Compare commits

..

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Leonardo de Moura
df2571286b chore: update stage0 2024-02-17 17:19:53 -08:00
Leonardo de Moura
b7dcd434fb chore: basic simprocs for String 2024-02-17 17:16:42 -08:00
Leonardo de Moura
80b10103a0 chore: simprocs for Eq 2024-02-17 16:29:29 -08:00
Leonardo de Moura
a0aea373a1 feat: simprocs for Char.val, default char, and Char.ofNatAux 2024-02-17 16:06:50 -08:00
Leonardo de Moura
7a8ff91d33 feat: simprocs for UInt??.ofNatCore and UInt??.toNat 2024-02-17 15:44:17 -08:00
2707 changed files with 8584 additions and 57895 deletions

View File

@@ -1,26 +0,0 @@
name: Check for modules that should use `prelude`
on: [pull_request]
jobs:
check-prelude:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- name: Checkout
uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
# the default is to use a virtual merge commit between the PR and master: just use the PR
ref: ${{ github.event.pull_request.head.sha }}
sparse-checkout: src/Lean
- name: Check Prelude
run: |
failed_files=""
while IFS= read -r -d '' file; do
if ! grep -q "^prelude$" "$file"; then
failed_files="$failed_files$file\n"
fi
done < <(find src/Lean -name '*.lean' -print0)
if [ -n "$failed_files" ]; then
echo -e "The following files should use 'prelude':\n$failed_files"
exit 1
fi

View File

@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ jobs:
"os": "ubuntu-latest",
"release": false,
"quick": false,
"shell": "nix develop .#oldGlibc -c bash -euxo pipefail {0}",
"shell": "nix-shell --arg pkgsDist \"import (fetchTarball \\\"channel:nixos-19.03\\\") {{}}\" --run \"bash -euxo pipefail {0}\"",
"llvm-url": "https://github.com/leanprover/lean-llvm/releases/download/15.0.1/lean-llvm-x86_64-linux-gnu.tar.zst",
"prepare-llvm": "../script/prepare-llvm-linux.sh lean-llvm*",
"binary-check": "ldd -v",
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ jobs:
"os": "ubuntu-latest",
"release": true,
"quick": true,
"shell": "nix develop .#oldGlibc -c bash -euxo pipefail {0}",
"shell": "nix-shell --arg pkgsDist \"import (fetchTarball \\\"channel:nixos-19.03\\\") {{}}\" --run \"bash -euxo pipefail {0}\"",
"llvm-url": "https://github.com/leanprover/lean-llvm/releases/download/15.0.1/lean-llvm-x86_64-linux-gnu.tar.zst",
"prepare-llvm": "../script/prepare-llvm-linux.sh lean-llvm*",
"binary-check": "ldd -v",
@@ -98,8 +98,7 @@ jobs:
// exclude seriously slow tests
"CTEST_OPTIONS": "-E 'interactivetest|leanpkgtest|laketest|benchtest'"
},
// TODO: suddenly started failing in CI
/*{
{
"name": "Linux fsanitize",
"os": "ubuntu-latest",
"quick": false,
@@ -107,7 +106,7 @@ jobs:
"CMAKE_OPTIONS": "-DLEAN_EXTRA_CXX_FLAGS=-fsanitize=address,undefined -DLEANC_EXTRA_FLAGS='-fsanitize=address,undefined -fsanitize-link-c++-runtime' -DSMALL_ALLOCATOR=OFF -DBSYMBOLIC=OFF",
// exclude seriously slow/problematic tests (laketests crash)
"CTEST_OPTIONS": "-E 'interactivetest|leanpkgtest|laketest|benchtest'"
},*/
},
{
"name": "macOS",
"os": "macos-latest",
@@ -154,7 +153,7 @@ jobs:
"quick": false,
"cross": true,
"cross_target": "aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu",
"shell": "nix develop .#oldGlibcAArch -c bash -euxo pipefail {0}",
"shell": "nix-shell --arg pkgsDist \"import (fetchTarball \\\"channel:nixos-19.03\\\") {{ localSystem.config = \\\"aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu\\\"; }}\" --run \"bash -euxo pipefail {0}\"",
"llvm-url": "https://github.com/leanprover/lean-llvm/releases/download/15.0.1/lean-llvm-x86_64-linux-gnu.tar.zst https://github.com/leanprover/lean-llvm/releases/download/15.0.1/lean-llvm-aarch64-linux-gnu.tar.zst",
"prepare-llvm": "../script/prepare-llvm-linux.sh lean-llvm-aarch64-* lean-llvm-x86_64-*"
},
@@ -252,7 +251,7 @@ jobs:
runs-on: ${{ matrix.os }}
defaults:
run:
shell: ${{ matrix.shell || 'nix develop -c bash -euxo pipefail {0}' }}
shell: ${{ matrix.shell || 'nix-shell --run "bash -euxo pipefail {0}"' }}
name: ${{ matrix.name }}
env:
# must be inside workspace
@@ -383,14 +382,8 @@ jobs:
cd build/stage1
ulimit -c unlimited # coredumps
# exclude nonreproducible test
ctest -j4 --progress --output-junit test-results.xml --output-on-failure ${{ matrix.CTEST_OPTIONS }} < /dev/null
ctest -j4 --output-on-failure ${{ matrix.CTEST_OPTIONS }} < /dev/null
if: (matrix.wasm || !matrix.cross) && needs.configure.outputs.quick == 'false'
- name: Test Summary
uses: test-summary/action@v2
with:
paths: build/stage1/test-results.xml
# prefix `if` above with `always` so it's run even if tests failed
if: always() && (matrix.wasm || !matrix.cross) && needs.configure.outputs.quick == 'false'
- name: Check Test Binary
run: ${{ matrix.binary-check }} tests/compiler/534.lean.out
if: ${{ !matrix.cross && needs.configure.outputs.quick == 'false' }}
@@ -417,8 +410,7 @@ jobs:
run: |
cd build
ulimit -c unlimited # coredumps
# clean rebuild in case of Makefile changes
make update-stage0 && rm -rf ./stage* && make -j4
make update-stage0 && make -j4
if: matrix.name == 'Linux' && needs.configure.outputs.quick == 'false'
- name: CCache stats
run: ccache -s
@@ -429,21 +421,19 @@ jobs:
progbin="$(file $c | sed "s/.*execfn: '\([^']*\)'.*/\1/")"
echo bt | $GDB/bin/gdb -q $progbin $c || true
done
# has not been used in a long while, would need to be adapted to new
# shared libs
#- name: Upload coredumps
# uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3
# if: ${{ failure() && matrix.os == 'ubuntu-latest' }}
# with:
# name: coredumps-${{ matrix.name }}
# path: |
# ./coredumps
# ./build/stage0/bin/lean
# ./build/stage0/lib/lean/libleanshared.so
# ./build/stage1/bin/lean
# ./build/stage1/lib/lean/libleanshared.so
# ./build/stage2/bin/lean
# ./build/stage2/lib/lean/libleanshared.so
- name: Upload coredumps
uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3
if: ${{ failure() && matrix.os == 'ubuntu-latest' }}
with:
name: coredumps-${{ matrix.name }}
path: |
./coredumps
./build/stage0/bin/lean
./build/stage0/lib/lean/libleanshared.so
./build/stage1/bin/lean
./build/stage1/lib/lean/libleanshared.so
./build/stage2/bin/lean
./build/stage2/lib/lean/libleanshared.so
# This job collects results from all the matrix jobs
# This can be made the “required” job, instead of listing each
@@ -452,10 +442,9 @@ jobs:
name: Build matrix complete
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
needs: build
# mark as merely cancelled not failed if builds are cancelled
if: ${{ !cancelled() }}
if: ${{ always() }}
steps:
- if: contains(needs.*.result, 'failure')
- if: contains(needs.*.result, 'failure') || contains(needs.*.result, 'cancelled')
uses: actions/github-script@v7
with:
script: |

View File

@@ -1,20 +0,0 @@
name: Check for copyright header
on: [pull_request]
jobs:
check-lean-files:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Verify .lean files start with a copyright header.
run: |
FILES=$(find ./src -type d \( -path "./src/lake/examples" -o -path "./src/lake/tests" \) -prune -o -type f -name "*.lean" -exec perl -ne 'BEGIN { $/ = undef; } print "$ARGV\n" if !m{\A/-\nCopyright}; exit;' {} \;)
if [ -n "$FILES" ]; then
echo "Found .lean files which do not have a copyright header:"
echo "$FILES"
exit 1
else
echo "All copyright headers present."
fi

View File

@@ -6,7 +6,6 @@ on:
tags:
- '*'
pull_request:
types: [opened, synchronize, reopened, labeled]
merge_group:
concurrency:
@@ -72,18 +71,18 @@ jobs:
run: |
sudo chown -R root:nixbld /nix/var/cache
sudo chmod -R 770 /nix/var/cache
- name: Install Cachix
uses: cachix/cachix-action@v12
with:
name: lean4
authToken: '${{ secrets.CACHIX_AUTH_TOKEN }}'
skipPush: true # we push specific outputs only
- name: Build
run: |
nix build $NIX_BUILD_ARGS .#cacheRoots -o push-build
- name: Test
run: |
nix build --keep-failed $NIX_BUILD_ARGS .#test -o push-test || (ln -s /tmp/nix-build-*/source/src/build/ ./push-test; false)
- name: Test Summary
uses: test-summary/action@v2
with:
paths: push-test/test-results.xml
if: always()
continue-on-error: true
nix build $NIX_BUILD_ARGS .#test -o push-test
- name: Build manual
run: |
nix build $NIX_BUILD_ARGS --update-input lean --no-write-lock-file ./doc#{lean-mdbook,leanInk,alectryon,test,inked} -o push-doc
@@ -99,6 +98,9 @@ jobs:
# gmplib.org consistently times out from GH actions
# the GitHub token is to avoid rate limiting
args: --base './dist' --no-progress --github-token ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} --exclude 'gmplib.org' './dist/**/*.html'
- name: Push to Cachix
run: |
[ -z "${{ secrets.CACHIX_AUTH_TOKEN }}" ] || cachix push -j4 lean4 ./push-* || true
- name: Rebuild Nix Store Cache
run: |
rm -rf nix-store-cache || true

View File

@@ -126,19 +126,21 @@ jobs:
if [ "$NIGHTLY_SHA" = "$MERGE_BASE_SHA" ]; then
echo "The merge base of this PR coincides with the nightly release"
STD_REMOTE_TAGS="$(git ls-remote https://github.com/leanprover/std4.git nightly-testing-"$MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY")"
MATHLIB_REMOTE_TAGS="$(git ls-remote https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4.git nightly-testing-"$MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY")"
if [[ -n "$MATHLIB_REMOTE_TAGS" ]]; then
echo "... and Mathlib has a 'nightly-testing-$MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY' tag."
MESSAGE=""
else
echo "... but Mathlib does not yet have a 'nightly-testing-$MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY' tag."
MESSAGE="- ❗ Mathlib CI can not be attempted yet, as the \`nightly-testing-$MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY\` tag does not exist there yet. We will retry when you push more commits. If you rebase your branch onto \`nightly-with-mathlib\`, Mathlib CI should run now."
fi
STD_REMOTE_TAGS="$(git ls-remote https://github.com/leanprover/std4.git nightly-testing-"$MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY")"
if [[ -n "$STD_REMOTE_TAGS" ]]; then
echo "... and Std has a 'nightly-testing-$MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY' tag."
MESSAGE=""
if [[ -n "$MATHLIB_REMOTE_TAGS" ]]; then
echo "... and Mathlib has a 'nightly-testing-$MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY' tag."
else
echo "... but Mathlib does not yet have a 'nightly-testing-$MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY' tag."
MESSAGE="- ❗ Mathlib CI can not be attempted yet, as the \`nightly-testing-$MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY\` tag does not exist there yet. We will retry when you push more commits. If you rebase your branch onto \`nightly-with-mathlib\`, Mathlib CI should run now."
fi
else
echo "... but Std does not yet have a 'nightly-testing-$MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY' tag."
MESSAGE="- ❗ Std CI can not be attempted yet, as the \`nightly-testing-$MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY\` tag does not exist there yet. We will retry when you push more commits. If you rebase your branch onto \`nightly-with-mathlib\`, Std CI should run now."
@@ -149,9 +151,7 @@ jobs:
echo "but 'git merge-base origin/master HEAD' reported: $MERGE_BASE_SHA"
git -C lean4.git log -10 origin/master
git -C lean4.git fetch origin nightly-with-mathlib
NIGHTLY_WITH_MATHLIB_SHA="$(git -C lean4.git rev-parse "origin/nightly-with-mathlib")"
MESSAGE="- ❗ Std/Mathlib CI will not be attempted unless your PR branches off the \`nightly-with-mathlib\` branch. Try \`git rebase $MERGE_BASE_SHA --onto $NIGHTLY_WITH_MATHLIB_SHA\`."
MESSAGE="- ❗ Std/Mathlib CI will not be attempted unless your PR branches off the \`nightly-with-mathlib\` branch."
fi
if [[ -n "$MESSAGE" ]]; then

View File

@@ -40,32 +40,18 @@ jobs:
run: |
git config --global user.name "Lean stage0 autoupdater"
git config --global user.email "<>"
- if: env.should_update_stage0 == 'yes'
uses: DeterminateSystems/nix-installer-action@main
# Would be nice, but does not work yet:
# https://github.com/DeterminateSystems/magic-nix-cache/issues/39
# This action does not run that often and building runs in a few minutes, so ok for now
#- if: env.should_update_stage0 == 'yes'
# uses: DeterminateSystems/magic-nix-cache-action@v2
- if: env.should_update_stage0 == 'yes'
name: Restore Build Cache
uses: actions/cache/restore@v3
name: Install Cachix
uses: cachix/cachix-action@v12
with:
path: nix-store-cache
key: Nix Linux-nix-store-cache-${{ github.sha }}
# fall back to (latest) previous cache
restore-keys: |
Nix Linux-nix-store-cache
- if: env.should_update_stage0 == 'yes'
name: Further Set Up Nix Cache
shell: bash -euxo pipefail {0}
run: |
# Nix seems to mutate the cache, so make a copy
cp -r nix-store-cache nix-store-cache-copy || true
- if: env.should_update_stage0 == 'yes'
name: Install Nix
uses: DeterminateSystems/nix-installer-action@main
with:
extra-conf: |
substituters = file://${{ github.workspace }}/nix-store-cache-copy?priority=10&trusted=true https://cache.nixos.org
name: lean4
- if: env.should_update_stage0 == 'yes'
run: nix run .#update-stage0-commit
- if: env.should_update_stage0 == 'yes'

View File

@@ -78,10 +78,6 @@ add_custom_target(update-stage0
COMMAND $(MAKE) -C stage1 update-stage0
DEPENDS stage1)
add_custom_target(update-stage0-commit
COMMAND $(MAKE) -C stage1 update-stage0-commit
DEPENDS stage1)
add_custom_target(test
COMMAND $(MAKE) -C stage1 test
DEPENDS stage1)

View File

@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
/.github/ @Kha @semorrison
/RELEASES.md @semorrison
/src/ @leodemoura @Kha
/src/Init/IO.lean @joehendrix
/src/kernel/ @leodemoura
/src/lake/ @tydeu
@@ -13,7 +14,6 @@
/src/Lean/Data/Lsp/ @mhuisi
/src/Lean/Elab/Deriving/ @semorrison
/src/Lean/Elab/Tactic/ @semorrison
/src/Lean/Language/ @Kha
/src/Lean/Meta/Tactic/ @leodemoura
/src/Lean/Parser/ @Kha
/src/Lean/PrettyPrinter/ @Kha
@@ -21,23 +21,3 @@
/src/Lean/Server/ @mhuisi
/src/Lean/Widget/ @Vtec234
/src/runtime/io.cpp @joehendrix
/src/Lean/Elab/Tactic/RCases.lean @digama0
/src/Init/RCases.lean @digama0
/src/Lean/Elab/Tactic/Ext.lean @digama0
/src/Init/Ext.lean @digama0
/src/Lean/Elab/Tactic/Simpa.lean @digama0
/src/Lean/Elab/Tactic/NormCast.lean @digama0
/src/Lean/Meta/Tactic/NormCast.lean @digama0
/src/Lean/Meta/Tactic/TryThis.lean @digama0
/src/Lean/Elab/Tactic/SimpTrace.lean @digama0
/src/Lean/Elab/Tactic/NoMatch.lean @digama0
/src/Lean/Elab/Tactic/ShowTerm.lean @digama0
/src/Lean/Elab/Tactic/Repeat.lean @digama0
/src/Lean/Meta/Tactic/Repeat.lean @digama0
/src/Lean/Meta/CoeAttr.lean @digama0
/src/Lean/Elab/GuardMsgs.lean @digama0
/src/Lean/Elab/Tactic/Guard.lean @digama0
/src/Init/Guard.lean @digama0
/src/Lean/Server/CodeActions/ @digama0
/src/Init/Data/Array/Subarray.lean @david-christiansen

View File

@@ -8,145 +8,9 @@ This file contains work-in-progress notes for the upcoming release, as well as p
Please check the [releases](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/releases) page for the current status
of each version.
v4.8.0 (development in progress)
v4.7.0 (development in progress)
---------
* **Executables configured with `supportInterpreter := true` on Windows should now be run via `lake exe` to function properly.**
The way Lean is built on Windows has changed (see PR [#3601](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3601)). As a result, Lake now dynamically links executables with `supportInterpreter := true` on Windows to `libleanshared.dll` and `libInit_shared.dll`. Therefore, such executables will not run unless those shared libraries are co-located with the executables or part of `PATH`. Running the executable via `lake exe` will ensure these libraries are part of `PATH`.
In a related change, the signature of the `nativeFacets` Lake configuration options has changed from a static `Array` to a function `(shouldExport : Bool) → Array`. See its docstring or Lake's [README](src/lake/README.md) for further details on the changed option.
* Lean now generates an error if the type of a theorem is **not** a proposition.
* Importing two different files containing proofs of the same theorem is no longer considered an error. This feature is particularly useful for theorems that are automatically generated on demand (e.g., equational theorems).
* Functional induction principles.
Derived from the definition of a (possibly mutually) recursive function, a **functional induction principle** is created that is tailored to proofs about that function.
For example from:
```
def ackermann : Nat → Nat → Nat
| 0, m => m + 1
| n+1, 0 => ackermann n 1
| n+1, m+1 => ackermann n (ackermann (n + 1) m)
```
we get
```
ackermann.induct (motive : Nat → Nat → Prop) (case1 : ∀ (m : Nat), motive 0 m)
(case2 : ∀ (n : Nat), motive n 1 → motive (Nat.succ n) 0)
(case3 : ∀ (n m : Nat), motive (n + 1) m → motive n (ackermann (n + 1) m) → motive (Nat.succ n) (Nat.succ m))
(x x : Nat) : motive x x
```
It can be used in the `induction` tactic using the `using` syntax:
```
induction n, m using ackermann.induct
```
* The termination checker now recognizes more recursion patterns without an
explicit `termination_by`. In particular the idiom of counting up to an upper
bound, as in
```
def Array.sum (arr : Array Nat) (i acc : Nat) : Nat :=
if _ : i < arr.size then
Array.sum arr (i+1) (acc + arr[i])
else
acc
```
is recognized without having to say `termination_by arr.size - i`.
* Shorter instances names. There is a new algorithm for generating names for anonymous instances.
Across Std and Mathlib, the median ratio between lengths of new names and of old names is about 72%.
With the old algorithm, the longest name was 1660 characters, and now the longest name is 202 characters.
The new algorithm's 95th percentile name length is 67 characters, versus 278 for the old algorithm.
While the new algorithm produces names that are 1.2% less unique,
it avoids cross-project collisions by adding a module-based suffix
when it does not refer to declarations from the same "project" (modules that share the same root).
PR [#3089](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3089).
* Attribute `@[pp_using_anonymous_constructor]` to make structures pretty print like `⟨x, y, z⟩`
rather than `{a := x, b := y, c := z}`.
This attribute is applied to `Sigma`, `PSigma`, `PProd`, `Subtype`, `And`, and `Fin`.
* Now structure instances pretty print with parent structures' fields inlined.
That is, if `B` extends `A`, then `{ toA := { x := 1 }, y := 2 }` now pretty prints as `{ x := 1, y := 2 }`.
Setting option `pp.structureInstances.flatten` to false turns this off.
* Option `pp.structureProjections` is renamed to `pp.fieldNotation`, and there is now a suboption `pp.fieldNotation.generalized`
to enable pretty printing function applications using generalized field notation (defaults to true).
Field notation can be disabled on a function-by-function basis using the `@[pp_nodot]` attribute.
* Added options `pp.mvars` (default: true) and `pp.mvars.withType` (default: false).
When `pp.mvars` is false, metavariables pretty print as `?_`,
and when `pp.mvars.withType` is true, metavariables pretty print with a type ascription.
These can be set when using `#guard_msgs` to make tests not rely on the unique ids assigned to anonymous metavariables.
[#3798](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3798).
* Added `@[induction_eliminator]` and `@[cases_eliminator]` attributes to be able to define custom eliminators
for the `induction` and `cases` tactics, replacing the `@[eliminator]` attribute.
Gives custom eliminators for `Nat` so that `induction` and `cases` put goal states into terms of `0` and `n + 1`
rather than `Nat.zero` and `Nat.succ n`.
Added option `tactic.customEliminators` to control whether to use custom eliminators.
Added a hack for `rcases`/`rintro`/`obtain` to use the custom eliminator for `Nat`.
[#3629](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3629),
[#3655](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3655), and
[#3747](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3747).
* The `#guard_msgs` command now has options to change whitespace normalization and sensitivity to message ordering.
For example, `#guard_msgs (whitespace := lax) in cmd` collapses whitespace before checking messages,
and `#guard_msgs (ordering := sorted) in cmd` sorts the messages in lexicographic order before checking.
PR [#3883](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3883).
* The `#guard_msgs` command now supports showing a diff between the expected and actual outputs. This feature is currently
disabled by default, but can be enabled with `set_option guard_msgs.diff true`. Depending on user feedback, this option
may default to `true` in a future version of Lean.
Breaking changes:
* Automatically generated equational theorems are now named using suffix `.eq_<idx>` instead of `._eq_<idx>`, and `.def` instead of `._unfold`. Example:
```
def fact : Nat → Nat
| 0 => 1
| n+1 => (n+1) * fact n
theorem ex : fact 0 = 1 := by unfold fact; decide
#check fact.eq_1
-- fact.eq_1 : fact 0 = 1
#check fact.eq_2
-- fact.eq_2 (n : Nat) : fact (Nat.succ n) = (n + 1) * fact n
#check fact.def
/-
fact.def :
∀ (x : Nat),
fact x =
match x with
| 0 => 1
| Nat.succ n => (n + 1) * fact n
-/
```
* The coercion from `String` to `Name` was removed. Previously, it was `Name.mkSimple`, which does not separate strings at dots, but experience showed that this is not always the desired coercion. For the previous behavior, manually insert a call to `Name.mkSimple`.
* The `Subarray` fields `as`, `h₁` and `h₂` have been renamed to `array`, `start_le_stop`, and `stop_le_array_size`, respectively. This more closely follows standard Lean conventions. Deprecated aliases for the field projections were added; these will be removed in a future release.
* The change to the instance name algorithm (described above) can break projects that made use of the auto-generated names.
* `Option.toMonad` has been renamed to `Option.getM` and the unneeded `[Monad m]` instance argument has been removed.
v4.7.0
---------
* `simp` and `rw` now use instance arguments found by unification,
rather than always resynthesizing. For backwards compatibility, the original behaviour is
available via `set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false`.
[#3507](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3507) and
[#3509](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3509).
* When the `pp.proofs` is false, now omitted proofs use `⋯` rather than `_`,
which gives a more helpful error message when copied from the Infoview.
The `pp.proofs.threshold` option lets small proofs always be pretty printed.
@@ -154,247 +18,71 @@ v4.7.0
* `pp.proofs.withType` is now set to false by default to reduce noise in the info view.
* The pretty printer for applications now handles the case of over-application itself when applying app unexpanders.
In particular, the ``| `($_ $a $b $xs*) => `(($a + $b) $xs*)`` case of an `app_unexpander` is no longer necessary.
[#3495](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3495).
* New `simp` (and `dsimp`) configuration option: `zetaDelta`. It is `false` by default.
The `zeta` option is still `true` by default, but their meaning has changed.
- When `zeta := true`, `simp` and `dsimp` reduce terms of the form
`let x := val; e[x]` into `e[val]`.
- When `zetaDelta := true`, `simp` and `dsimp` will expand let-variables in
the context. For example, suppose the context contains `x := val`. Then,
any occurrence of `x` is replaced with `val`.
See [issue #2682](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2682) for additional details. Here are some examples:
```
example (h : z = 9) : let x := 5; let y := 4; x + y = z := by
intro x
simp
/-
New goal:
h : z = 9; x := 5 |- x + 4 = z
-/
rw [h]
example (h : z = 9) : let x := 5; let y := 4; x + y = z := by
intro x
-- Using both `zeta` and `zetaDelta`.
simp (config := { zetaDelta := true })
/-
New goal:
h : z = 9; x := 5 |- 9 = z
-/
rw [h]
example (h : z = 9) : let x := 5; let y := 4; x + y = z := by
intro x
simp [x] -- asks `simp` to unfold `x`
/-
New goal:
h : z = 9; x := 5 |- 9 = z
-/
rw [h]
example (h : z = 9) : let x := 5; let y := 4; x + y = z := by
intro x
simp (config := { zetaDelta := true, zeta := false })
/-
New goal:
h : z = 9; x := 5 |- let y := 4; 5 + y = z
-/
rw [h]
```
* When adding new local theorems to `simp`, the system assumes that the function application arguments
have been annotated with `no_index`. This modification, which addresses [issue #2670](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2670),
restores the Lean 3 behavior that users expect. With this modification, the following examples are now operational:
```
example {α β : Type} {f : α × β → β → β} (h : ∀ p : α × β, f p p.2 = p.2)
(a : α) (b : β) : f (a, b) b = b := by
simp [h]
example {α β : Type} {f : α × β → β → β}
(a : α) (b : β) (h : f (a,b) (a,b).2 = (a,b).2) : f (a, b) b = b := by
simp [h]
```
In both cases, `h` is applicable because `simp` does not index f-arguments anymore when adding `h` to the `simp`-set.
It's important to note, however, that global theorems continue to be indexed in the usual manner.
* Improved the error messages produced by the `decide` tactic. [#3422](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3422)
* Improved auto-completion performance. [#3460](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3460)
* Improved initial language server startup performance. [#3552](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3552)
* Changed call hierarchy to sort entries and strip private header from names displayed in the call hierarchy. [#3482](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3482)
* There is now a low-level error recovery combinator in the parsing framework, primarily intended for DSLs. [#3413](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3413)
* You can now write `termination_by?` after a declaration to see the automatically inferred
termination argument, and turn it into a `termination_by …` clause using the “Try this” widget or a code action. [#3514](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3514)
* A large fraction of `Std` has been moved into the Lean repository.
This was motivated by:
1. Making universally useful tactics such as `ext`, `by_cases`, `change at`,
`norm_cast`, `rcases`, `simpa`, `simp?`, `omega`, and `exact?`
available to all users of Lean, without imports.
2. Minimizing the syntactic changes between plain Lean and Lean with `import Std`.
3. Simplifying the development process for the basic data types
`Nat`, `Int`, `Fin` (and variants such as `UInt64`), `List`, `Array`,
and `BitVec` as we begin making the APIs and simp normal forms for these types
more complete and consistent.
4. Laying the groundwork for the Std roadmap, as a library focused on
essential datatypes not provided by the core langauge (e.g. `RBMap`)
and utilities such as basic IO.
While we have achieved most of our initial aims in `v4.7.0-rc1`,
some upstreaming will continue over the coming months.
* The `/` and `%` notations in `Int` now use `Int.ediv` and `Int.emod`
(i.e. the rounding conventions have changed).
Previously `Std` overrode these notations, so this is no change for users of `Std`.
There is now kernel support for these functions.
[#3376](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3376).
* `omega`, our integer linear arithmetic tactic, is now availabe in the core langauge.
* It is supplemented by a preprocessing tactic `bv_omega` which can solve goals about `BitVec`
which naturally translate into linear arithmetic problems.
[#3435](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3435).
* `omega` now has support for `Fin` [#3427](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3427),
the `<<<` operator [#3433](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3433).
* During the port `omega` was modified to no longer identify atoms up to definitional equality
(so in particular it can no longer prove `id x ≤ x`). [#3525](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3525).
This may cause some regressions.
We plan to provide a general purpose preprocessing tactic later, or an `omega!` mode.
* `omega` is now invoked in Lean's automation for termination proofs
[#3503](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3503) as well as in
array indexing proofs [#3515](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3515).
This automation will be substantially revised in the medium term,
and while `omega` does help automate some proofs, we plan to make this much more robust.
* The library search tactics `exact?` and `apply?` that were originally in
Mathlib are now available in Lean itself. These use the implementation using
lazy discrimination trees from `Std`, and thus do not require a disk cache but
have a slightly longer startup time. The order used for selection lemmas has
changed as well to favor goals purely based on how many terms in the head
pattern match the current goal.
* The `solve_by_elim` tactic has been ported from `Std` to Lean so that library
search can use it.
* New `#check_tactic` and `#check_simp` commands have been added. These are
useful for checking tactics (particularly `simp`) behave as expected in test
suites.
* Previously, app unexpanders would only be applied to entire applications. However, some notations produce
functions, and these functions can be given additional arguments. The solution so far has been to write app unexpanders so that they can take an arbitrary number of additional arguments. However this leads to misleading hover information in the Infoview. For example, while `HAdd.hAdd f g 1` pretty prints as `(f + g) 1`, hovering over `f + g` shows `f`. There is no way to fix the situation from within an app unexpander; the expression position for `HAdd.hAdd f g` is absent, and app unexpanders cannot register TermInfo.
This commit changes the app delaborator to try running app unexpanders on every prefix of an application, from longest to shortest prefix. For efficiency, it is careful to only try this when app delaborators do in fact exist for the head constant, and it also ensures arguments are only delaborated once. Then, in `(f + g) 1`, the `f + g` gets TermInfo registered for that subexpression, making it properly hoverable.
[#3375](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3375)
Breaking changes:
* `Lean.withTraceNode` and variants got a stronger `MonadAlwaysExcept` assumption to
fix trace trees not being built on elaboration runtime exceptions. Instances for most elaboration
monads built on `EIO Exception` should be synthesized automatically.
* The `match ... with.` and `fun.` notations previously in Std have been replaced by
`nomatch ...` and `nofun`. [#3279](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3279) and [#3286](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3286)
Other improvements:
* several bug fixes for `simp`:
* we should not crash when `simp` loops [#3269](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3269)
* `simp` gets stuck on `autoParam` [#3315](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3315)
* `simp` fails when custom discharger makes no progress [#3317](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3317)
* `simp` fails to discharge `autoParam` premises even when it can reduce them to `True` [#3314](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3314)
* `simp?` suggests generated equations lemma names, fixes [#3547](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3547) [#3573](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3573)
* fixes for `match` expressions:
* fix regression with builtin literals [#3521](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3521)
* accept `match` when patterns cover all cases of a `BitVec` finite type [#3538](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3538)
* fix matching `Int` literals [#3504](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3504)
* patterns containing int values and constructors [#3496](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3496)
* improve `termination_by` error messages [#3255](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3255)
* fix `rename_i` in macros, fixes [#3553](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3553) [#3581](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3581)
* fix excessive resource usage in `generalize`, fixes [#3524](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3524) [#3575](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3575)
* an equation lemma with autoParam arguments fails to rewrite, fixing [#2243](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2243) [#3316](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3316)
* `add_decl_doc` should check that declarations are local [#3311](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3311)
* instantiate the types of inductives with the right parameters, closing [#3242](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3242) [#3246](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3246)
* New simprocs for many basic types. [#3407](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3407)
Lake fixes:
* Warn on fetch cloud release failure [#3401](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3401)
* Cloud release trace & `lake build :release` errors [#3248](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3248)
v4.6.1
---------
* Backport of [#3552](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3552) fixing a performance regression
in server startup.
v4.6.0
---------
* Add custom simplification procedures (aka `simproc`s) to `simp`. Simprocs can be triggered by the simplifier on a specified term-pattern. Here is an small example:
```lean
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Simp.BuiltinSimprocs.Nat
```lean
import Lean.Meta.Tactic.Simp.BuiltinSimprocs.Nat
def foo (x : Nat) : Nat :=
x + 10
def foo (x : Nat) : Nat :=
x + 10
/--
The `simproc` `reduceFoo` is invoked on terms that match the pattern `foo _`.
-/
simproc reduceFoo (foo _) :=
/- A term of type `Expr → SimpM Step -/
fun e => do
/-
The `Step` type has three constructors: `.done`, `.visit`, `.continue`.
* The constructor `.done` instructs `simp` that the result does
not need to be simplied further.
* The constructor `.visit` instructs `simp` to visit the resulting expression.
* The constructor `.continue` instructs `simp` to try other simplification procedures.
All three constructors take a `Result`. The `.continue` contructor may also take `none`.
`Result` has two fields `expr` (the new expression), and `proof?` (an optional proof).
If the new expression is definitionally equal to the input one, then `proof?` can be omitted or set to `none`.
-/
/- `simp` uses matching modulo reducibility. So, we ensure the term is a `foo`-application. -/
unless e.isAppOfArity ``foo 1 do
return .continue
/- `Nat.fromExpr?` tries to convert an expression into a `Nat` value -/
let some n ← Nat.fromExpr? e.appArg!
| return .continue
return .done { expr := Lean.mkNatLit (n+10) }
```
We disable simprocs support by using the command `set_option simprocs false`. This command is particularly useful when porting files to v4.6.0.
Simprocs can be scoped, manually added to `simp` commands, and suppressed using `-`. They are also supported by `simp?`. `simp only` does not execute any `simproc`. Here are some examples for the `simproc` defined above.
```lean
example : x + foo 2 = 12 + x := by
set_option simprocs false in
/- This `simp` command does not make progress since `simproc`s are disabled. -/
fail_if_success simp
simp_arith
example : x + foo 2 = 12 + x := by
/- `simp only` must not use the default simproc set. -/
fail_if_success simp only
simp_arith
example : x + foo 2 = 12 + x := by
/--
The `simproc` `reduceFoo` is invoked on terms that match the pattern `foo _`.
-/
simproc reduceFoo (foo _) :=
/- A term of type `Expr → SimpM Step -/
fun e => do
/-
`simp only` does not use the default simproc set,
but we can provide simprocs as arguments. -/
simp only [reduceFoo]
simp_arith
The `Step` type has three constructors: `.done`, `.visit`, `.continue`.
* The constructor `.done` instructs `simp` that the result does
not need to be simplied further.
* The constructor `.visit` instructs `simp` to visit the resulting expression.
* The constructor `.continue` instructs `simp` to try other simplification procedures.
example : x + foo 2 = 12 + x := by
/- We can use `-` to disable `simproc`s. -/
fail_if_success simp [-reduceFoo]
simp_arith
```
The command `register_simp_attr <id>` now creates a `simp` **and** a `simproc` set with the name `<id>`. The following command instructs Lean to insert the `reduceFoo` simplification procedure into the set `my_simp`. If no set is specified, Lean uses the default `simp` set.
```lean
simproc [my_simp] reduceFoo (foo _) := ...
```
All three constructors take a `Result`. The `.continue` contructor may also take `none`.
`Result` has two fields `expr` (the new expression), and `proof?` (an optional proof).
If the new expression is definitionally equal to the input one, then `proof?` can be omitted or set to `none`.
-/
/- `simp` uses matching modulo reducibility. So, we ensure the term is a `foo`-application. -/
unless e.isAppOfArity ``foo 1 do
return .continue
/- `Nat.fromExpr?` tries to convert an expression into a `Nat` value -/
let some n Nat.fromExpr? e.appArg!
| return .continue
return .done { expr := Lean.mkNatLit (n+10) }
```
We disable simprocs support by using the command `set_option simprocs false`. This command is particularly useful when porting files to v4.6.0.
Simprocs can be scoped, manually added to `simp` commands, and suppressed using `-`. They are also supported by `simp?`. `simp only` does not execute any `simproc`. Here are some examples for the `simproc` defined above.
```lean
example : x + foo 2 = 12 + x := by
set_option simprocs false in
/- This `simp` command does not make progress since `simproc`s are disabled. -/
fail_if_success simp
simp_arith
example : x + foo 2 = 12 + x := by
/- `simp only` must not use the default simproc set. -/
fail_if_success simp only
simp_arith
example : x + foo 2 = 12 + x := by
/-
`simp only` does not use the default simproc set,
but we can provide simprocs as arguments. -/
simp only [reduceFoo]
simp_arith
example : x + foo 2 = 12 + x := by
/- We can use `-` to disable `simproc`s. -/
fail_if_success simp [-reduceFoo]
simp_arith
```
The command `register_simp_attr <id>` now creates a `simp` **and** a `simproc` set with the name `<id>`. The following command instructs Lean to insert the `reduceFoo` simplification procedure into the set `my_simp`. If no set is specified, Lean uses the default `simp` set.
```lean
simproc [my_simp] reduceFoo (foo _) := ...
```
* The syntax of the `termination_by` and `decreasing_by` termination hints is overhauled:
@@ -533,7 +221,7 @@ v4.6.0
and hence greatly reduces the reliance on costly structure eta reduction. This has a large impact on mathlib,
reducing total CPU instructions by 3% and enabling impactful refactors like leanprover-community/mathlib4#8386
which reduces the build time by almost 20%.
See [PR #2478](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2478) and [RFC #2451](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2451).
See PR [#2478](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/2478) and RFC [#2451](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2451).
* Add pretty printer settings to omit deeply nested terms (`pp.deepTerms false` and `pp.deepTerms.threshold`) ([PR #3201](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3201))
@@ -552,7 +240,7 @@ Other improvements:
* produce simpler proof terms in `rw` [#3121](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3121)
* fuse nested `mkCongrArg` calls in proofs generated by `simp` [#3203](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3203)
* `induction using` followed by a general term [#3188](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3188)
* allow generalization in `let` [#3060](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3060), fixing [#3065](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/3065)
* allow generalization in `let` [#3060](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3060, fixing [#3065](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/3065)
* reducing out-of-bounds `swap!` should return `a`, not `default`` [#3197](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3197), fixing [#3196](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/3196)
* derive `BEq` on structure with `Prop`-fields [#3191](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3191), fixing [#3140](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/3140)
* refine through more `casesOnApp`/`matcherApp` [#3176](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3176), fixing [#3175](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3175)

9
default.nix Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
# used for `nix-shell https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/archive/master.tar.gz -A nix`
{ nix = (import ./shell.nix {}).nix; } //
(import (
fetchTarball {
url = "https://github.com/edolstra/flake-compat/archive/c75e76f80c57784a6734356315b306140646ee84.tar.gz";
sha256 = "071aal00zp2m9knnhddgr2wqzlx6i6qa1263lv1y7bdn2w20h10h"; }
) {
src = ./.;
}).defaultNix

View File

@@ -89,6 +89,5 @@
- [Testing](./dev/testing.md)
- [Debugging](./dev/debugging.md)
- [Commit Convention](./dev/commit_convention.md)
- [Release checklist](./dev/release_checklist.md)
- [Building This Manual](./dev/mdbook.md)
- [Foreign Function Interface](./dev/ffi.md)

View File

@@ -81,8 +81,20 @@ or using Github CLI with
gh workflow run update-stage0.yml
```
Leaving stage0 updates to the CI automation is preferable, but should you need to do it locally, you can use `make update-stage0-commit` in `build/release` to update `stage0` from `stage1` or `make -C stageN update-stage0-commit` to update from another stage.
This command will automatically stage the updated files and introduce a commit, so make sure to commit your work before that. Then coordinate with the admins to not squash your PR so that stage 0 updates are preserved as separate commits.
Leaving stage0 updates to the CI automation is preferrable, but should you need
to do it locally, you can use `make update-stage0` in `build/release`, to
update `stage0` from `stage1`, `make -C stageN update-stage0` to update from
another stage, or `nix run .#update-stage0-commit` to update using nix.
Updates to `stage0` should be their own commits in the Git history. So should
you have to include the stage0 update in your PR (rather than using above
automation after merging changes), commit your work before running `make
update-stage0`, commit the updated `stage0` compiler code with the commit
message:
```
chore: update stage0
```
and coordinate with the admins to not squash your PR.
## Further Bootstrapping Complications

View File

@@ -111,15 +111,6 @@ if (lean_io_result_is_ok(res)) {
lean_io_mark_end_initialization();
```
In addition, any other thread not spawned by the Lean runtime itself must be initialized for Lean use by calling
```c
void lean_initialize_thread();
```
and should be finalized in order to free all thread-local resources by calling
```c
void lean_finalize_thread();
```
## `@[extern]` in the Interpreter
The interpreter can run Lean declarations for which symbols are available in loaded shared libraries, which includes `@[extern]` declarations.

View File

@@ -74,9 +74,3 @@ Lean's build process uses [`ccache`](https://ccache.dev/) if it is
installed to speed up recompilation of the generated C code. Without
`ccache`, you'll likely spend more time than necessary waiting on
rebuilds - it's a good idea to make sure it's installed.
### `prelude`
Unlike most Lean projects, all submodules of the `Lean` module begin with the
`prelude` keyword. This disables the automated import of `Init`, meaning that
developers need to figure out their own subset of `Init` to import. This is done
such that changing files in `Init` doesn't force a full rebuild of `Lean`.

View File

@@ -1,229 +0,0 @@
# Releasing a stable version
This checklist walks you through releasing a stable version.
See below for the checklist for release candidates.
We'll use `v4.6.0` as the intended release version as a running example.
- One week before the planned release, ensure that someone has written the first draft of the release blog post
- `git checkout releases/v4.6.0`
(This branch should already exist, from the release candidates.)
- `git pull`
- In `src/CMakeLists.txt`, verify you see
- `set(LEAN_VERSION_MINOR 6)` (for whichever `6` is appropriate)
- `set(LEAN_VERSION_IS_RELEASE 1)`
- (both of these should already be in place from the release candidates)
- It is possible that the `v4.6.0` section of `RELEASES.md` is out of sync between
`releases/v4.6.0` and `master`. This should be reconciled:
- Run `git diff master RELEASES.md`.
- You should expect to see additons on `master` in the `v4.7.0-rc1` section; ignore these.
(i.e. the new release notes for the upcoming release candidate).
- Reconcile discrepancies in the `v4.6.0` section,
usually via copy and paste and a commit to `releases/v4.6.0`.
- `git tag v4.6.0`
- `git push $REMOTE v4.6.0`, where `$REMOTE` is the upstream Lean repository (e.g., `origin`, `upstream`)
- Now wait, while CI runs.
- You can monitor this at `https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/actions/workflows/ci.yml`,
looking for the `v4.6.0` tag.
- This step can take up to an hour.
- If you are intending to cut the next release candidate on the same day,
you may want to start on the release candidate checklist now.
- Go to https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/releases and verify that the `v4.6.0` release appears.
- Edit the release notes on Github to select the "Set as the latest release".
- Copy and paste the Github release notes from the previous releases candidate for this version
(e.g. `v4.6.0-rc1`), and quickly sanity check.
- Next, we will move a curated list of downstream repos to the latest stable release.
- For each of the repositories listed below:
- Make a PR to `master`/`main` changing the toolchain to `v4.6.0`
- Update the toolchain file
- In the Lakefile, if there are dependencies on specific version tags of dependencies that you've already pushed as part of this process, update them to the new tag.
If they depend on `main` or `master`, don't change this; you've just updated the dependency, so it will work and be saved in the manifest
- Run `lake update`
- The PR title should be "chore: bump toolchain to v4.6.0".
- Merge the PR once CI completes.
- Create the tag `v4.6.0` from `master`/`main` and push it.
- Merge the tag `v4.6.0` into the `stable` branch and push it.
- We do this for the repositories:
- [lean4checker](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4checker)
- No dependencies
- Note: `lean4checker` uses a different version tagging scheme: use `toolchain/v4.6.0` rather than `v4.6.0`.
- Toolchain bump PR
- Create and push the tag
- Merge the tag into `stable`
- [Std](https://github.com/leanprover-community/std4)
- No dependencies
- Toolchain bump PR
- Create and push the tag
- Merge the tag into `stable`
- [ProofWidgets4](https://github.com/leanprover-community/ProofWidgets4)
- Dependencies: `Std`
- Note on versions and branches:
- `ProofWidgets` uses a sequential version tagging scheme, e.g. `v0.0.29`,
which does not refer to the toolchain being used.
- Make a new release in this sequence after merging the toolchain bump PR.
- `ProofWidgets` does not maintain a `stable` branch.
- Toolchain bump PR
- Create and push the tag, following the version convention of the repository
- [Aesop](https://github.com/leanprover-community/aesop)
- Dependencies: `Std`
- Toolchain bump PR including updated Lake manifest
- Create and push the tag
- Merge the tag into `stable`
- [doc-gen4](https://github.com/leanprover/doc-gen4)
- Dependencies: exist, but they're not part of the release workflow
- Toolchain bump PR including updated Lake manifest
- Create and push the tag
- There is no `stable` branch; skip this step
- [import-graph](https://github.com/leanprover-community/import-graph)
- Toolchain bump PR including updated Lake manifest
- Create and push the tag
- There is no `stable` branch; skip this step
- [Mathlib](https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4)
- Dependencies: `Aesop`, `ProofWidgets4`, `lean4checker`, `Std`, `doc-gen4`, `import-graph`
- Toolchain bump PR notes:
- In addition to updating the `lean-toolchain` and `lakefile.lean`,
in `.github/workflows/build.yml.in` in the `lean4checker` section update the line
`git checkout toolchain/v4.6.0` to the appropriate tag,
and then run `.github/workflows/mk_build_yml.sh`. Coordinate with
a Mathlib maintainer to get this merged.
- Push the PR branch to the main Mathlib repository rather than a fork, or CI may not work reliably
- Create and push the tag
- Create a new branch from the tag, push it, and open a pull request against `stable`.
Coordinate with a Mathlib maintainer to get this merged.
- [REPL](https://github.com/leanprover-community/repl)
- Dependencies: `Mathlib` (for test code)
- Note that there are two copies of `lean-toolchain`/`lakefile.lean`:
in the root, and in `test/Mathlib/`. Edit both, and run `lake update` in both directories.
- Toolchain bump PR including updated Lake manifest
- Create and push the tag
- Merge the tag into `stable`
- Merge the release announcement PR for the Lean website - it will be deployed automatically
- Finally, make an announcement!
This should go in https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113486-announce, with topic `v4.6.0`.
Please see previous announcements for suggested language.
You will want a few bullet points for main topics from the release notes.
Link to the blog post from the Zulip announcement.
- Make sure that whoever is handling social media knows the release is out.
## Optimistic(?) time estimates:
- Initial checks and push the tag: 30 minutes.
- Note that if `RELEASES.md` has discrepancies this could take longer!
- Waiting for the release: 60 minutes.
- Fixing release notes: 10 minutes.
- Bumping toolchains in downstream repositories, up to creating the Mathlib PR: 30 minutes.
- Waiting for Mathlib CI and bors: 120 minutes.
- Finalizing Mathlib tags and stable branch, and updating REPL: 15 minutes.
- Posting announcement and/or blog post: 20 minutes.
# Creating a release candidate.
This checklist walks you through creating the first release candidate for a version of Lean.
We'll use `v4.7.0-rc1` as the intended release version in this example.
- Decide which nightly release you want to turn into a release candidate.
We will use `nightly-2024-02-29` in this example.
- It is essential that Std and Mathlib already have reviewed branches compatible with this nightly.
- Check that both Std and Mathlib's `bump/v4.7.0` branch contain `nightly-2024-02-29`
in their `lean-toolchain`.
- The steps required to reach that state are beyond the scope of this checklist, but see below!
- Create the release branch from this nightly tag:
```
git remote add nightly https://github.com/leanprover/lean4-nightly.git
git fetch nightly tag nightly-2024-02-29
git checkout nightly-2024-02-29
git checkout -b releases/v4.7.0
```
- In `RELEASES.md` remove `(development in progress)` from the `v4.7.0` section header.
- Our current goal is to have written release notes only about major language features or breaking changes,
and to rely on automatically generated release notes for bugfixes and minor changes.
- Do not wait on `RELEASES.md` being perfect before creating the `release/v4.7.0` branch. It is essential to choose the nightly which will become the release candidate as early as possible, to avoid confusion.
- If there are major changes not reflected in `RELEASES.md` already, you may need to solicit help from the authors.
- Minor changes and bug fixes do not need to be documented in `RELEASES.md`: they will be added automatically on the Github release page.
- Commit your changes to `RELEASES.md`, and push.
- Remember that changes to `RELEASES.md` after you have branched `releases/v4.7.0` should also be cherry-picked back to `master`.
- In `src/CMakeLists.txt`,
- verify that you see `set(LEAN_VERSION_MINOR 7)` (for whichever `7` is appropriate); this should already have been updated when the development cycle began.
- `set(LEAN_VERSION_IS_RELEASE 1)` (this should be a change; on `master` and nightly releases it is always `0`).
- Commit your changes to `src/CMakeLists.txt`, and push.
- `git tag v4.7.0-rc1`
- `git push origin v4.7.0-rc1`
- Now wait, while CI runs.
- You can monitor this at `https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/actions/workflows/ci.yml`, looking for the `v4.7.0-rc1` tag.
- This step can take up to an hour.
- Once the release appears at https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/releases/
- Edit the release notes on Github to select the "Set as a pre-release box".
- Copy the section of `RELEASES.md` for this version into the Github release notes.
- Use the title "Changes since v4.6.0 (from RELEASES.md)"
- Then in the "previous tag" dropdown, select `v4.6.0`, and click "Generate release notes".
- This will add a list of all the commits since the last stable version.
- Delete anything already mentioned in the hand-written release notes above.
- Delete "update stage0" commits, and anything with a completely inscrutable commit message.
- Briefly rearrange the remaining items by category (e.g. `simp`, `lake`, `bug fixes`),
but for minor items don't put any work in expanding on commit messages.
- (How we want to release notes to look is evolving: please update this section if it looks wrong!)
- Next, we will move a curated list of downstream repos to the release candidate.
- This assumes that there is already a *reviewed* branch `bump/v4.7.0` on each repository
containing the required adaptations (or no adaptations are required).
The preparation of this branch is beyond the scope of this document.
- For each of the target repositories:
- Checkout the `bump/v4.7.0` branch.
- Verify that the `lean-toolchain` is set to the nightly from which the release candidate was created.
- `git merge origin/master`
- Change the `lean-toolchain` to `leanprover/lean4:v4.7.0-rc1`
- In `lakefile.lean`, change any dependencies which were using `nightly-testing` or `bump/v4.7.0` branches
back to `master` or `main`, and run `lake update` for those dependencies.
- Run `lake build` to ensure that dependencies are found (but it's okay to stop it after a moment).
- `git commit`
- `git push`
- Open a PR from `bump/v4.7.0` to `master`, and either merge it yourself after CI, if appropriate,
or notify the maintainers that it is ready to go.
- Once this PR has been merged, tag `master` with `v4.7.0-rc1` and push this tag.
- We do this for the same list of repositories as for stable releases, see above.
As above, there are dependencies between these, and so the process above is iterative.
It greatly helps if you can merge the `bump/v4.7.0` PRs yourself!
- For Std/Aesop/Mathlib, which maintain a `nightly-testing` branch, make sure there is a tag
`nightly-testing-2024-02-29` with date corresponding to the nightly used for the release
(create it if not), and then on the `nightly-testing` branch `git reset --hard master`, and force push.
- Make an announcement!
This should go in https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113486-announce, with topic `v4.7.0-rc1`.
Please see previous announcements for suggested language.
You will want a few bullet points for main topics from the release notes.
Please also make sure that whoever is handling social media knows the release is out.
- Begin the next development cycle (i.e. for `v4.8.0`) on the Lean repository, by making a PR that:
- Updates `src/CMakeLists.txt` to say `set(LEAN_VERSION_MINOR 8)`
- Removes `(in development)` from the section heading in `RELEASES.md` for `v4.7.0`,
and creates a new `v4.8.0 (in development)` section heading.
## Time estimates:
Slightly longer than the corresponding steps for a stable release.
Similar process, but more things go wrong.
In particular, updating the downstream repositories is significantly more work
(because we need to merge existing `bump/v4.7.0` branches, not just update a toolchain).
# Preparing `bump/v4.7.0` branches
While not part of the release process per se,
this is a brief summary of the work that goes into updating Std/Aesop/Mathlib to new versions.
Please read https://leanprover-community.github.io/contribute/tags_and_branches.html
* Each repo has an unreviewed `nightly-testing` branch that
receives commits automatically from `master`, and
has its toolchain updated automatically for every nightly.
(Note: the aesop branch is not automated, and is updated on an as needed basis.)
As a consequence this branch is often broken.
A bot posts in the (private!) "Mathlib reviewers" stream on Zulip about the status of these branches.
* We fix the breakages by committing directly to `nightly-testing`: there is no PR process.
* This can either be done by the person managing this process directly,
or by soliciting assistance from authors of files, or generally helpful people on Zulip!
* Each repo has a `bump/v4.7.0` which accumulates reviewed changes adapting to new versions.
* Once `nightly-testing` is working on a given nightly, say `nightly-2024-02-15`, we:
* Make sure `bump/v4.7.0` is up to date with `master` (by merging `master`, no PR necessary)
* Create from `bump/v4.7.0` a `bump/nightly-2024-02-15` branch.
* In that branch, `git merge --squash nightly-testing` to bring across changes from `nightly-testing`.
* Sanity check changes, commit, and make a PR to `bump/v4.7.0` from the `bump/nightly-2024-02-15` branch.
* Solicit review, merge the PR into `bump/v4,7,0`.
* It is always okay to merge in the following directions:
`master` -> `bump/v4.7.0` -> `bump/nightly-2024-02-15` -> `nightly-testing`.
Please remember to push any merges you make to intermediate steps!

View File

@@ -277,13 +277,14 @@ theorem BinTree.find_insert (b : BinTree β) (k : Nat) (v : β)
. by_cases' key < k
cases h; apply ihr; assumption
theorem BinTree.find_insert_of_ne (b : BinTree β) (ne : k k') (v : β)
theorem BinTree.find_insert_of_ne (b : BinTree β) (h : k k') (v : β)
: (b.insert k v).find? k' = b.find? k' := by
let t, h := b; simp
induction t with simp
| leaf =>
intros le
exact Nat.lt_of_le_of_ne le ne
intros
have_eq k k'
contradiction
| node left key value right ihl ihr =>
let .node hl hr bl br := h
specialize ihl bl

View File

@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
src = inputs.mdBook;
cargoDeps = drv.cargoDeps.overrideAttrs (_: {
inherit src;
outputHash = "sha256-CO3A9Kpp4sIvkT9X3p+GTidazk7Fn4jf0AP2PINN44A=";
outputHash = "sha256-1YlPS6cqgxE4fjy9G8pWrpP27YrrbCDnfeyIsX81ZNw=";
});
doCheck = false;
});

View File

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Platform-Specific Setup
- [Windows (msys2)](msys2.md)
- [Windows (WSL)](wsl.md)
- [macOS (homebrew)](osx-10.9.md)
- Linux/macOS/WSL via [Nix](https://nixos.org/nix/): Call `nix develop` in the project root. That's it.
- Linux/macOS/WSL via [Nix](https://nixos.org/nix/): Call `nix-shell` in the project root. That's it.
Generic Build Instructions
--------------------------

View File

@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ convert the pure non-monadic value `x / y` into the required `Except` object. S
Now this return typing would get tedious if you had to include it everywhere that you call this
function, however, Lean type inference can clean this up. For example, you can define a test
function that calls the `divide` function and you don't need to say anything here about the fact that
function can calls the `divide` function and you don't need to say anything here about the fact that
it might throw an error, because that is inferred:
-/
def test := divide 5 0

105
flake.lock generated
View File

@@ -1,31 +1,12 @@
{
"nodes": {
"flake-compat": {
"flake": false,
"locked": {
"lastModified": 1673956053,
"narHash": "sha256-4gtG9iQuiKITOjNQQeQIpoIB6b16fm+504Ch3sNKLd8=",
"owner": "edolstra",
"repo": "flake-compat",
"rev": "35bb57c0c8d8b62bbfd284272c928ceb64ddbde9",
"type": "github"
},
"original": {
"owner": "edolstra",
"repo": "flake-compat",
"type": "github"
}
},
"flake-utils": {
"inputs": {
"systems": "systems"
},
"locked": {
"lastModified": 1710146030,
"narHash": "sha256-SZ5L6eA7HJ/nmkzGG7/ISclqe6oZdOZTNoesiInkXPQ=",
"lastModified": 1656928814,
"narHash": "sha256-RIFfgBuKz6Hp89yRr7+NR5tzIAbn52h8vT6vXkYjZoM=",
"owner": "numtide",
"repo": "flake-utils",
"rev": "b1d9ab70662946ef0850d488da1c9019f3a9752a",
"rev": "7e2a3b3dfd9af950a856d66b0a7d01e3c18aa249",
"type": "github"
},
"original": {
@@ -37,11 +18,11 @@
"lean4-mode": {
"flake": false,
"locked": {
"lastModified": 1709737301,
"narHash": "sha256-uT9JN2kLNKJK9c/S/WxLjiHmwijq49EgLb+gJUSDpz0=",
"lastModified": 1676498134,
"narHash": "sha256-u3WvyKxOViZG53hkb8wd2/Og6muTecbh+NdflIgVeyk=",
"owner": "leanprover",
"repo": "lean4-mode",
"rev": "f1f24c15134dee3754b82c9d9924866fe6bc6b9f",
"rev": "2c6ef33f476fdf5eb5e4fa4fa023ba8b11372440",
"type": "github"
},
"original": {
@@ -50,35 +31,34 @@
"type": "github"
}
},
"libgit2": {
"lowdown-src": {
"flake": false,
"locked": {
"lastModified": 1697646580,
"narHash": "sha256-oX4Z3S9WtJlwvj0uH9HlYcWv+x1hqp8mhXl7HsLu2f0=",
"owner": "libgit2",
"repo": "libgit2",
"rev": "45fd9ed7ae1a9b74b957ef4f337bc3c8b3df01b5",
"lastModified": 1633514407,
"narHash": "sha256-Dw32tiMjdK9t3ETl5fzGrutQTzh2rufgZV4A/BbxuD4=",
"owner": "kristapsdz",
"repo": "lowdown",
"rev": "d2c2b44ff6c27b936ec27358a2653caaef8f73b8",
"type": "github"
},
"original": {
"owner": "libgit2",
"repo": "libgit2",
"owner": "kristapsdz",
"repo": "lowdown",
"type": "github"
}
},
"nix": {
"inputs": {
"flake-compat": "flake-compat",
"libgit2": "libgit2",
"lowdown-src": "lowdown-src",
"nixpkgs": "nixpkgs",
"nixpkgs-regression": "nixpkgs-regression"
},
"locked": {
"lastModified": 1711102798,
"narHash": "sha256-CXOIJr8byjolqG7eqCLa+Wfi7rah62VmLoqSXENaZnw=",
"lastModified": 1657097207,
"narHash": "sha256-SmeGmjWM3fEed3kQjqIAO8VpGmkC2sL1aPE7kKpK650=",
"owner": "NixOS",
"repo": "nix",
"rev": "a22328066416650471c3545b0b138669ea212ab4",
"rev": "f6316b49a0c37172bca87ede6ea8144d7d89832f",
"type": "github"
},
"original": {
@@ -89,33 +69,16 @@
},
"nixpkgs": {
"locked": {
"lastModified": 1709083642,
"narHash": "sha256-7kkJQd4rZ+vFrzWu8sTRtta5D1kBG0LSRYAfhtmMlSo=",
"lastModified": 1653988320,
"narHash": "sha256-ZaqFFsSDipZ6KVqriwM34T739+KLYJvNmCWzErjAg7c=",
"owner": "NixOS",
"repo": "nixpkgs",
"rev": "b550fe4b4776908ac2a861124307045f8e717c8e",
"rev": "2fa57ed190fd6c7c746319444f34b5917666e5c1",
"type": "github"
},
"original": {
"owner": "NixOS",
"ref": "release-23.11",
"repo": "nixpkgs",
"type": "github"
}
},
"nixpkgs-old": {
"flake": false,
"locked": {
"lastModified": 1581379743,
"narHash": "sha256-i1XCn9rKuLjvCdu2UeXKzGLF6IuQePQKFt4hEKRU5oc=",
"owner": "NixOS",
"repo": "nixpkgs",
"rev": "34c7eb7545d155cc5b6f499b23a7cb1c96ab4d59",
"type": "github"
},
"original": {
"owner": "NixOS",
"ref": "nixos-19.03",
"ref": "nixos-22.05-small",
"repo": "nixpkgs",
"type": "github"
}
@@ -138,11 +101,11 @@
},
"nixpkgs_2": {
"locked": {
"lastModified": 1710889954,
"narHash": "sha256-Pr6F5Pmd7JnNEMHHmspZ0qVqIBVxyZ13ik1pJtm2QXk=",
"lastModified": 1686089707,
"narHash": "sha256-LTNlJcru2qJ0XhlhG9Acp5KyjB774Pza3tRH0pKIb3o=",
"owner": "NixOS",
"repo": "nixpkgs",
"rev": "7872526e9c5332274ea5932a0c3270d6e4724f3b",
"rev": "af21c31b2a1ec5d361ed8050edd0303c31306397",
"type": "github"
},
"original": {
@@ -157,23 +120,7 @@
"flake-utils": "flake-utils",
"lean4-mode": "lean4-mode",
"nix": "nix",
"nixpkgs": "nixpkgs_2",
"nixpkgs-old": "nixpkgs-old"
}
},
"systems": {
"locked": {
"lastModified": 1681028828,
"narHash": "sha256-Vy1rq5AaRuLzOxct8nz4T6wlgyUR7zLU309k9mBC768=",
"owner": "nix-systems",
"repo": "default",
"rev": "da67096a3b9bf56a91d16901293e51ba5b49a27e",
"type": "github"
},
"original": {
"owner": "nix-systems",
"repo": "default",
"type": "github"
"nixpkgs": "nixpkgs_2"
}
}
},

View File

@@ -2,9 +2,6 @@
description = "Lean interactive theorem prover";
inputs.nixpkgs.url = "github:NixOS/nixpkgs/nixpkgs-unstable";
# old nixpkgs used for portable release with older glibc (2.27)
inputs.nixpkgs-old.url = "github:NixOS/nixpkgs/nixos-19.03";
inputs.nixpkgs-old.flake = false;
inputs.flake-utils.url = "github:numtide/flake-utils";
inputs.nix.url = "github:NixOS/nix";
inputs.lean4-mode = {
@@ -20,41 +17,14 @@
# inputs.lean4-mode.follows = "lean4-mode";
#};
outputs = { self, nixpkgs, nixpkgs-old, flake-utils, nix, lean4-mode, ... }@inputs: flake-utils.lib.eachDefaultSystem (system:
outputs = { self, nixpkgs, flake-utils, nix, lean4-mode, ... }@inputs: flake-utils.lib.eachDefaultSystem (system:
let
pkgs = import nixpkgs {
inherit system;
# for `vscode-with-extensions`
config.allowUnfree = true;
};
# An old nixpkgs for creating releases with an old glibc
pkgsDist-old = import nixpkgs-old { inherit system; };
# An old nixpkgs for creating releases with an old glibc
pkgsDist-old-aarch = import nixpkgs-old { localSystem.config = "aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu"; };
lean-packages = pkgs.callPackage (./nix/packages.nix) { src = ./.; inherit nix lean4-mode; };
devShellWithDist = pkgsDist: pkgs.mkShell.override {
stdenv = pkgs.overrideCC pkgs.stdenv lean-packages.llvmPackages.clang;
} ({
buildInputs = with pkgs; [
cmake gmp ccache
lean-packages.llvmPackages.llvm # llvm-symbolizer for asan/lsan
# TODO: only add when proven to not affect the flakification
#pkgs.python3
];
# https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/60919
hardeningDisable = [ "all" ];
# more convenient `ctest` output
CTEST_OUTPUT_ON_FAILURE = 1;
} // pkgs.lib.optionalAttrs pkgs.stdenv.isLinux {
GMP = pkgsDist.gmp.override { withStatic = true; };
GLIBC = pkgsDist.glibc;
GLIBC_DEV = pkgsDist.glibc.dev;
GCC_LIB = pkgsDist.gcc.cc.lib;
ZLIB = pkgsDist.zlib;
GDB = pkgsDist.gdb;
});
in {
packages = lean-packages // rec {
debug = lean-packages.override { debug = true; };
@@ -79,10 +49,7 @@
};
defaultPackage = lean-packages.lean-all;
# The default development shell for working on lean itself
devShells.default = devShellWithDist pkgs;
devShells.oldGlibc = devShellWithDist pkgsDist-old;
devShells.oldGlibcAArch = devShellWithDist pkgsDist-old-aarch;
inherit (lean-packages) devShell;
checks.lean = lean-packages.test;
}) // rec {

View File

@@ -65,7 +65,12 @@ rec {
installPhase = ''
mkdir -p $out/bin $out/lib/lean
mv bin/lean $out/bin/
mv lib/lean/*.{so,dylib} $out/lib/lean
mv lib/lean/libleanshared.* $out/lib/lean
'' + lib.optionalString stdenv.isDarwin ''
for lib in $(otool -L $out/bin/lean | tail -n +2 | cut -d' ' -f1); do
if [[ "$lib" == *lean* ]]; then install_name_tool -change "$lib" "$out/lib/lean/$(basename $lib)" $out/bin/lean; fi
done
otool -L $out/bin/lean
'';
meta.mainProgram = "lean";
});
@@ -115,35 +120,29 @@ rec {
iTree = symlinkJoin { name = "ileans"; paths = map (l: l.iTree) stdlib; };
Leanc = build { name = "Leanc"; src = lean-bin-tools-unwrapped.leanc_src; deps = stdlib; roots = [ "Leanc" ]; };
stdlibLinkFlags = "-L${Init.staticLib} -L${Lean.staticLib} -L${Lake.staticLib} -L${leancpp}/lib/lean";
libInit_shared = runCommand "libInit_shared" { buildInputs = [ stdenv.cc ]; libName = "libInit_shared${stdenv.hostPlatform.extensions.sharedLibrary}"; } ''
mkdir $out
LEAN_CC=${stdenv.cc}/bin/cc ${lean-bin-tools-unwrapped}/bin/leanc -shared -Wl,-Bsymbolic \
-Wl,--whole-archive -lInit ${leancpp}/lib/libleanrt_initial-exec.a -Wl,--no-whole-archive -lstdc++ -lm ${stdlibLinkFlags} \
$(${llvmPackages.libllvm.dev}/bin/llvm-config --ldflags --libs) \
-o $out/$libName
'';
leanshared = runCommand "leanshared" { buildInputs = [ stdenv.cc ]; libName = "libleanshared${stdenv.hostPlatform.extensions.sharedLibrary}"; } ''
mkdir $out
LEAN_CC=${stdenv.cc}/bin/cc ${lean-bin-tools-unwrapped}/bin/leanc -shared -Wl,-Bsymbolic \
${libInit_shared}/* -Wl,--whole-archive -lLean -lleancpp -Wl,--no-whole-archive -lstdc++ -lm ${stdlibLinkFlags} \
LEAN_CC=${stdenv.cc}/bin/cc ${lean-bin-tools-unwrapped}/bin/leanc -shared ${lib.optionalString stdenv.isLinux "-Wl,-Bsymbolic"} \
${if stdenv.isDarwin then "-Wl,-force_load,${Init.staticLib}/libInit.a -Wl,-force_load,${Lean.staticLib}/libLean.a -Wl,-force_load,${leancpp}/lib/lean/libleancpp.a ${leancpp}/lib/libleanrt_initial-exec.a -lc++"
else "-Wl,--whole-archive -lInit -lLean -lleancpp ${leancpp}/lib/libleanrt_initial-exec.a -Wl,--no-whole-archive -lstdc++"} -lm ${stdlibLinkFlags} \
$(${llvmPackages.libllvm.dev}/bin/llvm-config --ldflags --libs) \
-o $out/$libName
'';
mods = foldl' (mods: pkg: mods // pkg.mods) {} stdlib;
print-paths = Lean.makePrintPathsFor [] mods;
leanc = writeShellScriptBin "leanc" ''
LEAN_CC=${stdenv.cc}/bin/cc ${Leanc.executable}/bin/leanc -I${lean-bin-tools-unwrapped}/include ${stdlibLinkFlags} -L${libInit_shared} -L${leanshared} "$@"
LEAN_CC=${stdenv.cc}/bin/cc ${Leanc.executable}/bin/leanc -I${lean-bin-tools-unwrapped}/include ${stdlibLinkFlags} -L${leanshared} "$@"
'';
lean = runCommand "lean" { buildInputs = lib.optional stdenv.isDarwin darwin.cctools; } ''
mkdir -p $out/bin
${leanc}/bin/leanc ${leancpp}/lib/lean.cpp.o ${libInit_shared}/* ${leanshared}/* -o $out/bin/lean
${leanc}/bin/leanc ${leancpp}/lib/lean.cpp.o ${leanshared}/* -o $out/bin/lean
'';
# derivation following the directory layout of the "basic" setup, mostly useful for running tests
lean-all = stdenv.mkDerivation {
name = "lean-${desc}";
buildCommand = ''
mkdir -p $out/bin $out/lib/lean
ln -sf ${leancpp}/lib/lean/* ${lib.concatMapStringsSep " " (l: "${l.modRoot}/* ${l.staticLib}/*") (lib.reverseList stdlib)} ${libInit_shared}/* ${leanshared}/* $out/lib/lean/
ln -sf ${leancpp}/lib/lean/* ${lib.concatMapStringsSep " " (l: "${l.modRoot}/* ${l.staticLib}/*") (lib.reverseList stdlib)} ${leanshared}/* $out/lib/lean/
# put everything in a single final derivation so `IO.appDir` references work
cp ${lean}/bin/lean ${leanc}/bin/leanc ${Lake-Main.executable}/bin/lake $out/bin
# NOTE: `lndir` will not override existing `bin/leanc`
@@ -170,11 +169,10 @@ rec {
ln -sf ${lean-all}/* .
'';
buildPhase = ''
ctest --output-junit test-results.xml --output-on-failure -E 'leancomptest_(doc_example|foreign)' -j$NIX_BUILD_CORES
ctest --output-on-failure -E 'leancomptest_(doc_example|foreign)' -j$NIX_BUILD_CORES
'';
installPhase = ''
mkdir $out
mv test-results.xml $out
touch $out
'';
};
update-stage0 =

