cleanup test

Co-authored-by: Joachim Breitner <mail@joachim-breitner.de>

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md

@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ Please put an X between the brackets as you perform the following steps:
 
 ### Context
 
-[Broader context that the issue occured in. If there was any prior discussion on [the Lean Zulip](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com), link it here as well.]
+[Broader context that the issue occurred in. If there was any prior discussion on [the Lean Zulip](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com), link it here as well.]
 
 ### Steps to Reproduce
 

.github/workflows/ci.yml

@@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ jobs:
           git fetch --depth=1 origin ${{ github.sha }}
           git checkout FETCH_HEAD flake.nix flake.lock
         if: github.event_name == 'pull_request'
-      # (needs to be after "Checkout" so files don't get overriden)
+      # (needs to be after "Checkout" so files don't get overridden)
       - name: Setup emsdk
         uses: mymindstorm/setup-emsdk@v12
         with:

.github/workflows/pr-release.yml

@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ jobs:
               MESSAGE=""
 
               if [[ -n "$MATHLIB_REMOTE_TAGS" ]]; then
-                echo "... and Mathlib has a 'nightly-testing-$MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY' tag."    
+                echo "... and Mathlib has a 'nightly-testing-$MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY' tag."
               else
                 echo "... but Mathlib does not yet have a 'nightly-testing-$MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY' tag."
                 MESSAGE="- ❗ Mathlib CI can not be attempted yet, as the \`nightly-testing-$MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY\` tag does not exist there yet. We will retry when you push more commits. If you rebase your branch onto \`nightly-with-mathlib\`, Mathlib CI should run now."
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ jobs:
             echo "but 'git merge-base origin/master HEAD' reported: $MERGE_BASE_SHA"
             git -C lean4.git log -10 origin/master
 
-            git -C lean4.git fetch origin nightly-with-mathlib 
+            git -C lean4.git fetch origin nightly-with-mathlib
             NIGHTLY_WITH_MATHLIB_SHA="$(git -C lean4.git rev-parse "origin/nightly-with-mathlib")"
             MESSAGE="- ❗ Batteries/Mathlib CI will not be attempted unless your PR branches off the \`nightly-with-mathlib\` branch. Try \`git rebase $MERGE_BASE_SHA --onto $NIGHTLY_WITH_MATHLIB_SHA\`."
           fi
@@ -164,10 +164,10 @@ jobs:
 
             # Use GitHub API to check if a comment already exists
             existing_comment="$(curl --retry 3 --location --silent \
-                                    -H "Authorization: token ${{ secrets.MATHLIB4_BOT }}" \
+                                    -H "Authorization: token ${{ secrets.MATHLIB4_COMMENT_BOT }}" \
                                     -H "Accept: application/vnd.github.v3+json" \
                                     "https://api.github.com/repos/leanprover/lean4/issues/${{ steps.workflow-info.outputs.pullRequestNumber }}/comments" \
-                                    | jq 'first(.[] | select(.body | test("^- . Mathlib") or startswith("Mathlib CI status")) | select(.user.login == "leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot"))')"
+                                    | jq 'first(.[] | select(.body | test("^- . Mathlib") or startswith("Mathlib CI status")) | select(.user.login == "leanprover-community-bot"))')"
             existing_comment_id="$(echo "$existing_comment" | jq -r .id)"
             existing_comment_body="$(echo "$existing_comment" | jq -r .body)"
 
@@ -177,14 +177,14 @@ jobs:
               echo "Posting message to the comments: $MESSAGE"
 
               # Append new result to the existing comment or post a new comment
-              # It's essential we use the MATHLIB4_BOT token here, so that Mathlib CI can subsequently edit the comment.
+              # It's essential we use the MATHLIB4_COMMENT_BOT token here, so that Mathlib CI can subsequently edit the comment.
               if [ -z "$existing_comment_id" ]; then
                 INTRO="Mathlib CI status ([docs](https://leanprover-community.github.io/contribute/tags_and_branches.html)):"
                 # Post new comment with a bullet point
                 echo "Posting as new comment at leanprover/lean4/issues/${{ steps.workflow-info.outputs.pullRequestNumber }}/comments"
                 curl -L -s \
                   -X POST \
-                  -H "Authorization: token ${{ secrets.MATHLIB4_BOT }}" \
+                  -H "Authorization: token ${{ secrets.MATHLIB4_COMMENT_BOT }}" \
                   -H "Accept: application/vnd.github.v3+json" \
                   -d "$(jq --null-input --arg intro "$INTRO" --arg val "$MESSAGE" '{"body":($intro + "\n" + $val)}')" \
                   "https://api.github.com/repos/leanprover/lean4/issues/${{ steps.workflow-info.outputs.pullRequestNumber }}/comments"
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ jobs:
                 echo "Appending to existing comment at leanprover/lean4/issues/${{ steps.workflow-info.outputs.pullRequestNumber }}/comments"
                 curl -L -s \
                   -X PATCH \
-                  -H "Authorization: token ${{ secrets.MATHLIB4_BOT }}" \
+                  -H "Authorization: token ${{ secrets.MATHLIB4_COMMENT_BOT }}" \
                   -H "Accept: application/vnd.github.v3+json" \
                   -d "$(jq --null-input --arg existing "$existing_comment_body" --arg message "$MESSAGE" '{"body":($existing + "\n" + $message)}')" \
                   "https://api.github.com/repos/leanprover/lean4/issues/comments/$existing_comment_id"
@@ -329,16 +329,18 @@ jobs:
             git switch -c lean-pr-testing-${{ steps.workflow-info.outputs.pullRequestNumber }} "$BASE"
             echo "leanprover/lean4-pr-releases:pr-release-${{ steps.workflow-info.outputs.pullRequestNumber }}" > lean-toolchain
             git add lean-toolchain
-            sed -i 's,require "leanprover-community" / "batteries" @ git ".\+",require "leanprover-community" / "batteries" @ git "nightly-testing-'"${MOST_RECENT_NIGHTLY}"'",' lakefile.lean
+            sed -i 's,require "leanprover-community" / "batteries" @ git ".\+",require "leanprover-community" / "batteries" @ git "lean-pr-testing-${{ steps.workflow-info.outputs.pullRequestNumber }}",' lakefile.lean
             lake update batteries
             git add lakefile.lean lake-manifest.json
             git commit -m "Update lean-toolchain for testing https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/${{ steps.workflow-info.outputs.pullRequestNumber }}"
           else
-            echo "Branch already exists, pushing an empty commit."
+            echo "Branch already exists, merging $BASE and bumping Batteries."
             git switch lean-pr-testing-${{ steps.workflow-info.outputs.pullRequestNumber }}
             # The Mathlib `nightly-testing` branch or `nightly-testing-YYYY-MM-DD` tag may have moved since this branch was created, so merge their changes.
             # (This should no longer be possible once `nightly-testing-YYYY-MM-DD` is a tag, but it is still safe to merge.)
             git merge "$BASE" --strategy-option ours --no-commit --allow-unrelated-histories
+            lake update batteries
+            get add lake-manifest.json
             git commit --allow-empty -m "Trigger CI for https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/${{ steps.workflow-info.outputs.pullRequestNumber }}"
           fi
 

RELEASES.md

@@ -10,7 +10,317 @@ of each version.
 
