chore: upstream Subarray.empty

Makes it possible to `extend` another structure through an abbreviation.
Also inserts a `withSynthesize` checkpoint for parents.

Closes #5417

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md

@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ Please put an X between the brackets as you perform the following steps:
 
 ### Context
 
-[Broader context that the issue occured in. If there was any prior discussion on [the Lean Zulip](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com), link it here as well.]
+[Broader context that the issue occurred in. If there was any prior discussion on [the Lean Zulip](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com), link it here as well.]
 
 ### Steps to Reproduce
 

.github/workflows/ci.yml

@@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ jobs:
           git fetch --depth=1 origin ${{ github.sha }}
           git checkout FETCH_HEAD flake.nix flake.lock
         if: github.event_name == 'pull_request'
-      # (needs to be after "Checkout" so files don't get overriden)
+      # (needs to be after "Checkout" so files don't get overridden)
       - name: Setup emsdk
         uses: mymindstorm/setup-emsdk@v12
         with:

.github/workflows/pr-release.yml

@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ jobs:
               MESSAGE=""
 
               if [[ -n "$MATHLIB_REMOTE_TAGS" ]]; then
-                echo "... and Mathlib has a 'nightly-testing-$MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY' tag."    
+                echo "... and Mathlib has a 'nightly-testing-$MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY' tag."
               else
                 echo "... but Mathlib does not yet have a 'nightly-testing-$MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY' tag."
                 MESSAGE="- ❗ Mathlib CI can not be attempted yet, as the \`nightly-testing-$MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY\` tag does not exist there yet. We will retry when you push more commits. If you rebase your branch onto \`nightly-with-mathlib\`, Mathlib CI should run now."
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ jobs:
             echo "but 'git merge-base origin/master HEAD' reported: $MERGE_BASE_SHA"
             git -C lean4.git log -10 origin/master
 
-            git -C lean4.git fetch origin nightly-with-mathlib 
+            git -C lean4.git fetch origin nightly-with-mathlib
             NIGHTLY_WITH_MATHLIB_SHA="$(git -C lean4.git rev-parse "origin/nightly-with-mathlib")"
             MESSAGE="- ❗ Batteries/Mathlib CI will not be attempted unless your PR branches off the \`nightly-with-mathlib\` branch. Try \`git rebase $MERGE_BASE_SHA --onto $NIGHTLY_WITH_MATHLIB_SHA\`."
           fi
@@ -164,10 +164,10 @@ jobs:
 
             # Use GitHub API to check if a comment already exists
             existing_comment="$(curl --retry 3 --location --silent \
-                                    -H "Authorization: token ${{ secrets.MATHLIB4_BOT }}" \
+                                    -H "Authorization: token ${{ secrets.MATHLIB4_COMMENT_BOT }}" \
                                     -H "Accept: application/vnd.github.v3+json" \
                                     "https://api.github.com/repos/leanprover/lean4/issues/${{ steps.workflow-info.outputs.pullRequestNumber }}/comments" \
-                                    | jq 'first(.[] | select(.body | test("^- . Mathlib") or startswith("Mathlib CI status")) | select(.user.login == "leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot"))')"
+                                    | jq 'first(.[] | select(.body | test("^- . Mathlib") or startswith("Mathlib CI status")) | select(.user.login == "leanprover-community-bot"))')"
             existing_comment_id="$(echo "$existing_comment" | jq -r .id)"
             existing_comment_body="$(echo "$existing_comment" | jq -r .body)"
 
@@ -177,14 +177,14 @@ jobs:
               echo "Posting message to the comments: $MESSAGE"
 
               # Append new result to the existing comment or post a new comment
-              # It's essential we use the MATHLIB4_BOT token here, so that Mathlib CI can subsequently edit the comment.
+              # It's essential we use the MATHLIB4_COMMENT_BOT token here, so that Mathlib CI can subsequently edit the comment.
               if [ -z "$existing_comment_id" ]; then
                 INTRO="Mathlib CI status ([docs](https://leanprover-community.github.io/contribute/tags_and_branches.html)):"
                 # Post new comment with a bullet point
                 echo "Posting as new comment at leanprover/lean4/issues/${{ steps.workflow-info.outputs.pullRequestNumber }}/comments"
                 curl -L -s \
                   -X POST \
-                  -H "Authorization: token ${{ secrets.MATHLIB4_BOT }}" \
+                  -H "Authorization: token ${{ secrets.MATHLIB4_COMMENT_BOT }}" \
                   -H "Accept: application/vnd.github.v3+json" \
                   -d "$(jq --null-input --arg intro "$INTRO" --arg val "$MESSAGE" '{"body":($intro + "\n" + $val)}')" \
                   "https://api.github.com/repos/leanprover/lean4/issues/${{ steps.workflow-info.outputs.pullRequestNumber }}/comments"
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ jobs:
                 echo "Appending to existing comment at leanprover/lean4/issues/${{ steps.workflow-info.outputs.pullRequestNumber }}/comments"
                 curl -L -s \
                   -X PATCH \
-                  -H "Authorization: token ${{ secrets.MATHLIB4_BOT }}" \
+                  -H "Authorization: token ${{ secrets.MATHLIB4_COMMENT_BOT }}" \
                   -H "Accept: application/vnd.github.v3+json" \
                   -d "$(jq --null-input --arg existing "$existing_comment_body" --arg message "$MESSAGE" '{"body":($existing + "\n" + $message)}')" \
                   "https://api.github.com/repos/leanprover/lean4/issues/comments/$existing_comment_id"
@@ -329,16 +329,18 @@ jobs:
             git switch -c lean-pr-testing-${{ steps.workflow-info.outputs.pullRequestNumber }} "$BASE"
             echo "leanprover/lean4-pr-releases:pr-release-${{ steps.workflow-info.outputs.pullRequestNumber }}" > lean-toolchain
             git add lean-toolchain
-            sed -i 's,require "leanprover-community" / "batteries" @ git ".\+",require "leanprover-community" / "batteries" @ git "nightly-testing-'"${MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY}"'",' lakefile.lean
+            sed -i 's,require "leanprover-community" / "batteries" @ git ".\+",require "leanprover-community" / "batteries" @ git "lean-pr-testing-${{ steps.workflow-info.outputs.pullRequestNumber }}",' lakefile.lean
             lake update batteries
             git add lakefile.lean lake-manifest.json
             git commit -m "Update lean-toolchain for testing https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/${{ steps.workflow-info.outputs.pullRequestNumber }}"
           else
-            echo "Branch already exists, pushing an empty commit."
+            echo "Branch already exists, merging $BASE and bumping Batteries."
             git switch lean-pr-testing-${{ steps.workflow-info.outputs.pullRequestNumber }}
             # The Mathlib `nightly-testing` branch or `nightly-testing-YYYY-MM-DD` tag may have moved since this branch was created, so merge their changes.
             # (This should no longer be possible once `nightly-testing-YYYY-MM-DD` is a tag, but it is still safe to merge.)
             git merge "$BASE" --strategy-option ours --no-commit --allow-unrelated-histories
+            lake update batteries
+            get add lake-manifest.json
             git commit --allow-empty -m "Trigger CI for https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/${{ steps.workflow-info.outputs.pullRequestNumber }}"
           fi
 

RELEASES.md

@@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ v4.10.0
 
 * **Commands**
   * [#4370](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4370) makes the `variable` command fully elaborate binders during validation, fixing an issue where some errors would be reported only at the next declaration.
-  * [#4408](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4408) fixes a discrepency in universe parameter order between `theorem` and `def` declarations.
+  * [#4408](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4408) fixes a discrepancy in universe parameter order between `theorem` and `def` declarations.
   * [#4493](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4493) and
     [#4482](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4482) fix a discrepancy in the elaborators for `theorem`, `def`, and `example`,
     making `Prop`-valued `example`s and other definition commands elaborate like `theorem`s.
@@ -443,7 +443,7 @@ v4.10.0
   * [#4454](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4454) adds public `Name.isInternalDetail` function for filtering declarations using naming conventions for internal names.
 
 * **Other fixes or improvements**
-  * [#4416](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4416) sorts the ouput of `#print axioms` for determinism.
+  * [#4416](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4416) sorts the output of `#print axioms` for determinism.
   * [#4528](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4528) fixes error message range for the cdot focusing tactic.
 
 ### Language server, widgets, and IDE extensions
@@ -479,7 +479,7 @@ v4.10.0
   * [#4372](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4372) fixes linearity in `HashMap.insert` and `HashMap.erase`, leading to a 40% speedup in a replace-heavy workload.
 * `Option`
   * [#4403](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4403) generalizes type of `Option.forM` from `Unit` to `PUnit`.
-  * [#4504](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4504) remove simp attribute from `Option.elim` and instead adds it to individal reduction lemmas, making unfolding less aggressive.
+  * [#4504](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4504) remove simp attribute from `Option.elim` and instead adds it to individual reduction lemmas, making unfolding less aggressive.
 * `Nat`
   * [#4242](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4242) adds missing theorems for `n + 1` and `n - 1` normal forms.
   * [#4486](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4486) makes `Nat.min_assoc` be a simp lemma.
@@ -940,7 +940,7 @@ While most changes could be considered to be a breaking change, this section mak
   In particular, tactics embedded in the type will no longer make use of the type of `value` in expressions such as `let x : type := value; body`.
 * Now functions defined by well-founded recursion are marked with `@[irreducible]` by default ([#4061](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4061)).
   Existing proofs that hold by definitional equality (e.g. `rfl`) can be
-  rewritten to explictly unfold the function definition (using `simp`,
+  rewritten to explicitly unfold the function definition (using `simp`,
   `unfold`, `rw`), or the recursive function can be temporarily made
   semireducible (using `unseal f in` before the command), or the function
   definition itself can be marked as `@[semireducible]` to get the previous
@@ -1559,7 +1559,7 @@ v4.7.0
      and `BitVec` as we begin making the APIs and simp normal forms for these types
      more complete and consistent.
   4. Laying the groundwork for the Std roadmap, as a library focused on
-     essential datatypes not provided by the core langauge (e.g. `RBMap`)
+     essential datatypes not provided by the core language (e.g. `RBMap`)
      and utilities such as basic IO.
   While we have achieved most of our initial aims in `v4.7.0-rc1`,
   some upstreaming will continue over the coming months.
@@ -1570,7 +1570,7 @@ v4.7.0
   There is now kernel support for these functions.
   [#3376](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3376).
 
-* `omega`, our integer linear arithmetic tactic, is now availabe in the core langauge.
+* `omega`, our integer linear arithmetic tactic, is now available in the core language.
   * It is supplemented by a preprocessing tactic `bv_omega` which can solve goals about `BitVec`
     which naturally translate into linear arithmetic problems.
     [#3435](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3435).
@@ -1663,11 +1663,11 @@ v4.6.0
       /-
       The `Step` type has three constructors: `.done`, `.visit`, `.continue`.
       * The constructor `.done` instructs `simp` that the result does
-        not need to be simplied further.
+        not need to be simplified further.
       * The constructor `.visit` instructs `simp` to visit the resulting expression.
       * The constructor `.continue` instructs `simp` to try other simplification procedures.
 
-      All three constructors take a `Result`. The `.continue` contructor may also take `none`.
+      All three constructors take a `Result`. The `.continue` constructor may also take `none`.
       `Result` has two fields `expr` (the new expression), and `proof?` (an optional proof).
        If the new expression is definitionally equal to the input one, then `proof?` can be omitted or set to `none`.
       -/
@@ -1879,7 +1879,7 @@ v4.5.0
 ---------
 
 * Modify the lexical syntax of string literals to have string gaps, which are escape sequences of the form `"\" newline whitespace*`.
-  These have the interpetation of an empty string and allow a string to flow across multiple lines without introducing additional whitespace.
+  These have the interpretation of an empty string and allow a string to flow across multiple lines without introducing additional whitespace.
   The following is equivalent to `"this is a string"`.
   ```lean
   "this is \
@@ -1902,7 +1902,7 @@ v4.5.0
 
   If the well-founded relation you want to use is not the one that the
   `WellFoundedRelation` type class would infer for your termination argument,
-  you can use `WellFounded.wrap` from the std libarary to explicitly give one:
+  you can use `WellFounded.wrap` from the std library to explicitly give one:
   ```diff
   -termination_by' ⟨r, hwf⟩
   +termination_by x => hwf.wrap x

doc/dev/bootstrap.md

@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ update the archived C source code of the stage 0 compiler in `stage0/src`.
 The github repository will automatically update stage0 on `master` once
 `src/stdlib_flags.h` and `stage0/src/stdlib_flags.h` are out of sync.
 
-If you have write access to the lean4 repository, you can also also manually
+If you have write access to the lean4 repository, you can also manually
 trigger that process, for example to be able to use new features in the compiler itself.
 You can do that on <https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/actions/workflows/update-stage0.yml>
 or using Github CLI with

doc/dev/release_checklist.md

@@ -71,6 +71,12 @@ We'll use `v4.6.0` as the intended release version as a running example.
       - Toolchain bump PR including updated Lake manifest
       - Create and push the tag
       - There is no `stable` branch; skip this step
+    - [Verso](https://github.com/leanprover/verso)
+      - Dependencies: exist, but they're not part of the release workflow
+      - The `SubVerso` dependency should be compatible with _every_ Lean release simultaneously, rather than following this workflow
+      - Toolchain bump PR including updated Lake manifest
+      - Create and push the tag
+      - There is no `stable` branch; skip this step
     - [import-graph](https://github.com/leanprover-community/import-graph)
       - Toolchain bump PR including updated Lake manifest
       - Create and push the tag

doc/examples/ICERM2022/ctor.lean

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ def ctor (mvarId : MVarId) (idx : Nat) : MetaM (List MVarId) := do
     else if h : idx - 1 < ctors.length then
       mvarId.apply (.const ctors[idx - 1] us)
     else
-      throwTacticEx `ctor mvarId "invalid index, inductive datatype has only {ctors.length} contructors"
+      throwTacticEx `ctor mvarId "invalid index, inductive datatype has only {ctors.length} constructors"
 
 open Elab Tactic
 

doc/examples/deBruijn.lean

@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ We now define the constant folding optimization that traverses a term if replace
 /-!
 The correctness of the `Term.constFold` is proved using induction, case-analysis, and the term simplifier.
 We prove all cases but the one for `plus` using `simp [*]`. This tactic instructs the term simplifier to
-use hypotheses such as `a = b` as rewriting/simplications rules.
+use hypotheses such as `a = b` as rewriting/simplifications rules.
 We use the `split` to break the nested `match` expression in the `plus` case into two cases.
 The local variables `iha` and `ihb` are the induction hypotheses for `a` and `b`.
 The modifier `←` in a term simplifier argument instructs the term simplifier to use the equation as a rewriting rule in

doc/examples/phoas.lean

@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ We now define the constant folding optimization that traverses a term if replace
 /-!
 The correctness of the `constFold` is proved using induction, case-analysis, and the term simplifier.
 We prove all cases but the one for `plus` using `simp [*]`. This tactic instructs the term simplifier to
-use hypotheses such as `a = b` as rewriting/simplications rules.
+use hypotheses such as `a = b` as rewriting/simplifications rules.
 We use the `split` to break the nested `match` expression in the `plus` case into two cases.
 The local variables `iha` and `ihb` are the induction hypotheses for `a` and `b`.
 The modifier `←` in a term simplifier argument instructs the term simplifier to use the equation as a rewriting rule in

doc/examples/tc.lean

@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ inductive HasType : Expr → Ty → Prop
 
 /-!
 We can easily show that if `e` has type `t₁` and type `t₂`, then `t₁` and `t₂` must be equal
-by using the the `cases` tactic. This tactic creates a new subgoal for every constructor,
+by using the `cases` tactic. This tactic creates a new subgoal for every constructor,
 and automatically discharges unreachable cases. The tactic combinator `tac₁ <;> tac₂` applies
 `tac₂` to each subgoal produced by `tac₁`. Then, the tactic `rfl` is used to close all produced
 goals using reflexivity.
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ theorem Expr.typeCheck_correct (h₁ : HasType e ty) (h₂ : e.typeCheck ≠ .un
 /-!
 Now, we prove that if `Expr.typeCheck e` returns `Maybe.unknown`, then forall `ty`, `HasType e ty` does not hold.
 The notation `e.typeCheck` is sugar for `Expr.typeCheck e`. Lean can infer this because we explicitly said that `e` has type `Expr`.
-The proof is by induction on `e` and case analysis. The tactic `rename_i` is used to to rename "inaccessible" variables.
+The proof is by induction on `e` and case analysis. The tactic `rename_i` is used to rename "inaccessible" variables.
 We say a variable is inaccessible if it is introduced by a tactic (e.g., `cases`) or has been shadowed by another variable introduced
 by the user. Note that the tactic `simp [typeCheck]` is applied to all goal generated by the `induction` tactic, and closes
 the cases corresponding to the constructors `Expr.nat` and `Expr.bool`.

doc/examples/widgets.lean

@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ Meaning "Remote Procedure Call",this is a Lean function callable from widget cod
 Our method will take in the `name : Name` of a constant in the environment and return its type.
 By convention, we represent the input data as a `structure`.
 Since it will be sent over from JavaScript,
-we need `FromJson` and `ToJson` instnace.
+we need `FromJson` and `ToJson` instance.
 We'll see why the position field is needed later.
 -/
 

doc/expressions.md

@@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ Every expression in Lean has a natural computational interpretation, unless it i
 
 * *β-reduction* : An expression ``(λ x, t) s`` β-reduces to ``t[s/x]``, that is, the result of replacing ``x`` by ``s`` in ``t``.
 * *ζ-reduction* : An expression ``let x := s in t`` ζ-reduces to ``t[s/x]``.
-* *δ-reduction* : If ``c`` is a defined constant with definition ``t``, then ``c`` δ-reduces to to ``t``.
+* *δ-reduction* : If ``c`` is a defined constant with definition ``t``, then ``c`` δ-reduces to ``t``.
 * *ι-reduction* : When a function defined by recursion on an inductive type is applied to an element given by an explicit constructor, the result ι-reduces to the specified function value, as described in [Inductive Types](inductive.md).
 
 The reduction relation is transitive, which is to say, is ``s`` reduces to ``s'`` and ``t`` reduces to ``t'``, then ``s t`` reduces to ``s' t'``, ``λ x, s`` reduces to ``λ x, s'``, and so on. If ``s`` and ``t`` reduce to a common term, they are said to be *definitionally equal*. Definitional equality is defined to be the smallest equivalence relation that satisfies all these properties and also includes α-equivalence and the following two relations:

doc/monads/laws.lean

@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ of data contained in the container resulting in a new container that has the sam
 
 `u <*> pure y = pure (. y) <*> u`.
 
-This law is is a little more complicated, so don't sweat it too much. It states that the order that
+This law is a little more complicated, so don't sweat it too much. It states that the order that
 you wrap things shouldn't matter. One the left, you apply any applicative `u` over a pure wrapped
 object. On the right, you first wrap a function applying the object as an argument. Note that `(·
 y)` is short hand for: `fun f => f y`. Then you apply this to the first applicative `u`. These

script/lib/update-stage0

@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ for f in $(git ls-files src ':!:src/lake/*' ':!:src/Leanc.lean'); do
 done
 
 # special handling for Lake files due to its nested directory
-# copy the README to ensure the `stage0/src/lake` directory is comitted
+# copy the README to ensure the `stage0/src/lake` directory is committed
 for f in $(git ls-files 'src/lake/Lake/*' src/lake/Lake.lean src/lake/LakeMain.lean src/lake/README.md ':!:src/lakefile.toml'); do
     if [[ $f == *.lean ]]; then
         f=${f#src/lake}

src/Init/ByCases.lean

@@ -40,21 +40,23 @@ theorem apply_ite (f : α → β) (P : Prop) [Decidable P] (x y : α) :
 /-- A `dite` whose results do not actually depend on the condition may be reduced to an `ite`. -/
 @[simp] theorem dite_eq_ite [Decidable P] : (dite P (fun _ => a) fun _ => b) = ite P a b := rfl
 
--- We don't mark this as `simp` as it is already handled by `ite_eq_right_iff`.
+@[deprecated "Use `ite_eq_right_iff`" (since := "2024-09-18")]
 theorem ite_some_none_eq_none [Decidable P] :
     (if P then some x else none) = none ↔ ¬ P := by
   simp only [ite_eq_right_iff, reduceCtorEq]
   rfl
 
-@[simp] theorem ite_some_none_eq_some [Decidable P] :
+@[deprecated "Use `Option.ite_none_right_eq_some`" (since := "2024-09-18")]
+theorem ite_some_none_eq_some [Decidable P] :
     (if P then some x else none) = some y ↔ P ∧ x = y := by
   split <;> simp_all
 
--- This is not marked as `simp` as it is already handled by `dite_eq_right_iff`.
+@[deprecated "Use `dite_eq_right_iff" (since := "2024-09-18")]
 theorem dite_some_none_eq_none [Decidable P] {x : P → α} :
     (if h : P then some (x h) else none) = none ↔ ¬P := by
   simp
 
-@[simp] theorem dite_some_none_eq_some [Decidable P] {x : P → α} {y : α} :
+@[deprecated "Use `Option.dite_none_right_eq_some`" (since := "2024-09-18")]
+theorem dite_some_none_eq_some [Decidable P] {x : P → α} {y : α} :
     (if h : P then some (x h) else none) = some y ↔ ∃ h : P, x h = y := by
   by_cases h : P <;> simp [h]

src/Init/Classical.lean

@@ -121,11 +121,11 @@ theorem propComplete (a : Prop) : a = True ∨ a = False :=
   | Or.inl ha => Or.inl (eq_true ha)
   | Or.inr hn => Or.inr (eq_false hn)
 
--- this supercedes byCases in Decidable
+-- this supersedes byCases in Decidable
 theorem byCases {p q : Prop} (hpq : p → q) (hnpq : ¬p → q) : q :=
   Decidable.byCases (dec := propDecidable _) hpq hnpq
 
--- this supercedes byContradiction in Decidable
+-- this supersedes byContradiction in Decidable
 theorem byContradiction {p : Prop} (h : ¬p → False) : p :=
   Decidable.byContradiction (dec := propDecidable _) h
 

src/Init/Control/Basic.lean

@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ Important instances include
 * `Option`, where `failure := none` and `<|>` returns the left-most `some`.
 * Parser combinators typically provide an `Applicative` instance for error-handling and
   backtracking.
-  
+
 Error recovery and state can interact subtly. For example, the implementation of `Alternative` for `OptionT (StateT σ Id)` keeps modifications made to the state while recovering from failure, while `StateT σ (OptionT Id)` discards them.
 -/
 -- NB: List instance is in mathlib. Once upstreamed, add

src/Init/Control/Lawful/Basic.lean

@@ -33,6 +33,10 @@ attribute [simp] id_map
 @[simp] theorem id_map' [Functor m] [LawfulFunctor m] (x : m α) : (fun a => a) <$> x = x :=
   id_map x
 
+@[simp] theorem Functor.map_map [Functor f] [LawfulFunctor f] (m : α → β) (g : β → γ) (x : f α) :
+    g <$> m <$> x = (fun a => g (m a)) <$> x :=
+  (comp_map _ _ _).symm
+
 /--
 The `Applicative` typeclass only contains the operations of an applicative functor.
 `LawfulApplicative` further asserts that these operations satisfy the laws of an applicative functor:
@@ -83,12 +87,16 @@ class LawfulMonad (m : Type u → Type v) [Monad m] extends LawfulApplicative m
   seq_assoc x g h := (by simp [← bind_pure_comp, ← bind_map, bind_assoc, pure_bind])
 
 export LawfulMonad (bind_pure_comp bind_map pure_bind bind_assoc)
-attribute [simp] pure_bind bind_assoc
+attribute [simp] pure_bind bind_assoc bind_pure_comp
 
 @[simp] theorem bind_pure [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : m α) : x >>= pure = x := by
   show x >>= (fun a => pure (id a)) = x
   rw [bind_pure_comp, id_map]
 
+/--
+Use `simp [← bind_pure_comp]` rather than `simp [map_eq_pure_bind]`,
+as `bind_pure_comp` is in the default simp set, so also using `map_eq_pure_bind` would cause a loop.
+-/
 theorem map_eq_pure_bind [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α → β) (x : m α) : f <$> x = x >>= fun a => pure (f a) := by
   rw [← bind_pure_comp]
 
@@ -109,10 +117,21 @@ theorem seq_eq_bind {α β : Type u} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (mf : m (α →
 
 theorem seqRight_eq_bind [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : m α) (y : m β) : x *> y = x >>= fun _ => y := by
   rw [seqRight_eq]
-  simp [map_eq_pure_bind, seq_eq_bind_map, const]
+  simp only [map_eq_pure_bind, const, seq_eq_bind_map, bind_assoc, pure_bind, id_eq, bind_pure]
 
 theorem seqLeft_eq_bind [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : m α) (y : m β) : x <* y = x >>= fun a => y >>= fun _ => pure a := by
-  rw [seqLeft_eq]; simp [map_eq_pure_bind, seq_eq_bind_map]
+  rw [seqLeft_eq]
+  simp only [map_eq_pure_bind, seq_eq_bind_map, bind_assoc, pure_bind, const_apply]
+
+@[simp] theorem map_bind [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : β → γ) (x : m α) (g : α → m β) :
+    f <$> (x >>= g) = x >>= fun a => f <$> g a := by
+  rw [← bind_pure_comp, LawfulMonad.bind_assoc]
+  simp [bind_pure_comp]
+
+@[simp] theorem bind_map_left [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α → β) (x : m α) (g : β → m γ) :
+    ((f <$> x) >>= fun b => g b) = (x >>= fun a => g (f a)) := by
+  rw [← bind_pure_comp]
+  simp only [bind_assoc, pure_bind]
 
 /--
 An alternative constructor for `LawfulMonad` which has more

src/Init/Control/Lawful/Instances.lean

@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ theorem ext {x y : ExceptT ε m α} (h : x.run = y.run) : x = y := by
 @[simp] theorem run_throw [Monad m] : run (throw e : ExceptT ε m β) = pure (Except.error e) := rfl
 
 @[simp] theorem run_bind_lift [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : m α) (f : α → ExceptT ε m β) : run (ExceptT.lift x >>= f : ExceptT ε m β) = x >>= fun a => run (f a) := by
-  simp[ExceptT.run, ExceptT.lift, bind, ExceptT.bind, ExceptT.mk, ExceptT.bindCont, map_eq_pure_bind]
+  simp [ExceptT.run, ExceptT.lift, bind, ExceptT.bind, ExceptT.mk, ExceptT.bindCont]
 
 @[simp] theorem bind_throw [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α → ExceptT ε m β) : (throw e >>= f) = throw e := by
   simp [throw, throwThe, MonadExceptOf.throw, bind, ExceptT.bind, ExceptT.bindCont, ExceptT.mk]
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ theorem run_bind [Monad m] (x : ExceptT ε m α)
 
 @[simp] theorem run_map [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α → β) (x : ExceptT ε m α)
     : (f <$> x).run = Except.map f <$> x.run := by
-  simp [Functor.map, ExceptT.map, map_eq_pure_bind]
+  simp [Functor.map, ExceptT.map, ←bind_pure_comp]
   apply bind_congr
   intro a; cases a <;> simp [Except.map]
 
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ protected theorem seqLeft_eq {α β ε : Type u} {m : Type u → Type v} [Monad
   intro
   | Except.error _ => simp
   | Except.ok _ =>
-    simp [map_eq_pure_bind]; apply bind_congr; intro b;
+    simp [←bind_pure_comp]; apply bind_congr; intro b;
     cases b <;> simp [comp, Except.map, const]
 
 protected theorem seqRight_eq [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : ExceptT ε m α) (y : ExceptT ε m β) : x *> y = const α id <$> x <*> y := by
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ theorem ext {x y : StateT σ m α} (h : ∀ s, x.run s = y.run s) : x = y :=
   simp [bind, StateT.bind, run]
 
 @[simp] theorem run_map {α β σ : Type u} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α → β) (x : StateT σ m α) (s : σ) : (f <$> x).run s = (fun (p : α × σ) => (f p.1, p.2)) <$> x.run s := by
-  simp [Functor.map, StateT.map, run, map_eq_pure_bind]
+  simp [Functor.map, StateT.map, run, ←bind_pure_comp]
 
 @[simp] theorem run_get [Monad m] (s : σ)    : (get : StateT σ m σ).run s = pure (s, s) := rfl
 
@@ -210,13 +210,13 @@ theorem run_bind_lift {α σ : Type u} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : m α) (f :
 
 theorem seqRight_eq [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : StateT σ m α) (y : StateT σ m β) : x *> y = const α id <$> x <*> y := by
   apply ext; intro s
-  simp [map_eq_pure_bind, const]
+  simp [←bind_pure_comp, const]
   apply bind_congr; intro p; cases p
   simp [Prod.eta]
 
 theorem seqLeft_eq [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : StateT σ m α) (y : StateT σ m β) : x <* y = const β <$> x <*> y := by
   apply ext; intro s
-  simp [map_eq_pure_bind]
+  simp [←bind_pure_comp]
 
 instance [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] : LawfulMonad (StateT σ m) where
   id_map         := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp[Prod.eta]
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ instance [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] : LawfulMonad (StateT σ m) where
   seqLeft_eq     := seqLeft_eq
   seqRight_eq    := seqRight_eq
   pure_seq       := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp
-  bind_pure_comp := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp; apply LawfulMonad.bind_pure_comp
+  bind_pure_comp := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp
   bind_map       := by intros; rfl
   pure_bind      := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp
   bind_assoc     := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp

src/Init/Core.lean

@@ -823,6 +823,9 @@ theorem iff_iff_implies_and_implies {a b : Prop} : (a ↔ b) ↔ (a → b) ∧ (
 protected theorem Iff.rfl {a : Prop} : a ↔ a :=
   Iff.refl a
 
+-- And, also for backward compatibility, we try `Iff.rfl.` using `exact` (see #5366)
+macro_rules | `(tactic| rfl) => `(tactic| exact Iff.rfl)
+
 theorem Iff.of_eq (h : a = b) : a ↔ b := h ▸ Iff.rfl
 
 theorem Iff.trans (h₁ : a ↔ b) (h₂ : b ↔ c) : a ↔ c :=
@@ -835,6 +838,9 @@ instance : Trans Iff Iff Iff where
 theorem Eq.comm {a b : α} : a = b ↔ b = a := Iff.intro Eq.symm Eq.symm
 theorem eq_comm {a b : α} : a = b ↔ b = a := Eq.comm
 
+theorem HEq.comm {a : α} {b : β} : HEq a b ↔ HEq b a := Iff.intro HEq.symm HEq.symm
+theorem heq_comm {a : α} {b : β} : HEq a b ↔ HEq b a := HEq.comm
+
 @[symm] theorem Iff.symm (h : a ↔ b) : b ↔ a := Iff.intro h.mpr h.mp
 theorem Iff.comm: (a ↔ b) ↔ (b ↔ a) := Iff.intro Iff.symm Iff.symm
 theorem iff_comm : (a ↔ b) ↔ (b ↔ a) := Iff.comm
@@ -1191,6 +1197,21 @@ end
 
 /-! # Product -/
 
+instance [h1 : Nonempty α] [h2 : Nonempty β] : Nonempty (α × β) :=
+  Nonempty.elim h1 fun x =>
+    Nonempty.elim h2 fun y =>
+      ⟨(x, y)⟩
+
+instance [h1 : Nonempty α] [h2 : Nonempty β] : Nonempty (MProd α β) :=
+  Nonempty.elim h1 fun x =>
+    Nonempty.elim h2 fun y =>
+      ⟨⟨x, y⟩⟩
+
+instance [h1 : Nonempty α] [h2 : Nonempty β] : Nonempty (PProd α β) :=
+  Nonempty.elim h1 fun x =>
+    Nonempty.elim h2 fun y =>
+      ⟨⟨x, y⟩⟩
+
 instance [Inhabited α] [Inhabited β] : Inhabited (α × β) where
   default := (default, default)
 
@@ -1875,7 +1896,8 @@ theorem funext {α : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v} {f g : (x : α) → β x}
   show extfunApp (Quot.mk eqv f) = extfunApp (Quot.mk eqv g)
   exact congrArg extfunApp (Quot.sound h)
 
-instance {α : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v} [∀ a, Subsingleton (β a)] : Subsingleton (∀ a, β a) where
+instance Pi.instSubsingleton {α : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v} [∀ a, Subsingleton (β a)] :
+    Subsingleton (∀ a, β a) where
   allEq f g := funext fun a => Subsingleton.elim (f a) (g a)
 
 /-! # Squash -/
@@ -2038,7 +2060,7 @@ class IdempotentOp (op : α → α → α) : Prop where
 `LeftIdentify op o` indicates `o` is a left identity of `op`.
 
 This class does not require a proof that `o` is an identity, and
-is used primarily for infering the identity using class resoluton.
+is used primarily for inferring the identity using class resolution.
 -/
 class LeftIdentity (op : α → β → β) (o : outParam α) : Prop
 
@@ -2054,7 +2076,7 @@ class LawfulLeftIdentity (op : α → β → β) (o : outParam α) extends LeftI
 `RightIdentify op o` indicates `o` is a right identity `o` of `op`.
 
 This class does not require a proof that `o` is an identity, and is used
-primarily for infering the identity using class resoluton.
+primarily for inferring the identity using class resolution.
 -/
 class RightIdentity (op : α → β → α) (o : outParam β) : Prop
 
@@ -2070,7 +2092,7 @@ class LawfulRightIdentity (op : α → β → α) (o : outParam β) extends Righ
 `Identity op o` indicates `o` is a left and right identity of `op`.
 
 This class does not require a proof that `o` is an identity, and is used
-primarily for infering the identity using class resoluton.
+primarily for inferring the identity using class resolution.
 -/
 class Identity (op : α → α → α) (o : outParam α) extends LeftIdentity op o, RightIdentity op o : Prop
 

src/Init/Data.lean

@@ -33,7 +33,6 @@ import Init.Data.Prod
 import Init.Data.AC
 import Init.Data.Queue
 import Init.Data.Channel
-import Init.Data.Cast
 import Init.Data.Sum
 import Init.Data.BEq
 import Init.Data.Subtype

src/Init/Data/Array.lean

@@ -15,3 +15,4 @@ import Init.Data.Array.BasicAux
 import Init.Data.Array.Lemmas
 import Init.Data.Array.TakeDrop
 import Init.Data.Array.Bootstrap
+import Init.Data.Array.GetLit

src/Init/Data/Array/Basic.lean

@@ -13,43 +13,75 @@ import Init.Data.ToString.Basic
 import Init.GetElem
 universe u v w
 
-namespace Array
+/-! ### Array literal syntax -/
+
+syntax "#[" withoutPosition(sepBy(term, ", ")) "]" : term
+
+macro_rules
+  | `(#[ $elems,* ]) => `(List.toArray [ $elems,* ])
+
 variable {α : Type u}
 
+namespace Array
+
+/-! ### Preliminary theorems -/
+
+@[simp] theorem size_set (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) (v : α) : (set a i v).size = a.size :=
+  List.length_set ..
+
+@[simp] theorem size_push (a : Array α) (v : α) : (push a v).size = a.size + 1 :=
+  List.length_concat ..
+
+theorem ext (a b : Array α)
+    (h₁ : a.size = b.size)
+    (h₂ : (i : Nat) → (hi₁ : i < a.size) → (hi₂ : i < b.size) → a[i] = b[i])
+    : a = b := by
+  let rec extAux (a b : List α)
+      (h₁ : a.length = b.length)
+      (h₂ : (i : Nat) → (hi₁ : i < a.length) → (hi₂ : i < b.length) → a.get ⟨i, hi₁⟩ = b.get ⟨i, hi₂⟩)
+      : a = b := by
+    induction a generalizing b with
+    | nil =>
+      cases b with
+      | nil       => rfl
+      | cons b bs => rw [List.length_cons] at h₁; injection h₁
+    | cons a as ih =>
+      cases b with
+      | nil => rw [List.length_cons] at h₁; injection h₁
+      | cons b bs =>
+        have hz₁ : 0 < (a::as).length := by rw [List.length_cons]; apply Nat.zero_lt_succ
+        have hz₂ : 0 < (b::bs).length := by rw [List.length_cons]; apply Nat.zero_lt_succ
+        have headEq : a = b := h₂ 0 hz₁ hz₂
+        have h₁' : as.length = bs.length := by rw [List.length_cons, List.length_cons] at h₁; injection h₁
+        have h₂' : (i : Nat) → (hi₁ : i < as.length) → (hi₂ : i < bs.length) → as.get ⟨i, hi₁⟩ = bs.get ⟨i, hi₂⟩ := by
+          intro i hi₁ hi₂
+          have hi₁' : i+1 < (a::as).length := by rw [List.length_cons]; apply Nat.succ_lt_succ; assumption
+          have hi₂' : i+1 < (b::bs).length := by rw [List.length_cons]; apply Nat.succ_lt_succ; assumption
+          have : (a::as).get ⟨i+1, hi₁'⟩ = (b::bs).get ⟨i+1, hi₂'⟩ := h₂ (i+1) hi₁' hi₂'
+          apply this
+        have tailEq : as = bs := ih bs h₁' h₂'
+        rw [headEq, tailEq]
+  cases a; cases b
+  apply congrArg
+  apply extAux
+  assumption
+  assumption
+
+theorem ext' {as bs : Array α} (h : as.toList = bs.toList) : as = bs := by
+  cases as; cases bs; simp at h; rw [h]
+
+@[simp] theorem toArrayAux_eq (as : List α) (acc : Array α) : (as.toArrayAux acc).toList = acc.toList ++ as := by
+  induction as generalizing acc <;> simp [*, List.toArrayAux, Array.push, List.append_assoc, List.concat_eq_append]
+
+@[simp] theorem toList_toArray (as : List α) : as.toArray.toList = as := rfl
+
+@[simp] theorem size_toArray (as : List α) : as.toArray.size = as.length := by simp [size]
+
+@[deprecated toList_toArray (since := "2024-09-09")] abbrev data_toArray := @toList_toArray
+
 @[deprecated Array.toList (since := "2024-09-10")] abbrev Array.data := @Array.toList
 
-@[extern "lean_mk_array"]
-def mkArray {α : Type u} (n : Nat) (v : α) : Array α where
-  toList := List.replicate n v
-
-/--
-`ofFn f` with `f : Fin n → α` returns the list whose ith element is `f i`.
-```
-ofFn f = #[f 0, f 1, ... , f(n - 1)]
-``` -/
-def ofFn {n} (f : Fin n → α) : Array α := go 0 (mkEmpty n) where
-  /-- Auxiliary for `ofFn`. `ofFn.go f i acc = acc ++ #[f i, ..., f(n - 1)]` -/
-  go (i : Nat) (acc : Array α) : Array α :=
-    if h : i < n then go (i+1) (acc.push (f ⟨i, h⟩)) else acc
-termination_by n - i
-decreasing_by simp_wf; decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
-
-/-- The array `#[0, 1, ..., n - 1]`. -/
-def range (n : Nat) : Array Nat :=
-  n.fold (flip Array.push) (mkEmpty n)
-
-@[simp] theorem size_mkArray (n : Nat) (v : α) : (mkArray n v).size = n :=
-  List.length_replicate ..
-
-instance : EmptyCollection (Array α) := ⟨Array.empty⟩
-instance : Inhabited (Array α) where
-  default := Array.empty
-
-@[simp] def isEmpty (a : Array α) : Bool :=
-  a.size = 0
-
-def singleton (v : α) : Array α :=
-  mkArray 1 v
+/-! ### Externs -/
 
 /-- Low-level version of `size` that directly queries the C array object cached size.
     While this is not provable, `usize` always returns the exact size of the array since
@@ -65,29 +97,6 @@ def usize (a : @& Array α) : USize := a.size.toUSize
 def uget (a : @& Array α) (i : USize) (h : i.toNat < a.size) : α :=
   a[i.toNat]
 
-instance : GetElem (Array α) USize α fun xs i => i.toNat < xs.size where
-  getElem xs i h := xs.uget i h
-
-def back [Inhabited α] (a : Array α) : α :=
-  a.get! (a.size - 1)
-
-def get? (a : Array α) (i : Nat) : Option α :=
-  if h : i < a.size then some a[i] else none
-
-def back? (a : Array α) : Option α :=
-  a.get? (a.size - 1)
-
--- auxiliary declaration used in the equation compiler when pattern matching array literals.
-abbrev getLit {α : Type u} {n : Nat} (a : Array α) (i : Nat) (h₁ : a.size = n) (h₂ : i < n) : α :=
-  have := h₁.symm ▸ h₂
-  a[i]
-
-@[simp] theorem size_set (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) (v : α) : (set a i v).size = a.size :=
-  List.length_set ..
-
-@[simp] theorem size_push (a : Array α) (v : α) : (push a v).size = a.size + 1 :=
-  List.length_concat ..
-
 /-- Low-level version of `fset` which is as fast as a C array fset.
    `Fin` values are represented as tag pointers in the Lean runtime. Thus,
    `fset` may be slightly slower than `uset`. -/
@@ -95,6 +104,19 @@ abbrev getLit {α : Type u} {n : Nat} (a : Array α) (i : Nat) (h₁ : a.size =
 def uset (a : Array α) (i : USize) (v : α) (h : i.toNat < a.size) : Array α :=
   a.set ⟨i.toNat, h⟩ v
 
+@[extern "lean_array_pop"]
+def pop (a : Array α) : Array α where
+  toList := a.toList.dropLast
+
+@[simp] theorem size_pop (a : Array α) : a.pop.size = a.size - 1 := by
+  match a with
+  | ⟨[]⟩ => rfl
+  | ⟨a::as⟩ => simp [pop, Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub, size]
+
+@[extern "lean_mk_array"]
+def mkArray {α : Type u} (n : Nat) (v : α) : Array α where
+  toList := List.replicate n v
+
 /--
 Swaps two entries in an array.
 
@@ -108,6 +130,10 @@ def swap (a : Array α) (i j : @& Fin a.size) : Array α :=
   let a'  := a.set i v₂
   a'.set (size_set a i v₂ ▸ j) v₁
 
+@[simp] theorem size_swap (a : Array α) (i j : Fin a.size) : (a.swap i j).size = a.size := by
+  show ((a.set i (a.get j)).set (size_set a i _ ▸ j) (a.get i)).size = a.size
+  rw [size_set, size_set]
+
 /--
 Swaps two entries in an array, or returns the array unchanged if either index is out of bounds.
 
