : x = y := by
-  simp [run] at h
-  exact funext h
-
-@[simp] theorem run_pure [Monad m] (a : α) (ctx : ρ) : (pure a : ReaderT ρ m α).run ctx = pure a := rfl
-
-@[simp] theorem run_bind [Monad m] (x : ReaderT ρ m α) (f : α → ReaderT ρ m β) (ctx : ρ)
-    : (x >>= f).run ctx = x.run ctx >>= λ a => (f a).run ctx := rfl
-
-@[simp] theorem run_mapConst [Monad m] (a : α) (x : ReaderT ρ m β) (ctx : ρ)
-    : (Functor.mapConst a x).run ctx = Functor.mapConst a (x.run ctx) := rfl
-
-@[simp] theorem run_map [Monad m] (f : α → β) (x : ReaderT ρ m α) (ctx : ρ)
-    : (f <$> x).run ctx = f <$> x.run ctx := rfl
-
-@[simp] theorem run_monadLift [MonadLiftT n m] (x : n α) (ctx : ρ)
-    : (monadLift x : ReaderT ρ m α).run ctx = (monadLift x : m α) := rfl
-
-@[simp] theorem run_monadMap [MonadFunctor n m] (f : {β : Type u} → n β → n β) (x : ReaderT ρ m α) (ctx : ρ)
-    : (monadMap @f x : ReaderT ρ m α).run ctx = monadMap @f (x.run ctx) := rfl
-
-@[simp] theorem run_read [Monad m] (ctx : ρ) : (ReaderT.read : ReaderT ρ m ρ).run ctx = pure ctx := rfl
-
-@[simp] theorem run_seq {α β : Type u} [Monad m] (f : ReaderT ρ m (α → β)) (x : ReaderT ρ m α) (ctx : ρ)
-    : (f <*> x).run ctx = (f.run ctx <*> x.run ctx) := rfl
-
-@[simp] theorem run_seqRight [Monad m] (x : ReaderT ρ m α) (y : ReaderT ρ m β) (ctx : ρ)
-    : (x *> y).run ctx = (x.run ctx *> y.run ctx) := rfl
-
-@[simp] theorem run_seqLeft [Monad m] (x : ReaderT ρ m α) (y : ReaderT ρ m β) (ctx : ρ)
-    : (x <* y).run ctx = (x.run ctx <* y.run ctx) := rfl
-
-instance [Monad m] [LawfulFunctor m] : LawfulFunctor (ReaderT ρ m) where
-  id_map    := by intros; apply ext; simp
-  map_const := by intros; funext a b; apply ext; intros; simp [map_const]
-  comp_map  := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [comp_map]
-
-instance [Monad m] [LawfulApplicative m] : LawfulApplicative (ReaderT ρ m) where
-  seqLeft_eq  := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [seqLeft_eq]
-  seqRight_eq := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [seqRight_eq]
-  pure_seq    := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [pure_seq]
-  map_pure    := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [map_pure]
-  seq_pure    := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [seq_pure]
-  seq_assoc   := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [seq_assoc]
-
-instance [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] : LawfulMonad (ReaderT ρ m) where
-  bind_pure_comp := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [LawfulMonad.bind_pure_comp]
-  bind_map       := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [bind_map]
-  pure_bind      := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp
-  bind_assoc     := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp
-
-end ReaderT
-
-/-! # StateRefT -/
-
-instance [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] : LawfulMonad (StateRefT' ω σ m) :=
-  inferInstanceAs (LawfulMonad (ReaderT (ST.Ref ω σ) m))
-
-/-! # StateT -/
-
-namespace StateT
-
-theorem ext {x y : StateT σ m α} (h : ∀ s, x.run s = y.run s) : x = y :=
-  funext h
-
-@[simp] theorem run'_eq [Monad m] (x : StateT σ m α) (s : σ) : run' x s = (·.1) <$> run x s :=
-  rfl
-
-@[simp] theorem run_pure [Monad m] (a : α) (s : σ) : (pure a : StateT σ m α).run s = pure (a, s) := rfl
-
-@[simp] theorem run_bind [Monad m] (x : StateT σ m α) (f : α → StateT σ m β) (s : σ)
-    : (x >>= f).run s = x.run s >>= λ p => (f p.1).run p.2 := by
-  simp [bind, StateT.bind, run]
-
-@[simp] theorem run_map {α β σ : Type u} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α → β) (x : StateT σ m α) (s : σ) : (f <$> x).run s = (fun (p : α × σ) => (f p.1, p.2)) <$> x.run s := by
-  simp [Functor.map, StateT.map, run, map_eq_pure_bind]
-
-@[simp] theorem run_get [Monad m] (s : σ)    : (get : StateT σ m σ).run s = pure (s, s) := rfl
-
-@[simp] theorem run_set [Monad m] (s s' : σ) : (set s' : StateT σ m PUnit).run s = pure (⟨⟩, s') := rfl
-
-@[simp] theorem run_modify [Monad m] (f : σ → σ) (s : σ) : (modify f : StateT σ m PUnit).run s = pure (⟨⟩, f s) := rfl
-
-@[simp] theorem run_modifyGet [Monad m] (f : σ → α × σ) (s : σ) : (modifyGet f : StateT σ m α).run s = pure ((f s).1, (f s).2) := by
-  simp [modifyGet, MonadStateOf.modifyGet, StateT.modifyGet, run]
-
-@[simp] theorem run_lift {α σ : Type u} [Monad m] (x : m α) (s : σ) : (StateT.lift x : StateT σ m α).run s = x >>= fun a => pure (a, s) := rfl
-
-@[simp] theorem run_bind_lift {α σ : Type u} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : m α) (f : α → StateT σ m β) (s : σ) : (StateT.lift x >>= f).run s = x >>= fun a => (f a).run s := by
-  simp [StateT.lift, StateT.run, bind, StateT.bind]
-
-@[simp] theorem run_monadLift {α σ : Type u} [Monad m] [MonadLiftT n m] (x : n α) (s : σ) : (monadLift x : StateT σ m α).run s = (monadLift x : m α) >>= fun a => pure (a, s) := rfl
-
-@[simp] theorem run_monadMap [Monad m] [MonadFunctor n m] (f : {β : Type u} → n β → n β) (x : StateT σ m α) (s : σ)
-    : (monadMap @f x : StateT σ m α).run s = monadMap @f (x.run s) := rfl
-
-@[simp] theorem run_seq {α β σ : Type u} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : StateT σ m (α → β)) (x : StateT σ m α) (s : σ) : (f <*> x).run s = (f.run s >>= fun fs => (fun (p : α × σ) => (fs.1 p.1, p.2)) <$> x.run fs.2) := by
-  show (f >>= fun g => g <$> x).run s = _
-  simp
-
-@[simp] theorem run_seqRight [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : StateT σ m α) (y : StateT σ m β) (s : σ) : (x *> y).run s = (x.run s >>= fun p => y.run p.2) := by
-  show (x >>= fun _ => y).run s = _
-  simp
-
-@[simp] theorem run_seqLeft {α β σ : Type u} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : StateT σ m α) (y : StateT σ m β) (s : σ) : (x <* y).run s = (x.run s >>= fun p => y.run p.2 >>= fun p' => pure (p.1, p'.2)) := by
-  show (x >>= fun a => y >>= fun _ => pure a).run s = _
-  simp
-
-theorem seqRight_eq [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : StateT σ m α) (y : StateT σ m β) : x *> y = const α id <$> x <*> y := by
-  apply ext; intro s
-  simp [map_eq_pure_bind, const]
-  apply bind_congr; intro p; cases p
-  simp [Prod.eta]
-
-theorem seqLeft_eq [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : StateT σ m α) (y : StateT σ m β) : x <* y = const β <$> x <*> y := by
-  apply ext; intro s
-  simp [map_eq_pure_bind]
-
-instance [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] : LawfulMonad (StateT σ m) where
-  id_map         := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp[Prod.eta]
-  map_const      := by intros; rfl
-  seqLeft_eq     := seqLeft_eq
-  seqRight_eq    := seqRight_eq
-  pure_seq       := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp
-  bind_pure_comp := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp; apply LawfulMonad.bind_pure_comp
-  bind_map       := by intros; rfl
-  pure_bind      := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp
-  bind_assoc     := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp
-
-end StateT
-
-/-! # EStateM -/
-
-instance : LawfulMonad (EStateM ε σ) := .mk'
-  (id_map := fun x => funext <| fun s => by
-    dsimp only [EStateM.instMonadEStateM, EStateM.map]
-    match x s with
-    | .ok _ _ => rfl
-    | .error _ _ => rfl)
-  (pure_bind := fun _ _ => rfl)
-  (bind_assoc := fun x _ _ => funext <| fun s => by
-    dsimp only [EStateM.instMonadEStateM, EStateM.bind]
-    match x s with
-    | .ok _ _ => rfl
-    | .error _ _ => rfl)
-  (map_const := fun _ _ => rfl)

src/Init/Control/StateCps.lean

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
 Authors: Leonardo de Moura
 -/
 prelude
-import Init.Control.Lawful.Basic
+import Init.Control.Lawful
 
 /-!
 The State monad transformer using CPS style.

src/Init/Conv.lean

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Authors: Leonardo de Moura
 Notation for operators defined at Prelude.lean
 -/
 prelude
-import Init.Tactics
+import Init.Meta
 
 namespace Lean.Parser.Tactic.Conv
 
@@ -156,6 +156,7 @@ match [a, b] with
 simplifies to `a`. -/
 syntax (name := simpMatch) "simp_match" : conv
 
+
 /-- Executes the given tactic block without converting `conv` goal into a regular goal. -/
 syntax (name := nestedTacticCore) "tactic'" " => " tacticSeq : conv
 
@@ -201,7 +202,7 @@ macro (name := anyGoals) tk:"any_goals " s:convSeq : conv =>
   with inaccessible names to the given names.
 * `case tag₁ | tag₂ => tac` is equivalent to `(case tag₁ => tac); (case tag₂ => tac)`.
 -/
-macro (name := case) tk:"case " args:sepBy1(caseArg, "|") arr:" => " s:convSeq : conv =>
+macro (name := case) tk:"case " args:sepBy1(caseArg, " | ") arr:" => " s:convSeq : conv =>
   `(conv| tactic' => case%$tk $args|* =>%$arr conv' => ($s); all_goals rfl)
 
 /--
@@ -210,7 +211,7 @@ has been solved after applying `tac`, nor admits the goal if `tac` failed.
 Recall that `case` closes the goal using `sorry` when `tac` fails, and
 the tactic execution is not interrupted.
 -/
-macro (name := case') tk:"case' " args:sepBy1(caseArg, "|") arr:" => " s:convSeq : conv =>
+macro (name := case') tk:"case' " args:sepBy1(caseArg, " | ") arr:" => " s:convSeq : conv =>
   `(conv| tactic' => case'%$tk $args|* =>%$arr conv' => $s)
 
 /--

src/Init/Core.lean

@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ which applies to all applications of the function).
 -/
 @[simp] def inline {α : Sort u} (a : α) : α := a
 
-theorem id_def {α : Sort u} (a : α) : id a = a := rfl
+theorem id.def {α : Sort u} (a : α) : id a = a := rfl
 
 /--
 `flip f a b` is `f b a`. It is useful for "point-free" programming,
@@ -165,7 +165,6 @@ whose first component is `a : α` and whose second component is `b : β a`
 It is sometimes known as the dependent sum type, since it is the type level version
 of an indexed summation.
 -/
-@[pp_using_anonymous_constructor]
 structure Sigma {α : Type u} (β : α → Type v) where
   /-- Constructor for a dependent pair. If `a : α` and `b : β a` then `⟨a, b⟩ : Sigma β`.
   (This will usually require a type ascription to determine `β`
@@ -191,7 +190,6 @@ which can cause problems for universe level unification,
 because the equation `max 1 u v = ?u + 1` has no solution in level arithmetic.
 `PSigma` is usually only used in automation that constructs pairs of arbitrary types.
 -/
-@[pp_using_anonymous_constructor]
 structure PSigma {α : Sort u} (β : α → Sort v) where
   /-- Constructor for a dependent pair. If `a : α` and `b : β a` then `⟨a, b⟩ : PSigma β`.
   (This will usually require a type ascription to determine `β`
@@ -679,7 +677,7 @@ You can prove theorems about the resulting element by induction on `h`, since
 theorem Eq.substr {α : Sort u} {p : α → Prop} {a b : α} (h₁ : b = a) (h₂ : p a) : p b :=
   h₁ ▸ h₂
 
-@[simp] theorem cast_eq {α : Sort u} (h : α = α) (a : α) : cast h a = a :=
+theorem cast_eq {α : Sort u} (h : α = α) (a : α) : cast h a = a :=
   rfl
 
 /--
@@ -739,16 +737,13 @@ theorem beq_false_of_ne [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] {a b : α} (h : a ≠ b) : (a ==
 section
 variable {α β φ : Sort u} {a a' : α} {b b' : β} {c : φ}
 
-/-- Non-dependent recursor for `HEq` -/
-noncomputable def HEq.ndrec.{u1, u2} {α : Sort u2} {a : α} {motive : {β : Sort u2} → β → Sort u1} (m : motive a) {β : Sort u2} {b : β} (h : HEq a b) : motive b :=
+theorem HEq.ndrec.{u1, u2} {α : Sort u2} {a : α} {motive : {β : Sort u2} → β → Sort u1} (m : motive a) {β : Sort u2} {b : β} (h : HEq a b) : motive b :=
   h.rec m
 
-/-- `HEq.ndrec` variant -/
-noncomputable def HEq.ndrecOn.{u1, u2} {α : Sort u2} {a : α} {motive : {β : Sort u2} → β → Sort u1} {β : Sort u2} {b : β} (h : HEq a b) (m : motive a) : motive b :=
+theorem HEq.ndrecOn.{u1, u2} {α : Sort u2} {a : α} {motive : {β : Sort u2} → β → Sort u1} {β : Sort u2} {b : β} (h : HEq a b) (m : motive a) : motive b :=
   h.rec m
 
-/-- `HEq.ndrec` variant -/
-noncomputable def HEq.elim {α : Sort u} {a : α} {p : α → Sort v} {b : α} (h₁ : HEq a b) (h₂ : p a) : p b :=
+theorem HEq.elim {α : Sort u} {a : α} {p : α → Sort v} {b : α} (h₁ : HEq a b) (h₂ : p a) : p b :=
   eq_of_heq h₁ ▸ h₂
 
 theorem HEq.subst {p : (T : Sort u) → T → Prop} (h₁ : HEq a b) (h₂ : p α a) : p β b :=
@@ -1308,6 +1303,7 @@ gen_injective_theorems% Fin
 gen_injective_theorems% Array
 gen_injective_theorems% Sum
 gen_injective_theorems% PSum
+gen_injective_theorems% Nat
 gen_injective_theorems% Option
 gen_injective_theorems% List
 gen_injective_theorems% Except
@@ -1315,12 +1311,6 @@ gen_injective_theorems% EStateM.Result
 gen_injective_theorems% Lean.Name
 gen_injective_theorems% Lean.Syntax
 
-theorem Nat.succ.inj {m n : Nat} : m.succ = n.succ → m = n :=
-  fun x => Nat.noConfusion x id
-
-theorem Nat.succ.injEq (u v : Nat) : (u.succ = v.succ) = (u = v) :=
-  Eq.propIntro Nat.succ.inj (congrArg Nat.succ)
-
 @[simp] theorem beq_iff_eq [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] (a b : α) : a == b ↔ a = b :=
   ⟨eq_of_beq, by intro h; subst h; exact LawfulBEq.rfl⟩
 
@@ -1413,9 +1403,9 @@ theorem false_imp_iff (a : Prop) : (False → a) ↔ True := iff_true_intro Fals
 
 theorem true_imp_iff (α : Prop) : (True → α) ↔ α := imp_iff_right True.intro
 
-@[simp high] theorem imp_self : (a → a) ↔ True := iff_true_intro id
+@[simp] theorem imp_self : (a → a) ↔ True := iff_true_intro id
 
-@[simp] theorem imp_false : (a → False) ↔ ¬a := Iff.rfl
+theorem imp_false : (a → False) ↔ ¬a := Iff.rfl
 
 theorem imp.swap : (a → b → c) ↔ (b → a → c) := Iff.intro flip flip
 
@@ -1601,7 +1591,7 @@ protected def mk' {α : Sort u} [s : Setoid α] (a : α) : Quotient s :=
 The analogue of `Quot.sound`: If `a` and `b` are related by the equivalence relation,
 then they have equal equivalence classes.
 -/
-theorem sound {α : Sort u} {s : Setoid α} {a b : α} : a ≈ b → Quotient.mk s a = Quotient.mk s b :=
+def sound {α : Sort u} {s : Setoid α} {a b : α} : a ≈ b → Quotient.mk s a = Quotient.mk s b :=
   Quot.sound
 
 /--

src/Init/Data/AC.lean

@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ def norm [info : ContextInformation α] (ctx : α) (e : Expr) : List Nat :=
   let xs := if info.isComm ctx then sort xs else xs
   if info.isIdem ctx then mergeIdem xs else xs
 
-noncomputable def List.two_step_induction
+theorem List.two_step_induction
   {motive : List Nat → Sort u}
   (l : List Nat)
   (empty : motive [])

src/Init/Data/Array/Basic.lean

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ import Init.Data.Fin.Basic
 import Init.Data.UInt.Basic
 import Init.Data.Repr
 import Init.Data.ToString.Basic
-import Init.GetElem
+import Init.Util
 universe u v w
 
 namespace Array
@@ -59,8 +59,6 @@ def uget (a : @& Array α) (i : USize) (h : i.toNat < a.size) : α :=
 instance : GetElem (Array α) USize α fun xs i => i.toNat < xs.size where
   getElem xs i h := xs.uget i h
 
-instance : LawfulGetElem (Array α) USize α fun xs i => i.toNat < xs.size where
-
 def back [Inhabited α] (a : Array α) : α :=
   a.get! (a.size - 1)
 
@@ -458,12 +456,24 @@ def findRev? {α : Type} (as : Array α) (p : α → Bool) : Option α :=
 
 @[inline]
 def findIdx? {α : Type u} (as : Array α) (p : α → Bool) : Option Nat :=
-  let rec loop (j : Nat) :=
-    if h : j < as.size then
-      if p as[j] then some j else loop (j + 1)
-    else none
-    termination_by as.size - j
-  loop 0
+  let rec loop (i : Nat) (j : Nat) (inv : i + j = as.size) : Option Nat :=
+    if hlt : j < as.size then
+      match i, inv with
+      | 0, inv => by
+        apply False.elim
+        rw [Nat.zero_add] at inv
+        rw [inv] at hlt
+        exact absurd hlt (Nat.lt_irrefl _)
+      | i+1, inv =>
+        if p as[j] then
+          some j
+        else
+          have : i + (j+1) = as.size := by
+            rw [← inv, Nat.add_comm j 1, Nat.add_assoc]
+          loop i (j+1) this
+    else
+      none
+  loop as.size 0 rfl
 
 def getIdx? [BEq α] (a : Array α) (v : α) : Option Nat :=
 a.findIdx? fun a => a == v
@@ -717,36 +727,33 @@ def takeWhile (p : α → Bool) (as : Array α) : Array α :=
     termination_by as.size - i
   go 0 #[]
 
-/-- Remove the element at a given index from an array without bounds checks, using a `Fin` index.
-
-  This function takes worst case O(n) time because
-  it has to backshift all elements at positions greater than `i`.-/
-def feraseIdx (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) : Array α :=
-  if h : i.val + 1 < a.size then
-    let a' := a.swap ⟨i.val + 1, h⟩ i
-    let i' : Fin a'.size := ⟨i.val + 1, by simp [a', h]⟩
-    have : a'.size - i' < a.size - i := by
-      simp [a', Nat.sub_succ_lt_self _ _ i.isLt]
-    a'.feraseIdx i'
+def eraseIdxAux (i : Nat) (a : Array α) : Array α :=
+  if h : i < a.size then
+    let idx  : Fin a.size := ⟨i, h⟩;
+    let idx1 : Fin a.size := ⟨i - 1, by exact Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.pred_le i) h⟩;
+    let a' := a.swap idx idx1
+    eraseIdxAux (i+1) a'
   else
     a.pop
-termination_by a.size - i.val
+termination_by a.size - i
 
-theorem size_feraseIdx (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) : (a.feraseIdx i).size = a.size - 1 := by
-  induction a, i using Array.feraseIdx.induct with
-  | @case1 a i h a' _ _ ih =>
-    unfold feraseIdx
-    simp [h, a', ih]
-  | case2 a i h =>
-    unfold feraseIdx
-    simp [h]
+def feraseIdx (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) : Array α :=
+  eraseIdxAux (i.val + 1) a
 
-/-- Remove the element at a given index from an array, or do nothing if the index is out of bounds.
-
-  This function takes worst case O(n) time because
-  it has to backshift all elements at positions greater than `i`.-/
 def eraseIdx (a : Array α) (i : Nat) : Array α :=
-  if h : i < a.size then a.feraseIdx ⟨i, h⟩ else a
+  if i < a.size then eraseIdxAux (i+1) a else a
+
+def eraseIdxSzAux (a : Array α) (i : Nat) (r : Array α) (heq : r.size = a.size) : { r : Array α // r.size = a.size - 1 } :=
+  if h : i < r.size then
+    let idx  : Fin r.size := ⟨i, h⟩;
+    let idx1 : Fin r.size := ⟨i - 1, by exact Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.pred_le i) h⟩;
+    eraseIdxSzAux a (i+1) (r.swap idx idx1) ((size_swap r idx idx1).trans heq)
+  else
+    ⟨r.pop, (size_pop r).trans (heq ▸ rfl)⟩
+termination_by r.size - i
+
+def eraseIdx' (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) : { r : Array α // r.size = a.size - 1 } :=
+  eraseIdxSzAux a (i.val + 1) a rfl
 
 def erase [BEq α] (as : Array α) (a : α) : Array α :=
   match as.indexOf? a with
@@ -802,7 +809,7 @@ where
     rfl
 
   go (i : Nat) (hi : i ≤ as.size) : toListLitAux as n hsz i hi (as.data.drop i) = as.data := by
-    induction i <;> simp [getLit_eq, List.get_drop_eq_drop, toListLitAux, List.drop, *]
+    cases i <;> simp [getLit_eq, List.get_drop_eq_drop, toListLitAux, List.drop, go]
 
 def isPrefixOfAux [BEq α] (as bs : Array α) (hle : as.size ≤ bs.size) (i : Nat) : Bool :=
   if h : i < as.size then

src/Init/Data/Array/Lemmas.lean

@@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ import Init.Data.Nat.MinMax
 import Init.Data.List.Lemmas
 import Init.Data.Fin.Basic
 import Init.Data.Array.Mem
-import Init.TacticsExtra
 
 /-!
 ## Bootstrapping theorems about arrays
@@ -186,84 +185,3 @@ theorem anyM_stop_le_start [Monad m] (p : α → m Bool) (as : Array α) (start
 
 theorem mem_def (a : α) (as : Array α) : a ∈ as ↔ a ∈ as.data :=
   ⟨fun | .mk h => h, Array.Mem.mk⟩
-
-/-- # get -/
-@[simp] theorem get_eq_getElem (a : Array α) (i : Fin _) : a.get i = a[i.1] := rfl
-
-theorem getElem?_lt
-    (a : Array α) {i : Nat} (h : i < a.size) : a[i]? = some (a[i]) := dif_pos h
-
-theorem getElem?_ge
-    (a : Array α) {i : Nat} (h : i ≥ a.size) : a[i]? = none := dif_neg (Nat.not_lt_of_le h)
-
-@[simp] theorem get?_eq_getElem? (a : Array α) (i : Nat) : a.get? i = a[i]? := rfl
-
-theorem getElem?_len_le (a : Array α) {i : Nat} (h : a.size ≤ i) : a[i]? = none := by
-  simp [getElem?_ge, h]
-
-theorem getD_get? (a : Array α) (i : Nat) (d : α) :
-  Option.getD a[i]? d = if p : i < a.size then a[i]'p else d := by
-  if h : i < a.size then
-    simp [setD, h, getElem?]
-  else
-    have p : i ≥ a.size := Nat.le_of_not_gt h
-    simp [setD, getElem?_len_le _ p, h]
-
-@[simp] theorem getD_eq_get? (a : Array α) (n d) : a.getD n d = (a[n]?).getD d := by
-  simp only [getD, get_eq_getElem, get?_eq_getElem?]; split <;> simp [getD_get?, *]
-
-theorem get!_eq_getD [Inhabited α] (a : Array α) : a.get! n = a.getD n default := rfl
-
-@[simp] theorem get!_eq_getElem? [Inhabited α] (a : Array α) (i : Nat) : a.get! i = (a.get? i).getD default := by
-  by_cases p : i < a.size <;> simp [getD_get?, get!_eq_getD, p]
-
-/-- # set -/
-
-@[simp] theorem getElem_set_eq (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) (v : α) {j : Nat}
-      (eq : i.val = j) (p : j < (a.set i v).size) :
-    (a.set i v)[j]'p = v := by
-  simp [set, getElem_eq_data_get, ←eq]
-
-@[simp] theorem getElem_set_ne (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) (v : α) {j : Nat} (pj : j < (a.set i v).size)
-    (h : i.val ≠ j) : (a.set i v)[j]'pj = a[j]'(size_set a i v ▸ pj) := by
-  simp only [set, getElem_eq_data_get, List.get_set_ne _ h]
-
-theorem getElem_set (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) (v : α) (j : Nat)
-    (h : j < (a.set i v).size) :
-    (a.set i v)[j]'h = if i = j then v else a[j]'(size_set a i v ▸ h) := by
-  by_cases p : i.1 = j <;> simp [p]
-
-@[simp] theorem getElem?_set_eq (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) (v : α) :
-    (a.set i v)[i.1]? = v := by simp [getElem?_lt, i.2]
-
-@[simp] theorem getElem?_set_ne (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) {j : Nat} (v : α)
-    (ne : i.val ≠ j) : (a.set i v)[j]? = a[j]? := by
-  by_cases h : j < a.size <;> simp [getElem?_lt, getElem?_ge, Nat.ge_of_not_lt, ne, h]
-
-/- # setD -/
-
-@[simp] theorem set!_is_setD : @set! = @setD := rfl
-
-@[simp] theorem size_setD (a : Array α) (index : Nat) (val : α) :
-  (Array.setD a index val).size = a.size := by
-  if h : index < a.size  then
-    simp [setD, h]
-  else
-    simp [setD, h]
-
-@[simp] theorem getElem_setD_eq (a : Array α) {i : Nat} (v : α) (h : _) :
-  (setD a i v)[i]'h = v := by
-  simp at h
-  simp only [setD, h, dite_true, getElem_set, ite_true]
-
-@[simp]
-theorem getElem?_setD_eq (a : Array α) {i : Nat} (p : i < a.size) (v : α) : (a.setD i v)[i]? = some v := by
-  simp [getElem?_lt, p]
-
-/-- Simplifies a normal form from `get!` -/
-@[simp] theorem getD_get?_setD (a : Array α) (i : Nat) (v d : α) :
-  Option.getD (setD a i v)[i]? d = if i < a.size then v else d := by
-  by_cases h : i < a.size <;>
-    simp [setD, Nat.not_lt_of_le, h,  getD_get?]
-
-end Array

src/Init/Data/Array/Mem.lean

@@ -8,6 +8,16 @@ import Init.Data.Array.Basic
 import Init.Data.Nat.Linear
 import Init.Data.List.BasicAux
 
+theorem List.sizeOf_get_lt [SizeOf α] (as : List α) (i : Fin as.length) : sizeOf (as.get i) < sizeOf as := by
+  match as, i with
+  | [],    i      => apply Fin.elim0 i
+  | a::as, ⟨0, _⟩ => simp_arith [get]
+  | a::as, ⟨i+1, h⟩ =>
+    simp [get]
+    have h : i < as.length := Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h
+    have ih := sizeOf_get_lt as ⟨i, h⟩
+    exact Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le ih (Nat.le_add_left ..)
+
 namespace Array
 
 /-- `a ∈ as` is a predicate which asserts that `a` is in the array `as`. -/
@@ -19,6 +29,10 @@ structure Mem (a : α) (as : Array α) : Prop where
 instance : Membership α (Array α) where
   mem a as := Mem a as
 
+theorem sizeOf_get_lt [SizeOf α] (as : Array α) (i : Fin as.size) : sizeOf (as.get i) < sizeOf as := by
+  cases as with | _ as =>
+  exact Nat.lt_trans (List.sizeOf_get_lt as i) (by simp_arith)
+
 theorem sizeOf_lt_of_mem [SizeOf α] {as : Array α} (h : a ∈ as) : sizeOf a < sizeOf as := by
   cases as with | _ as =>
   exact Nat.lt_trans (List.sizeOf_lt_of_mem h.val) (by simp_arith)

src/Init/Data/Array/QSort.lean

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ namespace Array
 -- TODO: remove the [Inhabited α] parameters as soon as we have the tactic framework for automating proof generation and using Array.fget
 
 def qpartition (as : Array α) (lt : α → α → Bool) (lo hi : Nat) : Nat × Array α :=
-  if h : as.size = 0 then (0, as) else have : Inhabited α := ⟨as[0]'(by revert h; cases as.size <;> simp)⟩ -- TODO: remove
+  if h : as.size = 0 then (0, as) else have : Inhabited α := ⟨as[0]'(by revert h; cases as.size <;> simp [Nat.zero_lt_succ])⟩ -- TODO: remove
   let mid := (lo + hi) / 2
   let as  := if lt (as.get! mid) (as.get! lo) then as.swap! lo mid else as
   let as  := if lt (as.get! hi)  (as.get! lo) then as.swap! lo hi  else as

src/Init/Data/Array/Subarray.lean

@@ -32,8 +32,6 @@ def get (s : Subarray α) (i : Fin s.size) : α :=
 instance : GetElem (Subarray α) Nat α fun xs i => i < xs.size where
   getElem xs i h := xs.get ⟨i, h⟩
 
-instance : LawfulGetElem (Subarray α) Nat α fun xs i => i < xs.size where
-
 @[inline] def getD (s : Subarray α) (i : Nat) (v₀ : α) : α :=
   if h : i < s.size then s.get ⟨i, h⟩ else v₀
 

src/Init/Data/BitVec/Basic.lean

@@ -7,7 +7,8 @@ prelude
 import Init.Data.Fin.Basic
 import Init.Data.Nat.Bitwise.Lemmas
 import Init.Data.Nat.Power2
-import Init.Data.Int.Bitwise
+
+namespace Std
 
 /-!
 We define bitvectors. We choose the `Fin` representation over others for its relative efficiency
@@ -34,8 +35,6 @@ structure BitVec (w : Nat) where
   O(1), because we use `Fin` as the internal representation of a bitvector. -/
   toFin : Fin (2^w)
 
-@[deprecated] abbrev Std.BitVec := _root_.BitVec
-
 -- We manually derive the `DecidableEq` instances for `BitVec` because
 -- we want to have builtin support for bit-vector literals, and we
 -- need a name for this function to implement `canUnfoldAtMatcher` at `WHNF.lean`.
@@ -73,9 +72,6 @@ protected def toNat (a : BitVec n) : Nat := a.toFin.val
 /-- Return the bound in terms of toNat. -/
 theorem isLt (x : BitVec w) : x.toNat < 2^w := x.toFin.isLt
 
-@[deprecated isLt]
-theorem toNat_lt (x : BitVec n) : x.toNat < 2^n := x.isLt
-
 /-- Theorem for normalizing the bit vector literal representation. -/
 -- TODO: This needs more usage data to assess which direction the simp should go.
 @[simp, bv_toNat] theorem ofNat_eq_ofNat : @OfNat.ofNat (BitVec n) i _ = .ofNat n i := rfl
@@ -128,20 +124,13 @@ section Int
 
 /-- Interpret the bitvector as an integer stored in two's complement form. -/
 protected def toInt (a : BitVec n) : Int :=
-  if 2 * a.toNat < 2^n then
-    a.toNat
-  else
-    (a.toNat : Int) - (2^n : Nat)
+  if a.msb then Int.ofNat a.toNat - Int.ofNat (2^n) else a.toNat
 
 /-- The `BitVec` with value `(2^n + (i mod 2^n)) mod 2^n`.  -/
-protected def ofInt (n : Nat) (i : Int) : BitVec n := .ofNatLt (i % (Int.ofNat (2^n))).toNat (by
-  apply (Int.toNat_lt _).mpr
-  · apply Int.emod_lt_of_pos
-    exact Int.ofNat_pos.mpr (Nat.two_pow_pos _)
-  · apply Int.emod_nonneg
-    intro eq
-    apply Nat.ne_of_gt (Nat.two_pow_pos n)
-    exact Int.ofNat_inj.mp eq)
+protected def ofInt (n : Nat) (i : Int) : BitVec n :=
+  match i with
+  | Int.ofNat x => .ofNat n x
+  | Int.negSucc x => BitVec.ofNatLt (2^n - x % 2^n - 1) (by omega)
 
 instance : IntCast (BitVec w) := ⟨BitVec.ofInt w⟩
 
@@ -177,7 +166,7 @@ protected def toHex {n : Nat} (x : BitVec n) : String :=
   let t := (List.replicate ((n+3) / 4 - s.length) '0').asString
   t ++ s
 
-instance : Repr (BitVec n) where reprPrec a _ := "0x" ++ (a.toHex : Std.Format) ++ "#" ++ repr n
+instance : Repr (BitVec n) where reprPrec a _ := "0x" ++ (a.toHex : Format) ++ "#" ++ repr n
 instance : ToString (BitVec n) where toString a := toString (repr a)
 
 end repr_toString
@@ -617,15 +606,3 @@ section normalization_eqs
 @[simp] theorem mul_eq (x y : BitVec w)                   : BitVec.mul x y = x * y            := rfl
 @[simp] theorem zero_eq                                   : BitVec.zero n = 0#n               := rfl
 end normalization_eqs
-
-/-- Converts a list of `Bool`s to a big-endian `BitVec`. -/
-def ofBoolListBE : (bs : List Bool) → BitVec bs.length
-| [] => 0#0
-| b :: bs => cons b (ofBoolListBE bs)
-
-/-- Converts a list of `Bool`s to a little-endian `BitVec`. -/
-def ofBoolListLE : (bs : List Bool) → BitVec bs.length
-| [] => 0#0
-| b :: bs => concat (ofBoolListLE bs) b
-
-end BitVec

src/Init/Data/BitVec/Bitblast.lean

@@ -5,7 +5,6 @@ Authors: Harun Khan, Abdalrhman M Mohamed, Joe Hendrix
 -/
 prelude
 import Init.Data.BitVec.Folds
-import Init.Data.Nat.Mod
 
 /-!
 # Bitblasting of bitvectors
@@ -46,7 +45,7 @@ end Bool
 
 /-! ### Preliminaries -/
 
-namespace BitVec
+namespace Std.BitVec
 
 private theorem testBit_limit {x i : Nat} (x_lt_succ : x < 2^(i+1)) :
     testBit x i = decide (x ≥ 2^i) := by
@@ -71,12 +70,28 @@ private theorem testBit_limit {x i : Nat} (x_lt_succ : x < 2^(i+1)) :
              _ ≤ x := testBit_implies_ge jp
 
 private theorem mod_two_pow_succ (x i : Nat) :
-    x % 2^(i+1) = 2^i*(x.testBit i).toNat + x % (2 ^ i):= by
-  rw [Nat.mod_pow_succ, Nat.add_comm, Nat.toNat_testBit]
+  x % 2^(i+1) = 2^i*(x.testBit i).toNat + x % (2 ^ i):= by
+  apply Nat.eq_of_testBit_eq
+  intro j
+  simp only [Nat.mul_add_lt_is_or, testBit_or, testBit_mod_two_pow, testBit_shiftLeft,
+    Nat.testBit_bool_to_nat, Nat.sub_eq_zero_iff_le, Nat.mod_lt, Nat.two_pow_pos,
+    testBit_mul_pow_two]
+  rcases Nat.lt_trichotomy i j with i_lt_j | i_eq_j | j_lt_i
+  · have i_le_j : i ≤ j := Nat.le_of_lt i_lt_j
+    have not_j_le_i : ¬(j ≤ i) := Nat.not_le_of_lt i_lt_j
+    have not_j_lt_i : ¬(j < i) := Nat.not_lt_of_le i_le_j
+    have not_j_lt_i_succ : ¬(j < i + 1) :=
+          Nat.not_le_of_lt (Nat.succ_lt_succ i_lt_j)
+    simp [i_le_j, not_j_le_i, not_j_lt_i, not_j_lt_i_succ]
+  · simp [i_eq_j]
+  · have j_le_i : j ≤ i := Nat.le_of_lt j_lt_i
+    have j_le_i_succ : j < i + 1 := Nat.succ_le_succ j_le_i
+    have not_j_ge_i : ¬(j ≥ i) := Nat.not_le_of_lt j_lt_i
+    simp [j_lt_i, j_le_i, not_j_ge_i, j_le_i_succ]
 
 private theorem mod_two_pow_add_mod_two_pow_add_bool_lt_two_pow_succ
      (x y i : Nat) (c : Bool) : x % 2^i + (y % 2^i + c.toNat) < 2^(i+1) := by
-  have : c.toNat ≤ 1 := Bool.toNat_le c
+  have : c.toNat ≤ 1 := Bool.toNat_le_one c
   rw [Nat.pow_succ]
   omega
 
@@ -158,5 +173,3 @@ theorem add_eq_adc (w : Nat) (x y : BitVec w) : x + y = (adc x y false).snd := b
 /-- Subtracting `x` from the all ones bitvector is equivalent to taking its complement -/
 theorem allOnes_sub_eq_not (x : BitVec w) : allOnes w - x = ~~~x := by
   rw [← add_not_self x, BitVec.add_comm, add_sub_cancel]
-
-end BitVec

src/Init/Data/BitVec/Folds.lean

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ import Init.Data.BitVec.Lemmas
 import Init.Data.Nat.Lemmas
 import Init.Data.Fin.Iterate
 
-namespace BitVec
+namespace Std.BitVec
 
 /--
 iunfoldr is an iterative operation that applies a function `f` repeatedly.
@@ -57,5 +57,3 @@ theorem iunfoldr_replace
     (step : ∀(i : Fin w), f i (state i.val) = (state (i.val+1), value.getLsb i.val)) :
     iunfoldr f a = (state w, value) := by
   simp [iunfoldr.eq_test state value a init step]
-
-end BitVec

src/Init/Data/BitVec/Lemmas.lean

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ import Init.Data.BitVec.Basic
 import Init.Data.Fin.Lemmas
 import Init.Data.Nat.Lemmas
 
-namespace BitVec
+namespace Std.BitVec
 
 /--
 This normalized a bitvec using `ofFin` to `ofNat`.
@@ -29,48 +29,26 @@ theorem eq_of_toNat_eq {n} : ∀ {i j : BitVec n}, i.toNat = j.toNat → i = j
 @[bv_toNat] theorem toNat_ne (x y : BitVec n) : x ≠ y ↔ x.toNat ≠ y.toNat := by
   rw [Ne, toNat_eq]
 
+theorem toNat_lt (x : BitVec n) : x.toNat < 2^n := x.toFin.2
+
 theorem testBit_toNat (x : BitVec w) : x.toNat.testBit i = x.getLsb i := rfl
 
 @[simp] theorem getLsb_ofFin (x : Fin (2^n)) (i : Nat) :
   getLsb (BitVec.ofFin x) i = x.val.testBit i := rfl
 
-@[simp] theorem getLsb_ge (x : BitVec w) (i : Nat) (ge : w ≤ i) : getLsb x i = false := by
+@[simp] theorem getLsb_ge (x : BitVec w) (i : Nat) (ge : i ≥ w) : getLsb x i = false := by
   let ⟨x, x_lt⟩ := x
   simp
   apply Nat.testBit_lt_two_pow
   have p : 2^w ≤ 2^i := Nat.pow_le_pow_of_le_right (by omega) ge
   omega
 
-@[simp] theorem getMsb_ge (x : BitVec w) (i : Nat) (ge : w ≤ i) : getMsb x i = false := by
-  rw [getMsb]
-  simp only [Bool.and_eq_false_imp, decide_eq_true_eq]
-  omega
-
 theorem lt_of_getLsb (x : BitVec w) (i : Nat) : getLsb x i = true → i < w := by
   if h : i < w then
     simp [h]
   else
     simp [Nat.ge_of_not_lt h]
 
-theorem lt_of_getMsb (x : BitVec w) (i : Nat) : getMsb x i = true → i < w := by
-  if h : i < w then
-    simp [h]
-  else
-    simp [Nat.ge_of_not_lt h]
-
-theorem getMsb_eq_getLsb (x : BitVec w) (i : Nat) : x.getMsb i = (decide (i < w) && x.getLsb (w - 1 - i)) := by
-  rw [getMsb]
-
-theorem getLsb_eq_getMsb (x : BitVec w) (i : Nat) : x.getLsb i = (decide (i < w) && x.getMsb (w - 1 - i)) := by
-  rw [getMsb]
-  by_cases h₁ : i < w <;> by_cases h₂ : w - 1 - i < w <;>
-    simp only [h₁, h₂] <;> simp only [decide_True, decide_False, Bool.false_and, Bool.and_false, Bool.true_and, Bool.and_true]
-  · congr
-    omega
-  all_goals
-    apply getLsb_ge
-    omega
-
 -- We choose `eq_of_getLsb_eq` as the `@[ext]` theorem for `BitVec`
 -- somewhat arbitrarily over `eq_of_getMsg_eq`.
 @[ext] theorem eq_of_getLsb_eq {x y : BitVec w}
@@ -94,7 +72,7 @@ theorem eq_of_getMsb_eq {x y : BitVec w}
   else
     have w_pos := Nat.pos_of_ne_zero w_zero
     have r : i ≤ w - 1 := by
-      simp [Nat.le_sub_iff_add_le w_pos]
+      simp [Nat.le_sub_iff_add_le w_pos, Nat.add_succ]
       exact i_lt
     have q_lt : w - 1 - i < w := by
       simp only [Nat.sub_sub]
@@ -111,17 +89,12 @@ theorem eq_of_toFin_eq : ∀ {x y : BitVec w}, x.toFin = y.toFin → x = y
 @[simp] theorem toNat_ofBool (b : Bool) : (ofBool b).toNat = b.toNat := by
   cases b <;> rfl
 
-@[simp] theorem msb_ofBool (b : Bool) : (ofBool b).msb = b := by
-  cases b <;> simp [BitVec.msb]
-
 theorem ofNat_one (n : Nat) : BitVec.ofNat 1 n = BitVec.ofBool (n % 2 = 1) :=  by
   rcases (Nat.mod_two_eq_zero_or_one n) with h | h <;> simp [h, BitVec.ofNat, Fin.ofNat']
 
 theorem ofBool_eq_iff_eq : ∀(b b' : Bool), BitVec.ofBool b = BitVec.ofBool b' ↔ b = b' := by
   decide
 
-@[simp] theorem not_ofBool : ~~~ (ofBool b) = ofBool (!b) := by cases b <;> rfl
-
 @[simp, bv_toNat] theorem toNat_ofFin (x : Fin (2^n)) : (BitVec.ofFin x).toNat = x.val := rfl
 
 @[simp] theorem toNat_ofNatLt (x : Nat) (p : x < 2^w) : (x#'p).toNat = x := rfl
@@ -143,8 +116,6 @@ theorem getLsb_ofNat (n : Nat) (x : Nat) (i : Nat) :
 
 @[simp] theorem getLsb_zero : (0#w).getLsb i = false := by simp [getLsb]
 
-@[simp] theorem getMsb_zero : (0#w).getMsb i = false := by simp [getMsb]
-
 @[simp] theorem toNat_mod_cancel (x : BitVec n) : x.toNat % (2^n) = x.toNat :=
   Nat.mod_eq_of_lt x.isLt
 
@@ -162,35 +133,21 @@ theorem msb_eq_getLsb_last (x : BitVec w) :
   · simp [BitVec.eq_nil x]
   · simp
 
-@[bv_toNat] theorem getLsb_last (x : BitVec w) :
-    x.getLsb (w-1) = decide (2 ^ (w-1) ≤ x.toNat) := by
-  rcases w with rfl | w
-  · simp
-  · simp only [Nat.zero_lt_succ, decide_True, getLsb, Nat.testBit, Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub,
+@[bv_toNat] theorem getLsb_last (x : BitVec (w + 1)) :
+    x.getLsb w = decide (2 ^ w ≤ x.toNat) := by
+  simp only [Nat.zero_lt_succ, decide_True, getLsb, Nat.testBit, Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub,
     Nat.sub_zero, Nat.and_one_is_mod, Bool.true_and, Nat.shiftRight_eq_div_pow]
-    rcases (Nat.lt_or_ge (BitVec.toNat x) (2 ^ w)) with h | h
-    · simp [Nat.div_eq_of_lt h, h]
-    · simp only [h]
-      rw [Nat.div_eq_sub_div (Nat.two_pow_pos w) h, Nat.div_eq_of_lt]
-      · decide
-      · have : BitVec.toNat x < 2^w + 2^w := by simpa [Nat.pow_succ, Nat.mul_two] using x.isLt
-        omega
+  rcases (Nat.lt_or_ge (BitVec.toNat x) (2 ^ w)) with h | h
+  · simp [Nat.div_eq_of_lt h, h]
+  · simp only [h]
+    rw [Nat.div_eq_sub_div (Nat.two_pow_pos w) h, Nat.div_eq_of_lt]
+    · decide
+    · have : BitVec.toNat x < 2^w + 2^w := by simpa [Nat.pow_succ, Nat.mul_two] using x.isLt
+      omega
 
-@[bv_toNat] theorem getLsb_succ_last (x : BitVec (w + 1)) :
-    x.getLsb w = decide (2 ^ w ≤ x.toNat) := getLsb_last x
-
-@[bv_toNat] theorem msb_eq_decide (x : BitVec w) : BitVec.msb x = decide (2 ^ (w-1) ≤ x.toNat) := by
+@[bv_toNat] theorem msb_eq_decide (x : BitVec (w + 1)) : BitVec.msb x = decide (2 ^ w ≤ x.toNat) := by
   simp [msb_eq_getLsb_last, getLsb_last]
 
-theorem toNat_ge_of_msb_true {x : BitVec n} (p : BitVec.msb x = true) : x.toNat ≥ 2^(n-1) := by
-  match n with
-  | 0 =>
-    simp [BitVec.msb, BitVec.getMsb] at p
-  | n + 1 =>
-    simp [BitVec.msb_eq_decide] at p
-    simp only [Nat.add_sub_cancel]
-    exact p
-
 /-! ### cast -/
 