 v4.12.0
 ----------
-Development in progress.
+
+### Language features, tactics, and metaprograms
+
+* `bv_decide` tactic. This release introduces a new tactic for proving goals involving `BitVec` and `Bool`. It reduces the goal to a SAT instance that is refuted by an external solver, and the resulting LRAT proof is checked in Lean. This is used to synthesize a proof of the goal by reflection. As this process uses verified algorithms, proofs generated by this tactic use `Lean.ofReduceBool`, so this tactic includes the Lean compiler as part of the trusted code base. The external solver CaDiCaL is included with Lean and does not need to be installed separately to make use of `bv_decide`.
+
+  For example, we can use `bv_decide` to verify that a bit twiddling formula leaves at most one bit set:
+  ```lean
+  def popcount (x : BitVec 64) : BitVec 64 :=
+    let rec go (x pop : BitVec 64) : Nat → BitVec 64
+      | 0 => pop
+      | n + 1 => go (x >>> 2) (pop + (x &&& 1)) n
+    go x 0 64
+
+  example (x : BitVec 64) : popcount ((x &&& (x - 1)) ^^^ x) ≤ 1 := by
+    simp only [popcount, popcount.go]
+    bv_decide
+  ```
+  When the external solver fails to refute the SAT instance generated by `bv_decide`, it can report a counterexample:
+  ```lean
+  /--
+  error: The prover found a counterexample, consider the following assignment:
+  x = 0xffffffffffffffff#64
+  -/
+  #guard_msgs in
+  example (x : BitVec 64) : x < x + 1 := by
+    bv_decide
+  ```
+
+  See `Lean.Elab.Tactic.BVDecide` for a more detailed overview, and look in `tests/lean/run/bv_*` for examples.
+
+  [#5013](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5013), [#5074](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5074), [#5100](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5100), [#5113](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5113), [#5137](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5137), [#5203](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5203), [#5212](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5212), [#5220](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5220).
+
+* `simp` tactic
+  * [#4988](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4988) fixes a panic in the `reducePow` simproc.
+  * [#5071](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5071) exposes the `index` option to the `dsimp` tactic, introduced to `simp` in [#4202](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4202).
+  * [#5159](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5159) fixes a panic at `Fin.isValue` simproc.
+  * [#5167](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5167) and [#5175](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5175) rename the `simpCtorEq` simproc to `reduceCtorEq` and makes it optional. (See breaking changes.)
+  * [#5187](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5187) ensures `reduceCtorEq` is enabled in the `norm_cast` tactic.
+  * [#5073](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5073) modifies the simp debug trace messages to tag with "dpre" and "dpost" instead of "pre" and "post" when in definitional rewrite mode. [#5054](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5054) explains the `reduce` steps for `trace.Debug.Meta.Tactic.simp` trace messages.
+* `ext` tactic
+  * [#4996](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4996) reduces default maximum iteration depth from 1000000 to 100.
+* `induction` tactic
+  * [#5117](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5117) fixes a bug where `let` bindings in minor premises wouldn't be counted correctly.
+
+* `omega` tactic
+  * [#5157](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5157) fixes a panic.
+
+* `conv` tactic
+  * [#5149](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5149) improves `arg n` to handle subsingleton instance arguments.
+
+* [#5044](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5044) upstreams the `#time` command.
+* [#5079](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5079) makes `#check` and `#reduce` typecheck the elaborated terms.
+
+* **Incrementality**
+  * [#4974](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4974) fixes regression where we would not interrupt elaboration of previous document versions.
+  * [#5004](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5004) fixes a performance regression.
+  * [#5001](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5001) disables incremental body elaboration in presence of `where` clauses in declarations.
+  * [#5018](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5018) enables infotrees on the command line for ilean generation.
+  * [#5040](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5040) and [#5056](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5056) improve performance of info trees.
+  * [#5090](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5090) disables incrementality in the `case .. | ..` tactic.
+  * [#5312](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5312) fixes a bug where changing whitespace after the module header could break subsequent commands.
+
+* **Definitions**
+  * [#5016](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5016) and [#5066](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5066) add `clean_wf` tactic to clean up tactic state in `decreasing_by`. This can be disabled with `set_option debug.rawDecreasingByGoal false`.
+  * [#5055](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5055) unifies equational theorems between structural and well-founded recursion.
+  * [#5041](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5041) allows mutually recursive functions to use different parameter names among the “fixed parameter prefix”
+  * [#4154](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4154) and [#5109](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5109) add fine-grained equational lemmas for non-recursive functions. See breaking changes.
+  * [#5129](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5129) unifies equation lemmas for recursive and non-recursive definitions. The `backward.eqns.deepRecursiveSplit` option can be set to `false` to get the old behavior. See breaking changes.
+  * [#5141](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5141) adds `f.eq_unfold` lemmas. Now Lean produces the following zoo of rewrite rules:
+    ```
+    Option.map.eq_1      : Option.map f none = none
+    Option.map.eq_2      : Option.map f (some x) = some (f x)
+    Option.map.eq_def    : Option.map f p = match o with | none => none | (some x) => some (f x)
+    Option.map.eq_unfold : Option.map = fun f p => match o with | none => none | (some x) => some (f x)
+    ```
+    The `f.eq_unfold` variant is especially useful to rewrite with `rw` under binders.
+  * [#5136](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5136) fixes bugs in recursion over predicates.
+
+* **Variable inclusion**
+  * [#5206](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5206) documents that `include` currently only applies to theorems.
+
+* **Elaboration**
+  * [#4926](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4926) fixes a bug where autoparam errors were associated to an incorrect source position.
+  * [#4833](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4833) fixes an issue where cdot anonymous functions (e.g. `(· + ·)`) would not handle ambiguous notation correctly. Numbers the parameters, making this example expand as `fun x1 x2 => x1 + x2` rather than `fun x x_1 => x + x_1`.
+  * [#5037](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5037) improves strength of the tactic that proves array indexing is in bounds.
+  * [#5119](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5119) fixes a bug in the tactic that proves indexing is in bounds where it could loop in the presence of mvars.
+  * [#5072](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5072) makes the structure type clickable in "not a field of structure" errors for structure instance notation.
+  * [#4717](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4717) fixes a bug where mutual `inductive` commands could create terms that the kernel rejects.
+  * [#5142](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5142) fixes a bug where `variable` could fail when mixing binder updates and declarations.
+
+* **Other fixes or improvements**
+  * [#5118](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5118) changes the definition of the `syntheticHole` parser so that hovering over `_` in `?_` gives the docstring for synthetic holes.
+  * [#5173](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5173) uses the emoji variant selector for ✅️,❌️,💥️ in messages, improving fonts selection.
+  * [#5183](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5183) fixes a bug in `rename_i` where implementation detail hypotheses could be renamed.
+
+### Language server, widgets, and IDE extensions
+
+* [#4821](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4821) resolves two language server bugs that especially affect Windows users. (1) Editing the header could result in the watchdog not correctly restarting the file worker, which would lead to the file seemingly being processed forever. (2) On an especially slow Windows machine, we found that starting the language server would sometimes not succeed at all. This PR also resolves an issue where we would not correctly emit messages that we received while the file worker is being restarted to the corresponding file worker after the restart.
+* [#5006](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5006) updates the user widget manual.
+* [#5193](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5193) updates the quickstart guide with the new display name for the Lean 4 extension ("Lean 4").
+* [#5185](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5185) fixes a bug where over time "import out of date" messages would accumulate.
+* [#4900](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4900) improves ilean loading performance by about a factor of two. Optimizes the JSON parser and the conversion from JSON to Lean data structures; see PR description for details.
+* **Other fixes or improvements**
+  * [#5031](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5031) localizes an instance in `Lsp.Diagnostics`.
+
+### Pretty printing
+
+* [#4976](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4976) introduces `@[app_delab]`, a macro for creating delaborators for particular constants. The `@[app_delab ident]` syntax resolves `ident` to its constant name `name` and then expands to `@[delab app.name]`.
+* [#4982](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4982) fixes a bug where the pretty printer assumed structure projections were type correct (such terms can appear in type mismatch errors). Improves hoverability of `#print` output for structures.
+* [#5218](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5218) and [#5239](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5239) add `pp.exprSizes` debugging option. When true, each pretty printed expression is prefixed with `[size a/b/c]`, where `a` is the size without sharing, `b` is the actual size, and `c` is the size with the maximum possible sharing.
+
+### Library
+
+* [#5020](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5020) swaps the parameters to `Membership.mem`. A purpose of this change is to make set-like `CoeSort` coercions to refer to the eta-expanded function `fun x => Membership.mem s x`, which can reduce in many computations. Another is that having the `s` argument first leads to better discrimination tree keys. (See breaking changes.)
+* `Array`
+  * [#4970](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4970) adds `@[ext]` attribute to `Array.ext`.
+  * [#4957](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4957) deprecates `Array.get_modify`.
+* `List`
+  * [#4995](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4995) upstreams `List.findIdx` lemmas.
+  * [#5029](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5029), [#5048](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5048) and [#5132](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5132) add `List.Sublist` lemmas, some upstreamed. [#5077](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5077) fixes implicitness in refl/rfl lemma binders.  add `List.Sublist` theorems.
+  * [#5047](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5047) upstreams `List.Pairwise` lemmas.
+  * [#5053](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5053), [#5124](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5124), and [#5161](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5161) add `List.find?/findSome?/findIdx?` theorems.
+  * [#5039](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5039) adds `List.foldlRecOn` and `List.foldrRecOn` recursion principles to prove things about `List.foldl` and `List.foldr`.
+  * [#5069](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5069) upstreams `List.Perm`.
+  * [#5092](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5092) and [#5107](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5107) add `List.mergeSort` and a fast `@[csimp]` implementation.
+  * [#5103](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5103) makes the simp lemmas for `List.subset` more aggressive.
+  * [#5106](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5106) changes the statement of `List.getLast?_cons`.
+  * [#5123](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5123) and [#5158](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5158) add `List.range` and `List.iota` lemmas.
+  * [#5130](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5130) adds `List.join` lemmas.
+  * [#5131](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5131) adds `List.append` lemmas.
+  * [#5152](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5152) adds `List.erase(|P|Idx)` lemmas.
+  * [#5127](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5127) makes miscellaneous lemma updates.
+  * [#5153](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5153) and [#5160](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5160) add lemmas about `List.attach` and `List.pmap`.
+  * [#5164](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5164), [#5177](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5177), and [#5215](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5215) add `List.find?` and `List.range'/range/iota` lemmas.
+  * [#5196](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5196) adds `List.Pairwise_erase` and related lemmas.
+  * [#5151](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5151) and [#5163](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5163) improve confluence of `List` simp lemmas. [#5105](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5105) and [#5102](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5102) adjust `List` simp lemmas.
+  * [#5178](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5178) removes `List.getLast_eq_iff_getLast_eq_some` as a simp lemma.
+  * [#5210](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5210) reverses the meaning of `List.getElem_drop` and `List.getElem_drop'`.
+  * [#5214](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5214) moves `@[csimp]` lemmas earlier where possible.
+* `Nat` and `Int`
+  * [#5104](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5104) adds `Nat.add_left_eq_self` and relatives.
+  * [#5146](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5146) adds missing `Nat.and_xor_distrib_(left|right)`.
+  * [#5148](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5148) and [#5190](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5190) improve `Nat` and `Int` simp lemma confluence.
+  * [#5165](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5165) adjusts `Int` simp lemmas.
+  * [#5166](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5166) adds `Int` lemmas relating `neg` and `emod`/`mod`.
+  * [#5208](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5208) reverses the direction of the `Int.toNat_sub` simp lemma.
+  * [#5209](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5209) adds `Nat.bitwise` lemmas.
+  * [#5230](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5230) corrects the docstrings for integer division and modulus.
+* `Option`
+  * [#5128](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5128) and [#5154](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5154) add `Option` lemmas.
+* `BitVec`
+  * [#4889](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4889) adds `sshiftRight` bitblasting.
+  * [#4981](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4981) adds `Std.Associative` and `Std.Commutative` instances for `BitVec.[and|or|xor]`.
+  * [#4913](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4913) enables `missingDocs` error for `BitVec` modules.
+  * [#4930](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4930) makes parameter names for `BitVec` more consistent.
+  * [#5098](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5098) adds `BitVec.intMin`. Introduces `boolToPropSimps` simp set for converting from boolean to propositional expressions.
+  * [#5200](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5200) and [#5217](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5217) rename `BitVec.getLsb` to `BitVec.getLsbD`, etc., to bring naming in line with `List`/`Array`/etc.
+  * **Theorems:** [#4977](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4977), [#4951](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4951), [#4667](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4667), [#5007](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5007), [#4997](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4997), [#5083](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5083), [#5081](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5081), [#4392](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4392)
+* `UInt`
+  * [#4514](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4514) fixes naming convention for `UInt` lemmas.
+* `Std.HashMap` and `Std.HashSet`
+  * [#4943](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4943) deprecates variants of hash map query methods. (See breaking changes.)
+  * [#4917](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4917) switches the library and Lean to `Std.HashMap` and `Std.HashSet` almost everywhere.
+  * [#4954](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4954) deprecates `Lean.HashMap` and `Lean.HashSet`.
+  * [#5023](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5023) cleans up lemma parameters.
+
+* `Std.Sat` (for `bv_decide`)
+  * [#4933](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4933) adds definitions of SAT and CNF.
+  * [#4953](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4953) defines "and-inverter graphs" (AIGs) as described in section 3 of [Davis-Swords 2013](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1304.7861.pdf).
+
+* **Parsec**
+  * [#4774](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4774) generalizes the `Parsec` library, allowing parsing of iterable data beyong `String` such as `ByteArray`. (See breaking changes.)
+  * [#5115](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5115) moves `Lean.Data.Parsec` to `Std.Internal.Parsec` for bootstrappng reasons.
+
+* `Thunk`
+  * [#4969](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4969) upstreams `Thunk.ext`.
+
+* **IO**
+  * [#4973](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4973) modifies `IO.FS.lines` to handle `\r\n` on all operating systems instead of just on Windows.
+  * [#5125](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5125) adds `createTempFile` and `withTempFile` for creating temporary files that can only be read and written by the current user.
+
+* **Other fixes or improvements**
+  * [#4945](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4945) adds `Array`, `Bool` and `Prod` utilities from LeanSAT.
+  * [#4960](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4960) adds `Relation.TransGen.trans`.
+  * [#5012](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5012) states `WellFoundedRelation Nat` using `<`, not `Nat.lt`.
+  * [#5011](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5011) uses `≠` instead of `Not (Eq ...)` in `Fin.ne_of_val_ne`.
+  * [#5197](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5197) upstreams `Fin.le_antisymm`.
+  * [#5042](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5042) reduces usage of `refine'`.
+  * [#5101](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5101) adds about `if-then-else` and `Option`.
+  * [#5112](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5112) adds basic instances for `ULift` and `PLift`.
+  * [#5133](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5133) and [#5168](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5168) make fixes from running the simpNF linter over Lean.
+  * [#5156](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5156) removes a bad simp lemma in `omega` theory.
+  * [#5155](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5155) improves confluence of `Bool` simp lemmas.
+  * [#5162](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5162) improves confluence of `Function.comp` simp lemmas.
+  * [#5191](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5191) improves confluence of `if-then-else` simp lemmas.
+  * [#5147](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5147) adds `@[elab_as_elim]` to `Quot.rec`, `Nat.strongInductionOn` and `Nat.casesStrongInductionOn`, and also renames the latter two to `Nat.strongRecOn` and `Nat.casesStrongRecOn` (deprecated in [#5179](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5179)).
+  * [#5180](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5180) disables some simp lemmas with bad discrimination tree keys.
+  * [#5189](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5189) cleans up internal simp lemmas that had leaked.
+  * [#5198](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5198) cleans up `allowUnsafeReducibility`.
+  * [#5229](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5229) removes unused lemmas from some `simp` tactics.
+  * [#5199](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5199) removes >6 month deprecations.
+
+### Lean internals
+
+* **Performance**
+  * Some core algorithms have been rewritten in C++ for performance.
+    * [#4910](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4910) and [#4912](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4912) reimplement `instantiateLevelMVars`.
+    * [#4915](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4915), [#4922](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4922), and [#4931](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4931) reimplement `instantiateExprMVars`, 30% faster on a benchmark.
+  * [#4934](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4934) has optimizations for the kernel's `Expr` equality test.
+  * [#4990](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4990) fixes bug in hashing for the kernel's `Expr` equality test.
+  * [#4935](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4935) and [#4936](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4936) skip some `PreDefinition` transformations if they are not needed.
+  * [#5225](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5225) adds caching for visited exprs at `CheckAssignmentQuick` in `ExprDefEq`.
+  * [#5226](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5226) maximizes term sharing at `instantiateMVarDeclMVars`, used by `runTactic`.
+* **Diagnostics and profiling**
+  * [#4923](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4923) adds profiling for `instantiateMVars` in `Lean.Elab.MutualDef`, which can be a bottleneck there.
+  * [#4924](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4924) adds diagnostics for large theorems, controlled by the `diagnostics.threshold.proofSize` option.
+  * [#4897](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4897) improves display of diagnostic results.
+* **Other fixes or improvements**
+  * [#4921](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4921) cleans up `Expr.betaRev`.
+  * [#4940](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4940) fixes tests by not writing directly to stdout, which is unreliable now that elaboration and reporting are executed in separate threads.
+  * [#4955](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4955) documents that `stderrAsMessages` is now the default on the command line as well.
+  * [#4647](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4647) adjusts documentation for building on macOS.
+  * [#4987](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4987) makes regular mvar assignments take precedence over delayed ones in `instantiateMVars`. Normally delayed assignment metavariables are never directly assigned, but on errors Lean assigns `sorry` to unassigned metavariables.
+  * [#4967](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4967) adds linter name to errors when a linter crashes.
+  * [#5043](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5043) cleans up command line snapshots logic.
+  * [#5067](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5067) minimizes some imports.
+  * [#5068](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5068) generalizes the monad for `addMatcherInfo`.
+  * [f71a1f](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/commit/f71a1fb4ae958fccb3ad4d48786a8f47ced05c15) adds missing test for [#5126](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/5126).
+  * [#5201](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5201) restores a test.
+  * [#3698](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3698) fixes a bug where label attributes did not pass on the attribute kind.
+  * Typos: [#5080](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5080), [#5150](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5150), [#5202](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5202)
+
+### Compiler, runtime, and FFI
+
+* [#3106](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3106) moves frontend to new snapshot architecture. Note that `Frontend.processCommand` and `FrontendM` are no longer used by Lean core, but they will be preserved.
+* [#4919](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4919) adds missing include in runtime for `AUTO_THREAD_FINALIZATION` feature on Windows.
+* [#4941](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4941) adds more `LEAN_EXPORT`s for Windows.
+* [#4911](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4911) improves formatting of CLI help text for the frontend.
+* [#4950](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4950) improves file reading and writing.
+  * `readBinFile` and `readFile` now only require two system calls (`stat` + `read`) instead of one `read` per 1024 byte chunk.
+  * `Handle.getLine` and `Handle.putStr` no longer get tripped up by NUL characters.
+* [#4971](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4971) handles the SIGBUS signal when detecting stack overflows.
+* [#5062](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5062) avoids overwriting existing signal handlers, like in [rust-lang/rust#69685](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/69685).
+* [#4860](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4860) improves workarounds for building on Windows. Splits `libleanshared` on Windows to avoid symbol limit, removes the `LEAN_EXPORT` denylist workaround, adds missing `LEAN_EXPORT`s.
+* [#4952](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4952) output panics into Lean's redirected stderr, ensuring panics ARE visible as regular messages in the language server and properly ordered in relation to other messages on the command line.
+* [#4963](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4963) links LibUV.
+
+### Lake
+
+* [#5030](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5030) removes dead code.
+* [#4770](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4770) adds additional fields to the package configuration which will be used by Reservoir. See the PR description for details.
+
+
+### DevOps/CI
+* [#4914](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4914) and [#4937](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4937) improve the release checklist.
+* [#4925](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4925) ignores stale leanpkg tests.
+* [#5003](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5003) upgrades `actions/cache` in CI.
+* [#5010](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5010) sets `save-always` in cache actions in CI.
+* [#5008](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5008) adds more libuv search patterns for the speedcenter.
+* [#5009](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5009) reduce number of runs in the speedcenter for "fast" benchmarks from 10 to 3.
+* [#5014](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5014) adjusts lakefile editing to use new `git` syntax in `pr-release` workflow.
+* [#5025](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5025) has `pr-release` workflow pass `--retry` to `curl`.
+* [#5022](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5022) builds MacOS Aarch64 release for PRs by default.
+* [#5045](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5045) adds libuv to the required packages heading in macos docs.
+* [#5034](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5034) fixes the install name of `libleanshared_1` on macOS.
+* [#5051](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5051) fixes Windows stage 0.
+* [#5052](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5052) fixes 32bit stage 0 builds in CI.
+* [#5057](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5057) avoids rebuilding `leanmanifest` in each build.
+* [#5099](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5099) makes `restart-on-label` workflow also filter by commit SHA.
+* [#4325](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4325) adds CaDiCaL.
+
+### Breaking changes
+
+* [LibUV](https://libuv.org/) is now required to build Lean. This change only affects developers who compile Lean themselves instead of obtaining toolchains via `elan`. We have updated the official build instructions with information on how to obtain LibUV on our supported platforms. ([#4963](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4963))
+
+* Recursive definitions with a `decreasing_by` clause that begins with `simp_wf` may break. Try removing `simp_wf` or replacing it with `simp`. ([#5016](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5016))
+
+* The behavior of `rw [f]` where `f` is a non-recursive function defined by pattern matching changed.
+
+  For example, preciously, `rw [Option.map]` would rewrite `Option.map f o` to `match o with … `. Now this rewrite fails because it will use the equational lemmas, and these require constructors – just like for `List.map`.
+
+  Remedies:
+  * Split on `o` before rewriting.
+  * Use `rw [Option.map.eq_def]`, which rewrites any (saturated) application of `Option.map`.
+  * Use `set_option backward.eqns.nonrecursive false` when *defining* the function in question.
+  ([#4154](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4154))
+
+* The unified handling of equation lemmas for recursive and non-recursive functions can break existing code, as there now can be extra equational lemmas:
+
+  * Explicit uses of `f.eq_2` might have to be adjusted if the numbering changed.
+
+  * Uses of `rw [f]` or `simp [f]` may no longer apply if they previously matched (and introduced a `match` statement), when the equational lemmas got more fine-grained.
+
+    In this case either case analysis on the parameters before rewriting helps, or setting the option `backward.eqns.deepRecursiveSplit false` while *defining* the function.
+
+  ([#5129](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5129), [#5207](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5207))
+
+* The `reduceCtorEq` simproc is now optional, and it might need to be included in lists of simp lemmas, like `simp only [reduceCtorEq]`. This simproc is responsible for reducing equalities of constructors. ([#5167](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5167))
+
+* `Nat.strongInductionOn` is now `Nat.strongRecOn` and `Nat.caseStrongInductionOn` to `Nat.caseStrongRecOn`. ([#5147](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5147))
+
+* The parameters to `Membership.mem` have been swapped, which affects all `Membership` instances. ([#5020](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5020))
+
+* The meanings of `List.getElem_drop` and `List.getElem_drop'` have been reversed and the first is now a simp lemma. ([#5210](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5210))
+
+* The `Parsec` library has moved from `Lean.Data.Parsec` to `Std.Internal.Parsec`. The `Parsec` type is now more general with a parameter for an iterable. Users parsing strings can migrate to `Parser` in the `Std.Internal.Parsec.String` namespace, which also includes string-focused parsing combinators. ([#4774](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4774))
+
+* The `Lean` module has switched from `Lean.HashMap` and `Lean.HashSet` to `Std.HashMap` and `Std.HashSet` ([#4943](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4943)). `Lean.HashMap` and `Lean.HashSet` are now deprecated ([#4954](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4954)) and will be removed in a future release. Users of `Lean` APIs that interact with hash maps, for example `Lean.Environment.const2ModIdx`, might encounter minor breakage due to the following changes from `Lean.HashMap` to `Std.HashMap`:
+  * query functions use the term `get` instead of `find`, ([#4943](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4943))
+  * the notation `map[key]` no longer returns an optional value but instead expects a proof that the key is present in the map. The previous behavior is available via the `map[key]?` notation.
+
 
 v4.11.0
 ----------
@@ -21,7 +331,7 @@ v4.11.0
 
   See breaking changes below.
 
-  PRs: [#4883](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4883), [1242ff](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/commit/1242ffbfb5a79296041683682268e770fc3cf820), [#5000](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5000), [#5036](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5036), [#5138](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5138), [0edf1b](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/commit/0edf1bac392f7e2fe0266b28b51c498306363a84).
+  PRs: [#4883](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4883), [#4814](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4814), [#5000](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5000), [#5036](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5036), [#5138](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5138), [0edf1b](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/commit/0edf1bac392f7e2fe0266b28b51c498306363a84).
 