View File

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ lib.makeOverridable (
staticLibDeps ? [],
# Whether to wrap static library inputs in a -Wl,--start-group [...] -Wl,--end-group to ensure dependencies are resolved.
groupStaticLibs ? false,
# Shared library dependencies included at interpretation with --load-dynlib and linked to. Each derivation `shared` should contain a
# Shared library dependencies included at interpretation with --load-dynlib and linked to. Each derivation `shared` should contain a
# shared library at the path `${shared}/${shared.libName or shared.name}` and a name to link to like `-l${shared.linkName or shared.name}`.
# These libs are also linked to in packages that depend on this one.
nativeSharedLibs ? [],
@@ -88,9 +88,9 @@ with builtins; let
allNativeSharedLibs =
lib.unique (lib.flatten (nativeSharedLibs ++ (map (dep: dep.allNativeSharedLibs or []) allExternalDeps)));
# A flattened list of all static library dependencies: this and every dep module's explicitly provided `staticLibDeps`,
# A flattened list of all static library dependencies: this and every dep module's explicitly provided `staticLibDeps`,
# plus every dep module itself: `dep.staticLib`
allStaticLibDeps =
allStaticLibDeps =
lib.unique (lib.flatten (staticLibDeps ++ (map (dep: [dep.staticLib] ++ dep.staticLibDeps or []) allExternalDeps)));
pathOfSharedLib = dep: dep.libPath or "${dep}/${dep.libName or dep.name}";
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ with builtins; let
# make local "copy" so `drv`'s Nix store path doesn't end up in ccache's hash
ln -s ${drv.c}/${drv.cPath} src.c
# on the other hand, a debug build is pretty fast anyway, so preserve the path for gdb
leanc -c -o $out/$oPath $leancFlags -fPIC ${if debug then "${drv.c}/${drv.cPath} -g" else "src.c -O3 -DNDEBUG -DLEAN_EXPORTING"}
leanc -c -o $out/$oPath $leancFlags -fPIC ${if debug then "${drv.c}/${drv.cPath} -g" else "src.c -O3 -DNDEBUG"}
'';
};
mkMod = mod: deps:
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ in rec {
${if stdenv.isDarwin then "-Wl,-force_load,${staticLib}/lib${libName}.a" else "-Wl,--whole-archive ${staticLib}/lib${libName}.a -Wl,--no-whole-archive"} \
${lib.concatStringsSep " " (map (d: "${d.sharedLib}/*") deps)}'';
executable = lib.makeOverridable ({ withSharedStdlib ? true }: let
objPaths = map (drv: "${drv}/${drv.oPath}") (attrValues objects) ++ lib.optional withSharedStdlib "${lean-final.libInit_shared}/* ${lean-final.leanshared}/*";
objPaths = map (drv: "${drv}/${drv.oPath}") (attrValues objects) ++ lib.optional withSharedStdlib "${lean-final.leanshared}/*";
in runCommand executableName { buildInputs = [ stdenv.cc leanc ]; } ''
mkdir -p $out/bin
leanc ${staticLibLinkWrapper (lib.concatStringsSep " " (objPaths ++ map (d: "${d}/*.a") allStaticLibDeps))} \

View File

@@ -1,8 +1,3 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sebastian Ullrich. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sebastian Ullrich
-/
import Lean.Runtime
abbrev M := ReaderT IO.FS.Stream IO
@@ -21,7 +16,7 @@ def mkTypedefFn (i : Nat) : M Unit := do
emit s!"typedef obj* (*fn{i})({args}); // NOLINT\n"
emit s!"#define FN{i}(f) reinterpret_cast<fn{i}>(lean_closure_fun(f))\n"
def genSeq (n : Nat) (f : Nat String) (sep := ", ") : String :=
def genSeq (n : Nat) (f : Nat String) (sep := ", ") : String :=
List.range n |>.map f |>.intersperse sep |> .join
-- make string: "obj* a1, obj* a2, ..., obj* an"

View File

@@ -1,28 +0,0 @@
import Lean.Util.Profiler
/-!
Usage:
```sh
lean --run ./script/collideProfiles.lean **/*.lean.json ... > merged.json
```
Merges multiple `trace.profiler.output` profiles into a single one while deduplicating samples with
the same stack. This is useful for building cumulative profiles of medium-to-large projects because
Firefox Profiler cannot handle hundreds of tracks and the deduplication will also ensure that the
profile is small enough for uploading.
As ordering of samples is not meaningful after this transformation, only "Call Tree" and "Flame
Graph" are useful for such profiles.
-/
open Lean
def main (args : List String) : IO Unit := do
let profiles args.toArray.mapM fun path => do
let json IO.FS.readFile path
let profile IO.ofExcept $ Json.parse json
IO.ofExcept <| fromJson? profile
-- NOTE: `collide` should not be interpreted
let profile := Firefox.Profile.collide profiles
IO.println <| Json.compress <| toJson profile

View File

@@ -25,8 +25,6 @@ cp -L llvm/bin/llvm-ar stage1/bin/
# dependencies of the above
$CP llvm/lib/lib{clang-cpp,LLVM}*.so* stage1/lib/
$CP $ZLIB/lib/libz.so* stage1/lib/
# general clang++ dependency, breaks cross-library C++ exceptions if linked statically
$CP $GCC_LIB/lib/libgcc_s.so* stage1/lib/
# bundle libatomic (referenced by LLVM >= 15, and required by the lean executable to run)
$CP $GCC_LIB/lib/libatomic.so* stage1/lib/
@@ -62,7 +60,7 @@ fi
# use `-nostdinc` to make sure headers are not visible by default (in particular, not to `#include_next` in the clang headers),
# but do not change sysroot so users can still link against system libs
echo -n " -DLEANC_INTERNAL_FLAGS='-nostdinc -isystem ROOT/include/clang' -DLEANC_CC=ROOT/bin/clang"
echo -n " -DLEANC_INTERNAL_LINKER_FLAGS='-L ROOT/lib -L ROOT/lib/glibc ROOT/lib/glibc/libc_nonshared.a -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-Bstatic -lgmp -lunwind -Wl,-Bdynamic -Wl,--no-as-needed -fuse-ld=lld'"
echo -n " -DLEANC_INTERNAL_LINKER_FLAGS='-L ROOT/lib -L ROOT/lib/glibc ROOT/lib/glibc/libc_nonshared.a -Wl,--as-needed -static-libgcc -Wl,-Bstatic -lgmp -lunwind -Wl,-Bdynamic -Wl,--no-as-needed -fuse-ld=lld'"
# when not using the above flags, link GMP dynamically/as usual
echo -n " -DLEAN_EXTRA_LINKER_FLAGS='-Wl,--as-needed -lgmp -Wl,--no-as-needed'"
# do not set `LEAN_CC` for tests

27
shell.nix Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
let
flake = (import ./default.nix);
flakePkgs = flake.packages.${builtins.currentSystem};
in { pkgs ? flakePkgs.nixpkgs, pkgsDist ? pkgs }:
# use `shell` as default
(attribs: attribs.shell // attribs) rec {
shell = pkgs.mkShell.override {
stdenv = pkgs.overrideCC pkgs.stdenv flakePkgs.llvmPackages.clang;
} (rec {
buildInputs = with pkgs; [
cmake gmp ccache
flakePkgs.llvmPackages.llvm # llvm-symbolizer for asan/lsan
];
# https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/60919
hardeningDisable = [ "all" ];
# more convenient `ctest` output
CTEST_OUTPUT_ON_FAILURE = 1;
} // pkgs.lib.optionalAttrs pkgs.stdenv.isLinux {
GMP = pkgsDist.gmp.override { withStatic = true; };
GLIBC = pkgsDist.glibc;
GLIBC_DEV = pkgsDist.glibc.dev;
GCC_LIB = pkgsDist.gcc.cc.lib;
ZLIB = pkgsDist.zlib;
GDB = pkgsDist.gdb;
});
nix = flake.devShell.${builtins.currentSystem};
}

View File

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ endif()
include(ExternalProject)
project(LEAN CXX C)
set(LEAN_VERSION_MAJOR 4)
set(LEAN_VERSION_MINOR 8)
set(LEAN_VERSION_MINOR 7)
set(LEAN_VERSION_PATCH 0)
set(LEAN_VERSION_IS_RELEASE 0) # This number is 1 in the release revision, and 0 otherwise.
set(LEAN_SPECIAL_VERSION_DESC "" CACHE STRING "Additional version description like 'nightly-2018-03-11'")
@@ -299,12 +299,13 @@ if(${CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME} MATCHES "Darwin")
cmake_path(GET ZLIB_LIBRARY PARENT_PATH ZLIB_LIBRARY_PARENT_PATH)
string(APPEND LEANSHARED_LINKER_FLAGS " -L ${ZLIB_LIBRARY_PARENT_PATH}")
endif()
string(APPEND TOOLCHAIN_STATIC_LINKER_FLAGS " -lleancpp -lInit -lLean -lleanrt")
string(APPEND LEANC_STATIC_LINKER_FLAGS " -lleancpp -lInit -lLean -lleanrt")
elseif(${CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME} MATCHES "Emscripten")
string(APPEND TOOLCHAIN_STATIC_LINKER_FLAGS " -lleancpp -lInit -lLean -lnodefs.js -lleanrt")
string(APPEND LEANC_STATIC_LINKER_FLAGS " -lleancpp -lInit -lLean -lnodefs.js -lleanrt")
else()
string(APPEND TOOLCHAIN_STATIC_LINKER_FLAGS " -Wl,--start-group -lleancpp -lLean -Wl,--end-group -Wl,--start-group -lInit -lleanrt -Wl,--end-group")
string(APPEND LEANC_STATIC_LINKER_FLAGS " -Wl,--start-group -lleancpp -lLean -Wl,--end-group -Wl,--start-group -lInit -lleanrt -Wl,--end-group")
endif()
string(APPEND LEANC_STATIC_LINKER_FLAGS " -lLake")
set(LEAN_CXX_STDLIB "-lstdc++" CACHE STRING "C++ stdlib linker flags")
@@ -312,11 +313,8 @@ if(${CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME} MATCHES "Darwin")
set(LEAN_CXX_STDLIB "-lc++")
endif()
string(APPEND TOOLCHAIN_STATIC_LINKER_FLAGS " ${LEAN_CXX_STDLIB}")
string(APPEND TOOLCHAIN_SHARED_LINKER_FLAGS " ${LEAN_CXX_STDLIB}")
# flags for user binaries = flags for toolchain binaries + Lake
string(APPEND LEANC_STATIC_LINKER_FLAGS " ${TOOLCHAIN_STATIC_LINKER_FLAGS} -lLake")
string(APPEND LEANC_STATIC_LINKER_FLAGS " ${LEAN_CXX_STDLIB}")
string(APPEND LEANSHARED_LINKER_FLAGS " ${LEAN_CXX_STDLIB}")
if (LLVM)
string(APPEND LEANSHARED_LINKER_FLAGS " -L${LLVM_CONFIG_LIBDIR} ${LLVM_CONFIG_LDFLAGS} ${LLVM_CONFIG_LIBS} ${LLVM_CONFIG_SYSTEM_LIBS}")
@@ -344,9 +342,9 @@ endif()
# get rid of unused parts of C++ stdlib
if(${CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME} MATCHES "Darwin")
string(APPEND TOOLCHAIN_SHARED_LINKER_FLAGS " -Wl,-dead_strip")
string(APPEND LEANSHARED_LINKER_FLAGS " -Wl,-dead_strip")
elseif(NOT ${CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME} MATCHES "Emscripten")
string(APPEND TOOLCHAIN_SHARED_LINKER_FLAGS " -Wl,--gc-sections")
string(APPEND LEANSHARED_LINKER_FLAGS " -Wl,--gc-sections")
endif()
if(NOT ${CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME} MATCHES "Darwin")
@@ -356,20 +354,26 @@ endif()
if(${CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME} MATCHES "Linux")
if(BSYMBOLIC)
string(APPEND LEANC_SHARED_LINKER_FLAGS " -Wl,-Bsymbolic")
string(APPEND TOOLCHAIN_SHARED_LINKER_FLAGS " -Wl,-Bsymbolic")
string(APPEND LEANSHARED_LINKER_FLAGS " -Wl,-Bsymbolic")
endif()
string(APPEND CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS " -fPIC -ftls-model=initial-exec")
string(APPEND LEANC_EXTRA_FLAGS " -fPIC")
string(APPEND TOOLCHAIN_SHARED_LINKER_FLAGS " -Wl,-rpath=\\$$ORIGIN/..:\\$$ORIGIN")
string(APPEND CMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS " -Wl,-rpath=\\\$ORIGIN/../lib:\\\$ORIGIN/../lib/lean")
string(APPEND LEANSHARED_LINKER_FLAGS " -Wl,-rpath=\\$$ORIGIN/..:\\$$ORIGIN")
string(APPEND CMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS " -lleanshared -Wl,-rpath=\\\$ORIGIN/../lib:\\\$ORIGIN/../lib/lean")
elseif(${CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME} MATCHES "Darwin")
string(APPEND CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS " -ftls-model=initial-exec")
string(APPEND INIT_SHARED_LINKER_FLAGS " -install_name @rpath/libInit_shared.dylib")
string(APPEND LEANSHARED_LINKER_FLAGS " -install_name @rpath/libleanshared.dylib")
string(APPEND CMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS " -Wl,-rpath,@executable_path/../lib -Wl,-rpath,@executable_path/../lib/lean")
string(APPEND CMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS " -lleanshared -Wl,-rpath,@executable_path/../lib -Wl,-rpath,@executable_path/../lib/lean")
elseif(${CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME} MATCHES "Emscripten")
string(APPEND CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS " -fPIC")
string(APPEND LEANC_EXTRA_FLAGS " -fPIC")
# We do not use dynamic linking via leanshared for Emscripten to keep things
# simple. (And we are not interested in `Lake` anyway.) To use dynamic
# linking, we would probably have to set MAIN_MODULE=2 on `leanshared`,
# SIDE_MODULE=2 on `lean`, and set CMAKE_SHARED_LIBRARY_SUFFIX to ".js".
string(APPEND CMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS " -Wl,--whole-archive -lInit -lLean -lleancpp -lleanrt ${EMSCRIPTEN_SETTINGS} -lnodefs.js -s EXIT_RUNTIME=1 -s MAIN_MODULE=1 -s LINKABLE=1 -s EXPORT_ALL=1")
elseif(${CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME} MATCHES "Windows")
string(APPEND CMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS " -lleanshared")
endif()
if(${CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME} MATCHES "Linux")
@@ -395,7 +399,7 @@ endif()
# are already loaded) and probably fail unless we set up LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
if(${CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME} MATCHES "Windows")
# import library created by the `leanshared` target
string(APPEND LEANC_SHARED_LINKER_FLAGS " -lInit_shared -lleanshared")
string(APPEND LEANC_SHARED_LINKER_FLAGS " -lleanshared")
elseif("${CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME}" MATCHES "Darwin")
string(APPEND LEANC_SHARED_LINKER_FLAGS " -Wl,-undefined,dynamic_lookup")
endif()
@@ -501,25 +505,13 @@ string(REGEX REPLACE "^([a-zA-Z]):" "/\\1" LEAN_BIN "${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/bin")
# (also looks nicer in the build log)
file(RELATIVE_PATH LIB ${LEAN_SOURCE_DIR} ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib)
# set up libInit_shared only on Windows; see also stdlib.make.in
if(${CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME} MATCHES "Windows")
set(INIT_SHARED_LINKER_FLAGS "-Wl,--whole-archive ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib/temp/libInit.a.export ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/runtime/libleanrt_initial-exec.a -Wl,--no-whole-archive -Wl,--out-implib,${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib/lean/libInit_shared.dll.a")
endif()
if(${CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME} MATCHES "Darwin")
set(LEANSHARED_LINKER_FLAGS "-Wl,-force_load,${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib/lean/libInit.a -Wl,-force_load,${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib/lean/libLean.a -Wl,-force_load,${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib/lean/libleancpp.a ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/runtime/libleanrt_initial-exec.a ${LEANSHARED_LINKER_FLAGS}")
elseif(${CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME} MATCHES "Windows")
set(LEANSHARED_LINKER_FLAGS "-Wl,--whole-archive ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib/temp/libLean.a.export -lleancpp -Wl,--no-whole-archive -lInit_shared -Wl,--out-implib,${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib/lean/libleanshared.dll.a")
else()
set(LEANSHARED_LINKER_FLAGS "-Wl,--whole-archive -lInit -lLean -lleancpp -Wl,--no-whole-archive ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/runtime/libleanrt_initial-exec.a ${LEANSHARED_LINKER_FLAGS}")
endif()
if (${CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME} MATCHES "Emscripten")
# We do not use dynamic linking via leanshared for Emscripten to keep things
# simple. (And we are not interested in `Lake` anyway.) To use dynamic
# linking, we would probably have to set MAIN_MODULE=2 on `leanshared`,
# SIDE_MODULE=2 on `lean`, and set CMAKE_SHARED_LIBRARY_SUFFIX to ".js".
string(APPEND LEAN_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS " ${TOOLCHAIN_STATIC_LINKER_FLAGS} ${EMSCRIPTEN_SETTINGS} -lnodefs.js -s EXIT_RUNTIME=1 -s MAIN_MODULE=1 -s LINKABLE=1 -s EXPORT_ALL=1")
if(${CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME} MATCHES "Windows")
string(APPEND LEANSHARED_LINKER_FLAGS " -Wl,--out-implib,${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib/lean/libleanshared.dll.a")
endif()
endif()
# Build the compiler using the bootstrapped C sources for stage0, and use
@@ -528,6 +520,10 @@ if (LLVM AND ${STAGE} GREATER 0)
set(EXTRA_LEANMAKE_OPTS "LLVM=1")
endif()
# Escape for `make`. Yes, twice.
string(REPLACE "$" "$$" CMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS_MAKE "${CMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS}")
string(REPLACE "$" "$$" CMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS_MAKE_MAKE "${CMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS_MAKE}")
configure_file(${LEAN_SOURCE_DIR}/stdlib.make.in ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/stdlib.make)
add_custom_target(make_stdlib ALL
WORKING_DIRECTORY ${LEAN_SOURCE_DIR}
# The actual rule is in a separate makefile because we want to prefix it with '+' to use the Make job server
@@ -545,33 +541,13 @@ endif()
# We declare these as separate custom targets so they use separate `make` invocations, which makes `make` recompute which dependencies
# (e.g. `libLean.a`) are now newer than the target file
if(${CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME} MATCHES "Emscripten")
# dummy targets, see `MAIN_MODULE` discussion above
add_custom_target(Init_shared ALL
DEPENDS make_stdlib leanrt_initial-exec
COMMAND touch ${CMAKE_LIBRARY_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY}/libInit_shared${CMAKE_SHARED_LIBRARY_SUFFIX}
)
add_custom_target(leanshared ALL
DEPENDS Init_shared leancpp
COMMAND touch ${CMAKE_LIBRARY_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY}/libleanshared${CMAKE_SHARED_LIBRARY_SUFFIX}
)
else()
add_custom_target(Init_shared ALL
WORKING_DIRECTORY ${LEAN_SOURCE_DIR}
DEPENDS make_stdlib leanrt_initial-exec
COMMAND $(MAKE) -f ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/stdlib.make Init_shared
VERBATIM)
add_custom_target(leanshared ALL
WORKING_DIRECTORY ${LEAN_SOURCE_DIR}
DEPENDS make_stdlib leancpp leanrt_initial-exec
COMMAND $(MAKE) -f ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/stdlib.make leanshared
VERBATIM)
add_custom_target(leanshared ALL
WORKING_DIRECTORY ${LEAN_SOURCE_DIR}
DEPENDS Init_shared leancpp
COMMAND $(MAKE) -f ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/stdlib.make leanshared
VERBATIM)
string(APPEND CMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS " -lInit_shared -lleanshared")
endif()
if(${STAGE} GREATER 0 AND NOT ${CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME} MATCHES "Emscripten")
if(${STAGE} GREATER 0)
if(NOT EXISTS ${LEAN_SOURCE_DIR}/lake/Lake.lean)
message(FATAL_ERROR "src/lake does not exist. Please check out the Lake submodule using `git submodule update --init src/lake`.")
endif()
@@ -588,15 +564,11 @@ if(PREV_STAGE)
COMMAND bash -c 'CSRCS=${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/lib/temp script/update-stage0'
DEPENDS make_stdlib
WORKING_DIRECTORY "${LEAN_SOURCE_DIR}/..")
add_custom_target(update-stage0-commit
COMMAND git commit -m "chore: update stage0"
DEPENDS update-stage0)
endif()
# use Bash version for building, use Lean version in bin/ for tests & distribution
configure_file("${LEAN_SOURCE_DIR}/bin/leanc.in" "${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/leanc.sh" @ONLY)
if(${STAGE} GREATER 0 AND EXISTS ${LEAN_SOURCE_DIR}/Leanc.lean AND NOT ${CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME} MATCHES "Emscripten")
if(${STAGE} GREATER 0 AND EXISTS ${LEAN_SOURCE_DIR}/Leanc.lean)
configure_file("${LEAN_SOURCE_DIR}/Leanc.lean" "${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/leanc/Leanc.lean" @ONLY)
add_custom_target(leanc ALL
WORKING_DIRECTORY ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/leanc
@@ -647,8 +619,3 @@ if(LEAN_INSTALL_PREFIX)
set(LEAN_INSTALL_SUFFIX "-${LOWER_SYSTEM_NAME}" CACHE STRING "If LEAN_INSTALL_PREFIX is set, append this value to CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX")
set(CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX "${LEAN_INSTALL_PREFIX}/lean-${LEAN_VERSION_STRING}${LEAN_INSTALL_SUFFIX}")
endif()
# Escape for `make`. Yes, twice.
string(REPLACE "$" "$$" CMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS_MAKE "${CMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS}")
string(REPLACE "$" "$$" CMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS_MAKE_MAKE "${CMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS_MAKE}")
configure_file(${LEAN_SOURCE_DIR}/stdlib.make.in ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/stdlib.make)

View File

@@ -32,5 +32,3 @@ import Init.Simproc
import Init.SizeOfLemmas
import Init.BinderPredicates
import Init.Ext
import Init.Omega
import Init.MacroTrace

View File

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Lean FRO, LLC. All rights reserved.
Copyright (c) 2024 Lean FRO. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro
-/
@@ -21,9 +21,9 @@ macro_rules
/-! ## if-then-else -/
@[simp] theorem if_true {_ : Decidable True} (t e : α) : ite True t e = t := if_pos trivial
@[simp] theorem if_true {h : Decidable True} (t e : α) : ite True t e = t := if_pos trivial
@[simp] theorem if_false {_ : Decidable False} (t e : α) : ite False t e = e := if_neg id
@[simp] theorem if_false {h : Decidable False} (t e : α) : ite False t e = e := if_neg id
theorem ite_id [Decidable c] {α} (t : α) : (if c then t else t) = t := by split <;> rfl
@@ -37,6 +37,15 @@ theorem apply_ite (f : α → β) (P : Prop) [Decidable P] (x y : α) :
f (ite P x y) = ite P (f x) (f y) :=
apply_dite f P (fun _ => x) (fun _ => y)
/-- Negation of the condition `P : Prop` in a `dite` is the same as swapping the branches. -/
@[simp] theorem dite_not (P : Prop) {_ : Decidable P} (x : ¬P α) (y : ¬¬P α) :
dite (¬P) x y = dite P (fun h => y (not_not_intro h)) x := by
by_cases h : P <;> simp [h]
/-- Negation of the condition `P : Prop` in a `ite` is the same as swapping the branches. -/
@[simp] theorem ite_not (P : Prop) {_ : Decidable P} (x y : α) : ite (¬P) x y = ite P y x :=
dite_not P (fun _ => x) (fun _ => y)
@[simp] theorem dite_eq_left_iff {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {B : ¬ P α} :
dite P (fun _ => a) B = a h, B h = a := by
by_cases P <;> simp [*, forall_prop_of_true, forall_prop_of_false]

View File

@@ -125,15 +125,16 @@ theorem byContradiction {p : Prop} (h : ¬p → False) : p :=
/-- The Double Negation Theorem: `¬¬P` is equivalent to `P`.
The left-to-right direction, double negation elimination (DNE),
is classically true but not constructively. -/
@[simp] theorem not_not : ¬¬a a := Decidable.not_not
@[scoped simp] theorem not_not : ¬¬a a := Decidable.not_not
@[simp low] theorem not_forall {p : α Prop} : (¬ x, p x) x, ¬p x := Decidable.not_forall
@[simp] theorem not_forall {p : α Prop} : (¬ x, p x) x, ¬p x := Decidable.not_forall
theorem not_forall_not {p : α Prop} : (¬ x, ¬p x) x, p x := Decidable.not_forall_not
theorem not_exists_not {p : α Prop} : (¬ x, ¬p x) x, p x := Decidable.not_exists_not
theorem forall_or_exists_not (P : α Prop) : ( a, P a) a, ¬ P a := by
rw [ not_forall]; exact em _
theorem exists_or_forall_not (P : α Prop) : ( a, P a) a, ¬ P a := by
rw [ not_exists]; exact em _
@@ -146,22 +147,8 @@ theorem not_and_iff_or_not_not : ¬(a ∧ b) ↔ ¬a ¬b := Decidable.not_an
theorem not_iff : ¬(a b) (¬a b) := Decidable.not_iff
@[simp] theorem imp_iff_left_iff : (b a b) a b := Decidable.imp_iff_left_iff
@[simp] theorem imp_iff_right_iff : (a b b) a b := Decidable.imp_iff_right_iff
@[simp] theorem and_or_imp : a b (a c) a b c := Decidable.and_or_imp
@[simp] theorem not_imp : ¬(a b) a ¬b := Decidable.not_imp_iff_and_not
@[simp] theorem imp_and_neg_imp_iff (p q : Prop) : (p q) (¬p q) q :=
Iff.intro (fun (a : _ _) => (Classical.em p).rec a.left a.right)
(fun a => And.intro (fun _ => a) (fun _ => a))
end Classical
/- Export for Mathlib compat. -/
export Classical (imp_iff_right_iff imp_and_neg_imp_iff and_or_imp not_imp)
/-- Extract an element from a existential statement, using `Classical.choose`. -/
-- This enables projection notation.
@[reducible] noncomputable def Exists.choose {p : α Prop} (P : a, p a) : α := Classical.choose P

View File

@@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ Helper definition used by the elaborator. It is not meant to be used directly by
This is used for coercions between monads, in the case where we want to apply
a monad lift and a coercion on the result type at the same time.
-/
@[coe_decl] abbrev Lean.Internal.liftCoeM {m : Type u Type v} {n : Type u Type w} {α β : Type u}
@[inline, coe_decl] def Lean.Internal.liftCoeM {m : Type u Type v} {n : Type u Type w} {α β : Type u}
[MonadLiftT m n] [ a, CoeT α a β] [Monad n] (x : m α) : n β := do
let a liftM x
pure (CoeT.coe a)
@@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ Helper definition used by the elaborator. It is not meant to be used directly by
This is used for coercing the result type under a monad.
-/
@[coe_decl] abbrev Lean.Internal.coeM {m : Type u Type v} {α β : Type u}
@[inline, coe_decl] def Lean.Internal.coeM {m : Type u Type v} {α β : Type u}
[ a, CoeT α a β] [Monad m] (x : m α) : m β := do
let a x
pure (CoeT.coe a)

View File

@@ -20,29 +20,8 @@ def Functor.discard {f : Type u → Type v} {α : Type u} [Functor f] (x : f α)
export Functor (discard)
/--
An `Alternative` functor is an `Applicative` functor that can "fail" or be "empty"
and a binary operation `<|>` that “collects values” or finds the “left-most success”.
Important instances include
* `Option`, where `failure := none` and `<|>` returns the left-most `some`.
* Parser combinators typically provide an `Applicative` instance for error-handling and
backtracking.
Error recovery and state can interact subtly. For example, the implementation of `Alternative` for `OptionT (StateT σ Id)` keeps modifications made to the state while recovering from failure, while `StateT σ (OptionT Id)` discards them.
-/
-- NB: List instance is in mathlib. Once upstreamed, add
-- * `List`, where `failure` is the empty list and `<|>` concatenates.
class Alternative (f : Type u Type v) extends Applicative f : Type (max (u+1) v) where
/--
Produces an empty collection or recoverable failure. The `<|>` operator collects values or recovers
from failures. See `Alternative` for more details.
-/
failure : {α : Type u} f α
/--
Depending on the `Alternative` instance, collects values or recovers from `failure`s by
returning the leftmost success. Can be written using the `<|>` operator syntax.
-/
orElse : {α : Type u} f α (Unit f α) f α
instance (f : Type u Type v) (α : Type u) [Alternative f] : OrElse (f α) := Alternative.orElse
@@ -51,15 +30,9 @@ variable {f : Type u → Type v} [Alternative f] {α : Type u}
export Alternative (failure)
/--
If the proposition `p` is true, does nothing, else fails (using `failure`).
-/
@[always_inline, inline] def guard {f : Type Type v} [Alternative f] (p : Prop) [Decidable p] : f Unit :=
if p then pure () else failure
/--
Returns `some x` if `f` succeeds with value `x`, else returns `none`.
-/
@[always_inline, inline] def optional (x : f α) : f (Option α) :=
some <$> x <|> pure none

View File

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import Init.Control.Lawful.Basic
import Init.Control.Lawful
/-!
The Exception monad transformer using CPS style.
@@ -18,7 +18,6 @@ namespace ExceptCpsT
def run {ε α : Type u} [Monad m] (x : ExceptCpsT ε m α) : m (Except ε α) :=
x _ (fun a => pure (Except.ok a)) (fun e => pure (Except.error e))
set_option linter.unusedVariables false in -- `s` unused
@[always_inline, inline]
def runK {ε α : Type u} (x : ExceptCpsT ε m α) (s : ε) (ok : α m β) (error : ε m β) : m β :=
x _ ok error

View File

@@ -4,5 +4,373 @@ Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sebastian Ullrich, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro
-/
prelude
import Init.Control.Lawful.Basic
import Init.Control.Lawful.Instances
import Init.SimpLemmas
import Init.Control.Except
import Init.Control.StateRef
open Function
@[simp] theorem monadLift_self [Monad m] (x : m α) : monadLift x = x :=
rfl
class LawfulFunctor (f : Type u Type v) [Functor f] : Prop where
map_const : (Functor.mapConst : α f β f α) = Functor.map const β
id_map (x : f α) : id <$> x = x
comp_map (g : α β) (h : β γ) (x : f α) : (h g) <$> x = h <$> g <$> x
export LawfulFunctor (map_const id_map comp_map)
attribute [simp] id_map
@[simp] theorem id_map' [Functor m] [LawfulFunctor m] (x : m α) : (fun a => a) <$> x = x :=
id_map x
class LawfulApplicative (f : Type u Type v) [Applicative f] extends LawfulFunctor f : Prop where
seqLeft_eq (x : f α) (y : f β) : x <* y = const β <$> x <*> y
seqRight_eq (x : f α) (y : f β) : x *> y = const α id <$> x <*> y
pure_seq (g : α β) (x : f α) : pure g <*> x = g <$> x
map_pure (g : α β) (x : α) : g <$> (pure x : f α) = pure (g x)
seq_pure {α β : Type u} (g : f (α β)) (x : α) : g <*> pure x = (fun h => h x) <$> g
seq_assoc {α β γ : Type u} (x : f α) (g : f (α β)) (h : f (β γ)) : h <*> (g <*> x) = ((@comp α β γ) <$> h) <*> g <*> x
comp_map g h x := (by
repeat rw [ pure_seq]
simp [seq_assoc, map_pure, seq_pure])
export LawfulApplicative (seqLeft_eq seqRight_eq pure_seq map_pure seq_pure seq_assoc)
attribute [simp] map_pure seq_pure
@[simp] theorem pure_id_seq [Applicative f] [LawfulApplicative f] (x : f α) : pure id <*> x = x := by
simp [pure_seq]
class LawfulMonad (m : Type u Type v) [Monad m] extends LawfulApplicative m : Prop where
bind_pure_comp (f : α β) (x : m α) : x >>= (fun a => pure (f a)) = f <$> x
bind_map {α β : Type u} (f : m (α β)) (x : m α) : f >>= (. <$> x) = f <*> x
pure_bind (x : α) (f : α m β) : pure x >>= f = f x
bind_assoc (x : m α) (f : α m β) (g : β m γ) : x >>= f >>= g = x >>= fun x => f x >>= g
map_pure g x := (by rw [ bind_pure_comp, pure_bind])
seq_pure g x := (by rw [ bind_map]; simp [map_pure, bind_pure_comp])
seq_assoc x g h := (by simp [ bind_pure_comp, bind_map, bind_assoc, pure_bind])
export LawfulMonad (bind_pure_comp bind_map pure_bind bind_assoc)
attribute [simp] pure_bind bind_assoc
@[simp] theorem bind_pure [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : m α) : x >>= pure = x := by
show x >>= (fun a => pure (id a)) = x
rw [bind_pure_comp, id_map]
theorem map_eq_pure_bind [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α β) (x : m α) : f <$> x = x >>= fun a => pure (f a) := by
rw [ bind_pure_comp]
theorem seq_eq_bind_map {α β : Type u} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : m (α β)) (x : m α) : f <*> x = f >>= (. <$> x) := by
rw [ bind_map]
theorem bind_congr [Bind m] {x : m α} {f g : α m β} (h : a, f a = g a) : x >>= f = x >>= g := by
simp [funext h]
@[simp] theorem bind_pure_unit [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] {x : m PUnit} : (x >>= fun _ => pure ) = x := by
rw [bind_pure]
theorem map_congr [Functor m] {x : m α} {f g : α β} (h : a, f a = g a) : (f <$> x : m β) = g <$> x := by
simp [funext h]
theorem seq_eq_bind {α β : Type u} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (mf : m (α β)) (x : m α) : mf <*> x = mf >>= fun f => f <$> x := by
rw [bind_map]
theorem seqRight_eq_bind [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : m α) (y : m β) : x *> y = x >>= fun _ => y := by
rw [seqRight_eq]
simp [map_eq_pure_bind, seq_eq_bind_map, const]
theorem seqLeft_eq_bind [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : m α) (y : m β) : x <* y = x >>= fun a => y >>= fun _ => pure a := by
rw [seqLeft_eq]; simp [map_eq_pure_bind, seq_eq_bind_map]
/--
An alternative constructor for `LawfulMonad` which has more
defaultable fields in the common case.
-/
theorem LawfulMonad.mk' (m : Type u Type v) [Monad m]
(id_map : {α} (x : m α), id <$> x = x)
(pure_bind : {α β} (x : α) (f : α m β), pure x >>= f = f x)
(bind_assoc : {α β γ} (x : m α) (f : α m β) (g : β m γ),
x >>= f >>= g = x >>= fun x => f x >>= g)
(map_const : {α β} (x : α) (y : m β),
Functor.mapConst x y = Function.const β x <$> y := by intros; rfl)
(seqLeft_eq : {α β} (x : m α) (y : m β),
x <* y = (x >>= fun a => y >>= fun _ => pure a) := by intros; rfl)
(seqRight_eq : {α β} (x : m α) (y : m β), x *> y = (x >>= fun _ => y) := by intros; rfl)
(bind_pure_comp : {α β} (f : α β) (x : m α),
x >>= (fun y => pure (f y)) = f <$> x := by intros; rfl)
(bind_map : {α β} (f : m (α β)) (x : m α), f >>= (. <$> x) = f <*> x := by intros; rfl)
: LawfulMonad m :=
have map_pure {α β} (g : α β) (x : α) : g <$> (pure x : m α) = pure (g x) := by
rw [ bind_pure_comp]; simp [pure_bind]
{ id_map, bind_pure_comp, bind_map, pure_bind, bind_assoc, map_pure,
comp_map := by simp [ bind_pure_comp, bind_assoc, pure_bind]
pure_seq := by intros; rw [ bind_map]; simp [pure_bind]
seq_pure := by intros; rw [ bind_map]; simp [map_pure, bind_pure_comp]
seq_assoc := by simp [ bind_pure_comp, bind_map, bind_assoc, pure_bind]
map_const := funext fun x => funext (map_const x)
seqLeft_eq := by simp [seqLeft_eq, bind_map, bind_pure_comp, pure_bind, bind_assoc]
seqRight_eq := fun x y => by
rw [seqRight_eq, bind_map, bind_pure_comp, bind_assoc]; simp [pure_bind, id_map] }
/-! # Id -/
namespace Id
@[simp] theorem map_eq (x : Id α) (f : α β) : f <$> x = f x := rfl
@[simp] theorem bind_eq (x : Id α) (f : α id β) : x >>= f = f x := rfl
@[simp] theorem pure_eq (a : α) : (pure a : Id α) = a := rfl
instance : LawfulMonad Id := by
refine' { .. } <;> intros <;> rfl
end Id
/-! # ExceptT -/
namespace ExceptT
theorem ext [Monad m] {x y : ExceptT ε m α} (h : x.run = y.run) : x = y := by
simp [run] at h
assumption
@[simp] theorem run_pure [Monad m] (x : α) : run (pure x : ExceptT ε m α) = pure (Except.ok x) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_lift [Monad.{u, v} m] (x : m α) : run (ExceptT.lift x : ExceptT ε m α) = (Except.ok <$> x : m (Except ε α)) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_throw [Monad m] : run (throw e : ExceptT ε m β) = pure (Except.error e) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_bind_lift [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : m α) (f : α ExceptT ε m β) : run (ExceptT.lift x >>= f : ExceptT ε m β) = x >>= fun a => run (f a) := by
simp[ExceptT.run, ExceptT.lift, bind, ExceptT.bind, ExceptT.mk, ExceptT.bindCont, map_eq_pure_bind]
@[simp] theorem bind_throw [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α ExceptT ε m β) : (throw e >>= f) = throw e := by
simp [throw, throwThe, MonadExceptOf.throw, bind, ExceptT.bind, ExceptT.bindCont, ExceptT.mk]
theorem run_bind [Monad m] (x : ExceptT ε m α)
: run (x >>= f : ExceptT ε m β)
=
run x >>= fun
| Except.ok x => run (f x)
| Except.error e => pure (Except.error e) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem lift_pure [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (a : α) : ExceptT.lift (pure a) = (pure a : ExceptT ε m α) := by
simp [ExceptT.lift, pure, ExceptT.pure]
@[simp] theorem run_map [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α β) (x : ExceptT ε m α)
: (f <$> x).run = Except.map f <$> x.run := by
simp [Functor.map, ExceptT.map, map_eq_pure_bind]
apply bind_congr
intro a; cases a <;> simp [Except.map]
protected theorem seq_eq {α β ε : Type u} [Monad m] (mf : ExceptT ε m (α β)) (x : ExceptT ε m α) : mf <*> x = mf >>= fun f => f <$> x :=
rfl
protected theorem bind_pure_comp [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α β) (x : ExceptT ε m α) : x >>= pure f = f <$> x := by
intros; rfl
protected theorem seqLeft_eq {α β ε : Type u} {m : Type u Type v} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : ExceptT ε m α) (y : ExceptT ε m β) : x <* y = const β <$> x <*> y := by
show (x >>= fun a => y >>= fun _ => pure a) = (const (α := α) β <$> x) >>= fun f => f <$> y
rw [ ExceptT.bind_pure_comp]
apply ext
simp [run_bind]
apply bind_congr
intro
| Except.error _ => simp
| Except.ok _ =>
simp [map_eq_pure_bind]; apply bind_congr; intro b;
cases b <;> simp [comp, Except.map, const]
protected theorem seqRight_eq [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : ExceptT ε m α) (y : ExceptT ε m β) : x *> y = const α id <$> x <*> y := by
show (x >>= fun _ => y) = (const α id <$> x) >>= fun f => f <$> y
rw [ ExceptT.bind_pure_comp]
apply ext
simp [run_bind]
apply bind_congr
intro a; cases a <;> simp
instance [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] : LawfulMonad (ExceptT ε m) where
id_map := by intros; apply ext; simp
map_const := by intros; rfl
seqLeft_eq := ExceptT.seqLeft_eq
seqRight_eq := ExceptT.seqRight_eq
pure_seq := by intros; apply ext; simp [ExceptT.seq_eq, run_bind]
bind_pure_comp := ExceptT.bind_pure_comp
bind_map := by intros; rfl
pure_bind := by intros; apply ext; simp [run_bind]
bind_assoc := by intros; apply ext; simp [run_bind]; apply bind_congr; intro a; cases a <;> simp
end ExceptT
/-! # Except -/
instance : LawfulMonad (Except ε) := LawfulMonad.mk'
(id_map := fun x => by cases x <;> rfl)
(pure_bind := fun a f => rfl)
(bind_assoc := fun a f g => by cases a <;> rfl)
instance : LawfulApplicative (Except ε) := inferInstance
instance : LawfulFunctor (Except ε) := inferInstance
/-! # ReaderT -/
namespace ReaderT
theorem ext {x y : ReaderT ρ m α} (h : ctx, x.run ctx = y.run ctx) : x = y := by
simp [run] at h
exact funext h
@[simp] theorem run_pure [Monad m] (a : α) (ctx : ρ) : (pure a : ReaderT ρ m α).run ctx = pure a := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_bind [Monad m] (x : ReaderT ρ m α) (f : α ReaderT ρ m β) (ctx : ρ)
: (x >>= f).run ctx = x.run ctx >>= λ a => (f a).run ctx := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_mapConst [Monad m] (a : α) (x : ReaderT ρ m β) (ctx : ρ)
: (Functor.mapConst a x).run ctx = Functor.mapConst a (x.run ctx) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_map [Monad m] (f : α β) (x : ReaderT ρ m α) (ctx : ρ)
: (f <$> x).run ctx = f <$> x.run ctx := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_monadLift [MonadLiftT n m] (x : n α) (ctx : ρ)
: (monadLift x : ReaderT ρ m α).run ctx = (monadLift x : m α) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_monadMap [MonadFunctor n m] (f : {β : Type u} n β n β) (x : ReaderT ρ m α) (ctx : ρ)
: (monadMap @f x : ReaderT ρ m α).run ctx = monadMap @f (x.run ctx) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_read [Monad m] (ctx : ρ) : (ReaderT.read : ReaderT ρ m ρ).run ctx = pure ctx := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_seq {α β : Type u} [Monad m] (f : ReaderT ρ m (α β)) (x : ReaderT ρ m α) (ctx : ρ)
: (f <*> x).run ctx = (f.run ctx <*> x.run ctx) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_seqRight [Monad m] (x : ReaderT ρ m α) (y : ReaderT ρ m β) (ctx : ρ)
: (x *> y).run ctx = (x.run ctx *> y.run ctx) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_seqLeft [Monad m] (x : ReaderT ρ m α) (y : ReaderT ρ m β) (ctx : ρ)
: (x <* y).run ctx = (x.run ctx <* y.run ctx) := rfl
instance [Monad m] [LawfulFunctor m] : LawfulFunctor (ReaderT ρ m) where
id_map := by intros; apply ext; simp
map_const := by intros; funext a b; apply ext; intros; simp [map_const]
comp_map := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [comp_map]
instance [Monad m] [LawfulApplicative m] : LawfulApplicative (ReaderT ρ m) where
seqLeft_eq := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [seqLeft_eq]
seqRight_eq := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [seqRight_eq]
pure_seq := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [pure_seq]
map_pure := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [map_pure]
seq_pure := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [seq_pure]
seq_assoc := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [seq_assoc]
instance [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] : LawfulMonad (ReaderT ρ m) where
bind_pure_comp := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [LawfulMonad.bind_pure_comp]
bind_map := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [bind_map]
pure_bind := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp
bind_assoc := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp
end ReaderT
/-! # StateRefT -/
instance [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] : LawfulMonad (StateRefT' ω σ m) :=
inferInstanceAs (LawfulMonad (ReaderT (ST.Ref ω σ) m))
/-! # StateT -/
namespace StateT
theorem ext {x y : StateT σ m α} (h : s, x.run s = y.run s) : x = y :=
funext h
@[simp] theorem run'_eq [Monad m] (x : StateT σ m α) (s : σ) : run' x s = (·.1) <$> run x s :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem run_pure [Monad m] (a : α) (s : σ) : (pure a : StateT σ m α).run s = pure (a, s) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_bind [Monad m] (x : StateT σ m α) (f : α StateT σ m β) (s : σ)
: (x >>= f).run s = x.run s >>= λ p => (f p.1).run p.2 := by
simp [bind, StateT.bind, run]
@[simp] theorem run_map {α β σ : Type u} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α β) (x : StateT σ m α) (s : σ) : (f <$> x).run s = (fun (p : α × σ) => (f p.1, p.2)) <$> x.run s := by
simp [Functor.map, StateT.map, run, map_eq_pure_bind]
@[simp] theorem run_get [Monad m] (s : σ) : (get : StateT σ m σ).run s = pure (s, s) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_set [Monad m] (s s' : σ) : (set s' : StateT σ m PUnit).run s = pure (, s') := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_modify [Monad m] (f : σ σ) (s : σ) : (modify f : StateT σ m PUnit).run s = pure (, f s) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_modifyGet [Monad m] (f : σ α × σ) (s : σ) : (modifyGet f : StateT σ m α).run s = pure ((f s).1, (f s).2) := by
simp [modifyGet, MonadStateOf.modifyGet, StateT.modifyGet, run]
@[simp] theorem run_lift {α σ : Type u} [Monad m] (x : m α) (s : σ) : (StateT.lift x : StateT σ m α).run s = x >>= fun a => pure (a, s) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_bind_lift {α σ : Type u} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : m α) (f : α StateT σ m β) (s : σ) : (StateT.lift x >>= f).run s = x >>= fun a => (f a).run s := by
simp [StateT.lift, StateT.run, bind, StateT.bind]
@[simp] theorem run_monadLift {α σ : Type u} [Monad m] [MonadLiftT n m] (x : n α) (s : σ) : (monadLift x : StateT σ m α).run s = (monadLift x : m α) >>= fun a => pure (a, s) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_monadMap [Monad m] [MonadFunctor n m] (f : {β : Type u} n β n β) (x : StateT σ m α) (s : σ)
: (monadMap @f x : StateT σ m α).run s = monadMap @f (x.run s) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_seq {α β σ : Type u} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : StateT σ m (α β)) (x : StateT σ m α) (s : σ) : (f <*> x).run s = (f.run s >>= fun fs => (fun (p : α × σ) => (fs.1 p.1, p.2)) <$> x.run fs.2) := by
show (f >>= fun g => g <$> x).run s = _
simp
@[simp] theorem run_seqRight [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : StateT σ m α) (y : StateT σ m β) (s : σ) : (x *> y).run s = (x.run s >>= fun p => y.run p.2) := by
show (x >>= fun _ => y).run s = _
simp
@[simp] theorem run_seqLeft {α β σ : Type u} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : StateT σ m α) (y : StateT σ m β) (s : σ) : (x <* y).run s = (x.run s >>= fun p => y.run p.2 >>= fun p' => pure (p.1, p'.2)) := by
show (x >>= fun a => y >>= fun _ => pure a).run s = _
simp
theorem seqRight_eq [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : StateT σ m α) (y : StateT σ m β) : x *> y = const α id <$> x <*> y := by
apply ext; intro s
simp [map_eq_pure_bind, const]
apply bind_congr; intro p; cases p
simp [Prod.eta]
theorem seqLeft_eq [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : StateT σ m α) (y : StateT σ m β) : x <* y = const β <$> x <*> y := by
apply ext; intro s
simp [map_eq_pure_bind]
instance [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] : LawfulMonad (StateT σ m) where
id_map := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp[Prod.eta]
map_const := by intros; rfl
seqLeft_eq := seqLeft_eq
seqRight_eq := seqRight_eq
pure_seq := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp
bind_pure_comp := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp; apply LawfulMonad.bind_pure_comp
bind_map := by intros; rfl
pure_bind := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp
bind_assoc := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp
end StateT
/-! # EStateM -/
instance : LawfulMonad (EStateM ε σ) := .mk'
(id_map := fun x => funext <| fun s => by
dsimp only [EStateM.instMonadEStateM, EStateM.map]
match x s with
| .ok _ _ => rfl
| .error _ _ => rfl)
(pure_bind := fun _ _ => rfl)
(bind_assoc := fun x _ _ => funext <| fun s => by
dsimp only [EStateM.instMonadEStateM, EStateM.bind]
match x s with
| .ok _ _ => rfl
| .error _ _ => rfl)
(map_const := fun _ _ => rfl)
/-! # Option -/
instance : LawfulMonad Option := LawfulMonad.mk'
(id_map := fun x => by cases x <;> rfl)
(pure_bind := fun x f => rfl)
(bind_assoc := fun x f g => by cases x <;> rfl)
(bind_pure_comp := fun f x => by cases x <;> rfl)
instance : LawfulApplicative Option := inferInstance
instance : LawfulFunctor Option := inferInstance

View File

@@ -1,169 +0,0 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sebastian Ullrich, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro
-/
prelude
import Init.SimpLemmas
import Init.Meta
open Function
@[simp] theorem monadLift_self [Monad m] (x : m α) : monadLift x = x :=
rfl
/--
The `Functor` typeclass only contains the operations of a functor.
`LawfulFunctor` further asserts that these operations satisfy the laws of a functor,
including the preservation of the identity and composition laws:
```
id <$> x = x
(h ∘ g) <$> x = h <$> g <$> x
```
-/
class LawfulFunctor (f : Type u Type v) [Functor f] : Prop where
map_const : (Functor.mapConst : α f β f α) = Functor.map const β
id_map (x : f α) : id <$> x = x
comp_map (g : α β) (h : β γ) (x : f α) : (h g) <$> x = h <$> g <$> x
export LawfulFunctor (map_const id_map comp_map)
attribute [simp] id_map
@[simp] theorem id_map' [Functor m] [LawfulFunctor m] (x : m α) : (fun a => a) <$> x = x :=
id_map x
/--
The `Applicative` typeclass only contains the operations of an applicative functor.
`LawfulApplicative` further asserts that these operations satisfy the laws of an applicative functor:
```
pure id <*> v = v
pure (·∘·) <*> u <*> v <*> w = u <*> (v <*> w)
pure f <*> pure x = pure (f x)
u <*> pure y = pure (· y) <*> u
```
-/
class LawfulApplicative (f : Type u Type v) [Applicative f] extends LawfulFunctor f : Prop where
seqLeft_eq (x : f α) (y : f β) : x <* y = const β <$> x <*> y
seqRight_eq (x : f α) (y : f β) : x *> y = const α id <$> x <*> y
pure_seq (g : α β) (x : f α) : pure g <*> x = g <$> x
map_pure (g : α β) (x : α) : g <$> (pure x : f α) = pure (g x)
seq_pure {α β : Type u} (g : f (α β)) (x : α) : g <*> pure x = (fun h => h x) <$> g
seq_assoc {α β γ : Type u} (x : f α) (g : f (α β)) (h : f (β γ)) : h <*> (g <*> x) = ((@comp α β γ) <$> h) <*> g <*> x
comp_map g h x := (by
repeat rw [ pure_seq]
simp [seq_assoc, map_pure, seq_pure])
export LawfulApplicative (seqLeft_eq seqRight_eq pure_seq map_pure seq_pure seq_assoc)
attribute [simp] map_pure seq_pure
@[simp] theorem pure_id_seq [Applicative f] [LawfulApplicative f] (x : f α) : pure id <*> x = x := by
simp [pure_seq]
/--
The `Monad` typeclass only contains the operations of a monad.
`LawfulMonad` further asserts that these operations satisfy the laws of a monad,
including associativity and identity laws for `bind`:
```
pure x >>= f = f x
x >>= pure = x
x >>= f >>= g = x >>= (fun x => f x >>= g)
```
`LawfulMonad.mk'` is an alternative constructor containing useful defaults for many fields.
-/
class LawfulMonad (m : Type u Type v) [Monad m] extends LawfulApplicative m : Prop where
bind_pure_comp (f : α β) (x : m α) : x >>= (fun a => pure (f a)) = f <$> x
bind_map {α β : Type u} (f : m (α β)) (x : m α) : f >>= (. <$> x) = f <*> x
pure_bind (x : α) (f : α m β) : pure x >>= f = f x
bind_assoc (x : m α) (f : α m β) (g : β m γ) : x >>= f >>= g = x >>= fun x => f x >>= g
map_pure g x := (by rw [ bind_pure_comp, pure_bind])
seq_pure g x := (by rw [ bind_map]; simp [map_pure, bind_pure_comp])
seq_assoc x g h := (by simp [ bind_pure_comp, bind_map, bind_assoc, pure_bind])
export LawfulMonad (bind_pure_comp bind_map pure_bind bind_assoc)
attribute [simp] pure_bind bind_assoc
@[simp] theorem bind_pure [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : m α) : x >>= pure = x := by
show x >>= (fun a => pure (id a)) = x
rw [bind_pure_comp, id_map]
theorem map_eq_pure_bind [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α β) (x : m α) : f <$> x = x >>= fun a => pure (f a) := by
rw [ bind_pure_comp]
theorem seq_eq_bind_map {α β : Type u} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : m (α β)) (x : m α) : f <*> x = f >>= (. <$> x) := by
rw [ bind_map]
theorem bind_congr [Bind m] {x : m α} {f g : α m β} (h : a, f a = g a) : x >>= f = x >>= g := by
simp [funext h]
@[simp] theorem bind_pure_unit [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] {x : m PUnit} : (x >>= fun _ => pure ) = x := by
rw [bind_pure]
theorem map_congr [Functor m] {x : m α} {f g : α β} (h : a, f a = g a) : (f <$> x : m β) = g <$> x := by
simp [funext h]
theorem seq_eq_bind {α β : Type u} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (mf : m (α β)) (x : m α) : mf <*> x = mf >>= fun f => f <$> x := by
rw [bind_map]
theorem seqRight_eq_bind [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : m α) (y : m β) : x *> y = x >>= fun _ => y := by
rw [seqRight_eq]
simp [map_eq_pure_bind, seq_eq_bind_map, const]
theorem seqLeft_eq_bind [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : m α) (y : m β) : x <* y = x >>= fun a => y >>= fun _ => pure a := by
rw [seqLeft_eq]; simp [map_eq_pure_bind, seq_eq_bind_map]
/--
An alternative constructor for `LawfulMonad` which has more
defaultable fields in the common case.
-/
theorem LawfulMonad.mk' (m : Type u Type v) [Monad m]
(id_map : {α} (x : m α), id <$> x = x)
(pure_bind : {α β} (x : α) (f : α m β), pure x >>= f = f x)
(bind_assoc : {α β γ} (x : m α) (f : α m β) (g : β m γ),
x >>= f >>= g = x >>= fun x => f x >>= g)
(map_const : {α β} (x : α) (y : m β),
Functor.mapConst x y = Function.const β x <$> y := by intros; rfl)
(seqLeft_eq : {α β} (x : m α) (y : m β),
x <* y = (x >>= fun a => y >>= fun _ => pure a) := by intros; rfl)
(seqRight_eq : {α β} (x : m α) (y : m β), x *> y = (x >>= fun _ => y) := by intros; rfl)
(bind_pure_comp : {α β} (f : α β) (x : m α),
x >>= (fun y => pure (f y)) = f <$> x := by intros; rfl)
(bind_map : {α β} (f : m (α β)) (x : m α), f >>= (. <$> x) = f <*> x := by intros; rfl)
: LawfulMonad m :=
have map_pure {α β} (g : α β) (x : α) : g <$> (pure x : m α) = pure (g x) := by
rw [ bind_pure_comp]; simp [pure_bind]
{ id_map, bind_pure_comp, bind_map, pure_bind, bind_assoc, map_pure,
comp_map := by simp [ bind_pure_comp, bind_assoc, pure_bind]
pure_seq := by intros; rw [ bind_map]; simp [pure_bind]
seq_pure := by intros; rw [ bind_map]; simp [map_pure, bind_pure_comp]
seq_assoc := by simp [ bind_pure_comp, bind_map, bind_assoc, pure_bind]
map_const := funext fun x => funext (map_const x)
seqLeft_eq := by simp [seqLeft_eq, bind_map, bind_pure_comp, pure_bind, bind_assoc]
seqRight_eq := fun x y => by
rw [seqRight_eq, bind_map, bind_pure_comp, bind_assoc]; simp [pure_bind, id_map] }
/-! # Id -/
namespace Id
@[simp] theorem map_eq (x : Id α) (f : α β) : f <$> x = f x := rfl
@[simp] theorem bind_eq (x : Id α) (f : α id β) : x >>= f = f x := rfl
@[simp] theorem pure_eq (a : α) : (pure a : Id α) = a := rfl
instance : LawfulMonad Id := by
refine' { .. } <;> intros <;> rfl
end Id
/-! # Option -/
instance : LawfulMonad Option := LawfulMonad.mk'
(id_map := fun x => by cases x <;> rfl)
(pure_bind := fun x f => rfl)
(bind_assoc := fun x f g => by cases x <;> rfl)
(bind_pure_comp := fun f x => by cases x <;> rfl)
instance : LawfulApplicative Option := inferInstance
instance : LawfulFunctor Option := inferInstance

View File

@@ -1,248 +0,0 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sebastian Ullrich, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro
-/
prelude
import Init.Control.Lawful.Basic
import Init.Control.Except
import Init.Control.StateRef
open Function
/-! # ExceptT -/
namespace ExceptT
theorem ext [Monad m] {x y : ExceptT ε m α} (h : x.run = y.run) : x = y := by
simp [run] at h
assumption
@[simp] theorem run_pure [Monad m] (x : α) : run (pure x : ExceptT ε m α) = pure (Except.ok x) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_lift [Monad.{u, v} m] (x : m α) : run (ExceptT.lift x : ExceptT ε m α) = (Except.ok <$> x : m (Except ε α)) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_throw [Monad m] : run (throw e : ExceptT ε m β) = pure (Except.error e) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_bind_lift [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : m α) (f : α ExceptT ε m β) : run (ExceptT.lift x >>= f : ExceptT ε m β) = x >>= fun a => run (f a) := by
simp[ExceptT.run, ExceptT.lift, bind, ExceptT.bind, ExceptT.mk, ExceptT.bindCont, map_eq_pure_bind]
@[simp] theorem bind_throw [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α ExceptT ε m β) : (throw e >>= f) = throw e := by
simp [throw, throwThe, MonadExceptOf.throw, bind, ExceptT.bind, ExceptT.bindCont, ExceptT.mk]
theorem run_bind [Monad m] (x : ExceptT ε m α)
: run (x >>= f : ExceptT ε m β)
=
run x >>= fun
| Except.ok x => run (f x)
| Except.error e => pure (Except.error e) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem lift_pure [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (a : α) : ExceptT.lift (pure a) = (pure a : ExceptT ε m α) := by
simp [ExceptT.lift, pure, ExceptT.pure]
@[simp] theorem run_map [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α β) (x : ExceptT ε m α)
: (f <$> x).run = Except.map f <$> x.run := by
simp [Functor.map, ExceptT.map, map_eq_pure_bind]
apply bind_congr
intro a; cases a <;> simp [Except.map]
protected theorem seq_eq {α β ε : Type u} [Monad m] (mf : ExceptT ε m (α β)) (x : ExceptT ε m α) : mf <*> x = mf >>= fun f => f <$> x :=
rfl
protected theorem bind_pure_comp [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α β) (x : ExceptT ε m α) : x >>= pure f = f <$> x := by
intros; rfl
protected theorem seqLeft_eq {α β ε : Type u} {m : Type u Type v} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : ExceptT ε m α) (y : ExceptT ε m β) : x <* y = const β <$> x <*> y := by
show (x >>= fun a => y >>= fun _ => pure a) = (const (α := α) β <$> x) >>= fun f => f <$> y
rw [ ExceptT.bind_pure_comp]
apply ext
simp [run_bind]
apply bind_congr
intro
| Except.error _ => simp
| Except.ok _ =>
simp [map_eq_pure_bind]; apply bind_congr; intro b;
cases b <;> simp [comp, Except.map, const]
protected theorem seqRight_eq [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : ExceptT ε m α) (y : ExceptT ε m β) : x *> y = const α id <$> x <*> y := by
show (x >>= fun _ => y) = (const α id <$> x) >>= fun f => f <$> y
rw [ ExceptT.bind_pure_comp]
apply ext
simp [run_bind]
apply bind_congr
intro a; cases a <;> simp
instance [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] : LawfulMonad (ExceptT ε m) where
id_map := by intros; apply ext; simp
map_const := by intros; rfl
seqLeft_eq := ExceptT.seqLeft_eq
seqRight_eq := ExceptT.seqRight_eq
pure_seq := by intros; apply ext; simp [ExceptT.seq_eq, run_bind]
bind_pure_comp := ExceptT.bind_pure_comp
bind_map := by intros; rfl
pure_bind := by intros; apply ext; simp [run_bind]
bind_assoc := by intros; apply ext; simp [run_bind]; apply bind_congr; intro a; cases a <;> simp
end ExceptT
/-! # Except -/
instance : LawfulMonad (Except ε) := LawfulMonad.mk'
(id_map := fun x => by cases x <;> rfl)
(pure_bind := fun a f => rfl)
(bind_assoc := fun a f g => by cases a <;> rfl)
instance : LawfulApplicative (Except ε) := inferInstance
instance : LawfulFunctor (Except ε) := inferInstance
/-! # ReaderT -/
namespace ReaderT
theorem ext {x y : ReaderT ρ m α} (h : ctx, x.run ctx = y.run ctx) : x = y := by
simp [run] at h
exact funext h
@[simp] theorem run_pure [Monad m] (a : α) (ctx : ρ) : (pure a : ReaderT ρ m α).run ctx = pure a := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_bind [Monad m] (x : ReaderT ρ m α) (f : α ReaderT ρ m β) (ctx : ρ)
: (x >>= f).run ctx = x.run ctx >>= λ a => (f a).run ctx := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_mapConst [Monad m] (a : α) (x : ReaderT ρ m β) (ctx : ρ)
: (Functor.mapConst a x).run ctx = Functor.mapConst a (x.run ctx) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_map [Monad m] (f : α β) (x : ReaderT ρ m α) (ctx : ρ)
: (f <$> x).run ctx = f <$> x.run ctx := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_monadLift [MonadLiftT n m] (x : n α) (ctx : ρ)
: (monadLift x : ReaderT ρ m α).run ctx = (monadLift x : m α) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_monadMap [MonadFunctor n m] (f : {β : Type u} n β n β) (x : ReaderT ρ m α) (ctx : ρ)
: (monadMap @f x : ReaderT ρ m α).run ctx = monadMap @f (x.run ctx) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_read [Monad m] (ctx : ρ) : (ReaderT.read : ReaderT ρ m ρ).run ctx = pure ctx := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_seq {α β : Type u} [Monad m] (f : ReaderT ρ m (α β)) (x : ReaderT ρ m α) (ctx : ρ)
: (f <*> x).run ctx = (f.run ctx <*> x.run ctx) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_seqRight [Monad m] (x : ReaderT ρ m α) (y : ReaderT ρ m β) (ctx : ρ)
: (x *> y).run ctx = (x.run ctx *> y.run ctx) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_seqLeft [Monad m] (x : ReaderT ρ m α) (y : ReaderT ρ m β) (ctx : ρ)
: (x <* y).run ctx = (x.run ctx <* y.run ctx) := rfl
instance [Monad m] [LawfulFunctor m] : LawfulFunctor (ReaderT ρ m) where
id_map := by intros; apply ext; simp
map_const := by intros; funext a b; apply ext; intros; simp [map_const]
comp_map := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [comp_map]
instance [Monad m] [LawfulApplicative m] : LawfulApplicative (ReaderT ρ m) where
seqLeft_eq := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [seqLeft_eq]
seqRight_eq := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [seqRight_eq]
pure_seq := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [pure_seq]
map_pure := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [map_pure]
seq_pure := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [seq_pure]
seq_assoc := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [seq_assoc]
instance [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] : LawfulMonad (ReaderT ρ m) where
bind_pure_comp := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [LawfulMonad.bind_pure_comp]
bind_map := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp [bind_map]
pure_bind := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp
bind_assoc := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp
end ReaderT
/-! # StateRefT -/
instance [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] : LawfulMonad (StateRefT' ω σ m) :=
inferInstanceAs (LawfulMonad (ReaderT (ST.Ref ω σ) m))
/-! # StateT -/
namespace StateT
theorem ext {x y : StateT σ m α} (h : s, x.run s = y.run s) : x = y :=
funext h
@[simp] theorem run'_eq [Monad m] (x : StateT σ m α) (s : σ) : run' x s = (·.1) <$> run x s :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem run_pure [Monad m] (a : α) (s : σ) : (pure a : StateT σ m α).run s = pure (a, s) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_bind [Monad m] (x : StateT σ m α) (f : α StateT σ m β) (s : σ)
: (x >>= f).run s = x.run s >>= λ p => (f p.1).run p.2 := by
simp [bind, StateT.bind, run]
@[simp] theorem run_map {α β σ : Type u} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α β) (x : StateT σ m α) (s : σ) : (f <$> x).run s = (fun (p : α × σ) => (f p.1, p.2)) <$> x.run s := by
simp [Functor.map, StateT.map, run, map_eq_pure_bind]
@[simp] theorem run_get [Monad m] (s : σ) : (get : StateT σ m σ).run s = pure (s, s) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_set [Monad m] (s s' : σ) : (set s' : StateT σ m PUnit).run s = pure (, s') := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_modify [Monad m] (f : σ σ) (s : σ) : (modify f : StateT σ m PUnit).run s = pure (, f s) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_modifyGet [Monad m] (f : σ α × σ) (s : σ) : (modifyGet f : StateT σ m α).run s = pure ((f s).1, (f s).2) := by
simp [modifyGet, MonadStateOf.modifyGet, StateT.modifyGet, run]
@[simp] theorem run_lift {α σ : Type u} [Monad m] (x : m α) (s : σ) : (StateT.lift x : StateT σ m α).run s = x >>= fun a => pure (a, s) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_bind_lift {α σ : Type u} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : m α) (f : α StateT σ m β) (s : σ) : (StateT.lift x >>= f).run s = x >>= fun a => (f a).run s := by
simp [StateT.lift, StateT.run, bind, StateT.bind]
@[simp] theorem run_monadLift {α σ : Type u} [Monad m] [MonadLiftT n m] (x : n α) (s : σ) : (monadLift x : StateT σ m α).run s = (monadLift x : m α) >>= fun a => pure (a, s) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_monadMap [Monad m] [MonadFunctor n m] (f : {β : Type u} n β n β) (x : StateT σ m α) (s : σ)
: (monadMap @f x : StateT σ m α).run s = monadMap @f (x.run s) := rfl
@[simp] theorem run_seq {α β σ : Type u} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : StateT σ m (α β)) (x : StateT σ m α) (s : σ) : (f <*> x).run s = (f.run s >>= fun fs => (fun (p : α × σ) => (fs.1 p.1, p.2)) <$> x.run fs.2) := by
show (f >>= fun g => g <$> x).run s = _
simp
@[simp] theorem run_seqRight [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : StateT σ m α) (y : StateT σ m β) (s : σ) : (x *> y).run s = (x.run s >>= fun p => y.run p.2) := by
show (x >>= fun _ => y).run s = _
simp
@[simp] theorem run_seqLeft {α β σ : Type u} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : StateT σ m α) (y : StateT σ m β) (s : σ) : (x <* y).run s = (x.run s >>= fun p => y.run p.2 >>= fun p' => pure (p.1, p'.2)) := by
show (x >>= fun a => y >>= fun _ => pure a).run s = _
simp
theorem seqRight_eq [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : StateT σ m α) (y : StateT σ m β) : x *> y = const α id <$> x <*> y := by
apply ext; intro s
simp [map_eq_pure_bind, const]
apply bind_congr; intro p; cases p
simp [Prod.eta]
theorem seqLeft_eq [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : StateT σ m α) (y : StateT σ m β) : x <* y = const β <$> x <*> y := by
apply ext; intro s
simp [map_eq_pure_bind]
instance [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] : LawfulMonad (StateT σ m) where
id_map := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp[Prod.eta]
map_const := by intros; rfl
seqLeft_eq := seqLeft_eq
seqRight_eq := seqRight_eq
pure_seq := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp
bind_pure_comp := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp; apply LawfulMonad.bind_pure_comp
bind_map := by intros; rfl
pure_bind := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp
bind_assoc := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp
end StateT
/-! # EStateM -/
instance : LawfulMonad (EStateM ε σ) := .mk'
(id_map := fun x => funext <| fun s => by
dsimp only [EStateM.instMonad, EStateM.map]
match x s with
| .ok _ _ => rfl
| .error _ _ => rfl)
(pure_bind := fun _ _ => rfl)
(bind_assoc := fun x _ _ => funext <| fun s => by
dsimp only [EStateM.instMonad, EStateM.bind]
match x s with
| .ok _ _ => rfl
| .error _ _ => rfl)
(map_const := fun _ _ => rfl)

View File

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import Init.Control.Lawful.Basic
import Init.Control.Lawful
/-!
The State monad transformer using CPS style.