 @[simp, bv_toNat] theorem toNat_cast (h : w = v) (x : BitVec w) : (cast h x).toNat = x.toNat := rfl
@@ -206,53 +163,6 @@ theorem toNat_ge_of_msb_true {x : BitVec n} (p : BitVec.msb x = true) : x.toNat
 @[simp] theorem msb_cast (h : w = v) (x : BitVec w) : (cast h x).msb = x.msb := by
   simp [BitVec.msb]
 
-/-! ### toInt/ofInt -/
-
-/-- Prove equality of bitvectors in terms of nat operations. -/
-theorem toInt_eq_toNat_cond (i : BitVec n) :
-    i.toInt =
-      if 2*i.toNat < 2^n then
-        (i.toNat : Int)
-      else
-        (i.toNat : Int) - (2^n : Nat) := by
-  unfold BitVec.toInt
-  split <;> omega
-
-theorem toInt_eq_toNat_bmod (x : BitVec n) : x.toInt = Int.bmod x.toNat (2^n) := by
-  simp only [toInt_eq_toNat_cond]
-  split
-  case inl g =>
-    rw [Int.bmod_pos] <;> simp only [←Int.ofNat_emod, toNat_mod_cancel]
-    omega
-  case inr g =>
-    rw [Int.bmod_neg] <;> simp only [←Int.ofNat_emod, toNat_mod_cancel]
-    omega
-
-/-- Prove equality of bitvectors in terms of nat operations. -/
-theorem eq_of_toInt_eq {i j : BitVec n} : i.toInt = j.toInt → i = j := by
-  intro eq
-  simp [toInt_eq_toNat_cond] at eq
-  apply eq_of_toNat_eq
-  revert eq
-  have _ilt := i.isLt
-  have _jlt := j.isLt
-  split <;> split <;> omega
-
-@[simp] theorem toNat_ofInt {n : Nat} (i : Int) :
-  (BitVec.ofInt n i).toNat = (i % (2^n : Nat)).toNat := by
-  unfold BitVec.ofInt
-  simp
-
-theorem toInt_ofNat {n : Nat} (x : Nat) :
-  (BitVec.ofNat n x).toInt = (x : Int).bmod (2^n) := by
-  simp [toInt_eq_toNat_bmod]
-
-@[simp] theorem toInt_ofInt {n : Nat} (i : Int) :
-  (BitVec.ofInt n i).toInt = i.bmod (2^n) := by
-  have _ := Nat.two_pow_pos n
-  have p : 0 ≤ i % (2^n : Nat) := by omega
-  simp [toInt_eq_toNat_bmod, Int.toNat_of_nonneg p]
-
 /-! ### zeroExtend and truncate -/
 
 @[simp, bv_toNat] theorem toNat_zeroExtend' {m n : Nat} (p : m ≤ n) (x : BitVec m) :
@@ -270,12 +180,6 @@ theorem toInt_ofNat {n : Nat} (x : Nat) :
   else
     simp [n_le_i, toNat_ofNat]
 
-theorem zeroExtend'_eq {x : BitVec w} (h : w ≤ v) : x.zeroExtend' h = x.zeroExtend v := by
-  apply eq_of_toNat_eq
-  rw [toNat_zeroExtend, toNat_zeroExtend']
-  rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
-  exact Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le x.isLt (Nat.pow_le_pow_right (Nat.zero_lt_two) h)
-
 @[simp, bv_toNat] theorem toNat_truncate (x : BitVec n) : (truncate i x).toNat = x.toNat % 2^i :=
   toNat_zeroExtend i x
 
@@ -294,64 +198,18 @@ theorem zeroExtend'_eq {x : BitVec w} (h : w ≤ v) : x.zeroExtend' h = x.zeroEx
   apply eq_of_toNat_eq
   simp
 
-/-- Moves one-sided left toNat equality to BitVec equality. -/
-theorem toNat_eq_nat (x : BitVec w) (y : Nat)
-  : (x.toNat = y) ↔ (y < 2^w ∧ (x = y#w)) := by
-  apply Iff.intro
-  · intro eq
-    simp at eq
-    have lt := x.isLt
-    simp [eq] at lt
-    simp [←eq, lt, x.isLt]
-  · intro eq
-    simp [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt, eq]
-
-/-- Moves one-sided right toNat equality to BitVec equality. -/
-theorem nat_eq_toNat (x : BitVec w) (y : Nat)
-  : (y = x.toNat) ↔ (y < 2^w ∧ (x = y#w)) := by
-  rw [@eq_comm _ _ x.toNat]
-  apply toNat_eq_nat
-
 @[simp] theorem getLsb_zeroExtend' (ge : m ≥ n) (x : BitVec n) (i : Nat) :
     getLsb (zeroExtend' ge x) i = getLsb x i := by
   simp [getLsb, toNat_zeroExtend']
 
-@[simp] theorem getMsb_zeroExtend' (ge : m ≥ n) (x : BitVec n) (i : Nat) :
-    getMsb (zeroExtend' ge x) i = (decide (i ≥ m - n) && getMsb x (i - (m - n))) := by
-  simp only [getMsb, getLsb_zeroExtend', gt_iff_lt]
-  by_cases h₁ : decide (i < m) <;> by_cases h₂ : decide (i ≥ m - n) <;> by_cases h₃ : decide (i - (m - n) < n) <;>
-    by_cases h₄ : n - 1 - (i - (m - n)) = m - 1 - i
-  all_goals
-    simp only [h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄]
-    simp_all only [ge_iff_le, decide_eq_true_eq, Nat.not_le, Nat.not_lt, Bool.true_and,
-      Bool.false_and, Bool.and_self] <;>
-    (try apply getLsb_ge) <;>
-    (try apply (getLsb_ge _ _ _).symm) <;>
-    omega
-
 @[simp] theorem getLsb_zeroExtend (m : Nat) (x : BitVec n) (i : Nat) :
     getLsb (zeroExtend m x) i = (decide (i < m) && getLsb x i) := by
   simp [getLsb, toNat_zeroExtend, Nat.testBit_mod_two_pow]
 
-@[simp] theorem getMsb_zeroExtend_add {x : BitVec w} (h : k ≤ i) :
-    (x.zeroExtend (w + k)).getMsb i = x.getMsb (i - k) := by
-  by_cases h : w = 0
-  · subst h; simp
-  simp only [getMsb, getLsb_zeroExtend]
-  by_cases h₁ : i < w + k <;> by_cases h₂ : i - k < w <;> by_cases h₃ : w + k - 1 - i < w + k
-    <;> simp [h₁, h₂, h₃]
-  · congr 1
-    omega
-  all_goals (first | apply getLsb_ge | apply Eq.symm; apply getLsb_ge)
-    <;> omega
-
 @[simp] theorem getLsb_truncate (m : Nat) (x : BitVec n) (i : Nat) :
     getLsb (truncate m x) i = (decide (i < m) && getLsb x i) :=
   getLsb_zeroExtend m x i
 
-theorem msb_truncate (x : BitVec w) : (x.truncate (k + 1)).msb = x.getLsb k := by
-  simp [BitVec.msb, getMsb]
-
 @[simp] theorem zeroExtend_zeroExtend_of_le (x : BitVec w) (h : k ≤ l) :
     (x.zeroExtend l).zeroExtend k = x.zeroExtend k := by
   ext i
@@ -364,18 +222,11 @@ theorem msb_truncate (x : BitVec w) : (x.truncate (k + 1)).msb = x.getLsb k := b
     (x.truncate l).truncate k = x.truncate k :=
   zeroExtend_zeroExtend_of_le x h
 
-@[simp] theorem truncate_cast {h : w = v} : (cast h x).truncate k = x.truncate k := by
-  apply eq_of_getLsb_eq
-  simp
-
 theorem msb_zeroExtend (x : BitVec w) : (x.zeroExtend v).msb = (decide (0 < v) && x.getLsb (v - 1)) := by
   rw [msb_eq_getLsb_last]
   simp only [getLsb_zeroExtend]
   cases getLsb x (v - 1) <;> simp; omega
 
-theorem msb_zeroExtend' (x : BitVec w) (h : w ≤ v) : (x.zeroExtend' h).msb = (decide (0 < v) && x.getLsb (v - 1)) := by
-  rw [zeroExtend'_eq, msb_zeroExtend]
-
 /-! ## extractLsb -/
 
 @[simp]
@@ -423,18 +274,6 @@ protected theorem extractLsb_ofNat (x n : Nat) (hi lo : Nat) :
   rw [← testBit_toNat, getLsb, getLsb]
   simp
 
-@[simp] theorem getMsb_or {x y : BitVec w} : (x ||| y).getMsb i = (x.getMsb i || y.getMsb i) := by
-  simp only [getMsb]
-  by_cases h : i < w <;> simp [h]
-
-@[simp] theorem msb_or {x y : BitVec w} : (x ||| y).msb = (x.msb || y.msb) := by
-  simp [BitVec.msb]
-
-@[simp] theorem truncate_or {x y : BitVec w} :
-    (x ||| y).truncate k = x.truncate k ||| y.truncate k := by
-  ext
-  simp
-
 /-! ### and -/
 
 @[simp] theorem toNat_and (x y : BitVec v) :
@@ -449,18 +288,6 @@ protected theorem extractLsb_ofNat (x n : Nat) (hi lo : Nat) :
   rw [← testBit_toNat, getLsb, getLsb]
   simp
 
-@[simp] theorem getMsb_and {x y : BitVec w} : (x &&& y).getMsb i = (x.getMsb i && y.getMsb i) := by
-  simp only [getMsb]
-  by_cases h : i < w <;> simp [h]
-
-@[simp] theorem msb_and {x y : BitVec w} : (x &&& y).msb = (x.msb && y.msb) := by
-  simp [BitVec.msb]
-
-@[simp] theorem truncate_and {x y : BitVec w} :
-    (x &&& y).truncate k = x.truncate k &&& y.truncate k := by
-  ext
-  simp
-
 /-! ### xor -/
 
 @[simp] theorem toNat_xor (x y : BitVec v) :
@@ -476,11 +303,6 @@ protected theorem extractLsb_ofNat (x n : Nat) (hi lo : Nat) :
   rw [← testBit_toNat, getLsb, getLsb]
   simp
 
-@[simp] theorem truncate_xor {x y : BitVec w} :
-    (x ^^^ y).truncate k = x.truncate k ^^^ y.truncate k := by
-  ext
-  simp
-
 /-! ### not -/
 
 theorem not_def {x : BitVec v} : ~~~x = allOnes v ^^^ x := rfl
@@ -495,12 +317,12 @@ theorem not_def {x : BitVec v} : ~~~x = allOnes v ^^^ x := rfl
   | y+1 =>
     rw [Nat.succ_eq_add_one] at h
     rw [← h]
-    rw [Nat.testBit_two_pow_sub_succ (isLt _)]
+    rw [Nat.testBit_two_pow_sub_succ (toNat_lt _)]
     · cases w : decide (i < v)
       · simp at w
         simp [w]
         rw [Nat.testBit_lt_two_pow]
-        calc BitVec.toNat x < 2 ^ v := isLt _
+        calc BitVec.toNat x < 2 ^ v := toNat_lt _
           _ ≤ 2 ^ i := Nat.pow_le_pow_of_le_right Nat.zero_lt_two w
       · simp
 
@@ -513,30 +335,6 @@ theorem not_def {x : BitVec v} : ~~~x = allOnes v ^^^ x := rfl
 @[simp] theorem getLsb_not {x : BitVec v} : (~~~x).getLsb i = (decide (i < v) && ! x.getLsb i) := by
   by_cases h' : i < v <;> simp_all [not_def]
 
-@[simp] theorem truncate_not {x : BitVec w} (h : k ≤ w) :
-    (~~~x).truncate k = ~~~(x.truncate k) := by
-  ext
-  simp [h]
-  omega
-
-/-! ### cast -/
-
-@[simp] theorem not_cast {x : BitVec w} (h : w = w') : ~~~(cast h x) = cast h (~~~x) := by
-  ext
-  simp_all [lt_of_getLsb]
-
-@[simp] theorem and_cast {x y : BitVec w} (h : w = w') : cast h x &&& cast h y = cast h (x &&& y) := by
-  ext
-  simp_all [lt_of_getLsb]
-
-@[simp] theorem or_cast {x y : BitVec w} (h : w = w') : cast h x ||| cast h y = cast h (x ||| y) := by
-  ext
-  simp_all [lt_of_getLsb]
-
-@[simp] theorem xor_cast {x y : BitVec w} (h : w = w') : cast h x &&& cast h y = cast h (x &&& y) := by
-  ext
-  simp_all [lt_of_getLsb]
-
 /-! ### shiftLeft -/
 
 @[simp, bv_toNat] theorem toNat_shiftLeft {x : BitVec v} :
@@ -554,19 +352,6 @@ theorem not_def {x : BitVec v} : ~~~x = allOnes v ^^^ x := rfl
   cases h₁ : decide (i < m) <;> cases h₂ : decide (n ≤ i) <;> cases h₃ : decide (i < n)
   all_goals { simp_all <;> omega }
 
-@[simp] theorem getMsb_shiftLeft (x : BitVec w) (i) :
-    (x <<< i).getMsb k = x.getMsb (k + i) := by
-  simp only [getMsb, getLsb_shiftLeft]
-  by_cases h : w = 0
-  · subst h; simp
-  have t : w - 1 - k < w := by omega
-  simp only [t]
-  simp only [decide_True, Nat.sub_sub, Bool.true_and, Nat.add_assoc]
-  by_cases h₁ : k < w <;> by_cases h₂ : w - (1 + k) < i <;> by_cases h₃ : k + i < w
-    <;> simp [h₁, h₂, h₃]
-    <;> (first | apply getLsb_ge | apply Eq.symm; apply getLsb_ge)
-    <;> omega
-
 theorem shiftLeftZeroExtend_eq {x : BitVec w} :
     shiftLeftZeroExtend x n = zeroExtend (w+n) x <<< n := by
   apply eq_of_toNat_eq
@@ -575,7 +360,7 @@ theorem shiftLeftZeroExtend_eq {x : BitVec w} :
   · simp
     rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
     rw [Nat.shiftLeft_eq, Nat.pow_add]
-    exact Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right x.isLt (Nat.two_pow_pos _)
+    exact Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right (BitVec.toNat_lt x) (Nat.two_pow_pos _)
   · omega
 
 @[simp] theorem getLsb_shiftLeftZeroExtend (x : BitVec m) (n : Nat) :
@@ -586,15 +371,6 @@ theorem shiftLeftZeroExtend_eq {x : BitVec w} :
     <;> simp_all
     <;> (rw [getLsb_ge]; omega)
 
-@[simp] theorem getMsb_shiftLeftZeroExtend (x : BitVec m) (n : Nat) :
-    getMsb (shiftLeftZeroExtend x n) i = getMsb x i := by
-  have : n ≤ i + n := by omega
-  simp_all [shiftLeftZeroExtend_eq]
-
-@[simp] theorem msb_shiftLeftZeroExtend (x : BitVec w) (i : Nat) :
-    (shiftLeftZeroExtend x i).msb = x.msb := by
-  simp [shiftLeftZeroExtend_eq, BitVec.msb]
-
 /-! ### ushiftRight -/
 
 @[simp, bv_toNat] theorem toNat_ushiftRight (x : BitVec n) (i : Nat) :
@@ -615,71 +391,11 @@ theorem append_def (x : BitVec v) (y : BitVec w) :
 
 @[simp] theorem getLsb_append {v : BitVec n} {w : BitVec m} :
     getLsb (v ++ w) i = bif i < m then getLsb w i else getLsb v (i - m) := by
-  simp only [append_def, getLsb_or, getLsb_shiftLeftZeroExtend, getLsb_zeroExtend']
+  simp [append_def]
   by_cases h : i < m
   · simp [h]
   · simp [h]; simp_all
 
-@[simp] theorem getMsb_append {v : BitVec n} {w : BitVec m} :
-    getMsb (v ++ w) i = bif n ≤ i then getMsb w (i - n) else getMsb v i := by
-  simp [append_def]
-  by_cases h : n ≤ i
-  · simp [h]
-  · simp [h]
-
-theorem msb_append {x : BitVec w} {y : BitVec v} :
-    (x ++ y).msb = bif (w == 0) then (y.msb) else (x.msb) := by
-  rw [← append_eq, append]
-  simp [msb_zeroExtend']
-  by_cases h : w = 0
-  · subst h
-    simp [BitVec.msb, getMsb]
-  · rw [cond_eq_if]
-    have q : 0 < w + v := by omega
-    have t : y.getLsb (w + v - 1) = false := getLsb_ge _ _ (by omega)
-    simp [h, q, t, BitVec.msb, getMsb]
-
-@[simp] theorem truncate_append {x : BitVec w} {y : BitVec v} :
-    (x ++ y).truncate k = if h : k ≤ v then y.truncate k else (x.truncate (k - v) ++ y).cast (by omega) := by
-  apply eq_of_getLsb_eq
-  intro i
-  simp only [getLsb_zeroExtend, Fin.is_lt, decide_True, getLsb_append, Bool.true_and]
-  split
-  · have t : i < v := by omega
-    simp [t]
-  · by_cases t : i < v
-    · simp [t]
-    · have t' : i - v < k - v := by omega
-      simp [t, t']
-
-@[simp] theorem truncate_cons {x : BitVec w} : (cons a x).truncate w = x := by
-  simp [cons]
-
-@[simp] theorem not_append {x : BitVec w} {y : BitVec v} : ~~~ (x ++ y) = (~~~ x) ++ (~~~ y) := by
-  ext i
-  simp only [getLsb_not, getLsb_append, cond_eq_if]
-  split
-  · simp_all
-  · simp_all; omega
-
-@[simp] theorem and_append {x₁ x₂ : BitVec w} {y₁ y₂ : BitVec v} :
-    (x₁ ++ y₁) &&& (x₂ ++ y₂) = (x₁ &&& x₂) ++ (y₁ &&& y₂) := by
-  ext i
-  simp only [getLsb_append, cond_eq_if]
-  split <;> simp [*]
-
-@[simp] theorem or_append {x₁ x₂ : BitVec w} {y₁ y₂ : BitVec v} :
-    (x₁ ++ y₁) ||| (x₂ ++ y₂) = (x₁ ||| x₂) ++ (y₁ ||| y₂) := by
-  ext i
-  simp only [getLsb_append, cond_eq_if]
-  split <;> simp [*]
-
-@[simp] theorem xor_append {x₁ x₂ : BitVec w} {y₁ y₂ : BitVec v} :
-    (x₁ ++ y₁) ^^^ (x₂ ++ y₂) = (x₁ ^^^ x₂) ++ (y₁ ^^^ y₂) := by
-  ext i
-  simp only [getLsb_append, cond_eq_if]
-  split <;> simp [*]
-
 /-! ### rev -/
 
 theorem getLsb_rev (x : BitVec w) (i : Fin w) :
@@ -702,11 +418,6 @@ theorem getMsb_rev (x : BitVec w) (i : Fin w) :
   let ⟨x, _⟩ := x
   simp [cons, toNat_append, toNat_ofBool]
 
-/-- Variant of `toNat_cons` using `+` instead of `|||`. -/
-theorem toNat_cons' {x : BitVec w} :
-    (cons a x).toNat = (a.toNat <<< w) + x.toNat := by
-  simp [cons, Nat.shiftLeft_eq, Nat.mul_comm _ (2^w), Nat.mul_add_lt_is_or, x.isLt]
-
 @[simp] theorem getLsb_cons (b : Bool) {n} (x : BitVec n) (i : Nat) :
     getLsb (cons b x) i = if i = n then b else getLsb x i := by
   simp only [getLsb, toNat_cons, Nat.testBit_or]
@@ -721,15 +432,6 @@ theorem toNat_cons' {x : BitVec w} :
     have p2 : i - n ≠ 0 := by omega
     simp [p1, p2, Nat.testBit_bool_to_nat]
 
-@[simp] theorem msb_cons : (cons a x).msb = a := by
-  simp [cons, msb_cast, msb_append]
-
-@[simp] theorem getMsb_cons_zero : (cons a x).getMsb 0 = a := by
-  rw [← BitVec.msb, msb_cons]
-
-@[simp] theorem getMsb_cons_succ : (cons a x).getMsb (i + 1) = x.getMsb i := by
-  simp [cons, Nat.le_add_left 1 i]
-
 theorem truncate_succ (x : BitVec w) :
     truncate (i+1) x = cons (getLsb x i) (truncate i x) := by
   apply eq_of_getLsb_eq
@@ -741,41 +443,8 @@ theorem truncate_succ (x : BitVec w) :
     have j_lt : j.val < i := Nat.lt_of_le_of_ne (Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ j.isLt) j_eq
     simp [j_eq, j_lt]
 
-theorem eq_msb_cons_truncate (x : BitVec (w+1)) : x = (cons x.msb (x.truncate w)) := by
-  ext i
-  simp
-  split <;> rename_i h
-  · simp [BitVec.msb, getMsb, h]
-  · by_cases h' : i < w
-    · simp_all
-    · omega
-
-@[simp] theorem not_cons (x : BitVec w) (b : Bool) : ~~~(cons b x) = cons (!b) (~~~x) := by
-  simp [cons]
-
-@[simp] theorem cons_or_cons (x y : BitVec w) (a b : Bool) :
-    (cons a x) ||| (cons b y) = cons (a || b) (x ||| y) := by
-  ext i; cases i using Fin.succRecOn <;> simp <;> split <;> rfl
-
-@[simp] theorem cons_and_cons (x y : BitVec w) (a b : Bool) :
-    (cons a x) &&& (cons b y) = cons (a && b) (x &&& y) := by
-  ext i; cases i using Fin.succRecOn <;> simp <;> split <;> rfl
-
-@[simp] theorem cons_xor_cons (x y : BitVec w) (a b : Bool) :
-    (cons a x) ^^^ (cons b y) = cons (xor a b) (x ^^^ y) := by
-  ext i; cases i using Fin.succRecOn <;> simp <;> split <;> rfl
-
 /-! ### concat -/
 
-@[simp] theorem toNat_concat (x : BitVec w) (b : Bool) :
-    (concat x b).toNat = x.toNat * 2 + b.toNat := by
-  apply Nat.eq_of_testBit_eq
-  simp only [concat, toNat_append, Nat.shiftLeft_eq, Nat.pow_one, toNat_ofBool, Nat.testBit_or]
-  cases b
-  · simp
-  · rintro (_ | i)
-    <;> simp [Nat.add_mod, Nat.add_comm, Nat.add_mul_div_right]
-
 theorem getLsb_concat (x : BitVec w) (b : Bool) (i : Nat) :
     (concat x b).getLsb i = if i = 0 then b else x.getLsb (i - 1) := by
   simp only [concat, getLsb, toNat_append, toNat_ofBool, Nat.testBit_or, Nat.shiftLeft_eq]
@@ -789,21 +458,6 @@ theorem getLsb_concat (x : BitVec w) (b : Bool) (i : Nat) :
 @[simp] theorem getLsb_concat_succ : (concat x b).getLsb (i + 1) = x.getLsb i := by
   simp [getLsb_concat]
 
-@[simp] theorem not_concat (x : BitVec w) (b : Bool) : ~~~(concat x b) = concat (~~~x) !b := by
-  ext i; cases i using Fin.succRecOn <;> simp [*, Nat.succ_lt_succ]
-
-@[simp] theorem concat_or_concat (x y : BitVec w) (a b : Bool) :
-    (concat x a) ||| (concat y b) = concat (x ||| y) (a || b) := by
-  ext i; cases i using Fin.succRecOn <;> simp
-
-@[simp] theorem concat_and_concat (x y : BitVec w) (a b : Bool) :
-    (concat x a) &&& (concat y b) = concat (x &&& y) (a && b) := by
-  ext i; cases i using Fin.succRecOn <;> simp
-
-@[simp] theorem concat_xor_concat (x y : BitVec w) (a b : Bool) :
-    (concat x a) ^^^ (concat y b) = concat (x ^^^ y) (xor a b) := by
-  ext i; cases i using Fin.succRecOn <;> simp
-
 /-! ### add -/
 
 theorem add_def {n} (x y : BitVec n) : x + y = .ofNat n (x.toNat + y.toNat) := rfl
@@ -830,10 +484,6 @@ protected theorem add_comm (x y : BitVec n) : x + y = y + x := by
 
 @[simp] protected theorem zero_add (x : BitVec n) : 0#n + x = x := by simp [add_def]
 
-theorem truncate_add (x y : BitVec w) (h : i ≤ w) :
-    (x + y).truncate i = x.truncate i + y.truncate i := by
-  have dvd : 2^i ∣ 2^w := Nat.pow_dvd_pow _ h
-  simp [bv_toNat, h, Nat.mod_mod_of_dvd _ dvd]
 
 /-! ### sub/neg -/
 
@@ -939,35 +589,3 @@ protected theorem lt_of_le_ne (x y : BitVec n) (h1 : x <= y) (h2 : ¬ x = y) : x
   let ⟨y, lt⟩ := y
   simp
   exact Nat.lt_of_le_of_ne
-
-/-! ### intMax -/
-
-/-- The bitvector of width `w` that has the largest value when interpreted as an integer. -/
-def intMax (w : Nat) : BitVec w  := (2^w - 1)#w
-
-theorem getLsb_intMax_eq (w : Nat) : (intMax w).getLsb i = decide (i < w) := by
-  simp [intMax, getLsb]
-
-theorem toNat_intMax_eq : (intMax w).toNat = 2^w - 1 := by
-  have h : 2^w - 1 < 2^w := by
-    have pos : 2^w > 0 := Nat.pow_pos (by decide)
-    omega
-  simp [intMax, Nat.shiftLeft_eq, Nat.one_mul, natCast_eq_ofNat, toNat_ofNat, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h]
-
-/-! ### ofBoolList -/
-
-@[simp] theorem getMsb_ofBoolListBE : (ofBoolListBE bs).getMsb i = bs.getD i false := by
-  induction bs generalizing i <;> cases i <;> simp_all [ofBoolListBE]
-
-@[simp] theorem getLsb_ofBoolListBE :
-    (ofBoolListBE bs).getLsb i = (decide (i < bs.length) && bs.getD (bs.length - 1 - i) false) := by
-  simp [getLsb_eq_getMsb]
-
-@[simp] theorem getLsb_ofBoolListLE : (ofBoolListLE bs).getLsb i = bs.getD i false := by
-  induction bs generalizing i <;> cases i <;> simp_all [ofBoolListLE]
-
-@[simp] theorem getMsb_ofBoolListLE :
-    (ofBoolListLE bs).getMsb i = (decide (i < bs.length) && bs.getD (bs.length - 1 - i) false) := by
-  simp [getMsb_eq_getLsb]
-
-end BitVec

src/Init/Data/Bool.lean

@@ -29,8 +29,6 @@ instance (p : Bool → Prop) [inst : DecidablePred p] : Decidable (∃ x, p x) :
   | _, isTrue hf => isTrue ⟨_, hf⟩
   | isFalse ht, isFalse hf => isFalse fun | ⟨true, h⟩ => absurd h ht | ⟨false, h⟩ => absurd h hf
 
-@[simp] theorem default_bool : default = false := rfl
-
 instance : LE Bool := ⟨(. → .)⟩
 instance : LT Bool := ⟨(!. && .)⟩
 
@@ -50,216 +48,85 @@ theorem ne_false_iff : {b : Bool} → b ≠ false ↔ b = true := by decide
 
 theorem eq_iff_iff {a b : Bool} : a = b ↔ (a ↔ b) := by cases b <;> simp
 
-@[simp] theorem decide_eq_true  {b : Bool} [Decidable (b = true)]  : decide (b = true)  =  b := by cases b <;> simp
-@[simp] theorem decide_eq_false {b : Bool} [Decidable (b = false)] : decide (b = false) = !b := by cases b <;> simp
-@[simp] theorem decide_true_eq  {b : Bool} [Decidable (true = b)]  : decide (true  = b) =  b := by cases b <;> simp
-@[simp] theorem decide_false_eq {b : Bool} [Decidable (false = b)] : decide (false = b) = !b := by cases b <;> simp
+@[simp] theorem decide_eq_true {b : Bool} : decide (b = true) = b := by cases b <;> simp
+@[simp] theorem decide_eq_false {b : Bool} : decide (b = false) = !b := by cases b <;> simp
+@[simp] theorem decide_true_eq {b : Bool} : decide (true = b) = b := by cases b <;> simp
+@[simp] theorem decide_false_eq {b : Bool} : decide (false = b) = !b := by cases b <;> simp
 
 /-! ### and -/
 
-@[simp] theorem and_self_left  : ∀(a b : Bool), (a && (a && b)) = (a && b) := by decide
-@[simp] theorem and_self_right : ∀(a b : Bool), ((a && b) && b) = (a && b) := by decide
-
 @[simp] theorem not_and_self : ∀ (x : Bool), (!x && x) = false := by decide
+
 @[simp] theorem and_not_self : ∀ (x : Bool), (x && !x) = false := by decide
 
-/-
-Added for confluence with `not_and_self` `and_not_self` on term
-`(b && !b) = true` due to reductions:
-
-1. `(b = true ∨ !b = true)` via `Bool.and_eq_true`
-2. `false = true` via `Bool.and_not_self`
--/
-@[simp] theorem eq_true_and_eq_false_self : ∀(b : Bool), (b = true ∧ b = false) ↔ False := by decide
-@[simp] theorem eq_false_and_eq_true_self : ∀(b : Bool), (b = false ∧ b = true) ↔ False := by decide
-
 theorem and_comm : ∀ (x y : Bool), (x && y) = (y && x) := by decide
 
 theorem and_left_comm : ∀ (x y z : Bool), (x && (y && z)) = (y && (x && z)) := by decide
+
 theorem and_right_comm : ∀ (x y z : Bool), ((x && y) && z) = ((x && z) && y) := by decide
 
-/-
-Bool version `and_iff_left_iff_imp`.
+theorem and_or_distrib_left : ∀ (x y z : Bool), (x && (y || z)) = ((x && y) || (x && z)) := by
+  decide
 
-Needed for confluence of term `(a && b) ↔ a` which reduces to `(a && b) = a` via
-`Bool.coe_iff_coe` and `a → b` via `Bool.and_eq_true` and
-`and_iff_left_iff_imp`.
--/
-@[simp] theorem and_iff_left_iff_imp  : ∀(a b : Bool), ((a && b) = a) ↔ (a → b) := by decide
-@[simp] theorem and_iff_right_iff_imp : ∀(a b : Bool), ((a && b) = b) ↔ (b → a) := by decide
-@[simp] theorem iff_self_and : ∀(a b : Bool), (a = (a && b)) ↔ (a → b) := by decide
-@[simp] theorem iff_and_self : ∀(a b : Bool), (b = (a && b)) ↔ (b → a) := by decide
+theorem and_or_distrib_right : ∀ (x y z : Bool), ((x || y) && z) = ((x && z) || (y && z)) := by
+  decide
+
+theorem and_xor_distrib_left : ∀ (x y z : Bool), (x && xor y z) = xor (x && y) (x && z) := by decide
+
+theorem and_xor_distrib_right : ∀ (x y z : Bool), (xor x y && z) = xor (x && z) (y && z) := by
+  decide
+
+/-- De Morgan's law for boolean and -/
+theorem not_and : ∀ (x y : Bool), (!(x && y)) = (!x || !y) := by decide
+
+theorem and_eq_true_iff : ∀ (x y : Bool), (x && y) = true ↔ x = true ∧ y = true := by decide
+
+theorem and_eq_false_iff : ∀ (x y : Bool), (x && y) = false ↔ x = false ∨ y = false := by decide
 
 /-! ### or -/
 
-@[simp] theorem or_self_left  : ∀(a b : Bool), (a || (a || b)) = (a || b) := by decide
-@[simp] theorem or_self_right : ∀(a b : Bool), ((a || b) || b) = (a || b) := by decide
-
 @[simp] theorem not_or_self : ∀ (x : Bool), (!x || x) = true := by decide
+
 @[simp] theorem or_not_self : ∀ (x : Bool), (x || !x) = true := by decide
 
-/-
-Added for confluence with `not_or_self` `or_not_self` on term
-`(b || !b) = true` due to reductions:
-1. `(b = true ∨ !b = true)` via `Bool.or_eq_true`
-2. `true = true` via `Bool.or_not_self`
--/
-@[simp] theorem eq_true_or_eq_false_self : ∀(b : Bool), (b = true ∨ b = false) ↔ True := by decide
-@[simp] theorem eq_false_or_eq_true_self : ∀(b : Bool), (b = false ∨ b = true) ↔ True := by decide
-
-/-
-Bool version `or_iff_left_iff_imp`.
-
-Needed for confluence of term `(a || b) ↔ a` which reduces to `(a || b) = a` via
-`Bool.coe_iff_coe` and `a → b` via `Bool.or_eq_true` and
-`and_iff_left_iff_imp`.
--/
-@[simp] theorem or_iff_left_iff_imp  : ∀(a b : Bool), ((a || b) = a) ↔ (b → a) := by decide
-@[simp] theorem or_iff_right_iff_imp : ∀(a b : Bool), ((a || b) = b) ↔ (a → b) := by decide
-@[simp] theorem iff_self_or : ∀(a b : Bool), (a = (a || b)) ↔ (b → a) := by decide
-@[simp] theorem iff_or_self : ∀(a b : Bool), (b = (a || b)) ↔ (a → b) := by decide
-
 theorem or_comm : ∀ (x y : Bool), (x || y) = (y || x) := by decide
 
 theorem or_left_comm : ∀ (x y z : Bool), (x || (y || z)) = (y || (x || z)) := by decide
+
 theorem or_right_comm : ∀ (x y z : Bool), ((x || y) || z) = ((x || z) || y) := by decide
 
-/-! ### distributivity -/
+theorem or_and_distrib_left : ∀ (x y z : Bool), (x || (y && z)) = ((x || y) && (x || z)) := by
+  decide
 
-theorem and_or_distrib_left  : ∀ (x y z : Bool), (x && (y || z)) = (x && y || x && z) := by decide
-theorem and_or_distrib_right : ∀ (x y z : Bool), ((x || y) && z) = (x && z || y && z) := by decide
-
-theorem or_and_distrib_left  : ∀ (x y z : Bool), (x || y && z) = ((x || y) && (x || z)) := by decide
-theorem or_and_distrib_right : ∀ (x y z : Bool), (x && y || z) = ((x || z) && (y || z)) := by decide
-
-theorem and_xor_distrib_left : ∀ (x y z : Bool), (x && xor y z) = xor (x && y) (x && z) := by decide
-theorem and_xor_distrib_right : ∀ (x y z : Bool), (xor x y && z) = xor (x && z) (y && z) := by decide
-
-/-- De Morgan's law for boolean and -/
-@[simp] theorem not_and : ∀ (x y : Bool), (!(x && y)) = (!x || !y) := by decide
+theorem or_and_distrib_right : ∀ (x y z : Bool), ((x && y) || z) = ((x || z) && (y || z)) := by
+  decide
 
 /-- De Morgan's law for boolean or -/
-@[simp] theorem not_or : ∀ (x y : Bool), (!(x || y)) = (!x && !y) := by decide
+theorem not_or : ∀ (x y : Bool), (!(x || y)) = (!x && !y) := by decide
 
-theorem and_eq_true_iff (x y : Bool) : (x && y) = true ↔ x = true ∧ y = true :=
-  Iff.of_eq (and_eq_true x y)
+theorem or_eq_true_iff : ∀ (x y : Bool), (x || y) = true ↔ x = true ∨ y = true := by decide
 
-theorem and_eq_false_iff : ∀ (x y : Bool), (x && y) = false ↔ x = false ∨ y = false := by decide
-
-/-
-New simp rule that replaces `Bool.and_eq_false_eq_eq_false_or_eq_false` in
-Mathlib due to confluence:
-
-Consider the term: `¬((b && c) = true)`:
-
-1. Reduces to `((b && c) = false)` via `Bool.not_eq_true`
-2. Reduces to `¬(b = true ∧ c = true)` via `Bool.and_eq_true`.
-
-
-1. Further reduces to `b = false ∨ c = false` via `Bool.and_eq_false_eq_eq_false_or_eq_false`.
-2. Further reduces to `b = true → c = false` via `not_and` and `Bool.not_eq_true`.
--/
-@[simp] theorem and_eq_false_imp : ∀ (x y : Bool), (x && y) = false ↔ (x = true → y = false) := by decide
-
-@[simp] theorem or_eq_true_iff : ∀ (x y : Bool), (x || y) = true ↔ x = true ∨ y = true := by decide
-
-@[simp] theorem or_eq_false_iff : ∀ (x y : Bool), (x || y) = false ↔ x = false ∧ y = false := by decide
-
-/-! ### eq/beq/bne -/
-
-/--
-These two rules follow trivially by simp, but are needed to avoid non-termination
-in false_eq and true_eq.
--/
-@[simp] theorem false_eq_true : (false = true) = False := by simp
-@[simp] theorem true_eq_false : (true = false) = False := by simp
-
--- The two lemmas below normalize terms with a constant to the
--- right-hand side but risk non-termination if `false_eq_true` and
--- `true_eq_false` are disabled.
-@[simp low] theorem false_eq (b : Bool) : (false = b) = (b = false) := by
-  cases b <;> simp
-
-@[simp low] theorem true_eq (b : Bool) : (true = b) = (b = true) := by
-  cases b <;> simp
-
-@[simp] theorem true_beq  : ∀b, (true  == b) =  b := by decide
-@[simp] theorem false_beq : ∀b, (false == b) = !b := by decide
-@[simp] theorem beq_true  : ∀b, (b == true)  =  b := by decide
-@[simp] theorem beq_false : ∀b, (b == false) = !b := by decide
-
-@[simp] theorem true_bne  : ∀(b : Bool), (true  != b) = !b := by decide
-@[simp] theorem false_bne : ∀(b : Bool), (false != b) =  b := by decide
-@[simp] theorem bne_true  : ∀(b : Bool), (b != true)  = !b := by decide
-@[simp] theorem bne_false : ∀(b : Bool), (b != false) =  b := by decide
-
-@[simp] theorem not_beq_self : ∀ (x : Bool), ((!x) == x) = false := by decide
-@[simp] theorem beq_not_self : ∀ (x : Bool), (x   == !x) = false := by decide
-
-@[simp] theorem not_bne_self : ∀ (x : Bool), ((!x) != x) = true := by decide
-@[simp] theorem bne_not_self : ∀ (x : Bool), (x   != !x) = true := by decide
-
-/-
-Added for equivalence with `Bool.not_beq_self` and needed for confluence
-due to `beq_iff_eq`.
--/
-@[simp] theorem not_eq_self : ∀(b : Bool), ((!b) = b) ↔ False := by decide
-@[simp] theorem eq_not_self : ∀(b : Bool), (b = (!b)) ↔ False := by decide
-
-@[simp] theorem beq_self_left  : ∀(a b : Bool), (a == (a == b)) = b := by decide
-@[simp] theorem beq_self_right : ∀(a b : Bool), ((a == b) == b) = a := by decide
-@[simp] theorem bne_self_left  : ∀(a b : Bool), (a != (a != b)) = b := by decide
-@[simp] theorem bne_self_right : ∀(a b : Bool), ((a != b) != b) = a := by decide
-
-@[simp] theorem not_bne_not : ∀ (x y : Bool), ((!x) != (!y)) = (x != y) := by decide
-
-@[simp] theorem bne_assoc : ∀ (x y z : Bool), ((x != y) != z) = (x != (y != z)) := by decide
-
-@[simp] theorem bne_left_inj  : ∀ (x y z : Bool), (x != y) = (x != z) ↔ y = z := by decide
-@[simp] theorem bne_right_inj : ∀ (x y z : Bool), (x != z) = (y != z) ↔ x = y := by decide
-
-/-! ### coercision related normal forms -/
-
-theorem beq_eq_decide_eq [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] [DecidableEq α] (a b : α) :
-    (a == b) = decide (a = b) := by
-  cases h : a == b
-  · simp [ne_of_beq_false h]
-  · simp [eq_of_beq h]
-
-@[simp] theorem not_eq_not : ∀ {a b : Bool}, ¬a = !b ↔ a = b := by decide
-
-@[simp] theorem not_not_eq : ∀ {a b : Bool}, ¬(!a) = b ↔ a = b := by decide
-
-@[simp] theorem coe_iff_coe : ∀(a b : Bool), (a ↔ b) ↔ a = b := by decide
-
-@[simp] theorem coe_true_iff_false  : ∀(a b : Bool), (a ↔ b = false) ↔ a = (!b) := by decide
-@[simp] theorem coe_false_iff_true  : ∀(a b : Bool), (a = false ↔ b) ↔ (!a) = b := by decide
-@[simp] theorem coe_false_iff_false : ∀(a b : Bool), (a = false ↔ b = false) ↔ (!a) = (!b) := by decide
-
-/-! ### beq properties -/
-
-theorem beq_comm {α} [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] {a b : α} : (a == b) = (b == a) :=
-  (Bool.coe_iff_coe (a == b) (b == a)).mp (by simp [@eq_comm α])
+theorem or_eq_false_iff : ∀ (x y : Bool), (x || y) = false ↔ x = false ∧ y = false := by decide
 
 /-! ### xor -/
 
-theorem false_xor : ∀ (x : Bool), xor false x = x := false_bne
+@[simp] theorem false_xor : ∀ (x : Bool), xor false x = x := by decide
 
-theorem xor_false : ∀ (x : Bool), xor x false = x := bne_false
+@[simp] theorem xor_false : ∀ (x : Bool), xor x false = x := by decide
 
-theorem true_xor : ∀ (x : Bool), xor true x = !x := true_bne
+@[simp] theorem true_xor : ∀ (x : Bool), xor true x = !x := by decide
 
-theorem xor_true : ∀ (x : Bool), xor x true = !x := bne_true
+@[simp] theorem xor_true : ∀ (x : Bool), xor x true = !x := by decide
 
-theorem not_xor_self : ∀ (x : Bool), xor (!x) x = true := not_bne_self
+@[simp] theorem not_xor_self : ∀ (x : Bool), xor (!x) x = true := by decide
 
-theorem xor_not_self : ∀ (x : Bool), xor x (!x) = true := bne_not_self
+@[simp] theorem xor_not_self : ∀ (x : Bool), xor x (!x) = true := by decide
 
 theorem not_xor : ∀ (x y : Bool), xor (!x) y = !(xor x y) := by decide
 
 theorem xor_not : ∀ (x y : Bool), xor x (!y) = !(xor x y) := by decide
 
-theorem not_xor_not : ∀ (x y : Bool), xor (!x) (!y) = (xor x y) := not_bne_not
+@[simp] theorem not_xor_not : ∀ (x y : Bool), xor (!x) (!y) = (xor x y) := by decide
 
 theorem xor_self : ∀ (x : Bool), xor x x = false := by decide
 
@@ -269,11 +136,13 @@ theorem xor_left_comm : ∀ (x y z : Bool), xor x (xor y z) = xor y (xor x z) :=
 
 theorem xor_right_comm : ∀ (x y z : Bool), xor (xor x y) z = xor (xor x z) y := by decide
 
-theorem xor_assoc : ∀ (x y z : Bool), xor (xor x y) z = xor x (xor y z) := bne_assoc
+theorem xor_assoc : ∀ (x y z : Bool), xor (xor x y) z = xor x (xor y z) := by decide
 
-theorem xor_left_inj : ∀ (x y z : Bool), xor x y = xor x z ↔ y = z := bne_left_inj
+@[simp]
+theorem xor_left_inj : ∀ (x y z : Bool), xor x y = xor x z ↔ y = z := by decide
 
-theorem xor_right_inj : ∀ (x y z : Bool), xor x z = xor y z ↔ x = y := bne_right_inj
+@[simp]
+theorem xor_right_inj : ∀ (x y z : Bool), xor x z = xor y z ↔ x = y := by decide
 
 /-! ### le/lt -/
 
@@ -348,161 +217,23 @@ def toNat (b:Bool) : Nat := cond b 1 0
 
 @[simp] theorem toNat_true : true.toNat = 1 := rfl
 
-theorem toNat_le (c : Bool) : c.toNat ≤ 1 := by
+theorem toNat_le_one (c:Bool) : c.toNat ≤ 1 := by
   cases c <;> trivial
 
-@[deprecated toNat_le] abbrev toNat_le_one := toNat_le
-
 theorem toNat_lt (b : Bool) : b.toNat < 2 :=
-  Nat.lt_succ_of_le (toNat_le _)
+  Nat.lt_succ_of_le (toNat_le_one _)
 
 @[simp] theorem toNat_eq_zero (b : Bool) : b.toNat = 0 ↔ b = false := by
   cases b <;> simp
-@[simp] theorem toNat_eq_one  (b : Bool) : b.toNat = 1 ↔ b = true := by
+@[simp] theorem toNat_eq_one (b : Bool) : b.toNat = 1 ↔ b = true := by
   cases b <;> simp
 