 * **Recursive definitions**
   * Structural recursion can now be explicitly requested using
@@ -381,7 +691,7 @@ v4.10.0
 
 * **Commands**
   * [#4370](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4370) makes the `variable` command fully elaborate binders during validation, fixing an issue where some errors would be reported only at the next declaration.
-  * [#4408](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4408) fixes a discrepency in universe parameter order between `theorem` and `def` declarations.
+  * [#4408](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4408) fixes a discrepancy in universe parameter order between `theorem` and `def` declarations.
   * [#4493](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4493) and
     [#4482](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4482) fix a discrepancy in the elaborators for `theorem`, `def`, and `example`,
     making `Prop`-valued `example`s and other definition commands elaborate like `theorem`s.
@@ -443,7 +753,7 @@ v4.10.0
   * [#4454](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4454) adds public `Name.isInternalDetail` function for filtering declarations using naming conventions for internal names.
 
 * **Other fixes or improvements**
-  * [#4416](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4416) sorts the ouput of `#print axioms` for determinism.
+  * [#4416](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4416) sorts the output of `#print axioms` for determinism.
   * [#4528](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4528) fixes error message range for the cdot focusing tactic.
 
 ### Language server, widgets, and IDE extensions
@@ -479,7 +789,7 @@ v4.10.0
   * [#4372](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4372) fixes linearity in `HashMap.insert` and `HashMap.erase`, leading to a 40% speedup in a replace-heavy workload.
 * `Option`
   * [#4403](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4403) generalizes type of `Option.forM` from `Unit` to `PUnit`.
-  * [#4504](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4504) remove simp attribute from `Option.elim` and instead adds it to individal reduction lemmas, making unfolding less aggressive.
+  * [#4504](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4504) remove simp attribute from `Option.elim` and instead adds it to individual reduction lemmas, making unfolding less aggressive.
 * `Nat`
   * [#4242](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4242) adds missing theorems for `n + 1` and `n - 1` normal forms.
   * [#4486](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4486) makes `Nat.min_assoc` be a simp lemma.
@@ -940,7 +1250,7 @@ While most changes could be considered to be a breaking change, this section mak
   In particular, tactics embedded in the type will no longer make use of the type of `value` in expressions such as `let x : type := value; body`.
 * Now functions defined by well-founded recursion are marked with `@[irreducible]` by default ([#4061](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4061)).
   Existing proofs that hold by definitional equality (e.g. `rfl`) can be
-  rewritten to explictly unfold the function definition (using `simp`,
+  rewritten to explicitly unfold the function definition (using `simp`,
   `unfold`, `rw`), or the recursive function can be temporarily made
   semireducible (using `unseal f in` before the command), or the function
   definition itself can be marked as `@[semireducible]` to get the previous
@@ -1559,7 +1869,7 @@ v4.7.0
      and `BitVec` as we begin making the APIs and simp normal forms for these types
      more complete and consistent.
   4. Laying the groundwork for the Std roadmap, as a library focused on
-     essential datatypes not provided by the core langauge (e.g. `RBMap`)
+     essential datatypes not provided by the core language (e.g. `RBMap`)
      and utilities such as basic IO.
   While we have achieved most of our initial aims in `v4.7.0-rc1`,
   some upstreaming will continue over the coming months.
@@ -1570,7 +1880,7 @@ v4.7.0
   There is now kernel support for these functions.
   [#3376](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3376).
 
-* `omega`, our integer linear arithmetic tactic, is now availabe in the core langauge.
+* `omega`, our integer linear arithmetic tactic, is now available in the core language.
   * It is supplemented by a preprocessing tactic `bv_omega` which can solve goals about `BitVec`
     which naturally translate into linear arithmetic problems.
     [#3435](https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/3435).
@@ -1663,11 +1973,11 @@ v4.6.0
       /-
       The `Step` type has three constructors: `.done`, `.visit`, `.continue`.
       * The constructor `.done` instructs `simp` that the result does
-        not need to be simplied further.
+        not need to be simplified further.
       * The constructor `.visit` instructs `simp` to visit the resulting expression.
       * The constructor `.continue` instructs `simp` to try other simplification procedures.
 
-      All three constructors take a `Result`. The `.continue` contructor may also take `none`.
+      All three constructors take a `Result`. The `.continue` constructor may also take `none`.
       `Result` has two fields `expr` (the new expression), and `proof?` (an optional proof).
        If the new expression is definitionally equal to the input one, then `proof?` can be omitted or set to `none`.
       -/
@@ -1879,7 +2189,7 @@ v4.5.0
 ---------
 
 * Modify the lexical syntax of string literals to have string gaps, which are escape sequences of the form `"\" newline whitespace*`.
-  These have the interpetation of an empty string and allow a string to flow across multiple lines without introducing additional whitespace.
+  These have the interpretation of an empty string and allow a string to flow across multiple lines without introducing additional whitespace.
   The following is equivalent to `"this is a string"`.
   ```lean
   "this is \
@@ -1902,7 +2212,7 @@ v4.5.0
 
   If the well-founded relation you want to use is not the one that the
   `WellFoundedRelation` type class would infer for your termination argument,
-  you can use `WellFounded.wrap` from the std libarary to explicitly give one:
+  you can use `WellFounded.wrap` from the std library to explicitly give one:
   ```diff
   -termination_by' ⟨r, hwf⟩
   +termination_by x => hwf.wrap x

doc/dev/bootstrap.md

@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ update the archived C source code of the stage 0 compiler in `stage0/src`.
 The github repository will automatically update stage0 on `master` once
 `src/stdlib_flags.h` and `stage0/src/stdlib_flags.h` are out of sync.
 
-If you have write access to the lean4 repository, you can also also manually
+If you have write access to the lean4 repository, you can also manually
 trigger that process, for example to be able to use new features in the compiler itself.
 You can do that on <https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/actions/workflows/update-stage0.yml>
 or using Github CLI with

doc/dev/release_checklist.md

@@ -71,6 +71,12 @@ We'll use `v4.6.0` as the intended release version as a running example.
       - Toolchain bump PR including updated Lake manifest
       - Create and push the tag
       - There is no `stable` branch; skip this step
+    - [Verso](https://github.com/leanprover/verso)
+      - Dependencies: exist, but they're not part of the release workflow
+      - The `SubVerso` dependency should be compatible with _every_ Lean release simultaneously, rather than following this workflow
+      - Toolchain bump PR including updated Lake manifest
+      - Create and push the tag
+      - There is no `stable` branch; skip this step
     - [import-graph](https://github.com/leanprover-community/import-graph)
       - Toolchain bump PR including updated Lake manifest
       - Create and push the tag

doc/examples/ICERM2022/ctor.lean

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ def ctor (mvarId : MVarId) (idx : Nat) : MetaM (List MVarId) := do
     else if h : idx - 1 < ctors.length then
       mvarId.apply (.const ctors[idx - 1] us)
     else
-      throwTacticEx `ctor mvarId "invalid index, inductive datatype has only {ctors.length} contructors"
+      throwTacticEx `ctor mvarId "invalid index, inductive datatype has only {ctors.length} constructors"
 
 open Elab Tactic
 

doc/examples/deBruijn.lean

@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ We now define the constant folding optimization that traverses a term if replace
 /-!
 The correctness of the `Term.constFold` is proved using induction, case-analysis, and the term simplifier.
 We prove all cases but the one for `plus` using `simp [*]`. This tactic instructs the term simplifier to
-use hypotheses such as `a = b` as rewriting/simplications rules.
+use hypotheses such as `a = b` as rewriting/simplifications rules.
 We use the `split` to break the nested `match` expression in the `plus` case into two cases.
 The local variables `iha` and `ihb` are the induction hypotheses for `a` and `b`.
 The modifier `←` in a term simplifier argument instructs the term simplifier to use the equation as a rewriting rule in

doc/examples/phoas.lean

@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ We now define the constant folding optimization that traverses a term if replace
 /-!
 The correctness of the `constFold` is proved using induction, case-analysis, and the term simplifier.
 We prove all cases but the one for `plus` using `simp [*]`. This tactic instructs the term simplifier to
-use hypotheses such as `a = b` as rewriting/simplications rules.
+use hypotheses such as `a = b` as rewriting/simplifications rules.
 We use the `split` to break the nested `match` expression in the `plus` case into two cases.
 The local variables `iha` and `ihb` are the induction hypotheses for `a` and `b`.
 The modifier `←` in a term simplifier argument instructs the term simplifier to use the equation as a rewriting rule in

doc/examples/tc.lean

@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ inductive HasType : Expr → Ty → Prop
 
 /-!
 We can easily show that if `e` has type `t₁` and type `t₂`, then `t₁` and `t₂` must be equal
-by using the the `cases` tactic. This tactic creates a new subgoal for every constructor,
+by using the `cases` tactic. This tactic creates a new subgoal for every constructor,
 and automatically discharges unreachable cases. The tactic combinator `tac₁ <;> tac₂` applies
 `tac₂` to each subgoal produced by `tac₁`. Then, the tactic `rfl` is used to close all produced
 goals using reflexivity.
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ theorem Expr.typeCheck_correct (h₁ : HasType e ty) (h₂ : e.typeCheck ≠ .un
 /-!
 Now, we prove that if `Expr.typeCheck e` returns `Maybe.unknown`, then forall `ty`, `HasType e ty` does not hold.
 The notation `e.typeCheck` is sugar for `Expr.typeCheck e`. Lean can infer this because we explicitly said that `e` has type `Expr`.
-The proof is by induction on `e` and case analysis. The tactic `rename_i` is used to to rename "inaccessible" variables.
+The proof is by induction on `e` and case analysis. The tactic `rename_i` is used to rename "inaccessible" variables.
 We say a variable is inaccessible if it is introduced by a tactic (e.g., `cases`) or has been shadowed by another variable introduced
 by the user. Note that the tactic `simp [typeCheck]` is applied to all goal generated by the `induction` tactic, and closes
 the cases corresponding to the constructors `Expr.nat` and `Expr.bool`.

doc/examples/widgets.lean

@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ Meaning "Remote Procedure Call",this is a Lean function callable from widget cod
 Our method will take in the `name : Name` of a constant in the environment and return its type.
 By convention, we represent the input data as a `structure`.
 Since it will be sent over from JavaScript,
-we need `FromJson` and `ToJson` instnace.
+we need `FromJson` and `ToJson` instance.
 We'll see why the position field is needed later.
 -/
 

doc/expressions.md

@@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ Every expression in Lean has a natural computational interpretation, unless it i
 
 * *β-reduction* : An expression ``(λ x, t) s`` β-reduces to ``t[s/x]``, that is, the result of replacing ``x`` by ``s`` in ``t``.
 * *ζ-reduction* : An expression ``let x := s in t`` ζ-reduces to ``t[s/x]``.
-* *δ-reduction* : If ``c`` is a defined constant with definition ``t``, then ``c`` δ-reduces to to ``t``.
+* *δ-reduction* : If ``c`` is a defined constant with definition ``t``, then ``c`` δ-reduces to ``t``.
 * *ι-reduction* : When a function defined by recursion on an inductive type is applied to an element given by an explicit constructor, the result ι-reduces to the specified function value, as described in [Inductive Types](inductive.md).
 
 The reduction relation is transitive, which is to say, is ``s`` reduces to ``s'`` and ``t`` reduces to ``t'``, then ``s t`` reduces to ``s' t'``, ``λ x, s`` reduces to ``λ x, s'``, and so on. If ``s`` and ``t`` reduce to a common term, they are said to be *definitionally equal*. Definitional equality is defined to be the smallest equivalence relation that satisfies all these properties and also includes α-equivalence and the following two relations:

doc/monads/laws.lean

@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ of data contained in the container resulting in a new container that has the sam
 
 `u <*> pure y = pure (. y) <*> u`.
 
-This law is is a little more complicated, so don't sweat it too much. It states that the order that
+This law is a little more complicated, so don't sweat it too much. It states that the order that
 you wrap things shouldn't matter. One the left, you apply any applicative `u` over a pure wrapped
 object. On the right, you first wrap a function applying the object as an argument. Note that `(·
 y)` is short hand for: `fun f => f y`. Then you apply this to the first applicative `u`. These

releases_drafts/hashmap.md

@@ -1,3 +0,0 @@
-* The `Lean` module has switched from `Lean.HashMap` and `Lean.HashSet` to `Std.HashMap` and `Std.HashSet`. `Lean.HashMap` and `Lean.HashSet` are now deprecated and will be removed in a future release. Users of `Lean` APIs that interact with hash maps, for example `Lean.Environment.const2ModIdx`, might encounter minor breakage due to the following breaking changes from `Lean.HashMap` to `Std.HashMap`:
-    * query functions use the term `get` instead of `find`,
-    * the notation `map[key]` no longer returns an optional value but expects a proof that the key is present in the map instead. The previous behavior is available via the `map[key]?` notation.

releases_drafts/libuv.md

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-* #4963 [LibUV](https://libuv.org/) is now required to build Lean. This change only affects developers who compile Lean themselves instead of obtaining toolchains via `elan`. We have updated the official build instructions with information on how to obtain LibUV on our supported platforms.

script/lib/update-stage0

@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ for f in $(git ls-files src ':!:src/lake/*' ':!:src/Leanc.lean'); do
 done
 
 # special handling for Lake files due to its nested directory
-# copy the README to ensure the `stage0/src/lake` directory is comitted
+# copy the README to ensure the `stage0/src/lake` directory is committed
 for f in $(git ls-files 'src/lake/Lake/*' src/lake/Lake.lean src/lake/LakeMain.lean src/lake/README.md ':!:src/lakefile.toml'); do
     if [[ $f == *.lean ]]; then
         f=${f#src/lake}

src/Init/ByCases.lean

@@ -40,21 +40,23 @@ theorem apply_ite (f : α → β) (P : Prop) [Decidable P] (x y : α) :
 /-- A `dite` whose results do not actually depend on the condition may be reduced to an `ite`. -/
 @[simp] theorem dite_eq_ite [Decidable P] : (dite P (fun _ => a) fun _ => b) = ite P a b := rfl
 
--- We don't mark this as `simp` as it is already handled by `ite_eq_right_iff`.
+@[deprecated "Use `ite_eq_right_iff`" (since := "2024-09-18")]
 theorem ite_some_none_eq_none [Decidable P] :
     (if P then some x else none) = none ↔ ¬ P := by
   simp only [ite_eq_right_iff, reduceCtorEq]
   rfl
 
-@[simp] theorem ite_some_none_eq_some [Decidable P] :
+@[deprecated "Use `Option.ite_none_right_eq_some`" (since := "2024-09-18")]
+theorem ite_some_none_eq_some [Decidable P] :
     (if P then some x else none) = some y ↔ P ∧ x = y := by
   split <;> simp_all
 
--- This is not marked as `simp` as it is already handled by `dite_eq_right_iff`.
+@[deprecated "Use `dite_eq_right_iff" (since := "2024-09-18")]
 theorem dite_some_none_eq_none [Decidable P] {x : P → α} :
     (if h : P then some (x h) else none) = none ↔ ¬P := by
   simp
 
-@[simp] theorem dite_some_none_eq_some [Decidable P] {x : P → α} {y : α} :
+@[deprecated "Use `Option.dite_none_right_eq_some`" (since := "2024-09-18")]
+theorem dite_some_none_eq_some [Decidable P] {x : P → α} {y : α} :
     (if h : P then some (x h) else none) = some y ↔ ∃ h : P, x h = y := by
   by_cases h : P <;> simp [h]

src/Init/Classical.lean

@@ -80,6 +80,8 @@ noncomputable scoped instance (priority := low) propDecidable (a : Prop) : Decid
 noncomputable def decidableInhabited (a : Prop) : Inhabited (Decidable a) where
   default := inferInstance
 
+instance (a : Prop) : Nonempty (Decidable a) := ⟨propDecidable a⟩
+
 noncomputable def typeDecidableEq (α : Sort u) : DecidableEq α :=
   fun _ _ => inferInstance
 