@@ -121,6 +147,64 @@ def swap! (a : Array α) (i j : @& Nat) : Array α :=
   else a
   else a
 
+/-! ### GetElem instance for `USize`, backed by `uget` -/
+
+instance : GetElem (Array α) USize α fun xs i => i.toNat < xs.size where
+  getElem xs i h := xs.uget i h
+
+/-! ### Definitions -/
+
+instance : EmptyCollection (Array α) := ⟨Array.empty⟩
+instance : Inhabited (Array α) where
+  default := Array.empty
+
+@[simp] def isEmpty (a : Array α) : Bool :=
+  a.size = 0
+
+@[specialize]
+def isEqvAux (a b : Array α) (hsz : a.size = b.size) (p : α → α → Bool) :
+    ∀ (i : Nat) (_ : i ≤ a.size), Bool
+  | 0, _ => true
+  | i+1, h =>
+    p a[i] (b[i]'(hsz ▸ h)) && isEqvAux a b hsz p i (Nat.le_trans (Nat.le_add_right i 1) h)
+
+@[inline] def isEqv (a b : Array α) (p : α → α → Bool) : Bool :=
+  if h : a.size = b.size then
+    isEqvAux a b h p a.size (Nat.le_refl a.size)
+  else
+    false
+
+instance [BEq α] : BEq (Array α) :=
+  ⟨fun a b => isEqv a b BEq.beq⟩
+
+/--
+`ofFn f` with `f : Fin n → α` returns the list whose ith element is `f i`.
+```
+ofFn f = #[f 0, f 1, ... , f(n - 1)]
+``` -/
+def ofFn {n} (f : Fin n → α) : Array α := go 0 (mkEmpty n) where
+  /-- Auxiliary for `ofFn`. `ofFn.go f i acc = acc ++ #[f i, ..., f(n - 1)]` -/
+  @[semireducible] -- This is otherwise irreducible because it uses well-founded recursion.
+  go (i : Nat) (acc : Array α) : Array α :=
+    if h : i < n then go (i+1) (acc.push (f ⟨i, h⟩)) else acc
+  decreasing_by simp_wf; decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
+
+/-- The array `#[0, 1, ..., n - 1]`. -/
+def range (n : Nat) : Array Nat :=
+  n.fold (flip Array.push) (mkEmpty n)
+
+def singleton (v : α) : Array α :=
+  mkArray 1 v
+
+def back [Inhabited α] (a : Array α) : α :=
+  a.get! (a.size - 1)
+
+def get? (a : Array α) (i : Nat) : Option α :=
+  if h : i < a.size then some a[i] else none
+
+def back? (a : Array α) : Option α :=
+  a.get? (a.size - 1)
+
 @[inline] def swapAt (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) (v : α) : α × Array α :=
   let e := a.get i
   let a := a.set i v
@@ -134,10 +218,6 @@ def swapAt! (a : Array α) (i : Nat) (v : α) : α × Array α :=
     have : Inhabited α := ⟨v⟩
     panic! ("index " ++ toString i ++ " out of bounds")
 
-@[extern "lean_array_pop"]
-def pop (a : Array α) : Array α where
-  toList := a.toList.dropLast
-
 def shrink (a : Array α) (n : Nat) : Array α :=
   let rec loop
     | 0,   a => a
@@ -306,12 +386,12 @@ unsafe def mapMUnsafe {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {m : Type v → Type w} [Monad
 def mapM {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {m : Type v → Type w} [Monad m] (f : α → m β) (as : Array α) : m (Array β) :=
   -- Note: we cannot use `foldlM` here for the reference implementation because this calls
   -- `bind` and `pure` too many times. (We are not assuming `m` is a `LawfulMonad`)
-  let rec map (i : Nat) (r : Array β) : m (Array β) := do
-    if hlt : i < as.size then
-      map (i+1) (r.push (← f as[i]))
-    else
-      pure r
-  termination_by as.size - i
+  let rec @[semireducible] -- This is otherwise irreducible because it uses well-founded recursion.
+    map (i : Nat) (r : Array β) : m (Array β) := do
+      if hlt : i < as.size then
+        map (i+1) (r.push (← f as[i]))
+      else
+        pure r
   decreasing_by simp_wf; decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
   map 0 (mkEmpty as.size)
 
@@ -375,7 +455,8 @@ unsafe def anyMUnsafe {α : Type u} {m : Type → Type w} [Monad m] (p : α →
 @[implemented_by anyMUnsafe]
 def anyM {α : Type u} {m : Type → Type w} [Monad m] (p : α → m Bool) (as : Array α) (start := 0) (stop := as.size) : m Bool :=
   let any (stop : Nat) (h : stop ≤ as.size) :=
-    let rec loop (j : Nat) : m Bool := do
+    let rec @[semireducible] -- This is otherwise irreducible because it uses well-founded recursion.
+    loop (j : Nat) : m Bool := do
       if hlt : j < stop then
         have : j < as.size := Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le hlt h
         if (← p as[j]) then
@@ -384,7 +465,6 @@ def anyM {α : Type u} {m : Type → Type w} [Monad m] (p : α → m Bool) (as :
           loop (j+1)
       else
         pure false
-      termination_by stop - j
       decreasing_by simp_wf; decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
     loop start
   if h : stop ≤ as.size then
@@ -466,16 +546,28 @@ def findRev? {α : Type} (as : Array α) (p : α → Bool) : Option α :=
 
 @[inline]
 def findIdx? {α : Type u} (as : Array α) (p : α → Bool) : Option Nat :=
-  let rec loop (j : Nat) :=
+  let rec @[semireducible] -- This is otherwise irreducible because it uses well-founded recursion.
+  loop (j : Nat) :=
     if h : j < as.size then
       if p as[j] then some j else loop (j + 1)
     else none
-    termination_by as.size - j
     decreasing_by simp_wf; decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
   loop 0
 
 def getIdx? [BEq α] (a : Array α) (v : α) : Option Nat :=
-a.findIdx? fun a => a == v
+  a.findIdx? fun a => a == v
+
+@[semireducible] -- This is otherwise irreducible because it uses well-founded recursion.
+def indexOfAux [BEq α] (a : Array α) (v : α) (i : Nat) : Option (Fin a.size) :=
+  if h : i < a.size then
+    let idx : Fin a.size := ⟨i, h⟩;
+    if a.get idx == v then some idx
+    else indexOfAux a v (i+1)
+  else none
+decreasing_by simp_wf; decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
+
+def indexOf? [BEq α] (a : Array α) (v : α) : Option (Fin a.size) :=
+  indexOfAux a v 0
 
 @[inline]
 def any (as : Array α) (p : α → Bool) (start := 0) (stop := as.size) : Bool :=
@@ -491,13 +583,6 @@ def contains [BEq α] (as : Array α) (a : α) : Bool :=
 def elem [BEq α] (a : α) (as : Array α) : Bool :=
   as.contains a
 
-@[inline] def getEvenElems (as : Array α) : Array α :=
-  (·.2) <| as.foldl (init := (true, Array.empty)) fun (even, r) a =>
-    if even then
-      (false, r.push a)
-    else
-      (true, r)
-
 /-- Convert a `Array α` into an `List α`. This is O(n) in the size of the array.  -/
 -- This function is exported to C, where it is called by `Array.toList`
 -- (the projection) to implement this functionality.
@@ -510,17 +595,6 @@ def toListImpl (as : Array α) : List α :=
 def toListAppend (as : Array α) (l : List α) : List α :=
   as.foldr List.cons l
 
-instance {α : Type u} [Repr α] : Repr (Array α) where
-  reprPrec a _ :=
-    let _ : Std.ToFormat α := ⟨repr⟩
-    if a.size == 0 then
-      "#[]"
-    else
-      Std.Format.bracketFill "#[" (Std.Format.joinSep (toList a) ("," ++ Std.Format.line)) "]"
-
-instance [ToString α] : ToString (Array α) where
-  toString a := "#" ++ toString a.toList
-
 protected def append (as : Array α) (bs : Array α) : Array α :=
   bs.foldl (init := as) fun r v => r.push v
 
@@ -546,44 +620,13 @@ def concatMap (f : α → Array β) (as : Array α) : Array β :=
 def flatten (as : Array (Array α)) : Array α :=
   as.foldl (init := empty) fun r a => r ++ a
 
-end Array
-
-export Array (mkArray)
-
-syntax "#[" withoutPosition(sepBy(term, ", ")) "]" : term
-
-macro_rules
-  | `(#[ $elems,* ]) => `(List.toArray [ $elems,* ])
-
-namespace Array
-
--- TODO(Leo): cleanup
-@[specialize]
-def isEqvAux (a b : Array α) (hsz : a.size = b.size) (p : α → α → Bool) (i : Nat) : Bool :=
-  if h : i < a.size then
-     have : i < b.size := hsz ▸ h
-     p a[i] b[i] && isEqvAux a b hsz p (i+1)
-  else
-    true
-termination_by a.size - i
-decreasing_by simp_wf; decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
-
-@[inline] def isEqv (a b : Array α) (p : α → α → Bool) : Bool :=
-  if h : a.size = b.size then
-    isEqvAux a b h p 0
-  else
-    false
-
-instance [BEq α] : BEq (Array α) :=
-  ⟨fun a b => isEqv a b BEq.beq⟩
-
 @[inline]
 def filter (p : α → Bool) (as : Array α) (start := 0) (stop := as.size) : Array α :=
   as.foldl (init := #[]) (start := start) (stop := stop) fun r a =>
     if p a then r.push a else r
 
 @[inline]
-def filterM [Monad m] (p : α → m Bool) (as : Array α) (start := 0) (stop := as.size) : m (Array α) :=
+def filterM {α : Type} [Monad m] (p : α → m Bool) (as : Array α) (start := 0) (stop := as.size) : m (Array α) :=
   as.foldlM (init := #[]) (start := start) (stop := stop) fun r a => do
     if (← p a) then return r.push a else return r
 
@@ -618,93 +661,25 @@ def partition (p : α → Bool) (as : Array α) : Array α × Array α := Id.run
       cs := cs.push a
   return (bs, cs)
 
-theorem ext (a b : Array α)
-    (h₁ : a.size = b.size)
-    (h₂ : (i : Nat) → (hi₁ : i < a.size) → (hi₂ : i < b.size) → a[i] = b[i])
-    : a = b := by
-  let rec extAux (a b : List α)
-      (h₁ : a.length = b.length)
-      (h₂ : (i : Nat) → (hi₁ : i < a.length) → (hi₂ : i < b.length) → a.get ⟨i, hi₁⟩ = b.get ⟨i, hi₂⟩)
-      : a = b := by
-    induction a generalizing b with
-    | nil =>
-      cases b with
-      | nil       => rfl
-      | cons b bs => rw [List.length_cons] at h₁; injection h₁
-    | cons a as ih =>
-      cases b with
-      | nil => rw [List.length_cons] at h₁; injection h₁
-      | cons b bs =>
-        have hz₁ : 0 < (a::as).length := by rw [List.length_cons]; apply Nat.zero_lt_succ
-        have hz₂ : 0 < (b::bs).length := by rw [List.length_cons]; apply Nat.zero_lt_succ
-        have headEq : a = b := h₂ 0 hz₁ hz₂
-        have h₁' : as.length = bs.length := by rw [List.length_cons, List.length_cons] at h₁; injection h₁
-        have h₂' : (i : Nat) → (hi₁ : i < as.length) → (hi₂ : i < bs.length) → as.get ⟨i, hi₁⟩ = bs.get ⟨i, hi₂⟩ := by
-          intro i hi₁ hi₂
-          have hi₁' : i+1 < (a::as).length := by rw [List.length_cons]; apply Nat.succ_lt_succ; assumption
-          have hi₂' : i+1 < (b::bs).length := by rw [List.length_cons]; apply Nat.succ_lt_succ; assumption
-          have : (a::as).get ⟨i+1, hi₁'⟩ = (b::bs).get ⟨i+1, hi₂'⟩ := h₂ (i+1) hi₁' hi₂'
-          apply this
-        have tailEq : as = bs := ih bs h₁' h₂'
-        rw [headEq, tailEq]
-  cases a; cases b
-  apply congrArg
-  apply extAux
-  assumption
-  assumption
-
-theorem extLit {n : Nat}
-    (a b : Array α)
-    (hsz₁ : a.size = n) (hsz₂ : b.size = n)
-    (h : (i : Nat) → (hi : i < n) → a.getLit i hsz₁ hi = b.getLit i hsz₂ hi) : a = b :=
-  Array.ext a b (hsz₁.trans hsz₂.symm) fun i hi₁ _ => h i (hsz₁ ▸ hi₁)
-
-end Array
-
--- CLEANUP the following code
-namespace Array
-
-def indexOfAux [BEq α] (a : Array α) (v : α) (i : Nat) : Option (Fin a.size) :=
-  if h : i < a.size then
-    let idx : Fin a.size := ⟨i, h⟩;
-    if a.get idx == v then some idx
-    else indexOfAux a v (i+1)
-  else none
-termination_by a.size - i
-decreasing_by simp_wf; decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
-
-def indexOf? [BEq α] (a : Array α) (v : α) : Option (Fin a.size) :=
-  indexOfAux a v 0
-
-@[simp] theorem size_swap (a : Array α) (i j : Fin a.size) : (a.swap i j).size = a.size := by
-  show ((a.set i (a.get j)).set (size_set a i _ ▸ j) (a.get i)).size = a.size
-  rw [size_set, size_set]
-
-@[simp] theorem size_pop (a : Array α) : a.pop.size = a.size - 1 := by
-  match a with
-  | ⟨[]⟩ => rfl
-  | ⟨a::as⟩ => simp [pop, Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub, size]
-
-theorem reverse.termination {i j : Nat} (h : i < j) : j - 1 - (i + 1) < j - i := by
-  rw [Nat.sub_sub, Nat.add_comm]
-  exact Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.pred_le _) (Nat.sub_succ_lt_self _ _ h)
-
 def reverse (as : Array α) : Array α :=
   if h : as.size ≤ 1 then
     as
   else
     loop as 0 ⟨as.size - 1, Nat.pred_lt (mt (fun h : as.size = 0 => h ▸ by decide) h)⟩
 where
+  termination {i j : Nat} (h : i < j) : j - 1 - (i + 1) < j - i := by
+    rw [Nat.sub_sub, Nat.add_comm]
+    exact Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.pred_le _) (Nat.sub_succ_lt_self _ _ h)
   loop (as : Array α) (i : Nat) (j : Fin as.size) :=
     if h : i < j then
-      have := reverse.termination h
+      have := termination h
       let as := as.swap ⟨i, Nat.lt_trans h j.2⟩ j
       have : j-1 < as.size := by rw [size_swap]; exact Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.pred_le _) j.2
       loop as (i+1) ⟨j-1, this⟩
     else
       as
-termination_by j - i
 
+@[semireducible] -- This is otherwise irreducible because it uses well-founded recursion.
 def popWhile (p : α → Bool) (as : Array α) : Array α :=
   if h : as.size > 0 then
     if p (as.get ⟨as.size - 1, Nat.sub_lt h (by decide)⟩) then
@@ -713,11 +688,11 @@ def popWhile (p : α → Bool) (as : Array α) : Array α :=
       as
   else
     as
-termination_by as.size
 decreasing_by simp_wf; decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
 
 def takeWhile (p : α → Bool) (as : Array α) : Array α :=
-  let rec go (i : Nat) (r : Array α) : Array α :=
+  let rec @[semireducible] -- This is otherwise irreducible because it uses well-founded recursion.
+  go (i : Nat) (r : Array α) : Array α :=
     if h : i < as.size then
       let a := as.get ⟨i, h⟩
       if p a then
@@ -726,7 +701,6 @@ def takeWhile (p : α → Bool) (as : Array α) : Array α :=
         r
     else
       r
-    termination_by as.size - i
     decreasing_by simp_wf; decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
   go 0 #[]
 
@@ -734,6 +708,7 @@ def takeWhile (p : α → Bool) (as : Array α) : Array α :=
 
   This function takes worst case O(n) time because
   it has to backshift all elements at positions greater than `i`.-/
+@[semireducible] -- This is otherwise irreducible because it uses well-founded recursion.
 def feraseIdx (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) : Array α :=
   if h : i.val + 1 < a.size then
     let a' := a.swap ⟨i.val + 1, h⟩ i
@@ -744,6 +719,7 @@ def feraseIdx (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) : Array α :=
 termination_by a.size - i.val
 decreasing_by simp_wf; exact Nat.sub_succ_lt_self _ _ i.isLt
 
+-- This is required in `Lean.Data.PersistentHashMap`.
 theorem size_feraseIdx (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) : (a.feraseIdx i).size = a.size - 1 := by
   induction a, i using Array.feraseIdx.induct with
   | @case1 a i h a' _ ih =>
@@ -767,14 +743,14 @@ def erase [BEq α] (as : Array α) (a : α) : Array α :=
 
 /-- Insert element `a` at position `i`. -/
 @[inline] def insertAt (as : Array α) (i : Fin (as.size + 1)) (a : α) : Array α :=
-  let rec loop (as : Array α) (j : Fin as.size) :=
+  let rec @[semireducible] -- This is otherwise irreducible because it uses well-founded recursion.
+  loop (as : Array α) (j : Fin as.size) :=
     if i.1 < j then
       let j' := ⟨j-1, Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.pred_le _) j.2⟩
       let as := as.swap j' j
       loop as ⟨j', by rw [size_swap]; exact j'.2⟩
     else
       as
-    termination_by j.1
     decreasing_by simp_wf; decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
   let j := as.size
   let as := as.push a
@@ -786,41 +762,7 @@ def insertAt! (as : Array α) (i : Nat) (a : α) : Array α :=
     insertAt as ⟨i, Nat.lt_succ_of_le h⟩ a
   else panic! "invalid index"
 
-def toListLitAux (a : Array α) (n : Nat) (hsz : a.size = n) : ∀ (i : Nat), i ≤ a.size → List α → List α
-  | 0,     _,  acc => acc
-  | (i+1), hi, acc => toListLitAux a n hsz i (Nat.le_of_succ_le hi) (a.getLit i hsz (Nat.lt_of_lt_of_eq (Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le (Nat.lt_succ_self i) hi) hsz) :: acc)
-
-def toArrayLit (a : Array α) (n : Nat) (hsz : a.size = n) : Array α :=
-  List.toArray <| toListLitAux a n hsz n (hsz ▸ Nat.le_refl _) []
-
-theorem ext' {as bs : Array α} (h : as.toList = bs.toList) : as = bs := by
-  cases as; cases bs; simp at h; rw [h]
-
-@[simp] theorem toArrayAux_eq (as : List α) (acc : Array α) : (as.toArrayAux acc).toList = acc.toList ++ as := by
-  induction as generalizing acc <;> simp [*, List.toArrayAux, Array.push, List.append_assoc, List.concat_eq_append]
-
-@[simp] theorem toList_toArray (as : List α) : as.toArray.toList = as := by
-  simp [List.toArray, Array.mkEmpty]
-
-@[deprecated toList_toArray (since := "2024-09-09")] abbrev data_toArray := @toList_toArray
-
-@[simp] theorem size_toArray (as : List α) : as.toArray.size = as.length := by simp [size]
-
-theorem toArrayLit_eq (as : Array α) (n : Nat) (hsz : as.size = n) : as = toArrayLit as n hsz := by
-  apply ext'
-  simp [toArrayLit, toList_toArray]
-  have hle : n ≤ as.size := hsz ▸ Nat.le_refl _
-  have hge : as.size ≤ n := hsz ▸ Nat.le_refl _
-  have := go n hle
-  rw [List.drop_eq_nil_of_le hge] at this
-  rw [this]
-where
-  getLit_eq (as : Array α) (i : Nat) (h₁ : as.size = n) (h₂ : i < n) : as.getLit i h₁ h₂ = getElem as.toList i ((id (α := as.toList.length = n) h₁) ▸ h₂) :=
-    rfl
-
-  go (i : Nat) (hi : i ≤ as.size) : toListLitAux as n hsz i hi (as.toList.drop i) = as.toList := by
-    induction i <;> simp [getLit_eq, List.get_drop_eq_drop, toListLitAux, List.drop, *]
-
+@[semireducible] -- This is otherwise irreducible because it uses well-founded recursion.
 def isPrefixOfAux [BEq α] (as bs : Array α) (hle : as.size ≤ bs.size) (i : Nat) : Bool :=
   if h : i < as.size then
     let a := as[i]
@@ -832,7 +774,6 @@ def isPrefixOfAux [BEq α] (as bs : Array α) (hle : as.size ≤ bs.size) (i : N
       false
   else
     true
-termination_by as.size - i
 decreasing_by simp_wf; decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
 
 /-- Return true iff `as` is a prefix of `bs`.
@@ -843,24 +784,8 @@ def isPrefixOf [BEq α] (as bs : Array α) : Bool :=
   else
     false
 
-private def allDiffAuxAux [BEq α] (as : Array α) (a : α) : forall (i : Nat), i < as.size → Bool
-  | 0,   _ => true
-  | i+1, h =>
-    have : i < as.size := Nat.lt_trans (Nat.lt_succ_self _) h;
-    a != as[i] && allDiffAuxAux as a i this
-
-private def allDiffAux [BEq α] (as : Array α) (i : Nat) : Bool :=
-  if h : i < as.size then
-    allDiffAuxAux as as[i] i h && allDiffAux as (i+1)
-  else
-    true
-termination_by as.size - i
-decreasing_by simp_wf; decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
-
-def allDiff [BEq α] (as : Array α) : Bool :=
-  allDiffAux as 0
-
-@[specialize] def zipWithAux (f : α → β → γ) (as : Array α) (bs : Array β) (i : Nat) (cs : Array γ) : Array γ :=
+@[semireducible, specialize] -- This is otherwise irreducible because it uses well-founded recursion.
+def zipWithAux (f : α → β → γ) (as : Array α) (bs : Array β) (i : Nat) (cs : Array γ) : Array γ :=
   if h : i < as.size then
     let a := as[i]
     if h : i < bs.size then
@@ -870,7 +795,6 @@ def allDiff [BEq α] (as : Array α) : Bool :=
       cs
   else
     cs
-termination_by as.size - i
 decreasing_by simp_wf; decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
 
 @[inline] def zipWith (as : Array α) (bs : Array β) (f : α → β → γ) : Array γ :=
@@ -886,4 +810,48 @@ def split (as : Array α) (p : α → Bool) : Array α × Array α :=
   as.foldl (init := (#[], #[])) fun (as, bs) a =>
     if p a then (as.push a, bs) else (as, bs.push a)
 
+/-! ### Auxiliary functions used in metaprogramming.
+
+We do not intend to provide verification theorems for these functions.
+-/
+
+private def allDiffAuxAux [BEq α] (as : Array α) (a : α) : forall (i : Nat), i < as.size → Bool
+  | 0,   _ => true
+  | i+1, h =>
+    have : i < as.size := Nat.lt_trans (Nat.lt_succ_self _) h;
+    a != as[i] && allDiffAuxAux as a i this
+
+@[semireducible] -- This is otherwise irreducible because it uses well-founded recursion.
+private def allDiffAux [BEq α] (as : Array α) (i : Nat) : Bool :=
+  if h : i < as.size then
+    allDiffAuxAux as as[i] i h && allDiffAux as (i+1)
+  else
+    true
+decreasing_by simp_wf; decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
+
+def allDiff [BEq α] (as : Array α) : Bool :=
+  allDiffAux as 0
+
+@[inline] def getEvenElems (as : Array α) : Array α :=
+  (·.2) <| as.foldl (init := (true, Array.empty)) fun (even, r) a =>
+    if even then
+      (false, r.push a)
+    else
+      (true, r)
+
+/-! ### Repr and ToString -/
+
+instance {α : Type u} [Repr α] : Repr (Array α) where
+  reprPrec a _ :=
+    let _ : Std.ToFormat α := ⟨repr⟩
+    if a.size == 0 then
+      "#[]"
+    else
+      Std.Format.bracketFill "#[" (Std.Format.joinSep (toList a) ("," ++ Std.Format.line)) "]"
+
+instance [ToString α] : ToString (Array α) where
+  toString a := "#" ++ toString a.toList
+
 end Array
+
+export Array (mkArray)

src/Init/Data/Array/BasicAux.lean

@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ private theorem List.of_toArrayAux_eq_toArrayAux {as bs : List α} {cs ds : Arra
 
 @[simp] theorem List.toArray_eq_toArray_eq (as bs : List α) : (as.toArray = bs.toArray) = (as = bs) := by
   apply propext; apply Iff.intro
-  · intro h; simp [toArray] at h; have := of_toArrayAux_eq_toArrayAux h rfl; exact this.1
+  · intro h; simpa [toArray] using h
   · intro h; rw [h]
 
 def Array.mapM' [Monad m] (f : α → m β) (as : Array α) : m { bs : Array β // bs.size = as.size } :=

src/Init/Data/Array/DecidableEq.lean

@@ -5,43 +5,49 @@ Authors: Leonardo de Moura
 -/
 prelude
 import Init.Data.Array.Basic
+import Init.Data.BEq
 import Init.ByCases
 
 namespace Array
 
-theorem eq_of_isEqvAux [DecidableEq α] (a b : Array α) (hsz : a.size = b.size) (i : Nat) (hi : i ≤ a.size) (heqv : Array.isEqvAux a b hsz (fun x y => x = y) i) (j : Nat) (low : i ≤ j) (high : j < a.size) : a[j] = b[j]'(hsz ▸ high) := by
-  by_cases h : i < a.size
-  · unfold Array.isEqvAux at heqv
-    simp [h] at heqv
-    have hind := eq_of_isEqvAux a b hsz (i+1) (Nat.succ_le_of_lt h) heqv.2
-    by_cases heq : i = j
-    · subst heq; exact heqv.1
-    · exact hind j (Nat.succ_le_of_lt (Nat.lt_of_le_of_ne low heq)) high
-  · have heq : i = a.size := Nat.le_antisymm hi (Nat.ge_of_not_lt h)
-    subst heq
-    exact absurd (Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le high low) (Nat.lt_irrefl j)
-termination_by a.size - i
-decreasing_by decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
+theorem rel_of_isEqvAux
+    (r : α → α → Bool) (a b : Array α) (hsz : a.size = b.size) (i : Nat) (hi : i ≤ a.size)
+    (heqv : Array.isEqvAux a b hsz r i hi)
+    (j : Nat) (hj : j < i) : r (a[j]'(Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le hj hi)) (b[j]'(Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le hj (hsz ▸ hi))) := by
+  induction i with
+  | zero => contradiction
+  | succ i ih =>
+    simp only [Array.isEqvAux, Bool.and_eq_true, decide_eq_true_eq] at heqv
+    by_cases hj' : j < i
+    next =>
+      exact ih _ heqv.right hj'
+    next =>
+      replace hj' : j = i := Nat.eq_of_le_of_lt_succ (Nat.not_lt.mp hj') hj
+      subst hj'
+      exact heqv.left
 
+theorem rel_of_isEqv (r : α → α → Bool) (a b : Array α) :
+    Array.isEqv a b r → ∃ h : a.size = b.size, ∀ (i : Nat) (h' : i < a.size), r (a[i]) (b[i]'(h ▸ h')) := by
+  simp only [isEqv]
+  split <;> rename_i h
+  · exact fun h' => ⟨h, rel_of_isEqvAux r a b h a.size (Nat.le_refl ..) h'⟩
+  · intro; contradiction
 
-theorem eq_of_isEqv [DecidableEq α] (a b : Array α) : Array.isEqv a b (fun x y => x = y) → a = b := by
-  simp [Array.isEqv]
-  split
-  next hsz =>
-   intro h
-   have aux := eq_of_isEqvAux a b hsz 0 (Nat.zero_le ..) h
-   exact ext a b hsz fun i h _ => aux i (Nat.zero_le ..) _
-  next => intro; contradiction
+theorem eq_of_isEqv [DecidableEq α] (a b : Array α) (h : Array.isEqv a b (fun x y => x = y)) : a = b := by
+  have ⟨h, h'⟩ := rel_of_isEqv (fun x y => x = y) a b h
+  exact ext _ _ h (fun i lt _ => by simpa using h' i lt)
 
-theorem isEqvAux_self [DecidableEq α] (a : Array α) (i : Nat) : Array.isEqvAux a a rfl (fun x y => x = y) i = true := by
-  unfold Array.isEqvAux
-  split
-  next h => simp [h, isEqvAux_self a (i+1)]
-  next h => simp [h]
-termination_by a.size - i
-decreasing_by decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
+theorem isEqvAux_self (r : α → α → Bool) (hr : ∀ a, r a a) (a : Array α) (i : Nat) (h : i ≤ a.size) :
+    Array.isEqvAux a a rfl r i h = true := by
+  induction i with
+  | zero => simp [Array.isEqvAux]
+  | succ i ih =>
+    simp_all only [isEqvAux, Bool.and_self]
 
-theorem isEqv_self [DecidableEq α] (a : Array α) : Array.isEqv a a (fun x y => x = y) = true := by
+theorem isEqv_self_beq [BEq α] [ReflBEq α] (a : Array α) : Array.isEqv a a (· == ·) = true := by
+  simp [isEqv, isEqvAux_self]
+
+theorem isEqv_self [DecidableEq α] (a : Array α) : Array.isEqv a a (· = ·) = true := by
   simp [isEqv, isEqvAux_self]
 
 instance [DecidableEq α] : DecidableEq (Array α) :=

src/Init/Data/Array/GetLit.lean

@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+/-
+Copyright (c) 2018 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
+Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
+Authors: Leonardo de Moura
+-/
+
+prelude
+import Init.Data.Array.Basic
+
+namespace Array
+
+/-! ### getLit -/
+
+-- auxiliary declaration used in the equation compiler when pattern matching array literals.
+abbrev getLit {α : Type u} {n : Nat} (a : Array α) (i : Nat) (h₁ : a.size = n) (h₂ : i < n) : α :=
+  have := h₁.symm ▸ h₂
+  a[i]
+
+theorem extLit {n : Nat}
+    (a b : Array α)
+    (hsz₁ : a.size = n) (hsz₂ : b.size = n)
+    (h : (i : Nat) → (hi : i < n) → a.getLit i hsz₁ hi = b.getLit i hsz₂ hi) : a = b :=
+  Array.ext a b (hsz₁.trans hsz₂.symm) fun i hi₁ _ => h i (hsz₁ ▸ hi₁)
+
+def toListLitAux (a : Array α) (n : Nat) (hsz : a.size = n) : ∀ (i : Nat), i ≤ a.size → List α → List α
+  | 0,     _,  acc => acc
+  | (i+1), hi, acc => toListLitAux a n hsz i (Nat.le_of_succ_le hi) (a.getLit i hsz (Nat.lt_of_lt_of_eq (Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le (Nat.lt_succ_self i) hi) hsz) :: acc)
+
+def toArrayLit (a : Array α) (n : Nat) (hsz : a.size = n) : Array α :=
+  List.toArray <| toListLitAux a n hsz n (hsz ▸ Nat.le_refl _) []
+
+theorem toArrayLit_eq (as : Array α) (n : Nat) (hsz : as.size = n) : as = toArrayLit as n hsz := by
+  apply ext'
+  simp [toArrayLit, toList_toArray]
+  have hle : n ≤ as.size := hsz ▸ Nat.le_refl _
+  have hge : as.size ≤ n := hsz ▸ Nat.le_refl _
+  have := go n hle
+  rw [List.drop_eq_nil_of_le hge] at this
+  rw [this]
+where
+  getLit_eq (as : Array α) (i : Nat) (h₁ : as.size = n) (h₂ : i < n) : as.getLit i h₁ h₂ = getElem as.toList i ((id (α := as.toList.length = n) h₁) ▸ h₂) :=
+    rfl
+  go (i : Nat) (hi : i ≤ as.size) : toListLitAux as n hsz i hi (as.toList.drop i) = as.toList := by
+    induction i <;> simp [getLit_eq, List.get_drop_eq_drop, toListLitAux, List.drop, *]
+
+end Array

src/Init/Data/Array/Lemmas.lean

@@ -19,12 +19,119 @@ This file contains some theorems about `Array` and `List` needed for `Init.Data.
 
 namespace Array
 
-attribute [simp] data_toArray uset
+@[simp] theorem getElem_toList {a : Array α} {i : Nat} (h : i < a.size) : a.toList[i] = a[i] := rfl
+
+@[simp] theorem getElem_mk {xs : List α} {i : Nat} (h : i < xs.length) : (Array.mk xs)[i] = xs[i] := rfl
+
+theorem getElem_eq_getElem_toList {a : Array α} (h : i < a.size) : a[i] = a.toList[i] := by
+  by_cases i < a.size <;> (try simp [*]) <;> rfl
+
+theorem getElem?_eq_getElem {a : Array α} {i : Nat} (h : i < a.size) : a[i]? = some a[i] :=
+  getElem?_pos ..
+
+@[simp] theorem getElem?_eq_none_iff {a : Array α} : a[i]? = none ↔ a.size ≤ i := by
+  by_cases h : i < a.size
+  · simp [getElem?_eq_getElem, h]
+  · rw [getElem?_neg a i h]
+    simp_all
+
+theorem getElem?_eq {a : Array α} {i : Nat} :
+    a[i]? = if h : i < a.size then some a[i] else none := by
+  split
+  · simp_all [getElem?_eq_getElem]
+  · simp_all
+
+theorem getElem?_eq_getElem?_toList (a : Array α) (i : Nat) : a[i]? = a.toList[i]? := by
+  rw [getElem?_eq]
+  split <;> simp_all
+
+@[deprecated getElem_eq_getElem_toList (since := "2024-09-25")]
+abbrev getElem_eq_toList_getElem := @getElem_eq_getElem_toList
+
+@[deprecated getElem_eq_toList_getElem (since := "2024-09-09")]
+abbrev getElem_eq_data_getElem := @getElem_eq_getElem_toList
+
+@[deprecated getElem_eq_toList_getElem (since := "2024-06-12")]
+theorem getElem_eq_toList_get (a : Array α) (h : i < a.size) : a[i] = a.toList.get ⟨i, h⟩ := by
+  simp
+
+theorem get_push_lt (a : Array α) (x : α) (i : Nat) (h : i < a.size) :
+    have : i < (a.push x).size := by simp [*, Nat.lt_succ_of_le, Nat.le_of_lt]
+    (a.push x)[i] = a[i] := by
+  simp only [push, getElem_eq_getElem_toList, List.concat_eq_append, List.getElem_append_left, h]
+
+@[simp] theorem get_push_eq (a : Array α) (x : α) : (a.push x)[a.size] = x := by
+  simp only [push, getElem_eq_getElem_toList, List.concat_eq_append]
+  rw [List.getElem_append_right] <;> simp [getElem_eq_getElem_toList, Nat.zero_lt_one]
+
+theorem get_push (a : Array α) (x : α) (i : Nat) (h : i < (a.push x).size) :
+    (a.push x)[i] = if h : i < a.size then a[i] else x := by
+  by_cases h' : i < a.size
+  · simp [get_push_lt, h']
+  · simp at h
+    simp [get_push_lt, Nat.le_antisymm (Nat.le_of_lt_succ h) (Nat.ge_of_not_lt h')]
+
+end Array
+
+namespace List
+
+open Array
+
+/-! ### Lemmas about `List.toArray`. -/
+
+@[simp] theorem size_toArrayAux {a : List α} {b : Array α} :
+    (a.toArrayAux b).size = b.size + a.length := by
+  simp [size]
+
+@[simp] theorem toArray_toList (a : Array α) : a.toList.toArray = a := rfl
+
+@[deprecated toArray_toList (since := "2024-09-09")]
+abbrev toArray_data := @toArray_toList
+
+@[simp] theorem getElem_toArray {a : List α} {i : Nat} (h : i < a.toArray.size) :
+    a.toArray[i] = a[i]'(by simpa using h) := rfl
+
+@[deprecated "Use the reverse direction of `List.push_toArray`." (since := "2024-09-27")]
+theorem toArray_concat {as : List α} {x : α} :
+    (as ++ [x]).toArray = as.toArray.push x := by
+  apply ext'
+  simp
+
+@[simp] theorem push_toArray (l : List α) (a : α) : l.toArray.push a = (l ++ [a]).toArray := by
+  apply Array.ext'
+  simp
+
+/-- Unapplied variant of `push_toArray`, useful for monadic reasoning. -/
+@[simp] theorem push_toArray_fun (l : List α) : l.toArray.push = fun a => (l ++ [a]).toArray := by
+  funext a
+  simp
+
+@[simp] theorem foldrM_toArray [Monad m] (f : α → β → m β) (init : β) (l : List α) :
+    l.toArray.foldrM f init = l.foldrM f init := by
+  rw [foldrM_eq_reverse_foldlM_toList]
+  simp
+
+@[simp] theorem foldlM_toArray [Monad m] (f : β → α → m β) (init : β) (l : List α) :
+    l.toArray.foldlM f init = l.foldlM f init := by
+  rw [foldlM_eq_foldlM_toList]
+
+@[simp] theorem foldr_toArray (f : α → β → β) (init : β) (l : List α) :
+    l.toArray.foldr f init = l.foldr f init := by
+  rw [foldr_eq_foldr_toList]
+
+@[simp] theorem foldl_toArray (f : β → α → β) (init : β) (l : List α) :
+    l.toArray.foldl f init = l.foldl f init := by
+  rw [foldl_eq_foldl_toList]
+
+end List
+
+namespace Array
+
+attribute [simp] uset
 
 @[simp] theorem singleton_def (v : α) : singleton v = #[v] := rfl
 
-@[simp] theorem toArray_toList : (a : Array α) → a.toList.toArray = a
-  | ⟨l⟩ => ext' (toList_toArray l)
+@[simp] theorem toArray_toList (a : Array α) : a.toList.toArray = a := rfl
 
 @[deprecated toArray_toList (since := "2024-09-09")]
 abbrev toArray_data := @toArray_toList
@@ -38,20 +145,11 @@ abbrev data_length := @toList_length
 
 @[simp] theorem size_mk (as : List α) : (Array.mk as).size = as.length := by simp [size]
 
-theorem getElem_eq_toList_getElem (a : Array α) (h : i < a.size) : a[i] = a.toList[i] := by
-  by_cases i < a.size <;> (try simp [*]) <;> rfl
-
-@[deprecated getElem_eq_toList_getElem (since := "2024-09-09")]
-abbrev getElem_eq_data_getElem := @getElem_eq_toList_getElem
-
-@[deprecated getElem_eq_toList_getElem (since := "2024-06-12")]
-theorem getElem_eq_toList_get (a : Array α) (h : i < a.size) : a[i] = a.toList.get ⟨i, h⟩ := by
-  simp [getElem_eq_toList_getElem]
-
 theorem foldrM_push [Monad m] (f : α → β → m β) (init : β) (arr : Array α) (a : α) :
     (arr.push a).foldrM f init = f a init >>= arr.foldrM f := by
   simp [foldrM_eq_reverse_foldlM_toList, -size_push]
 
+/-- Variant of `foldrM_push` with the `start := arr.size + 1` rather than `(arr.push a).size`. -/
 @[simp] theorem foldrM_push' [Monad m] (f : α → β → m β) (init : β) (arr : Array α) (a : α) :
     (arr.push a).foldrM f init (start := arr.size + 1) = f a init >>= arr.foldrM f := by
   simp [← foldrM_push]
@@ -59,6 +157,7 @@ theorem foldrM_push [Monad m] (f : α → β → m β) (init : β) (arr : Array
 theorem foldr_push (f : α → β → β) (init : β) (arr : Array α) (a : α) :
     (arr.push a).foldr f init = arr.foldr f (f a init) := foldrM_push ..
 
+/-- Variant of `foldr_push` with the `start := arr.size + 1` rather than `(arr.push a).size`. -/
 @[simp] theorem foldr_push' (f : α → β → β) (init : β) (arr : Array α) (a : α) :
     (arr.push a).foldr f init (start := arr.size + 1) = arr.foldr f (f a init) := foldrM_push' ..
 
@@ -68,22 +167,6 @@ theorem foldr_push (f : α → β → β) (init : β) (arr : Array α) (a : α)
 @[simp] theorem toListRev_eq (arr : Array α) : arr.toListRev = arr.toList.reverse := by
   rw [toListRev, foldl_eq_foldl_toList, ← List.foldr_reverse, List.foldr_cons_nil]
 
-theorem get_push_lt (a : Array α) (x : α) (i : Nat) (h : i < a.size) :
-    have : i < (a.push x).size := by simp [*, Nat.lt_succ_of_le, Nat.le_of_lt]
-    (a.push x)[i] = a[i] := by
-  simp only [push, getElem_eq_toList_getElem, List.concat_eq_append, List.getElem_append_left, h]
-
-@[simp] theorem get_push_eq (a : Array α) (x : α) : (a.push x)[a.size] = x := by
-  simp only [push, getElem_eq_toList_getElem, List.concat_eq_append]
-  rw [List.getElem_append_right] <;> simp [getElem_eq_toList_getElem, Nat.zero_lt_one]
-
-theorem get_push (a : Array α) (x : α) (i : Nat) (h : i < (a.push x).size) :
-    (a.push x)[i] = if h : i < a.size then a[i] else x := by
-  by_cases h' : i < a.size
-  · simp [get_push_lt, h']
-  · simp at h
-    simp [get_push_lt, Nat.le_antisymm (Nat.le_of_lt_succ h) (Nat.ge_of_not_lt h')]
-
 theorem mapM_eq_foldlM [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α → m β) (arr : Array α) :
     arr.mapM f = arr.foldlM (fun bs a => bs.push <$> f a) #[] := by
   rw [mapM, aux, foldlM_eq_foldlM_toList]; rfl
@@ -186,11 +269,11 @@ theorem get!_eq_getD [Inhabited α] (a : Array α) : a.get! n = a.getD n default
 @[simp] theorem getElem_set_eq (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) (v : α) {j : Nat}
       (eq : i.val = j) (p : j < (a.set i v).size) :
     (a.set i v)[j]'p = v := by
-  simp [set, getElem_eq_toList_getElem, ←eq]
+  simp [set, getElem_eq_getElem_toList, ←eq]
 
 @[simp] theorem getElem_set_ne (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) (v : α) {j : Nat} (pj : j < (a.set i v).size)
     (h : i.val ≠ j) : (a.set i v)[j]'pj = a[j]'(size_set a i v ▸ pj) := by
-  simp only [set, getElem_eq_toList_getElem, List.getElem_set_ne h]
+  simp only [set, getElem_eq_getElem_toList, List.getElem_set_ne h]
 
 theorem getElem_set (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) (v : α) (j : Nat)
     (h : j < (a.set i v).size) :
@@ -271,13 +354,16 @@ termination_by n - i
 
 /-- # mkArray -/
 
+@[simp] theorem size_mkArray (n : Nat) (v : α) : (mkArray n v).size = n :=
+  List.length_replicate ..
+
 @[simp] theorem toList_mkArray (n : Nat) (v : α) : (mkArray n v).toList = List.replicate n v := rfl
 
 @[deprecated toList_mkArray (since := "2024-09-09")]
 abbrev mkArray_data := @toList_mkArray
 
 @[simp] theorem getElem_mkArray (n : Nat) (v : α) (h : i < (mkArray n v).size) :
-    (mkArray n v)[i] = v := by simp [Array.getElem_eq_toList_getElem]
+    (mkArray n v)[i] = v := by simp [Array.getElem_eq_getElem_toList]
 
 /-- # mem -/
 
@@ -318,7 +404,7 @@ theorem lt_of_getElem {x : α} {a : Array α} {idx : Nat} {hidx : idx < a.size}
   hidx
 
 theorem getElem?_mem {l : Array α} {i : Fin l.size} : l[i] ∈ l := by
-  erw [Array.mem_def, getElem_eq_toList_getElem]
+  erw [Array.mem_def, getElem_eq_getElem_toList]
   apply List.get_mem
 
 theorem getElem_fin_eq_toList_get (a : Array α) (i : Fin _) : a[i] = a.toList.get i := rfl
@@ -329,20 +415,17 @@ abbrev getElem_fin_eq_data_get := @getElem_fin_eq_toList_get
 @[simp] theorem ugetElem_eq_getElem (a : Array α) {i : USize} (h : i.toNat < a.size) :
   a[i] = a[i.toNat] := rfl
 
-theorem getElem?_eq_getElem (a : Array α) (i : Nat) (h : i < a.size) : a[i]? = some a[i] :=
-  getElem?_pos ..
-
 theorem get?_len_le (a : Array α) (i : Nat) (h : a.size ≤ i) : a[i]? = none := by
   simp [getElem?_neg, h]
 
 theorem getElem_mem_toList (a : Array α) (h : i < a.size) : a[i] ∈ a.toList := by
-  simp only [getElem_eq_toList_getElem, List.getElem_mem]
+  simp only [getElem_eq_getElem_toList, List.getElem_mem]
 
 @[deprecated getElem_mem_toList (since := "2024-09-09")]
 abbrev getElem_mem_data := @getElem_mem_toList
 
 theorem getElem?_eq_toList_get? (a : Array α) (i : Nat) : a[i]? = a.toList.get? i := by
-  by_cases i < a.size <;> simp_all [getElem?_pos, getElem?_neg, List.get?_eq_get, eq_comm]; rfl
+  by_cases i < a.size <;> simp_all [getElem?_pos, getElem?_neg, List.get?_eq_get, eq_comm]
 
 @[deprecated getElem?_eq_toList_get? (since := "2024-09-09")]
 abbrev getElem?_eq_data_get? := @getElem?_eq_toList_get?
@@ -396,7 +479,7 @@ abbrev data_set := @toList_set
 
 theorem get_set_eq (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) (v : α) :
     (a.set i v)[i.1] = v := by
-  simp only [set, getElem_eq_toList_getElem, List.getElem_set_self]
+  simp only [set, getElem_eq_getElem_toList, List.getElem_set_self]
 
 theorem get?_set_eq (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) (v : α) :
     (a.set i v)[i.1]? = v := by simp [getElem?_pos, i.2]
@@ -415,7 +498,7 @@ theorem get_set (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) (j : Nat) (hj : j < a.size) (v :
 
 @[simp] theorem get_set_ne (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) {j : Nat} (v : α) (hj : j < a.size)
     (h : i.1 ≠ j) : (a.set i v)[j]'(by simp [*]) = a[j] := by
-  simp only [set, getElem_eq_toList_getElem, List.getElem_set_ne h]
+  simp only [set, getElem_eq_getElem_toList, List.getElem_set_ne h]
 
 theorem getElem_setD (a : Array α) (i : Nat) (v : α) (h : i < (setD a i v).size) :
   (setD a i v)[i] = v := by
@@ -431,7 +514,7 @@ theorem swap_def (a : Array α) (i j : Fin a.size) :
     a.swap i j = (a.set i (a.get j)).set ⟨j.1, by simp [j.2]⟩ (a.get i) := by
   simp [swap, fin_cast_val]
 
-theorem toList_swap (a : Array α) (i j : Fin a.size) :
+@[simp] theorem toList_swap (a : Array α) (i j : Fin a.size) :
     (a.swap i j).toList = (a.toList.set i (a.get j)).set j (a.get i) := by simp [swap_def]
 
 @[deprecated toList_swap (since := "2024-09-09")]
@@ -444,7 +527,7 @@ theorem get?_swap (a : Array α) (i j : Fin a.size) (k : Nat) : (a.swap i j)[k]?
 @[simp] theorem swapAt_def (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) (v : α) :
     a.swapAt i v = (a[i.1], a.set i v) := rfl
 
--- @[simp] -- FIXME: gives a weird linter error
+@[simp]
 theorem swapAt!_def (a : Array α) (i : Nat) (v : α) (h : i < a.size) :
     a.swapAt! i v = (a[i], a.set ⟨i, h⟩ v) := by simp [swapAt!, h]
 
@@ -495,7 +578,6 @@ abbrev size_eq_length_data := @size_eq_length_toList
   let rec go (as : Array α) (i j) : (reverse.loop as i j).size = as.size := by
     rw [reverse.loop]
     if h : i < j then
-      have := reverse.termination h
       simp [(go · (i+1) ⟨j-1, ·⟩), h]
     else simp [h]
     termination_by j - i
@@ -518,7 +600,7 @@ abbrev data_range := @toList_range
 