-/-! ### ite -/
-
-@[simp] theorem if_true_left  (p : Prop) [h : Decidable p] (f : Bool) :
-    (ite p true f) = (p || f) := by cases h with | _ p => simp [p]
-
-@[simp] theorem if_false_left  (p : Prop) [h : Decidable p] (f : Bool) :
-    (ite p false f) = (!p && f) := by cases h with | _ p => simp [p]
-
-@[simp] theorem if_true_right  (p : Prop) [h : Decidable p] (t : Bool) :
-    (ite p t true) = (!(p : Bool) || t) := by cases h with | _ p => simp [p]
-
-@[simp] theorem if_false_right  (p : Prop) [h : Decidable p] (t : Bool) :
-    (ite p t false) = (p && t) := by cases h with | _ p => simp [p]
-
-@[simp] theorem ite_eq_true_distrib (p : Prop) [h : Decidable p] (t f : Bool) :
-    (ite p t f = true) = ite p (t = true) (f = true) := by
-  cases h with | _ p => simp [p]
-
-@[simp] theorem ite_eq_false_distrib (p : Prop) [h : Decidable p] (t f : Bool) :
-    (ite p t f = false) = ite p (t = false) (f = false) := by
-  cases h with | _ p => simp [p]
-
-/-
-`not_ite_eq_true_eq_true` and related theorems below are added for
-non-confluence.  A motivating example is
-`¬((if u then b else c) = true)`.
-
-This reduces to:
-1. `¬((if u then (b = true) else (c = true))` via `ite_eq_true_distrib`
-2. `(if u then b c) = false)` via `Bool.not_eq_true`.
-
-Similar logic holds for `¬((if u then b else c) = false)` and related
-lemmas.
--/
-
-@[simp]
-theorem not_ite_eq_true_eq_true (p : Prop) [h : Decidable p] (b c : Bool) :
-  ¬(ite p (b = true) (c = true)) ↔ (ite p (b = false) (c = false)) := by
-  cases h with | _ p => simp [p]
-
-@[simp]
-theorem not_ite_eq_false_eq_false (p : Prop) [h : Decidable p] (b c : Bool) :
-  ¬(ite p (b = false) (c = false)) ↔ (ite p (b = true) (c = true)) := by
-  cases h with | _ p => simp [p]
-
-@[simp]
-theorem not_ite_eq_true_eq_false (p : Prop) [h : Decidable p] (b c : Bool) :
-  ¬(ite p (b = true) (c = false)) ↔ (ite p (b = false) (c = true)) := by
-  cases h with | _ p => simp [p]
-
-@[simp]
-theorem not_ite_eq_false_eq_true (p : Prop) [h : Decidable p] (b c : Bool) :
-  ¬(ite p (b = false) (c = true)) ↔ (ite p (b = true) (c = false)) := by
-  cases h with | _ p => simp [p]
-
-/-
-Added for confluence between `if_true_left` and `ite_false_same` on
-`if b = true then True else b = true`
--/
-@[simp] theorem eq_false_imp_eq_true : ∀(b:Bool), (b = false → b = true) ↔ (b = true) := by decide
-
-/-
-Added for confluence between `if_true_left` and `ite_false_same` on
-`if b = false then True else b = false`
--/
-@[simp] theorem eq_true_imp_eq_false : ∀(b:Bool), (b = true → b = false) ↔ (b = false) := by decide
-
-
-/-! ### cond -/
-
-theorem cond_eq_ite {α} (b : Bool) (t e : α) : cond b t e = if b then t else e := by
-  cases b <;> simp
-
-theorem cond_eq_if : (bif b then x else y) = (if b then x else y) := cond_eq_ite b x y
-
-@[simp] theorem cond_not (b : Bool) (t e : α) : cond (!b) t e = cond b e t := by
-  cases b <;> rfl
-
-@[simp] theorem cond_self (c : Bool) (t : α) : cond c t t = t := by cases c <;> rfl
-
-/-
-This is a simp rule in Mathlib, but results in non-confluence that is difficult
-to fix as decide distributes over propositions. As an example, observe that
-`cond (decide (p ∧ q)) t f` could simplify to either:
-
-* `if p ∧ q then t else f` via `Bool.cond_decide` or
-* `cond (decide p && decide q) t f` via `Bool.decide_and`.
-
-A possible approach to improve normalization between `cond` and `ite` would be
-to completely simplify away `cond` by making `cond_eq_ite` a `simp` rule, but
-that has not been taken since it could surprise users to migrate pure `Bool`
-operations like `cond` to a mix of `Prop` and `Bool`.
--/
-theorem cond_decide {α} (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (t e : α) :
-    cond (decide p) t e = if p then t else e := by
-  simp [cond_eq_ite]
-
-@[simp] theorem cond_eq_ite_iff (a : Bool) (p : Prop) [h : Decidable p] (x y u v : α) :
-  (cond a x y = ite p u v) ↔ ite a x y = ite p u v := by
-  simp [Bool.cond_eq_ite]
-
-@[simp] theorem ite_eq_cond_iff (p : Prop) [h : Decidable p] (a : Bool) (x y u v : α) :
-  (ite p x y = cond a u v) ↔ ite p x y = ite a u v := by
-  simp [Bool.cond_eq_ite]
-
-@[simp] theorem cond_eq_true_distrib : ∀(c t f : Bool),
-    (cond c t f = true) = ite (c = true) (t = true) (f = true) := by
-  decide
-
-@[simp] theorem cond_eq_false_distrib : ∀(c t f : Bool),
-    (cond c t f = false) = ite (c = true) (t = false) (f = false) := by decide
-
-protected theorem cond_true  {α : Type u} {a b : α} : cond true  a b = a := cond_true  a b
-protected theorem cond_false {α : Type u} {a b : α} : cond false a b = b := cond_false a b
-
-@[simp] theorem cond_true_left   : ∀(c f : Bool), cond c true f  = ( c || f) := by decide
-@[simp] theorem cond_false_left  : ∀(c f : Bool), cond c false f = (!c && f) := by decide
-@[simp] theorem cond_true_right  : ∀(c t : Bool), cond c t true  = (!c || t) := by decide
-@[simp] theorem cond_false_right : ∀(c t : Bool), cond c t false = ( c && t) := by decide
-
-@[simp] theorem cond_true_same  : ∀(c b : Bool), cond c c b = (c || b) := by decide
-@[simp] theorem cond_false_same : ∀(c b : Bool), cond c b c = (c && b) := by decide
-
-/-# decidability -/
-
-protected theorem decide_coe (b : Bool) [Decidable (b = true)] : decide (b = true) = b := decide_eq_true
-
-@[simp] theorem decide_and (p q : Prop) [dpq : Decidable (p ∧ q)] [dp : Decidable p] [dq : Decidable q] :
-    decide (p ∧ q) = (p && q) := by
-  cases dp with | _ p => simp [p]
-
-@[simp] theorem decide_or (p q : Prop) [dpq : Decidable (p ∨ q)] [dp : Decidable p] [dq : Decidable q] :
-    decide (p ∨ q) = (p || q) := by
-  cases dp with | _ p => simp [p]
-
-@[simp] theorem decide_iff_dist (p q : Prop) [dpq : Decidable (p ↔ q)] [dp : Decidable p] [dq : Decidable q] :
-    decide (p ↔ q) = (decide p == decide q) := by
-  cases dp with | _ p => simp [p]
-
 end Bool
 
-export Bool (cond_eq_if)
+/-! ### cond -/
+
+theorem cond_eq_if : (bif b then x else y) = (if b then x else y) := by
+  cases b <;> simp
 
 /-! ### decide -/
 

src/Init/Data/ByteArray/Basic.lean

@@ -52,13 +52,9 @@ def get : (a : @& ByteArray) → (@& Fin a.size) → UInt8
 instance : GetElem ByteArray Nat UInt8 fun xs i => i < xs.size where
   getElem xs i h := xs.get ⟨i, h⟩
 
-instance : LawfulGetElem ByteArray Nat UInt8 fun xs i => i < xs.size where
-
 instance : GetElem ByteArray USize UInt8 fun xs i => i.val < xs.size where
   getElem xs i h := xs.uget i h
 
-instance : LawfulGetElem ByteArray USize UInt8 fun xs i => i.val < xs.size where
-
 @[extern "lean_byte_array_set"]
 def set! : ByteArray → (@& Nat) → UInt8 → ByteArray
   | ⟨bs⟩, i, b => ⟨bs.set! i b⟩
@@ -199,18 +195,6 @@ instance : ToString ByteArray := ⟨fun bs => bs.toList.toString⟩
 
 /-- Interpret a `ByteArray` of size 8 as a little-endian `UInt64`. -/
 def ByteArray.toUInt64LE! (bs : ByteArray) : UInt64 :=
-  assert! bs.size == 8
-  (bs.get! 7).toUInt64 <<< 0x38 |||
-  (bs.get! 6).toUInt64 <<< 0x30 |||
-  (bs.get! 5).toUInt64 <<< 0x28 |||
-  (bs.get! 4).toUInt64 <<< 0x20 |||
-  (bs.get! 3).toUInt64 <<< 0x18 |||
-  (bs.get! 2).toUInt64 <<< 0x10 |||
-  (bs.get! 1).toUInt64 <<< 0x8  |||
-  (bs.get! 0).toUInt64
-
-/-- Interpret a `ByteArray` of size 8 as a big-endian `UInt64`. -/
-def ByteArray.toUInt64BE! (bs : ByteArray) : UInt64 :=
   assert! bs.size == 8
   (bs.get! 0).toUInt64 <<< 0x38 |||
   (bs.get! 1).toUInt64 <<< 0x30 |||
@@ -220,3 +204,15 @@ def ByteArray.toUInt64BE! (bs : ByteArray) : UInt64 :=
   (bs.get! 5).toUInt64 <<< 0x10 |||
   (bs.get! 6).toUInt64 <<< 0x8  |||
   (bs.get! 7).toUInt64
+
+/-- Interpret a `ByteArray` of size 8 as a big-endian `UInt64`. -/
+def ByteArray.toUInt64BE! (bs : ByteArray) : UInt64 :=
+  assert! bs.size == 8
+  (bs.get! 7).toUInt64 <<< 0x38 |||
+  (bs.get! 6).toUInt64 <<< 0x30 |||
+  (bs.get! 5).toUInt64 <<< 0x28 |||
+  (bs.get! 4).toUInt64 <<< 0x20 |||
+  (bs.get! 3).toUInt64 <<< 0x18 |||
+  (bs.get! 2).toUInt64 <<< 0x10 |||
+  (bs.get! 1).toUInt64 <<< 0x8  |||
+  (bs.get! 0).toUInt64

src/Init/Data/Channel.lean

@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ Sends a message on an `Channel`.
 
 This function does not block.
 -/
-def Channel.send (ch : Channel α) (v : α) : BaseIO Unit :=
+def Channel.send (v : α) (ch : Channel α) : BaseIO Unit :=
   ch.atomically do
     let st ← get
     if st.closed then return

src/Init/Data/Fin/Basic.lean

@@ -4,7 +4,9 @@ Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
 Author: Leonardo de Moura, Robert Y. Lewis, Keeley Hoek, Mario Carneiro
 -/
 prelude
+import Init.Data.Nat.Div
 import Init.Data.Nat.Bitwise.Basic
+import Init.Coe
 
 open Nat
 
@@ -168,3 +170,9 @@ theorem val_add_one_le_of_lt {n : Nat} {a b : Fin n} (h : a < b) : (a : Nat) + 1
 theorem val_add_one_le_of_gt {n : Nat} {a b : Fin n} (h : a > b) : (b : Nat) + 1 ≤ (a : Nat) := h
 
 end Fin
+
+instance [GetElem cont Nat elem dom] : GetElem cont (Fin n) elem fun xs i => dom xs i where
+  getElem xs i h := getElem xs i.1 h
+
+macro_rules
+  | `(tactic| get_elem_tactic_trivial) => `(tactic| apply Fin.val_lt_of_le; get_elem_tactic_trivial; done)

src/Init/Data/Fin/Lemmas.lean

@@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ theorem pred_mk {n : Nat} (i : Nat) (h : i < n + 1) (w) : Fin.pred ⟨i, h⟩ w
     ∀ {a b : Fin (n + 1)} {ha : a ≠ 0} {hb : b ≠ 0}, a.pred ha = b.pred hb ↔ a = b
   | ⟨0, _⟩, _, ha, _ => by simp only [mk_zero, ne_eq, not_true] at ha
   | ⟨i + 1, _⟩, ⟨0, _⟩, _, hb => by simp only [mk_zero, ne_eq, not_true] at hb
-  | ⟨i + 1, hi⟩, ⟨j + 1, hj⟩, ha, hb => by simp [ext_iff, Nat.succ.injEq]
+  | ⟨i + 1, hi⟩, ⟨j + 1, hj⟩, ha, hb => by simp [ext_iff]
 
 @[simp] theorem pred_one {n : Nat} :
     Fin.pred (1 : Fin (n + 2)) (Ne.symm (Fin.ne_of_lt one_pos)) = 0 := rfl
@@ -683,12 +683,11 @@ and `cast` defines the inductive step using `motive i.succ`, inducting downwards
 termination_by n + 1 - i
 decreasing_by decreasing_with
   -- FIXME: we put the proof down here to avoid getting a dummy `have` in the definition
-  try simp only [Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub]
   exact Nat.add_sub_add_right .. ▸ Nat.sub_lt_sub_left i.2 (Nat.lt_succ_self i)
 
 @[simp] theorem reverseInduction_last {n : Nat} {motive : Fin (n + 1) → Sort _} {zero succ} :
     (reverseInduction zero succ (Fin.last n) : motive (Fin.last n)) = zero := by
-  rw [reverseInduction]; simp
+  rw [reverseInduction]; simp; rfl
 
 @[simp] theorem reverseInduction_castSucc {n : Nat} {motive : Fin (n + 1) → Sort _} {zero succ}
     (i : Fin n) : reverseInduction (motive := motive) zero succ (castSucc i) =

src/Init/Data/FloatArray/Basic.lean

@@ -58,13 +58,9 @@ def get? (ds : FloatArray) (i : Nat) : Option Float :=
 instance : GetElem FloatArray Nat Float fun xs i => i < xs.size where
   getElem xs i h := xs.get ⟨i, h⟩
 
-instance : LawfulGetElem FloatArray Nat Float fun xs i => i < xs.size where
-
 instance : GetElem FloatArray USize Float fun xs i => i.val < xs.size where
   getElem xs i h := xs.uget i h
 
-instance : LawfulGetElem FloatArray USize Float fun xs i => i.val < xs.size where
-
 @[extern "lean_float_array_uset"]
 def uset : (a : FloatArray) → (i : USize) → Float → i.toNat < a.size → FloatArray
   | ⟨ds⟩, i, v, h => ⟨ds.uset i v h⟩

src/Init/Data/Int.lean

@@ -11,4 +11,3 @@ import Init.Data.Int.DivModLemmas
 import Init.Data.Int.Gcd
 import Init.Data.Int.Lemmas
 import Init.Data.Int.Order
-import Init.Data.Int.Pow

src/Init/Data/Int/DivMod.lean

@@ -158,52 +158,4 @@ instance : Div Int where
 instance : Mod Int where
   mod := Int.emod
 
-@[simp, norm_cast] theorem ofNat_ediv (m n : Nat) : (↑(m / n) : Int) = ↑m / ↑n := rfl
-
-theorem ofNat_div (m n : Nat) : ↑(m / n) = div ↑m ↑n := rfl
-
-theorem ofNat_fdiv : ∀ m n : Nat, ↑(m / n) = fdiv ↑m ↑n
-  | 0, _ => by simp [fdiv]
-  | succ _, _ => rfl
-
-/-!
-# `bmod` ("balanced" mod)
-
-Balanced mod (and balanced div) are a division and modulus pair such
-that `b * (Int.bdiv a b) + Int.bmod a b = a` and `b/2 ≤ Int.bmod a b <
-b/2` for all `a : Int` and `b > 0`.
-
-This is used in Omega as well as signed bitvectors.
--/
-
-/--
-Balanced modulus.  This version of Integer modulus uses the
-balanced rounding convention, which guarantees that
-`m/2 ≤ bmod x m < m/2` for `m ≠ 0` and `bmod x m` is congruent
-to `x` modulo `m`.
-
-If `m = 0`, then `bmod x m = x`.
--/
-def bmod (x : Int) (m : Nat) : Int :=
-  let r := x % m
-  if r < (m + 1) / 2 then
-    r
-  else
-    r - m
-
-/--
-Balanced division.  This returns the unique integer so that
-`b * (Int.bdiv a b) + Int.bmod a b = a`.
--/
-def bdiv (x : Int) (m : Nat) : Int :=
-  if m = 0 then
-    0
-  else
-    let q := x / m
-    let r := x % m
-    if r < (m + 1) / 2 then
-      q
-    else
-      q + 1
-
 end Int

src/Init/Data/Int/Gcd.lean

@@ -6,12 +6,7 @@ Authors: Mario Carneiro
 prelude
 import Init.Data.Int.Basic
 import Init.Data.Nat.Gcd
-import Init.Data.Nat.Lcm
-import Init.Data.Int.DivModLemmas
 
-/-!
-Definition and lemmas for gcd and lcm over Int
--/
 namespace Int
 
 /-! ## gcd -/
@@ -19,37 +14,4 @@ namespace Int
 /-- Computes the greatest common divisor of two integers, as a `Nat`. -/
 def gcd (m n : Int) : Nat := m.natAbs.gcd n.natAbs
 
-theorem gcd_dvd_left {a b : Int} : (gcd a b : Int) ∣ a := by
-  have := Nat.gcd_dvd_left a.natAbs b.natAbs
-  rw [← Int.ofNat_dvd] at this
-  exact Int.dvd_trans this natAbs_dvd_self
-
-theorem gcd_dvd_right {a b : Int} : (gcd a b : Int) ∣ b := by
-  have := Nat.gcd_dvd_right a.natAbs b.natAbs
-  rw [← Int.ofNat_dvd] at this
-  exact Int.dvd_trans this natAbs_dvd_self
-
-@[simp] theorem one_gcd {a : Int} : gcd 1 a = 1 := by simp [gcd]
-@[simp] theorem gcd_one {a : Int} : gcd a 1 = 1 := by simp [gcd]
-
-@[simp] theorem neg_gcd {a b : Int} : gcd (-a) b = gcd a b := by simp [gcd]
-@[simp] theorem gcd_neg {a b : Int} : gcd a (-b) = gcd a b := by simp [gcd]
-
-/-! ## lcm -/
-
-/-- Computes the least common multiple of two integers, as a `Nat`. -/
-def lcm (m n : Int) : Nat := m.natAbs.lcm n.natAbs
-
-theorem lcm_ne_zero (hm : m ≠ 0) (hn : n ≠ 0) : lcm m n ≠ 0 := by
-  simp only [lcm]
-  apply Nat.lcm_ne_zero <;> simpa
-
-theorem dvd_lcm_left {a b : Int} : a ∣ lcm a b :=
-  Int.dvd_trans dvd_natAbs_self (Int.ofNat_dvd.mpr (Nat.dvd_lcm_left a.natAbs b.natAbs))
-
-theorem dvd_lcm_right {a b : Int} : b ∣ lcm a b :=
-  Int.dvd_trans dvd_natAbs_self (Int.ofNat_dvd.mpr (Nat.dvd_lcm_right a.natAbs b.natAbs))
-
-@[simp] theorem lcm_self {a : Int} : lcm a a = a.natAbs := Nat.lcm_self _
-
 end Int

src/Init/Data/Int/Lemmas.lean

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Deniz Aydin, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
 prelude
 import Init.Data.Int.Basic
 import Init.Conv
-import Init.NotationExtra
+import Init.PropLemmas
 
 namespace Int
 
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ theorem subNatNat_sub (h : n ≤ m) (k : Nat) : subNatNat (m - n) k = subNatNat
 theorem subNatNat_add (m n k : Nat) : subNatNat (m + n) k = m + subNatNat n k := by
   cases n.lt_or_ge k with
   | inl h' =>
-    simp [subNatNat_of_lt h', sub_one_add_one_eq_of_pos (Nat.sub_pos_of_lt h')]
+    simp [subNatNat_of_lt h', succ_pred_eq_of_pos (Nat.sub_pos_of_lt h')]
     conv => lhs; rw [← Nat.sub_add_cancel (Nat.le_of_lt h')]
     apply subNatNat_add_add
   | inr h' => simp [subNatNat_of_le h',
@@ -169,11 +169,12 @@ theorem subNatNat_add_negSucc (m n k : Nat) :
     rw [subNatNat_sub h', Nat.add_comm]
   | inl h' =>
     have h₂ : m < n + succ k := Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h' (le_add_right _ _)
+    have h₃ : m ≤ n + k := le_of_succ_le_succ h₂
     rw [subNatNat_of_lt h', subNatNat_of_lt h₂]
-    simp only [pred_eq_sub_one, negSucc_add_negSucc, succ_eq_add_one, negSucc.injEq]
-    rw [Nat.add_right_comm, sub_one_add_one_eq_of_pos (Nat.sub_pos_of_lt h'), Nat.sub_sub,
-      ← Nat.add_assoc, succ_sub_succ_eq_sub, Nat.add_comm n,Nat.add_sub_assoc (Nat.le_of_lt h'),
-      Nat.add_comm]
+    simp [Nat.add_comm]
+    rw [← add_succ, succ_pred_eq_of_pos (Nat.sub_pos_of_lt h'), add_succ, succ_sub h₃,
+      Nat.pred_succ]
+    rw [Nat.add_comm n, Nat.add_sub_assoc (Nat.le_of_lt h')]
 
 protected theorem add_assoc : ∀ a b c : Int, a + b + c = a + (b + c)
   | (m:Nat), (n:Nat), c => aux1 ..
@@ -187,15 +188,15 @@ protected theorem add_assoc : ∀ a b c : Int, a + b + c = a + (b + c)
   | (m:Nat), -[n+1], -[k+1] => by
     rw [Int.add_comm, Int.add_comm m, Int.add_comm m, ← aux2, Int.add_comm -[k+1]]
   | -[m+1], -[n+1], -[k+1] => by
-    simp [Nat.add_comm, Nat.add_left_comm, Nat.add_assoc]
+    simp [add_succ, Nat.add_comm, Nat.add_left_comm, neg_ofNat_succ]
 where
   aux1 (m n : Nat) : ∀ c : Int, m + n + c = m + (n + c)
     | (k:Nat) => by simp [Nat.add_assoc]
     | -[k+1]  => by simp [subNatNat_add]
   aux2 (m n k : Nat) : -[m+1] + -[n+1] + k = -[m+1] + (-[n+1] + k) := by
-    simp
+    simp [add_succ]
     rw [Int.add_comm, subNatNat_add_negSucc]
-    simp [Nat.add_comm, Nat.add_left_comm, Nat.add_assoc]
+    simp [add_succ, succ_add, Nat.add_comm]
 
 protected theorem add_left_comm (a b c : Int) : a + (b + c) = b + (a + c) := by
   rw [← Int.add_assoc, Int.add_comm a, Int.add_assoc]
@@ -320,27 +321,6 @@ theorem toNat_sub (m n : Nat) : toNat (m - n) = m - n := by
   · exact (Nat.add_sub_cancel_left ..).symm
   · dsimp; rw [Nat.add_assoc, Nat.sub_eq_zero_of_le (Nat.le_add_right ..)]; rfl
 
-/- ## add/sub injectivity -/
-
-@[simp]
-protected theorem add_right_inj (i j k : Int) : (i + k = j + k) ↔ i = j := by
-  apply Iff.intro
-  · intro p
-    rw [←Int.add_sub_cancel i k, ←Int.add_sub_cancel j k, p]
-  · exact congrArg (· + k)
-
-@[simp]
-protected theorem add_left_inj (i j k : Int) : (k + i = k + j) ↔ i = j := by
-  simp [Int.add_comm k]
-
-@[simp]
-protected theorem sub_left_inj (i j k : Int) : (k - i = k - j) ↔ i = j := by
-  simp [Int.sub_eq_add_neg, Int.neg_inj]
-
-@[simp]
-protected theorem sub_right_inj (i j k : Int) : (i - k = j - k) ↔ i = j := by
-  simp [Int.sub_eq_add_neg]
-
 /- ## Ring properties -/
 
 @[simp] theorem ofNat_mul_negSucc (m n : Nat) : (m : Int) * -[n+1] = -↑(m * succ n) := rfl
@@ -390,7 +370,7 @@ theorem ofNat_mul_subNatNat (m n k : Nat) :
     | inl h =>
       have h' : succ m * n < succ m * k := Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h (Nat.succ_pos m)
       simp [subNatNat_of_lt h, subNatNat_of_lt h']
-      rw [sub_one_add_one_eq_of_pos (Nat.sub_pos_of_lt h), ← neg_ofNat_succ, Nat.mul_sub_left_distrib,
+      rw [succ_pred_eq_of_pos (Nat.sub_pos_of_lt h), ← neg_ofNat_succ, Nat.mul_sub_left_distrib,
         ← succ_pred_eq_of_pos (Nat.sub_pos_of_lt h')]; rfl
     | inr h =>
       have h' : succ m * k ≤ succ m * n := Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ h
@@ -405,7 +385,7 @@ theorem negSucc_mul_subNatNat (m n k : Nat) :
   | inl h =>
     have h' : succ m * n < succ m * k := Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h (Nat.succ_pos m)
     rw [subNatNat_of_lt h, subNatNat_of_le (Nat.le_of_lt h')]
-    simp [sub_one_add_one_eq_of_pos (Nat.sub_pos_of_lt h), Nat.mul_sub_left_distrib]
+    simp [succ_pred_eq_of_pos (Nat.sub_pos_of_lt h), Nat.mul_sub_left_distrib]
   | inr h => cases Nat.lt_or_ge k n with
     | inl h' =>
       have h₁ : succ m * n > succ m * k := Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h' (Nat.succ_pos m)
@@ -421,12 +401,12 @@ protected theorem mul_add : ∀ a b c : Int, a * (b + c) = a * b + a * c
     simp [negOfNat_eq_subNatNat_zero]; rw [← subNatNat_add]; rfl
   | (m:Nat), -[n+1],  (k:Nat) => by
     simp [negOfNat_eq_subNatNat_zero]; rw [Int.add_comm, ← subNatNat_add]; rfl
-  | (m:Nat), -[n+1],  -[k+1]  => by simp [← Nat.left_distrib, Nat.add_left_comm, Nat.add_assoc]
+  | (m:Nat), -[n+1],  -[k+1]  => by simp; rw [← Nat.left_distrib, succ_add]; rfl
   | -[m+1],  (n:Nat), (k:Nat) => by simp [Nat.mul_comm]; rw [← Nat.right_distrib, Nat.mul_comm]
   | -[m+1],  (n:Nat), -[k+1]  => by
     simp [negOfNat_eq_subNatNat_zero]; rw [Int.add_comm, ← subNatNat_add]; rfl
   | -[m+1],  -[n+1],  (k:Nat) => by simp [negOfNat_eq_subNatNat_zero]; rw [← subNatNat_add]; rfl
-  | -[m+1],  -[n+1],  -[k+1]  => by simp [← Nat.left_distrib, Nat.add_left_comm, Nat.add_assoc]
+  | -[m+1],  -[n+1],  -[k+1]  => by simp; rw [← Nat.left_distrib, succ_add]; rfl
 
 protected theorem add_mul (a b c : Int) : (a + b) * c = a * c + b * c := by
   simp [Int.mul_comm, Int.mul_add]
@@ -498,6 +478,10 @@ theorem eq_one_of_mul_eq_self_left {a b : Int} (Hpos : a ≠ 0) (H : b * a = a)
 theorem eq_one_of_mul_eq_self_right {a b : Int} (Hpos : b ≠ 0) (H : b * a = b) : a = 1 :=
   Int.eq_of_mul_eq_mul_left Hpos <| by rw [Int.mul_one, H]
 
+protected theorem pow_succ (b : Int) (e : Nat) : b ^ (e+1) = (b ^ e) * b := rfl
+protected theorem pow_succ' (b : Int) (e : Nat) : b ^ (e+1) = b * (b ^ e) := by
+  rw [Int.mul_comm, Int.pow_succ]
+
 /-! NatCast lemmas -/
 
 /-!

src/Init/Data/Int/Order.lean

@@ -192,11 +192,6 @@ protected theorem min_le_right (a b : Int) : min a b ≤ b := by rw [Int.min_def
 
 protected theorem min_le_left (a b : Int) : min a b ≤ a := Int.min_comm .. ▸ Int.min_le_right ..
 
-protected theorem min_eq_left {a b : Int} (h : a ≤ b) : min a b = a := by simp [Int.min_def, h]
-
-protected theorem min_eq_right {a b : Int} (h : b ≤ a) : min a b = b := by
-  rw [Int.min_comm a b]; exact Int.min_eq_left h
-
 protected theorem le_min {a b c : Int} : a ≤ min b c ↔ a ≤ b ∧ a ≤ c :=
   ⟨fun h => ⟨Int.le_trans h (Int.min_le_left ..), Int.le_trans h (Int.min_le_right ..)⟩,
    fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => by rw [Int.min_def]; split <;> assumption⟩
@@ -215,12 +210,6 @@ protected theorem max_le {a b c : Int} : max a b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c ∧ b ≤ c :
   ⟨fun h => ⟨Int.le_trans (Int.le_max_left ..) h, Int.le_trans (Int.le_max_right ..) h⟩,
    fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => by rw [Int.max_def]; split <;> assumption⟩
 
-protected theorem max_eq_right {a b : Int} (h : a ≤ b) : max a b = b := by
-  simp [Int.max_def, h, Int.not_lt.2 h]
-
-protected theorem max_eq_left {a b : Int} (h : b ≤ a) : max a b = a := by
-  rw [← Int.max_comm b a]; exact Int.max_eq_right h
-
 theorem eq_natAbs_of_zero_le {a : Int} (h : 0 ≤ a) : a = natAbs a := by
   let ⟨n, e⟩ := eq_ofNat_of_zero_le h
   rw [e]; rfl
@@ -447,576 +436,3 @@ theorem natAbs_of_nonneg {a : Int} (H : 0 ≤ a) : (natAbs a : Int) = a :=
 
 theorem ofNat_natAbs_of_nonpos {a : Int} (H : a ≤ 0) : (natAbs a : Int) = -a := by
   rw [← natAbs_neg, natAbs_of_nonneg (Int.neg_nonneg_of_nonpos H)]
-
-/-! ### toNat -/
-
-theorem toNat_eq_max : ∀ a : Int, (toNat a : Int) = max a 0
-  | (n : Nat) => (Int.max_eq_left (ofNat_zero_le n)).symm
-  | -[n+1] => (Int.max_eq_right (Int.le_of_lt (negSucc_lt_zero n))).symm
-
-@[simp] theorem toNat_zero : (0 : Int).toNat = 0 := rfl
-
-@[simp] theorem toNat_one : (1 : Int).toNat = 1 := rfl
-
-@[simp] theorem toNat_of_nonneg {a : Int} (h : 0 ≤ a) : (toNat a : Int) = a := by
-  rw [toNat_eq_max, Int.max_eq_left h]
-
-@[simp] theorem toNat_ofNat (n : Nat) : toNat ↑n = n := rfl
-
-@[simp] theorem toNat_ofNat_add_one {n : Nat} : ((n : Int) + 1).toNat = n + 1 := rfl
-
-theorem self_le_toNat (a : Int) : a ≤ toNat a := by rw [toNat_eq_max]; apply Int.le_max_left
-
-@[simp] theorem le_toNat {n : Nat} {z : Int} (h : 0 ≤ z) : n ≤ z.toNat ↔ (n : Int) ≤ z := by
-  rw [← Int.ofNat_le, Int.toNat_of_nonneg h]
-
-@[simp] theorem toNat_lt {n : Nat} {z : Int} (h : 0 ≤ z) : z.toNat < n ↔ z < (n : Int) := by
-  rw [← Int.not_le, ← Nat.not_le, Int.le_toNat h]
-
-theorem toNat_add {a b : Int} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : (a + b).toNat = a.toNat + b.toNat :=
-  match a, b, eq_ofNat_of_zero_le ha, eq_ofNat_of_zero_le hb with
-  | _, _, ⟨_, rfl⟩, ⟨_, rfl⟩ => rfl
-
-theorem toNat_add_nat {a : Int} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (n : Nat) : (a + n).toNat = a.toNat + n :=
-  match a, eq_ofNat_of_zero_le ha with | _, ⟨_, rfl⟩ => rfl
-
-@[simp] theorem pred_toNat : ∀ i : Int, (i - 1).toNat = i.toNat - 1
-  | 0 => rfl
-  | (n+1:Nat) => by simp [ofNat_add]
-  | -[n+1] => rfl
-
-@[simp] theorem toNat_sub_toNat_neg : ∀ n : Int, ↑n.toNat - ↑(-n).toNat = n
-  | 0 => rfl
-  | (_+1:Nat) => Int.sub_zero _
-  | -[_+1] => Int.zero_sub _
-
-@[simp] theorem toNat_add_toNat_neg_eq_natAbs : ∀ n : Int, n.toNat + (-n).toNat = n.natAbs
-  | 0 => rfl
-  | (_+1:Nat) => Nat.add_zero _
-  | -[_+1] => Nat.zero_add _
-
-@[simp] theorem toNat_neg_nat : ∀ n : Nat, (-(n : Int)).toNat = 0
-  | 0 => rfl
-  | _+1 => rfl
-
-/-! ### toNat' -/
-
-theorem mem_toNat' : ∀ (a : Int) (n : Nat), toNat' a = some n ↔ a = n
-  | (m : Nat), n => by simp [toNat', Int.ofNat_inj]
-  | -[m+1], n => by constructor <;> nofun
-
-/-! ## Order properties of the integers -/
-
-protected theorem lt_of_not_ge {a b : Int} : ¬a ≤ b → b < a := Int.not_le.mp
-protected theorem not_le_of_gt {a b : Int} : b < a → ¬a ≤ b := Int.not_le.mpr
-
-protected theorem le_of_not_le {a b : Int} : ¬ a ≤ b → b ≤ a := (Int.le_total a b).resolve_left
-
-@[simp] theorem negSucc_not_pos (n : Nat) : 0 < -[n+1] ↔ False := by
-  simp only [Int.not_lt, iff_false]; constructor
-
-theorem eq_negSucc_of_lt_zero : ∀ {a : Int}, a < 0 → ∃ n : Nat, a = -[n+1]
-  | ofNat _, h => absurd h (Int.not_lt.2 (ofNat_zero_le _))
-  | -[n+1],  _ => ⟨n, rfl⟩
-
-protected theorem lt_of_add_lt_add_left {a b c : Int} (h : a + b < a + c) : b < c := by
-  have : -a + (a + b) < -a + (a + c) := Int.add_lt_add_left h _
-  simp [Int.neg_add_cancel_left] at this
-  assumption
-
-protected theorem lt_of_add_lt_add_right {a b c : Int} (h : a + b < c + b) : a < c :=
-  Int.lt_of_add_lt_add_left (a := b) <| by rwa [Int.add_comm b a, Int.add_comm b c]
-
-protected theorem add_lt_add_iff_left (a : Int) : a + b < a + c ↔ b < c :=
-  ⟨Int.lt_of_add_lt_add_left, (Int.add_lt_add_left · _)⟩
-
-protected theorem add_lt_add_iff_right (c : Int) : a + c < b + c ↔ a < b :=
-  ⟨Int.lt_of_add_lt_add_right, (Int.add_lt_add_right · _)⟩
-
-protected theorem add_lt_add {a b c d : Int} (h₁ : a < b) (h₂ : c < d) : a + c < b + d :=
-  Int.lt_trans (Int.add_lt_add_right h₁ c) (Int.add_lt_add_left h₂ b)
-
-protected theorem add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt {a b c d : Int} (h₁ : a ≤ b) (h₂ : c < d) :
-    a + c < b + d :=
-  Int.lt_of_le_of_lt (Int.add_le_add_right h₁ c) (Int.add_lt_add_left h₂ b)
-
-protected theorem add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le {a b c d : Int} (h₁ : a < b) (h₂ : c ≤ d) :
-    a + c < b + d :=
-  Int.lt_of_lt_of_le (Int.add_lt_add_right h₁ c) (Int.add_le_add_left h₂ b)
-
-protected theorem lt_add_of_pos_right (a : Int) {b : Int} (h : 0 < b) : a < a + b := by
-  have : a + 0 < a + b := Int.add_lt_add_left h a
-  rwa [Int.add_zero] at this
-
-protected theorem lt_add_of_pos_left (a : Int) {b : Int} (h : 0 < b) : a < b + a := by
-  have : 0 + a < b + a := Int.add_lt_add_right h a
-  rwa [Int.zero_add] at this
-
-protected theorem add_nonneg {a b : Int} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : 0 ≤ a + b :=
-  Int.zero_add 0 ▸ Int.add_le_add ha hb
-
-protected theorem add_pos {a b : Int} (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : 0 < a + b :=
-  Int.zero_add 0 ▸ Int.add_lt_add ha hb
-
-protected theorem add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg {a b : Int} (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) : 0 < a + b :=
-  Int.zero_add 0 ▸ Int.add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le ha hb
-
-protected theorem add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos {a b : Int} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 < b) : 0 < a + b :=
-  Int.zero_add 0 ▸ Int.add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt ha hb
-
-protected theorem add_nonpos {a b : Int} (ha : a ≤ 0) (hb : b ≤ 0) : a + b ≤ 0 :=
-  Int.zero_add 0 ▸ Int.add_le_add ha hb
-
-protected theorem add_neg {a b : Int} (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : a + b < 0 :=
-  Int.zero_add 0 ▸ Int.add_lt_add ha hb
-
-protected theorem add_neg_of_neg_of_nonpos {a b : Int} (ha : a < 0) (hb : b ≤ 0) : a + b < 0 :=
-  Int.zero_add 0 ▸ Int.add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le ha hb
-
-protected theorem add_neg_of_nonpos_of_neg {a b : Int} (ha : a ≤ 0) (hb : b < 0) : a + b < 0 :=
-  Int.zero_add 0 ▸ Int.add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt ha hb
-
-protected theorem lt_add_of_le_of_pos {a b c : Int} (hbc : b ≤ c) (ha : 0 < a) : b < c + a :=
-  Int.add_zero b ▸ Int.add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt hbc ha
-
-theorem add_one_le_iff {a b : Int} : a + 1 ≤ b ↔ a < b := .rfl
-
-theorem lt_add_one_iff {a b : Int} : a < b + 1 ↔ a ≤ b := Int.add_le_add_iff_right _
-
-@[simp] theorem succ_ofNat_pos (n : Nat) : 0 < (n : Int) + 1 :=
-  lt_add_one_iff.2 (ofNat_zero_le _)
-
-theorem le_add_one {a b : Int} (h : a ≤ b) : a ≤ b + 1 :=
-  Int.le_of_lt (Int.lt_add_one_iff.2 h)
-
-protected theorem nonneg_of_neg_nonpos {a : Int} (h : -a ≤ 0) : 0 ≤ a :=
-  Int.le_of_neg_le_neg <| by rwa [Int.neg_zero]
-
-protected theorem nonpos_of_neg_nonneg {a : Int} (h : 0 ≤ -a) : a ≤ 0 :=
-  Int.le_of_neg_le_neg <| by rwa [Int.neg_zero]
-
-protected theorem lt_of_neg_lt_neg {a b : Int} (h : -b < -a) : a < b :=
-  Int.neg_neg a ▸ Int.neg_neg b ▸ Int.neg_lt_neg h
-
-protected theorem pos_of_neg_neg {a : Int} (h : -a < 0) : 0 < a :=
-  Int.lt_of_neg_lt_neg <| by rwa [Int.neg_zero]
-
-protected theorem neg_of_neg_pos {a : Int} (h : 0 < -a) : a < 0 :=
-  have : -0 < -a := by rwa [Int.neg_zero]
-  Int.lt_of_neg_lt_neg this
-
-protected theorem le_neg_of_le_neg {a b : Int} (h : a ≤ -b) : b ≤ -a := by
-  have h := Int.neg_le_neg h
-  rwa [Int.neg_neg] at h
-
-protected theorem neg_le_of_neg_le {a b : Int} (h : -a ≤ b) : -b ≤ a := by
-  have h := Int.neg_le_neg h
-  rwa [Int.neg_neg] at h
-
-protected theorem lt_neg_of_lt_neg {a b : Int} (h : a < -b) : b < -a := by
-  have h := Int.neg_lt_neg h
-  rwa [Int.neg_neg] at h
-
-protected theorem neg_lt_of_neg_lt {a b : Int} (h : -a < b) : -b < a := by
-  have h := Int.neg_lt_neg h
-  rwa [Int.neg_neg] at h
-
-protected theorem sub_nonpos_of_le {a b : Int} (h : a ≤ b) : a - b ≤ 0 := by
-  have h := Int.add_le_add_right h (-b)
-  rwa [Int.add_right_neg] at h
-
-protected theorem le_of_sub_nonpos {a b : Int} (h : a - b ≤ 0) : a ≤ b := by
-  have h := Int.add_le_add_right h b
-  rwa [Int.sub_add_cancel, Int.zero_add] at h
-
-protected theorem sub_neg_of_lt {a b : Int} (h : a < b) : a - b < 0 := by
-  have h := Int.add_lt_add_right h (-b)
-  rwa [Int.add_right_neg] at h
-
-protected theorem lt_of_sub_neg {a b : Int} (h : a - b < 0) : a < b := by
-  have h := Int.add_lt_add_right h b
-  rwa [Int.sub_add_cancel, Int.zero_add] at h
-
-protected theorem add_le_of_le_neg_add {a b c : Int} (h : b ≤ -a + c) : a + b ≤ c := by
-  have h := Int.add_le_add_left h a
-  rwa [Int.add_neg_cancel_left] at h
-
-protected theorem le_neg_add_of_add_le {a b c : Int} (h : a + b ≤ c) : b ≤ -a + c := by
-  have h := Int.add_le_add_left h (-a)
-  rwa [Int.neg_add_cancel_left] at h
-
-protected theorem add_le_of_le_sub_left {a b c : Int} (h : b ≤ c - a) : a + b ≤ c := by
-  have h := Int.add_le_add_left h a
-  rwa [← Int.add_sub_assoc, Int.add_comm a c, Int.add_sub_cancel] at h
-
-protected theorem le_sub_left_of_add_le {a b c : Int} (h : a + b ≤ c) : b ≤ c - a := by
-  have h := Int.add_le_add_right h (-a)
-  rwa [Int.add_comm a b, Int.add_neg_cancel_right] at h
-
-protected theorem add_le_of_le_sub_right {a b c : Int} (h : a ≤ c - b) : a + b ≤ c := by
-  have h := Int.add_le_add_right h b
-  rwa [Int.sub_add_cancel] at h
-
-protected theorem le_sub_right_of_add_le {a b c : Int} (h : a + b ≤ c) : a ≤ c - b := by
-  have h := Int.add_le_add_right h (-b)
-  rwa [Int.add_neg_cancel_right] at h
-
-protected theorem le_add_of_neg_add_le {a b c : Int} (h : -b + a ≤ c) : a ≤ b + c := by
-  have h := Int.add_le_add_left h b
-  rwa [Int.add_neg_cancel_left] at h
-
-protected theorem neg_add_le_of_le_add {a b c : Int} (h : a ≤ b + c) : -b + a ≤ c := by
-  have h := Int.add_le_add_left h (-b)
-  rwa [Int.neg_add_cancel_left] at h
-
-protected theorem le_add_of_sub_left_le {a b c : Int} (h : a - b ≤ c) : a ≤ b + c := by
-  have h := Int.add_le_add_right h b
-  rwa [Int.sub_add_cancel, Int.add_comm] at h
-
-protected theorem le_add_of_sub_right_le {a b c : Int} (h : a - c ≤ b) : a ≤ b + c := by
-  have h := Int.add_le_add_right h c
-  rwa [Int.sub_add_cancel] at h
-
-protected theorem sub_right_le_of_le_add {a b c : Int} (h : a ≤ b + c) : a - c ≤ b := by
-  have h := Int.add_le_add_right h (-c)
-  rwa [Int.add_neg_cancel_right] at h
-
-protected theorem le_add_of_neg_add_le_left {a b c : Int} (h : -b + a ≤ c) : a ≤ b + c := by
-  rw [Int.add_comm] at h
-  exact Int.le_add_of_sub_left_le h
-
-protected theorem neg_add_le_left_of_le_add {a b c : Int} (h : a ≤ b + c) : -b + a ≤ c := by
-  rw [Int.add_comm]
-  exact Int.sub_left_le_of_le_add h
-
-protected theorem le_add_of_neg_add_le_right {a b c : Int} (h : -c + a ≤ b) : a ≤ b + c := by
-  rw [Int.add_comm] at h
-  exact Int.le_add_of_sub_right_le h
-
-protected theorem neg_add_le_right_of_le_add {a b c : Int} (h : a ≤ b + c) : -c + a ≤ b := by
-  rw [Int.add_comm] at h
-  exact Int.neg_add_le_left_of_le_add h
-
-protected theorem le_add_of_neg_le_sub_left {a b c : Int} (h : -a ≤ b - c) : c ≤ a + b :=
-  Int.le_add_of_neg_add_le_left (Int.add_le_of_le_sub_right h)
-
-protected theorem neg_le_sub_left_of_le_add {a b c : Int} (h : c ≤ a + b) : -a ≤ b - c := by
-  have h := Int.le_neg_add_of_add_le (Int.sub_left_le_of_le_add h)
-  rwa [Int.add_comm] at h
-
-protected theorem le_add_of_neg_le_sub_right {a b c : Int} (h : -b ≤ a - c) : c ≤ a + b :=
-  Int.le_add_of_sub_right_le (Int.add_le_of_le_sub_left h)
-
-protected theorem neg_le_sub_right_of_le_add {a b c : Int} (h : c ≤ a + b) : -b ≤ a - c :=
-  Int.le_sub_left_of_add_le (Int.sub_right_le_of_le_add h)
-
-protected theorem sub_le_of_sub_le {a b c : Int} (h : a - b ≤ c) : a - c ≤ b :=
-  Int.sub_left_le_of_le_add (Int.le_add_of_sub_right_le h)
-
-protected theorem sub_le_sub_left {a b : Int} (h : a ≤ b) (c : Int) : c - b ≤ c - a :=
-  Int.add_le_add_left (Int.neg_le_neg h) c
-
-protected theorem sub_le_sub_right {a b : Int} (h : a ≤ b) (c : Int) : a - c ≤ b - c :=
-  Int.add_le_add_right h (-c)
-
-protected theorem sub_le_sub {a b c d : Int} (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : a - d ≤ b - c :=
-  Int.add_le_add hab (Int.neg_le_neg hcd)
-
-protected theorem add_lt_of_lt_neg_add {a b c : Int} (h : b < -a + c) : a + b < c := by
-  have h := Int.add_lt_add_left h a
-  rwa [Int.add_neg_cancel_left] at h
-
-protected theorem lt_neg_add_of_add_lt {a b c : Int} (h : a + b < c) : b < -a + c := by
-  have h := Int.add_lt_add_left h (-a)
-  rwa [Int.neg_add_cancel_left] at h
-
-protected theorem add_lt_of_lt_sub_left {a b c : Int} (h : b < c - a) : a + b < c := by
-  have h := Int.add_lt_add_left h a
-  rwa [← Int.add_sub_assoc, Int.add_comm a c, Int.add_sub_cancel] at h
-
-protected theorem lt_sub_left_of_add_lt {a b c : Int} (h : a + b < c) : b < c - a := by
-  have h := Int.add_lt_add_right h (-a)
-  rwa [Int.add_comm a b, Int.add_neg_cancel_right] at h
-
-protected theorem add_lt_of_lt_sub_right {a b c : Int} (h : a < c - b) : a + b < c := by
-  have h := Int.add_lt_add_right h b
-  rwa [Int.sub_add_cancel] at h
-
-protected theorem lt_sub_right_of_add_lt {a b c : Int} (h : a + b < c) : a < c - b := by
-  have h := Int.add_lt_add_right h (-b)
-  rwa [Int.add_neg_cancel_right] at h
-
-protected theorem lt_add_of_neg_add_lt {a b c : Int} (h : -b + a < c) : a < b + c := by
-  have h := Int.add_lt_add_left h b
-  rwa [Int.add_neg_cancel_left] at h
-
-protected theorem neg_add_lt_of_lt_add {a b c : Int} (h : a < b + c) : -b + a < c := by
-  have h := Int.add_lt_add_left h (-b)
-  rwa [Int.neg_add_cancel_left] at h
-
-protected theorem lt_add_of_sub_left_lt {a b c : Int} (h : a - b < c) : a < b + c := by
-  have h := Int.add_lt_add_right h b
-  rwa [Int.sub_add_cancel, Int.add_comm] at h
-
-protected theorem sub_left_lt_of_lt_add {a b c : Int} (h : a < b + c) : a - b < c := by
-  have h := Int.add_lt_add_right h (-b)
-  rwa [Int.add_comm b c, Int.add_neg_cancel_right] at h
-
-protected theorem lt_add_of_sub_right_lt {a b c : Int} (h : a - c < b) : a < b + c := by
-  have h := Int.add_lt_add_right h c
-  rwa [Int.sub_add_cancel] at h
-
-protected theorem sub_right_lt_of_lt_add {a b c : Int} (h : a < b + c) : a - c < b := by
-  have h := Int.add_lt_add_right h (-c)
-  rwa [Int.add_neg_cancel_right] at h
-
-protected theorem lt_add_of_neg_add_lt_left {a b c : Int} (h : -b + a < c) : a < b + c := by
-  rw [Int.add_comm] at h
-  exact Int.lt_add_of_sub_left_lt h
-
-protected theorem neg_add_lt_left_of_lt_add {a b c : Int} (h : a < b + c) : -b + a < c := by
-  rw [Int.add_comm]
-  exact Int.sub_left_lt_of_lt_add h
-
-protected theorem lt_add_of_neg_add_lt_right {a b c : Int} (h : -c + a < b) : a < b + c := by
-  rw [Int.add_comm] at h
-  exact Int.lt_add_of_sub_right_lt h
-
-protected theorem neg_add_lt_right_of_lt_add {a b c : Int} (h : a < b + c) : -c + a < b := by
-  rw [Int.add_comm] at h
-  exact Int.neg_add_lt_left_of_lt_add h
-
-protected theorem lt_add_of_neg_lt_sub_left {a b c : Int} (h : -a < b - c) : c < a + b :=
-  Int.lt_add_of_neg_add_lt_left (Int.add_lt_of_lt_sub_right h)
-
-protected theorem neg_lt_sub_left_of_lt_add {a b c : Int} (h : c < a + b) : -a < b - c := by
-  have h := Int.lt_neg_add_of_add_lt (Int.sub_left_lt_of_lt_add h)
-  rwa [Int.add_comm] at h
-
-protected theorem lt_add_of_neg_lt_sub_right {a b c : Int} (h : -b < a - c) : c < a + b :=
-  Int.lt_add_of_sub_right_lt (Int.add_lt_of_lt_sub_left h)
-
-protected theorem neg_lt_sub_right_of_lt_add {a b c : Int} (h : c < a + b) : -b < a - c :=
-  Int.lt_sub_left_of_add_lt (Int.sub_right_lt_of_lt_add h)
-
-protected theorem sub_lt_of_sub_lt {a b c : Int} (h : a - b < c) : a - c < b :=
-  Int.sub_left_lt_of_lt_add (Int.lt_add_of_sub_right_lt h)
-
-protected theorem sub_lt_sub_left {a b : Int} (h : a < b) (c : Int) : c - b < c - a :=
-  Int.add_lt_add_left (Int.neg_lt_neg h) c
-
-protected theorem sub_lt_sub_right {a b : Int} (h : a < b) (c : Int) : a - c < b - c :=
-  Int.add_lt_add_right h (-c)
-
-protected theorem sub_lt_sub {a b c d : Int} (hab : a < b) (hcd : c < d) : a - d < b - c :=
-  Int.add_lt_add hab (Int.neg_lt_neg hcd)
-
-protected theorem sub_lt_sub_of_le_of_lt {a b c d : Int}
-  (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c < d) : a - d < b - c :=
-  Int.add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt hab (Int.neg_lt_neg hcd)
-
-protected theorem sub_lt_sub_of_lt_of_le {a b c d : Int}
-  (hab : a < b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : a - d < b - c :=
-  Int.add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le hab (Int.neg_le_neg hcd)
-
-protected theorem add_le_add_three {a b c d e f : Int}
-    (h₁ : a ≤ d) (h₂ : b ≤ e) (h₃ : c ≤ f) : a + b + c ≤ d + e + f :=
-  Int.add_le_add (Int.add_le_add h₁ h₂) h₃
-
-theorem exists_eq_neg_ofNat {a : Int} (H : a ≤ 0) : ∃ n : Nat, a = -(n : Int) :=
-  let ⟨n, h⟩ := eq_ofNat_of_zero_le (Int.neg_nonneg_of_nonpos H)
-  ⟨n, Int.eq_neg_of_eq_neg h.symm⟩
-
-theorem lt_of_add_one_le {a b : Int} (H : a + 1 ≤ b) : a < b := H
-
-theorem lt_add_one_of_le {a b : Int} (H : a ≤ b) : a < b + 1 := Int.add_le_add_right H 1
-
-theorem le_of_lt_add_one {a b : Int} (H : a < b + 1) : a ≤ b := Int.le_of_add_le_add_right H
-
-theorem sub_one_lt_of_le {a b : Int} (H : a ≤ b) : a - 1 < b :=
-  Int.sub_right_lt_of_lt_add <| lt_add_one_of_le H
-
-theorem le_of_sub_one_lt {a b : Int} (H : a - 1 < b) : a ≤ b :=
-  le_of_lt_add_one <| Int.lt_add_of_sub_right_lt H
-
-theorem le_sub_one_of_lt {a b : Int} (H : a < b) : a ≤ b - 1 := Int.le_sub_right_of_add_le H
-
-theorem lt_of_le_sub_one {a b : Int} (H : a ≤ b - 1) : a < b := Int.add_le_of_le_sub_right H
-
-/- ### Order properties and multiplication -/
-
-protected theorem mul_lt_mul {a b c d : Int}
-    (h₁ : a < c) (h₂ : b ≤ d) (h₃ : 0 < b) (h₄ : 0 ≤ c) : a * b < c * d :=
-  Int.lt_of_lt_of_le (Int.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right h₁ h₃) (Int.mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left h₂ h₄)
-
-protected theorem mul_lt_mul' {a b c d : Int}
-    (h₁ : a ≤ c) (h₂ : b < d) (h₃ : 0 ≤ b) (h₄ : 0 < c) : a * b < c * d :=
-  Int.lt_of_le_of_lt (Int.mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h₁ h₃) (Int.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h₂ h₄)
-
-protected theorem mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg {a b : Int} (ha : 0 < a) (hb : b < 0) : a * b < 0 := by
-  have h : a * b < a * 0 := Int.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left hb ha
-  rwa [Int.mul_zero] at h
-
-protected theorem mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos {a b : Int} (ha : a < 0) (hb : 0 < b) : a * b < 0 := by
-  have h : a * b < 0 * b := Int.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right ha hb
-  rwa [Int.zero_mul] at h
-
-protected theorem mul_nonneg_of_nonpos_of_nonpos {a b : Int}
-  (ha : a ≤ 0) (hb : b ≤ 0) : 0 ≤ a * b := by
-  have : 0 * b ≤ a * b := Int.mul_le_mul_of_nonpos_right ha hb
-  rwa [Int.zero_mul] at this
-
-protected theorem mul_lt_mul_of_neg_left {a b c : Int} (h : b < a) (hc : c < 0) : c * a < c * b :=
-  have : -c > 0 := Int.neg_pos_of_neg hc
-  have : -c * b < -c * a := Int.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h this
-  have : -(c * b) < -(c * a) := by
-    rwa [← Int.neg_mul_eq_neg_mul, ← Int.neg_mul_eq_neg_mul] at this
-  Int.lt_of_neg_lt_neg this
-
-protected theorem mul_lt_mul_of_neg_right {a b c : Int} (h : b < a) (hc : c < 0) : a * c < b * c :=
-  have : -c > 0 := Int.neg_pos_of_neg hc
-  have : b * -c < a * -c := Int.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right h this
-  have : -(b * c) < -(a * c) := by
-    rwa [← Int.neg_mul_eq_mul_neg, ← Int.neg_mul_eq_mul_neg] at this
-  Int.lt_of_neg_lt_neg this
-
-protected theorem mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg {a b : Int} (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : 0 < a * b := by
-  have : 0 * b < a * b := Int.mul_lt_mul_of_neg_right ha hb
-  rwa [Int.zero_mul] at this
-
-protected theorem mul_self_le_mul_self {a b : Int} (h1 : 0 ≤ a) (h2 : a ≤ b) : a * a ≤ b * b :=
-  Int.mul_le_mul h2 h2 h1 (Int.le_trans h1 h2)
-
-protected theorem mul_self_lt_mul_self {a b : Int} (h1 : 0 ≤ a) (h2 : a < b) : a * a < b * b :=
-  Int.mul_lt_mul' (Int.le_of_lt h2) h2 h1 (Int.lt_of_le_of_lt h1 h2)
-
-/- ## sign -/
-
-@[simp] theorem sign_zero : sign 0 = 0 := rfl
-@[simp] theorem sign_one : sign 1 = 1 := rfl
-theorem sign_neg_one : sign (-1) = -1 := rfl
-
-@[simp] theorem sign_of_add_one (x : Nat) : Int.sign (x + 1) = 1 := rfl
-@[simp] theorem sign_negSucc (x : Nat) : Int.sign (Int.negSucc x) = -1 := rfl
-
-theorem natAbs_sign (z : Int) : z.sign.natAbs = if z = 0 then 0 else 1 :=
-  match z with | 0 | succ _ | -[_+1] => rfl
-
-theorem natAbs_sign_of_nonzero {z : Int} (hz : z ≠ 0) : z.sign.natAbs = 1 := by
-  rw [Int.natAbs_sign, if_neg hz]
-
-theorem sign_ofNat_of_nonzero {n : Nat} (hn : n ≠ 0) : Int.sign n = 1 :=
-  match n, Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hn with
-  | _, ⟨n, rfl⟩ => Int.sign_of_add_one n
-
-@[simp] theorem sign_neg (z : Int) : Int.sign (-z) = -Int.sign z := by
-  match z with | 0 | succ _ | -[_+1] => rfl
-
-theorem sign_mul_natAbs : ∀ a : Int, sign a * natAbs a = a
-  | 0      => rfl
-  | succ _ => Int.one_mul _
-  | -[_+1] => (Int.neg_eq_neg_one_mul _).symm
-
-@[simp] theorem sign_mul : ∀ a b, sign (a * b) = sign a * sign b
-  | a, 0 | 0, b => by simp [Int.mul_zero, Int.zero_mul]
-  | succ _, succ _ | succ _, -[_+1] | -[_+1], succ _ | -[_+1], -[_+1] => rfl
-
-theorem sign_eq_one_of_pos {a : Int} (h : 0 < a) : sign a = 1 :=
-  match a, eq_succ_of_zero_lt h with
-  | _, ⟨_, rfl⟩ => rfl
-
-theorem sign_eq_neg_one_of_neg {a : Int} (h : a < 0) : sign a = -1 :=
-  match a, eq_negSucc_of_lt_zero h with
-  | _, ⟨_, rfl⟩ => rfl
-
-theorem eq_zero_of_sign_eq_zero : ∀ {a : Int}, sign a = 0 → a = 0
-  | 0, _ => rfl
-
-theorem pos_of_sign_eq_one : ∀ {a : Int}, sign a = 1 → 0 < a
-  | (_ + 1 : Nat), _ => ofNat_lt.2 (Nat.succ_pos _)
-
-theorem neg_of_sign_eq_neg_one : ∀ {a : Int}, sign a = -1 → a < 0
-  | (_ + 1 : Nat), h => nomatch h
-  | 0, h => nomatch h
-  | -[_+1], _ => negSucc_lt_zero _
-
-theorem sign_eq_one_iff_pos (a : Int) : sign a = 1 ↔ 0 < a :=
-  ⟨pos_of_sign_eq_one, sign_eq_one_of_pos⟩
-
-theorem sign_eq_neg_one_iff_neg (a : Int) : sign a = -1 ↔ a < 0 :=
-  ⟨neg_of_sign_eq_neg_one, sign_eq_neg_one_of_neg⟩
-
-@[simp] theorem sign_eq_zero_iff_zero (a : Int) : sign a = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
-  ⟨eq_zero_of_sign_eq_zero, fun h => by rw [h, sign_zero]⟩
-
-@[simp] theorem sign_sign : sign (sign x) = sign x := by
-  match x with
-  | 0 => rfl
-  | .ofNat (_ + 1) => rfl
-  | .negSucc _ => rfl
-
-@[simp] theorem sign_nonneg : 0 ≤ sign x ↔ 0 ≤ x := by
-  match x with
-  | 0 => rfl
-  | .ofNat (_ + 1) =>
-    simp (config := { decide := true }) only [sign, true_iff]
-    exact Int.le_add_one (ofNat_nonneg _)
-  | .negSucc _ => simp (config := { decide := true }) [sign]
-
-theorem mul_sign : ∀ i : Int, i * sign i = natAbs i
-  | succ _ => Int.mul_one _
-  | 0 => Int.mul_zero _
-  | -[_+1] => Int.mul_neg_one _
-
-/- ## natAbs -/
-
-theorem natAbs_ne_zero {a : Int} : a.natAbs ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 := not_congr Int.natAbs_eq_zero
-
-theorem natAbs_mul_self : ∀ {a : Int}, ↑(natAbs a * natAbs a) = a * a
-  | ofNat _ => rfl
-  | -[_+1]  => rfl
-
-theorem eq_nat_or_neg (a : Int) : ∃ n : Nat, a = n ∨ a = -↑n := ⟨_, natAbs_eq a⟩
-
-theorem natAbs_mul_natAbs_eq {a b : Int} {c : Nat}
-    (h : a * b = (c : Int)) : a.natAbs * b.natAbs = c := by rw [← natAbs_mul, h, natAbs]
-
-@[simp] theorem natAbs_mul_self' (a : Int) : (natAbs a * natAbs a : Int) = a * a := by
-  rw [← Int.ofNat_mul, natAbs_mul_self]
-
-theorem natAbs_eq_iff {a : Int} {n : Nat} : a.natAbs = n ↔ a = n ∨ a = -↑n := by
-  rw [← Int.natAbs_eq_natAbs_iff, Int.natAbs_ofNat]
-
-theorem natAbs_add_le (a b : Int) : natAbs (a + b) ≤ natAbs a + natAbs b := by
-  suffices ∀ a b : Nat, natAbs (subNatNat a b.succ) ≤ (a + b).succ by
-    match a, b with
-    | (a:Nat), (b:Nat) => rw [ofNat_add_ofNat, natAbs_ofNat]; apply Nat.le_refl
-    | (a:Nat), -[b+1]  => rw [natAbs_ofNat, natAbs_negSucc]; apply this
-    | -[a+1],  (b:Nat) =>
-      rw [natAbs_negSucc, natAbs_ofNat, Nat.succ_add, Nat.add_comm a b]; apply this
-    | -[a+1],  -[b+1]  => rw [natAbs_negSucc, succ_add]; apply Nat.le_refl
-  refine fun a b => subNatNat_elim a b.succ
-    (fun m n i => n = b.succ → natAbs i ≤ (m + b).succ) ?_
-    (fun i n (e : (n + i).succ = _) => ?_) rfl
-  · intro i n h
-    subst h
-    rw [Nat.add_comm _ i, Nat.add_assoc]
-    exact Nat.le_add_right i (b.succ + b).succ
-  · apply succ_le_succ
-    rw [← succ.inj e, ← Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_comm]
-    apply Nat.le_add_right
-
-theorem natAbs_sub_le (a b : Int) : natAbs (a - b) ≤ natAbs a + natAbs b := by
-  rw [← Int.natAbs_neg b]; apply natAbs_add_le
-
-theorem negSucc_eq' (m : Nat) : -[m+1] = -m - 1 := by simp only [negSucc_eq, Int.neg_add]; rfl
-
-theorem natAbs_lt_natAbs_of_nonneg_of_lt {a b : Int}
-    (w₁ : 0 ≤ a) (w₂ : a < b) : a.natAbs < b.natAbs :=
-  match a, b, eq_ofNat_of_zero_le w₁, eq_ofNat_of_zero_le (Int.le_trans w₁ (Int.le_of_lt w₂)) with
-  | _, _, ⟨_, rfl⟩, ⟨_, rfl⟩ => ofNat_lt.1 w₂
-
-theorem eq_natAbs_iff_mul_eq_zero : natAbs a = n ↔ (a - n) * (a + n) = 0 := by
-  rw [natAbs_eq_iff, Int.mul_eq_zero, ← Int.sub_neg, Int.sub_eq_zero, Int.sub_eq_zero]
-
-end Int