@@ -121,11 +123,11 @@ theorem propComplete (a : Prop) : a = True ∨ a = False :=
   | Or.inl ha => Or.inl (eq_true ha)
   | Or.inr hn => Or.inr (eq_false hn)
 
--- this supercedes byCases in Decidable
+-- this supersedes byCases in Decidable
 theorem byCases {p q : Prop} (hpq : p → q) (hnpq : ¬p → q) : q :=
   Decidable.byCases (dec := propDecidable _) hpq hnpq
 
--- this supercedes byContradiction in Decidable
+-- this supersedes byContradiction in Decidable
 theorem byContradiction {p : Prop} (h : ¬p → False) : p :=
   Decidable.byContradiction (dec := propDecidable _) h
 

src/Init/Control/Basic.lean

@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ Important instances include
 * `Option`, where `failure := none` and `<|>` returns the left-most `some`.
 * Parser combinators typically provide an `Applicative` instance for error-handling and
   backtracking.
-  
+
 Error recovery and state can interact subtly. For example, the implementation of `Alternative` for `OptionT (StateT σ Id)` keeps modifications made to the state while recovering from failure, while `StateT σ (OptionT Id)` discards them.
 -/
 -- NB: List instance is in mathlib. Once upstreamed, add

src/Init/Control/Lawful/Basic.lean

@@ -33,6 +33,10 @@ attribute [simp] id_map
 @[simp] theorem id_map' [Functor m] [LawfulFunctor m] (x : m α) : (fun a => a) <$> x = x :=
   id_map x
 
+@[simp] theorem Functor.map_map [Functor f] [LawfulFunctor f] (m : α → β) (g : β → γ) (x : f α) :
+    g <$> m <$> x = (fun a => g (m a)) <$> x :=
+  (comp_map _ _ _).symm
+
 /--
 The `Applicative` typeclass only contains the operations of an applicative functor.
 `LawfulApplicative` further asserts that these operations satisfy the laws of an applicative functor:
@@ -83,12 +87,16 @@ class LawfulMonad (m : Type u → Type v) [Monad m] extends LawfulApplicative m
   seq_assoc x g h := (by simp [← bind_pure_comp, ← bind_map, bind_assoc, pure_bind])
 
 export LawfulMonad (bind_pure_comp bind_map pure_bind bind_assoc)
-attribute [simp] pure_bind bind_assoc
+attribute [simp] pure_bind bind_assoc bind_pure_comp
 
 @[simp] theorem bind_pure [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : m α) : x >>= pure = x := by
   show x >>= (fun a => pure (id a)) = x
   rw [bind_pure_comp, id_map]
 
+/--
+Use `simp [← bind_pure_comp]` rather than `simp [map_eq_pure_bind]`,
+as `bind_pure_comp` is in the default simp set, so also using `map_eq_pure_bind` would cause a loop.
+-/
 theorem map_eq_pure_bind [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α → β) (x : m α) : f <$> x = x >>= fun a => pure (f a) := by
   rw [← bind_pure_comp]
 
@@ -109,10 +117,24 @@ theorem seq_eq_bind {α β : Type u} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (mf : m (α →
 
 theorem seqRight_eq_bind [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : m α) (y : m β) : x *> y = x >>= fun _ => y := by
   rw [seqRight_eq]
-  simp [map_eq_pure_bind, seq_eq_bind_map, const]
+  simp only [map_eq_pure_bind, const, seq_eq_bind_map, bind_assoc, pure_bind, id_eq, bind_pure]
 
 theorem seqLeft_eq_bind [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : m α) (y : m β) : x <* y = x >>= fun a => y >>= fun _ => pure a := by
-  rw [seqLeft_eq]; simp [map_eq_pure_bind, seq_eq_bind_map]
+  rw [seqLeft_eq]
+  simp only [map_eq_pure_bind, seq_eq_bind_map, bind_assoc, pure_bind, const_apply]
+
+@[simp] theorem map_bind [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : β → γ) (x : m α) (g : α → m β) :
+    f <$> (x >>= g) = x >>= fun a => f <$> g a := by
+  rw [← bind_pure_comp, LawfulMonad.bind_assoc]
+  simp [bind_pure_comp]
+
+@[simp] theorem bind_map_left [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α → β) (x : m α) (g : β → m γ) :
+    ((f <$> x) >>= fun b => g b) = (x >>= fun a => g (f a)) := by
+  rw [← bind_pure_comp]
+  simp only [bind_assoc, pure_bind]
+
+@[simp] theorem Functor.map_unit [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] {a : m PUnit} : (fun _ => PUnit.unit) <$> a = a := by
+  simp [map]
 
 /--
 An alternative constructor for `LawfulMonad` which has more
@@ -161,9 +183,9 @@ end Id
 
 instance : LawfulMonad Option := LawfulMonad.mk'
   (id_map := fun x => by cases x <;> rfl)
-  (pure_bind := fun x f => rfl)
-  (bind_assoc := fun x f g => by cases x <;> rfl)
-  (bind_pure_comp := fun f x => by cases x <;> rfl)
+  (pure_bind := fun _ _ => rfl)
+  (bind_assoc := fun x _ _ => by cases x <;> rfl)
+  (bind_pure_comp := fun _ x => by cases x <;> rfl)
 
 instance : LawfulApplicative Option := inferInstance
 instance : LawfulFunctor Option := inferInstance

src/Init/Control/Lawful/Instances.lean

@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ theorem ext {x y : ExceptT ε m α} (h : x.run = y.run) : x = y := by
 @[simp] theorem run_throw [Monad m] : run (throw e : ExceptT ε m β) = pure (Except.error e) := rfl
 
 @[simp] theorem run_bind_lift [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : m α) (f : α → ExceptT ε m β) : run (ExceptT.lift x >>= f : ExceptT ε m β) = x >>= fun a => run (f a) := by
-  simp[ExceptT.run, ExceptT.lift, bind, ExceptT.bind, ExceptT.mk, ExceptT.bindCont, map_eq_pure_bind]
+  simp [ExceptT.run, ExceptT.lift, bind, ExceptT.bind, ExceptT.mk, ExceptT.bindCont]
 
 @[simp] theorem bind_throw [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α → ExceptT ε m β) : (throw e >>= f) = throw e := by
   simp [throw, throwThe, MonadExceptOf.throw, bind, ExceptT.bind, ExceptT.bindCont, ExceptT.mk]
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ theorem run_bind [Monad m] (x : ExceptT ε m α)
 
 @[simp] theorem run_map [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α → β) (x : ExceptT ε m α)
     : (f <$> x).run = Except.map f <$> x.run := by
-  simp [Functor.map, ExceptT.map, map_eq_pure_bind]
+  simp [Functor.map, ExceptT.map, ←bind_pure_comp]
   apply bind_congr
   intro a; cases a <;> simp [Except.map]
 
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ protected theorem seqLeft_eq {α β ε : Type u} {m : Type u → Type v} [Monad
   intro
   | Except.error _ => simp
   | Except.ok _ =>
-    simp [map_eq_pure_bind]; apply bind_congr; intro b;
+    simp [←bind_pure_comp]; apply bind_congr; intro b;
     cases b <;> simp [comp, Except.map, const]
 
 protected theorem seqRight_eq [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : ExceptT ε m α) (y : ExceptT ε m β) : x *> y = const α id <$> x <*> y := by
@@ -84,14 +84,19 @@ instance [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] : LawfulMonad (ExceptT ε m) where
   pure_bind      := by intros; apply ext; simp [run_bind]
   bind_assoc     := by intros; apply ext; simp [run_bind]; apply bind_congr; intro a; cases a <;> simp
 
+@[simp] theorem map_throw [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] {α β : Type _} (f : α → β) (e : ε) :
+    f <$> (throw e : ExceptT ε m α) = (throw e : ExceptT ε m β) := by
+  simp only [ExceptT.instMonad, ExceptT.map, ExceptT.mk, throw, throwThe, MonadExceptOf.throw,
+    pure_bind]
+
 end ExceptT
 
 /-! # Except -/
 
 instance : LawfulMonad (Except ε) := LawfulMonad.mk'
   (id_map := fun x => by cases x <;> rfl)
-  (pure_bind := fun a f => rfl)
-  (bind_assoc := fun a f g => by cases a <;> rfl)
+  (pure_bind := fun _ _ => rfl)
+  (bind_assoc := fun a _ _ => by cases a <;> rfl)
 
 instance : LawfulApplicative (Except ε) := inferInstance
 instance : LawfulFunctor (Except ε) := inferInstance
@@ -175,7 +180,7 @@ theorem ext {x y : StateT σ m α} (h : ∀ s, x.run s = y.run s) : x = y :=
   simp [bind, StateT.bind, run]
 
 @[simp] theorem run_map {α β σ : Type u} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α → β) (x : StateT σ m α) (s : σ) : (f <$> x).run s = (fun (p : α × σ) => (f p.1, p.2)) <$> x.run s := by
-  simp [Functor.map, StateT.map, run, map_eq_pure_bind]
+  simp [Functor.map, StateT.map, run, ←bind_pure_comp]
 
 @[simp] theorem run_get [Monad m] (s : σ)    : (get : StateT σ m σ).run s = pure (s, s) := rfl
 
@@ -210,13 +215,13 @@ theorem run_bind_lift {α σ : Type u} [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : m α) (f :
 
 theorem seqRight_eq [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : StateT σ m α) (y : StateT σ m β) : x *> y = const α id <$> x <*> y := by
   apply ext; intro s
-  simp [map_eq_pure_bind, const]
+  simp [←bind_pure_comp, const]
   apply bind_congr; intro p; cases p
   simp [Prod.eta]
 
 theorem seqLeft_eq [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (x : StateT σ m α) (y : StateT σ m β) : x <* y = const β <$> x <*> y := by
   apply ext; intro s
-  simp [map_eq_pure_bind]
+  simp [←bind_pure_comp]
 
 instance [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] : LawfulMonad (StateT σ m) where
   id_map         := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp[Prod.eta]
@@ -224,7 +229,7 @@ instance [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] : LawfulMonad (StateT σ m) where
   seqLeft_eq     := seqLeft_eq
   seqRight_eq    := seqRight_eq
   pure_seq       := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp
-  bind_pure_comp := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp; apply LawfulMonad.bind_pure_comp
+  bind_pure_comp := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp
   bind_map       := by intros; rfl
   pure_bind      := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp
   bind_assoc     := by intros; apply ext; intros; simp

src/Init/Core.lean

@@ -823,6 +823,9 @@ theorem iff_iff_implies_and_implies {a b : Prop} : (a ↔ b) ↔ (a → b) ∧ (
 protected theorem Iff.rfl {a : Prop} : a ↔ a :=
   Iff.refl a
 
+-- And, also for backward compatibility, we try `Iff.rfl.` using `exact` (see #5366)
+macro_rules | `(tactic| rfl) => `(tactic| exact Iff.rfl)
+
 theorem Iff.of_eq (h : a = b) : a ↔ b := h ▸ Iff.rfl
 
 theorem Iff.trans (h₁ : a ↔ b) (h₂ : b ↔ c) : a ↔ c :=
@@ -835,6 +838,9 @@ instance : Trans Iff Iff Iff where
 theorem Eq.comm {a b : α} : a = b ↔ b = a := Iff.intro Eq.symm Eq.symm
 theorem eq_comm {a b : α} : a = b ↔ b = a := Eq.comm
 
+theorem HEq.comm {a : α} {b : β} : HEq a b ↔ HEq b a := Iff.intro HEq.symm HEq.symm
+theorem heq_comm {a : α} {b : β} : HEq a b ↔ HEq b a := HEq.comm
+
 @[symm] theorem Iff.symm (h : a ↔ b) : b ↔ a := Iff.intro h.mpr h.mp
 theorem Iff.comm: (a ↔ b) ↔ (b ↔ a) := Iff.intro Iff.symm Iff.symm
 theorem iff_comm : (a ↔ b) ↔ (b ↔ a) := Iff.comm
@@ -1191,6 +1197,21 @@ end
 
 /-! # Product -/
 
+instance [h1 : Nonempty α] [h2 : Nonempty β] : Nonempty (α × β) :=
+  Nonempty.elim h1 fun x =>
+    Nonempty.elim h2 fun y =>
+      ⟨(x, y)⟩
+
+instance [h1 : Nonempty α] [h2 : Nonempty β] : Nonempty (MProd α β) :=
+  Nonempty.elim h1 fun x =>
+    Nonempty.elim h2 fun y =>
+      ⟨⟨x, y⟩⟩
+
+instance [h1 : Nonempty α] [h2 : Nonempty β] : Nonempty (PProd α β) :=
+  Nonempty.elim h1 fun x =>
+    Nonempty.elim h2 fun y =>
+      ⟨⟨x, y⟩⟩
+
 instance [Inhabited α] [Inhabited β] : Inhabited (α × β) where
   default := (default, default)
 
@@ -1875,7 +1896,8 @@ theorem funext {α : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v} {f g : (x : α) → β x}
   show extfunApp (Quot.mk eqv f) = extfunApp (Quot.mk eqv g)
   exact congrArg extfunApp (Quot.sound h)
 
-instance {α : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v} [∀ a, Subsingleton (β a)] : Subsingleton (∀ a, β a) where
+instance Pi.instSubsingleton {α : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v} [∀ a, Subsingleton (β a)] :
+    Subsingleton (∀ a, β a) where
   allEq f g := funext fun a => Subsingleton.elim (f a) (g a)
 
 /-! # Squash -/
@@ -2038,7 +2060,7 @@ class IdempotentOp (op : α → α → α) : Prop where
 `LeftIdentify op o` indicates `o` is a left identity of `op`.
 
 This class does not require a proof that `o` is an identity, and
-is used primarily for infering the identity using class resoluton.
+is used primarily for inferring the identity using class resolution.
 -/
 class LeftIdentity (op : α → β → β) (o : outParam α) : Prop
 
@@ -2054,7 +2076,7 @@ class LawfulLeftIdentity (op : α → β → β) (o : outParam α) extends LeftI
 `RightIdentify op o` indicates `o` is a right identity `o` of `op`.
 
 This class does not require a proof that `o` is an identity, and is used
-primarily for infering the identity using class resoluton.
+primarily for inferring the identity using class resolution.
 -/
 class RightIdentity (op : α → β → α) (o : outParam β) : Prop
 
@@ -2070,7 +2092,7 @@ class LawfulRightIdentity (op : α → β → α) (o : outParam β) extends Righ
 `Identity op o` indicates `o` is a left and right identity of `op`.
 