View File

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Authors: Leonardo de Moura
Notation for operators defined at Prelude.lean
-/
prelude
import Init.Tactics
import Init.NotationExtra
namespace Lean.Parser.Tactic.Conv
@@ -54,10 +54,6 @@ syntax (name := lhs) "lhs" : conv
(In general, for an `n`-ary operator, it traverses into the last argument.) -/
syntax (name := rhs) "rhs" : conv
/-- Traverses into the function of a (unary) function application.
For example, `| f a b` turns into `| f a`. (Use `arg 0` to traverse into `f`.) -/
syntax (name := «fun») "fun" : conv
/-- Reduces the target to Weak Head Normal Form. This reduces definitions
in "head position" until a constructor is exposed. For example, `List.map f [a, b, c]`
weak head normalizes to `f a :: List.map f [b, c]`. -/
@@ -78,8 +74,7 @@ syntax (name := congr) "congr" : conv
* `arg i` traverses into the `i`'th argument of the target. For example if the
target is `f a b c d` then `arg 1` traverses to `a` and `arg 3` traverses to `c`.
* `arg @i` is the same as `arg i` but it counts all arguments instead of just the
explicit arguments.
* `arg 0` traverses into the function. If the target is `f a b c d`, `arg 0` traverses into `f`. -/
explicit arguments. -/
syntax (name := arg) "arg " "@"? num : conv
/-- `ext x` traverses into a binder (a `fun x => e` or `∀ x, e` expression)
@@ -156,6 +151,7 @@ match [a, b] with
simplifies to `a`. -/
syntax (name := simpMatch) "simp_match" : conv
/-- Executes the given tactic block without converting `conv` goal into a regular goal. -/
syntax (name := nestedTacticCore) "tactic'" " => " tacticSeq : conv
@@ -201,7 +197,7 @@ macro (name := anyGoals) tk:"any_goals " s:convSeq : conv =>
with inaccessible names to the given names.
* `case tag₁ | tag₂ => tac` is equivalent to `(case tag₁ => tac); (case tag₂ => tac)`.
-/
macro (name := case) tk:"case " args:sepBy1(caseArg, "|") arr:" => " s:convSeq : conv =>
macro (name := case) tk:"case " args:sepBy1(caseArg, " | ") arr:" => " s:convSeq : conv =>
`(conv| tactic' => case%$tk $args|* =>%$arr conv' => ($s); all_goals rfl)
/--
@@ -210,7 +206,7 @@ has been solved after applying `tac`, nor admits the goal if `tac` failed.
Recall that `case` closes the goal using `sorry` when `tac` fails, and
the tactic execution is not interrupted.
-/
macro (name := case') tk:"case' " args:sepBy1(caseArg, "|") arr:" => " s:convSeq : conv =>
macro (name := case') tk:"case' " args:sepBy1(caseArg, " | ") arr:" => " s:convSeq : conv =>
`(conv| tactic' => case'%$tk $args|* =>%$arr conv' => $s)
/--
@@ -307,7 +303,4 @@ Basic forms:
-- refer to the syntax category instead of this syntax
syntax (name := conv) "conv" (" at " ident)? (" in " (occs)? term)? " => " convSeq : tactic
/-- `norm_cast` tactic in `conv` mode. -/
syntax (name := normCast) "norm_cast" : conv
end Lean.Parser.Tactic.Conv

View File

@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ which applies to all applications of the function).
-/
@[simp] def inline {α : Sort u} (a : α) : α := a
theorem id_def {α : Sort u} (a : α) : id a = a := rfl
theorem id.def {α : Sort u} (a : α) : id a = a := rfl
/--
`flip f a b` is `f b a`. It is useful for "point-free" programming,
@@ -165,7 +165,6 @@ whose first component is `a : α` and whose second component is `b : β a`
It is sometimes known as the dependent sum type, since it is the type level version
of an indexed summation.
-/
@[pp_using_anonymous_constructor]
structure Sigma {α : Type u} (β : α Type v) where
/-- Constructor for a dependent pair. If `a : α` and `b : β a` then `⟨a, b⟩ : Sigma β`.
(This will usually require a type ascription to determine `β`
@@ -191,7 +190,6 @@ which can cause problems for universe level unification,
because the equation `max 1 u v = ?u + 1` has no solution in level arithmetic.
`PSigma` is usually only used in automation that constructs pairs of arbitrary types.
-/
@[pp_using_anonymous_constructor]
structure PSigma {α : Sort u} (β : α Sort v) where
/-- Constructor for a dependent pair. If `a : α` and `b : β a` then `⟨a, b⟩ : PSigma β`.
(This will usually require a type ascription to determine `β`
@@ -679,7 +677,7 @@ You can prove theorems about the resulting element by induction on `h`, since
theorem Eq.substr {α : Sort u} {p : α Prop} {a b : α} (h₁ : b = a) (h₂ : p a) : p b :=
h₁ h₂
@[simp] theorem cast_eq {α : Sort u} (h : α = α) (a : α) : cast h a = a :=
theorem cast_eq {α : Sort u} (h : α = α) (a : α) : cast h a = a :=
rfl
/--
@@ -739,16 +737,13 @@ theorem beq_false_of_ne [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] {a b : α} (h : a ≠ b) : (a ==
section
variable {α β φ : Sort u} {a a' : α} {b b' : β} {c : φ}
/-- Non-dependent recursor for `HEq` -/
noncomputable def HEq.ndrec.{u1, u2} {α : Sort u2} {a : α} {motive : {β : Sort u2} β Sort u1} (m : motive a) {β : Sort u2} {b : β} (h : HEq a b) : motive b :=
theorem HEq.ndrec.{u1, u2} {α : Sort u2} {a : α} {motive : {β : Sort u2} β Sort u1} (m : motive a) {β : Sort u2} {b : β} (h : HEq a b) : motive b :=
h.rec m
/-- `HEq.ndrec` variant -/
noncomputable def HEq.ndrecOn.{u1, u2} {α : Sort u2} {a : α} {motive : {β : Sort u2} β Sort u1} {β : Sort u2} {b : β} (h : HEq a b) (m : motive a) : motive b :=
theorem HEq.ndrecOn.{u1, u2} {α : Sort u2} {a : α} {motive : {β : Sort u2} β Sort u1} {β : Sort u2} {b : β} (h : HEq a b) (m : motive a) : motive b :=
h.rec m
/-- `HEq.ndrec` variant -/
noncomputable def HEq.elim {α : Sort u} {a : α} {p : α Sort v} {b : α} (h₁ : HEq a b) (h₂ : p a) : p b :=
theorem HEq.elim {α : Sort u} {a : α} {p : α Sort v} {b : α} (h₁ : HEq a b) (h₂ : p a) : p b :=
eq_of_heq h₁ h₂
theorem HEq.subst {p : (T : Sort u) T Prop} (h₁ : HEq a b) (h₂ : p α a) : p β b :=
@@ -1308,6 +1303,7 @@ gen_injective_theorems% Fin
gen_injective_theorems% Array
gen_injective_theorems% Sum
gen_injective_theorems% PSum
gen_injective_theorems% Nat
gen_injective_theorems% Option
gen_injective_theorems% List
gen_injective_theorems% Except
@@ -1315,12 +1311,6 @@ gen_injective_theorems% EStateM.Result
gen_injective_theorems% Lean.Name
gen_injective_theorems% Lean.Syntax
theorem Nat.succ.inj {m n : Nat} : m.succ = n.succ m = n :=
fun x => Nat.noConfusion x id
theorem Nat.succ.injEq (u v : Nat) : (u.succ = v.succ) = (u = v) :=
Eq.propIntro Nat.succ.inj (congrArg Nat.succ)
@[simp] theorem beq_iff_eq [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] (a b : α) : a == b a = b :=
eq_of_beq, by intro h; subst h; exact LawfulBEq.rfl
@@ -1413,9 +1403,9 @@ theorem false_imp_iff (a : Prop) : (False → a) ↔ True := iff_true_intro Fals
theorem true_imp_iff (α : Prop) : (True α) α := imp_iff_right True.intro
@[simp high] theorem imp_self : (a a) True := iff_true_intro id
@[simp] theorem imp_self : (a a) True := iff_true_intro id
@[simp] theorem imp_false : (a False) ¬a := Iff.rfl
theorem imp_false : (a False) ¬a := Iff.rfl
theorem imp.swap : (a b c) (b a c) := Iff.intro flip flip
@@ -1601,7 +1591,7 @@ protected def mk' {α : Sort u} [s : Setoid α] (a : α) : Quotient s :=
The analogue of `Quot.sound`: If `a` and `b` are related by the equivalence relation,
then they have equal equivalence classes.
-/
theorem sound {α : Sort u} {s : Setoid α} {a b : α} : a b Quotient.mk s a = Quotient.mk s b :=
def sound {α : Sort u} {s : Setoid α} {a b : α} : a b Quotient.mk s a = Quotient.mk s b :=
Quot.sound
/--

View File

@@ -6,15 +6,12 @@ Authors: Leonardo de Moura
prelude
import Init.Data.Basic
import Init.Data.Nat
import Init.Data.Bool
import Init.Data.BitVec
import Init.Data.Cast
import Init.Data.Char
import Init.Data.String
import Init.Data.List
import Init.Data.Int
import Init.Data.Array
import Init.Data.Array.Subarray.Split
import Init.Data.ByteArray
import Init.Data.FloatArray
import Init.Data.Fin
@@ -33,5 +30,3 @@ import Init.Data.Prod
import Init.Data.AC
import Init.Data.Queue
import Init.Data.Channel
import Init.Data.Cast
import Init.Data.Sum

View File

@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ def norm [info : ContextInformation α] (ctx : α) (e : Expr) : List Nat :=
let xs := if info.isComm ctx then sort xs else xs
if info.isIdem ctx then mergeIdem xs else xs
noncomputable def List.two_step_induction
theorem List.two_step_induction
{motive : List Nat Sort u}
(l : List Nat)
(empty : motive [])

View File

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ import Init.Data.Fin.Basic
import Init.Data.UInt.Basic
import Init.Data.Repr
import Init.Data.ToString.Basic
import Init.GetElem
import Init.Util
universe u v w
namespace Array
@@ -59,8 +59,6 @@ def uget (a : @& Array α) (i : USize) (h : i.toNat < a.size) : α :=
instance : GetElem (Array α) USize α fun xs i => i.toNat < xs.size where
getElem xs i h := xs.uget i h
instance : LawfulGetElem (Array α) USize α fun xs i => i.toNat < xs.size where
def back [Inhabited α] (a : Array α) : α :=
a.get! (a.size - 1)
@@ -458,12 +456,24 @@ def findRev? {α : Type} (as : Array α) (p : α → Bool) : Option α :=
@[inline]
def findIdx? {α : Type u} (as : Array α) (p : α Bool) : Option Nat :=
let rec loop (j : Nat) :=
if h : j < as.size then
if p as[j] then some j else loop (j + 1)
else none
termination_by as.size - j
loop 0
let rec loop (i : Nat) (j : Nat) (inv : i + j = as.size) : Option Nat :=
if hlt : j < as.size then
match i, inv with
| 0, inv => by
apply False.elim
rw [Nat.zero_add] at inv
rw [inv] at hlt
exact absurd hlt (Nat.lt_irrefl _)
| i+1, inv =>
if p as[j] then
some j
else
have : i + (j+1) = as.size := by
rw [ inv, Nat.add_comm j 1, Nat.add_assoc]
loop i (j+1) this
else
none
loop as.size 0 rfl
def getIdx? [BEq α] (a : Array α) (v : α) : Option Nat :=
a.findIdx? fun a => a == v
@@ -717,36 +727,33 @@ def takeWhile (p : α → Bool) (as : Array α) : Array α :=
termination_by as.size - i
go 0 #[]
/-- Remove the element at a given index from an array without bounds checks, using a `Fin` index.
This function takes worst case O(n) time because
it has to backshift all elements at positions greater than `i`.-/
def feraseIdx (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) : Array α :=
if h : i.val + 1 < a.size then
let a' := a.swap i.val + 1, h i
let i' : Fin a'.size := i.val + 1, by simp [a', h]
have : a'.size - i' < a.size - i := by
simp [a', Nat.sub_succ_lt_self _ _ i.isLt]
a'.feraseIdx i'
def eraseIdxAux (i : Nat) (a : Array α) : Array α :=
if h : i < a.size then
let idx : Fin a.size := i, h;
let idx1 : Fin a.size := i - 1, by exact Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.pred_le i) h;
let a' := a.swap idx idx1
eraseIdxAux (i+1) a'
else
a.pop
termination_by a.size - i.val
termination_by a.size - i
theorem size_feraseIdx (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) : (a.feraseIdx i).size = a.size - 1 := by
induction a, i using Array.feraseIdx.induct with
| @case1 a i h a' _ _ ih =>
unfold feraseIdx
simp [h, a', ih]
| case2 a i h =>
unfold feraseIdx
simp [h]
def feraseIdx (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) : Array α :=
eraseIdxAux (i.val + 1) a
/-- Remove the element at a given index from an array, or do nothing if the index is out of bounds.
This function takes worst case O(n) time because
it has to backshift all elements at positions greater than `i`.-/
def eraseIdx (a : Array α) (i : Nat) : Array α :=
if h : i < a.size then a.feraseIdx i, h else a
if i < a.size then eraseIdxAux (i+1) a else a
def eraseIdxSzAux (a : Array α) (i : Nat) (r : Array α) (heq : r.size = a.size) : { r : Array α // r.size = a.size - 1 } :=
if h : i < r.size then
let idx : Fin r.size := i, h;
let idx1 : Fin r.size := i - 1, by exact Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.pred_le i) h;
eraseIdxSzAux a (i+1) (r.swap idx idx1) ((size_swap r idx idx1).trans heq)
else
r.pop, (size_pop r).trans (heq rfl)
termination_by r.size - i
def eraseIdx' (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) : { r : Array α // r.size = a.size - 1 } :=
eraseIdxSzAux a (i.val + 1) a rfl
def erase [BEq α] (as : Array α) (a : α) : Array α :=
match as.indexOf? a with
@@ -802,7 +809,7 @@ where
rfl
go (i : Nat) (hi : i as.size) : toListLitAux as n hsz i hi (as.data.drop i) = as.data := by
induction i <;> simp [getLit_eq, List.get_drop_eq_drop, toListLitAux, List.drop, *]
cases i <;> simp [getLit_eq, List.get_drop_eq_drop, toListLitAux, List.drop, go]
def isPrefixOfAux [BEq α] (as bs : Array α) (hle : as.size bs.size) (i : Nat) : Bool :=
if h : i < as.size then

View File

@@ -4,11 +4,10 @@ Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Nat.MinMax
import Init.Data.Nat
import Init.Data.List.Lemmas
import Init.Data.Fin.Basic
import Init.Data.Array.Mem
import Init.TacticsExtra
/-!
## Bootstrapping theorems about arrays
@@ -186,84 +185,3 @@ theorem anyM_stop_le_start [Monad m] (p : α → m Bool) (as : Array α) (start
theorem mem_def (a : α) (as : Array α) : a as a as.data :=
fun | .mk h => h, Array.Mem.mk
/-- # get -/
@[simp] theorem get_eq_getElem (a : Array α) (i : Fin _) : a.get i = a[i.1] := rfl
theorem getElem?_lt
(a : Array α) {i : Nat} (h : i < a.size) : a[i]? = some (a[i]) := dif_pos h
theorem getElem?_ge
(a : Array α) {i : Nat} (h : i a.size) : a[i]? = none := dif_neg (Nat.not_lt_of_le h)
@[simp] theorem get?_eq_getElem? (a : Array α) (i : Nat) : a.get? i = a[i]? := rfl
theorem getElem?_len_le (a : Array α) {i : Nat} (h : a.size i) : a[i]? = none := by
simp [getElem?_ge, h]
theorem getD_get? (a : Array α) (i : Nat) (d : α) :
Option.getD a[i]? d = if p : i < a.size then a[i]'p else d := by
if h : i < a.size then
simp [setD, h, getElem?]
else
have p : i a.size := Nat.le_of_not_gt h
simp [setD, getElem?_len_le _ p, h]
@[simp] theorem getD_eq_get? (a : Array α) (n d) : a.getD n d = (a[n]?).getD d := by
simp only [getD, get_eq_getElem, get?_eq_getElem?]; split <;> simp [getD_get?, *]
theorem get!_eq_getD [Inhabited α] (a : Array α) : a.get! n = a.getD n default := rfl
@[simp] theorem get!_eq_getElem? [Inhabited α] (a : Array α) (i : Nat) : a.get! i = (a.get? i).getD default := by
by_cases p : i < a.size <;> simp [getD_get?, get!_eq_getD, p]
/-- # set -/
@[simp] theorem getElem_set_eq (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) (v : α) {j : Nat}
(eq : i.val = j) (p : j < (a.set i v).size) :
(a.set i v)[j]'p = v := by
simp [set, getElem_eq_data_get, eq]
@[simp] theorem getElem_set_ne (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) (v : α) {j : Nat} (pj : j < (a.set i v).size)
(h : i.val j) : (a.set i v)[j]'pj = a[j]'(size_set a i v pj) := by
simp only [set, getElem_eq_data_get, List.get_set_ne _ h]
theorem getElem_set (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) (v : α) (j : Nat)
(h : j < (a.set i v).size) :
(a.set i v)[j]'h = if i = j then v else a[j]'(size_set a i v h) := by
by_cases p : i.1 = j <;> simp [p]
@[simp] theorem getElem?_set_eq (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) (v : α) :
(a.set i v)[i.1]? = v := by simp [getElem?_lt, i.2]
@[simp] theorem getElem?_set_ne (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) {j : Nat} (v : α)
(ne : i.val j) : (a.set i v)[j]? = a[j]? := by
by_cases h : j < a.size <;> simp [getElem?_lt, getElem?_ge, Nat.ge_of_not_lt, ne, h]
/- # setD -/
@[simp] theorem set!_is_setD : @set! = @setD := rfl
@[simp] theorem size_setD (a : Array α) (index : Nat) (val : α) :
(Array.setD a index val).size = a.size := by
if h : index < a.size then
simp [setD, h]
else
simp [setD, h]
@[simp] theorem getElem_setD_eq (a : Array α) {i : Nat} (v : α) (h : _) :
(setD a i v)[i]'h = v := by
simp at h
simp only [setD, h, dite_true, getElem_set, ite_true]
@[simp]
theorem getElem?_setD_eq (a : Array α) {i : Nat} (p : i < a.size) (v : α) : (a.setD i v)[i]? = some v := by
simp [getElem?_lt, p]
/-- Simplifies a normal form from `get!` -/
@[simp] theorem getD_get?_setD (a : Array α) (i : Nat) (v d : α) :
Option.getD (setD a i v)[i]? d = if i < a.size then v else d := by
by_cases h : i < a.size <;>
simp [setD, Nat.not_lt_of_le, h, getD_get?]
end Array

View File

@@ -8,6 +8,16 @@ import Init.Data.Array.Basic
import Init.Data.Nat.Linear
import Init.Data.List.BasicAux
theorem List.sizeOf_get_lt [SizeOf α] (as : List α) (i : Fin as.length) : sizeOf (as.get i) < sizeOf as := by
match as, i with
| [], i => apply Fin.elim0 i
| a::as, 0, _ => simp_arith [get]
| a::as, i+1, h =>
simp [get]
have h : i < as.length := Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h
have ih := sizeOf_get_lt as i, h
exact Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le ih (Nat.le_add_left ..)
namespace Array
/-- `a ∈ as` is a predicate which asserts that `a` is in the array `as`. -/
@@ -19,6 +29,10 @@ structure Mem (a : α) (as : Array α) : Prop where
instance : Membership α (Array α) where
mem a as := Mem a as
theorem sizeOf_get_lt [SizeOf α] (as : Array α) (i : Fin as.size) : sizeOf (as.get i) < sizeOf as := by
cases as with | _ as =>
exact Nat.lt_trans (List.sizeOf_get_lt as i) (by simp_arith)
theorem sizeOf_lt_of_mem [SizeOf α] {as : Array α} (h : a as) : sizeOf a < sizeOf as := by
cases as with | _ as =>
exact Nat.lt_trans (List.sizeOf_lt_of_mem h.val) (by simp_arith)

View File

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ namespace Array
-- TODO: remove the [Inhabited α] parameters as soon as we have the tactic framework for automating proof generation and using Array.fget
def qpartition (as : Array α) (lt : α α Bool) (lo hi : Nat) : Nat × Array α :=
if h : as.size = 0 then (0, as) else have : Inhabited α := as[0]'(by revert h; cases as.size <;> simp) -- TODO: remove
if h : as.size = 0 then (0, as) else have : Inhabited α := as[0]'(by revert h; cases as.size <;> simp [Nat.zero_lt_succ]) -- TODO: remove
let mid := (lo + hi) / 2
let as := if lt (as.get! mid) (as.get! lo) then as.swap! lo mid else as
let as := if lt (as.get! hi) (as.get! lo) then as.swap! lo hi else as

View File

@@ -9,46 +9,29 @@ import Init.Data.Array.Basic
universe u v w
structure Subarray (α : Type u) where
array : Array α
as : Array α
start : Nat
stop : Nat
start_le_stop : start stop
stop_le_array_size : stop array.size
@[deprecated Subarray.array]
abbrev Subarray.as (s : Subarray α) : Array α := s.array
@[deprecated Subarray.start_le_stop]
theorem Subarray.h₁ (s : Subarray α) : s.start s.stop := s.start_le_stop
@[deprecated Subarray.stop_le_array_size]
theorem Subarray.h₂ (s : Subarray α) : s.stop s.as.size := s.stop_le_array_size
h₁ : start stop
h₂ : stop as.size
namespace Subarray
def size (s : Subarray α) : Nat :=
s.stop - s.start
theorem size_le_array_size {s : Subarray α} : s.size s.array.size := by
let {array, start, stop, start_le_stop, stop_le_array_size} := s
simp [size]
apply Nat.le_trans (Nat.sub_le stop start)
assumption
def get (s : Subarray α) (i : Fin s.size) : α :=
have : s.start + i.val < s.array.size := by
apply Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le _ s.stop_le_array_size
have : s.start + i.val < s.as.size := by
apply Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le _ s.h₂
have := i.isLt
simp [size] at this
rw [Nat.add_comm]
exact Nat.add_lt_of_lt_sub this
s.array[s.start + i.val]
s.as[s.start + i.val]
instance : GetElem (Subarray α) Nat α fun xs i => i < xs.size where
getElem xs i h := xs.get i, h
instance : LawfulGetElem (Subarray α) Nat α fun xs i => i < xs.size where
@[inline] def getD (s : Subarray α) (i : Nat) (v₀ : α) : α :=
if h : i < s.size then s.get i, h else v₀
@@ -57,7 +40,7 @@ abbrev get! [Inhabited α] (s : Subarray α) (i : Nat) : α :=
def popFront (s : Subarray α) : Subarray α :=
if h : s.start < s.stop then
{ s with start := s.start + 1, start_le_stop := Nat.le_of_lt_succ (Nat.add_lt_add_right h 1) }
{ s with start := s.start + 1, h₁ := Nat.le_of_lt_succ (Nat.add_lt_add_right h 1) }
else
s
@@ -65,7 +48,7 @@ def popFront (s : Subarray α) : Subarray α :=
let sz := USize.ofNat s.stop
let rec @[specialize] loop (i : USize) (b : β) : m β := do
if i < sz then
let a := s.array.uget i lcProof
let a := s.as.uget i lcProof
match ( f a b) with
| ForInStep.done b => pure b
| ForInStep.yield b => loop (i+1) b
@@ -83,27 +66,27 @@ instance : ForIn m (Subarray α) α where
@[inline]
def foldlM {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {m : Type v Type w} [Monad m] (f : β α m β) (init : β) (as : Subarray α) : m β :=
as.array.foldlM f (init := init) (start := as.start) (stop := as.stop)
as.as.foldlM f (init := init) (start := as.start) (stop := as.stop)
@[inline]
def foldrM {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {m : Type v Type w} [Monad m] (f : α β m β) (init : β) (as : Subarray α) : m β :=
as.array.foldrM f (init := init) (start := as.stop) (stop := as.start)
as.as.foldrM f (init := init) (start := as.stop) (stop := as.start)
@[inline]
def anyM {α : Type u} {m : Type Type w} [Monad m] (p : α m Bool) (as : Subarray α) : m Bool :=
as.array.anyM p (start := as.start) (stop := as.stop)
as.as.anyM p (start := as.start) (stop := as.stop)
@[inline]
def allM {α : Type u} {m : Type Type w} [Monad m] (p : α m Bool) (as : Subarray α) : m Bool :=
as.array.allM p (start := as.start) (stop := as.stop)
as.as.allM p (start := as.start) (stop := as.stop)
@[inline]
def forM {α : Type u} {m : Type v Type w} [Monad m] (f : α m PUnit) (as : Subarray α) : m PUnit :=
as.array.forM f (start := as.start) (stop := as.stop)
as.as.forM f (start := as.start) (stop := as.stop)
@[inline]
def forRevM {α : Type u} {m : Type v Type w} [Monad m] (f : α m PUnit) (as : Subarray α) : m PUnit :=
as.array.forRevM f (start := as.stop) (stop := as.start)
as.as.forRevM f (start := as.stop) (stop := as.start)
@[inline]
def foldl {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : β α β) (init : β) (as : Subarray α) : β :=
@@ -150,27 +133,16 @@ variable {α : Type u}
def toSubarray (as : Array α) (start : Nat := 0) (stop : Nat := as.size) : Subarray α :=
if h₂ : stop as.size then
if h₁ : start stop then
{ array := as, start := start, stop := stop,
start_le_stop := h₁, stop_le_array_size := h₂ }
else
{ array := as, start := stop, stop := stop,
start_le_stop := Nat.le_refl _, stop_le_array_size := h₂ }
if h₁ : start stop then
{ as := as, start := start, stop := stop, h₁ := h₁, h₂ := h₂ }
else
{ as := as, start := stop, stop := stop, h₁ := Nat.le_refl _, h₂ := h₂ }
else
if h₁ : start as.size then
{ array := as,
start := start,
stop := as.size,
start_le_stop := h₁,
stop_le_array_size := Nat.le_refl _ }
else
{ array := as,
start := as.size,
stop := as.size,
start_le_stop := Nat.le_refl _,
stop_le_array_size := Nat.le_refl _ }
if h₁ : start as.size then
{ as := as, start := start, stop := as.size, h₁ := h₁, h₂ := Nat.le_refl _ }
else
{ as := as, start := as.size, stop := as.size, h₁ := Nat.le_refl _, h₂ := Nat.le_refl _ }
@[coe]
def ofSubarray (s : Subarray α) : Array α := Id.run do
let mut as := mkEmpty (s.stop - s.start)
for a in s do

View File

@@ -1,71 +0,0 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Lean FRO, LLC. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Thrane Christiansen
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Array.Basic
import Init.Data.Array.Subarray
import Init.Omega
/-
This module contains splitting operations on subarrays that crucially rely on `omega` for proof
automation. Placing them in another module breaks an import cycle, because `omega` itself uses the
array library.
-/
namespace Subarray
/--
Splits a subarray into two parts.
-/
def split (s : Subarray α) (i : Fin s.size.succ) : (Subarray α × Subarray α) :=
let i', isLt := i
have := s.start_le_stop
have := s.stop_le_array_size
have : i' s.stop - s.start := Nat.lt_succ.mp isLt
have : s.start + i' s.stop := by omega
have : s.start + i' s.array.size := by omega
have : s.start + i' s.stop := by
simp only [size] at isLt
omega
let pre := {s with
stop := s.start + i',
start_le_stop := by omega,
stop_le_array_size := by assumption
}
let post := {s with
start := s.start + i'
start_le_stop := by assumption
}
(pre, post)
/--
Removes the first `i` elements of the subarray. If there are `i` or fewer elements, the resulting
subarray is empty.
-/
def drop (arr : Subarray α) (i : Nat) : Subarray α where
array := arr.array
start := min (arr.start + i) arr.stop
stop := arr.stop
start_le_stop := by
rw [Nat.min_def]
split <;> simp only [Nat.le_refl, *]
stop_le_array_size := arr.stop_le_array_size
/--
Keeps only the first `i` elements of the subarray. If there are `i` or fewer elements, the resulting
subarray is empty.
-/
def take (arr : Subarray α) (i : Nat) : Subarray α where
array := arr.array
start := arr.start
stop := min (arr.start + i) arr.stop
start_le_stop := by
have := arr.start_le_stop
rw [Nat.min_def]
split <;> omega
stop_le_array_size := by
have := arr.stop_le_array_size
rw [Nat.min_def]
split <;> omega

View File

@@ -1,10 +0,0 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Lean FRO, LLC. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.BitVec.Basic
import Init.Data.BitVec.Bitblast
import Init.Data.BitVec.Folds
import Init.Data.BitVec.Lemmas