src/Init/Data/Int/Pow.lean

@@ -1,44 +0,0 @@
-/-
-Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
-Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Deniz Aydin, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
--/
-prelude
-import Init.Data.Int.Lemmas
-
-namespace Int
-
-/-! # pow -/
-
-protected theorem pow_zero (b : Int) : b^0 = 1 := rfl
-
-protected theorem pow_succ (b : Int) (e : Nat) : b ^ (e+1) = (b ^ e) * b := rfl
-protected theorem pow_succ' (b : Int) (e : Nat) : b ^ (e+1) = b * (b ^ e) := by
-  rw [Int.mul_comm, Int.pow_succ]
-
-theorem pow_le_pow_of_le_left {n m : Nat} (h : n ≤ m) : ∀ (i : Nat), n^i ≤ m^i
-  | 0      => Nat.le_refl _
-  | i + 1 => Nat.mul_le_mul (pow_le_pow_of_le_left h i) h
-
-theorem pow_le_pow_of_le_right {n : Nat} (hx : n > 0) {i : Nat} : ∀ {j}, i ≤ j → n^i ≤ n^j
-  | 0,      h =>
-    have : i = 0 := Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero h
-    this.symm ▸ Nat.le_refl _
-  | j + 1, h =>
-    match Nat.le_or_eq_of_le_succ h with
-    | Or.inl h => show n^i ≤ n^j * n from
-      have : n^i * 1 ≤ n^j * n := Nat.mul_le_mul (pow_le_pow_of_le_right hx h) hx
-      Nat.mul_one (n^i) ▸ this
-    | Or.inr h =>
-      h.symm ▸ Nat.le_refl _
-
-theorem pos_pow_of_pos {n : Nat} (m : Nat) (h : 0 < n) : 0 < n^m :=
-  pow_le_pow_of_le_right h (Nat.zero_le _)
-
-theorem natCast_pow (b n : Nat) : ((b^n : Nat) : Int) = (b : Int) ^ n := by
-  match n with
-  | 0 => rfl
-  | n + 1 =>
-    simp only [Nat.pow_succ, Int.pow_succ, natCast_mul, natCast_pow _ n]
-
-end Int

src/Init/Data/List.lean

@@ -8,4 +8,3 @@ import Init.Data.List.Basic
 import Init.Data.List.BasicAux
 import Init.Data.List.Control
 import Init.Data.List.Lemmas
-import Init.Data.List.Impl

src/Init/Data/List/Basic.lean

@@ -7,7 +7,6 @@ prelude
 import Init.SimpLemmas
 import Init.Data.Nat.Basic
 import Init.Data.Nat.Div
-
 set_option linter.missingDocs true -- keep it documented
 open Decidable List
 
@@ -55,6 +54,15 @@ variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
 
 namespace List
 
+instance : GetElem (List α) Nat α fun as i => i < as.length where
+  getElem as i h := as.get ⟨i, h⟩
+
+@[simp] theorem cons_getElem_zero (a : α) (as : List α) (h : 0 < (a :: as).length) : getElem (a :: as) 0 h = a := by
+  rfl
+
+@[simp] theorem cons_getElem_succ (a : α) (as : List α) (i : Nat) (h : i + 1 < (a :: as).length) : getElem (a :: as) (i+1) h = getElem as i (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h) := by
+  rfl
+
 theorem length_add_eq_lengthTRAux (as : List α) (n : Nat) : as.length + n = as.lengthTRAux n := by
   induction as generalizing n with
   | nil  => simp [length, lengthTRAux]
@@ -450,7 +458,7 @@ contains the longest initial segment for which `p` returns true
 and the second part is everything else.
 
 * `span (· > 5) [6, 8, 9, 5, 2, 9] = ([6, 8, 9], [5, 2, 9])`
-* `span (· > 10) [6, 8, 9, 5, 2, 9] = ([], [6, 8, 9, 5, 2, 9])`
+* `span (· > 10) [6, 8, 9, 5, 2, 9] = ([6, 8, 9, 5, 2, 9], [])`
 -/
 @[inline] def span (p : α → Bool) (as : List α) : List α × List α :=
   loop as []
@@ -512,6 +520,11 @@ def drop : Nat → List α → List α
 @[simp] theorem drop_nil : ([] : List α).drop i = [] := by
   cases i <;> rfl
 
+theorem get_drop_eq_drop (as : List α) (i : Nat) (h : i < as.length) : as[i] :: as.drop (i+1) = as.drop i :=
+  match as, i with
+  | _::_, 0   => rfl
+  | _::_, i+1 => get_drop_eq_drop _ i _
+
 /--
 `O(min n |xs|)`. Returns the first `n` elements of `xs`, or the whole list if `n` is too large.
 * `take 0 [a, b, c, d, e] = []`
@@ -714,9 +727,9 @@ inductive lt [LT α] : List α → List α → Prop where
 instance [LT α] : LT (List α) := ⟨List.lt⟩
 
 instance hasDecidableLt [LT α] [h : DecidableRel (α:=α) (·<·)] : (l₁ l₂ : List α) → Decidable (l₁ < l₂)
-  | [],    []    => isFalse nofun
+  | [],    []    => isFalse (fun h => nomatch h)
   | [],    _::_  => isTrue (List.lt.nil _ _)
-  | _::_, []     => isFalse nofun
+  | _::_, []     => isFalse (fun h => nomatch h)
   | a::as, b::bs =>
     match h a b with
     | isTrue h₁  => isTrue (List.lt.head _ _ h₁)

src/Init/Data/List/BasicAux.lean

@@ -5,6 +5,9 @@ Author: Leonardo de Moura
 -/
 prelude
 import Init.Data.Nat.Linear
+import Init.Data.Array.Basic
+import Init.Data.List.Basic
+import Init.Util
 
 universe u
 
@@ -224,23 +227,4 @@ where
     else
       go xs acc₁ (acc₂.push x)
 
-/--
-Given a function `f : α → β ⊕ γ`, `partitionMap f l` maps the list by `f`
-whilst partitioning the result it into a pair of lists, `List β × List γ`,
-partitioning the `.inl _` into the left list, and the `.inr _` into the right List.
-```
-partitionMap (id : Nat ⊕ Nat → Nat ⊕ Nat) [inl 0, inr 1, inl 2] = ([0, 2], [1])
-```
--/
-@[inline] def partitionMap (f : α → β ⊕ γ) (l : List α) : List β × List γ := go l #[] #[] where
-  /-- Auxiliary for `partitionMap`:
-  `partitionMap.go f l acc₁ acc₂ = (acc₁.toList ++ left, acc₂.toList ++ right)`
-  if `partitionMap f l = (left, right)`. -/
-  @[specialize] go : List α → Array β → Array γ → List β × List γ
-  | [], acc₁, acc₂ => (acc₁.toList, acc₂.toList)
-  | x :: xs, acc₁, acc₂ =>
-    match f x with
-    | .inl a => go xs (acc₁.push a) acc₂
-    | .inr b => go xs acc₁ (acc₂.push b)
-
 end List

src/Init/Data/List/Impl.lean

@@ -1,261 +0,0 @@
-/-
-Copyright (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
-Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-Authors: Leonardo de Moura
--/
-
-prelude
-import Init.Data.Array.Lemmas
-
-/-!
-## Tail recursive implementations for `List` definitions.
-
-Many of the proofs require theorems about `Array`,
-so these are in a separate file to minimize imports.
--/
-
-namespace List
-
-/-- Tail recursive version of `erase`. -/
-@[inline] def setTR (l : List α) (n : Nat) (a : α) : List α := go l n #[] where
-  /-- Auxiliary for `setTR`: `setTR.go l a xs n acc = acc.toList ++ set xs a`,
-  unless `n ≥ l.length` in which case it returns `l` -/
-  go : List α → Nat → Array α → List α
-  | [], _, _ => l
-  | _::xs, 0, acc => acc.toListAppend (a::xs)
-  | x::xs, n+1, acc => go xs n (acc.push x)
-
-@[csimp] theorem set_eq_setTR : @set = @setTR := by
-  funext α l n a; simp [setTR]
-  let rec go (acc) : ∀ xs n, l = acc.data ++ xs →
-    setTR.go l a xs n acc = acc.data ++ xs.set n a
-  | [], _ => fun h => by simp [setTR.go, set, h]
-  | x::xs, 0 => by simp [setTR.go, set]
-  | x::xs, n+1 => fun h => by simp [setTR.go, set]; rw [go _ xs]; {simp}; simp [h]
-  exact (go #[] _ _ rfl).symm
-
-/-- Tail recursive version of `erase`. -/
-@[inline] def eraseTR [BEq α] (l : List α) (a : α) : List α := go l #[] where
-  /-- Auxiliary for `eraseTR`: `eraseTR.go l a xs acc = acc.toList ++ erase xs a`,
-  unless `a` is not present in which case it returns `l` -/
-  go : List α → Array α → List α
-  | [], _ => l
-  | x::xs, acc => bif x == a then acc.toListAppend xs else go xs (acc.push x)
-
-@[csimp] theorem erase_eq_eraseTR : @List.erase = @eraseTR := by
-  funext α _ l a; simp [eraseTR]
-  suffices ∀ xs acc, l = acc.data ++ xs → eraseTR.go l a xs acc = acc.data ++ xs.erase a from
-    (this l #[] (by simp)).symm
-  intro xs; induction xs with intro acc h
-  | nil => simp [List.erase, eraseTR.go, h]
-  | cons x xs IH =>
-    simp [List.erase, eraseTR.go]
-    cases x == a <;> simp
-    · rw [IH]; simp; simp; exact h
-
-/-- Tail recursive version of `eraseIdx`. -/
-@[inline] def eraseIdxTR (l : List α) (n : Nat) : List α := go l n #[] where
-  /-- Auxiliary for `eraseIdxTR`: `eraseIdxTR.go l n xs acc = acc.toList ++ eraseIdx xs a`,
-  unless `a` is not present in which case it returns `l` -/
-  go : List α → Nat → Array α → List α
-  | [], _, _ => l
-  | _::as, 0, acc => acc.toListAppend as
-  | a::as, n+1, acc => go as n (acc.push a)
-
-@[csimp] theorem eraseIdx_eq_eraseIdxTR : @eraseIdx = @eraseIdxTR := by
-  funext α l n; simp [eraseIdxTR]
-  suffices ∀ xs acc, l = acc.data ++ xs → eraseIdxTR.go l xs n acc = acc.data ++ xs.eraseIdx n from
-    (this l #[] (by simp)).symm
-  intro xs; induction xs generalizing n with intro acc h
-  | nil => simp [eraseIdx, eraseIdxTR.go, h]
-  | cons x xs IH =>
-    match n with
-    | 0 => simp [eraseIdx, eraseIdxTR.go]
-    | n+1 =>
-      simp [eraseIdx, eraseIdxTR.go]
-      rw [IH]; simp; simp; exact h
-
-/-- Tail recursive version of `bind`. -/
-@[inline] def bindTR (as : List α) (f : α → List β) : List β := go as #[] where
-  /-- Auxiliary for `bind`: `bind.go f as = acc.toList ++ bind f as` -/
-  @[specialize] go : List α → Array β → List β
-  | [], acc => acc.toList
-  | x::xs, acc => go xs (acc ++ f x)
-
-@[csimp] theorem bind_eq_bindTR : @List.bind = @bindTR := by
-  funext α β as f
-  let rec go : ∀ as acc, bindTR.go f as acc = acc.data ++ as.bind f
-    | [], acc => by simp [bindTR.go, bind]
-    | x::xs, acc => by simp [bindTR.go, bind, go xs]
-  exact (go as #[]).symm
-
-/-- Tail recursive version of `join`. -/
-@[inline] def joinTR (l : List (List α)) : List α := bindTR l id
-
-@[csimp] theorem join_eq_joinTR : @join = @joinTR := by
-  funext α l; rw [← List.bind_id, List.bind_eq_bindTR]; rfl
-
-/-- Tail recursive version of `filterMap`. -/
-@[inline] def filterMapTR (f : α → Option β) (l : List α) : List β := go l #[] where
-  /-- Auxiliary for `filterMap`: `filterMap.go f l = acc.toList ++ filterMap f l` -/
-  @[specialize] go : List α → Array β → List β
-  | [], acc => acc.toList
-  | a::as, acc => match f a with
-    | none => go as acc
-    | some b => go as (acc.push b)
-
-@[csimp] theorem filterMap_eq_filterMapTR : @List.filterMap = @filterMapTR := by
-  funext α β f l
-  let rec go : ∀ as acc, filterMapTR.go f as acc = acc.data ++ as.filterMap f
-    | [], acc => by simp [filterMapTR.go, filterMap]
-    | a::as, acc => by simp [filterMapTR.go, filterMap, go as]; split <;> simp [*]
-  exact (go l #[]).symm
-
-/-- Tail recursive version of `replace`. -/
-@[inline] def replaceTR [BEq α] (l : List α) (b c : α) : List α := go l #[] where
-  /-- Auxiliary for `replace`: `replace.go l b c xs acc = acc.toList ++ replace xs b c`,
-  unless `b` is not found in `xs` in which case it returns `l`. -/
-  @[specialize] go : List α → Array α → List α
-  | [], _ => l
-  | a::as, acc => bif a == b then acc.toListAppend (c::as) else go as (acc.push a)
-
-@[csimp] theorem replace_eq_replaceTR : @List.replace = @replaceTR := by
-  funext α _ l b c; simp [replaceTR]
-  suffices ∀ xs acc, l = acc.data ++ xs →
-      replaceTR.go l b c xs acc = acc.data ++ xs.replace b c from
-    (this l #[] (by simp)).symm
-  intro xs; induction xs with intro acc
-  | nil => simp [replace, replaceTR.go]
-  | cons x xs IH =>
-    simp [replace, replaceTR.go]; split <;> simp [*]
-    · intro h; rw [IH]; simp; simp; exact h
-
-/-- Tail recursive version of `take`. -/
-@[inline] def takeTR (n : Nat) (l : List α) : List α := go l n #[] where
-  /-- Auxiliary for `take`: `take.go l xs n acc = acc.toList ++ take n xs`,
-  unless `n ≥ xs.length` in which case it returns `l`. -/
-  @[specialize] go : List α → Nat → Array α → List α
-  | [], _, _ => l
-  | _::_, 0, acc => acc.toList
-  | a::as, n+1, acc => go as n (acc.push a)
-
-@[csimp] theorem take_eq_takeTR : @take = @takeTR := by
-  funext α n l; simp [takeTR]
-  suffices ∀ xs acc, l = acc.data ++ xs → takeTR.go l xs n acc = acc.data ++ xs.take n from
-    (this l #[] (by simp)).symm
-  intro xs; induction xs generalizing n with intro acc
-  | nil => cases n <;> simp [take, takeTR.go]
-  | cons x xs IH =>
-    cases n with simp [take, takeTR.go]
-    | succ n => intro h; rw [IH]; simp; simp; exact h
-
-/-- Tail recursive version of `takeWhile`. -/
-@[inline] def takeWhileTR (p : α → Bool) (l : List α) : List α := go l #[] where
-  /-- Auxiliary for `takeWhile`: `takeWhile.go p l xs acc = acc.toList ++ takeWhile p xs`,
-  unless no element satisfying `p` is found in `xs` in which case it returns `l`. -/
-  @[specialize] go : List α → Array α → List α
-  | [], _ => l
-  | a::as, acc => bif p a then go as (acc.push a) else acc.toList
-
-@[csimp] theorem takeWhile_eq_takeWhileTR : @takeWhile = @takeWhileTR := by
-  funext α p l; simp [takeWhileTR]
-  suffices ∀ xs acc, l = acc.data ++ xs →
-      takeWhileTR.go p l xs acc = acc.data ++ xs.takeWhile p from
-    (this l #[] (by simp)).symm
-  intro xs; induction xs with intro acc
-  | nil => simp [takeWhile, takeWhileTR.go]
-  | cons x xs IH =>
-    simp [takeWhile, takeWhileTR.go]; split <;> simp [*]
-    · intro h; rw [IH]; simp; simp; exact h
-
-/-- Tail recursive version of `foldr`. -/
-@[specialize] def foldrTR (f : α → β → β) (init : β) (l : List α) : β := l.toArray.foldr f init
-
-@[csimp] theorem foldr_eq_foldrTR : @foldr = @foldrTR := by
-  funext α β f init l; simp [foldrTR, Array.foldr_eq_foldr_data, -Array.size_toArray]
-
-/-- Tail recursive version of `zipWith`. -/
-@[inline] def zipWithTR (f : α → β → γ) (as : List α) (bs : List β) : List γ := go as bs #[] where
-  /-- Auxiliary for `zipWith`: `zipWith.go f as bs acc = acc.toList ++ zipWith f as bs` -/
-  go : List α → List β → Array γ → List γ
-  | a::as, b::bs, acc => go as bs (acc.push (f a b))
-  | _, _, acc => acc.toList
-
-@[csimp] theorem zipWith_eq_zipWithTR : @zipWith = @zipWithTR := by
-  funext α β γ f as bs
-  let rec go : ∀ as bs acc, zipWithTR.go f as bs acc = acc.data ++ as.zipWith f bs
-    | [], _, acc | _::_, [], acc => by simp [zipWithTR.go, zipWith]
-    | a::as, b::bs, acc => by simp [zipWithTR.go, zipWith, go as bs]
-  exact (go as bs #[]).symm
-
-/-- Tail recursive version of `unzip`. -/
-def unzipTR (l : List (α × β)) : List α × List β :=
-  l.foldr (fun (a, b) (al, bl) => (a::al, b::bl)) ([], [])
-
-@[csimp] theorem unzip_eq_unzipTR : @unzip = @unzipTR := by
-  funext α β l; simp [unzipTR]; induction l <;> simp [*]
-
-/-- Tail recursive version of `enumFrom`. -/
-def enumFromTR (n : Nat) (l : List α) : List (Nat × α) :=
-  let arr := l.toArray
-  (arr.foldr (fun a (n, acc) => (n-1, (n-1, a) :: acc)) (n + arr.size, [])).2
-
-@[csimp] theorem enumFrom_eq_enumFromTR : @enumFrom = @enumFromTR := by
-  funext α n l; simp [enumFromTR, -Array.size_toArray]
-  let f := fun (a : α) (n, acc) => (n-1, (n-1, a) :: acc)
-  let rec go : ∀ l n, l.foldr f (n + l.length, []) = (n, enumFrom n l)
-    | [], n => rfl
-    | a::as, n => by
-      rw [← show _ + as.length = n + (a::as).length from Nat.succ_add .., foldr, go as]
-      simp [enumFrom, f]
-  rw [Array.foldr_eq_foldr_data]
-  simp [go]
-
-theorem replicateTR_loop_eq : ∀ n, replicateTR.loop a n acc = replicate n a ++ acc
-  | 0 => rfl
-  | n+1 => by rw [← replicateTR_loop_replicate_eq _ 1 n, replicate, replicate,
-    replicateTR.loop, replicateTR_loop_eq n, replicateTR_loop_eq n, append_assoc]; rfl
-
-/-- Tail recursive version of `dropLast`. -/
-@[inline] def dropLastTR (l : List α) : List α := l.toArray.pop.toList
-
-@[csimp] theorem dropLast_eq_dropLastTR : @dropLast = @dropLastTR := by
-  funext α l; simp [dropLastTR]
-
-/-- Tail recursive version of `intersperse`. -/
-def intersperseTR (sep : α) : List α → List α
-  | [] => []
-  | [x] => [x]
-  | x::y::xs => x :: sep :: y :: xs.foldr (fun a r => sep :: a :: r) []
-
-@[csimp] theorem intersperse_eq_intersperseTR : @intersperse = @intersperseTR := by
-  funext α sep l; simp [intersperseTR]
-  match l with
-  | [] | [_] => rfl
-  | x::y::xs => simp [intersperse]; induction xs generalizing y <;> simp [*]
-
-/-- Tail recursive version of `intercalate`. -/
-def intercalateTR (sep : List α) : List (List α) → List α
-  | [] => []
-  | [x] => x
-  | x::xs => go sep.toArray x xs #[]
-where
-  /-- Auxiliary for `intercalateTR`:
-  `intercalateTR.go sep x xs acc = acc.toList ++ intercalate sep.toList (x::xs)` -/
-  go (sep : Array α) : List α → List (List α) → Array α → List α
-  | x, [], acc => acc.toListAppend x
-  | x, y::xs, acc => go sep y xs (acc ++ x ++ sep)
-
-@[csimp] theorem intercalate_eq_intercalateTR : @intercalate = @intercalateTR := by
-  funext α sep l; simp [intercalate, intercalateTR]
-  match l with
-  | [] => rfl
-  | [_] => simp
-  | x::y::xs =>
-    let rec go {acc x} : ∀ xs,
-      intercalateTR.go sep.toArray x xs acc = acc.data ++ join (intersperse sep (x::xs))
-    | [] => by simp [intercalateTR.go]
-    | _::_ => by simp [intercalateTR.go, go]
-    simp [intersperse, go]
-
-end List

src/Init/Data/List/Lemmas.lean

@@ -6,8 +6,9 @@ Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, M
 prelude
 import Init.Data.List.BasicAux
 import Init.Data.List.Control
+import Init.Data.Nat.Lemmas
 import Init.PropLemmas
-import Init.Control.Lawful.Basic
+import Init.Control.Lawful
 import Init.Hints
 
 namespace List
@@ -68,7 +69,7 @@ theorem mem_cons_self (a : α) (l : List α) : a ∈ a :: l := .head ..
 theorem mem_cons_of_mem (y : α) {a : α} {l : List α} : a ∈ l → a ∈ y :: l := .tail _
 
 theorem eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem {l : List α} : l = [] ↔ ∀ a, a ∉ l := by
-  cases l <;> simp [-not_or]
+  cases l <;> simp
 
 /-! ### append -/
 
@@ -249,14 +250,12 @@ theorem getD_eq_get? : ∀ l n (a : α), getD l n a = (get? l n).getD a
 theorem get?_append_right : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : List α} {n : Nat}, l₁.length ≤ n →
   (l₁ ++ l₂).get? n = l₂.get? (n - l₁.length)
 | [], _, n, _ => rfl
-| a :: l, _, n+1, h₁ => by
-  rw [cons_append]
-  simp [Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub, get?_append_right (Nat.lt_succ.1 h₁)]
+| a :: l, _, n+1, h₁ => by rw [cons_append]; simp [get?_append_right (Nat.lt_succ.1 h₁)]
 
 theorem get?_reverse' : ∀ {l : List α} (i j), i + j + 1 = length l →
     get? l.reverse i = get? l j
   | [], _, _, _ => rfl
-  | a::l, i, 0, h => by simp [Nat.succ.injEq] at h; simp [h, get?_append_right, Nat.succ.injEq]
+  | a::l, i, 0, h => by simp at h; simp [h, get?_append_right]
   | a::l, i, j+1, h => by
     have := Nat.succ.inj h; simp at this ⊢
     rw [get?_append, get?_reverse' _ j this]
@@ -268,12 +267,6 @@ theorem get?_reverse {l : List α} (i) (h : i < length l) :
     rw [Nat.add_sub_of_le (Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt h),
       Nat.sub_add_cancel (Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.zero_le _) h)]
 
-@[simp] theorem getD_nil : getD [] n d = d := rfl
-
-@[simp] theorem getD_cons_zero : getD (x :: xs) 0 d = x := rfl
-
-@[simp] theorem getD_cons_succ : getD (x :: xs) (n + 1) d = getD xs n d := rfl
-
 /-! ### take and drop -/
 
 @[simp] theorem take_append_drop : ∀ (n : Nat) (l : List α), take n l ++ drop n l = l
@@ -458,9 +451,9 @@ theorem mem_filter : x ∈ filter p as ↔ x ∈ as ∧ p x := by
   induction as with
   | nil => simp [filter]
   | cons a as ih =>
-    by_cases h : p a
-    · simp_all [or_and_left]
-    · simp_all [or_and_right]
+    by_cases h : p a <;> simp [*, or_and_right]
+    · exact or_congr_left (and_iff_left_of_imp fun | rfl => h).symm
+    · exact (or_iff_right fun ⟨rfl, h'⟩ => h h').symm
 
 theorem filter_eq_nil {l} : filter p l = [] ↔ ∀ a, a ∈ l → ¬p a := by
   simp only [eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_filter, not_and]
@@ -672,46 +665,3 @@ theorem minimum?_eq_some_iff [Min α] [LE α] [anti : Antisymm ((· : α) ≤ ·
     exact congrArg some <| anti.1
       ((le_minimum?_iff le_min_iff (xs := x::xs) rfl _).1 (le_refl _) _ h₁)
       (h₂ _ (minimum?_mem min_eq_or (xs := x::xs) rfl))
-
-@[simp] theorem get_cons_succ {as : List α} {h : i + 1 < (a :: as).length} :
-  (a :: as).get ⟨i+1, h⟩ = as.get ⟨i, Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h⟩ := rfl
-
-@[simp] theorem get_cons_succ' {as : List α} {i : Fin as.length} :
-  (a :: as).get i.succ = as.get i := rfl
-
-@[simp] theorem set_nil (n : Nat) (a : α) : [].set n a = [] := rfl
-
-@[simp] theorem set_zero (x : α) (xs : List α) (a : α) :
-  (x :: xs).set 0 a = a :: xs := rfl
-
-@[simp] theorem set_succ (x : α) (xs : List α) (n : Nat) (a : α) :
-  (x :: xs).set n.succ a = x :: xs.set n a := rfl
-
-@[simp] theorem get_set_eq (l : List α) (i : Nat) (a : α) (h : i < (l.set i a).length) :
-    (l.set i a).get ⟨i, h⟩ = a :=
-  match l, i with
-  | [], _ => by
-    simp at h
-    contradiction
-  | _ :: _, 0 => by
-    simp
-  | _ :: l, i + 1 => by
-    simp [get_set_eq l]
-
-@[simp] theorem get_set_ne (l : List α) {i j : Nat} (h : i ≠ j) (a : α)
-    (hj : j < (l.set i a).length) :
-    (l.set i a).get ⟨j, hj⟩ = l.get ⟨j, by simp at hj; exact hj⟩ :=
-  match l, i, j with
-  | [], _, _ => by
-    simp
-  | _ :: _, 0, 0 => by
-    contradiction
-  | _ :: _, 0, _ + 1 => by
-    simp
-  | _ :: _, _ + 1, 0 => by
-    simp
-  | _ :: l, i + 1, j + 1 => by
-    have g : i ≠ j := h ∘ congrArg (· + 1)
-    simp [get_set_ne l g]
-
-end List

src/Init/Data/Nat.lean

@@ -16,7 +16,3 @@ import Init.Data.Nat.Power2
 import Init.Data.Nat.Linear
 import Init.Data.Nat.SOM
 import Init.Data.Nat.Lemmas
-import Init.Data.Nat.Mod
-import Init.Data.Nat.Lcm
-import Init.Data.Nat.Compare
-import Init.Data.Nat.Simproc

src/Init/Data/Nat/Basic.lean

@@ -10,29 +10,6 @@ universe u
 
 namespace Nat
 
-/-- Compiled version of `Nat.rec` so that we can define `Nat.recAux` to be defeq to `Nat.rec`.
-This is working around the fact that the compiler does not currently support recursors. -/
-private def recCompiled {motive : Nat → Sort u} (zero : motive zero) (succ : (n : Nat) → motive n → motive (Nat.succ n)) : (t : Nat) → motive t
-  | .zero => zero
-  | .succ n => succ n (recCompiled zero succ n)
-
-@[csimp]
-private theorem rec_eq_recCompiled : @Nat.rec = @Nat.recCompiled :=
-  funext fun _ => funext fun _ => funext fun succ => funext fun t =>
-    Nat.recOn t rfl (fun n ih => congrArg (succ n) ih)
-
-/-- Recursor identical to `Nat.rec` but uses notations `0` for `Nat.zero` and `· + 1` for `Nat.succ`.
-Used as the default `Nat` eliminator by the `induction` tactic. -/
-@[elab_as_elim, induction_eliminator]
-protected abbrev recAux {motive : Nat → Sort u} (zero : motive 0) (succ : (n : Nat) → motive n → motive (n + 1)) (t : Nat) : motive t :=
-  Nat.rec zero succ t
-
-/-- Recursor identical to `Nat.casesOn` but uses notations `0` for `Nat.zero` and `· + 1` for `Nat.succ`.
-Used as the default `Nat` eliminator by the `cases` tactic. -/
-@[elab_as_elim, cases_eliminator]
-protected abbrev casesAuxOn {motive : Nat → Sort u} (t : Nat) (zero : motive 0) (succ : (n : Nat) → motive (n + 1)) : motive t :=
-  Nat.casesOn t zero succ
-
 /--
 `Nat.fold` evaluates `f` on the numbers up to `n` exclusive, in increasing order:
 * `Nat.fold f 3 init = init |> f 0 |> f 1 |> f 2`
@@ -148,12 +125,9 @@ theorem add_succ (n m : Nat) : n + succ m = succ (n + m) :=
 theorem add_one (n : Nat) : n + 1 = succ n :=
   rfl
 
-@[simp] theorem succ_eq_add_one (n : Nat) : succ n = n + 1 :=
+theorem succ_eq_add_one (n : Nat) : succ n = n + 1 :=
   rfl
 