 This class does not require a proof that `o` is an identity, and is used
-primarily for infering the identity using class resoluton.
+primarily for inferring the identity using class resolution.
 -/
 class Identity (op : α → α → α) (o : outParam α) extends LeftIdentity op o, RightIdentity op o : Prop
 

src/Init/Data.lean

@@ -33,7 +33,6 @@ import Init.Data.Prod
 import Init.Data.AC
 import Init.Data.Queue
 import Init.Data.Channel
-import Init.Data.Cast
 import Init.Data.Sum
 import Init.Data.BEq
 import Init.Data.Subtype

src/Init/Data/Array.lean

@@ -15,3 +15,4 @@ import Init.Data.Array.BasicAux
 import Init.Data.Array.Lemmas
 import Init.Data.Array.TakeDrop
 import Init.Data.Array.Bootstrap
+import Init.Data.Array.GetLit

src/Init/Data/Array/Attach.lean

@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ Authors: Joachim Breitner, Mario Carneiro
 -/
 prelude
 import Init.Data.Array.Mem
+import Init.Data.Array.Lemmas
 import Init.Data.List.Attach
 
 namespace Array
@@ -26,4 +27,154 @@ Unsafe implementation of `attachWith`, taking advantage of the fact that the rep
   with the same elements but in the type `{x // x ∈ xs}`. -/
 @[inline] def attach (xs : Array α) : Array {x // x ∈ xs} := xs.attachWith _ fun _ => id
 
+@[simp] theorem _root_.List.attachWith_toArray {l : List α} {P : α → Prop} {H : ∀ x ∈ l.toArray, P x} :
+    l.toArray.attachWith P H = (l.attachWith P (by simpa using H)).toArray := by
+  simp [attachWith]
+
+@[simp] theorem _root_.List.attach_toArray {l : List α} :
+    l.toArray.attach = (l.attachWith (· ∈ l.toArray) (by simp)).toArray := by
+  simp [attach]
+
+@[simp] theorem toList_attachWith {l : Array α} {P : α → Prop} {H : ∀ x ∈ l, P x} :
+   (l.attachWith P H).toList = l.toList.attachWith P (by simpa [mem_toList] using H) := by
+  simp [attachWith]
+
+@[simp] theorem toList_attach {α : Type _} {l : Array α} :
+    l.attach.toList = l.toList.attachWith (· ∈ l) (by simp [mem_toList]) := by
+  simp [attach]
+
+/-! ## unattach
+
+`Array.unattach` is the (one-sided) inverse of `Array.attach`. It is a synonym for `Array.map Subtype.val`.
+
+We use it by providing a simp lemma `l.attach.unattach = l`, and simp lemmas which recognize higher order
+functions applied to `l : Array { x // p x }` which only depend on the value, not the predicate, and rewrite these
+in terms of a simpler function applied to `l.unattach`.
+
+Further, we provide simp lemmas that push `unattach` inwards.
+-/
+
+/--
+A synonym for `l.map (·.val)`. Mostly this should not be needed by users.
+It is introduced as in intermediate step by lemmas such as `map_subtype`,
+and is ideally subsequently simplified away by `unattach_attach`.
+
+If not, usually the right approach is `simp [Array.unattach, -Array.map_subtype]` to unfold.
+-/
+def unattach {α : Type _} {p : α → Prop} (l : Array { x // p x }) := l.map (·.val)
+
+@[simp] theorem unattach_nil {α : Type _} {p : α → Prop} : (#[] : Array { x // p x }).unattach = #[] := rfl
+@[simp] theorem unattach_push {α : Type _} {p : α → Prop} {a : { x // p x }} {l : Array { x // p x }} :
+    (l.push a).unattach = l.unattach.push a.1 := by
+  simp [unattach]
+
+@[simp] theorem size_unattach {α : Type _} {p : α → Prop} {l : Array { x // p x }} :
+    l.unattach.size = l.size := by
+  unfold unattach
+  simp
+
+@[simp] theorem _root_.List.unattach_toArray {α : Type _} {p : α → Prop} {l : List { x // p x }} :
+    l.toArray.unattach = l.unattach.toArray := by
+  simp [unattach, List.unattach]
+
+@[simp] theorem toList_unattach {α : Type _} {p : α → Prop} {l : Array { x // p x }} :
+    l.unattach.toList = l.toList.unattach := by
+  simp [unattach, List.unattach]
+
+@[simp] theorem unattach_attach {α : Type _} (l : Array α) : l.attach.unattach = l := by
+  cases l
+  simp
+
+@[simp] theorem unattach_attachWith {α : Type _} {p : α → Prop} {l : Array α}
+    {H : ∀ a ∈ l, p a} :
+    (l.attachWith p H).unattach = l := by
+  cases l
+  simp
+
+/-! ### Recognizing higher order functions using a function that only depends on the value. -/
+
+/--
+This lemma identifies folds over arrays of subtypes, where the function only depends on the value, not the proposition,
+and simplifies these to the function directly taking the value.
+-/
+theorem foldl_subtype {p : α → Prop} {l : Array { x // p x }}
+    {f : β → { x // p x } → β} {g : β → α → β} {x : β}
+    {hf : ∀ b x h, f b ⟨x, h⟩ = g b x} :
+    l.foldl f x = l.unattach.foldl g x := by
+  cases l
+  simp only [List.foldl_toArray', List.unattach_toArray]
+  rw [List.foldl_subtype] -- Why can't simp do this?
+  simp [hf]
+
+/-- Variant of `foldl_subtype` with side condition to check `stop = l.size`. -/
+@[simp] theorem foldl_subtype' {p : α → Prop} {l : Array { x // p x }}
+    {f : β → { x // p x } → β} {g : β → α → β} {x : β}
+    {hf : ∀ b x h, f b ⟨x, h⟩ = g b x} (h : stop = l.size) :
+    l.foldl f x 0 stop = l.unattach.foldl g x := by
+  subst h
+  rwa [foldl_subtype]
+
+/--
+This lemma identifies folds over arrays of subtypes, where the function only depends on the value, not the proposition,
+and simplifies these to the function directly taking the value.
+-/
+theorem foldr_subtype {p : α → Prop} {l : Array { x // p x }}
+    {f : { x // p x } → β → β} {g : α → β → β} {x : β}
+    {hf : ∀ x h b, f ⟨x, h⟩ b = g x b} :
+    l.foldr f x = l.unattach.foldr g x := by
+  cases l
+  simp only [List.foldr_toArray', List.unattach_toArray]
+  rw [List.foldr_subtype]
+  simp [hf]
+
+/-- Variant of `foldr_subtype` with side condition to check `stop = l.size`. -/
+@[simp] theorem foldr_subtype' {p : α → Prop} {l : Array { x // p x }}
+    {f : { x // p x } → β → β} {g : α → β → β} {x : β}
+    {hf : ∀ x h b, f ⟨x, h⟩ b = g x b} (h : start = l.size) :
+    l.foldr f x start 0 = l.unattach.foldr g x := by
+  subst h
+  rwa [foldr_subtype]
+
+/--
+This lemma identifies maps over arrays of subtypes, where the function only depends on the value, not the proposition,
+and simplifies these to the function directly taking the value.
+-/
+@[simp] theorem map_subtype {p : α → Prop} {l : Array { x // p x }}
+    {f : { x // p x } → β} {g : α → β} {hf : ∀ x h, f ⟨x, h⟩ = g x} :
+    l.map f = l.unattach.map g := by
+  cases l
+  simp only [List.map_toArray, List.unattach_toArray]
+  rw [List.map_subtype]
+  simp [hf]
+
+@[simp] theorem filterMap_subtype {p : α → Prop} {l : Array { x // p x }}
+    {f : { x // p x } → Option β} {g : α → Option β} {hf : ∀ x h, f ⟨x, h⟩ = g x} :
+    l.filterMap f = l.unattach.filterMap g := by
+  cases l
+  simp only [size_toArray, List.filterMap_toArray', List.unattach_toArray, List.length_unattach,
+    mk.injEq]
+  rw [List.filterMap_subtype]
+  simp [hf]
+
+@[simp] theorem unattach_filter {p : α → Prop} {l : Array { x // p x }}
+    {f : { x // p x } → Bool} {g : α → Bool} {hf : ∀ x h, f ⟨x, h⟩ = g x} :
+    (l.filter f).unattach = l.unattach.filter g := by
+  cases l
+  simp [hf]
+  rw [List.unattach_filter]
+  simp [hf]
+
+/-! ### Simp lemmas pushing `unattach` inwards. -/
+
+@[simp] theorem unattach_reverse {p : α → Prop} {l : Array { x // p x }} :
+    l.reverse.unattach = l.unattach.reverse := by
+  cases l
+  simp
+
+@[simp] theorem unattach_append {p : α → Prop} {l₁ l₂ : Array { x // p x }} :
+    (l₁ ++ l₂).unattach = l₁.unattach ++ l₂.unattach := by
+  cases l₁
+  cases l₂
+  simp
+
 end Array

src/Init/Data/Array/Basic.lean

@@ -13,43 +13,75 @@ import Init.Data.ToString.Basic
 import Init.GetElem
 universe u v w
 
-namespace Array
+/-! ### Array literal syntax -/
+
+syntax "#[" withoutPosition(sepBy(term, ", ")) "]" : term
+
+macro_rules
+  | `(#[ $elems,* ]) => `(List.toArray [ $elems,* ])
+
 variable {α : Type u}
 
+namespace Array
+
+/-! ### Preliminary theorems -/
+
+@[simp] theorem size_set (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) (v : α) : (set a i v).size = a.size :=
+  List.length_set ..
+
+@[simp] theorem size_push (a : Array α) (v : α) : (push a v).size = a.size + 1 :=
+  List.length_concat ..
+
+theorem ext (a b : Array α)
+    (h₁ : a.size = b.size)
+    (h₂ : (i : Nat) → (hi₁ : i < a.size) → (hi₂ : i < b.size) → a[i] = b[i])
+    : a = b := by
+  let rec extAux (a b : List α)
+      (h₁ : a.length = b.length)
+      (h₂ : (i : Nat) → (hi₁ : i < a.length) → (hi₂ : i < b.length) → a.get ⟨i, hi₁⟩ = b.get ⟨i, hi₂⟩)
+      : a = b := by
+    induction a generalizing b with
+    | nil =>
+      cases b with
+      | nil       => rfl
+      | cons b bs => rw [List.length_cons] at h₁; injection h₁
+    | cons a as ih =>
+      cases b with
+      | nil => rw [List.length_cons] at h₁; injection h₁
+      | cons b bs =>
+        have hz₁ : 0 < (a::as).length := by rw [List.length_cons]; apply Nat.zero_lt_succ
+        have hz₂ : 0 < (b::bs).length := by rw [List.length_cons]; apply Nat.zero_lt_succ
+        have headEq : a = b := h₂ 0 hz₁ hz₂
+        have h₁' : as.length = bs.length := by rw [List.length_cons, List.length_cons] at h₁; injection h₁
+        have h₂' : (i : Nat) → (hi₁ : i < as.length) → (hi₂ : i < bs.length) → as.get ⟨i, hi₁⟩ = bs.get ⟨i, hi₂⟩ := by
+          intro i hi₁ hi₂
+          have hi₁' : i+1 < (a::as).length := by rw [List.length_cons]; apply Nat.succ_lt_succ; assumption
+          have hi₂' : i+1 < (b::bs).length := by rw [List.length_cons]; apply Nat.succ_lt_succ; assumption
+          have : (a::as).get ⟨i+1, hi₁'⟩ = (b::bs).get ⟨i+1, hi₂'⟩ := h₂ (i+1) hi₁' hi₂'
+          apply this
+        have tailEq : as = bs := ih bs h₁' h₂'
+        rw [headEq, tailEq]
+  cases a; cases b
+  apply congrArg
+  apply extAux
+  assumption
+  assumption
+
+theorem ext' {as bs : Array α} (h : as.toList = bs.toList) : as = bs := by
+  cases as; cases bs; simp at h; rw [h]
+
+@[simp] theorem toArrayAux_eq (as : List α) (acc : Array α) : (as.toArrayAux acc).toList = acc.toList ++ as := by
+  induction as generalizing acc <;> simp [*, List.toArrayAux, Array.push, List.append_assoc, List.concat_eq_append]
+
+@[simp] theorem toList_toArray (as : List α) : as.toArray.toList = as := rfl
+
+@[simp] theorem size_toArray (as : List α) : as.toArray.size = as.length := by simp [size]
+
+@[deprecated toList_toArray (since := "2024-09-09")] abbrev data_toArray := @toList_toArray
+
 @[deprecated Array.toList (since := "2024-09-10")] abbrev Array.data := @Array.toList
 
-@[extern "lean_mk_array"]
-def mkArray {α : Type u} (n : Nat) (v : α) : Array α where
-  toList := List.replicate n v
-
-/--
-`ofFn f` with `f : Fin n → α` returns the list whose ith element is `f i`.
-```
-ofFn f = #[f 0, f 1, ... , f(n - 1)]
-``` -/
-def ofFn {n} (f : Fin n → α) : Array α := go 0 (mkEmpty n) where
-  /-- Auxiliary for `ofFn`. `ofFn.go f i acc = acc ++ #[f i, ..., f(n - 1)]` -/
-  go (i : Nat) (acc : Array α) : Array α :=
-    if h : i < n then go (i+1) (acc.push (f ⟨i, h⟩)) else acc
-termination_by n - i
-decreasing_by simp_wf; decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
-
-/-- The array `#[0, 1, ..., n - 1]`. -/
-def range (n : Nat) : Array Nat :=
-  n.fold (flip Array.push) (mkEmpty n)
-
-@[simp] theorem size_mkArray (n : Nat) (v : α) : (mkArray n v).size = n :=
-  List.length_replicate ..
-
-instance : EmptyCollection (Array α) := ⟨Array.empty⟩
-instance : Inhabited (Array α) where
-  default := Array.empty
-
-@[simp] def isEmpty (a : Array α) : Bool :=
-  a.size = 0
-
-def singleton (v : α) : Array α :=
-  mkArray 1 v
+/-! ### Externs -/
 
 /-- Low-level version of `size` that directly queries the C array object cached size.
     While this is not provable, `usize` always returns the exact size of the array since
@@ -65,29 +97,6 @@ def usize (a : @& Array α) : USize := a.size.toUSize
 def uget (a : @& Array α) (i : USize) (h : i.toNat < a.size) : α :=
   a[i.toNat]
 
-instance : GetElem (Array α) USize α fun xs i => i.toNat < xs.size where
-  getElem xs i h := xs.uget i h
-
-def back [Inhabited α] (a : Array α) : α :=
-  a.get! (a.size - 1)
-
-def get? (a : Array α) (i : Nat) : Option α :=
-  if h : i < a.size then some a[i] else none
-
-def back? (a : Array α) : Option α :=
-  a.get? (a.size - 1)
-
--- auxiliary declaration used in the equation compiler when pattern matching array literals.
-abbrev getLit {α : Type u} {n : Nat} (a : Array α) (i : Nat) (h₁ : a.size = n) (h₂ : i < n) : α :=
-  have := h₁.symm ▸ h₂
-  a[i]
-
-@[simp] theorem size_set (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) (v : α) : (set a i v).size = a.size :=
-  List.length_set ..
-
-@[simp] theorem size_push (a : Array α) (v : α) : (push a v).size = a.size + 1 :=
-  List.length_concat ..
-
 /-- Low-level version of `fset` which is as fast as a C array fset.
    `Fin` values are represented as tag pointers in the Lean runtime. Thus,
    `fset` may be slightly slower than `uset`. -/
@@ -95,6 +104,19 @@ abbrev getLit {α : Type u} {n : Nat} (a : Array α) (i : Nat) (h₁ : a.size =
 def uset (a : Array α) (i : USize) (v : α) (h : i.toNat < a.size) : Array α :=
   a.set ⟨i.toNat, h⟩ v
 
+@[extern "lean_array_pop"]
+def pop (a : Array α) : Array α where
+  toList := a.toList.dropLast
+
+@[simp] theorem size_pop (a : Array α) : a.pop.size = a.size - 1 := by
+  match a with
+  | ⟨[]⟩ => rfl
+  | ⟨a::as⟩ => simp [pop, Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub, size]
+
+@[extern "lean_mk_array"]
+def mkArray {α : Type u} (n : Nat) (v : α) : Array α where
+  toList := List.replicate n v
+
 /--
 Swaps two entries in an array.
 
@@ -108,6 +130,10 @@ def swap (a : Array α) (i j : @& Fin a.size) : Array α :=
   let a'  := a.set i v₂
   a'.set (size_set a i v₂ ▸ j) v₁
 
+@[simp] theorem size_swap (a : Array α) (i j : Fin a.size) : (a.swap i j).size = a.size := by
+  show ((a.set i (a.get j)).set (size_set a i _ ▸ j) (a.get i)).size = a.size
+  rw [size_set, size_set]
+
 /--
 Swaps two entries in an array, or returns the array unchanged if either index is out of bounds.
 