View File

@@ -1,631 +0,0 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Lean FRO, LLC. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joe Hendrix, Wojciech Nawrocki, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro, Alex Keizer, Harun Khan, Abdalrhman M Mohamed
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Fin.Basic
import Init.Data.Nat.Bitwise.Lemmas
import Init.Data.Nat.Power2
import Init.Data.Int.Bitwise
/-!
We define bitvectors. We choose the `Fin` representation over others for its relative efficiency
(Lean has special support for `Nat`), alignment with `UIntXY` types which are also represented
with `Fin`, and the fact that bitwise operations on `Fin` are already defined. Some other possible
representations are `List Bool`, `{ l : List Bool // l.length = w }`, `Fin w → Bool`.
We define many of the bitvector operations from the
[`QF_BV` logic](https://smtlib.cs.uiowa.edu/logics-all.shtml#QF_BV).
of SMT-LIBv2.
-/
/--
A bitvector of the specified width.
This is represented as the underlying `Nat` number in both the runtime
and the kernel, inheriting all the special support for `Nat`.
-/
structure BitVec (w : Nat) where
/-- Construct a `BitVec w` from a number less than `2^w`.
O(1), because we use `Fin` as the internal representation of a bitvector. -/
ofFin ::
/-- Interpret a bitvector as a number less than `2^w`.
O(1), because we use `Fin` as the internal representation of a bitvector. -/
toFin : Fin (2^w)
@[deprecated] protected abbrev Std.BitVec := _root_.BitVec
-- We manually derive the `DecidableEq` instances for `BitVec` because
-- we want to have builtin support for bit-vector literals, and we
-- need a name for this function to implement `canUnfoldAtMatcher` at `WHNF.lean`.
def BitVec.decEq (a b : BitVec n) : Decidable (a = b) :=
match a, b with
| n, m =>
if h : n = m then
isTrue (h rfl)
else
isFalse (fun h' => BitVec.noConfusion h' (fun h' => absurd h' h))
instance : DecidableEq (BitVec n) := BitVec.decEq
namespace BitVec
section Nat
/-- The `BitVec` with value `i`, given a proof that `i < 2^n`. -/
@[match_pattern]
protected def ofNatLt {n : Nat} (i : Nat) (p : i < 2^n) : BitVec n where
toFin := i, p
/-- The `BitVec` with value `i mod 2^n`. -/
@[match_pattern]
protected def ofNat (n : Nat) (i : Nat) : BitVec n where
toFin := Fin.ofNat' i (Nat.two_pow_pos n)
instance instOfNat : OfNat (BitVec n) i where ofNat := .ofNat n i
instance natCastInst : NatCast (BitVec w) := BitVec.ofNat w
/-- Given a bitvector `a`, return the underlying `Nat`. This is O(1) because `BitVec` is a
(zero-cost) wrapper around a `Nat`. -/
protected def toNat (a : BitVec n) : Nat := a.toFin.val
/-- Return the bound in terms of toNat. -/
theorem isLt (x : BitVec w) : x.toNat < 2^w := x.toFin.isLt
@[deprecated isLt]
theorem toNat_lt (x : BitVec n) : x.toNat < 2^n := x.isLt
/-- Theorem for normalizing the bit vector literal representation. -/
-- TODO: This needs more usage data to assess which direction the simp should go.
@[simp, bv_toNat] theorem ofNat_eq_ofNat : @OfNat.ofNat (BitVec n) i _ = .ofNat n i := rfl
-- Note. Mathlib would like this to go the other direction.
@[simp] theorem natCast_eq_ofNat (w x : Nat) : @Nat.cast (BitVec w) _ x = .ofNat w x := rfl
end Nat
section subsingleton
/-- All empty bitvectors are equal -/
instance : Subsingleton (BitVec 0) where
allEq := by intro 0, _ 0, _; rfl
/-- The empty bitvector -/
abbrev nil : BitVec 0 := 0
/-- Every bitvector of length 0 is equal to `nil`, i.e., there is only one empty bitvector -/
theorem eq_nil (x : BitVec 0) : x = nil := Subsingleton.allEq ..
end subsingleton
section zero_allOnes
/-- Return a bitvector `0` of size `n`. This is the bitvector with all zero bits. -/
protected def zero (n : Nat) : BitVec n := .ofNatLt 0 (Nat.two_pow_pos n)
instance : Inhabited (BitVec n) where default := .zero n
/-- Bit vector of size `n` where all bits are `1`s -/
def allOnes (n : Nat) : BitVec n :=
.ofNatLt (2^n - 1) (Nat.le_of_eq (Nat.sub_add_cancel (Nat.two_pow_pos n)))
end zero_allOnes
section getXsb
/-- Return the `i`-th least significant bit or `false` if `i ≥ w`. -/
@[inline] def getLsb (x : BitVec w) (i : Nat) : Bool := x.toNat.testBit i
/-- Return the `i`-th most significant bit or `false` if `i ≥ w`. -/
@[inline] def getMsb (x : BitVec w) (i : Nat) : Bool := i < w && getLsb x (w-1-i)
/-- Return most-significant bit in bitvector. -/
@[inline] protected def msb (a : BitVec n) : Bool := getMsb a 0
end getXsb
section Int
/-- Interpret the bitvector as an integer stored in two's complement form. -/
protected def toInt (a : BitVec n) : Int :=
if 2 * a.toNat < 2^n then
a.toNat
else
(a.toNat : Int) - (2^n : Nat)
/-- The `BitVec` with value `(2^n + (i mod 2^n)) mod 2^n`. -/
protected def ofInt (n : Nat) (i : Int) : BitVec n := .ofNatLt (i % (Int.ofNat (2^n))).toNat (by
apply (Int.toNat_lt _).mpr
· apply Int.emod_lt_of_pos
exact Int.ofNat_pos.mpr (Nat.two_pow_pos _)
· apply Int.emod_nonneg
intro eq
apply Nat.ne_of_gt (Nat.two_pow_pos n)
exact Int.ofNat_inj.mp eq)
instance : IntCast (BitVec w) := BitVec.ofInt w
end Int
section Syntax
/-- Notation for bit vector literals. `i#n` is a shorthand for `BitVec.ofNat n i`. -/
scoped syntax:max term:max noWs "#" noWs term:max : term
macro_rules | `($i#$n) => `(BitVec.ofNat $n $i)
/-- Unexpander for bit vector literals. -/
@[app_unexpander BitVec.ofNat] def unexpandBitVecOfNat : Lean.PrettyPrinter.Unexpander
| `($(_) $n $i) => `($i#$n)
| _ => throw ()
/-- Notation for bit vector literals without truncation. `i#'lt` is a shorthand for `BitVec.ofNatLt i lt`. -/
scoped syntax:max term:max noWs "#'" noWs term:max : term
macro_rules | `($i#'$p) => `(BitVec.ofNatLt $i $p)
/-- Unexpander for bit vector literals without truncation. -/
@[app_unexpander BitVec.ofNatLt] def unexpandBitVecOfNatLt : Lean.PrettyPrinter.Unexpander
| `($(_) $i $p) => `($i#'$p)
| _ => throw ()
end Syntax
section repr_toString
/-- Convert bitvector into a fixed-width hex number. -/
protected def toHex {n : Nat} (x : BitVec n) : String :=
let s := (Nat.toDigits 16 x.toNat).asString
let t := (List.replicate ((n+3) / 4 - s.length) '0').asString
t ++ s
instance : Repr (BitVec n) where reprPrec a _ := "0x" ++ (a.toHex : Std.Format) ++ "#" ++ repr n
instance : ToString (BitVec n) where toString a := toString (repr a)
end repr_toString
section arithmetic
/--
Addition for bit vectors. This can be interpreted as either signed or unsigned addition
modulo `2^n`.
SMT-Lib name: `bvadd`.
-/
protected def add (x y : BitVec n) : BitVec n := .ofNat n (x.toNat + y.toNat)
instance : Add (BitVec n) := BitVec.add
/--
Subtraction for bit vectors. This can be interpreted as either signed or unsigned subtraction
modulo `2^n`.
-/
protected def sub (x y : BitVec n) : BitVec n := .ofNat n (x.toNat + (2^n - y.toNat))
instance : Sub (BitVec n) := BitVec.sub
/--
Negation for bit vectors. This can be interpreted as either signed or unsigned negation
modulo `2^n`.
SMT-Lib name: `bvneg`.
-/
protected def neg (x : BitVec n) : BitVec n := .ofNat n (2^n - x.toNat)
instance : Neg (BitVec n) := .neg
/--
Return the absolute value of a signed bitvector.
-/
protected def abs (s : BitVec n) : BitVec n := if s.msb then .neg s else s
/--
Multiplication for bit vectors. This can be interpreted as either signed or unsigned negation
modulo `2^n`.
SMT-Lib name: `bvmul`.
-/
protected def mul (x y : BitVec n) : BitVec n := BitVec.ofNat n (x.toNat * y.toNat)
instance : Mul (BitVec n) := .mul
/--
Unsigned division for bit vectors using the Lean convention where division by zero returns zero.
-/
def udiv (x y : BitVec n) : BitVec n :=
(x.toNat / y.toNat)#'(Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.div_le_self _ _) x.isLt)
instance : Div (BitVec n) := .udiv
/--
Unsigned modulo for bit vectors.
SMT-Lib name: `bvurem`.
-/
def umod (x y : BitVec n) : BitVec n :=
(x.toNat % y.toNat)#'(Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.mod_le _ _) x.isLt)
instance : Mod (BitVec n) := .umod
/--
Unsigned division for bit vectors using the
[SMT-Lib convention](http://smtlib.cs.uiowa.edu/theories-FixedSizeBitVectors.shtml)
where division by zero returns the `allOnes` bitvector.
SMT-Lib name: `bvudiv`.
-/
def smtUDiv (x y : BitVec n) : BitVec n := if y = 0 then allOnes n else udiv x y
/--
Signed t-division for bit vectors using the Lean convention where division
by zero returns zero.
```lean
sdiv 7#4 2 = 3#4
sdiv (-9#4) 2 = -4#4
sdiv 5#4 -2 = -2#4
sdiv (-7#4) (-2) = 3#4
```
-/
def sdiv (s t : BitVec n) : BitVec n :=
match s.msb, t.msb with
| false, false => udiv s t
| false, true => .neg (udiv s (.neg t))
| true, false => .neg (udiv (.neg s) t)
| true, true => udiv (.neg s) (.neg t)
/--
Signed division for bit vectors using SMTLIB rules for division by zero.
Specifically, `smtSDiv x 0 = if x >= 0 then -1 else 1`
SMT-Lib name: `bvsdiv`.
-/
def smtSDiv (s t : BitVec n) : BitVec n :=
match s.msb, t.msb with
| false, false => smtUDiv s t
| false, true => .neg (smtUDiv s (.neg t))
| true, false => .neg (smtUDiv (.neg s) t)
| true, true => smtUDiv (.neg s) (.neg t)
/--
Remainder for signed division rounding to zero.
SMT_Lib name: `bvsrem`.
-/
def srem (s t : BitVec n) : BitVec n :=
match s.msb, t.msb with
| false, false => umod s t
| false, true => umod s (.neg t)
| true, false => .neg (umod (.neg s) t)
| true, true => .neg (umod (.neg s) (.neg t))
/--
Remainder for signed division rounded to negative infinity.
SMT_Lib name: `bvsmod`.
-/
def smod (s t : BitVec m) : BitVec m :=
match s.msb, t.msb with
| false, false => umod s t
| false, true =>
let u := umod s (.neg t)
(if u = .zero m then u else .add u t)
| true, false =>
let u := umod (.neg s) t
(if u = .zero m then u else .sub t u)
| true, true => .neg (umod (.neg s) (.neg t))
end arithmetic
section bool
/-- Turn a `Bool` into a bitvector of length `1` -/
def ofBool (b : Bool) : BitVec 1 := cond b 1 0
@[simp] theorem ofBool_false : ofBool false = 0 := by trivial
@[simp] theorem ofBool_true : ofBool true = 1 := by trivial
/-- Fills a bitvector with `w` copies of the bit `b`. -/
def fill (w : Nat) (b : Bool) : BitVec w := bif b then -1 else 0
end bool
section relations
/--
Unsigned less-than for bit vectors.
SMT-Lib name: `bvult`.
-/
protected def ult (x y : BitVec n) : Bool := x.toNat < y.toNat
instance : LT (BitVec n) where lt := (·.toNat < ·.toNat)
instance (x y : BitVec n) : Decidable (x < y) :=
inferInstanceAs (Decidable (x.toNat < y.toNat))
/--
Unsigned less-than-or-equal-to for bit vectors.
SMT-Lib name: `bvule`.
-/
protected def ule (x y : BitVec n) : Bool := x.toNat y.toNat
instance : LE (BitVec n) where le := (·.toNat ·.toNat)
instance (x y : BitVec n) : Decidable (x y) :=
inferInstanceAs (Decidable (x.toNat y.toNat))
/--
Signed less-than for bit vectors.
```lean
BitVec.slt 6#4 7 = true
BitVec.slt 7#4 8 = false
```
SMT-Lib name: `bvslt`.
-/
protected def slt (x y : BitVec n) : Bool := x.toInt < y.toInt
/--
Signed less-than-or-equal-to for bit vectors.
SMT-Lib name: `bvsle`.
-/
protected def sle (x y : BitVec n) : Bool := x.toInt y.toInt
end relations
section cast
/-- `cast eq i` embeds `i` into an equal `BitVec` type. -/
@[inline] def cast (eq : n = m) (i : BitVec n) : BitVec m := .ofNatLt i.toNat (eq i.isLt)
@[simp] theorem cast_ofNat {n m : Nat} (h : n = m) (x : Nat) :
cast h (BitVec.ofNat n x) = BitVec.ofNat m x := by
subst h; rfl
@[simp] theorem cast_cast {n m k : Nat} (h₁ : n = m) (h₂ : m = k) (x : BitVec n) :
cast h₂ (cast h₁ x) = cast (h₁ h₂) x :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem cast_eq {n : Nat} (h : n = n) (x : BitVec n) : cast h x = x := rfl
/--
Extraction of bits `start` to `start + len - 1` from a bit vector of size `n` to yield a
new bitvector of size `len`. If `start + len > n`, then the vector will be zero-padded in the
high bits.
-/
def extractLsb' (start len : Nat) (a : BitVec n) : BitVec len := .ofNat _ (a.toNat >>> start)
/--
Extraction of bits `hi` (inclusive) down to `lo` (inclusive) from a bit vector of size `n` to
yield a new bitvector of size `hi - lo + 1`.
SMT-Lib name: `extract`.
-/
def extractLsb (hi lo : Nat) (a : BitVec n) : BitVec (hi - lo + 1) := extractLsb' lo _ a
/--
A version of `zeroExtend` that requires a proof, but is a noop.
-/
def zeroExtend' {n w : Nat} (le : n w) (x : BitVec n) : BitVec w :=
x.toNat#'(by
apply Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le x.isLt
exact Nat.pow_le_pow_of_le_right (by trivial) le)
/--
`shiftLeftZeroExtend x n` returns `zeroExtend (w+n) x <<< n` without
needing to compute `x % 2^(2+n)`.
-/
def shiftLeftZeroExtend (msbs : BitVec w) (m : Nat) : BitVec (w+m) :=
let shiftLeftLt {x : Nat} (p : x < 2^w) (m : Nat) : x <<< m < 2^(w+m) := by
simp [Nat.shiftLeft_eq, Nat.pow_add]
apply Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right p
exact (Nat.two_pow_pos m)
(msbs.toNat <<< m)#'(shiftLeftLt msbs.isLt m)
/--
Zero extend vector `x` of length `w` by adding zeros in the high bits until it has length `v`.
If `v < w` then it truncates the high bits instead.
SMT-Lib name: `zero_extend`.
-/
def zeroExtend (v : Nat) (x : BitVec w) : BitVec v :=
if h : w v then
zeroExtend' h x
else
.ofNat v x.toNat
/--
Truncate the high bits of bitvector `x` of length `w`, resulting in a vector of length `v`.
If `v > w` then it zero-extends the vector instead.
-/
abbrev truncate := @zeroExtend
/--
Sign extend a vector of length `w`, extending with `i` additional copies of the most significant
bit in `x`. If `x` is an empty vector, then the sign is treated as zero.
SMT-Lib name: `sign_extend`.
-/
def signExtend (v : Nat) (x : BitVec w) : BitVec v := .ofInt v x.toInt
end cast
section bitwise
/--
Bitwise AND for bit vectors.
```lean
0b1010#4 &&& 0b0110#4 = 0b0010#4
```
SMT-Lib name: `bvand`.
-/
protected def and (x y : BitVec n) : BitVec n :=
(x.toNat &&& y.toNat)#'(Nat.and_lt_two_pow x.toNat y.isLt)
instance : AndOp (BitVec w) := .and
/--
Bitwise OR for bit vectors.
```lean
0b1010#4 ||| 0b0110#4 = 0b1110#4
```
SMT-Lib name: `bvor`.
-/
protected def or (x y : BitVec n) : BitVec n :=
(x.toNat ||| y.toNat)#'(Nat.or_lt_two_pow x.isLt y.isLt)
instance : OrOp (BitVec w) := .or
/--
Bitwise XOR for bit vectors.
```lean
0b1010#4 ^^^ 0b0110#4 = 0b1100#4
```
SMT-Lib name: `bvxor`.
-/
protected def xor (x y : BitVec n) : BitVec n :=
(x.toNat ^^^ y.toNat)#'(Nat.xor_lt_two_pow x.isLt y.isLt)
instance : Xor (BitVec w) := .xor
/--
Bitwise NOT for bit vectors.
```lean
~~~(0b0101#4) == 0b1010
```
SMT-Lib name: `bvnot`.
-/
protected def not (x : BitVec n) : BitVec n := allOnes n ^^^ x
instance : Complement (BitVec w) := .not
/--
Left shift for bit vectors. The low bits are filled with zeros. As a numeric operation, this is
equivalent to `a * 2^s`, modulo `2^n`.
SMT-Lib name: `bvshl` except this operator uses a `Nat` shift value.
-/
protected def shiftLeft (a : BitVec n) (s : Nat) : BitVec n := (a.toNat <<< s)#n
instance : HShiftLeft (BitVec w) Nat (BitVec w) := .shiftLeft
/--
(Logical) right shift for bit vectors. The high bits are filled with zeros.
As a numeric operation, this is equivalent to `a / 2^s`, rounding down.
SMT-Lib name: `bvlshr` except this operator uses a `Nat` shift value.
-/
def ushiftRight (a : BitVec n) (s : Nat) : BitVec n :=
(a.toNat >>> s)#'(by
let a, lt := a
simp only [BitVec.toNat, Nat.shiftRight_eq_div_pow, Nat.div_lt_iff_lt_mul (Nat.two_pow_pos s)]
rw [Nat.mul_one a]
exact Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le' lt (Nat.two_pow_pos s) (Nat.le_refl 1))
instance : HShiftRight (BitVec w) Nat (BitVec w) := .ushiftRight
/--
Arithmetic right shift for bit vectors. The high bits are filled with the
most-significant bit.
As a numeric operation, this is equivalent to `a.toInt >>> s`.
SMT-Lib name: `bvashr` except this operator uses a `Nat` shift value.
-/
def sshiftRight (a : BitVec n) (s : Nat) : BitVec n := .ofInt n (a.toInt >>> s)
instance {n} : HShiftLeft (BitVec m) (BitVec n) (BitVec m) := fun x y => x <<< y.toNat
instance {n} : HShiftRight (BitVec m) (BitVec n) (BitVec m) := fun x y => x >>> y.toNat
/--
Rotate left for bit vectors. All the bits of `x` are shifted to higher positions, with the top `n`
bits wrapping around to fill the low bits.
```lean
rotateLeft 0b0011#4 3 = 0b1001
```
SMT-Lib name: `rotate_left` except this operator uses a `Nat` shift amount.
-/
def rotateLeft (x : BitVec w) (n : Nat) : BitVec w := x <<< n ||| x >>> (w - n)
/--
Rotate right for bit vectors. All the bits of `x` are shifted to lower positions, with the
bottom `n` bits wrapping around to fill the high bits.
```lean
rotateRight 0b01001#5 1 = 0b10100
```
SMT-Lib name: `rotate_right` except this operator uses a `Nat` shift amount.
-/
def rotateRight (x : BitVec w) (n : Nat) : BitVec w := x >>> n ||| x <<< (w - n)
/--
Concatenation of bitvectors. This uses the "big endian" convention that the more significant
input is on the left, so `0xAB#8 ++ 0xCD#8 = 0xABCD#16`.
SMT-Lib name: `concat`.
-/
def append (msbs : BitVec n) (lsbs : BitVec m) : BitVec (n+m) :=
shiftLeftZeroExtend msbs m ||| zeroExtend' (Nat.le_add_left m n) lsbs
instance : HAppend (BitVec w) (BitVec v) (BitVec (w + v)) := .append
-- TODO: write this using multiplication
/-- `replicate i x` concatenates `i` copies of `x` into a new vector of length `w*i`. -/
def replicate : (i : Nat) BitVec w BitVec (w*i)
| 0, _ => 0
| n+1, x =>
have hEq : w + w*n = w*(n + 1) := by
rw [Nat.mul_add, Nat.add_comm, Nat.mul_one]
hEq (x ++ replicate n x)
/-!
### Cons and Concat
We give special names to the operations of adding a single bit to either end of a bitvector.
We follow the precedent of `Vector.cons`/`Vector.concat` both for the name, and for the decision
to have the resulting size be `n + 1` for both operations (rather than `1 + n`, which would be the
result of appending a single bit to the front in the naive implementation).
-/
/-- Append a single bit to the end of a bitvector, using big endian order (see `append`).
That is, the new bit is the least significant bit. -/
def concat {n} (msbs : BitVec n) (lsb : Bool) : BitVec (n+1) := msbs ++ (ofBool lsb)
/-- Prepend a single bit to the front of a bitvector, using big endian order (see `append`).
That is, the new bit is the most significant bit. -/
def cons {n} (msb : Bool) (lsbs : BitVec n) : BitVec (n+1) :=
((ofBool msb) ++ lsbs).cast (Nat.add_comm ..)
theorem append_ofBool (msbs : BitVec w) (lsb : Bool) :
msbs ++ ofBool lsb = concat msbs lsb :=
rfl
theorem ofBool_append (msb : Bool) (lsbs : BitVec w) :
ofBool msb ++ lsbs = (cons msb lsbs).cast (Nat.add_comm ..) :=
rfl
end bitwise
section normalization_eqs
/-! We add simp-lemmas that rewrite bitvector operations into the equivalent notation -/
@[simp] theorem append_eq (x : BitVec w) (y : BitVec v) : BitVec.append x y = x ++ y := rfl
@[simp] theorem shiftLeft_eq (x : BitVec w) (n : Nat) : BitVec.shiftLeft x n = x <<< n := rfl
@[simp] theorem ushiftRight_eq (x : BitVec w) (n : Nat) : BitVec.ushiftRight x n = x >>> n := rfl
@[simp] theorem not_eq (x : BitVec w) : BitVec.not x = ~~~x := rfl
@[simp] theorem and_eq (x y : BitVec w) : BitVec.and x y = x &&& y := rfl
@[simp] theorem or_eq (x y : BitVec w) : BitVec.or x y = x ||| y := rfl
@[simp] theorem xor_eq (x y : BitVec w) : BitVec.xor x y = x ^^^ y := rfl
@[simp] theorem neg_eq (x : BitVec w) : BitVec.neg x = -x := rfl
@[simp] theorem add_eq (x y : BitVec w) : BitVec.add x y = x + y := rfl
@[simp] theorem sub_eq (x y : BitVec w) : BitVec.sub x y = x - y := rfl
@[simp] theorem mul_eq (x y : BitVec w) : BitVec.mul x y = x * y := rfl
@[simp] theorem zero_eq : BitVec.zero n = 0#n := rfl
end normalization_eqs
/-- Converts a list of `Bool`s to a big-endian `BitVec`. -/
def ofBoolListBE : (bs : List Bool) BitVec bs.length
| [] => 0#0
| b :: bs => cons b (ofBoolListBE bs)
/-- Converts a list of `Bool`s to a little-endian `BitVec`. -/
def ofBoolListLE : (bs : List Bool) BitVec bs.length
| [] => 0#0
| b :: bs => concat (ofBoolListLE bs) b
end BitVec

View File

@@ -1,162 +0,0 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Lean FRO, LLC. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Harun Khan, Abdalrhman M Mohamed, Joe Hendrix
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.BitVec.Folds
import Init.Data.Nat.Mod
/-!
# Bitblasting of bitvectors
This module provides theorems for showing the equivalence between BitVec operations using
the `Fin 2^n` representation and Boolean vectors. It is still under development, but
intended to provide a path for converting SAT and SMT solver proofs about BitVectors
as vectors of bits into proofs about Lean `BitVec` values.
The module is named for the bit-blasting operation in an SMT solver that converts bitvector
expressions into expressions about individual bits in each vector.
## Main results
* `x + y : BitVec w` is `(adc x y false).2`.
## Future work
All other operations are to be PR'ed later and are already proved in
https://github.com/mhk119/lean-smt/blob/bitvec/Smt/Data/Bitwise.lean.
-/
open Nat Bool
namespace Bool
/-- At least two out of three booleans are true. -/
abbrev atLeastTwo (a b c : Bool) : Bool := a && b || a && c || b && c
@[simp] theorem atLeastTwo_false_left : atLeastTwo false b c = (b && c) := by simp [atLeastTwo]
@[simp] theorem atLeastTwo_false_mid : atLeastTwo a false c = (a && c) := by simp [atLeastTwo]
@[simp] theorem atLeastTwo_false_right : atLeastTwo a b false = (a && b) := by simp [atLeastTwo]
@[simp] theorem atLeastTwo_true_left : atLeastTwo true b c = (b || c) := by cases b <;> cases c <;> simp [atLeastTwo]
@[simp] theorem atLeastTwo_true_mid : atLeastTwo a true c = (a || c) := by cases a <;> cases c <;> simp [atLeastTwo]
@[simp] theorem atLeastTwo_true_right : atLeastTwo a b true = (a || b) := by cases a <;> cases b <;> simp [atLeastTwo]
end Bool
/-! ### Preliminaries -/
namespace BitVec
private theorem testBit_limit {x i : Nat} (x_lt_succ : x < 2^(i+1)) :
testBit x i = decide (x 2^i) := by
cases xi : testBit x i with
| true =>
simp [testBit_implies_ge xi]
| false =>
simp
cases Nat.lt_or_ge x (2^i) with
| inl x_lt =>
exact x_lt
| inr x_ge =>
have j, j_ge, jp := ge_two_pow_implies_high_bit_true x_ge
cases Nat.lt_or_eq_of_le j_ge with
| inr x_eq =>
simp [x_eq, jp] at xi
| inl x_lt =>
exfalso
apply Nat.lt_irrefl
calc x < 2^(i+1) := x_lt_succ
_ 2 ^ j := Nat.pow_le_pow_of_le_right Nat.zero_lt_two x_lt
_ x := testBit_implies_ge jp
private theorem mod_two_pow_succ (x i : Nat) :
x % 2^(i+1) = 2^i*(x.testBit i).toNat + x % (2 ^ i):= by
rw [Nat.mod_pow_succ, Nat.add_comm, Nat.toNat_testBit]
private theorem mod_two_pow_add_mod_two_pow_add_bool_lt_two_pow_succ
(x y i : Nat) (c : Bool) : x % 2^i + (y % 2^i + c.toNat) < 2^(i+1) := by
have : c.toNat 1 := Bool.toNat_le c
rw [Nat.pow_succ]
omega
/-! ### Addition -/
/-- carry i x y c returns true if the `i` carry bit is true when computing `x + y + c`. -/
def carry (i : Nat) (x y : BitVec w) (c : Bool) : Bool :=
decide (x.toNat % 2^i + y.toNat % 2^i + c.toNat 2^i)
@[simp] theorem carry_zero : carry 0 x y c = c := by
cases c <;> simp [carry, mod_one]
theorem carry_succ (i : Nat) (x y : BitVec w) (c : Bool) :
carry (i+1) x y c = atLeastTwo (x.getLsb i) (y.getLsb i) (carry i x y c) := by
simp only [carry, mod_two_pow_succ, atLeastTwo, getLsb]
simp only [Nat.pow_succ']
have sum_bnd : x.toNat%2^i + (y.toNat%2^i + c.toNat) < 2*2^i := by
simp only [ Nat.pow_succ']
exact mod_two_pow_add_mod_two_pow_add_bool_lt_two_pow_succ ..
cases x.toNat.testBit i <;> cases y.toNat.testBit i <;> (simp; omega)
/-- Carry function for bitwise addition. -/
def adcb (x y c : Bool) : Bool × Bool := (atLeastTwo x y c, Bool.xor x (Bool.xor y c))
/-- Bitwise addition implemented via a ripple carry adder. -/
def adc (x y : BitVec w) : Bool Bool × BitVec w :=
iunfoldr fun (i : Fin w) c => adcb (x.getLsb i) (y.getLsb i) c
theorem getLsb_add_add_bool {i : Nat} (i_lt : i < w) (x y : BitVec w) (c : Bool) :
getLsb (x + y + zeroExtend w (ofBool c)) i =
Bool.xor (getLsb x i) (Bool.xor (getLsb y i) (carry i x y c)) := by
let x, x_lt := x
let y, y_lt := y
simp only [getLsb, toNat_add, toNat_zeroExtend, i_lt, toNat_ofFin, toNat_ofBool,
Nat.mod_add_mod, Nat.add_mod_mod]
apply Eq.trans
rw [ Nat.div_add_mod x (2^i), Nat.div_add_mod y (2^i)]
simp only
[ Nat.testBit_mod_two_pow,
Nat.testBit_mul_two_pow_add_eq,
i_lt,
decide_True,
Bool.true_and,
Nat.add_assoc,
Nat.add_left_comm (_%_) (_ * _) _,
testBit_limit (mod_two_pow_add_mod_two_pow_add_bool_lt_two_pow_succ x y i c)
]
simp [testBit_to_div_mod, carry, Nat.add_assoc]
theorem getLsb_add {i : Nat} (i_lt : i < w) (x y : BitVec w) :
getLsb (x + y) i =
Bool.xor (getLsb x i) (Bool.xor (getLsb y i) (carry i x y false)) := by
simpa using getLsb_add_add_bool i_lt x y false
theorem adc_spec (x y : BitVec w) (c : Bool) :
adc x y c = (carry w x y c, x + y + zeroExtend w (ofBool c)) := by
simp only [adc]
apply iunfoldr_replace
(fun i => carry i x y c)
(x + y + zeroExtend w (ofBool c))
c
case init =>
simp [carry, Nat.mod_one]
cases c <;> rfl
case step =>
simp [adcb, Prod.mk.injEq, carry_succ, getLsb_add_add_bool]
theorem add_eq_adc (w : Nat) (x y : BitVec w) : x + y = (adc x y false).snd := by
simp [adc_spec]
/-! ### add -/
/-- Adding a bitvector to its own complement yields the all ones bitpattern -/
@[simp] theorem add_not_self (x : BitVec w) : x + ~~~x = allOnes w := by
rw [add_eq_adc, adc, iunfoldr_replace (fun _ => false) (allOnes w)]
· rfl
· simp [adcb, atLeastTwo]
/-- Subtracting `x` from the all ones bitvector is equivalent to taking its complement -/
theorem allOnes_sub_eq_not (x : BitVec w) : allOnes w - x = ~~~x := by
rw [ add_not_self x, BitVec.add_comm, add_sub_cancel]
end BitVec

View File

@@ -1,61 +0,0 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Lean FRO, LLC. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joe Hendrix
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.BitVec.Lemmas
import Init.Data.Nat.Lemmas
import Init.Data.Fin.Iterate
namespace BitVec
/--
iunfoldr is an iterative operation that applies a function `f` repeatedly.
It produces a sequence of state values `[s_0, s_1 .. s_w]` and a bitvector
`v` where `f i s_i = (s_{i+1}, b_i)` and `b_i` is bit `i`th least-significant bit
in `v` (e.g., `getLsb v i = b_i`).
Theorems involving `iunfoldr` can be eliminated using `iunfoldr_replace` below.
-/
def iunfoldr (f : Fin w -> α α × Bool) (s : α) : α × BitVec w :=
Fin.hIterate (fun i => α × BitVec i) (s, nil) fun i q =>
(fun p => p.fst, cons p.snd q.snd) (f i q.fst)
theorem iunfoldr.fst_eq
{f : Fin w α α × Bool} (state : Nat α) (s : α)
(init : s = state 0)
(ind : (i : Fin w), (f i (state i.val)).fst = state (i.val+1)) :
(iunfoldr f s).fst = state w := by
unfold iunfoldr
apply Fin.hIterate_elim (fun i (p : α × BitVec i) => p.fst = state i)
case init =>
exact init
case step =>
intro i s, v p
simp_all [ind i]
private theorem iunfoldr.eq_test
{f : Fin w α α × Bool} (state : Nat α) (value : BitVec w) (a : α)
(init : state 0 = a)
(step : (i : Fin w), f i (state i.val) = (state (i.val+1), value.getLsb i.val)) :
iunfoldr f a = (state w, BitVec.truncate w value) := by
apply Fin.hIterate_eq (fun i => ((state i, BitVec.truncate i value) : α × BitVec i))
case init =>
simp only [init, eq_nil]
case step =>
intro i
simp_all [truncate_succ]
/--
Correctness theorem for `iunfoldr`.
-/
theorem iunfoldr_replace
{f : Fin w α α × Bool} (state : Nat α) (value : BitVec w) (a : α)
(init : state 0 = a)
(step : (i : Fin w), f i (state i.val) = (state (i.val+1), value.getLsb i.val)) :
iunfoldr f a = (state w, value) := by
simp [iunfoldr.eq_test state value a init step]
end BitVec

View File

@@ -1,995 +0,0 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Lean FRO, LLC. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joe Hendrix, Harun Khan, Alex Keizer, Abdalrhman M Mohamed,
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Bool
import Init.Data.BitVec.Basic
import Init.Data.Fin.Lemmas
import Init.Data.Nat.Lemmas
namespace BitVec
/--
This normalized a bitvec using `ofFin` to `ofNat`.
-/
theorem ofFin_eq_ofNat : @BitVec.ofFin w (Fin.mk x lt) = BitVec.ofNat w x := by
simp only [BitVec.ofNat, Fin.ofNat', lt, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
/-- Prove equality of bitvectors in terms of nat operations. -/
theorem eq_of_toNat_eq {n} : {i j : BitVec n}, i.toNat = j.toNat i = j
| _, _, _, _, rfl => rfl
@[simp] theorem val_toFin (x : BitVec w) : x.toFin.val = x.toNat := rfl
@[bv_toNat] theorem toNat_eq (x y : BitVec n) : x = y x.toNat = y.toNat :=
Iff.intro (congrArg BitVec.toNat) eq_of_toNat_eq
@[bv_toNat] theorem toNat_ne (x y : BitVec n) : x y x.toNat y.toNat := by
rw [Ne, toNat_eq]
theorem testBit_toNat (x : BitVec w) : x.toNat.testBit i = x.getLsb i := rfl
@[simp] theorem getLsb_ofFin (x : Fin (2^n)) (i : Nat) :
getLsb (BitVec.ofFin x) i = x.val.testBit i := rfl
@[simp] theorem getLsb_ge (x : BitVec w) (i : Nat) (ge : w i) : getLsb x i = false := by
let x, x_lt := x
simp
apply Nat.testBit_lt_two_pow
have p : 2^w 2^i := Nat.pow_le_pow_of_le_right (by omega) ge
omega
@[simp] theorem getMsb_ge (x : BitVec w) (i : Nat) (ge : w i) : getMsb x i = false := by
rw [getMsb]
simp only [Bool.and_eq_false_imp, decide_eq_true_eq]
omega
theorem lt_of_getLsb (x : BitVec w) (i : Nat) : getLsb x i = true i < w := by
if h : i < w then
simp [h]
else
simp [Nat.ge_of_not_lt h]
theorem lt_of_getMsb (x : BitVec w) (i : Nat) : getMsb x i = true i < w := by
if h : i < w then
simp [h]
else
simp [Nat.ge_of_not_lt h]
theorem getMsb_eq_getLsb (x : BitVec w) (i : Nat) : x.getMsb i = (decide (i < w) && x.getLsb (w - 1 - i)) := by
rw [getMsb]
theorem getLsb_eq_getMsb (x : BitVec w) (i : Nat) : x.getLsb i = (decide (i < w) && x.getMsb (w - 1 - i)) := by
rw [getMsb]
by_cases h₁ : i < w <;> by_cases h₂ : w - 1 - i < w <;>
simp only [h₁, h₂] <;> simp only [decide_True, decide_False, Bool.false_and, Bool.and_false, Bool.true_and, Bool.and_true]
· congr
omega
all_goals
apply getLsb_ge
omega
-- We choose `eq_of_getLsb_eq` as the `@[ext]` theorem for `BitVec`
-- somewhat arbitrarily over `eq_of_getMsg_eq`.
@[ext] theorem eq_of_getLsb_eq {x y : BitVec w}
(pred : (i : Fin w), x.getLsb i.val = y.getLsb i.val) : x = y := by
apply eq_of_toNat_eq
apply Nat.eq_of_testBit_eq
intro i
if i_lt : i < w then
exact pred i, i_lt
else
have p : i w := Nat.le_of_not_gt i_lt
simp [testBit_toNat, getLsb_ge _ _ p]
theorem eq_of_getMsb_eq {x y : BitVec w}
(pred : (i : Fin w), x.getMsb i = y.getMsb i.val) : x = y := by
simp only [getMsb] at pred
apply eq_of_getLsb_eq
intro i, i_lt
if w_zero : w = 0 then
simp [w_zero]
else
have w_pos := Nat.pos_of_ne_zero w_zero
have r : i w - 1 := by
simp [Nat.le_sub_iff_add_le w_pos]
exact i_lt
have q_lt : w - 1 - i < w := by
simp only [Nat.sub_sub]
apply Nat.sub_lt w_pos
simp [Nat.succ_add]
have q := pred w - 1 - i, q_lt
simpa [q_lt, Nat.sub_sub_self, r] using q
@[simp] theorem of_length_zero {x : BitVec 0} : x = 0#0 := by ext; simp
theorem eq_of_toFin_eq : {x y : BitVec w}, x.toFin = y.toFin x = y
| _, _, _, _, rfl => rfl
@[simp] theorem toNat_ofBool (b : Bool) : (ofBool b).toNat = b.toNat := by
cases b <;> rfl
@[simp] theorem msb_ofBool (b : Bool) : (ofBool b).msb = b := by
cases b <;> simp [BitVec.msb]
theorem ofNat_one (n : Nat) : BitVec.ofNat 1 n = BitVec.ofBool (n % 2 = 1) := by
rcases (Nat.mod_two_eq_zero_or_one n) with h | h <;> simp [h, BitVec.ofNat, Fin.ofNat']
theorem ofBool_eq_iff_eq : (b b' : Bool), BitVec.ofBool b = BitVec.ofBool b' b = b' := by
decide
@[simp] theorem not_ofBool : ~~~ (ofBool b) = ofBool (!b) := by cases b <;> rfl
@[simp, bv_toNat] theorem toNat_ofFin (x : Fin (2^n)) : (BitVec.ofFin x).toNat = x.val := rfl
@[simp] theorem toNat_ofNatLt (x : Nat) (p : x < 2^w) : (x#'p).toNat = x := rfl
@[simp] theorem getLsb_ofNatLt {n : Nat} (x : Nat) (lt : x < 2^n) (i : Nat) :
getLsb (x#'lt) i = x.testBit i := by
simp [getLsb, BitVec.ofNatLt]
@[simp, bv_toNat] theorem toNat_ofNat (x w : Nat) : (x#w).toNat = x % 2^w := by
simp [BitVec.toNat, BitVec.ofNat, Fin.ofNat']
-- Remark: we don't use `[simp]` here because simproc` subsumes it for literals.
-- If `x` and `n` are not literals, applying this theorem eagerly may not be a good idea.
theorem getLsb_ofNat (n : Nat) (x : Nat) (i : Nat) :
getLsb (x#n) i = (i < n && x.testBit i) := by
simp [getLsb, BitVec.ofNat, Fin.val_ofNat']
@[simp, deprecated toNat_ofNat] theorem toNat_zero (n : Nat) : (0#n).toNat = 0 := by trivial
@[simp] theorem getLsb_zero : (0#w).getLsb i = false := by simp [getLsb]
@[simp] theorem getMsb_zero : (0#w).getMsb i = false := by simp [getMsb]
@[simp] theorem toNat_mod_cancel (x : BitVec n) : x.toNat % (2^n) = x.toNat :=
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt x.isLt
private theorem lt_two_pow_of_le {x m n : Nat} (lt : x < 2 ^ m) (le : m n) : x < 2 ^ n :=
Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le lt (Nat.pow_le_pow_of_le_right (by trivial : 0 < 2) le)
/-! ### msb -/
@[simp] theorem msb_zero : (0#w).msb = false := by simp [BitVec.msb, getMsb]
theorem msb_eq_getLsb_last (x : BitVec w) :
x.msb = x.getLsb (w - 1) := by
simp [BitVec.msb, getMsb, getLsb]
rcases w with rfl | w
· simp [BitVec.eq_nil x]
· simp
@[bv_toNat] theorem getLsb_last (x : BitVec w) :
x.getLsb (w-1) = decide (2 ^ (w-1) x.toNat) := by
rcases w with rfl | w
· simp
· simp only [Nat.zero_lt_succ, decide_True, getLsb, Nat.testBit, Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub,
Nat.sub_zero, Nat.and_one_is_mod, Bool.true_and, Nat.shiftRight_eq_div_pow]
rcases (Nat.lt_or_ge (BitVec.toNat x) (2 ^ w)) with h | h
· simp [Nat.div_eq_of_lt h, h]
· simp only [h]
rw [Nat.div_eq_sub_div (Nat.two_pow_pos w) h, Nat.div_eq_of_lt]
· decide
· have : BitVec.toNat x < 2^w + 2^w := by simpa [Nat.pow_succ, Nat.mul_two] using x.isLt
omega
@[bv_toNat] theorem getLsb_succ_last (x : BitVec (w + 1)) :
x.getLsb w = decide (2 ^ w x.toNat) := getLsb_last x
@[bv_toNat] theorem msb_eq_decide (x : BitVec w) : BitVec.msb x = decide (2 ^ (w-1) x.toNat) := by
simp [msb_eq_getLsb_last, getLsb_last]
theorem toNat_ge_of_msb_true {x : BitVec n} (p : BitVec.msb x = true) : x.toNat 2^(n-1) := by
match n with
| 0 =>
simp [BitVec.msb, BitVec.getMsb] at p
| n + 1 =>
simp [BitVec.msb_eq_decide] at p
simp only [Nat.add_sub_cancel]
exact p
/-! ### cast -/
@[simp, bv_toNat] theorem toNat_cast (h : w = v) (x : BitVec w) : (cast h x).toNat = x.toNat := rfl
@[simp] theorem toFin_cast (h : w = v) (x : BitVec w) :
(cast h x).toFin = x.toFin.cast (by rw [h]) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem getLsb_cast (h : w = v) (x : BitVec w) : (cast h x).getLsb i = x.getLsb i := by
subst h; simp
@[simp] theorem getMsb_cast (h : w = v) (x : BitVec w) : (cast h x).getMsb i = x.getMsb i := by
subst h; simp
@[simp] theorem msb_cast (h : w = v) (x : BitVec w) : (cast h x).msb = x.msb := by
simp [BitVec.msb]
/-! ### toInt/ofInt -/
/-- Prove equality of bitvectors in terms of nat operations. -/
theorem toInt_eq_toNat_cond (i : BitVec n) :
i.toInt =
if 2*i.toNat < 2^n then
(i.toNat : Int)
else
(i.toNat : Int) - (2^n : Nat) := by
unfold BitVec.toInt
split <;> omega
theorem toInt_eq_toNat_bmod (x : BitVec n) : x.toInt = Int.bmod x.toNat (2^n) := by
simp only [toInt_eq_toNat_cond]
split
case inl g =>
rw [Int.bmod_pos] <;> simp only [Int.ofNat_emod, toNat_mod_cancel]
omega
case inr g =>
rw [Int.bmod_neg] <;> simp only [Int.ofNat_emod, toNat_mod_cancel]
omega
/-- Prove equality of bitvectors in terms of nat operations. -/
theorem eq_of_toInt_eq {i j : BitVec n} : i.toInt = j.toInt i = j := by
intro eq
simp [toInt_eq_toNat_cond] at eq
apply eq_of_toNat_eq
revert eq
have _ilt := i.isLt
have _jlt := j.isLt
split <;> split <;> omega
@[simp] theorem toNat_ofInt {n : Nat} (i : Int) :
(BitVec.ofInt n i).toNat = (i % (2^n : Nat)).toNat := by
unfold BitVec.ofInt
simp
theorem toInt_ofNat {n : Nat} (x : Nat) :
(BitVec.ofNat n x).toInt = (x : Int).bmod (2^n) := by
simp [toInt_eq_toNat_bmod]
@[simp] theorem toInt_ofInt {n : Nat} (i : Int) :
(BitVec.ofInt n i).toInt = i.bmod (2^n) := by
have _ := Nat.two_pow_pos n
have p : 0 i % (2^n : Nat) := by omega
simp [toInt_eq_toNat_bmod, Int.toNat_of_nonneg p]
/-! ### zeroExtend and truncate -/
@[simp, bv_toNat] theorem toNat_zeroExtend' {m n : Nat} (p : m n) (x : BitVec m) :
(zeroExtend' p x).toNat = x.toNat := by
unfold zeroExtend'
simp [p, x.isLt, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
@[bv_toNat] theorem toNat_zeroExtend (i : Nat) (x : BitVec n) :
BitVec.toNat (zeroExtend i x) = x.toNat % 2^i := by
let x, lt_n := x
simp only [zeroExtend]
if n_le_i : n i then
have x_lt_two_i : x < 2 ^ i := lt_two_pow_of_le lt_n n_le_i
simp [n_le_i, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt, x_lt_two_i]
else
simp [n_le_i, toNat_ofNat]
theorem zeroExtend'_eq {x : BitVec w} (h : w v) : x.zeroExtend' h = x.zeroExtend v := by
apply eq_of_toNat_eq
rw [toNat_zeroExtend, toNat_zeroExtend']
rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
exact Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le x.isLt (Nat.pow_le_pow_right (Nat.zero_lt_two) h)
@[simp, bv_toNat] theorem toNat_truncate (x : BitVec n) : (truncate i x).toNat = x.toNat % 2^i :=
toNat_zeroExtend i x
@[simp] theorem zeroExtend_eq (x : BitVec n) : zeroExtend n x = x := by
apply eq_of_toNat_eq
let x, lt_n := x
simp [truncate, zeroExtend]
@[simp] theorem zeroExtend_zero (m n : Nat) : zeroExtend m (0#n) = 0#m := by
apply eq_of_toNat_eq
simp [toNat_zeroExtend]
@[simp] theorem truncate_eq (x : BitVec n) : truncate n x = x := zeroExtend_eq x
@[simp] theorem ofNat_toNat (m : Nat) (x : BitVec n) : x.toNat#m = truncate m x := by
apply eq_of_toNat_eq
simp
/-- Moves one-sided left toNat equality to BitVec equality. -/
theorem toNat_eq_nat (x : BitVec w) (y : Nat)
: (x.toNat = y) (y < 2^w (x = y#w)) := by
apply Iff.intro
· intro eq
simp at eq
have lt := x.isLt
simp [eq] at lt
simp [eq, lt, x.isLt]
· intro eq
simp [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt, eq]
/-- Moves one-sided right toNat equality to BitVec equality. -/
theorem nat_eq_toNat (x : BitVec w) (y : Nat)
: (y = x.toNat) (y < 2^w (x = y#w)) := by
rw [@eq_comm _ _ x.toNat]
apply toNat_eq_nat
@[simp] theorem getLsb_zeroExtend' (ge : m n) (x : BitVec n) (i : Nat) :
getLsb (zeroExtend' ge x) i = getLsb x i := by
simp [getLsb, toNat_zeroExtend']
@[simp] theorem getMsb_zeroExtend' (ge : m n) (x : BitVec n) (i : Nat) :
getMsb (zeroExtend' ge x) i = (decide (i m - n) && getMsb x (i - (m - n))) := by
simp only [getMsb, getLsb_zeroExtend', gt_iff_lt]
by_cases h₁ : decide (i < m) <;> by_cases h₂ : decide (i m - n) <;> by_cases h₃ : decide (i - (m - n) < n) <;>
by_cases h₄ : n - 1 - (i - (m - n)) = m - 1 - i
all_goals
simp only [h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄]
simp_all only [ge_iff_le, decide_eq_true_eq, Nat.not_le, Nat.not_lt, Bool.true_and,
Bool.false_and, Bool.and_self] <;>
(try apply getLsb_ge) <;>
(try apply (getLsb_ge _ _ _).symm) <;>
omega
@[simp] theorem getLsb_zeroExtend (m : Nat) (x : BitVec n) (i : Nat) :
getLsb (zeroExtend m x) i = (decide (i < m) && getLsb x i) := by
simp [getLsb, toNat_zeroExtend, Nat.testBit_mod_two_pow]
@[simp] theorem getMsb_zeroExtend_add {x : BitVec w} (h : k i) :
(x.zeroExtend (w + k)).getMsb i = x.getMsb (i - k) := by
by_cases h : w = 0
· subst h; simp
simp only [getMsb, getLsb_zeroExtend]
by_cases h₁ : i < w + k <;> by_cases h₂ : i - k < w <;> by_cases h₃ : w + k - 1 - i < w + k
<;> simp [h₁, h₂, h₃]
· congr 1
omega
all_goals (first | apply getLsb_ge | apply Eq.symm; apply getLsb_ge)
<;> omega
@[simp] theorem getLsb_truncate (m : Nat) (x : BitVec n) (i : Nat) :
getLsb (truncate m x) i = (decide (i < m) && getLsb x i) :=
getLsb_zeroExtend m x i
theorem msb_truncate (x : BitVec w) : (x.truncate (k + 1)).msb = x.getLsb k := by
simp [BitVec.msb, getMsb]
@[simp] theorem zeroExtend_zeroExtend_of_le (x : BitVec w) (h : k l) :
(x.zeroExtend l).zeroExtend k = x.zeroExtend k := by
ext i
simp only [getLsb_zeroExtend, Fin.is_lt, decide_True, Bool.true_and]
have p := lt_of_getLsb x i
revert p
cases getLsb x i <;> simp; omega
@[simp] theorem truncate_truncate_of_le (x : BitVec w) (h : k l) :
(x.truncate l).truncate k = x.truncate k :=
zeroExtend_zeroExtend_of_le x h
@[simp] theorem truncate_cast {h : w = v} : (cast h x).truncate k = x.truncate k := by
apply eq_of_getLsb_eq
simp
theorem msb_zeroExtend (x : BitVec w) : (x.zeroExtend v).msb = (decide (0 < v) && x.getLsb (v - 1)) := by
rw [msb_eq_getLsb_last]
simp only [getLsb_zeroExtend]
cases getLsb x (v - 1) <;> simp; omega
theorem msb_zeroExtend' (x : BitVec w) (h : w v) : (x.zeroExtend' h).msb = (decide (0 < v) && x.getLsb (v - 1)) := by
rw [zeroExtend'_eq, msb_zeroExtend]
/-! ## extractLsb -/
@[simp]
protected theorem extractLsb_ofFin {n} (x : Fin (2^n)) (hi lo : Nat) :
extractLsb hi lo (@BitVec.ofFin n x) = .ofNat (hi-lo+1) (x.val >>> lo) := rfl
@[simp]
protected theorem extractLsb_ofNat (x n : Nat) (hi lo : Nat) :
extractLsb hi lo x#n = .ofNat (hi - lo + 1) ((x % 2^n) >>> lo) := by
apply eq_of_getLsb_eq
intro i, _lt
simp [BitVec.ofNat]
@[simp] theorem extractLsb'_toNat (s m : Nat) (x : BitVec n) :
(extractLsb' s m x).toNat = (x.toNat >>> s) % 2^m := rfl
@[simp] theorem extractLsb_toNat (hi lo : Nat) (x : BitVec n) :
(extractLsb hi lo x).toNat = (x.toNat >>> lo) % 2^(hi-lo+1) := rfl
@[simp] theorem getLsb_extract (hi lo : Nat) (x : BitVec n) (i : Nat) :
getLsb (extractLsb hi lo x) i = (i (hi-lo) && getLsb x (lo+i)) := by
unfold getLsb
simp [Nat.lt_succ]
/-! ### allOnes -/
@[simp] theorem toNat_allOnes : (allOnes v).toNat = 2^v - 1 := by
unfold allOnes
simp
@[simp] theorem getLsb_allOnes : (allOnes v).getLsb i = decide (i < v) := by
simp [allOnes]
/-! ### or -/
@[simp] theorem toNat_or (x y : BitVec v) :
BitVec.toNat (x ||| y) = BitVec.toNat x ||| BitVec.toNat y := rfl
@[simp] theorem toFin_or (x y : BitVec v) :
BitVec.toFin (x ||| y) = BitVec.toFin x ||| BitVec.toFin y := by
apply Fin.eq_of_val_eq
exact (Nat.mod_eq_of_lt <| Nat.or_lt_two_pow x.isLt y.isLt).symm
@[simp] theorem getLsb_or {x y : BitVec v} : (x ||| y).getLsb i = (x.getLsb i || y.getLsb i) := by
rw [ testBit_toNat, getLsb, getLsb]
simp
@[simp] theorem getMsb_or {x y : BitVec w} : (x ||| y).getMsb i = (x.getMsb i || y.getMsb i) := by
simp only [getMsb]
by_cases h : i < w <;> simp [h]
@[simp] theorem msb_or {x y : BitVec w} : (x ||| y).msb = (x.msb || y.msb) := by
simp [BitVec.msb]
@[simp] theorem truncate_or {x y : BitVec w} :
(x ||| y).truncate k = x.truncate k ||| y.truncate k := by
ext
simp
/-! ### and -/
@[simp] theorem toNat_and (x y : BitVec v) :
BitVec.toNat (x &&& y) = BitVec.toNat x &&& BitVec.toNat y := rfl
@[simp] theorem toFin_and (x y : BitVec v) :
BitVec.toFin (x &&& y) = BitVec.toFin x &&& BitVec.toFin y := by
apply Fin.eq_of_val_eq
exact (Nat.mod_eq_of_lt <| Nat.and_lt_two_pow _ y.isLt).symm
@[simp] theorem getLsb_and {x y : BitVec v} : (x &&& y).getLsb i = (x.getLsb i && y.getLsb i) := by
rw [ testBit_toNat, getLsb, getLsb]
simp
@[simp] theorem getMsb_and {x y : BitVec w} : (x &&& y).getMsb i = (x.getMsb i && y.getMsb i) := by
simp only [getMsb]
by_cases h : i < w <;> simp [h]
@[simp] theorem msb_and {x y : BitVec w} : (x &&& y).msb = (x.msb && y.msb) := by
simp [BitVec.msb]
@[simp] theorem truncate_and {x y : BitVec w} :
(x &&& y).truncate k = x.truncate k &&& y.truncate k := by
ext
simp
/-! ### xor -/
@[simp] theorem toNat_xor (x y : BitVec v) :
BitVec.toNat (x ^^^ y) = BitVec.toNat x ^^^ BitVec.toNat y := rfl
@[simp] theorem toFin_xor (x y : BitVec v) :
BitVec.toFin (x ^^^ y) = BitVec.toFin x ^^^ BitVec.toFin y := by
apply Fin.eq_of_val_eq
exact (Nat.mod_eq_of_lt <| Nat.xor_lt_two_pow x.isLt y.isLt).symm
@[simp] theorem getLsb_xor {x y : BitVec v} :
(x ^^^ y).getLsb i = (xor (x.getLsb i) (y.getLsb i)) := by
rw [ testBit_toNat, getLsb, getLsb]
simp
@[simp] theorem truncate_xor {x y : BitVec w} :
(x ^^^ y).truncate k = x.truncate k ^^^ y.truncate k := by
ext
simp
/-! ### not -/
theorem not_def {x : BitVec v} : ~~~x = allOnes v ^^^ x := rfl
@[simp, bv_toNat] theorem toNat_not {x : BitVec v} : (~~~x).toNat = 2^v - 1 - x.toNat := by
rw [Nat.sub_sub, Nat.add_comm, not_def, toNat_xor]
apply Nat.eq_of_testBit_eq
intro i
simp only [toNat_allOnes, Nat.testBit_xor, Nat.testBit_two_pow_sub_one]
match h : BitVec.toNat x with
| 0 => simp
| y+1 =>
rw [Nat.succ_eq_add_one] at h
rw [ h]
rw [Nat.testBit_two_pow_sub_succ (isLt _)]
· cases w : decide (i < v)
· simp at w
simp [w]
rw [Nat.testBit_lt_two_pow]
calc BitVec.toNat x < 2 ^ v := isLt _
_ 2 ^ i := Nat.pow_le_pow_of_le_right Nat.zero_lt_two w
· simp
@[simp] theorem toFin_not (x : BitVec w) :
(~~~x).toFin = x.toFin.rev := by
apply Fin.val_inj.mp
simp only [val_toFin, toNat_not, Fin.val_rev]
omega
@[simp] theorem getLsb_not {x : BitVec v} : (~~~x).getLsb i = (decide (i < v) && ! x.getLsb i) := by
by_cases h' : i < v <;> simp_all [not_def]
@[simp] theorem truncate_not {x : BitVec w} (h : k w) :
(~~~x).truncate k = ~~~(x.truncate k) := by
ext
simp [h]
omega
/-! ### cast -/
@[simp] theorem not_cast {x : BitVec w} (h : w = w') : ~~~(cast h x) = cast h (~~~x) := by
ext
simp_all [lt_of_getLsb]
@[simp] theorem and_cast {x y : BitVec w} (h : w = w') : cast h x &&& cast h y = cast h (x &&& y) := by
ext
simp_all [lt_of_getLsb]
@[simp] theorem or_cast {x y : BitVec w} (h : w = w') : cast h x ||| cast h y = cast h (x ||| y) := by
ext
simp_all [lt_of_getLsb]
@[simp] theorem xor_cast {x y : BitVec w} (h : w = w') : cast h x &&& cast h y = cast h (x &&& y) := by
ext
simp_all [lt_of_getLsb]
/-! ### shiftLeft -/
@[simp, bv_toNat] theorem toNat_shiftLeft {x : BitVec v} :
BitVec.toNat (x <<< n) = BitVec.toNat x <<< n % 2^v :=
BitVec.toNat_ofNat _ _
@[simp] theorem toFin_shiftLeft {n : Nat} (x : BitVec w) :
BitVec.toFin (x <<< n) = Fin.ofNat' (x.toNat <<< n) (Nat.two_pow_pos w) := rfl
@[simp] theorem getLsb_shiftLeft (x : BitVec m) (n) :
getLsb (x <<< n) i = (decide (i < m) && !decide (i < n) && getLsb x (i - n)) := by
rw [ testBit_toNat, getLsb]
simp only [toNat_shiftLeft, Nat.testBit_mod_two_pow, Nat.testBit_shiftLeft, ge_iff_le]
-- This step could be a case bashing tactic.
cases h₁ : decide (i < m) <;> cases h₂ : decide (n i) <;> cases h₃ : decide (i < n)
all_goals { simp_all <;> omega }
@[simp] theorem getMsb_shiftLeft (x : BitVec w) (i) :
(x <<< i).getMsb k = x.getMsb (k + i) := by
simp only [getMsb, getLsb_shiftLeft]
by_cases h : w = 0
· subst h; simp
have t : w - 1 - k < w := by omega
simp only [t]
simp only [decide_True, Nat.sub_sub, Bool.true_and, Nat.add_assoc]
by_cases h₁ : k < w <;> by_cases h₂ : w - (1 + k) < i <;> by_cases h₃ : k + i < w
<;> simp [h₁, h₂, h₃]
<;> (first | apply getLsb_ge | apply Eq.symm; apply getLsb_ge)
<;> omega
theorem shiftLeftZeroExtend_eq {x : BitVec w} :
shiftLeftZeroExtend x n = zeroExtend (w+n) x <<< n := by
apply eq_of_toNat_eq
rw [shiftLeftZeroExtend, zeroExtend]
split
· simp
rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
rw [Nat.shiftLeft_eq, Nat.pow_add]
exact Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right x.isLt (Nat.two_pow_pos _)
· omega
@[simp] theorem getLsb_shiftLeftZeroExtend (x : BitVec m) (n : Nat) :
getLsb (shiftLeftZeroExtend x n) i = ((! decide (i < n)) && getLsb x (i - n)) := by
rw [shiftLeftZeroExtend_eq]
simp only [getLsb_shiftLeft, getLsb_zeroExtend]
cases h₁ : decide (i < n) <;> cases h₂ : decide (i - n < m + n) <;> cases h₃ : decide (i < m + n)
<;> simp_all
<;> (rw [getLsb_ge]; omega)
@[simp] theorem getMsb_shiftLeftZeroExtend (x : BitVec m) (n : Nat) :
getMsb (shiftLeftZeroExtend x n) i = getMsb x i := by
have : n i + n := by omega
simp_all [shiftLeftZeroExtend_eq]
@[simp] theorem msb_shiftLeftZeroExtend (x : BitVec w) (i : Nat) :
(shiftLeftZeroExtend x i).msb = x.msb := by
simp [shiftLeftZeroExtend_eq, BitVec.msb]
/-! ### ushiftRight -/
@[simp, bv_toNat] theorem toNat_ushiftRight (x : BitVec n) (i : Nat) :
(x >>> i).toNat = x.toNat >>> i := rfl
@[simp] theorem getLsb_ushiftRight (x : BitVec n) (i j : Nat) :
getLsb (x >>> i) j = getLsb x (i+j) := by
unfold getLsb ; simp
/-! ### append -/
theorem append_def (x : BitVec v) (y : BitVec w) :
x ++ y = (shiftLeftZeroExtend x w ||| zeroExtend' (Nat.le_add_left w v) y) := rfl
@[simp] theorem toNat_append (x : BitVec m) (y : BitVec n) :
(x ++ y).toNat = x.toNat <<< n ||| y.toNat :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem getLsb_append {v : BitVec n} {w : BitVec m} :
getLsb (v ++ w) i = bif i < m then getLsb w i else getLsb v (i - m) := by
simp only [append_def, getLsb_or, getLsb_shiftLeftZeroExtend, getLsb_zeroExtend']
by_cases h : i < m
· simp [h]
· simp [h]; simp_all
@[simp] theorem getMsb_append {v : BitVec n} {w : BitVec m} :
getMsb (v ++ w) i = bif n i then getMsb w (i - n) else getMsb v i := by
simp [append_def]
by_cases h : n i
· simp [h]
· simp [h]
theorem msb_append {x : BitVec w} {y : BitVec v} :
(x ++ y).msb = bif (w == 0) then (y.msb) else (x.msb) := by
rw [ append_eq, append]
simp [msb_zeroExtend']
by_cases h : w = 0
· subst h
simp [BitVec.msb, getMsb]
· rw [cond_eq_if]
have q : 0 < w + v := by omega
have t : y.getLsb (w + v - 1) = false := getLsb_ge _ _ (by omega)
simp [h, q, t, BitVec.msb, getMsb]
@[simp] theorem truncate_append {x : BitVec w} {y : BitVec v} :
(x ++ y).truncate k = if h : k v then y.truncate k else (x.truncate (k - v) ++ y).cast (by omega) := by
apply eq_of_getLsb_eq
intro i
simp only [getLsb_zeroExtend, Fin.is_lt, decide_True, getLsb_append, Bool.true_and]
split
· have t : i < v := by omega
simp [t]
· by_cases t : i < v
· simp [t]
· have t' : i - v < k - v := by omega
simp [t, t']
@[simp] theorem truncate_cons {x : BitVec w} : (cons a x).truncate w = x := by
simp [cons]
@[simp] theorem not_append {x : BitVec w} {y : BitVec v} : ~~~ (x ++ y) = (~~~ x) ++ (~~~ y) := by
ext i
simp only [getLsb_not, getLsb_append, cond_eq_if]
split
· simp_all
· simp_all; omega
@[simp] theorem and_append {x₁ x₂ : BitVec w} {y₁ y₂ : BitVec v} :
(x₁ ++ y₁) &&& (x₂ ++ y₂) = (x₁ &&& x₂) ++ (y₁ &&& y₂) := by
ext i
simp only [getLsb_append, cond_eq_if]
split <;> simp [*]
@[simp] theorem or_append {x₁ x₂ : BitVec w} {y₁ y₂ : BitVec v} :
(x₁ ++ y₁) ||| (x₂ ++ y₂) = (x₁ ||| x₂) ++ (y₁ ||| y₂) := by
ext i
simp only [getLsb_append, cond_eq_if]
split <;> simp [*]
@[simp] theorem xor_append {x₁ x₂ : BitVec w} {y₁ y₂ : BitVec v} :
(x₁ ++ y₁) ^^^ (x₂ ++ y₂) = (x₁ ^^^ x₂) ++ (y₁ ^^^ y₂) := by
ext i
simp only [getLsb_append, cond_eq_if]
split <;> simp [*]
/-! ### rev -/
theorem getLsb_rev (x : BitVec w) (i : Fin w) :
x.getLsb i.rev = x.getMsb i := by
simp [getLsb, getMsb]
congr 1
omega
theorem getMsb_rev (x : BitVec w) (i : Fin w) :
x.getMsb i.rev = x.getLsb i := by
simp only [ getLsb_rev]
simp only [Fin.rev]
congr
omega
/-! ### cons -/
@[simp] theorem toNat_cons (b : Bool) (x : BitVec w) :
(cons b x).toNat = (b.toNat <<< w) ||| x.toNat := by
let x, _ := x
simp [cons, toNat_append, toNat_ofBool]
/-- Variant of `toNat_cons` using `+` instead of `|||`. -/
theorem toNat_cons' {x : BitVec w} :
(cons a x).toNat = (a.toNat <<< w) + x.toNat := by
simp [cons, Nat.shiftLeft_eq, Nat.mul_comm _ (2^w), Nat.mul_add_lt_is_or, x.isLt]
@[simp] theorem getLsb_cons (b : Bool) {n} (x : BitVec n) (i : Nat) :
getLsb (cons b x) i = if i = n then b else getLsb x i := by
simp only [getLsb, toNat_cons, Nat.testBit_or]
rw [Nat.testBit_shiftLeft]
rcases Nat.lt_trichotomy i n with i_lt_n | i_eq_n | n_lt_i
· have p1 : ¬(n i) := by omega
have p2 : i n := by omega
simp [p1, p2]
· simp [i_eq_n, testBit_toNat]
cases b <;> trivial
· have p1 : i n := by omega
have p2 : i - n 0 := by omega
simp [p1, p2, Nat.testBit_bool_to_nat]
@[simp] theorem msb_cons : (cons a x).msb = a := by
simp [cons, msb_cast, msb_append]
@[simp] theorem getMsb_cons_zero : (cons a x).getMsb 0 = a := by
rw [ BitVec.msb, msb_cons]
@[simp] theorem getMsb_cons_succ : (cons a x).getMsb (i + 1) = x.getMsb i := by
simp [cons, Nat.le_add_left 1 i]
theorem truncate_succ (x : BitVec w) :
truncate (i+1) x = cons (getLsb x i) (truncate i x) := by
apply eq_of_getLsb_eq
intro j
simp only [getLsb_truncate, getLsb_cons, j.isLt, decide_True, Bool.true_and]
if j_eq : j.val = i then
simp [j_eq]
else
have j_lt : j.val < i := Nat.lt_of_le_of_ne (Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ j.isLt) j_eq
simp [j_eq, j_lt]
theorem eq_msb_cons_truncate (x : BitVec (w+1)) : x = (cons x.msb (x.truncate w)) := by
ext i
simp
split <;> rename_i h
· simp [BitVec.msb, getMsb, h]
· by_cases h' : i < w
· simp_all
· omega
@[simp] theorem not_cons (x : BitVec w) (b : Bool) : ~~~(cons b x) = cons (!b) (~~~x) := by
simp [cons]
@[simp] theorem cons_or_cons (x y : BitVec w) (a b : Bool) :
(cons a x) ||| (cons b y) = cons (a || b) (x ||| y) := by
ext i; cases i using Fin.succRecOn <;> simp <;> split <;> rfl
@[simp] theorem cons_and_cons (x y : BitVec w) (a b : Bool) :
(cons a x) &&& (cons b y) = cons (a && b) (x &&& y) := by
ext i; cases i using Fin.succRecOn <;> simp <;> split <;> rfl
@[simp] theorem cons_xor_cons (x y : BitVec w) (a b : Bool) :
(cons a x) ^^^ (cons b y) = cons (xor a b) (x ^^^ y) := by
ext i; cases i using Fin.succRecOn <;> simp <;> split <;> rfl
/-! ### concat -/
@[simp] theorem toNat_concat (x : BitVec w) (b : Bool) :
(concat x b).toNat = x.toNat * 2 + b.toNat := by
apply Nat.eq_of_testBit_eq
simp only [concat, toNat_append, Nat.shiftLeft_eq, Nat.pow_one, toNat_ofBool, Nat.testBit_or]
cases b
· simp
· rintro (_ | i)
<;> simp [Nat.add_mod, Nat.add_comm, Nat.add_mul_div_right]
theorem getLsb_concat (x : BitVec w) (b : Bool) (i : Nat) :
(concat x b).getLsb i = if i = 0 then b else x.getLsb (i - 1) := by
simp only [concat, getLsb, toNat_append, toNat_ofBool, Nat.testBit_or, Nat.shiftLeft_eq]
cases i
· simp [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt b.toNat_lt]
· simp [Nat.div_eq_of_lt b.toNat_lt]
@[simp] theorem getLsb_concat_zero : (concat x b).getLsb 0 = b := by
simp [getLsb_concat]
@[simp] theorem getLsb_concat_succ : (concat x b).getLsb (i + 1) = x.getLsb i := by
simp [getLsb_concat]
@[simp] theorem not_concat (x : BitVec w) (b : Bool) : ~~~(concat x b) = concat (~~~x) !b := by
ext i; cases i using Fin.succRecOn <;> simp [*, Nat.succ_lt_succ]
@[simp] theorem concat_or_concat (x y : BitVec w) (a b : Bool) :
(concat x a) ||| (concat y b) = concat (x ||| y) (a || b) := by
ext i; cases i using Fin.succRecOn <;> simp
@[simp] theorem concat_and_concat (x y : BitVec w) (a b : Bool) :
(concat x a) &&& (concat y b) = concat (x &&& y) (a && b) := by
ext i; cases i using Fin.succRecOn <;> simp
@[simp] theorem concat_xor_concat (x y : BitVec w) (a b : Bool) :
(concat x a) ^^^ (concat y b) = concat (x ^^^ y) (xor a b) := by
ext i; cases i using Fin.succRecOn <;> simp
/-! ### add -/
theorem add_def {n} (x y : BitVec n) : x + y = .ofNat n (x.toNat + y.toNat) := rfl
/--
Definition of bitvector addition as a nat.
-/
@[simp, bv_toNat] theorem toNat_add (x y : BitVec w) : (x + y).toNat = (x.toNat + y.toNat) % 2^w := rfl
@[simp] theorem toFin_add (x y : BitVec w) : (x + y).toFin = toFin x + toFin y := rfl
@[simp] theorem ofFin_add (x : Fin (2^n)) (y : BitVec n) :
.ofFin x + y = .ofFin (x + y.toFin) := rfl
@[simp] theorem add_ofFin (x : BitVec n) (y : Fin (2^n)) :
x + .ofFin y = .ofFin (x.toFin + y) := rfl
theorem ofNat_add {n} (x y : Nat) : (x + y)#n = x#n + y#n := by
apply eq_of_toNat_eq ; simp [BitVec.ofNat]
theorem ofNat_add_ofNat {n} (x y : Nat) : x#n + y#n = (x + y)#n :=
(ofNat_add x y).symm
protected theorem add_assoc (x y z : BitVec n) : x + y + z = x + (y + z) := by
apply eq_of_toNat_eq ; simp [Nat.add_assoc]
protected theorem add_comm (x y : BitVec n) : x + y = y + x := by
simp [add_def, Nat.add_comm]
@[simp] protected theorem add_zero (x : BitVec n) : x + 0#n = x := by simp [add_def]
@[simp] protected theorem zero_add (x : BitVec n) : 0#n + x = x := by simp [add_def]
theorem truncate_add (x y : BitVec w) (h : i w) :
(x + y).truncate i = x.truncate i + y.truncate i := by
have dvd : 2^i 2^w := Nat.pow_dvd_pow _ h
simp [bv_toNat, h, Nat.mod_mod_of_dvd _ dvd]
@[simp, bv_toNat] theorem toInt_add (x y : BitVec w) :
(x + y).toInt = (x.toInt + y.toInt).bmod (2^w) := by
simp [toInt_eq_toNat_bmod]
theorem ofInt_add {n} (x y : Int) : BitVec.ofInt n (x + y) =
BitVec.ofInt n x + BitVec.ofInt n y := by
apply eq_of_toInt_eq
simp
/-! ### sub/neg -/
theorem sub_def {n} (x y : BitVec n) : x - y = .ofNat n (x.toNat + (2^n - y.toNat)) := by rfl
@[simp, bv_toNat] theorem toNat_sub {n} (x y : BitVec n) :
(x - y).toNat = ((x.toNat + (2^n - y.toNat)) % 2^n) := rfl
@[simp] theorem toFin_sub (x y : BitVec n) : (x - y).toFin = toFin x - toFin y := rfl
@[simp] theorem ofFin_sub (x : Fin (2^n)) (y : BitVec n) : .ofFin x - y = .ofFin (x - y.toFin) :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem sub_ofFin (x : BitVec n) (y : Fin (2^n)) : x - .ofFin y = .ofFin (x.toFin - y) :=
rfl
-- Remark: we don't use `[simp]` here because simproc` subsumes it for literals.
-- If `x` and `n` are not literals, applying this theorem eagerly may not be a good idea.
theorem ofNat_sub_ofNat {n} (x y : Nat) : x#n - y#n = .ofNat n (x + (2^n - y % 2^n)) := by
apply eq_of_toNat_eq ; simp [BitVec.ofNat]
@[simp] protected theorem sub_zero (x : BitVec n) : x - (0#n) = x := by apply eq_of_toNat_eq ; simp
@[simp] protected theorem sub_self (x : BitVec n) : x - x = 0#n := by
apply eq_of_toNat_eq
simp only [toNat_sub]
rw [Nat.add_sub_of_le]
· simp
· exact Nat.le_of_lt x.isLt
@[simp, bv_toNat] theorem toNat_neg (x : BitVec n) : (- x).toNat = (2^n - x.toNat) % 2^n := by
simp [Neg.neg, BitVec.neg]
theorem sub_toAdd {n} (x y : BitVec n) : x - y = x + - y := by
apply eq_of_toNat_eq
simp
@[simp] theorem neg_zero (n:Nat) : -0#n = 0#n := by apply eq_of_toNat_eq ; simp
theorem add_sub_cancel (x y : BitVec w) : x + y - y = x := by
apply eq_of_toNat_eq
have y_toNat_le := Nat.le_of_lt y.toNat_lt
rw [toNat_sub, toNat_add, Nat.mod_add_mod, Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_sub_assoc y_toNat_le,
Nat.add_sub_cancel_left, Nat.add_mod_right, toNat_mod_cancel]
theorem negOne_eq_allOnes : -1#w = allOnes w := by
apply eq_of_toNat_eq
if g : w = 0 then
simp [g]
else
have q : 1 < 2^w := by simp [g]
have r : (2^w - 1) < 2^w := by omega
simp [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt q, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt r]
/-! ### mul -/
theorem mul_def {n} {x y : BitVec n} : x * y = (ofFin <| x.toFin * y.toFin) := by rfl
@[simp, bv_toNat] theorem toNat_mul (x y : BitVec n) : (x * y).toNat = (x.toNat * y.toNat) % 2 ^ n := rfl
@[simp] theorem toFin_mul (x y : BitVec n) : (x * y).toFin = (x.toFin * y.toFin) := rfl
protected theorem mul_comm (x y : BitVec w) : x * y = y * x := by
apply eq_of_toFin_eq; simpa using Fin.mul_comm ..
instance : Std.Commutative (fun (x y : BitVec w) => x * y) := BitVec.mul_comm
protected theorem mul_assoc (x y z : BitVec w) : x * y * z = x * (y * z) := by
apply eq_of_toFin_eq; simpa using Fin.mul_assoc ..
instance : Std.Associative (fun (x y : BitVec w) => x * y) := BitVec.mul_assoc
@[simp] protected theorem mul_one (x : BitVec w) : x * 1#w = x := by
cases w
· apply Subsingleton.elim
· apply eq_of_toNat_eq; simp [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
@[simp] protected theorem one_mul (x : BitVec w) : 1#w * x = x := by
rw [BitVec.mul_comm, BitVec.mul_one]
instance : Std.LawfulCommIdentity (fun (x y : BitVec w) => x * y) (1#w) where
right_id := BitVec.mul_one
@[simp, bv_toNat] theorem toInt_mul (x y : BitVec w) :
(x * y).toInt = (x.toInt * y.toInt).bmod (2^w) := by
simp [toInt_eq_toNat_bmod]
theorem ofInt_mul {n} (x y : Int) : BitVec.ofInt n (x * y) =
BitVec.ofInt n x * BitVec.ofInt n y := by
apply eq_of_toInt_eq
simp
/-! ### le and lt -/
@[bv_toNat] theorem le_def (x y : BitVec n) :
x y x.toNat y.toNat := Iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem le_ofFin (x : BitVec n) (y : Fin (2^n)) :
x BitVec.ofFin y x.toFin y := Iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem ofFin_le (x : Fin (2^n)) (y : BitVec n) :
BitVec.ofFin x y x y.toFin := Iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem ofNat_le_ofNat {n} (x y : Nat) : (x#n) (y#n) x % 2^n y % 2^n := by
simp [le_def]
@[bv_toNat] theorem lt_def (x y : BitVec n) :
x < y x.toNat < y.toNat := Iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem lt_ofFin (x : BitVec n) (y : Fin (2^n)) :
x < BitVec.ofFin y x.toFin < y := Iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem ofFin_lt (x : Fin (2^n)) (y : BitVec n) :
BitVec.ofFin x < y x < y.toFin := Iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem ofNat_lt_ofNat {n} (x y : Nat) : (x#n) < (y#n) x % 2^n < y % 2^n := by
simp [lt_def]
protected theorem lt_of_le_ne (x y : BitVec n) (h1 : x <= y) (h2 : ¬ x = y) : x < y := by
revert h1 h2
let x, lt := x
let y, lt := y
simp
exact Nat.lt_of_le_of_ne
/-! ### intMax -/
/-- The bitvector of width `w` that has the largest value when interpreted as an integer. -/
def intMax (w : Nat) : BitVec w := (2^w - 1)#w
theorem getLsb_intMax_eq (w : Nat) : (intMax w).getLsb i = decide (i < w) := by
simp [intMax, getLsb]
theorem toNat_intMax_eq : (intMax w).toNat = 2^w - 1 := by
have h : 2^w - 1 < 2^w := by
have pos : 2^w > 0 := Nat.pow_pos (by decide)
omega
simp [intMax, Nat.shiftLeft_eq, Nat.one_mul, natCast_eq_ofNat, toNat_ofNat, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h]
/-! ### ofBoolList -/
@[simp] theorem getMsb_ofBoolListBE : (ofBoolListBE bs).getMsb i = bs.getD i false := by
induction bs generalizing i <;> cases i <;> simp_all [ofBoolListBE]
@[simp] theorem getLsb_ofBoolListBE :
(ofBoolListBE bs).getLsb i = (decide (i < bs.length) && bs.getD (bs.length - 1 - i) false) := by
simp [getLsb_eq_getMsb]
@[simp] theorem getLsb_ofBoolListLE : (ofBoolListLE bs).getLsb i = bs.getD i false := by
induction bs generalizing i <;> cases i <;> simp_all [ofBoolListLE]
@[simp] theorem getMsb_ofBoolListLE :
(ofBoolListLE bs).getMsb i = (decide (i < bs.length) && bs.getD (bs.length - 1 - i) false) := by
simp [getMsb_eq_getLsb]
end BitVec

View File

@@ -1,513 +0,0 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 F. G. Dorais. No rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: F. G. Dorais
-/
prelude
import Init.BinderPredicates
/-- Boolean exclusive or -/
abbrev xor : Bool Bool Bool := bne
namespace Bool
/- Namespaced versions that can be used instead of prefixing `_root_` -/
@[inherit_doc not] protected abbrev not := not
@[inherit_doc or] protected abbrev or := or
@[inherit_doc and] protected abbrev and := and
@[inherit_doc xor] protected abbrev xor := xor
instance (p : Bool Prop) [inst : DecidablePred p] : Decidable ( x, p x) :=
match inst true, inst false with
| isFalse ht, _ => isFalse fun h => absurd (h _) ht
| _, isFalse hf => isFalse fun h => absurd (h _) hf
| isTrue ht, isTrue hf => isTrue fun | true => ht | false => hf
instance (p : Bool Prop) [inst : DecidablePred p] : Decidable ( x, p x) :=
match inst true, inst false with
| isTrue ht, _ => isTrue _, ht
| _, isTrue hf => isTrue _, hf
| isFalse ht, isFalse hf => isFalse fun | true, h => absurd h ht | false, h => absurd h hf
@[simp] theorem default_bool : default = false := rfl
instance : LE Bool := (. .)
instance : LT Bool := (!. && .)
instance (x y : Bool) : Decidable (x y) := inferInstanceAs (Decidable (x y))
instance (x y : Bool) : Decidable (x < y) := inferInstanceAs (Decidable (!x && y))
instance : Max Bool := or
instance : Min Bool := and
theorem false_ne_true : false true := Bool.noConfusion
theorem eq_false_or_eq_true : (b : Bool) b = true b = false := by decide
theorem eq_false_iff : {b : Bool} b = false b true := by decide
theorem ne_false_iff : {b : Bool} b false b = true := by decide
theorem eq_iff_iff {a b : Bool} : a = b (a b) := by cases b <;> simp
@[simp] theorem decide_eq_true {b : Bool} [Decidable (b = true)] : decide (b = true) = b := by cases b <;> simp
@[simp] theorem decide_eq_false {b : Bool} [Decidable (b = false)] : decide (b = false) = !b := by cases b <;> simp
@[simp] theorem decide_true_eq {b : Bool} [Decidable (true = b)] : decide (true = b) = b := by cases b <;> simp
@[simp] theorem decide_false_eq {b : Bool} [Decidable (false = b)] : decide (false = b) = !b := by cases b <;> simp
/-! ### and -/
@[simp] theorem and_self_left : (a b : Bool), (a && (a && b)) = (a && b) := by decide
@[simp] theorem and_self_right : (a b : Bool), ((a && b) && b) = (a && b) := by decide
@[simp] theorem not_and_self : (x : Bool), (!x && x) = false := by decide
@[simp] theorem and_not_self : (x : Bool), (x && !x) = false := by decide
/-
Added for confluence with `not_and_self` `and_not_self` on term
`(b && !b) = true` due to reductions:
1. `(b = true !b = true)` via `Bool.and_eq_true`
2. `false = true` via `Bool.and_not_self`
-/
@[simp] theorem eq_true_and_eq_false_self : (b : Bool), (b = true b = false) False := by decide
@[simp] theorem eq_false_and_eq_true_self : (b : Bool), (b = false b = true) False := by decide
theorem and_comm : (x y : Bool), (x && y) = (y && x) := by decide
theorem and_left_comm : (x y z : Bool), (x && (y && z)) = (y && (x && z)) := by decide
theorem and_right_comm : (x y z : Bool), ((x && y) && z) = ((x && z) && y) := by decide
/-
Bool version `and_iff_left_iff_imp`.
Needed for confluence of term `(a && b) ↔ a` which reduces to `(a && b) = a` via
`Bool.coe_iff_coe` and `a → b` via `Bool.and_eq_true` and
`and_iff_left_iff_imp`.
-/
@[simp] theorem and_iff_left_iff_imp : (a b : Bool), ((a && b) = a) (a b) := by decide
@[simp] theorem and_iff_right_iff_imp : (a b : Bool), ((a && b) = b) (b a) := by decide
@[simp] theorem iff_self_and : (a b : Bool), (a = (a && b)) (a b) := by decide
@[simp] theorem iff_and_self : (a b : Bool), (b = (a && b)) (b a) := by decide
/-! ### or -/
@[simp] theorem or_self_left : (a b : Bool), (a || (a || b)) = (a || b) := by decide
@[simp] theorem or_self_right : (a b : Bool), ((a || b) || b) = (a || b) := by decide
@[simp] theorem not_or_self : (x : Bool), (!x || x) = true := by decide
@[simp] theorem or_not_self : (x : Bool), (x || !x) = true := by decide
/-
Added for confluence with `not_or_self` `or_not_self` on term
`(b || !b) = true` due to reductions:
1. `(b = true !b = true)` via `Bool.or_eq_true`
2. `true = true` via `Bool.or_not_self`
-/
@[simp] theorem eq_true_or_eq_false_self : (b : Bool), (b = true b = false) True := by decide
@[simp] theorem eq_false_or_eq_true_self : (b : Bool), (b = false b = true) True := by decide
/-
Bool version `or_iff_left_iff_imp`.
Needed for confluence of term `(a || b) ↔ a` which reduces to `(a || b) = a` via
`Bool.coe_iff_coe` and `a → b` via `Bool.or_eq_true` and
`and_iff_left_iff_imp`.
-/
@[simp] theorem or_iff_left_iff_imp : (a b : Bool), ((a || b) = a) (b a) := by decide
@[simp] theorem or_iff_right_iff_imp : (a b : Bool), ((a || b) = b) (a b) := by decide
@[simp] theorem iff_self_or : (a b : Bool), (a = (a || b)) (b a) := by decide
@[simp] theorem iff_or_self : (a b : Bool), (b = (a || b)) (a b) := by decide
theorem or_comm : (x y : Bool), (x || y) = (y || x) := by decide
theorem or_left_comm : (x y z : Bool), (x || (y || z)) = (y || (x || z)) := by decide
theorem or_right_comm : (x y z : Bool), ((x || y) || z) = ((x || z) || y) := by decide
/-! ### distributivity -/
theorem and_or_distrib_left : (x y z : Bool), (x && (y || z)) = (x && y || x && z) := by decide
theorem and_or_distrib_right : (x y z : Bool), ((x || y) && z) = (x && z || y && z) := by decide
theorem or_and_distrib_left : (x y z : Bool), (x || y && z) = ((x || y) && (x || z)) := by decide
theorem or_and_distrib_right : (x y z : Bool), (x && y || z) = ((x || z) && (y || z)) := by decide
theorem and_xor_distrib_left : (x y z : Bool), (x && xor y z) = xor (x && y) (x && z) := by decide
theorem and_xor_distrib_right : (x y z : Bool), (xor x y && z) = xor (x && z) (y && z) := by decide
/-- De Morgan's law for boolean and -/
@[simp] theorem not_and : (x y : Bool), (!(x && y)) = (!x || !y) := by decide
/-- De Morgan's law for boolean or -/
@[simp] theorem not_or : (x y : Bool), (!(x || y)) = (!x && !y) := by decide
theorem and_eq_true_iff (x y : Bool) : (x && y) = true x = true y = true :=
Iff.of_eq (and_eq_true x y)
theorem and_eq_false_iff : (x y : Bool), (x && y) = false x = false y = false := by decide
/-
New simp rule that replaces `Bool.and_eq_false_eq_eq_false_or_eq_false` in
Mathlib due to confluence:
Consider the term: `¬((b && c) = true)`:
1. Reduces to `((b && c) = false)` via `Bool.not_eq_true`
2. Reduces to `¬(b = true ∧ c = true)` via `Bool.and_eq_true`.
1. Further reduces to `b = false c = false` via `Bool.and_eq_false_eq_eq_false_or_eq_false`.
2. Further reduces to `b = true → c = false` via `not_and` and `Bool.not_eq_true`.
-/
@[simp] theorem and_eq_false_imp : (x y : Bool), (x && y) = false (x = true y = false) := by decide
@[simp] theorem or_eq_true_iff : (x y : Bool), (x || y) = true x = true y = true := by decide
@[simp] theorem or_eq_false_iff : (x y : Bool), (x || y) = false x = false y = false := by decide
/-! ### eq/beq/bne -/
/--
These two rules follow trivially by simp, but are needed to avoid non-termination
in false_eq and true_eq.
-/
@[simp] theorem false_eq_true : (false = true) = False := by simp
@[simp] theorem true_eq_false : (true = false) = False := by simp
-- The two lemmas below normalize terms with a constant to the
-- right-hand side but risk non-termination if `false_eq_true` and
-- `true_eq_false` are disabled.
@[simp low] theorem false_eq (b : Bool) : (false = b) = (b = false) := by
cases b <;> simp
@[simp low] theorem true_eq (b : Bool) : (true = b) = (b = true) := by
cases b <;> simp
@[simp] theorem true_beq : b, (true == b) = b := by decide
@[simp] theorem false_beq : b, (false == b) = !b := by decide
@[simp] theorem beq_true : b, (b == true) = b := by decide
@[simp] theorem beq_false : b, (b == false) = !b := by decide
@[simp] theorem true_bne : (b : Bool), (true != b) = !b := by decide
@[simp] theorem false_bne : (b : Bool), (false != b) = b := by decide
@[simp] theorem bne_true : (b : Bool), (b != true) = !b := by decide
@[simp] theorem bne_false : (b : Bool), (b != false) = b := by decide
@[simp] theorem not_beq_self : (x : Bool), ((!x) == x) = false := by decide
@[simp] theorem beq_not_self : (x : Bool), (x == !x) = false := by decide
@[simp] theorem not_bne_self : (x : Bool), ((!x) != x) = true := by decide
@[simp] theorem bne_not_self : (x : Bool), (x != !x) = true := by decide
/-
Added for equivalence with `Bool.not_beq_self` and needed for confluence
due to `beq_iff_eq`.
-/
@[simp] theorem not_eq_self : (b : Bool), ((!b) = b) False := by decide
@[simp] theorem eq_not_self : (b : Bool), (b = (!b)) False := by decide
@[simp] theorem beq_self_left : (a b : Bool), (a == (a == b)) = b := by decide
@[simp] theorem beq_self_right : (a b : Bool), ((a == b) == b) = a := by decide
@[simp] theorem bne_self_left : (a b : Bool), (a != (a != b)) = b := by decide
@[simp] theorem bne_self_right : (a b : Bool), ((a != b) != b) = a := by decide
@[simp] theorem not_bne_not : (x y : Bool), ((!x) != (!y)) = (x != y) := by decide
@[simp] theorem bne_assoc : (x y z : Bool), ((x != y) != z) = (x != (y != z)) := by decide
@[simp] theorem bne_left_inj : (x y z : Bool), (x != y) = (x != z) y = z := by decide
@[simp] theorem bne_right_inj : (x y z : Bool), (x != z) = (y != z) x = y := by decide
/-! ### coercision related normal forms -/
theorem beq_eq_decide_eq [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] [DecidableEq α] (a b : α) :
(a == b) = decide (a = b) := by
cases h : a == b
· simp [ne_of_beq_false h]
· simp [eq_of_beq h]
@[simp] theorem not_eq_not : {a b : Bool}, ¬a = !b a = b := by decide
@[simp] theorem not_not_eq : {a b : Bool}, ¬(!a) = b a = b := by decide
@[simp] theorem coe_iff_coe : (a b : Bool), (a b) a = b := by decide
@[simp] theorem coe_true_iff_false : (a b : Bool), (a b = false) a = (!b) := by decide
@[simp] theorem coe_false_iff_true : (a b : Bool), (a = false b) (!a) = b := by decide
@[simp] theorem coe_false_iff_false : (a b : Bool), (a = false b = false) (!a) = (!b) := by decide
/-! ### beq properties -/
theorem beq_comm {α} [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] {a b : α} : (a == b) = (b == a) :=
(Bool.coe_iff_coe (a == b) (b == a)).mp (by simp [@eq_comm α])
/-! ### xor -/
theorem false_xor : (x : Bool), xor false x = x := false_bne
theorem xor_false : (x : Bool), xor x false = x := bne_false
theorem true_xor : (x : Bool), xor true x = !x := true_bne
theorem xor_true : (x : Bool), xor x true = !x := bne_true
theorem not_xor_self : (x : Bool), xor (!x) x = true := not_bne_self
theorem xor_not_self : (x : Bool), xor x (!x) = true := bne_not_self
theorem not_xor : (x y : Bool), xor (!x) y = !(xor x y) := by decide
theorem xor_not : (x y : Bool), xor x (!y) = !(xor x y) := by decide
theorem not_xor_not : (x y : Bool), xor (!x) (!y) = (xor x y) := not_bne_not
theorem xor_self : (x : Bool), xor x x = false := by decide
theorem xor_comm : (x y : Bool), xor x y = xor y x := by decide
theorem xor_left_comm : (x y z : Bool), xor x (xor y z) = xor y (xor x z) := by decide
theorem xor_right_comm : (x y z : Bool), xor (xor x y) z = xor (xor x z) y := by decide
theorem xor_assoc : (x y z : Bool), xor (xor x y) z = xor x (xor y z) := bne_assoc
theorem xor_left_inj : (x y z : Bool), xor x y = xor x z y = z := bne_left_inj
theorem xor_right_inj : (x y z : Bool), xor x z = xor y z x = y := bne_right_inj
/-! ### le/lt -/
@[simp] protected theorem le_true : (x : Bool), x true := by decide
@[simp] protected theorem false_le : (x : Bool), false x := by decide
@[simp] protected theorem le_refl : (x : Bool), x x := by decide
@[simp] protected theorem lt_irrefl : (x : Bool), ¬ x < x := by decide
protected theorem le_trans : {x y z : Bool}, x y y z x z := by decide
protected theorem le_antisymm : {x y : Bool}, x y y x x = y := by decide
protected theorem le_total : (x y : Bool), x y y x := by decide
protected theorem lt_asymm : {x y : Bool}, x < y ¬ y < x := by decide
protected theorem lt_trans : {x y z : Bool}, x < y y < z x < z := by decide
protected theorem lt_iff_le_not_le : {x y : Bool}, x < y x y ¬ y x := by decide
protected theorem lt_of_le_of_lt : {x y z : Bool}, x y y < z x < z := by decide
protected theorem lt_of_lt_of_le : {x y z : Bool}, x < y y z x < z := by decide
protected theorem le_of_lt : {x y : Bool}, x < y x y := by decide
protected theorem le_of_eq : {x y : Bool}, x = y x y := by decide
protected theorem ne_of_lt : {x y : Bool}, x < y x y := by decide
protected theorem lt_of_le_of_ne : {x y : Bool}, x y x y x < y := by decide
protected theorem le_of_lt_or_eq : {x y : Bool}, x < y x = y x y := by decide
protected theorem eq_true_of_true_le : {x : Bool}, true x x = true := by decide
protected theorem eq_false_of_le_false : {x : Bool}, x false x = false := by decide
/-! ### min/max -/
@[simp] protected theorem max_eq_or : max = or := rfl
@[simp] protected theorem min_eq_and : min = and := rfl
/-! ### injectivity lemmas -/
theorem not_inj : {x y : Bool}, (!x) = (!y) x = y := by decide
theorem not_inj_iff : {x y : Bool}, (!x) = (!y) x = y := by decide
theorem and_or_inj_right : {m x y : Bool}, (x && m) = (y && m) (x || m) = (y || m) x = y := by
decide
theorem and_or_inj_right_iff :
{m x y : Bool}, (x && m) = (y && m) (x || m) = (y || m) x = y := by decide
theorem and_or_inj_left : {m x y : Bool}, (m && x) = (m && y) (m || x) = (m || y) x = y := by
decide
theorem and_or_inj_left_iff :
{m x y : Bool}, (m && x) = (m && y) (m || x) = (m || y) x = y := by decide
/-! ## toNat -/
/-- convert a `Bool` to a `Nat`, `false -> 0`, `true -> 1` -/
def toNat (b:Bool) : Nat := cond b 1 0
@[simp] theorem toNat_false : false.toNat = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem toNat_true : true.toNat = 1 := rfl
theorem toNat_le (c : Bool) : c.toNat 1 := by
cases c <;> trivial
@[deprecated toNat_le] abbrev toNat_le_one := toNat_le
theorem toNat_lt (b : Bool) : b.toNat < 2 :=
Nat.lt_succ_of_le (toNat_le _)
@[simp] theorem toNat_eq_zero (b : Bool) : b.toNat = 0 b = false := by
cases b <;> simp
@[simp] theorem toNat_eq_one (b : Bool) : b.toNat = 1 b = true := by
cases b <;> simp
/-! ### ite -/
@[simp] theorem if_true_left (p : Prop) [h : Decidable p] (f : Bool) :
(ite p true f) = (p || f) := by cases h with | _ p => simp [p]
@[simp] theorem if_false_left (p : Prop) [h : Decidable p] (f : Bool) :
(ite p false f) = (!p && f) := by cases h with | _ p => simp [p]
@[simp] theorem if_true_right (p : Prop) [h : Decidable p] (t : Bool) :
(ite p t true) = (!(p : Bool) || t) := by cases h with | _ p => simp [p]
@[simp] theorem if_false_right (p : Prop) [h : Decidable p] (t : Bool) :
(ite p t false) = (p && t) := by cases h with | _ p => simp [p]
@[simp] theorem ite_eq_true_distrib (p : Prop) [h : Decidable p] (t f : Bool) :
(ite p t f = true) = ite p (t = true) (f = true) := by
cases h with | _ p => simp [p]
@[simp] theorem ite_eq_false_distrib (p : Prop) [h : Decidable p] (t f : Bool) :
(ite p t f = false) = ite p (t = false) (f = false) := by
cases h with | _ p => simp [p]
/-
`not_ite_eq_true_eq_true` and related theorems below are added for
non-confluence. A motivating example is
`¬((if u then b else c) = true)`.
This reduces to:
1. `¬((if u then (b = true) else (c = true))` via `ite_eq_true_distrib`
2. `(if u then b c) = false)` via `Bool.not_eq_true`.
Similar logic holds for `¬((if u then b else c) = false)` and related
lemmas.
-/
@[simp]
theorem not_ite_eq_true_eq_true (p : Prop) [h : Decidable p] (b c : Bool) :
¬(ite p (b = true) (c = true)) (ite p (b = false) (c = false)) := by
cases h with | _ p => simp [p]
@[simp]
theorem not_ite_eq_false_eq_false (p : Prop) [h : Decidable p] (b c : Bool) :
¬(ite p (b = false) (c = false)) (ite p (b = true) (c = true)) := by
cases h with | _ p => simp [p]
@[simp]
theorem not_ite_eq_true_eq_false (p : Prop) [h : Decidable p] (b c : Bool) :
¬(ite p (b = true) (c = false)) (ite p (b = false) (c = true)) := by
cases h with | _ p => simp [p]
@[simp]
theorem not_ite_eq_false_eq_true (p : Prop) [h : Decidable p] (b c : Bool) :
¬(ite p (b = false) (c = true)) (ite p (b = true) (c = false)) := by
cases h with | _ p => simp [p]
/-
Added for confluence between `if_true_left` and `ite_false_same` on
`if b = true then True else b = true`
-/
@[simp] theorem eq_false_imp_eq_true : (b:Bool), (b = false b = true) (b = true) := by decide
/-
Added for confluence between `if_true_left` and `ite_false_same` on
`if b = false then True else b = false`
-/
@[simp] theorem eq_true_imp_eq_false : (b:Bool), (b = true b = false) (b = false) := by decide
/-! ### cond -/
theorem cond_eq_ite {α} (b : Bool) (t e : α) : cond b t e = if b then t else e := by
cases b <;> simp
theorem cond_eq_if : (bif b then x else y) = (if b then x else y) := cond_eq_ite b x y
@[simp] theorem cond_not (b : Bool) (t e : α) : cond (!b) t e = cond b e t := by
cases b <;> rfl
@[simp] theorem cond_self (c : Bool) (t : α) : cond c t t = t := by cases c <;> rfl
/-
This is a simp rule in Mathlib, but results in non-confluence that is difficult
to fix as decide distributes over propositions. As an example, observe that
`cond (decide (p ∧ q)) t f` could simplify to either:
* `if p ∧ q then t else f` via `Bool.cond_decide` or
* `cond (decide p && decide q) t f` via `Bool.decide_and`.
A possible approach to improve normalization between `cond` and `ite` would be
to completely simplify away `cond` by making `cond_eq_ite` a `simp` rule, but
that has not been taken since it could surprise users to migrate pure `Bool`
operations like `cond` to a mix of `Prop` and `Bool`.
-/
theorem cond_decide {α} (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (t e : α) :
cond (decide p) t e = if p then t else e := by
simp [cond_eq_ite]
@[simp] theorem cond_eq_ite_iff (a : Bool) (p : Prop) [h : Decidable p] (x y u v : α) :
(cond a x y = ite p u v) ite a x y = ite p u v := by
simp [Bool.cond_eq_ite]
@[simp] theorem ite_eq_cond_iff (p : Prop) [h : Decidable p] (a : Bool) (x y u v : α) :
(ite p x y = cond a u v) ite p x y = ite a u v := by
simp [Bool.cond_eq_ite]
@[simp] theorem cond_eq_true_distrib : (c t f : Bool),
(cond c t f = true) = ite (c = true) (t = true) (f = true) := by
decide
@[simp] theorem cond_eq_false_distrib : (c t f : Bool),
(cond c t f = false) = ite (c = true) (t = false) (f = false) := by decide
protected theorem cond_true {α : Type u} {a b : α} : cond true a b = a := cond_true a b
protected theorem cond_false {α : Type u} {a b : α} : cond false a b = b := cond_false a b
@[simp] theorem cond_true_left : (c f : Bool), cond c true f = ( c || f) := by decide
@[simp] theorem cond_false_left : (c f : Bool), cond c false f = (!c && f) := by decide
@[simp] theorem cond_true_right : (c t : Bool), cond c t true = (!c || t) := by decide
@[simp] theorem cond_false_right : (c t : Bool), cond c t false = ( c && t) := by decide
@[simp] theorem cond_true_same : (c b : Bool), cond c c b = (c || b) := by decide
@[simp] theorem cond_false_same : (c b : Bool), cond c b c = (c && b) := by decide
/-# decidability -/
protected theorem decide_coe (b : Bool) [Decidable (b = true)] : decide (b = true) = b := decide_eq_true
@[simp] theorem decide_and (p q : Prop) [dpq : Decidable (p q)] [dp : Decidable p] [dq : Decidable q] :
decide (p q) = (p && q) := by
cases dp with | _ p => simp [p]
@[simp] theorem decide_or (p q : Prop) [dpq : Decidable (p q)] [dp : Decidable p] [dq : Decidable q] :
decide (p q) = (p || q) := by
cases dp with | _ p => simp [p]
@[simp] theorem decide_iff_dist (p q : Prop) [dpq : Decidable (p q)] [dp : Decidable p] [dq : Decidable q] :
decide (p q) = (decide p == decide q) := by
cases dp with | _ p => simp [p]
end Bool
export Bool (cond_eq_if)
/-! ### decide -/
@[simp] theorem false_eq_decide_iff {p : Prop} [h : Decidable p] : false = decide p ¬p := by
cases h with | _ q => simp [q]
@[simp] theorem true_eq_decide_iff {p : Prop} [h : Decidable p] : true = decide p p := by
cases h with | _ q => simp [q]

View File

@@ -52,13 +52,9 @@ def get : (a : @& ByteArray) → (@& Fin a.size) → UInt8
instance : GetElem ByteArray Nat UInt8 fun xs i => i < xs.size where
getElem xs i h := xs.get i, h
instance : LawfulGetElem ByteArray Nat UInt8 fun xs i => i < xs.size where
instance : GetElem ByteArray USize UInt8 fun xs i => i.val < xs.size where
getElem xs i h := xs.uget i h
instance : LawfulGetElem ByteArray USize UInt8 fun xs i => i.val < xs.size where
@[extern "lean_byte_array_set"]
def set! : ByteArray (@& Nat) UInt8 ByteArray
| bs, i, b => bs.set! i b
@@ -199,18 +195,6 @@ instance : ToString ByteArray := ⟨fun bs => bs.toList.toString⟩
/-- Interpret a `ByteArray` of size 8 as a little-endian `UInt64`. -/
def ByteArray.toUInt64LE! (bs : ByteArray) : UInt64 :=
assert! bs.size == 8
(bs.get! 7).toUInt64 <<< 0x38 |||
(bs.get! 6).toUInt64 <<< 0x30 |||
(bs.get! 5).toUInt64 <<< 0x28 |||
(bs.get! 4).toUInt64 <<< 0x20 |||
(bs.get! 3).toUInt64 <<< 0x18 |||
(bs.get! 2).toUInt64 <<< 0x10 |||
(bs.get! 1).toUInt64 <<< 0x8 |||
(bs.get! 0).toUInt64
/-- Interpret a `ByteArray` of size 8 as a big-endian `UInt64`. -/
def ByteArray.toUInt64BE! (bs : ByteArray) : UInt64 :=
assert! bs.size == 8
(bs.get! 0).toUInt64 <<< 0x38 |||
(bs.get! 1).toUInt64 <<< 0x30 |||
@@ -220,3 +204,15 @@ def ByteArray.toUInt64BE! (bs : ByteArray) : UInt64 :=
(bs.get! 5).toUInt64 <<< 0x10 |||
(bs.get! 6).toUInt64 <<< 0x8 |||
(bs.get! 7).toUInt64
/-- Interpret a `ByteArray` of size 8 as a big-endian `UInt64`. -/
def ByteArray.toUInt64BE! (bs : ByteArray) : UInt64 :=
assert! bs.size == 8
(bs.get! 7).toUInt64 <<< 0x38 |||
(bs.get! 6).toUInt64 <<< 0x30 |||
(bs.get! 5).toUInt64 <<< 0x28 |||
(bs.get! 4).toUInt64 <<< 0x20 |||
(bs.get! 3).toUInt64 <<< 0x18 |||
(bs.get! 2).toUInt64 <<< 0x10 |||
(bs.get! 1).toUInt64 <<< 0x8 |||
(bs.get! 0).toUInt64

View File

@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ Sends a message on an `Channel`.
This function does not block.
-/
def Channel.send (ch : Channel α) (v : α) : BaseIO Unit :=
def Channel.send (v : α) (ch : Channel α) : BaseIO Unit :=
ch.atomically do
let st get
if st.closed then return

View File

@@ -6,6 +6,3 @@ Author: Leonardo de Moura
prelude
import Init.Data.Fin.Basic
import Init.Data.Fin.Log2
import Init.Data.Fin.Iterate
import Init.Data.Fin.Fold
import Init.Data.Fin.Lemmas

View File

@@ -1,10 +1,12 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Leonardo de Moura, Robert Y. Lewis, Keeley Hoek, Mario Carneiro
Author: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Nat.Bitwise.Basic
import Init.Data.Nat.Div
import Init.Data.Nat.Bitwise
import Init.Coe
open Nat
@@ -13,40 +15,17 @@ namespace Fin
instance coeToNat : CoeOut (Fin n) Nat :=
fun v => v.val
/--
From the empty type `Fin 0`, any desired result `α` can be derived. This is simlar to `Empty.elim`.
-/
def elim0.{u} {α : Sort u} : Fin 0 α
| _, h => absurd h (not_lt_zero _)
/--
Returns the successor of the argument.
The bound in the result type is increased:
```
(2 : Fin 3).succ = (3 : Fin 4)
```
This differs from addition, which wraps around:
```
(2 : Fin 3) + 1 = (0 : Fin 3)
```
-/
def succ : Fin n Fin n.succ
| i, h => i+1, Nat.succ_lt_succ h
variable {n : Nat}
/--
Returns `a` modulo `n + 1` as a `Fin n.succ`.
-/
protected def ofNat {n : Nat} (a : Nat) : Fin n.succ :=
a % (n+1), Nat.mod_lt _ (Nat.zero_lt_succ _)
/--
Returns `a` modulo `n` as a `Fin n`.
The assumption `n > 0` ensures that `Fin n` is nonempty.
-/
protected def ofNat' {n : Nat} (a : Nat) (h : n > 0) : Fin n :=
a % n, Nat.mod_lt _ h
@@ -56,15 +35,12 @@ private theorem mlt {b : Nat} : {a : Nat} → a < n → b % n < n
have : n > 0 := Nat.lt_trans (Nat.zero_lt_succ _) h;
Nat.mod_lt _ this
/-- Addition modulo `n` -/
protected def add : Fin n Fin n Fin n
| a, h, b, _ => (a + b) % n, mlt h
/-- Multiplication modulo `n` -/
protected def mul : Fin n Fin n Fin n
| a, h, b, _ => (a * b) % n, mlt h
/-- Subtraction modulo `n` -/
protected def sub : Fin n Fin n Fin n
| a, h, b, _ => (a + (n - b)) % n, mlt h
@@ -141,56 +117,10 @@ theorem modn_lt : ∀ {m : Nat} (i : Fin n), m > 0 → (modn i m).val < m
theorem val_lt_of_le (i : Fin b) (h : b n) : i.val < n :=
Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le i.isLt h
protected theorem pos (i : Fin n) : 0 < n :=
Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.zero_le _) i.2
/-- The greatest value of `Fin (n+1)`. -/
@[inline] def last (n : Nat) : Fin (n + 1) := n, n.lt_succ_self
/-- `castLT i h` embeds `i` into a `Fin` where `h` proves it belongs into. -/
@[inline] def castLT (i : Fin m) (h : i.1 < n) : Fin n := i.1, h
/-- `castLE h i` embeds `i` into a larger `Fin` type. -/
@[inline] def castLE (h : n m) (i : Fin n) : Fin m := i, Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le i.2 h
/-- `cast eq i` embeds `i` into an equal `Fin` type. -/
@[inline] def cast (eq : n = m) (i : Fin n) : Fin m := i, eq i.2
/-- `castAdd m i` embeds `i : Fin n` in `Fin (n+m)`. See also `Fin.natAdd` and `Fin.addNat`. -/
@[inline] def castAdd (m) : Fin n Fin (n + m) :=
castLE <| Nat.le_add_right n m
/-- `castSucc i` embeds `i : Fin n` in `Fin (n+1)`. -/
@[inline] def castSucc : Fin n Fin (n + 1) := castAdd 1
/-- `addNat m i` adds `m` to `i`, generalizes `Fin.succ`. -/
def addNat (i : Fin n) (m) : Fin (n + m) := i + m, Nat.add_lt_add_right i.2 _
/-- `natAdd n i` adds `n` to `i` "on the left". -/
def natAdd (n) (i : Fin m) : Fin (n + m) := n + i, Nat.add_lt_add_left i.2 _
/-- Maps `0` to `n-1`, `1` to `n-2`, ..., `n-1` to `0`. -/
@[inline] def rev (i : Fin n) : Fin n := n - (i + 1), Nat.sub_lt i.pos (Nat.succ_pos _)
/-- `subNat i h` subtracts `m` from `i`, generalizes `Fin.pred`. -/
@[inline] def subNat (m) (i : Fin (n + m)) (h : m i) : Fin n :=
i - m, Nat.sub_lt_right_of_lt_add h i.2
/-- Predecessor of a nonzero element of `Fin (n+1)`. -/
@[inline] def pred {n : Nat} (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i 0) : Fin n :=
subNat 1 i <| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero <| mt (Fin.eq_of_val_eq (j := 0)) h
theorem val_inj {a b : Fin n} : a.1 = b.1 a = b := Fin.eq_of_val_eq, Fin.val_eq_of_eq
theorem val_congr {n : Nat} {a b : Fin n} (h : a = b) : (a : Nat) = (b : Nat) :=
Fin.val_inj.mpr h
theorem val_le_of_le {n : Nat} {a b : Fin n} (h : a b) : (a : Nat) (b : Nat) := h
theorem val_le_of_ge {n : Nat} {a b : Fin n} (h : a b) : (b : Nat) (a : Nat) := h
theorem val_add_one_le_of_lt {n : Nat} {a b : Fin n} (h : a < b) : (a : Nat) + 1 (b : Nat) := h
theorem val_add_one_le_of_gt {n : Nat} {a b : Fin n} (h : a > b) : (b : Nat) + 1 (a : Nat) := h
end Fin
instance [GetElem cont Nat elem dom] : GetElem cont (Fin n) elem fun xs i => dom xs i where
getElem xs i h := getElem xs i.1 h
macro_rules
| `(tactic| get_elem_tactic_trivial) => `(tactic| apply Fin.val_lt_of_le; get_elem_tactic_trivial; done)

View File

@@ -1,21 +0,0 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 François G. Dorais. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: François G. Dorais
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Nat.Linear
/-- Folds over `Fin n` from the left: `foldl 3 f x = f (f (f x 0) 1) 2`. -/
@[inline] def foldl (n) (f : α Fin n α) (init : α) : α := loop init 0 where
/-- Inner loop for `Fin.foldl`. `Fin.foldl.loop n f x i = f (f (f x i) ...) (n-1)` -/
loop (x : α) (i : Nat) : α :=
if h : i < n then loop (f x i, h) (i+1) else x
termination_by n - i
/-- Folds over `Fin n` from the right: `foldr 3 f x = f 0 (f 1 (f 2 x))`. -/
@[inline] def foldr (n) (f : Fin n α α) (init : α) : α := loop n, Nat.le_refl n init where
/-- Inner loop for `Fin.foldr`. `Fin.foldr.loop n f i x = f 0 (f ... (f (i-1) x))` -/
loop : {i // i n} α α
| 0, _, x => x
| i+1, h, x => loop i, Nat.le_of_lt h (f i, h x)

View File

@@ -1,95 +0,0 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Lean FRO, LLC. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joe Hendrix
-/
prelude
import Init.PropLemmas
import Init.Data.Fin.Basic
namespace Fin
/--
`hIterateFrom f i bnd a` applies `f` over indices `[i:n]` to compute `P n`
from `P i`.
See `hIterate` below for more details.
-/
def hIterateFrom (P : Nat Sort _) {n} (f : (i : Fin n), P i.val P (i.val+1))
(i : Nat) (ubnd : i n) (a : P i) : P n :=
if g : i < n then
hIterateFrom P f (i+1) g (f i, g a)
else
have p : i = n := (or_iff_left g).mp (Nat.eq_or_lt_of_le ubnd)
_root_.cast (congrArg P p) a
termination_by n - i
/--
`hIterate` is a heterogenous iterative operation that applies a
index-dependent function `f` to a value `init : P start` a total of
`stop - start` times to produce a value of type `P stop`.
Concretely, `hIterate start stop f init` is equal to
```lean
init |> f start _ |> f (start+1) _ ... |> f (end-1) _
```
Because it is heterogenous and must return a value of type `P stop`,
`hIterate` requires proof that `start ≤ stop`.
One can prove properties of `hIterate` using the general theorem
`hIterate_elim` or other more specialized theorems.
-/
def hIterate (P : Nat Sort _) {n : Nat} (init : P 0) (f : (i : Fin n), P i.val P (i.val+1)) :
P n :=
hIterateFrom P f 0 (Nat.zero_le n) init
private theorem hIterateFrom_elim {P : Nat Sort _}(Q : (i : Nat), P i Prop)
{n : Nat}
(f : (i : Fin n), P i.val P (i.val+1))
{i : Nat} (ubnd : i n)
(s : P i)
(init : Q i s)
(step : (k : Fin n) (s : P k.val), Q k.val s Q (k.val+1) (f k s)) :
Q n (hIterateFrom P f i ubnd s) := by
let j, p := Nat.le.dest ubnd
induction j generalizing i ubnd init with
| zero =>
unfold hIterateFrom
have g : ¬ (i < n) := by simp at p; simp [p]
have r : Q n (_root_.cast (congrArg P p) s) :=
@Eq.rec Nat i (fun k eq => Q k (_root_.cast (congrArg P eq) s)) init n p
simp only [g, r, dite_false]
| succ j inv =>
unfold hIterateFrom
have d : Nat.succ i + j = n := by simp [Nat.succ_add]; exact p
have g : i < n := Nat.le.intro d
simp only [g]
exact inv _ _ (step i,g s init) d
/-
`hIterate_elim` provides a mechanism for showing that the result of
`hIterate` satisifies a property `Q stop` by showing that the states
at the intermediate indices `i : start ≤ i < stop` satisfy `Q i`.
-/
theorem hIterate_elim {P : Nat Sort _} (Q : (i : Nat), P i Prop)
{n : Nat} (f : (i : Fin n), P i.val P (i.val+1)) (s : P 0) (init : Q 0 s)
(step : (k : Fin n) (s : P k.val), Q k.val s Q (k.val+1) (f k s)) :
Q n (hIterate P s f) := by
exact hIterateFrom_elim _ _ _ _ init step
/-
`hIterate_eq`provides a mechanism for replacing `hIterate P s f` with a
function `state` showing that matches the steps performed by `hIterate`.
This allows rewriting incremental code using `hIterate` with a
non-incremental state function.
-/
theorem hIterate_eq {P : Nat Sort _} (state : (i : Nat), P i)
{n : Nat} (f : (i : Fin n), P i.val P (i.val+1)) (s : P 0)
(init : s = state 0)
(step : (i : Fin n), f i (state i) = state (i+1)) :
hIterate P s f = state n := by
apply hIterate_elim (fun i s => s = state i) f s init
intro i s s_eq
simp only [s_eq, step]

View File

@@ -1,835 +0,0 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Fin.Basic
import Init.Data.Nat.Lemmas
import Init.Ext
import Init.ByCases
import Init.Conv
import Init.Omega
namespace Fin
/-- If you actually have an element of `Fin n`, then the `n` is always positive -/
theorem size_pos (i : Fin n) : 0 < n := Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.zero_le _) i.2
theorem mod_def (a m : Fin n) : a % m = Fin.mk (a % m) (Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.mod_le _ _) a.2) :=
rfl
theorem mul_def (a b : Fin n) : a * b = Fin.mk ((a * b) % n) (Nat.mod_lt _ a.size_pos) := rfl
theorem sub_def (a b : Fin n) : a - b = Fin.mk ((a + (n - b)) % n) (Nat.mod_lt _ a.size_pos) := rfl
theorem size_pos' : [Nonempty (Fin n)], 0 < n | i => i.size_pos
@[simp] theorem is_lt (a : Fin n) : (a : Nat) < n := a.2
theorem pos_iff_nonempty {n : Nat} : 0 < n Nonempty (Fin n) :=
fun h => 0, h, fun i => i.pos
/-! ### coercions and constructions -/
@[simp] protected theorem eta (a : Fin n) (h : a < n) : (a, h : Fin n) = a := rfl
@[ext] theorem ext {a b : Fin n} (h : (a : Nat) = b) : a = b := eq_of_val_eq h
theorem ext_iff {a b : Fin n} : a = b a.1 = b.1 := val_inj.symm
theorem val_ne_iff {a b : Fin n} : a.1 b.1 a b := not_congr val_inj
theorem exists_iff {p : Fin n Prop} : ( i, p i) i h, p i, h :=
fun i, hi, hpi => i, hi, hpi, fun i, hi, hpi => i, hi, hpi
theorem forall_iff {p : Fin n Prop} : ( i, p i) i h, p i, h :=
fun h i hi => h i, hi, fun h i, hi => h i hi
protected theorem mk.inj_iff {n a b : Nat} {ha : a < n} {hb : b < n} :
(a, ha : Fin n) = b, hb a = b := ext_iff
theorem val_mk {m n : Nat} (h : m < n) : (m, h : Fin n).val = m := rfl
theorem eq_mk_iff_val_eq {a : Fin n} {k : Nat} {hk : k < n} :
a = k, hk (a : Nat) = k := ext_iff
theorem mk_val (i : Fin n) : (i, i.isLt : Fin n) = i := Fin.eta ..
@[simp] theorem val_ofNat' (a : Nat) (is_pos : n > 0) :
(Fin.ofNat' a is_pos).val = a % n := rfl
@[deprecated ofNat'_zero_val] theorem ofNat'_zero_val : (Fin.ofNat' 0 h).val = 0 := Nat.zero_mod _
@[simp] theorem mod_val (a b : Fin n) : (a % b).val = a.val % b.val :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem div_val (a b : Fin n) : (a / b).val = a.val / b.val :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem modn_val (a : Fin n) (b : Nat) : (a.modn b).val = a.val % b :=
rfl
theorem ite_val {n : Nat} {c : Prop} [Decidable c] {x : c Fin n} (y : ¬c Fin n) :
(if h : c then x h else y h).val = if h : c then (x h).val else (y h).val := by
by_cases c <;> simp [*]
theorem dite_val {n : Nat} {c : Prop} [Decidable c] {x y : Fin n} :
(if c then x else y).val = if c then x.val else y.val := by
by_cases c <;> simp [*]
/-! ### order -/
theorem le_def {a b : Fin n} : a b a.1 b.1 := .rfl
theorem lt_def {a b : Fin n} : a < b a.1 < b.1 := .rfl
theorem lt_iff_val_lt_val {a b : Fin n} : a < b a.val < b.val := Iff.rfl
@[simp] protected theorem not_le {a b : Fin n} : ¬ a b b < a := Nat.not_le
@[simp] protected theorem not_lt {a b : Fin n} : ¬ a < b b a := Nat.not_lt
protected theorem ne_of_lt {a b : Fin n} (h : a < b) : a b := Fin.ne_of_val_ne (Nat.ne_of_lt h)
protected theorem ne_of_gt {a b : Fin n} (h : a < b) : b a := Fin.ne_of_val_ne (Nat.ne_of_gt h)
protected theorem le_of_lt {a b : Fin n} (h : a < b) : a b := Nat.le_of_lt h
theorem is_le (i : Fin (n + 1)) : i n := Nat.le_of_lt_succ i.is_lt
@[simp] theorem is_le' {a : Fin n} : a n := Nat.le_of_lt a.is_lt
theorem mk_lt_of_lt_val {b : Fin n} {a : Nat} (h : a < b) :
(a, Nat.lt_trans h b.is_lt : Fin n) < b := h
theorem mk_le_of_le_val {b : Fin n} {a : Nat} (h : a b) :
(a, Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt h b.is_lt : Fin n) b := h
@[simp] theorem mk_le_mk {x y : Nat} {hx hy} : (x, hx : Fin n) y, hy x y := .rfl
@[simp] theorem mk_lt_mk {x y : Nat} {hx hy} : (x, hx : Fin n) < y, hy x < y := .rfl
@[simp] theorem val_zero (n : Nat) : (0 : Fin (n + 1)).1 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem mk_zero : (0, Nat.succ_pos n : Fin (n + 1)) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem zero_le (a : Fin (n + 1)) : 0 a := Nat.zero_le a.val
theorem zero_lt_one : (0 : Fin (n + 2)) < 1 := Nat.zero_lt_one
@[simp] theorem not_lt_zero (a : Fin (n + 1)) : ¬a < 0 := nofun
theorem pos_iff_ne_zero {a : Fin (n + 1)} : 0 < a a 0 := by
rw [lt_def, val_zero, Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero, val_ne_iff]; rfl
theorem eq_zero_or_eq_succ {n : Nat} : i : Fin (n + 1), i = 0 j : Fin n, i = j.succ
| 0 => .inl rfl
| j + 1, h => .inr j, Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h, rfl
theorem eq_succ_of_ne_zero {n : Nat} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i 0) : j : Fin n, i = j.succ :=
(eq_zero_or_eq_succ i).resolve_left hi
@[simp] theorem val_rev (i : Fin n) : rev i = n - (i + 1) := rfl
@[simp] theorem rev_rev (i : Fin n) : rev (rev i) = i := ext <| by
rw [val_rev, val_rev, Nat.sub_sub, Nat.sub_sub_self (by exact i.2), Nat.add_sub_cancel]
@[simp] theorem rev_le_rev {i j : Fin n} : rev i rev j j i := by
simp only [le_def, val_rev, Nat.sub_le_sub_iff_left (Nat.succ_le.2 j.is_lt)]
exact Nat.succ_le_succ_iff
@[simp] theorem rev_inj {i j : Fin n} : rev i = rev j i = j :=
fun h => by simpa using congrArg rev h, congrArg _
theorem rev_eq {n a : Nat} (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : n = a + i) :
rev i = a, Nat.lt_succ_of_le (h Nat.le_add_right ..) := by
ext; dsimp
conv => lhs; congr; rw [h]
rw [Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_sub_cancel]
@[simp] theorem rev_lt_rev {i j : Fin n} : rev i < rev j j < i := by
rw [ Fin.not_le, Fin.not_le, rev_le_rev]
@[simp] theorem val_last (n : Nat) : last n = n := rfl
theorem le_last (i : Fin (n + 1)) : i last n := Nat.le_of_lt_succ i.is_lt
theorem last_pos : (0 : Fin (n + 2)) < last (n + 1) := Nat.succ_pos _
theorem eq_last_of_not_lt {i : Fin (n + 1)} (h : ¬(i : Nat) < n) : i = last n :=
ext <| Nat.le_antisymm (le_last i) (Nat.not_lt.1 h)
theorem val_lt_last {i : Fin (n + 1)} : i last n (i : Nat) < n :=
Decidable.not_imp_comm.1 eq_last_of_not_lt
@[simp] theorem rev_last (n : Nat) : rev (last n) = 0 := ext <| by simp
@[simp] theorem rev_zero (n : Nat) : rev 0 = last n := by
rw [ rev_rev (last _), rev_last]
/-! ### addition, numerals, and coercion from Nat -/
@[simp] theorem val_one (n : Nat) : (1 : Fin (n + 2)).val = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem mk_one : (1, Nat.succ_lt_succ (Nat.succ_pos n) : Fin (n + 2)) = (1 : Fin _) := rfl
theorem subsingleton_iff_le_one : Subsingleton (Fin n) n 1 := by
(match n with | 0 | 1 | n+2 => ?_) <;> try simp
· exact nofun
· exact fun 0, _ 0, _ => rfl
· exact iff_of_false (fun h => Fin.ne_of_lt zero_lt_one (h.elim ..)) (of_decide_eq_false rfl)
instance subsingleton_zero : Subsingleton (Fin 0) := subsingleton_iff_le_one.2 (by decide)
instance subsingleton_one : Subsingleton (Fin 1) := subsingleton_iff_le_one.2 (by decide)
theorem fin_one_eq_zero (a : Fin 1) : a = 0 := Subsingleton.elim a 0
theorem add_def (a b : Fin n) : a + b = Fin.mk ((a + b) % n) (Nat.mod_lt _ a.size_pos) := rfl
theorem val_add (a b : Fin n) : (a + b).val = (a.val + b.val) % n := rfl
theorem val_add_one_of_lt {n : Nat} {i : Fin n.succ} (h : i < last _) : (i + 1).1 = i + 1 := by
match n with
| 0 => cases h
| n+1 => rw [val_add, val_one, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (by exact Nat.succ_lt_succ h)]
@[simp] theorem last_add_one : n, last n + 1 = 0
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by ext; rw [val_add, val_zero, val_last, val_one, Nat.mod_self]
theorem val_add_one {n : Nat} (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
((i + 1 : Fin (n + 1)) : Nat) = if i = last _ then (0 : Nat) else i + 1 := by
match Nat.eq_or_lt_of_le (le_last i) with
| .inl h => cases Fin.eq_of_val_eq h; simp
| .inr h => simpa [Fin.ne_of_lt h] using val_add_one_of_lt h
@[simp] theorem val_two {n : Nat} : (2 : Fin (n + 3)).val = 2 := rfl
theorem add_one_pos (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i < Fin.last n) : (0 : Fin (n + 1)) < i + 1 := by
match n with
| 0 => cases h
| n+1 =>
rw [Fin.lt_def, val_last, Nat.add_lt_add_iff_right] at h
rw [Fin.lt_def, val_add, val_zero, val_one, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h]
exact Nat.zero_lt_succ _
theorem one_pos : (0 : Fin (n + 2)) < 1 := Nat.succ_pos 0
theorem zero_ne_one : (0 : Fin (n + 2)) 1 := Fin.ne_of_lt one_pos
/-! ### succ and casts into larger Fin types -/
@[simp] theorem val_succ (j : Fin n) : (j.succ : Nat) = j + 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem succ_pos (a : Fin n) : (0 : Fin (n + 1)) < a.succ := by
simp [Fin.lt_def, Nat.succ_pos]
@[simp] theorem succ_le_succ_iff {a b : Fin n} : a.succ b.succ a b := Nat.succ_le_succ_iff
@[simp] theorem succ_lt_succ_iff {a b : Fin n} : a.succ < b.succ a < b := Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff
@[simp] theorem succ_inj {a b : Fin n} : a.succ = b.succ a = b := by
refine fun h => ext ?_, congrArg _
apply Nat.le_antisymm <;> exact succ_le_succ_iff.1 (h Nat.le_refl _)
theorem succ_ne_zero {n} : k : Fin n, Fin.succ k 0
| k, _, heq => Nat.succ_ne_zero k <| ext_iff.1 heq
@[simp] theorem succ_zero_eq_one : Fin.succ (0 : Fin (n + 1)) = 1 := rfl
/-- Version of `succ_one_eq_two` to be used by `dsimp` -/
@[simp] theorem succ_one_eq_two : Fin.succ (1 : Fin (n + 2)) = 2 := rfl
@[simp] theorem succ_mk (n i : Nat) (h : i < n) :
Fin.succ i, h = i + 1, Nat.succ_lt_succ h := rfl
theorem mk_succ_pos (i : Nat) (h : i < n) :
(0 : Fin (n + 1)) < i.succ, Nat.add_lt_add_right h 1 := by
rw [lt_def, val_zero]; exact Nat.succ_pos i
theorem one_lt_succ_succ (a : Fin n) : (1 : Fin (n + 2)) < a.succ.succ := by
let n+1 := n
rw [ succ_zero_eq_one, succ_lt_succ_iff]; exact succ_pos a
@[simp] theorem add_one_lt_iff {n : Nat} {k : Fin (n + 2)} : k + 1 < k k = last _ := by
simp only [lt_def, val_add, val_last, ext_iff]
let k, hk := k
match Nat.eq_or_lt_of_le (Nat.le_of_lt_succ hk) with
| .inl h => cases h; simp [Nat.succ_pos]
| .inr hk' => simp [Nat.ne_of_lt hk', Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (Nat.succ_lt_succ hk'), Nat.le_succ]
@[simp] theorem add_one_le_iff {n : Nat} : {k : Fin (n + 1)}, k + 1 k k = last _ := by
match n with
| 0 =>
intro (k : Fin 1)
exact iff_of_true (Subsingleton.elim (α := Fin 1) (k+1) _ Nat.le_refl _) (fin_one_eq_zero ..)
| n + 1 =>
intro (k : Fin (n+2))
rw [ add_one_lt_iff, lt_def, le_def, Nat.lt_iff_le_and_ne, and_iff_left]
rw [val_add_one]
split <;> simp [*, (Nat.succ_ne_zero _).symm, Nat.ne_of_gt (Nat.lt_succ_self _)]
@[simp] theorem last_le_iff {n : Nat} {k : Fin (n + 1)} : last n k k = last n := by
rw [ext_iff, Nat.le_antisymm_iff, le_def, and_iff_right (by apply le_last)]
@[simp] theorem lt_add_one_iff {n : Nat} {k : Fin (n + 1)} : k < k + 1 k < last n := by
rw [ Decidable.not_iff_not]; simp
@[simp] theorem le_zero_iff {n : Nat} {k : Fin (n + 1)} : k 0 k = 0 :=
fun h => Fin.eq_of_val_eq <| Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero h, (· Nat.le_refl _)
theorem succ_succ_ne_one (a : Fin n) : Fin.succ (Fin.succ a) 1 :=
Fin.ne_of_gt (one_lt_succ_succ a)
@[simp] theorem coe_castLT (i : Fin m) (h : i.1 < n) : (castLT i h : Nat) = i := rfl
@[simp] theorem castLT_mk (i n m : Nat) (hn : i < n) (hm : i < m) : castLT i, hn hm = i, hm :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_castLE (h : n m) (i : Fin n) : (castLE h i : Nat) = i := rfl
@[simp] theorem castLE_mk (i n m : Nat) (hn : i < n) (h : n m) :
castLE h i, hn = i, Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le hn h := rfl
@[simp] theorem castLE_zero {n m : Nat} (h : n.succ m.succ) : castLE h 0 = 0 := by simp [ext_iff]
@[simp] theorem castLE_succ {m n : Nat} (h : m + 1 n + 1) (i : Fin m) :
castLE h i.succ = (castLE (Nat.succ_le_succ_iff.mp h) i).succ := by simp [ext_iff]
@[simp] theorem castLE_castLE {k m n} (km : k m) (mn : m n) (i : Fin k) :
Fin.castLE mn (Fin.castLE km i) = Fin.castLE (Nat.le_trans km mn) i :=
Fin.ext (by simp only [coe_castLE])
@[simp] theorem castLE_comp_castLE {k m n} (km : k m) (mn : m n) :
Fin.castLE mn Fin.castLE km = Fin.castLE (Nat.le_trans km mn) :=
funext (castLE_castLE km mn)
@[simp] theorem coe_cast (h : n = m) (i : Fin n) : (cast h i : Nat) = i := rfl
@[simp] theorem cast_last {n' : Nat} {h : n + 1 = n' + 1} : cast h (last n) = last n' :=
ext (by rw [coe_cast, val_last, val_last, Nat.succ.inj h])
@[simp] theorem cast_mk (h : n = m) (i : Nat) (hn : i < n) : cast h i, hn = i, h hn := rfl
@[simp] theorem cast_trans {k : Nat} (h : n = m) (h' : m = k) {i : Fin n} :
cast h' (cast h i) = cast (Eq.trans h h') i := rfl
theorem castLE_of_eq {m n : Nat} (h : m = n) {h' : m n} : castLE h' = Fin.cast h := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_castAdd (m : Nat) (i : Fin n) : (castAdd m i : Nat) = i := rfl
@[simp] theorem castAdd_zero : (castAdd 0 : Fin n Fin (n + 0)) = cast rfl := rfl
theorem castAdd_lt {m : Nat} (n : Nat) (i : Fin m) : (castAdd n i : Nat) < m := by simp
@[simp] theorem castAdd_mk (m : Nat) (i : Nat) (h : i < n) :
castAdd m i, h = i, Nat.lt_add_right m h := rfl
@[simp] theorem castAdd_castLT (m : Nat) (i : Fin (n + m)) (hi : i.val < n) :
castAdd m (castLT i hi) = i := rfl
@[simp] theorem castLT_castAdd (m : Nat) (i : Fin n) :
castLT (castAdd m i) (castAdd_lt m i) = i := rfl
/-- For rewriting in the reverse direction, see `Fin.cast_castAdd_left`. -/
theorem castAdd_cast {n n' : Nat} (m : Nat) (i : Fin n') (h : n' = n) :
castAdd m (Fin.cast h i) = Fin.cast (congrArg (. + m) h) (castAdd m i) := ext rfl
theorem cast_castAdd_left {n n' m : Nat} (i : Fin n') (h : n' + m = n + m) :
cast h (castAdd m i) = castAdd m (cast (Nat.add_right_cancel h) i) := rfl
@[simp] theorem cast_castAdd_right {n m m' : Nat} (i : Fin n) (h : n + m' = n + m) :
cast h (castAdd m' i) = castAdd m i := rfl
theorem castAdd_castAdd {m n p : Nat} (i : Fin m) :
castAdd p (castAdd n i) = cast (Nat.add_assoc ..).symm (castAdd (n + p) i) := rfl
/-- The cast of the successor is the successor of the cast. See `Fin.succ_cast_eq` for rewriting in
the reverse direction. -/
@[simp] theorem cast_succ_eq {n' : Nat} (i : Fin n) (h : n.succ = n'.succ) :
cast h i.succ = (cast (Nat.succ.inj h) i).succ := rfl
theorem succ_cast_eq {n' : Nat} (i : Fin n) (h : n = n') :
(cast h i).succ = cast (by rw [h]) i.succ := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_castSucc (i : Fin n) : (Fin.castSucc i : Nat) = i := rfl
@[simp] theorem castSucc_mk (n i : Nat) (h : i < n) : castSucc i, h = i, Nat.lt.step h := rfl
@[simp] theorem cast_castSucc {n' : Nat} {h : n + 1 = n' + 1} {i : Fin n} :
cast h (castSucc i) = castSucc (cast (Nat.succ.inj h) i) := rfl
theorem castSucc_lt_succ (i : Fin n) : Fin.castSucc i < i.succ :=
lt_def.2 <| by simp only [coe_castSucc, val_succ, Nat.lt_succ_self]
theorem le_castSucc_iff {i : Fin (n + 1)} {j : Fin n} : i Fin.castSucc j i < j.succ := by
simpa [lt_def, le_def] using Nat.succ_le_succ_iff.symm
theorem castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le {n : Nat} {i : Fin n} {j : Fin (n + 1)} :
Fin.castSucc i < j i.succ j := .rfl
@[simp] theorem succ_last (n : Nat) : (last n).succ = last n.succ := rfl
@[simp] theorem succ_eq_last_succ {n : Nat} (i : Fin n.succ) :
i.succ = last (n + 1) i = last n := by rw [ succ_last, succ_inj]
@[simp] theorem castSucc_castLT (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : (i : Nat) < n) :
castSucc (castLT i h) = i := rfl
@[simp] theorem castLT_castSucc {n : Nat} (a : Fin n) (h : (a : Nat) < n) :
castLT (castSucc a) h = a := rfl
@[simp] theorem castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff {a b : Fin n} :
Fin.castSucc a < Fin.castSucc b a < b := .rfl
theorem castSucc_inj {a b : Fin n} : castSucc a = castSucc b a = b := by simp [ext_iff]
theorem castSucc_lt_last (a : Fin n) : castSucc a < last n := a.is_lt
@[simp] theorem castSucc_zero : castSucc (0 : Fin (n + 1)) = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem castSucc_one {n : Nat} : castSucc (1 : Fin (n + 2)) = 1 := rfl
/-- `castSucc i` is positive when `i` is positive -/
theorem castSucc_pos {i : Fin (n + 1)} (h : 0 < i) : 0 < castSucc i := by
simpa [lt_def] using h
@[simp] theorem castSucc_eq_zero_iff (a : Fin (n + 1)) : castSucc a = 0 a = 0 := by simp [ext_iff]
theorem castSucc_ne_zero_iff (a : Fin (n + 1)) : castSucc a 0 a 0 :=
not_congr <| castSucc_eq_zero_iff a
theorem castSucc_fin_succ (n : Nat) (j : Fin n) :
castSucc (Fin.succ j) = Fin.succ (castSucc j) := by simp [Fin.ext_iff]
@[simp]
theorem coeSucc_eq_succ {a : Fin n} : castSucc a + 1 = a.succ := by
cases n
· exact a.elim0
· simp [ext_iff, add_def, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (Nat.succ_lt_succ a.is_lt)]
theorem lt_succ {a : Fin n} : castSucc a < a.succ := by
rw [castSucc, lt_def, coe_castAdd, val_succ]; exact Nat.lt_succ_self a.val
theorem exists_castSucc_eq {n : Nat} {i : Fin (n + 1)} : ( j, castSucc j = i) i last n :=
fun j, hj => hj Fin.ne_of_lt j.castSucc_lt_last,
fun hi => i.castLT <| Fin.val_lt_last hi, rfl
theorem succ_castSucc {n : Nat} (i : Fin n) : i.castSucc.succ = castSucc i.succ := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_addNat (m : Nat) (i : Fin n) : (addNat i m : Nat) = i + m := rfl
@[simp] theorem addNat_one {i : Fin n} : addNat i 1 = i.succ := rfl
theorem le_coe_addNat (m : Nat) (i : Fin n) : m addNat i m :=
Nat.le_add_left _ _
@[simp] theorem addNat_mk (n i : Nat) (hi : i < m) :
addNat i, hi n = i + n, Nat.add_lt_add_right hi n := rfl
@[simp] theorem cast_addNat_zero {n n' : Nat} (i : Fin n) (h : n + 0 = n') :
cast h (addNat i 0) = cast ((Nat.add_zero _).symm.trans h) i := rfl
/-- For rewriting in the reverse direction, see `Fin.cast_addNat_left`. -/
theorem addNat_cast {n n' m : Nat} (i : Fin n') (h : n' = n) :
addNat (cast h i) m = cast (congrArg (. + m) h) (addNat i m) := rfl
theorem cast_addNat_left {n n' m : Nat} (i : Fin n') (h : n' + m = n + m) :
cast h (addNat i m) = addNat (cast (Nat.add_right_cancel h) i) m := rfl
@[simp] theorem cast_addNat_right {n m m' : Nat} (i : Fin n) (h : n + m' = n + m) :
cast h (addNat i m') = addNat i m :=
ext <| (congrArg ((· + ·) (i : Nat)) (Nat.add_left_cancel h) : _)
@[simp] theorem coe_natAdd (n : Nat) {m : Nat} (i : Fin m) : (natAdd n i : Nat) = n + i := rfl
@[simp] theorem natAdd_mk (n i : Nat) (hi : i < m) :
natAdd n i, hi = n + i, Nat.add_lt_add_left hi n := rfl
theorem le_coe_natAdd (m : Nat) (i : Fin n) : m natAdd m i := Nat.le_add_right ..
theorem natAdd_zero {n : Nat} : natAdd 0 = cast (Nat.zero_add n).symm := by ext; simp
/-- For rewriting in the reverse direction, see `Fin.cast_natAdd_right`. -/
theorem natAdd_cast {n n' : Nat} (m : Nat) (i : Fin n') (h : n' = n) :
natAdd m (cast h i) = cast (congrArg _ h) (natAdd m i) := rfl
theorem cast_natAdd_right {n n' m : Nat} (i : Fin n') (h : m + n' = m + n) :
cast h (natAdd m i) = natAdd m (cast (Nat.add_left_cancel h) i) := rfl
@[simp] theorem cast_natAdd_left {n m m' : Nat} (i : Fin n) (h : m' + n = m + n) :
cast h (natAdd m' i) = natAdd m i :=
ext <| (congrArg (· + (i : Nat)) (Nat.add_right_cancel h) : _)
theorem castAdd_natAdd (p m : Nat) {n : Nat} (i : Fin n) :
castAdd p (natAdd m i) = cast (Nat.add_assoc ..).symm (natAdd m (castAdd p i)) := rfl
theorem natAdd_castAdd (p m : Nat) {n : Nat} (i : Fin n) :
natAdd m (castAdd p i) = cast (Nat.add_assoc ..) (castAdd p (natAdd m i)) := rfl
theorem natAdd_natAdd (m n : Nat) {p : Nat} (i : Fin p) :
natAdd m (natAdd n i) = cast (Nat.add_assoc ..) (natAdd (m + n) i) :=
ext <| (Nat.add_assoc ..).symm
@[simp]
theorem cast_natAdd_zero {n n' : Nat} (i : Fin n) (h : 0 + n = n') :
cast h (natAdd 0 i) = cast ((Nat.zero_add _).symm.trans h) i :=
ext <| Nat.zero_add _
@[simp]
theorem cast_natAdd (n : Nat) {m : Nat} (i : Fin m) :
cast (Nat.add_comm ..) (natAdd n i) = addNat i n := ext <| Nat.add_comm ..
@[simp]
theorem cast_addNat {n : Nat} (m : Nat) (i : Fin n) :
cast (Nat.add_comm ..) (addNat i m) = natAdd m i := ext <| Nat.add_comm ..
@[simp] theorem natAdd_last {m n : Nat} : natAdd n (last m) = last (n + m) := rfl
theorem natAdd_castSucc {m n : Nat} {i : Fin m} : natAdd n (castSucc i) = castSucc (natAdd n i) :=
rfl
theorem rev_castAdd (k : Fin n) (m : Nat) : rev (castAdd m k) = addNat (rev k) m := ext <| by
rw [val_rev, coe_castAdd, coe_addNat, val_rev, Nat.sub_add_comm (Nat.succ_le_of_lt k.is_lt)]
theorem rev_addNat (k : Fin n) (m : Nat) : rev (addNat k m) = castAdd m (rev k) := by
rw [ rev_rev (castAdd ..), rev_castAdd, rev_rev]
theorem rev_castSucc (k : Fin n) : rev (castSucc k) = succ (rev k) := k.rev_castAdd 1
theorem rev_succ (k : Fin n) : rev (succ k) = castSucc (rev k) := k.rev_addNat 1
/-! ### pred -/
@[simp] theorem coe_pred (j : Fin (n + 1)) (h : j 0) : (j.pred h : Nat) = j - 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem succ_pred : (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i 0), (i.pred h).succ = i
| 0, h, hi => by simp only [mk_zero, ne_eq, not_true] at hi
| n + 1, h, hi => rfl
@[simp]
theorem pred_succ (i : Fin n) {h : i.succ 0} : i.succ.pred h = i := by
cases i
rfl
theorem pred_eq_iff_eq_succ {n : Nat} (i : Fin (n + 1)) (hi : i 0) (j : Fin n) :
i.pred hi = j i = j.succ :=
fun h => by simp only [ h, Fin.succ_pred], fun h => by simp only [h, Fin.pred_succ]
theorem pred_mk_succ (i : Nat) (h : i < n + 1) :
Fin.pred i + 1, Nat.add_lt_add_right h 1 (ne_of_val_ne (Nat.ne_of_gt (mk_succ_pos i h))) =
i, h := by
simp only [ext_iff, coe_pred, Nat.add_sub_cancel]
@[simp] theorem pred_mk_succ' (i : Nat) (h₁ : i + 1 < n + 1 + 1) (h₂) :
Fin.pred i + 1, h₁ h₂ = i, Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h₁ := pred_mk_succ i _
-- This is not a simp theorem by default, because `pred_mk_succ` is nicer when it applies.
theorem pred_mk {n : Nat} (i : Nat) (h : i < n + 1) (w) : Fin.pred i, h w =
i - 1, Nat.sub_lt_right_of_lt_add (Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 (Fin.val_ne_of_ne w)) h :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem pred_le_pred_iff {n : Nat} {a b : Fin n.succ} {ha : a 0} {hb : b 0} :
a.pred ha b.pred hb a b := by rw [ succ_le_succ_iff, succ_pred, succ_pred]
@[simp] theorem pred_lt_pred_iff {n : Nat} {a b : Fin n.succ} {ha : a 0} {hb : b 0} :
a.pred ha < b.pred hb a < b := by rw [ succ_lt_succ_iff, succ_pred, succ_pred]
@[simp] theorem pred_inj :
{a b : Fin (n + 1)} {ha : a 0} {hb : b 0}, a.pred ha = b.pred hb a = b
| 0, _, _, ha, _ => by simp only [mk_zero, ne_eq, not_true] at ha
| i + 1, _, 0, _, _, hb => by simp only [mk_zero, ne_eq, not_true] at hb
| i + 1, hi, j + 1, hj, ha, hb => by simp [ext_iff, Nat.succ.injEq]
@[simp] theorem pred_one {n : Nat} :
Fin.pred (1 : Fin (n + 2)) (Ne.symm (Fin.ne_of_lt one_pos)) = 0 := rfl
theorem pred_add_one (i : Fin (n + 2)) (h : (i : Nat) < n + 1) :
pred (i + 1) (Fin.ne_of_gt (add_one_pos _ (lt_def.2 h))) = castLT i h := by
rw [ext_iff, coe_pred, coe_castLT, val_add, val_one, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt, Nat.add_sub_cancel]
exact Nat.add_lt_add_right h 1
@[simp] theorem coe_subNat (i : Fin (n + m)) (h : m i) : (i.subNat m h : Nat) = i - m := rfl
@[simp] theorem subNat_mk {i : Nat} (h₁ : i < n + m) (h₂ : m i) :
subNat m i, h₁ h₂ = i - m, Nat.sub_lt_right_of_lt_add h₂ h₁ := rfl
@[simp] theorem pred_castSucc_succ (i : Fin n) :
pred (castSucc i.succ) (Fin.ne_of_gt (castSucc_pos i.succ_pos)) = castSucc i := rfl
@[simp] theorem addNat_subNat {i : Fin (n + m)} (h : m i) : addNat (subNat m i h) m = i :=
ext <| Nat.sub_add_cancel h
@[simp] theorem subNat_addNat (i : Fin n) (m : Nat) (h : m addNat i m := le_coe_addNat m i) :
subNat m (addNat i m) h = i := ext <| Nat.add_sub_cancel i m
@[simp] theorem natAdd_subNat_cast {i : Fin (n + m)} (h : n i) :
natAdd n (subNat n (cast (Nat.add_comm ..) i) h) = i := by simp [ cast_addNat]; rfl
/-! ### recursion and induction principles -/
/-- Define `motive n i` by induction on `i : Fin n` interpreted as `(0 : Fin (n - i)).succ.succ…`.
This function has two arguments: `zero n` defines `0`-th element `motive (n+1) 0` of an
`(n+1)`-tuple, and `succ n i` defines `(i+1)`-st element of `(n+1)`-tuple based on `n`, `i`, and
`i`-th element of `n`-tuple. -/
-- FIXME: Performance review
@[elab_as_elim] def succRec {motive : n, Fin n Sort _}
(zero : n, motive n.succ (0 : Fin (n + 1)))
(succ : n i, motive n i motive n.succ i.succ) : {n : Nat} (i : Fin n), motive n i
| 0, i => i.elim0
| Nat.succ n, 0, _ => by rw [mk_zero]; exact zero n
| Nat.succ _, Nat.succ i, h => succ _ _ (succRec zero succ i, Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h)
/-- Define `motive n i` by induction on `i : Fin n` interpreted as `(0 : Fin (n - i)).succ.succ…`.
This function has two arguments:
`zero n` defines the `0`-th element `motive (n+1) 0` of an `(n+1)`-tuple, and
`succ n i` defines the `(i+1)`-st element of an `(n+1)`-tuple based on `n`, `i`,
and the `i`-th element of an `n`-tuple.
A version of `Fin.succRec` taking `i : Fin n` as the first argument. -/
-- FIXME: Performance review
@[elab_as_elim] def succRecOn {n : Nat} (i : Fin n) {motive : n, Fin n Sort _}
(zero : n, motive (n + 1) 0) (succ : n i, motive n i motive (Nat.succ n) i.succ) :
motive n i := i.succRec zero succ
@[simp] theorem succRecOn_zero {motive : n, Fin n Sort _} {zero succ} (n) :
@Fin.succRecOn (n + 1) 0 motive zero succ = zero n := by
cases n <;> rfl
@[simp] theorem succRecOn_succ {motive : n, Fin n Sort _} {zero succ} {n} (i : Fin n) :
@Fin.succRecOn (n + 1) i.succ motive zero succ = succ n i (Fin.succRecOn i zero succ) := by
cases i; rfl
/-- Define `motive i` by induction on `i : Fin (n + 1)` via induction on the underlying `Nat` value.
This function has two arguments: `zero` handles the base case on `motive 0`,
and `succ` defines the inductive step using `motive i.castSucc`.
-/
-- FIXME: Performance review
@[elab_as_elim] def induction {motive : Fin (n + 1) Sort _} (zero : motive 0)
(succ : i : Fin n, motive (castSucc i) motive i.succ) :
i : Fin (n + 1), motive i
| 0, hi => by rwa [Fin.mk_zero]
| i+1, hi => succ i, Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ hi (induction zero succ i, Nat.lt_of_succ_lt hi)
@[simp] theorem induction_zero {motive : Fin (n + 1) Sort _} (zero : motive 0)
(hs : i : Fin n, motive (castSucc i) motive i.succ) :
(induction zero hs : i : Fin (n + 1), motive i) 0 = zero := rfl
@[simp] theorem induction_succ {motive : Fin (n + 1) Sort _} (zero : motive 0)
(succ : i : Fin n, motive (castSucc i) motive i.succ) (i : Fin n) :
induction (motive := motive) zero succ i.succ = succ i (induction zero succ (castSucc i)) := rfl
/-- Define `motive i` by induction on `i : Fin (n + 1)` via induction on the underlying `Nat` value.
This function has two arguments: `zero` handles the base case on `motive 0`,
and `succ` defines the inductive step using `motive i.castSucc`.
A version of `Fin.induction` taking `i : Fin (n + 1)` as the first argument.
-/
-- FIXME: Performance review
@[elab_as_elim] def inductionOn (i : Fin (n + 1)) {motive : Fin (n + 1) Sort _} (zero : motive 0)
(succ : i : Fin n, motive (castSucc i) motive i.succ) : motive i := induction zero succ i
/-- Define `f : Π i : Fin n.succ, motive i` by separately handling the cases `i = 0` and
`i = j.succ`, `j : Fin n`. -/
@[elab_as_elim] def cases {motive : Fin (n + 1) Sort _}
(zero : motive 0) (succ : i : Fin n, motive i.succ) :
i : Fin (n + 1), motive i := induction zero fun i _ => succ i
@[simp] theorem cases_zero {n} {motive : Fin (n + 1) Sort _} {zero succ} :
@Fin.cases n motive zero succ 0 = zero := rfl
@[simp] theorem cases_succ {n} {motive : Fin (n + 1) Sort _} {zero succ} (i : Fin n) :
@Fin.cases n motive zero succ i.succ = succ i := rfl
@[simp] theorem cases_succ' {n} {motive : Fin (n + 1) Sort _} {zero succ}
{i : Nat} (h : i + 1 < n + 1) :
@Fin.cases n motive zero succ i.succ, h = succ i, Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h := rfl
theorem forall_fin_succ {P : Fin (n + 1) Prop} : ( i, P i) P 0 i : Fin n, P i.succ :=
fun H => H 0, fun _ => H _, fun H0, H1 i => Fin.cases H0 H1 i
theorem exists_fin_succ {P : Fin (n + 1) Prop} : ( i, P i) P 0 i : Fin n, P i.succ :=
fun i, h => Fin.cases Or.inl (fun i hi => Or.inr i, hi) i h, fun h =>
(h.elim fun h => 0, h) fun i, hi => i.succ, hi
theorem forall_fin_one {p : Fin 1 Prop} : ( i, p i) p 0 :=
fun h => h _, fun h i => Subsingleton.elim i 0 h
theorem exists_fin_one {p : Fin 1 Prop} : ( i, p i) p 0 :=
fun i, h => Subsingleton.elim i 0 h, fun h => _, h
theorem forall_fin_two {p : Fin 2 Prop} : ( i, p i) p 0 p 1 :=
forall_fin_succ.trans <| and_congr_right fun _ => forall_fin_one
theorem exists_fin_two {p : Fin 2 Prop} : ( i, p i) p 0 p 1 :=
exists_fin_succ.trans <| or_congr_right exists_fin_one
theorem fin_two_eq_of_eq_zero_iff : {a b : Fin 2}, (a = 0 b = 0) a = b := by
simp only [forall_fin_two]; decide
/--
Define `motive i` by reverse induction on `i : Fin (n + 1)` via induction on the underlying `Nat`
value. This function has two arguments: `last` handles the base case on `motive (Fin.last n)`,
and `cast` defines the inductive step using `motive i.succ`, inducting downwards.
-/
@[elab_as_elim] def reverseInduction {motive : Fin (n + 1) Sort _} (last : motive (Fin.last n))
(cast : i : Fin n, motive i.succ motive (castSucc i)) (i : Fin (n + 1)) : motive i :=
if hi : i = Fin.last n then _root_.cast (congrArg motive hi.symm) last
else
let j : Fin n := i, Nat.lt_of_le_of_ne (Nat.le_of_lt_succ i.2) fun h => hi (Fin.ext h)
cast _ (reverseInduction last cast j.succ)
termination_by n + 1 - i
decreasing_by decreasing_with
-- FIXME: we put the proof down here to avoid getting a dummy `have` in the definition
try simp only [Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub]
exact Nat.add_sub_add_right .. Nat.sub_lt_sub_left i.2 (Nat.lt_succ_self i)
@[simp] theorem reverseInduction_last {n : Nat} {motive : Fin (n + 1) Sort _} {zero succ} :
(reverseInduction zero succ (Fin.last n) : motive (Fin.last n)) = zero := by
rw [reverseInduction]; simp
@[simp] theorem reverseInduction_castSucc {n : Nat} {motive : Fin (n + 1) Sort _} {zero succ}
(i : Fin n) : reverseInduction (motive := motive) zero succ (castSucc i) =
succ i (reverseInduction zero succ i.succ) := by
rw [reverseInduction, dif_neg (Fin.ne_of_lt (Fin.castSucc_lt_last i))]; rfl
/-- Define `f : Π i : Fin n.succ, motive i` by separately handling the cases `i = Fin.last n` and
`i = j.castSucc`, `j : Fin n`. -/
@[elab_as_elim] def lastCases {n : Nat} {motive : Fin (n + 1) Sort _} (last : motive (Fin.last n))
(cast : i : Fin n, motive (castSucc i)) (i : Fin (n + 1)) : motive i :=
reverseInduction last (fun i _ => cast i) i
@[simp] theorem lastCases_last {n : Nat} {motive : Fin (n + 1) Sort _} {last cast} :
(Fin.lastCases last cast (Fin.last n) : motive (Fin.last n)) = last :=
reverseInduction_last ..
@[simp] theorem lastCases_castSucc {n : Nat} {motive : Fin (n + 1) Sort _} {last cast}
(i : Fin n) : (Fin.lastCases last cast (Fin.castSucc i) : motive (Fin.castSucc i)) = cast i :=
reverseInduction_castSucc ..
/-- Define `f : Π i : Fin (m + n), motive i` by separately handling the cases `i = castAdd n i`,
`j : Fin m` and `i = natAdd m j`, `j : Fin n`. -/
@[elab_as_elim] def addCases {m n : Nat} {motive : Fin (m + n) Sort u}
(left : i, motive (castAdd n i)) (right : i, motive (natAdd m i))
(i : Fin (m + n)) : motive i :=
if hi : (i : Nat) < m then (castAdd_castLT n i hi) (left (castLT i hi))
else (natAdd_subNat_cast (Nat.le_of_not_lt hi)) (right _)
@[simp] theorem addCases_left {m n : Nat} {motive : Fin (m + n) Sort _} {left right} (i : Fin m) :
addCases (motive := motive) left right (Fin.castAdd n i) = left i := by
rw [addCases, dif_pos (castAdd_lt _ _)]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem addCases_right {m n : Nat} {motive : Fin (m + n) Sort _} {left right} (i : Fin n) :
addCases (motive := motive) left right (natAdd m i) = right i := by
have : ¬(natAdd m i : Nat) < m := Nat.not_lt.2 (le_coe_natAdd ..)
rw [addCases, dif_neg this]; exact eq_of_heq <| (eqRec_heq _ _).trans (by congr 1; simp)
/-! ### add -/
@[simp] theorem ofNat'_add (x : Nat) (lt : 0 < n) (y : Fin n) :
Fin.ofNat' x lt + y = Fin.ofNat' (x + y.val) lt := by
apply Fin.eq_of_val_eq
simp [Fin.ofNat', Fin.add_def]
@[simp] theorem add_ofNat' (x : Fin n) (y : Nat) (lt : 0 < n) :
x + Fin.ofNat' y lt = Fin.ofNat' (x.val + y) lt := by
apply Fin.eq_of_val_eq
simp [Fin.ofNat', Fin.add_def]
/-! ### sub -/
protected theorem coe_sub (a b : Fin n) : ((a - b : Fin n) : Nat) = (a + (n - b)) % n := by
cases a; cases b; rfl
@[simp] theorem ofNat'_sub (x : Nat) (lt : 0 < n) (y : Fin n) :
Fin.ofNat' x lt - y = Fin.ofNat' (x + (n - y.val)) lt := by
apply Fin.eq_of_val_eq
simp [Fin.ofNat', Fin.sub_def]
@[simp] theorem sub_ofNat' (x : Fin n) (y : Nat) (lt : 0 < n) :
x - Fin.ofNat' y lt = Fin.ofNat' (x.val + (n - y % n)) lt := by
apply Fin.eq_of_val_eq
simp [Fin.ofNat', Fin.sub_def]
private theorem _root_.Nat.mod_eq_sub_of_lt_two_mul {x n} (h₁ : n x) (h₂ : x < 2 * n) :
x % n = x - n := by
rw [Nat.mod_eq, if_pos (by omega), Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (by omega)]
theorem coe_sub_iff_le {a b : Fin n} : ((a - b) : Nat) = a - b b a := by
rw [sub_def, le_def]
dsimp only
if h : n a + (n - b) then
rw [Nat.mod_eq_sub_of_lt_two_mul h]
all_goals omega
else
rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
all_goals omega
theorem coe_sub_iff_lt {a b : Fin n} : ((a - b) : Nat) = n + a - b a < b := by
rw [sub_def, lt_def]
dsimp only
if h : n a + (n - b) then
rw [Nat.mod_eq_sub_of_lt_two_mul h]
all_goals omega
else
rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
all_goals omega
/-! ### mul -/
theorem val_mul {n : Nat} : a b : Fin n, (a * b).val = a.val * b.val % n
| _, _, _, _ => rfl
theorem coe_mul {n : Nat} : a b : Fin n, ((a * b : Fin n) : Nat) = a * b % n
| _, _, _, _ => rfl
protected theorem mul_one (k : Fin (n + 1)) : k * 1 = k := by
match n with
| 0 => exact Subsingleton.elim (α := Fin 1) ..
| n+1 => simp [ext_iff, mul_def, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (is_lt k)]
protected theorem mul_comm (a b : Fin n) : a * b = b * a :=
ext <| by rw [mul_def, mul_def, Nat.mul_comm]
protected theorem mul_assoc (a b c : Fin n) : a * b * c = a * (b * c) := by
apply eq_of_val_eq
simp only [val_mul]
rw [ Nat.mod_eq_of_lt a.isLt, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt b.isLt, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt c.isLt]
simp only [ Nat.mul_mod, Nat.mul_assoc]
protected theorem one_mul (k : Fin (n + 1)) : (1 : Fin (n + 1)) * k = k := by
rw [Fin.mul_comm, Fin.mul_one]
protected theorem mul_zero (k : Fin (n + 1)) : k * 0 = 0 := by simp [ext_iff, mul_def]
protected theorem zero_mul (k : Fin (n + 1)) : (0 : Fin (n + 1)) * k = 0 := by
simp [ext_iff, mul_def]
end Fin
namespace USize
@[simp] theorem lt_def {a b : USize} : a < b a.toNat < b.toNat := .rfl
@[simp] theorem le_def {a b : USize} : a b a.toNat b.toNat := .rfl
@[simp] theorem zero_toNat : (0 : USize).toNat = 0 := Nat.zero_mod _
@[simp] theorem mod_toNat (a b : USize) : (a % b).toNat = a.toNat % b.toNat :=
Fin.mod_val ..
@[simp] theorem div_toNat (a b : USize) : (a / b).toNat = a.toNat / b.toNat :=
Fin.div_val ..
@[simp] theorem modn_toNat (a : USize) (b : Nat) : (a.modn b).toNat = a.toNat % b :=
Fin.modn_val ..
theorem mod_lt (a b : USize) (h : 0 < b) : a % b < b := USize.modn_lt _ (by simp at h; exact h)
theorem toNat.inj : {a b : USize}, a.toNat = b.toNat a = b
| _, _, _, _, rfl => rfl
end USize

View File

@@ -58,13 +58,9 @@ def get? (ds : FloatArray) (i : Nat) : Option Float :=
instance : GetElem FloatArray Nat Float fun xs i => i < xs.size where
getElem xs i h := xs.get i, h
instance : LawfulGetElem FloatArray Nat Float fun xs i => i < xs.size where
instance : GetElem FloatArray USize Float fun xs i => i.val < xs.size where
getElem xs i h := xs.uget i h
instance : LawfulGetElem FloatArray USize Float fun xs i => i.val < xs.size where
@[extern "lean_float_array_uset"]
def uset : (a : FloatArray) (i : USize) Float i.toNat < a.size FloatArray
| ds, i, v, h => ds.uset i v h

View File

@@ -11,4 +11,3 @@ import Init.Data.Int.DivModLemmas
import Init.Data.Int.Gcd
import Init.Data.Int.Lemmas
import Init.Data.Int.Order
import Init.Data.Int.Pow

View File

@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ protected def neg (n : @& Int) : Int :=
```
-/
@[default_instance mid]
instance instNegInt : Neg Int where
instance : Neg Int where
neg := Int.neg
/-- Subtraction of two natural numbers. -/
@@ -173,13 +173,13 @@ inductive NonNeg : Int → Prop where
/-- Definition of `a ≤ b`, encoded as `b - a ≥ 0`. -/
protected def le (a b : Int) : Prop := NonNeg (b - a)
instance instLEInt : LE Int where
instance : LE Int where
le := Int.le
/-- Definition of `a < b`, encoded as `a + 1 ≤ b`. -/
protected def lt (a b : Int) : Prop := (a + 1) b
instance instLTInt : LT Int where
instance : LT Int where
lt := Int.lt
set_option bootstrap.genMatcherCode false in