-@[simp] theorem add_one_ne_zero (n : Nat) : n + 1 ≠ 0 := nofun
-@[simp] theorem zero_ne_add_one (n : Nat) : 0 ≠ n + 1 := nofun
-
 protected theorem add_comm : ∀ (n m : Nat), n + m = m + n
   | n, 0   => Eq.symm (Nat.zero_add n)
   | n, m+1 => by
@@ -174,7 +148,7 @@ protected theorem add_right_comm (n m k : Nat) : (n + m) + k = (n + k) + m := by
 protected theorem add_left_cancel {n m k : Nat} : n + m = n + k → m = k := by
   induction n with
   | zero => simp
-  | succ n ih => simp [succ_add, succ.injEq]; intro h; apply ih h
+  | succ n ih => simp [succ_add]; intro h; apply ih h
 
 protected theorem add_right_cancel {n m k : Nat} (h : n + m = k + m) : n = k := by
   rw [Nat.add_comm n m, Nat.add_comm k m] at h
@@ -215,7 +189,7 @@ protected theorem mul_comm : ∀ (n m : Nat), n * m = m * n
   Nat.mul_comm n 1 ▸ Nat.mul_one n
 
 protected theorem left_distrib (n m k : Nat) : n * (m + k) = n * m + n * k := by
-  induction n with
+  induction n generalizing m k with
   | zero      => repeat rw [Nat.zero_mul]
   | succ n ih => simp [succ_mul, ih]; rw [Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_assoc (n*m)]; apply congrArg; apply Nat.add_left_comm
 
@@ -235,9 +209,6 @@ protected theorem mul_assoc : ∀ (n m k : Nat), (n * m) * k = n * (m * k)
 protected theorem mul_left_comm (n m k : Nat) : n * (m * k) = m * (n * k) := by
   rw [← Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_comm n m, Nat.mul_assoc]
 
-protected theorem mul_two (n) : n * 2 = n + n := by rw [Nat.mul_succ, Nat.mul_one]
-protected theorem two_mul (n) : 2 * n = n + n := by rw [Nat.succ_mul, Nat.one_mul]
-
 /-! # Inequalities -/
 
 attribute [simp] Nat.le_refl
@@ -248,12 +219,12 @@ theorem lt_succ_of_le {n m : Nat} : n ≤ m → n < succ m := succ_le_succ
 
 @[simp] protected theorem sub_zero (n : Nat) : n - 0 = n := rfl
 
-theorem succ_sub_succ_eq_sub (n m : Nat) : succ n - succ m = n - m := by
+@[simp] theorem succ_sub_succ_eq_sub (n m : Nat) : succ n - succ m = n - m := by
   induction m with
   | zero      => exact rfl
   | succ m ih => apply congrArg pred ih
 
-@[simp] theorem pred_le : ∀ (n : Nat), pred n ≤ n
+theorem pred_le : ∀ (n : Nat), pred n ≤ n
   | zero   => Nat.le.refl
   | succ _ => le_succ _
 
@@ -286,7 +257,7 @@ theorem succ_sub_succ (n m : Nat) : succ n - succ m = n - m :=
 theorem sub_add_eq (a b c : Nat) : a - (b + c) = a - b - c := by
   induction c with
   | zero => simp
-  | succ c ih => simp only [Nat.add_succ, Nat.sub_succ, ih]
+  | succ c ih => simp [Nat.add_succ, Nat.sub_succ, ih]
 
 protected theorem lt_of_lt_of_le {n m k : Nat} : n < m → m ≤ k → n < k :=
   Nat.le_trans
@@ -327,8 +298,7 @@ theorem eq_zero_or_pos : ∀ (n : Nat), n = 0 ∨ n > 0
 protected theorem pos_of_ne_zero {n : Nat} : n ≠ 0 → 0 < n := (eq_zero_or_pos n).resolve_left
 
 theorem lt.base (n : Nat) : n < succ n := Nat.le_refl (succ n)
-
-@[simp] theorem lt_succ_self (n : Nat) : n < succ n := lt.base n
+theorem lt_succ_self (n : Nat) : n < succ n := lt.base n
 
 protected theorem le_total (m n : Nat) : m ≤ n ∨ n ≤ m :=
   match Nat.lt_or_ge m n with
@@ -367,12 +337,6 @@ theorem le_add_right : ∀ (n k : Nat), n ≤ n + k
 theorem le_add_left (n m : Nat): n ≤ m + n :=
   Nat.add_comm n m ▸ le_add_right n m
 
-protected theorem lt_add_left (c : Nat) (h : a < b) : a < c + b :=
-  Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h (Nat.le_add_left ..)
-
-protected theorem lt_add_right (c : Nat) (h : a < b) : a < b + c :=
-  Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h (Nat.le_add_right ..)
-
 theorem le.dest : ∀ {n m : Nat}, n ≤ m → Exists (fun k => n + k = m)
   | zero,   zero,   _ => ⟨0, rfl⟩
   | zero,   succ n, _ => ⟨succ n, Nat.add_comm 0 (succ n) ▸ rfl⟩
@@ -462,9 +426,6 @@ protected theorem add_lt_add_left {n m : Nat} (h : n < m) (k : Nat) : k + n < k
 protected theorem add_lt_add_right {n m : Nat} (h : n < m) (k : Nat) : n + k < m + k :=
   Nat.add_comm k m ▸ Nat.add_comm k n ▸ Nat.add_lt_add_left h k
 
-protected theorem lt_add_of_pos_right (h : 0 < k) : n < n + k :=
-  Nat.add_lt_add_left h n
-
 protected theorem zero_lt_one : 0 < (1:Nat) :=
   zero_lt_succ 0
 
@@ -490,137 +451,6 @@ protected theorem le_of_add_le_add_right {a b c : Nat} : a + b ≤ c + b → a
 protected theorem add_le_add_iff_right {n : Nat} : m + n ≤ k + n ↔ m ≤ k :=
   ⟨Nat.le_of_add_le_add_right, fun h => Nat.add_le_add_right h _⟩
 
-/-! ### le/lt -/
-
-protected theorem lt_asymm {a b : Nat} (h : a < b) : ¬ b < a := Nat.not_lt.2 (Nat.le_of_lt h)
-/-- Alias for `Nat.lt_asymm`. -/
-protected abbrev not_lt_of_gt := @Nat.lt_asymm
-/-- Alias for `Nat.lt_asymm`. -/
-protected abbrev not_lt_of_lt := @Nat.lt_asymm
-
-protected theorem lt_iff_le_not_le {m n : Nat} : m < n ↔ m ≤ n ∧ ¬ n ≤ m :=
-  ⟨fun h => ⟨Nat.le_of_lt h, Nat.not_le_of_gt h⟩, fun ⟨_, h⟩ => Nat.lt_of_not_ge h⟩
-/-- Alias for `Nat.lt_iff_le_not_le`. -/
-protected abbrev lt_iff_le_and_not_ge := @Nat.lt_iff_le_not_le
-
-protected theorem lt_iff_le_and_ne {m n : Nat} : m < n ↔ m ≤ n ∧ m ≠ n :=
-  ⟨fun h => ⟨Nat.le_of_lt h, Nat.ne_of_lt h⟩, fun h => Nat.lt_of_le_of_ne h.1 h.2⟩
-
-protected theorem ne_iff_lt_or_gt {a b : Nat} : a ≠ b ↔ a < b ∨ b < a :=
-  ⟨Nat.lt_or_gt_of_ne, fun | .inl h => Nat.ne_of_lt h | .inr h => Nat.ne_of_gt h⟩
-/-- Alias for `Nat.ne_iff_lt_or_gt`. -/
-protected abbrev lt_or_gt := @Nat.ne_iff_lt_or_gt
-
-/-- Alias for `Nat.le_total`. -/
-protected abbrev le_or_ge := @Nat.le_total
-/-- Alias for `Nat.le_total`. -/
-protected abbrev le_or_le := @Nat.le_total
-
-protected theorem eq_or_lt_of_not_lt {a b : Nat} (hnlt : ¬ a < b) : a = b ∨ b < a :=
-  (Nat.lt_trichotomy ..).resolve_left hnlt
-
-protected theorem lt_or_eq_of_le {n m : Nat} (h : n ≤ m) : n < m ∨ n = m :=
-  (Nat.lt_or_ge ..).imp_right (Nat.le_antisymm h)
-
-protected theorem le_iff_lt_or_eq {n m : Nat} : n ≤ m ↔ n < m ∨ n = m :=
-  ⟨Nat.lt_or_eq_of_le, fun | .inl h => Nat.le_of_lt h | .inr rfl => Nat.le_refl _⟩
-
-protected theorem lt_succ_iff : m < succ n ↔ m ≤ n := ⟨le_of_lt_succ, lt_succ_of_le⟩
-
-protected theorem lt_succ_iff_lt_or_eq : m < succ n ↔ m < n ∨ m = n :=
-  Nat.lt_succ_iff.trans Nat.le_iff_lt_or_eq
-
-protected theorem eq_of_lt_succ_of_not_lt (hmn : m < n + 1) (h : ¬ m < n) : m = n :=
-  (Nat.lt_succ_iff_lt_or_eq.1 hmn).resolve_left h
-
-protected theorem eq_of_le_of_lt_succ (h₁ : n ≤ m) (h₂ : m < n + 1) : m = n :=
-  Nat.le_antisymm (le_of_succ_le_succ h₂) h₁
-
-
-/-! ## zero/one/two -/
-
-theorem le_zero : i ≤ 0 ↔ i = 0 := ⟨Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero, fun | rfl => Nat.le_refl _⟩
-
-/-- Alias for `Nat.zero_lt_one`. -/
-protected abbrev one_pos := @Nat.zero_lt_one
-
-protected theorem two_pos : 0 < 2 := Nat.zero_lt_succ _
-
-protected theorem ne_zero_iff_zero_lt : n ≠ 0 ↔ 0 < n := Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.symm
-
-protected theorem zero_lt_two : 0 < 2 := Nat.zero_lt_succ _
-
-protected theorem one_lt_two : 1 < 2 := Nat.succ_lt_succ Nat.zero_lt_one
-
-protected theorem eq_zero_of_not_pos (h : ¬0 < n) : n = 0 :=
-  Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero (Nat.not_lt.1 h)
-
-/-! ## succ/pred -/
-
-attribute [simp] zero_lt_succ
-
-theorem succ_ne_self (n) : succ n ≠ n := Nat.ne_of_gt (lt_succ_self n)
-
-theorem succ_le : succ n ≤ m ↔ n < m := .rfl
-
-theorem lt_succ : m < succ n ↔ m ≤ n := ⟨le_of_lt_succ, lt_succ_of_le⟩
-
-theorem lt_succ_of_lt (h : a < b) : a < succ b := le_succ_of_le h
-
-theorem succ_pred_eq_of_ne_zero : ∀ {n}, n ≠ 0 → succ (pred n) = n
-  | _+1, _ => rfl
-
-theorem eq_zero_or_eq_succ_pred : ∀ n, n = 0 ∨ n = succ (pred n)
-  | 0 => .inl rfl
-  | _+1 => .inr rfl
-
-theorem succ_inj' : succ a = succ b ↔ a = b := (Nat.succ.injEq a b).to_iff
-
-theorem succ_le_succ_iff : succ a ≤ succ b ↔ a ≤ b := ⟨le_of_succ_le_succ, succ_le_succ⟩
-
-theorem succ_lt_succ_iff : succ a < succ b ↔ a < b := ⟨lt_of_succ_lt_succ, succ_lt_succ⟩
-
-theorem pred_inj : ∀ {a b}, 0 < a → 0 < b → pred a = pred b → a = b
-  | _+1, _+1, _, _ => congrArg _
-
-theorem pred_ne_self : ∀ {a}, a ≠ 0 → pred a ≠ a
-  | _+1, _ => (succ_ne_self _).symm
-
-theorem pred_lt_self : ∀ {a}, 0 < a → pred a < a
-  | _+1, _ => lt_succ_self _
-
-theorem pred_lt_pred : ∀ {n m}, n ≠ 0 → n < m → pred n < pred m
-  | _+1, _+1, _, h => lt_of_succ_lt_succ h
-
-theorem pred_le_iff_le_succ : ∀ {n m}, pred n ≤ m ↔ n ≤ succ m
-  | 0, _ => ⟨fun _ => Nat.zero_le _, fun _ => Nat.zero_le _⟩
-  | _+1, _ => Nat.succ_le_succ_iff.symm
-
-theorem le_succ_of_pred_le : pred n ≤ m → n ≤ succ m := pred_le_iff_le_succ.1
-
-theorem pred_le_of_le_succ : n ≤ succ m → pred n ≤ m := pred_le_iff_le_succ.2
-
-theorem lt_pred_iff_succ_lt : ∀ {n m}, n < pred m ↔ succ n < m
-  | _, 0 => ⟨nofun, nofun⟩
-  | _, _+1 => Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff.symm
-
-theorem succ_lt_of_lt_pred : n < pred m → succ n < m := lt_pred_iff_succ_lt.1
-
-theorem lt_pred_of_succ_lt : succ n < m → n < pred m := lt_pred_iff_succ_lt.2
-
-theorem le_pred_iff_lt : ∀ {n m}, 0 < m → (n ≤ pred m ↔ n < m)
-  | 0, _+1, _ => ⟨fun _ => Nat.zero_lt_succ _, fun _ => Nat.zero_le _⟩
-  | _+1, _+1, _ => Nat.lt_pred_iff_succ_lt
-
-theorem le_pred_of_lt (h : n < m) : n ≤ pred m := (le_pred_iff_lt (Nat.zero_lt_of_lt h)).2 h
-
-theorem le_sub_one_of_lt : a < b → a ≤ b - 1 := Nat.le_pred_of_lt
-
-theorem lt_of_le_pred (h : 0 < m) : n ≤ pred m → n < m := (le_pred_iff_lt h).1
-
-theorem exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero : ∀ {n}, n ≠ 0 → Exists fun k => n = succ k
-  | _+1, _ => ⟨_, rfl⟩
-
 /-! # Basic theorems for comparing numerals -/
 
 theorem ctor_eq_zero : Nat.zero = 0 :=
@@ -632,7 +462,7 @@ protected theorem one_ne_zero : 1 ≠ (0 : Nat) :=
 protected theorem zero_ne_one : 0 ≠ (1 : Nat) :=
   fun h => Nat.noConfusion h
 
-@[simp] theorem succ_ne_zero (n : Nat) : succ n ≠ 0 :=
+theorem succ_ne_zero (n : Nat) : succ n ≠ 0 :=
   fun h => Nat.noConfusion h
 
 /-! # mul + order -/
@@ -673,10 +503,10 @@ theorem eq_of_mul_eq_mul_right {n m k : Nat} (hm : 0 < m) (h : n * m = k * m) :
 
 /-! # power -/
 
-protected theorem pow_succ (n m : Nat) : n^(succ m) = n^m * n :=
+theorem pow_succ (n m : Nat) : n^(succ m) = n^m * n :=
   rfl
 
-protected theorem pow_zero (n : Nat) : n^0 = 1 := rfl
+theorem pow_zero (n : Nat) : n^0 = 1 := rfl
 
 theorem pow_le_pow_of_le_left {n m : Nat} (h : n ≤ m) : ∀ (i : Nat), n^i ≤ m^i
   | 0      => Nat.le_refl _
@@ -743,11 +573,6 @@ theorem succ_pred {a : Nat} (h : a ≠ 0) : a.pred.succ = a := by
 theorem succ_pred_eq_of_pos : ∀ {n}, 0 < n → succ (pred n) = n
   | _+1, _ => rfl
 
-theorem sub_one_add_one_eq_of_pos : ∀ {n}, 0 < n → (n - 1) + 1 = n
-  | _+1, _ => rfl
-
-@[simp] theorem pred_eq_sub_one : pred n = n - 1 := rfl
-
 /-! # sub theorems -/
 
 theorem add_sub_self_left (a b : Nat) : (a + b) - a = b := by
@@ -770,7 +595,7 @@ theorem zero_lt_sub_of_lt (h : i < a) : 0 < a - i := by
   | zero => contradiction
   | succ a ih =>
     match Nat.eq_or_lt_of_le h with
-    | Or.inl h => injection h with h; subst h; rw [Nat.add_sub_self_left]; decide
+    | Or.inl h => injection h with h; subst h; rw [←Nat.add_one, Nat.add_sub_self_left]; decide
     | Or.inr h =>
       have : 0 < a - i := ih (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h)
       exact Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le this (Nat.sub_le_succ_sub _ _)
@@ -784,7 +609,7 @@ theorem sub_succ_lt_self (a i : Nat) (h : i < a) : a - (i + 1) < a - i := by
 
 theorem sub_ne_zero_of_lt : {a b : Nat} → a < b → b - a ≠ 0
   | 0, 0, h      => absurd h (Nat.lt_irrefl 0)
-  | 0, succ b, _ => by simp only [Nat.sub_zero, ne_eq, not_false_eq_true]
+  | 0, succ b, _ => by simp
   | succ a, 0, h => absurd h (Nat.not_lt_zero a.succ)
   | succ a, succ b, h => by rw [Nat.succ_sub_succ]; exact sub_ne_zero_of_lt (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h)
 
@@ -802,7 +627,7 @@ theorem add_sub_of_le {a b : Nat} (h : a ≤ b) : a + (b - a) = b := by
 protected theorem add_sub_add_right (n k m : Nat) : (n + k) - (m + k) = n - m := by
   induction k with
   | zero => simp
-  | succ k ih => simp [← Nat.add_assoc, succ_sub_succ_eq_sub, ih]
+  | succ k ih => simp [add_succ, add_succ, succ_sub_succ, ih]
 
 protected theorem add_sub_add_left (k n m : Nat) : (k + n) - (k + m) = n - m := by
   rw [Nat.add_comm k n, Nat.add_comm k m, Nat.add_sub_add_right]
@@ -915,7 +740,7 @@ protected theorem sub_pos_of_lt (h : m < n) : 0 < n - m :=
 protected theorem sub_sub (n m k : Nat) : n - m - k = n - (m + k) := by
   induction k with
   | zero => simp
-  | succ k ih => rw [Nat.add_succ, Nat.sub_succ, Nat.add_succ, Nat.sub_succ, ih]
+  | succ k ih => rw [Nat.add_succ, Nat.sub_succ, Nat.sub_succ, ih]
 
 protected theorem sub_le_sub_left (h : n ≤ m) (k : Nat) : k - m ≤ k - n :=
   match m, le.dest h with

src/Init/Data/Nat/Bitwise/Basic.lean

@@ -51,26 +51,6 @@ instance : Xor Nat := ⟨Nat.xor⟩
 instance : ShiftLeft Nat := ⟨Nat.shiftLeft⟩
 instance : ShiftRight Nat := ⟨Nat.shiftRight⟩
 
-theorem shiftLeft_eq (a b : Nat) : a <<< b = a * 2 ^ b :=
-  match b with
-  | 0 => (Nat.mul_one _).symm
-  | b+1 => (shiftLeft_eq _ b).trans <| by
-    simp [Nat.pow_succ, Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_left_comm, Nat.mul_comm]
-
-@[simp] theorem shiftRight_zero : n >>> 0 = n := rfl
-
-theorem shiftRight_succ (m n) : m >>> (n + 1) = (m >>> n) / 2 := rfl
-
-theorem shiftRight_add (m n : Nat) : ∀ k, m >>> (n + k) = (m >>> n) >>> k
-  | 0 => rfl
-  | k + 1 => by simp [← Nat.add_assoc, shiftRight_add _ _ k, shiftRight_succ]
-
-theorem shiftRight_eq_div_pow (m : Nat) : ∀ n, m >>> n = m / 2 ^ n
-  | 0 => (Nat.div_one _).symm
-  | k + 1 => by
-    rw [shiftRight_add, shiftRight_eq_div_pow m k]
-    simp [Nat.div_div_eq_div_mul, ← Nat.pow_succ, shiftRight_succ]
-
 /-!
 ### testBit
 We define an operation for testing individual bits in the binary representation

src/Init/Data/Nat/Bitwise/Lemmas.lean

@@ -6,10 +6,8 @@ Authors: Joe Hendrix
 
 prelude
 import Init.Data.Bool
-import Init.Data.Int.Pow
 import Init.Data.Nat.Bitwise.Basic
 import Init.Data.Nat.Lemmas
-import Init.Data.Nat.Simproc
 import Init.TacticsExtra
 import Init.Omega
 
@@ -25,13 +23,26 @@ namespace Nat
 private theorem one_div_two : 1/2 = 0 := by trivial
 
 private theorem two_pow_succ_sub_succ_div_two : (2 ^ (n+1) - (x + 1)) / 2 = 2^n - (x/2 + 1) := by
-  omega
+  if h : x + 1 ≤ 2 ^ (n + 1) then
+    apply fun x => (Nat.sub_eq_of_eq_add x).symm
+    apply Eq.trans _
+    apply Nat.add_mul_div_left _ _ Nat.zero_lt_two
+    rw [← Nat.sub_add_comm h]
+    rw [Nat.add_sub_assoc (by omega)]
+    rw [Nat.pow_succ']
+    rw [Nat.mul_add_div Nat.zero_lt_two]
+    simp [show (2 * (x / 2 + 1) - (x + 1)) / 2 = 0 by omega]
+  else
+    rw [Nat.pow_succ'] at *
+    omega
 
 private theorem two_pow_succ_sub_one_div_two : (2 ^ (n+1) - 1) / 2 = 2^n - 1 :=
   two_pow_succ_sub_succ_div_two
 
 private theorem two_mul_sub_one {n : Nat} (n_pos : n > 0) : (2*n - 1) % 2 = 1 := by
-  omega
+  match n with
+  | 0 => contradiction
+  | n + 1 => simp [Nat.mul_succ, Nat.mul_add_mod, mod_eq_of_lt]
 
 /-! ### Preliminaries -/
 
@@ -88,11 +99,6 @@ theorem testBit_to_div_mod {x : Nat} : testBit x i = decide (x / 2^i % 2 = 1) :=
   | succ i hyp =>
     simp [hyp, Nat.div_div_eq_div_mul, Nat.pow_succ']
 
-theorem toNat_testBit (x i : Nat) :
-    (x.testBit i).toNat = x / 2 ^ i % 2 := by
-  rw [Nat.testBit_to_div_mod]
-  rcases Nat.mod_two_eq_zero_or_one (x / 2^i) <;> simp_all
-
 theorem ne_zero_implies_bit_true {x : Nat} (xnz : x ≠ 0) : ∃ i, testBit x i := by
   induction x using div2Induction with
   | ind x hyp =>
@@ -233,7 +239,7 @@ theorem testBit_two_pow_add_gt {i j : Nat} (j_lt_i : j < i) (x : Nat) :
     rw [Nat.sub_eq_zero_iff_le] at i_sub_j_eq
     exact Nat.not_le_of_gt j_lt_i i_sub_j_eq
   | d+1 =>
-    simp [Nat.pow_succ, Nat.mul_comm _ 2,  Nat.mul_add_mod]
+    simp [pow_succ, Nat.mul_comm _ 2,  Nat.mul_add_mod]
 
 @[simp] theorem testBit_mod_two_pow (x j i : Nat) :
     testBit (x % 2^j) i = (decide (i < j) && testBit x i) := by
@@ -263,28 +269,31 @@ theorem testBit_two_pow_add_gt {i j : Nat} (j_lt_i : j < i) (x : Nat) :
 
 theorem testBit_one_zero : testBit 1 0 = true := by trivial
 
-theorem not_decide_mod_two_eq_one (x : Nat)
-    : (!decide (x % 2 = 1)) = decide (x % 2 = 0) := by
-  cases Nat.mod_two_eq_zero_or_one x <;> (rename_i p; simp [p])
-
 theorem testBit_two_pow_sub_succ (h₂ : x < 2 ^ n) (i : Nat) :
     testBit (2^n - (x + 1)) i = (decide (i < n) && ! testBit x i) := by
   induction i generalizing n x with
   | zero =>
+    simp only [testBit_zero, zero_eq, Bool.and_eq_true, decide_eq_true_eq,
+      Bool.not_eq_true']
     match n with
-    | 0 => simp [succ_sub_succ_eq_sub]
+    | 0 => simp
     | n+1 =>
-      simp [not_decide_mod_two_eq_one]
+      -- just logic + omega:
+      simp only [zero_lt_succ, decide_True, Bool.true_and]
+      rw [Nat.pow_succ', ← decide_not, decide_eq_decide]
+      rw [Nat.pow_succ'] at h₂
       omega
   | succ i ih =>
     simp only [testBit_succ]
     match n with
     | 0 =>
-      simp [decide_eq_false, succ_sub_succ_eq_sub]
+      simp only [pow_zero, succ_sub_succ_eq_sub, Nat.zero_sub, Nat.zero_div, zero_testBit]
+      rw [decide_eq_false] <;> simp
     | n+1 =>
       rw [Nat.two_pow_succ_sub_succ_div_two, ih]
       · simp [Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff]
-      · omega
+      · rw [Nat.pow_succ'] at h₂
+        omega
 
 @[simp] theorem testBit_two_pow_sub_one (n i : Nat) : testBit (2^n-1) i = decide (i < n) := by
   rw [testBit_two_pow_sub_succ]
@@ -335,7 +344,7 @@ private theorem eq_0_of_lt_one (x : Nat) : x < 1 ↔ x = 0 :=
       match x with
       | 0 => Eq.refl 0
       | _+1 => False.elim (not_lt_zero _ (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ p)))
-    (fun p => by simp [p])
+    (fun p => by simp [p, Nat.zero_lt_succ])
 
 private theorem eq_0_of_lt (x : Nat) : x < 2^ 0 ↔ x = 0 := eq_0_of_lt_one x
 
@@ -343,7 +352,7 @@ private theorem eq_0_of_lt (x : Nat) : x < 2^ 0 ↔ x = 0 := eq_0_of_lt_one x
 private theorem zero_lt_pow (n : Nat) : 0 < 2^n := by
   induction n
   case zero => simp [eq_0_of_lt]
-  case succ n hyp => simpa [Nat.pow_succ]
+  case succ n hyp => simpa [pow_succ]
 
 private theorem div_two_le_of_lt_two {m n : Nat} (p : m < 2 ^ succ n) : m / 2 < 2^n := by
   simp [div_lt_iff_lt_mul Nat.zero_lt_two]
@@ -368,7 +377,7 @@ theorem bitwise_lt_two_pow (left : x < 2^n) (right : y < 2^n) : (Nat.bitwise f x
       simp only [x_zero, y_zero, if_neg]
       have hyp1 := hyp (div_two_le_of_lt_two left) (div_two_le_of_lt_two right)
       by_cases p : f (decide (x % 2 = 1)) (decide (y % 2 = 1)) = true <;>
-        simp [p, Nat.pow_succ, mul_succ, Nat.add_assoc]
+        simp [p, pow_succ, mul_succ, Nat.add_assoc]
       case pos =>
         apply lt_of_succ_le
         simp only [← Nat.succ_add]
@@ -438,8 +447,12 @@ theorem testBit_mul_pow_two_add (a : Nat) {b i : Nat} (b_lt : b < 2^i) (j : Nat)
   cases Nat.lt_or_ge j i with
   | inl j_lt =>
     simp only [j_lt]
-    have i_def : i = j + succ (pred (i-j)) := by
-      rw [succ_pred_eq_of_pos] <;> omega
+    have i_ge := Nat.le_of_lt j_lt
+    have i_sub_j_nez : i-j ≠ 0 := Nat.sub_ne_zero_of_lt j_lt
+    have i_def : i = j + succ (pred (i-j)) :=
+          calc i = j + (i-j) := (Nat.add_sub_cancel' i_ge).symm
+               _ = j + succ (pred (i-j)) := by
+                 rw [← congrArg (j+·) (Nat.succ_pred i_sub_j_nez)]
     rw [i_def]
     simp only [testBit_to_div_mod, Nat.pow_add, Nat.mul_assoc]
     simp only [Nat.mul_add_div (Nat.two_pow_pos _), Nat.mul_add_mod]

src/Init/Data/Nat/Compare.lean

@@ -1,57 +0,0 @@
-/-
-Copyright (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
-Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Mario Carneiro
--/
-prelude
-import Init.Classical
-import Init.Data.Ord
-
-/-! # Basic lemmas about comparing natural numbers
-
-This file introduce some basic lemmas about compare as applied to natural
-numbers.
--/
-namespace Nat
-
-theorem compare_def_lt (a b : Nat) :
-    compare a b = if a < b then .lt else if b < a then .gt else .eq := by
-  simp only [compare, compareOfLessAndEq]
-  split
-  · rfl
-  · next h =>
-    match Nat.lt_or_eq_of_le (Nat.not_lt.1 h) with
-    | .inl h => simp [h, Nat.ne_of_gt h]
-    | .inr rfl => simp
-
-theorem compare_def_le (a b : Nat) :
-    compare a b = if a ≤ b then if b ≤ a then .eq else .lt else .gt := by
-  rw [compare_def_lt]
-  split
-  · next hlt => simp [Nat.le_of_lt hlt, Nat.not_le.2 hlt]
-  · next hge =>
-    split
-    · next hgt => simp [Nat.le_of_lt hgt, Nat.not_le.2 hgt]
-    · next hle => simp [Nat.not_lt.1 hge, Nat.not_lt.1 hle]
-
-protected theorem compare_swap (a b : Nat) : (compare a b).swap = compare b a := by
-  simp only [compare_def_le]; (repeat' split) <;> try rfl
-  next h1 h2 => cases h1 (Nat.le_of_not_le h2)
-
-protected theorem compare_eq_eq {a b : Nat} : compare a b = .eq ↔ a = b := by
-  rw [compare_def_lt]; (repeat' split) <;> simp [Nat.ne_of_lt, Nat.ne_of_gt, *]
-  next hlt hgt => exact Nat.le_antisymm (Nat.not_lt.1 hgt) (Nat.not_lt.1 hlt)
-
-protected theorem compare_eq_lt {a b : Nat} : compare a b = .lt ↔ a < b := by
-  rw [compare_def_lt]; (repeat' split) <;> simp [*]
-
-protected theorem compare_eq_gt {a b : Nat} : compare a b = .gt ↔ b < a := by
-  rw [compare_def_lt]; (repeat' split) <;> simp [Nat.le_of_lt, *]
-
-protected theorem compare_ne_gt {a b : Nat} : compare a b ≠ .gt ↔ a ≤ b := by
-  rw [compare_def_le]; (repeat' split) <;> simp [*]
-
-protected theorem compare_ne_lt {a b : Nat} : compare a b ≠ .lt ↔ b ≤ a := by
-  rw [compare_def_le]; (repeat' split) <;> simp [Nat.le_of_not_le, *]
-
-end Nat

src/Init/Data/Nat/Div.lean

@@ -10,13 +10,6 @@ import Init.Data.Nat.Basic
 
 namespace Nat
 
-/--
-Divisibility of natural numbers. `a ∣ b` (typed as `\|`) says that
-there is some `c` such that `b = a * c`.
--/
-instance : Dvd Nat where
-  dvd a b := Exists (fun c => b = a * c)
-
 theorem div_rec_lemma {x y : Nat} : 0 < y ∧ y ≤ x → x - y < x :=
   fun ⟨ypos, ylex⟩ => sub_lt (Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le ypos ylex) ypos
 
@@ -35,7 +28,7 @@ theorem div_eq (x y : Nat) : x / y = if 0 < y ∧ y ≤ x then (x - y) / y + 1 e
   rw [Nat.div]
   rfl
 
-def div.inductionOn.{u}
+theorem div.inductionOn.{u}
       {motive : Nat → Nat → Sort u}
       (x y : Nat)
       (ind  : ∀ x y, 0 < y ∧ y ≤ x → motive (x - y) y → motive x y)
@@ -102,7 +95,7 @@ protected theorem modCore_eq_mod (x y : Nat) : Nat.modCore x y = x % y := by
 theorem mod_eq (x y : Nat) : x % y = if 0 < y ∧ y ≤ x then (x - y) % y else x := by
   rw [←Nat.modCore_eq_mod, ←Nat.modCore_eq_mod, Nat.modCore]
 
-def mod.inductionOn.{u}
+theorem mod.inductionOn.{u}
       {motive : Nat → Nat → Sort u}
       (x y  : Nat)
       (ind  : ∀ x y, 0 < y ∧ y ≤ x → motive (x - y) y → motive x y)
@@ -205,33 +198,13 @@ theorem le_div_iff_mul_le (k0 : 0 < k) : x ≤ y / k ↔ x * k ≤ y := by
   induction y, k using mod.inductionOn generalizing x with
     (rw [div_eq]; simp [h]; cases x with | zero => simp [zero_le] | succ x => ?_)
   | base y k h =>
-    simp only [add_one, succ_mul, false_iff, Nat.not_le]
-    refine Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ (Nat.le_add_left ..)
+    simp [not_succ_le_zero x, succ_mul, Nat.add_comm]
+    refine Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ (Nat.le_add_right ..)
     exact Nat.not_le.1 fun h' => h ⟨k0, h'⟩
   | ind y k h IH =>
-    rw [Nat.add_le_add_iff_right, IH k0, succ_mul,
+    rw [← add_one, Nat.add_le_add_iff_right, IH k0, succ_mul,
         ← Nat.add_sub_cancel (x*k) k, Nat.sub_le_sub_iff_right h.2, Nat.add_sub_cancel]
 
-protected theorem div_div_eq_div_mul (m n k : Nat) : m / n / k = m / (n * k) := by
-  cases eq_zero_or_pos k with
-  | inl k0 => rw [k0, Nat.mul_zero, Nat.div_zero, Nat.div_zero] | inr kpos => ?_
-  cases eq_zero_or_pos n with
-  | inl n0 => rw [n0, Nat.zero_mul, Nat.div_zero, Nat.zero_div] | inr npos => ?_
-
-  apply Nat.le_antisymm
-
-  apply (le_div_iff_mul_le (Nat.mul_pos npos kpos)).2
-  rw [Nat.mul_comm n k, ← Nat.mul_assoc]
-  apply (le_div_iff_mul_le npos).1
-  apply (le_div_iff_mul_le kpos).1
-  (apply Nat.le_refl)
-
-  apply (le_div_iff_mul_le kpos).2
-  apply (le_div_iff_mul_le npos).2
-  rw [Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_comm n k]
-  apply (le_div_iff_mul_le (Nat.mul_pos kpos npos)).1
-  apply Nat.le_refl
-
 theorem div_mul_le_self : ∀ (m n : Nat), m / n * n ≤ m
   | m, 0   => by simp
   | m, n+1 => (le_div_iff_mul_le (Nat.succ_pos _)).1 (Nat.le_refl _)
@@ -293,7 +266,7 @@ theorem sub_mul_div (x n p : Nat) (h₁ : n*p ≤ x) : (x - n*p) / n = x / n - p
         rw [mul_succ] at h₁
         exact h₁
       rw [sub_succ, ← IH h₂, div_eq_sub_div h₀ h₃]
-      simp [Nat.pred_succ, mul_succ, Nat.sub_sub]
+      simp [add_one, Nat.pred_succ, mul_succ, Nat.sub_sub]
 
 theorem mul_sub_div (x n p : Nat) (h₁ : x < n*p) : (n * p - succ x) / n = p - succ (x / n) := by
   have npos : 0 < n := (eq_zero_or_pos _).resolve_left fun n0 => by
@@ -334,50 +307,4 @@ theorem div_eq_of_lt (h₀ : a < b) : a / b = 0 := by
   intro h₁
   apply Nat.not_le_of_gt h₀ h₁.right
 
-protected theorem mul_div_cancel (m : Nat) {n : Nat} (H : 0 < n) : m * n / n = m := by
-  let t := add_mul_div_right 0 m H
-  rwa [Nat.zero_add, Nat.zero_div, Nat.zero_add] at t
-
-protected theorem mul_div_cancel_left (m : Nat) {n : Nat} (H : 0 < n) : n * m / n = m := by
-  rw [Nat.mul_comm, Nat.mul_div_cancel _ H]
-
-protected theorem div_le_of_le_mul {m n : Nat} : ∀ {k}, m ≤ k * n → m / k ≤ n
-  | 0, _ => by simp [Nat.div_zero, n.zero_le]
-  | succ k, h => by
-    suffices succ k * (m / succ k) ≤ succ k * n from
-      Nat.le_of_mul_le_mul_left this (zero_lt_succ _)
-    have h1 : succ k * (m / succ k) ≤ m % succ k + succ k * (m / succ k) := Nat.le_add_left _ _
-    have h2 : m % succ k + succ k * (m / succ k) = m := by rw [mod_add_div]
-    have h3 : m ≤ succ k * n := h
-    rw [← h2] at h3
-    exact Nat.le_trans h1 h3
-
-@[simp] theorem mul_div_right (n : Nat) {m : Nat} (H : 0 < m) : m * n / m = n := by
-  induction n <;> simp_all [mul_succ]
-
-@[simp] theorem mul_div_left (m : Nat) {n : Nat} (H : 0 < n) : m * n / n = m := by
-  rw [Nat.mul_comm, mul_div_right _ H]
-
-protected theorem div_self (H : 0 < n) : n / n = 1 := by
-  let t := add_div_right 0 H
-  rwa [Nat.zero_add, Nat.zero_div] at t
-
-protected theorem div_eq_of_eq_mul_left (H1 : 0 < n) (H2 : m = k * n) : m / n = k :=
-by rw [H2, Nat.mul_div_cancel _ H1]
-
-protected theorem div_eq_of_eq_mul_right (H1 : 0 < n) (H2 : m = n * k) : m / n = k :=
-by rw [H2, Nat.mul_div_cancel_left _ H1]
-
-protected theorem mul_div_mul_left {m : Nat} (n k : Nat) (H : 0 < m) :
-    m * n / (m * k) = n / k := by rw [← Nat.div_div_eq_div_mul, Nat.mul_div_cancel_left _ H]
-
-protected theorem mul_div_mul_right {m : Nat} (n k : Nat) (H : 0 < m) :
-    n * m / (k * m) = n / k := by rw [Nat.mul_comm, Nat.mul_comm k, Nat.mul_div_mul_left _ _ H]
-
-theorem mul_div_le (m n : Nat) : n * (m / n) ≤ m := by
-  match n, Nat.eq_zero_or_pos n with
-  | _, Or.inl rfl => rw [Nat.zero_mul]; exact m.zero_le
-  | n, Or.inr h => rw [Nat.mul_comm, ← Nat.le_div_iff_mul_le h]; exact Nat.le_refl _
-
-
 end Nat

src/Init/Data/Nat/Dvd.lean

@@ -5,10 +5,16 @@ Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Mario Carneiro
 -/
 prelude
 import Init.Data.Nat.Div
-import Init.Meta
 
 namespace Nat
 
+/--
+Divisibility of natural numbers. `a ∣ b` (typed as `\|`) says that
+there is some `c` such that `b = a * c`.
+-/
+instance : Dvd Nat where
+  dvd a b := Exists (fun c => b = a * c)
+
 protected theorem dvd_refl (a : Nat) : a ∣ a := ⟨1, by simp⟩
 
 protected theorem dvd_zero (a : Nat) : a ∣ 0 := ⟨0, by simp⟩
@@ -91,42 +97,4 @@ protected theorem mul_div_cancel' {n m : Nat} (H : n ∣ m) : n * (m / n) = m :=
 protected theorem div_mul_cancel {n m : Nat} (H : n ∣ m) : m / n * n = m := by
   rw [Nat.mul_comm, Nat.mul_div_cancel' H]
 
-@[simp] theorem mod_mod_of_dvd (a : Nat) (h : c ∣ b) : a % b % c = a % c := by
-  rw (config := {occs := .pos [2]}) [← mod_add_div a b]
-  have ⟨x, h⟩ := h
-  subst h
-  rw [Nat.mul_assoc, add_mul_mod_self_left]
-
-protected theorem dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_left
-    (kpos : 0 < k) (H : k * m ∣ k * n) : m ∣ n := by
-  let ⟨l, H⟩ := H
-  rw [Nat.mul_assoc] at H
-  exact ⟨_, Nat.eq_of_mul_eq_mul_left kpos H⟩
-
-protected theorem dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_right (kpos : 0 < k) (H : m * k ∣ n * k) : m ∣ n := by
-  rw [Nat.mul_comm m k, Nat.mul_comm n k] at H; exact Nat.dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_left kpos H
-
-theorem dvd_sub {k m n : Nat} (H : n ≤ m) (h₁ : k ∣ m) (h₂ : k ∣ n) : k ∣ m - n :=
-  (Nat.dvd_add_iff_left h₂).2 <| by rwa [Nat.sub_add_cancel H]
-
-protected theorem mul_dvd_mul {a b c d : Nat} : a ∣ b → c ∣ d → a * c ∣ b * d
-  | ⟨e, he⟩, ⟨f, hf⟩ =>
-    ⟨e * f, by simp [he, hf, Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_left_comm, Nat.mul_comm]⟩
-
-protected theorem mul_dvd_mul_left (a : Nat) (h : b ∣ c) : a * b ∣ a * c :=
-  Nat.mul_dvd_mul (Nat.dvd_refl a) h
-
-protected theorem mul_dvd_mul_right (h: a ∣ b) (c : Nat) : a * c ∣ b * c :=
-  Nat.mul_dvd_mul h (Nat.dvd_refl c)
-
-@[simp] theorem dvd_one {n : Nat} : n ∣ 1 ↔ n = 1 :=
-  ⟨eq_one_of_dvd_one, fun h => h.symm ▸ Nat.dvd_refl _⟩
-
-protected theorem mul_div_assoc (m : Nat) (H : k ∣ n) : m * n / k = m * (n / k) := by
-  match Nat.eq_zero_or_pos k with
-  | .inl h0 => rw [h0, Nat.div_zero, Nat.div_zero, Nat.mul_zero]
-  | .inr hpos =>
-    have h1 : m * n / k = m * (n / k * k) / k := by rw [Nat.div_mul_cancel H]
-    rw [h1, ← Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_div_cancel _ hpos]
-
 end Nat

src/Init/Data/Nat/Gcd.lean

@@ -1,12 +1,10 @@
 /-
 Copyright (c) 2021 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
 Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro
+Authors: Leonardo de Moura
 -/
 prelude
 import Init.Data.Nat.Dvd
-import Init.NotationExtra
-import Init.RCases
 
 namespace Nat
 
@@ -16,8 +14,8 @@ def gcd (m n : @& Nat) : Nat :=
     n
   else
     gcd (n % m) m
-  termination_by m
-  decreasing_by simp_wf; apply mod_lt _ (zero_lt_of_ne_zero _); assumption
+termination_by m
+decreasing_by simp_wf; apply mod_lt _ (zero_lt_of_ne_zero _); assumption
 
 @[simp] theorem gcd_zero_left (y : Nat) : gcd 0 y = y :=
   rfl
@@ -71,166 +69,4 @@ theorem dvd_gcd : k ∣ m → k ∣ n → k ∣ gcd m n := by
   | H0 n => rw [gcd_zero_left]; exact kn
   | H1 n m _ IH => rw [gcd_rec]; exact IH ((dvd_mod_iff km).2 kn) km
 