@@ -121,6 +147,64 @@ def swap! (a : Array α) (i j : @& Nat) : Array α :=
   else a
   else a
 
+/-! ### GetElem instance for `USize`, backed by `uget` -/
+
+instance : GetElem (Array α) USize α fun xs i => i.toNat < xs.size where
+  getElem xs i h := xs.uget i h
+
+/-! ### Definitions -/
+
+instance : EmptyCollection (Array α) := ⟨Array.empty⟩
+instance : Inhabited (Array α) where
+  default := Array.empty
+
+@[simp] def isEmpty (a : Array α) : Bool :=
+  a.size = 0
+
+@[specialize]
+def isEqvAux (a b : Array α) (hsz : a.size = b.size) (p : α → α → Bool) :
+    ∀ (i : Nat) (_ : i ≤ a.size), Bool
+  | 0, _ => true
+  | i+1, h =>
+    p a[i] (b[i]'(hsz ▸ h)) && isEqvAux a b hsz p i (Nat.le_trans (Nat.le_add_right i 1) h)
+
+@[inline] def isEqv (a b : Array α) (p : α → α → Bool) : Bool :=
+  if h : a.size = b.size then
+    isEqvAux a b h p a.size (Nat.le_refl a.size)
+  else
+    false
+
+instance [BEq α] : BEq (Array α) :=
+  ⟨fun a b => isEqv a b BEq.beq⟩
+
+/--
+`ofFn f` with `f : Fin n → α` returns the list whose ith element is `f i`.
+```
+ofFn f = #[f 0, f 1, ... , f(n - 1)]
+``` -/
+def ofFn {n} (f : Fin n → α) : Array α := go 0 (mkEmpty n) where
+  /-- Auxiliary for `ofFn`. `ofFn.go f i acc = acc ++ #[f i, ..., f(n - 1)]` -/
+  @[semireducible] -- This is otherwise irreducible because it uses well-founded recursion.
+  go (i : Nat) (acc : Array α) : Array α :=
+    if h : i < n then go (i+1) (acc.push (f ⟨i, h⟩)) else acc
+  decreasing_by simp_wf; decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
+
+/-- The array `#[0, 1, ..., n - 1]`. -/
+def range (n : Nat) : Array Nat :=
+  n.fold (flip Array.push) (mkEmpty n)
+
+def singleton (v : α) : Array α :=
+  mkArray 1 v
+
+def back [Inhabited α] (a : Array α) : α :=
+  a.get! (a.size - 1)
+
+def get? (a : Array α) (i : Nat) : Option α :=
+  if h : i < a.size then some a[i] else none
+
+def back? (a : Array α) : Option α :=
+  a.get? (a.size - 1)
+
 @[inline] def swapAt (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) (v : α) : α × Array α :=
   let e := a.get i
   let a := a.set i v
@@ -134,10 +218,6 @@ def swapAt! (a : Array α) (i : Nat) (v : α) : α × Array α :=
     have : Inhabited α := ⟨v⟩
     panic! ("index " ++ toString i ++ " out of bounds")
 
-@[extern "lean_array_pop"]
-def pop (a : Array α) : Array α where
-  toList := a.toList.dropLast
-
 def shrink (a : Array α) (n : Nat) : Array α :=
   let rec loop
     | 0,   a => a
@@ -306,12 +386,12 @@ unsafe def mapMUnsafe {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {m : Type v → Type w} [Monad
 def mapM {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {m : Type v → Type w} [Monad m] (f : α → m β) (as : Array α) : m (Array β) :=
   -- Note: we cannot use `foldlM` here for the reference implementation because this calls
   -- `bind` and `pure` too many times. (We are not assuming `m` is a `LawfulMonad`)
-  let rec map (i : Nat) (r : Array β) : m (Array β) := do
-    if hlt : i < as.size then
-      map (i+1) (r.push (← f as[i]))
-    else
-      pure r
-  termination_by as.size - i
+  let rec @[semireducible] -- This is otherwise irreducible because it uses well-founded recursion.
+    map (i : Nat) (r : Array β) : m (Array β) := do
+      if hlt : i < as.size then
+        map (i+1) (r.push (← f as[i]))
+      else
+        pure r
   decreasing_by simp_wf; decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
   map 0 (mkEmpty as.size)
 
@@ -375,7 +455,8 @@ unsafe def anyMUnsafe {α : Type u} {m : Type → Type w} [Monad m] (p : α →
 @[implemented_by anyMUnsafe]
 def anyM {α : Type u} {m : Type → Type w} [Monad m] (p : α → m Bool) (as : Array α) (start := 0) (stop := as.size) : m Bool :=
   let any (stop : Nat) (h : stop ≤ as.size) :=
-    let rec loop (j : Nat) : m Bool := do
+    let rec @[semireducible] -- This is otherwise irreducible because it uses well-founded recursion.
+    loop (j : Nat) : m Bool := do
       if hlt : j < stop then
         have : j < as.size := Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le hlt h
         if (← p as[j]) then
@@ -384,7 +465,6 @@ def anyM {α : Type u} {m : Type → Type w} [Monad m] (p : α → m Bool) (as :
           loop (j+1)
       else
         pure false
-      termination_by stop - j
       decreasing_by simp_wf; decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
     loop start
   if h : stop ≤ as.size then
@@ -466,16 +546,28 @@ def findRev? {α : Type} (as : Array α) (p : α → Bool) : Option α :=
 
 @[inline]
 def findIdx? {α : Type u} (as : Array α) (p : α → Bool) : Option Nat :=
-  let rec loop (j : Nat) :=
+  let rec @[semireducible] -- This is otherwise irreducible because it uses well-founded recursion.
+  loop (j : Nat) :=
     if h : j < as.size then
       if p as[j] then some j else loop (j + 1)
     else none
-    termination_by as.size - j
     decreasing_by simp_wf; decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
   loop 0
 
 def getIdx? [BEq α] (a : Array α) (v : α) : Option Nat :=
-a.findIdx? fun a => a == v
+  a.findIdx? fun a => a == v
+
+@[semireducible] -- This is otherwise irreducible because it uses well-founded recursion.
+def indexOfAux [BEq α] (a : Array α) (v : α) (i : Nat) : Option (Fin a.size) :=
+  if h : i < a.size then
+    let idx : Fin a.size := ⟨i, h⟩;
+    if a.get idx == v then some idx
+    else indexOfAux a v (i+1)
+  else none
+decreasing_by simp_wf; decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
+
+def indexOf? [BEq α] (a : Array α) (v : α) : Option (Fin a.size) :=
+  indexOfAux a v 0
 
 @[inline]
 def any (as : Array α) (p : α → Bool) (start := 0) (stop := as.size) : Bool :=
@@ -491,13 +583,6 @@ def contains [BEq α] (as : Array α) (a : α) : Bool :=
 def elem [BEq α] (a : α) (as : Array α) : Bool :=
   as.contains a
 
-@[inline] def getEvenElems (as : Array α) : Array α :=
-  (·.2) <| as.foldl (init := (true, Array.empty)) fun (even, r) a =>
-    if even then
-      (false, r.push a)
-    else
-      (true, r)
-
 /-- Convert a `Array α` into an `List α`. This is O(n) in the size of the array.  -/
 -- This function is exported to C, where it is called by `Array.toList`
 -- (the projection) to implement this functionality.
@@ -510,17 +595,6 @@ def toListImpl (as : Array α) : List α :=
 def toListAppend (as : Array α) (l : List α) : List α :=
   as.foldr List.cons l
 
-instance {α : Type u} [Repr α] : Repr (Array α) where
-  reprPrec a _ :=
-    let _ : Std.ToFormat α := ⟨repr⟩
-    if a.size == 0 then
-      "#[]"
-    else
-      Std.Format.bracketFill "#[" (Std.Format.joinSep (toList a) ("," ++ Std.Format.line)) "]"
-
-instance [ToString α] : ToString (Array α) where
-  toString a := "#" ++ toString a.toList
-
 protected def append (as : Array α) (bs : Array α) : Array α :=
   bs.foldl (init := as) fun r v => r.push v
 
@@ -543,47 +617,16 @@ def concatMap (f : α → Array β) (as : Array α) : Array β :=
 
 `flatten #[#[a₁, a₂, ⋯], #[b₁, b₂, ⋯], ⋯]` = `#[a₁, a₂, ⋯, b₁, b₂, ⋯]`
 -/
-def flatten (as : Array (Array α)) : Array α :=
+@[inline] def flatten (as : Array (Array α)) : Array α :=
   as.foldl (init := empty) fun r a => r ++ a
 
-end Array
-
-export Array (mkArray)
-
-syntax "#[" withoutPosition(sepBy(term, ", ")) "]" : term
-
-macro_rules
-  | `(#[ $elems,* ]) => `(List.toArray [ $elems,* ])
-
-namespace Array
-
--- TODO(Leo): cleanup
-@[specialize]
-def isEqvAux (a b : Array α) (hsz : a.size = b.size) (p : α → α → Bool) (i : Nat) : Bool :=
-  if h : i < a.size then
-     have : i < b.size := hsz ▸ h
-     p a[i] b[i] && isEqvAux a b hsz p (i+1)
-  else
-    true
-termination_by a.size - i
-decreasing_by simp_wf; decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
-
-@[inline] def isEqv (a b : Array α) (p : α → α → Bool) : Bool :=
-  if h : a.size = b.size then
-    isEqvAux a b h p 0
-  else
-    false
-
-instance [BEq α] : BEq (Array α) :=
-  ⟨fun a b => isEqv a b BEq.beq⟩
-
 @[inline]
 def filter (p : α → Bool) (as : Array α) (start := 0) (stop := as.size) : Array α :=
   as.foldl (init := #[]) (start := start) (stop := stop) fun r a =>
     if p a then r.push a else r
 
 @[inline]
-def filterM [Monad m] (p : α → m Bool) (as : Array α) (start := 0) (stop := as.size) : m (Array α) :=
+def filterM {α : Type} [Monad m] (p : α → m Bool) (as : Array α) (start := 0) (stop := as.size) : m (Array α) :=
   as.foldlM (init := #[]) (start := start) (stop := stop) fun r a => do
     if (← p a) then return r.push a else return r
 
@@ -618,93 +661,25 @@ def partition (p : α → Bool) (as : Array α) : Array α × Array α := Id.run
       cs := cs.push a
   return (bs, cs)
 
-theorem ext (a b : Array α)
-    (h₁ : a.size = b.size)
-    (h₂ : (i : Nat) → (hi₁ : i < a.size) → (hi₂ : i < b.size) → a[i] = b[i])
-    : a = b := by
-  let rec extAux (a b : List α)
-      (h₁ : a.length = b.length)
-      (h₂ : (i : Nat) → (hi₁ : i < a.length) → (hi₂ : i < b.length) → a.get ⟨i, hi₁⟩ = b.get ⟨i, hi₂⟩)
-      : a = b := by
-    induction a generalizing b with
-    | nil =>
-      cases b with
-      | nil       => rfl
-      | cons b bs => rw [List.length_cons] at h₁; injection h₁
-    | cons a as ih =>
-      cases b with
-      | nil => rw [List.length_cons] at h₁; injection h₁
-      | cons b bs =>
-        have hz₁ : 0 < (a::as).length := by rw [List.length_cons]; apply Nat.zero_lt_succ
-        have hz₂ : 0 < (b::bs).length := by rw [List.length_cons]; apply Nat.zero_lt_succ
-        have headEq : a = b := h₂ 0 hz₁ hz₂
-        have h₁' : as.length = bs.length := by rw [List.length_cons, List.length_cons] at h₁; injection h₁
-        have h₂' : (i : Nat) → (hi₁ : i < as.length) → (hi₂ : i < bs.length) → as.get ⟨i, hi₁⟩ = bs.get ⟨i, hi₂⟩ := by
-          intro i hi₁ hi₂
-          have hi₁' : i+1 < (a::as).length := by rw [List.length_cons]; apply Nat.succ_lt_succ; assumption
-          have hi₂' : i+1 < (b::bs).length := by rw [List.length_cons]; apply Nat.succ_lt_succ; assumption
-          have : (a::as).get ⟨i+1, hi₁'⟩ = (b::bs).get ⟨i+1, hi₂'⟩ := h₂ (i+1) hi₁' hi₂'
-          apply this
-        have tailEq : as = bs := ih bs h₁' h₂'
-        rw [headEq, tailEq]
-  cases a; cases b
-  apply congrArg
-  apply extAux
-  assumption
-  assumption
-
-theorem extLit {n : Nat}
-    (a b : Array α)
-    (hsz₁ : a.size = n) (hsz₂ : b.size = n)
-    (h : (i : Nat) → (hi : i < n) → a.getLit i hsz₁ hi = b.getLit i hsz₂ hi) : a = b :=
-  Array.ext a b (hsz₁.trans hsz₂.symm) fun i hi₁ _ => h i (hsz₁ ▸ hi₁)
-
-end Array
-
--- CLEANUP the following code
-namespace Array
-
-def indexOfAux [BEq α] (a : Array α) (v : α) (i : Nat) : Option (Fin a.size) :=
-  if h : i < a.size then
-    let idx : Fin a.size := ⟨i, h⟩;
-    if a.get idx == v then some idx
-    else indexOfAux a v (i+1)
-  else none
-termination_by a.size - i
-decreasing_by simp_wf; decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
-
-def indexOf? [BEq α] (a : Array α) (v : α) : Option (Fin a.size) :=
-  indexOfAux a v 0
-
-@[simp] theorem size_swap (a : Array α) (i j : Fin a.size) : (a.swap i j).size = a.size := by
-  show ((a.set i (a.get j)).set (size_set a i _ ▸ j) (a.get i)).size = a.size
-  rw [size_set, size_set]
-
-@[simp] theorem size_pop (a : Array α) : a.pop.size = a.size - 1 := by
-  match a with
-  | ⟨[]⟩ => rfl
-  | ⟨a::as⟩ => simp [pop, Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub, size]
-
-theorem reverse.termination {i j : Nat} (h : i < j) : j - 1 - (i + 1) < j - i := by
-  rw [Nat.sub_sub, Nat.add_comm]
-  exact Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.pred_le _) (Nat.sub_succ_lt_self _ _ h)
-
 def reverse (as : Array α) : Array α :=
   if h : as.size ≤ 1 then
     as
   else
     loop as 0 ⟨as.size - 1, Nat.pred_lt (mt (fun h : as.size = 0 => h ▸ by decide) h)⟩
 where
+  termination {i j : Nat} (h : i < j) : j - 1 - (i + 1) < j - i := by
+    rw [Nat.sub_sub, Nat.add_comm]
+    exact Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.pred_le _) (Nat.sub_succ_lt_self _ _ h)
   loop (as : Array α) (i : Nat) (j : Fin as.size) :=
     if h : i < j then
-      have := reverse.termination h
+      have := termination h
       let as := as.swap ⟨i, Nat.lt_trans h j.2⟩ j
       have : j-1 < as.size := by rw [size_swap]; exact Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.pred_le _) j.2
       loop as (i+1) ⟨j-1, this⟩
     else
       as
-termination_by j - i
 
+@[semireducible] -- This is otherwise irreducible because it uses well-founded recursion.
 def popWhile (p : α → Bool) (as : Array α) : Array α :=
   if h : as.size > 0 then
     if p (as.get ⟨as.size - 1, Nat.sub_lt h (by decide)⟩) then
@@ -713,11 +688,11 @@ def popWhile (p : α → Bool) (as : Array α) : Array α :=
       as
   else
     as
-termination_by as.size
 decreasing_by simp_wf; decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
 
 def takeWhile (p : α → Bool) (as : Array α) : Array α :=
-  let rec go (i : Nat) (r : Array α) : Array α :=
+  let rec @[semireducible] -- This is otherwise irreducible because it uses well-founded recursion.
+  go (i : Nat) (r : Array α) : Array α :=
     if h : i < as.size then
       let a := as.get ⟨i, h⟩
       if p a then
@@ -726,7 +701,6 @@ def takeWhile (p : α → Bool) (as : Array α) : Array α :=
         r
     else
       r
-    termination_by as.size - i
     decreasing_by simp_wf; decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
   go 0 #[]
 
@@ -734,6 +708,7 @@ def takeWhile (p : α → Bool) (as : Array α) : Array α :=
 
   This function takes worst case O(n) time because
   it has to backshift all elements at positions greater than `i`.-/
+@[semireducible] -- This is otherwise irreducible because it uses well-founded recursion.
 def feraseIdx (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) : Array α :=
   if h : i.val + 1 < a.size then
     let a' := a.swap ⟨i.val + 1, h⟩ i
@@ -744,7 +719,8 @@ def feraseIdx (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) : Array α :=
 termination_by a.size - i.val
 decreasing_by simp_wf; exact Nat.sub_succ_lt_self _ _ i.isLt
 