View File

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Int.Basic
import Init.Data.Nat.Bitwise.Basic
import Init.Data.Nat.Bitwise
namespace Int

View File

@@ -131,8 +131,7 @@ Integer division. This version of `Int.div` uses the E-rounding convention
(euclidean division), in which `Int.emod x y` satisfies `0 ≤ mod x y < natAbs y` for `y ≠ 0`
and `Int.ediv` is the unique function satisfying `emod x y + (ediv x y) * y = x`.
-/
@[extern "lean_int_ediv"]
def ediv : (@& Int) (@& Int) Int
def ediv : Int Int Int
| ofNat m, ofNat n => ofNat (m / n)
| ofNat m, -[n+1] => -ofNat (m / succ n)
| -[_+1], 0 => 0
@@ -144,8 +143,7 @@ Integer modulus. This version of `Int.mod` uses the E-rounding convention
(euclidean division), in which `Int.emod x y` satisfies `0 ≤ emod x y < natAbs y` for `y ≠ 0`
and `Int.ediv` is the unique function satisfying `emod x y + (ediv x y) * y = x`.
-/
@[extern "lean_int_emod"]
def emod : (@& Int) (@& Int) Int
def emod : Int Int Int
| ofNat m, n => ofNat (m % natAbs n)
| -[m+1], n => subNatNat (natAbs n) (succ (m % natAbs n))
@@ -158,52 +156,4 @@ instance : Div Int where
instance : Mod Int where
mod := Int.emod
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem ofNat_ediv (m n : Nat) : ((m / n) : Int) = m / n := rfl
theorem ofNat_div (m n : Nat) : (m / n) = div m n := rfl
theorem ofNat_fdiv : m n : Nat, (m / n) = fdiv m n
| 0, _ => by simp [fdiv]
| succ _, _ => rfl
/-!
# `bmod` ("balanced" mod)
Balanced mod (and balanced div) are a division and modulus pair such
that `b * (Int.bdiv a b) + Int.bmod a b = a` and `b/2 ≤ Int.bmod a b <
b/2` for all `a : Int` and `b > 0`.
This is used in Omega as well as signed bitvectors.
-/
/--
Balanced modulus. This version of Integer modulus uses the
balanced rounding convention, which guarantees that
`m/2 ≤ bmod x m < m/2` for `m ≠ 0` and `bmod x m` is congruent
to `x` modulo `m`.
If `m = 0`, then `bmod x m = x`.
-/
def bmod (x : Int) (m : Nat) : Int :=
let r := x % m
if r < (m + 1) / 2 then
r
else
r - m
/--
Balanced division. This returns the unique integer so that
`b * (Int.bdiv a b) + Int.bmod a b = a`.
-/
def bdiv (x : Int) (m : Nat) : Int :=
if m = 0 then
0
else
let q := x / m
let r := x % m
if r < (m + 1) / 2 then
q
else
q + 1
end Int

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff

View File

@@ -6,12 +6,7 @@ Authors: Mario Carneiro
prelude
import Init.Data.Int.Basic
import Init.Data.Nat.Gcd
import Init.Data.Nat.Lcm
import Init.Data.Int.DivModLemmas
/-!
Definition and lemmas for gcd and lcm over Int
-/
namespace Int
/-! ## gcd -/
@@ -19,37 +14,4 @@ namespace Int
/-- Computes the greatest common divisor of two integers, as a `Nat`. -/
def gcd (m n : Int) : Nat := m.natAbs.gcd n.natAbs
theorem gcd_dvd_left {a b : Int} : (gcd a b : Int) a := by
have := Nat.gcd_dvd_left a.natAbs b.natAbs
rw [ Int.ofNat_dvd] at this
exact Int.dvd_trans this natAbs_dvd_self
theorem gcd_dvd_right {a b : Int} : (gcd a b : Int) b := by
have := Nat.gcd_dvd_right a.natAbs b.natAbs
rw [ Int.ofNat_dvd] at this
exact Int.dvd_trans this natAbs_dvd_self
@[simp] theorem one_gcd {a : Int} : gcd 1 a = 1 := by simp [gcd]
@[simp] theorem gcd_one {a : Int} : gcd a 1 = 1 := by simp [gcd]
@[simp] theorem neg_gcd {a b : Int} : gcd (-a) b = gcd a b := by simp [gcd]
@[simp] theorem gcd_neg {a b : Int} : gcd a (-b) = gcd a b := by simp [gcd]
/-! ## lcm -/
/-- Computes the least common multiple of two integers, as a `Nat`. -/
def lcm (m n : Int) : Nat := m.natAbs.lcm n.natAbs
theorem lcm_ne_zero (hm : m 0) (hn : n 0) : lcm m n 0 := by
simp only [lcm]
apply Nat.lcm_ne_zero <;> simpa
theorem dvd_lcm_left {a b : Int} : a lcm a b :=
Int.dvd_trans dvd_natAbs_self (Int.ofNat_dvd.mpr (Nat.dvd_lcm_left a.natAbs b.natAbs))
theorem dvd_lcm_right {a b : Int} : b lcm a b :=
Int.dvd_trans dvd_natAbs_self (Int.ofNat_dvd.mpr (Nat.dvd_lcm_right a.natAbs b.natAbs))
@[simp] theorem lcm_self {a : Int} : lcm a a = a.natAbs := Nat.lcm_self _
end Int

View File

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Deniz Aydin, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
prelude
import Init.Data.Int.Basic
import Init.Conv
import Init.NotationExtra
import Init.PropLemmas
namespace Int
@@ -22,8 +22,8 @@ theorem subNatNat_of_sub_eq_succ {m n k : Nat} (h : n - m = succ k) : subNatNat
@[simp] protected theorem neg_zero : -(0:Int) = 0 := rfl
@[norm_cast] theorem ofNat_add (n m : Nat) : ((n + m) : Int) = n + m := rfl
@[norm_cast] theorem ofNat_mul (n m : Nat) : ((n * m) : Int) = n * m := rfl
theorem ofNat_add (n m : Nat) : ((n + m) : Int) = n + m := rfl
theorem ofNat_mul (n m : Nat) : ((n * m) : Int) = n * m := rfl
theorem ofNat_succ (n : Nat) : (succ n : Int) = n + 1 := rfl
@[local simp] theorem neg_ofNat_zero : -((0 : Nat) : Int) = 0 := rfl
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ theorem negOfNat_eq : negOfNat n = -ofNat n := rfl
/- ## some basic functions and properties -/
@[norm_cast] theorem ofNat_inj : ((m : Nat) : Int) = (n : Nat) m = n := ofNat.inj, congrArg _
theorem ofNat_inj : ((m : Nat) : Int) = (n : Nat) m = n := ofNat.inj, congrArg _
theorem ofNat_eq_zero : ((n : Nat) : Int) = 0 n = 0 := ofNat_inj
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ theorem negSucc_eq (n : Nat) : -[n+1] = -((n : Int) + 1) := rfl
@[simp] theorem zero_ne_negSucc (n : Nat) : 0 -[n+1] := nofun
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem Nat.cast_ofNat_Int :
@[simp] theorem Nat.cast_ofNat_Int :
(Nat.cast (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) : Int) = OfNat.ofNat n := rfl
/- ## neg -/
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ theorem subNatNat_sub (h : n ≤ m) (k : Nat) : subNatNat (m - n) k = subNatNat
theorem subNatNat_add (m n k : Nat) : subNatNat (m + n) k = m + subNatNat n k := by
cases n.lt_or_ge k with
| inl h' =>
simp [subNatNat_of_lt h', sub_one_add_one_eq_of_pos (Nat.sub_pos_of_lt h')]
simp [subNatNat_of_lt h', succ_pred_eq_of_pos (Nat.sub_pos_of_lt h')]
conv => lhs; rw [ Nat.sub_add_cancel (Nat.le_of_lt h')]
apply subNatNat_add_add
| inr h' => simp [subNatNat_of_le h',
@@ -169,11 +169,12 @@ theorem subNatNat_add_negSucc (m n k : Nat) :
rw [subNatNat_sub h', Nat.add_comm]
| inl h' =>
have h₂ : m < n + succ k := Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h' (le_add_right _ _)
have h₃ : m n + k := le_of_succ_le_succ h₂
rw [subNatNat_of_lt h', subNatNat_of_lt h₂]
simp only [pred_eq_sub_one, negSucc_add_negSucc, succ_eq_add_one, negSucc.injEq]
rw [Nat.add_right_comm, sub_one_add_one_eq_of_pos (Nat.sub_pos_of_lt h'), Nat.sub_sub,
Nat.add_assoc, succ_sub_succ_eq_sub, Nat.add_comm n,Nat.add_sub_assoc (Nat.le_of_lt h'),
Nat.add_comm]
simp [Nat.add_comm]
rw [ add_succ, succ_pred_eq_of_pos (Nat.sub_pos_of_lt h'), add_succ, succ_sub h₃,
Nat.pred_succ]
rw [Nat.add_comm n, Nat.add_sub_assoc (Nat.le_of_lt h')]
protected theorem add_assoc : a b c : Int, a + b + c = a + (b + c)
| (m:Nat), (n:Nat), c => aux1 ..
@@ -187,15 +188,15 @@ protected theorem add_assoc : ∀ a b c : Int, a + b + c = a + (b + c)
| (m:Nat), -[n+1], -[k+1] => by
rw [Int.add_comm, Int.add_comm m, Int.add_comm m, aux2, Int.add_comm -[k+1]]
| -[m+1], -[n+1], -[k+1] => by
simp [Nat.add_comm, Nat.add_left_comm, Nat.add_assoc]
simp [add_succ, Nat.add_comm, Nat.add_left_comm, neg_ofNat_succ]
where
aux1 (m n : Nat) : c : Int, m + n + c = m + (n + c)
| (k:Nat) => by simp [Nat.add_assoc]
| -[k+1] => by simp [subNatNat_add]
aux2 (m n k : Nat) : -[m+1] + -[n+1] + k = -[m+1] + (-[n+1] + k) := by
simp
simp [add_succ]
rw [Int.add_comm, subNatNat_add_negSucc]
simp [Nat.add_comm, Nat.add_left_comm, Nat.add_assoc]
simp [add_succ, succ_add, Nat.add_comm]
protected theorem add_left_comm (a b c : Int) : a + (b + c) = b + (a + c) := by
rw [ Int.add_assoc, Int.add_comm a, Int.add_assoc]
@@ -294,7 +295,7 @@ protected theorem sub_neg (a b : Int) : a - -b = a + b := by simp [Int.sub_eq_ad
protected theorem add_sub_assoc (a b c : Int) : a + b - c = a + (b - c) := by
rw [Int.sub_eq_add_neg, Int.add_assoc, Int.sub_eq_add_neg]
@[norm_cast] theorem ofNat_sub (h : m n) : ((n - m : Nat) : Int) = n - m := by
theorem ofNat_sub (h : m n) : ((n - m : Nat) : Int) = n - m := by
match m with
| 0 => rfl
| succ m =>
@@ -320,27 +321,6 @@ theorem toNat_sub (m n : Nat) : toNat (m - n) = m - n := by
· exact (Nat.add_sub_cancel_left ..).symm
· dsimp; rw [Nat.add_assoc, Nat.sub_eq_zero_of_le (Nat.le_add_right ..)]; rfl
/- ## add/sub injectivity -/
@[simp]
protected theorem add_right_inj (i j k : Int) : (i + k = j + k) i = j := by
apply Iff.intro
· intro p
rw [Int.add_sub_cancel i k, Int.add_sub_cancel j k, p]
· exact congrArg (· + k)
@[simp]
protected theorem add_left_inj (i j k : Int) : (k + i = k + j) i = j := by
simp [Int.add_comm k]
@[simp]
protected theorem sub_left_inj (i j k : Int) : (k - i = k - j) i = j := by
simp [Int.sub_eq_add_neg, Int.neg_inj]
@[simp]
protected theorem sub_right_inj (i j k : Int) : (i - k = j - k) i = j := by
simp [Int.sub_eq_add_neg]
/- ## Ring properties -/
@[simp] theorem ofNat_mul_negSucc (m n : Nat) : (m : Int) * -[n+1] = -(m * succ n) := rfl
@@ -390,7 +370,7 @@ theorem ofNat_mul_subNatNat (m n k : Nat) :
| inl h =>
have h' : succ m * n < succ m * k := Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h (Nat.succ_pos m)
simp [subNatNat_of_lt h, subNatNat_of_lt h']
rw [sub_one_add_one_eq_of_pos (Nat.sub_pos_of_lt h), neg_ofNat_succ, Nat.mul_sub_left_distrib,
rw [succ_pred_eq_of_pos (Nat.sub_pos_of_lt h), neg_ofNat_succ, Nat.mul_sub_left_distrib,
succ_pred_eq_of_pos (Nat.sub_pos_of_lt h')]; rfl
| inr h =>
have h' : succ m * k succ m * n := Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ h
@@ -405,7 +385,7 @@ theorem negSucc_mul_subNatNat (m n k : Nat) :
| inl h =>
have h' : succ m * n < succ m * k := Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h (Nat.succ_pos m)
rw [subNatNat_of_lt h, subNatNat_of_le (Nat.le_of_lt h')]
simp [sub_one_add_one_eq_of_pos (Nat.sub_pos_of_lt h), Nat.mul_sub_left_distrib]
simp [succ_pred_eq_of_pos (Nat.sub_pos_of_lt h), Nat.mul_sub_left_distrib]
| inr h => cases Nat.lt_or_ge k n with
| inl h' =>
have h₁ : succ m * n > succ m * k := Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h' (Nat.succ_pos m)
@@ -421,12 +401,12 @@ protected theorem mul_add : ∀ a b c : Int, a * (b + c) = a * b + a * c
simp [negOfNat_eq_subNatNat_zero]; rw [ subNatNat_add]; rfl
| (m:Nat), -[n+1], (k:Nat) => by
simp [negOfNat_eq_subNatNat_zero]; rw [Int.add_comm, subNatNat_add]; rfl
| (m:Nat), -[n+1], -[k+1] => by simp [ Nat.left_distrib, Nat.add_left_comm, Nat.add_assoc]
| (m:Nat), -[n+1], -[k+1] => by simp; rw [ Nat.left_distrib, succ_add]; rfl
| -[m+1], (n:Nat), (k:Nat) => by simp [Nat.mul_comm]; rw [ Nat.right_distrib, Nat.mul_comm]
| -[m+1], (n:Nat), -[k+1] => by
simp [negOfNat_eq_subNatNat_zero]; rw [Int.add_comm, subNatNat_add]; rfl
| -[m+1], -[n+1], (k:Nat) => by simp [negOfNat_eq_subNatNat_zero]; rw [ subNatNat_add]; rfl
| -[m+1], -[n+1], -[k+1] => by simp [ Nat.left_distrib, Nat.add_left_comm, Nat.add_assoc]
| -[m+1], -[n+1], -[k+1] => by simp; rw [ Nat.left_distrib, succ_add]; rfl
protected theorem add_mul (a b c : Int) : (a + b) * c = a * c + b * c := by
simp [Int.mul_comm, Int.mul_add]