-theorem dvd_gcd_iff : k ∣ gcd m n ↔ k ∣ m ∧ k ∣ n :=
-  ⟨fun h => let ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := gcd_dvd m n; ⟨Nat.dvd_trans h h₁, Nat.dvd_trans h h₂⟩,
-   fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => dvd_gcd h₁ h₂⟩
-
-theorem gcd_comm (m n : Nat) : gcd m n = gcd n m :=
-  Nat.dvd_antisymm
-    (dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_right m n) (gcd_dvd_left m n))
-    (dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_right n m) (gcd_dvd_left n m))
-
-theorem gcd_eq_left_iff_dvd : m ∣ n ↔ gcd m n = m :=
-  ⟨fun h => by rw [gcd_rec, mod_eq_zero_of_dvd h, gcd_zero_left],
-   fun h => h ▸ gcd_dvd_right m n⟩
-
-theorem gcd_eq_right_iff_dvd : m ∣ n ↔ gcd n m = m := by
-  rw [gcd_comm]; exact gcd_eq_left_iff_dvd
-
-theorem gcd_assoc (m n k : Nat) : gcd (gcd m n) k = gcd m (gcd n k) :=
-  Nat.dvd_antisymm
-    (dvd_gcd
-      (Nat.dvd_trans (gcd_dvd_left (gcd m n) k) (gcd_dvd_left m n))
-      (dvd_gcd (Nat.dvd_trans (gcd_dvd_left (gcd m n) k) (gcd_dvd_right m n))
-        (gcd_dvd_right (gcd m n) k)))
-    (dvd_gcd
-      (dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_left m (gcd n k))
-        (Nat.dvd_trans (gcd_dvd_right m (gcd n k)) (gcd_dvd_left n k)))
-      (Nat.dvd_trans (gcd_dvd_right m (gcd n k)) (gcd_dvd_right n k)))
-
-@[simp] theorem gcd_one_right (n : Nat) : gcd n 1 = 1 := (gcd_comm n 1).trans (gcd_one_left n)
-
-theorem gcd_mul_left (m n k : Nat) : gcd (m * n) (m * k) = m * gcd n k := by
-  induction n, k using gcd.induction with
-  | H0 k => simp
-  | H1 n k _ IH => rwa [← mul_mod_mul_left, ← gcd_rec, ← gcd_rec] at IH
-
-theorem gcd_mul_right (m n k : Nat) : gcd (m * n) (k * n) = gcd m k * n := by
-  rw [Nat.mul_comm m n, Nat.mul_comm k n, Nat.mul_comm (gcd m k) n, gcd_mul_left]
-
-theorem gcd_pos_of_pos_left {m : Nat} (n : Nat) (mpos : 0 < m) : 0 < gcd m n :=
-  pos_of_dvd_of_pos (gcd_dvd_left m n) mpos
-
-theorem gcd_pos_of_pos_right (m : Nat) {n : Nat} (npos : 0 < n) : 0 < gcd m n :=
-  pos_of_dvd_of_pos (gcd_dvd_right m n) npos
-
-theorem div_gcd_pos_of_pos_left (b : Nat) (h : 0 < a) : 0 < a / a.gcd b :=
-  (Nat.le_div_iff_mul_le <| Nat.gcd_pos_of_pos_left _ h).2 (Nat.one_mul _ ▸ Nat.gcd_le_left _ h)
-
-theorem div_gcd_pos_of_pos_right (a : Nat) (h : 0 < b) : 0 < b / a.gcd b :=
-  (Nat.le_div_iff_mul_le <| Nat.gcd_pos_of_pos_right _ h).2 (Nat.one_mul _ ▸ Nat.gcd_le_right _ h)
-
-theorem eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left {m n : Nat} (H : gcd m n = 0) : m = 0 :=
-  match eq_zero_or_pos m with
-  | .inl H0 => H0
-  | .inr H1 => absurd (Eq.symm H) (ne_of_lt (gcd_pos_of_pos_left _ H1))
-
-theorem eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right {m n : Nat} (H : gcd m n = 0) : n = 0 := by
-  rw [gcd_comm] at H
-  exact eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left H
-
-theorem gcd_ne_zero_left : m ≠ 0 → gcd m n ≠ 0 := mt eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left
-
-theorem gcd_ne_zero_right : n ≠ 0 → gcd m n ≠ 0 := mt eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right
-
-theorem gcd_div {m n k : Nat} (H1 : k ∣ m) (H2 : k ∣ n) :
-    gcd (m / k) (n / k) = gcd m n / k :=
-  match eq_zero_or_pos k with
-  | .inl H0 => by simp [H0]
-  | .inr H3 => by
-    apply Nat.eq_of_mul_eq_mul_right H3
-    rw [Nat.div_mul_cancel (dvd_gcd H1 H2), ← gcd_mul_right,
-        Nat.div_mul_cancel H1, Nat.div_mul_cancel H2]
-
-theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_left {m k : Nat} (n : Nat) (H : m ∣ k) : gcd m n ∣ gcd k n :=
-  dvd_gcd (Nat.dvd_trans (gcd_dvd_left m n) H) (gcd_dvd_right m n)
-
-theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_right {m k : Nat} (n : Nat) (H : m ∣ k) : gcd n m ∣ gcd n k :=
-  dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_left n m) (Nat.dvd_trans (gcd_dvd_right n m) H)
-
-theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left (m n k : Nat) : gcd m n ∣ gcd (k * m) n :=
-  gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_left _ (Nat.dvd_mul_left _ _)
-
-theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right (m n k : Nat) : gcd m n ∣ gcd (m * k) n :=
-  gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_left _ (Nat.dvd_mul_right _ _)
-
-theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left_right (m n k : Nat) : gcd m n ∣ gcd m (k * n) :=
-  gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_right _ (Nat.dvd_mul_left _ _)
-
-theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right_right (m n k : Nat) : gcd m n ∣ gcd m (n * k) :=
-  gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_right _ (Nat.dvd_mul_right _ _)
-
-theorem gcd_eq_left {m n : Nat} (H : m ∣ n) : gcd m n = m :=
-  Nat.dvd_antisymm (gcd_dvd_left _ _) (dvd_gcd (Nat.dvd_refl _) H)
-
-theorem gcd_eq_right {m n : Nat} (H : n ∣ m) : gcd m n = n := by
-  rw [gcd_comm, gcd_eq_left H]
-
-@[simp] theorem gcd_mul_left_left (m n : Nat) : gcd (m * n) n = n :=
-  Nat.dvd_antisymm (gcd_dvd_right _ _) (dvd_gcd (Nat.dvd_mul_left _ _) (Nat.dvd_refl _))
-
-@[simp] theorem gcd_mul_left_right (m n : Nat) : gcd n (m * n) = n := by
-  rw [gcd_comm, gcd_mul_left_left]
-
-@[simp] theorem gcd_mul_right_left (m n : Nat) : gcd (n * m) n = n := by
-  rw [Nat.mul_comm, gcd_mul_left_left]
-
-@[simp] theorem gcd_mul_right_right (m n : Nat) : gcd n (n * m) = n := by
-  rw [gcd_comm, gcd_mul_right_left]
-
-@[simp] theorem gcd_gcd_self_right_left (m n : Nat) : gcd m (gcd m n) = gcd m n :=
-  Nat.dvd_antisymm (gcd_dvd_right _ _) (dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_left _ _) (Nat.dvd_refl _))
-
-@[simp] theorem gcd_gcd_self_right_right (m n : Nat) : gcd m (gcd n m) = gcd n m := by
-  rw [gcd_comm n m, gcd_gcd_self_right_left]
-
-@[simp] theorem gcd_gcd_self_left_right (m n : Nat) : gcd (gcd n m) m = gcd n m := by
-  rw [gcd_comm, gcd_gcd_self_right_right]
-
-@[simp] theorem gcd_gcd_self_left_left (m n : Nat) : gcd (gcd m n) m = gcd m n := by
-  rw [gcd_comm m n, gcd_gcd_self_left_right]
-
-theorem gcd_add_mul_self (m n k : Nat) : gcd m (n + k * m) = gcd m n := by
-  simp [gcd_rec m (n + k * m), gcd_rec m n]
-
-theorem gcd_eq_zero_iff {i j : Nat} : gcd i j = 0 ↔ i = 0 ∧ j = 0 :=
-  ⟨fun h => ⟨eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left h, eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right h⟩,
-   fun h => by simp [h]⟩
-
-/-- Characterization of the value of `Nat.gcd`. -/
-theorem gcd_eq_iff (a b : Nat) :
-    gcd a b = g ↔ g ∣ a ∧ g ∣ b ∧ (∀ c, c ∣ a → c ∣ b → c ∣ g) := by
-  constructor
-  · rintro rfl
-    exact ⟨gcd_dvd_left _ _, gcd_dvd_right _ _, fun _ => Nat.dvd_gcd⟩
-  · rintro ⟨ha, hb, hc⟩
-    apply Nat.dvd_antisymm
-    · apply hc
-      · exact gcd_dvd_left a b
-      · exact gcd_dvd_right a b
-    · exact Nat.dvd_gcd ha hb
-
-/-- Represent a divisor of `m * n` as a product of a divisor of `m` and a divisor of `n`. -/
-def prod_dvd_and_dvd_of_dvd_prod {k m n : Nat} (H : k ∣ m * n) :
-    {d : {m' // m' ∣ m} × {n' // n' ∣ n} // k = d.1.val * d.2.val} :=
-  if h0 : gcd k m = 0 then
-    ⟨⟨⟨0, eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right h0 ▸ Nat.dvd_refl 0⟩,
-      ⟨n, Nat.dvd_refl n⟩⟩,
-      eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left h0 ▸ (Nat.zero_mul n).symm⟩
-  else by
-    have hd : gcd k m * (k / gcd k m) = k := Nat.mul_div_cancel' (gcd_dvd_left k m)
-    refine ⟨⟨⟨gcd k m, gcd_dvd_right k m⟩, ⟨k / gcd k m, ?_⟩⟩, hd.symm⟩
-    apply Nat.dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_left (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h0)
-    rw [hd, ← gcd_mul_right]
-    exact Nat.dvd_gcd (Nat.dvd_mul_right _ _) H
-
-theorem gcd_mul_dvd_mul_gcd (k m n : Nat) : gcd k (m * n) ∣ gcd k m * gcd k n := by
-  let ⟨⟨⟨m', hm'⟩, ⟨n', hn'⟩⟩, (h : gcd k (m * n) = m' * n')⟩ :=
-    prod_dvd_and_dvd_of_dvd_prod <| gcd_dvd_right k (m * n)
-  rw [h]
-  have h' : m' * n' ∣ k := h ▸ gcd_dvd_left ..
-  exact Nat.mul_dvd_mul
-    (dvd_gcd (Nat.dvd_trans (Nat.dvd_mul_right m' n') h') hm')
-    (dvd_gcd (Nat.dvd_trans (Nat.dvd_mul_left n' m') h') hn')
-
 end Nat

src/Init/Data/Nat/Lcm.lean

@@ -1,66 +0,0 @@
-/-
-Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
-Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro
--/
-prelude
-import Init.Data.Nat.Gcd
-import Init.Data.Nat.Lemmas
-
-namespace Nat
-
-/-- The least common multiple of `m` and `n`, defined using `gcd`. -/
-def lcm (m n : Nat) : Nat := m * n / gcd m n
-
-theorem lcm_comm (m n : Nat) : lcm m n = lcm n m := by
-  rw [lcm, lcm, Nat.mul_comm n m, gcd_comm n m]
-
-@[simp] theorem lcm_zero_left (m : Nat) : lcm 0 m = 0 := by simp [lcm]
-
-@[simp] theorem lcm_zero_right (m : Nat) : lcm m 0 = 0 := by simp [lcm]
-
-@[simp] theorem lcm_one_left (m : Nat) : lcm 1 m = m := by simp [lcm]
-
-@[simp] theorem lcm_one_right (m : Nat) : lcm m 1 = m := by simp [lcm]
-
-@[simp] theorem lcm_self (m : Nat) : lcm m m = m := by
-  match eq_zero_or_pos m with
-  | .inl h => rw [h, lcm_zero_left]
-  | .inr h => simp [lcm, Nat.mul_div_cancel _ h]
-
-theorem dvd_lcm_left (m n : Nat) : m ∣ lcm m n :=
-  ⟨n / gcd m n, by rw [← Nat.mul_div_assoc m (Nat.gcd_dvd_right m n)]; rfl⟩
-
-theorem dvd_lcm_right (m n : Nat) : n ∣ lcm m n := lcm_comm n m ▸ dvd_lcm_left n m
-
-theorem gcd_mul_lcm (m n : Nat) : gcd m n * lcm m n = m * n := by
-  rw [lcm, Nat.mul_div_cancel' (Nat.dvd_trans (gcd_dvd_left m n) (Nat.dvd_mul_right m n))]
-
-theorem lcm_dvd {m n k : Nat} (H1 : m ∣ k) (H2 : n ∣ k) : lcm m n ∣ k := by
-  match eq_zero_or_pos k with
-  | .inl h => rw [h]; exact Nat.dvd_zero _
-  | .inr kpos =>
-    apply Nat.dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_left (gcd_pos_of_pos_left n (pos_of_dvd_of_pos H1 kpos))
-    rw [gcd_mul_lcm, ← gcd_mul_right, Nat.mul_comm n k]
-    exact dvd_gcd (Nat.mul_dvd_mul_left _ H2) (Nat.mul_dvd_mul_right H1 _)
-
-theorem lcm_assoc (m n k : Nat) : lcm (lcm m n) k = lcm m (lcm n k) :=
-Nat.dvd_antisymm
-  (lcm_dvd
-    (lcm_dvd (dvd_lcm_left m (lcm n k))
-      (Nat.dvd_trans (dvd_lcm_left n k) (dvd_lcm_right m (lcm n k))))
-    (Nat.dvd_trans (dvd_lcm_right n k) (dvd_lcm_right m (lcm n k))))
-  (lcm_dvd
-    (Nat.dvd_trans (dvd_lcm_left m n) (dvd_lcm_left (lcm m n) k))
-    (lcm_dvd (Nat.dvd_trans (dvd_lcm_right m n) (dvd_lcm_left (lcm m n) k))
-      (dvd_lcm_right (lcm m n) k)))
-
-theorem lcm_ne_zero (hm : m ≠ 0) (hn : n ≠ 0) : lcm m n ≠ 0 := by
-  intro h
-  have h1 := gcd_mul_lcm m n
-  rw [h, Nat.mul_zero] at h1
-  match mul_eq_zero.1 h1.symm with
-  | .inl hm1 => exact hm hm1
-  | .inr hn1 => exact hn hn1
-
-end Nat

src/Init/Data/Nat/Lemmas.lean

@@ -4,10 +4,10 @@ Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
 Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Mario Carneiro
 -/
 prelude
+import Init.Data.Nat.Dvd
 import Init.Data.Nat.MinMax
 import Init.Data.Nat.Log2
 import Init.Data.Nat.Power2
-import Init.Omega
 
 /-! # Basic lemmas about natural numbers
 
@@ -19,6 +19,131 @@ and later these lemmas should be organised into other files more systematically.
 -/
 
 namespace Nat
+
+/-! ### le/lt -/
+
+protected theorem lt_asymm {a b : Nat} (h : a < b) : ¬ b < a := Nat.not_lt.2 (Nat.le_of_lt h)
+protected abbrev not_lt_of_gt := @Nat.lt_asymm
+protected abbrev not_lt_of_lt := @Nat.lt_asymm
+
+protected theorem lt_iff_le_not_le {m n : Nat} : m < n ↔ m ≤ n ∧ ¬ n ≤ m :=
+  ⟨fun h => ⟨Nat.le_of_lt h, Nat.not_le_of_gt h⟩, fun ⟨_, h⟩ => Nat.lt_of_not_ge h⟩
+protected abbrev lt_iff_le_and_not_ge := @Nat.lt_iff_le_not_le
+
+protected theorem lt_iff_le_and_ne {m n : Nat} : m < n ↔ m ≤ n ∧ m ≠ n :=
+  ⟨fun h => ⟨Nat.le_of_lt h, Nat.ne_of_lt h⟩, fun h => Nat.lt_of_le_of_ne h.1 h.2⟩
+
+protected theorem ne_iff_lt_or_gt {a b : Nat} : a ≠ b ↔ a < b ∨ b < a :=
+  ⟨Nat.lt_or_gt_of_ne, fun | .inl h => Nat.ne_of_lt h | .inr h => Nat.ne_of_gt h⟩
+protected abbrev lt_or_gt := @Nat.ne_iff_lt_or_gt
+
+protected abbrev le_or_ge := @Nat.le_total
+protected abbrev le_or_le := @Nat.le_total
+
+protected theorem eq_or_lt_of_not_lt {a b : Nat} (hnlt : ¬ a < b) : a = b ∨ b < a :=
+  (Nat.lt_trichotomy ..).resolve_left hnlt
+
+protected theorem lt_or_eq_of_le {n m : Nat} (h : n ≤ m) : n < m ∨ n = m :=
+  (Nat.lt_or_ge ..).imp_right (Nat.le_antisymm h)
+
+protected theorem le_iff_lt_or_eq {n m : Nat} : n ≤ m ↔ n < m ∨ n = m :=
+  ⟨Nat.lt_or_eq_of_le, fun | .inl h => Nat.le_of_lt h | .inr rfl => Nat.le_refl _⟩
+
+protected theorem lt_succ_iff : m < succ n ↔ m ≤ n := ⟨le_of_lt_succ, lt_succ_of_le⟩
+
+protected theorem lt_succ_iff_lt_or_eq : m < succ n ↔ m < n ∨ m = n :=
+  Nat.lt_succ_iff.trans Nat.le_iff_lt_or_eq
+
+protected theorem eq_of_lt_succ_of_not_lt (hmn : m < n + 1) (h : ¬ m < n) : m = n :=
+  (Nat.lt_succ_iff_lt_or_eq.1 hmn).resolve_left h
+
+protected theorem eq_of_le_of_lt_succ (h₁ : n ≤ m) (h₂ : m < n + 1) : m = n :=
+  Nat.le_antisymm (le_of_succ_le_succ h₂) h₁
+
+
+/-! ## zero/one/two -/
+
+theorem le_zero : i ≤ 0 ↔ i = 0 := ⟨Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero, fun | rfl => Nat.le_refl _⟩
+
+protected abbrev one_pos := @Nat.zero_lt_one
+
+protected theorem two_pos : 0 < 2 := Nat.zero_lt_succ _
+
+theorem add_one_ne_zero (n) : n + 1 ≠ 0 := succ_ne_zero _
+
+protected theorem ne_zero_iff_zero_lt : n ≠ 0 ↔ 0 < n := Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.symm
+
+protected theorem zero_lt_two : 0 < 2 := Nat.zero_lt_succ _
+
+protected theorem one_lt_two : 1 < 2 := Nat.succ_lt_succ Nat.zero_lt_one
+
+protected theorem eq_zero_of_not_pos (h : ¬0 < n) : n = 0 :=
+  Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero (Nat.not_lt.1 h)
+
+/-! ## succ/pred -/
+
+attribute [simp] succ_ne_zero zero_lt_succ lt_succ_self Nat.pred_zero Nat.pred_succ Nat.pred_le
+
+theorem succ_ne_self (n) : succ n ≠ n := Nat.ne_of_gt (lt_succ_self n)
+
+theorem succ_le : succ n ≤ m ↔ n < m := .rfl
+
+theorem lt_succ : m < succ n ↔ m ≤ n := ⟨le_of_lt_succ, lt_succ_of_le⟩
+
+theorem lt_succ_of_lt (h : a < b) : a < succ b := le_succ_of_le h
+
+theorem succ_pred_eq_of_ne_zero : ∀ {n}, n ≠ 0 → succ (pred n) = n
+  | _+1, _ => rfl
+
+theorem eq_zero_or_eq_succ_pred : ∀ n, n = 0 ∨ n = succ (pred n)
+  | 0 => .inl rfl
+  | _+1 => .inr rfl
+
+theorem succ_inj' : succ a = succ b ↔ a = b := ⟨succ.inj, congrArg _⟩
+
+theorem succ_le_succ_iff : succ a ≤ succ b ↔ a ≤ b := ⟨le_of_succ_le_succ, succ_le_succ⟩
+
+theorem succ_lt_succ_iff : succ a < succ b ↔ a < b := ⟨lt_of_succ_lt_succ, succ_lt_succ⟩
+
+theorem pred_inj : ∀ {a b}, 0 < a → 0 < b → pred a = pred b → a = b
+  | _+1, _+1, _, _ => congrArg _
+
+theorem pred_ne_self : ∀ {a}, a ≠ 0 → pred a ≠ a
+  | _+1, _ => (succ_ne_self _).symm
+
+theorem pred_lt_self : ∀ {a}, 0 < a → pred a < a
+  | _+1, _ => lt_succ_self _
+
+theorem pred_lt_pred : ∀ {n m}, n ≠ 0 → n < m → pred n < pred m
+  | _+1, _+1, _, h => lt_of_succ_lt_succ h
+
+theorem pred_le_iff_le_succ : ∀ {n m}, pred n ≤ m ↔ n ≤ succ m
+  | 0, _ => ⟨fun _ => Nat.zero_le _, fun _ => Nat.zero_le _⟩
+  | _+1, _ => Nat.succ_le_succ_iff.symm
+
+theorem le_succ_of_pred_le : pred n ≤ m → n ≤ succ m := pred_le_iff_le_succ.1
+
+theorem pred_le_of_le_succ : n ≤ succ m → pred n ≤ m := pred_le_iff_le_succ.2
+
+theorem lt_pred_iff_succ_lt : ∀ {n m}, n < pred m ↔ succ n < m
+  | _, 0 => ⟨nofun, nofun⟩
+  | _, _+1 => Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff.symm
+
+theorem succ_lt_of_lt_pred : n < pred m → succ n < m := lt_pred_iff_succ_lt.1
+
+theorem lt_pred_of_succ_lt : succ n < m → n < pred m := lt_pred_iff_succ_lt.2
+
+theorem le_pred_iff_lt : ∀ {n m}, 0 < m → (n ≤ pred m ↔ n < m)
+  | 0, _+1, _ => ⟨fun _ => Nat.zero_lt_succ _, fun _ => Nat.zero_le _⟩
+  | _+1, _+1, _ => Nat.lt_pred_iff_succ_lt
+
+theorem lt_of_le_pred (h : 0 < m) : n ≤ pred m → n < m := (le_pred_iff_lt h).1
+
+theorem le_pred_of_lt (h : n < m) : n ≤ pred m := (le_pred_iff_lt (Nat.zero_lt_of_lt h)).2 h
+
+theorem exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero : ∀ {n}, n ≠ 0 → ∃ k, n = succ k
+  | _+1, _ => ⟨_, rfl⟩
+
 /-! ## add -/
 
 protected theorem add_add_add_comm (a b c d : Nat) : (a + b) + (c + d) = (a + c) + (b + d) := by
@@ -66,6 +191,15 @@ protected theorem add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le {a b c d : Nat} (hlt : a < b) (hle : c
     a + c < b + d :=
   Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.add_le_add_left hle _) (Nat.add_lt_add_right hlt _)
 
+protected theorem lt_add_left (c : Nat) (h : a < b) : a < c + b :=
+  Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h (Nat.le_add_left ..)
+
+protected theorem lt_add_right (c : Nat) (h : a < b) : a < b + c :=
+  Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h (Nat.le_add_right ..)
+
+protected theorem lt_add_of_pos_right (h : 0 < k) : n < n + k :=
+  Nat.add_lt_add_left h n
+
 protected theorem lt_add_of_pos_left : 0 < k → n < k + n := by
   rw [Nat.add_comm]; exact Nat.lt_add_of_pos_right
 
@@ -88,7 +222,7 @@ protected theorem add_pos_right (m) (h : 0 < n) : 0 < m + n :=
   Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h (Nat.le_add_left ..)
 
 protected theorem add_self_ne_one : ∀ n, n + n ≠ 1
-  | n+1, h => by rw [Nat.succ_add, Nat.succ.injEq] at h; contradiction
+  | n+1, h => by rw [Nat.succ_add, Nat.succ_inj'] at h; contradiction
 
 /-! ## sub -/
 
@@ -175,6 +309,8 @@ theorem add_lt_of_lt_sub' {a b c : Nat} : b < c - a → a + b < c := by
 protected theorem sub_add_lt_sub (h₁ : m + k ≤ n) (h₂ : 0 < k) : n - (m + k) < n - m := by
   rw [← Nat.sub_sub]; exact Nat.sub_lt_of_pos_le h₂ (Nat.le_sub_of_add_le' h₁)
 
+theorem le_sub_one_of_lt : a < b → a ≤ b - 1 := Nat.le_pred_of_lt
+
 theorem sub_one_lt_of_le (h₀ : 0 < a) (h₁ : a ≤ b) : a - 1 < b :=
   Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le (Nat.pred_lt' h₀) h₁
 
@@ -334,32 +470,6 @@ protected theorem sub_max_sub_right : ∀ (a b c : Nat), max (a - c) (b - c) = m
   | _, _, 0 => rfl
   | _, _, _+1 => Eq.trans (Nat.pred_max_pred ..) <| congrArg _ (Nat.sub_max_sub_right ..)
 
-protected theorem sub_min_sub_left (a b c : Nat) : min (a - b) (a - c) = a - max b c := by
-  omega
-
-protected theorem sub_max_sub_left (a b c : Nat) : max (a - b) (a - c) = a - min b c := by
-  omega
-
-protected theorem mul_max_mul_right (a b c : Nat) : max (a * c) (b * c) = max a b * c := by
-  induction a generalizing b with
-  | zero => simp
-  | succ i ind =>
-    cases b <;> simp [succ_eq_add_one, Nat.succ_mul, Nat.add_max_add_right, ind]
-
-protected theorem mul_min_mul_right (a b c : Nat) : min (a * c) (b * c) = min a b * c := by
-  induction a generalizing b with
-  | zero => simp
-  | succ i ind =>
-    cases b <;> simp [succ_eq_add_one, Nat.succ_mul, Nat.add_min_add_right, ind]
-
-protected theorem mul_max_mul_left (a b c : Nat) : max (a * b) (a * c) = a * max b c := by
-  repeat rw [Nat.mul_comm a]
-  exact Nat.mul_max_mul_right ..
-
-protected theorem mul_min_mul_left (a b c : Nat) : min (a * b) (a * c) = a * min b c := by
-  repeat rw [Nat.mul_comm a]
-  exact Nat.mul_min_mul_right ..
-
 -- protected theorem sub_min_sub_left (a b c : Nat) : min (a - b) (a - c) = a - max b c := by
 --   induction b, c using Nat.recDiagAux with
 --   | zero_left => rw [Nat.sub_zero, Nat.zero_max]; exact Nat.min_eq_right (Nat.sub_le ..)
@@ -408,6 +518,10 @@ protected theorem mul_right_comm (n m k : Nat) : n * m * k = n * k * m := by
 protected theorem mul_mul_mul_comm (a b c d : Nat) : (a * b) * (c * d) = (a * c) * (b * d) := by
   rw [Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_left_comm b]
 
+protected theorem mul_two (n) : n * 2 = n + n := by rw [Nat.mul_succ, Nat.mul_one]
+
+protected theorem two_mul (n) : 2 * n = n + n := by rw [Nat.succ_mul, Nat.one_mul]
+
 theorem mul_eq_zero : ∀ {m n}, n * m = 0 ↔ n = 0 ∨ m = 0
   | 0, _ => ⟨fun _ => .inr rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
   | _, 0 => ⟨fun _ => .inl rfl, fun _ => Nat.zero_mul ..⟩
@@ -505,6 +619,68 @@ protected theorem pos_of_mul_pos_right {a b : Nat} (h : 0 < a * b) : 0 < a := by
 
 /-! ### div/mod -/
 
+protected theorem div_le_of_le_mul {m n : Nat} : ∀ {k}, m ≤ k * n → m / k ≤ n
+  | 0, _ => by simp [Nat.div_zero, n.zero_le]
+  | succ k, h => by
+    suffices succ k * (m / succ k) ≤ succ k * n from
+      Nat.le_of_mul_le_mul_left this (zero_lt_succ _)
+    have h1 : succ k * (m / succ k) ≤ m % succ k + succ k * (m / succ k) := Nat.le_add_left _ _
+    have h2 : m % succ k + succ k * (m / succ k) = m := by rw [mod_add_div]
+    have h3 : m ≤ succ k * n := h
+    rw [← h2] at h3
+    exact Nat.le_trans h1 h3
+
+@[simp] theorem mul_div_right (n : Nat) {m : Nat} (H : 0 < m) : m * n / m = n := by
+  induction n <;> simp_all [mul_succ]
+
+@[simp] theorem mul_div_left (m : Nat) {n : Nat} (H : 0 < n) : m * n / n = m := by
+  rw [Nat.mul_comm, mul_div_right _ H]
+
+protected theorem div_self (H : 0 < n) : n / n = 1 := by
+  let t := add_div_right 0 H
+  rwa [Nat.zero_add, Nat.zero_div] at t
+
+protected theorem mul_div_cancel (m : Nat) {n : Nat} (H : 0 < n) : m * n / n = m := by
+  let t := add_mul_div_right 0 m H
+  rwa [Nat.zero_add, Nat.zero_div, Nat.zero_add] at t
+
+protected theorem mul_div_cancel_left (m : Nat) {n : Nat} (H : 0 < n) : n * m / n = m :=
+by rw [Nat.mul_comm, Nat.mul_div_cancel _ H]
+
+protected theorem div_eq_of_eq_mul_left (H1 : 0 < n) (H2 : m = k * n) : m / n = k :=
+by rw [H2, Nat.mul_div_cancel _ H1]
+
+protected theorem div_eq_of_eq_mul_right (H1 : 0 < n) (H2 : m = n * k) : m / n = k :=
+by rw [H2, Nat.mul_div_cancel_left _ H1]
+
+protected theorem div_div_eq_div_mul (m n k : Nat) : m / n / k = m / (n * k) := by
+  cases eq_zero_or_pos k with
+  | inl k0 => rw [k0, Nat.mul_zero, Nat.div_zero, Nat.div_zero] | inr kpos => ?_
+  cases eq_zero_or_pos n with
+  | inl n0 => rw [n0, Nat.zero_mul, Nat.div_zero, Nat.zero_div] | inr npos => ?_
+  apply Nat.le_antisymm
+  · apply (le_div_iff_mul_le (Nat.mul_pos npos kpos)).2
+    rw [Nat.mul_comm n k, ← Nat.mul_assoc]
+    apply (le_div_iff_mul_le npos).1
+    apply (le_div_iff_mul_le kpos).1
+    (apply Nat.le_refl)
+  · apply (le_div_iff_mul_le kpos).2
+    apply (le_div_iff_mul_le npos).2
+    rw [Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_comm n k]
+    apply (le_div_iff_mul_le (Nat.mul_pos kpos npos)).1
+    apply Nat.le_refl
+
+protected theorem mul_div_mul_left {m : Nat} (n k : Nat) (H : 0 < m) :
+    m * n / (m * k) = n / k := by rw [← Nat.div_div_eq_div_mul, Nat.mul_div_cancel_left _ H]
+
+protected theorem mul_div_mul_right {m : Nat} (n k : Nat) (H : 0 < m) :
+    n * m / (k * m) = n / k := by rw [Nat.mul_comm, Nat.mul_comm k, Nat.mul_div_mul_left _ _ H]
+
+theorem mul_div_le (m n : Nat) : n * (m / n) ≤ m := by
+  match n, Nat.eq_zero_or_pos n with
+  | _, Or.inl rfl => rw [Nat.zero_mul]; exact m.zero_le
+  | n, Or.inr h => rw [Nat.mul_comm, ← Nat.le_div_iff_mul_le h]; exact Nat.le_refl _
+
 theorem mod_two_eq_zero_or_one (n : Nat) : n % 2 = 0 ∨ n % 2 = 1 :=
   match n % 2, @Nat.mod_lt n 2 (by decide) with
   | 0, _ => .inl rfl
@@ -516,6 +692,12 @@ theorem le_of_mod_lt {a b : Nat} (h : a % b < a) : b ≤ a :=
 theorem mul_mod_mul_right (z x y : Nat) : (x * z) % (y * z) = (x % y) * z := by
   rw [Nat.mul_comm x z, Nat.mul_comm y z, Nat.mul_comm (x % y) z]; apply mul_mod_mul_left
 
+@[simp] theorem mod_mod_of_dvd (a : Nat) (h : c ∣ b) : a % b % c = a % c := by
+  rw (config := {occs := .pos [2]}) [← mod_add_div a b]
+  have ⟨x, h⟩ := h
+  subst h
+  rw [Nat.mul_assoc, add_mul_mod_self_left]
+
 theorem sub_mul_mod {x k n : Nat} (h₁ : n*k ≤ x) : (x - n*k) % n = x % n := by
   match k with
   | 0 => rw [Nat.mul_zero, Nat.sub_zero]
@@ -556,6 +738,12 @@ theorem pow_succ' {m n : Nat} : m ^ n.succ = m * m ^ n := by
 
 @[simp] theorem pow_eq {m n : Nat} : m.pow n = m ^ n := rfl
 
+theorem shiftLeft_eq (a b : Nat) : a <<< b = a * 2 ^ b :=
+  match b with
+  | 0 => (Nat.mul_one _).symm
+  | b+1 => (shiftLeft_eq _ b).trans <| by
+    simp [pow_succ, Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_left_comm, Nat.mul_comm]
+
 theorem one_shiftLeft (n : Nat) : 1 <<< n = 2 ^ n := by rw [shiftLeft_eq, Nat.one_mul]
 
 attribute [simp] Nat.pow_zero
@@ -695,17 +883,37 @@ theorem lt_log2_self : n < 2 ^ (n.log2 + 1) :=
 
 /-! ### dvd -/
 
-protected theorem eq_mul_of_div_eq_right {a b c : Nat} (H1 : b ∣ a) (H2 : a / b = c) :
-    a = b * c := by
-  rw [← H2, Nat.mul_div_cancel' H1]
+theorem dvd_sub {k m n : Nat} (H : n ≤ m) (h₁ : k ∣ m) (h₂ : k ∣ n) : k ∣ m - n :=
+  (Nat.dvd_add_iff_left h₂).2 <| by rwa [Nat.sub_add_cancel H]
 
-protected theorem div_eq_iff_eq_mul_right {a b c : Nat} (H : 0 < b) (H' : b ∣ a) :
-    a / b = c ↔ a = b * c :=
-  ⟨Nat.eq_mul_of_div_eq_right H', Nat.div_eq_of_eq_mul_right H⟩
+protected theorem mul_dvd_mul {a b c d : Nat} : a ∣ b → c ∣ d → a * c ∣ b * d
+  | ⟨e, he⟩, ⟨f, hf⟩ =>
+    ⟨e * f, by simp [he, hf, Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_left_comm, Nat.mul_comm]⟩
 
-protected theorem div_eq_iff_eq_mul_left {a b c : Nat} (H : 0 < b) (H' : b ∣ a) :
-    a / b = c ↔ a = c * b := by
-  rw [Nat.mul_comm]; exact Nat.div_eq_iff_eq_mul_right H H'
+protected theorem mul_dvd_mul_left (a : Nat) (h : b ∣ c) : a * b ∣ a * c :=
+  Nat.mul_dvd_mul (Nat.dvd_refl a) h
+
+protected theorem mul_dvd_mul_right (h: a ∣ b) (c : Nat) : a * c ∣ b * c :=
+  Nat.mul_dvd_mul h (Nat.dvd_refl c)
+
+@[simp] theorem dvd_one {n : Nat} : n ∣ 1 ↔ n = 1 :=
+  ⟨eq_one_of_dvd_one, fun h => h.symm ▸ Nat.dvd_refl _⟩
+
+protected theorem mul_div_assoc (m : Nat) (H : k ∣ n) : m * n / k = m * (n / k) := by
+  match Nat.eq_zero_or_pos k with
+  | .inl h0 => rw [h0, Nat.div_zero, Nat.div_zero, Nat.mul_zero]
+  | .inr hpos =>
+    have h1 : m * n / k = m * (n / k * k) / k := by rw [Nat.div_mul_cancel H]
+    rw [h1, ← Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_div_cancel _ hpos]
+
+protected theorem dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_left
+    (kpos : 0 < k) (H : k * m ∣ k * n) : m ∣ n := by
+  let ⟨l, H⟩ := H
+  rw [Nat.mul_assoc] at H
+  exact ⟨_, Nat.eq_of_mul_eq_mul_left kpos H⟩
+
+protected theorem dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_right (kpos : 0 < k) (H : m * k ∣ n * k) : m ∣ n := by
+  rw [Nat.mul_comm m k, Nat.mul_comm n k] at H; exact Nat.dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_left kpos H
 
 theorem pow_dvd_pow_iff_pow_le_pow {k l : Nat} :
     ∀ {x : Nat}, 0 < x → (x ^ k ∣ x ^ l ↔ x ^ k ≤ x ^ l)
@@ -729,6 +937,18 @@ theorem pow_dvd_pow_iff_le_right {x k l : Nat} (w : 1 < x) : x ^ k ∣ x ^ l ↔
 theorem pow_dvd_pow_iff_le_right' {b k l : Nat} : (b + 2) ^ k ∣ (b + 2) ^ l ↔ k ≤ l :=
   pow_dvd_pow_iff_le_right (Nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ rfl)
 
+protected theorem eq_mul_of_div_eq_right {a b c : Nat} (H1 : b ∣ a) (H2 : a / b = c) :
+    a = b * c := by
+  rw [← H2, Nat.mul_div_cancel' H1]
+
+protected theorem div_eq_iff_eq_mul_right {a b c : Nat} (H : 0 < b) (H' : b ∣ a) :
+    a / b = c ↔ a = b * c :=
+  ⟨Nat.eq_mul_of_div_eq_right H', Nat.div_eq_of_eq_mul_right H⟩
+
+protected theorem div_eq_iff_eq_mul_left {a b c : Nat} (H : 0 < b) (H' : b ∣ a) :
+    a / b = c ↔ a = c * b := by
+  rw [Nat.mul_comm]; exact Nat.div_eq_iff_eq_mul_right H H'
+
 protected theorem pow_dvd_pow {m n : Nat} (a : Nat) (h : m ≤ n) : a ^ m ∣ a ^ n := by
   cases Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le h
   case intro k p =>
@@ -763,6 +983,10 @@ theorem shiftLeft_succ : ∀(m n), m <<< (n + 1) = 2 * (m <<< n)
   rw [shiftLeft_succ_inside _ (k+1)]
   rw [shiftLeft_succ _ k, shiftLeft_succ_inside]
 
+@[simp] theorem shiftRight_zero : n >>> 0 = n := rfl
+
+theorem shiftRight_succ (m n) : m >>> (n + 1) = (m >>> n) / 2 := rfl
+
 /-- Shiftright on successor with division moved inside. -/
 theorem shiftRight_succ_inside : ∀m n, m >>> (n+1) = (m/2) >>> n
 | m, 0 => rfl
@@ -778,9 +1002,19 @@ theorem shiftRight_succ_inside : ∀m n, m >>> (n+1) = (m/2) >>> n
   | 0 => by simp [shiftRight]
   | n + 1 => by simp [shiftRight, zero_shiftRight n, shiftRight_succ]
 
+theorem shiftRight_add (m n : Nat) : ∀ k, m >>> (n + k) = (m >>> n) >>> k
+  | 0 => rfl
+  | k + 1 => by simp [add_succ, shiftRight_add, shiftRight_succ]
+
 theorem shiftLeft_shiftLeft (m n : Nat) : ∀ k, (m <<< n) <<< k = m <<< (n + k)
   | 0 => rfl
-  | k + 1 => by simp [← Nat.add_assoc, shiftLeft_shiftLeft _ _ k, shiftLeft_succ]
+  | k + 1 => by simp [add_succ, shiftLeft_shiftLeft _ _ k, shiftLeft_succ]
+
+theorem shiftRight_eq_div_pow (m : Nat) : ∀ n, m >>> n = m / 2 ^ n
+  | 0 => (Nat.div_one _).symm
+  | k + 1 => by
+    rw [shiftRight_add, shiftRight_eq_div_pow m k]
+    simp [Nat.div_div_eq_div_mul, ← Nat.pow_succ, shiftRight_succ]
 
 theorem mul_add_div {m : Nat} (m_pos : m > 0) (x y : Nat) : (m * x + y) / m = x + y / m := by
   match x with

src/Init/Data/Nat/Linear.lean

@@ -4,7 +4,10 @@ Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
 Authors: Leonardo de Moura
 -/
 prelude
+import Init.Coe
 import Init.ByCases
+import Init.Data.Nat.Basic
+import Init.Data.List.Basic
 import Init.Data.Prod
 
 namespace Nat.Linear
@@ -580,7 +583,7 @@ attribute [-simp] Nat.right_distrib Nat.left_distrib
 
 theorem PolyCnstr.denote_mul (ctx : Context) (k : Nat) (c : PolyCnstr) : (c.mul (k+1)).denote ctx = c.denote ctx := by
   cases c; rename_i eq lhs rhs
-  have : k ≠ 0 → k + 1 ≠ 1 := by intro h; match k with | 0 => contradiction | k+1 => simp [Nat.succ.injEq]
+  have : k ≠ 0 → k + 1 ≠ 1 := by intro h; match k with | 0 => contradiction | k+1 => simp; apply Nat.succ_ne_zero
   have : ¬ (k == 0) → (k + 1 == 1) = false := fun h => beq_false_of_ne (this (ne_of_beq_false (Bool.of_not_eq_true h)))
   have : ¬ ((k + 1 == 0) = true)  := fun h => absurd (eq_of_beq h) (Nat.succ_ne_zero k)
   have : (1 == (0 : Nat)) = false := rfl

src/Init/Data/Nat/Log2.lean

@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
 Authors: Gabriel Ebner
 -/
 prelude
+import Init.NotationExtra
 import Init.Data.Nat.Linear
 
 namespace Nat

src/Init/Data/Nat/Mod.lean

@@ -1,76 +0,0 @@
-/-
-Copyright (c) 2024 Lean FRO, LLC. All rights reserved.
-Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-Authors: Scott Morrison
--/
-prelude
-import Init.Omega
-
-/-!
-# Further results about `mod`.
-
-This file proves some results about `mod` that are useful for bitblasting,
-in particular
-`Nat.mod_mul : x % (a * b) = x % a + a * (x / a % b)`
-and its corollary
-`Nat.mod_pow_succ : x % b ^ (k + 1) = x % b ^ k + b ^ k * ((x / b ^ k) % b)`.
-
-It contains the necesssary preliminary results relating order and `*` and `/`,
-which should probably be moved to their own file.
--/
-
-namespace Nat
-
-@[simp] protected theorem mul_lt_mul_left (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b < a * c ↔ b < c := by
-  induction a with
-  | zero => simp_all
-  | succ a ih =>
-    cases a
-    · simp
-    · simp_all [succ_eq_add_one, Nat.right_distrib]
-      omega
-
-@[simp] protected theorem mul_lt_mul_right (a0 : 0 < a) : b * a < c * a ↔ b < c := by
-  rw [Nat.mul_comm b a, Nat.mul_comm c a, Nat.mul_lt_mul_left a0]
-
-protected theorem lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left {a b c : Nat} (h : a * b < a * c) : b < c := by
-  cases a <;> simp_all
-
-protected theorem lt_of_mul_lt_mul_right {a b c : Nat} (h : b * a < c * a) : b < c := by
-  rw [Nat.mul_comm b a, Nat.mul_comm c a] at h
-  exact Nat.lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left h
-
-protected theorem div_lt_of_lt_mul {m n k : Nat} (h : m < n * k) : m / n < k :=
-  Nat.lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left <|
-    calc
-      n * (m / n) ≤ m % n + n * (m / n) := Nat.le_add_left _ _
-      _ = m := mod_add_div _ _
-      _ < n * k := h
-
-theorem mod_mul_right_div_self (m n k : Nat) : m % (n * k) / n = m / n % k := by
-  rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos n with (rfl | hn); simp [mod_zero]
-  rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos k with (rfl | hk); simp [mod_zero]
-  conv => rhs; rw [← mod_add_div m (n * k)]
-  rw [Nat.mul_assoc, add_mul_div_left _ _ hn, add_mul_mod_self_left,
-    mod_eq_of_lt (Nat.div_lt_of_lt_mul (mod_lt _ (Nat.mul_pos hn hk)))]
-
-theorem mod_mul_left_div_self (m n k : Nat) : m % (k * n) / n = m / n % k := by
-  rw [Nat.mul_comm k n, mod_mul_right_div_self]
-
-@[simp 1100]
-theorem mod_mul_right_mod (a b c : Nat) : a % (b * c) % b = a % b :=
-  Nat.mod_mod_of_dvd a (Nat.dvd_mul_right b c)
-
-@[simp 1100]
-theorem mod_mul_left_mod (a b c : Nat) : a % (b * c) % c = a % c :=
-  Nat.mod_mod_of_dvd a (Nat.mul_comm _ _ ▸ Nat.dvd_mul_left c b)
-
-theorem mod_mul {a b x : Nat} : x % (a * b) = x % a + a * (x / a % b) := by
-  rw [Nat.add_comm, ← Nat.div_add_mod (x % (a*b)) a, Nat.mod_mul_right_mod,
-    Nat.mod_mul_right_div_self]
-
-theorem mod_pow_succ {x b k : Nat} :
-    x % b ^ (k + 1) = x % b ^ k + b ^ k * ((x / b ^ k) % b) := by
-  rw [Nat.pow_succ, Nat.mod_mul]
-
-end Nat

src/Init/Data/Nat/Simproc.lean

@@ -1,108 +0,0 @@
-/-
-Copyright (c) 2023 Lean FRO. All rights reserved.
-Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-Authors: Joe Hendrix
--/
-prelude
-import Init.Data.Bool
-import Init.Data.Nat.Basic
-import Init.Data.Nat.Lemmas
-
-/-!
-This contains lemmas used by the Nat simprocs for simplifying arithmetic
-addition offsets.
--/
-namespace Nat.Simproc
-
-/- Sub proofs -/
-
-theorem sub_add_eq_comm (a b c : Nat) : a - (b + c) = a - c - b := by
-  rw [Nat.add_comm b c]
-  exact Nat.sub_add_eq a c b
-
-theorem add_sub_add_le (a c : Nat) {b d : Nat} (h : b ≤ d) : a + b - (c + d) = a - (c + (d-b)) := by
-  induction b generalizing a c d with
-  | zero =>
-    simp
-  | succ b ind =>
-    match d with
-    | 0 =>
-      contradiction
-    | d + 1 =>
-      have g := Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h
-      rw [Nat.add_succ a, Nat.add_succ c, Nat.succ_sub_succ, Nat.succ_sub_succ,
-          ind _ _ g]
-
-theorem add_sub_add_ge (a c : Nat) {b d : Nat} (h : b ≥ d) : a + b - (c + d) = a + (b - d) - c := by
-  rw [Nat.add_comm c d, Nat.sub_add_eq, Nat.add_sub_assoc h a]
-
-theorem add_sub_le (a : Nat) {b c : Nat} (h : b ≤ c) : a + b - c = a - (c - b) := by
-  have p := add_sub_add_le a 0 h
-  simp only [Nat.zero_add] at p
-  exact p
-
-/- Eq proofs -/
-
-theorem add_eq_gt (a : Nat) {b c : Nat} (h : b > c) : (a + b = c) = False :=
-  eq_false (Nat.ne_of_gt (Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h (le_add_left b a)))
-
-theorem eq_add_gt (a : Nat) {b c : Nat} (h : c > a) : (a = b + c) = False := by
-  rw [@Eq.comm Nat a (b + c)]
-  exact add_eq_gt b h
-
-theorem add_eq_add_le (a c : Nat) {b d : Nat} (h : b ≤ d) : (a + b = c + d) = (a = c + (d - b)) := by
-  have g : b ≤ c + d := Nat.le_trans h (le_add_left d c)
-  rw [← Nat.add_sub_assoc h, @Eq.comm _ a, Nat.sub_eq_iff_eq_add g, @Eq.comm _ (a + b)]
-
-theorem add_eq_add_ge (a c : Nat) {b d : Nat} (h : b ≥ d) : (a + b = c + d) = (a + (b - d) = c) := by
-  rw [@Eq.comm _ (a + b) _, add_eq_add_le c a h, @Eq.comm _ _ c]
-
-theorem add_eq_le (a : Nat) {b c : Nat} (h : b ≤ c) : (a + b = c) = (a = c - b) := by
-  have r := add_eq_add_le a 0 h
-  simp only [Nat.zero_add] at r
-  exact r
-
-theorem eq_add_le {a : Nat} (b : Nat) {c : Nat} (h : c ≤ a) : (a = b + c) = (b = a - c) := by
-  rw [@Eq.comm Nat a (b + c)]
-  exact add_eq_le b h
-
-/- Lemmas for lifting Eq proofs to beq -/
-
-theorem beqEqOfEqEq {a b c d : Nat} (p : (a = b) = (c = d)) : (a == b) = (c == d) := by
-  simp only [Bool.beq_eq_decide_eq, p]
-
-theorem beqFalseOfEqFalse {a b : Nat} (p : (a = b) = False) : (a == b) = false := by
-  simp [Bool.beq_eq_decide_eq, p]
-
-theorem bneEqOfEqEq {a b c d : Nat} (p : (a = b) = (c = d)) : (a != b) = (c != d) := by
-  simp only [bne, beqEqOfEqEq p]
-
-theorem bneTrueOfEqFalse {a b : Nat} (p : (a = b) = False) : (a != b) = true := by
-  simp [bne, beqFalseOfEqFalse p]
-
-/- le proofs -/
-
-theorem add_le_add_le (a c : Nat) {b d : Nat} (h : b ≤ d) : (a + b ≤ c + d) = (a ≤ c + (d - b)) := by
-  rw [← Nat.add_sub_assoc h, Nat.le_sub_iff_add_le]
-  exact Nat.le_trans h (le_add_left d c)
-
-theorem add_le_add_ge (a c : Nat) {b d : Nat} (h : b ≥ d) : (a + b ≤ c + d) = (a + (b - d) ≤ c) := by
-  rw [← Nat.add_sub_assoc h, Nat.sub_le_iff_le_add]
-
-theorem add_le_le (a : Nat) {b c : Nat} (h : b ≤ c) : (a + b ≤ c) = (a ≤ c - b) := by
-  have r := add_le_add_le a 0 h
-  simp only [Nat.zero_add] at r
-  exact r
-
-theorem add_le_gt (a : Nat) {b c : Nat} (h : b > c) : (a + b ≤ c) = False :=
-  eq_false (Nat.not_le_of_gt (Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h (le_add_left b a)))
-
-theorem le_add_le (a : Nat) {b c : Nat} (h : a ≤ c) : (a ≤ b + c) = True :=
-  eq_true (Nat.le_trans h (le_add_left c b))
-
-theorem le_add_ge (a : Nat) {b c : Nat} (h : a ≥ c) : (a ≤ b + c) = (a - c ≤ b) := by
-  have r := add_le_add_ge 0 b h
-  simp only [Nat.zero_add] at r
-  exact r
-
-end Nat.Simproc

src/Init/Data/Option/Basic.lean

@@ -37,13 +37,6 @@ def toMonad [Monad m] [Alternative m] : Option α → m α
   | none,   _ => none
   | some a, b => b a
 