-theorem size_feraseIdx (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) : (a.feraseIdx i).size = a.size - 1 := by
+-- This is required in `Lean.Data.PersistentHashMap`.
+@[simp] theorem size_feraseIdx (a : Array α) (i : Fin a.size) : (a.feraseIdx i).size = a.size - 1 := by
   induction a, i using Array.feraseIdx.induct with
   | @case1 a i h a' _ ih =>
     unfold feraseIdx
@@ -767,14 +743,14 @@ def erase [BEq α] (as : Array α) (a : α) : Array α :=
 
 /-- Insert element `a` at position `i`. -/
 @[inline] def insertAt (as : Array α) (i : Fin (as.size + 1)) (a : α) : Array α :=
-  let rec loop (as : Array α) (j : Fin as.size) :=
+  let rec @[semireducible] -- This is otherwise irreducible because it uses well-founded recursion.
+  loop (as : Array α) (j : Fin as.size) :=
     if i.1 < j then
       let j' := ⟨j-1, Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.pred_le _) j.2⟩
       let as := as.swap j' j
       loop as ⟨j', by rw [size_swap]; exact j'.2⟩
     else
       as
-    termination_by j.1
     decreasing_by simp_wf; decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
   let j := as.size
   let as := as.push a
@@ -786,41 +762,7 @@ def insertAt! (as : Array α) (i : Nat) (a : α) : Array α :=
     insertAt as ⟨i, Nat.lt_succ_of_le h⟩ a
   else panic! "invalid index"
 
-def toListLitAux (a : Array α) (n : Nat) (hsz : a.size = n) : ∀ (i : Nat), i ≤ a.size → List α → List α
-  | 0,     _,  acc => acc
-  | (i+1), hi, acc => toListLitAux a n hsz i (Nat.le_of_succ_le hi) (a.getLit i hsz (Nat.lt_of_lt_of_eq (Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le (Nat.lt_succ_self i) hi) hsz) :: acc)
-
-def toArrayLit (a : Array α) (n : Nat) (hsz : a.size = n) : Array α :=
-  List.toArray <| toListLitAux a n hsz n (hsz ▸ Nat.le_refl _) []
-
-theorem ext' {as bs : Array α} (h : as.toList = bs.toList) : as = bs := by
-  cases as; cases bs; simp at h; rw [h]
-
-@[simp] theorem toArrayAux_eq (as : List α) (acc : Array α) : (as.toArrayAux acc).toList = acc.toList ++ as := by
-  induction as generalizing acc <;> simp [*, List.toArrayAux, Array.push, List.append_assoc, List.concat_eq_append]
-
-@[simp] theorem toList_toArray (as : List α) : as.toArray.toList = as := by
-  simp [List.toArray, Array.mkEmpty]
-
-@[deprecated toList_toArray (since := "2024-09-09")] abbrev data_toArray := @toList_toArray
-
-@[simp] theorem size_toArray (as : List α) : as.toArray.size = as.length := by simp [size]
-
-theorem toArrayLit_eq (as : Array α) (n : Nat) (hsz : as.size = n) : as = toArrayLit as n hsz := by
-  apply ext'
-  simp [toArrayLit, toList_toArray]
-  have hle : n ≤ as.size := hsz ▸ Nat.le_refl _
-  have hge : as.size ≤ n := hsz ▸ Nat.le_refl _
-  have := go n hle
-  rw [List.drop_eq_nil_of_le hge] at this
-  rw [this]
-where
-  getLit_eq (as : Array α) (i : Nat) (h₁ : as.size = n) (h₂ : i < n) : as.getLit i h₁ h₂ = getElem as.toList i ((id (α := as.toList.length = n) h₁) ▸ h₂) :=
-    rfl
-
-  go (i : Nat) (hi : i ≤ as.size) : toListLitAux as n hsz i hi (as.toList.drop i) = as.toList := by
-    induction i <;> simp [getLit_eq, List.get_drop_eq_drop, toListLitAux, List.drop, *]
-
+@[semireducible] -- This is otherwise irreducible because it uses well-founded recursion.
 def isPrefixOfAux [BEq α] (as bs : Array α) (hle : as.size ≤ bs.size) (i : Nat) : Bool :=
   if h : i < as.size then
     let a := as[i]
@@ -832,7 +774,6 @@ def isPrefixOfAux [BEq α] (as bs : Array α) (hle : as.size ≤ bs.size) (i : N
       false
   else
     true
-termination_by as.size - i
 decreasing_by simp_wf; decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
 
 /-- Return true iff `as` is a prefix of `bs`.
@@ -843,24 +784,8 @@ def isPrefixOf [BEq α] (as bs : Array α) : Bool :=
   else
     false
 
-private def allDiffAuxAux [BEq α] (as : Array α) (a : α) : forall (i : Nat), i < as.size → Bool
-  | 0,   _ => true
-  | i+1, h =>
-    have : i < as.size := Nat.lt_trans (Nat.lt_succ_self _) h;
-    a != as[i] && allDiffAuxAux as a i this
-
-private def allDiffAux [BEq α] (as : Array α) (i : Nat) : Bool :=
-  if h : i < as.size then
-    allDiffAuxAux as as[i] i h && allDiffAux as (i+1)
-  else
-    true
-termination_by as.size - i
-decreasing_by simp_wf; decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
-
-def allDiff [BEq α] (as : Array α) : Bool :=
-  allDiffAux as 0
-
-@[specialize] def zipWithAux (f : α → β → γ) (as : Array α) (bs : Array β) (i : Nat) (cs : Array γ) : Array γ :=
+@[semireducible, specialize] -- This is otherwise irreducible because it uses well-founded recursion.
+def zipWithAux (f : α → β → γ) (as : Array α) (bs : Array β) (i : Nat) (cs : Array γ) : Array γ :=
   if h : i < as.size then
     let a := as[i]
     if h : i < bs.size then
@@ -870,7 +795,6 @@ def allDiff [BEq α] (as : Array α) : Bool :=
       cs
   else
     cs
-termination_by as.size - i
 decreasing_by simp_wf; decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
 
 @[inline] def zipWith (as : Array α) (bs : Array β) (f : α → β → γ) : Array γ :=
@@ -886,4 +810,66 @@ def split (as : Array α) (p : α → Bool) : Array α × Array α :=
   as.foldl (init := (#[], #[])) fun (as, bs) a =>
     if p a then (as.push a, bs) else (as, bs.push a)
 
+/-! ## Auxiliary functions used in metaprogramming.
+
+We do not intend to provide verification theorems for these functions.
+-/
+
+/-! ### eraseReps -/
+
+/--
+`O(|l|)`. Erase repeated adjacent elements. Keeps the first occurrence of each run.
+* `eraseReps #[1, 3, 2, 2, 2, 3, 5] = #[1, 3, 2, 3, 5]`
+-/
+def eraseReps {α} [BEq α] (as : Array α) : Array α :=
+  if h : 0 < as.size then
+    let ⟨last, r⟩ := as.foldl (init := (as[0], #[])) fun ⟨last, r⟩ a =>
+      if a == last then ⟨last, r⟩ else ⟨a, r.push last⟩
+    r.push last
+  else
+    #[]
+
+/-! ### allDiff -/
+
+private def allDiffAuxAux [BEq α] (as : Array α) (a : α) : forall (i : Nat), i < as.size → Bool
+  | 0,   _ => true
+  | i+1, h =>
+    have : i < as.size := Nat.lt_trans (Nat.lt_succ_self _) h;
+    a != as[i] && allDiffAuxAux as a i this
+
+@[semireducible] -- This is otherwise irreducible because it uses well-founded recursion.
+private def allDiffAux [BEq α] (as : Array α) (i : Nat) : Bool :=
+  if h : i < as.size then
+    allDiffAuxAux as as[i] i h && allDiffAux as (i+1)
+  else
+    true
+decreasing_by simp_wf; decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
+
+def allDiff [BEq α] (as : Array α) : Bool :=
+  allDiffAux as 0
+
+/-! ### getEvenElems -/
+
+@[inline] def getEvenElems (as : Array α) : Array α :=
+  (·.2) <| as.foldl (init := (true, Array.empty)) fun (even, r) a =>
+    if even then
+      (false, r.push a)
+    else
+      (true, r)
+
+/-! ### Repr and ToString -/
+
+instance {α : Type u} [Repr α] : Repr (Array α) where
+  reprPrec a _ :=
+    let _ : Std.ToFormat α := ⟨repr⟩
+    if a.size == 0 then
+      "#[]"
+    else
+      Std.Format.bracketFill "#[" (Std.Format.joinSep (toList a) ("," ++ Std.Format.line)) "]"
+
+instance [ToString α] : ToString (Array α) where
+  toString a := "#" ++ toString a.toList
+
 end Array
+
+export Array (mkArray)

src/Init/Data/Array/BasicAux.lean

@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ private theorem List.of_toArrayAux_eq_toArrayAux {as bs : List α} {cs ds : Arra
 
 @[simp] theorem List.toArray_eq_toArray_eq (as bs : List α) : (as.toArray = bs.toArray) = (as = bs) := by
   apply propext; apply Iff.intro
-  · intro h; simp [toArray] at h; have := of_toArrayAux_eq_toArrayAux h rfl; exact this.1
+  · intro h; simpa [toArray] using h
   · intro h; rw [h]
 
 def Array.mapM' [Monad m] (f : α → m β) (as : Array α) : m { bs : Array β // bs.size = as.size } :=

src/Init/Data/Array/Bootstrap.lean

@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ theorem foldr_eq_foldr_toList (f : α → β → β) (init : β) (arr : Array α
 
 @[simp] theorem append_eq_append (arr arr' : Array α) : arr.append arr' = arr ++ arr' := rfl
 
-@[simp] theorem append_toList (arr arr' : Array α) :
+@[simp] theorem toList_append (arr arr' : Array α) :
     (arr ++ arr').toList = arr.toList ++ arr'.toList := by
   rw [← append_eq_append]; unfold Array.append
   rw [foldl_eq_foldl_toList]
@@ -111,8 +111,8 @@ abbrev toList_eq := @toListImpl_eq
 @[deprecated pop_toList (since := "2024-09-09")]
 abbrev pop_data := @pop_toList
 
-@[deprecated append_toList (since := "2024-09-09")]
-abbrev append_data := @append_toList
+@[deprecated toList_append (since := "2024-09-09")]
+abbrev append_data := @toList_append
 
 @[deprecated appendList_toList (since := "2024-09-09")]
 abbrev appendList_data := @appendList_toList

src/Init/Data/Array/DecidableEq.lean

@@ -5,43 +5,49 @@ Authors: Leonardo de Moura
 -/
 prelude
 import Init.Data.Array.Basic
+import Init.Data.BEq
 import Init.ByCases
 
 namespace Array
 
-theorem eq_of_isEqvAux [DecidableEq α] (a b : Array α) (hsz : a.size = b.size) (i : Nat) (hi : i ≤ a.size) (heqv : Array.isEqvAux a b hsz (fun x y => x = y) i) (j : Nat) (low : i ≤ j) (high : j < a.size) : a[j] = b[j]'(hsz ▸ high) := by
-  by_cases h : i < a.size
-  · unfold Array.isEqvAux at heqv
-    simp [h] at heqv
-    have hind := eq_of_isEqvAux a b hsz (i+1) (Nat.succ_le_of_lt h) heqv.2
-    by_cases heq : i = j
-    · subst heq; exact heqv.1
-    · exact hind j (Nat.succ_le_of_lt (Nat.lt_of_le_of_ne low heq)) high
-  · have heq : i = a.size := Nat.le_antisymm hi (Nat.ge_of_not_lt h)
-    subst heq
-    exact absurd (Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le high low) (Nat.lt_irrefl j)
-termination_by a.size - i
-decreasing_by decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
+theorem rel_of_isEqvAux
+    (r : α → α → Bool) (a b : Array α) (hsz : a.size = b.size) (i : Nat) (hi : i ≤ a.size)
+    (heqv : Array.isEqvAux a b hsz r i hi)
+    (j : Nat) (hj : j < i) : r (a[j]'(Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le hj hi)) (b[j]'(Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le hj (hsz ▸ hi))) := by
+  induction i with
+  | zero => contradiction
+  | succ i ih =>
+    simp only [Array.isEqvAux, Bool.and_eq_true, decide_eq_true_eq] at heqv
+    by_cases hj' : j < i
+    next =>
+      exact ih _ heqv.right hj'
+    next =>
+      replace hj' : j = i := Nat.eq_of_le_of_lt_succ (Nat.not_lt.mp hj') hj
+      subst hj'
+      exact heqv.left
 
+theorem rel_of_isEqv (r : α → α → Bool) (a b : Array α) :
+    Array.isEqv a b r → ∃ h : a.size = b.size, ∀ (i : Nat) (h' : i < a.size), r (a[i]) (b[i]'(h ▸ h')) := by
+  simp only [isEqv]
+  split <;> rename_i h
+  · exact fun h' => ⟨h, rel_of_isEqvAux r a b h a.size (Nat.le_refl ..) h'⟩
+  · intro; contradiction
 
-theorem eq_of_isEqv [DecidableEq α] (a b : Array α) : Array.isEqv a b (fun x y => x = y) → a = b := by
-  simp [Array.isEqv]
-  split
-  next hsz =>
-   intro h
-   have aux := eq_of_isEqvAux a b hsz 0 (Nat.zero_le ..) h
-   exact ext a b hsz fun i h _ => aux i (Nat.zero_le ..) _
-  next => intro; contradiction
+theorem eq_of_isEqv [DecidableEq α] (a b : Array α) (h : Array.isEqv a b (fun x y => x = y)) : a = b := by
+  have ⟨h, h'⟩ := rel_of_isEqv (fun x y => x = y) a b h
+  exact ext _ _ h (fun i lt _ => by simpa using h' i lt)
 
-theorem isEqvAux_self [DecidableEq α] (a : Array α) (i : Nat) : Array.isEqvAux a a rfl (fun x y => x = y) i = true := by
-  unfold Array.isEqvAux
-  split
-  next h => simp [h, isEqvAux_self a (i+1)]
-  next h => simp [h]
-termination_by a.size - i
-decreasing_by decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
+theorem isEqvAux_self (r : α → α → Bool) (hr : ∀ a, r a a) (a : Array α) (i : Nat) (h : i ≤ a.size) :
+    Array.isEqvAux a a rfl r i h = true := by
+  induction i with
+  | zero => simp [Array.isEqvAux]
+  | succ i ih =>
+    simp_all only [isEqvAux, Bool.and_self]
 