 @[simp]
 theorem getElem_range {n : Nat} {x : Nat} (h : x < (Array.range n).size) : (Array.range n)[x] = x := by
-  simp [getElem_eq_toList_getElem]
+  simp [getElem_eq_getElem_toList]
 
 set_option linter.deprecated false in
 @[simp] theorem reverse_toList (a : Array α) : a.reverse.toList = a.toList.reverse := by
@@ -527,9 +609,8 @@ set_option linter.deprecated false in
       (H : ∀ k, as.toList.get? k = if i ≤ k ∧ k ≤ j then a.toList.get? k else a.toList.reverse.get? k)
       (k) : (reverse.loop as i ⟨j, hj⟩).toList.get? k = a.toList.reverse.get? k := by
     rw [reverse.loop]; dsimp; split <;> rename_i h₁
-    · have p := reverse.termination h₁
-      match j with | j+1 => ?_
-      simp only [Nat.add_sub_cancel] at p ⊢
+    · match j with | j+1 => ?_
+      simp only [Nat.add_sub_cancel]
       rw [(go · (i+1) j)]
       · rwa [Nat.add_right_comm i]
       · simp [size_swap, h₂]
@@ -565,6 +646,32 @@ set_option linter.deprecated false in
 
 /-! ### foldl / foldr -/
 
+@[simp] theorem foldlM_loop_empty [Monad m] (f : β → α → m β) (init : β) (i j : Nat) :
+    foldlM.loop f #[] s h i j init = pure init := by
+  unfold foldlM.loop; split
+  · split
+    · rfl
+    · simp at h
+      omega
+  · rfl
+
+@[simp] theorem foldlM_empty [Monad m] (f : β → α → m β) (init : β) :
+    foldlM f init #[] start stop = return init := by
+  simp [foldlM]
+
+@[simp] theorem foldrM_fold_empty [Monad m] (f : α → β → m β) (init : β) (i j : Nat) (h) :
+    foldrM.fold f #[] i j h init = pure init := by
+  unfold foldrM.fold
+  split <;> rename_i h₁
+  · rfl
+  · split <;> rename_i h₂
+    · rfl
+    · simp at h₂
+
+@[simp] theorem foldrM_empty [Monad m] (f : α → β → m β) (init : β) :
+    foldrM f init #[] start stop = return init := by
+  simp [foldrM]
+
 -- This proof is the pure version of `Array.SatisfiesM_foldlM`,
 -- reproduced to avoid a dependency on `SatisfiesM`.
 theorem foldl_induction
@@ -608,8 +715,8 @@ theorem mapM_eq_mapM_toList [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α → m β) (arr : A
   rw [mapM_eq_foldlM, foldlM_eq_foldlM_toList, ← List.foldrM_reverse]
   conv => rhs; rw [← List.reverse_reverse arr.toList]
   induction arr.toList.reverse with
-  | nil => simp; rfl
-  | cons a l ih => simp [ih]; simp [map_eq_pure_bind, push]
+  | nil => simp
+  | cons a l ih => simp [ih]
 
 @[deprecated mapM_eq_mapM_toList (since := "2024-09-09")]
 abbrev mapM_eq_mapM_data := @mapM_eq_mapM_toList
@@ -750,7 +857,7 @@ theorem get_modify {arr : Array α} {x i} (h : i < arr.size) :
 
 /-! ### filter -/
 
-@[simp] theorem filter_toList (p : α → Bool) (l : Array α) :
+@[simp] theorem toList_filter (p : α → Bool) (l : Array α) :
     (l.filter p).toList = l.toList.filter p := by
   dsimp only [filter]
   rw [foldl_eq_foldl_toList]
@@ -761,23 +868,23 @@ theorem get_modify {arr : Array α} {x i} (h : i < arr.size) :
   induction l with simp
   | cons => split <;> simp [*]
 
-@[deprecated filter_toList (since := "2024-09-09")]
-abbrev filter_data := @filter_toList
+@[deprecated toList_filter (since := "2024-09-09")]
+abbrev filter_data := @toList_filter
 
 @[simp] theorem filter_filter (q) (l : Array α) :
     filter p (filter q l) = filter (fun a => p a && q a) l := by
   apply ext'
-  simp only [filter_toList, List.filter_filter]
+  simp only [toList_filter, List.filter_filter]
 
 @[simp] theorem mem_filter : x ∈ filter p as ↔ x ∈ as ∧ p x := by
-  simp only [mem_def, filter_toList, List.mem_filter]
+  simp only [mem_def, toList_filter, List.mem_filter]
 
 theorem mem_of_mem_filter {a : α} {l} (h : a ∈ filter p l) : a ∈ l :=
   (mem_filter.mp h).1
 
 /-! ### filterMap -/
 
-@[simp] theorem filterMap_toList (f : α → Option β) (l : Array α) :
+@[simp] theorem toList_filterMap (f : α → Option β) (l : Array α) :
     (l.filterMap f).toList = l.toList.filterMap f := by
   dsimp only [filterMap, filterMapM]
   rw [foldlM_eq_foldlM_toList]
@@ -790,12 +897,12 @@ theorem mem_of_mem_filter {a : α} {l} (h : a ∈ filter p l) : a ∈ l :=
   · simp_all [Id.run, List.filterMap_cons]
     split <;> simp_all
 
-@[deprecated filterMap_toList (since := "2024-09-09")]
-abbrev filterMap_data := @filterMap_toList
+@[deprecated toList_filterMap (since := "2024-09-09")]
+abbrev filterMap_data := @toList_filterMap
 
 @[simp] theorem mem_filterMap {f : α → Option β} {l : Array α} {b : β} :
     b ∈ filterMap f l ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ l ∧ f a = some b := by
-  simp only [mem_def, filterMap_toList, List.mem_filterMap]
+  simp only [mem_def, toList_filterMap, List.mem_filterMap]
 
 /-! ### empty -/
 
@@ -818,7 +925,7 @@ theorem size_append (as bs : Array α) : (as ++ bs).size = as.size + bs.size :=
 
 theorem get_append_left {as bs : Array α} {h : i < (as ++ bs).size} (hlt : i < as.size) :
     (as ++ bs)[i] = as[i] := by
-  simp only [getElem_eq_toList_getElem]
+  simp only [getElem_eq_getElem_toList]
   have h' : i < (as.toList ++ bs.toList).length := by rwa [← toList_length, append_toList] at h
   conv => rhs; rw [← List.getElem_append_left (bs := bs.toList) (h' := h')]
   apply List.get_of_eq; rw [append_toList]
@@ -826,9 +933,9 @@ theorem get_append_left {as bs : Array α} {h : i < (as ++ bs).size} (hlt : i <
 theorem get_append_right {as bs : Array α} {h : i < (as ++ bs).size} (hle : as.size ≤ i)
     (hlt : i - as.size < bs.size := Nat.sub_lt_left_of_lt_add hle (size_append .. ▸ h)) :
     (as ++ bs)[i] = bs[i - as.size] := by
-  simp only [getElem_eq_toList_getElem]
+  simp only [getElem_eq_getElem_toList]
   have h' : i < (as.toList ++ bs.toList).length := by rwa [← toList_length, append_toList] at h
-  conv => rhs; rw [← List.getElem_append_right (h' := h') (h := Nat.not_lt_of_ge hle)]
+  conv => rhs; rw [← List.getElem_append_right (h₁ := hle) (h₂ := h')]
   apply List.get_of_eq; rw [append_toList]
 
 @[simp] theorem append_nil (as : Array α) : as ++ #[] = as := by
@@ -974,6 +1081,33 @@ theorem extract_empty_of_size_le_start (as : Array α) {start stop : Nat} (h : a
 
 /-! ### any -/
 
+theorem anyM_loop_cons [Monad m] (p : α → m Bool) (a : α) (as : List α) (stop start : Nat) (h : stop + 1 ≤ (a :: as).length) :
+    anyM.loop p ⟨a :: as⟩ (stop + 1) h (start + 1) = anyM.loop p ⟨as⟩ stop (by simpa using h) start := by
+  rw [anyM.loop]
+  conv => rhs; rw [anyM.loop]
+  split <;> rename_i h'
+  · simp only [Nat.add_lt_add_iff_right] at h'
+    rw [dif_pos h']
+    rw [anyM_loop_cons]
+    simp
+  · rw [dif_neg]
+    omega
+
+@[simp] theorem anyM_toList [Monad m] (p : α → m Bool) (as : Array α) :
+    as.toList.anyM p = as.anyM p :=
+  match as with
+  | ⟨[]⟩  => rfl
+  | ⟨a :: as⟩ => by
+    simp only [List.anyM, anyM, size_toArray, List.length_cons, Nat.le_refl, ↓reduceDIte]
+    rw [anyM.loop, dif_pos (by omega)]
+    congr 1
+    funext b
+    split
+    · simp
+    · simp only [Bool.false_eq_true, ↓reduceIte]
+      rw [anyM_loop_cons]
+      simpa [anyM] using anyM_toList p ⟨as⟩
+
 -- Auxiliary for `any_iff_exists`.
 theorem anyM_loop_iff_exists {p : α → Bool} {as : Array α} {start stop} (h : stop ≤ as.size) :
     anyM.loop (m := Id) p as stop h start = true ↔
@@ -1018,6 +1152,17 @@ theorem any_def {p : α → Bool} (as : Array α) : as.any p = as.toList.any p :
 
 /-! ### all -/
 
+theorem allM_eq_not_anyM_not [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (p : α → m Bool) (as : Array α) :
+    allM p as = (! ·) <$> anyM ((! ·) <$> p ·) as := by
+  dsimp [allM, anyM]
+  simp
+
+@[simp] theorem allM_toList [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (p : α → m Bool) (as : Array α) :
+    as.toList.allM p = as.allM p := by
+  rw [allM_eq_not_anyM_not]
+  rw [← anyM_toList]
+  rw [List.allM_eq_not_anyM_not]
+
 theorem all_eq_not_any_not (p : α → Bool) (as : Array α) (start stop) :
     all as p start stop = !(any as (!p ·) start stop) := by
   dsimp [all, allM]
@@ -1039,10 +1184,10 @@ theorem all_def {p : α → Bool} (as : Array α) : as.all p = as.toList.all p :
   rw [Bool.eq_iff_iff, all_eq_true, List.all_eq_true]; simp only [List.mem_iff_getElem]
   constructor
   · rintro w x ⟨r, h, rfl⟩
-    rw [← getElem_eq_toList_getElem]
+    rw [← getElem_eq_getElem_toList]
     exact w ⟨r, h⟩
   · intro w i
-    exact w as[i] ⟨i, i.2, (getElem_eq_toList_getElem as i.2).symm⟩
+    exact w as[i] ⟨i, i.2, (getElem_eq_getElem_toList i.2).symm⟩
 
 theorem all_eq_true_iff_forall_mem {l : Array α} : l.all p ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ l → p x := by
   simp only [all_def, List.all_eq_true, mem_def]
@@ -1113,5 +1258,118 @@ theorem swap_comm (a : Array α) {i j : Fin a.size} : a.swap i j = a.swap j i :=
     · split <;> simp_all
     · split <;> simp_all
 
-
 end Array
+
+
+open Array
+
+namespace List
+
+/-!
+### More theorems about `List.toArray`, followed by an `Array` operation.
+
+Our goal is to have `simp` "pull `List.toArray` outwards" as much as possible.
+-/
+
+@[simp] theorem mem_toArray {a : α} {l : List α} : a ∈ l.toArray ↔ a ∈ l := by
+  simp [mem_def]
+
+@[simp] theorem getElem?_toArray (l : List α) (i : Nat) : l.toArray[i]? = l[i]? := by
+  simp [getElem?_eq_getElem?_toList]
+
+@[simp] theorem toListRev_toArray (l : List α) : l.toArray.toListRev = l.reverse := by
+  simp
+
+@[simp] theorem push_append_toArray (as : Array α) (a : α) (l : List α) :
+    as.push a ++ l.toArray = as ++ (a :: l).toArray := by
+  apply ext'
+  simp
+
+@[simp] theorem mapM_toArray [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α → m β) (l : List α) :
+    l.toArray.mapM f = List.toArray <$> l.mapM f := by
+  simp only [← mapM'_eq_mapM, mapM_eq_foldlM]
+  suffices ∀ init : Array β,
+      foldlM (fun bs a => bs.push <$> f a) init l.toArray = (init ++ toArray ·) <$> mapM' f l by
+    simpa using this #[]
+  intro init
+  induction l generalizing init with
+  | nil => simp
+  | cons a l ih =>
+    simp only [foldlM_toArray] at ih
+    rw [size_toArray, mapM'_cons, foldlM_toArray]
+    simp [ih]
+
+@[simp] theorem map_toArray (f : α → β) (l : List α) : l.toArray.map f = (l.map f).toArray := by
+  apply ext'
+  simp
+
+@[simp] theorem toArray_appendList (l₁ l₂ : List α) :
+    l₁.toArray ++ l₂ = (l₁ ++ l₂).toArray := by
+  apply ext'
+  simp
+
+@[simp] theorem set_toArray (l : List α) (i : Fin l.toArray.size) (a : α) :
+    l.toArray.set i a = (l.set i a).toArray := by
+  apply ext'
+  simp
+
+@[simp] theorem uset_toArray (l : List α) (i : USize) (a : α) (h : i.toNat < l.toArray.size) :
+    l.toArray.uset i a h = (l.set i.toNat a).toArray := by
+  apply ext'
+  simp
+
+@[simp] theorem setD_toArray (l : List α) (i : Nat) (a : α) :
+    l.toArray.setD i a  = (l.set i a).toArray := by
+  apply ext'
+  simp only [setD]
+  split
+  · simp
+  · simp_all [List.set_eq_of_length_le]
+
+@[simp] theorem anyM_toArray [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (p : α → m Bool) (l : List α) :
+    l.toArray.anyM p = l.anyM p := by
+  rw [← anyM_toList]
+
+@[simp] theorem any_toArray (p : α → Bool) (l : List α) : l.toArray.any p = l.any p := by
+  rw [Array.any_def]
+
+@[simp] theorem allM_toArray [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (p : α → m Bool) (l : List α) :
+    l.toArray.allM p = l.allM p := by
+  rw [← allM_toList]
+
+@[simp] theorem all_toArray (p : α → Bool) (l : List α) : l.toArray.all p = l.all p := by
+  rw [Array.all_def]
+
+@[simp] theorem swap_toArray (l : List α) (i j : Fin l.toArray.size) :
+    l.toArray.swap i j = ((l.set i l[j]).set j l[i]).toArray := by
+  apply ext'
+  simp
+
+@[simp] theorem pop_toArray (l : List α) : l.toArray.pop = l.dropLast.toArray := by
+  apply ext'
+  simp
+
+@[simp] theorem reverse_toArray (l : List α) : l.toArray.reverse = l.reverse.toArray := by
+  apply ext'
+  simp
+
+@[simp] theorem filter_toArray (p : α → Bool) (l : List α) :
+    l.toArray.filter p = (l.filter p).toArray := by
+  apply ext'
+  erw [toList_filter] -- `erw` required to unify `l.length` with `l.toArray.size`.
+
+@[simp] theorem filterMap_toArray (f : α → Option β) (l : List α) :
+    l.toArray.filterMap f = (l.filterMap f).toArray := by
+  apply ext'
+  erw [toList_filterMap] -- `erw` required to unify `l.length` with `l.toArray.size`.
+
+@[simp] theorem append_toArray (l₁ l₂ : List α) :
+    l₁.toArray ++ l₂.toArray = (l₁ ++ l₂).toArray := by
+  apply ext'
+  simp
+
+@[simp] theorem toArray_range (n : Nat) : (range n).toArray = Array.range n := by
+  apply ext'
+  simp
+
+end List

src/Init/Data/Array/Subarray.lean

@@ -59,6 +59,22 @@ def popFront (s : Subarray α) : Subarray α :=
   else
     s
 
+/--
+The empty subarray.
+-/
+protected def empty : Subarray α where
+  array := #[]
+  start := 0
+  stop := 0
+  start_le_stop := Nat.le_refl 0
+  stop_le_array_size := Nat.le_refl 0
+
+instance : EmptyCollection (Subarray α) :=
+  ⟨Subarray.empty⟩
+
+instance : Inhabited (Subarray α) :=
+  ⟨{}⟩
+
 @[inline] unsafe def forInUnsafe {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {m : Type v → Type w} [Monad m] (s : Subarray α) (b : β) (f : α → β → m (ForInStep β)) : m β :=
   let sz := USize.ofNat s.stop
   let rec @[specialize] loop (i : USize) (b : β) : m β := do

src/Init/Data/Array/TakeDrop.lean

@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ namespace Array
 theorem exists_of_uset (self : Array α) (i d h) :
     ∃ l₁ l₂, self.toList = l₁ ++ self[i] :: l₂ ∧ List.length l₁ = i.toNat ∧
       (self.uset i d h).toList = l₁ ++ d :: l₂ := by
-  simpa [Array.getElem_eq_toList_getElem] using List.exists_of_set _
+  simpa only [ugetElem_eq_getElem, getElem_eq_getElem_toList, uset, toList_set] using
+    List.exists_of_set _
 
 end Array

src/Init/Data/BitVec.lean

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 /-
 Copyright (c) 2024 Lean FRO, LLC. All rights reserved.
 Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-Authors: Scott Morrison
+Authors: Kim Morrison
 -/
 prelude
 import Init.Data.BitVec.Basic

src/Init/Data/BitVec/Basic.lean

@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ protected def ofNatLt {n : Nat} (i : Nat) (p : i < 2^n) : BitVec n where
 /-- The `BitVec` with value `i mod 2^n`. -/
 @[match_pattern]
 protected def ofNat (n : Nat) (i : Nat) : BitVec n where
-  toFin := Fin.ofNat' i (Nat.two_pow_pos n)
+  toFin := Fin.ofNat' (2^n) i
 
 instance instOfNat : OfNat (BitVec n) i where ofNat := .ofNat n i
 instance natCastInst : NatCast (BitVec w) := ⟨BitVec.ofNat w⟩
@@ -173,6 +173,9 @@ instance : GetElem (BitVec w) Nat Bool fun _ i => i < w where
 theorem getElem_eq_testBit_toNat (x : BitVec w) (i : Nat) (h : i < w) :
   x[i] = x.toNat.testBit i := rfl
 
+theorem getLsbD_eq_getElem {x : BitVec w} {i : Nat} (h : i < w) :
+    x.getLsbD i = x[i] := rfl
+
 end getElem
 
 section Int
@@ -266,8 +269,8 @@ Return the absolute value of a signed bitvector.
 protected def abs (x : BitVec n) : BitVec n := if x.msb then .neg x else x
 
 /--
-Multiplication for bit vectors. This can be interpreted as either signed or unsigned negation
-modulo `2^n`.
+Multiplication for bit vectors. This can be interpreted as either signed or unsigned
+multiplication modulo `2^n`.
 
 SMT-Lib name: `bvmul`.
 -/
@@ -450,13 +453,15 @@ SMT-Lib name: `extract`.
 def extractLsb (hi lo : Nat) (x : BitVec n) : BitVec (hi - lo + 1) := extractLsb' lo _ x
 
 /--
-A version of `zeroExtend` that requires a proof, but is a noop.
+A version of `setWidth` that requires a proof, but is a noop.
 -/
-def zeroExtend' {n w : Nat} (le : n ≤ w) (x : BitVec n) : BitVec w :=
+def setWidth' {n w : Nat} (le : n ≤ w) (x : BitVec n) : BitVec w :=
   x.toNat#'(by
     apply Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le x.isLt
     exact Nat.pow_le_pow_of_le_right (by trivial) le)
 
+@[deprecated setWidth' (since := "2024-09-18"), inherit_doc setWidth'] abbrev zeroExtend' := @setWidth'
+
 /--
 `shiftLeftZeroExtend x n` returns `zeroExtend (w+n) x <<< n` without
 needing to compute `x % 2^(2+n)`.
@@ -469,22 +474,35 @@ def shiftLeftZeroExtend (msbs : BitVec w) (m : Nat) : BitVec (w + m) :=
   (msbs.toNat <<< m)#'(shiftLeftLt msbs.isLt m)
 
 /--
-Zero extend vector `x` of length `w` by adding zeros in the high bits until it has length `v`.
-If `v < w` then it truncates the high bits instead.
+Transform `x` of length `w` into a bitvector of length `v`, by either:
+- zero extending, that is, adding zeros in the high bits until it has length `v`, if `v > w`, or
+- truncating the high bits, if `v < w`.
 
 SMT-Lib name: `zero_extend`.
 -/
-def zeroExtend (v : Nat) (x : BitVec w) : BitVec v :=
+def setWidth (v : Nat) (x : BitVec w) : BitVec v :=
   if h : w ≤ v then
-    zeroExtend' h x
+    setWidth' h x
   else
     .ofNat v x.toNat
 
 /--
-Truncate the high bits of bitvector `x` of length `w`, resulting in a vector of length `v`.
-If `v > w` then it zero-extends the vector instead.
+Transform `x` of length `w` into a bitvector of length `v`, by either:
+- zero extending, that is, adding zeros in the high bits until it has length `v`, if `v > w`, or
+- truncating the high bits, if `v < w`.
+
+SMT-Lib name: `zero_extend`.
 -/
-abbrev truncate := @zeroExtend
+abbrev zeroExtend := @setWidth
+
+/--
+Transform `x` of length `w` into a bitvector of length `v`, by either:
+- zero extending, that is, adding zeros in the high bits until it has length `v`, if `v > w`, or
+- truncating the high bits, if `v < w`.
+
+SMT-Lib name: `zero_extend`.
+-/
+abbrev truncate := @setWidth
 
 /--
 Sign extend a vector of length `w`, extending with `i` additional copies of the most significant
@@ -635,7 +653,7 @@ input is on the left, so `0xAB#8 ++ 0xCD#8 = 0xABCD#16`.
 SMT-Lib name: `concat`.
 -/
 def append (msbs : BitVec n) (lsbs : BitVec m) : BitVec (n+m) :=
-  shiftLeftZeroExtend msbs m ||| zeroExtend' (Nat.le_add_left m n) lsbs
+  shiftLeftZeroExtend msbs m ||| setWidth' (Nat.le_add_left m n) lsbs
 
 instance : HAppend (BitVec w) (BitVec v) (BitVec (w + v)) := ⟨.append⟩
 
@@ -658,6 +676,13 @@ result of appending a single bit to the front in the naive implementation).
     That is, the new bit is the least significant bit. -/
 def concat {n} (msbs : BitVec n) (lsb : Bool) : BitVec (n+1) := msbs ++ (ofBool lsb)
 
+/--
+`x.shiftConcat b` shifts all bits of `x` to the left by `1` and sets the least significant bit to `b`.
+It is a non-dependent version of `concat` that does not change the total bitwidth.
+-/
+def shiftConcat (x : BitVec n) (b : Bool) : BitVec n :=
+  (x.concat b).truncate n
+
 /-- Prepend a single bit to the front of a bitvector, using big endian order (see `append`).
     That is, the new bit is the most significant bit. -/
 def cons {n} (msb : Bool) (lsbs : BitVec n) : BitVec (n+1) :=

src/Init/Data/BitVec/Bitblast.lean

@@ -132,18 +132,18 @@ theorem toNat_add_of_and_eq_zero {x y : BitVec w} (h : x &&& y = 0#w) :
   simp [not_eq_true, carry_of_and_eq_zero h]
 
 /-- Carry function for bitwise addition. -/
-def adcb (x y c : Bool) : Bool × Bool := (atLeastTwo x y c, Bool.xor x (Bool.xor y c))
+def adcb (x y c : Bool) : Bool × Bool := (atLeastTwo x y c, x ^^ (y ^^ c))
 
 /-- Bitwise addition implemented via a ripple carry adder. -/
 def adc (x y : BitVec w) : Bool → Bool × BitVec w :=
   iunfoldr fun (i : Fin w) c => adcb (x.getLsbD i) (y.getLsbD i) c
 
 theorem getLsbD_add_add_bool {i : Nat} (i_lt : i < w) (x y : BitVec w) (c : Bool) :
-    getLsbD (x + y + zeroExtend w (ofBool c)) i =
-      Bool.xor (getLsbD x i) (Bool.xor (getLsbD y i) (carry i x y c)) := by
+    getLsbD (x + y + setWidth w (ofBool c)) i =
+      (getLsbD x i ^^ (getLsbD y i ^^ carry i x y c)) := by
   let ⟨x, x_lt⟩ := x
   let ⟨y, y_lt⟩ := y
-  simp only [getLsbD, toNat_add, toNat_zeroExtend, i_lt, toNat_ofFin, toNat_ofBool,
+  simp only [getLsbD, toNat_add, toNat_setWidth, i_lt, toNat_ofFin, toNat_ofBool,
     Nat.mod_add_mod, Nat.add_mod_mod]
   apply Eq.trans
   rw [← Nat.div_add_mod x (2^i), ← Nat.div_add_mod y (2^i)]
@@ -161,15 +161,15 @@ theorem getLsbD_add_add_bool {i : Nat} (i_lt : i < w) (x y : BitVec w) (c : Bool
 
 theorem getLsbD_add {i : Nat} (i_lt : i < w) (x y : BitVec w) :
     getLsbD (x + y) i =
-      Bool.xor (getLsbD x i) (Bool.xor (getLsbD y i) (carry i x y false)) := by
+      (getLsbD x i ^^ (getLsbD y i ^^ carry i x y false)) := by
   simpa using getLsbD_add_add_bool i_lt x y false
 
 theorem adc_spec (x y : BitVec w) (c : Bool) :
-    adc x y c = (carry w x y c, x + y + zeroExtend w (ofBool c)) := by
+    adc x y c = (carry w x y c, x + y + setWidth w (ofBool c)) := by
   simp only [adc]
   apply iunfoldr_replace
           (fun i => carry i x y c)
-          (x + y + zeroExtend w (ofBool c))
+          (x + y + setWidth w (ofBool c))
           c
   case init =>
     simp [carry, Nat.mod_one]
@@ -306,12 +306,12 @@ theorem mulRec_succ_eq (x y : BitVec w) (s : Nat) :
 Recurrence lemma: truncating to `i+1` bits and then zero extending to `w`
 equals truncating upto `i` bits `[0..i-1]`, and then adding the `i`th bit of `x`.
 -/
-theorem zeroExtend_truncate_succ_eq_zeroExtend_truncate_add_twoPow (x : BitVec w) (i : Nat) :
-    zeroExtend w (x.truncate (i + 1)) =
-      zeroExtend w (x.truncate i) + (x &&& twoPow w i) := by
+theorem setWidth_setWidth_succ_eq_setWidth_setWidth_add_twoPow (x : BitVec w) (i : Nat) :
+    setWidth w (x.setWidth (i + 1)) =
+      setWidth w (x.setWidth i) + (x &&& twoPow w i) := by
   rw [add_eq_or_of_and_eq_zero]
   · ext k
-    simp only [getLsbD_zeroExtend, Fin.is_lt, decide_True, Bool.true_and, getLsbD_or, getLsbD_and]
+    simp only [getLsbD_setWidth, Fin.is_lt, decide_True, Bool.true_and, getLsbD_or, getLsbD_and]
     by_cases hik : i = k
     · subst hik
       simp
@@ -322,27 +322,32 @@ theorem zeroExtend_truncate_succ_eq_zeroExtend_truncate_add_twoPow (x : BitVec w
       · have hik'' : ¬ (k < i) := by omega
         simp [hik', hik'']
   · ext k
-    simp only [and_twoPow, getLsbD_and, getLsbD_zeroExtend, Fin.is_lt, decide_True, Bool.true_and,
+    simp only [and_twoPow, getLsbD_and, getLsbD_setWidth, Fin.is_lt, decide_True, Bool.true_and,
       getLsbD_zero, and_eq_false_imp, and_eq_true, decide_eq_true_eq, and_imp]
     by_cases hi : x.getLsbD i <;> simp [hi] <;> omega
 
+@[deprecated setWidth_setWidth_succ_eq_setWidth_setWidth_add_twoPow (since := "2024-09-18"),
+  inherit_doc setWidth_setWidth_succ_eq_setWidth_setWidth_add_twoPow]
+abbrev zeroExtend_truncate_succ_eq_zeroExtend_truncate_add_twoPow :=
+  @setWidth_setWidth_succ_eq_setWidth_setWidth_add_twoPow
+
 /--
 Recurrence lemma: multiplying `x` with the first `s` bits of `y` is the
 same as truncating `y` to `s` bits, then zero extending to the original length,
 and performing the multplication. -/
-theorem mulRec_eq_mul_signExtend_truncate (x y : BitVec w) (s : Nat) :
-    mulRec x y s = x * ((y.truncate (s + 1)).zeroExtend w) := by
+theorem mulRec_eq_mul_signExtend_setWidth (x y : BitVec w) (s : Nat) :
+    mulRec x y s = x * ((y.setWidth (s + 1)).setWidth w) := by
   induction s
   case zero =>
     simp only [mulRec_zero_eq, ofNat_eq_ofNat, Nat.reduceAdd]
     by_cases y.getLsbD 0
     case pos hy =>
-      simp only [hy, ↓reduceIte, truncate, zeroExtend_one_eq_ofBool_getLsb_zero,
+      simp only [hy, ↓reduceIte, setWidth_one_eq_ofBool_getLsb_zero,
         ofBool_true, ofNat_eq_ofNat]
-      rw [zeroExtend_ofNat_one_eq_ofNat_one_of_lt (by omega)]
+      rw [setWidth_ofNat_one_eq_ofNat_one_of_lt (by omega)]
       simp
     case neg hy =>
-      simp [hy, zeroExtend_one_eq_ofBool_getLsb_zero]
+      simp [hy, setWidth_one_eq_ofBool_getLsb_zero]
   case succ s' hs =>
     rw [mulRec_succ_eq, hs]
     have heq :
@@ -350,13 +355,16 @@ theorem mulRec_eq_mul_signExtend_truncate (x y : BitVec w) (s : Nat) :
         (x * (y &&& (BitVec.twoPow w (s' + 1)))) := by
       simp only [ofNat_eq_ofNat, and_twoPow]
       by_cases hy : y.getLsbD (s' + 1) <;> simp [hy]
-    rw [heq, ← BitVec.mul_add, ← zeroExtend_truncate_succ_eq_zeroExtend_truncate_add_twoPow]
+    rw [heq, ← BitVec.mul_add, ← setWidth_setWidth_succ_eq_setWidth_setWidth_add_twoPow]
+
+@[deprecated mulRec_eq_mul_signExtend_setWidth (since := "2024-09-18"),
+  inherit_doc mulRec_eq_mul_signExtend_setWidth]
+abbrev mulRec_eq_mul_signExtend_truncate := @mulRec_eq_mul_signExtend_setWidth
 
 theorem getLsbD_mul (x y : BitVec w) (i : Nat) :
     (x * y).getLsbD i = (mulRec x y w).getLsbD i := by
-  simp only [mulRec_eq_mul_signExtend_truncate]
-  rw [truncate, ← truncate_eq_zeroExtend, ← truncate_eq_zeroExtend,
-    truncate_truncate_of_le]
+  simp only [mulRec_eq_mul_signExtend_setWidth]
+  rw [setWidth_setWidth_of_le]
   · simp
   · omega
 
@@ -402,22 +410,22 @@ theorem shiftLeft_or_of_and_eq_zero {x : BitVec w₁} {y z : BitVec w₂}
 `shiftLeftRec x y n` shifts `x` to the left by the first `n` bits of `y`.
 -/
 theorem shiftLeftRec_eq {x : BitVec w₁} {y : BitVec w₂} {n : Nat} :
-    shiftLeftRec x y n = x <<< (y.truncate (n + 1)).zeroExtend w₂ := by
+    shiftLeftRec x y n = x <<< (y.setWidth (n + 1)).setWidth w₂ := by
   induction n generalizing x y
   case zero =>
     ext i
-    simp only [shiftLeftRec_zero, twoPow_zero, Nat.reduceAdd, truncate_one,
-      and_one_eq_zeroExtend_ofBool_getLsbD]
+    simp only [shiftLeftRec_zero, twoPow_zero, Nat.reduceAdd, setWidth_one,
+      and_one_eq_setWidth_ofBool_getLsbD]
   case succ n ih =>
     simp only [shiftLeftRec_succ, and_twoPow]
     rw [ih]
     by_cases h : y.getLsbD (n + 1)
     · simp only [h, ↓reduceIte]
-      rw [zeroExtend_truncate_succ_eq_zeroExtend_truncate_or_twoPow_of_getLsbD_true h,
+      rw [setWidth_setWidth_succ_eq_setWidth_setWidth_or_twoPow_of_getLsbD_true h,
         shiftLeft_or_of_and_eq_zero]
       simp [and_twoPow]
     · simp only [h, false_eq_true, ↓reduceIte, shiftLeft_zero']
-      rw [zeroExtend_truncate_succ_eq_zeroExtend_truncate_of_getLsbD_false (i := n + 1)]
+      rw [setWidth_setWidth_succ_eq_setWidth_setWidth_of_getLsbD_false (i := n + 1)]
       simp [h]
 
 /--
@@ -430,6 +438,386 @@ theorem shiftLeft_eq_shiftLeftRec (x : BitVec w₁) (y : BitVec w₂) :
   · simp [of_length_zero]
   · simp [shiftLeftRec_eq]
 
+/-! # udiv/urem recurrence for bitblasting
+
+In order to prove the correctness of the division algorithm on the integers,
+one shows that `n.div d = q` and `n.mod d = r` iff `n = d * q + r` and `0 ≤ r < d`.
+Mnemonic: `n` is the numerator, `d` is the denominator, `q` is the quotient, and `r` the remainder.
+
+This *uniqueness of decomposition* is not true for bitvectors.
+For `n = 0, d = 3, w = 3`, we can write:
+- `0 = 0 * 3 + 0` (`q = 0`, `r = 0 < 3`.)
+- `0 = 2 * 3 + 2 = 6 + 2 ≃ 0 (mod 8)` (`q = 2`, `r = 2 < 3`).
+
+Such examples can be created by choosing different `(q, r)` for a fixed `(d, n)`
+such that `(d * q + r)` overflows and wraps around to equal `n`.
+
+This tells us that the division algorithm must have more restrictions than just the ones
+we have for integers. These restrictions are captured in `DivModState.Lawful`.
+The key idea is to state the relationship in terms of the toNat values of {n, d, q, r}.
+If the division equation `d.toNat * q.toNat + r.toNat = n.toNat` holds,
+then `n.udiv d = q` and `n.umod d = r`.
+
+Following this, we implement the division algorithm by repeated shift-subtract.
+
+References:
+- Fast 32-bit Division on the DSP56800E: Minimized nonrestoring division algorithm by David Baca
+- Bitwuzla sources for bitblasting.h
+-/
+
+private theorem Nat.div_add_eq_left_of_lt {x y z : Nat} (hx : z ∣ x) (hy : y < z) (hz : 0 < z) :
+    (x + y) / z = x / z := by
+  refine Nat.div_eq_of_lt_le ?lo ?hi
+  · apply Nat.le_trans
+    · exact div_mul_le_self x z
+    · omega
+  · simp only [succ_eq_add_one, Nat.add_mul, Nat.one_mul]
+    apply Nat.add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt
+    · apply Nat.le_of_eq
+      exact (Nat.div_eq_iff_eq_mul_left hz hx).mp rfl
+    · exact hy
+
+/-- If the division equation `d.toNat * q.toNat + r.toNat = n.toNat` holds,
+then `n.udiv d = q`. -/
+theorem udiv_eq_of_mul_add_toNat {d n q r : BitVec w} (hd : 0 < d)
+    (hrd : r < d)
+    (hdqnr : d.toNat * q.toNat + r.toNat = n.toNat) :
+    n.udiv d = q := by
+  apply BitVec.eq_of_toNat_eq
+  rw [toNat_udiv]
+  replace hdqnr : (d.toNat * q.toNat + r.toNat) / d.toNat = n.toNat / d.toNat := by
+    simp [hdqnr]
+  rw [Nat.div_add_eq_left_of_lt] at hdqnr
+  · rw [← hdqnr]
+    exact mul_div_right q.toNat hd
+  · exact Nat.dvd_mul_right d.toNat q.toNat
+  · exact hrd
+  · exact hd
+
+/-- If the division equation `d.toNat * q.toNat + r.toNat = n.toNat` holds,
+then `n.umod d = r`. -/
+theorem umod_eq_of_mul_add_toNat {d n q r : BitVec w} (hrd : r < d)
+    (hdqnr : d.toNat * q.toNat + r.toNat = n.toNat) :
+    n.umod d = r := by
+  apply BitVec.eq_of_toNat_eq
+  rw [toNat_umod]
+  replace hdqnr : (d.toNat * q.toNat + r.toNat) % d.toNat = n.toNat % d.toNat := by
+    simp [hdqnr]
+  rw [Nat.add_mod, Nat.mul_mod_right] at hdqnr
+  simp only [Nat.zero_add, mod_mod] at hdqnr
+  replace hrd : r.toNat < d.toNat := by
+    simpa [BitVec.lt_def] using hrd
+  rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt hrd] at hdqnr
+  simp [hdqnr]
+
+/-! ### DivModState -/
+
+/-- `DivModState` is a structure that maintains the state of recursive `divrem` calls. -/
+structure DivModState (w : Nat) : Type where
+  /-- The number of bits in the numerator that are not yet processed -/
+  wn : Nat
+  /-- The number of bits in the remainder (and quotient) -/
+  wr : Nat
+  /-- The current quotient. -/
+  q : BitVec w
+  /-- The current remainder. -/
+  r : BitVec w
+
+
+/-- `DivModArgs` contains the arguments to a `divrem` call which remain constant throughout
+execution. -/
+structure DivModArgs (w : Nat) where
+  /-- the numerator (aka, dividend) -/
+  n : BitVec w
+  /-- the denumerator (aka, divisor)-/
+  d : BitVec w
+
+/-- A `DivModState` is lawful if the remainder width `wr` plus the numerator width `wn` equals `w`,
+and the bitvectors `r` and `n` have values in the bounds given by bitwidths `wr`, resp. `wn`.
+
+This is a proof engineering choice: an alternative world could have been
+`r : BitVec wr` and `n : BitVec wn`, but this required much more dependent typing coercions.
+
+Instead, we choose to declare all involved bitvectors as length `w`, and then prove that
+the values are within their respective bounds.
+
+We start with `wn = w` and `wr = 0`, and then in each step, we decrement `wn` and increment `wr`.
+In this way, we grow a legal remainder in each loop iteration.
+-/
+structure DivModState.Lawful {w : Nat} (args : DivModArgs w) (qr : DivModState w) : Prop where
+  /-- The sum of widths of the dividend and remainder is `w`. -/
+  hwrn : qr.wr + qr.wn = w
+  /-- The denominator is positive. -/
+  hdPos : 0 < args.d
+  /-- The remainder is strictly less than the denominator. -/
+  hrLtDivisor : qr.r.toNat < args.d.toNat
+  /-- The remainder is morally a `Bitvec wr`, and so has value less than `2^wr`. -/
+  hrWidth : qr.r.toNat < 2^qr.wr
+  /-- The quotient is morally a `Bitvec wr`, and so has value less than `2^wr`. -/
+  hqWidth : qr.q.toNat < 2^qr.wr
+  /-- The low `(w - wn)` bits of `n` obey the invariant for division. -/
+  hdiv : args.n.toNat >>> qr.wn = args.d.toNat * qr.q.toNat + qr.r.toNat
+
+/-- A lawful DivModState implies `w > 0`. -/
+def DivModState.Lawful.hw {args : DivModArgs w} {qr : DivModState w}
+    {h : DivModState.Lawful args qr} : 0 < w := by
+  have hd := h.hdPos
+  rcases w with rfl | w
+  · have hcontra : args.d = 0#0 := by apply Subsingleton.elim
+    rw [hcontra] at hd
+    simp at hd
+  · omega
+
+/-- An initial value with both `q, r = 0`. -/
+def DivModState.init (w : Nat) : DivModState w := {
+  wn := w
+  wr := 0
+  q := 0#w
+  r := 0#w
+}
+
+/-- The initial state is lawful. -/
+def DivModState.lawful_init {w : Nat} (args : DivModArgs w) (hd : 0#w < args.d) :
+    DivModState.Lawful args (DivModState.init w) := by
+  simp only [BitVec.DivModState.init]
+  exact {
+    hwrn := by simp only; omega,
+    hdPos := by assumption
+    hrLtDivisor := by simp [BitVec.lt_def] at hd ⊢; assumption
+    hrWidth := by simp [DivModState.init],
+    hqWidth := by simp [DivModState.init],
+    hdiv := by
+      simp only [DivModState.init, toNat_ofNat, zero_mod, Nat.mul_zero, Nat.add_zero];
+      rw [Nat.shiftRight_eq_div_pow]
+      apply Nat.div_eq_of_lt args.n.isLt
+  }
+
+/--
+A lawful DivModState with a fully consumed dividend (`wn = 0`) witnesses that the
+quotient has been correctly computed.
+-/
+theorem DivModState.udiv_eq_of_lawful {n d : BitVec w} {qr : DivModState w}
+    (h_lawful : DivModState.Lawful {n, d} qr)
+    (h_final  : qr.wn = 0) :
+    n.udiv d = qr.q := by
+  apply udiv_eq_of_mul_add_toNat h_lawful.hdPos h_lawful.hrLtDivisor
+  have hdiv := h_lawful.hdiv
+  simp only [h_final] at *
+  omega
+
+/--
+A lawful DivModState with a fully consumed dividend (`wn = 0`) witnesses that the
+remainder has been correctly computed.
+-/
+theorem DivModState.umod_eq_of_lawful {qr : DivModState w}
+    (h : DivModState.Lawful {n, d} qr)
+    (h_final  : qr.wn = 0) :
+    n.umod d = qr.r := by
+  apply umod_eq_of_mul_add_toNat h.hrLtDivisor
+  have hdiv := h.hdiv
+  simp only [shiftRight_zero] at hdiv
+  simp only [h_final] at *
+  exact hdiv.symm
+
+/-! ### DivModState.Poised -/
+
+/--
+A `Poised` DivModState is a state which is `Lawful` and furthermore, has at least
+one numerator bit left to process `(0 < wn)`
+
+The input to the shift subtractor is a legal input to `divrem`, and we also need to have an
+input bit to perform shift subtraction on, and thus we need `0 < wn`.
+-/
+structure DivModState.Poised {w : Nat} (args : DivModArgs w) (qr : DivModState w)
+  extends DivModState.Lawful args qr : Type where
+  /-- Only perform a round of shift-subtract if we have dividend bits. -/
+  hwn_lt : 0 < qr.wn
+
+/--
+In the shift subtract input, the dividend is at least one bit long (`wn > 0`), so
+the remainder has bits to be computed (`wr < w`).
+-/
+def DivModState.wr_lt_w {qr : DivModState w} (h : qr.Poised args) : qr.wr < w := by
+  have hwrn := h.hwrn
+  have hwn_lt := h.hwn_lt
+  omega
+
+/-! ### Division shift subtractor -/
+
+/--
+One round of the division algorithm, that tries to perform a subtract shift.
+Note that this should only be called when `r.msb = false`, so we will not overflow.
+-/
+def divSubtractShift (args : DivModArgs w) (qr : DivModState w) : DivModState w :=
+  let {n, d} := args
+  let wn := qr.wn - 1
+  let wr := qr.wr + 1
+  let r' := shiftConcat qr.r (n.getLsbD wn)
+  if r' < d then {
+    q := qr.q.shiftConcat false, -- If `r' < d`, then we do not have a quotient bit.
+    r := r'
+    wn, wr
+  } else {
+    q := qr.q.shiftConcat true, -- Otherwise, `r' ≥ d`, and we have a quotient bit.
+    r := r' - d -- we subtract to maintain the invariant that `r < d`.
+    wn, wr
+  }
+
+/-- The value of shifting right by `wn - 1` equals shifting by `wn` and grabbing the lsb at `(wn - 1)`. -/
+theorem DivModState.toNat_shiftRight_sub_one_eq
+    {args : DivModArgs w} {qr : DivModState w} (h : qr.Poised args) :
+    args.n.toNat >>> (qr.wn - 1)
+    = (args.n.toNat >>> qr.wn) * 2 + (args.n.getLsbD (qr.wn - 1)).toNat := by
+  show BitVec.toNat (args.n >>> (qr.wn - 1)) = _
+  have {..} := h -- break the structure down for `omega`
+  rw [shiftRight_sub_one_eq_shiftConcat args.n h.hwn_lt]
+  rw [toNat_shiftConcat_eq_of_lt (k := w - qr.wn)]
+  · simp
+  · omega
+  · apply BitVec.toNat_ushiftRight_lt
+    omega
+
+/--
+This is used when proving the correctness of the divison algorithm,
+where we know that `r < d`.
+We then want to show that `((r.shiftConcat b) - d) < d` as the loop invariant.
+In arithmetic, this is the same as showing that
+`r * 2 + 1 - d < d`, which this theorem establishes.
+-/
+private theorem two_mul_add_sub_lt_of_lt_of_lt_two (h : a < x) (hy : y < 2) :
+    2 * a + y - x < x := by omega
+
+/-- We show that the output of `divSubtractShift` is lawful, which tells us that it
+obeys the division equation. -/
+theorem lawful_divSubtractShift (qr : DivModState w) (h : qr.Poised args) :
+    DivModState.Lawful args (divSubtractShift args qr) := by
+  rcases args with ⟨n, d⟩
+  simp only [divSubtractShift, decide_eq_true_eq]
+  -- We add these hypotheses for `omega` to find them later.
+  have ⟨⟨hrwn, hd, hrd, hr, hn, hrnd⟩, hwn_lt⟩ := h
+  have : d.toNat * (qr.q.toNat * 2) = d.toNat * qr.q.toNat * 2 := by rw [Nat.mul_assoc]
+  by_cases rltd : shiftConcat qr.r (n.getLsbD (qr.wn - 1)) < d
+  · simp only [rltd, ↓reduceIte]
+    constructor <;> try bv_omega
+    case pos.hrWidth => apply toNat_shiftConcat_lt_of_lt <;> omega
+    case pos.hqWidth => apply toNat_shiftConcat_lt_of_lt <;> omega
+    case pos.hdiv =>
+      simp [qr.toNat_shiftRight_sub_one_eq h, h.hdiv, this,
+        toNat_shiftConcat_eq_of_lt (qr.wr_lt_w h) h.hrWidth,
+        toNat_shiftConcat_eq_of_lt (qr.wr_lt_w h) h.hqWidth]
+      omega
+  · simp only [rltd, ↓reduceIte]
+    constructor <;> try bv_omega
+    case neg.hrLtDivisor =>
+      simp only [lt_def, Nat.not_lt] at rltd
+      rw [BitVec.toNat_sub_of_le rltd,
+        toNat_shiftConcat_eq_of_lt (hk := qr.wr_lt_w h) (hx := h.hrWidth),
+        Nat.mul_comm]
+      apply two_mul_add_sub_lt_of_lt_of_lt_two <;> bv_omega
+    case neg.hrWidth =>
+      simp only
+      have hdr' : d ≤ (qr.r.shiftConcat (n.getLsbD (qr.wn - 1))) :=
+        BitVec.not_lt_iff_le.mp rltd
+      have hr' : ((qr.r.shiftConcat (n.getLsbD (qr.wn - 1)))).toNat < 2 ^ (qr.wr + 1) := by
+        apply toNat_shiftConcat_lt_of_lt <;> bv_omega
+      rw [BitVec.toNat_sub_of_le hdr']
+      omega
+    case neg.hqWidth =>
+      apply toNat_shiftConcat_lt_of_lt <;> omega
+    case neg.hdiv =>
+      have rltd' := (BitVec.not_lt_iff_le.mp rltd)
+      simp only [qr.toNat_shiftRight_sub_one_eq h,
+        BitVec.toNat_sub_of_le rltd',
+        toNat_shiftConcat_eq_of_lt (qr.wr_lt_w h) h.hrWidth]
+      simp only [BitVec.le_def,
+        toNat_shiftConcat_eq_of_lt (qr.wr_lt_w h) h.hrWidth] at rltd'
+      simp only [toNat_shiftConcat_eq_of_lt (qr.wr_lt_w h) h.hqWidth, h.hdiv, Nat.mul_add]
+      bv_omega
+
+/-! ### Core division algorithm circuit -/
+
+/-- A recursive definition of division for bitblasting, in terms of a shift-subtraction circuit. -/
+def divRec {w : Nat} (m : Nat) (args : DivModArgs w) (qr : DivModState w) :
+    DivModState w :=
+  match m with
+  | 0 => qr
+  | m + 1 => divRec m args <| divSubtractShift args qr
+
+@[simp]
+theorem divRec_zero (qr : DivModState w) :
+    divRec 0 args qr = qr := rfl
+
+@[simp]
+theorem divRec_succ (m : Nat) (args : DivModArgs w) (qr : DivModState w) :
+    divRec (m + 1) args qr =
+      divRec m args (divSubtractShift args qr) := rfl
+
+/-- The output of `divRec` is a lawful state -/
+theorem lawful_divRec {args : DivModArgs w} {qr : DivModState w}
+    (h : DivModState.Lawful args qr) :
+    DivModState.Lawful args (divRec qr.wn args qr) := by
+  generalize hm : qr.wn = m
+  induction m generalizing qr
+  case zero =>
+    exact h
+  case succ wn' ih =>
+    simp only [divRec_succ]
+    apply ih
+    · apply lawful_divSubtractShift
+      constructor
+      · assumption
+      · omega
+    · simp only [divSubtractShift, hm]
+      split <;> rfl
+
+/-- The output of `divRec` has no more bits left to process (i.e., `wn = 0`) -/
+@[simp]
+theorem wn_divRec (args : DivModArgs w) (qr : DivModState w) :
+    (divRec qr.wn args qr).wn = 0 := by
+  generalize hm : qr.wn = m
+  induction m generalizing qr
+  case zero =>
+    assumption
+  case succ wn' ih =>
+    apply ih
+    simp only [divSubtractShift, hm]
+    split <;> rfl
+
+/-- The result of `udiv` agrees with the result of the division recurrence. -/
+theorem udiv_eq_divRec (hd : 0#w < d) :
+    let out := divRec w {n, d} (DivModState.init w)
+    n.udiv d = out.q := by
+  have := DivModState.lawful_init {n, d} hd
+  have := lawful_divRec this
+  apply DivModState.udiv_eq_of_lawful this (wn_divRec ..)
+
+/-- The result of `umod` agrees with the result of the division recurrence. -/
+theorem umod_eq_divRec (hd : 0#w < d) :
+    let out := divRec w {n, d} (DivModState.init w)
+    n.umod d = out.r := by
+  have := DivModState.lawful_init {n, d} hd
+  have := lawful_divRec this
+  apply DivModState.umod_eq_of_lawful this (wn_divRec ..)
+
+@[simp]
+theorem divRec_succ' (m : Nat) (args : DivModArgs w) (qr : DivModState w) :
+    divRec (m+1) args qr =
+    let wn := qr.wn - 1
+    let wr := qr.wr + 1
+    let r' := shiftConcat qr.r (args.n.getLsbD wn)
+    let input : DivModState _ :=
+      if r' < args.d then {
+        q := qr.q.shiftConcat false,
+        r := r'
+        wn, wr
+      } else {
+        q := qr.q.shiftConcat true,
+        r := r' - args.d
+        wn, wr
+      }
+    divRec m args input := by
+  simp [divRec_succ, divSubtractShift]
+
 /- ### Arithmetic shift right (sshiftRight) recurrence -/
 