-/-- Runs `f` on `o`'s value, if any, and returns its result, or else returns `none`.  -/
-@[inline] protected def bindM [Monad m] (f : α → m (Option β)) (o : Option α) : m (Option β) := do
-  if let some a := o then
-    return (← f a)
-  else
-    return none
-
 @[inline] protected def mapM [Monad m] (f : α → m β) (o : Option α) : m (Option β) := do
   if let some a := o then
     return some (← f a)

src/Init/Data/Ord.lean

@@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ Authors: Dany Fabian, Sebastian Ullrich
 -/
 
 prelude
+import Init.Data.Int
 import Init.Data.String
-import Init.Data.Array.Basic
 
 inductive Ordering where
   | lt | eq | gt
@@ -88,24 +88,11 @@ def isGE : Ordering → Bool
 
 end Ordering
 
-/--
-Yields an `Ordering` s.t. `x < y` corresponds to `Ordering.lt` / `Ordering.gt` and
-`x = y` corresponds to `Ordering.eq`.
--/
 @[inline] def compareOfLessAndEq {α} (x y : α) [LT α] [Decidable (x < y)] [DecidableEq α] : Ordering :=
   if x < y then Ordering.lt
   else if x = y then Ordering.eq
   else Ordering.gt
 
-/--
-Yields an `Ordering` s.t. `x < y` corresponds to `Ordering.lt` / `Ordering.gt` and
-`x == y` corresponds to `Ordering.eq`.
--/
-@[inline] def compareOfLessAndBEq {α} (x y : α) [LT α] [Decidable (x < y)] [BEq α] : Ordering :=
-  if x < y then .lt
-  else if x == y then .eq
-  else .gt
-
 /--
 Compare `a` and `b` lexicographically by `cmp₁` and `cmp₂`. `a` and `b` are
 first compared by `cmp₁`. If this returns 'equal', `a` and `b` are compared
@@ -119,7 +106,6 @@ class Ord (α : Type u) where
 
 export Ord (compare)
 
-set_option linter.unusedVariables false in  -- allow specifying `ord` explicitly
 /--
 Compare `x` and `y` by comparing `f x` and `f y`.
 -/
@@ -162,13 +148,6 @@ instance : Ord USize where
 instance : Ord Char where
   compare x y := compareOfLessAndEq x y
 
-instance [Ord α] : Ord (Option α) where
-  compare
-  | none,   none   => .eq
-  | none,   some _ => .lt
-  | some _, none   => .gt
-  | some x, some y => compare x y
-
 /-- The lexicographic order on pairs. -/
 def lexOrd [Ord α] [Ord β] : Ord (α × β) where
   compare p1 p2 := match compare p1.1 p2.1 with
@@ -216,7 +195,7 @@ protected def opposite (ord : Ord α) : Ord α where
 /--
 `ord.on f` compares `x` and `y` by comparing `f x` and `f y` according to `ord`.
 -/
-protected def on (_ : Ord β) (f : α → β) : Ord α where
+protected def on (ord : Ord β) (f : α → β) : Ord α where
   compare := compareOn f
 
 /--
@@ -232,13 +211,4 @@ returns 'equal', by `ord₂`.
 protected def lex' (ord₁ ord₂ : Ord α) : Ord α where
   compare := compareLex ord₁.compare ord₂.compare
 
-/--
-Creates an order which compares elements of an `Array` in lexicographic order.
--/
-protected def arrayOrd [a : Ord α] : Ord (Array α) where
-  compare x y :=
-    let _ : LT α := a.toLT
-    let _ : BEq α := a.toBEq
-    compareOfLessAndBEq x.toList y.toList
-
 end Ord

src/Init/Data/Random.lean

@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ Authors: Leonardo de Moura
 -/
 prelude
 import Init.System.IO
+import Init.Data.Int
 universe u
 
 /-!

src/Init/Data/String/Basic.lean

@@ -245,21 +245,12 @@ termination_by s.endPos.1 - i.1
 @[specialize] def split (s : String) (p : Char → Bool) : List String :=
   splitAux s p 0 0 []
 
-/--
-Auxiliary for `splitOn`. Preconditions:
-* `sep` is not empty
-* `b <= i` are indexes into `s`
-* `j` is an index into `sep`, and not at the end
-
-It represents the state where we have currently parsed some split parts into `r` (in reverse order),
-`b` is the beginning of the string / the end of the previous match of `sep`, and the first `j` bytes
-of `sep` match the bytes `i-j .. i` of `s`.
--/
 def splitOnAux (s sep : String) (b : Pos) (i : Pos) (j : Pos) (r : List String) : List String :=
-  if s.atEnd i then
+  if h : s.atEnd i then
     let r := (s.extract b i)::r
     r.reverse
   else
+    have := Nat.sub_lt_sub_left (Nat.gt_of_not_le (mt decide_eq_true h)) (lt_next s _)
     if s.get i == sep.get j then
       let i := s.next i
       let j := sep.next j
@@ -268,42 +259,9 @@ def splitOnAux (s sep : String) (b : Pos) (i : Pos) (j : Pos) (r : List String)
       else
         splitOnAux s sep b i j r
     else
-      splitOnAux s sep b (s.next (i - j)) 0 r
-termination_by (s.endPos.1 - (i - j).1, sep.endPos.1 - j.1)
-decreasing_by
-  all_goals simp_wf
-  focus
-    rename_i h _ _
-    left; exact Nat.sub_lt_sub_left
-      (Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.sub_le ..) (Nat.gt_of_not_le (mt decide_eq_true h)))
-      (Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.sub_le ..) (lt_next s _))
-  focus
-    rename_i i₀ j₀ _ eq h'
-    rw [show (s.next i₀ - sep.next j₀).1 = (i₀ - j₀).1 by
-      show (_ + csize _) - (_ + csize _) = _
-      rw [(beq_iff_eq ..).1 eq, Nat.add_sub_add_right]; rfl]
-    right; exact Nat.sub_lt_sub_left
-      (Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.le_add_right ..) (Nat.gt_of_not_le (mt decide_eq_true h')))
-      (lt_next sep _)
-  focus
-    rename_i h _
-    left; exact Nat.sub_lt_sub_left
-      (Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.sub_le ..) (Nat.gt_of_not_le (mt decide_eq_true h)))
-      (lt_next s _)
+      splitOnAux s sep b (s.next i) 0 r
+termination_by s.endPos.1 - i.1
 
-/--
-Splits a string `s` on occurrences of the separator `sep`. When `sep` is empty, it returns `[s]`;
-when `sep` occurs in overlapping patterns, the first match is taken. There will always be exactly
-`n+1` elements in the returned list if there were `n` nonoverlapping matches of `sep` in the string.
-The default separator is `" "`. The separators are not included in the returned substrings.
-
-```
-"here is some text ".splitOn = ["here", "is", "some", "text", ""]
-"here is some text ".splitOn "some" = ["here is ", " text "]
-"here is some text ".splitOn "" = ["here is some text "]
-"ababacabac".splitOn "aba" = ["", "bac", "c"]
-```
--/
 def splitOn (s : String) (sep : String := " ") : List String :=
   if sep == "" then [s] else splitOnAux s sep 0 0 0 []
 

src/Init/Data/String/Extra.lean

@@ -62,40 +62,4 @@ namespace Iterator
 
 end Iterator
 
-private def findLeadingSpacesSize (s : String) : Nat :=
-  let it := s.iter
-  let it := it.find (· == '\n') |>.next
-  consumeSpaces it 0 s.length
-where
-  consumeSpaces (it : String.Iterator) (curr min : Nat) : Nat :=
-    if it.atEnd then min
-    else if it.curr == ' ' || it.curr == '\t' then consumeSpaces it.next (curr + 1) min
-    else if it.curr == '\n' then findNextLine it.next min
-    else findNextLine it.next (Nat.min curr min)
-  findNextLine (it : String.Iterator) (min : Nat) : Nat :=
-    if it.atEnd then min
-    else if it.curr == '\n' then consumeSpaces it.next 0 min
-    else findNextLine it.next min
-
-private def removeNumLeadingSpaces (n : Nat) (s : String) : String :=
-  consumeSpaces n s.iter ""
-where
-  consumeSpaces (n : Nat) (it : String.Iterator) (r : String) : String :=
-     match n with
-     | 0 => saveLine it r
-     | n+1 =>
-       if it.atEnd then r
-       else if it.curr == ' ' || it.curr == '\t' then consumeSpaces n it.next r
-       else saveLine it r
-  termination_by (it, 1)
-  saveLine (it : String.Iterator) (r : String) : String :=
-    if it.atEnd then r
-    else if it.curr == '\n' then consumeSpaces n it.next (r.push '\n')
-    else saveLine it.next (r.push it.curr)
-  termination_by (it, 0)
-
-def removeLeadingSpaces (s : String) : String :=
-  let n := findLeadingSpacesSize s
-  if n == 0 then s else removeNumLeadingSpaces n s
-
 end String

src/Init/Ext.lean

@@ -4,7 +4,6 @@ Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
 Authors: Gabriel Ebner, Mario Carneiro
 -/
 prelude
-import Init.Data.ToString.Macro
 import Init.TacticsExtra
 import Init.RCases
 

src/Init/GetElem.lean

@@ -1,173 +0,0 @@
-/-
-Copyright (c) 2020 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
-Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro
--/
-prelude
-import Init.Util
-
-@[never_extract]
-private def outOfBounds [Inhabited α] : α :=
-  panic! "index out of bounds"
-
-/--
-The class `GetElem coll idx elem valid` implements the `xs[i]` notation.
-Given `xs[i]` with `xs : coll` and `i : idx`, Lean looks for an instance of
-`GetElem coll idx elem valid` and uses this to infer the type of return
-value `elem` and side conditions `valid` required to ensure `xs[i]` yields
-a valid value of type `elem`.
-
-For example, the instance for arrays looks like
-`GetElem (Array α) Nat α (fun xs i => i < xs.size)`.
-
-The proof side-condition `valid xs i` is automatically dispatched by the
-`get_elem_tactic` tactic, which can be extended by adding more clauses to
-`get_elem_tactic_trivial`.
--/
-class GetElem (coll : Type u) (idx : Type v) (elem : outParam (Type w))
-              (valid : outParam (coll → idx → Prop)) where
-  /--
-  The syntax `arr[i]` gets the `i`'th element of the collection `arr`. If there
-  are proof side conditions to the application, they will be automatically
-  inferred by the `get_elem_tactic` tactic.
-
-  The actual behavior of this class is type-dependent, but here are some
-  important implementations:
-  * `arr[i] : α` where `arr : Array α` and `i : Nat` or `i : USize`: does array
-    indexing with no bounds check and a proof side goal `i < arr.size`.
-  * `l[i] : α` where `l : List α` and `i : Nat`: index into a list, with proof
-    side goal `i < l.length`.
-  * `stx[i] : Syntax` where `stx : Syntax` and `i : Nat`: get a syntax argument,
-    no side goal (returns `.missing` out of range)
-
-  There are other variations on this syntax:
-  * `arr[i]!` is syntax for `getElem! arr i` which should panic and return
-    `default : α` if the index is not valid.
-  * `arr[i]?` is syntax for `getElem?` which should return `none` if the index
-    is not valid.
-  * `arr[i]'h` is syntax for `getElem arr i h` with `h` an explicit proof the
-    index is valid.
-  -/
-  getElem (xs : coll) (i : idx) (h : valid xs i) : elem
-
-  getElem? (xs : coll) (i : idx) [Decidable (valid xs i)] : Option elem :=
-    if h : _ then some (getElem xs i h) else none
-
-  getElem! [Inhabited elem] (xs : coll) (i : idx) [Decidable (valid xs i)] : elem :=
-    match getElem? xs i with | some e => e | none => outOfBounds
-
-export GetElem (getElem getElem! getElem?)
-
-@[inherit_doc getElem]
-syntax:max term noWs "[" withoutPosition(term) "]" : term
-macro_rules | `($x[$i]) => `(getElem $x $i (by get_elem_tactic))
-
-@[inherit_doc getElem]
-syntax term noWs "[" withoutPosition(term) "]'" term:max : term
-macro_rules | `($x[$i]'$h) => `(getElem $x $i $h)
-
-/--
-The syntax `arr[i]?` gets the `i`'th element of the collection `arr` or
-returns `none` if `i` is out of bounds.
--/
-macro:max x:term noWs "[" i:term "]" noWs "?" : term => `(getElem? $x $i)
-
-/--
-The syntax `arr[i]!` gets the `i`'th element of the collection `arr` and
-panics `i` is out of bounds.
--/
-macro:max x:term noWs "[" i:term "]" noWs "!" : term => `(getElem! $x $i)
-
-class LawfulGetElem (cont : Type u) (idx : Type v) (elem : outParam (Type w))
-   (dom : outParam (cont → idx → Prop)) [ge : GetElem cont idx elem dom] : Prop where
-
-  getElem?_def (c : cont) (i : idx) [Decidable (dom c i)] :
-    c[i]? = if h : dom c i then some (c[i]'h) else none := by intros; eq_refl
-  getElem!_def [Inhabited elem] (c : cont) (i : idx) [Decidable (dom c i)] :
-    c[i]! = match c[i]? with | some e => e | none => default := by intros; eq_refl
-
-export LawfulGetElem (getElem?_def getElem!_def)
-
-theorem getElem?_pos [GetElem cont idx elem dom] [LawfulGetElem cont idx elem dom]
-    (c : cont) (i : idx) (h : dom c i) [Decidable (dom c i)] : c[i]? = some (c[i]'h) := by
-  rw [getElem?_def]
-  exact dif_pos h
-
-theorem getElem?_neg [GetElem cont idx elem dom] [LawfulGetElem cont idx elem dom]
-    (c : cont) (i : idx) (h : ¬dom c i) [Decidable (dom c i)] : c[i]? = none := by
-  rw [getElem?_def]
-  exact dif_neg h
-
-theorem getElem!_pos [GetElem cont idx elem dom] [LawfulGetElem cont idx elem dom]
-    [Inhabited elem] (c : cont) (i : idx) (h : dom c i) [Decidable (dom c i)] :
-    c[i]! = c[i]'h := by
-  simp only [getElem!_def, getElem?_def, h]
-
-theorem getElem!_neg [GetElem cont idx elem dom] [LawfulGetElem cont idx elem dom]
-    [Inhabited elem] (c : cont) (i : idx) (h : ¬dom c i) [Decidable (dom c i)] : c[i]! = default := by
-  simp only [getElem!_def, getElem?_def, h]
-
-namespace Fin
-
-instance instGetElemFinVal [GetElem cont Nat elem dom] : GetElem cont (Fin n) elem fun xs i => dom xs i where
-  getElem xs i h := getElem xs i.1 h
-  getElem? xs i := getElem? xs i.val
-  getElem! xs i := getElem! xs i.val
-
-instance [GetElem cont Nat elem dom] [h : LawfulGetElem cont Nat elem dom] :
-      LawfulGetElem cont (Fin n) elem fun xs i => dom xs i where
-
-  getElem?_def _c _i _d := h.getElem?_def ..
-  getElem!_def _c _i _d := h.getElem!_def ..
-
-@[simp] theorem getElem_fin [GetElem Cont Nat Elem Dom] (a : Cont) (i : Fin n) (h : Dom a i) :
-    a[i] = a[i.1] := rfl
-
-@[simp] theorem getElem?_fin [h : GetElem Cont Nat Elem Dom] (a : Cont) (i : Fin n)
-    [Decidable (Dom a i)] : a[i]? = a[i.1]? := by rfl
-
-@[simp] theorem getElem!_fin [GetElem Cont Nat Elem Dom] (a : Cont) (i : Fin n)
-    [Decidable (Dom a i)] [Inhabited Elem] : a[i]! = a[i.1]! := rfl
-
-macro_rules
-  | `(tactic| get_elem_tactic_trivial) => `(tactic| apply Fin.val_lt_of_le; get_elem_tactic_trivial; done)
-
-end Fin
-
-namespace List
-
-instance : GetElem (List α) Nat α fun as i => i < as.length where
-  getElem as i h := as.get ⟨i, h⟩
-
-instance : LawfulGetElem (List α) Nat α fun as i => i < as.length where
-
-@[simp] theorem cons_getElem_zero (a : α) (as : List α) (h : 0 < (a :: as).length) : getElem (a :: as) 0 h = a := by
-  rfl
-
-@[simp] theorem cons_getElem_succ (a : α) (as : List α) (i : Nat) (h : i + 1 < (a :: as).length) : getElem (a :: as) (i+1) h = getElem as i (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h) := by
-  rfl
-
-theorem get_drop_eq_drop (as : List α) (i : Nat) (h : i < as.length) : as[i] :: as.drop (i+1) = as.drop i :=
-  match as, i with
-  | _::_, 0   => rfl
-  | _::_, i+1 => get_drop_eq_drop _ i _
-
-end List
-
-namespace Array
-
-instance : GetElem (Array α) Nat α fun xs i => i < xs.size where
-  getElem xs i h := xs.get ⟨i, h⟩
-
-instance : LawfulGetElem (Array α) Nat α fun xs i => i < xs.size where
-
-end Array
-
-namespace Lean.Syntax
-
-instance : GetElem Syntax Nat Syntax fun _ _ => True where
-  getElem stx i _ := stx.getArg i
-
-instance : LawfulGetElem Syntax Nat Syntax fun _ _ => True where
-
-end Lean.Syntax

src/Init/MacroTrace.lean

@@ -1,18 +0,0 @@
-/-
-Copyright (c) 2020 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
-Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-
-Extra notation that depends on Init/Meta
--/
-
-prelude
-import Init.Data.ToString.Macro
-import Init.Meta
-
-namespace Lean
-
-macro "Macro.trace[" id:ident "]" s:interpolatedStr(term) : term =>
-  `(Macro.trace $(quote id.getId.eraseMacroScopes) (s! $s))
-
-end Lean

src/Init/Meta.lean

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ prelude
 import Init.MetaTypes
 import Init.Data.Array.Basic
 import Init.Data.Option.BasicAux
+import Init.Data.String.Extra
 
 namespace Lean
 
@@ -104,6 +105,43 @@ def idBeginEscape := '«'
 def idEndEscape   := '»'
 def isIdBeginEscape (c : Char) : Bool := c = idBeginEscape
 def isIdEndEscape (c : Char) : Bool := c = idEndEscape
+
+private def findLeadingSpacesSize (s : String) : Nat :=
+  let it := s.iter
+  let it := it.find (· == '\n') |>.next
+  consumeSpaces it 0 s.length
+where
+  consumeSpaces (it : String.Iterator) (curr min : Nat) : Nat :=
+    if it.atEnd then min
+    else if it.curr == ' ' || it.curr == '\t' then consumeSpaces it.next (curr + 1) min
+    else if it.curr == '\n' then findNextLine it.next min
+    else findNextLine it.next (Nat.min curr min)
+  findNextLine (it : String.Iterator) (min : Nat) : Nat :=
+    if it.atEnd then min
+    else if it.curr == '\n' then consumeSpaces it.next 0 min
+    else findNextLine it.next min
+
+private def removeNumLeadingSpaces (n : Nat) (s : String) : String :=
+  consumeSpaces n s.iter ""
+where
+  consumeSpaces (n : Nat) (it : String.Iterator) (r : String) : String :=
+     match n with
+     | 0 => saveLine it r
+     | n+1 =>
+       if it.atEnd then r
+       else if it.curr == ' ' || it.curr == '\t' then consumeSpaces n it.next r
+       else saveLine it r
+  termination_by (it, 1)
+  saveLine (it : String.Iterator) (r : String) : String :=
+    if it.atEnd then r
+    else if it.curr == '\n' then consumeSpaces n it.next (r.push '\n')
+    else saveLine it.next (r.push it.curr)
+  termination_by (it, 0)
+
+def removeLeadingSpaces (s : String) : String :=
+  let n := findLeadingSpacesSize s
+  if n == 0 then s else removeNumLeadingSpaces n s
+
 namespace Name
 
 def getRoot : Name → Name
@@ -909,11 +947,6 @@ def _root_.Substring.toName (s : Substring) : Name :=
       else
         Name.mkStr n comp
 
-/--
-Converts a `String` to a hierarchical `Name` after splitting it at the dots.
-
-`"a.b".toName` is the name `a.b`, not `«a.b»`. For the latter, use `Name.mkSimple`.
--/
 def _root_.String.toName (s : String) : Name :=
   s.toSubstring.toName
 
@@ -1194,6 +1227,14 @@ instance : Coe (Lean.Term) (Lean.TSyntax `Lean.Parser.Term.funBinder) where
 
 end Lean.Syntax
 
+set_option linter.unusedVariables.funArgs false in
+/--
+  Gadget for automatic parameter support. This is similar to the `optParam` gadget, but it uses
+  the given tactic.
+  Like `optParam`, this gadget only affects elaboration.
+  For example, the tactic will *not* be invoked during type class resolution. -/
+abbrev autoParam.{u} (α : Sort u) (tactic : Lean.Syntax) : Sort u := α
+
 /-! # Helper functions for manipulating interpolated strings -/
 
 namespace Lean.Syntax
@@ -1321,19 +1362,6 @@ structure OmegaConfig where
 
 end Omega
 
-namespace CheckTactic
-
-/--
-Type used to lift an arbitrary value into a type parameter so it can
-appear in a proof goal.
-
-It is used by the #check_tactic command.
--/
-inductive CheckGoalType {α : Sort u} : (val : α) → Prop where
-| intro : (val : α) → CheckGoalType val
-
-end CheckTactic
-
 end Meta
 
 namespace Parser

src/Init/Notation.lean

@@ -503,25 +503,6 @@ applications of this function as `↑` when printing expressions.
 -/
 syntax (name := Attr.coe) "coe" : attr
 
-/--
-This attribute marks a code action, which is used to suggest new tactics or replace existing ones.
-
-* `@[command_code_action kind]`: This is a code action which applies to applications of the command
-  `kind` (a command syntax kind), which can replace the command or insert things before or after it.
-
-* `@[command_code_action kind₁ kind₂]`: shorthand for
-  `@[command_code_action kind₁, command_code_action kind₂]`.
-
-* `@[command_code_action]`: This is a command code action that applies to all commands.
-  Use sparingly.
--/
-syntax (name := command_code_action) "command_code_action" (ppSpace ident)* : attr
-
-/--
-Builtin command code action. See `command_code_action`.
--/
-syntax (name := builtin_command_code_action) "builtin_command_code_action" (ppSpace ident)* : attr
-
 /--
 When `parent_dir` contains the current Lean file, `include_str "path" / "to" / "file"` becomes
 a string literal with the contents of the file at `"parent_dir" / "path" / "to" / "file"`. If this
@@ -551,92 +532,3 @@ except that it doesn't print an empty diagnostic.
 (This is effectively a synonym for `run_elab`.)
 -/
 syntax (name := runMeta) "run_meta " doSeq : command
-
-/-- Element that can be part of a `#guard_msgs` specification. -/
-syntax guardMsgsSpecElt := &"drop"? (&"info" <|> &"warning" <|> &"error" <|> &"all")
-
-/-- Specification for `#guard_msgs` command. -/
-syntax guardMsgsSpec := "(" guardMsgsSpecElt,* ")"
-
-/--
-`#guard_msgs` captures the messages generated by another command and checks that they
-match the contents of the docstring attached to the `#guard_msgs` command.
-
-Basic example:
-```lean
-/--
-error: unknown identifier 'x'
--/
-#guard_msgs in
-example : α := x
-```
-This checks that there is such an error and then consumes the message entirely.
-
-By default, the command intercepts all messages, but there is a way to specify which types
-of messages to consider. For example, we can select only warnings:
-```lean
-/--
-warning: declaration uses 'sorry'
--/
-#guard_msgs(warning) in
-example : α := sorry
-```
-or only errors
-```lean
-#guard_msgs(error) in
-example : α := sorry
-```
-In this last example, since the message is not intercepted there is a warning on `sorry`.
-We can drop the warning completely with
-```lean
-#guard_msgs(error, drop warning) in
-example : α := sorry
-```
-
-Syntax description:
-```
-#guard_msgs (drop? info|warning|error|all,*)? in cmd
-```
-
-If there is no specification, `#guard_msgs` intercepts all messages.
-Otherwise, if there is one, the specification is considered in left-to-right order, and the first
-that applies chooses the outcome of the message:
-- `info`, `warning`, `error`: intercept a message with the given severity level.
-- `all`: intercept any message (so `#guard_msgs in cmd` and `#guard_msgs (all) in cmd`
-  are equivalent).
-- `drop info`, `drop warning`, `drop error`: intercept a message with the given severity
-  level and then drop it. These messages are not checked.
-- `drop all`: intercept a message and drop it.
-
-For example, `#guard_msgs (error, drop all) in cmd` means to check warnings and then drop
-everything else.
--/
-syntax (name := guardMsgsCmd)
-  (docComment)? "#guard_msgs" (ppSpace guardMsgsSpec)? " in" ppLine command : command
-
-namespace Parser
-
-/--
-`#check_tactic t ~> r by commands` runs the tactic sequence `commands`
-on a goal with `t` and sees if the resulting expression has reduced it
-to `r`.
--/
-syntax (name := checkTactic) "#check_tactic " term "~>" term "by" tactic : command
-
-/--
-`#check_tactic_failure t by tac` runs the tactic `tac`
-on a goal with `t` and verifies it fails.
--/
-syntax  (name := checkTacticFailure) "#check_tactic_failure " term "by" tactic : command
-
-/--
-`#check_simp t ~> r` checks `simp` reduces `t` to `r`.
--/
-syntax (name := checkSimp) "#check_simp " term "~>" term : command
-
-/--
-`#check_simp t !~>` checks `simp` fails on reducing `t`.
--/
-syntax (name := checkSimpFailure) "#check_simp " term "!~>" : command
-
-end Parser

src/Init/NotationExtra.lean

@@ -6,13 +6,14 @@ Authors: Leonardo de Moura
 Extra notation that depends on Init/Meta
 -/
 prelude
-import Init.Data.ToString.Basic
-import Init.Data.Array.Subarray
-import Init.Conv
 import Init.Meta
-
+import Init.Data.Array.Subarray
+import Init.Data.ToString
 namespace Lean
 
+macro "Macro.trace[" id:ident "]" s:interpolatedStr(term) : term =>
+  `(Macro.trace $(quote id.getId.eraseMacroScopes) (s! $s))
+
 -- Auxiliary parsers and functions for declaring notation with binders
 
 syntax unbracketedExplicitBinders := (ppSpace binderIdent)+ (" : " term)?
@@ -122,7 +123,7 @@ calc abc
   _ = xyz := pwxyz
 ```
 
-`calc` works as a term, as a tactic or as a `conv` tactic.
+`calc` has term mode and tactic mode variants. This is the term mode variant.
 
 See [Theorem Proving in Lean 4][tpil4] for more information.
 
@@ -130,12 +131,57 @@ See [Theorem Proving in Lean 4][tpil4] for more information.
 -/
 syntax (name := calc) "calc" calcSteps : term
 
-@[inherit_doc «calc»]
+/-- Step-wise reasoning over transitive relations.
+```
+calc
+  a = b := pab
+  b = c := pbc
+  ...
+  y = z := pyz
+```
+proves `a = z` from the given step-wise proofs. `=` can be replaced with any
+relation implementing the typeclass `Trans`. Instead of repeating the right-
+hand sides, subsequent left-hand sides can be replaced with `_`.
+```
+calc
+  a = b := pab
+  _ = c := pbc
+  ...
+  _ = z := pyz
+```
+It is also possible to write the *first* relation as `<lhs>\n  _ = <rhs> :=
+<proof>`. This is useful for aligning relation symbols:
+```
+calc abc
+  _ = bce := pabce
+  _ = cef := pbcef
+  ...
+  _ = xyz := pwxyz
+```
+
+`calc` has term mode and tactic mode variants. This is the tactic mode variant,
+which supports an additional feature: it works even if the goal is `a = z'`
+for some other `z'`; in this case it will not close the goal but will instead
+leave a subgoal proving `z = z'`.
+
+See [Theorem Proving in Lean 4][tpil4] for more information.
+
+[tpil4]: https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#calculational-proofs
+-/
 syntax (name := calcTactic) "calc" calcSteps : tactic
 
-@[inherit_doc «calc»]
-macro tk:"calc" steps:calcSteps : conv =>
-  `(conv| tactic => calc%$tk $steps)
+/--
+Denotes a term that was omitted by the pretty printer.
+This is only used for pretty printing, and it cannot be elaborated.
+The presence of `⋯` is controlled by the `pp.deepTerms` and `pp.proofs` options.
+-/
+syntax "⋯" : term
+
+macro_rules | `(⋯) => Macro.throwError "\
+  Error: The '⋯' token is used by the pretty printer to indicate omitted terms, \
+  and it cannot be elaborated.\
+  \n\nIts presence in pretty printing output is controlled by the 'pp.deepTerms' and `pp.proofs` options. \
+  These options can be further adjusted using `pp.deepTerms.threshold` and `pp.proofs.threshold`."
 
 @[app_unexpander Unit.unit] def unexpandUnit : Lean.PrettyPrinter.Unexpander
   | `($(_)) => `(())
@@ -222,35 +268,35 @@ macro tk:"calc" steps:calcSteps : conv =>
   | _ => throw ()
 
 @[app_unexpander Name.mkStr1] def unexpandMkStr1 : Lean.PrettyPrinter.Unexpander
-  | `($(_) $a:str) => return mkNode `Lean.Parser.Term.quotedName #[Syntax.mkNameLit ("`" ++  a.getString)]
+  | `($(_) $a:str) => return mkNode `Lean.Parser.Term.quotedName #[Syntax.mkNameLit s!"`{a.getString}"]
   | _  => throw ()
 
 @[app_unexpander Name.mkStr2] def unexpandMkStr2 : Lean.PrettyPrinter.Unexpander
-  | `($(_) $a1:str $a2:str) => return mkNode `Lean.Parser.Term.quotedName #[Syntax.mkNameLit ("`" ++ a1.getString ++ "." ++ a2.getString)]
+  | `($(_) $a1:str $a2:str) => return mkNode `Lean.Parser.Term.quotedName #[Syntax.mkNameLit s!"`{a1.getString}.{a2.getString}"]
   | _  => throw ()
 
 @[app_unexpander Name.mkStr3] def unexpandMkStr3 : Lean.PrettyPrinter.Unexpander
-  | `($(_) $a1:str $a2:str $a3:str) => return mkNode `Lean.Parser.Term.quotedName #[Syntax.mkNameLit ("`" ++ a1.getString ++ "." ++ a2.getString ++ "." ++ a3.getString)]
+  | `($(_) $a1:str $a2:str $a3:str) => return mkNode `Lean.Parser.Term.quotedName #[Syntax.mkNameLit s!"`{a1.getString}.{a2.getString}.{a3.getString}"]
   | _  => throw ()
 
 @[app_unexpander Name.mkStr4] def unexpandMkStr4 : Lean.PrettyPrinter.Unexpander
-  | `($(_) $a1:str $a2:str $a3:str $a4:str) => return mkNode `Lean.Parser.Term.quotedName #[Syntax.mkNameLit ("`" ++ a1.getString ++ "." ++ a2.getString ++ "." ++ a3.getString ++ "." ++ a4.getString)]
+  | `($(_) $a1:str $a2:str $a3:str $a4:str) => return mkNode `Lean.Parser.Term.quotedName #[Syntax.mkNameLit s!"`{a1.getString}.{a2.getString}.{a3.getString}.{a4.getString}"]
   | _  => throw ()
 
 @[app_unexpander Name.mkStr5] def unexpandMkStr5 : Lean.PrettyPrinter.Unexpander
-  | `($(_) $a1:str $a2:str $a3:str $a4:str $a5:str) => return mkNode `Lean.Parser.Term.quotedName #[Syntax.mkNameLit ("`" ++ a1.getString ++ "." ++ a2.getString ++ "." ++ a3.getString ++ "." ++ a4.getString ++ "." ++ a5.getString)]
+  | `($(_) $a1:str $a2:str $a3:str $a4:str $a5:str) => return mkNode `Lean.Parser.Term.quotedName #[Syntax.mkNameLit s!"`{a1.getString}.{a2.getString}.{a3.getString}.{a4.getString}.{a5.getString}"]
   | _  => throw ()
 
 @[app_unexpander Name.mkStr6] def unexpandMkStr6 : Lean.PrettyPrinter.Unexpander
-  | `($(_) $a1:str $a2:str $a3:str $a4:str $a5:str $a6:str) => return mkNode `Lean.Parser.Term.quotedName #[Syntax.mkNameLit ("`" ++ a1.getString ++ "." ++ a2.getString ++ "." ++ a3.getString ++ "." ++ a4.getString ++ "." ++ a5.getString ++ "." ++ a6.getString)]
+  | `($(_) $a1:str $a2:str $a3:str $a4:str $a5:str $a6:str) => return mkNode `Lean.Parser.Term.quotedName #[Syntax.mkNameLit s!"`{a1.getString}.{a2.getString}.{a3.getString}.{a4.getString}.{a5.getString}.{a6.getString}"]
   | _  => throw ()
 
 @[app_unexpander Name.mkStr7] def unexpandMkStr7 : Lean.PrettyPrinter.Unexpander
-  | `($(_) $a1:str $a2:str $a3:str $a4:str $a5:str $a6:str $a7:str) => return mkNode `Lean.Parser.Term.quotedName #[Syntax.mkNameLit ("`" ++ a1.getString ++ "." ++ a2.getString ++ "." ++ a3.getString ++ "." ++ a4.getString ++ "." ++ a5.getString ++ "." ++ a6.getString ++ "." ++ a7.getString)]
+  | `($(_) $a1:str $a2:str $a3:str $a4:str $a5:str $a6:str $a7:str) => return mkNode `Lean.Parser.Term.quotedName #[Syntax.mkNameLit s!"`{a1.getString}.{a2.getString}.{a3.getString}.{a4.getString}.{a5.getString}.{a6.getString}.{a7.getString}"]
   | _  => throw ()
 
 @[app_unexpander Name.mkStr8] def unexpandMkStr8 : Lean.PrettyPrinter.Unexpander
-  | `($(_) $a1:str $a2:str $a3:str $a4:str $a5:str $a6:str $a7:str $a8:str) => return mkNode `Lean.Parser.Term.quotedName #[Syntax.mkNameLit ("`" ++ a1.getString ++ "." ++ a2.getString ++ "." ++ a3.getString ++ "." ++ a4.getString ++ "." ++ a5.getString ++ "." ++ a6.getString ++ "." ++ a7.getString ++ "." ++ a8.getString)]
+  | `($(_) $a1:str $a2:str $a3:str $a4:str $a5:str $a6:str $a7:str $a8:str) => return mkNode `Lean.Parser.Term.quotedName #[Syntax.mkNameLit s!"`{a1.getString}.{a2.getString}.{a3.getString}.{a4.getString}.{a5.getString}.{a6.getString}.{a7.getString}.{a8.getString}"]
   | _  => throw ()
 
 @[app_unexpander Array.empty] def unexpandArrayEmpty : Lean.PrettyPrinter.Unexpander
@@ -420,19 +466,3 @@ syntax "{" term,+ "}" : term
 macro_rules
   | `({$x:term}) => `(singleton $x)
   | `({$x:term, $xs:term,*}) => `(insert $x {$xs:term,*})
-
-namespace Lean
-
-/-- Unexpander for the `{ x }` notation. -/
-@[app_unexpander singleton]
-def singletonUnexpander : Lean.PrettyPrinter.Unexpander
-  | `($_ $a) => `({ $a:term })
-  | _ => throw ()
-
-/-- Unexpander for the `{ x, y, ... }` notation. -/
-@[app_unexpander insert]
-def insertUnexpander : Lean.PrettyPrinter.Unexpander
-  | `($_ $a { $ts:term,* }) => `({$a:term, $ts,*})
-  | _ => throw ()
-
-end Lean

src/Init/Omega/Coeffs.lean

@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ There is an equivalent file setting up `Coeffs` as a type synonym for `AssocList
 currently in a private branch.
 Not all the theorems about the algebraic operations on that representation have been proved yet.
 When they are ready, we can replace the implementation in `omega` simply by importing
-`Init.Omega.IntDict` instead of `Init.Omega.IntList`.
+`Std.Tactic.Omega.Coeffs.IntDict` instead of `Std.Tactic.Omega.Coeffs.IntList`.
 
 For small problems, the sparse representation is actually slightly slower,
 so it is not urgent to make this replacement.

src/Init/Omega/Int.lean

@@ -4,14 +4,15 @@ Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
 Authors: Scott Morrison
 -/
 prelude
-import Init.Data.Int.DivMod
 import Init.Data.Int.Order
+import Init.Data.Int.DivModLemmas
+import Init.Data.Nat.Lemmas
 
 /-!
 # Lemmas about `Nat`, `Int`, and `Fin` needed internally by `omega`.
 
 These statements are useful for constructing proof expressions,
-but unlikely to be widely useful, so are inside the `Lean.Omega` namespace.
+but unlikely to be widely useful, so are inside the `Std.Tactic.Omega` namespace.
 
 If you do find a use for them, please move them into the appropriate file and namespace!
 -/
@@ -48,10 +49,7 @@ theorem ofNat_shiftLeft_eq {x y : Nat} : (x <<< y : Int) = (x : Int) * (2 ^ y :
   simp [Nat.shiftLeft_eq]
 
 theorem ofNat_shiftRight_eq_div_pow {x y : Nat} : (x >>> y : Int) = (x : Int) / (2 ^ y : Nat) := by
-  simp only [Nat.shiftRight_eq_div_pow, Int.ofNat_ediv]
-
-theorem emod_ofNat_nonneg {x : Nat} {y : Int} : 0 ≤ (x : Int) % y :=
-  Int.ofNat_zero_le _
+  simp [Nat.shiftRight_eq_div_pow]
 
 -- FIXME these are insane:
 theorem lt_of_not_ge {x y : Int} (h : ¬ (x ≤ y)) : y < x := Int.not_le.mp h
@@ -137,13 +135,11 @@ theorem add_le_iff_le_sub (a b c : Int) : a + b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c - b := by
     lhs
     rw [← Int.add_zero c, ← Int.sub_self (-b), Int.sub_eq_add_neg, ← Int.add_assoc, Int.neg_neg,
       Int.add_le_add_iff_right]
-  try rfl -- stage0 update TODO: Change this to rfl or remove
 
 theorem le_add_iff_sub_le (a b c : Int) : a ≤ b + c ↔ a - c ≤ b := by
   conv =>
     lhs
     rw [← Int.neg_neg c, ← Int.sub_eq_add_neg, ← add_le_iff_le_sub]
-  try rfl -- stage0 update TODO: Change this to rfl or remove
 
 theorem add_le_zero_iff_le_neg (a b : Int) : a + b ≤ 0 ↔ a ≤ - b := by
   rw [add_le_iff_le_sub, Int.zero_sub]

src/Init/Omega/IntList.lean

@@ -5,8 +5,6 @@ Authors: Scott Morrison
 -/
 prelude
 import Init.Data.List.Lemmas
-import Init.Data.Int.DivModLemmas
-import Init.Data.Nat.Gcd
 
 namespace Lean.Omega
 

src/Init/Omega/LinearCombo.lean

@@ -5,7 +5,6 @@ Authors: Scott Morrison
 -/
 prelude
 import Init.Omega.Coeffs
-import Init.Data.ToString.Macro
 
 /-!
 # Linear combinations

src/Init/Omega/Logic.lean

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ import Init.PropLemmas
 # Specializations of basic logic lemmas
 
 These are useful for `omega` while constructing proofs, but not considered generally useful
-so are hidden in the `Lean.Omega` namespace.
+so are hidden in the `Std.Tactic.Omega` namespace.
 
 If you find yourself needing them elsewhere, please move them first to another file.
 -/

src/Init/Prelude.lean

@@ -488,7 +488,6 @@ attribute [unbox] Prod
 Similar to `Prod`, but `α` and `β` can be propositions.
 We use this type internally to automatically generate the `brecOn` recursor.
 -/
-@[pp_using_anonymous_constructor]
 structure PProd (α : Sort u) (β : Sort v) where
   /-- The first projection out of a pair. if `p : PProd α β` then `p.1 : α`. -/
   fst : α
@@ -510,7 +509,6 @@ structure MProd (α β : Type u) where
 constructed and destructed like a pair: if `ha : a` and `hb : b` then
 `⟨ha, hb⟩ : a ∧ b`, and if `h : a ∧ b` then `h.left : a` and `h.right : b`.
 -/
-@[pp_using_anonymous_constructor]
 structure And (a b : Prop) : Prop where
   /-- `And.intro : a → b → a ∧ b` is the constructor for the And operation. -/
   intro ::
@@ -577,7 +575,6 @@ a pair-like type, so if you have `x : α` and `h : p x` then
 `⟨x, h⟩ : {x // p x}`. An element `s : {x // p x}` will coerce to `α` but
 you can also make it explicit using `s.1` or `s.val`.
 -/
-@[pp_using_anonymous_constructor]
 structure Subtype {α : Sort u} (p : α → Prop) where
   /-- If `s : {x // p x}` then `s.val : α` is the underlying element in the base
   type. You can also write this as `s.1`, or simply as `s` when the type is
@@ -950,8 +947,7 @@ return `t` or `e` depending on whether `c` is true or false. The explicit argume
 determines how to evaluate `c` to true or false. Write `if h : c then t else e`
 instead for a "dependent if-then-else" `dite`, which allows `t`/`e` to use the fact
 that `c` is true/false.
--/
-/-
+
 Because Lean uses a strict (call-by-value) evaluation strategy, the signature of this
 function is problematic in that it would require `t` and `e` to be evaluated before
 calling the `ite` function, which would cause both sides of the `if` to be evaluated.
@@ -1197,12 +1193,7 @@ class HDiv (α : Type u) (β : Type v) (γ : outParam (Type w)) where
   /-- `a / b` computes the result of dividing `a` by `b`.
   The meaning of this notation is type-dependent.
   * For most types like `Nat`, `Int`, `Rat`, `Real`, `a / 0` is defined to be `0`.
-  * For `Nat`, `a / b` rounds downwards.
-  * For `Int`, `a / b` rounds downwards if `b` is positive or upwards if `b` is negative.
-    It is implemented as `Int.ediv`, the unique function satisfiying
-    `a % b + b * (a / b) = a` and `0 ≤ a % b < natAbs b` for `b ≠ 0`.
-    Other rounding conventions are available using the functions
-    `Int.fdiv` (floor rounding) and `Int.div` (truncation rounding).
+  * For `Nat` and `Int`, `a / b` rounds toward 0.
   * For `Float`, `a / 0` follows the IEEE 754 semantics for division,
     usually resulting in `inf` or `nan`. -/
   hDiv : α → β → γ
@@ -1214,8 +1205,7 @@ This enables the notation `a % b : γ` where `a : α`, `b : β`.
 class HMod (α : Type u) (β : Type v) (γ : outParam (Type w)) where
   /-- `a % b` computes the remainder upon dividing `a` by `b`.
   The meaning of this notation is type-dependent.
-  * For `Nat` and `Int` it satisfies `a % b + b * (a / b) = a`,
-    and `a % 0` is defined to be `a`. -/
+  * For `Nat` and `Int`, `a % 0` is defined to be `a`. -/
   hMod : α → β → γ
 
 /--
@@ -1494,7 +1484,6 @@ instance [ShiftRight α] : HShiftRight α α α where
   hShiftRight a b := ShiftRight.shiftRight a b
 
 open HAdd (hAdd)
-open HSub (hSub)
 open HMul (hMul)
 open HPow (hPow)
 open HAppend (hAppend)
@@ -1645,8 +1634,8 @@ instance : LT Nat where
   lt := Nat.lt
 
 theorem Nat.not_succ_le_zero : ∀ (n : Nat), LE.le (succ n) 0 → False
-  | 0      => nofun
-  | succ _ => nofun
+  | 0,      h => nomatch h
+  | succ _, h => nomatch h
 
 theorem Nat.not_lt_zero (n : Nat) : Not (LT.lt n 0) :=
   not_succ_le_zero n
@@ -1818,7 +1807,6 @@ theorem System.Platform.numBits_eq : Or (Eq numBits 32) (Eq numBits 64) :=
 `Fin n` is a natural number `i` with the constraint that `0 ≤ i < n`.
 It is the "canonical type with `n` elements".
 -/
-@[pp_using_anonymous_constructor]
 structure Fin (n : Nat) where
   /-- If `i : Fin n`, then `i.val : ℕ` is the described number. It can also be
   written as `i.1` or just `i` when the target type is known. -/
@@ -2046,7 +2034,7 @@ instance : Inhabited UInt64 where
   default := UInt64.ofNatCore 0 (by decide)
 
 /--
-The size of type `USize`, that is, `2^System.Platform.numBits`, which may
+The size of type `UInt16`, that is, `2^System.Platform.numBits`, which may
 be either `2^32` or `2^64` depending on the platform's architecture.
 
 Remark: we define `USize.size` using `(2^numBits - 1) + 1` to ensure the
@@ -2064,7 +2052,7 @@ instance : OfNat (Fin (n+1)) i where
   ofNat := Fin.ofNat i
 ```
 -/
-abbrev USize.size : Nat := hAdd (hSub (hPow 2 System.Platform.numBits) 1) 1
+abbrev USize.size : Nat := Nat.succ (Nat.sub (hPow 2 System.Platform.numBits) 1)
 
 theorem usize_size_eq : Or (Eq USize.size 4294967296) (Eq USize.size 18446744073709551616) :=
   show Or (Eq (Nat.succ (Nat.sub (hPow 2 System.Platform.numBits) 1)) 4294967296) (Eq (Nat.succ (Nat.sub (hPow 2 System.Platform.numBits) 1)) 18446744073709551616) from
@@ -2543,6 +2531,43 @@ def panic {α : Type u} [Inhabited α] (msg : String) : α :=
 -- TODO: this be applied directly to `Inhabited`'s definition when we remove the above workaround
 attribute [nospecialize] Inhabited
 
+/--
+The class `GetElem cont idx elem dom` implements the `xs[i]` notation.
+When you write this, given `xs : cont` and `i : idx`, Lean looks for an instance
+of `GetElem cont idx elem dom`. Here `elem` is the type of `xs[i]`, while
+`dom` is whatever proof side conditions are required to make this applicable.
+For example, the instance for arrays looks like
+`GetElem (Array α) Nat α (fun xs i => i < xs.size)`.
+
+The proof side-condition `dom xs i` is automatically dispatched by the
+`get_elem_tactic` tactic, which can be extended by adding more clauses to
+`get_elem_tactic_trivial`.
+-/
+class GetElem (cont : Type u) (idx : Type v) (elem : outParam (Type w)) (dom : outParam (cont → idx → Prop)) where
+  /--
+  The syntax `arr[i]` gets the `i`'th element of the collection `arr`.
+  If there are proof side conditions to the application, they will be automatically
+  inferred by the `get_elem_tactic` tactic.
+
+  The actual behavior of this class is type-dependent,
+  but here are some important implementations:
+  * `arr[i] : α` where `arr : Array α` and `i : Nat` or `i : USize`:
+    does array indexing with no bounds check and a proof side goal `i < arr.size`.
+  * `l[i] : α` where `l : List α` and `i : Nat`: index into a list,
+    with proof side goal `i < l.length`.
+  * `stx[i] : Syntax` where `stx : Syntax` and `i : Nat`: get a syntax argument,
+    no side goal (returns `.missing` out of range)
+
+  There are other variations on this syntax:
+  * `arr[i]`: proves the proof side goal by `get_elem_tactic`
+  * `arr[i]!`: panics if the side goal is false
+  * `arr[i]?`: returns `none` if the side goal is false
+  * `arr[i]'h`: uses `h` to prove the side goal
+  -/
+  getElem (xs : cont) (i : idx) (h : dom xs i) : elem
+
+export GetElem (getElem)
+
 /--
 `Array α` is the type of [dynamic arrays](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_array)
 with elements from `α`. This type has special support in the runtime.
@@ -2600,6 +2625,9 @@ def Array.get {α : Type u} (a : @& Array α) (i : @& Fin a.size) : α :=
 def Array.get! {α : Type u} [Inhabited α] (a : @& Array α) (i : @& Nat) : α :=
   Array.getD a i default
 
+instance : GetElem (Array α) Nat α fun xs i => LT.lt i xs.size where
+  getElem xs i h := xs.get ⟨i, h⟩
+
 /--
 Push an element onto the end of an array. This is amortized O(1) because
 `Array α` is internally a dynamic array.
@@ -2715,7 +2743,7 @@ def List.redLength : List α → Nat
 /-- Convert a `List α` into an `Array α`. This is O(n) in the length of the list.  -/
 -- This function is exported to C, where it is called by `Array.mk`
 -- (the constructor) to implement this functionality.
-@[inline, match_pattern, pp_nodot, export lean_list_to_array]
+@[inline, match_pattern, export lean_list_to_array]
 def List.toArray (as : List α) : Array α :=
   as.toArrayAux (Array.mkEmpty as.redLength)
 
@@ -3452,31 +3480,20 @@ instance : Hashable String where
 namespace Lean
 
 /--
-Hierarchical names consist of a sequence of components, each of
-which is either a string or numeric, that are written separated by dots (`.`).
+Hierarchical names. We use hierarchical names to name declarations and
+for creating unique identifiers for free variables and metavariables.
 