View File

@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ protected theorem le_total (a b : Int) : a ≤ b b ≤ a :=
(nonneg_or_nonneg_neg (b - a)).imp_right fun H => by
rwa [show -(b - a) = a - b by simp [Int.add_comm, Int.sub_eq_add_neg]] at H
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem ofNat_le {m n : Nat} : (m : Int) n m n :=
@[simp] theorem ofNat_le {m n : Nat} : (m : Int) n m n :=
fun h =>
let k, hk := le.dest h
Nat.le.intro <| Int.ofNat.inj <| (Int.ofNat_add m k).trans hk,
@@ -74,10 +74,10 @@ theorem lt.intro {a b : Int} {n : Nat} (h : a + Nat.succ n = b) : a < b :=
theorem lt.dest {a b : Int} (h : a < b) : n : Nat, a + Nat.succ n = b :=
let n, h := le.dest h; n, by rwa [Int.add_comm, Int.add_left_comm] at h
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem ofNat_lt {n m : Nat} : (n : Int) < m n < m := by
@[simp] theorem ofNat_lt {n m : Nat} : (n : Int) < m n < m := by
rw [lt_iff_add_one_le, ofNat_succ, ofNat_le]; rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem ofNat_pos {n : Nat} : 0 < (n : Int) 0 < n := ofNat_lt
@[simp] theorem ofNat_pos {n : Nat} : 0 < (n : Int) 0 < n := ofNat_lt
theorem ofNat_nonneg (n : Nat) : 0 (n : Int) := _
@@ -192,11 +192,6 @@ protected theorem min_le_right (a b : Int) : min a b ≤ b := by rw [Int.min_def
protected theorem min_le_left (a b : Int) : min a b a := Int.min_comm .. Int.min_le_right ..
protected theorem min_eq_left {a b : Int} (h : a b) : min a b = a := by simp [Int.min_def, h]
protected theorem min_eq_right {a b : Int} (h : b a) : min a b = b := by
rw [Int.min_comm a b]; exact Int.min_eq_left h
protected theorem le_min {a b c : Int} : a min b c a b a c :=
fun h => Int.le_trans h (Int.min_le_left ..), Int.le_trans h (Int.min_le_right ..),
fun h₁, h₂ => by rw [Int.min_def]; split <;> assumption
@@ -215,12 +210,6 @@ protected theorem max_le {a b c : Int} : max a b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c ∧ b ≤ c :
fun h => Int.le_trans (Int.le_max_left ..) h, Int.le_trans (Int.le_max_right ..) h,
fun h₁, h₂ => by rw [Int.max_def]; split <;> assumption
protected theorem max_eq_right {a b : Int} (h : a b) : max a b = b := by
simp [Int.max_def, h, Int.not_lt.2 h]
protected theorem max_eq_left {a b : Int} (h : b a) : max a b = a := by
rw [ Int.max_comm b a]; exact Int.max_eq_right h
theorem eq_natAbs_of_zero_le {a : Int} (h : 0 a) : a = natAbs a := by
let n, e := eq_ofNat_of_zero_le h
rw [e]; rfl
@@ -447,576 +436,3 @@ theorem natAbs_of_nonneg {a : Int} (H : 0 ≤ a) : (natAbs a : Int) = a :=
theorem ofNat_natAbs_of_nonpos {a : Int} (H : a 0) : (natAbs a : Int) = -a := by
rw [ natAbs_neg, natAbs_of_nonneg (Int.neg_nonneg_of_nonpos H)]
/-! ### toNat -/
theorem toNat_eq_max : a : Int, (toNat a : Int) = max a 0
| (n : Nat) => (Int.max_eq_left (ofNat_zero_le n)).symm
| -[n+1] => (Int.max_eq_right (Int.le_of_lt (negSucc_lt_zero n))).symm
@[simp] theorem toNat_zero : (0 : Int).toNat = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem toNat_one : (1 : Int).toNat = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem toNat_of_nonneg {a : Int} (h : 0 a) : (toNat a : Int) = a := by
rw [toNat_eq_max, Int.max_eq_left h]
@[simp] theorem toNat_ofNat (n : Nat) : toNat n = n := rfl
@[simp] theorem toNat_ofNat_add_one {n : Nat} : ((n : Int) + 1).toNat = n + 1 := rfl
theorem self_le_toNat (a : Int) : a toNat a := by rw [toNat_eq_max]; apply Int.le_max_left
@[simp] theorem le_toNat {n : Nat} {z : Int} (h : 0 z) : n z.toNat (n : Int) z := by
rw [ Int.ofNat_le, Int.toNat_of_nonneg h]
@[simp] theorem toNat_lt {n : Nat} {z : Int} (h : 0 z) : z.toNat < n z < (n : Int) := by
rw [ Int.not_le, Nat.not_le, Int.le_toNat h]
theorem toNat_add {a b : Int} (ha : 0 a) (hb : 0 b) : (a + b).toNat = a.toNat + b.toNat :=
match a, b, eq_ofNat_of_zero_le ha, eq_ofNat_of_zero_le hb with
| _, _, _, rfl, _, rfl => rfl
theorem toNat_add_nat {a : Int} (ha : 0 a) (n : Nat) : (a + n).toNat = a.toNat + n :=
match a, eq_ofNat_of_zero_le ha with | _, _, rfl => rfl
@[simp] theorem pred_toNat : i : Int, (i - 1).toNat = i.toNat - 1
| 0 => rfl
| (n+1:Nat) => by simp [ofNat_add]
| -[n+1] => rfl
@[simp] theorem toNat_sub_toNat_neg : n : Int, n.toNat - (-n).toNat = n
| 0 => rfl
| (_+1:Nat) => Int.sub_zero _
| -[_+1] => Int.zero_sub _
@[simp] theorem toNat_add_toNat_neg_eq_natAbs : n : Int, n.toNat + (-n).toNat = n.natAbs
| 0 => rfl
| (_+1:Nat) => Nat.add_zero _
| -[_+1] => Nat.zero_add _
@[simp] theorem toNat_neg_nat : n : Nat, (-(n : Int)).toNat = 0
| 0 => rfl
| _+1 => rfl
/-! ### toNat' -/
theorem mem_toNat' : (a : Int) (n : Nat), toNat' a = some n a = n
| (m : Nat), n => by simp [toNat', Int.ofNat_inj]
| -[m+1], n => by constructor <;> nofun
/-! ## Order properties of the integers -/
protected theorem lt_of_not_ge {a b : Int} : ¬a b b < a := Int.not_le.mp
protected theorem not_le_of_gt {a b : Int} : b < a ¬a b := Int.not_le.mpr
protected theorem le_of_not_le {a b : Int} : ¬ a b b a := (Int.le_total a b).resolve_left
@[simp] theorem negSucc_not_pos (n : Nat) : 0 < -[n+1] False := by
simp only [Int.not_lt, iff_false]; constructor
theorem eq_negSucc_of_lt_zero : {a : Int}, a < 0 n : Nat, a = -[n+1]
| ofNat _, h => absurd h (Int.not_lt.2 (ofNat_zero_le _))
| -[n+1], _ => n, rfl
protected theorem lt_of_add_lt_add_left {a b c : Int} (h : a + b < a + c) : b < c := by
have : -a + (a + b) < -a + (a + c) := Int.add_lt_add_left h _
simp [Int.neg_add_cancel_left] at this
assumption
protected theorem lt_of_add_lt_add_right {a b c : Int} (h : a + b < c + b) : a < c :=
Int.lt_of_add_lt_add_left (a := b) <| by rwa [Int.add_comm b a, Int.add_comm b c]
protected theorem add_lt_add_iff_left (a : Int) : a + b < a + c b < c :=
Int.lt_of_add_lt_add_left, (Int.add_lt_add_left · _)
protected theorem add_lt_add_iff_right (c : Int) : a + c < b + c a < b :=
Int.lt_of_add_lt_add_right, (Int.add_lt_add_right · _)
protected theorem add_lt_add {a b c d : Int} (h₁ : a < b) (h₂ : c < d) : a + c < b + d :=
Int.lt_trans (Int.add_lt_add_right h₁ c) (Int.add_lt_add_left h₂ b)
protected theorem add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt {a b c d : Int} (h₁ : a b) (h₂ : c < d) :
a + c < b + d :=
Int.lt_of_le_of_lt (Int.add_le_add_right h₁ c) (Int.add_lt_add_left h₂ b)
protected theorem add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le {a b c d : Int} (h₁ : a < b) (h₂ : c d) :
a + c < b + d :=
Int.lt_of_lt_of_le (Int.add_lt_add_right h₁ c) (Int.add_le_add_left h₂ b)
protected theorem lt_add_of_pos_right (a : Int) {b : Int} (h : 0 < b) : a < a + b := by
have : a + 0 < a + b := Int.add_lt_add_left h a
rwa [Int.add_zero] at this
protected theorem lt_add_of_pos_left (a : Int) {b : Int} (h : 0 < b) : a < b + a := by
have : 0 + a < b + a := Int.add_lt_add_right h a
rwa [Int.zero_add] at this
protected theorem add_nonneg {a b : Int} (ha : 0 a) (hb : 0 b) : 0 a + b :=
Int.zero_add 0 Int.add_le_add ha hb
protected theorem add_pos {a b : Int} (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : 0 < a + b :=
Int.zero_add 0 Int.add_lt_add ha hb
protected theorem add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg {a b : Int} (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 b) : 0 < a + b :=
Int.zero_add 0 Int.add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le ha hb
protected theorem add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos {a b : Int} (ha : 0 a) (hb : 0 < b) : 0 < a + b :=
Int.zero_add 0 Int.add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt ha hb
protected theorem add_nonpos {a b : Int} (ha : a 0) (hb : b 0) : a + b 0 :=
Int.zero_add 0 Int.add_le_add ha hb
protected theorem add_neg {a b : Int} (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : a + b < 0 :=
Int.zero_add 0 Int.add_lt_add ha hb
protected theorem add_neg_of_neg_of_nonpos {a b : Int} (ha : a < 0) (hb : b 0) : a + b < 0 :=
Int.zero_add 0 Int.add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le ha hb
protected theorem add_neg_of_nonpos_of_neg {a b : Int} (ha : a 0) (hb : b < 0) : a + b < 0 :=
Int.zero_add 0 Int.add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt ha hb
protected theorem lt_add_of_le_of_pos {a b c : Int} (hbc : b c) (ha : 0 < a) : b < c + a :=
Int.add_zero b Int.add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt hbc ha
theorem add_one_le_iff {a b : Int} : a + 1 b a < b := .rfl
theorem lt_add_one_iff {a b : Int} : a < b + 1 a b := Int.add_le_add_iff_right _
@[simp] theorem succ_ofNat_pos (n : Nat) : 0 < (n : Int) + 1 :=
lt_add_one_iff.2 (ofNat_zero_le _)
theorem le_add_one {a b : Int} (h : a b) : a b + 1 :=
Int.le_of_lt (Int.lt_add_one_iff.2 h)
protected theorem nonneg_of_neg_nonpos {a : Int} (h : -a 0) : 0 a :=
Int.le_of_neg_le_neg <| by rwa [Int.neg_zero]
protected theorem nonpos_of_neg_nonneg {a : Int} (h : 0 -a) : a 0 :=
Int.le_of_neg_le_neg <| by rwa [Int.neg_zero]
protected theorem lt_of_neg_lt_neg {a b : Int} (h : -b < -a) : a < b :=
Int.neg_neg a Int.neg_neg b Int.neg_lt_neg h
protected theorem pos_of_neg_neg {a : Int} (h : -a < 0) : 0 < a :=
Int.lt_of_neg_lt_neg <| by rwa [Int.neg_zero]
protected theorem neg_of_neg_pos {a : Int} (h : 0 < -a) : a < 0 :=
have : -0 < -a := by rwa [Int.neg_zero]
Int.lt_of_neg_lt_neg this
protected theorem le_neg_of_le_neg {a b : Int} (h : a -b) : b -a := by
have h := Int.neg_le_neg h
rwa [Int.neg_neg] at h
protected theorem neg_le_of_neg_le {a b : Int} (h : -a b) : -b a := by
have h := Int.neg_le_neg h
rwa [Int.neg_neg] at h
protected theorem lt_neg_of_lt_neg {a b : Int} (h : a < -b) : b < -a := by
have h := Int.neg_lt_neg h
rwa [Int.neg_neg] at h
protected theorem neg_lt_of_neg_lt {a b : Int} (h : -a < b) : -b < a := by
have h := Int.neg_lt_neg h
rwa [Int.neg_neg] at h
protected theorem sub_nonpos_of_le {a b : Int} (h : a b) : a - b 0 := by
have h := Int.add_le_add_right h (-b)
rwa [Int.add_right_neg] at h
protected theorem le_of_sub_nonpos {a b : Int} (h : a - b 0) : a b := by
have h := Int.add_le_add_right h b
rwa [Int.sub_add_cancel, Int.zero_add] at h
protected theorem sub_neg_of_lt {a b : Int} (h : a < b) : a - b < 0 := by
have h := Int.add_lt_add_right h (-b)
rwa [Int.add_right_neg] at h
protected theorem lt_of_sub_neg {a b : Int} (h : a - b < 0) : a < b := by
have h := Int.add_lt_add_right h b
rwa [Int.sub_add_cancel, Int.zero_add] at h
protected theorem add_le_of_le_neg_add {a b c : Int} (h : b -a + c) : a + b c := by
have h := Int.add_le_add_left h a
rwa [Int.add_neg_cancel_left] at h
protected theorem le_neg_add_of_add_le {a b c : Int} (h : a + b c) : b -a + c := by
have h := Int.add_le_add_left h (-a)
rwa [Int.neg_add_cancel_left] at h
protected theorem add_le_of_le_sub_left {a b c : Int} (h : b c - a) : a + b c := by
have h := Int.add_le_add_left h a
rwa [ Int.add_sub_assoc, Int.add_comm a c, Int.add_sub_cancel] at h
protected theorem le_sub_left_of_add_le {a b c : Int} (h : a + b c) : b c - a := by
have h := Int.add_le_add_right h (-a)
rwa [Int.add_comm a b, Int.add_neg_cancel_right] at h
protected theorem add_le_of_le_sub_right {a b c : Int} (h : a c - b) : a + b c := by
have h := Int.add_le_add_right h b
rwa [Int.sub_add_cancel] at h
protected theorem le_sub_right_of_add_le {a b c : Int} (h : a + b c) : a c - b := by
have h := Int.add_le_add_right h (-b)
rwa [Int.add_neg_cancel_right] at h
protected theorem le_add_of_neg_add_le {a b c : Int} (h : -b + a c) : a b + c := by
have h := Int.add_le_add_left h b
rwa [Int.add_neg_cancel_left] at h
protected theorem neg_add_le_of_le_add {a b c : Int} (h : a b + c) : -b + a c := by
have h := Int.add_le_add_left h (-b)
rwa [Int.neg_add_cancel_left] at h
protected theorem le_add_of_sub_left_le {a b c : Int} (h : a - b c) : a b + c := by
have h := Int.add_le_add_right h b
rwa [Int.sub_add_cancel, Int.add_comm] at h
protected theorem le_add_of_sub_right_le {a b c : Int} (h : a - c b) : a b + c := by
have h := Int.add_le_add_right h c
rwa [Int.sub_add_cancel] at h
protected theorem sub_right_le_of_le_add {a b c : Int} (h : a b + c) : a - c b := by
have h := Int.add_le_add_right h (-c)
rwa [Int.add_neg_cancel_right] at h
protected theorem le_add_of_neg_add_le_left {a b c : Int} (h : -b + a c) : a b + c := by
rw [Int.add_comm] at h
exact Int.le_add_of_sub_left_le h
protected theorem neg_add_le_left_of_le_add {a b c : Int} (h : a b + c) : -b + a c := by
rw [Int.add_comm]
exact Int.sub_left_le_of_le_add h
protected theorem le_add_of_neg_add_le_right {a b c : Int} (h : -c + a b) : a b + c := by
rw [Int.add_comm] at h
exact Int.le_add_of_sub_right_le h
protected theorem neg_add_le_right_of_le_add {a b c : Int} (h : a b + c) : -c + a b := by
rw [Int.add_comm] at h
exact Int.neg_add_le_left_of_le_add h
protected theorem le_add_of_neg_le_sub_left {a b c : Int} (h : -a b - c) : c a + b :=
Int.le_add_of_neg_add_le_left (Int.add_le_of_le_sub_right h)
protected theorem neg_le_sub_left_of_le_add {a b c : Int} (h : c a + b) : -a b - c := by
have h := Int.le_neg_add_of_add_le (Int.sub_left_le_of_le_add h)
rwa [Int.add_comm] at h
protected theorem le_add_of_neg_le_sub_right {a b c : Int} (h : -b a - c) : c a + b :=
Int.le_add_of_sub_right_le (Int.add_le_of_le_sub_left h)
protected theorem neg_le_sub_right_of_le_add {a b c : Int} (h : c a + b) : -b a - c :=
Int.le_sub_left_of_add_le (Int.sub_right_le_of_le_add h)
protected theorem sub_le_of_sub_le {a b c : Int} (h : a - b c) : a - c b :=
Int.sub_left_le_of_le_add (Int.le_add_of_sub_right_le h)
protected theorem sub_le_sub_left {a b : Int} (h : a b) (c : Int) : c - b c - a :=
Int.add_le_add_left (Int.neg_le_neg h) c
protected theorem sub_le_sub_right {a b : Int} (h : a b) (c : Int) : a - c b - c :=
Int.add_le_add_right h (-c)
protected theorem sub_le_sub {a b c d : Int} (hab : a b) (hcd : c d) : a - d b - c :=
Int.add_le_add hab (Int.neg_le_neg hcd)
protected theorem add_lt_of_lt_neg_add {a b c : Int} (h : b < -a + c) : a + b < c := by
have h := Int.add_lt_add_left h a
rwa [Int.add_neg_cancel_left] at h
protected theorem lt_neg_add_of_add_lt {a b c : Int} (h : a + b < c) : b < -a + c := by
have h := Int.add_lt_add_left h (-a)
rwa [Int.neg_add_cancel_left] at h
protected theorem add_lt_of_lt_sub_left {a b c : Int} (h : b < c - a) : a + b < c := by
have h := Int.add_lt_add_left h a
rwa [ Int.add_sub_assoc, Int.add_comm a c, Int.add_sub_cancel] at h
protected theorem lt_sub_left_of_add_lt {a b c : Int} (h : a + b < c) : b < c - a := by
have h := Int.add_lt_add_right h (-a)
rwa [Int.add_comm a b, Int.add_neg_cancel_right] at h
protected theorem add_lt_of_lt_sub_right {a b c : Int} (h : a < c - b) : a + b < c := by
have h := Int.add_lt_add_right h b
rwa [Int.sub_add_cancel] at h
protected theorem lt_sub_right_of_add_lt {a b c : Int} (h : a + b < c) : a < c - b := by
have h := Int.add_lt_add_right h (-b)
rwa [Int.add_neg_cancel_right] at h
protected theorem lt_add_of_neg_add_lt {a b c : Int} (h : -b + a < c) : a < b + c := by
have h := Int.add_lt_add_left h b
rwa [Int.add_neg_cancel_left] at h
protected theorem neg_add_lt_of_lt_add {a b c : Int} (h : a < b + c) : -b + a < c := by
have h := Int.add_lt_add_left h (-b)
rwa [Int.neg_add_cancel_left] at h
protected theorem lt_add_of_sub_left_lt {a b c : Int} (h : a - b < c) : a < b + c := by
have h := Int.add_lt_add_right h b
rwa [Int.sub_add_cancel, Int.add_comm] at h
protected theorem sub_left_lt_of_lt_add {a b c : Int} (h : a < b + c) : a - b < c := by
have h := Int.add_lt_add_right h (-b)
rwa [Int.add_comm b c, Int.add_neg_cancel_right] at h
protected theorem lt_add_of_sub_right_lt {a b c : Int} (h : a - c < b) : a < b + c := by
have h := Int.add_lt_add_right h c
rwa [Int.sub_add_cancel] at h
protected theorem sub_right_lt_of_lt_add {a b c : Int} (h : a < b + c) : a - c < b := by
have h := Int.add_lt_add_right h (-c)
rwa [Int.add_neg_cancel_right] at h
protected theorem lt_add_of_neg_add_lt_left {a b c : Int} (h : -b + a < c) : a < b + c := by
rw [Int.add_comm] at h
exact Int.lt_add_of_sub_left_lt h
protected theorem neg_add_lt_left_of_lt_add {a b c : Int} (h : a < b + c) : -b + a < c := by
rw [Int.add_comm]
exact Int.sub_left_lt_of_lt_add h
protected theorem lt_add_of_neg_add_lt_right {a b c : Int} (h : -c + a < b) : a < b + c := by
rw [Int.add_comm] at h
exact Int.lt_add_of_sub_right_lt h
protected theorem neg_add_lt_right_of_lt_add {a b c : Int} (h : a < b + c) : -c + a < b := by
rw [Int.add_comm] at h
exact Int.neg_add_lt_left_of_lt_add h
protected theorem lt_add_of_neg_lt_sub_left {a b c : Int} (h : -a < b - c) : c < a + b :=
Int.lt_add_of_neg_add_lt_left (Int.add_lt_of_lt_sub_right h)
protected theorem neg_lt_sub_left_of_lt_add {a b c : Int} (h : c < a + b) : -a < b - c := by
have h := Int.lt_neg_add_of_add_lt (Int.sub_left_lt_of_lt_add h)
rwa [Int.add_comm] at h
protected theorem lt_add_of_neg_lt_sub_right {a b c : Int} (h : -b < a - c) : c < a + b :=
Int.lt_add_of_sub_right_lt (Int.add_lt_of_lt_sub_left h)
protected theorem neg_lt_sub_right_of_lt_add {a b c : Int} (h : c < a + b) : -b < a - c :=
Int.lt_sub_left_of_add_lt (Int.sub_right_lt_of_lt_add h)
protected theorem sub_lt_of_sub_lt {a b c : Int} (h : a - b < c) : a - c < b :=
Int.sub_left_lt_of_lt_add (Int.lt_add_of_sub_right_lt h)
protected theorem sub_lt_sub_left {a b : Int} (h : a < b) (c : Int) : c - b < c - a :=
Int.add_lt_add_left (Int.neg_lt_neg h) c
protected theorem sub_lt_sub_right {a b : Int} (h : a < b) (c : Int) : a - c < b - c :=
Int.add_lt_add_right h (-c)
protected theorem sub_lt_sub {a b c d : Int} (hab : a < b) (hcd : c < d) : a - d < b - c :=
Int.add_lt_add hab (Int.neg_lt_neg hcd)
protected theorem sub_lt_sub_of_le_of_lt {a b c d : Int}
(hab : a b) (hcd : c < d) : a - d < b - c :=
Int.add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt hab (Int.neg_lt_neg hcd)
protected theorem sub_lt_sub_of_lt_of_le {a b c d : Int}
(hab : a < b) (hcd : c d) : a - d < b - c :=
Int.add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le hab (Int.neg_le_neg hcd)
protected theorem add_le_add_three {a b c d e f : Int}
(h₁ : a d) (h₂ : b e) (h₃ : c f) : a + b + c d + e + f :=
Int.add_le_add (Int.add_le_add h₁ h₂) h₃
theorem exists_eq_neg_ofNat {a : Int} (H : a 0) : n : Nat, a = -(n : Int) :=
let n, h := eq_ofNat_of_zero_le (Int.neg_nonneg_of_nonpos H)
n, Int.eq_neg_of_eq_neg h.symm
theorem lt_of_add_one_le {a b : Int} (H : a + 1 b) : a < b := H
theorem lt_add_one_of_le {a b : Int} (H : a b) : a < b + 1 := Int.add_le_add_right H 1
theorem le_of_lt_add_one {a b : Int} (H : a < b + 1) : a b := Int.le_of_add_le_add_right H
theorem sub_one_lt_of_le {a b : Int} (H : a b) : a - 1 < b :=
Int.sub_right_lt_of_lt_add <| lt_add_one_of_le H
theorem le_of_sub_one_lt {a b : Int} (H : a - 1 < b) : a b :=
le_of_lt_add_one <| Int.lt_add_of_sub_right_lt H
theorem le_sub_one_of_lt {a b : Int} (H : a < b) : a b - 1 := Int.le_sub_right_of_add_le H
theorem lt_of_le_sub_one {a b : Int} (H : a b - 1) : a < b := Int.add_le_of_le_sub_right H
/- ### Order properties and multiplication -/
protected theorem mul_lt_mul {a b c d : Int}
(h₁ : a < c) (h₂ : b d) (h₃ : 0 < b) (h₄ : 0 c) : a * b < c * d :=
Int.lt_of_lt_of_le (Int.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right h₁ h₃) (Int.mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left h₂ h₄)
protected theorem mul_lt_mul' {a b c d : Int}
(h₁ : a c) (h₂ : b < d) (h₃ : 0 b) (h₄ : 0 < c) : a * b < c * d :=
Int.lt_of_le_of_lt (Int.mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h₁ h₃) (Int.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h₂ h₄)
protected theorem mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg {a b : Int} (ha : 0 < a) (hb : b < 0) : a * b < 0 := by
have h : a * b < a * 0 := Int.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left hb ha
rwa [Int.mul_zero] at h
protected theorem mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos {a b : Int} (ha : a < 0) (hb : 0 < b) : a * b < 0 := by
have h : a * b < 0 * b := Int.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right ha hb
rwa [Int.zero_mul] at h
protected theorem mul_nonneg_of_nonpos_of_nonpos {a b : Int}
(ha : a 0) (hb : b 0) : 0 a * b := by
have : 0 * b a * b := Int.mul_le_mul_of_nonpos_right ha hb
rwa [Int.zero_mul] at this
protected theorem mul_lt_mul_of_neg_left {a b c : Int} (h : b < a) (hc : c < 0) : c * a < c * b :=
have : -c > 0 := Int.neg_pos_of_neg hc
have : -c * b < -c * a := Int.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h this
have : -(c * b) < -(c * a) := by
rwa [ Int.neg_mul_eq_neg_mul, Int.neg_mul_eq_neg_mul] at this
Int.lt_of_neg_lt_neg this
protected theorem mul_lt_mul_of_neg_right {a b c : Int} (h : b < a) (hc : c < 0) : a * c < b * c :=
have : -c > 0 := Int.neg_pos_of_neg hc
have : b * -c < a * -c := Int.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right h this
have : -(b * c) < -(a * c) := by
rwa [ Int.neg_mul_eq_mul_neg, Int.neg_mul_eq_mul_neg] at this
Int.lt_of_neg_lt_neg this
protected theorem mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg {a b : Int} (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : 0 < a * b := by
have : 0 * b < a * b := Int.mul_lt_mul_of_neg_right ha hb
rwa [Int.zero_mul] at this
protected theorem mul_self_le_mul_self {a b : Int} (h1 : 0 a) (h2 : a b) : a * a b * b :=
Int.mul_le_mul h2 h2 h1 (Int.le_trans h1 h2)
protected theorem mul_self_lt_mul_self {a b : Int} (h1 : 0 a) (h2 : a < b) : a * a < b * b :=
Int.mul_lt_mul' (Int.le_of_lt h2) h2 h1 (Int.lt_of_le_of_lt h1 h2)
/- ## sign -/
@[simp] theorem sign_zero : sign 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem sign_one : sign 1 = 1 := rfl
theorem sign_neg_one : sign (-1) = -1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem sign_of_add_one (x : Nat) : Int.sign (x + 1) = 1 := rfl
@[simp] theorem sign_negSucc (x : Nat) : Int.sign (Int.negSucc x) = -1 := rfl
theorem natAbs_sign (z : Int) : z.sign.natAbs = if z = 0 then 0 else 1 :=
match z with | 0 | succ _ | -[_+1] => rfl
theorem natAbs_sign_of_nonzero {z : Int} (hz : z 0) : z.sign.natAbs = 1 := by
rw [Int.natAbs_sign, if_neg hz]
theorem sign_ofNat_of_nonzero {n : Nat} (hn : n 0) : Int.sign n = 1 :=
match n, Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hn with
| _, n, rfl => Int.sign_of_add_one n
@[simp] theorem sign_neg (z : Int) : Int.sign (-z) = -Int.sign z := by
match z with | 0 | succ _ | -[_+1] => rfl
theorem sign_mul_natAbs : a : Int, sign a * natAbs a = a
| 0 => rfl
| succ _ => Int.one_mul _
| -[_+1] => (Int.neg_eq_neg_one_mul _).symm
@[simp] theorem sign_mul : a b, sign (a * b) = sign a * sign b
| a, 0 | 0, b => by simp [Int.mul_zero, Int.zero_mul]
| succ _, succ _ | succ _, -[_+1] | -[_+1], succ _ | -[_+1], -[_+1] => rfl
theorem sign_eq_one_of_pos {a : Int} (h : 0 < a) : sign a = 1 :=
match a, eq_succ_of_zero_lt h with
| _, _, rfl => rfl
theorem sign_eq_neg_one_of_neg {a : Int} (h : a < 0) : sign a = -1 :=
match a, eq_negSucc_of_lt_zero h with
| _, _, rfl => rfl
theorem eq_zero_of_sign_eq_zero : {a : Int}, sign a = 0 a = 0
| 0, _ => rfl
theorem pos_of_sign_eq_one : {a : Int}, sign a = 1 0 < a
| (_ + 1 : Nat), _ => ofNat_lt.2 (Nat.succ_pos _)
theorem neg_of_sign_eq_neg_one : {a : Int}, sign a = -1 a < 0
| (_ + 1 : Nat), h => nomatch h
| 0, h => nomatch h
| -[_+1], _ => negSucc_lt_zero _
theorem sign_eq_one_iff_pos (a : Int) : sign a = 1 0 < a :=
pos_of_sign_eq_one, sign_eq_one_of_pos
theorem sign_eq_neg_one_iff_neg (a : Int) : sign a = -1 a < 0 :=
neg_of_sign_eq_neg_one, sign_eq_neg_one_of_neg
@[simp] theorem sign_eq_zero_iff_zero (a : Int) : sign a = 0 a = 0 :=
eq_zero_of_sign_eq_zero, fun h => by rw [h, sign_zero]
@[simp] theorem sign_sign : sign (sign x) = sign x := by
match x with
| 0 => rfl
| .ofNat (_ + 1) => rfl
| .negSucc _ => rfl
@[simp] theorem sign_nonneg : 0 sign x 0 x := by
match x with
| 0 => rfl
| .ofNat (_ + 1) =>
simp (config := { decide := true }) only [sign, true_iff]
exact Int.le_add_one (ofNat_nonneg _)
| .negSucc _ => simp (config := { decide := true }) [sign]
theorem mul_sign : i : Int, i * sign i = natAbs i
| succ _ => Int.mul_one _
| 0 => Int.mul_zero _
| -[_+1] => Int.mul_neg_one _
/- ## natAbs -/
theorem natAbs_ne_zero {a : Int} : a.natAbs 0 a 0 := not_congr Int.natAbs_eq_zero
theorem natAbs_mul_self : {a : Int}, (natAbs a * natAbs a) = a * a
| ofNat _ => rfl
| -[_+1] => rfl
theorem eq_nat_or_neg (a : Int) : n : Nat, a = n a = -n := _, natAbs_eq a
theorem natAbs_mul_natAbs_eq {a b : Int} {c : Nat}
(h : a * b = (c : Int)) : a.natAbs * b.natAbs = c := by rw [ natAbs_mul, h, natAbs]
@[simp] theorem natAbs_mul_self' (a : Int) : (natAbs a * natAbs a : Int) = a * a := by
rw [ Int.ofNat_mul, natAbs_mul_self]
theorem natAbs_eq_iff {a : Int} {n : Nat} : a.natAbs = n a = n a = -n := by
rw [ Int.natAbs_eq_natAbs_iff, Int.natAbs_ofNat]
theorem natAbs_add_le (a b : Int) : natAbs (a + b) natAbs a + natAbs b := by
suffices a b : Nat, natAbs (subNatNat a b.succ) (a + b).succ by
match a, b with
| (a:Nat), (b:Nat) => rw [ofNat_add_ofNat, natAbs_ofNat]; apply Nat.le_refl
| (a:Nat), -[b+1] => rw [natAbs_ofNat, natAbs_negSucc]; apply this
| -[a+1], (b:Nat) =>
rw [natAbs_negSucc, natAbs_ofNat, Nat.succ_add, Nat.add_comm a b]; apply this
| -[a+1], -[b+1] => rw [natAbs_negSucc, succ_add]; apply Nat.le_refl
refine fun a b => subNatNat_elim a b.succ
(fun m n i => n = b.succ natAbs i (m + b).succ) ?_
(fun i n (e : (n + i).succ = _) => ?_) rfl
· intro i n h
subst h
rw [Nat.add_comm _ i, Nat.add_assoc]
exact Nat.le_add_right i (b.succ + b).succ
· apply succ_le_succ
rw [ succ.inj e, Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_comm]
apply Nat.le_add_right
theorem natAbs_sub_le (a b : Int) : natAbs (a - b) natAbs a + natAbs b := by
rw [ Int.natAbs_neg b]; apply natAbs_add_le
theorem negSucc_eq' (m : Nat) : -[m+1] = -m - 1 := by simp only [negSucc_eq, Int.neg_add]; rfl
theorem natAbs_lt_natAbs_of_nonneg_of_lt {a b : Int}
(w₁ : 0 a) (w₂ : a < b) : a.natAbs < b.natAbs :=
match a, b, eq_ofNat_of_zero_le w₁, eq_ofNat_of_zero_le (Int.le_trans w₁ (Int.le_of_lt w₂)) with
| _, _, _, rfl, _, rfl => ofNat_lt.1 w₂
theorem eq_natAbs_iff_mul_eq_zero : natAbs a = n (a - n) * (a + n) = 0 := by
rw [natAbs_eq_iff, Int.mul_eq_zero, Int.sub_neg, Int.sub_eq_zero, Int.sub_eq_zero]
end Int

View File

@@ -1,44 +0,0 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Deniz Aydin, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Int.Lemmas
namespace Int
/-! # pow -/
protected theorem pow_zero (b : Int) : b^0 = 1 := rfl
protected theorem pow_succ (b : Int) (e : Nat) : b ^ (e+1) = (b ^ e) * b := rfl
protected theorem pow_succ' (b : Int) (e : Nat) : b ^ (e+1) = b * (b ^ e) := by
rw [Int.mul_comm, Int.pow_succ]
theorem pow_le_pow_of_le_left {n m : Nat} (h : n m) : (i : Nat), n^i m^i
| 0 => Nat.le_refl _
| i + 1 => Nat.mul_le_mul (pow_le_pow_of_le_left h i) h
theorem pow_le_pow_of_le_right {n : Nat} (hx : n > 0) {i : Nat} : {j}, i j n^i n^j
| 0, h =>
have : i = 0 := Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero h
this.symm Nat.le_refl _
| j + 1, h =>
match Nat.le_or_eq_of_le_succ h with
| Or.inl h => show n^i n^j * n from
have : n^i * 1 n^j * n := Nat.mul_le_mul (pow_le_pow_of_le_right hx h) hx
Nat.mul_one (n^i) this
| Or.inr h =>
h.symm Nat.le_refl _
theorem pos_pow_of_pos {n : Nat} (m : Nat) (h : 0 < n) : 0 < n^m :=
pow_le_pow_of_le_right h (Nat.zero_le _)
theorem natCast_pow (b n : Nat) : ((b^n : Nat) : Int) = (b : Int) ^ n := by
match n with
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 =>
simp only [Nat.pow_succ, Int.pow_succ, natCast_mul, natCast_pow _ n]
end Int

View File

@@ -8,4 +8,3 @@ import Init.Data.List.Basic
import Init.Data.List.BasicAux
import Init.Data.List.Control
import Init.Data.List.Lemmas
import Init.Data.List.Impl

View File

@@ -7,7 +7,6 @@ prelude
import Init.SimpLemmas
import Init.Data.Nat.Basic
import Init.Data.Nat.Div
set_option linter.missingDocs true -- keep it documented
open Decidable List
@@ -55,6 +54,15 @@ variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
namespace List
instance : GetElem (List α) Nat α fun as i => i < as.length where
getElem as i h := as.get i, h
@[simp] theorem cons_getElem_zero (a : α) (as : List α) (h : 0 < (a :: as).length) : getElem (a :: as) 0 h = a := by
rfl
@[simp] theorem cons_getElem_succ (a : α) (as : List α) (i : Nat) (h : i + 1 < (a :: as).length) : getElem (a :: as) (i+1) h = getElem as i (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h) := by
rfl
theorem length_add_eq_lengthTRAux (as : List α) (n : Nat) : as.length + n = as.lengthTRAux n := by
induction as generalizing n with
| nil => simp [length, lengthTRAux]
@@ -450,7 +458,7 @@ contains the longest initial segment for which `p` returns true
and the second part is everything else.
* `span (· > 5) [6, 8, 9, 5, 2, 9] = ([6, 8, 9], [5, 2, 9])`
* `span (· > 10) [6, 8, 9, 5, 2, 9] = ([], [6, 8, 9, 5, 2, 9])`
* `span (· > 10) [6, 8, 9, 5, 2, 9] = ([6, 8, 9, 5, 2, 9], [])`
-/
@[inline] def span (p : α Bool) (as : List α) : List α × List α :=
loop as []
@@ -512,6 +520,11 @@ def drop : Nat → List α → List α
@[simp] theorem drop_nil : ([] : List α).drop i = [] := by
cases i <;> rfl
theorem get_drop_eq_drop (as : List α) (i : Nat) (h : i < as.length) : as[i] :: as.drop (i+1) = as.drop i :=
match as, i with
| _::_, 0 => rfl
| _::_, i+1 => get_drop_eq_drop _ i _
/--
`O(min n |xs|)`. Returns the first `n` elements of `xs`, or the whole list if `n` is too large.
* `take 0 [a, b, c, d, e] = []`
@@ -714,9 +727,9 @@ inductive lt [LT α] : List α → List α → Prop where
instance [LT α] : LT (List α) := List.lt
instance hasDecidableLt [LT α] [h : DecidableRel (α:=α) (·<·)] : (l₁ l₂ : List α) Decidable (l₁ < l₂)
| [], [] => isFalse nofun
| [], [] => isFalse (fun h => nomatch h)
| [], _::_ => isTrue (List.lt.nil _ _)
| _::_, [] => isFalse nofun
| _::_, [] => isFalse (fun h => nomatch h)
| a::as, b::bs =>
match h a b with
| isTrue h₁ => isTrue (List.lt.head _ _ h₁)
@@ -876,33 +889,6 @@ def minimum? [Min α] : List α → Option α
| [] => none
| a::as => some <| as.foldl min a
/-- Inserts an element into a list without duplication. -/
@[inline] protected def insert [BEq α] (a : α) (l : List α) : List α :=
if l.elem a then l else a :: l
instance decidableBEx (p : α Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
l : List α, Decidable (Exists fun x => x l p x)
| [] => isFalse nofun
| x :: xs =>
if h₁ : p x then isTrue x, .head .., h₁ else
match decidableBEx p xs with
| isTrue h₂ => isTrue <| let y, hm, hp := h₂; y, .tail _ hm, hp
| isFalse h₂ => isFalse fun
| y, .tail _ h, hp => h₂ y, h, hp
| _, .head .., hp => h₁ hp
instance decidableBAll (p : α Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
l : List α, Decidable ( x, x l p x)
| [] => isTrue nofun
| x :: xs =>
if h₁ : p x then
match decidableBAll p xs with
| isTrue h₂ => isTrue fun
| y, .tail _ h => h₂ y h
| _, .head .. => h₁
| isFalse h₂ => isFalse fun H => h₂ fun y hm => H y (.tail _ hm)
else isFalse fun H => h₁ <| H x (.head ..)
instance [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] : LawfulBEq (List α) where
eq_of_beq {as bs} := by
induction as generalizing bs with

View File

@@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ Author: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Nat.Linear
import Init.Data.List.Basic
import Init.Util
universe u
@@ -12,139 +14,60 @@ namespace List
/-! The following functions can't be defined at `Init.Data.List.Basic`, because they depend on `Init.Util`,
and `Init.Util` depends on `Init.Data.List.Basic`. -/
/--
Returns the `i`-th element in the list (zero-based).
If the index is out of bounds (`i ≥ as.length`), this function panics when executed, and returns
`default`. See `get?` and `getD` for safer alternatives.
-/
def get! [Inhabited α] : (as : List α) (i : Nat) α
def get! [Inhabited α] : List α Nat α
| a::_, 0 => a
| _::as, n+1 => get! as n
| _, _ => panic! "invalid index"
/--
Returns the `i`-th element in the list (zero-based).
If the index is out of bounds (`i ≥ as.length`), this function returns `none`.
Also see `get`, `getD` and `get!`.
-/
def get? : (as : List α) (i : Nat) Option α
def get? : List α Nat Option α
| a::_, 0 => some a
| _::as, n+1 => get? as n
| _, _ => none
/--
Returns the `i`-th element in the list (zero-based).
def getD (as : List α) (idx : Nat) (a₀ : α) : α :=
(as.get? idx).getD a₀
If the index is out of bounds (`i ≥ as.length`), this function returns `fallback`.
See also `get?` and `get!`.
-/
def getD (as : List α) (i : Nat) (fallback : α) : α :=
(as.get? i).getD fallback
/--
Returns the first element in the list.
If the list is empty, this function panics when executed, and returns `default`.
See `head` and `headD` for safer alternatives.
-/
def head! [Inhabited α] : List α α
| [] => panic! "empty list"
| a::_ => a
/--
Returns the first element in the list.
If the list is empty, this function returns `none`.
Also see `headD` and `head!`.
-/
def head? : List α Option α
| [] => none
| a::_ => some a
/--
Returns the first element in the list.
If the list is empty, this function returns `fallback`.
Also see `head?` and `head!`.
-/
def headD : (as : List α) (fallback : α) α
| [], fallback => fallback
def headD : List α α α
| [], a₀ => a₀
| a::_, _ => a
/--
Returns the first element of a non-empty list.
-/
def head : (as : List α) as [] α
| a::_, _ => a
/--
Drops the first element of the list.
If the list is empty, this function panics when executed, and returns the empty list.
See `tail` and `tailD` for safer alternatives.
-/
def tail! : List α List α
| [] => panic! "empty list"
| _::as => as
/--
Drops the first element of the list.
If the list is empty, this function returns `none`.
Also see `tailD` and `tail!`.
-/
def tail? : List α Option (List α)
| [] => none
| _::as => some as
/--
Drops the first element of the list.
def tailD : List α List α List α
| [], as₀ => as₀
| _::as, _ => as
If the list is empty, this function returns `fallback`.
Also see `head?` and `head!`.
-/
def tailD (list fallback : List α) : List α :=
match list with
| [] => fallback
| _ :: tl => tl
/--
Returns the last element of a non-empty list.
-/
def getLast : (as : List α), as [] α
| [], h => absurd rfl h
| [a], _ => a
| _::b::as, _ => getLast (b::as) (fun h => List.noConfusion h)
/--
Returns the last element in the list.
If the list is empty, this function panics when executed, and returns `default`.
See `getLast` and `getLastD` for safer alternatives.
-/
def getLast! [Inhabited α] : List α α
| [] => panic! "empty list"
| a::as => getLast (a::as) (fun h => List.noConfusion h)
/--
Returns the last element in the list.
If the list is empty, this function returns `none`.
Also see `getLastD` and `getLast!`.
-/
def getLast? : List α Option α
| [] => none
| a::as => some (getLast (a::as) (fun h => List.noConfusion h))
/--
Returns the last element in the list.
If the list is empty, this function returns `fallback`.
Also see `getLast?` and `getLast!`.
-/
def getLastD : (as : List α) (fallback : α) α
def getLastD : List α α α
| [], a₀ => a₀
| a::as, _ => getLast (a::as) (fun h => List.noConfusion h)
@@ -284,42 +207,4 @@ if the result of each `f a` is a pointer equal value `a`.
def mapMono (as : List α) (f : α α) : List α :=
Id.run <| as.mapMonoM f
/--
Monadic generalization of `List.partition`.
This uses `Array.toList` and which isn't imported by `Init.Data.List.Basic`.
-/
@[inline] def partitionM [Monad m] (p : α m Bool) (l : List α) : m (List α × List α) :=
go l #[] #[]
where
/-- Auxiliary for `partitionM`:
`partitionM.go p l acc₁ acc₂` returns `(acc₁.toList ++ left, acc₂.toList ++ right)`
if `partitionM p l` returns `(left, right)`. -/
@[specialize] go : List α Array α Array α m (List α × List α)
| [], acc₁, acc₂ => pure (acc₁.toList, acc₂.toList)
| x :: xs, acc₁, acc₂ => do
if p x then
go xs (acc₁.push x) acc₂
else
go xs acc₁ (acc₂.push x)
/--
Given a function `f : α → β ⊕ γ`, `partitionMap f l` maps the list by `f`
whilst partitioning the result it into a pair of lists, `List β × List γ`,
partitioning the `.inl _` into the left list, and the `.inr _` into the right List.
```
partitionMap (id : Nat ⊕ Nat → Nat ⊕ Nat) [inl 0, inr 1, inl 2] = ([0, 2], [1])
```
-/
@[inline] def partitionMap (f : α β γ) (l : List α) : List β × List γ := go l #[] #[] where
/-- Auxiliary for `partitionMap`:
`partitionMap.go f l acc₁ acc₂ = (acc₁.toList ++ left, acc₂.toList ++ right)`
if `partitionMap f l = (left, right)`. -/
@[specialize] go : List α Array β Array γ List β × List γ
| [], acc₁, acc₂ => (acc₁.toList, acc₂.toList)
| x :: xs, acc₁, acc₂ =>
match f x with
| .inl a => go xs (acc₁.push a) acc₂
| .inr b => go xs acc₁ (acc₂.push b)
end List

View File

@@ -40,13 +40,6 @@ Finally, we rarely use `mapM` with something that is not a `Monad`.
Users that want to use `mapM` with `Applicative` should use `mapA` instead.
-/
/--
Applies the monadic action `f` on every element in the list, left-to-right, and returns the list of
results.
See `List.forM` for the variant that discards the results.
See `List.mapA` for the variant that works with `Applicative`.
-/
@[inline]
def mapM {m : Type u Type v} [Monad m] {α : Type w} {β : Type u} (f : α m β) (as : List α) : m (List β) :=
let rec @[specialize] loop
@@ -54,42 +47,17 @@ def mapM {m : Type u → Type v} [Monad m] {α : Type w} {β : Type u} (f : α
| a :: as, bs => do loop as (( f a)::bs)
loop as []
/--
Applies the applicative action `f` on every element in the list, left-to-right, and returns the list of
results.
NB: If `m` is also a `Monad`, then using `mapM` can be more efficient.
See `List.forA` for the variant that discards the results.
See `List.mapM` for the variant that works with `Monad`.
**Warning**: this function is not tail-recursive, meaning that it may fail with a stack overflow on long lists.
-/
@[specialize]
def mapA {m : Type u Type v} [Applicative m] {α : Type w} {β : Type u} (f : α m β) : List α m (List β)
| [] => pure []
| a::as => List.cons <$> f a <*> mapA f as
/--
Applies the monadic action `f` on every element in the list, left-to-right.
See `List.mapM` for the variant that collects results.
See `List.forA` for the variant that works with `Applicative`.
-/
@[specialize]
protected def forM {m : Type u Type v} [Monad m] {α : Type w} (as : List α) (f : α m PUnit) : m PUnit :=
match as with
| [] => pure
| a :: as => do f a; List.forM as f
/--
Applies the applicative action `f` on every element in the list, left-to-right.
NB: If `m` is also a `Monad`, then using `forM` can be more efficient.
See `List.mapA` for the variant that collects results.
See `List.forM` for the variant that works with `Monad`.
-/
@[specialize]
def forA {m : Type u Type v} [Applicative m] {α : Type w} (as : List α) (f : α m PUnit) : m PUnit :=
match as with
@@ -103,27 +71,15 @@ def filterAuxM {m : Type → Type v} [Monad m] {α : Type} (f : α → m Bool) :
let b f h
filterAuxM f t (cond b (h :: acc) acc)
/--
Applies the monadic predicate `p` on every element in the list, left-to-right, and returns those
elements `x` for which `p x` returns `true`.
-/
@[inline]
def filterM {m : Type Type v} [Monad m] {α : Type} (p : α m Bool) (as : List α) : m (List α) := do
let as filterAuxM p as []
def filterM {m : Type Type v} [Monad m] {α : Type} (f : α m Bool) (as : List α) : m (List α) := do
let as filterAuxM f as []
pure as.reverse
/--
Applies the monadic predicate `p` on every element in the list, right-to-left, and returns those
elements `x` for which `p x` returns `true`.
-/
@[inline]
def filterRevM {m : Type Type v} [Monad m] {α : Type} (p : α m Bool) (as : List α) : m (List α) :=
filterAuxM p as.reverse []
def filterRevM {m : Type Type v} [Monad m] {α : Type} (f : α m Bool) (as : List α) : m (List α) :=
filterAuxM f as.reverse []
/--
Applies the monadic function `f` on every element `x` in the list, left-to-right, and returns those
results `y` for which `f x` returns `some y`.
-/
@[inline]
def filterMapM {m : Type u Type v} [Monad m] {α β : Type u} (f : α m (Option β)) (as : List α) : m (List β) :=
let rec @[specialize] loop
@@ -134,16 +90,6 @@ def filterMapM {m : Type u → Type v} [Monad m] {α β : Type u} (f : α → m
| some b => loop as (b::bs)
loop as.reverse []
/--
Folds a monadic function over a list from left to right:
```
foldlM f x₀ [a, b, c] = do
let x₁ ← f x₀ a
let x₂ ← f x₁ b
let x₃ ← f x₂ c
pure x₃
```
-/
@[specialize]
protected def foldlM {m : Type u Type v} [Monad m] {s : Type u} {α : Type w} : (f : s α m s) (init : s) List α m s
| _, s, [] => pure s
@@ -151,26 +97,10 @@ protected def foldlM {m : Type u → Type v} [Monad m] {s : Type u} {α : Type w
let s' f s a
List.foldlM f s' as
/--
Folds a monadic function over a list from right to left:
```
foldrM f x₀ [a, b, c] = do
let x₁ ← f c x₀
let x₂ ← f b x₁
let x₃ ← f a x₂
pure x₃
```
-/
@[inline]
def foldrM {m : Type u Type v} [Monad m] {s : Type u} {α : Type w} (f : α s m s) (init : s) (l : List α) : m s :=
l.reverse.foldlM (fun s a => f a s) init
/--
Maps `f` over the list and collects the results with `<|>`.
```
firstM f [a, b, c] = f a <|> f b <|> f c <|> failure
```
-/
@[specialize]
def firstM {m : Type u Type v} [Alternative m] {α : Type w} {β : Type u} (f : α m β) : List α m β
| [] => failure

View File

@@ -1,261 +0,0 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Array.Lemmas
/-!
## Tail recursive implementations for `List` definitions.
Many of the proofs require theorems about `Array`,
so these are in a separate file to minimize imports.
-/
namespace List
/-- Tail recursive version of `erase`. -/
@[inline] def setTR (l : List α) (n : Nat) (a : α) : List α := go l n #[] where
/-- Auxiliary for `setTR`: `setTR.go l a xs n acc = acc.toList ++ set xs a`,
unless `n ≥ l.length` in which case it returns `l` -/
go : List α Nat Array α List α
| [], _, _ => l
| _::xs, 0, acc => acc.toListAppend (a::xs)
| x::xs, n+1, acc => go xs n (acc.push x)
@[csimp] theorem set_eq_setTR : @set = @setTR := by
funext α l n a; simp [setTR]
let rec go (acc) : xs n, l = acc.data ++ xs
setTR.go l a xs n acc = acc.data ++ xs.set n a
| [], _ => fun h => by simp [setTR.go, set, h]
| x::xs, 0 => by simp [setTR.go, set]
| x::xs, n+1 => fun h => by simp [setTR.go, set]; rw [go _ xs]; {simp}; simp [h]
exact (go #[] _ _ rfl).symm
/-- Tail recursive version of `erase`. -/
@[inline] def eraseTR [BEq α] (l : List α) (a : α) : List α := go l #[] where
/-- Auxiliary for `eraseTR`: `eraseTR.go l a xs acc = acc.toList ++ erase xs a`,
unless `a` is not present in which case it returns `l` -/
go : List α Array α List α
| [], _ => l
| x::xs, acc => bif x == a then acc.toListAppend xs else go xs (acc.push x)
@[csimp] theorem erase_eq_eraseTR : @List.erase = @eraseTR := by
funext α _ l a; simp [eraseTR]
suffices xs acc, l = acc.data ++ xs eraseTR.go l a xs acc = acc.data ++ xs.erase a from
(this l #[] (by simp)).symm
intro xs; induction xs with intro acc h
| nil => simp [List.erase, eraseTR.go, h]
| cons x xs IH =>
simp [List.erase, eraseTR.go]
cases x == a <;> simp
· rw [IH]; simp; simp; exact h
/-- Tail recursive version of `eraseIdx`. -/
@[inline] def eraseIdxTR (l : List α) (n : Nat) : List α := go l n #[] where
/-- Auxiliary for `eraseIdxTR`: `eraseIdxTR.go l n xs acc = acc.toList ++ eraseIdx xs a`,
unless `a` is not present in which case it returns `l` -/
go : List α Nat Array α List α
| [], _, _ => l
| _::as, 0, acc => acc.toListAppend as
| a::as, n+1, acc => go as n (acc.push a)
@[csimp] theorem eraseIdx_eq_eraseIdxTR : @eraseIdx = @eraseIdxTR := by
funext α l n; simp [eraseIdxTR]
suffices xs acc, l = acc.data ++ xs eraseIdxTR.go l xs n acc = acc.data ++ xs.eraseIdx n from
(this l #[] (by simp)).symm
intro xs; induction xs generalizing n with intro acc h
| nil => simp [eraseIdx, eraseIdxTR.go, h]
| cons x xs IH =>
match n with
| 0 => simp [eraseIdx, eraseIdxTR.go]
| n+1 =>
simp [eraseIdx, eraseIdxTR.go]
rw [IH]; simp; simp; exact h
/-- Tail recursive version of `bind`. -/
@[inline] def bindTR (as : List α) (f : α List β) : List β := go as #[] where
/-- Auxiliary for `bind`: `bind.go f as = acc.toList ++ bind f as` -/
@[specialize] go : List α Array β List β
| [], acc => acc.toList
| x::xs, acc => go xs (acc ++ f x)
@[csimp] theorem bind_eq_bindTR : @List.bind = @bindTR := by
funext α β as f
let rec go : as acc, bindTR.go f as acc = acc.data ++ as.bind f
| [], acc => by simp [bindTR.go, bind]
| x::xs, acc => by simp [bindTR.go, bind, go xs]
exact (go as #[]).symm
/-- Tail recursive version of `join`. -/
@[inline] def joinTR (l : List (List α)) : List α := bindTR l id
@[csimp] theorem join_eq_joinTR : @join = @joinTR := by
funext α l; rw [ List.bind_id, List.bind_eq_bindTR]; rfl
/-- Tail recursive version of `filterMap`. -/
@[inline] def filterMapTR (f : α Option β) (l : List α) : List β := go l #[] where
/-- Auxiliary for `filterMap`: `filterMap.go f l = acc.toList ++ filterMap f l` -/
@[specialize] go : List α Array β List β
| [], acc => acc.toList
| a::as, acc => match f a with
| none => go as acc
| some b => go as (acc.push b)
@[csimp] theorem filterMap_eq_filterMapTR : @List.filterMap = @filterMapTR := by
funext α β f l
let rec go : as acc, filterMapTR.go f as acc = acc.data ++ as.filterMap f
| [], acc => by simp [filterMapTR.go, filterMap]
| a::as, acc => by simp [filterMapTR.go, filterMap, go as]; split <;> simp [*]
exact (go l #[]).symm
/-- Tail recursive version of `replace`. -/
@[inline] def replaceTR [BEq α] (l : List α) (b c : α) : List α := go l #[] where
/-- Auxiliary for `replace`: `replace.go l b c xs acc = acc.toList ++ replace xs b c`,
unless `b` is not found in `xs` in which case it returns `l`. -/
@[specialize] go : List α Array α List α
| [], _ => l
| a::as, acc => bif a == b then acc.toListAppend (c::as) else go as (acc.push a)
@[csimp] theorem replace_eq_replaceTR : @List.replace = @replaceTR := by
funext α _ l b c; simp [replaceTR]
suffices xs acc, l = acc.data ++ xs
replaceTR.go l b c xs acc = acc.data ++ xs.replace b c from
(this l #[] (by simp)).symm
intro xs; induction xs with intro acc
| nil => simp [replace, replaceTR.go]
| cons x xs IH =>
simp [replace, replaceTR.go]; split <;> simp [*]
· intro h; rw [IH]; simp; simp; exact h
/-- Tail recursive version of `take`. -/
@[inline] def takeTR (n : Nat) (l : List α) : List α := go l n #[] where
/-- Auxiliary for `take`: `take.go l xs n acc = acc.toList ++ take n xs`,
unless `n ≥ xs.length` in which case it returns `l`. -/
@[specialize] go : List α Nat Array α List α
| [], _, _ => l
| _::_, 0, acc => acc.toList
| a::as, n+1, acc => go as n (acc.push a)
@[csimp] theorem take_eq_takeTR : @take = @takeTR := by
funext α n l; simp [takeTR]
suffices xs acc, l = acc.data ++ xs takeTR.go l xs n acc = acc.data ++ xs.take n from
(this l #[] (by simp)).symm
intro xs; induction xs generalizing n with intro acc
| nil => cases n <;> simp [take, takeTR.go]
| cons x xs IH =>
cases n with simp [take, takeTR.go]
| succ n => intro h; rw [IH]; simp; simp; exact h
/-- Tail recursive version of `takeWhile`. -/
@[inline] def takeWhileTR (p : α Bool) (l : List α) : List α := go l #[] where
/-- Auxiliary for `takeWhile`: `takeWhile.go p l xs acc = acc.toList ++ takeWhile p xs`,
unless no element satisfying `p` is found in `xs` in which case it returns `l`. -/
@[specialize] go : List α Array α List α
| [], _ => l
| a::as, acc => bif p a then go as (acc.push a) else acc.toList
@[csimp] theorem takeWhile_eq_takeWhileTR : @takeWhile = @takeWhileTR := by
funext α p l; simp [takeWhileTR]
suffices xs acc, l = acc.data ++ xs
takeWhileTR.go p l xs acc = acc.data ++ xs.takeWhile p from
(this l #[] (by simp)).symm
intro xs; induction xs with intro acc
| nil => simp [takeWhile, takeWhileTR.go]
| cons x xs IH =>
simp [takeWhile, takeWhileTR.go]; split <;> simp [*]
· intro h; rw [IH]; simp; simp; exact h
/-- Tail recursive version of `foldr`. -/
@[specialize] def foldrTR (f : α β β) (init : β) (l : List α) : β := l.toArray.foldr f init
@[csimp] theorem foldr_eq_foldrTR : @foldr = @foldrTR := by
funext α β f init l; simp [foldrTR, Array.foldr_eq_foldr_data, -Array.size_toArray]
/-- Tail recursive version of `zipWith`. -/
@[inline] def zipWithTR (f : α β γ) (as : List α) (bs : List β) : List γ := go as bs #[] where
/-- Auxiliary for `zipWith`: `zipWith.go f as bs acc = acc.toList ++ zipWith f as bs` -/
go : List α List β Array γ List γ
| a::as, b::bs, acc => go as bs (acc.push (f a b))
| _, _, acc => acc.toList
@[csimp] theorem zipWith_eq_zipWithTR : @zipWith = @zipWithTR := by
funext α β γ f as bs
let rec go : as bs acc, zipWithTR.go f as bs acc = acc.data ++ as.zipWith f bs
| [], _, acc | _::_, [], acc => by simp [zipWithTR.go, zipWith]
| a::as, b::bs, acc => by simp [zipWithTR.go, zipWith, go as bs]
exact (go as bs #[]).symm
/-- Tail recursive version of `unzip`. -/
def unzipTR (l : List (α × β)) : List α × List β :=
l.foldr (fun (a, b) (al, bl) => (a::al, b::bl)) ([], [])
@[csimp] theorem unzip_eq_unzipTR : @unzip = @unzipTR := by
funext α β l; simp [unzipTR]; induction l <;> simp [*]
/-- Tail recursive version of `enumFrom`. -/
def enumFromTR (n : Nat) (l : List α) : List (Nat × α) :=
let arr := l.toArray
(arr.foldr (fun a (n, acc) => (n-1, (n-1, a) :: acc)) (n + arr.size, [])).2
@[csimp] theorem enumFrom_eq_enumFromTR : @enumFrom = @enumFromTR := by
funext α n l; simp [enumFromTR, -Array.size_toArray]
let f := fun (a : α) (n, acc) => (n-1, (n-1, a) :: acc)
let rec go : l n, l.foldr f (n + l.length, []) = (n, enumFrom n l)
| [], n => rfl
| a::as, n => by
rw [ show _ + as.length = n + (a::as).length from Nat.succ_add .., foldr, go as]
simp [enumFrom, f]
rw [Array.foldr_eq_foldr_data]
simp [go]
theorem replicateTR_loop_eq : n, replicateTR.loop a n acc = replicate n a ++ acc
| 0 => rfl
| n+1 => by rw [ replicateTR_loop_replicate_eq _ 1 n, replicate, replicate,
replicateTR.loop, replicateTR_loop_eq n, replicateTR_loop_eq n, append_assoc]; rfl
/-- Tail recursive version of `dropLast`. -/
@[inline] def dropLastTR (l : List α) : List α := l.toArray.pop.toList
@[csimp] theorem dropLast_eq_dropLastTR : @dropLast = @dropLastTR := by
funext α l; simp [dropLastTR]
/-- Tail recursive version of `intersperse`. -/
def intersperseTR (sep : α) : List α List α
| [] => []
| [x] => [x]
| x::y::xs => x :: sep :: y :: xs.foldr (fun a r => sep :: a :: r) []
@[csimp] theorem intersperse_eq_intersperseTR : @intersperse = @intersperseTR := by
funext α sep l; simp [intersperseTR]
match l with
| [] | [_] => rfl
| x::y::xs => simp [intersperse]; induction xs generalizing y <;> simp [*]
/-- Tail recursive version of `intercalate`. -/
def intercalateTR (sep : List α) : List (List α) List α
| [] => []
| [x] => x
| x::xs => go sep.toArray x xs #[]
where
/-- Auxiliary for `intercalateTR`:
`intercalateTR.go sep x xs acc = acc.toList ++ intercalate sep.toList (x::xs)` -/
go (sep : Array α) : List α List (List α) Array α List α
| x, [], acc => acc.toListAppend x
| x, y::xs, acc => go sep y xs (acc ++ x ++ sep)
@[csimp] theorem intercalate_eq_intercalateTR : @intercalate = @intercalateTR := by
funext α sep l; simp [intercalate, intercalateTR]
match l with
| [] => rfl
| [_] => simp
| x::y::xs =>
let rec go {acc x} : xs,
intercalateTR.go sep.toArray x xs acc = acc.data ++ join (intersperse sep (x::xs))
| [] => by simp [intercalateTR.go]
| _::_ => by simp [intercalateTR.go, go]
simp [intersperse, go]
end List

View File

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ prelude
import Init.Data.List.BasicAux
import Init.Data.List.Control
import Init.PropLemmas
import Init.Control.Lawful.Basic
import Init.Control.Lawful
import Init.Hints
namespace List
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ theorem mem_cons_self (a : α) (l : List α) : a ∈ a :: l := .head ..
theorem mem_cons_of_mem (y : α) {a : α} {l : List α} : a l a y :: l := .tail _
theorem eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem {l : List α} : l = [] a, a l := by
cases l <;> simp [-not_or]
cases l <;> simp
/-! ### append -/
@@ -105,11 +105,6 @@ theorem append_left_inj {s₁ s₂ : List α} (t) : s₁ ++ t = s₂ ++ t ↔ s
@[simp] theorem append_eq_nil : p ++ q = [] p = [] q = [] := by
cases p <;> simp
theorem get_append : {l₁ l₂ : List α} (n : Nat) (h : n < l₁.length),
(l₁ ++ l₂).get n, length_append .. Nat.lt_add_right _ h = l₁.get n, h
| a :: l, _, 0, h => rfl
| a :: l, _, n+1, h => by simp only [get, cons_append]; apply get_append
/-! ### map -/
@[simp] theorem map_nil {f : α β} : map f [] = [] := rfl
@@ -209,12 +204,6 @@ theorem get?_eq_some : l.get? n = some a ↔ ∃ h, get l ⟨n, h⟩ = a :=
| _ :: _, 0 => rfl
| _ :: l, n+1 => get?_map f l n
theorem get?_append {l₁ l₂ : List α} {n : Nat} (hn : n < l₁.length) :
(l₁ ++ l₂).get? n = l₁.get? n := by
have hn' : n < (l₁ ++ l₂).length := Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le hn <|
length_append .. Nat.le_add_right ..
rw [get?_eq_get hn, get?_eq_get hn', get_append]
@[simp] theorem get?_concat_length : (l : List α) (a : α), (l ++ [a]).get? l.length = some a
| [], a => rfl
| b :: l, a => by rw [cons_append, length_cons]; simp only [get?, get?_concat_length]
@@ -241,39 +230,6 @@ theorem getLast?_eq_get? : ∀ (l : List α), getLast? l = l.get? (l.length - 1)
@[simp] theorem getLast?_concat (l : List α) : getLast? (l ++ [a]) = some a := by
simp [getLast?_eq_get?, Nat.succ_sub_succ]
theorem getD_eq_get? : l n (a : α), getD l n a = (get? l n).getD a
| [], _, _ => rfl
| _a::_, 0, _ => rfl
| _::l, _+1, _ => getD_eq_get? (l := l) ..
theorem get?_append_right : {l₁ l₂ : List α} {n : Nat}, l₁.length n
(l₁ ++ l₂).get? n = l₂.get? (n - l₁.length)
| [], _, n, _ => rfl
| a :: l, _, n+1, h₁ => by
rw [cons_append]
simp [Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub, get?_append_right (Nat.lt_succ.1 h₁)]
theorem get?_reverse' : {l : List α} (i j), i + j + 1 = length l
get? l.reverse i = get? l j
| [], _, _, _ => rfl
| a::l, i, 0, h => by simp [Nat.succ.injEq] at h; simp [h, get?_append_right, Nat.succ.injEq]
| a::l, i, j+1, h => by
have := Nat.succ.inj h; simp at this
rw [get?_append, get?_reverse' _ j this]
rw [length_reverse, this]; apply Nat.lt_add_of_pos_right (Nat.succ_pos _)
theorem get?_reverse {l : List α} (i) (h : i < length l) :
get? l.reverse i = get? l (l.length - 1 - i) :=
get?_reverse' _ _ <| by
rw [Nat.add_sub_of_le (Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt h),
Nat.sub_add_cancel (Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.zero_le _) h)]
@[simp] theorem getD_nil : getD [] n d = d := rfl
@[simp] theorem getD_cons_zero : getD (x :: xs) 0 d = x := rfl
@[simp] theorem getD_cons_succ : getD (x :: xs) (n + 1) d = getD xs n d := rfl
/-! ### take and drop -/
@[simp] theorem take_append_drop : (n : Nat) (l : List α), take n l ++ drop n l = l
@@ -458,9 +414,9 @@ theorem mem_filter : x ∈ filter p as ↔ x ∈ as ∧ p x := by
induction as with
| nil => simp [filter]
| cons a as ih =>
by_cases h : p a
· simp_all [or_and_left]
· simp_all [or_and_right]
by_cases h : p a <;> simp [*, or_and_right]
· exact or_congr_left (and_iff_left_of_imp fun | rfl => h).symm
· exact (or_iff_right fun rfl, h' => h h').symm
theorem filter_eq_nil {l} : filter p l = [] a, a l ¬p a := by
simp only [eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_filter, not_and]
@@ -672,46 +628,3 @@ theorem minimum?_eq_some_iff [Min α] [LE α] [anti : Antisymm ((· : α) ≤ ·
exact congrArg some <| anti.1
((le_minimum?_iff le_min_iff (xs := x::xs) rfl _).1 (le_refl _) _ h₁)
(h₂ _ (minimum?_mem min_eq_or (xs := x::xs) rfl))
@[simp] theorem get_cons_succ {as : List α} {h : i + 1 < (a :: as).length} :
(a :: as).get i+1, h = as.get i, Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h := rfl
@[simp] theorem get_cons_succ' {as : List α} {i : Fin as.length} :
(a :: as).get i.succ = as.get i := rfl
@[simp] theorem set_nil (n : Nat) (a : α) : [].set n a = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem set_zero (x : α) (xs : List α) (a : α) :
(x :: xs).set 0 a = a :: xs := rfl
@[simp] theorem set_succ (x : α) (xs : List α) (n : Nat) (a : α) :
(x :: xs).set n.succ a = x :: xs.set n a := rfl
@[simp] theorem get_set_eq (l : List α) (i : Nat) (a : α) (h : i < (l.set i a).length) :
(l.set i a).get i, h = a :=
match l, i with
| [], _ => by
simp at h
contradiction
| _ :: _, 0 => by
simp
| _ :: l, i + 1 => by
simp [get_set_eq l]
@[simp] theorem get_set_ne (l : List α) {i j : Nat} (h : i j) (a : α)
(hj : j < (l.set i a).length) :
(l.set i a).get j, hj = l.get j, by simp at hj; exact hj :=
match l, i, j with
| [], _, _ => by
simp
| _ :: _, 0, 0 => by
contradiction
| _ :: _, 0, _ + 1 => by
simp
| _ :: _, _ + 1, 0 => by
simp
| _ :: l, i + 1, j + 1 => by
have g : i j := h congrArg (· + 1)
simp [get_set_ne l g]
end List

View File

@@ -15,8 +15,3 @@ import Init.Data.Nat.Log2
import Init.Data.Nat.Power2
import Init.Data.Nat.Linear
import Init.Data.Nat.SOM
import Init.Data.Nat.Lemmas
import Init.Data.Nat.Mod
import Init.Data.Nat.Lcm
import Init.Data.Nat.Compare
import Init.Data.Nat.Simproc