 /--
@@ -466,18 +854,18 @@ theorem sshiftRight'_or_of_and_eq_zero {x : BitVec w₁} {y z : BitVec w₂}
     toNat_add_of_and_eq_zero h, sshiftRight_add]
 
 theorem sshiftRightRec_eq (x : BitVec w₁) (y : BitVec w₂) (n : Nat) :
-    sshiftRightRec x y n = x.sshiftRight' ((y.truncate (n + 1)).zeroExtend w₂) := by
+    sshiftRightRec x y n = x.sshiftRight' ((y.setWidth (n + 1)).setWidth w₂) := by
   induction n generalizing x y
   case zero =>
     ext i
-    simp [twoPow_zero, Nat.reduceAdd, and_one_eq_zeroExtend_ofBool_getLsbD, truncate_one]
+    simp [twoPow_zero, Nat.reduceAdd, and_one_eq_setWidth_ofBool_getLsbD, setWidth_one]
   case succ n ih =>
     simp only [sshiftRightRec_succ_eq, and_twoPow, ih]
     by_cases h : y.getLsbD (n + 1)
-    · rw [zeroExtend_truncate_succ_eq_zeroExtend_truncate_or_twoPow_of_getLsbD_true h,
+    · rw [setWidth_setWidth_succ_eq_setWidth_setWidth_or_twoPow_of_getLsbD_true h,
         sshiftRight'_or_of_and_eq_zero (by simp [and_twoPow]), h]
       simp
-    · rw [zeroExtend_truncate_succ_eq_zeroExtend_truncate_of_getLsbD_false (i := n + 1)
+    · rw [setWidth_setWidth_succ_eq_setWidth_setWidth_of_getLsbD_false (i := n + 1)
         (by simp [h])]
       simp [h]
 
@@ -529,20 +917,20 @@ theorem ushiftRight'_or_of_and_eq_zero {x : BitVec w₁} {y z : BitVec w₂}
   simp [← add_eq_or_of_and_eq_zero _ _ h, toNat_add_of_and_eq_zero h, shiftRight_add]
 
 theorem ushiftRightRec_eq (x : BitVec w₁) (y : BitVec w₂) (n : Nat) :
-    ushiftRightRec x y n = x >>> (y.truncate (n + 1)).zeroExtend w₂ := by
+    ushiftRightRec x y n = x >>> (y.setWidth (n + 1)).setWidth w₂ := by
   induction n generalizing x y
   case zero =>
     ext i
     simp only [ushiftRightRec_zero, twoPow_zero, Nat.reduceAdd,
-      and_one_eq_zeroExtend_ofBool_getLsbD, truncate_one]
+      and_one_eq_setWidth_ofBool_getLsbD, setWidth_one]
   case succ n ih =>
     simp only [ushiftRightRec_succ, and_twoPow]
     rw [ih]
     by_cases h : y.getLsbD (n + 1) <;> simp only [h, ↓reduceIte]
-    · rw [zeroExtend_truncate_succ_eq_zeroExtend_truncate_or_twoPow_of_getLsbD_true h,
+    · rw [setWidth_setWidth_succ_eq_setWidth_setWidth_or_twoPow_of_getLsbD_true h,
         ushiftRight'_or_of_and_eq_zero]
       simp [and_twoPow]
-    · simp [zeroExtend_truncate_succ_eq_zeroExtend_truncate_of_getLsbD_false, h]
+    · simp [setWidth_setWidth_succ_eq_setWidth_setWidth_of_getLsbD_false, h]
 
 /--
 Show that `x >>> y` can be written in terms of `ushiftRightRec`.

src/Init/Data/BitVec/Folds.lean

@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ private theorem iunfoldr.eq_test
     simp only [init, eq_nil]
   case step =>
     intro i
-    simp_all [truncate_succ]
+    simp_all [setWidth_succ]
 
 theorem iunfoldr_getLsbD' {f : Fin w → α → α × Bool} (state : Nat → α)
     (ind : ∀(i : Fin w), (f i (state i.val)).fst = state (i.val+1)) :

src/Init/Data/Bool.lean

@@ -6,16 +6,13 @@ Authors: F. G. Dorais
 prelude
 import Init.NotationExtra
 
-/-- Boolean exclusive or -/
-abbrev xor : Bool → Bool → Bool := bne
 
 namespace Bool
 
-/- Namespaced versions that can be used instead of prefixing `_root_` -/
-@[inherit_doc not] protected abbrev not := not
-@[inherit_doc or]  protected abbrev or  := or
-@[inherit_doc and] protected abbrev and := and
-@[inherit_doc xor] protected abbrev xor := xor
+/-- Boolean exclusive or -/
+abbrev xor : Bool → Bool → Bool := bne
+
+@[inherit_doc] infixl:33 " ^^ " => xor
 
 instance (p : Bool → Prop) [inst : DecidablePred p] : Decidable (∀ x, p x) :=
   match inst true, inst false with
@@ -150,8 +147,8 @@ theorem and_or_distrib_right : ∀ (x y z : Bool), ((x || y) && z) = (x && z ||
 theorem or_and_distrib_left  : ∀ (x y z : Bool), (x || y && z) = ((x || y) && (x || z)) := by decide
 theorem or_and_distrib_right : ∀ (x y z : Bool), (x && y || z) = ((x || z) && (y || z)) := by decide
 
-theorem and_xor_distrib_left  : ∀ (x y z : Bool), (x && xor y z) = xor (x && y) (x && z) := by decide
-theorem and_xor_distrib_right : ∀ (x y z : Bool), (xor x y && z) = xor (x && z) (y && z) := by decide
+theorem and_xor_distrib_left  : ∀ (x y z : Bool), (x && (y ^^ z)) = ((x && y) ^^ (x && z)) := by decide
+theorem and_xor_distrib_right : ∀ (x y z : Bool), ((x ^^ y) && z) = ((x && z) ^^ (y && z)) := by decide
 
 /-- De Morgan's law for boolean and -/
 @[simp] theorem not_and : ∀ (x y : Bool), (!(x && y)) = (!x || !y) := by decide
@@ -257,15 +254,6 @@ theorem beq_eq_decide_eq [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] [DecidableEq α] (a b : α) :
 theorem eq_not : ∀ {a b : Bool}, (a = (!b)) ↔ (a ≠ b) := by decide
 theorem not_eq : ∀ {a b : Bool}, ((!a) = b) ↔ (a ≠ b) := by decide
 
-@[simp] theorem not_eq_not : ∀ {a b : Bool}, ¬a = !b ↔ a = b := by decide
-@[simp] theorem not_not_eq : ∀ {a b : Bool}, ¬(!a) = b ↔ a = b := by decide
-
-/--
-We move `!` from the left hand side of an equality to the right hand side.
-This helps confluence, and also helps combining pairs of `!`s.
--/
-@[simp] theorem not_eq_eq_eq_not : ∀ {a b : Bool}, ((!a) = b) ↔ (a = !b) := by decide
-
 @[simp] theorem coe_iff_coe : ∀{a b : Bool}, (a ↔ b) ↔ a = b := by decide
 
 @[simp] theorem coe_true_iff_false  : ∀{a b : Bool}, (a ↔ b = false) ↔ a = (!b) := by decide
@@ -279,37 +267,37 @@ theorem beq_comm {α} [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] {a b : α} : (a == b) = (b == a) :
 
 /-! ### xor -/
 
-theorem false_xor : ∀ (x : Bool), xor false x = x := false_bne
+theorem false_xor : ∀ (x : Bool), (false ^^ x) = x := false_bne
 
-theorem xor_false : ∀ (x : Bool), xor x false = x := bne_false
+theorem xor_false : ∀ (x : Bool), (x ^^ false) = x := bne_false
 
-theorem true_xor : ∀ (x : Bool), xor true x = !x := true_bne
+theorem true_xor : ∀ (x : Bool), (true ^^ x) = !x := true_bne
 
-theorem xor_true : ∀ (x : Bool), xor x true = !x := bne_true
+theorem xor_true : ∀ (x : Bool), (x ^^ true) = !x := bne_true
 
-theorem not_xor_self : ∀ (x : Bool), xor (!x) x = true := not_bne_self
+theorem not_xor_self : ∀ (x : Bool), (!x ^^ x) = true := not_bne_self
 
-theorem xor_not_self : ∀ (x : Bool), xor x (!x) = true := bne_not_self
+theorem xor_not_self : ∀ (x : Bool), (x ^^ !x) = true := bne_not_self
 
-theorem not_xor : ∀ (x y : Bool), xor (!x) y = !(xor x y) := by decide
+theorem not_xor : ∀ (x y : Bool), (!x ^^ y) = !(x ^^ y) := by decide
 
-theorem xor_not : ∀ (x y : Bool), xor x (!y) = !(xor x y) := by decide
+theorem xor_not : ∀ (x y : Bool), (x ^^ !y) = !(x ^^ y) := by decide
 
-theorem not_xor_not : ∀ (x y : Bool), xor (!x) (!y) = (xor x y) := not_bne_not
+theorem not_xor_not : ∀ (x y : Bool), (!x ^^ !y) = (x ^^ y) := not_bne_not
 
-theorem xor_self : ∀ (x : Bool), xor x x = false := by decide
+theorem xor_self : ∀ (x : Bool), (x ^^ x) = false := by decide
 
-theorem xor_comm : ∀ (x y : Bool), xor x y = xor y x := by decide
+theorem xor_comm : ∀ (x y : Bool), (x ^^ y) = (y ^^ x) := by decide
 
-theorem xor_left_comm : ∀ (x y z : Bool), xor x (xor y z) = xor y (xor x z) := by decide
+theorem xor_left_comm : ∀ (x y z : Bool), (x ^^ (y ^^ z)) = (y ^^ (x ^^ z)) := by decide
 
-theorem xor_right_comm : ∀ (x y z : Bool), xor (xor x y) z = xor (xor x z) y := by decide
+theorem xor_right_comm : ∀ (x y z : Bool), ((x ^^ y) ^^ z) = ((x ^^ z) ^^ y) := by decide
 
-theorem xor_assoc : ∀ (x y z : Bool), xor (xor x y) z = xor x (xor y z) := bne_assoc
+theorem xor_assoc : ∀ (x y z : Bool), ((x ^^ y) ^^ z) = (x ^^ (y ^^ z)) := bne_assoc
 
-theorem xor_left_inj : ∀ {x y z : Bool}, xor x y = xor x z ↔ y = z := bne_left_inj
+theorem xor_left_inj : ∀ {x y z : Bool}, (x ^^ y) = (x ^^ z) ↔ y = z := bne_left_inj
 
-theorem xor_right_inj : ∀ {x y z : Bool}, xor x z = xor y z ↔ x = y := bne_right_inj
+theorem xor_right_inj : ∀ {x y z : Bool}, (x ^^ z) = (y ^^ z) ↔ x = y := bne_right_inj
 
 /-! ### le/lt -/
 
@@ -380,13 +368,14 @@ theorem and_or_inj_left_iff :
 /-- convert a `Bool` to a `Nat`, `false -> 0`, `true -> 1` -/
 def toNat (b : Bool) : Nat := cond b 1 0
 
-@[simp] theorem toNat_false : false.toNat = 0 := rfl
+@[simp, bv_toNat] theorem toNat_false : false.toNat = 0 := rfl
 
-@[simp] theorem toNat_true : true.toNat = 1 := rfl
+@[simp, bv_toNat] theorem toNat_true : true.toNat = 1 := rfl
 
 theorem toNat_le (c : Bool) : c.toNat ≤ 1 := by
   cases c <;> trivial
 
+@[bv_toNat]
 theorem toNat_lt (b : Bool) : b.toNat < 2 :=
   Nat.lt_succ_of_le (toNat_le _)
 
@@ -597,7 +586,7 @@ theorem decide_beq_decide (p q : Prop) [dpq : Decidable (p ↔ q)] [dp : Decidab
 
 end Bool
 
-export Bool (cond_eq_if)
+export Bool (cond_eq_if xor and or not)
 
 /-! ### decide -/
 

src/Init/Data/Fin/Basic.lean

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ instance coeToNat : CoeOut (Fin n) Nat :=
   ⟨fun v => v.val⟩
 
 /--
-From the empty type `Fin 0`, any desired result `α` can be derived. This is simlar to `Empty.elim`.
+From the empty type `Fin 0`, any desired result `α` can be derived. This is similar to `Empty.elim`.
 -/
 def elim0.{u} {α : Sort u} : Fin 0 → α
   | ⟨_, h⟩ => absurd h (not_lt_zero _)
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ This differs from addition, which wraps around:
 (2 : Fin 3) + 1 = (0 : Fin 3)
 ```
 -/
-def succ : Fin n → Fin n.succ
+def succ : Fin n → Fin (n + 1)
   | ⟨i, h⟩ => ⟨i+1, Nat.succ_lt_succ h⟩
 
 variable {n : Nat}
@@ -39,16 +39,20 @@ variable {n : Nat}
 /--
 Returns `a` modulo `n + 1` as a `Fin n.succ`.
 -/
-protected def ofNat {n : Nat} (a : Nat) : Fin n.succ :=
+protected def ofNat {n : Nat} (a : Nat) : Fin (n + 1) :=
   ⟨a % (n+1), Nat.mod_lt _ (Nat.zero_lt_succ _)⟩
 
 /--
 Returns `a` modulo `n` as a `Fin n`.
 
-The assumption `n > 0` ensures that `Fin n` is nonempty.
+The assumption `NeZero n` ensures that `Fin n` is nonempty.
 -/
-protected def ofNat' {n : Nat} (a : Nat) (h : n > 0) : Fin n :=
-  ⟨a % n, Nat.mod_lt _ h⟩
+protected def ofNat' (n : Nat) [NeZero n] (a : Nat) : Fin n :=
+  ⟨a % n, Nat.mod_lt _ (pos_of_neZero n)⟩
+
+-- We intend to deprecate `Fin.ofNat` in favor of `Fin.ofNat'` (and later rename).
+-- This is waiting on https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5323
+-- attribute [deprecated Fin.ofNat' (since := "2024-09-16")] Fin.ofNat
 
 private theorem mlt {b : Nat} : {a : Nat} → a < n → b % n < n
   | 0,   h => Nat.mod_lt _ h
@@ -141,10 +145,10 @@ instance : ShiftLeft (Fin n) where
 instance : ShiftRight (Fin n) where
   shiftRight := Fin.shiftRight
 
-instance instOfNat {n : Nat} [NeZero n] {i : Nat} : OfNat (Fin (no_index n)) i where
-  ofNat := Fin.ofNat' i (pos_of_neZero _)
+instance instOfNat {n : Nat} [NeZero n] {i : Nat} : OfNat (Fin n) i where
+  ofNat := Fin.ofNat' n i
 
-instance : Inhabited (Fin (no_index (n+1))) where
+instance instInhabited {n : Nat} [NeZero n] : Inhabited (Fin n) where
   default := 0
 
 @[simp] theorem zero_eta : (⟨0, Nat.zero_lt_succ _⟩ : Fin (n + 1)) = 0 := rfl

src/Init/Data/Fin/Iterate.lean

@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ def hIterateFrom (P : Nat → Sort _) {n} (f : ∀(i : Fin n), P i.val → P (i.
   decreasing_by decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
 
 /--
-`hIterate` is a heterogenous iterative operation that applies a
+`hIterate` is a heterogeneous iterative operation that applies a
 index-dependent function `f` to a value `init : P start` a total of
 `stop - start` times to produce a value of type `P stop`.
 
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ Concretely, `hIterate start stop f init` is equal to
   init |> f start _ |> f (start+1) _ ... |> f (end-1) _
 ```
 
-Because it is heterogenous and must return a value of type `P stop`,
+Because it is heterogeneous and must return a value of type `P stop`,
 `hIterate` requires proof that `start ≤ stop`.
 
 One can prove properties of `hIterate` using the general theorem
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ private theorem hIterateFrom_elim {P : Nat → Sort _}(Q : ∀(i : Nat), P i →
 
 /-
 `hIterate_elim` provides a mechanism for showing that the result of
-`hIterate` satisifies a property `Q stop` by showing that the states
+`hIterate` satisfies a property `Q stop` by showing that the states
 at the intermediate indices `i : start ≤ i < stop` satisfy `Q i`.
 -/
 theorem hIterate_elim {P : Nat → Sort _} (Q : ∀(i : Nat), P i → Prop)

src/Init/Data/Fin/Lemmas.lean

@@ -51,10 +51,15 @@ theorem eq_mk_iff_val_eq {a : Fin n} {k : Nat} {hk : k < n} :
 
 theorem mk_val (i : Fin n) : (⟨i, i.isLt⟩ : Fin n) = i := Fin.eta ..
 
-@[simp] theorem val_ofNat' (a : Nat) (is_pos : n > 0) :
-  (Fin.ofNat' a is_pos).val = a % n := rfl
+@[simp] theorem val_ofNat' (n : Nat) [NeZero n] (a : Nat) :
+  (Fin.ofNat' n a).val = a % n := rfl
 
-@[simp] theorem ofNat'_val_eq_self (x : Fin n) (h) : (Fin.ofNat' x h) = x := by
+@[simp] theorem ofNat'_self {n : Nat} [NeZero n] : Fin.ofNat' n n = 0 := by
+  ext
+  simp
+  congr
+
+@[simp] theorem ofNat'_val_eq_self [NeZero n] (x : Fin n) : (Fin.ofNat' n x) = x := by
   ext
   rw [val_ofNat', Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
   exact x.2
@@ -68,6 +73,9 @@ theorem mk_val (i : Fin n) : (⟨i, i.isLt⟩ : Fin n) = i := Fin.eta ..
 @[simp] theorem modn_val (a : Fin n) (b : Nat) : (a.modn b).val = a.val % b :=
   rfl
 
+@[simp] theorem val_eq_zero (a : Fin 1) : a.val = 0 :=
+  Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero <| Nat.le_of_lt_succ a.isLt
+
 theorem ite_val {n : Nat} {c : Prop} [Decidable c] {x : c → Fin n} (y : ¬c → Fin n) :
     (if h : c then x h else y h).val = if h : c then (x h).val else (y h).val := by
   by_cases c <;> simp [*]
@@ -120,7 +128,7 @@ theorem mk_le_of_le_val {b : Fin n} {a : Nat} (h : a ≤ b) :
 
 @[simp] theorem mk_lt_mk {x y : Nat} {hx hy} : (⟨x, hx⟩ : Fin n) < ⟨y, hy⟩ ↔ x < y := .rfl
 
-@[simp] theorem val_zero (n : Nat) : (0 : Fin (n + 1)).1 = 0 := rfl
+@[simp] theorem val_zero (n : Nat) [NeZero n] : ((0 : Fin n) : Nat) = 0 := rfl
 
 @[simp] theorem mk_zero : (⟨0, Nat.succ_pos n⟩ : Fin (n + 1)) = 0 := rfl
 
@@ -167,8 +175,24 @@ theorem rev_eq {n a : Nat} (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : n = a + i) :
 @[simp] theorem rev_lt_rev {i j : Fin n} : rev i < rev j ↔ j < i := by
   rw [← Fin.not_le, ← Fin.not_le, rev_le_rev]
 
+/-! ### last -/
+
 @[simp] theorem val_last (n : Nat) : last n = n := rfl
 
+@[simp] theorem last_zero : (Fin.last 0 : Fin 1) = 0 := by
+  ext
+  simp
+
+@[simp] theorem zero_eq_last_iff {n : Nat} : (0 : Fin (n + 1)) = last n ↔ n = 0 := by
+  constructor
+  · intro h
+    simp_all [Fin.ext_iff]
+  · rintro rfl
+    simp
+
+@[simp] theorem last_eq_zero_iff {n : Nat} : Fin.last n = 0 ↔ n = 0 := by
+  simp [eq_comm (a := Fin.last n)]
+
 theorem le_last (i : Fin (n + 1)) : i ≤ last n := Nat.le_of_lt_succ i.is_lt
 
 theorem last_pos : (0 : Fin (n + 2)) < last (n + 1) := Nat.succ_pos _
@@ -202,10 +226,28 @@ instance subsingleton_one : Subsingleton (Fin 1) := subsingleton_iff_le_one.2 (b
 
 theorem fin_one_eq_zero (a : Fin 1) : a = 0 := Subsingleton.elim a 0
 
+@[simp] theorem zero_eq_one_iff {n : Nat} [NeZero n] : (0 : Fin n) = 1 ↔ n = 1 := by
+  constructor
+  · intro h
+    simp [Fin.ext_iff] at h
+    change 0 % n = 1 % n at h
+    rw [eq_comm] at h
+    simpa using h
+  · rintro rfl
+    simp
+
+@[simp] theorem one_eq_zero_iff {n : Nat} [NeZero n] : (1 : Fin n) = 0 ↔ n = 1 := by
+  rw [eq_comm]
+  simp
+
 theorem add_def (a b : Fin n) : a + b = Fin.mk ((a + b) % n) (Nat.mod_lt _ a.size_pos) := rfl
 
 theorem val_add (a b : Fin n) : (a + b).val = (a.val + b.val) % n := rfl
 
+@[simp] protected theorem zero_add {n : Nat} [NeZero n] (i : Fin n) : (0 : Fin n) + i = i := by
+  ext
+  simp [Fin.add_def, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt i.2]
+
 theorem val_add_one_of_lt {n : Nat} {i : Fin n.succ} (h : i < last _) : (i + 1).1 = i + 1 := by
   match n with
   | 0 => cases h
@@ -329,6 +371,10 @@ theorem succ_succ_ne_one (a : Fin n) : Fin.succ (Fin.succ a) ≠ 1 :=
 
 @[simp] theorem cast_mk (h : n = m) (i : Nat) (hn : i < n) : cast h ⟨i, hn⟩ = ⟨i, h ▸ hn⟩ := rfl
 
+@[simp] theorem cast_refl (n : Nat) (h : n = n) : cast h = id := by
+  ext
+  simp
+
 @[simp] theorem cast_trans {k : Nat} (h : n = m) (h' : m = k) {i : Fin n} :
     cast h' (cast h i) = cast (Eq.trans h h') i := rfl
 
@@ -437,6 +483,10 @@ theorem succ_castSucc {n : Nat} (i : Fin n) : i.castSucc.succ = castSucc i.succ
 
 @[simp] theorem coe_addNat (m : Nat) (i : Fin n) : (addNat i m : Nat) = i + m := rfl
 
+@[simp] theorem addNat_zero (n : Nat) (i : Fin n) : addNat i 0 = i := by
+  ext
+  simp
+
 @[simp] theorem addNat_one {i : Fin n} : addNat i 1 = i.succ := rfl
 
 theorem le_coe_addNat (m : Nat) (i : Fin n) : m ≤ addNat i m :=
@@ -466,7 +516,7 @@ theorem cast_addNat_left {n n' m : Nat} (i : Fin n') (h : n' + m = n + m) :
 
 theorem le_coe_natAdd (m : Nat) (i : Fin n) : m ≤ natAdd m i := Nat.le_add_right ..
 
-theorem natAdd_zero {n : Nat} : natAdd 0 = cast (Nat.zero_add n).symm := by ext; simp
+@[simp] theorem natAdd_zero {n : Nat} : natAdd 0 = cast (Nat.zero_add n).symm := by ext; simp
 
 /-- For rewriting in the reverse direction, see `Fin.cast_natAdd_right`. -/
 theorem natAdd_cast {n n' : Nat} (m : Nat) (i : Fin n') (h : n' = n) :
@@ -504,9 +554,19 @@ theorem cast_addNat {n : Nat} (m : Nat) (i : Fin n) :
 
 @[simp] theorem natAdd_last {m n : Nat} : natAdd n (last m) = last (n + m) := rfl
 
+@[simp] theorem addNat_last (n : Nat) :
+    addNat (last n) m = cast (by omega) (last (n + m)) := by
+  ext
+  simp
+
 theorem natAdd_castSucc {m n : Nat} {i : Fin m} : natAdd n (castSucc i) = castSucc (natAdd n i) :=
   rfl
 
+@[simp] theorem natAdd_eq_addNat (n : Nat) (i : Fin n) : Fin.natAdd n i = i.addNat n := by
+  ext
+  simp
+  omega
+
 theorem rev_castAdd (k : Fin n) (m : Nat) : rev (castAdd m k) = addNat (rev k) m := Fin.ext <| by
   rw [val_rev, coe_castAdd, coe_addNat, val_rev, Nat.sub_add_comm (Nat.succ_le_of_lt k.is_lt)]
 
@@ -572,6 +632,15 @@ theorem pred_add_one (i : Fin (n + 2)) (h : (i : Nat) < n + 1) :
 @[simp] theorem subNat_mk {i : Nat} (h₁ : i < n + m) (h₂ : m ≤ i) :
     subNat m ⟨i, h₁⟩ h₂ = ⟨i - m, Nat.sub_lt_right_of_lt_add h₂ h₁⟩ := rfl
 
+@[simp] theorem subNat_zero (i : Fin n) (h : 0 ≤ (i : Nat)): Fin.subNat 0 i h = i := by
+  ext
+  simp
+
+@[simp] theorem subNat_one_succ (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : 1 ≤ ↑i) : (subNat 1 i h).succ = i := by
+  ext
+  simp
+  omega
+
 @[simp] theorem pred_castSucc_succ (i : Fin n) :
     pred (castSucc i.succ) (Fin.ne_of_gt (castSucc_pos i.succ_pos)) = castSucc i := rfl
 
@@ -582,7 +651,7 @@ theorem pred_add_one (i : Fin (n + 2)) (h : (i : Nat) < n + 1) :
     subNat m (addNat i m) h = i := Fin.ext <| Nat.add_sub_cancel i m
 
 @[simp] theorem natAdd_subNat_cast {i : Fin (n + m)} (h : n ≤ i) :
-    natAdd n (subNat n (cast (Nat.add_comm ..) i) h) = i := by simp [← cast_addNat]; rfl
+    natAdd n (subNat n (cast (Nat.add_comm ..) i) h) = i := by simp [← cast_addNat]
 
 /-! ### recursion and induction principles -/
 
@@ -750,13 +819,13 @@ theorem addCases_right {m n : Nat} {motive : Fin (m + n) → Sort _} {left right
 
 /-! ### add -/
 
-@[simp] theorem ofNat'_add (x : Nat) (lt : 0 < n) (y : Fin n) :
-    Fin.ofNat' x lt + y = Fin.ofNat' (x + y.val) lt := by
+theorem ofNat'_add [NeZero n] (x : Nat) (y : Fin n) :
+    Fin.ofNat' n x + y = Fin.ofNat' n (x + y.val) := by
   apply Fin.eq_of_val_eq
   simp [Fin.ofNat', Fin.add_def]
 
-@[simp] theorem add_ofNat' (x : Fin n) (y : Nat) (lt : 0 < n) :
-    x + Fin.ofNat' y lt = Fin.ofNat' (x.val + y) lt := by
+theorem add_ofNat' [NeZero n] (x : Fin n) (y : Nat) :
+    x + Fin.ofNat' n y = Fin.ofNat' n (x.val + y) := by
   apply Fin.eq_of_val_eq
   simp [Fin.ofNat', Fin.add_def]
 
@@ -765,16 +834,21 @@ theorem addCases_right {m n : Nat} {motive : Fin (m + n) → Sort _} {left right
 protected theorem coe_sub (a b : Fin n) : ((a - b : Fin n) : Nat) = ((n - b) + a) % n := by
   cases a; cases b; rfl
 
-@[simp] theorem ofNat'_sub (x : Nat) (lt : 0 < n) (y : Fin n) :
-    Fin.ofNat' x lt - y = Fin.ofNat' ((n - y.val) + x) lt := by
+theorem ofNat'_sub [NeZero n] (x : Nat) (y : Fin n) :
+    Fin.ofNat' n x - y = Fin.ofNat' n ((n - y.val) + x) := by
   apply Fin.eq_of_val_eq
   simp [Fin.ofNat', Fin.sub_def]
 
-@[simp] theorem sub_ofNat' (x : Fin n) (y : Nat) (lt : 0 < n) :
-    x - Fin.ofNat' y lt = Fin.ofNat' ((n - y % n) + x.val) lt := by
+theorem sub_ofNat' [NeZero n] (x : Fin n) (y : Nat) :
+    x - Fin.ofNat' n y = Fin.ofNat' n ((n - y % n) + x.val) := by
   apply Fin.eq_of_val_eq
   simp [Fin.ofNat', Fin.sub_def]
 
+@[simp] protected theorem sub_self [NeZero n] {x : Fin n} : x - x = 0 := by
+  ext
+  rw [Fin.sub_def]
+  simp
+
 private theorem _root_.Nat.mod_eq_sub_of_lt_two_mul {x n} (h₁ : n ≤ x) (h₂ : x < 2 * n) :
     x % n = x - n := by
   rw [Nat.mod_eq, if_pos (by omega), Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (by omega)]

src/Init/Data/Int/DivModLemmas.lean

@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ theorem fdiv_eq_tdiv {a b : Int} (Ha : 0 ≤ a) (Hb : 0 ≤ b) : fdiv a b = tdiv
 @[simp, norm_cast] theorem ofNat_emod (m n : Nat) : (↑(m % n) : Int) = m % n := rfl
 
 
-/-! ### mod definitiions -/
+/-! ### mod definitions -/
 
 theorem emod_add_ediv : ∀ a b : Int, a % b + b * (a / b) = a
   | ofNat _, ofNat _ => congrArg ofNat <| Nat.mod_add_div ..

src/Init/Data/Int/Pow.lean

@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Deniz Aydin, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
 -/
 prelude
 import Init.Data.Int.Lemmas
+import Init.Data.Nat.Lemmas
 
 namespace Int
 
@@ -35,10 +36,24 @@ theorem pow_le_pow_of_le_right {n : Nat} (hx : n > 0) {i : Nat} : ∀ {j}, i ≤
 theorem pos_pow_of_pos {n : Nat} (m : Nat) (h : 0 < n) : 0 < n^m :=
   pow_le_pow_of_le_right h (Nat.zero_le _)
 
+@[norm_cast]
 theorem natCast_pow (b n : Nat) : ((b^n : Nat) : Int) = (b : Int) ^ n := by
   match n with
   | 0 => rfl
   | n + 1 =>
     simp only [Nat.pow_succ, Int.pow_succ, natCast_mul, natCast_pow _ n]
 
+@[simp]
+protected theorem two_pow_pred_sub_two_pow {w : Nat} (h : 0 < w) :
+    ((2 ^ (w - 1) : Nat) - (2 ^ w : Nat) : Int) = - ((2 ^ (w - 1) : Nat) : Int) := by
+  rw [← Nat.two_pow_pred_add_two_pow_pred h]
+  omega
+
+@[simp]
+protected theorem two_pow_pred_sub_two_pow' {w : Nat} (h : 0 < w) :
+    (2 : Int) ^ (w - 1) - (2 : Int) ^ w = - (2 : Int) ^ (w - 1) := by
+  norm_cast
+  rw [← Nat.two_pow_pred_add_two_pow_pred h]
+  simp [h]
+
 end Int

src/Init/Data/List/Attach.lean

@@ -130,24 +130,6 @@ theorem attachWith_map_subtype_val {p : α → Prop} (l : List α) (H : ∀ a
     (l.attachWith p H).map Subtype.val = l :=
   (attachWith_map_coe _ _ _).trans (List.map_id _)
 
-theorem countP_attach (l : List α) (p : α → Bool) :
-    l.attach.countP (fun a : {x // x ∈ l} => p a) = l.countP p := by
-  simp only [← Function.comp_apply (g := Subtype.val), ← countP_map, attach_map_subtype_val]
-
-theorem countP_attachWith {p : α → Prop} (l : List α) (H : ∀ a ∈ l, p a) (q : α → Bool) :
-    (l.attachWith p H).countP (fun a : {x // p x} => q a) = l.countP q := by
-  simp only [← Function.comp_apply (g := Subtype.val), ← countP_map, attachWith_map_subtype_val]
-
-@[simp]
-theorem count_attach [DecidableEq α] (l : List α) (a : {x // x ∈ l}) :
-    l.attach.count a = l.count ↑a :=
-  Eq.trans (countP_congr fun _ _ => by simp [Subtype.ext_iff]) <| countP_attach _ _
-
-@[simp]
-theorem count_attachWith [DecidableEq α] {p : α → Prop} (l : List α) (H : ∀ a ∈ l, p a) (a : {x // p x}) :
-    (l.attachWith p H).count a = l.count ↑a :=
-  Eq.trans (countP_congr fun _ _ => by simp [Subtype.ext_iff]) <| countP_attachWith _ _ _
-
 @[simp]
 theorem mem_attach (l : List α) : ∀ x, x ∈ l.attach
   | ⟨a, h⟩ => by
@@ -235,7 +217,7 @@ theorem getElem_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : ∀ a, p a → β) {l : List α} (h
     (hn : n < (pmap f l h).length) :
     (pmap f l h)[n] =
       f (l[n]'(@length_pmap _ _ p f l h ▸ hn))
-        (h _ (getElem_mem l n (@length_pmap _ _ p f l h ▸ hn))) := by
+        (h _ (getElem_mem (@length_pmap _ _ p f l h ▸ hn))) := by
   induction l generalizing n with
   | nil =>
     simp only [length, pmap] at hn
@@ -266,12 +248,12 @@ theorem getElem?_attach {xs : List α} {i : Nat} :
 @[simp]
 theorem getElem_attachWith {xs : List α} {P : α → Prop} {H : ∀ a ∈ xs, P a}
     {i : Nat} (h : i < (xs.attachWith P H).length) :
-    (xs.attachWith P H)[i] = ⟨xs[i]'(by simpa using h), H _ (getElem_mem xs i (by simpa using h))⟩ :=
+    (xs.attachWith P H)[i] = ⟨xs[i]'(by simpa using h), H _ (getElem_mem (by simpa using h))⟩ :=
   getElem_pmap ..
 