-Hierarchical names are used to name declarations and for creating
-unique identifiers for free variables and metavariables.
-
-You can create hierarchical names using a backtick:
+You can create hierarchical names using the following quotation notation.
 ```
 `Lean.Meta.whnf
 ```
-It is short for `.str (.str (.str .anonymous "Lean") "Meta") "whnf"`.
-
-You can use double backticks to request Lean to statically check whether the name
+It is short for `.str (.str (.str .anonymous "Lean") "Meta") "whnf"`
+You can use double quotes to request Lean to statically check whether the name
 corresponds to a Lean declaration in scope.
 ```
 ``Lean.Meta.whnf
 ```
 If the name is not in scope, Lean will report an error.
-
-There are two ways to convert a `String` to a `Name`:
-
- 1. `Name.mkSimple` creates a name with a single string component.
-
- 2. `String.toName` first splits the string into its dot-separated
-    components, and then creates a hierarchical name.
 -/
 inductive Name where
   /-- The "anonymous" name. -/
@@ -3527,9 +3544,7 @@ abbrev mkNum (p : Name) (v : Nat) : Name :=
   Name.num p v
 
 /--
-Converts a `String` to a `Name` without performing any parsing. `mkSimple s` is short for `.str .anonymous s`.
-
-This means that `mkSimple "a.b"` is the name `«a.b»`, not `a.b`.
+Short for `.str .anonymous s`.
 -/
 abbrev mkSimple (s : String) : Name :=
   .str .anonymous s
@@ -3867,6 +3882,9 @@ def getArg (stx : Syntax) (i : Nat) : Syntax :=
   | Syntax.node _ _ args => args.getD i Syntax.missing
   | _                    => Syntax.missing
 
+instance : GetElem Syntax Nat Syntax fun _ _ => True where
+  getElem stx i _ := stx.getArg i
+
 /-- Gets the list of arguments of the syntax node, or `#[]` if it's not a `node`. -/
 def getArgs (stx : Syntax) : Array Syntax :=
   match stx with
@@ -4561,12 +4579,6 @@ def resolveNamespace (n : Name) : MacroM (List Name) := do
 Resolves the given name to an overload list of global definitions.
 The `List String` in each alternative is the deduced list of projections
 (which are ambiguous with name components).
-
-Remark: it will not trigger actions associated with reserved names. Recall that Lean
-has reserved names. For example, a definition `foo` has a reserved name `foo.def` for theorem
-containing stating that `foo` is equal to its definition. The action associated with `foo.def`
-automatically proves the theorem. At the macro level, the name is resolved, but the action is not
-executed. The actions are executed by the elaborator when converting `Syntax` into `Expr`.
 -/
 def resolveGlobalName (n : Name) : MacroM (List (Prod Name (List String))) := do
   (← getMethods).resolveGlobalName n

src/Init/PropLemmas.lean

@@ -11,21 +11,6 @@ import Init.Core
 import Init.NotationExtra
 set_option linter.missingDocs true -- keep it documented
 
-/-! ## cast and equality -/
-
-@[simp] theorem eq_mp_eq_cast  (h : α = β) : Eq.mp  h = cast h := rfl
-@[simp] theorem eq_mpr_eq_cast (h : α = β) : Eq.mpr h = cast h.symm := rfl
-
-@[simp] theorem cast_cast : ∀ (ha : α = β) (hb : β = γ) (a : α),
-    cast hb (cast ha a) = cast (ha.trans hb) a
-  | rfl, rfl, _ => rfl
-
-@[simp] theorem eq_true_eq_id : Eq True = id := by
-  funext _; simp only [true_iff, id_def, eq_iff_iff]
-
-theorem proof_irrel_heq {p q : Prop} (hp : p) (hq : q) : HEq hp hq := by
-  cases propext (iff_of_true hp hq); rfl
-
 /-! ## not -/
 
 theorem not_not_em (a : Prop) : ¬¬(a ∨ ¬a) := fun h => h (.inr (h ∘ .inl))
@@ -119,62 +104,10 @@ theorem and_or_right : (a ∧ b) ∨ c ↔ (a ∨ c) ∧ (b ∨ c) := by rw [@or
 
 theorem or_imp : (a ∨ b → c) ↔ (a → c) ∧ (b → c) :=
   Iff.intro (fun h => ⟨h ∘ .inl, h ∘ .inr⟩) (fun ⟨ha, hb⟩ => Or.rec ha hb)
-
-/-
-`not_or` is made simp for confluence with `¬((b || c) = true)`:
-
-Critical pair:
-1. `¬(b = true ∨ c = true)` via `Bool.or_eq_true`.
-2. `(b || c = false)` via `Bool.not_eq_true` which then
-   reduces to `b = false ∧ c = false` via Mathlib simp lemma
-   `Bool.or_eq_false_eq_eq_false_and_eq_false`.
-
-Both reduce to `b = false ∧ c = false` via `not_or`.
--/
-@[simp] theorem not_or : ¬(p ∨ q) ↔ ¬p ∧ ¬q := or_imp
+theorem not_or : ¬(p ∨ q) ↔ ¬p ∧ ¬q := or_imp
 
 theorem not_and_of_not_or_not (h : ¬a ∨ ¬b) : ¬(a ∧ b) := h.elim (mt (·.1)) (mt (·.2))
 
-
-/-! ## Ite -/
-
-@[simp]
-theorem if_false_left [h : Decidable p] :
-    ite p False q ↔ ¬p ∧ q := by cases h <;> (rename_i g; simp [g])
-
-@[simp]
-theorem if_false_right [h : Decidable p] :
-    ite p q False ↔ p ∧ q := by cases h <;> (rename_i g; simp [g])
-
-/-
-`if_true_left` and `if_true_right` are lower priority because
-they introduce disjunctions and we prefer `if_false_left` and
-`if_false_right` if they overlap.
--/
-
-@[simp low]
-theorem if_true_left [h : Decidable p] :
-    ite p True q ↔ ¬p → q := by cases h <;> (rename_i g; simp [g])
-
-@[simp low]
-theorem if_true_right [h : Decidable p] :
-    ite p q True ↔ p → q := by cases h <;> (rename_i g; simp [g])
-
-/-- Negation of the condition `P : Prop` in a `dite` is the same as swapping the branches. -/
-@[simp] theorem dite_not [hn : Decidable (¬p)] [h : Decidable p]  (x : ¬p → α) (y : ¬¬p → α) :
-    dite (¬p) x y = dite p (fun h => y (not_not_intro h)) x := by
-  cases h <;> (rename_i g; simp [g])
-
-/-- Negation of the condition `P : Prop` in a `ite` is the same as swapping the branches. -/
-@[simp] theorem ite_not (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (x y : α) : ite (¬p) x y = ite p y x :=
-  dite_not (fun _ => x) (fun _ => y)
-
-@[simp] theorem ite_true_same (p q : Prop) [h : Decidable p] : (if p then p else q) = (¬p → q) := by
-  cases h <;> (rename_i g; simp [g])
-
-@[simp] theorem ite_false_same (p q : Prop) [h : Decidable p] : (if p then q else p) = (p ∧ q) := by
-  cases h <;> (rename_i g; simp [g])
-
 /-! ## exists and forall -/
 
 section quantifiers
@@ -335,14 +268,7 @@ end quantifiers
 
 /-! ## decidable -/
 
-@[simp] theorem Decidable.not_not [Decidable p] : ¬¬p ↔ p := ⟨of_not_not, not_not_intro⟩
-
-/-- Excluded middle.  Added as alias for Decidable.em -/
-abbrev Decidable.or_not_self := em
-
-/-- Excluded middle commuted.  Added as alias for Decidable.em -/
-theorem Decidable.not_or_self (p : Prop) [h : Decidable p] : ¬p ∨ p := by
-  cases h <;> simp [*]
+theorem Decidable.not_not [Decidable p] : ¬¬p ↔ p := ⟨of_not_not, not_not_intro⟩
 
 theorem Decidable.by_contra [Decidable p] : (¬p → False) → p := of_not_not
 
@@ -384,7 +310,7 @@ theorem Decidable.not_imp_symm [Decidable a] (h : ¬a → b) (hb : ¬b) : a :=
 theorem Decidable.not_imp_comm [Decidable a] [Decidable b] : (¬a → b) ↔ (¬b → a) :=
   ⟨not_imp_symm, not_imp_symm⟩
 
-@[simp] theorem Decidable.not_imp_self [Decidable a] : (¬a → a) ↔ a := by
+theorem Decidable.not_imp_self [Decidable a] : (¬a → a) ↔ a := by
   have := @imp_not_self (¬a); rwa [not_not] at this
 
 theorem Decidable.or_iff_not_imp_left [Decidable a] : a ∨ b ↔ (¬a → b) :=
@@ -463,12 +389,8 @@ theorem Decidable.and_iff_not_or_not [Decidable a] [Decidable b] : a ∧ b ↔
   rw [← not_and_iff_or_not_not, not_not]
 
 theorem Decidable.imp_iff_right_iff [Decidable a] : (a → b ↔ b) ↔ a ∨ b :=
-  Iff.intro
-    (fun h => (Decidable.em a).imp_right fun ha' => h.mp fun ha => (ha' ha).elim)
-    (fun ab => ab.elim imp_iff_right fun hb => iff_of_true (fun _ => hb) hb)
-
-theorem Decidable.imp_iff_left_iff  [Decidable a] : (b ↔ a → b) ↔ a ∨ b :=
-  propext (@Iff.comm (a → b) b) ▸ (@Decidable.imp_iff_right_iff a b _)
+  ⟨fun H => (Decidable.em a).imp_right fun ha' => H.1 fun ha => (ha' ha).elim,
+   fun H => H.elim imp_iff_right fun hb => iff_of_true (fun _ => hb) hb⟩
 
 theorem Decidable.and_or_imp [Decidable a] : a ∧ b ∨ (a → c) ↔ a → b ∨ c :=
   if ha : a then by simp only [ha, true_and, true_imp_iff]
@@ -513,53 +435,3 @@ protected theorem Decidable.not_forall_not {p : α → Prop} [Decidable (∃ x,
 protected theorem Decidable.not_exists_not {p : α → Prop} [∀ x, Decidable (p x)] :
     (¬∃ x, ¬p x) ↔ ∀ x, p x := by
   simp only [not_exists, Decidable.not_not]
-
-export Decidable (not_imp_self)
-
-/-
-`decide_implies` simp justification.
-
-We have a critical pair from `decide (¬(p ∧ q))`:
-
- 1. `decide (p → ¬q)` via `not_and`
- 2. `!decide (p ∧ q)` via `decide_not` This further refines to
-    `!(decide p) || !(decide q)` via `Bool.decide_and` (in Mathlib) and
-    `Bool.not_and` (made simp in Mathlib).
-
-We introduce `decide_implies` below and then both normalize to
-`!(decide p) || !(decide q)`.
--/
-@[simp]
-theorem decide_implies (u v : Prop)
-    [duv : Decidable (u → v)] [du : Decidable u] {dv : u → Decidable v}
-  : decide (u → v) = dite u (fun h => @decide v (dv h)) (fun _ => true) :=
-  if h : u then by
-    simp [h]
-  else by
-    simp [h]
-
-/-
-`decide_ite` is needed to resolve critical pair with
-
-We have a critical pair from `decide (ite p b c = true)`:
-
- 1. `ite p b c` via `decide_coe`
- 2. `decide (ite p (b = true) (c = true))` via `Bool.ite_eq_true_distrib`.
-
-We introduce `decide_ite` so both normalize to `ite p b c`.
--/
-@[simp]
-theorem decide_ite (u : Prop) [du : Decidable u] (p q : Prop)
-      [dpq : Decidable (ite u p q)] [dp : Decidable p] [dq : Decidable q] :
-    decide (ite u p q) = ite u (decide p) (decide q) := by
-  cases du <;> simp [*]
-
-/- Confluence for `ite_true_same` and `decide_ite`. -/
-@[simp] theorem ite_true_decide_same (p : Prop) [h : Decidable p] (b : Bool) :
-  (if p then decide p else b) = (decide p || b) := by
-  cases h <;> (rename_i pt; simp [pt])
-
-/- Confluence for `ite_false_same` and `decide_ite`. -/
-@[simp] theorem ite_false_decide_same (p : Prop) [h : Decidable p] (b : Bool) :
-  (if p then b else decide p) = (decide p && b) := by
-  cases h <;> (rename_i pt; simp [pt])

src/Init/RCases.lean

@@ -5,8 +5,7 @@ Authors: Mario Carneiro, Jacob von Raumer
 -/
 prelude
 import Init.Tactics
-import Init.Meta
-
+import Init.NotationExtra
 
 /-!
 # Recursive cases (`rcases`) tactic and related tactics
@@ -128,7 +127,7 @@ the input expression). An `rcases` pattern has the following grammar:
   and so on.
 * A `@` before a tuple pattern as in `@⟨p1, p2, p3⟩` will bind all arguments in the constructor,
   while leaving the `@` off will only use the patterns on the explicit arguments.
-* An alternation pattern `p1 | p2 | p3`, which matches an inductive type with multiple constructors,
+* An alteration pattern `p1 | p2 | p3`, which matches an inductive type with multiple constructors,
   or a nested disjunction like `a ∨ b ∨ c`.
 
 A pattern like `⟨a, b, c⟩ | ⟨d, e⟩` will do a split over the inductive datatype,

src/Init/SimpLemmas.lean

@@ -15,15 +15,12 @@ theorem of_eq_false (h : p = False) : ¬ p := fun hp => False.elim (h.mp hp)
 theorem eq_true (h : p) : p = True :=
   propext ⟨fun _ => trivial, fun _ => h⟩
 
--- Adding this attribute needs `eq_true`.
-attribute [simp] cast_heq
-
 theorem eq_false (h : ¬ p) : p = False :=
   propext ⟨fun h' => absurd h' h, fun h' => False.elim h'⟩
 
 theorem eq_false' (h : p → False) : p = False := eq_false h
 
-theorem eq_true_of_decide {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (h : decide p = true) : p = True :=
+theorem eq_true_of_decide {p : Prop} {_ : Decidable p} (h : decide p = true) : p = True :=
   eq_true (of_decide_eq_true h)
 
 theorem eq_false_of_decide {p : Prop} {_ : Decidable p} (h : decide p = false) : p = False :=
@@ -127,7 +124,6 @@ end SimprocHelperLemmas
 @[simp] theorem not_true_eq_false : (¬ True) = False := by decide
 
 @[simp] theorem not_iff_self : ¬(¬a ↔ a) | H => iff_not_self H.symm
-attribute [simp] iff_not_self
 
 /-! ## and -/
 
@@ -177,11 +173,6 @@ theorem or_iff_left_of_imp  (hb : b → a) : (a ∨ b) ↔ a  := Iff.intro (Or.r
 @[simp] theorem or_iff_left_iff_imp  : (a ∨ b ↔ a) ↔ (b → a) := Iff.intro (·.mp ∘ Or.inr) or_iff_left_of_imp
 @[simp] theorem or_iff_right_iff_imp : (a ∨ b ↔ b) ↔ (a → b) := by rw [or_comm, or_iff_left_iff_imp]
 
-@[simp] theorem iff_self_or (a b : Prop) : (a ↔ a ∨ b) ↔ (b → a) :=
-  propext (@Iff.comm _ a) ▸ @or_iff_left_iff_imp a b
-@[simp] theorem iff_or_self (a b : Prop) : (b ↔ a ∨ b) ↔ (a → b) :=
-  propext (@Iff.comm _ b) ▸ @or_iff_right_iff_imp a b
-
 /-# Bool -/
 
 @[simp] theorem Bool.or_false (b : Bool) : (b || false) = b  := by cases b <;> rfl
@@ -208,9 +199,9 @@ theorem Bool.or_assoc (a b c : Bool) : (a || b || c) = (a || (b || c)) := by
 @[simp] theorem Bool.not_not (b : Bool) : (!!b) = b := by cases b <;> rfl
 @[simp] theorem Bool.not_true  : (!true) = false := by decide
 @[simp] theorem Bool.not_false : (!false) = true := by decide
-@[simp] theorem Bool.not_beq_true  (b : Bool) : (!(b == true)) = (b == false) := by cases b <;> rfl
+@[simp] theorem Bool.not_beq_true (b : Bool) : (!(b == true)) = (b == false) := by cases b <;> rfl
 @[simp] theorem Bool.not_beq_false (b : Bool) : (!(b == false)) = (b == true) := by cases b <;> rfl
-@[simp] theorem Bool.not_eq_true'  (b : Bool) : ((!b) = true) = (b = false) := by cases b <;> simp
+@[simp] theorem Bool.not_eq_true' (b : Bool) : ((!b) = true) = (b = false) := by cases b <;> simp
 @[simp] theorem Bool.not_eq_false' (b : Bool) : ((!b) = false) = (b = true) := by cases b <;> simp
 
 @[simp] theorem Bool.beq_to_eq (a b : Bool) :
@@ -221,14 +212,11 @@ theorem Bool.or_assoc (a b c : Bool) : (a || b || c) = (a || (b || c)) := by
 @[simp] theorem Bool.not_eq_true (b : Bool) : (¬(b = true)) = (b = false) := by cases b <;> decide
 @[simp] theorem Bool.not_eq_false (b : Bool) : (¬(b = false)) = (b = true) := by cases b <;> decide
 
-@[simp] theorem decide_eq_true_eq [Decidable p] : (decide p = true) = p :=
-  propext <| Iff.intro of_decide_eq_true decide_eq_true
-@[simp] theorem decide_not [g : Decidable p] [h : Decidable (Not p)] : decide (Not p) = !(decide p) := by
-  cases g <;> (rename_i gp; simp [gp]; rfl)
-@[simp] theorem not_decide_eq_true [h : Decidable p] : ((!decide p) = true) = ¬ p := by
-  cases h <;> (rename_i hp; simp [decide, hp])
+@[simp] theorem decide_eq_true_eq {_ : Decidable p} : (decide p = true) = p := propext <| Iff.intro of_decide_eq_true decide_eq_true
+@[simp] theorem decide_not {h : Decidable p} : decide (¬ p) = !decide p := by cases h <;> rfl
+@[simp] theorem not_decide_eq_true {h : Decidable p} : ((!decide p) = true) = ¬ p := by cases h <;> simp [decide, *]
 
-@[simp] theorem heq_eq_eq (a b : α) : HEq a b = (a = b) := propext <| Iff.intro eq_of_heq heq_of_eq
+@[simp] theorem heq_eq_eq {α : Sort u} (a b : α) : HEq a b = (a = b) := propext <| Iff.intro eq_of_heq heq_of_eq
 
 @[simp] theorem cond_true (a b : α) : cond true a b = a := rfl
 @[simp] theorem cond_false (a b : α) : cond false a b = b := rfl
@@ -240,29 +228,11 @@ theorem Bool.or_assoc (a b c : Bool) : (a || b || c) = (a || (b || c)) := by
 @[simp] theorem bne_self_eq_false' [DecidableEq α] (a : α) : (a != a) = false := by simp [bne]
 
 @[simp] theorem decide_False : decide False = false := rfl
-@[simp] theorem decide_True  : decide True  = true := rfl
+@[simp] theorem decide_True : decide True = true := rfl
 
 @[simp] theorem bne_iff_ne [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] (a b : α) : a != b ↔ a ≠ b := by
   simp [bne]; rw [← beq_iff_eq a b]; simp [-beq_iff_eq]
 
-/-
-Added for critical pair for `¬((a != b) = true)`
-
-1. `(a != b) = false` via `Bool.not_eq_true`
-2. `¬(a ≠ b)` via `bne_iff_ne`
-
-These will both normalize to `a = b` with the first via `bne_eq_false_iff_eq`.
--/
-@[simp] theorem beq_eq_false_iff_ne [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α]
-    (a b : α) : (a == b) = false ↔ a ≠ b := by
-  rw [ne_eq, ← beq_iff_eq a b]
-  cases a == b <;> decide
-
-@[simp] theorem bne_eq_false_iff_eq [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] (a b : α) :
-    (a != b) = false ↔ a = b := by
-  rw [bne, ← beq_iff_eq a b]
-  cases a == b <;> decide
-
 /-# Nat -/
 
 @[simp] theorem Nat.le_zero_eq (a : Nat) : (a ≤ 0) = (a = 0) :=

src/Init/Simproc.lean

@@ -11,64 +11,42 @@ namespace Lean.Parser
 A user-defined simplification procedure used by the `simp` tactic, and its variants.
 Here is an example.
 ```lean
-theorem and_false_eq {p : Prop} (q : Prop) (h : p = False) : (p ∧ q) = False := by simp [*]
-
-open Lean Meta Simp
-simproc ↓ shortCircuitAnd (And _ _) := fun e => do
-  let_expr And p q := e | return .continue
-  let r ← simp p
-  let_expr False := r.expr | return .continue
-  let proof ← mkAppM ``and_false_eq #[q, (← r.getProof)]
-  return .done { expr := r.expr, proof? := some proof }
+simproc reduce_add (_ + _) := fun e => do
+  unless (e.isAppOfArity ``HAdd.hAdd 6) do return none
+  let some n ← getNatValue? (e.getArg! 4) | return none
+  let some m ← getNatValue? (e.getArg! 5) | return none
+  return some (.done { expr := mkNatLit (n+m) })
 ```
-The `simp` tactic invokes `shortCircuitAnd` whenever it finds a term of the form `And _ _`.
+The `simp` tactic invokes `reduce_add` whenever it finds a term of the form `_ + _`.
 The simplification procedures are stored in an (imperfect) discrimination tree.
 The procedure should **not** assume the term `e` perfectly matches the given pattern.
 The body of a simplification procedure must have type `Simproc`, which is an alias for
-`Expr → SimpM Step`
+`Expr → SimpM (Option Step)`.
 You can instruct the simplifier to apply the procedure before its sub-expressions
-have been simplified by using the modifier `↓` before the procedure name.
+have been simplified by using the modifier `↓` before the procedure name. Example.
+```lean
+simproc ↓ reduce_add (_ + _) := fun e => ...
+```
 Simplification procedures can be also scoped or local.
 -/
 syntax (docComment)? attrKind "simproc " (Tactic.simpPre <|> Tactic.simpPost)? ("[" ident,* "]")? ident " (" term ")" " := " term : command
 
-/--
-Similar to `simproc`, but resulting expression must be definitionally equal to the input one.
--/
-syntax (docComment)? attrKind "dsimproc " (Tactic.simpPre <|> Tactic.simpPost)? ("[" ident,* "]")? ident " (" term ")" " := " term : command
-
 /--
 A user-defined simplification procedure declaration. To activate this procedure in `simp` tactic,
 we must provide it as an argument, or use the command `attribute` to set its `[simproc]` attribute.
 -/
 syntax (docComment)? "simproc_decl " ident " (" term ")" " := " term : command
 
-/--
-A user-defined defeq simplification procedure declaration. To activate this procedure in `simp` tactic,
-we must provide it as an argument, or use the command `attribute` to set its `[simproc]` attribute.
--/
-syntax (docComment)? "dsimproc_decl " ident " (" term ")" " := " term : command
-
 /--
 A builtin simplification procedure.
 -/
 syntax (docComment)? attrKind "builtin_simproc " (Tactic.simpPre <|> Tactic.simpPost)? ("[" ident,* "]")? ident " (" term ")" " := " term : command
 
-/--
-A builtin defeq simplification procedure.
--/
-syntax (docComment)? attrKind "builtin_dsimproc " (Tactic.simpPre <|> Tactic.simpPost)? ("[" ident,* "]")? ident " (" term ")" " := " term : command
-
 /--
 A builtin simplification procedure declaration.
 -/
 syntax (docComment)? "builtin_simproc_decl " ident " (" term ")" " := " term : command
 
-/--
-A builtin defeq simplification procedure declaration.
--/
-syntax (docComment)? "builtin_dsimproc_decl " ident " (" term ")" " := " term : command
-
 /--
 Auxiliary command for associating a pattern with a simplification procedure.
 -/
@@ -108,60 +86,33 @@ macro_rules
     `($[$doc?:docComment]? def $n:ident : $(mkIdent simprocType) := $body
       simproc_pattern% $pattern => $n)
 
-macro_rules
-  | `($[$doc?:docComment]? dsimproc_decl $n:ident ($pattern:term) := $body) => do
-    let simprocType := `Lean.Meta.Simp.DSimproc
-    `($[$doc?:docComment]? def $n:ident : $(mkIdent simprocType) := $body
-      simproc_pattern% $pattern => $n)
-
 macro_rules
   | `($[$doc?:docComment]? builtin_simproc_decl $n:ident ($pattern:term) := $body) => do
     let simprocType := `Lean.Meta.Simp.Simproc
     `($[$doc?:docComment]? def $n:ident : $(mkIdent simprocType) := $body
       builtin_simproc_pattern% $pattern => $n)
 
-macro_rules
-  | `($[$doc?:docComment]? builtin_dsimproc_decl $n:ident ($pattern:term) := $body) => do
-    let simprocType := `Lean.Meta.Simp.DSimproc
-    `($[$doc?:docComment]? def $n:ident : $(mkIdent simprocType) := $body
-      builtin_simproc_pattern% $pattern => $n)
-
-private def mkAttributeCmds
-    (kind : TSyntax `Lean.Parser.Term.attrKind)
-    (pre? : Option (TSyntax [`Lean.Parser.Tactic.simpPre, `Lean.Parser.Tactic.simpPost]))
-    (ids? : Option (Syntax.TSepArray `ident ","))
-    (n : Ident) : MacroM (Array Syntax) := do
-  let mut cmds := #[]
-  let pushDefault (cmds : Array (TSyntax `command)) : MacroM (Array (TSyntax `command)) := do
-    return cmds.push (← `(attribute [$kind simproc $[$pre?]?] $n))
-  if let some ids := ids? then
-    for id in ids.getElems do
-      let idName := id.getId
-      let (attrName, attrKey) :=
-        if idName == `simp then
-          (`simprocAttr, "simproc")
-        else if idName == `seval then
-          (`sevalprocAttr, "sevalproc")
-        else
-          let idName := idName.appendAfter "_proc"
-          (`Parser.Attr ++ idName, idName.toString)
-      let attrStx : TSyntax `attr := ⟨mkNode attrName #[mkAtom attrKey, mkOptionalNode pre?]⟩
-      cmds := cmds.push (← `(attribute [$kind $attrStx] $n))
-  else
-    cmds ← pushDefault cmds
-  return cmds
-
 macro_rules
   | `($[$doc?:docComment]? $kind:attrKind simproc $[$pre?]? $[ [ $ids?:ident,* ] ]? $n:ident ($pattern:term) := $body) => do
-     return mkNullNode <|
-       #[(← `($[$doc?:docComment]? simproc_decl $n ($pattern) := $body))]
-       ++ (← mkAttributeCmds kind pre? ids? n)
-
-macro_rules
-  | `($[$doc?:docComment]? $kind:attrKind dsimproc $[$pre?]? $[ [ $ids?:ident,* ] ]? $n:ident ($pattern:term) := $body) => do
-     return mkNullNode <|
-       #[(← `($[$doc?:docComment]? dsimproc_decl $n ($pattern) := $body))]
-       ++ (← mkAttributeCmds kind pre? ids? n)
+     let mut cmds := #[(← `($[$doc?:docComment]? simproc_decl $n ($pattern) := $body))]
+     let pushDefault (cmds : Array (TSyntax `command)) : MacroM (Array (TSyntax `command)) := do
+       return cmds.push (← `(attribute [$kind simproc $[$pre?]?] $n))
+     if let some ids := ids? then
+       for id in ids.getElems do
+         let idName := id.getId
+         let (attrName, attrKey) :=
+           if idName == `simp then
+             (`simprocAttr, "simproc")
+           else if idName == `seval then
+             (`sevalprocAttr, "sevalproc")
+           else
+             let idName := idName.appendAfter "_proc"
+             (`Parser.Attr ++ idName, idName.toString)
+         let attrStx : TSyntax `attr := ⟨mkNode attrName #[mkAtom attrKey, mkOptionalNode pre?]⟩
+         cmds := cmds.push (← `(attribute [$kind $attrStx] $n))
+     else
+       cmds ← pushDefault cmds
+     return mkNullNode cmds
 
 macro_rules
   | `($[$doc?:docComment]? $kind:attrKind builtin_simproc $[$pre?]? $n:ident ($pattern:term) := $body) => do
@@ -175,16 +126,4 @@ macro_rules
       attribute [$kind builtin_simproc $[$pre?]?] $n
       attribute [$kind builtin_sevalproc $[$pre?]?] $n)
 
-macro_rules
-  | `($[$doc?:docComment]? $kind:attrKind builtin_dsimproc $[$pre?]? $n:ident ($pattern:term) := $body) => do
-    `($[$doc?:docComment]? builtin_dsimproc_decl $n ($pattern) := $body
-      attribute [$kind builtin_simproc $[$pre?]?] $n)
-  | `($[$doc?:docComment]? $kind:attrKind builtin_dsimproc $[$pre?]? [seval] $n:ident ($pattern:term) := $body) => do
-    `($[$doc?:docComment]? builtin_dsimproc_decl $n ($pattern) := $body
-      attribute [$kind builtin_sevalproc $[$pre?]?] $n)
-  | `($[$doc?:docComment]? $kind:attrKind builtin_dsimproc $[$pre?]? [simp, seval] $n:ident ($pattern:term) := $body) => do
-    `($[$doc?:docComment]? builtin_dsimproc_decl $n ($pattern) := $body
-      attribute [$kind builtin_simproc $[$pre?]?] $n
-      attribute [$kind builtin_sevalproc $[$pre?]?] $n)
-
 end Lean.Parser

src/Init/System/FilePath.lean

@@ -73,21 +73,7 @@ private def posOfLastSep (p : FilePath) : Option String.Pos :=
   p.toString.revFind pathSeparators.contains
 
 def parent (p : FilePath) : Option FilePath :=
-  let extractParentPath := FilePath.mk <$> p.toString.extract {} <$> posOfLastSep p
-  if p.isAbsolute then
-    let lengthOfRootDirectory := if pathSeparators.contains p.toString.front then 1 else 3
-    if p.toString.length == lengthOfRootDirectory then
-      -- `p` is a root directory
-      none
-    else if posOfLastSep p == String.Pos.mk (lengthOfRootDirectory - 1) then
-      -- `p` is a direct child of the root
-      some ⟨p.toString.extract 0 ⟨lengthOfRootDirectory⟩⟩
-    else
-      -- `p` is an absolute path with at least two subdirectories
-      extractParentPath
-  else
-    -- `p` is a relative path
-    extractParentPath
+  FilePath.mk <$> p.toString.extract {} <$> posOfLastSep p
 
 def fileName (p : FilePath) : Option String :=
   let lastPart := match posOfLastSep p with

src/Init/System/IO.lean

@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
 Authors: Luke Nelson, Jared Roesch, Leonardo de Moura, Sebastian Ullrich, Mac Malone
 -/
 prelude
+import Init.Control.EState
 import Init.Control.Reader
 import Init.Data.String
 import Init.Data.ByteArray

src/Init/Tactics.lean

@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ the first matching constructor, or else fails.
 syntax (name := constructor) "constructor" : tactic
 
 /--
-Applies the first constructor when
+Applies the second constructor when
 the goal is an inductive type with exactly two constructors, or fails otherwise.
 ```
 example : True ∨ False := by
@@ -354,9 +354,6 @@ macro:1 x:tactic tk:" <;> " y:tactic:2 : tactic => `(tactic|
     with_annotate_state $tk skip
     all_goals $y:tactic)
 
-/-- `fail msg` is a tactic that always fails, and produces an error using the given message. -/
-syntax (name := fail) "fail" (ppSpace str)? : tactic
-
 /-- `eq_refl` is equivalent to `exact rfl`, but has a few optimizations. -/
 syntax (name := eqRefl) "eq_refl" : tactic
 
@@ -368,23 +365,10 @@ for new reflexive relations.
 Remark: `rfl` is an extensible tactic. We later add `macro_rules` to try different
 reflexivity theorems (e.g., `Iff.rfl`).
 -/
-macro "rfl" : tactic => `(tactic| fail "The rfl tactic failed. Possible reasons:
-- The goal is not a reflexive relation (neither `=` nor a relation with a @[refl] lemma).
-- The arguments of the relation are not equal.
-Try using the reflexivitiy lemma for your relation explicitly, e.g. `exact Eq.rfl`.")
+macro "rfl" : tactic => `(tactic| eq_refl)
 
-macro_rules | `(tactic| rfl) => `(tactic| eq_refl)
 macro_rules | `(tactic| rfl) => `(tactic| exact HEq.rfl)
 
-/--
-This tactic applies to a goal whose target has the form `x ~ x`,
-where `~` is a reflexive relation other than `=`,
-that is, a relation which has a reflexive lemma tagged with the attribute @[refl].
--/
-syntax (name := applyRfl) "apply_rfl" : tactic
-
-macro_rules | `(tactic| rfl) => `(tactic| apply_rfl)
-
 /--
 `rfl'` is similar to `rfl`, but disables smart unfolding and unfolds all kinds of definitions,
 theorems included (relevant for declarations defined by well-founded recursion).
@@ -689,13 +673,12 @@ It makes sure the "continuation" `?_` is the main goal after refining.
 macro "refine_lift " e:term : tactic => `(tactic| focus (refine no_implicit_lambda% $e; rotate_right))
 
 /--
-The `have` tactic is for adding hypotheses to the local context of the main goal.
-* `have h : t := e` adds the hypothesis `h : t` if `e` is a term of type `t`.
-* `have h := e` uses the type of `e` for `t`.
-* `have : t := e` and `have := e` use `this` for the name of the hypothesis.
-* `have pat := e` for a pattern `pat` is equivalent to `match e with | pat => _`,
-  where `_` stands for the tactics that follow this one.
-  It is convenient for types that have only one applicable constructor.
+`have h : t := e` adds the hypothesis `h : t` to the current goal if `e` a term
+of type `t`.
+* If `t` is omitted, it will be inferred.
+* If `h` is omitted, the name `this` is used.
+* The variant `have pattern := e` is equivalent to `match e with | pattern => _`,
+  and it is convenient for types that have only one applicable constructor.
   For example, given `h : p ∧ q ∧ r`, `have ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := h` produces the
   hypotheses `h₁ : p`, `h₂ : q`, and `h₃ : r`.
 -/
@@ -710,15 +693,12 @@ If `h :` is omitted, the name `this` is used.
  -/
 macro "suffices " d:sufficesDecl : tactic => `(tactic| refine_lift suffices $d; ?_)
 /--
-The `let` tactic is for adding definitions to the local context of the main goal.
-* `let x : t := e` adds the definition `x : t := e` if `e` is a term of type `t`.
-* `let x := e` uses the type of `e` for `t`.
-* `let : t := e` and `let := e` use `this` for the name of the hypothesis.
-* `let pat := e` for a pattern `pat` is equivalent to `match e with | pat => _`,
-  where `_` stands for the tactics that follow this one.
-  It is convenient for types that let only one applicable constructor.
-  For example, given `p : α × β × γ`, `let ⟨x, y, z⟩ := p` produces the
-  local variables `x : α`, `y : β`, and `z : γ`.
+`let h : t := e` adds the hypothesis `h : t := e` to the current goal if `e` a term of type `t`.
+If `t` is omitted, it will be inferred.
+The variant `let pattern := e` is equivalent to `match e with | pattern => _`,
+and it is convenient for types that have only applicable constructor.
+Example: given `h : p ∧ q ∧ r`, `let ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := h` produces the hypotheses
+`h₁ : p`, `h₂ : q`, and `h₃ : r`.
 -/
 macro "let " d:letDecl : tactic => `(tactic| refine_lift let $d:letDecl; ?_)
 /--
@@ -915,6 +895,9 @@ example : ∀ x : Nat, x = x := by unhygienic
 -/
 macro "unhygienic " t:tacticSeq : tactic => `(tactic| set_option tactic.hygienic false in $t)
 
+/-- `fail msg` is a tactic that always fails, and produces an error using the given message. -/
+syntax (name := fail) "fail" (ppSpace str)? : tactic
+
 /--
 `checkpoint tac` acts the same as `tac`, but it caches the input and output of `tac`,
 and if the file is re-elaborated and the input matches, the tactic is not re-run and
@@ -1304,61 +1287,6 @@ a lemma from the list until it gets stuck.
 syntax (name := applyRules) "apply_rules" (config)? (&" only")? (args)? (using_)? : tactic
 end SolveByElim
 
-/--
-Searches environment for definitions or theorems that can solve the goal using `exact`
-with conditions resolved by `solve_by_elim`.
-
-The optional `using` clause provides identifiers in the local context that must be
-used by `exact?` when closing the goal.  This is most useful if there are multiple
-ways to resolve the goal, and one wants to guide which lemma is used.
--/
-syntax (name := exact?) "exact?" (" using " (colGt ident),+)? : tactic
-
-/--
-Searches environment for definitions or theorems that can refine the goal using `apply`
-with conditions resolved when possible with `solve_by_elim`.
-
-The optional `using` clause provides identifiers in the local context that must be
-used when closing the goal.
--/
-syntax (name := apply?) "apply?" (" using " (colGt term),+)? : tactic
-
-/--
-Syntax for excluding some names, e.g. `[-my_lemma, -my_theorem]`.
--/
-syntax rewrites_forbidden := " [" (("-" ident),*,?) "]"
-
-/--
-`rw?` tries to find a lemma which can rewrite the goal.
-
-`rw?` should not be left in proofs; it is a search tool, like `apply?`.
-
-Suggestions are printed as `rw [h]` or `rw [← h]`.
-
-You can use `rw? [-my_lemma, -my_theorem]` to prevent `rw?` using the named lemmas.
--/
-syntax (name := rewrites?) "rw?" (ppSpace location)? (rewrites_forbidden)? : tactic
-
-/--
-`show_term tac` runs `tac`, then prints the generated term in the form
-"exact X Y Z" or "refine X ?_ Z" if there are remaining subgoals.
-
-(For some tactics, the printed term will not be human readable.)
--/
-syntax (name := showTerm) "show_term " tacticSeq : tactic
-
-/--
-`show_term e` elaborates `e`, then prints the generated term.
--/
-macro (name := showTermElab) tk:"show_term " t:term : term =>
-  `(term| no_implicit_lambda% (show_term_elab%$tk $t))
-
-/--
-The command `by?` will print a suggestion for replacing the proof block with a proof term
-using `show_term`.
--/
-macro (name := by?) tk:"by?" t:tacticSeq : term => `(show_term%$tk by%$tk $t)
-
 end Tactic
 
 namespace Attr
@@ -1478,14 +1406,13 @@ macro_rules | `(‹$type›) => `((by assumption : $type))
 by the notation `arr[i]` to prove any side conditions that arise when
 constructing the term (e.g. the index is in bounds of the array).
 The default behavior is to just try `trivial` (which handles the case
-where `i < arr.size` is in the context) and `simp_arith` and `omega`
+where `i < arr.size` is in the context) and `simp_arith`
 (for doing linear arithmetic in the index).
 -/
 syntax "get_elem_tactic_trivial" : tactic
 
-macro_rules | `(tactic| get_elem_tactic_trivial) => `(tactic| omega)
-macro_rules | `(tactic| get_elem_tactic_trivial) => `(tactic| simp (config := { arith := true }); done)
 macro_rules | `(tactic| get_elem_tactic_trivial) => `(tactic| trivial)
+macro_rules | `(tactic| get_elem_tactic_trivial) => `(tactic| simp (config := { arith := true }); done)
 
 /--
 `get_elem_tactic` is the tactic automatically called by the notation `arr[i]`
@@ -1496,24 +1423,6 @@ users are encouraged to extend `get_elem_tactic_trivial` instead of this tactic.
 -/
 macro "get_elem_tactic" : tactic =>
   `(tactic| first
-      /-
-      Recall that `macro_rules` are tried in reverse order.
-      We want `assumption` to be tried first.
-      This is important for theorems such as
-      ```
-      [simp] theorem getElem_pop (a : Array α) (i : Nat) (hi : i < a.pop.size) :
-      a.pop[i] = a[i]'(Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le (a.size_pop ▸ hi) (Nat.sub_le _ _)) :=
-      ```
-      There is a proof embedded in the right-hand-side, and we want it to be just `hi`.
-      If `omega` is used to "fill" this proof, we will have a more complex proof term that
-      cannot be inferred by unification.
-      We hardcoded `assumption` here to ensure users cannot accidentaly break this IF
-      they add new `macro_rules` for `get_elem_tactic_trivial`.
-
-      TODO: Implement priorities for `macro_rules`.
-      TODO: Ensure we have a **high-priority** macro_rules for `get_elem_tactic_trivial` which is just `assumption`.
-      -/
-    | assumption
     | get_elem_tactic_trivial
     | fail "failed to prove index is valid, possible solutions:
   - Use `have`-expressions to prove the index is valid
@@ -1522,16 +1431,10 @@ macro "get_elem_tactic" : tactic =>
   - Use `a[i]'h` notation instead, where `h` is a proof that index is valid"
    )
 
-/--
-Searches environment for definitions or theorems that can be substituted in
-for `exact?% to solve the goal.
- -/
-syntax (name := Lean.Parser.Syntax.exact?) "exact?%" : term
+@[inherit_doc getElem]
+syntax:max term noWs "[" withoutPosition(term) "]" : term
+macro_rules | `($x[$i]) => `(getElem $x $i (by get_elem_tactic))
 
-set_option linter.unusedVariables.funArgs false in
-/--
-  Gadget for automatic parameter support. This is similar to the `optParam` gadget, but it uses
-  the given tactic.
-  Like `optParam`, this gadget only affects elaboration.
-  For example, the tactic will *not* be invoked during type class resolution. -/
-abbrev autoParam.{u} (α : Sort u) (tactic : Lean.Syntax) : Sort u := α
+@[inherit_doc getElem]
+syntax term noWs "[" withoutPosition(term) "]'" term:max : term
+macro_rules | `($x[$i]'$h) => `(getElem $x $i $h)

src/Init/Util.lean

@@ -73,6 +73,19 @@ def withPtrEq {α : Type u} (a b : α) (k : Unit → Bool) (h : a = b → k () =
 @[implemented_by withPtrAddrUnsafe]
 def withPtrAddr {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (a : α) (k : USize → β) (h : ∀ u₁ u₂, k u₁ = k u₂) : β := k 0
 
+@[never_extract]
+private def outOfBounds [Inhabited α] : α :=
+  panic! "index out of bounds"
+
+@[inline] def getElem! [GetElem cont idx elem dom] [Inhabited elem] (xs : cont) (i : idx) [Decidable (dom xs i)] : elem :=
+  if h : _ then getElem xs i h else outOfBounds
+
+@[inline] def getElem? [GetElem cont idx elem dom] (xs : cont) (i : idx) [Decidable (dom xs i)] : Option elem :=
+  if h : _ then some (getElem xs i h) else none
+
+macro:max x:term noWs "[" i:term "]" noWs "?" : term => `(getElem? $x $i)
+macro:max x:term noWs "[" i:term "]" noWs "!" : term => `(getElem! $x $i)
+
 /--
   Marks given value and its object graph closure as multi-threaded if currently
   marked single-threaded. This will make reference counter updates atomic and