View File

@@ -10,29 +10,6 @@ universe u
namespace Nat
/-- Compiled version of `Nat.rec` so that we can define `Nat.recAux` to be defeq to `Nat.rec`.
This is working around the fact that the compiler does not currently support recursors. -/
private def recCompiled {motive : Nat Sort u} (zero : motive zero) (succ : (n : Nat) motive n motive (Nat.succ n)) : (t : Nat) motive t
| .zero => zero
| .succ n => succ n (recCompiled zero succ n)
@[csimp]
private theorem rec_eq_recCompiled : @Nat.rec = @Nat.recCompiled :=
funext fun _ => funext fun _ => funext fun succ => funext fun t =>
Nat.recOn t rfl (fun n ih => congrArg (succ n) ih)
/-- Recursor identical to `Nat.rec` but uses notations `0` for `Nat.zero` and `· + 1` for `Nat.succ`.
Used as the default `Nat` eliminator by the `induction` tactic. -/
@[elab_as_elim, induction_eliminator]
protected abbrev recAux {motive : Nat Sort u} (zero : motive 0) (succ : (n : Nat) motive n motive (n + 1)) (t : Nat) : motive t :=
Nat.rec zero succ t
/-- Recursor identical to `Nat.casesOn` but uses notations `0` for `Nat.zero` and `· + 1` for `Nat.succ`.
Used as the default `Nat` eliminator by the `cases` tactic. -/
@[elab_as_elim, cases_eliminator]
protected abbrev casesAuxOn {motive : Nat Sort u} (t : Nat) (zero : motive 0) (succ : (n : Nat) motive (n + 1)) : motive t :=
Nat.casesOn t zero succ
/--
`Nat.fold` evaluates `f` on the numbers up to `n` exclusive, in increasing order:
* `Nat.fold f 3 init = init |> f 0 |> f 1 |> f 2`
@@ -148,12 +125,9 @@ theorem add_succ (n m : Nat) : n + succ m = succ (n + m) :=
theorem add_one (n : Nat) : n + 1 = succ n :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem succ_eq_add_one (n : Nat) : succ n = n + 1 :=
theorem succ_eq_add_one (n : Nat) : succ n = n + 1 :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem add_one_ne_zero (n : Nat) : n + 1 0 := nofun
@[simp] theorem zero_ne_add_one (n : Nat) : 0 n + 1 := nofun
protected theorem add_comm : (n m : Nat), n + m = m + n
| n, 0 => Eq.symm (Nat.zero_add n)
| n, m+1 => by
@@ -174,7 +148,7 @@ protected theorem add_right_comm (n m k : Nat) : (n + m) + k = (n + k) + m := by
protected theorem add_left_cancel {n m k : Nat} : n + m = n + k m = k := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => simp [succ_add, succ.injEq]; intro h; apply ih h
| succ n ih => simp [succ_add]; intro h; apply ih h
protected theorem add_right_cancel {n m k : Nat} (h : n + m = k + m) : n = k := by
rw [Nat.add_comm n m, Nat.add_comm k m] at h
@@ -215,7 +189,7 @@ protected theorem mul_comm : ∀ (n m : Nat), n * m = m * n
Nat.mul_comm n 1 Nat.mul_one n
protected theorem left_distrib (n m k : Nat) : n * (m + k) = n * m + n * k := by
induction n with
induction n generalizing m k with
| zero => repeat rw [Nat.zero_mul]
| succ n ih => simp [succ_mul, ih]; rw [Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_assoc (n*m)]; apply congrArg; apply Nat.add_left_comm
@@ -235,9 +209,6 @@ protected theorem mul_assoc : ∀ (n m k : Nat), (n * m) * k = n * (m * k)
protected theorem mul_left_comm (n m k : Nat) : n * (m * k) = m * (n * k) := by
rw [ Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_comm n m, Nat.mul_assoc]
protected theorem mul_two (n) : n * 2 = n + n := by rw [Nat.mul_succ, Nat.mul_one]
protected theorem two_mul (n) : 2 * n = n + n := by rw [Nat.succ_mul, Nat.one_mul]
/-! # Inequalities -/
attribute [simp] Nat.le_refl
@@ -248,12 +219,12 @@ theorem lt_succ_of_le {n m : Nat} : n ≤ m → n < succ m := succ_le_succ
@[simp] protected theorem sub_zero (n : Nat) : n - 0 = n := rfl
theorem succ_sub_succ_eq_sub (n m : Nat) : succ n - succ m = n - m := by
@[simp] theorem succ_sub_succ_eq_sub (n m : Nat) : succ n - succ m = n - m := by
induction m with
| zero => exact rfl
| succ m ih => apply congrArg pred ih
@[simp] theorem pred_le : (n : Nat), pred n n
theorem pred_le : (n : Nat), pred n n
| zero => Nat.le.refl
| succ _ => le_succ _
@@ -286,7 +257,7 @@ theorem succ_sub_succ (n m : Nat) : succ n - succ m = n - m :=
theorem sub_add_eq (a b c : Nat) : a - (b + c) = a - b - c := by
induction c with
| zero => simp
| succ c ih => simp only [Nat.add_succ, Nat.sub_succ, ih]
| succ c ih => simp [Nat.add_succ, Nat.sub_succ, ih]
protected theorem lt_of_lt_of_le {n m k : Nat} : n < m m k n < k :=
Nat.le_trans
@@ -327,8 +298,7 @@ theorem eq_zero_or_pos : ∀ (n : Nat), n = 0 n > 0
protected theorem pos_of_ne_zero {n : Nat} : n 0 0 < n := (eq_zero_or_pos n).resolve_left
theorem lt.base (n : Nat) : n < succ n := Nat.le_refl (succ n)
@[simp] theorem lt_succ_self (n : Nat) : n < succ n := lt.base n
theorem lt_succ_self (n : Nat) : n < succ n := lt.base n
protected theorem le_total (m n : Nat) : m n n m :=
match Nat.lt_or_ge m n with
@@ -367,12 +337,6 @@ theorem le_add_right : ∀ (n k : Nat), n ≤ n + k
theorem le_add_left (n m : Nat): n m + n :=
Nat.add_comm n m le_add_right n m
protected theorem lt_add_left (c : Nat) (h : a < b) : a < c + b :=
Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h (Nat.le_add_left ..)
protected theorem lt_add_right (c : Nat) (h : a < b) : a < b + c :=
Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h (Nat.le_add_right ..)
theorem le.dest : {n m : Nat}, n m Exists (fun k => n + k = m)
| zero, zero, _ => 0, rfl
| zero, succ n, _ => succ n, Nat.add_comm 0 (succ n) rfl
@@ -462,9 +426,6 @@ protected theorem add_lt_add_left {n m : Nat} (h : n < m) (k : Nat) : k + n < k
protected theorem add_lt_add_right {n m : Nat} (h : n < m) (k : Nat) : n + k < m + k :=
Nat.add_comm k m Nat.add_comm k n Nat.add_lt_add_left h k
protected theorem lt_add_of_pos_right (h : 0 < k) : n < n + k :=
Nat.add_lt_add_left h n
protected theorem zero_lt_one : 0 < (1:Nat) :=
zero_lt_succ 0
@@ -490,137 +451,6 @@ protected theorem le_of_add_le_add_right {a b c : Nat} : a + b ≤ c + b → a
protected theorem add_le_add_iff_right {n : Nat} : m + n k + n m k :=
Nat.le_of_add_le_add_right, fun h => Nat.add_le_add_right h _
/-! ### le/lt -/
protected theorem lt_asymm {a b : Nat} (h : a < b) : ¬ b < a := Nat.not_lt.2 (Nat.le_of_lt h)
/-- Alias for `Nat.lt_asymm`. -/
protected abbrev not_lt_of_gt := @Nat.lt_asymm
/-- Alias for `Nat.lt_asymm`. -/
protected abbrev not_lt_of_lt := @Nat.lt_asymm
protected theorem lt_iff_le_not_le {m n : Nat} : m < n m n ¬ n m :=
fun h => Nat.le_of_lt h, Nat.not_le_of_gt h, fun _, h => Nat.lt_of_not_ge h
/-- Alias for `Nat.lt_iff_le_not_le`. -/
protected abbrev lt_iff_le_and_not_ge := @Nat.lt_iff_le_not_le
protected theorem lt_iff_le_and_ne {m n : Nat} : m < n m n m n :=
fun h => Nat.le_of_lt h, Nat.ne_of_lt h, fun h => Nat.lt_of_le_of_ne h.1 h.2
protected theorem ne_iff_lt_or_gt {a b : Nat} : a b a < b b < a :=
Nat.lt_or_gt_of_ne, fun | .inl h => Nat.ne_of_lt h | .inr h => Nat.ne_of_gt h
/-- Alias for `Nat.ne_iff_lt_or_gt`. -/
protected abbrev lt_or_gt := @Nat.ne_iff_lt_or_gt
/-- Alias for `Nat.le_total`. -/
protected abbrev le_or_ge := @Nat.le_total
/-- Alias for `Nat.le_total`. -/
protected abbrev le_or_le := @Nat.le_total
protected theorem eq_or_lt_of_not_lt {a b : Nat} (hnlt : ¬ a < b) : a = b b < a :=
(Nat.lt_trichotomy ..).resolve_left hnlt
protected theorem lt_or_eq_of_le {n m : Nat} (h : n m) : n < m n = m :=
(Nat.lt_or_ge ..).imp_right (Nat.le_antisymm h)
protected theorem le_iff_lt_or_eq {n m : Nat} : n m n < m n = m :=
Nat.lt_or_eq_of_le, fun | .inl h => Nat.le_of_lt h | .inr rfl => Nat.le_refl _
protected theorem lt_succ_iff : m < succ n m n := le_of_lt_succ, lt_succ_of_le
protected theorem lt_succ_iff_lt_or_eq : m < succ n m < n m = n :=
Nat.lt_succ_iff.trans Nat.le_iff_lt_or_eq
protected theorem eq_of_lt_succ_of_not_lt (hmn : m < n + 1) (h : ¬ m < n) : m = n :=
(Nat.lt_succ_iff_lt_or_eq.1 hmn).resolve_left h
protected theorem eq_of_le_of_lt_succ (h₁ : n m) (h₂ : m < n + 1) : m = n :=
Nat.le_antisymm (le_of_succ_le_succ h₂) h₁
/-! ## zero/one/two -/
theorem le_zero : i 0 i = 0 := Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero, fun | rfl => Nat.le_refl _
/-- Alias for `Nat.zero_lt_one`. -/
protected abbrev one_pos := @Nat.zero_lt_one
protected theorem two_pos : 0 < 2 := Nat.zero_lt_succ _
protected theorem ne_zero_iff_zero_lt : n 0 0 < n := Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.symm
protected theorem zero_lt_two : 0 < 2 := Nat.zero_lt_succ _
protected theorem one_lt_two : 1 < 2 := Nat.succ_lt_succ Nat.zero_lt_one
protected theorem eq_zero_of_not_pos (h : ¬0 < n) : n = 0 :=
Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero (Nat.not_lt.1 h)
/-! ## succ/pred -/
attribute [simp] zero_lt_succ
theorem succ_ne_self (n) : succ n n := Nat.ne_of_gt (lt_succ_self n)
theorem succ_le : succ n m n < m := .rfl
theorem lt_succ : m < succ n m n := le_of_lt_succ, lt_succ_of_le
theorem lt_succ_of_lt (h : a < b) : a < succ b := le_succ_of_le h
theorem succ_pred_eq_of_ne_zero : {n}, n 0 succ (pred n) = n
| _+1, _ => rfl
theorem eq_zero_or_eq_succ_pred : n, n = 0 n = succ (pred n)
| 0 => .inl rfl
| _+1 => .inr rfl
theorem succ_inj' : succ a = succ b a = b := (Nat.succ.injEq a b).to_iff
theorem succ_le_succ_iff : succ a succ b a b := le_of_succ_le_succ, succ_le_succ
theorem succ_lt_succ_iff : succ a < succ b a < b := lt_of_succ_lt_succ, succ_lt_succ
theorem pred_inj : {a b}, 0 < a 0 < b pred a = pred b a = b
| _+1, _+1, _, _ => congrArg _
theorem pred_ne_self : {a}, a 0 pred a a
| _+1, _ => (succ_ne_self _).symm
theorem pred_lt_self : {a}, 0 < a pred a < a
| _+1, _ => lt_succ_self _
theorem pred_lt_pred : {n m}, n 0 n < m pred n < pred m
| _+1, _+1, _, h => lt_of_succ_lt_succ h
theorem pred_le_iff_le_succ : {n m}, pred n m n succ m
| 0, _ => fun _ => Nat.zero_le _, fun _ => Nat.zero_le _
| _+1, _ => Nat.succ_le_succ_iff.symm
theorem le_succ_of_pred_le : pred n m n succ m := pred_le_iff_le_succ.1
theorem pred_le_of_le_succ : n succ m pred n m := pred_le_iff_le_succ.2
theorem lt_pred_iff_succ_lt : {n m}, n < pred m succ n < m
| _, 0 => nofun, nofun
| _, _+1 => Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff.symm
theorem succ_lt_of_lt_pred : n < pred m succ n < m := lt_pred_iff_succ_lt.1
theorem lt_pred_of_succ_lt : succ n < m n < pred m := lt_pred_iff_succ_lt.2
theorem le_pred_iff_lt : {n m}, 0 < m (n pred m n < m)
| 0, _+1, _ => fun _ => Nat.zero_lt_succ _, fun _ => Nat.zero_le _
| _+1, _+1, _ => Nat.lt_pred_iff_succ_lt
theorem le_pred_of_lt (h : n < m) : n pred m := (le_pred_iff_lt (Nat.zero_lt_of_lt h)).2 h
theorem le_sub_one_of_lt : a < b a b - 1 := Nat.le_pred_of_lt
theorem lt_of_le_pred (h : 0 < m) : n pred m n < m := (le_pred_iff_lt h).1
theorem exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero : {n}, n 0 Exists fun k => n = succ k
| _+1, _ => _, rfl
/-! # Basic theorems for comparing numerals -/
theorem ctor_eq_zero : Nat.zero = 0 :=
@@ -632,7 +462,7 @@ protected theorem one_ne_zero : 1 ≠ (0 : Nat) :=
protected theorem zero_ne_one : 0 (1 : Nat) :=
fun h => Nat.noConfusion h
@[simp] theorem succ_ne_zero (n : Nat) : succ n 0 :=
theorem succ_ne_zero (n : Nat) : succ n 0 :=
fun h => Nat.noConfusion h
/-! # mul + order -/
@@ -673,10 +503,10 @@ theorem eq_of_mul_eq_mul_right {n m k : Nat} (hm : 0 < m) (h : n * m = k * m) :
/-! # power -/
protected theorem pow_succ (n m : Nat) : n^(succ m) = n^m * n :=
theorem pow_succ (n m : Nat) : n^(succ m) = n^m * n :=
rfl
protected theorem pow_zero (n : Nat) : n^0 = 1 := rfl
theorem pow_zero (n : Nat) : n^0 = 1 := rfl
theorem pow_le_pow_of_le_left {n m : Nat} (h : n m) : (i : Nat), n^i m^i
| 0 => Nat.le_refl _
@@ -743,11 +573,6 @@ theorem succ_pred {a : Nat} (h : a ≠ 0) : a.pred.succ = a := by
theorem succ_pred_eq_of_pos : {n}, 0 < n succ (pred n) = n
| _+1, _ => rfl
theorem sub_one_add_one_eq_of_pos : {n}, 0 < n (n - 1) + 1 = n
| _+1, _ => rfl
@[simp] theorem pred_eq_sub_one : pred n = n - 1 := rfl
/-! # sub theorems -/
theorem add_sub_self_left (a b : Nat) : (a + b) - a = b := by
@@ -770,7 +595,7 @@ theorem zero_lt_sub_of_lt (h : i < a) : 0 < a - i := by
| zero => contradiction
| succ a ih =>
match Nat.eq_or_lt_of_le h with
| Or.inl h => injection h with h; subst h; rw [Nat.add_sub_self_left]; decide
| Or.inl h => injection h with h; subst h; rw [Nat.add_one, Nat.add_sub_self_left]; decide
| Or.inr h =>
have : 0 < a - i := ih (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h)
exact Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le this (Nat.sub_le_succ_sub _ _)
@@ -784,7 +609,7 @@ theorem sub_succ_lt_self (a i : Nat) (h : i < a) : a - (i + 1) < a - i := by
theorem sub_ne_zero_of_lt : {a b : Nat} a < b b - a 0
| 0, 0, h => absurd h (Nat.lt_irrefl 0)
| 0, succ b, _ => by simp only [Nat.sub_zero, ne_eq, not_false_eq_true]
| 0, succ b, _ => by simp
| succ a, 0, h => absurd h (Nat.not_lt_zero a.succ)
| succ a, succ b, h => by rw [Nat.succ_sub_succ]; exact sub_ne_zero_of_lt (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h)
@@ -796,13 +621,13 @@ theorem add_sub_of_le {a b : Nat} (h : a ≤ b) : a + (b - a) = b := by
have : a b := Nat.le_of_succ_le h
rw [sub_succ, Nat.succ_add, Nat.add_succ, Nat.succ_pred hne, ih this]
@[simp] protected theorem sub_add_cancel {n m : Nat} (h : m n) : n - m + m = n := by
protected theorem sub_add_cancel {n m : Nat} (h : m n) : n - m + m = n := by
rw [Nat.add_comm, Nat.add_sub_of_le h]
protected theorem add_sub_add_right (n k m : Nat) : (n + k) - (m + k) = n - m := by
induction k with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih => simp [ Nat.add_assoc, succ_sub_succ_eq_sub, ih]
| succ k ih => simp [add_succ, add_succ, succ_sub_succ, ih]
protected theorem add_sub_add_left (k n m : Nat) : (k + n) - (k + m) = n - m := by
rw [Nat.add_comm k n, Nat.add_comm k m, Nat.add_sub_add_right]
@@ -915,7 +740,7 @@ protected theorem sub_pos_of_lt (h : m < n) : 0 < n - m :=
protected theorem sub_sub (n m k : Nat) : n - m - k = n - (m + k) := by
induction k with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih => rw [Nat.add_succ, Nat.sub_succ, Nat.add_succ, Nat.sub_succ, ih]
| succ k ih => rw [Nat.add_succ, Nat.sub_succ, Nat.sub_succ, ih]
protected theorem sub_le_sub_left (h : n m) (k : Nat) : k - m k - n :=
match m, le.dest h with

View File

@@ -1,8 +1,54 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Lean FRO, LLC. All rights reserved.
Copyright (c) 2019 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Nat.Bitwise.Basic
import Init.Data.Nat.Bitwise.Lemmas
import Init.Data.Nat.Basic
import Init.Data.Nat.Div
import Init.Coe
namespace Nat
theorem bitwise_rec_lemma {n : Nat} (hNe : n 0) : n / 2 < n :=
Nat.div_lt_self (Nat.zero_lt_of_ne_zero hNe) (Nat.lt_succ_self _)
def bitwise (f : Bool Bool Bool) (n m : Nat) : Nat :=
if n = 0 then
if f false true then m else 0
else if m = 0 then
if f true false then n else 0
else
let n' := n / 2
let m' := m / 2
let b₁ := n % 2 = 1
let b₂ := m % 2 = 1
let r := bitwise f n' m'
if f b₁ b₂ then
r+r+1
else
r+r
decreasing_by apply bitwise_rec_lemma; assumption
@[extern "lean_nat_land"]
def land : @& Nat @& Nat Nat := bitwise and
@[extern "lean_nat_lor"]
def lor : @& Nat @& Nat Nat := bitwise or
@[extern "lean_nat_lxor"]
def xor : @& Nat @& Nat Nat := bitwise bne
@[extern "lean_nat_shiftl"]
def shiftLeft : @& Nat @& Nat Nat
| n, 0 => n
| n, succ m => shiftLeft (2*n) m
@[extern "lean_nat_shiftr"]
def shiftRight : @& Nat @& Nat Nat
| n, 0 => n
| n, succ m => shiftRight n m / 2
instance : AndOp Nat := Nat.land
instance : OrOp Nat := Nat.lor
instance : Xor Nat := Nat.xor
instance : ShiftLeft Nat := Nat.shiftLeft
instance : ShiftRight Nat := Nat.shiftRight
end Nat

View File

@@ -1,83 +0,0 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Nat.Basic
import Init.Data.Nat.Div
import Init.Coe
namespace Nat
theorem bitwise_rec_lemma {n : Nat} (hNe : n 0) : n / 2 < n :=
Nat.div_lt_self (Nat.zero_lt_of_ne_zero hNe) (Nat.lt_succ_self _)
def bitwise (f : Bool Bool Bool) (n m : Nat) : Nat :=
if n = 0 then
if f false true then m else 0
else if m = 0 then
if f true false then n else 0
else
let n' := n / 2
let m' := m / 2
let b₁ := n % 2 = 1
let b₂ := m % 2 = 1
let r := bitwise f n' m'
if f b₁ b₂ then
r+r+1
else
r+r
decreasing_by apply bitwise_rec_lemma; assumption
@[extern "lean_nat_land"]
def land : @& Nat @& Nat Nat := bitwise and
@[extern "lean_nat_lor"]
def lor : @& Nat @& Nat Nat := bitwise or
@[extern "lean_nat_lxor"]
def xor : @& Nat @& Nat Nat := bitwise bne
@[extern "lean_nat_shiftl"]
def shiftLeft : @& Nat @& Nat Nat
| n, 0 => n
| n, succ m => shiftLeft (2*n) m
@[extern "lean_nat_shiftr"]
def shiftRight : @& Nat @& Nat Nat
| n, 0 => n
| n, succ m => shiftRight n m / 2
instance : AndOp Nat := Nat.land
instance : OrOp Nat := Nat.lor
instance : Xor Nat := Nat.xor
instance : ShiftLeft Nat := Nat.shiftLeft
instance : ShiftRight Nat := Nat.shiftRight
theorem shiftLeft_eq (a b : Nat) : a <<< b = a * 2 ^ b :=
match b with
| 0 => (Nat.mul_one _).symm
| b+1 => (shiftLeft_eq _ b).trans <| by
simp [Nat.pow_succ, Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_left_comm, Nat.mul_comm]
@[simp] theorem shiftRight_zero : n >>> 0 = n := rfl
theorem shiftRight_succ (m n) : m >>> (n + 1) = (m >>> n) / 2 := rfl
theorem shiftRight_add (m n : Nat) : k, m >>> (n + k) = (m >>> n) >>> k
| 0 => rfl
| k + 1 => by simp [ Nat.add_assoc, shiftRight_add _ _ k, shiftRight_succ]
theorem shiftRight_eq_div_pow (m : Nat) : n, m >>> n = m / 2 ^ n
| 0 => (Nat.div_one _).symm
| k + 1 => by
rw [shiftRight_add, shiftRight_eq_div_pow m k]
simp [Nat.div_div_eq_div_mul, Nat.pow_succ, shiftRight_succ]
/-!
### testBit
We define an operation for testing individual bits in the binary representation
of a number.
-/
/-- `testBit m n` returns whether the `(n+1)` least significant bit is `1` or `0`-/
def testBit (m n : Nat) : Bool := (m >>> n) &&& 1 != 0
end Nat

View File

@@ -1,489 +0,0 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Lean FRO, LLC. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joe Hendrix
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Bool
import Init.Data.Int.Pow
import Init.Data.Nat.Bitwise.Basic
import Init.Data.Nat.Lemmas
import Init.Data.Nat.Simproc
import Init.TacticsExtra
import Init.Omega
/-
This module defines properties of the bitwise operations on Natural numbers.
It is primarily intended to support the bitvector library.
-/
namespace Nat
@[local simp]
private theorem one_div_two : 1/2 = 0 := by trivial
private theorem two_pow_succ_sub_succ_div_two : (2 ^ (n+1) - (x + 1)) / 2 = 2^n - (x/2 + 1) := by
omega
private theorem two_pow_succ_sub_one_div_two : (2 ^ (n+1) - 1) / 2 = 2^n - 1 :=
two_pow_succ_sub_succ_div_two
private theorem two_mul_sub_one {n : Nat} (n_pos : n > 0) : (2*n - 1) % 2 = 1 := by
omega
/-! ### Preliminaries -/
/--
An induction principal that works on divison by two.
-/
noncomputable def div2Induction {motive : Nat Sort u}
(n : Nat) (ind : (n : Nat), (n > 0 motive (n/2)) motive n) : motive n := by
induction n using Nat.strongInductionOn with
| ind n hyp =>
apply ind
intro n_pos
if n_eq : n = 0 then
simp [n_eq] at n_pos
else
apply hyp
exact Nat.div_lt_self n_pos (Nat.le_refl _)
@[simp] theorem zero_and (x : Nat) : 0 &&& x = 0 := by rfl
@[simp] theorem and_zero (x : Nat) : x &&& 0 = 0 := by
simp only [HAnd.hAnd, AndOp.and, land]
unfold bitwise
simp
@[simp] theorem and_one_is_mod (x : Nat) : x &&& 1 = x % 2 := by
if xz : x = 0 then
simp [xz, zero_and]
else
have andz := and_zero (x/2)
simp only [HAnd.hAnd, AndOp.and, land] at andz
simp only [HAnd.hAnd, AndOp.and, land]
unfold bitwise
cases mod_two_eq_zero_or_one x with | _ p =>
simp [xz, p, andz, one_div_two, mod_eq_of_lt]
/-! ### testBit -/
@[simp] theorem zero_testBit (i : Nat) : testBit 0 i = false := by
simp only [testBit, zero_shiftRight, zero_and, bne_self_eq_false]
@[simp] theorem testBit_zero (x : Nat) : testBit x 0 = decide (x % 2 = 1) := by
cases mod_two_eq_zero_or_one x with | _ p => simp [testBit, p]
@[simp] theorem testBit_succ (x i : Nat) : testBit x (succ i) = testBit (x/2) i := by
unfold testBit
simp [shiftRight_succ_inside]
theorem testBit_to_div_mod {x : Nat} : testBit x i = decide (x / 2^i % 2 = 1) := by
induction i generalizing x with
| zero =>
unfold testBit
cases mod_two_eq_zero_or_one x with | _ xz => simp [xz]
| succ i hyp =>
simp [hyp, Nat.div_div_eq_div_mul, Nat.pow_succ']
theorem toNat_testBit (x i : Nat) :
(x.testBit i).toNat = x / 2 ^ i % 2 := by
rw [Nat.testBit_to_div_mod]
rcases Nat.mod_two_eq_zero_or_one (x / 2^i) <;> simp_all
theorem ne_zero_implies_bit_true {x : Nat} (xnz : x 0) : i, testBit x i := by
induction x using div2Induction with
| ind x hyp =>
have x_pos : x > 0 := Nat.pos_of_ne_zero xnz
match mod_two_eq_zero_or_one x with
| Or.inl mod2_eq =>
rw [div_add_mod x 2] at xnz
simp only [mod2_eq, ne_eq, Nat.mul_eq_zero, Nat.add_zero, false_or] at xnz
have d, dif := hyp x_pos xnz
apply Exists.intro (d+1)
simp_all
| Or.inr mod2_eq =>
apply Exists.intro 0
simp_all
theorem ne_implies_bit_diff {x y : Nat} (p : x y) : i, testBit x i testBit y i := by
induction y using Nat.div2Induction generalizing x with
| ind y hyp =>
cases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos y with
| inl yz =>
simp only [yz, Nat.zero_testBit, Bool.eq_false_iff]
simp only [yz] at p
have i,ip := ne_zero_implies_bit_true p
apply Exists.intro i
simp [ip]
| inr ypos =>
if lsb_diff : x % 2 = y % 2 then
rw [Nat.div_add_mod x 2, Nat.div_add_mod y 2] at p
simp only [ne_eq, lsb_diff, Nat.add_right_cancel_iff,
Nat.zero_lt_succ, Nat.mul_left_cancel_iff] at p
have i, ieq := hyp ypos p
apply Exists.intro (i+1)
simpa
else
apply Exists.intro 0
simp only [testBit_zero]
revert lsb_diff
cases mod_two_eq_zero_or_one x with | _ p =>
cases mod_two_eq_zero_or_one y with | _ q =>
simp [p,q]
/--
`eq_of_testBit_eq` allows proving two natural numbers are equal
if their bits are all equal.
-/
theorem eq_of_testBit_eq {x y : Nat} (pred : i, testBit x i = testBit y i) : x = y := by
if h : x = y then
exact h
else
let i,eq := ne_implies_bit_diff h
have p := pred i
contradiction
theorem ge_two_pow_implies_high_bit_true {x : Nat} (p : x 2^n) : i, i n testBit x i := by
induction x using div2Induction generalizing n with
| ind x hyp =>
have x_pos : x > 0 := Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le (Nat.two_pow_pos n) p
have x_ne_zero : x 0 := Nat.ne_of_gt x_pos
match n with
| zero =>
let j, jp := ne_zero_implies_bit_true x_ne_zero
exact Exists.intro j (And.intro (Nat.zero_le _) jp)
| succ n =>
have x_ge_n : x / 2 2 ^ n := by
simpa [le_div_iff_mul_le, Nat.pow_succ'] using p
have j, jp := @hyp x_pos n x_ge_n
apply Exists.intro (j+1)
apply And.intro
case left =>
exact (Nat.succ_le_succ jp.left)
case right =>
simpa using jp.right
theorem testBit_implies_ge {x : Nat} (p : testBit x i = true) : x 2^i := by
simp only [testBit_to_div_mod] at p
apply Decidable.by_contra
intro not_ge
have x_lt : x < 2^i := Nat.lt_of_not_le not_ge
simp [div_eq_of_lt x_lt] at p
theorem testBit_lt_two_pow {x i : Nat} (lt : x < 2^i) : x.testBit i = false := by
match p : x.testBit i with
| false => trivial
| true =>
exfalso
exact Nat.not_le_of_gt lt (testBit_implies_ge p)
theorem lt_pow_two_of_testBit (x : Nat) (p : i, i n testBit x i = false) : x < 2^n := by
apply Decidable.by_contra
intro not_lt
have x_ge_n := Nat.ge_of_not_lt not_lt
have i, i_ge_n, test_true := ge_two_pow_implies_high_bit_true x_ge_n
have test_false := p _ i_ge_n
simp only [test_true] at test_false
/-! ### testBit -/
private theorem succ_mod_two : succ x % 2 = 1 - x % 2 := by
induction x with
| zero =>
trivial
| succ x hyp =>
have p : 2 x + 2 := Nat.le_add_left _ _
simp [Nat.mod_eq (x+2) 2, p, hyp]
cases Nat.mod_two_eq_zero_or_one x with | _ p => simp [p]
private theorem testBit_succ_zero : testBit (x + 1) 0 = not (testBit x 0) := by
simp [testBit_to_div_mod, succ_mod_two]
cases Nat.mod_two_eq_zero_or_one x with | _ p =>
simp [p]
theorem testBit_two_pow_add_eq (x i : Nat) : testBit (2^i + x) i = not (testBit x i) := by
simp [testBit_to_div_mod, add_div_left, Nat.two_pow_pos, succ_mod_two]
cases mod_two_eq_zero_or_one (x / 2 ^ i) with
| _ p => simp [p]
theorem testBit_mul_two_pow_add_eq (a b i : Nat) :
testBit (2^i*a + b) i = Bool.xor (a%2 = 1) (testBit b i) := by
match a with
| 0 => simp
| a+1 =>
simp [Nat.mul_succ, Nat.add_assoc,
testBit_mul_two_pow_add_eq a,
testBit_two_pow_add_eq,
Nat.succ_mod_two]
cases mod_two_eq_zero_or_one a with
| _ p => simp [p]
theorem testBit_two_pow_add_gt {i j : Nat} (j_lt_i : j < i) (x : Nat) :
testBit (2^i + x) j = testBit x j := by
have i_def : i = j + (i-j) := (Nat.add_sub_cancel' (Nat.le_of_lt j_lt_i)).symm
rw [i_def]
simp only [testBit_to_div_mod, Nat.pow_add,
Nat.add_comm x, Nat.mul_add_div (Nat.two_pow_pos _)]
match i_sub_j_eq : i - j with
| 0 =>
exfalso
rw [Nat.sub_eq_zero_iff_le] at i_sub_j_eq
exact Nat.not_le_of_gt j_lt_i i_sub_j_eq
| d+1 =>
simp [Nat.pow_succ, Nat.mul_comm _ 2, Nat.mul_add_mod]
@[simp] theorem testBit_mod_two_pow (x j i : Nat) :
testBit (x % 2^j) i = (decide (i < j) && testBit x i) := by
induction x using Nat.strongInductionOn generalizing j i with
| ind x hyp =>
rw [mod_eq]
rcases Nat.lt_or_ge x (2^j) with x_lt_j | x_ge_j
· have not_j_le_x := Nat.not_le_of_gt x_lt_j
simp [not_j_le_x]
rcases Nat.lt_or_ge i j with i_lt_j | i_ge_j
· simp [i_lt_j]
· have x_lt : x < 2^i :=
calc x < 2^j := x_lt_j
_ 2^i := Nat.pow_le_pow_of_le_right Nat.zero_lt_two i_ge_j
simp [Nat.testBit_lt_two_pow x_lt]
· generalize y_eq : x - 2^j = y
have x_eq : x = y + 2^j := Nat.eq_add_of_sub_eq x_ge_j y_eq
simp only [Nat.two_pow_pos, x_eq, Nat.le_add_left, true_and, ite_true]
have y_lt_x : y < x := by
simp [x_eq]
exact Nat.lt_add_of_pos_right (Nat.two_pow_pos j)
simp only [hyp y y_lt_x]
if i_lt_j : i < j then
rw [ Nat.add_comm _ (2^_), testBit_two_pow_add_gt i_lt_j]
else
simp [i_lt_j]
theorem testBit_one_zero : testBit 1 0 = true := by trivial
theorem not_decide_mod_two_eq_one (x : Nat)
: (!decide (x % 2 = 1)) = decide (x % 2 = 0) := by
cases Nat.mod_two_eq_zero_or_one x <;> (rename_i p; simp [p])
theorem testBit_two_pow_sub_succ (h₂ : x < 2 ^ n) (i : Nat) :
testBit (2^n - (x + 1)) i = (decide (i < n) && ! testBit x i) := by
induction i generalizing n x with
| zero =>
match n with
| 0 => simp [succ_sub_succ_eq_sub]
| n+1 =>
simp [not_decide_mod_two_eq_one]
omega
| succ i ih =>
simp only [testBit_succ]
match n with
| 0 =>
simp [decide_eq_false, succ_sub_succ_eq_sub]
| n+1 =>
rw [Nat.two_pow_succ_sub_succ_div_two, ih]
· simp [Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff]
· omega
@[simp] theorem testBit_two_pow_sub_one (n i : Nat) : testBit (2^n-1) i = decide (i < n) := by
rw [testBit_two_pow_sub_succ]
· simp
· exact Nat.two_pow_pos _
theorem testBit_bool_to_nat (b : Bool) (i : Nat) :
testBit (Bool.toNat b) i = (decide (i = 0) && b) := by
cases b <;> cases i <;>
simp [testBit_to_div_mod, Nat.pow_succ, Nat.mul_comm _ 2,
Nat.div_div_eq_div_mul _ 2, one_div_two,
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
/-! ### bitwise -/
theorem testBit_bitwise
(false_false_axiom : f false false = false) (x y i : Nat)
: (bitwise f x y).testBit i = f (x.testBit i) (y.testBit i) := by
induction i using Nat.strongInductionOn generalizing x y with
| ind i hyp =>
unfold bitwise
if x_zero : x = 0 then
cases p : f false true <;>
cases yi : testBit y i <;>
simp [x_zero, p, yi, false_false_axiom]
else if y_zero : y = 0 then
simp [x_zero, y_zero]
cases p : f true false <;>
cases xi : testBit x i <;>
simp [p, xi, false_false_axiom]
else
simp only [x_zero, y_zero, Nat.two_mul]
cases i with
| zero =>
cases p : f (decide (x % 2 = 1)) (decide (y % 2 = 1)) <;>
simp [p, Nat.mul_add_mod, mod_eq_of_lt]
| succ i =>
have hyp_i := hyp i (Nat.le_refl (i+1))
cases p : f (decide (x % 2 = 1)) (decide (y % 2 = 1)) <;>
simp [p, one_div_two, hyp_i, Nat.mul_add_div]
/-! ### bitwise -/
@[local simp]
private theorem eq_0_of_lt_one (x : Nat) : x < 1 x = 0 :=
Iff.intro
(fun p =>
match x with
| 0 => Eq.refl 0
| _+1 => False.elim (not_lt_zero _ (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ p)))
(fun p => by simp [p])
private theorem eq_0_of_lt (x : Nat) : x < 2^ 0 x = 0 := eq_0_of_lt_one x
@[local simp]
private theorem zero_lt_pow (n : Nat) : 0 < 2^n := by
induction n
case zero => simp [eq_0_of_lt]
case succ n hyp => simpa [Nat.pow_succ]
private theorem div_two_le_of_lt_two {m n : Nat} (p : m < 2 ^ succ n) : m / 2 < 2^n := by
simp [div_lt_iff_lt_mul Nat.zero_lt_two]
exact p
/-- This provides a bound on bitwise operations. -/
theorem bitwise_lt_two_pow (left : x < 2^n) (right : y < 2^n) : (Nat.bitwise f x y) < 2^n := by
induction n generalizing x y with
| zero =>
simp only [eq_0_of_lt] at left right
unfold bitwise
simp [left, right]
| succ n hyp =>
unfold bitwise
if x_zero : x = 0 then
simp only [x_zero, if_pos]
by_cases p : f false true = true <;> simp [p, right]
else if y_zero : y = 0 then
simp only [x_zero, y_zero, if_neg, if_pos]
by_cases p : f true false = true <;> simp [p, left]
else
simp only [x_zero, y_zero, if_neg]
have hyp1 := hyp (div_two_le_of_lt_two left) (div_two_le_of_lt_two right)
by_cases p : f (decide (x % 2 = 1)) (decide (y % 2 = 1)) = true <;>
simp [p, Nat.pow_succ, mul_succ, Nat.add_assoc]
case pos =>
apply lt_of_succ_le
simp only [ Nat.succ_add]
apply Nat.add_le_add <;> exact hyp1
case neg =>
apply Nat.add_lt_add <;> exact hyp1
/-! ### and -/
@[simp] theorem testBit_and (x y i : Nat) : (x &&& y).testBit i = (x.testBit i && y.testBit i) := by
simp [HAnd.hAnd, AndOp.and, land, testBit_bitwise ]
theorem and_lt_two_pow (x : Nat) {y n : Nat} (right : y < 2^n) : (x &&& y) < 2^n := by
apply lt_pow_two_of_testBit
intro i i_ge_n
have yf : testBit y i = false := by
apply Nat.testBit_lt_two_pow
apply Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le right
exact pow_le_pow_of_le_right Nat.zero_lt_two i_ge_n
simp [testBit_and, yf]
@[simp] theorem and_pow_two_is_mod (x n : Nat) : x &&& (2^n-1) = x % 2^n := by
apply eq_of_testBit_eq
intro i
simp only [testBit_and, testBit_mod_two_pow]
cases testBit x i <;> simp
theorem and_pow_two_identity {x : Nat} (lt : x < 2^n) : x &&& 2^n-1 = x := by
rw [and_pow_two_is_mod]
apply Nat.mod_eq_of_lt lt
/-! ### lor -/
@[simp] theorem or_zero (x : Nat) : 0 ||| x = x := by
simp only [HOr.hOr, OrOp.or, lor]
unfold bitwise
simp [@eq_comm _ 0]
@[simp] theorem zero_or (x : Nat) : x ||| 0 = x := by
simp only [HOr.hOr, OrOp.or, lor]
unfold bitwise
simp [@eq_comm _ 0]
@[simp] theorem testBit_or (x y i : Nat) : (x ||| y).testBit i = (x.testBit i || y.testBit i) := by
simp [HOr.hOr, OrOp.or, lor, testBit_bitwise ]
theorem or_lt_two_pow {x y n : Nat} (left : x < 2^n) (right : y < 2^n) : x ||| y < 2^n :=
bitwise_lt_two_pow left right
/-! ### xor -/
@[simp] theorem testBit_xor (x y i : Nat) :
(x ^^^ y).testBit i = Bool.xor (x.testBit i) (y.testBit i) := by
simp [HXor.hXor, Xor.xor, xor, testBit_bitwise ]
theorem xor_lt_two_pow {x y n : Nat} (left : x < 2^n) (right : y < 2^n) : x ^^^ y < 2^n :=
bitwise_lt_two_pow left right
/-! ### Arithmetic -/
theorem testBit_mul_pow_two_add (a : Nat) {b i : Nat} (b_lt : b < 2^i) (j : Nat) :
testBit (2 ^ i * a + b) j =
if j < i then
testBit b j
else
testBit a (j - i) := by
cases Nat.lt_or_ge j i with
| inl j_lt =>
simp only [j_lt]
have i_def : i = j + succ (pred (i-j)) := by
rw [succ_pred_eq_of_pos] <;> omega
rw [i_def]
simp only [testBit_to_div_mod, Nat.pow_add, Nat.mul_assoc]
simp only [Nat.mul_add_div (Nat.two_pow_pos _), Nat.mul_add_mod]
simp [Nat.pow_succ, Nat.mul_comm _ 2, Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_add_mod]
| inr j_ge =>
have j_def : j = i + (j-i) := (Nat.add_sub_cancel' j_ge).symm
simp only [
testBit_to_div_mod,
Nat.not_lt_of_le,
j_ge,
ite_false]
simp [congrArg (2^·) j_def, Nat.pow_add,
Nat.div_div_eq_div_mul,
Nat.mul_add_div,
Nat.div_eq_of_lt b_lt,
Nat.two_pow_pos i]
theorem testBit_mul_pow_two :
testBit (2 ^ i * a) j = (decide (j i) && testBit a (j-i)) := by
have gen := testBit_mul_pow_two_add a (Nat.two_pow_pos i) j
simp at gen
rw [gen]
cases Nat.lt_or_ge j i with
| _ p => simp [p, Nat.not_le_of_lt, Nat.not_lt_of_le]
theorem mul_add_lt_is_or {b : Nat} (b_lt : b < 2^i) (a : Nat) : 2^i * a + b = 2^i * a ||| b := by
apply eq_of_testBit_eq
intro j
simp only [testBit_mul_pow_two_add _ b_lt,
testBit_or, testBit_mul_pow_two]
if j_lt : j < i then
simp [Nat.not_le_of_lt, j_lt]
else
have i_le : i j := Nat.le_of_not_lt j_lt
have b_lt_j :=
calc b < 2 ^ i := b_lt
_ 2 ^ j := Nat.pow_le_pow_of_le_right Nat.zero_lt_two i_le
simp [i_le, j_lt, testBit_lt_two_pow, b_lt_j]
/-! ### shiftLeft and shiftRight -/
@[simp] theorem testBit_shiftLeft (x : Nat) : testBit (x <<< i) j =
(decide (j i) && testBit x (j-i)) := by
simp [shiftLeft_eq, Nat.mul_comm _ (2^_), testBit_mul_pow_two]
@[simp] theorem testBit_shiftRight (x : Nat) : testBit (x >>> i) j = testBit x (i+j) := by
simp [testBit, shiftRight_add]

View File

@@ -1,57 +0,0 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Mario Carneiro
-/
prelude
import Init.Classical
import Init.Data.Ord
/-! # Basic lemmas about comparing natural numbers
This file introduce some basic lemmas about compare as applied to natural
numbers.
-/
namespace Nat
theorem compare_def_lt (a b : Nat) :
compare a b = if a < b then .lt else if b < a then .gt else .eq := by
simp only [compare, compareOfLessAndEq]
split
· rfl
· next h =>
match Nat.lt_or_eq_of_le (Nat.not_lt.1 h) with
| .inl h => simp [h, Nat.ne_of_gt h]
| .inr rfl => simp
theorem compare_def_le (a b : Nat) :
compare a b = if a b then if b a then .eq else .lt else .gt := by
rw [compare_def_lt]
split
· next hlt => simp [Nat.le_of_lt hlt, Nat.not_le.2 hlt]
· next hge =>
split
· next hgt => simp [Nat.le_of_lt hgt, Nat.not_le.2 hgt]
· next hle => simp [Nat.not_lt.1 hge, Nat.not_lt.1 hle]
protected theorem compare_swap (a b : Nat) : (compare a b).swap = compare b a := by
simp only [compare_def_le]; (repeat' split) <;> try rfl
next h1 h2 => cases h1 (Nat.le_of_not_le h2)
protected theorem compare_eq_eq {a b : Nat} : compare a b = .eq a = b := by
rw [compare_def_lt]; (repeat' split) <;> simp [Nat.ne_of_lt, Nat.ne_of_gt, *]
next hlt hgt => exact Nat.le_antisymm (Nat.not_lt.1 hgt) (Nat.not_lt.1 hlt)
protected theorem compare_eq_lt {a b : Nat} : compare a b = .lt a < b := by
rw [compare_def_lt]; (repeat' split) <;> simp [*]
protected theorem compare_eq_gt {a b : Nat} : compare a b = .gt b < a := by
rw [compare_def_lt]; (repeat' split) <;> simp [Nat.le_of_lt, *]
protected theorem compare_ne_gt {a b : Nat} : compare a b .gt a b := by
rw [compare_def_le]; (repeat' split) <;> simp [*]
protected theorem compare_ne_lt {a b : Nat} : compare a b .lt b a := by
rw [compare_def_le]; (repeat' split) <;> simp [Nat.le_of_not_le, *]
end Nat

View File

@@ -10,13 +10,6 @@ import Init.Data.Nat.Basic
namespace Nat
/--
Divisibility of natural numbers. `a b` (typed as `\|`) says that
there is some `c` such that `b = a * c`.
-/
instance : Dvd Nat where
dvd a b := Exists (fun c => b = a * c)
theorem div_rec_lemma {x y : Nat} : 0 < y y x x - y < x :=
fun ypos, ylex => sub_lt (Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le ypos ylex) ypos
@@ -28,14 +21,14 @@ protected def div (x y : @& Nat) : Nat :=
0
decreasing_by apply div_rec_lemma; assumption
instance instDiv : Div Nat := Nat.div
instance : Div Nat := Nat.div
theorem div_eq (x y : Nat) : x / y = if 0 < y y x then (x - y) / y + 1 else 0 := by
show Nat.div x y = _
rw [Nat.div]
rfl
def div.inductionOn.{u}
theorem div.inductionOn.{u}
{motive : Nat Nat Sort u}
(x y : Nat)
(ind : x y, 0 < y y x motive (x - y) y motive x y)
@@ -90,7 +83,7 @@ protected def mod : @& Nat → @& Nat → Nat
| 0, _ => 0
| x@(_ + 1), y => Nat.modCore x y
instance instMod : Mod Nat := Nat.mod
instance : Mod Nat := Nat.mod
protected theorem modCore_eq_mod (x y : Nat) : Nat.modCore x y = x % y := by
cases x with
@@ -102,7 +95,7 @@ protected theorem modCore_eq_mod (x y : Nat) : Nat.modCore x y = x % y := by
theorem mod_eq (x y : Nat) : x % y = if 0 < y y x then (x - y) % y else x := by
rw [Nat.modCore_eq_mod, Nat.modCore_eq_mod, Nat.modCore]
def mod.inductionOn.{u}
theorem mod.inductionOn.{u}
{motive : Nat Nat Sort u}
(x y : Nat)
(ind : x y, 0 < y y x motive (x - y) y motive x y)
@@ -205,33 +198,13 @@ theorem le_div_iff_mul_le (k0 : 0 < k) : x ≤ y / k ↔ x * k ≤ y := by
induction y, k using mod.inductionOn generalizing x with
(rw [div_eq]; simp [h]; cases x with | zero => simp [zero_le] | succ x => ?_)
| base y k h =>
simp only [add_one, succ_mul, false_iff, Nat.not_le]
refine Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ (Nat.le_add_left ..)
simp [not_succ_le_zero x, succ_mul, Nat.add_comm]
refine Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ (Nat.le_add_right ..)
exact Nat.not_le.1 fun h' => h k0, h'
| ind y k h IH =>
rw [Nat.add_le_add_iff_right, IH k0, succ_mul,
rw [ add_one, Nat.add_le_add_iff_right, IH k0, succ_mul,
Nat.add_sub_cancel (x*k) k, Nat.sub_le_sub_iff_right h.2, Nat.add_sub_cancel]
protected theorem div_div_eq_div_mul (m n k : Nat) : m / n / k = m / (n * k) := by
cases eq_zero_or_pos k with
| inl k0 => rw [k0, Nat.mul_zero, Nat.div_zero, Nat.div_zero] | inr kpos => ?_
cases eq_zero_or_pos n with
| inl n0 => rw [n0, Nat.zero_mul, Nat.div_zero, Nat.zero_div] | inr npos => ?_
apply Nat.le_antisymm
apply (le_div_iff_mul_le (Nat.mul_pos npos kpos)).2
rw [Nat.mul_comm n k, Nat.mul_assoc]
apply (le_div_iff_mul_le npos).1
apply (le_div_iff_mul_le kpos).1
(apply Nat.le_refl)
apply (le_div_iff_mul_le kpos).2
apply (le_div_iff_mul_le npos).2
rw [Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_comm n k]
apply (le_div_iff_mul_le (Nat.mul_pos kpos npos)).1
apply Nat.le_refl
theorem div_mul_le_self : (m n : Nat), m / n * n m
| m, 0 => by simp
| m, n+1 => (le_div_iff_mul_le (Nat.succ_pos _)).1 (Nat.le_refl _)
@@ -293,7 +266,7 @@ theorem sub_mul_div (x n p : Nat) (h₁ : n*p ≤ x) : (x - n*p) / n = x / n - p
rw [mul_succ] at h₁
exact h₁
rw [sub_succ, IH h₂, div_eq_sub_div h₀ h₃]
simp [Nat.pred_succ, mul_succ, Nat.sub_sub]
simp [add_one, Nat.pred_succ, mul_succ, Nat.sub_sub]
theorem mul_sub_div (x n p : Nat) (h₁ : x < n*p) : (n * p - succ x) / n = p - succ (x / n) := by
have npos : 0 < n := (eq_zero_or_pos _).resolve_left fun n0 => by
@@ -334,50 +307,4 @@ theorem div_eq_of_lt (h₀ : a < b) : a / b = 0 := by
intro h₁
apply Nat.not_le_of_gt h₀ h₁.right
protected theorem mul_div_cancel (m : Nat) {n : Nat} (H : 0 < n) : m * n / n = m := by
let t := add_mul_div_right 0 m H
rwa [Nat.zero_add, Nat.zero_div, Nat.zero_add] at t
protected theorem mul_div_cancel_left (m : Nat) {n : Nat} (H : 0 < n) : n * m / n = m := by
rw [Nat.mul_comm, Nat.mul_div_cancel _ H]
protected theorem div_le_of_le_mul {m n : Nat} : {k}, m k * n m / k n
| 0, _ => by simp [Nat.div_zero, n.zero_le]
| succ k, h => by
suffices succ k * (m / succ k) succ k * n from
Nat.le_of_mul_le_mul_left this (zero_lt_succ _)
have h1 : succ k * (m / succ k) m % succ k + succ k * (m / succ k) := Nat.le_add_left _ _
have h2 : m % succ k + succ k * (m / succ k) = m := by rw [mod_add_div]
have h3 : m succ k * n := h
rw [ h2] at h3
exact Nat.le_trans h1 h3
@[simp] theorem mul_div_right (n : Nat) {m : Nat} (H : 0 < m) : m * n / m = n := by
induction n <;> simp_all [mul_succ]
@[simp] theorem mul_div_left (m : Nat) {n : Nat} (H : 0 < n) : m * n / n = m := by
rw [Nat.mul_comm, mul_div_right _ H]
protected theorem div_self (H : 0 < n) : n / n = 1 := by
let t := add_div_right 0 H
rwa [Nat.zero_add, Nat.zero_div] at t
protected theorem div_eq_of_eq_mul_left (H1 : 0 < n) (H2 : m = k * n) : m / n = k :=
by rw [H2, Nat.mul_div_cancel _ H1]
protected theorem div_eq_of_eq_mul_right (H1 : 0 < n) (H2 : m = n * k) : m / n = k :=
by rw [H2, Nat.mul_div_cancel_left _ H1]
protected theorem mul_div_mul_left {m : Nat} (n k : Nat) (H : 0 < m) :
m * n / (m * k) = n / k := by rw [ Nat.div_div_eq_div_mul, Nat.mul_div_cancel_left _ H]
protected theorem mul_div_mul_right {m : Nat} (n k : Nat) (H : 0 < m) :
n * m / (k * m) = n / k := by rw [Nat.mul_comm, Nat.mul_comm k, Nat.mul_div_mul_left _ _ H]
theorem mul_div_le (m n : Nat) : n * (m / n) m := by
match n, Nat.eq_zero_or_pos n with
| _, Or.inl rfl => rw [Nat.zero_mul]; exact m.zero_le
| n, Or.inr h => rw [Nat.mul_comm, Nat.le_div_iff_mul_le h]; exact Nat.le_refl _
end Nat

View File

@@ -1,14 +1,15 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Mario Carneiro
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Nat.Div
import Init.Meta
namespace Nat
/--
Divisibility of natural numbers. `a b` (typed as `\|`) says that
there is some `c` such that `b = a * c`.
-/
instance : Dvd Nat where
dvd a b := Exists (fun c => b = a * c)
protected theorem dvd_refl (a : Nat) : a a := 1, by simp
protected theorem dvd_zero (a : Nat) : a 0 := 0, by simp
@@ -84,6 +85,7 @@ theorem emod_pos_of_not_dvd {a b : Nat} (h : ¬ a b) : 0 < b % a := by
rw [dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero] at h
exact Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h
protected theorem mul_div_cancel' {n m : Nat} (H : n m) : n * (m / n) = m := by
have := mod_add_div m n
rwa [mod_eq_zero_of_dvd H, Nat.zero_add] at this
@@ -91,42 +93,4 @@ protected theorem mul_div_cancel' {n m : Nat} (H : n m) : n * (m / n) = m :=
protected theorem div_mul_cancel {n m : Nat} (H : n m) : m / n * n = m := by
rw [Nat.mul_comm, Nat.mul_div_cancel' H]
@[simp] theorem mod_mod_of_dvd (a : Nat) (h : c b) : a % b % c = a % c := by
rw (config := {occs := .pos [2]}) [ mod_add_div a b]
have x, h := h
subst h
rw [Nat.mul_assoc, add_mul_mod_self_left]
protected theorem dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_left
(kpos : 0 < k) (H : k * m k * n) : m n := by
let l, H := H
rw [Nat.mul_assoc] at H
exact _, Nat.eq_of_mul_eq_mul_left kpos H
protected theorem dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_right (kpos : 0 < k) (H : m * k n * k) : m n := by
rw [Nat.mul_comm m k, Nat.mul_comm n k] at H; exact Nat.dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_left kpos H
theorem dvd_sub {k m n : Nat} (H : n m) (h₁ : k m) (h₂ : k n) : k m - n :=
(Nat.dvd_add_iff_left h₂).2 <| by rwa [Nat.sub_add_cancel H]
protected theorem mul_dvd_mul {a b c d : Nat} : a b c d a * c b * d
| e, he, f, hf =>
e * f, by simp [he, hf, Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_left_comm, Nat.mul_comm]
protected theorem mul_dvd_mul_left (a : Nat) (h : b c) : a * b a * c :=
Nat.mul_dvd_mul (Nat.dvd_refl a) h
protected theorem mul_dvd_mul_right (h: a b) (c : Nat) : a * c b * c :=
Nat.mul_dvd_mul h (Nat.dvd_refl c)
@[simp] theorem dvd_one {n : Nat} : n 1 n = 1 :=
eq_one_of_dvd_one, fun h => h.symm Nat.dvd_refl _
protected theorem mul_div_assoc (m : Nat) (H : k n) : m * n / k = m * (n / k) := by
match Nat.eq_zero_or_pos k with
| .inl h0 => rw [h0, Nat.div_zero, Nat.div_zero, Nat.mul_zero]
| .inr hpos =>
have h1 : m * n / k = m * (n / k * k) / k := by rw [Nat.div_mul_cancel H]
rw [h1, Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_div_cancel _ hpos]
end Nat

View File

@@ -1,41 +1,21 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Nat.Dvd
import Init.NotationExtra
import Init.RCases
namespace Nat
/--
Computes the greatest common divisor of two natural numbers.
This reference implementation via the Euclidean algorithm
is overridden in both the kernel and the compiler to efficiently
evaluate using the "bignum" representation (see `Nat`).
The definition provided here is the logical model
(and it is soundness-critical that they coincide).
The GCD of two natural numbers is the largest natural number
that divides both arguments.
In particular, the GCD of a number and `0` is the number itself:
```
example : Nat.gcd 10 15 = 5 := rfl
example : Nat.gcd 0 5 = 5 := rfl
example : Nat.gcd 7 0 = 7 := rfl
```
-/
@[extern "lean_nat_gcd"]
def gcd (m n : @& Nat) : Nat :=
if m = 0 then
n
else
gcd (n % m) m
termination_by m
decreasing_by simp_wf; apply mod_lt _ (zero_lt_of_ne_zero _); assumption
termination_by m
decreasing_by simp_wf; apply mod_lt _ (zero_lt_of_ne_zero _); assumption
@[simp] theorem gcd_zero_left (y : Nat) : gcd 0 y = y :=
rfl
@@ -89,166 +69,4 @@ theorem dvd_gcd : k m → k n → k gcd m n := by
| H0 n => rw [gcd_zero_left]; exact kn
| H1 n m _ IH => rw [gcd_rec]; exact IH ((dvd_mod_iff km).2 kn) km
theorem dvd_gcd_iff : k gcd m n k m k n :=
fun h => let h₁, h₂ := gcd_dvd m n; Nat.dvd_trans h h₁, Nat.dvd_trans h h₂,
fun h₁, h₂ => dvd_gcd h₁ h₂
theorem gcd_comm (m n : Nat) : gcd m n = gcd n m :=
Nat.dvd_antisymm
(dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_right m n) (gcd_dvd_left m n))
(dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_right n m) (gcd_dvd_left n m))
theorem gcd_eq_left_iff_dvd : m n gcd m n = m :=
fun h => by rw [gcd_rec, mod_eq_zero_of_dvd h, gcd_zero_left],
fun h => h gcd_dvd_right m n
theorem gcd_eq_right_iff_dvd : m n gcd n m = m := by
rw [gcd_comm]; exact gcd_eq_left_iff_dvd
theorem gcd_assoc (m n k : Nat) : gcd (gcd m n) k = gcd m (gcd n k) :=
Nat.dvd_antisymm
(dvd_gcd
(Nat.dvd_trans (gcd_dvd_left (gcd m n) k) (gcd_dvd_left m n))
(dvd_gcd (Nat.dvd_trans (gcd_dvd_left (gcd m n) k) (gcd_dvd_right m n))
(gcd_dvd_right (gcd m n) k)))
(dvd_gcd
(dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_left m (gcd n k))
(Nat.dvd_trans (gcd_dvd_right m (gcd n k)) (gcd_dvd_left n k)))
(Nat.dvd_trans (gcd_dvd_right m (gcd n k)) (gcd_dvd_right n k)))
@[simp] theorem gcd_one_right (n : Nat) : gcd n 1 = 1 := (gcd_comm n 1).trans (gcd_one_left n)
theorem gcd_mul_left (m n k : Nat) : gcd (m * n) (m * k) = m * gcd n k := by
induction n, k using gcd.induction with
| H0 k => simp
| H1 n k _ IH => rwa [ mul_mod_mul_left, gcd_rec, gcd_rec] at IH
theorem gcd_mul_right (m n k : Nat) : gcd (m * n) (k * n) = gcd m k * n := by
rw [Nat.mul_comm m n, Nat.mul_comm k n, Nat.mul_comm (gcd m k) n, gcd_mul_left]
theorem gcd_pos_of_pos_left {m : Nat} (n : Nat) (mpos : 0 < m) : 0 < gcd m n :=
pos_of_dvd_of_pos (gcd_dvd_left m n) mpos
theorem gcd_pos_of_pos_right (m : Nat) {n : Nat} (npos : 0 < n) : 0 < gcd m n :=
pos_of_dvd_of_pos (gcd_dvd_right m n) npos
theorem div_gcd_pos_of_pos_left (b : Nat) (h : 0 < a) : 0 < a / a.gcd b :=
(Nat.le_div_iff_mul_le <| Nat.gcd_pos_of_pos_left _ h).2 (Nat.one_mul _ Nat.gcd_le_left _ h)
theorem div_gcd_pos_of_pos_right (a : Nat) (h : 0 < b) : 0 < b / a.gcd b :=
(Nat.le_div_iff_mul_le <| Nat.gcd_pos_of_pos_right _ h).2 (Nat.one_mul _ Nat.gcd_le_right _ h)
theorem eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left {m n : Nat} (H : gcd m n = 0) : m = 0 :=
match eq_zero_or_pos m with
| .inl H0 => H0
| .inr H1 => absurd (Eq.symm H) (ne_of_lt (gcd_pos_of_pos_left _ H1))
theorem eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right {m n : Nat} (H : gcd m n = 0) : n = 0 := by
rw [gcd_comm] at H
exact eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left H
theorem gcd_ne_zero_left : m 0 gcd m n 0 := mt eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left
theorem gcd_ne_zero_right : n 0 gcd m n 0 := mt eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right
theorem gcd_div {m n k : Nat} (H1 : k m) (H2 : k n) :
gcd (m / k) (n / k) = gcd m n / k :=
match eq_zero_or_pos k with
| .inl H0 => by simp [H0]
| .inr H3 => by
apply Nat.eq_of_mul_eq_mul_right H3
rw [Nat.div_mul_cancel (dvd_gcd H1 H2), gcd_mul_right,
Nat.div_mul_cancel H1, Nat.div_mul_cancel H2]
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_left {m k : Nat} (n : Nat) (H : m k) : gcd m n gcd k n :=
dvd_gcd (Nat.dvd_trans (gcd_dvd_left m n) H) (gcd_dvd_right m n)
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_right {m k : Nat} (n : Nat) (H : m k) : gcd n m gcd n k :=
dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_left n m) (Nat.dvd_trans (gcd_dvd_right n m) H)
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left (m n k : Nat) : gcd m n gcd (k * m) n :=
gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_left _ (Nat.dvd_mul_left _ _)
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right (m n k : Nat) : gcd m n gcd (m * k) n :=
gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_left _ (Nat.dvd_mul_right _ _)
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left_right (m n k : Nat) : gcd m n gcd m (k * n) :=
gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_right _ (Nat.dvd_mul_left _ _)
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right_right (m n k : Nat) : gcd m n gcd m (n * k) :=
gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_right _ (Nat.dvd_mul_right _ _)
theorem gcd_eq_left {m n : Nat} (H : m n) : gcd m n = m :=
Nat.dvd_antisymm (gcd_dvd_left _ _) (dvd_gcd (Nat.dvd_refl _) H)
theorem gcd_eq_right {m n : Nat} (H : n m) : gcd m n = n := by
rw [gcd_comm, gcd_eq_left H]
@[simp] theorem gcd_mul_left_left (m n : Nat) : gcd (m * n) n = n :=
Nat.dvd_antisymm (gcd_dvd_right _ _) (dvd_gcd (Nat.dvd_mul_left _ _) (Nat.dvd_refl _))
@[simp] theorem gcd_mul_left_right (m n : Nat) : gcd n (m * n) = n := by
rw [gcd_comm, gcd_mul_left_left]
@[simp] theorem gcd_mul_right_left (m n : Nat) : gcd (n * m) n = n := by
rw [Nat.mul_comm, gcd_mul_left_left]
@[simp] theorem gcd_mul_right_right (m n : Nat) : gcd n (n * m) = n := by
rw [gcd_comm, gcd_mul_right_left]
@[simp] theorem gcd_gcd_self_right_left (m n : Nat) : gcd m (gcd m n) = gcd m n :=
Nat.dvd_antisymm (gcd_dvd_right _ _) (dvd_gcd (gcd_dvd_left _ _) (Nat.dvd_refl _))
@[simp] theorem gcd_gcd_self_right_right (m n : Nat) : gcd m (gcd n m) = gcd n m := by
rw [gcd_comm n m, gcd_gcd_self_right_left]
@[simp] theorem gcd_gcd_self_left_right (m n : Nat) : gcd (gcd n m) m = gcd n m := by
rw [gcd_comm, gcd_gcd_self_right_right]
@[simp] theorem gcd_gcd_self_left_left (m n : Nat) : gcd (gcd m n) m = gcd m n := by
rw [gcd_comm m n, gcd_gcd_self_left_right]
theorem gcd_add_mul_self (m n k : Nat) : gcd m (n + k * m) = gcd m n := by
simp [gcd_rec m (n + k * m), gcd_rec m n]
theorem gcd_eq_zero_iff {i j : Nat} : gcd i j = 0 i = 0 j = 0 :=
fun h => eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left h, eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right h,
fun h => by simp [h]
/-- Characterization of the value of `Nat.gcd`. -/
theorem gcd_eq_iff (a b : Nat) :
gcd a b = g g a g b ( c, c a c b c g) := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
exact gcd_dvd_left _ _, gcd_dvd_right _ _, fun _ => Nat.dvd_gcd
· rintro ha, hb, hc
apply Nat.dvd_antisymm
· apply hc
· exact gcd_dvd_left a b
· exact gcd_dvd_right a b
· exact Nat.dvd_gcd ha hb
/-- Represent a divisor of `m * n` as a product of a divisor of `m` and a divisor of `n`. -/
def prod_dvd_and_dvd_of_dvd_prod {k m n : Nat} (H : k m * n) :
{d : {m' // m' m} × {n' // n' n} // k = d.1.val * d.2.val} :=
if h0 : gcd k m = 0 then
0, eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right h0 Nat.dvd_refl 0,
n, Nat.dvd_refl n,
eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left h0 (Nat.zero_mul n).symm
else by
have hd : gcd k m * (k / gcd k m) = k := Nat.mul_div_cancel' (gcd_dvd_left k m)
refine gcd k m, gcd_dvd_right k m, k / gcd k m, ?_, hd.symm
apply Nat.dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_left (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h0)
rw [hd, gcd_mul_right]
exact Nat.dvd_gcd (Nat.dvd_mul_right _ _) H
theorem gcd_mul_dvd_mul_gcd (k m n : Nat) : gcd k (m * n) gcd k m * gcd k n := by
let m', hm', n', hn', (h : gcd k (m * n) = m' * n') :=
prod_dvd_and_dvd_of_dvd_prod <| gcd_dvd_right k (m * n)
rw [h]
have h' : m' * n' k := h gcd_dvd_left ..
exact Nat.mul_dvd_mul
(dvd_gcd (Nat.dvd_trans (Nat.dvd_mul_right m' n') h') hm')
(dvd_gcd (Nat.dvd_trans (Nat.dvd_mul_left n' m') h') hn')
end Nat

View File

@@ -1,66 +0,0 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Nat.Gcd
import Init.Data.Nat.Lemmas
namespace Nat
/-- The least common multiple of `m` and `n`, defined using `gcd`. -/
def lcm (m n : Nat) : Nat := m * n / gcd m n
theorem lcm_comm (m n : Nat) : lcm m n = lcm n m := by
rw [lcm, lcm, Nat.mul_comm n m, gcd_comm n m]
@[simp] theorem lcm_zero_left (m : Nat) : lcm 0 m = 0 := by simp [lcm]
@[simp] theorem lcm_zero_right (m : Nat) : lcm m 0 = 0 := by simp [lcm]
@[simp] theorem lcm_one_left (m : Nat) : lcm 1 m = m := by simp [lcm]
@[simp] theorem lcm_one_right (m : Nat) : lcm m 1 = m := by simp [lcm]
@[simp] theorem lcm_self (m : Nat) : lcm m m = m := by
match eq_zero_or_pos m with
| .inl h => rw [h, lcm_zero_left]
| .inr h => simp [lcm, Nat.mul_div_cancel _ h]
theorem dvd_lcm_left (m n : Nat) : m lcm m n :=
n / gcd m n, by rw [ Nat.mul_div_assoc m (Nat.gcd_dvd_right m n)]; rfl
theorem dvd_lcm_right (m n : Nat) : n lcm m n := lcm_comm n m dvd_lcm_left n m
theorem gcd_mul_lcm (m n : Nat) : gcd m n * lcm m n = m * n := by
rw [lcm, Nat.mul_div_cancel' (Nat.dvd_trans (gcd_dvd_left m n) (Nat.dvd_mul_right m n))]
theorem lcm_dvd {m n k : Nat} (H1 : m k) (H2 : n k) : lcm m n k := by
match eq_zero_or_pos k with
| .inl h => rw [h]; exact Nat.dvd_zero _
| .inr kpos =>
apply Nat.dvd_of_mul_dvd_mul_left (gcd_pos_of_pos_left n (pos_of_dvd_of_pos H1 kpos))
rw [gcd_mul_lcm, gcd_mul_right, Nat.mul_comm n k]
exact dvd_gcd (Nat.mul_dvd_mul_left _ H2) (Nat.mul_dvd_mul_right H1 _)
theorem lcm_assoc (m n k : Nat) : lcm (lcm m n) k = lcm m (lcm n k) :=
Nat.dvd_antisymm
(lcm_dvd
(lcm_dvd (dvd_lcm_left m (lcm n k))
(Nat.dvd_trans (dvd_lcm_left n k) (dvd_lcm_right m (lcm n k))))
(Nat.dvd_trans (dvd_lcm_right n k) (dvd_lcm_right m (lcm n k))))
(lcm_dvd
(Nat.dvd_trans (dvd_lcm_left m n) (dvd_lcm_left (lcm m n) k))
(lcm_dvd (Nat.dvd_trans (dvd_lcm_right m n) (dvd_lcm_left (lcm m n) k))
(dvd_lcm_right (lcm m n) k)))
theorem lcm_ne_zero (hm : m 0) (hn : n 0) : lcm m n 0 := by
intro h
have h1 := gcd_mul_lcm m n
rw [h, Nat.mul_zero] at h1
match mul_eq_zero.1 h1.symm with
| .inl hm1 => exact hm hm1
| .inr hn1 => exact hn hn1
end Nat