 @[simp]
 theorem getElem_attach {xs : List α} {i : Nat} (h : i < xs.attach.length) :
-    xs.attach[i] = ⟨xs[i]'(by simpa using h), getElem_mem xs i (by simpa using h)⟩ :=
+    xs.attach[i] = ⟨xs[i]'(by simpa using h), getElem_mem (by simpa using h)⟩ :=
   getElem_attachWith h
 
 @[simp] theorem head?_pmap {P : α → Prop} (f : (a : α) → P a → β) (xs : List α)
@@ -312,6 +294,60 @@ theorem getElem_attach {xs : List α} {i : Nat} (h : i < xs.attach.length) :
   | nil => simp at h
   | cons x xs => simp [head_attach, h]
 
+@[simp] theorem tail_pmap {P : α → Prop} (f : (a : α) → P a → β) (xs : List α)
+    (H : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ xs → P a) :
+    (xs.pmap f H).tail = xs.tail.pmap f (fun a h => H a (mem_of_mem_tail h)) := by
+  cases xs <;> simp
+
+@[simp] theorem tail_attachWith {P : α → Prop} {xs : List α}
+    {H : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ xs → P a} :
+    (xs.attachWith P H).tail = xs.tail.attachWith P (fun a h => H a (mem_of_mem_tail h)) := by
+  cases xs <;> simp
+
+@[simp] theorem tail_attach (xs : List α) :
+    xs.attach.tail = xs.tail.attach.map (fun ⟨x, h⟩ => ⟨x, mem_of_mem_tail h⟩) := by
+  cases xs <;> simp
+
+theorem foldl_pmap (l : List α) {P : α → Prop} (f : (a : α) → P a → β)
+  (H : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ l → P a) (g : γ → β → γ) (x : γ) :
+    (l.pmap f H).foldl g x = l.attach.foldl (fun acc a => g acc (f a.1 (H _ a.2))) x := by
+  rw [pmap_eq_map_attach, foldl_map]
+
+theorem foldr_pmap (l : List α) {P : α → Prop} (f : (a : α) → P a → β)
+  (H : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ l → P a) (g : β → γ → γ) (x : γ) :
+    (l.pmap f H).foldr g x = l.attach.foldr (fun a acc => g (f a.1 (H _ a.2)) acc) x := by
+  rw [pmap_eq_map_attach, foldr_map]
+
+/--
+If we fold over `l.attach` with a function that ignores the membership predicate,
+we get the same results as folding over `l` directly.
+
+This is useful when we need to use `attach` to show termination.
+
+Unfortunately this can't be applied by `simp` because of the higher order unification problem,
+and even when rewriting we need to specify the function explicitly.
+-/
+theorem foldl_attach (l : List α) (f : β → α → β) (b : β) :
+    l.attach.foldl (fun acc t => f acc t.1) b = l.foldl f b := by
+  induction l generalizing b with
+  | nil => simp
+  | cons a l ih => rw [foldl_cons, attach_cons, foldl_cons, foldl_map, ih]
+
+/--
+If we fold over `l.attach` with a function that ignores the membership predicate,
+we get the same results as folding over `l` directly.
+
+This is useful when we need to use `attach` to show termination.
+
+Unfortunately this can't be applied by `simp` because of the higher order unification problem,
+and even when rewriting we need to specify the function explicitly.
+-/
+theorem foldr_attach (l : List α) (f : α → β → β) (b : β) :
+    l.attach.foldr (fun t acc => f t.1 acc) b = l.foldr f b := by
+  induction l generalizing b with
+  | nil => simp
+  | cons a l ih => rw [foldr_cons, attach_cons, foldr_cons, foldr_map, ih]
+
 theorem attach_map {l : List α} (f : α → β) :
     (l.map f).attach = l.attach.map (fun ⟨x, h⟩ => ⟨f x, mem_map_of_mem f h⟩) := by
   induction l <;> simp [*]
@@ -492,4 +528,24 @@ theorem getLast_attach {xs : List α} (h : xs.attach ≠ []) :
     xs.attach.getLast h = ⟨xs.getLast (by simpa using h), getLast_mem (by simpa using h)⟩ := by
   simp only [getLast_eq_head_reverse, reverse_attach, head_map, head_attach]
 
+@[simp]
+theorem countP_attach (l : List α) (p : α → Bool) :
+    l.attach.countP (fun a : {x // x ∈ l} => p a) = l.countP p := by
+  simp only [← Function.comp_apply (g := Subtype.val), ← countP_map, attach_map_subtype_val]
+
+@[simp]
+theorem countP_attachWith {p : α → Prop} (l : List α) (H : ∀ a ∈ l, p a) (q : α → Bool) :
+    (l.attachWith p H).countP (fun a : {x // p x} => q a) = l.countP q := by
+  simp only [← Function.comp_apply (g := Subtype.val), ← countP_map, attachWith_map_subtype_val]
+
+@[simp]
+theorem count_attach [DecidableEq α] (l : List α) (a : {x // x ∈ l}) :
+    l.attach.count a = l.count ↑a :=
+  Eq.trans (countP_congr fun _ _ => by simp [Subtype.ext_iff]) <| countP_attach _ _
+
+@[simp]
+theorem count_attachWith [DecidableEq α] {p : α → Prop} (l : List α) (H : ∀ a ∈ l, p a) (a : {x // p x}) :
+    (l.attachWith p H).count a = l.count ↑a :=
+  Eq.trans (countP_congr fun _ _ => by simp [Subtype.ext_iff]) <| countP_attachWith _ _ _
+
 end List

src/Init/Data/List/Basic.lean

@@ -1588,6 +1588,14 @@ such that adjacent elements are related by `R`.
   | []    => []
   | a::as => loop as a [] []
 where
+  /--
+  The arguments of `groupBy.loop l ag g gs` represent the following:
+
+  - `l : List α` are the elements which we still need to group.
+  - `ag : α` is the previous element for which a comparison was performed.
+  - `g : List α` is the group currently being assembled, in **reverse order**.
+  - `gs : List (List α)` is all of the groups that have been completed, in **reverse order**.
+  -/
   @[specialize] loop : List α → α → List α → List (List α) → List (List α)
   | a::as, ag, g, gs => match R ag a with
     | true  => loop as a (ag::g) gs

src/Init/Data/List/BasicAux.lean

@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ def mapMono (as : List α) (f : α → α) : List α :=
 
 /-! ## Additional lemmas required for bootstrapping `Array`. -/
 
-theorem getElem_append_left (as bs : List α) (h : i < as.length) {h'} : (as ++ bs)[i] = as[i] := by
+theorem getElem_append_left {as bs : List α} (h : i < as.length) {h'} : (as ++ bs)[i] = as[i] := by
   induction as generalizing i with
   | nil => trivial
   | cons a as ih =>
@@ -163,12 +163,14 @@ theorem getElem_append_left (as bs : List α) (h : i < as.length) {h'} : (as ++
     | zero => rfl
     | succ i => apply ih
 
-theorem getElem_append_right (as bs : List α) (h : ¬ i < as.length) {h' h''} : (as ++ bs)[i]'h' = bs[i - as.length]'h'' := by
+theorem getElem_append_right {as bs : List α} {i : Nat} (h₁ : as.length ≤ i) {h₂} :
+    (as ++ bs)[i]'h₂ =
+      bs[i - as.length]'(by rw [length_append] at h₂; exact Nat.sub_lt_left_of_lt_add h₁ h₂) := by
   induction as generalizing i with
   | nil => trivial
   | cons a as ih =>
-    cases i with simp [get, Nat.succ_sub_succ] <;> simp [Nat.succ_sub_succ] at h
-    | succ i => apply ih; simp [h]
+    cases i with simp [get, Nat.succ_sub_succ] <;> simp [Nat.succ_sub_succ] at h₁
+    | succ i => apply ih; simp [h₁]
 
 theorem get_last {as : List α} {i : Fin (length (as ++ [a]))} (h : ¬ i.1 < as.length) : (as ++ [a] : List _).get i = a := by
   cases i; rename_i i h'

src/Init/Data/List/Count.lean

@@ -115,6 +115,13 @@ theorem IsPrefix.countP_le (s : l₁ <+: l₂) : countP p l₁ ≤ countP p l₂
 theorem IsSuffix.countP_le (s : l₁ <:+ l₂) : countP p l₁ ≤ countP p l₂ := s.sublist.countP_le _
 theorem IsInfix.countP_le (s : l₁ <:+: l₂) : countP p l₁ ≤ countP p l₂ := s.sublist.countP_le _
 
+-- See `Init.Data.List.Nat.Count` for `Sublist.le_countP : countP p l₂ - (l₂.length - l₁.length) ≤ countP p l₁`.
+
+theorem countP_tail_le (l) : countP p l.tail ≤ countP p l :=
+  (tail_sublist l).countP_le _
+
+-- See `Init.Data.List.Nat.Count` for `le_countP_tail : countP p l - 1 ≤ countP p l.tail`.
+
 theorem countP_filter (l : List α) :
     countP p (filter q l) = countP (fun a => p a && q a) l := by
   simp only [countP_eq_length_filter, filter_filter]
@@ -207,6 +214,13 @@ theorem IsPrefix.count_le (h : l₁ <+: l₂) (a : α) : count a l₁ ≤ count
 theorem IsSuffix.count_le (h : l₁ <:+ l₂) (a : α) : count a l₁ ≤ count a l₂ := h.sublist.count_le _
 theorem IsInfix.count_le (h : l₁ <:+: l₂) (a : α) : count a l₁ ≤ count a l₂ := h.sublist.count_le _
 
+-- See `Init.Data.List.Nat.Count` for `Sublist.le_count : count a l₂ - (l₂.length - l₁.length) ≤ countP a l₁`.
+
+theorem count_tail_le (a : α) (l) : count a l.tail ≤ count a l :=
+  (tail_sublist l).count_le _
+
+-- See `Init.Data.List.Nat.Count` for `le_count_tail : count a l - 1 ≤ count a l.tail`.
+
 theorem count_le_count_cons (a b : α) (l : List α) : count a l ≤ count a (b :: l) :=
   (sublist_cons_self _ _).count_le _
 

src/Init/Data/List/Erase.lean

@@ -109,6 +109,10 @@ protected theorem Sublist.eraseP : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁.eraseP p <+ l₂.eraseP
 theorem length_eraseP_le (l : List α) : (l.eraseP p).length ≤ l.length :=
   l.eraseP_sublist.length_le
 
+theorem le_length_eraseP (l : List α) : l.length - 1 ≤ (l.eraseP p).length := by
+  rw [length_eraseP]
+  split <;> simp
+
 theorem mem_of_mem_eraseP {l : List α} : a ∈ l.eraseP p → a ∈ l := (eraseP_subset _ ·)
 
 @[simp] theorem mem_eraseP_of_neg {l : List α} (pa : ¬p a) : a ∈ l.eraseP p ↔ a ∈ l := by
@@ -332,6 +336,10 @@ theorem IsPrefix.erase (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h : l₁ <+: l₂) : l₁
 theorem length_erase_le (a : α) (l : List α) : (l.erase a).length ≤ l.length :=
   (erase_sublist a l).length_le
 
+theorem le_length_erase [LawfulBEq α] (a : α) (l : List α) : l.length - 1 ≤ (l.erase a).length := by
+  rw [length_erase]
+  split <;> simp
+
 theorem mem_of_mem_erase {a b : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l.erase b) : a ∈ l := erase_subset _ _ h
 
 @[simp] theorem mem_erase_of_ne [LawfulBEq α] {a b : α} {l : List α} (ab : a ≠ b) :
@@ -452,13 +460,22 @@ end erase
 
 /-! ### eraseIdx -/
 
-theorem length_eraseIdx : ∀ {l i}, i < length l → length (@eraseIdx α l i) = length l - 1
-  | [], _, _ => rfl
-  | _::_, 0, _ => by simp [eraseIdx]
-  | x::xs, i+1, h => by
-    have : i < length xs := Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h
-    simp [eraseIdx, ← Nat.add_one]
-    rw [length_eraseIdx this, Nat.sub_add_cancel (Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.zero_le _) this)]
+theorem length_eraseIdx (l : List α) (i : Nat) :
+    (l.eraseIdx i).length = if i < l.length then l.length - 1 else l.length := by
+  induction l generalizing i with
+  | nil => simp
+  | cons x l ih =>
+    cases i with
+    | zero => simp
+    | succ i =>
+      simp only [eraseIdx, length_cons, ih, add_one_lt_add_one_iff, Nat.add_one_sub_one]
+      split
+      · cases l <;> simp_all
+      · rfl
+
+theorem length_eraseIdx_of_lt {l : List α} {i} (h : i < length l) :
+    (l.eraseIdx i).length = length l - 1 := by
+  simp [length_eraseIdx, h]
 
 @[simp] theorem eraseIdx_zero (l : List α) : eraseIdx l 0 = tail l := by cases l <;> rfl
 
@@ -468,6 +485,8 @@ theorem eraseIdx_eq_take_drop_succ :
   | a::l, 0 => by simp
   | a::l, i + 1 => by simp [eraseIdx_eq_take_drop_succ l i]
 
+-- See `Init.Data.List.Nat.Erase` for `getElem?_eraseIdx` and `getElem_eraseIdx`.
+
 @[simp] theorem eraseIdx_eq_nil {l : List α} {i : Nat} : eraseIdx l i = [] ↔ l = [] ∨ (length l = 1 ∧ i = 0) := by
   match l, i with
   | [], _
@@ -499,6 +518,13 @@ theorem eraseIdx_eq_self : ∀ {l : List α} {k : Nat}, eraseIdx l k = l ↔ len
 theorem eraseIdx_of_length_le {l : List α} {k : Nat} (h : length l ≤ k) : eraseIdx l k = l := by
   rw [eraseIdx_eq_self.2 h]
 
+theorem length_eraseIdx_le (l : List α) (i : Nat) : length (l.eraseIdx i) ≤ length l :=
+  (eraseIdx_sublist l i).length_le
+
+theorem le_length_eraseIdx (l : List α) (i : Nat) : length l - 1 ≤ length (l.eraseIdx i) := by
+  rw [length_eraseIdx]
+  split <;> simp
+
 theorem eraseIdx_append_of_lt_length {l : List α} {k : Nat} (hk : k < length l) (l' : List α) :
     eraseIdx (l ++ l') k = eraseIdx l k ++ l' := by
   induction l generalizing k with
@@ -520,7 +546,7 @@ theorem eraseIdx_append_of_length_le {l : List α} {k : Nat} (hk : length l ≤
 theorem eraseIdx_replicate {n : Nat} {a : α} {k : Nat} :
     (replicate n a).eraseIdx k = if k < n then replicate (n - 1) a else replicate n a := by
   split <;> rename_i h
-  · rw [eq_replicate_iff, length_eraseIdx (by simpa using h)]
+  · rw [eq_replicate_iff, length_eraseIdx_of_lt (by simpa using h)]
     simp only [length_replicate, true_and]
     intro b m
     replace m := mem_of_mem_eraseIdx m

src/Init/Data/List/Find.lean

@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ theorem find?_eq_some : xs.find? p = some b ↔ p b ∧ ∃ as bs, xs = as ++ b
           simp only [cons_append] at h₁
           obtain ⟨rfl, -⟩ := h₁
           simp_all
-    · simp only [ih, Bool.not_eq_true', exists_and_right, and_congr_right_iff]
+    · simp only [ih, Bool.not_eq_eq_eq_not, Bool.not_true, exists_and_right, and_congr_right_iff]
       intro pb
       constructor
       · rintro ⟨as, ⟨⟨bs, rfl⟩, h₁⟩⟩
@@ -620,6 +620,18 @@ theorem IsPrefix.findIdx_eq_of_findIdx_lt_length {l₁ l₂ : List α} {p : α
   · rfl
   · simp_all
 
+theorem findIdx_le_findIdx {l : List α} {p q : α → Bool} (h : ∀ x ∈ l, p x → q x) : l.findIdx q ≤ l.findIdx p := by
+  induction l with
+  | nil => simp
+  | cons x xs ih =>
+    simp only [findIdx_cons, cond_eq_if]
+    split
+    · simp
+    · split
+      · simp_all
+      · simp only [Nat.add_le_add_iff_right]
+        exact ih fun _ m w => h _ (mem_cons_of_mem x m) w
+
 /-! ### findIdx? -/
 
 @[simp] theorem findIdx?_nil : ([] : List α).findIdx? p i = none := rfl
@@ -803,7 +815,7 @@ theorem findIdx?_join {l : List (List α)} {p : α → Bool} :
     simp only [replicate, findIdx?_cons, Nat.zero_add, findIdx?_succ, zero_lt_succ, true_and]
     split <;> simp_all
 
-theorem findIdx?_eq_enum_findSome? {xs : List α} {p : α → Bool} :
+theorem findIdx?_eq_findSome?_enum {xs : List α} {p : α → Bool} :
     xs.findIdx? p = xs.enum.findSome? fun ⟨i, a⟩ => if p a then some i else none := by
   induction xs with
   | nil => simp
@@ -814,6 +826,30 @@ theorem findIdx?_eq_enum_findSome? {xs : List α} {p : α → Bool} :
     · simp_all only [enumFrom_cons, ite_false, Option.isNone_none, findSome?_cons_of_isNone, reduceCtorEq]
       simp [Function.comp_def, ← map_fst_add_enum_eq_enumFrom, findSome?_map]
 
+theorem findIdx?_eq_fst_find?_enum {xs : List α} {p : α → Bool} :
+    xs.findIdx? p = (xs.enum.find? fun ⟨_, x⟩ => p x).map (·.1) := by
+  induction xs with
+  | nil => simp
+  | cons x xs ih =>
+    simp only [findIdx?_cons, Nat.zero_add, findIdx?_start_succ, enum_cons]
+    split
+    · simp_all
+    · simp only [Option.map_map, enumFrom_eq_map_enum, Bool.false_eq_true, not_false_eq_true,
+        find?_cons_of_neg, find?_map, *]
+      congr
+
+-- See also `findIdx_le_findIdx`.
+theorem findIdx?_eq_none_of_findIdx?_eq_none {xs : List α} {p q : α → Bool} (w : ∀ x ∈ xs, p x → q x) :
+    xs.findIdx? q = none → xs.findIdx? p = none := by
+  simp only [findIdx?_eq_none_iff]
+  intro h x m
+  cases z : p x
+  · rfl
+  · exfalso
+    specialize w x m z
+    specialize h x m
+    simp_all
+
 theorem Sublist.findIdx?_isSome {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) :
     (l₁.findIdx? p).isSome → (l₂.findIdx? p).isSome := by
   simp only [List.findIdx?_isSome, any_eq_true]
@@ -878,7 +914,7 @@ theorem lookup_eq_some_iff {l : List (α × β)} {k : α} {b : β} :
   simp only [lookup_eq_findSome?, findSome?_eq_some_iff]
   constructor
   · rintro ⟨l₁, a, l₂, rfl, h₁, h₂⟩
-    simp only [beq_iff_eq, ite_some_none_eq_some] at h₁
+    simp only [beq_iff_eq, Option.ite_none_right_eq_some, Option.some.injEq] at h₁
     obtain ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ := h₁
     simp at h₂
     exact ⟨l₁, l₂, rfl, by simpa using h₂⟩

src/Init/Data/List/Lemmas.lean

@@ -109,6 +109,9 @@ theorem cons_eq_cons {a b : α} {l l' : List α} : a :: l = b :: l' ↔ a = b
 theorem exists_cons_of_ne_nil : ∀ {l : List α}, l ≠ [] → ∃ b L, l = b :: L
   | c :: l', _ => ⟨c, l', rfl⟩
 
+theorem singleton_inj {α : Type _} {a b : α} : [a] = [b] ↔ a = b := by
+  simp
+
 /-! ### length -/
 
 theorem eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero (_ : length l = 0) : l = [] := match l with | [] => rfl
@@ -263,9 +266,15 @@ theorem get!_len_le [Inhabited α] : ∀ {l : List α} {n}, length l ≤ n → l
 theorem getElem?_eq_some_iff {l : List α} : l[n]? = some a ↔ ∃ h : n < l.length, l[n] = a := by
   simp only [← get?_eq_getElem?, get?_eq_some, get_eq_getElem]
 
+theorem some_eq_getElem?_iff {l : List α} : some a = l[n]? ↔ ∃ h : n < l.length, l[n] = a := by
+  rw [eq_comm, getElem?_eq_some_iff]
+
 @[simp] theorem getElem?_eq_none_iff : l[n]? = none ↔ length l ≤ n := by
   simp only [← get?_eq_getElem?, get?_eq_none]
 
+@[simp] theorem none_eq_getElem?_iff {l : List α} {n : Nat} : none = l[n]? ↔ length l ≤ n := by
+  simp [eq_comm (a := none)]
+
 theorem getElem?_eq_none (h : length l ≤ n) : l[n]? = none := getElem?_eq_none_iff.mpr h
 
 theorem getElem?_eq (l : List α) (i : Nat) :
@@ -480,9 +489,9 @@ theorem getElem?_of_mem {a} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) : ∃ n : Nat, l[n]? = s
 theorem get?_of_mem {a} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) : ∃ n, l.get? n = some a :=
   let ⟨⟨n, _⟩, e⟩ := get_of_mem h; ⟨n, e ▸ get?_eq_get _⟩
 
-theorem getElem_mem : ∀ (l : List α) n (h : n < l.length), l[n]'h ∈ l
+theorem getElem_mem : ∀ {l : List α} {n} (h : n < l.length), l[n]'h ∈ l
   | _ :: _, 0, _ => .head ..
-  | _ :: l, _+1, _ => .tail _ (getElem_mem l ..)
+  | _ :: l, _+1, _ => .tail _ (getElem_mem (l := l) ..)
 
 theorem get_mem : ∀ (l : List α) n h, get l ⟨n, h⟩ ∈ l
   | _ :: _, 0, _ => .head ..
@@ -524,7 +533,7 @@ theorem forall_getElem {l : List α} {p : α → Prop} :
       · simpa
       · apply w
         simp only [getElem_cons_succ]
-        exact getElem_mem l n (lt_of_succ_lt_succ h)
+        exact getElem_mem (lt_of_succ_lt_succ h)
 
 @[simp] theorem decide_mem_cons [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] {l : List α} :
     decide (y ∈ a :: l) = (y == a || decide (y ∈ l)) := by
@@ -729,6 +738,45 @@ theorem mem_or_eq_of_mem_set : ∀ {l : List α} {n : Nat} {a b : α}, a ∈ l.s
 
 -- See also `set_eq_take_append_cons_drop` in `Init.Data.List.TakeDrop`.
 
+/-! ### BEq -/
+
+@[simp] theorem reflBEq_iff [BEq α] : ReflBEq (List α) ↔ ReflBEq α := by
+  constructor
+  · intro h
+    constructor
+    intro a
+    suffices ([a] == [a]) = true by
+      simpa only [List.instBEq, List.beq, Bool.and_true]
+    simp
+  · intro h
+    constructor
+    intro a
+    induction a with
+    | nil => simp only [List.instBEq, List.beq]
+    | cons a as ih =>
+      simp [List.instBEq, List.beq]
+      exact ih
+
+@[simp] theorem lawfulBEq_iff [BEq α] : LawfulBEq (List α) ↔ LawfulBEq α := by
+  constructor
+  · intro h
+    constructor
+    · intro a b h
+      apply singleton_inj.1
+      apply eq_of_beq
+      simp only [List.instBEq, List.beq]
+      simpa
+    · intro a
+      suffices ([a] == [a]) = true by
+        simpa only [List.instBEq, List.beq, Bool.and_true]
+      simp
+  · intro h
+    constructor
+    · intro a b h
+      simpa using h
+    · intro a
+      simp
+
 /-! ### Lexicographic ordering -/
 
 protected theorem lt_irrefl [LT α] (lt_irrefl : ∀ x : α, ¬x < x) (l : List α) : ¬l < l := by
@@ -890,6 +938,38 @@ def foldrRecOn {motive : β → Sort _} : ∀ (l : List α) (op : α → β →
         x (mem_cons_self x l) :=
   rfl
 
+/--
+We can prove that two folds over the same list are related (by some arbitrary relation)
+if we know that the initial elements are related and the folding function, for each element of the list,
+preserves the relation.
+-/
+theorem foldl_rel {l : List α} {f g : β → α → β} {a b : β} (r : β → β → Prop)
+    (h : r a b) (h' : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ l → ∀ (c c' : β), r c c' → r (f c a) (g c' a)) :
+    r (l.foldl (fun acc a => f acc a) a) (l.foldl (fun acc a => g acc a) b) := by
+  induction l generalizing a b with
+  | nil => simp_all
+  | cons a l ih =>
+    simp only [foldl_cons]
+    apply ih
+    · simp_all
+    · exact fun a m c c' h => h' _ (by simp_all) _ _ h
+
+/--
+We can prove that two folds over the same list are related (by some arbitrary relation)
+if we know that the initial elements are related and the folding function, for each element of the list,
+preserves the relation.
+-/
+theorem foldr_rel {l : List α} {f g : α → β → β} {a b : β} (r : β → β → Prop)
+    (h : r a b) (h' : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ l → ∀ (c c' : β), r c c' → r (f a c) (g a c')) :
+    r (l.foldr (fun a acc => f a acc) a) (l.foldr (fun a acc => g a acc) b) := by
+  induction l generalizing a b with
+  | nil => simp_all
+  | cons a l ih =>
+    simp only [foldr_cons]
+    apply h'
+    · simp
+    · exact ih h fun a m c c' h => h' _ (by simp_all) _ _ h
+
 /-! ### getLast -/
 
 theorem getLast_eq_getElem : ∀ (l : List α) (h : l ≠ []),
@@ -929,6 +1009,10 @@ theorem getLast_mem : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), getLast l h ∈ l
   | [_], _ => .head ..
   | _::a::l, _ => .tail _ <| getLast_mem (cons_ne_nil a l)
 
+theorem getLast_mem_getLast? : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), getLast l h ∈ getLast? l
+  | [], h => by contradiction
+  | a :: l, _ => rfl
+
 theorem getLastD_mem_cons : ∀ (l : List α) (a : α), getLastD l a ∈ a::l
   | [], _ => .head ..
   | _::_, _ => .tail _ <| getLast_mem _
@@ -999,6 +1083,11 @@ theorem head?_eq_getElem? : ∀ l : List α, head? l = l[0]?
   | [] => rfl
   | a :: l => by simp
 
+theorem head_eq_getElem (l : List α) (h : l ≠ []) : head l h = l[0]'(length_pos.mpr h) := by
+  cases l with
+  | nil => simp at h
+  | cons _ _ => simp
+
 theorem head_eq_iff_head?_eq_some {xs : List α} (h) : xs.head h = a ↔ xs.head? = some a := by
   cases xs with
   | nil => simp at h
@@ -1026,6 +1115,10 @@ theorem mem_of_mem_head? : ∀ {l : List α} {a : α}, a ∈ l.head? → a ∈ l
     cases h
     exact mem_cons_self a l
 
+theorem head_mem_head? : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), head l h ∈ head? l
+  | [], h => by contradiction
+  | a :: l, _ => rfl
+
 theorem head?_concat {a : α} : (l ++ [a]).head? = l.head?.getD a := by
   cases l <;> simp
 
@@ -1055,6 +1148,55 @@ theorem tail_eq_tail? (l) : @tail α l = (tail? l).getD [] := by simp [tail_eq_t
 theorem mem_of_mem_tail {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ tail l) : a ∈ l := by
   induction l <;> simp_all
 
+theorem ne_nil_of_tail_ne_nil {l : List α} : l.tail ≠ [] → l ≠ [] := by
+  cases l <;> simp
+
+@[simp] theorem getElem_tail (l : List α) (i : Nat) (h : i < l.tail.length) :
+    (tail l)[i] = l[i + 1]'(add_lt_of_lt_sub (by simpa using h)) := by
+  cases l with
+  | nil => simp at h
+  | cons _ l => simp
+
+@[simp] theorem getElem?_tail (l : List α) (i : Nat) :
+    (tail l)[i]? = l[i + 1]? := by
+  cases l <;> simp
+
+@[simp] theorem set_tail (l : List α) (i : Nat) (a : α) :
+    l.tail.set i a = (l.set (i + 1) a).tail := by
+  cases l <;> simp
+
+theorem one_lt_length_of_tail_ne_nil {l : List α} (h : l.tail ≠ []) : 1 < l.length := by
+  cases l with
+  | nil => simp at h
+  | cons _ l =>
+    simp only [tail_cons, ne_eq] at h
+    exact Nat.lt_add_of_pos_left (length_pos.mpr h)
+
+@[simp] theorem head_tail (l : List α) (h : l.tail ≠ []) :
+    (tail l).head h = l[1]'(one_lt_length_of_tail_ne_nil h) := by
+  cases l with
+  | nil => simp at h
+  | cons _ l => simp [head_eq_getElem]
+
+@[simp] theorem head?_tail (l : List α) : (tail l).head? = l[1]? := by
+  simp [head?_eq_getElem?]
+
+@[simp] theorem getLast_tail (l : List α) (h : l.tail ≠ []) :
+    (tail l).getLast h = l.getLast (ne_nil_of_tail_ne_nil h) := by
+  simp only [getLast_eq_getElem, length_tail, getElem_tail]
+  congr
+  match l with
+  | _ :: _ :: l => simp
+
+theorem getLast?_tail (l : List α) : (tail l).getLast? = if l.length = 1 then none else l.getLast? := by
+  match l with
+  | [] => simp
+  | [a] => simp
+  | _ :: _ :: l =>
+    simp only [tail_cons, length_cons, getLast?_cons_cons]
+    rw [if_neg]
+    rintro ⟨⟩
+
 /-! ## Basic operations -/
 
 /-! ### map -/
@@ -1172,11 +1314,16 @@ theorem map_eq_iff : map f l = l' ↔ ∀ i : Nat, l'[i]? = l[i]?.map f := by
 theorem map_eq_foldr (f : α → β) (l : List α) : map f l = foldr (fun a bs => f a :: bs) [] l := by
   induction l <;> simp [*]
 
-@[simp] theorem set_map {f : α → β} {l : List α} {n : Nat} {a : α} :
-    (map f l).set n (f a) = map f (l.set n a) := by
-  induction l generalizing n with
+@[simp] theorem map_set {f : α → β} {l : List α} {i : Nat} {a : α} :
+    (l.set i a).map f = (l.map f).set i (f a) := by
+  induction l generalizing i with
   | nil => simp
-  | cons b l ih => cases n <;> simp_all
+  | cons b l ih => cases i <;> simp_all
+
+@[deprecated "Use the reverse direction of `map_set`." (since := "2024-09-20")]
+theorem set_map {f : α → β} {l : List α} {n : Nat} {a : α} :
+    (map f l).set n (f a) = map f (l.set n a) := by
+  simp
 
 @[simp] theorem head_map (f : α → β) (l : List α) (w) :
     head (map f l) w = f (head l (by simpa using w)) := by
@@ -1507,10 +1654,16 @@ theorem filterMap_eq_cons_iff {l} {b} {bs} :
 
 /-! ### append -/
 
-theorem getElem_append : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : List α} (n : Nat) (h : n < l₁.length),
-    (l₁ ++ l₂)[n]'(length_append .. ▸ Nat.lt_add_right _ h) = l₁[n]
-| a :: l, _, 0, h => rfl
-| a :: l, _, n+1, h => by simp only [get, cons_append]; apply getElem_append
+@[simp] theorem nil_append_fun : (([] : List α) ++ ·) = id := rfl
+
+@[simp] theorem cons_append_fun (a : α) (as : List α) :
+    (fun bs => ((a :: as) ++ bs)) = fun bs => a :: (as ++ bs) := rfl
+
+theorem getElem_append {l₁ l₂ : List α} (n : Nat) (h) :
+    (l₁ ++ l₂)[n] = if h' : n < l₁.length then l₁[n] else l₂[n - l₁.length]'(by simp at h h'; exact Nat.sub_lt_left_of_lt_add h' h) := by
+  split <;> rename_i h'
+  · rw [getElem_append_left h']
+  · rw [getElem_append_right (by simpa using h')]
 
 theorem getElem?_append_left {l₁ l₂ : List α} {n : Nat} (hn : n < l₁.length) :
     (l₁ ++ l₂)[n]? = l₁[n]? := by
@@ -1536,12 +1689,13 @@ theorem get?_append_right {l₁ l₂ : List α} {n : Nat} (h : l₁.length ≤ n
     (l₁ ++ l₂).get? n = l₂.get? (n - l₁.length) := by
   simp [getElem?_append_right, h]
 
-theorem getElem_append_right' {l₁ l₂ : List α} {n : Nat} (h₁ : l₁.length ≤ n) (h₂) :
-    (l₁ ++ l₂)[n]'h₂ =
-      l₂[n - l₁.length]'(by rw [length_append] at h₂; exact Nat.sub_lt_left_of_lt_add h₁ h₂) :=
-  Option.some.inj <| by rw [← getElem?_eq_getElem, ← getElem?_eq_getElem, getElem?_append_right h₁]
+/-- Variant of `getElem_append_left` useful for rewriting from the small list to the big list. -/
+theorem getElem_append_left' (l₂ : List α) {l₁ : List α} {n : Nat} (hn : n < l₁.length) :
+    l₁[n] = (l₁ ++ l₂)[n]'(by simpa using Nat.lt_add_right l₂.length hn) := by
+  rw [getElem_append_left] <;> simp
 
-theorem getElem_append_right'' (l₁ : List α) {l₂ : List α} {n : Nat} (hn : n < l₂.length) :
+/-- Variant of `getElem_append_right` useful for rewriting from the small list to the big list. -/
+theorem getElem_append_right' (l₁ : List α) {l₂ : List α} {n : Nat} (hn : n < l₂.length) :
     l₂[n] = (l₁ ++ l₂)[n + l₁.length]'(by simpa [Nat.add_comm] using Nat.add_lt_add_left hn _) := by
   rw [getElem_append_right] <;> simp [*, le_add_left]
 
@@ -1552,7 +1706,7 @@ theorem get_append_right_aux {l₁ l₂ : List α} {n : Nat}
   exact Nat.sub_lt_left_of_lt_add h₁ h₂
 
 set_option linter.deprecated false in
-@[deprecated getElem_append_right' (since := "2024-06-12")]
+@[deprecated getElem_append_right (since := "2024-06-12")]
 theorem get_append_right' {l₁ l₂ : List α} {n : Nat} (h₁ : l₁.length ≤ n) (h₂) :
     (l₁ ++ l₂).get ⟨n, h₂⟩ = l₂.get ⟨n - l₁.length, get_append_right_aux h₁ h₂⟩ :=
   Option.some.inj <| by rw [← get?_eq_get, ← get?_eq_get, get?_append_right h₁]
@@ -1644,7 +1798,7 @@ theorem get_append_left (as bs : List α) (h : i < as.length) {h'} :
   simp [getElem_append_left, h, h']
 
 @[deprecated getElem_append_right (since := "2024-06-12")]
-theorem get_append_right (as bs : List α) (h : ¬ i < as.length) {h' h''} :
+theorem get_append_right (as bs : List α) (h : as.length ≤ i) {h' h''} :
     (as ++ bs).get ⟨i, h'⟩ = bs.get ⟨i - as.length, h''⟩ := by
   simp [getElem_append_right, h, h', h'']
 
@@ -1840,7 +1994,7 @@ theorem map_eq_append_iff {f : α → β} :
     map f l = L₁ ++ L₂ ↔ ∃ l₁ l₂, l = l₁ ++ l₂ ∧ map f l₁ = L₁ ∧ map f l₂ = L₂ := by
   rw [← filterMap_eq_map, filterMap_eq_append_iff]
 
-theorem append_eq_map_iff (f : α → β) :
+theorem append_eq_map_iff {f : α → β} :
     L₁ ++ L₂ = map f l ↔ ∃ l₁ l₂, l = l₁ ++ l₂ ∧ map f l₁ = L₁ ∧ map f l₂ = L₂ := by
   rw [eq_comm, map_eq_append_iff]
 
@@ -2243,6 +2397,12 @@ theorem map_eq_replicate_iff {l : List α} {f : α → β} {b : β} :
 theorem map_const' (l : List α) (b : β) : map (fun _ => b) l = replicate l.length b :=
   map_const l b
 
+@[simp] theorem set_replicate_self : (replicate n a).set i a = replicate n a := by
+  apply ext_getElem
+  · simp
+  · intro i h₁ h₂
+    simp [getElem_set]
+
 @[simp] theorem append_replicate_replicate : replicate n a ++ replicate m a = replicate (n + m) a := by
   rw [eq_replicate_iff]
   constructor
@@ -2323,6 +2483,47 @@ theorem bind_replicate {β} (f : α → List β) : (replicate n a).bind f = (rep
 @[simp] theorem isEmpty_replicate : (replicate n a).isEmpty = decide (n = 0) := by
   cases n <;> simp [replicate_succ]
 
+/-- Every list is either empty, a non-empty `replicate`, or begins with a non-empty `replicate`
+followed by a different element. -/
+theorem eq_replicate_or_eq_replicate_append_cons {α : Type _} (l : List α) :
+    (l = []) ∨ (∃ n a, l = replicate n a ∧ 0 < n) ∨
+      (∃ n a b l', l = replicate n a ++ b :: l' ∧ 0 < n ∧ a ≠ b) := by
+  induction l with
+  | nil => simp
+  | cons x l ih =>
+    right
+    rcases ih with rfl | ⟨n, a, rfl, h⟩ | ⟨n, a, b, l', rfl, h⟩
+    · left
+      exact ⟨1, x, rfl, by decide⟩
+    · by_cases h' : x = a
+      · subst h'
+        left
+        exact ⟨n + 1, x, rfl, by simp⟩
+      · right
+        refine ⟨1, x, a, replicate (n - 1) a, ?_, by decide, h'⟩
+        match n with | n + 1 => simp [replicate_succ]
+    · right
+      by_cases h' : x = a
+      · subst h'
+        refine ⟨n + 1, x, b, l', by simp [replicate_succ], by simp, h.2⟩
+      · refine ⟨1, x, a, replicate (n - 1) a ++ b :: l', ?_, by decide, h'⟩
+        match n with | n + 1 => simp [replicate_succ]
+
+/-- An induction principle for lists based on contiguous runs of identical elements. -/
+-- A `Sort _` valued version would require a different design. (And associated `@[simp]` lemmas.)
+theorem replicateRecOn {α : Type _} {p : List α → Prop} (m : List α)
+    (h0 : p []) (hr : ∀ a n, 0 < n → p (replicate n a))
+    (hi : ∀ a b n l, a ≠ b → 0 < n → p (b :: l) → p (replicate n a ++ b :: l)) : p m := by
+  rcases eq_replicate_or_eq_replicate_append_cons m with
+    rfl | ⟨n, a, rfl, hn⟩ | ⟨n, a, b, l', w, hn, h⟩
+  · exact h0
+  · exact hr _ _ hn
+  · have : (b :: l').length < m.length := by
+      simpa [w] using Nat.lt_add_of_pos_left hn
+    subst w
+    exact hi _ _ _ _ h hn (replicateRecOn (b :: l') h0 hr hi)
+termination_by m.length
+
 /-! ### reverse -/
 
 @[simp] theorem length_reverse (as : List α) : (as.reverse).length = as.length := by
@@ -2754,6 +2955,12 @@ theorem dropLast_append_cons : dropLast (l₁ ++ b :: l₂) = l₁ ++ dropLast (
     dropLast (a :: replicate n a) = replicate n a := by
   rw [← replicate_succ, dropLast_replicate, Nat.add_sub_cancel]
 
+@[simp] theorem tail_reverse (l : List α) : l.reverse.tail = l.dropLast.reverse := by
+  apply ext_getElem
+  · simp
+  · intro i h₁ h₂
+    simp [Nat.add_comm i, Nat.sub_add_eq]
+
 /-!
 ### splitAt
 

src/Init/Data/List/Monadic.lean

@@ -51,6 +51,27 @@ theorem mapM'_eq_mapM [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α → m β) (l : List α)
 @[simp] theorem mapM_append [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α → m β) {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
     (l₁ ++ l₂).mapM f = (return (← l₁.mapM f) ++ (← l₂.mapM f)) := by induction l₁ <;> simp [*]
 
+/-- Auxiliary lemma for `mapM_eq_reverse_foldlM_cons`. -/
+theorem foldlM_cons_eq_append [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α → m β) (as : List α) (b : β) (bs : List β) :
+    (as.foldlM (init := b :: bs) fun acc a => return ((← f a) :: acc)) =
+      (· ++ b :: bs) <$> as.foldlM (init := []) fun acc a => return ((← f a) :: acc) := by
+  induction as generalizing b bs with
+  | nil => simp
+  | cons a as ih =>
+    simp only [bind_pure_comp] at ih
+    simp [ih, _root_.map_bind, Functor.map_map, Function.comp_def]
+
+theorem mapM_eq_reverse_foldlM_cons [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α → m β) (l : List α) :
+    mapM f l = reverse <$> (l.foldlM (fun acc a => return ((← f a) :: acc)) []) := by
+  rw [← mapM'_eq_mapM]
+  induction l with
+  | nil => simp
+  | cons a as ih =>
+    simp only [mapM'_cons, ih, bind_map_left, foldlM_cons, LawfulMonad.bind_assoc, pure_bind,
+      foldlM_cons_eq_append, _root_.map_bind, Functor.map_map, Function.comp_def, reverse_append,
+      reverse_cons, reverse_nil, nil_append, singleton_append]
+    simp [bind_pure_comp]
+
 /-! ### forM -/
 
 -- We use `List.forM` as the simp normal form, rather that `ForM.forM`.
@@ -66,4 +87,16 @@ theorem mapM'_eq_mapM [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α → m β) (l : List α)
     (l₁ ++ l₂).forM f = (do l₁.forM f; l₂.forM f) := by
   induction l₁ <;> simp [*]
 
+/-! ### allM -/
+
+theorem allM_eq_not_anyM_not [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (p : α → m Bool) (as : List α) :
+    allM p as = (! ·) <$> anyM ((! ·) <$> p ·) as := by
+  induction as with
+  | nil => simp
+  | cons a as ih =>
+    simp only [allM, anyM, bind_map_left, _root_.map_bind]
+    congr
+    funext b
+    split <;> simp_all
+
 end List

src/Init/Data/List/Nat.lean

@@ -10,3 +10,5 @@ import Init.Data.List.Nat.Range
 import Init.Data.List.Nat.Sublist
 import Init.Data.List.Nat.TakeDrop
 import Init.Data.List.Nat.Count
+import Init.Data.List.Nat.Erase
+import Init.Data.List.Nat.Find

src/Init/Data/List/Nat/Basic.lean

@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, M
 -/
 prelude
 import Init.Data.List.Count
+import Init.Data.List.Find
 import Init.Data.List.MinMax
 import Init.Data.Nat.Lemmas
 
@@ -18,6 +19,26 @@ open Nat
 
 namespace List
 
+/-! ### dropLast -/
+
+theorem tail_dropLast (l : List α) : tail (dropLast l) = dropLast (tail l) := by
+  ext1
+  simp only [getElem?_tail, getElem?_dropLast, length_tail]
+  split <;> split
+  · rfl
+  · omega
+  · omega
+  · rfl
+
+@[simp] theorem dropLast_reverse (l : List α) : l.reverse.dropLast = l.tail.reverse := by
+  apply ext_getElem
+  · simp
+  · intro i h₁ h₂
+    simp only [getElem_dropLast, getElem_reverse, length_tail, getElem_tail]
+    congr
+    simp only [length_dropLast, length_reverse, length_tail] at h₁ h₂
+    omega
+
 /-! ### filter -/
 
 theorem length_filter_lt_length_iff_exists {l} :
@@ -37,7 +58,8 @@ theorem getElem_eq_getElem_reverse {l : List α} {i} (h : i < l.length) :
 
 /-- The length of the List returned by `List.leftpad n a l` is equal
   to the larger of `n` and `l.length` -/
-@[simp]
+-- We don't mark this as a `@[simp]` lemma since we allow `simp` to unfold `leftpad`,
+-- so the left hand side simplifies directly to `n - l.length + l.length`.
 theorem leftpad_length (n : Nat) (a : α) (l : List α) :
     (leftpad n a l).length = max n l.length := by
   simp only [leftpad, length_append, length_replicate, Nat.sub_add_eq_max]
@@ -97,6 +119,53 @@ theorem minimum?_cons' {a : Nat} {l : List Nat} :
         specialize le b h
         split <;> omega
 
+theorem foldl_min
+    {α : Type _} [Min α] [Std.IdempotentOp (min : α → α → α)] [Std.Associative (min : α → α → α)]
+    {l : List α} {a : α} :
+    l.foldl (init := a) min = min a (l.minimum?.getD a) := by
+  cases l with
+  | nil => simp [Std.IdempotentOp.idempotent]
+  | cons b l =>
+    simp only [minimum?]
+    induction l generalizing a b with
+    | nil => simp
+    | cons c l ih => simp [ih, Std.Associative.assoc]
+
+theorem foldl_min_right {α β : Type _}
+    [Min β] [Std.IdempotentOp (min : β → β → β)] [Std.Associative (min : β → β → β)]
+    {l : List α} {b : β} {f : α → β} :
+    (l.foldl (init := b) fun acc a => min acc (f a)) = min b ((l.map f).minimum?.getD b) := by
+  rw [← foldl_map, foldl_min]
+
+theorem foldl_min_le {l : List Nat} {a : Nat} : l.foldl (init := a) min ≤ a := by
+  induction l generalizing a with
+  | nil => simp
+  | cons c l ih =>
+    simp only [foldl_cons]
+    exact Nat.le_trans ih (Nat.min_le_left _ _)
+
+theorem foldl_min_min_of_le {l : List Nat} {a b : Nat} (h : a ≤ b) :
+    l.foldl (init := a) min ≤ b :=
+  Nat.le_trans (foldl_min_le) h
+
+theorem minimum?_getD_le_of_mem {l : List Nat} {a k : Nat} (h : a ∈ l) :
+    l.minimum?.getD k ≤ a := by
+  cases l with
+  | nil => simp at h
+  | cons b l =>
+    simp [minimum?_cons]
+    simp at h
+    rcases h with (rfl | h)
+    · exact foldl_min_le
+    · induction l generalizing b with
+      | nil => simp_all
+      | cons c l ih =>
+        simp only [foldl_cons]
+        simp at h
+        rcases h with (rfl | h)
+        · exact foldl_min_min_of_le (Nat.min_le_right _ _)
+        · exact ih _ h
+
 /-! ### maximum? -/
 
 -- A specialization of `maximum?_eq_some_iff` to Nat.
@@ -130,4 +199,51 @@ theorem maximum?_cons' {a : Nat} {l : List Nat} :
         specialize le b h
         split <;> omega
 
+theorem foldl_max
+    {α : Type _} [Max α] [Std.IdempotentOp (max : α → α → α)] [Std.Associative (max : α → α → α)]
+    {l : List α} {a : α} :
+    l.foldl (init := a) max = max a (l.maximum?.getD a) := by
+  cases l with
+  | nil => simp [Std.IdempotentOp.idempotent]
+  | cons b l =>
+    simp only [maximum?]
+    induction l generalizing a b with
+    | nil => simp
+    | cons c l ih => simp [ih, Std.Associative.assoc]
+
+theorem foldl_max_right {α β : Type _}
+    [Max β] [Std.IdempotentOp (max : β → β → β)] [Std.Associative (max : β → β → β)]
+    {l : List α} {b : β} {f : α → β} :
+    (l.foldl (init := b) fun acc a => max acc (f a)) = max b ((l.map f).maximum?.getD b) := by
+  rw [← foldl_map, foldl_max]
+
+theorem le_foldl_max {l : List Nat} {a : Nat} : a ≤ l.foldl (init := a) max := by
+  induction l generalizing a with
+  | nil => simp
+  | cons c l ih =>
+    simp only [foldl_cons]
+    exact Nat.le_trans (Nat.le_max_left _ _) ih
+
+theorem le_foldl_max_of_le {l : List Nat} {a b : Nat} (h : a ≤ b) :
+    a ≤ l.foldl (init := b) max :=
+  Nat.le_trans h (le_foldl_max)
+
+theorem le_maximum?_getD_of_mem {l : List Nat} {a k : Nat} (h : a ∈ l) :
+    a ≤ l.maximum?.getD k := by
+  cases l with
+  | nil => simp at h
+  | cons b l =>
+    simp [maximum?_cons]
+    simp at h
+    rcases h with (rfl | h)
+    · exact le_foldl_max
+    · induction l generalizing b with
+      | nil => simp_all
+      | cons c l ih =>
+        simp only [foldl_cons]
+        simp at h
+        rcases h with (rfl | h)
+        · exact le_foldl_max_of_le (Nat.le_max_right b a)
+        · exact ih _ h
+
 end List

src/Init/Data/List/Nat/Count.lean

@@ -28,4 +28,59 @@ theorem count_set [BEq α] (a b : α) (l : List α) (i : Nat) (h : i < l.length)
     (l.set i a).count b = l.count b - (if l[i] == b then 1 else 0) + (if a == b then 1 else 0) := by
   simp [count_eq_countP, countP_set, h]
 