View File

@@ -1,832 +0,0 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Mario Carneiro
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Nat.MinMax
import Init.Data.Nat.Log2
import Init.Data.Nat.Power2
import Init.Omega
/-! # Basic lemmas about natural numbers
The primary purpose of the lemmas in this file is to assist with reasoning
about sizes of objects, array indices and such.
This file was upstreamed from Std,
and later these lemmas should be organised into other files more systematically.
-/
namespace Nat
/-! ## add -/
protected theorem add_add_add_comm (a b c d : Nat) : (a + b) + (c + d) = (a + c) + (b + d) := by
rw [Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_left_comm b]
theorem one_add (n) : 1 + n = succ n := Nat.add_comm ..
theorem succ_eq_one_add (n) : succ n = 1 + n := (one_add _).symm
theorem succ_add_eq_add_succ (a b) : succ a + b = a + succ b := Nat.succ_add ..
protected theorem eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero_right (h : n + m = 0) : n = 0 :=
(Nat.eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero h).1
protected theorem add_eq_zero_iff : n + m = 0 n = 0 m = 0 :=
Nat.eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero, fun h₁, h₂ => h₂.symm h₁
protected theorem add_left_cancel_iff {n : Nat} : n + m = n + k m = k :=
Nat.add_left_cancel, fun | rfl => rfl
protected theorem add_right_cancel_iff {n : Nat} : m + n = k + n m = k :=
Nat.add_right_cancel, fun | rfl => rfl
protected theorem add_le_add_iff_left {n : Nat} : n + m n + k m k :=
Nat.le_of_add_le_add_left, fun h => Nat.add_le_add_left h _
protected theorem lt_of_add_lt_add_right : {n : Nat}, k + n < m + n k < m
| 0, h => h
| _+1, h => Nat.lt_of_add_lt_add_right (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h)
protected theorem lt_of_add_lt_add_left {n : Nat} : n + k < n + m k < m := by
rw [Nat.add_comm n, Nat.add_comm n]; exact Nat.lt_of_add_lt_add_right
protected theorem add_lt_add_iff_left {k n m : Nat} : k + n < k + m n < m :=
Nat.lt_of_add_lt_add_left, fun h => Nat.add_lt_add_left h _
protected theorem add_lt_add_iff_right {k n m : Nat} : n + k < m + k n < m :=
Nat.lt_of_add_lt_add_right, fun h => Nat.add_lt_add_right h _
protected theorem add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt {a b c d : Nat} (hle : a b) (hlt : c < d) :
a + c < b + d :=
Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.add_le_add_right hle _) (Nat.add_lt_add_left hlt _)
protected theorem add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le {a b c d : Nat} (hlt : a < b) (hle : c d) :
a + c < b + d :=
Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.add_le_add_left hle _) (Nat.add_lt_add_right hlt _)
protected theorem lt_add_of_pos_left : 0 < k n < k + n := by
rw [Nat.add_comm]; exact Nat.lt_add_of_pos_right
protected theorem pos_of_lt_add_right (h : n < n + k) : 0 < k :=
Nat.lt_of_add_lt_add_left h
protected theorem pos_of_lt_add_left : n < k + n 0 < k := by
rw [Nat.add_comm]; exact Nat.pos_of_lt_add_right
protected theorem lt_add_right_iff_pos : n < n + k 0 < k :=
Nat.pos_of_lt_add_right, Nat.lt_add_of_pos_right
protected theorem lt_add_left_iff_pos : n < k + n 0 < k :=
Nat.pos_of_lt_add_left, Nat.lt_add_of_pos_left
protected theorem add_pos_left (h : 0 < m) (n) : 0 < m + n :=
Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h (Nat.le_add_right ..)
protected theorem add_pos_right (m) (h : 0 < n) : 0 < m + n :=
Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h (Nat.le_add_left ..)
protected theorem add_self_ne_one : n, n + n 1
| n+1, h => by rw [Nat.succ_add, Nat.succ.injEq] at h; contradiction
/-! ## sub -/
protected theorem sub_one (n) : n - 1 = pred n := rfl
protected theorem one_sub : n, 1 - n = if n = 0 then 1 else 0
| 0 => rfl
| _+1 => by rw [if_neg (Nat.succ_ne_zero _), Nat.succ_sub_succ, Nat.zero_sub]
theorem succ_sub_sub_succ (n m k) : succ n - m - succ k = n - m - k := by
rw [Nat.sub_sub, Nat.sub_sub, add_succ, succ_sub_succ]
protected theorem sub_right_comm (m n k : Nat) : m - n - k = m - k - n := by
rw [Nat.sub_sub, Nat.sub_sub, Nat.add_comm]
protected theorem add_sub_cancel_right (n m : Nat) : (n + m) - m = n := Nat.add_sub_cancel ..
@[simp] protected theorem add_sub_cancel' {n m : Nat} (h : m n) : m + (n - m) = n := by
rw [Nat.add_comm, Nat.sub_add_cancel h]
theorem succ_sub_one (n) : succ n - 1 = n := rfl
protected theorem add_one_sub_one (n : Nat) : (n + 1) - 1 = n := rfl
protected theorem one_add_sub_one (n : Nat) : (1 + n) - 1 = n := Nat.add_sub_cancel_left 1 _
protected theorem sub_sub_self {n m : Nat} (h : m n) : n - (n - m) = m :=
(Nat.sub_eq_iff_eq_add (Nat.sub_le ..)).2 (Nat.add_sub_of_le h).symm
protected theorem sub_add_comm {n m k : Nat} (h : k n) : n + m - k = n - k + m := by
rw [Nat.sub_eq_iff_eq_add (Nat.le_trans h (Nat.le_add_right ..))]
rwa [Nat.add_right_comm, Nat.sub_add_cancel]
protected theorem sub_eq_zero_iff_le : n - m = 0 n m :=
Nat.le_of_sub_eq_zero, Nat.sub_eq_zero_of_le
protected theorem sub_pos_iff_lt : 0 < n - m m < n :=
Nat.lt_of_sub_pos, Nat.sub_pos_of_lt
protected theorem sub_le_iff_le_add {a b c : Nat} : a - b c a c + b :=
Nat.le_add_of_sub_le, sub_le_of_le_add
protected theorem sub_le_iff_le_add' {a b c : Nat} : a - b c a b + c := by
rw [Nat.add_comm, Nat.sub_le_iff_le_add]
protected theorem le_sub_iff_add_le {n : Nat} (h : k m) : n m - k n + k m :=
Nat.add_le_of_le_sub h, Nat.le_sub_of_add_le
@[deprecated Nat.le_sub_iff_add_le]
protected theorem add_le_to_le_sub (n : Nat) (h : m k) : n + m k n k - m :=
(Nat.le_sub_iff_add_le h).symm
protected theorem add_le_of_le_sub' {n k m : Nat} (h : m k) : n k - m m + n k :=
Nat.add_comm .. Nat.add_le_of_le_sub h
@[deprecated Nat.add_le_of_le_sub']
protected theorem add_le_of_le_sub_left {n k m : Nat} (h : m k) : n k - m m + n k :=
Nat.add_le_of_le_sub' h
protected theorem le_sub_of_add_le' {n k m : Nat} : m + n k n k - m :=
Nat.add_comm .. Nat.le_sub_of_add_le
protected theorem le_sub_iff_add_le' {n : Nat} (h : k m) : n m - k k + n m :=
Nat.add_le_of_le_sub' h, Nat.le_sub_of_add_le'
protected theorem le_of_sub_le_sub_left : {n k m : Nat}, n k k - m k - n n m
| 0, _, _, _, _ => Nat.zero_le ..
| _+1, _, 0, h₀, h₁ =>
absurd (Nat.sub_lt (Nat.zero_lt_of_lt h₀) (Nat.zero_lt_succ _)) (Nat.not_lt.2 h₁)
| _+1, _+1, _+1, h₀, h₁ => by
simp only [Nat.succ_sub_succ] at h₁
exact succ_le_succ <| Nat.le_of_sub_le_sub_left (Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h₀) h₁
protected theorem sub_le_sub_iff_left {n m k : Nat} (h : n k) : k - m k - n n m :=
Nat.le_of_sub_le_sub_left h, fun h => Nat.sub_le_sub_left h _
protected theorem sub_lt_of_pos_le (h₀ : 0 < a) (h₁ : a b) : b - a < b :=
Nat.sub_lt (Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h₀ h₁) h₀
protected abbrev sub_lt_self := @Nat.sub_lt_of_pos_le
theorem add_lt_of_lt_sub' {a b c : Nat} : b < c - a a + b < c := by
rw [Nat.add_comm]; exact Nat.add_lt_of_lt_sub
protected theorem sub_add_lt_sub (h₁ : m + k n) (h₂ : 0 < k) : n - (m + k) < n - m := by
rw [ Nat.sub_sub]; exact Nat.sub_lt_of_pos_le h₂ (Nat.le_sub_of_add_le' h₁)
theorem sub_one_lt_of_le (h₀ : 0 < a) (h₁ : a b) : a - 1 < b :=
Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le (Nat.pred_lt' h₀) h₁
theorem sub_lt_succ (a b) : a - b < succ a := lt_succ_of_le (sub_le a b)
theorem sub_one_sub_lt (h : i < n) : n - 1 - i < n := by
rw [Nat.sub_right_comm]; exact Nat.sub_one_lt_of_le (Nat.sub_pos_of_lt h) (Nat.sub_le ..)
protected theorem exists_eq_add_of_le (h : m n) : k : Nat, n = m + k :=
n - m, (add_sub_of_le h).symm
protected theorem exists_eq_add_of_le' (h : m n) : k : Nat, n = k + m :=
n - m, (Nat.sub_add_cancel h).symm
protected theorem exists_eq_add_of_lt (h : m < n) : k : Nat, n = m + k + 1 :=
n - (m + 1), by rw [Nat.add_right_comm, add_sub_of_le h]
/-! ### min/max -/
theorem succ_min_succ (x y) : min (succ x) (succ y) = succ (min x y) := by
cases Nat.le_total x y with
| inl h => rw [Nat.min_eq_left h, Nat.min_eq_left (Nat.succ_le_succ h)]
| inr h => rw [Nat.min_eq_right h, Nat.min_eq_right (Nat.succ_le_succ h)]
@[simp] protected theorem min_self (a : Nat) : min a a = a := Nat.min_eq_left (Nat.le_refl _)
@[simp] protected theorem zero_min (a) : min 0 a = 0 := Nat.min_eq_left (Nat.zero_le _)
@[simp] protected theorem min_zero (a) : min a 0 = 0 := Nat.min_eq_right (Nat.zero_le _)
protected theorem min_assoc : (a b c : Nat), min (min a b) c = min a (min b c)
| 0, _, _ => by rw [Nat.zero_min, Nat.zero_min, Nat.zero_min]
| _, 0, _ => by rw [Nat.zero_min, Nat.min_zero, Nat.zero_min]
| _, _, 0 => by rw [Nat.min_zero, Nat.min_zero, Nat.min_zero]
| _+1, _+1, _+1 => by simp only [Nat.succ_min_succ]; exact congrArg succ <| Nat.min_assoc ..
protected theorem sub_sub_eq_min : (a b : Nat), a - (a - b) = min a b
| 0, _ => by rw [Nat.zero_sub, Nat.zero_min]
| _, 0 => by rw [Nat.sub_zero, Nat.sub_self, Nat.min_zero]
| _+1, _+1 => by
rw [Nat.succ_sub_succ, Nat.succ_min_succ, Nat.succ_sub (Nat.sub_le ..)]
exact congrArg succ <| Nat.sub_sub_eq_min ..
protected theorem sub_eq_sub_min (n m : Nat) : n - m = n - min n m := by
cases Nat.le_total n m with
| inl h => rw [Nat.min_eq_left h, Nat.sub_eq_zero_of_le h, Nat.sub_self]
| inr h => rw [Nat.min_eq_right h]
@[simp] protected theorem sub_add_min_cancel (n m : Nat) : n - m + min n m = n := by
rw [Nat.sub_eq_sub_min, Nat.sub_add_cancel (Nat.min_le_left ..)]
protected theorem max_eq_right {a b : Nat} (h : a b) : max a b = b := if_pos h
protected theorem max_eq_left {a b : Nat} (h : b a) : max a b = a := by
rw [Nat.max_comm]; exact Nat.max_eq_right h
protected theorem succ_max_succ (x y) : max (succ x) (succ y) = succ (max x y) := by
cases Nat.le_total x y with
| inl h => rw [Nat.max_eq_right h, Nat.max_eq_right (Nat.succ_le_succ h)]
| inr h => rw [Nat.max_eq_left h, Nat.max_eq_left (Nat.succ_le_succ h)]
protected theorem max_le_of_le_of_le {a b c : Nat} : a c b c max a b c := by
intros; cases Nat.le_total a b with
| inl h => rw [Nat.max_eq_right h]; assumption
| inr h => rw [Nat.max_eq_left h]; assumption
protected theorem max_le {a b c : Nat} : max a b c a c b c :=
fun h => Nat.le_trans (Nat.le_max_left ..) h, Nat.le_trans (Nat.le_max_right ..) h,
fun h₁, h₂ => Nat.max_le_of_le_of_le h₁ h₂
protected theorem max_lt {a b c : Nat} : max a b < c a < c b < c := by
rw [ Nat.succ_le, Nat.succ_max_succ a b]; exact Nat.max_le
@[simp] protected theorem max_self (a : Nat) : max a a = a := Nat.max_eq_right (Nat.le_refl _)
@[simp] protected theorem zero_max (a) : max 0 a = a := Nat.max_eq_right (Nat.zero_le _)
@[simp] protected theorem max_zero (a) : max a 0 = a := Nat.max_eq_left (Nat.zero_le _)
protected theorem max_assoc : (a b c : Nat), max (max a b) c = max a (max b c)
| 0, _, _ => by rw [Nat.zero_max, Nat.zero_max]
| _, 0, _ => by rw [Nat.zero_max, Nat.max_zero]
| _, _, 0 => by rw [Nat.max_zero, Nat.max_zero]
| _+1, _+1, _+1 => by simp only [Nat.succ_max_succ]; exact congrArg succ <| Nat.max_assoc ..
protected theorem sub_add_eq_max (a b : Nat) : a - b + b = max a b := by
match Nat.le_total a b with
| .inl hl => rw [Nat.max_eq_right hl, Nat.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.mpr hl, Nat.zero_add]
| .inr hr => rw [Nat.max_eq_left hr, Nat.sub_add_cancel hr]
protected theorem sub_eq_max_sub (n m : Nat) : n - m = max n m - m := by
cases Nat.le_total m n with
| inl h => rw [Nat.max_eq_left h]
| inr h => rw [Nat.max_eq_right h, Nat.sub_eq_zero_of_le h, Nat.sub_self]
protected theorem max_min_distrib_left : (a b c : Nat), max a (min b c) = min (max a b) (max a c)
| 0, _, _ => by simp only [Nat.zero_max]
| _, 0, _ => by
rw [Nat.zero_min, Nat.max_zero]
exact Nat.min_eq_left (Nat.le_max_left ..) |>.symm
| _, _, 0 => by
rw [Nat.min_zero, Nat.max_zero]
exact Nat.min_eq_right (Nat.le_max_left ..) |>.symm
| _+1, _+1, _+1 => by
simp only [Nat.succ_max_succ, Nat.succ_min_succ]
exact congrArg succ <| Nat.max_min_distrib_left ..
protected theorem min_max_distrib_left : (a b c : Nat), min a (max b c) = max (min a b) (min a c)
| 0, _, _ => by simp only [Nat.zero_min, Nat.max_self]
| _, 0, _ => by simp only [Nat.min_zero, Nat.zero_max]
| _, _, 0 => by simp only [Nat.min_zero, Nat.max_zero]
| _+1, _+1, _+1 => by
simp only [Nat.succ_max_succ, Nat.succ_min_succ]
exact congrArg succ <| Nat.min_max_distrib_left ..
protected theorem max_min_distrib_right (a b c : Nat) :
max (min a b) c = min (max a c) (max b c) := by
repeat rw [Nat.max_comm _ c]
exact Nat.max_min_distrib_left ..
protected theorem min_max_distrib_right (a b c : Nat) :
min (max a b) c = max (min a c) (min b c) := by
repeat rw [Nat.min_comm _ c]
exact Nat.min_max_distrib_left ..
protected theorem add_max_add_right : (a b c : Nat), max (a + c) (b + c) = max a b + c
| _, _, 0 => rfl
| _, _, _+1 => Eq.trans (Nat.succ_max_succ ..) <| congrArg _ (Nat.add_max_add_right ..)
protected theorem add_min_add_right : (a b c : Nat), min (a + c) (b + c) = min a b + c
| _, _, 0 => rfl
| _, _, _+1 => Eq.trans (Nat.succ_min_succ ..) <| congrArg _ (Nat.add_min_add_right ..)
protected theorem add_max_add_left (a b c : Nat) : max (a + b) (a + c) = a + max b c := by
repeat rw [Nat.add_comm a]
exact Nat.add_max_add_right ..
protected theorem add_min_add_left (a b c : Nat) : min (a + b) (a + c) = a + min b c := by
repeat rw [Nat.add_comm a]
exact Nat.add_min_add_right ..
protected theorem pred_min_pred : (x y), min (pred x) (pred y) = pred (min x y)
| 0, _ => by simp only [Nat.pred_zero, Nat.zero_min]
| _, 0 => by simp only [Nat.pred_zero, Nat.min_zero]
| _+1, _+1 => by simp only [Nat.pred_succ, Nat.succ_min_succ]
protected theorem pred_max_pred : (x y), max (pred x) (pred y) = pred (max x y)
| 0, _ => by simp only [Nat.pred_zero, Nat.zero_max]
| _, 0 => by simp only [Nat.pred_zero, Nat.max_zero]
| _+1, _+1 => by simp only [Nat.pred_succ, Nat.succ_max_succ]
protected theorem sub_min_sub_right : (a b c : Nat), min (a - c) (b - c) = min a b - c
| _, _, 0 => rfl
| _, _, _+1 => Eq.trans (Nat.pred_min_pred ..) <| congrArg _ (Nat.sub_min_sub_right ..)
protected theorem sub_max_sub_right : (a b c : Nat), max (a - c) (b - c) = max a b - c
| _, _, 0 => rfl
| _, _, _+1 => Eq.trans (Nat.pred_max_pred ..) <| congrArg _ (Nat.sub_max_sub_right ..)
protected theorem sub_min_sub_left (a b c : Nat) : min (a - b) (a - c) = a - max b c := by
omega
protected theorem sub_max_sub_left (a b c : Nat) : max (a - b) (a - c) = a - min b c := by
omega
protected theorem mul_max_mul_right (a b c : Nat) : max (a * c) (b * c) = max a b * c := by
induction a generalizing b with
| zero => simp
| succ i ind =>
cases b <;> simp [succ_eq_add_one, Nat.succ_mul, Nat.add_max_add_right, ind]
protected theorem mul_min_mul_right (a b c : Nat) : min (a * c) (b * c) = min a b * c := by
induction a generalizing b with
| zero => simp
| succ i ind =>
cases b <;> simp [succ_eq_add_one, Nat.succ_mul, Nat.add_min_add_right, ind]
protected theorem mul_max_mul_left (a b c : Nat) : max (a * b) (a * c) = a * max b c := by
repeat rw [Nat.mul_comm a]
exact Nat.mul_max_mul_right ..
protected theorem mul_min_mul_left (a b c : Nat) : min (a * b) (a * c) = a * min b c := by
repeat rw [Nat.mul_comm a]
exact Nat.mul_min_mul_right ..
-- protected theorem sub_min_sub_left (a b c : Nat) : min (a - b) (a - c) = a - max b c := by
-- induction b, c using Nat.recDiagAux with
-- | zero_left => rw [Nat.sub_zero, Nat.zero_max]; exact Nat.min_eq_right (Nat.sub_le ..)
-- | zero_right => rw [Nat.sub_zero, Nat.max_zero]; exact Nat.min_eq_left (Nat.sub_le ..)
-- | succ_succ _ _ ih => simp only [Nat.sub_succ, Nat.succ_max_succ, Nat.pred_min_pred, ih]
-- protected theorem sub_max_sub_left (a b c : Nat) : max (a - b) (a - c) = a - min b c := by
-- induction b, c using Nat.recDiagAux with
-- | zero_left => rw [Nat.sub_zero, Nat.zero_min]; exact Nat.max_eq_left (Nat.sub_le ..)
-- | zero_right => rw [Nat.sub_zero, Nat.min_zero]; exact Nat.max_eq_right (Nat.sub_le ..)
-- | succ_succ _ _ ih => simp only [Nat.sub_succ, Nat.succ_min_succ, Nat.pred_max_pred, ih]
-- protected theorem mul_max_mul_right (a b c : Nat) : max (a * c) (b * c) = max a b * c := by
-- induction a, b using Nat.recDiagAux with
-- | zero_left => simp only [Nat.zero_mul, Nat.zero_max]
-- | zero_right => simp only [Nat.zero_mul, Nat.max_zero]
-- | succ_succ _ _ ih => simp only [Nat.succ_mul, Nat.add_max_add_right, ih]
-- protected theorem mul_min_mul_right (a b c : Nat) : min (a * c) (b * c) = min a b * c := by
-- induction a, b using Nat.recDiagAux with
-- | zero_left => simp only [Nat.zero_mul, Nat.zero_min]
-- | zero_right => simp only [Nat.zero_mul, Nat.min_zero]
-- | succ_succ _ _ ih => simp only [Nat.succ_mul, Nat.add_min_add_right, ih]
-- protected theorem mul_max_mul_left (a b c : Nat) : max (a * b) (a * c) = a * max b c := by
-- repeat rw [Nat.mul_comm a]
-- exact Nat.mul_max_mul_right ..
-- protected theorem mul_min_mul_left (a b c : Nat) : min (a * b) (a * c) = a * min b c := by
-- repeat rw [Nat.mul_comm a]
-- exact Nat.mul_min_mul_right ..
/-! ### mul -/
@[deprecated Nat.mul_le_mul_left]
protected theorem mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left {a b c : Nat} : a b c * a c * b :=
Nat.mul_le_mul_left c
@[deprecated Nat.mul_le_mul_right]
protected theorem mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right {a b c : Nat} : a b a * c b * c :=
Nat.mul_le_mul_right c
protected theorem mul_right_comm (n m k : Nat) : n * m * k = n * k * m := by
rw [Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_comm m, Nat.mul_assoc]
protected theorem mul_mul_mul_comm (a b c d : Nat) : (a * b) * (c * d) = (a * c) * (b * d) := by
rw [Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_left_comm b]
theorem mul_eq_zero : {m n}, n * m = 0 n = 0 m = 0
| 0, _ => fun _ => .inr rfl, fun _ => rfl
| _, 0 => fun _ => .inl rfl, fun _ => Nat.zero_mul ..
| _+1, _+1 => nofun, nofun
protected theorem mul_ne_zero_iff : n * m 0 n 0 m 0 := by rw [ne_eq, mul_eq_zero, not_or]
protected theorem mul_ne_zero : n 0 m 0 n * m 0 := (Nat.mul_ne_zero_iff.2 ·,·)
protected theorem ne_zero_of_mul_ne_zero_left (h : n * m 0) : n 0 :=
(Nat.mul_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
protected theorem mul_left_cancel {n m k : Nat} (np : 0 < n) (h : n * m = n * k) : m = k := by
match Nat.lt_trichotomy m k with
| Or.inl p =>
have r : n * m < n * k := Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left p np
simp [h] at r
| Or.inr (Or.inl p) => exact p
| Or.inr (Or.inr p) =>
have r : n * k < n * m := Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left p np
simp [h] at r
protected theorem mul_right_cancel {n m k : Nat} (mp : 0 < m) (h : n * m = k * m) : n = k := by
simp [Nat.mul_comm _ m] at h
apply Nat.mul_left_cancel mp h
protected theorem mul_left_cancel_iff {n: Nat} (p : 0 < n) (m k : Nat) : n * m = n * k m = k :=
Nat.mul_left_cancel p, fun | rfl => rfl
protected theorem mul_right_cancel_iff {m : Nat} (p : 0 < m) (n k : Nat) : n * m = k * m n = k :=
Nat.mul_right_cancel p, fun | rfl => rfl
protected theorem ne_zero_of_mul_ne_zero_right (h : n * m 0) : m 0 :=
(Nat.mul_ne_zero_iff.1 h).2
protected theorem le_mul_of_pos_left (m) (h : 0 < n) : m n * m :=
Nat.le_trans (Nat.le_of_eq (Nat.one_mul _).symm) (Nat.mul_le_mul_right _ h)
protected theorem le_mul_of_pos_right (n) (h : 0 < m) : n n * m :=
Nat.le_trans (Nat.le_of_eq (Nat.mul_one _).symm) (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ h)
protected theorem mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le (hac : a < c) (hbd : b d) (hd : 0 < d) :
a * b < c * d :=
Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ hbd) (Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right hac hd)
protected theorem mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le' (hac : a < c) (hbd : b d) (hb : 0 < b) :
a * b < c * d :=
Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le hac hbd (Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le hb hbd)
protected theorem mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt (hac : a c) (hbd : b < d) (hc : 0 < c) :
a * b < c * d :=
Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.mul_le_mul_right _ hac) (Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left hbd hc)
protected theorem mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt' (hac : a c) (hbd : b < d) (ha : 0 < a) :
a * b < c * d :=
Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt hac hbd (Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le ha hac)
protected theorem mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_lt {a b c d : Nat} (hac : a < c) (hbd : b < d) :
a * b < c * d :=
Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt (Nat.le_of_lt hac) hbd (Nat.zero_lt_of_lt hac)
theorem succ_mul_succ (a b) : succ a * succ b = a * b + a + b + 1 := by
rw [succ_mul, mul_succ]; rfl
theorem mul_le_add_right (m k n : Nat) : k * m m + n (k-1) * m n := by
match k with
| 0 =>
simp
| succ k =>
simp [succ_mul, Nat.add_comm _ m, Nat.add_le_add_iff_left]
theorem succ_mul_succ_eq (a b : Nat) : succ a * succ b = a * b + a + b + 1 := by
rw [mul_succ, succ_mul, Nat.add_right_comm _ a]; rfl
protected theorem mul_self_sub_mul_self_eq (a b : Nat) : a * a - b * b = (a + b) * (a - b) := by
rw [Nat.mul_sub_left_distrib, Nat.right_distrib, Nat.right_distrib, Nat.mul_comm b a,
Nat.sub_add_eq, Nat.add_sub_cancel]
protected theorem pos_of_mul_pos_left {a b : Nat} (h : 0 < a * b) : 0 < b := by
apply Decidable.by_contra
intros
simp_all
protected theorem pos_of_mul_pos_right {a b : Nat} (h : 0 < a * b) : 0 < a := by
apply Decidable.by_contra
intros
simp_all
@[simp] protected theorem mul_pos_iff_of_pos_left {a b : Nat} (h : 0 < a) :
0 < a * b 0 < b :=
Nat.pos_of_mul_pos_left, Nat.mul_pos h
@[simp] protected theorem mul_pos_iff_of_pos_right {a b : Nat} (h : 0 < b) :
0 < a * b 0 < a :=
Nat.pos_of_mul_pos_right, fun w => Nat.mul_pos w h
/-! ### div/mod -/
theorem mod_two_eq_zero_or_one (n : Nat) : n % 2 = 0 n % 2 = 1 :=
match n % 2, @Nat.mod_lt n 2 (by decide) with
| 0, _ => .inl rfl
| 1, _ => .inr rfl
theorem le_of_mod_lt {a b : Nat} (h : a % b < a) : b a :=
Nat.not_lt.1 fun hf => (ne_of_lt h).elim (Nat.mod_eq_of_lt hf)
theorem mul_mod_mul_right (z x y : Nat) : (x * z) % (y * z) = (x % y) * z := by
rw [Nat.mul_comm x z, Nat.mul_comm y z, Nat.mul_comm (x % y) z]; apply mul_mod_mul_left
theorem sub_mul_mod {x k n : Nat} (h₁ : n*k x) : (x - n*k) % n = x % n := by
match k with
| 0 => rw [Nat.mul_zero, Nat.sub_zero]
| succ k =>
have h₂ : n * k x := Nat.le_trans (le_add_right _ n) h₁
have h₄ : x - n * k n := by
apply Nat.le_of_add_le_add_right (b := n * k)
rw [Nat.sub_add_cancel h₂]
simp [mul_succ, Nat.add_comm] at h₁; simp [h₁]
rw [mul_succ, Nat.sub_sub, mod_eq_sub_mod h₄, sub_mul_mod h₂]
@[simp] theorem mod_mod (a n : Nat) : (a % n) % n = a % n :=
match eq_zero_or_pos n with
| .inl n0 => by simp [n0, mod_zero]
| .inr npos => Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (mod_lt _ npos)
theorem mul_mod (a b n : Nat) : a * b % n = (a % n) * (b % n) % n := by
rw (config := {occs := .pos [1]}) [ mod_add_div a n]
rw (config := {occs := .pos [1]}) [ mod_add_div b n]
rw [Nat.add_mul, Nat.mul_add, Nat.mul_add,
Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_add n, add_mul_mod_self_left,
Nat.mul_comm _ (n * (b / n)), Nat.mul_assoc, add_mul_mod_self_left]
@[simp] theorem mod_add_mod (m n k : Nat) : (m % n + k) % n = (m + k) % n := by
have := (add_mul_mod_self_left (m % n + k) n (m / n)).symm
rwa [Nat.add_right_comm, mod_add_div] at this
@[simp] theorem add_mod_mod (m n k : Nat) : (m + n % k) % k = (m + n) % k := by
rw [Nat.add_comm, mod_add_mod, Nat.add_comm]
theorem add_mod (a b n : Nat) : (a + b) % n = ((a % n) + (b % n)) % n := by
rw [add_mod_mod, mod_add_mod]
/-! ### pow -/
theorem pow_succ' {m n : Nat} : m ^ n.succ = m * m ^ n := by
rw [Nat.pow_succ, Nat.mul_comm]
@[simp] theorem pow_eq {m n : Nat} : m.pow n = m ^ n := rfl
theorem one_shiftLeft (n : Nat) : 1 <<< n = 2 ^ n := by rw [shiftLeft_eq, Nat.one_mul]
attribute [simp] Nat.pow_zero
protected theorem zero_pow {n : Nat} (H : 0 < n) : 0 ^ n = 0 := by
match n with
| 0 => contradiction
| n+1 => rw [Nat.pow_succ, Nat.mul_zero]
@[simp] protected theorem one_pow (n : Nat) : 1 ^ n = 1 := by
induction n with
| zero => rfl
| succ _ ih => rw [Nat.pow_succ, Nat.mul_one, ih]
@[simp] protected theorem pow_one (a : Nat) : a ^ 1 = a := by
rw [Nat.pow_succ, Nat.pow_zero, Nat.one_mul]
protected theorem pow_two (a : Nat) : a ^ 2 = a * a := by rw [Nat.pow_succ, Nat.pow_one]
protected theorem pow_add (a m n : Nat) : a ^ (m + n) = a ^ m * a ^ n := by
induction n with
| zero => rw [Nat.add_zero, Nat.pow_zero, Nat.mul_one]
| succ _ ih => rw [Nat.add_succ, Nat.pow_succ, Nat.pow_succ, ih, Nat.mul_assoc]
protected theorem pow_add' (a m n : Nat) : a ^ (m + n) = a ^ n * a ^ m := by
rw [ Nat.pow_add, Nat.add_comm]
protected theorem pow_mul (a m n : Nat) : a ^ (m * n) = (a ^ m) ^ n := by
induction n with
| zero => rw [Nat.mul_zero, Nat.pow_zero, Nat.pow_zero]
| succ _ ih => rw [Nat.mul_succ, Nat.pow_add, Nat.pow_succ, ih]
protected theorem pow_mul' (a m n : Nat) : a ^ (m * n) = (a ^ n) ^ m := by
rw [ Nat.pow_mul, Nat.mul_comm]
protected theorem pow_right_comm (a m n : Nat) : (a ^ m) ^ n = (a ^ n) ^ m := by
rw [ Nat.pow_mul, Nat.pow_mul']
protected theorem mul_pow (a b n : Nat) : (a * b) ^ n = a ^ n * b ^ n := by
induction n with
| zero => rw [Nat.pow_zero, Nat.pow_zero, Nat.pow_zero, Nat.mul_one]
| succ _ ih => rw [Nat.pow_succ, Nat.pow_succ, Nat.pow_succ, Nat.mul_mul_mul_comm, ih]
protected abbrev pow_le_pow_left := @pow_le_pow_of_le_left
protected abbrev pow_le_pow_right := @pow_le_pow_of_le_right
protected theorem one_lt_two_pow (h : n 0) : 1 < 2 ^ n :=
match n, h with
| n+1, _ => by
rw [Nat.pow_succ', Nat.one_mul 1]
exact Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le' (by decide) (Nat.two_pow_pos n) (by decide)
@[simp] protected theorem one_lt_two_pow_iff : 1 < 2 ^ n n 0 :=
(by intro h p; subst p; simp at h), Nat.one_lt_two_pow
protected theorem one_le_two_pow : 1 2 ^ n :=
if h : n = 0 then
by subst h; simp
else
Nat.le_of_lt (Nat.one_lt_two_pow h)
protected theorem pow_pos (h : 0 < a) : 0 < a^n :=
match n with
| 0 => Nat.zero_lt_one
| _ + 1 => Nat.mul_pos (Nat.pow_pos h) h
protected theorem pow_lt_pow_succ (h : 1 < a) : a ^ n < a ^ (n + 1) := by
rw [ Nat.mul_one (a^n), Nat.pow_succ]
exact Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_le_of_lt (Nat.le_refl _) h (Nat.pow_pos (Nat.lt_trans Nat.zero_lt_one h))
protected theorem pow_lt_pow_of_lt {a n m : Nat} (h : 1 < a) (w : n < m) : a ^ n < a ^ m := by
have := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_lt w
cases this
case intro k p =>
rw [Nat.add_right_comm] at p
subst p
rw [Nat.pow_add, Nat.mul_one (a^n)]
have t : 0 < a ^ k := Nat.pow_pos (Nat.lt_trans Nat.zero_lt_one h)
exact Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le (Nat.pow_lt_pow_succ h) t t
protected theorem pow_le_pow_of_le {a n m : Nat} (h : 1 < a) (w : n m) : a ^ n a ^ m := by
cases Nat.lt_or_eq_of_le w
case inl lt =>
exact Nat.le_of_lt (Nat.pow_lt_pow_of_lt h lt)
case inr eq =>
subst eq
exact Nat.le_refl _
protected theorem pow_le_pow_iff_right {a n m : Nat} (h : 1 < a) :
a ^ n a ^ m n m := by
constructor
· apply Decidable.by_contra
intros w
simp [Decidable.not_imp_iff_and_not] at w
apply Nat.lt_irrefl (a ^ n)
exact Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt w.1 (Nat.pow_lt_pow_of_lt h w.2)
· intro w
cases Nat.eq_or_lt_of_le w
case inl eq => subst eq; apply Nat.le_refl
case inr lt => exact Nat.le_of_lt (Nat.pow_lt_pow_of_lt h lt)
protected theorem pow_lt_pow_iff_right {a n m : Nat} (h : 1 < a) :
a ^ n < a ^ m n < m := by
constructor
· apply Decidable.by_contra
intros w
simp at w
apply Nat.lt_irrefl (a ^ n)
exact Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le w.1 (Nat.pow_le_pow_of_le h w.2)
· intro w
exact Nat.pow_lt_pow_of_lt h w
/-! ### log2 -/
theorem le_log2 (h : n 0) : k n.log2 2 ^ k n := by
match k with
| 0 => simp [show 1 n from Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h]
| k+1 =>
rw [log2]; split
· have n0 : 0 < n / 2 := (Nat.le_div_iff_mul_le (by decide)).2 _
simp only [Nat.add_le_add_iff_right, le_log2 (Nat.ne_of_gt n0), le_div_iff_mul_le,
Nat.pow_succ]
exact Nat.le_div_iff_mul_le (by decide)
· simp only [le_zero_eq, succ_ne_zero, false_iff]
refine mt (Nat.le_trans ?_) _
exact Nat.pow_le_pow_of_le_right Nat.zero_lt_two (Nat.le_add_left 1 k)
theorem log2_lt (h : n 0) : n.log2 < k n < 2 ^ k := by
rw [ Nat.not_le, Nat.not_le, le_log2 h]
theorem log2_self_le (h : n 0) : 2 ^ n.log2 n := (le_log2 h).1 (Nat.le_refl _)
theorem lt_log2_self : n < 2 ^ (n.log2 + 1) :=
match n with
| 0 => Nat.zero_lt_two
| n+1 => (log2_lt n.succ_ne_zero).1 (Nat.le_refl _)
/-! ### dvd -/
protected theorem eq_mul_of_div_eq_right {a b c : Nat} (H1 : b a) (H2 : a / b = c) :
a = b * c := by
rw [ H2, Nat.mul_div_cancel' H1]
protected theorem div_eq_iff_eq_mul_right {a b c : Nat} (H : 0 < b) (H' : b a) :
a / b = c a = b * c :=
Nat.eq_mul_of_div_eq_right H', Nat.div_eq_of_eq_mul_right H
protected theorem div_eq_iff_eq_mul_left {a b c : Nat} (H : 0 < b) (H' : b a) :
a / b = c a = c * b := by
rw [Nat.mul_comm]; exact Nat.div_eq_iff_eq_mul_right H H'
theorem pow_dvd_pow_iff_pow_le_pow {k l : Nat} :
{x : Nat}, 0 < x (x ^ k x ^ l x ^ k x ^ l)
| x + 1, w => by
constructor
· intro a
exact le_of_dvd (Nat.pow_pos (succ_pos x)) a
· intro a
cases x
case zero => simp
case succ x =>
have le :=
(Nat.pow_le_pow_iff_right (Nat.succ_le_succ (Nat.succ_le_succ (Nat.zero_le _)))).mp a
refine (x + 2) ^ (l - k), ?_
rw [ Nat.pow_add, Nat.add_comm k, Nat.sub_add_cancel le]
/-- If `1 < x`, then `x^k` divides `x^l` if and only if `k` is at most `l`. -/
theorem pow_dvd_pow_iff_le_right {x k l : Nat} (w : 1 < x) : x ^ k x ^ l k l := by
rw [pow_dvd_pow_iff_pow_le_pow (lt_of_succ_lt w), Nat.pow_le_pow_iff_right w]
theorem pow_dvd_pow_iff_le_right' {b k l : Nat} : (b + 2) ^ k (b + 2) ^ l k l :=
pow_dvd_pow_iff_le_right (Nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ rfl)
protected theorem pow_dvd_pow {m n : Nat} (a : Nat) (h : m n) : a ^ m a ^ n := by
cases Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le h
case intro k p =>
subst p
rw [Nat.pow_add]
apply Nat.dvd_mul_right
protected theorem pow_sub_mul_pow (a : Nat) {m n : Nat} (h : m n) :
a ^ (n - m) * a ^ m = a ^ n := by
rw [ Nat.pow_add, Nat.sub_add_cancel h]
theorem pow_dvd_of_le_of_pow_dvd {p m n k : Nat} (hmn : m n) (hdiv : p ^ n k) : p ^ m k :=
Nat.dvd_trans (Nat.pow_dvd_pow _ hmn) hdiv
theorem dvd_of_pow_dvd {p k m : Nat} (hk : 1 k) (hpk : p ^ k m) : p m := by
rw [ Nat.pow_one p]; exact pow_dvd_of_le_of_pow_dvd hk hpk
protected theorem pow_div {x m n : Nat} (h : n m) (hx : 0 < x) : x ^ m / x ^ n = x ^ (m - n) := by
rw [Nat.div_eq_iff_eq_mul_left (Nat.pow_pos hx) (Nat.pow_dvd_pow _ h), Nat.pow_sub_mul_pow _ h]
/-! ### shiftLeft and shiftRight -/
@[simp] theorem shiftLeft_zero : n <<< 0 = n := rfl
/-- Shiftleft on successor with multiple moved inside. -/
theorem shiftLeft_succ_inside (m n : Nat) : m <<< (n+1) = (2*m) <<< n := rfl
/-- Shiftleft on successor with multiple moved to outside. -/
theorem shiftLeft_succ : (m n), m <<< (n + 1) = 2 * (m <<< n)
| m, 0 => rfl
| m, k + 1 => by
rw [shiftLeft_succ_inside _ (k+1)]
rw [shiftLeft_succ _ k, shiftLeft_succ_inside]
/-- Shiftright on successor with division moved inside. -/
theorem shiftRight_succ_inside : m n, m >>> (n+1) = (m/2) >>> n
| m, 0 => rfl
| m, k + 1 => by
rw [shiftRight_succ _ (k+1)]
rw [shiftRight_succ_inside _ k, shiftRight_succ]
@[simp] theorem zero_shiftLeft : n, 0 <<< n = 0
| 0 => by simp [shiftLeft]
| n + 1 => by simp [shiftLeft, zero_shiftLeft n, shiftLeft_succ]
@[simp] theorem zero_shiftRight : n, 0 >>> n = 0
| 0 => by simp [shiftRight]
| n + 1 => by simp [shiftRight, zero_shiftRight n, shiftRight_succ]
theorem shiftLeft_shiftLeft (m n : Nat) : k, (m <<< n) <<< k = m <<< (n + k)
| 0 => rfl
| k + 1 => by simp [ Nat.add_assoc, shiftLeft_shiftLeft _ _ k, shiftLeft_succ]
theorem mul_add_div {m : Nat} (m_pos : m > 0) (x y : Nat) : (m * x + y) / m = x + y / m := by
match x with
| 0 => simp
| x + 1 =>
rw [Nat.mul_succ, Nat.add_assoc _ m, mul_add_div m_pos x (m+y), div_eq]
simp_arith [m_pos]; rw [Nat.add_comm, Nat.add_sub_cancel]
theorem mul_add_mod (m x y : Nat) : (m * x + y) % m = y % m := by
match x with
| 0 => simp
| x + 1 =>
simp [Nat.mul_succ, Nat.add_assoc _ m, mul_add_mod _ x]
@[simp] theorem mod_div_self (m n : Nat) : m % n / n = 0 := by
cases n
· exact (m % 0).div_zero
· case succ n => exact Nat.div_eq_of_lt (m.mod_lt n.succ_pos)
/-! ### Decidability of predicates -/
instance decidableBallLT :
(n : Nat) (P : k, k < n Prop) [ n h, Decidable (P n h)], Decidable ( n h, P n h)
| 0, _, _ => isTrue fun _ => (by cases ·)
| n + 1, P, H =>
match decidableBallLT n (P · <| lt_succ_of_lt ·) with
| isFalse h => isFalse (h fun _ _ => · _ _)
| isTrue h =>
match H n Nat.le.refl with
| isFalse p => isFalse (p <| · _ _)
| isTrue p => isTrue fun _ h' => (Nat.lt_succ_iff_lt_or_eq.1 h').elim (h _) fun hn => hn p
instance decidableForallFin (P : Fin n Prop) [DecidablePred P] : Decidable ( i, P i) :=
decidable_of_iff ( k h, P k, h) fun m k, h => m k h, fun m k h => m k, h
instance decidableBallLE (n : Nat) (P : k, k n Prop) [ n h, Decidable (P n h)] :
Decidable ( n h, P n h) :=
decidable_of_iff ( (k) (h : k < succ n), P k (le_of_lt_succ h))
fun m k h => m k (lt_succ_of_le h), fun m k _ => m k _
instance decidableExistsLT [h : DecidablePred p] : DecidablePred fun n => m : Nat, m < n p m
| 0 => isFalse (by simp only [not_lt_zero, false_and, exists_const, not_false_eq_true])
| n + 1 =>
@decidable_of_decidable_of_iff _ _ (@instDecidableOr _ _ (decidableExistsLT (p := p) n) (h n))
(by simp only [Nat.lt_succ_iff_lt_or_eq, or_and_right, exists_or, exists_eq_left])
instance decidableExistsLE [DecidablePred p] : DecidablePred fun n => m : Nat, m n p m :=
fun n => decidable_of_iff ( m, m < n + 1 p m)
(exists_congr fun _ => and_congr_left' Nat.lt_succ_iff)

View File

@@ -4,7 +4,10 @@ Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import Init.Coe
import Init.ByCases
import Init.Data.Nat.Basic
import Init.Data.List.Basic
import Init.Data.Prod
namespace Nat.Linear
@@ -580,7 +583,7 @@ attribute [-simp] Nat.right_distrib Nat.left_distrib
theorem PolyCnstr.denote_mul (ctx : Context) (k : Nat) (c : PolyCnstr) : (c.mul (k+1)).denote ctx = c.denote ctx := by
cases c; rename_i eq lhs rhs
have : k 0 k + 1 1 := by intro h; match k with | 0 => contradiction | k+1 => simp [Nat.succ.injEq]
have : k 0 k + 1 1 := by intro h; match k with | 0 => contradiction | k+1 => simp; apply Nat.succ_ne_zero
have : ¬ (k == 0) (k + 1 == 1) = false := fun h => beq_false_of_ne (this (ne_of_beq_false (Bool.of_not_eq_true h)))
have : ¬ ((k + 1 == 0) = true) := fun h => absurd (eq_of_beq h) (Nat.succ_ne_zero k)
have : (1 == (0 : Nat)) = false := rfl

View File

@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Gabriel Ebner
-/
prelude
import Init.NotationExtra
import Init.Data.Nat.Linear
namespace Nat

View File

@@ -1,8 +1,3 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Mario Carneiro
-/
prelude
import Init.ByCases

View File

@@ -1,76 +0,0 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Lean FRO, LLC. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
prelude
import Init.Omega
/-!
# Further results about `mod`.
This file proves some results about `mod` that are useful for bitblasting,
in particular
`Nat.mod_mul : x % (a * b) = x % a + a * (x / a % b)`
and its corollary
`Nat.mod_pow_succ : x % b ^ (k + 1) = x % b ^ k + b ^ k * ((x / b ^ k) % b)`.
It contains the necesssary preliminary results relating order and `*` and `/`,
which should probably be moved to their own file.
-/
namespace Nat
@[simp] protected theorem mul_lt_mul_left (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b < a * c b < c := by
induction a with
| zero => simp_all
| succ a ih =>
cases a
· simp
· simp_all [succ_eq_add_one, Nat.right_distrib]
omega
@[simp] protected theorem mul_lt_mul_right (a0 : 0 < a) : b * a < c * a b < c := by
rw [Nat.mul_comm b a, Nat.mul_comm c a, Nat.mul_lt_mul_left a0]
protected theorem lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left {a b c : Nat} (h : a * b < a * c) : b < c := by
cases a <;> simp_all
protected theorem lt_of_mul_lt_mul_right {a b c : Nat} (h : b * a < c * a) : b < c := by
rw [Nat.mul_comm b a, Nat.mul_comm c a] at h
exact Nat.lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left h
protected theorem div_lt_of_lt_mul {m n k : Nat} (h : m < n * k) : m / n < k :=
Nat.lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left <|
calc
n * (m / n) m % n + n * (m / n) := Nat.le_add_left _ _
_ = m := mod_add_div _ _
_ < n * k := h
theorem mod_mul_right_div_self (m n k : Nat) : m % (n * k) / n = m / n % k := by
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos n with (rfl | hn); simp [mod_zero]
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos k with (rfl | hk); simp [mod_zero]
conv => rhs; rw [ mod_add_div m (n * k)]
rw [Nat.mul_assoc, add_mul_div_left _ _ hn, add_mul_mod_self_left,
mod_eq_of_lt (Nat.div_lt_of_lt_mul (mod_lt _ (Nat.mul_pos hn hk)))]
theorem mod_mul_left_div_self (m n k : Nat) : m % (k * n) / n = m / n % k := by
rw [Nat.mul_comm k n, mod_mul_right_div_self]
@[simp 1100]
theorem mod_mul_right_mod (a b c : Nat) : a % (b * c) % b = a % b :=
Nat.mod_mod_of_dvd a (Nat.dvd_mul_right b c)
@[simp 1100]
theorem mod_mul_left_mod (a b c : Nat) : a % (b * c) % c = a % c :=
Nat.mod_mod_of_dvd a (Nat.mul_comm _ _ Nat.dvd_mul_left c b)
theorem mod_mul {a b x : Nat} : x % (a * b) = x % a + a * (x / a % b) := by
rw [Nat.add_comm, Nat.div_add_mod (x % (a*b)) a, Nat.mod_mul_right_mod,
Nat.mod_mul_right_div_self]
theorem mod_pow_succ {x b k : Nat} :
x % b ^ (k + 1) = x % b ^ k + b ^ k * ((x / b ^ k) % b) := by
rw [Nat.pow_succ, Nat.mod_mul]
end Nat

View File

@@ -1,108 +0,0 @@
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Lean FRO. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joe Hendrix
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Bool
import Init.Data.Nat.Basic
import Init.Data.Nat.Lemmas
/-!
This contains lemmas used by the Nat simprocs for simplifying arithmetic
addition offsets.
-/
namespace Nat.Simproc
/- Sub proofs -/
theorem sub_add_eq_comm (a b c : Nat) : a - (b + c) = a - c - b := by
rw [Nat.add_comm b c]
exact Nat.sub_add_eq a c b
theorem add_sub_add_le (a c : Nat) {b d : Nat} (h : b d) : a + b - (c + d) = a - (c + (d-b)) := by
induction b generalizing a c d with
| zero =>
simp
| succ b ind =>
match d with
| 0 =>
contradiction
| d + 1 =>
have g := Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h
rw [Nat.add_succ a, Nat.add_succ c, Nat.succ_sub_succ, Nat.succ_sub_succ,
ind _ _ g]
theorem add_sub_add_ge (a c : Nat) {b d : Nat} (h : b d) : a + b - (c + d) = a + (b - d) - c := by
rw [Nat.add_comm c d, Nat.sub_add_eq, Nat.add_sub_assoc h a]
theorem add_sub_le (a : Nat) {b c : Nat} (h : b c) : a + b - c = a - (c - b) := by
have p := add_sub_add_le a 0 h
simp only [Nat.zero_add] at p
exact p
/- Eq proofs -/
theorem add_eq_gt (a : Nat) {b c : Nat} (h : b > c) : (a + b = c) = False :=
eq_false (Nat.ne_of_gt (Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h (le_add_left b a)))
theorem eq_add_gt (a : Nat) {b c : Nat} (h : c > a) : (a = b + c) = False := by
rw [@Eq.comm Nat a (b + c)]
exact add_eq_gt b h
theorem add_eq_add_le (a c : Nat) {b d : Nat} (h : b d) : (a + b = c + d) = (a = c + (d - b)) := by
have g : b c + d := Nat.le_trans h (le_add_left d c)
rw [ Nat.add_sub_assoc h, @Eq.comm _ a, Nat.sub_eq_iff_eq_add g, @Eq.comm _ (a + b)]
theorem add_eq_add_ge (a c : Nat) {b d : Nat} (h : b d) : (a + b = c + d) = (a + (b - d) = c) := by
rw [@Eq.comm _ (a + b) _, add_eq_add_le c a h, @Eq.comm _ _ c]
theorem add_eq_le (a : Nat) {b c : Nat} (h : b c) : (a + b = c) = (a = c - b) := by
have r := add_eq_add_le a 0 h
simp only [Nat.zero_add] at r
exact r
theorem eq_add_le {a : Nat} (b : Nat) {c : Nat} (h : c a) : (a = b + c) = (b = a - c) := by
rw [@Eq.comm Nat a (b + c)]
exact add_eq_le b h
/- Lemmas for lifting Eq proofs to beq -/
theorem beqEqOfEqEq {a b c d : Nat} (p : (a = b) = (c = d)) : (a == b) = (c == d) := by
simp only [Bool.beq_eq_decide_eq, p]
theorem beqFalseOfEqFalse {a b : Nat} (p : (a = b) = False) : (a == b) = false := by
simp [Bool.beq_eq_decide_eq, p]
theorem bneEqOfEqEq {a b c d : Nat} (p : (a = b) = (c = d)) : (a != b) = (c != d) := by
simp only [bne, beqEqOfEqEq p]
theorem bneTrueOfEqFalse {a b : Nat} (p : (a = b) = False) : (a != b) = true := by
simp [bne, beqFalseOfEqFalse p]
/- le proofs -/
theorem add_le_add_le (a c : Nat) {b d : Nat} (h : b d) : (a + b c + d) = (a c + (d - b)) := by
rw [ Nat.add_sub_assoc h, Nat.le_sub_iff_add_le]
exact Nat.le_trans h (le_add_left d c)
theorem add_le_add_ge (a c : Nat) {b d : Nat} (h : b d) : (a + b c + d) = (a + (b - d) c) := by
rw [ Nat.add_sub_assoc h, Nat.sub_le_iff_le_add]
theorem add_le_le (a : Nat) {b c : Nat} (h : b c) : (a + b c) = (a c - b) := by
have r := add_le_add_le a 0 h
simp only [Nat.zero_add] at r
exact r
theorem add_le_gt (a : Nat) {b c : Nat} (h : b > c) : (a + b c) = False :=
eq_false (Nat.not_le_of_gt (Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h (le_add_left b a)))
theorem le_add_le (a : Nat) {b c : Nat} (h : a c) : (a b + c) = True :=
eq_true (Nat.le_trans h (le_add_left c b))
theorem le_add_ge (a : Nat) {b c : Nat} (h : a c) : (a b + c) = (a - c b) := by
have r := add_le_add_ge 0 b h
simp only [Nat.zero_add] at r
exact r
end Nat.Simproc

View File

@@ -13,50 +13,30 @@ namespace Option
deriving instance DecidableEq for Option
deriving instance BEq for Option
/-- Lifts an optional value to any `Alternative`, sending `none` to `failure`. -/
def getM [Alternative m] : Option α m α
def toMonad [Monad m] [Alternative m] : Option α m α
| none => failure
| some a => pure a
@[deprecated getM] def toMonad [Monad m] [Alternative m] : Option α m α :=
getM
@[inline] def toBool : Option α Bool
| some _ => true
| none => false
/-- Returns `true` on `some x` and `false` on `none`. -/
@[inline] def isSome : Option α Bool
| some _ => true
| none => false
/-- Returns `true` on `none` and `false` on `some x`. -/
@[inline] def isNone : Option α Bool
| some _ => false
| none => true
/--
`x?.isEqSome y` is equivalent to `x? == some y`, but avoids an allocation.
-/
@[inline] def isEqSome [BEq α] : Option α α Bool
| some a, b => a == b
| none, _ => false
@[inline] protected def bind : Option α (α Option β) Option β
| none, _ => none
| some a, f => f a
| some a, b => b a
/-- Runs `f` on `o`'s value, if any, and returns its result, or else returns `none`. -/
@[inline] protected def bindM [Monad m] (f : α m (Option β)) (o : Option α) : m (Option β) := do
if let some a := o then
return ( f a)
else
return none
/--
Runs a monadic function `f` on an optional value.
If the optional value is `none` the function is not called.
-/
@[inline] protected def mapM [Monad m] (f : α m β) (o : Option α) : m (Option β) := do
if let some a := o then
return some ( f a)
@@ -66,24 +46,18 @@ If the optional value is `none` the function is not called.
theorem map_id : (Option.map id : Option α Option α) = id :=
funext (fun o => match o with | none => rfl | some _ => rfl)
/-- Keeps an optional value only if it satisfies the predicate `p`. -/
@[always_inline, inline] protected def filter (p : α Bool) : Option α Option α
| some a => if p a then some a else none
| none => none
/-- Checks that an optional value satisfies a predicate `p` or is `none`. -/
@[always_inline, inline] protected def all (p : α Bool) : Option α Bool
| some a => p a
| none => true
/-- Checks that an optional value is not `none` and the value satisfies a predicate `p`. -/
@[always_inline, inline] protected def any (p : α Bool) : Option α Bool
| some a => p a
| none => false
/--
Implementation of `OrElse`'s `<|>` syntax for `Option`.
-/
@[always_inline, macro_inline] protected def orElse : Option α (Unit Option α) Option α
| some a, _ => some a
| none, b => b ()

View File

@@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ Authors: Dany Fabian, Sebastian Ullrich
-/
prelude
import Init.Data.Int
import Init.Data.String
import Init.Data.Array.Basic
inductive Ordering where
| lt | eq | gt
@@ -88,24 +88,11 @@ def isGE : Ordering → Bool
end Ordering
/--
Yields an `Ordering` s.t. `x < y` corresponds to `Ordering.lt` / `Ordering.gt` and
`x = y` corresponds to `Ordering.eq`.
-/
@[inline] def compareOfLessAndEq {α} (x y : α) [LT α] [Decidable (x < y)] [DecidableEq α] : Ordering :=
if x < y then Ordering.lt
else if x = y then Ordering.eq
else Ordering.gt
/--
Yields an `Ordering` s.t. `x < y` corresponds to `Ordering.lt` / `Ordering.gt` and
`x == y` corresponds to `Ordering.eq`.
-/
@[inline] def compareOfLessAndBEq {α} (x y : α) [LT α] [Decidable (x < y)] [BEq α] : Ordering :=
if x < y then .lt
else if x == y then .eq
else .gt
/--
Compare `a` and `b` lexicographically by `cmp₁` and `cmp₂`. `a` and `b` are
first compared by `cmp₁`. If this returns 'equal', `a` and `b` are compared
@@ -114,23 +101,11 @@ by `cmp₂` to break the tie.
@[inline] def compareLex (cmp₁ cmp₂ : α β Ordering) (a : α) (b : β) : Ordering :=
(cmp₁ a b).then (cmp₂ a b)
/--
`Ord α` provides a computable total order on `α`, in terms of the
`compare : αα → Ordering` function.
Typically instances will be transitive, reflexive, and antisymmetric,
but this is not enforced by the typeclass.
There is a derive handler, so appending `deriving Ord` to an inductive type or structure
will attempt to create an `Ord` instance.
-/
class Ord (α : Type u) where
/-- Compare two elements in `α` using the comparator contained in an `[Ord α]` instance. -/
compare : α α Ordering
export Ord (compare)
set_option linter.unusedVariables false in -- allow specifying `ord` explicitly
/--
Compare `x` and `y` by comparing `f x` and `f y`.
-/
@@ -173,13 +148,6 @@ instance : Ord USize where
instance : Ord Char where
compare x y := compareOfLessAndEq x y
instance [Ord α] : Ord (Option α) where
compare
| none, none => .eq
| none, some _ => .lt
| some _, none => .gt
| some x, some y => compare x y
/-- The lexicographic order on pairs. -/
def lexOrd [Ord α] [Ord β] : Ord (α × β) where
compare p1 p2 := match compare p1.1 p2.1 with
@@ -227,7 +195,7 @@ protected def opposite (ord : Ord α) : Ord α where
/--
`ord.on f` compares `x` and `y` by comparing `f x` and `f y` according to `ord`.
-/
protected def on (_ : Ord β) (f : α β) : Ord α where
protected def on (ord : Ord β) (f : α β) : Ord α where
compare := compareOn f
/--
@@ -243,13 +211,4 @@ returns 'equal', by `ord₂`.
protected def lex' (ord₁ ord₂ : Ord α) : Ord α where
compare := compareLex ord₁.compare ord₂.compare
/--
Creates an order which compares elements of an `Array` in lexicographic order.
-/
protected def arrayOrd [a : Ord α] : Ord (Array α) where
compare x y :=
let _ : LT α := a.toLT
let _ : BEq α := a.toBEq
compareOfLessAndBEq x.toList y.toList
end Ord

View File

@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import Init.System.IO
import Init.Data.Int
universe u
/-!

View File

@@ -13,24 +13,11 @@ open Sum Subtype Nat
open Std
/--
A typeclass that specifies the standard way of turning values of some type into `Format`.
When rendered this `Format` should be as close as possible to something that can be parsed as the
input value.
-/
class Repr (α : Type u) where
/--
Turn a value of type `α` into `Format` at a given precedence. The precedence value can be used
to avoid parentheses if they are not necessary.
-/
reprPrec : α Nat Format
export Repr (reprPrec)
/--
Turn `a` into `Format` using its `Repr` instance. The precedence level is initially set to 0.
-/
abbrev repr [Repr α] (a : α) : Format :=
reprPrec a 0
@@ -116,11 +103,6 @@ instance {p : α → Prop} [Repr α] : Repr (Subtype p) where
namespace Nat
/-
We have pure functions for calculating the decimal representation of a `Nat` (`toDigits`), but also
a fast variant that handles small numbers (`USize`) via C code (`lean_string_of_usize`).
-/
def digitChar (n : Nat) : Char :=
if n = 0 then '0' else
if n = 1 then '1' else
@@ -151,20 +133,6 @@ def toDigitsCore (base : Nat) : Nat → Nat → List Char → List Char
def toDigits (base : Nat) (n : Nat) : List Char :=
toDigitsCore base (n+1) n []
@[extern "lean_string_of_usize"]
protected def _root_.USize.repr (n : @& USize) : String :=
(toDigits 10 n.toNat).asString
/-- We statically allocate and memoize reprs for small natural numbers. -/
private def reprArray : Array String := Id.run do
List.range 128 |>.map (·.toUSize.repr) |> Array.mk
private def reprFast (n : Nat) : String :=
if h : n < 128 then Nat.reprArray.get n, h else
if h : n < USize.size then (USize.ofNatCore n h).repr
else (toDigits 10 n).asString
@[implemented_by reprFast]
protected def repr (n : Nat) : String :=
(toDigits 10 n).asString
@@ -194,32 +162,6 @@ def toSuperDigits (n : Nat) : List Char :=
def toSuperscriptString (n : Nat) : String :=
(toSuperDigits n).asString
def subDigitChar (n : Nat) : Char :=
if n = 0 then '' else
if n = 1 then '' else
if n = 2 then '' else
if n = 3 then '' else
if n = 4 then '' else
if n = 5 then '' else
if n = 6 then '' else
if n = 7 then '' else
if n = 8 then '' else
if n = 9 then '' else
'*'
partial def toSubDigitsAux : Nat List Char List Char
| n, ds =>
let d := subDigitChar <| n % 10;
let n' := n / 10;
if n' = 0 then d::ds
else toSubDigitsAux n' (d::ds)
def toSubDigits (n : Nat) : List Char :=
toSubDigitsAux n []
def toSubscriptString (n : Nat) : String :=
(toSubDigits n).asString
end Nat
instance : Repr Nat where

View File

@@ -94,8 +94,7 @@ instance : Stream (Subarray α) α where
next? s :=
if h : s.start < s.stop then
have : s.start + 1 s.stop := Nat.succ_le_of_lt h
some (s.as.get s.start, Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h s.stop_le_array_size,
{ s with start := s.start + 1, start_le_stop := this })
some (s.as.get s.start, Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h s.h₂, { s with start := s.start + 1, h₁ := this })
else
none

View File

@@ -44,16 +44,6 @@ def append : String → (@& String) → String
def toList (s : String) : List Char :=
s.data
/-- Returns true if `p` is a valid UTF-8 position in the string `s`, meaning that `p ≤ s.endPos`
and `p` lies on a UTF-8 character boundary. This has an O(1) implementation in the runtime. -/
@[extern "lean_string_is_valid_pos"]
def Pos.isValid (s : @&String) (p : @& Pos) : Bool :=
go s.data 0
where
go : List Char Pos Bool
| [], i => i = p
| c::cs, i => if i = p then true else go cs (i + c)
def utf8GetAux : List Char Pos Pos Char
| [], _, _ => default
| c::cs, i, p => if i = p then c else utf8GetAux cs (i + c) p
@@ -255,21 +245,12 @@ termination_by s.endPos.1 - i.1
@[specialize] def split (s : String) (p : Char Bool) : List String :=
splitAux s p 0 0 []
/--
Auxiliary for `splitOn`. Preconditions:
* `sep` is not empty
* `b <= i` are indexes into `s`
* `j` is an index into `sep`, and not at the end
It represents the state where we have currently parsed some split parts into `r` (in reverse order),
`b` is the beginning of the string / the end of the previous match of `sep`, and the first `j` bytes
of `sep` match the bytes `i-j .. i` of `s`.
-/
def splitOnAux (s sep : String) (b : Pos) (i : Pos) (j : Pos) (r : List String) : List String :=
if s.atEnd i then
if h : s.atEnd i then
let r := (s.extract b i)::r
r.reverse
else
have := Nat.sub_lt_sub_left (Nat.gt_of_not_le (mt decide_eq_true h)) (lt_next s _)
if s.get i == sep.get j then
let i := s.next i
let j := sep.next j
@@ -278,42 +259,9 @@ def splitOnAux (s sep : String) (b : Pos) (i : Pos) (j : Pos) (r : List String)
else
splitOnAux s sep b i j r
else
splitOnAux s sep b (s.next (i - j)) 0 r
termination_by (s.endPos.1 - (i - j).1, sep.endPos.1 - j.1)
decreasing_by
all_goals simp_wf
focus
rename_i h _ _
left; exact Nat.sub_lt_sub_left
(Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.sub_le ..) (Nat.gt_of_not_le (mt decide_eq_true h)))
(Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.sub_le ..) (lt_next s _))
focus
rename_i i₀ j₀ _ eq h'
rw [show (s.next i₀ - sep.next j₀).1 = (i₀ - j₀).1 by
show (_ + csize _) - (_ + csize _) = _
rw [(beq_iff_eq ..).1 eq, Nat.add_sub_add_right]; rfl]
right; exact Nat.sub_lt_sub_left
(Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.le_add_right ..) (Nat.gt_of_not_le (mt decide_eq_true h')))
(lt_next sep _)
focus
rename_i h _
left; exact Nat.sub_lt_sub_left
(Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.sub_le ..) (Nat.gt_of_not_le (mt decide_eq_true h)))
(lt_next s _)
splitOnAux s sep b (s.next i) 0 r
termination_by s.endPos.1 - i.1
/--
Splits a string `s` on occurrences of the separator `sep`. When `sep` is empty, it returns `[s]`;
when `sep` occurs in overlapping patterns, the first match is taken. There will always be exactly
`n+1` elements in the returned list if there were `n` nonoverlapping matches of `sep` in the string.
The default separator is `" "`. The separators are not included in the returned substrings.
```
"here is some text ".splitOn = ["here", "is", "some", "text", ""]
"here is some text ".splitOn "some" = ["here is ", " text "]
"here is some text ".splitOn "" = ["here is some text "]
"ababacabac".splitOn "aba" = ["", "bac", "c"]
```
-/
def splitOn (s : String) (sep : String := " ") : List String :=
if sep == "" then [s] else splitOnAux s sep 0 0 0 []
@@ -342,40 +290,17 @@ where go (acc : String) (s : String) : List String → String
| a :: as => go (acc ++ s ++ a) s as
| [] => acc
/-- Iterator over the characters (`Char`) of a `String`.
Typically created by `s.iter`, where `s` is a `String`.
An iterator is *valid* if the position `i` is *valid* for the string `s`, meaning `0 ≤ i ≤ s.endPos`
and `i` lies on a UTF8 byte boundary. If `i = s.endPos`, the iterator is at the end of the string.
Most operations on iterators return arbitrary values if the iterator is not valid. The functions in
the `String.Iterator` API should rule out the creation of invalid iterators, with two exceptions:
- `Iterator.next iter` is invalid if `iter` is already at the end of the string (`iter.atEnd` is
`true`), and
- `Iterator.forward iter n`/`Iterator.nextn iter n` is invalid if `n` is strictly greater than the
number of remaining characters.
-/
/-- Iterator for `String`. That is, a `String` and a position in that string. -/
structure Iterator where
/-- The string the iterator is for. -/
s : String
/-- The current position.
This position is not necessarily valid for the string, for instance if one keeps calling
`Iterator.next` when `Iterator.atEnd` is true. If the position is not valid, then the
current character is `(default : Char)`, similar to `String.get` on an invalid position. -/
i : Pos
deriving DecidableEq
/-- Creates an iterator at the beginning of a string. -/
def mkIterator (s : String) : Iterator :=
s, 0
@[inherit_doc mkIterator]
abbrev iter := mkIterator
/-- The size of a string iterator is the number of bytes remaining. -/
instance : SizeOf String.Iterator where
sizeOf i := i.1.utf8ByteSize - i.2.byteIdx
@@ -383,90 +308,55 @@ theorem Iterator.sizeOf_eq (i : String.Iterator) : sizeOf i = i.1.utf8ByteSize -
rfl
namespace Iterator
@[inherit_doc Iterator.s]
def toString := Iterator.s
def toString : Iterator String
| s, _ => s
/-- Number of bytes remaining in the iterator. -/
def remainingBytes : Iterator Nat
| s, i => s.endPos.byteIdx - i.byteIdx
@[inherit_doc Iterator.i]
def pos := Iterator.i
def pos : Iterator Pos
| _, i => i
/-- The character at the current position.
On an invalid position, returns `(default : Char)`. -/
def curr : Iterator Char
| s, i => get s i
/-- Moves the iterator's position forward by one character, unconditionally.
It is only valid to call this function if the iterator is not at the end of the string, *i.e.*
`Iterator.atEnd` is `false`; otherwise, the resulting iterator will be invalid. -/
def next : Iterator Iterator
| s, i => s, s.next i
/-- Decreases the iterator's position.
If the position is zero, this function is the identity. -/
def prev : Iterator Iterator
| s, i => s, s.prev i
/-- True if the iterator is past the string's last character. -/
def atEnd : Iterator Bool
| s, i => i.byteIdx s.endPos.byteIdx
/-- True if the iterator is not past the string's last character. -/
def hasNext : Iterator Bool
| s, i => i.byteIdx < s.endPos.byteIdx
/-- True if the position is not zero. -/
def hasPrev : Iterator Bool
| _, i => i.byteIdx > 0
/-- Replaces the current character in the string.
Does nothing if the iterator is at the end of the string. If the iterator contains the only
reference to its string, this function will mutate the string in-place instead of allocating a new
one. -/
def setCurr : Iterator Char Iterator
| s, i, c => s.set i c, i
/-- Moves the iterator's position to the end of the string.
Note that `i.toEnd.atEnd` is always `true`. -/
def toEnd : Iterator Iterator
| s, _ => s, s.endPos
/-- Extracts the substring between the positions of two iterators.
Returns the empty string if the iterators are for different strings, or if the position of the first
iterator is past the position of the second iterator. -/
def extract : Iterator Iterator String
| s₁, b, s₂, e =>
if s₁ s₂ || b > e then ""
else s₁.extract b e
/-- Moves the iterator's position several characters forward.
The resulting iterator is only valid if the number of characters to skip is less than or equal to
the number of characters left in the iterator. -/
def forward : Iterator Nat Iterator
| it, 0 => it
| it, n+1 => forward it.next n
/-- The remaining characters in an iterator, as a string. -/
def remainingToString : Iterator String
| s, i => s.extract i s.endPos
@[inherit_doc forward]
def nextn : Iterator Nat Iterator
| it, 0 => it
| it, i+1 => nextn it.next i
/-- Moves the iterator's position several characters back.
If asked to go back more characters than available, stops at the beginning of the string. -/
def prevn : Iterator Nat Iterator
| it, 0 => it
| it, i+1 => prevn it.prev i

View File

@@ -4,7 +4,12 @@ Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author: Leonardo de Moura
-/
prelude
import Init.Control.Except
import Init.Data.ByteArray
import Init.SimpLemmas
import Init.Data.Nat.Linear
import Init.Util
import Init.WFTactics
namespace String
@@ -17,25 +22,14 @@ def toNat! (s : String) : Nat :=
else
panic! "Nat expected"
/-- Returns true if the given byte array consists of valid UTF-8. -/
@[extern "lean_string_validate_utf8"]
opaque validateUTF8 (a : @& ByteArray) : Bool
/--
Convert a [UTF-8](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UTF-8) encoded `ByteArray` string to `String`.
The result is unspecified if `a` is not properly UTF-8 encoded.
-/
@[extern "lean_string_from_utf8_unchecked"]
opaque fromUTF8Unchecked (a : @& ByteArray) : String
/-- Converts a [UTF-8](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UTF-8) encoded `ByteArray` string to `String`. -/
@[extern "lean_string_from_utf8"]
opaque fromUTF8 (a : @& ByteArray) (h : validateUTF8 a) : String
/-- Converts a [UTF-8](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UTF-8) encoded `ByteArray` string to `String`,
or returns `none` if `a` is not properly UTF-8 encoded. -/
@[inline] def fromUTF8? (a : ByteArray) : Option String :=
if h : validateUTF8 a then fromUTF8 a h else none
/-- Converts a [UTF-8](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UTF-8) encoded `ByteArray` string to `String`,
or panics if `a` is not properly UTF-8 encoded. -/
@[inline] def fromUTF8! (a : ByteArray) : String :=
if h : validateUTF8 a then fromUTF8 a h else panic! "invalid UTF-8 string"
/-- Converts the given `String` to a [UTF-8](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UTF-8) encoded byte array. -/
/-- Convert the given `String` to a [UTF-8](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UTF-8) encoded byte array. -/
@[extern "lean_string_to_utf8"]
opaque toUTF8 (a : @& String) : ByteArray
@@ -73,40 +67,4 @@ namespace Iterator
end Iterator
private def findLeadingSpacesSize (s : String) : Nat :=
let it := s.iter
let it := it.find (· == '\n') |>.next
consumeSpaces it 0 s.length
where
consumeSpaces (it : String.Iterator) (curr min : Nat) : Nat :=
if it.atEnd then min
else if it.curr == ' ' || it.curr == '\t' then consumeSpaces it.next (curr + 1) min
else if it.curr == '\n' then findNextLine it.next min
else findNextLine it.next (Nat.min curr min)
findNextLine (it : String.Iterator) (min : Nat) : Nat :=
if it.atEnd then min
else if it.curr == '\n' then consumeSpaces it.next 0 min
else findNextLine it.next min
private def removeNumLeadingSpaces (n : Nat) (s : String) : String :=
consumeSpaces n s.iter ""
where
consumeSpaces (n : Nat) (it : String.Iterator) (r : String) : String :=
match n with
| 0 => saveLine it r
| n+1 =>
if it.atEnd then r
else if it.curr == ' ' || it.curr == '\t' then consumeSpaces n it.next r
else saveLine it r
termination_by (it, 1)
saveLine (it : String.Iterator) (r : String) : String :=
if it.atEnd then r
else if it.curr == '\n' then consumeSpaces n it.next (r.push '\n')
else saveLine it.next (r.push it.curr)
termination_by (it, 0)
def removeLeadingSpaces (s : String) : String :=
let n := findLeadingSpacesSize s
if n == 0 then s else removeNumLeadingSpaces n s
end String

Some files were not shown because too many files have changed in this diff Show More