+/--
+The number of elements satisfying a predicate in a sublist is at least the number of elements satisfying the predicate in the list,
+minus the difference in the lengths.
+-/
+theorem Sublist.le_countP (s : l₁ <+ l₂) (p) : countP p l₂ - (l₂.length - l₁.length) ≤ countP p l₁ := by
+  match s with
+  | .slnil => simp
+  | .cons a s =>
+    rename_i l
+    simp only [countP_cons, length_cons]
+    have := s.le_countP p
+    have := s.length_le
+    split <;> omega
+  | .cons₂ a s =>
+    rename_i l₁ l₂
+    simp only [countP_cons, length_cons]
+    have := s.le_countP p
+    have := s.length_le
+    split <;> omega
+
+theorem IsPrefix.le_countP (s : l₁ <+: l₂) : countP p l₂ - (l₂.length - l₁.length) ≤ countP p l₁ :=
+  s.sublist.le_countP _
+
+theorem IsSuffix.le_countP (s : l₁ <:+ l₂) : countP p l₂ - (l₂.length - l₁.length) ≤ countP p l₁ :=
+  s.sublist.le_countP _
+
+theorem IsInfix.le_countP (s : l₁ <:+: l₂) : countP p l₂ - (l₂.length - l₁.length) ≤ countP p l₁ :=
+  s.sublist.le_countP _
+
+/--
+The number of elements satisfying a predicate in the tail of a list is
+at least one less than the number of elements satisfying the predicate in the list.
+-/
+theorem le_countP_tail (l) : countP p l - 1 ≤ countP p l.tail := by
+  have := (tail_sublist l).le_countP p
+  simp only [length_tail] at this
+  omega
+
+variable [BEq α]
+
+theorem Sublist.le_count (s : l₁ <+ l₂) (a : α) : count a l₂ - (l₂.length - l₁.length) ≤ count a l₁ :=
+  s.le_countP _
+
+theorem IsPrefix.le_count (s : l₁ <+: l₂) (a : α) : count a l₂ - (l₂.length - l₁.length) ≤ count a l₁ :=
+  s.sublist.le_count _
+
+theorem IsSuffix.le_count (s : l₁ <:+ l₂) (a : α) : count a l₂ - (l₂.length - l₁.length) ≤ count a l₁ :=
+  s.sublist.le_count _
+
+theorem IsInfix.le_count (s : l₁ <:+: l₂) (a : α) : count a l₂ - (l₂.length - l₁.length) ≤ count a l₁ :=
+  s.sublist.le_count _
+
+theorem le_count_tail (a : α) (l) : count a l - 1 ≤ count a l.tail :=
+  le_countP_tail _
+
 end List

src/Init/Data/List/Nat/Erase.lean

@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+/-
+Copyright (c) 2024 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
+Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
+Authors: Kim Morrison
+-/
+prelude
+import Init.Data.List.Nat.TakeDrop
+import Init.Data.List.Erase
+
+namespace List
+
+theorem getElem?_eraseIdx (l : List α) (i : Nat) (j : Nat) :
+    (l.eraseIdx i)[j]? = if h : j < i then l[j]? else l[j + 1]? := by
+  rw [eraseIdx_eq_take_drop_succ, getElem?_append]
+  split <;> rename_i h
+  · rw [getElem?_take]
+    split
+    · rfl
+    · simp_all
+      omega
+  · rw [getElem?_drop]
+    split <;> rename_i h'
+    · simp only [length_take, Nat.min_def, Nat.not_lt] at h
+      split at h
+      · omega
+      · simp_all [getElem?_eq_none]
+        omega
+    · simp only [length_take]
+      simp only [length_take, Nat.min_def, Nat.not_lt] at h
+      split at h
+      · congr 1
+        omega
+      · rw [getElem?_eq_none, getElem?_eq_none] <;> omega
+
+theorem getElem?_eraseIdx_of_lt (l : List α) (i : Nat) (j : Nat) (h : j < i) :
+    (l.eraseIdx i)[j]? = l[j]? := by
+  rw [getElem?_eraseIdx]
+  simp [h]
+
+theorem getElem?_eraseIdx_of_ge (l : List α) (i : Nat) (j : Nat) (h : i ≤ j) :
+    (l.eraseIdx i)[j]? = l[j + 1]? := by
+  rw [getElem?_eraseIdx]
+  simp only [dite_eq_ite, ite_eq_right_iff]
+  intro h'
+  omega
+
+theorem getElem_eraseIdx (l : List α) (i : Nat) (j : Nat) (h : j < (l.eraseIdx i).length) :
+    (l.eraseIdx i)[j] = if h' : j < i then
+        l[j]'(by have := length_eraseIdx_le l i; omega)
+      else
+        l[j + 1]'(by rw [length_eraseIdx] at h; split at h <;> omega) := by
+  apply Option.some.inj
+  rw [← getElem?_eq_getElem, getElem?_eraseIdx]
+  split <;> simp
+
+theorem getElem_eraseIdx_of_lt (l : List α) (i : Nat) (j : Nat) (h : j < (l.eraseIdx i).length) (h' : j < i) :
+    (l.eraseIdx i)[j] = l[j]'(by have := length_eraseIdx_le l i; omega) := by
+  rw [getElem_eraseIdx]
+  simp only [dite_eq_left_iff, Nat.not_lt]
+  intro h'
+  omega
+
+theorem getElem_eraseIdx_of_ge (l : List α) (i : Nat) (j : Nat) (h : j < (l.eraseIdx i).length) (h' : i ≤ j) :
+    (l.eraseIdx i)[j] = l[j + 1]'(by rw [length_eraseIdx] at h; split at h <;> omega) := by
+  rw [getElem_eraseIdx, dif_neg]
+  omega

src/Init/Data/List/Nat/Find.lean

@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+/-
+Copyright (c) 2024 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
+Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
+Authors: Kim Morrison
+-/
+prelude
+import Init.Data.List.Nat.Range
+import Init.Data.List.Find
+
+namespace List
+
+theorem findIdx?_eq_some_le_of_findIdx?_eq_some {xs : List α} {p q : α → Bool} (w : ∀ x ∈ xs, p x → q x) {i : Nat}
+    (h : xs.findIdx? p = some i) : ∃ j, j ≤ i ∧ xs.findIdx? q = some j := by
+  simp only [findIdx?_eq_findSome?_enum] at h
+  rw [findSome?_eq_some_iff] at h
+  simp only [Option.ite_none_right_eq_some, Option.some.injEq, ite_eq_right_iff, reduceCtorEq,
+    imp_false, Bool.not_eq_true, Prod.forall, exists_and_right, Prod.exists] at h
+  obtain ⟨h, h₁, b, ⟨es, h₂⟩, ⟨hb, rfl⟩, h₃⟩ := h
+  rw [enum_eq_enumFrom, enumFrom_eq_append_iff] at h₂
+  obtain ⟨l₁', l₂', rfl, rfl, h₂⟩ := h₂
+  rw [eq_comm, enumFrom_eq_cons_iff] at h₂
+  obtain ⟨a, as, rfl, h₂, rfl⟩ := h₂
+  simp only [Nat.zero_add, Prod.mk.injEq] at h₂
+  obtain ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ := h₂
+  simp only [findIdx?_append]
+  match h : findIdx? q l₁' with
+  | some j =>
+    refine ⟨j, ?_, by simp⟩
+    rw [findIdx?_eq_some_iff_findIdx_eq] at h
+    omega
+  | none =>
+    refine ⟨l₁'.length, by simp, by simp_all⟩

src/Init/Data/List/Nat/Range.lean

@@ -109,7 +109,8 @@ theorem range'_eq_append_iff : range' s n = xs ++ ys ↔ ∃ k, k ≤ n ∧ xs =
 @[simp] theorem find?_range'_eq_some {s n : Nat} {i : Nat} {p : Nat → Bool} :
     (range' s n).find? p = some i ↔ p i ∧ i ∈ range' s n ∧ ∀ j, s ≤ j → j < i → !p j := by
   rw [find?_eq_some]
-  simp only [Bool.not_eq_true', exists_and_right, mem_range'_1, and_congr_right_iff]
+  simp only [Bool.not_eq_eq_eq_not, Bool.not_true, exists_and_right, mem_range'_1,
+    and_congr_right_iff]
   simp only [range'_eq_append_iff, eq_comm (a := i :: _), range'_eq_cons_iff]
   intro h
   constructor
@@ -176,7 +177,7 @@ theorem pairwise_le_range (n : Nat) : Pairwise (· ≤ ·) (range n) :=
 theorem take_range (m n : Nat) : take m (range n) = range (min m n) := by
   apply List.ext_getElem
   · simp
-  · simp (config := { contextual := true }) [← getElem_take, Nat.lt_min]
+  · simp (config := { contextual := true }) [getElem_take, Nat.lt_min]
 
 theorem nodup_range (n : Nat) : Nodup (range n) := by
   simp (config := {decide := true}) only [range_eq_range', nodup_range']
@@ -258,6 +259,9 @@ theorem nodup_iota (n : Nat) : Nodup (iota n) :=
   | zero => simp at h
   | succ n => simp
 
+@[simp] theorem tail_iota (n : Nat) : (iota n).tail = iota (n - 1) := by
+  cases n <;> simp
+
 @[simp] theorem reverse_iota : reverse (iota n) = range' 1 n := by
   induction n with
   | zero => simp
@@ -272,15 +276,15 @@ theorem nodup_iota (n : Nat) : Nodup (iota n) :=
   rw [getLast_eq_head_reverse]
   simp
 
-theorem find?_iota_eq_none {n : Nat} (p : Nat → Bool) :
+theorem find?_iota_eq_none {n : Nat} {p : Nat → Bool} :
     (iota n).find? p = none ↔ ∀ i, 0 < i → i ≤ n → !p i := by
   simp
 
 @[simp] theorem find?_iota_eq_some {n : Nat} {i : Nat} {p : Nat → Bool} :
     (iota n).find? p = some i ↔ p i ∧ i ∈ iota n ∧ ∀ j, i < j → j ≤ n → !p j := by
   rw [find?_eq_some]
-  simp only [iota_eq_reverse_range', reverse_eq_append_iff, reverse_cons, append_assoc,
-    singleton_append, Bool.not_eq_true', exists_and_right, mem_reverse, mem_range'_1,
+  simp only [iota_eq_reverse_range', reverse_eq_append_iff, reverse_cons, append_assoc, cons_append,
+    nil_append, Bool.not_eq_eq_eq_not, Bool.not_true, exists_and_right, mem_reverse, mem_range'_1,
     and_congr_right_iff]
   intro h
   constructor
@@ -354,17 +358,6 @@ theorem map_enumFrom (f : α → β) (n : Nat) (l : List α) :
     map (Prod.map id f) (enumFrom n l) = enumFrom n (map f l) := by
   induction l generalizing n <;> simp_all
 
-@[simp]
-theorem enumFrom_map_fst (n) :
-    ∀ (l : List α), map Prod.fst (enumFrom n l) = range' n l.length
-  | [] => rfl
-  | _ :: _ => congrArg (cons _) (enumFrom_map_fst _ _)
-
-@[simp]
-theorem enumFrom_map_snd : ∀ (n) (l : List α), map Prod.snd (enumFrom n l) = l
-  | _, [] => rfl
-  | _, _ :: _ => congrArg (cons _) (enumFrom_map_snd _ _)
-
 theorem snd_mem_of_mem_enumFrom {x : Nat × α} {n : Nat} {l : List α} (h : x ∈ enumFrom n l) : x.2 ∈ l :=
   enumFrom_map_snd n l ▸ mem_map_of_mem _ h
 
@@ -387,10 +380,6 @@ theorem mem_enumFrom {x : α} {i j : Nat} {xs : List α} (h : (i, x) ∈ xs.enum
       x = xs[i - j]'(by have := le_fst_of_mem_enumFrom h; have := fst_lt_add_of_mem_enumFrom h; omega) :=
   ⟨le_fst_of_mem_enumFrom h, fst_lt_add_of_mem_enumFrom h, snd_eq_of_mem_enumFrom h⟩
 
-theorem enumFrom_cons' (n : Nat) (x : α) (xs : List α) :
-    enumFrom n (x :: xs) = (n, x) :: (enumFrom n xs).map (Prod.map (· + 1) id) := by
-  rw [enumFrom_cons, Nat.add_comm, ← map_fst_add_enumFrom_eq_enumFrom]
-
 theorem enumFrom_map (n : Nat) (l : List α) (f : α → β) :
     enumFrom n (l.map f) = (enumFrom n l).map (Prod.map id f) := by
   induction l with
@@ -407,22 +396,39 @@ theorem enumFrom_append (xs ys : List α) (n : Nat) :
     rw [cons_append, enumFrom_cons, IH, ← cons_append, ← enumFrom_cons, length, Nat.add_right_comm,
       Nat.add_assoc]
 
-theorem enumFrom_eq_zip_range' (l : List α) {n : Nat} : l.enumFrom n = (range' n l.length).zip l :=
-  zip_of_prod (enumFrom_map_fst _ _) (enumFrom_map_snd _ _)
+theorem enumFrom_eq_cons_iff {l : List α} {n : Nat} :
+    l.enumFrom n = x :: l' ↔ ∃ a as, l = a :: as ∧ x = (n, a) ∧ l' = enumFrom (n + 1) as := by
+  rw [enumFrom_eq_zip_range', zip_eq_cons_iff]
+  constructor
+  · rintro ⟨l₁, l₂, h, rfl, rfl⟩
+    rw [range'_eq_cons_iff] at h
+    obtain ⟨rfl, -, rfl⟩ := h
+    exact ⟨x.2, l₂, by simp [enumFrom_eq_zip_range']⟩
+  · rintro ⟨a, as, rfl, rfl, rfl⟩
+    refine ⟨range' (n+1) as.length, as, ?_⟩
+    simp [enumFrom_eq_zip_range', range'_succ]
 
-@[simp]
-theorem unzip_enumFrom_eq_prod (l : List α) {n : Nat} :
-    (l.enumFrom n).unzip = (range' n l.length, l) := by
-  simp only [enumFrom_eq_zip_range', unzip_zip, length_range']
+theorem enumFrom_eq_append_iff {l : List α} {n : Nat} :
+    l.enumFrom n = l₁ ++ l₂ ↔
+      ∃ l₁' l₂', l = l₁' ++ l₂' ∧ l₁ = l₁'.enumFrom n ∧ l₂ = l₂'.enumFrom (n + l₁'.length) := by
+  rw [enumFrom_eq_zip_range', zip_eq_append_iff]
+  constructor
+  · rintro ⟨w, x, y, z, h, h', rfl, rfl, rfl⟩
+    rw [range'_eq_append_iff] at h'
+    obtain ⟨k, -, rfl, rfl⟩ := h'
+    simp only [length_range'] at h
+    obtain rfl := h
+    refine ⟨y, z, rfl, ?_⟩
+    simp only [enumFrom_eq_zip_range', length_append, true_and]
+    congr
+    omega
+  · rintro ⟨l₁', l₂', rfl, rfl, rfl⟩
+    simp only [enumFrom_eq_zip_range']
+    refine ⟨range' n l₁'.length, range' (n + l₁'.length) l₂'.length, l₁', l₂', ?_⟩
+    simp [Nat.add_comm]
 
 /-! ### enum -/
 
-theorem enum_cons : (a::as).enum = (0, a) :: as.enumFrom 1 := rfl
-
-theorem enum_cons' (x : α) (xs : List α) :
-    enum (x :: xs) = (0, x) :: (enum xs).map (Prod.map (· + 1) id) :=
-  enumFrom_cons' _ _ _
-
 @[simp]
 theorem enum_eq_nil {l : List α} : List.enum l = [] ↔ l = [] := enumFrom_eq_nil
 
@@ -448,6 +454,9 @@ theorem getElem_enum (l : List α) (i : Nat) (h : i < l.enum.length) :
     l.enum.getLast? = l.getLast?.map fun a => (l.length - 1, a) := by
   simp [getLast?_eq_getElem?]
 
+@[simp] theorem tail_enum (l : List α) : (enum l).tail = enumFrom 1 l.tail := by
+  simp [enum]
+
 theorem mk_mem_enum_iff_getElem? {i : Nat} {x : α} {l : List α} : (i, x) ∈ enum l ↔ l[i]? = x := by
   simp [enum, mk_mem_enumFrom_iff_le_and_getElem?_sub]
 

src/Init/Data/List/Nat/TakeDrop.lean

@@ -36,23 +36,23 @@ theorem length_take_of_le (h : n ≤ length l) : length (take n l) = n := by sim
 
 /-- The `i`-th element of a list coincides with the `i`-th element of any of its prefixes of
 length `> i`. Version designed to rewrite from the big list to the small list. -/
-theorem getElem_take (L : List α) {i j : Nat} (hi : i < L.length) (hj : i < j) :
+theorem getElem_take' (L : List α) {i j : Nat} (hi : i < L.length) (hj : i < j) :
     L[i] = (L.take j)[i]'(length_take .. ▸ Nat.lt_min.mpr ⟨hj, hi⟩) :=
-  getElem_of_eq (take_append_drop j L).symm _ ▸ getElem_append ..
+  getElem_of_eq (take_append_drop j L).symm _ ▸ getElem_append_left ..
 
 /-- The `i`-th element of a list coincides with the `i`-th element of any of its prefixes of
 length `> i`. Version designed to rewrite from the small list to the big list. -/
-theorem getElem_take' (L : List α) {j i : Nat} {h : i < (L.take j).length} :
+theorem getElem_take (L : List α) {j i : Nat} {h : i < (L.take j).length} :
     (L.take j)[i] =
     L[i]'(Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h (length_take_le' _ _)) := by
-  rw [length_take, Nat.lt_min] at h; rw [getElem_take L _ h.1]
+  rw [length_take, Nat.lt_min] at h; rw [getElem_take' L _ h.1]
 
 /-- The `i`-th element of a list coincides with the `i`-th element of any of its prefixes of
 length `> i`. Version designed to rewrite from the big list to the small list. -/
-@[deprecated getElem_take (since := "2024-06-12")]
+@[deprecated getElem_take' (since := "2024-06-12")]
 theorem get_take (L : List α) {i j : Nat} (hi : i < L.length) (hj : i < j) :
     get L ⟨i, hi⟩ = get (L.take j) ⟨i, length_take .. ▸ Nat.lt_min.mpr ⟨hj, hi⟩⟩ := by
-  simp [getElem_take _ hi hj]
+  simp [getElem_take' _ hi hj]
 
 /-- The `i`-th element of a list coincides with the `i`-th element of any of its prefixes of
 length `> i`. Version designed to rewrite from the small list to the big list. -/
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ length `> i`. Version designed to rewrite from the small list to the big list. -
 theorem get_take' (L : List α) {j i} :
     get (L.take j) i =
     get L ⟨i.1, Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le i.2 (length_take_le' _ _)⟩ := by
-  simp [getElem_take']
+  simp [getElem_take]
 
 theorem getElem?_take_eq_none {l : List α} {n m : Nat} (h : n ≤ m) :
     (l.take n)[m]? = none :=
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ theorem getLast?_take {l : List α} : (l.take n).getLast? = if n = 0 then none e
 
 theorem getLast_take {l : List α} (h : l.take n ≠ []) :
     (l.take n).getLast h = l[n - 1]?.getD (l.getLast (by simp_all)) := by
-  rw [getLast_eq_getElem, getElem_take']
+  rw [getLast_eq_getElem, getElem_take]
   simp [length_take, Nat.min_def]
   simp at h
   split
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ theorem dropLast_take {n : Nat} {l : List α} (h : n < l.length) :
 theorem take_prefix_take_left (l : List α) {m n : Nat} (h : m ≤ n) : take m l <+: take n l := by
   rw [isPrefix_iff]
   intro i w
-  rw [getElem?_take_of_lt, getElem_take', getElem?_eq_getElem]
+  rw [getElem?_take_of_lt, getElem_take, getElem?_eq_getElem]
   simp only [length_take] at w
   exact Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le (Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le w (Nat.min_le_left _ _)) h
 
@@ -219,8 +219,9 @@ dropping the first `i` elements. Version designed to rewrite from the big list t
 theorem getElem_drop' (L : List α) {i j : Nat} (h : i + j < L.length) :
     L[i + j] = (L.drop i)[j]'(lt_length_drop L h) := by
   have : i ≤ L.length := Nat.le_trans (Nat.le_add_right _ _) (Nat.le_of_lt h)
-  rw [getElem_of_eq (take_append_drop i L).symm h, getElem_append_right'] <;>
-    simp [Nat.min_eq_left this, Nat.add_sub_cancel_left, Nat.le_add_right]
+  rw [getElem_of_eq (take_append_drop i L).symm h, getElem_append_right]
+  · simp [Nat.min_eq_left this, Nat.add_sub_cancel_left]
+  · simp [Nat.min_eq_left this, Nat.le_add_right]
 
 /-- The `i + j`-th element of a list coincides with the `j`-th element of the list obtained by
 dropping the first `i` elements. Version designed to rewrite from the big list to the small list. -/
@@ -267,9 +268,9 @@ theorem mem_take_iff_getElem {l : List α} {a : α} :
   constructor
   · rintro ⟨i, hm, rfl⟩
     simp at hm
-    refine ⟨i, by omega, by rw [getElem_take']⟩
+    refine ⟨i, by omega, by rw [getElem_take]⟩
   · rintro ⟨i, hm, rfl⟩
-    refine ⟨i, by simpa, by rw [getElem_take']⟩
+    refine ⟨i, by simpa, by rw [getElem_take]⟩
 
 theorem mem_drop_iff_getElem {l : List α} {a : α} :
     a ∈ l.drop n ↔ ∃ (i : Nat) (hm : i + n < l.length), l[n + i] = a := by
@@ -478,7 +479,7 @@ theorem false_of_mem_take_findIdx {xs : List α} {p : α → Bool} (h : x ∈ xs
     · simp only [take_succ_cons, findIdx?_cons]
       split
       · simp
-      · simp [ih, Option.guard_comp]
+      · simp [ih, Option.guard_comp, Option.bind_map]
 
 @[simp] theorem min_findIdx_findIdx {xs : List α} {p q : α → Bool} :
     min (xs.findIdx p) (xs.findIdx q) = xs.findIdx (fun a => p a || q a) := by

src/Init/Data/List/Range.lean

@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, M
 -/
 prelude
 import Init.Data.List.Pairwise
+import Init.Data.List.Zip
 
 /-!
 # Lemmas about `List.range` and `List.enum`
@@ -35,11 +36,16 @@ theorem range'_succ (s n step) : range' s (n + 1) step = s :: range' (s + step)
 theorem range'_ne_nil (s : Nat) {n : Nat} : range' s n ≠ [] ↔ n ≠ 0 := by
   cases n <;> simp
 
-@[simp] theorem range'_zero : range' s 0 = [] := by
+@[simp] theorem range'_zero : range' s 0 step = [] := by
   simp
 
 @[simp] theorem range'_one {s step : Nat} : range' s 1 step = [s] := rfl
 
+@[simp] theorem tail_range' (n : Nat) : (range' s n step).tail = range' (s + step) (n - 1) step := by
+  cases n with
+  | zero => simp
+  | succ n => simp [range'_succ]
+
 @[simp] theorem range'_inj : range' s n = range' s' n' ↔ n = n' ∧ (n = 0 ∨ s = s') := by
   constructor
   · intro h
@@ -153,6 +159,9 @@ theorem range'_eq_map_range (s n : Nat) : range' s n = map (s + ·) (range n) :=
 theorem range_ne_nil {n : Nat} : range n ≠ [] ↔ n ≠ 0 := by
   cases n <;> simp
 
+@[simp] theorem tail_range (n : Nat) : (range n).tail = range' 1 (n - 1) := by
+  rw [range_eq_range', tail_range']
+
 @[simp]
 theorem range_sublist {m n : Nat} : range m <+ range n ↔ m ≤ n := by
   simp only [range_eq_range', range'_sublist_right]
@@ -219,6 +228,12 @@ theorem getElem_enumFrom (l : List α) (n) (i : Nat) (h : i < (l.enumFrom n).len
   simp only [getElem?_enumFrom, getElem?_eq_getElem h]
   simp
 
+@[simp]
+theorem tail_enumFrom (l : List α) (n : Nat) : (enumFrom n l).tail = enumFrom (n + 1) l.tail := by
+  induction l generalizing n with
+  | nil => simp
+  | cons _ l ih => simp [ih, enumFrom_cons]
+
 theorem map_fst_add_enumFrom_eq_enumFrom (l : List α) (n k : Nat) :
     map (Prod.map (· + n) id) (enumFrom k l) = enumFrom (n + k) l :=
   ext_getElem? fun i ↦ by simp [(· ∘ ·), Nat.add_comm, Nat.add_left_comm]; rfl
@@ -227,4 +242,47 @@ theorem map_fst_add_enum_eq_enumFrom (l : List α) (n : Nat) :
     map (Prod.map (· + n) id) (enum l) = enumFrom n l :=
   map_fst_add_enumFrom_eq_enumFrom l _ _
 
+theorem enumFrom_cons' (n : Nat) (x : α) (xs : List α) :
+    enumFrom n (x :: xs) = (n, x) :: (enumFrom n xs).map (Prod.map (· + 1) id) := by
+  rw [enumFrom_cons, Nat.add_comm, ← map_fst_add_enumFrom_eq_enumFrom]
+
+@[simp]
+theorem enumFrom_map_fst (n) :
+    ∀ (l : List α), map Prod.fst (enumFrom n l) = range' n l.length
+  | [] => rfl
+  | _ :: _ => congrArg (cons _) (enumFrom_map_fst _ _)
+
+@[simp]
+theorem enumFrom_map_snd : ∀ (n) (l : List α), map Prod.snd (enumFrom n l) = l
+  | _, [] => rfl
+  | _, _ :: _ => congrArg (cons _) (enumFrom_map_snd _ _)
+
+theorem enumFrom_eq_zip_range' (l : List α) {n : Nat} : l.enumFrom n = (range' n l.length).zip l :=
+  zip_of_prod (enumFrom_map_fst _ _) (enumFrom_map_snd _ _)
+
+@[simp]
+theorem unzip_enumFrom_eq_prod (l : List α) {n : Nat} :
+    (l.enumFrom n).unzip = (range' n l.length, l) := by
+  simp only [enumFrom_eq_zip_range', unzip_zip, length_range']
+
+/-! ### enum -/
+
+theorem enum_cons : (a::as).enum = (0, a) :: as.enumFrom 1 := rfl
+
+theorem enum_cons' (x : α) (xs : List α) :
+    enum (x :: xs) = (0, x) :: (enum xs).map (Prod.map (· + 1) id) :=
+  enumFrom_cons' _ _ _
+
+theorem enum_eq_enumFrom {l : List α} : l.enum = l.enumFrom 0 := rfl
+
+theorem enumFrom_eq_map_enum (l : List α) (n : Nat) :
+    enumFrom n l = (enum l).map (Prod.map (· + n) id) := by
+  induction l generalizing n with
+  | nil => simp
+  | cons x xs ih =>
+    simp only [enumFrom_cons, ih, enum_cons, map_cons, Prod.map_apply, Nat.zero_add, id_eq, map_map,
+      cons.injEq, map_inj_left, Function.comp_apply, Prod.forall, Prod.mk.injEq, and_true, true_and]
+    intro a b _
+    exact (succ_add a n).symm
+
 end List

src/Init/Data/List/Sort/Lemmas.lean

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 /-
 Copyright (c) 2024 Lean FRO. All rights reserved.
 Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-Authors: Kim Morrison
+Authors: Kim Morrison, Eric Wieser, François G. Dorais
 -/
 prelude
 import Init.Data.List.Perm
@@ -114,31 +114,40 @@ theorem enumLE_trans (trans : ∀ a b c, le a b → le b c → le a c)
   · simp_all
   · simp_all
 
-theorem enumLE_total (total : ∀ a b, !le a b → le b a)
-    (a b : Nat × α) : !enumLE le a b → enumLE le b a := by
+theorem enumLE_total (total : ∀ a b, le a b || le b a)
+    (a b : Nat × α) : enumLE le a b || enumLE le b a := by
   simp only [enumLE]
   split <;> split
-  · simpa using Nat.le_of_lt
+  · simpa using Nat.le_total a.fst b.fst
   · simp
   · simp
-  · simp_all [total a.2 b.2]
+  · have := total a.2 b.2
+    simp_all
 
 /-! ### merge -/
 
-theorem merge_stable : ∀ (xs ys) (_ : ∀ x y, x ∈ xs → y ∈ ys → x.1 ≤ y.1),
-    (merge xs ys (enumLE le)).map (·.2) = merge (xs.map (·.2)) (ys.map (·.2)) le
-  | [], ys, _ => by simp [merge]
-  | xs, [], _ => by simp [merge]
-  | (i, x) :: xs, (j, y) :: ys, h => by
-    simp only [merge, enumLE, map_cons]
-    split <;> rename_i w
-    · rw [if_pos (by simp [h _ _ (mem_cons_self ..) (mem_cons_self ..)])]
-      simp only [map_cons, cons.injEq, true_and]
-      rw [merge_stable, map_cons]
-      exact fun x' y' mx my => h x' y' (mem_cons_of_mem (i, x) mx) my
-    · simp only [↓reduceIte, map_cons, cons.injEq, true_and, reduceCtorEq]
-      rw [merge_stable, map_cons]
-      exact fun x' y' mx my => h x' y' mx (mem_cons_of_mem (j, y) my)
+theorem cons_merge_cons (s : α → α → Bool) (a b l r) :
+    merge (a::l) (b::r) s = if s a b then a :: merge l (b::r) s else b :: merge (a::l) r s := by
+  simp only [merge]
+
+@[simp] theorem cons_merge_cons_pos (s : α → α → Bool) (l r) (h : s a b) :
+    merge (a::l) (b::r) s = a :: merge l (b::r) s := by
+  rw [cons_merge_cons, if_pos h]
+
+@[simp] theorem cons_merge_cons_neg (s : α → α → Bool) (l r) (h : ¬ s a b) :
+    merge (a::l) (b::r) s = b :: merge (a::l) r s := by
+  rw [cons_merge_cons, if_neg h]
+
+@[simp] theorem length_merge (s : α → α → Bool) (l r) :
+    (merge l r s).length = l.length + r.length := by
+  match l, r with
+  | [], r => simp
+  | l, [] => simp
+  | a::l, b::r =>
+    rw [cons_merge_cons]
+    split
+    · simp_arith [length_merge s l (b::r)]
+    · simp_arith [length_merge s (a::l) r]
 
 /--
 The elements of `merge le xs ys` are exactly the elements of `xs` and `ys`.
@@ -158,16 +167,37 @@ theorem mem_merge {a : α} {xs ys : List α} : a ∈ merge xs ys le ↔ a ∈ xs
         apply or_congr_left
         simp only [or_comm (a := a = y), or_assoc]
 
+theorem mem_merge_left (s : α → α → Bool) (h : x ∈ l) : x ∈ merge l r s :=
+  mem_merge.2 <| .inl h
+
+theorem mem_merge_right (s : α → α → Bool) (h : x ∈ r) : x ∈ merge l r s :=
+  mem_merge.2 <| .inr h
+
+theorem merge_stable : ∀ (xs ys) (_ : ∀ x y, x ∈ xs → y ∈ ys → x.1 ≤ y.1),
+    (merge xs ys (enumLE le)).map (·.2) = merge (xs.map (·.2)) (ys.map (·.2)) le
+  | [], ys, _ => by simp [merge]
+  | xs, [], _ => by simp [merge]
+  | (i, x) :: xs, (j, y) :: ys, h => by
+    simp only [merge, enumLE, map_cons]
+    split <;> rename_i w
+    · rw [if_pos (by simp [h _ _ (mem_cons_self ..) (mem_cons_self ..)])]
+      simp only [map_cons, cons.injEq, true_and]
+      rw [merge_stable, map_cons]
+      exact fun x' y' mx my => h x' y' (mem_cons_of_mem (i, x) mx) my
+    · simp only [↓reduceIte, map_cons, cons.injEq, true_and, reduceCtorEq]
+      rw [merge_stable, map_cons]
+      exact fun x' y' mx my => h x' y' mx (mem_cons_of_mem (j, y) my)
+
 -- We enable this instance locally so we can write `Pairwise le` instead of `Pairwise (le · ·)` everywhere.
 attribute [local instance] boolRelToRel
 
 /--
-If the ordering relation `le` is transitive and total (i.e. `le a b ∨ le b a` for all `a, b`)
+If the ordering relation `le` is transitive and total (i.e. `le a b || le b a` for all `a, b`)
 then the `merge` of two sorted lists is sorted.
 -/
 theorem sorted_merge
     (trans : ∀ (a b c : α), le a b → le b c → le a c)
-    (total : ∀ (a b : α), !le a b → le b a)
+    (total : ∀ (a b : α), le a b || le b a)
     (l₁ l₂ : List α) (h₁ : l₁.Pairwise le) (h₂ : l₂.Pairwise le) : (merge l₁ l₂ le).Pairwise le := by
   induction l₁ generalizing l₂ with
   | nil => simpa only [merge]
@@ -188,9 +218,10 @@ theorem sorted_merge
       · apply Pairwise.cons
         · intro z m
           rw [mem_merge, mem_cons] at m
+          simp only [Bool.not_eq_true] at h
           rcases m with (⟨rfl|m⟩|m)
-          · exact total _ _ (by simpa using h)
-          · exact trans _ _ _ (total _ _ (by simpa using h)) (rel_of_pairwise_cons h₁ m)
+          · simpa [h] using total y z
+          · exact trans _ _ _ (by simpa [h] using total x y) (rel_of_pairwise_cons h₁ m)
           · exact rel_of_pairwise_cons h₂ m
         · exact ih₂ h₂.tail
 
@@ -234,7 +265,7 @@ theorem mergeSort_perm : ∀ (l : List α) (le), mergeSort l le ~ l
         (Perm.of_eq (splitInTwo_fst_append_splitInTwo_snd _)))
 termination_by l => l.length
 
-@[simp] theorem mergeSort_length (l : List α) : (mergeSort l le).length = l.length :=
+@[simp] theorem length_mergeSort (l : List α) : (mergeSort l le).length = l.length :=
   (mergeSort_perm l le).length_eq
 
 @[simp] theorem mem_mergeSort {a : α} {l : List α} : a ∈ mergeSort l le ↔ a ∈ l :=
@@ -243,13 +274,13 @@ termination_by l => l.length
 /--
 The result of `mergeSort` is sorted,
 as long as the comparison function is transitive (`le a b → le b c → le a c`)
-and total in the sense that `le a b ∨ le b a`.
+and total in the sense that `le a b || le b a`.
 
 The comparison function need not be irreflexive, i.e. `le a b` and `le b a` is allowed even when `a ≠ b`.
 -/
 theorem sorted_mergeSort
     (trans : ∀ (a b c : α), le a b → le b c → le a c)
-    (total : ∀ (a b : α), !le a b → le b a) :
+    (total : ∀ (a b : α), le a b || le b a) :
     (l : List α) → (mergeSort l le).Pairwise le
   | [] => by simp [mergeSort]
   | [a] => by simp [mergeSort]
@@ -317,7 +348,7 @@ termination_by _ l => l.length
 
 theorem mergeSort_cons {le : α → α → Bool}
     (trans : ∀ (a b c : α), le a b → le b c → le a c)
-    (total : ∀ (a b : α), !le a b → le b a)
+    (total : ∀ (a b : α), le a b || le b a)
     (a : α) (l : List α) :
     ∃ l₁ l₂, mergeSort (a :: l) le = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ mergeSort l le = l₁ ++ l₂ ∧
       ∀ b, b ∈ l₁ → !le a b := by
@@ -376,7 +407,7 @@ then `c` is still a sublist of `mergeSort le l`.
 -/
 theorem sublist_mergeSort
     (trans : ∀ (a b c : α), le a b → le b c → le a c)
-    (total : ∀ (a b : α), !le a b → le b a) :
+    (total : ∀ (a b : α), le a b || le b a) :
     ∀ {c : List α} (_ : c.Pairwise le) (_ : c <+ l),
     c <+ mergeSort l le
   | _, _, .slnil => nil_sublist _
@@ -407,8 +438,45 @@ then `[a, b]` is still a sublist of `mergeSort le l`.
 -/
 theorem pair_sublist_mergeSort
     (trans : ∀ (a b c : α), le a b → le b c → le a c)
-    (total : ∀ (a b : α), !le a b → le b a)
+    (total : ∀ (a b : α), le a b || le b a)
     (hab : le a b) (h : [a, b] <+ l) : [a, b] <+ mergeSort l le :=
   sublist_mergeSort trans total (pairwise_pair.mpr hab) h
 
 @[deprecated (since := "2024-09-02")] abbrev mergeSort_stable_pair := @pair_sublist_mergeSort
+
+theorem map_merge {f : α → β} {r : α → α → Bool} {s : β → β → Bool} {l l' : List α}
+    (hl : ∀ a ∈ l, ∀ b ∈ l', r a b = s (f a) (f b)) :
+    (l.merge l' r).map f = (l.map f).merge (l'.map f) s := by
+  match l, l' with
+  | [], x' => simp
+  | x, [] => simp
+  | x :: xs, x' :: xs' =>
+    simp only [List.forall_mem_cons] at hl
+    simp only [forall_and] at hl
+    simp only [List.map, List.cons_merge_cons]
+    rw [← hl.1.1]
+    split
+    · rw [List.map, map_merge, List.map]
+      simp only [List.forall_mem_cons, forall_and]
+      exact ⟨hl.2.1, hl.2.2⟩
+    · rw [List.map, map_merge, List.map]
+      simp only [List.forall_mem_cons]
+      exact ⟨hl.1.2, hl.2.2⟩
+
+theorem map_mergeSort {r : α → α → Bool} {s : β → β → Bool} {f : α → β} {l : List α}
+    (hl : ∀ a ∈ l, ∀ b ∈ l, r a b = s (f a) (f b)) :
+    (l.mergeSort r).map f = (l.map f).mergeSort s :=
+  match l with
+  | [] => by simp
+  | [x] => by simp
+  | a :: b :: l => by
+    simp only [mergeSort, splitInTwo_fst, splitInTwo_snd, map_cons]
+    rw [map_merge (fun a am b bm => hl a (mem_of_mem_take (by simpa using am))
+      b (mem_of_mem_drop (by simpa using bm)))]
+    rw [map_mergeSort (s := s) (fun a am b bm => hl a (mem_of_mem_take (by simpa using am))
+      b (mem_of_mem_take (by simpa using bm)))]
+    rw [map_mergeSort (s := s) (fun a am b bm => hl a (mem_of_mem_drop (by simpa using am))
+      b (mem_of_mem_drop (by simpa using bm)))]
+    rw [map_take, map_drop]
+    simp
+  termination_by length l

src/Init/Data/List/Sublist.lean

@@ -667,7 +667,7 @@ theorem IsSuffix.length_le (h : l₁ <:+ l₂) : l₁.length ≤ l₂.length :=
 theorem IsPrefix.getElem {x y : List α} (h : x <+: y) {n} (hn : n < x.length) :
     x[n] = y[n]'(Nat.le_trans hn h.length_le) := by
   obtain ⟨_, rfl⟩ := h
-  exact (List.getElem_append n hn).symm
+  exact (List.getElem_append_left hn).symm
 
 -- See `Init.Data.List.Nat.Sublist` for `IsSuffix.getElem`.
 
@@ -725,12 +725,21 @@ theorem infix_iff_suffix_prefix {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ <:+: l₂ ↔ ∃ t
 theorem IsInfix.eq_of_length (h : l₁ <:+: l₂) : l₁.length = l₂.length → l₁ = l₂ :=
   h.sublist.eq_of_length
 
+theorem IsInfix.eq_of_length_le (h : l₁ <:+: l₂) : l₂.length ≤ l₁.length → l₁ = l₂ :=
+  h.sublist.eq_of_length_le
+
 theorem IsPrefix.eq_of_length (h : l₁ <+: l₂) : l₁.length = l₂.length → l₁ = l₂ :=
   h.sublist.eq_of_length
 
+theorem IsPrefix.eq_of_length_le (h : l₁ <+: l₂) : l₂.length ≤ l₁.length → l₁ = l₂ :=
+  h.sublist.eq_of_length_le
+
 theorem IsSuffix.eq_of_length (h : l₁ <:+ l₂) : l₁.length = l₂.length → l₁ = l₂ :=
   h.sublist.eq_of_length
 
+theorem IsSuffix.eq_of_length_le (h : l₁ <:+ l₂) : l₂.length ≤ l₁.length → l₁ = l₂ :=
+  h.sublist.eq_of_length_le
+
 theorem prefix_of_prefix_length_le :
     ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α}, l₁ <+: l₃ → l₂ <+: l₃ → length l₁ ≤ length l₂ → l₁ <+: l₂
   | [], l₂, _, _, _, _ => nil_prefix
@@ -829,6 +838,24 @@ theorem isPrefix_iff : l₁ <+: l₂ ↔ ∀ i (h : i < l₁.length), l₂[i]? =
       rw (config := {occs := .pos [2]}) [← Nat.and_forall_add_one]
       simp [Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff, eq_comm]
 
+theorem isPrefix_iff_getElem {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
+    l₁ <+: l₂ ↔ ∃ (h : l₁.length ≤ l₂.length), ∀ x (hx : x < l₁.length),
+      l₁[x] = l₂[x]'(Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le hx h) where
+  mp h := ⟨h.length_le, fun _ _ ↦ h.getElem _⟩
+  mpr h := by
+    obtain ⟨hl, h⟩ := h
+    induction l₂ generalizing l₁ with
+    | nil =>
+      simpa using hl
+    | cons _ _ tail_ih =>
+      cases l₁ with
+      | nil =>
+        exact nil_prefix
+      | cons _ _ =>
+        simp only [length_cons, Nat.add_le_add_iff_right, Fin.getElem_fin] at hl h
+        simp only [cons_prefix_cons]
+        exact ⟨h 0 (zero_lt_succ _), tail_ih hl fun a ha ↦ h a.succ (succ_lt_succ ha)⟩
+
 -- See `Init.Data.List.Nat.Sublist` for `isSuffix_iff` and `ifInfix_iff`.
 
 theorem isPrefix_filterMap_iff {β} {f : α → Option β} {l₁ : List α} {l₂ : List β} :

src/Init/Data/List/Zip.lean

@@ -16,83 +16,6 @@ open Nat
 
 /-! ## Zippers -/
 
-/-! ### zip -/
-
-theorem zip_map (f : α → γ) (g : β → δ) :
-    ∀ (l₁ : List α) (l₂ : List β), zip (l₁.map f) (l₂.map g) = (zip l₁ l₂).map (Prod.map f g)
-  | [], l₂ => rfl
-  | l₁, [] => by simp only [map, zip_nil_right]
-  | a :: l₁, b :: l₂ => by
-    simp only [map, zip_cons_cons, zip_map, Prod.map]; constructor
-
-theorem zip_map_left (f : α → γ) (l₁ : List α) (l₂ : List β) :
-    zip (l₁.map f) l₂ = (zip l₁ l₂).map (Prod.map f id) := by rw [← zip_map, map_id]
-
-theorem zip_map_right (f : β → γ) (l₁ : List α) (l₂ : List β) :
-    zip l₁ (l₂.map f) = (zip l₁ l₂).map (Prod.map id f) := by rw [← zip_map, map_id]
-
-theorem zip_append :
-    ∀ {l₁ r₁ : List α} {l₂ r₂ : List β} (_h : length l₁ = length l₂),
-      zip (l₁ ++ r₁) (l₂ ++ r₂) = zip l₁ l₂ ++ zip r₁ r₂
-  | [], r₁, l₂, r₂, h => by simp only [eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero h.symm]; rfl
-  | l₁, r₁, [], r₂, h => by simp only [eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero h]; rfl
-  | a :: l₁, r₁, b :: l₂, r₂, h => by
-    simp only [cons_append, zip_cons_cons, zip_append (Nat.succ.inj h)]
-
-theorem zip_map' (f : α → β) (g : α → γ) :
-    ∀ l : List α, zip (l.map f) (l.map g) = l.map fun a => (f a, g a)
-  | [] => rfl
-  | a :: l => by simp only [map, zip_cons_cons, zip_map']
-
-theorem of_mem_zip {a b} : ∀ {l₁ : List α} {l₂ : List β}, (a, b) ∈ zip l₁ l₂ → a ∈ l₁ ∧ b ∈ l₂
-  | _ :: l₁, _ :: l₂, h => by
-    cases h
-    case head => simp
-    case tail h =>
-    · have := of_mem_zip h
-      exact ⟨Mem.tail _ this.1, Mem.tail _ this.2⟩
-
-@[deprecated of_mem_zip (since := "2024-07-28")] abbrev mem_zip := @of_mem_zip
-
-theorem map_fst_zip :
-    ∀ (l₁ : List α) (l₂ : List β), l₁.length ≤ l₂.length → map Prod.fst (zip l₁ l₂) = l₁
-  | [], bs, _ => rfl
-  | _ :: as, _ :: bs, h => by
-    simp [Nat.succ_le_succ_iff] at h
-    show _ :: map Prod.fst (zip as bs) = _ :: as
-    rw [map_fst_zip as bs h]
-  | a :: as, [], h => by simp at h
-
-theorem map_snd_zip :
-    ∀ (l₁ : List α) (l₂ : List β), l₂.length ≤ l₁.length → map Prod.snd (zip l₁ l₂) = l₂
-  | _, [], _ => by
-    rw [zip_nil_right]
-    rfl
-  | [], b :: bs, h => by simp at h
-  | a :: as, b :: bs, h => by
-    simp [Nat.succ_le_succ_iff] at h
-    show _ :: map Prod.snd (zip as bs) = _ :: bs
-    rw [map_snd_zip as bs h]
-
-theorem map_prod_left_eq_zip {l : List α} (f : α → β) :
-    (l.map fun x => (x, f x)) = l.zip (l.map f) := by
-  rw [← zip_map']
-  congr
-  simp
-
-theorem map_prod_right_eq_zip {l : List α} (f : α → β) :
-    (l.map fun x => (f x, x)) = (l.map f).zip l := by
-  rw [← zip_map']
-  congr
-  simp
-
-/-- See also `List.zip_replicate` in `Init.Data.List.TakeDrop` for a generalization with different lengths. -/
-@[simp] theorem zip_replicate' {a : α} {b : β} {n : Nat} :
-    zip (replicate n a) (replicate n b) = replicate n (a, b) := by
-  induction n with
-  | zero => rfl
-  | succ n ih => simp [replicate_succ, ih]
-
 /-! ### zipWith -/
 
 theorem zipWith_comm (f : α → β → γ) :
@@ -229,6 +152,7 @@ theorem drop_zipWith : (zipWith f l l').drop n = zipWith f (l.drop n) (l'.drop n
 
 @[deprecated drop_zipWith (since := "2024-07-26")] abbrev zipWith_distrib_drop := @drop_zipWith
 
+@[simp]
 theorem tail_zipWith : (zipWith f l l').tail = zipWith f l.tail l'.tail := by
   rw [← drop_one]; simp [drop_zipWith]
 
@@ -248,6 +172,65 @@ theorem zipWith_append (f : α → β → γ) (l la : List α) (l' lb : List β)
       simp only [length_cons, Nat.succ.injEq] at h
       simp [ih _ h]
 
+theorem zipWith_eq_cons_iff {f : α → β → γ} {l₁ : List α} {l₂ : List β} :
+    zipWith f l₁ l₂ = g :: l ↔
+      ∃ a l₁' b l₂', l₁ = a :: l₁' ∧ l₂ = b :: l₂' ∧ g = f a b ∧ l = zipWith f l₁' l₂' := by
+  match l₁, l₂ with
+  | [], [] => simp
+  | [], b :: l₂ => simp
+  | a :: l₁, [] => simp
+  | a' :: l₁, b' :: l₂ =>
+    simp only [zip_cons_cons, cons.injEq, Prod.mk.injEq]
+    constructor
+    · rintro ⟨⟨rfl, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
+      refine ⟨a', l₁, b', l₂, by simp⟩
+    · rintro ⟨a, l₁, b, l₂, ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, rfl, rfl⟩
+      simp
+
+theorem zipWith_eq_append_iff {f : α → β → γ} {l₁ : List α} {l₂ : List β} :
+    zipWith f l₁ l₂ = l₁' ++ l₂' ↔
+      ∃ w x y z, w.length = y.length ∧ l₁ = w ++ x ∧ l₂ = y ++ z ∧ l₁' = zipWith f w y ∧ l₂' = zipWith f x z := by
+  induction l₁ generalizing l₂ l₁' with
+  | nil =>
+    simp
+    constructor
+    · rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
+      exact ⟨[], [], [], by simp⟩
+    · rintro ⟨_, _, _, -, ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, _, rfl, rfl, rfl⟩
+      simp
+  | cons x₁ l₁ ih₁ =>
+    cases l₂ with
+    | nil =>
+      constructor
+      · simp only [zipWith_nil_right, nil_eq, append_eq_nil, exists_and_left, and_imp]
+        rintro rfl  rfl
+        exact ⟨[], x₁ :: l₁, [], by simp⟩
+      · rintro ⟨w, x, y, z, h₁, _, h₃, rfl, rfl⟩
+        simp only [nil_eq, append_eq_nil] at h₃
+        obtain ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ := h₃
+        simp
+    | cons x₂ l₂ =>
+      simp only [zipWith_cons_cons]
+      rw [cons_eq_append_iff]
+      constructor
+      · rintro (⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨l₁'', rfl, h⟩)
+        · exact ⟨[], x₁ :: l₁, [], x₂ :: l₂, by simp⟩
+        · rw [ih₁] at h
+          obtain ⟨w, x, y, z, h, rfl, rfl, h', rfl⟩ := h
+          refine ⟨x₁ :: w, x, x₂ :: y, z, by simp [h, h']⟩
+      · rintro ⟨w, x, y, z, h₁, h₂, h₃, rfl, rfl⟩
+        rw [cons_eq_append_iff] at h₂
+        rw [cons_eq_append_iff] at h₃
+        obtain (⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨w', rfl, rfl⟩) := h₂
+        · simp only [zipWith_nil_left, true_and, nil_eq, reduceCtorEq, false_and, exists_const,
+          or_false]
+          obtain (⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨y', rfl, rfl⟩) := h₃
+          · simp
+          · simp_all
+        · obtain (⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨y', rfl, rfl⟩) := h₃
+          · simp_all
+          · simp_all [zipWith_append, Nat.succ_inj']
+
 /-- See also `List.zipWith_replicate` in `Init.Data.List.TakeDrop` for a generalization with different lengths. -/
 @[simp] theorem zipWith_replicate' {a : α} {b : β} {n : Nat} :
     zipWith f (replicate n a) (replicate n b) = replicate n (f a b) := by
@@ -255,6 +238,113 @@ theorem zipWith_append (f : α → β → γ) (l la : List α) (l' lb : List β)
   | zero => rfl
   | succ n ih => simp [replicate_succ, ih]
 
+/-! ### zip -/
+
+theorem zip_eq_zipWith : ∀ (l₁ : List α) (l₂ : List β), zip l₁ l₂ = zipWith Prod.mk l₁ l₂
+  | [], _ => rfl
+  | _, [] => rfl
+  | a :: l₁, b :: l₂ => by simp [zip_cons_cons, zip_eq_zipWith l₁ l₂]
+
+theorem zip_map (f : α → γ) (g : β → δ) :
+    ∀ (l₁ : List α) (l₂ : List β), zip (l₁.map f) (l₂.map g) = (zip l₁ l₂).map (Prod.map f g)
+  | [], l₂ => rfl
+  | l₁, [] => by simp only [map, zip_nil_right]
+  | a :: l₁, b :: l₂ => by
+    simp only [map, zip_cons_cons, zip_map, Prod.map]; constructor
+
+theorem zip_map_left (f : α → γ) (l₁ : List α) (l₂ : List β) :
+    zip (l₁.map f) l₂ = (zip l₁ l₂).map (Prod.map f id) := by rw [← zip_map, map_id]
+
+theorem zip_map_right (f : β → γ) (l₁ : List α) (l₂ : List β) :
+    zip l₁ (l₂.map f) = (zip l₁ l₂).map (Prod.map id f) := by rw [← zip_map, map_id]
+
+@[simp] theorem tail_zip (l₁ : List α) (l₂ : List β) :
+    (zip l₁ l₂).tail = zip l₁.tail l₂.tail := by
+  cases l₁ <;> cases l₂ <;> simp
+
+theorem zip_append :
+    ∀ {l₁ r₁ : List α} {l₂ r₂ : List β} (_h : length l₁ = length l₂),
+      zip (l₁ ++ r₁) (l₂ ++ r₂) = zip l₁ l₂ ++ zip r₁ r₂
+  | [], r₁, l₂, r₂, h => by simp only [eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero h.symm]; rfl
+  | l₁, r₁, [], r₂, h => by simp only [eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero h]; rfl
+  | a :: l₁, r₁, b :: l₂, r₂, h => by
+    simp only [cons_append, zip_cons_cons, zip_append (Nat.succ.inj h)]
+
+theorem zip_map' (f : α → β) (g : α → γ) :
+    ∀ l : List α, zip (l.map f) (l.map g) = l.map fun a => (f a, g a)
+  | [] => rfl
+  | a :: l => by simp only [map, zip_cons_cons, zip_map']
+
+theorem of_mem_zip {a b} : ∀ {l₁ : List α} {l₂ : List β}, (a, b) ∈ zip l₁ l₂ → a ∈ l₁ ∧ b ∈ l₂
+  | _ :: l₁, _ :: l₂, h => by
+    cases h
+    case head => simp
+    case tail h =>
+    · have := of_mem_zip h
+      exact ⟨Mem.tail _ this.1, Mem.tail _ this.2⟩
+
+@[deprecated of_mem_zip (since := "2024-07-28")] abbrev mem_zip := @of_mem_zip
+
+theorem map_fst_zip :
+    ∀ (l₁ : List α) (l₂ : List β), l₁.length ≤ l₂.length → map Prod.fst (zip l₁ l₂) = l₁
+  | [], bs, _ => rfl
+  | _ :: as, _ :: bs, h => by
+    simp [Nat.succ_le_succ_iff] at h
+    show _ :: map Prod.fst (zip as bs) = _ :: as
+    rw [map_fst_zip as bs h]
+  | a :: as, [], h => by simp at h
+
+theorem map_snd_zip :
+    ∀ (l₁ : List α) (l₂ : List β), l₂.length ≤ l₁.length → map Prod.snd (zip l₁ l₂) = l₂
+  | _, [], _ => by
+    rw [zip_nil_right]
+    rfl
+  | [], b :: bs, h => by simp at h
+  | a :: as, b :: bs, h => by
+    simp [Nat.succ_le_succ_iff] at h
+    show _ :: map Prod.snd (zip as bs) = _ :: bs
+    rw [map_snd_zip as bs h]
+
+theorem map_prod_left_eq_zip {l : List α} (f : α → β) :
+    (l.map fun x => (x, f x)) = l.zip (l.map f) := by
+  rw [← zip_map']
+  congr
+  simp
+
+theorem map_prod_right_eq_zip {l : List α} (f : α → β) :
+    (l.map fun x => (f x, x)) = (l.map f).zip l := by
+  rw [← zip_map']
+  congr
+  simp
+
+@[simp] theorem zip_eq_nil_iff {l₁ : List α} {l₂ : List β} :
+    zip l₁ l₂ = [] ↔ l₁ = [] ∨ l₂ = [] := by
+  simp [zip_eq_zipWith]
+
+theorem zip_eq_cons_iff {l₁ : List α} {l₂ : List β} :
+    zip l₁ l₂ = (a, b) :: l ↔
+      ∃ l₁' l₂', l₁ = a :: l₁' ∧ l₂ = b :: l₂' ∧ l = zip l₁' l₂' := by
+  simp only [zip_eq_zipWith, zipWith_eq_cons_iff]
+  constructor
+  · rintro ⟨a, l₁, b, l₂, rfl, rfl, h, rfl, rfl⟩
+    simp only [Prod.mk.injEq] at h
+    obtain ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ := h
+    simp
+  · rintro ⟨l₁', l₂', rfl, rfl, rfl⟩
+    refine ⟨a, l₁', b, l₂', by simp⟩
+
+theorem zip_eq_append_iff {l₁ : List α} {l₂ : List β} :
+    zip l₁ l₂ = l₁' ++ l₂' ↔
+      ∃ w x y z, w.length = y.length ∧ l₁ = w ++ x ∧ l₂ = y ++ z ∧ l₁' = zip w y ∧ l₂' = zip x z := by
+  simp [zip_eq_zipWith, zipWith_eq_append_iff]
+
+/-- See also `List.zip_replicate` in `Init.Data.List.TakeDrop` for a generalization with different lengths. -/
+@[simp] theorem zip_replicate' {a : α} {b : β} {n : Nat} :
+    zip (replicate n a) (replicate n b) = replicate n (a, b) := by
+  induction n with
+  | zero => rfl
+  | succ n ih => simp [replicate_succ, ih]
+
 /-! ### zipWithAll -/
 
 theorem getElem?_zipWithAll {f : Option α → Option β → γ} {i : Nat} :
@@ -284,12 +374,16 @@ theorem head?_zipWithAll {f : Option α → Option β → γ} :
       | none, none => .none | a?, b? => some (f a? b?) := by
   simp [head?_eq_getElem?, getElem?_zipWithAll]
 
-theorem head_zipWithAll {f : Option α → Option β → γ} (h) :
+@[simp] theorem head_zipWithAll {f : Option α → Option β → γ} (h) :
     (zipWithAll f as bs).head h = f as.head? bs.head? := by
   apply Option.some.inj
   rw [← head?_eq_head, head?_zipWithAll]
   split <;> simp_all
 
+@[simp] theorem tail_zipWithAll {f : Option α → Option β → γ} :
+    (zipWithAll f as bs).tail = zipWithAll f as.tail bs.tail := by
+  cases as <;> cases bs <;> simp
+
 theorem zipWithAll_map {μ} (f : Option γ → Option δ → μ) (g : α → γ) (h : β → δ) (l₁ : List α) (l₂ : List β) :
     zipWithAll f (l₁.map g) (l₂.map h) = zipWithAll (fun a b => f (g <$> a) (h <$> b)) l₁ l₂ := by
   induction l₁ generalizing l₂ <;> cases l₂ <;> simp_all
@@ -358,6 +452,12 @@ theorem zip_of_prod {l : List α} {l' : List β} {lp : List (α × β)} (hl : lp
     (hr : lp.map Prod.snd = l') : lp = l.zip l' := by
   rw [← hl, ← hr, ← zip_unzip lp, ← unzip_fst, ← unzip_snd, zip_unzip, zip_unzip]
 
+theorem tail_zip_fst {l : List (α × β)} : l.unzip.1.tail = l.tail.unzip.1 := by
+  simp
+
+theorem tail_zip_snd {l : List (α × β)} : l.unzip.2.tail = l.tail.unzip.2 := by
+  simp
+
 @[simp] theorem unzip_replicate {n : Nat} {a : α} {b : β} :
     unzip (replicate n (a, b)) = (replicate n a, replicate n b) := by
   ext1 <;> simp

src/Init/Data/Nat/Basic.lean

@@ -514,6 +514,10 @@ protected theorem add_lt_add_left {n m : Nat} (h : n < m) (k : Nat) : k + n < k
 protected theorem add_lt_add_right {n m : Nat} (h : n < m) (k : Nat) : n + k < m + k :=
   Nat.add_comm k m ▸ Nat.add_comm k n ▸ Nat.add_lt_add_left h k
 
+protected theorem lt_add_of_pos_left (h : 0 < k) : n < k + n := by
+  rw [Nat.add_comm]
+  exact Nat.add_lt_add_left h n
+
 protected theorem lt_add_of_pos_right (h : 0 < k) : n < n + k :=
   Nat.add_lt_add_left h n
 
@@ -630,6 +634,8 @@ theorem lt_succ_of_lt (h : a < b) : a < succ b := le_succ_of_le h
 
 theorem lt_add_one_of_lt (h : a < b) : a < b + 1 := le_succ_of_le h
 
+@[simp] theorem lt_one_iff : n < 1 ↔ n = 0 := Nat.lt_succ_iff.trans <| by rw [le_zero_eq]
+
 theorem succ_pred_eq_of_ne_zero : ∀ {n}, n ≠ 0 → succ (pred n) = n
   | _+1, _ => rfl
 
@@ -718,7 +724,7 @@ protected theorem zero_ne_one : 0 ≠ (1 : Nat) :=
 
 theorem succ_ne_zero (n : Nat) : succ n ≠ 0 := by simp
 
-instance {n : Nat} : NeZero (succ n) := ⟨succ_ne_zero n⟩
+instance instNeZeroSucc {n : Nat} : NeZero (n + 1) := ⟨succ_ne_zero n⟩
 
 /-! # mul + order -/
 

src/Init/Data/Nat/Bitwise.lean

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 /-
 Copyright (c) 2024 Lean FRO, LLC. All rights reserved.
 Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-Authors: Scott Morrison
+Authors: Kim Morrison
 -/
 prelude
 import Init.Data.Nat.Bitwise.Basic

src/Init/Data/Nat/Bitwise/Lemmas.lean

@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ private theorem two_mul_sub_one {n : Nat} (n_pos : n > 0) : (2*n - 1) % 2 = 1 :=
 /-! ### Preliminaries -/
 
 /--
-An induction principal that works on divison by two.
+An induction principal that works on division by two.
 -/
 noncomputable def div2Induction {motive : Nat → Sort u}
     (n : Nat) (ind : ∀(n : Nat), (n > 0 → motive (n/2)) → motive n) : motive n := by
@@ -226,18 +226,18 @@ private theorem succ_mod_two : succ x % 2 = 1 - x % 2 := by
     simp [Nat.mod_eq (x+2) 2, p, hyp]
     cases Nat.mod_two_eq_zero_or_one x with | _ p => simp [p]
 
-private theorem testBit_succ_zero : testBit (x + 1) 0 = not (testBit x 0) := by
+private theorem testBit_succ_zero : testBit (x + 1) 0 = !(testBit x 0) := by
   simp [testBit_to_div_mod, succ_mod_two]
   cases Nat.mod_two_eq_zero_or_one x with | _ p =>
     simp [p]
 
-theorem testBit_two_pow_add_eq (x i : Nat) : testBit (2^i + x) i = not (testBit x i) := by
+theorem testBit_two_pow_add_eq (x i : Nat) : testBit (2^i + x) i = !(testBit x i) := by
   simp [testBit_to_div_mod, add_div_left, Nat.two_pow_pos, succ_mod_two]
   cases mod_two_eq_zero_or_one (x / 2 ^ i) with
   | _ p => simp [p]
 
 theorem testBit_mul_two_pow_add_eq (a b i : Nat) :
-    testBit (2^i*a + b) i = Bool.xor (a%2 = 1) (testBit b i) := by
+    testBit (2^i*a + b) i = (a%2 = 1 ^^ testBit b i) := by
   match a with
   | 0 => simp
   | a+1 =>
@@ -570,7 +570,7 @@ theorem or_div_two : (a ||| b) / 2 = a / 2 ||| b / 2 := by
 /-! ### xor -/
 
 @[simp] theorem testBit_xor (x y i : Nat) :
-    (x ^^^ y).testBit i = Bool.xor (x.testBit i) (y.testBit i) := by
+    (x ^^^ y).testBit i = ((x.testBit i) ^^ (y.testBit i)) := by
   simp [HXor.hXor, Xor.xor, xor, testBit_bitwise ]
 
 @[simp] theorem zero_xor (x : Nat) : 0 ^^^ x = x := by

src/Init/Data/Nat/Div.lean

@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ decreasing_by apply div_rec_lemma; assumption
 protected def mod : @& Nat → @& Nat → Nat
   /-
   Nat.modCore is defined by well-founded recursion and thus irreducible. Nevertheless it is
-  desireable if trivial `Nat.mod` calculations, namely
+  desirable if trivial `Nat.mod` calculations, namely
   * `Nat.mod 0 m` for all `m`
   * `Nat.mod n (m+n)` for concrete literals `n`
   reduce definitionally.
@@ -134,6 +134,19 @@ theorem mod_eq_of_lt {a b : Nat} (h : a < b) : a % b = a :=
     if_neg h'
   (mod_eq a b).symm ▸ this
 
+@[simp] theorem one_mod_eq_zero_iff {n : Nat} : 1 % n = 0 ↔ n = 1 := by
+  match n with
+  | 0 => simp
+  | 1 => simp
+  | n + 2 =>
+    rw [mod_eq_of_lt (by exact Nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ rfl)]
+    simp only [add_one_ne_zero, false_iff, ne_eq]
+    exact ne_of_beq_eq_false rfl
+
+@[simp] theorem Nat.zero_eq_one_mod_iff {n : Nat} : 0 = 1 % n ↔ n = 1 := by
+  rw [eq_comm]
+  simp
+
 theorem mod_eq_sub_mod {a b : Nat} (h : a ≥ b) : a % b = (a - b) % b :=
   match eq_zero_or_pos b with
   | Or.inl h₁ => h₁.symm ▸ (Nat.sub_zero a).symm ▸ rfl
@@ -157,6 +170,13 @@ theorem mod_lt (x : Nat) {y : Nat} : y > 0 → x % y < y := by
     rw [mod_eq_sub_mod h₁]
     exact h₂ h₃
 
+@[simp] protected theorem sub_mod_add_mod_cancel (a b : Nat) [NeZero a] : a - b % a + b % a = a := by
+  rw [Nat.sub_add_cancel]
+  cases a with
+  | zero => simp_all
+  | succ a =>
+    exact Nat.le_of_lt (mod_lt b (zero_lt_succ a))
+
 theorem mod_le (x y : Nat) : x % y ≤ x := by
   match Nat.lt_or_ge x y with
   | Or.inl h₁ => rw [mod_eq_of_lt h₁]; apply Nat.le_refl
@@ -197,7 +217,6 @@ decreasing_by apply div_rec_lemma; assumption
 theorem div_eq_sub_div (h₁ : 0 < b) (h₂ : b ≤ a) : a / b = (a - b) / b + 1 := by
  rw [div_eq a, if_pos]; constructor <;> assumption
 
-
 theorem mod_add_div (m k : Nat) : m % k + k * (m / k) = m := by
   induction m, k using mod.inductionOn with rw [div_eq, mod_eq]
   | base x y h => simp [h]

src/Init/Data/Nat/Lemmas.lean

@@ -84,9 +84,6 @@ protected theorem add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le {a b c d : Nat} (hlt : a < b) (hle : c
     a + c < b + d :=
   Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.add_le_add_left hle _) (Nat.add_lt_add_right hlt _)
 
-protected theorem lt_add_of_pos_left : 0 < k → n < k + n := by
-  rw [Nat.add_comm]; exact Nat.lt_add_of_pos_right
-
 protected theorem pos_of_lt_add_right (h : n < n + k) : 0 < k :=
   Nat.lt_of_add_lt_add_left h
 
@@ -233,6 +230,17 @@ instance : Std.Associative (α := Nat) min := ⟨Nat.min_assoc⟩
 @[simp] protected theorem min_self_assoc' {m n : Nat} : min n (min m n) = min n m := by
   rw [Nat.min_comm m n, ← Nat.min_assoc, Nat.min_self]
 
+@[simp] theorem min_add_left {a b : Nat} : min a (b + a) = a := by
+  rw [Nat.min_def]
+  simp
+@[simp] theorem min_add_right {a b : Nat} : min a (a + b) = a := by
+  rw [Nat.min_def]
+  simp
+@[simp] theorem add_left_min {a b : Nat} : min (b + a) a = a := by
+  rw [Nat.min_comm, min_add_left]
+@[simp] theorem add_right_min {a b : Nat} : min (a + b) a = a := by
+  rw [Nat.min_comm, min_add_right]
+
 protected theorem sub_sub_eq_min : ∀ (a b : Nat), a - (a - b) = min a b
   | 0, _ => by rw [Nat.zero_sub, Nat.zero_min]
   | _, 0 => by rw [Nat.sub_zero, Nat.sub_self, Nat.min_zero]
@@ -287,6 +295,17 @@ protected theorem max_assoc : ∀ (a b c : Nat), max (max a b) c = max a (max b
   | _+1, _+1, _+1 => by simp only [Nat.succ_max_succ]; exact congrArg succ <| Nat.max_assoc ..
 instance : Std.Associative (α := Nat) max := ⟨Nat.max_assoc⟩
 
+@[simp] theorem max_add_left {a b : Nat} : max a (b + a) = b + a := by
+  rw [Nat.max_def]
+  simp
+@[simp] theorem max_add_right {a b : Nat} : max a (a + b) = a + b := by
+  rw [Nat.max_def]
+  simp
+@[simp] theorem add_left_max {a b : Nat} : max (b + a) a = b + a := by
+  rw [Nat.max_comm, max_add_left]
+@[simp] theorem add_right_max {a b : Nat} : max (a + b) a = a + b := by
+  rw [Nat.max_comm, max_add_right]
+
 protected theorem sub_add_eq_max (a b : Nat) : a - b + b = max a b := by
   match Nat.le_total a b with
   | .inl hl => rw [Nat.max_eq_right hl, Nat.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.mpr hl, Nat.zero_add]
@@ -586,6 +605,9 @@ theorem add_mod (a b n : Nat) : (a + b) % n = ((a % n) + (b % n)) % n := by
     | zero => simp_all
     | succ k => omega
 
+@[simp] theorem mod_mul_mod {a b c : Nat} : (a % c * b) % c = a * b % c := by
+  rw [mul_mod, mod_mod, ← mul_mod]
+
 /-! ### pow -/
 
 theorem pow_succ' {m n : Nat} : m ^ n.succ = m * m ^ n := by
@@ -748,6 +770,16 @@ protected theorem two_pow_pred_mod_two_pow (h : 0 < w) :
   rw [mod_eq_of_lt]
   apply Nat.pow_pred_lt_pow (by omega) h
 
+protected theorem pow_lt_pow_iff_pow_mul_le_pow {a n m : Nat} (h : 1 < a) :
+    a ^ n < a ^ m ↔ a ^ n * a ≤ a ^ m := by
+  rw [←Nat.pow_add_one, Nat.pow_le_pow_iff_right (by omega), Nat.pow_lt_pow_iff_right (by omega)]
+  omega
+
+@[simp]
+theorem two_pow_pred_mul_two (h : 0 < w) :
+    2 ^ (w - 1) * 2 = 2 ^ w := by
+  simp [← Nat.pow_succ, Nat.sub_add_cancel h]
+
 /-! ### log2 -/
 
 @[simp]

src/Init/Data/Nat/Mod.lean

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 /-
 Copyright (c) 2024 Lean FRO, LLC. All rights reserved.
 Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-Authors: Scott Morrison
+Authors: Kim Morrison
 -/
 prelude
 import Init.Omega
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ in particular
 and its corollary
 `Nat.mod_pow_succ : x % b ^ (k + 1) = x % b ^ k + b ^ k * ((x / b ^ k) % b)`.
 
-It contains the necesssary preliminary results relating order and `*` and `/`,
+It contains the necessary preliminary results relating order and `*` and `/`,
 which should probably be moved to their own file.
 -/
 

src/Init/Data/NeZero.lean

@@ -35,4 +35,4 @@ theorem neZero_iff {n : R} : NeZero n ↔ n ≠ 0 :=
   ⟨fun h ↦ h.out, NeZero.mk⟩
 
 @[simp] theorem neZero_zero_iff_false {α : Type _} [Zero α] : NeZero (0 : α) ↔ False :=
-  ⟨fun h ↦ h.ne rfl, fun h ↦ h.elim⟩
+  ⟨fun _ ↦ NeZero.ne (0 : α) rfl, fun h ↦ h.elim⟩

src/Init/Data/Option/Lemmas.lean

@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ Authors: Mario Carneiro
 prelude
 import Init.Data.Option.BasicAux
 import Init.Data.Option.Instances
+import Init.Data.BEq
 import Init.Classical
 import Init.Ext
 
@@ -13,7 +14,7 @@ namespace Option
 
 theorem mem_iff {a : α} {b : Option α} : a ∈ b ↔ b = some a := .rfl
 
-@[simp] theorem mem_some {a b : α} : a ∈ some b ↔ b = a := by simp [mem_iff]
+theorem mem_some {a b : α} : a ∈ some b ↔ b = a := by simp
 
 theorem mem_some_self (a : α) : a ∈ some a := mem_some.2 rfl
 
@@ -230,7 +231,7 @@ theorem isSome_filter_of_isSome (p : α → Bool) (o : Option α) (h : (o.filter
     o.isSome := by
   cases o <;> simp at h ⊢
 
-@[simp] theorem filter_eq_none (p : α → Bool) :
+@[simp] theorem filter_eq_none {p : α → Bool} :
     Option.filter p o = none ↔ o = none ∨ ∀ a, a ∈ o → ¬ p a := by
   cases o <;> simp [filter_some]
 
@@ -247,7 +248,7 @@ theorem isSome_filter_of_isSome (p : α → Bool) (o : Option α) (h : (o.filter
 theorem bind_map_comm {α β} {x : Option (Option α)} {f : α → β} :
     x.bind (Option.map f) = (x.map (Option.map f)).bind id := by cases x <;> simp
 
-@[simp] theorem bind_map {f : α → β} {g : β → Option γ} {x : Option α} :
+theorem bind_map {f : α → β} {g : β → Option γ} {x : Option α} :
     (x.map f).bind g = x.bind (g ∘ f) := by cases x <;> simp
 
 @[simp] theorem map_bind {f : α → Option β} {g : β → γ} {x : Option α} :
@@ -411,27 +412,42 @@ variable [BEq α]
 @[simp] theorem some_beq_none (a : α) : ((some a : Option α) == none) = false := rfl
 @[simp] theorem some_beq_some {a b : α} : (some a == some b) = (a == b) := rfl
 
+@[simp] theorem reflBEq_iff : ReflBEq (Option α) ↔ ReflBEq α := by
+  constructor
+  · intro h
+    constructor
+    intro a
+    suffices (some a == some a) = true by
+      simpa only [some_beq_some]
+    simp
+  · intro h
+    constructor
+    · rintro (_ | a) <;> simp
+
+@[simp] theorem lawfulBEq_iff : LawfulBEq (Option α) ↔ LawfulBEq α := by
+  constructor
+  · intro h
+    constructor
+    · intro a b h
+      apply Option.some.inj
+      apply eq_of_beq
+      simpa
+    · intro a
+      suffices (some a == some a) = true by
+        simpa only [some_beq_some]
+      simp
+  · intro h
+    constructor
+    · intro a b h
+      simpa using h
+    · intro a
+      simp
+
 end beq
 
 /-! ### ite -/
 section ite
 
-@[simp] theorem mem_dite_none_left {x : α} [Decidable p] {l : ¬ p → Option α} :
-    (x ∈ if h : p then none else l h) ↔ ∃ h : ¬ p, x ∈ l h := by
-  split <;> simp_all
-
-@[simp] theorem mem_dite_none_right {x : α} [Decidable p] {l : p → Option α} :
-    (x ∈ if h : p then l h else none) ↔ ∃ h : p, x ∈ l h := by
-  split <;> simp_all
-
-@[simp] theorem mem_ite_none_left {x : α} [Decidable p] {l : Option α} :
-    (x ∈ if p then none else l) ↔ ¬ p ∧ x ∈ l := by
-  split <;> simp_all
-
-@[simp] theorem mem_ite_none_right {x : α} [Decidable p] {l : Option α} :
-    (x ∈ if p then l else none) ↔ p ∧ x ∈ l := by
-  split <;> simp_all
-
 @[simp] theorem dite_none_left_eq_some {p : Prop} [Decidable p] {b : ¬p → Option β} :
     (if h : p then none else b h) = some a ↔ ∃ h, b h = some a := by
   split <;> simp_all
@@ -464,6 +480,22 @@ section ite
     some a = (if p then b else none) ↔ p ∧ some a = b := by
   split <;> simp_all
 
+theorem mem_dite_none_left {x : α} [Decidable p] {l : ¬ p → Option α} :
+    (x ∈ if h : p then none else l h) ↔ ∃ h : ¬ p, x ∈ l h := by
+  simp
+
+theorem mem_dite_none_right {x : α} [Decidable p] {l : p → Option α} :
+    (x ∈ if h : p then l h else none) ↔ ∃ h : p, x ∈ l h := by
+  simp
+
+theorem mem_ite_none_left {x : α} [Decidable p] {l : Option α} :
+    (x ∈ if p then none else l) ↔ ¬ p ∧ x ∈ l := by
+  simp
+
+theorem mem_ite_none_right {x : α} [Decidable p] {l : Option α} :
+    (x ∈ if p then l else none) ↔ p ∧ x ∈ l := by
+  simp
+
 @[simp] theorem isSome_dite {p : Prop} [Decidable p] {b : p → β} :
     (if h : p then some (b h) else none).isSome = true ↔ p := by
   split <;> simpa

src/Init/Data/Repr.lean

@@ -51,6 +51,12 @@ instance [Repr α] : Repr (id α) :=
 instance [Repr α] : Repr (Id α) :=
   inferInstanceAs (Repr α)
 
+/-
+This instance allows us to use `Empty` as a type parameter without causing instance synthesis to fail.
+-/
+instance : Repr Empty where
+  reprPrec := nofun
+
 instance : Repr Bool where
   reprPrec
     | true, _  => "true"

src/Init/Data/UInt/Basic.lean

@@ -290,11 +290,17 @@ instance (a b : UInt64) : Decidable (a ≤ b) := UInt64.decLe a b
 instance : Max UInt64 := maxOfLe
 instance : Min UInt64 := minOfLe
 
+-- This instance would interfere with the global instance `NeZero (n + 1)`,
+-- so we only enable it locally.
+@[local instance]
+private def instNeZeroUSizeSize : NeZero USize.size := ⟨add_one_ne_zero _⟩
+
+@[deprecated (since := "2024-09-16")]
 theorem usize_size_gt_zero : USize.size > 0 :=
   Nat.zero_lt_succ ..
 
 @[extern "lean_usize_of_nat"]
-def USize.ofNat (n : @& Nat) : USize := ⟨Fin.ofNat' n usize_size_gt_zero⟩
+def USize.ofNat (n : @& Nat) : USize := ⟨Fin.ofNat'  _ n⟩
 abbrev Nat.toUSize := USize.ofNat
 @[extern "lean_usize_to_nat"]
 def USize.toNat (n : USize) : Nat := n.val.val

src/Init/GetElem.lean

@@ -156,11 +156,11 @@ theorem getElem?_neg [GetElem? cont idx elem dom] [LawfulGetElem cont idx elem d
 theorem getElem!_pos [GetElem? cont idx elem dom] [LawfulGetElem cont idx elem dom]
     [Inhabited elem] (c : cont) (i : idx) (h : dom c i) [Decidable (dom c i)] :
     c[i]! = c[i]'h := by
-  simp only [getElem!_def, getElem?_def, h]
+  simp [getElem!_def, getElem?_def, h]
 
 theorem getElem!_neg [GetElem? cont idx elem dom] [LawfulGetElem cont idx elem dom]
     [Inhabited elem] (c : cont) (i : idx) (h : ¬dom c i) [Decidable (dom c i)] : c[i]! = default := by
-  simp only [getElem!_def, getElem?_def, h]
+  simp [getElem!_def, getElem?_def, h]
 
 namespace Fin
 

src/Init/Meta.lean

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ Additional goodies for writing macros
 -/
 prelude
 import Init.MetaTypes
-import Init.Data.Array.Basic
+import Init.Data.Array.GetLit
 import Init.Data.Option.BasicAux
 
 namespace Lean
@@ -862,7 +862,7 @@ partial def decodeRawStrLitAux (s : String) (i : String.Pos) (num : Nat) : Strin
 /--
 Takes the string literal lexical syntax parsed by the parser and interprets it as a string.
 This is where escape sequences are processed for example.
-The string `s` is is either a plain string literal or a raw string literal.
+The string `s` is either a plain string literal or a raw string literal.
 
 If it returns `none` then the string literal is ill-formed, which indicates a bug in the parser.
 The function is not required to return `none` if the string literal is ill-formed.

src/Init/Omega.lean

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 /-
 Copyright (c) 2023 Lean FRO, LLC. All rights reserved.
 Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-Authors: Scott Morrison
+Authors: Kim Morrison
 -/
 prelude
 import Init.Omega.Int

src/Init/Omega/Coeffs.lean

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 /-
 Copyright (c) 2023 Lean FRO, LLC. All rights reserved.
 Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-Authors: Scott Morrison
+Authors: Kim Morrison
 -/
 prelude
 import Init.Omega.IntList

src/Init/Omega/Constraint.lean

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 /-
 Copyright (c) 2023 Lean FRO, LLC. All rights reserved.
 Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-Authors: Scott Morrison
+Authors: Kim Morrison
 -/
 prelude
 import Init.Omega.LinearCombo

src/Init/Omega/Int.lean

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 /-
 Copyright (c) 2023 Lean FRO, LLC. All rights reserved.
 Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-Authors: Scott Morrison
+Authors: Kim Morrison
 -/
 prelude
 import Init.Data.Int.DivMod

src/Init/Omega/IntList.lean

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 /-
 Copyright (c) 2023 Lean FRO, LLC. All rights reserved.
 Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-Authors: Scott Morrison
+Authors: Kim Morrison
 -/
 prelude
 import Init.Data.List.Zip

src/Init/Omega/LinearCombo.lean

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 /-
 Copyright (c) 2023 Lean FRO, LLC. All rights reserved.
 Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-Authors: Scott Morrison
+Authors: Kim Morrison
 -/
 prelude
 import Init.Omega.Coeffs

src/Init/Omega/Logic.lean

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 /-
 Copyright (c) 2023 Lean FRO, LLC. All rights reserved.
 Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-Authors: Scott Morrison
+Authors: Kim Morrison
 -/
 prelude
 import Init.PropLemmas

src/Init/Prelude.lean

@@ -754,10 +754,11 @@ infer the proof of `Nonempty α`.
 noncomputable def Classical.ofNonempty {α : Sort u} [Nonempty α] : α :=
   Classical.choice inferInstance
 
-instance (α : Sort u) {β : Sort v} [Nonempty β] : Nonempty (α → β) :=
+instance {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} [Nonempty β] : Nonempty (α → β) :=
   Nonempty.intro fun _ => Classical.ofNonempty
 
-instance (α : Sort u) {β : α → Sort v} [(a : α) → Nonempty (β a)] : Nonempty ((a : α) → β a) :=
+instance Pi.instNonempty {α : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v} [(a : α) → Nonempty (β a)] :
+    Nonempty ((a : α) → β a) :=
   Nonempty.intro fun _ => Classical.ofNonempty
 
 instance : Inhabited (Sort u) where
@@ -766,7 +767,8 @@ instance : Inhabited (Sort u) where
 instance (α : Sort u) {β : Sort v} [Inhabited β] : Inhabited (α → β) where
   default := fun _ => default
 
-instance (α : Sort u) {β : α → Sort v} [(a : α) → Inhabited (β a)] : Inhabited ((a : α) → β a) where
+instance Pi.instInhabited {α : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v} [(a : α) → Inhabited (β a)] :
+    Inhabited ((a : α) → β a) where
   default := fun _ => default
 
 deriving instance Inhabited for Bool
@@ -1014,7 +1016,7 @@ with `Or : Prop → Prop → Prop`, which is the propositional connective).
 It is `@[macro_inline]` because it has C-like short-circuiting behavior:
 if `x` is true then `y` is not evaluated.
 -/
-@[macro_inline] def or (x y : Bool) : Bool :=
+@[macro_inline] def Bool.or (x y : Bool) : Bool :=
   match x with
   | true  => true
   | false => y
@@ -1025,7 +1027,7 @@ with `And : Prop → Prop → Prop`, which is the propositional connective).
 It is `@[macro_inline]` because it has C-like short-circuiting behavior:
 if `x` is false then `y` is not evaluated.
 -/
-@[macro_inline] def and (x y : Bool) : Bool :=
+@[macro_inline] def Bool.and (x y : Bool) : Bool :=
   match x with
   | false => false
   | true  => y
@@ -1034,10 +1036,12 @@ if `x` is false then `y` is not evaluated.
 `not x`, or `!x`, is the boolean "not" operation (not to be confused
 with `Not : Prop → Prop`, which is the propositional connective).
 -/
-@[inline] def not : Bool → Bool
+@[inline] def Bool.not : Bool → Bool
   | true  => false
   | false => true
 
+export Bool (or and not)
+
 /--
 The type of natural numbers, starting at zero. It is defined as an
 inductive type freely generated by "zero is a natural number" and
@@ -1208,7 +1212,7 @@ class HDiv (α : Type u) (β : Type v) (γ : outParam (Type w)) where
   * For most types like `Nat`, `Int`, `Rat`, `Real`, `a / 0` is defined to be `0`.
   * For `Nat`, `a / b` rounds downwards.
   * For `Int`, `a / b` rounds downwards if `b` is positive or upwards if `b` is negative.
-    It is implemented as `Int.ediv`, the unique function satisfiying
+    It is implemented as `Int.ediv`, the unique function satisfying
     `a % b + b * (a / b) = a` and `0 ≤ a % b < natAbs b` for `b ≠ 0`.
     Other rounding conventions are available using the functions
     `Int.fdiv` (floor rounding) and `Int.div` (truncation rounding).
@@ -1362,7 +1366,7 @@ class Pow (α : Type u) (β : Type v) where
   /-- `a ^ b` computes `a` to the power of `b`. See `HPow`. -/
   pow : α → β → α
 
-/-- The homogenous version of `Pow` where the exponent is a `Nat`.
+/-- The homogeneous version of `Pow` where the exponent is a `Nat`.
 The purpose of this class is that it provides a default `Pow` instance,
 which can be used to specialize the exponent to `Nat` during elaboration.
 
@@ -2063,7 +2067,7 @@ The size of type `USize`, that is, `2^System.Platform.numBits`, which may
 be either `2^32` or `2^64` depending on the platform's architecture.
 
 Remark: we define `USize.size` using `(2^numBits - 1) + 1` to ensure the
-Lean unifier can solve contraints such as `?m + 1 = USize.size`. Recall that
+Lean unifier can solve constraints such as `?m + 1 = USize.size`. Recall that
 `numBits` does not reduce to a numeral in the Lean kernel since it is platform
 specific. Without this trick, the following definition would be rejected by the
 Lean type checker.
@@ -2566,7 +2570,9 @@ structure Array (α : Type u) where
   /--
   Converts a `List α` into an `Array α`.
 
-  At runtime, this constructor is implemented by `List.toArray` and is O(n) in the length of the
+  You can also use the synonym `List.toArray` when dot notation is convenient.
+
+  At runtime, this constructor is implemented by `List.toArrayImpl` and is O(n) in the length of the
   list.
   -/
   mk ::
@@ -2580,6 +2586,9 @@ structure Array (α : Type u) where
 attribute [extern "lean_array_to_list"] Array.toList
 attribute [extern "lean_array_mk"] Array.mk
 
+@[inherit_doc Array.mk, match_pattern]
+abbrev List.toArray (xs : List α) : Array α := .mk xs
+
 /-- Construct a new empty array with initial capacity `c`. -/
 @[extern "lean_mk_empty_array_with_capacity"]
 def Array.mkEmpty {α : Type u} (c : @& Nat) : Array α where
@@ -2707,7 +2716,10 @@ def Array.extract (as : Array α) (start stop : Nat) : Array α :=
   let sz' := Nat.sub (min stop as.size) start
   loop sz' start (mkEmpty sz')
 
-/-- Auxiliary definition for `List.toArray`. -/
+/--
+Auxiliary definition for `List.toArray`.
+`List.toArrayAux as r = r ++ as.toArray`
+-/
 @[inline_if_reduce]
 def List.toArrayAux : List α → Array α → Array α
   | nil,       r => r
@@ -2723,7 +2735,7 @@ def List.redLength : List α → Nat
 -- This function is exported to C, where it is called by `Array.mk`
 -- (the constructor) to implement this functionality.
 @[inline, match_pattern, pp_nodot, export lean_list_to_array]
-def List.toArray (as : List α) : Array α :=
+def List.toArrayImpl (as : List α) : Array α :=
   as.toArrayAux (Array.mkEmpty as.redLength)
 
 /-- The typeclass which supplies the `>>=` "bind" function. See `Monad`. -/

src/Init/SimpLemmas.lean

@@ -231,8 +231,21 @@ instance : Std.Associative (· || ·) := ⟨Bool.or_assoc⟩
 @[simp] theorem Bool.not_false : (!false) = true := by decide
 @[simp] theorem beq_true  (b : Bool) : (b == true)  =  b := by cases b <;> rfl
 @[simp] theorem beq_false (b : Bool) : (b == false) = !b := by cases b <;> rfl
-@[simp] theorem Bool.not_eq_true'  (b : Bool) : ((!b) = true) = (b = false) := by cases b <;> simp
-@[simp] theorem Bool.not_eq_false' (b : Bool) : ((!b) = false) = (b = true) := by cases b <;> simp
+
+
+/--
+We move `!` from the left hand side of an equality to the right hand side.
+This helps confluence, and also helps combining pairs of `!`s.
+-/
+@[simp] theorem Bool.not_eq_eq_eq_not {a b : Bool} : ((!a) = b) ↔ (a = !b) := by
+  cases a <;> cases b <;> simp
+
+@[simp] theorem Bool.not_eq_not {a b : Bool} : ¬a = !b ↔ a = b := by
+  cases a <;> cases b <;> simp
+theorem Bool.not_not_eq {a b : Bool} : ¬(!a) = b ↔ a = b := by simp
+
+theorem Bool.not_eq_true'  (b : Bool) : ((!b) = true) = (b = false) := by simp
+theorem Bool.not_eq_false' (b : Bool) : ((!b) = false) = (b = true) := by simp
 
 @[simp] theorem Bool.not_eq_true (b : Bool) : (¬(b = true)) = (b = false) := by cases b <;> decide
 @[simp] theorem Bool.not_eq_false (b : Bool) : (¬(b = false)) = (b = true) := by cases b <;> decide

src/Init/Tactics.lean

@@ -149,26 +149,27 @@ syntax (name := assumption) "assumption" : tactic
 
 /--
 `contradiction` closes the main goal if its hypotheses are "trivially contradictory".
+
 - Inductive type/family with no applicable constructors
-```lean
-example (h : False) : p := by contradiction
-```
+  ```lean
+  example (h : False) : p := by contradiction
+  ```
 - Injectivity of constructors
-```lean
-example (h : none = some true) : p := by contradiction  --
-```
+  ```lean
+  example (h : none = some true) : p := by contradiction  --
+  ```
 - Decidable false proposition
-```lean
-example (h : 2 + 2 = 3) : p := by contradiction
-```
+  ```lean
+  example (h : 2 + 2 = 3) : p := by contradiction
+  ```
 - Contradictory hypotheses
-```lean
-example (h : p) (h' : ¬ p) : q := by contradiction
-```
+  ```lean
+  example (h : p) (h' : ¬ p) : q := by contradiction
+  ```
 - Other simple contradictions such as
-```lean
-example (x : Nat) (h : x ≠ x) : p := by contradiction
-```
+  ```lean
+  example (x : Nat) (h : x ≠ x) : p := by contradiction
+  ```
 -/
 syntax (name := contradiction) "contradiction" : tactic
 
@@ -363,31 +364,24 @@ syntax (name := fail) "fail" (ppSpace str)? : tactic
 syntax (name := eqRefl) "eq_refl" : tactic
 
 /--
-`rfl` tries to close the current goal using reflexivity.
-This is supposed to be an extensible tactic and users can add their own support
-for new reflexive relations.
-
-Remark: `rfl` is an extensible tactic. We later add `macro_rules` to try different
-reflexivity theorems (e.g., `Iff.rfl`).
+This tactic applies to a goal whose target has the form `x ~ x`,
+where `~` is equality, heterogeneous equality or any relation that
+has a reflexivity lemma tagged with the attribute @[refl].
 -/
-macro "rfl" : tactic => `(tactic| case' _ => fail "The rfl tactic failed. Possible reasons:
-- The goal is not a reflexive relation (neither `=` nor a relation with a @[refl] lemma).
-- The arguments of the relation are not equal.
-Try using the reflexivity lemma for your relation explicitly, e.g. `exact Eq.refl _` or
-`exact HEq.rfl` etc.")
-
-macro_rules | `(tactic| rfl) => `(tactic| eq_refl)
-macro_rules | `(tactic| rfl) => `(tactic| exact HEq.rfl)
+syntax "rfl" : tactic
 
 /--
-This tactic applies to a goal whose target has the form `x ~ x`,
-where `~` is a reflexive relation other than `=`,
-that is, a relation which has a reflexive lemma tagged with the attribute @[refl].
+The same as `rfl`, but without trying `eq_refl` at the end.
 -/
 syntax (name := applyRfl) "apply_rfl" : tactic
 
+-- We try `apply_rfl` first, beause it produces a nice error message
 macro_rules | `(tactic| rfl) => `(tactic| apply_rfl)
 
+-- But, mostly for backward compatibility, we try `eq_refl` too (reduces more aggressively)
+macro_rules | `(tactic| rfl) => `(tactic| eq_refl)
+-- Als for backward compatibility, because `exact` can trigger the implicit lambda feature (see #5366)
+macro_rules | `(tactic| rfl) => `(tactic| exact HEq.rfl)
 /--
 `rfl'` is similar to `rfl`, but disables smart unfolding and unfolds all kinds of definitions,
 theorems included (relevant for declarations defined by well-founded recursion).
@@ -456,7 +450,7 @@ syntax (name := change) "change " term (location)? : tactic
 
 /--
 * `change a with b` will change occurrences of `a` to `b` in the goal,
-  assuming `a` and `b` are are definitionally equal.
+  assuming `a` and `b` are definitionally equal.
 * `change a with b at h` similarly changes `a` to `b` in the type of hypothesis `h`.
 -/
 syntax (name := changeWith) "change " term " with " term (location)? : tactic
@@ -773,8 +767,9 @@ macro_rules
 macro "refine_lift' " e:term : tactic => `(tactic| focus (refine' no_implicit_lambda% $e; rotate_right))
 /-- Similar to `have`, but using `refine'` -/
 macro "have' " d:haveDecl : tactic => `(tactic| refine_lift' have $d:haveDecl; ?_)
-/-- Similar to `have`, but using `refine'` -/
+set_option linter.missingDocs false in -- OK, because `tactic_alt` causes inheritance of docs
 macro (priority := high) "have'" x:ident " := " p:term : tactic => `(tactic| have' $x:ident : _ := $p)
+attribute [tactic_alt tacticHave'_] «tacticHave'_:=_»
 /-- Similar to `let`, but using `refine'` -/
 macro "let' " d:letDecl : tactic => `(tactic| refine_lift' let $d:letDecl; ?_)
 
@@ -793,7 +788,7 @@ syntax inductionAlt  := ppDedent(ppLine) inductionAltLHS+ " => " (hole <|> synth
 After `with`, there is an optional tactic that runs on all branches, and
 then a list of alternatives.
 -/
-syntax inductionAlts := " with" (ppSpace tactic)? withPosition((colGe inductionAlt)+)
+syntax inductionAlts := " with" (ppSpace colGt tactic)? withPosition((colGe inductionAlt)+)
 
 /--
 Assuming `x` is a variable in the local context with an inductive type,
@@ -1588,7 +1583,7 @@ macro "get_elem_tactic" : tactic =>
       There is a proof embedded in the right-hand-side, and we want it to be just `hi`.
       If `omega` is used to "fill" this proof, we will have a more complex proof term that
       cannot be inferred by unification.
-      We hardcoded `assumption` here to ensure users cannot accidentaly break this IF
+      We hardcoded `assumption` here to ensure users cannot accidentally break this IF
       they add new `macro_rules` for `get_elem_tactic_trivial`.
 
       TODO: Implement priorities for `macro_rules`.
@@ -1598,7 +1593,7 @@ macro "get_elem_tactic" : tactic =>
     | get_elem_tactic_trivial
     | fail "failed to prove index is valid, possible solutions:
   - Use `have`-expressions to prove the index is valid
-  - Use `a[i]!` notation instead, runtime check is perfomed, and 'Panic' error message is produced if index is not valid
+  - Use `a[i]!` notation instead, runtime check is performed, and 'Panic' error message is produced if index is not valid
   - Use `a[i]?` notation instead, result is an `Option` type
   - Use `a[i]'h` notation instead, where `h` is a proof that index is valid"
    )

src/Init/WFTactics.lean

@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ macro "simp_wf" : tactic =>
 
 /--
 This tactic is used internally by lean before presenting the proof obligations from a well-founded
-definition to the user via `decreasing_by`. It is not necessary to use this tactic manuall.
+definition to the user via `decreasing_by`. It is not necessary to use this tactic manually.
 -/
 macro "clean_wf" : tactic =>
   `(tactic| simp

src/Lean/Compiler/IR/Borrow.lean

@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ namespace InitParamMap
 def initBorrow (ps : Array Param) : Array Param :=
   ps.map fun p => { p with borrow := p.ty.isObj }
 
-/-- We do perform borrow inference for constants marked as `export`.
+/-- We do not perform borrow inference for constants marked as `export`.
    Reason: we current write wrappers in C++ for using exported functions.
    These wrappers use smart pointers such as `object_ref`.
    When writing a new wrapper we need to know whether an argument is a borrow

src/Lean/Compiler/IR/RC.lean

@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ private def isBorrowParamAux (x : VarId) (ys : Array Arg) (consumeParamPred : Na
     | Arg.var y      => x == y && !consumeParamPred i
 
 private def isBorrowParam (x : VarId) (ys : Array Arg) (ps : Array Param) : Bool :=
-  isBorrowParamAux x ys fun i => not ps[i]!.borrow
+  isBorrowParamAux x ys fun i => ! ps[i]!.borrow
 
 /--
 Return `n`, the number of times `x` is consumed.
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ private def addIncBeforeAux (ctx : Context) (xs : Array Arg) (consumeParamPred :
         addInc ctx x b numIncs
 
 private def addIncBefore (ctx : Context) (xs : Array Arg) (ps : Array Param) (b : FnBody) (liveVarsAfter : LiveVarSet) : FnBody :=
-  addIncBeforeAux ctx xs (fun i => not ps[i]!.borrow) b liveVarsAfter
+  addIncBeforeAux ctx xs (fun i => ! ps[i]!.borrow) b liveVarsAfter
 
 /-- See `addIncBeforeAux`/`addIncBefore` for the procedure that inserts `inc` operations before an application.  -/
 private def addDecAfterFullApp (ctx : Context) (xs : Array Arg) (ps : Array Param) (b : FnBody) (bLiveVars : LiveVarSet) : FnBody :=

src/Lean/Compiler/IR/ResetReuse.lean

@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ private def mkFresh : M VarId := do
 
 /--
 Helper function for applying `S`. We only introduce a `reset` if we managed
-to replace a `ctor` withe `reuse` in `b`.
+to replace a `ctor` with `reuse` in `b`.
 -/
 private def tryS (x : VarId) (c : CtorInfo) (b : FnBody) : M FnBody := do
   let w ← mkFresh

src/Lean/Compiler/LCNF/JoinPoints.lean

@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ structure ExtendState where
   /--
   A map from join point `FVarId`s to a respective map from free variables
   to `Param`s. The free variables in this map are the once that the context
-  of said join point will be extended by by passing in the respective parameter.
+  of said join point will be extended by passing in the respective parameter.
   -/
   fvarMap : Std.HashMap FVarId (Std.HashMap FVarId Param) := {}
 

src/Lean/Compiler/Old.lean

@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ def checkIsDefinition (env : Environment) (n : Name) : Except String Unit :=
 match env.find? n with
   | (some (ConstantInfo.defnInfo _))   => Except.ok ()
   | (some (ConstantInfo.opaqueInfo _)) => Except.ok ()
-  | none => Except.error s!"unknow declaration '{n}'"
+  | none => Except.error s!"unknown declaration '{n}'"
   | _    => Except.error s!"declaration is not a definition '{n}'"
 
 /--

src/Lean/Data/HashMap.lean

@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ def insert' (m : HashMap α β) (a : α) (b : β) : HashMap α β × Bool :=
 
 /--
 Similar to `insert`, but returns `some old` if the map already had an entry `α → old`.
-If the result is `some old`, the the resulting map is equal to `m`. -/
+If the result is `some old`, the resulting map is equal to `m`. -/
 def insertIfNew (m : HashMap α β) (a : α) (b : β) : HashMap α β × Option β :=
   match m with
   | ⟨ m, hw ⟩ =>

src/Lean/Data/Json/FromToJson.lean

@@ -28,6 +28,12 @@ instance : ToJson Json := ⟨id⟩
 instance : FromJson JsonNumber := ⟨Json.getNum?⟩
 instance : ToJson JsonNumber := ⟨Json.num⟩
 
+instance : FromJson Empty where
+  fromJson? j := throw (s!"type Empty has no constructor to match JSON value '{j}'. \
+                           This occurs when deserializing a value for type Empty, \
+                           e.g. at type Option Empty with code for the 'some' constructor.")
+
+instance : ToJson Empty := ⟨nofun⟩
 -- looks like id, but there are coercions happening
 instance : FromJson Bool := ⟨Json.getBool?⟩
 instance : ToJson Bool := ⟨fun b => b⟩

src/Lean/Data/JsonRpc.lean

@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ instance [FromJson α] : FromJson (Notification α) where
       let params := params?
       let param : α ← fromJson? (toJson params)
       pure $ ⟨method, param⟩
-    else throw "not a notfication"
+    else throw "not a notification"
 
 end Lean.JsonRpc
 

src/Lean/Data/Lsp/InitShutdown.lean

@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ instance : FromJson Trace := ⟨fun j =>
   | Except.ok "off"      => return Trace.off
   | Except.ok "messages" => return Trace.messages
   | Except.ok "verbose"  => return Trace.verbose
-  | _               => throw "uknown trace"⟩
+  | _               => throw "unknown trace"⟩
 
 instance Trace.hasToJson : ToJson Trace :=
 ⟨fun

src/Lean/Data/PersistentArray.lean

@@ -317,8 +317,8 @@ variable {m : Type → Type w} [Monad m]
   anyMAux p t.root <||> t.tail.anyM p
 
 @[inline] def allM (a : PersistentArray α) (p : α → m Bool) : m Bool := do
-  let b ← anyM a (fun v => do let b ← p v; pure (not b))
-  pure (not b)
+  let b ← anyM a (fun v => do let b ← p v; pure (!b))
+  pure (!b)
 
 end
 

src/Lean/Declaration.lean

@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ structure InductiveVal extends ConstantVal where
   all : List Name
   /-- List of the names of the constructors for this inductive datatype. -/
   ctors : List Name
-  /-- Number of auxillary data types produced from nested occurrences.
+  /-- Number of auxiliary data types produced from nested occurrences.
   An inductive definition `T` is nested when there is a constructor with an argument `x : F T`,
    where `F : Type → Type` is some suitably behaved (ie strictly positive) function (Eg `Array T`, `List T`, `T × T`, ...).  -/
   numNested : Nat

src/Lean/Elab/App.lean

@@ -411,21 +411,23 @@ private def finalize : M Expr := do
   synthesizeAppInstMVars
   return e
 
-/-- Return `true` if there is a named argument that depends on the next argument. -/
-private def anyNamedArgDependsOnCurrent : M Bool := do
+/--
+Returns a named argument that depends on the next argument, otherwise `none`.
+-/
+private def findNamedArgDependsOnCurrent? : M (Option NamedArg) := do
   let s ← get
   if s.namedArgs.isEmpty then
-    return false
+    return none
   else
     forallTelescopeReducing s.fType fun xs _ => do
       let curr := xs[0]!
       for i in [1:xs.size] do
         let xDecl ← xs[i]!.fvarId!.getDecl
-        if s.namedArgs.any fun arg => arg.name == xDecl.userName then
+        if let some arg := s.namedArgs.find? fun arg => arg.name == xDecl.userName then
           /- Remark: a default value at `optParam` does not count as a dependency -/
           if (← exprDependsOn xDecl.type.cleanupAnnotations curr.fvarId!) then
-            return true
-      return false
+            return arg
+      return none
 
 
 /-- Return `true` if there are regular or named arguments to be processed. -/
@@ -433,11 +435,13 @@ private def hasArgsToProcess : M Bool := do
   let s ← get
   return !s.args.isEmpty || !s.namedArgs.isEmpty
 
-/-- Return `true` if the next argument at `args` is of the form `_` -/
-private def isNextArgHole : M Bool := do
+/--
+Returns the argument syntax if the next argument at `args` is of the form `_`.
+-/
+private def nextArgHole? : M (Option Syntax) := do
   match (← get).args with
-  | Arg.stx (Syntax.node _ ``Lean.Parser.Term.hole _) :: _ => pure true
-  | _ => pure false
+  | Arg.stx stx@(Syntax.node _ ``Lean.Parser.Term.hole _) :: _ => pure stx
+  | _ => pure none
 
 /--
   Return `true` if the next argument to be processed is the outparam of a local instance, and it the result type
@@ -512,8 +516,9 @@ where
 
 mutual
   /--
-    Create a fresh local variable with the current binder name and argument type, add it to `etaArgs` and `f`,
-    and then execute the main loop.-/
+  Create a fresh local variable with the current binder name and argument type, add it to `etaArgs` and `f`,
+  and then execute the main loop.
+  -/
   private partial def addEtaArg (argName : Name) : M Expr := do
     let n    ← getBindingName
     let type ← getArgExpectedType
@@ -522,6 +527,9 @@ mutual
       addNewArg argName x
       main
 
+  /--
+  Create a fresh metavariable for the implicit argument, add it to `f`, and thn execute the main loop.
+  -/
   private partial def addImplicitArg (argName : Name) : M Expr := do
     let argType ← getArgExpectedType
     let arg ← if (← isNextOutParamOfLocalInstanceAndResult) then
@@ -539,35 +547,47 @@ mutual
     main
 
   /--
-    Process a `fType` of the form `(x : A) → B x`.
-    This method assume `fType` is a function type -/
+  Process a `fType` of the form `(x : A) → B x`.
+  This method assume `fType` is a function type.
+  -/
   private partial def processExplicitArg (argName : Name) : M Expr := do
     match (← get).args with
     | arg::args =>
-      if (← anyNamedArgDependsOnCurrent) then
+      -- Note: currently the following test never succeeds in explicit mode since `@x.f` notation does not exist.
+      if let some true := NamedArg.suppressDeps <$> (← findNamedArgDependsOnCurrent?) then
         /-
-        We treat the explicit argument `argName` as implicit if we have named arguments that depend on it.
-        The idea is that this explicit argument can be inferred using the type of the named argument one.
-        Note that we also use this approach in the branch where there are no explicit arguments left.
-        This is important to make sure the system behaves in a uniform way.
-        Moreover, users rely on this behavior. For example, consider the example on issue #1851
+        We treat the explicit argument `argName` as implicit
+        if we have a named arguments that depends on it whose `suppressDeps` flag set to `true`.
+        The motivation for this is class projections (issue #1851).
+        In some cases, class projections can have explicit parameters. For example, in
         ```
         class Approx {α : Type} (a : α) (X : Type) : Type where
           val : X
-
-        variable {α β X Y : Type} {f' : α → β} {x' : α} [f : Approx f' (X → Y)] [x : Approx x' X]
-
-        #check f.val
-        #check f.val x.val
         ```
-        The type of `Approx.val` is `{α : Type} → (a : α) → {X : Type} → [self : Approx a X] → X`
-        Note that the argument `a` is explicit since there is no way to infer it from the expected
-        type or the type of other explicit arguments.
-        Recall that `f.val` is sugar for `Approx.val (self := f)`. In both `#check` commands above
-        the user assumed that `a` does not need to be provided since it can be inferred from the type
-        of `self`.
-        We used to that only in the branch where `(← get).args` was empty, but it created an asymmetry
-        because `#check f.val` worked as expected, but one would have to write `#check f.val _ x.val`
+        the type of `Approx.val` is `{α : Type} → (a : α) → {X : Type} → [self : Approx a X] → X`.
+        Note that the parameter `a` is explicit since there is no way to infer it from the expected
+        type or from the types of other explicit parameters.
+        Being a parameter of the class, `a` is determined by the type of `self`.
+
+        Consider
+        ```
+        variable {α β X Y : Type} {f' : α → β} {x' : α} [f : Approx f' (X → Y)]
+        ```
+        Recall that `f.val` is, to first approximation, sugar for `Approx.val (self := f)`.
+        Without further refinement, this would expand to `fun f'' : α → β => Approx.val f'' f`,
+        which is a type error, since `f''` must be defeq to `f'`.
+        Furthermore, with projection notation, users expect all structure parameters
+        to be uniformly implicit; after all, they are determined by `self`.
+        To handle this, the `(self := f)` named argument is annotated with the `suppressDeps` flag.
+        This causes the `a` parameter to become implicit, and `f.val` instead expands to `Approx.val f' f`.
+
+        This feature previously was enabled for *all* explicit arguments, which confused users
+        and was frequently reported as a bug (issue #1867).
+        Now it is only enabled for the `self` argument in structure projections.
+
+        We used to do this only when `(← get).args` was empty,
+        but it created an asymmetry because `f.val` worked as expected,
+        yet one would have to write `f.val _ x` when there are further arguments.
         -/
         return (← addImplicitArg argName)
       propagateExpectedType arg
@@ -584,7 +604,6 @@ mutual
         match evalSyntaxConstant env opts tacticDecl with
         | Except.error err       => throwError err
         | Except.ok tacticSyntax =>
-          -- TODO(Leo): does this work correctly for tactic sequences?
           let tacticBlock ← `(by $(⟨tacticSyntax⟩))
           /-
           We insert position information from the current ref into `stx` everywhere, simulating this being
@@ -596,24 +615,32 @@ mutual
           -/
           let info := (← getRef).getHeadInfo
           let tacticBlock := tacticBlock.raw.rewriteBottomUp (·.setInfo info)
-          let argNew := Arg.stx tacticBlock
+          let mvar ← mkTacticMVar argType.consumeTypeAnnotations tacticBlock (.autoParam argName)
+          -- Note(kmill): We are adding terminfo to simulate a previous implementation that elaborated `tacticBlock`.
+          -- We should look into removing this since terminfo for synthetic syntax is suspect,
+          -- but we noted it was necessary to preserve the behavior of the unused variable linter.
+          addTermInfo' tacticBlock mvar
+          let argNew := Arg.expr mvar
           propagateExpectedType argNew
           elabAndAddNewArg argName argNew
           main
       | false, _, some _ =>
         throwError "invalid autoParam, argument must be a constant"
       | _, _, _ =>
-        if !(← get).namedArgs.isEmpty then
-          if (← anyNamedArgDependsOnCurrent) then
-            addImplicitArg argName
-          else if (← read).ellipsis then
+        if (← read).ellipsis then
+          addImplicitArg argName
+        else if !(← get).namedArgs.isEmpty then
+          if let some _ ← findNamedArgDependsOnCurrent? then
+            /-
+            Dependencies of named arguments cannot be turned into eta arguments
+            since they are determined by the named arguments.
+            Instead we can turn them into implicit arguments.
+            -/
             addImplicitArg argName
           else
             addEtaArg argName
         else if !(← read).explicit then
-          if (← read).ellipsis then
-            addImplicitArg argName
-          else if (← fTypeHasOptAutoParams) then
+          if (← fTypeHasOptAutoParams) then
             addEtaArg argName
           else
             finalize
@@ -641,24 +668,30 @@ mutual
       finalize
 
   /--
-    Process a `fType` of the form `[x : A] → B x`.
-    This method assume `fType` is a function type -/
+  Process a `fType` of the form `[x : A] → B x`.
+  This method assume `fType` is a function type.
+  -/
   private partial def processInstImplicitArg (argName : Name) : M Expr := do
     if (← read).explicit then
-      if (← isNextArgHole) then
-        /- Recall that if '@' has been used, and the argument is '_', then we still use type class resolution -/
-        let arg ← mkFreshExprMVar (← getArgExpectedType) MetavarKind.synthetic
+      if let some stx ← nextArgHole? then
+        -- We still use typeclass resolution for `_` arguments.
+        -- This behavior can be suppressed with `(_)`.
+        let ty ← getArgExpectedType
+        let arg ← mkInstMVar ty
+        addTermInfo' stx arg ty
         modify fun s => { s with args := s.args.tail! }
-        addInstMVar arg.mvarId!
-        addNewArg argName arg
         main
       else
         processExplicitArg argName
     else
-      let arg ← mkFreshExprMVar (← getArgExpectedType) MetavarKind.synthetic
+      discard <| mkInstMVar (← getArgExpectedType)
+      main
+  where
+    mkInstMVar (ty : Expr) : M Expr := do
+      let arg ← mkFreshExprMVar ty MetavarKind.synthetic
       addInstMVar arg.mvarId!
       addNewArg argName arg
-      main
+      return arg
 
   /-- Elaborate function application arguments. -/
   partial def main : M Expr := do
@@ -689,6 +722,104 @@ end
 
 end ElabAppArgs
 
+
+/-! # Eliminator-like function application elaborator -/
+
+/--
+Information about an eliminator used by the elab-as-elim elaborator.
+This is not to be confused with `Lean.Meta.ElimInfo`, which is for `induction` and `cases`.
+The elab-as-elim routine is less restrictive in what counts as an eliminator, and it doesn't need
+to have a strict notion of what is a "target" — all it cares about are
+1. that the return type of a function is of the form `m ...` where `m` is a parameter
+   (unlike `induction` and `cases` eliminators, the arguments to `m`, known as "discriminants",
+   can be any expressions, not just parameters), and
+2. which arguments should be eagerly elaborated, to make discriminants be as elaborated as
+   possible for the expected type generalization procedure,
+   and which should be postponed (since they are the "minor premises").
+
+Note that the routine isn't doing induction/cases *on* particular expressions.
+The purpose of elab-as-elim is to successfully solve the higher-order unification problem
+between the return type of the function and the expected type.
+-/
+structure ElabElimInfo where
+  /-- The eliminator. -/
+  elimExpr   : Expr
+  /-- The type of the eliminator. -/
+  elimType   : Expr
+  /-- The position of the motive parameter. -/
+  motivePos  : Nat
+  /--
+  Positions of "major" parameters (those that should be eagerly elaborated
+  because they can contribute to the motive inference procedure).
+  All parameters that are neither the motive nor a major parameter are "minor" parameters.
+  The major parameters include all of the parameters that transitively appear in the motive's arguments,
+  as well as "first-order" arguments that include such parameters,
+  since they too can help with elaborating discriminants.
+
+  For example, in the following theorem the argument `h : a = b`
+  should be elaborated eagerly because it contains `b`, which occurs in `motive b`.
+  ```
+  theorem Eq.subst' {α} {motive : α → Prop} {a b : α} (h : a = b) : motive a → motive b
+  ```
+  For another example, the term `isEmptyElim (α := α)` is an underapplied eliminator, and it needs
+  argument `α` to be elaborated eagerly to create a type-correct motive.
+  ```
+  def isEmptyElim [IsEmpty α] {p : α → Sort _} (a : α) : p a := ...
+  example {α : Type _} [IsEmpty α] : id (α → False) := isEmptyElim (α := α)
+  ```
+  -/
+  majorsPos : Array Nat := #[]
+  deriving Repr, Inhabited
+
+def getElabElimExprInfo (elimExpr : Expr) : MetaM ElabElimInfo := do
+  let elimType ← inferType elimExpr
+  trace[Elab.app.elab_as_elim] "eliminator {indentExpr elimExpr}\nhas type{indentExpr elimType}"
+  forallTelescopeReducing elimType fun xs type => do
+    let motive  := type.getAppFn
+    let motiveArgs := type.getAppArgs
+    unless motive.isFVar do
+      throwError "unexpected eliminator resulting type{indentExpr type}"
+    let motiveType ← inferType motive
+    forallTelescopeReducing motiveType fun motiveParams motiveResultType => do
+      unless motiveParams.size == motiveArgs.size do
+        throwError "unexpected number of arguments at motive type{indentExpr motiveType}"
+      unless motiveResultType.isSort do
+        throwError "motive result type must be a sort{indentExpr motiveType}"
+    let some motivePos ← pure (xs.indexOf? motive) |
+      throwError "unexpected eliminator type{indentExpr elimType}"
+    /-
+    Compute transitive closure of fvars appearing in arguments to the motive.
+    These are the primary set of major parameters.
+    -/
+    let initMotiveFVars : CollectFVars.State := motiveArgs.foldl (init := {}) collectFVars
+    let motiveFVars ← xs.size.foldRevM (init := initMotiveFVars) fun i s => do
+      let x := xs[i]!
+      if s.fvarSet.contains x.fvarId! then
+        return collectFVars s (← inferType x)
+      else
+        return s
+    /- Collect the major parameter positions -/
+    let mut majorsPos := #[]
+    for i in [:xs.size] do
+      let x := xs[i]!
+      unless motivePos == i do
+        let xType ← x.fvarId!.getType
+        /-
+        We also consider "first-order" types because we can reliably "extract" information from them.
+        We say a term is "first-order" if all applications are of the form `f ...` where `f` is a constant.
+        -/
+        let isFirstOrder (e : Expr) : Bool := Option.isNone <| e.find? fun e => e.isApp && !e.getAppFn.isConst
+        if motiveFVars.fvarSet.contains x.fvarId!
+            || (isFirstOrder xType
+                && Option.isSome (xType.find? fun e => e.isFVar && motiveFVars.fvarSet.contains e.fvarId!)) then
+          majorsPos := majorsPos.push i
+    trace[Elab.app.elab_as_elim] "motivePos: {motivePos}"
+    trace[Elab.app.elab_as_elim] "majorsPos: {majorsPos}"
+    return { elimExpr, elimType,  motivePos, majorsPos }
+
+def getElabElimInfo (elimName : Name) : MetaM ElabElimInfo := do
+  getElabElimExprInfo (← mkConstWithFreshMVarLevels elimName)
+
 builtin_initialize elabAsElim : TagAttribute ←
   registerTagAttribute `elab_as_elim
     "instructs elaborator that the arguments of the function application should be elaborated as were an eliminator"
@@ -703,33 +834,15 @@ builtin_initialize elabAsElim : TagAttribute ←
         let info ← getConstInfo declName
         if (← hasOptAutoParams info.type) then
           throwError "[elab_as_elim] attribute cannot be used in declarations containing optional and auto parameters"
-        discard <| getElimInfo declName
+        discard <| getElabElimInfo declName
       go.run' {} {}
 
-/-! # Eliminator-like function application elaborator -/
 namespace ElabElim
 
 /-- Context of the `elab_as_elim` elaboration procedure. -/
 structure Context where
-  elimInfo : ElimInfo
+  elimInfo : ElabElimInfo
   expectedType : Expr
-  /--
-  Position of additional arguments that should be elaborated eagerly
-  because they can contribute to the motive inference procedure.
-  For example, in the following theorem the argument `h : a = b`
-  should be elaborated eagerly because it contains `b` which occurs
-  in `motive b`.
-  ```
-  theorem Eq.subst' {α} {motive : α → Prop} {a b : α} (h : a = b) : motive a → motive b
-  ```
-  For another example, the term `isEmptyElim (α := α)` is an underapplied eliminator, and it needs
-  argument `α` to be elaborated eagerly to create a type-correct motive.
-  ```
-  def isEmptyElim [IsEmpty α] {p : α → Sort _} (a : α) : p a := ...
-  example {α : Type _} [IsEmpty α] : id (α → False) := isEmptyElim (α := α)
-  ```
-  -/
-  extraArgsPos : Array Nat
 
 /-- State of the `elab_as_elim` elaboration procedure. -/
 structure State where
@@ -741,8 +854,6 @@ structure State where
   namedArgs    : List NamedArg
   /-- User-provided arguments that still have to be processed. -/
   args         : List Arg
-  /-- Discriminants (targets) processed so far. -/
-  discrs       : Array (Option Expr)
   /-- Instance implicit arguments collected so far. -/
   instMVars    : Array MVarId := #[]
   /-- Position of the next argument to be processed. We use it to decide whether the argument is the motive or a discriminant. -/
@@ -788,7 +899,7 @@ def finalize : M Expr := do
   let some motive := (← get).motive?
     | throwError "failed to elaborate eliminator, insufficient number of arguments"
   trace[Elab.app.elab_as_elim] "motive: {motive}"
-  forallTelescope (← get).fType fun xs _ => do
+  forallTelescope (← get).fType fun xs fType => do
     trace[Elab.app.elab_as_elim] "xs: {xs}"
     let mut expectedType := (← read).expectedType
     trace[Elab.app.elab_as_elim] "expectedType:{indentD expectedType}"
@@ -797,6 +908,7 @@ def finalize : M Expr := do
     let mut f := (← get).f
     if xs.size > 0 then
       -- under-application, specialize the expected type using `xs`
+      -- Note: if we ever wanted to support optParams and autoParams, this is where it could be.
       assert! (← get).args.isEmpty
       for x in xs do
         let .forallE _ t b _ ← whnf expectedType | throwInsufficient
@@ -813,18 +925,11 @@ def finalize : M Expr := do
     trace[Elab.app.elab_as_elim] "expectedType after processing:{indentD expectedType}"
     let result := mkAppN f xs
     trace[Elab.app.elab_as_elim] "result:{indentD result}"
-    let mut discrs := (← get).discrs
-    let idx := (← get).idx
-    if discrs.any Option.isNone then
-      for i in [idx:idx + xs.size], x in xs do
-        if let some tidx := (← read).elimInfo.targetsPos.indexOf? i then
-          discrs := discrs.set! tidx x
-    if let some idx := discrs.findIdx? Option.isNone then
-      -- This should not happen.
-      trace[Elab.app.elab_as_elim] "Internal error, missing target with index {idx}"
-      throwError "failed to elaborate eliminator, insufficient number of arguments"
-    trace[Elab.app.elab_as_elim] "discrs: {discrs.map Option.get!}"
-    let motiveVal ← mkMotive (discrs.map Option.get!) expectedType
+    unless fType.getAppFn == (← get).motive? do
+      throwError "Internal error, eliminator target type isn't an application of the motive"
+    let discrs := fType.getAppArgs
+    trace[Elab.app.elab_as_elim] "discrs: {discrs}"
+    let motiveVal ← mkMotive discrs expectedType
     unless (← isTypeCorrect motiveVal) do
       throwError "failed to elaborate eliminator, motive is not type correct:{indentD motiveVal}"
     unless (← isDefEq motive motiveVal) do
@@ -858,10 +963,6 @@ def getNextArg? (binderName : Name) (binderInfo : BinderInfo) : M (LOption Arg)
 def setMotive (motive : Expr) : M Unit :=
   modify fun s => { s with motive? := motive }
 
-/-- Push the given expression into the `discrs` field in the state, where `i` is which target it is for. -/
-def addDiscr (i : Nat) (discr : Expr) : M Unit :=
-  modify fun s => { s with discrs := s.discrs.set! i discr }
-
 /-- Elaborate the given argument with the given expected type. -/
 private def elabArg (arg : Arg) (argExpectedType : Expr) : M Expr := do
   match arg with
@@ -904,18 +1005,13 @@ partial def main : M Expr := do
         mkImplicitArg binderType binderInfo
     setMotive motive
     addArgAndContinue motive
-  else if let some tidx := (← read).elimInfo.targetsPos.indexOf? idx then
+  else if (← read).elimInfo.majorsPos.contains idx then
     match (← getNextArg? binderName binderInfo) with
-    | .some arg => let discr ← elabArg arg binderType; addDiscr tidx discr; addArgAndContinue discr
+    | .some arg => let discr ← elabArg arg binderType; addArgAndContinue discr
     | .undef => finalize
-    | .none => let discr ← mkImplicitArg binderType binderInfo; addDiscr tidx discr; addArgAndContinue discr
+    | .none => let discr ← mkImplicitArg binderType binderInfo; addArgAndContinue discr
   else match (← getNextArg? binderName binderInfo) with
-    | .some (.stx stx) =>
-      if (← read).extraArgsPos.contains idx then
-        let arg ← elabArg (.stx stx) binderType
-        addArgAndContinue arg
-      else
-        addArgAndContinue (← postponeElabTerm stx binderType)
+    | .some (.stx stx) => addArgAndContinue (← postponeElabTerm stx binderType)
     | .some (.expr val) => addArgAndContinue (← ensureArgType (← get).f val binderType)
     | .undef => finalize
     | .none => addArgAndContinue (← mkImplicitArg binderType binderInfo)
@@ -969,13 +1065,10 @@ def elabAppArgs (f : Expr) (namedArgs : Array NamedArg) (args : Array Arg)
     let some expectedType := expectedType? | throwError "failed to elaborate eliminator, expected type is not available"
     let expectedType ← instantiateMVars expectedType
     if expectedType.getAppFn.isMVar then throwError "failed to elaborate eliminator, expected type is not available"
-    let extraArgsPos ← getElabAsElimExtraArgsPos elimInfo
-    trace[Elab.app.elab_as_elim] "extraArgsPos: {extraArgsPos}"
-    ElabElim.main.run { elimInfo, expectedType, extraArgsPos } |>.run' {
+    ElabElim.main.run { elimInfo, expectedType } |>.run' {
       f, fType
       args := args.toList
       namedArgs := namedArgs.toList
-      discrs := mkArray elimInfo.targetsPos.size none
     }
   else
     ElabAppArgs.main.run { explicit, ellipsis, resultIsOutParamSupport } |>.run' {
@@ -986,12 +1079,12 @@ def elabAppArgs (f : Expr) (namedArgs : Array NamedArg) (args : Array Arg)
     }
 where
   /-- Return `some info` if we should elaborate as an eliminator. -/
-  elabAsElim? : TermElabM (Option ElimInfo) := do
+  elabAsElim? : TermElabM (Option ElabElimInfo) := do
     unless (← read).heedElabAsElim do return none
     if explicit || ellipsis then return none
     let .const declName _ := f | return none
     unless (← shouldElabAsElim declName) do return none
-    let elimInfo ← getElimInfo declName
+    let elimInfo ← getElabElimInfo declName
     forallTelescopeReducing (← inferType f) fun xs _ => do
       /- Process arguments similar to `Lean.Elab.Term.ElabElim.main` to see if the motive has been
          provided, in which case we use the standard app elaborator.
@@ -1022,41 +1115,6 @@ where
             return none
         | _, _ => return some elimInfo
 
-  /--
-  Collect extra argument positions that must be elaborated eagerly when using `elab_as_elim`.
-  The idea is that they contribute to motive inference. See comment at `ElamElim.Context.extraArgsPos`.
-  -/
-  getElabAsElimExtraArgsPos (elimInfo : ElimInfo) : MetaM (Array Nat) := do
-    forallTelescope elimInfo.elimType fun xs type => do
-      let targets := type.getAppArgs
-      /- Compute transitive closure of fvars appearing in the motive and the targets. -/
-      let initMotiveFVars : CollectFVars.State := targets.foldl (init := {}) collectFVars
-      let motiveFVars ← xs.size.foldRevM (init := initMotiveFVars) fun i s => do
-        let x := xs[i]!
-        if elimInfo.motivePos == i || elimInfo.targetsPos.contains i || s.fvarSet.contains x.fvarId! then
-          return collectFVars s (← inferType x)
-        else
-          return s
-      /- Collect the extra argument positions -/
-      let mut extraArgsPos := #[]
-      for i in [:xs.size] do
-        let x := xs[i]!
-        unless elimInfo.motivePos == i || elimInfo.targetsPos.contains i do
-          let xType ← x.fvarId!.getType
-          /- We only consider "first-order" types because we can reliably "extract" information from them. -/
-          if motiveFVars.fvarSet.contains x.fvarId!
-             || (isFirstOrder xType
-                 && Option.isSome (xType.find? fun e => e.isFVar && motiveFVars.fvarSet.contains e.fvarId!)) then
-            extraArgsPos := extraArgsPos.push i
-      return extraArgsPos
-
-  /-
-  Helper function for implementing `elab_as_elim`.
-  We say a term is "first-order" if all applications are of the form `f ...` where `f` is a constant.
-  -/
-  isFirstOrder (e : Expr) : Bool :=
-    Option.isNone <| e.find? fun e =>
-      e.isApp && !e.getAppFn.isConst
 
 /-- Auxiliary inductive datatype that represents the resolution of an `LVal`. -/
 inductive LValResolution where
@@ -1221,7 +1279,7 @@ private partial def mkBaseProjections (baseStructName : Name) (structName : Name
     let mut e := e
     for projFunName in path do
       let projFn ← mkConst projFunName
-      e ← elabAppArgs projFn #[{ name := `self, val := Arg.expr e }] (args := #[]) (expectedType? := none) (explicit := false) (ellipsis := false)
+      e ← elabAppArgs projFn #[{ name := `self, val := Arg.expr e, suppressDeps := true }] (args := #[]) (expectedType? := none) (explicit := false) (ellipsis := false)
     return e
 
 private def typeMatchesBaseName (type : Expr) (baseName : Name) : MetaM Bool := do
@@ -1305,10 +1363,10 @@ private def elabAppLValsAux (namedArgs : Array NamedArg) (args : Array Arg) (exp
         let projFn ← mkConst info.projFn
         let projFn ← addProjTermInfo lval.getRef projFn
         if lvals.isEmpty then
-          let namedArgs ← addNamedArg namedArgs { name := `self, val := Arg.expr f }
+          let namedArgs ← addNamedArg namedArgs { name := `self, val := Arg.expr f, suppressDeps := true }
           elabAppArgs projFn namedArgs args expectedType? explicit ellipsis
         else
-          let f ← elabAppArgs projFn #[{ name := `self, val := Arg.expr f }] #[] (expectedType? := none) (explicit := false) (ellipsis := false)
+          let f ← elabAppArgs projFn #[{ name := `self, val := Arg.expr f, suppressDeps := true }] #[] (expectedType? := none) (explicit := false) (ellipsis := false)
           loop f lvals
       else
         unreachable!

src/Lean/Elab/Arg.lean

@@ -9,18 +9,22 @@ import Lean.Elab.Term
 namespace Lean.Elab.Term
 
 /--
-  Auxiliary inductive datatype for combining unelaborated syntax
-  and already elaborated expressions. It is used to elaborate applications. -/
+Auxiliary inductive datatype for combining unelaborated syntax
+and already elaborated expressions. It is used to elaborate applications.
+-/
 inductive Arg where
   | stx  (val : Syntax)
   | expr (val : Expr)
   deriving Inhabited
 
-/-- Named arguments created using the notation `(x := val)` -/
+/-- Named arguments created using the notation `(x := val)`. -/
 structure NamedArg where
   ref  : Syntax := Syntax.missing
   name : Name
   val  : Arg
+  /-- If `true`, then make all parameters that depend on this one become implicit.
+  This is used for projection notation, since structure parameters might be explicit for classes. -/
+  suppressDeps : Bool := false
   deriving Inhabited
 
 /--

src/Lean/Elab/AuxDef.lean

@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ def elabAuxDef : CommandElab
     let id := `_aux ++ (← getMainModule) ++ `_ ++ id
     let id := String.intercalate "_" <| id.components.map (·.toString (escape := false))
     let ns ← getCurrNamespace
-    -- make sure we only add a single component so that scoped workes
+    -- make sure we only add a single component so that scoped works
     let id ← mkAuxName (ns.mkStr id) 1
     let id := id.replacePrefix ns Name.anonymous -- TODO: replace with def _root_.id
     elabCommand <|

src/Lean/Elab/Binders.lean

@@ -170,8 +170,9 @@ private def toBinderViews (stx : Syntax) : TermElabM (Array BinderView) := do
   else
     throwUnsupportedSyntax
 
-private def registerFailedToInferBinderTypeInfo (type : Expr) (ref : Syntax) : TermElabM Unit :=
+private def registerFailedToInferBinderTypeInfo (type : Expr) (ref : Syntax) : TermElabM Unit := do
   registerCustomErrorIfMVar type ref "failed to infer binder type"
+  registerLevelMVarErrorExprInfo type ref m!"failed to infer universe levels in binder type"
 
 def addLocalVarInfo (stx : Syntax) (fvar : Expr) : TermElabM Unit :=
   addTermInfo' (isBinder := true) stx fvar
@@ -639,7 +640,7 @@ open Lean.Elab.Term.Quotation in
   | _ => throwUnsupportedSyntax
 
 /-- If `useLetExpr` is true, then a kernel let-expression `let x : type := val; body` is created.
-   Otherwise, we create a term of the form `(fun (x : type) => body) val`
+   Otherwise, we create a term of the form `letFun val (fun (x : type) => body)`
 
    The default elaboration order is `binders`, `typeStx`, `valStx`, and `body`.
    If `elabBodyFirst == true`, then we use the order `binders`, `typeStx`, `body`, and `valStx`. -/
@@ -650,7 +651,7 @@ def elabLetDeclAux (id : Syntax) (binders : Array Syntax) (typeStx : Syntax) (va
     /-
     We use `withSynthesize` to ensure that any postponed elaboration problem
     and nested tactics in `type` are resolved before elaborating `val`.
-    Resolved: we want to avoid synthethic opaque metavariables in `type`.
+    Resolved: we want to avoid synthetic opaque metavariables in `type`.
     Recall that this kind of metavariable is non-assignable, and `isDefEq`
     may waste a lot of time unfolding declarations before failing.
     See issue #4051 for an example.
@@ -670,7 +671,9 @@ def elabLetDeclAux (id : Syntax) (binders : Array Syntax) (typeStx : Syntax) (va
     Recall that TC resolution does **not** produce synthetic opaque metavariables.
     -/
     let type ← withSynthesize (postpone := .partial) <| elabType typeStx
-    registerCustomErrorIfMVar type typeStx "failed to infer 'let' declaration type"
+    let letMsg := if useLetExpr then "let" else "have"
+    registerCustomErrorIfMVar type typeStx m!"failed to infer '{letMsg}' declaration type"
+    registerLevelMVarErrorExprInfo type typeStx m!"failed to infer universe levels in '{letMsg}' declaration type"
     if elabBodyFirst then
       let type ← mkForallFVars fvars type
       let val  ← mkFreshExprMVar type

src/Lean/Elab/BuiltinCommand.lean

@@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ unsafe def elabEvalCoreUnsafe (bang : Bool) (tk term : Syntax): CommandElabM Uni
     -- Evaluate using term using `MetaEval` class.
     let elabMetaEval : CommandElabM Unit := do
       -- Generate an action without executing it. We use `withoutModifyingEnv` to ensure
-      -- we don't polute the environment with auxliary declarations.
+      -- we don't pollute the environment with auxliary declarations.
       -- We have special support for `CommandElabM` to ensure `#eval` can be used to execute commands
       -- that modify `CommandElabM` state not just the `Environment`.
       let act : Sum (CommandElabM Unit) (Environment → Options → IO (String × Except IO.Error Environment)) ←

src/Lean/Elab/BuiltinTerm.lean

@@ -150,26 +150,10 @@ private def getMVarFromUserName (ident : Syntax) : MetaM Expr := do
     elabTerm b expectedType?
   | _ => throwUnsupportedSyntax
 
-private def mkTacticMVar (type : Expr) (tacticCode : Syntax) : TermElabM Expr := do
-  let mvar ← mkFreshExprMVar type MetavarKind.syntheticOpaque
-  let mvarId := mvar.mvarId!
-  let ref ← getRef
-  registerSyntheticMVar ref mvarId <| SyntheticMVarKind.tactic tacticCode (← saveContext)
-  return mvar
-
-register_builtin_option debug.byAsSorry : Bool := {
-  defValue := false
-  group    := "debug"
-  descr    := "replace `by ..` blocks with `sorry` IF the expected type is a proposition"
-}
-
 @[builtin_term_elab byTactic] def elabByTactic : TermElab := fun stx expectedType? => do
   match expectedType? with
   | some expectedType =>
-    if ← pure (debug.byAsSorry.get (← getOptions)) <&&> isProp expectedType then
-      mkSorry expectedType false
-    else
-      mkTacticMVar expectedType stx
+    mkTacticMVar expectedType stx .term
   | none =>
     tryPostpone
     throwError ("invalid 'by' tactic, expected type has not been provided")

src/Lean/Elab/Command.lean

@@ -532,8 +532,7 @@ def elabCommandTopLevel (stx : Syntax) : CommandElabM Unit := withRef stx do pro
       -- We can assume that the root command snapshot is not involved in parallelism yet, so this
       -- should be true iff the command supports incrementality
       if (← IO.hasFinished snap.new.result) then
-        trace[Elab.snapshotTree]
-          (←Language.ToSnapshotTree.toSnapshotTree snap.new.result.get |>.format)
+        liftCoreM <| Language.ToSnapshotTree.toSnapshotTree snap.new.result.get |>.trace
     modify fun st => { st with
       messages := initMsgs ++ msgs
       infoState := { st.infoState with trees := initInfoTrees ++ st.infoState.trees }