-theorem isEqv_self [DecidableEq α] (a : Array α) : Array.isEqv a a (fun x y => x = y) = true := by
+theorem isEqv_self_beq [BEq α] [ReflBEq α] (a : Array α) : Array.isEqv a a (· == ·) = true := by
+  simp [isEqv, isEqvAux_self]
+
+theorem isEqv_self [DecidableEq α] (a : Array α) : Array.isEqv a a (· = ·) = true := by
   simp [isEqv, isEqvAux_self]
 
 instance [DecidableEq α] : DecidableEq (Array α) :=

src/Init/Data/Array/GetLit.lean

@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+/-
+Copyright (c) 2018 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
+Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
+Authors: Leonardo de Moura
+-/
+
+prelude
+import Init.Data.Array.Basic
+
+namespace Array
+
+/-! ### getLit -/
+
+-- auxiliary declaration used in the equation compiler when pattern matching array literals.
+abbrev getLit {α : Type u} {n : Nat} (a : Array α) (i : Nat) (h₁ : a.size = n) (h₂ : i < n) : α :=
+  have := h₁.symm ▸ h₂
+  a[i]
+
+theorem extLit {n : Nat}
+    (a b : Array α)
+    (hsz₁ : a.size = n) (hsz₂ : b.size = n)
+    (h : (i : Nat) → (hi : i < n) → a.getLit i hsz₁ hi = b.getLit i hsz₂ hi) : a = b :=
+  Array.ext a b (hsz₁.trans hsz₂.symm) fun i hi₁ _ => h i (hsz₁ ▸ hi₁)
+
+def toListLitAux (a : Array α) (n : Nat) (hsz : a.size = n) : ∀ (i : Nat), i ≤ a.size → List α → List α
+  | 0,     _,  acc => acc
+  | (i+1), hi, acc => toListLitAux a n hsz i (Nat.le_of_succ_le hi) (a.getLit i hsz (Nat.lt_of_lt_of_eq (Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le (Nat.lt_succ_self i) hi) hsz) :: acc)
+
+def toArrayLit (a : Array α) (n : Nat) (hsz : a.size = n) : Array α :=
+  List.toArray <| toListLitAux a n hsz n (hsz ▸ Nat.le_refl _) []
+
+theorem toArrayLit_eq (as : Array α) (n : Nat) (hsz : as.size = n) : as = toArrayLit as n hsz := by
+  apply ext'
+  simp [toArrayLit, toList_toArray]
+  have hle : n ≤ as.size := hsz ▸ Nat.le_refl _
+  have hge : as.size ≤ n := hsz ▸ Nat.le_refl _
+  have := go n hle
+  rw [List.drop_eq_nil_of_le hge] at this
+  rw [this]
+where
+  getLit_eq (as : Array α) (i : Nat) (h₁ : as.size = n) (h₂ : i < n) : as.getLit i h₁ h₂ = getElem as.toList i ((id (α := as.toList.length = n) h₁) ▸ h₂) :=
+    rfl
+  go (i : Nat) (hi : i ≤ as.size) : toListLitAux as n hsz i hi (as.toList.drop i) = as.toList := by
+    induction i <;> simp [getLit_eq, List.get_drop_eq_drop, toListLitAux, List.drop, *]
+
+end Array

src/Init/Data/Array/QSort.lean

@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ Authors: Leonardo de Moura
 -/
 prelude
 import Init.Data.Array.Basic
+import Init.Data.Ord
 
 namespace Array
 -- TODO: remove the [Inhabited α] parameters as soon as we have the tactic framework for automating proof generation and using Array.fget
@@ -44,4 +45,11 @@ def qpartition (as : Array α) (lt : α → α → Bool) (lo hi : Nat) : Nat ×
     else as
   sort as low high
 
+set_option linter.unusedVariables.funArgs false in
+/--
+Sort an array using `compare` to compare elements.
+-/
+def qsortOrd [ord : Ord α] (xs : Array α) : Array α :=
+  xs.qsort fun x y => compare x y |>.isLT
+
 end Array

src/Init/Data/Array/Subarray.lean

@@ -59,6 +59,22 @@ def popFront (s : Subarray α) : Subarray α :=
   else
     s
 
+/--
+The empty subarray.
+-/
+protected def empty : Subarray α where
+  array := #[]
+  start := 0
+  stop := 0
+  start_le_stop := Nat.le_refl 0
+  stop_le_array_size := Nat.le_refl 0
+
+instance : EmptyCollection (Subarray α) :=
+  ⟨Subarray.empty⟩
+
+instance : Inhabited (Subarray α) :=
+  ⟨{}⟩
+
 @[inline] unsafe def forInUnsafe {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {m : Type v → Type w} [Monad m] (s : Subarray α) (b : β) (f : α → β → m (ForInStep β)) : m β :=
   let sz := USize.ofNat s.stop
   let rec @[specialize] loop (i : USize) (b : β) : m β := do

src/Init/Data/Array/TakeDrop.lean

@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ namespace Array
 theorem exists_of_uset (self : Array α) (i d h) :
     ∃ l₁ l₂, self.toList = l₁ ++ self[i] :: l₂ ∧ List.length l₁ = i.toNat ∧
       (self.uset i d h).toList = l₁ ++ d :: l₂ := by
-  simpa [Array.getElem_eq_toList_getElem] using List.exists_of_set _
+  simpa only [ugetElem_eq_getElem, getElem_eq_getElem_toList, uset, toList_set] using
+    List.exists_of_set _
 
 end Array

src/Init/Data/BitVec.lean

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 /-
 Copyright (c) 2024 Lean FRO, LLC. All rights reserved.
 Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-Authors: Scott Morrison
+Authors: Kim Morrison
 -/
 prelude
 import Init.Data.BitVec.Basic

src/Init/Data/BitVec/Basic.lean

@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ protected def ofNatLt {n : Nat} (i : Nat) (p : i < 2^n) : BitVec n where
 /-- The `BitVec` with value `i mod 2^n`. -/
 @[match_pattern]
 protected def ofNat (n : Nat) (i : Nat) : BitVec n where
-  toFin := Fin.ofNat' i (Nat.two_pow_pos n)
+  toFin := Fin.ofNat' (2^n) i
 
 instance instOfNat : OfNat (BitVec n) i where ofNat := .ofNat n i
 instance natCastInst : NatCast (BitVec w) := ⟨BitVec.ofNat w⟩
@@ -173,6 +173,9 @@ instance : GetElem (BitVec w) Nat Bool fun _ i => i < w where
 theorem getElem_eq_testBit_toNat (x : BitVec w) (i : Nat) (h : i < w) :
   x[i] = x.toNat.testBit i := rfl
 
+theorem getLsbD_eq_getElem {x : BitVec w} {i : Nat} (h : i < w) :
+    x.getLsbD i = x[i] := rfl
+
 end getElem
 
 section Int
@@ -266,8 +269,8 @@ Return the absolute value of a signed bitvector.
 protected def abs (x : BitVec n) : BitVec n := if x.msb then .neg x else x
 
 /--
-Multiplication for bit vectors. This can be interpreted as either signed or unsigned negation
-modulo `2^n`.
+Multiplication for bit vectors. This can be interpreted as either signed or unsigned
+multiplication modulo `2^n`.
 
 SMT-Lib name: `bvmul`.
 -/
@@ -450,13 +453,15 @@ SMT-Lib name: `extract`.
 def extractLsb (hi lo : Nat) (x : BitVec n) : BitVec (hi - lo + 1) := extractLsb' lo _ x
 
 /--
-A version of `zeroExtend` that requires a proof, but is a noop.
+A version of `setWidth` that requires a proof, but is a noop.
 -/
-def zeroExtend' {n w : Nat} (le : n ≤ w) (x : BitVec n) : BitVec w :=
+def setWidth' {n w : Nat} (le : n ≤ w) (x : BitVec n) : BitVec w :=
   x.toNat#'(by
     apply Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le x.isLt
     exact Nat.pow_le_pow_of_le_right (by trivial) le)
 
+@[deprecated setWidth' (since := "2024-09-18"), inherit_doc setWidth'] abbrev zeroExtend' := @setWidth'
+
 /--
 `shiftLeftZeroExtend x n` returns `zeroExtend (w+n) x <<< n` without
 needing to compute `x % 2^(2+n)`.
@@ -469,22 +474,35 @@ def shiftLeftZeroExtend (msbs : BitVec w) (m : Nat) : BitVec (w + m) :=
   (msbs.toNat <<< m)#'(shiftLeftLt msbs.isLt m)
 
 /--
-Zero extend vector `x` of length `w` by adding zeros in the high bits until it has length `v`.
-If `v < w` then it truncates the high bits instead.
+Transform `x` of length `w` into a bitvector of length `v`, by either:
+- zero extending, that is, adding zeros in the high bits until it has length `v`, if `v > w`, or
+- truncating the high bits, if `v < w`.
 
 SMT-Lib name: `zero_extend`.
 -/
-def zeroExtend (v : Nat) (x : BitVec w) : BitVec v :=
+def setWidth (v : Nat) (x : BitVec w) : BitVec v :=
   if h : w ≤ v then
-    zeroExtend' h x
+    setWidth' h x
   else
     .ofNat v x.toNat
 
 /--
-Truncate the high bits of bitvector `x` of length `w`, resulting in a vector of length `v`.
-If `v > w` then it zero-extends the vector instead.
+Transform `x` of length `w` into a bitvector of length `v`, by either:
+- zero extending, that is, adding zeros in the high bits until it has length `v`, if `v > w`, or
+- truncating the high bits, if `v < w`.
+
+SMT-Lib name: `zero_extend`.
 -/
-abbrev truncate := @zeroExtend
+abbrev zeroExtend := @setWidth
+
+/--
+Transform `x` of length `w` into a bitvector of length `v`, by either:
+- zero extending, that is, adding zeros in the high bits until it has length `v`, if `v > w`, or
+- truncating the high bits, if `v < w`.
+
+SMT-Lib name: `zero_extend`.
+-/
+abbrev truncate := @setWidth
 
 /--
 Sign extend a vector of length `w`, extending with `i` additional copies of the most significant
@@ -635,7 +653,7 @@ input is on the left, so `0xAB#8 ++ 0xCD#8 = 0xABCD#16`.
 SMT-Lib name: `concat`.
 -/
 def append (msbs : BitVec n) (lsbs : BitVec m) : BitVec (n+m) :=
-  shiftLeftZeroExtend msbs m ||| zeroExtend' (Nat.le_add_left m n) lsbs
+  shiftLeftZeroExtend msbs m ||| setWidth' (Nat.le_add_left m n) lsbs
 
 instance : HAppend (BitVec w) (BitVec v) (BitVec (w + v)) := ⟨.append⟩
 
@@ -658,6 +676,13 @@ result of appending a single bit to the front in the naive implementation).
     That is, the new bit is the least significant bit. -/
 def concat {n} (msbs : BitVec n) (lsb : Bool) : BitVec (n+1) := msbs ++ (ofBool lsb)
 
+/--
+`x.shiftConcat b` shifts all bits of `x` to the left by `1` and sets the least significant bit to `b`.
+It is a non-dependent version of `concat` that does not change the total bitwidth.
+-/
+def shiftConcat (x : BitVec n) (b : Bool) : BitVec n :=
+  (x.concat b).truncate n
+
 /-- Prepend a single bit to the front of a bitvector, using big endian order (see `append`).
     That is, the new bit is the most significant bit. -/
 def cons {n} (msb : Bool) (lsbs : BitVec n) : BitVec (n+1) :=

src/Init/Data/BitVec/Bitblast.lean

@@ -132,18 +132,18 @@ theorem toNat_add_of_and_eq_zero {x y : BitVec w} (h : x &&& y = 0#w) :
   simp [not_eq_true, carry_of_and_eq_zero h]
 
 /-- Carry function for bitwise addition. -/
-def adcb (x y c : Bool) : Bool × Bool := (atLeastTwo x y c, Bool.xor x (Bool.xor y c))
+def adcb (x y c : Bool) : Bool × Bool := (atLeastTwo x y c, x ^^ (y ^^ c))
 
 /-- Bitwise addition implemented via a ripple carry adder. -/
 def adc (x y : BitVec w) : Bool → Bool × BitVec w :=
   iunfoldr fun (i : Fin w) c => adcb (x.getLsbD i) (y.getLsbD i) c
 
 theorem getLsbD_add_add_bool {i : Nat} (i_lt : i < w) (x y : BitVec w) (c : Bool) :
-    getLsbD (x + y + zeroExtend w (ofBool c)) i =
-      Bool.xor (getLsbD x i) (Bool.xor (getLsbD y i) (carry i x y c)) := by
+    getLsbD (x + y + setWidth w (ofBool c)) i =
+      (getLsbD x i ^^ (getLsbD y i ^^ carry i x y c)) := by
   let ⟨x, x_lt⟩ := x
   let ⟨y, y_lt⟩ := y
-  simp only [getLsbD, toNat_add, toNat_zeroExtend, i_lt, toNat_ofFin, toNat_ofBool,
+  simp only [getLsbD, toNat_add, toNat_setWidth, i_lt, toNat_ofFin, toNat_ofBool,
     Nat.mod_add_mod, Nat.add_mod_mod]
   apply Eq.trans
   rw [← Nat.div_add_mod x (2^i), ← Nat.div_add_mod y (2^i)]
@@ -161,15 +161,26 @@ theorem getLsbD_add_add_bool {i : Nat} (i_lt : i < w) (x y : BitVec w) (c : Bool
 
 theorem getLsbD_add {i : Nat} (i_lt : i < w) (x y : BitVec w) :
     getLsbD (x + y) i =
-      Bool.xor (getLsbD x i) (Bool.xor (getLsbD y i) (carry i x y false)) := by
+      (getLsbD x i ^^ (getLsbD y i ^^ carry i x y false)) := by
   simpa using getLsbD_add_add_bool i_lt x y false
 
+theorem getElem_add_add_bool {i : Nat} (i_lt : i < w) (x y : BitVec w) (c : Bool) :
+    (x + y + setWidth w (ofBool c))[i] =
+      (x[i] ^^ (y[i] ^^ carry i x y c)) := by
+  simp only [← getLsbD_eq_getElem]
+  rw [getLsbD_add_add_bool]
+  omega
+
+theorem getElem_add {i : Nat} (i_lt : i < w) (x y : BitVec w) :
+    (x + y)[i] = (x[i] ^^ (y[i] ^^ carry i x y false)) := by
+  simpa using getElem_add_add_bool i_lt x y false
+
 theorem adc_spec (x y : BitVec w) (c : Bool) :
-    adc x y c = (carry w x y c, x + y + zeroExtend w (ofBool c)) := by
+    adc x y c = (carry w x y c, x + y + setWidth w (ofBool c)) := by
   simp only [adc]
   apply iunfoldr_replace
           (fun i => carry i x y c)
-          (x + y + zeroExtend w (ofBool c))
+          (x + y + setWidth w (ofBool c))
           c
   case init =>
     simp [carry, Nat.mod_one]
@@ -306,12 +317,12 @@ theorem mulRec_succ_eq (x y : BitVec w) (s : Nat) :
 Recurrence lemma: truncating to `i+1` bits and then zero extending to `w`
 equals truncating upto `i` bits `[0..i-1]`, and then adding the `i`th bit of `x`.
 -/
-theorem zeroExtend_truncate_succ_eq_zeroExtend_truncate_add_twoPow (x : BitVec w) (i : Nat) :
-    zeroExtend w (x.truncate (i + 1)) =
-      zeroExtend w (x.truncate i) + (x &&& twoPow w i) := by
+theorem setWidth_setWidth_succ_eq_setWidth_setWidth_add_twoPow (x : BitVec w) (i : Nat) :
+    setWidth w (x.setWidth (i + 1)) =
+      setWidth w (x.setWidth i) + (x &&& twoPow w i) := by
   rw [add_eq_or_of_and_eq_zero]
   · ext k
-    simp only [getLsbD_zeroExtend, Fin.is_lt, decide_True, Bool.true_and, getLsbD_or, getLsbD_and]
+    simp only [getLsbD_setWidth, Fin.is_lt, decide_True, Bool.true_and, getLsbD_or, getLsbD_and]
     by_cases hik : i = k
     · subst hik
       simp
@@ -322,27 +333,32 @@ theorem zeroExtend_truncate_succ_eq_zeroExtend_truncate_add_twoPow (x : BitVec w
       · have hik'' : ¬ (k < i) := by omega
         simp [hik', hik'']
   · ext k
-    simp only [and_twoPow, getLsbD_and, getLsbD_zeroExtend, Fin.is_lt, decide_True, Bool.true_and,
+    simp only [and_twoPow, getLsbD_and, getLsbD_setWidth, Fin.is_lt, decide_True, Bool.true_and,
       getLsbD_zero, and_eq_false_imp, and_eq_true, decide_eq_true_eq, and_imp]
     by_cases hi : x.getLsbD i <;> simp [hi] <;> omega
 
+@[deprecated setWidth_setWidth_succ_eq_setWidth_setWidth_add_twoPow (since := "2024-09-18"),
+  inherit_doc setWidth_setWidth_succ_eq_setWidth_setWidth_add_twoPow]
+abbrev zeroExtend_truncate_succ_eq_zeroExtend_truncate_add_twoPow :=
+  @setWidth_setWidth_succ_eq_setWidth_setWidth_add_twoPow
+
 /--
 Recurrence lemma: multiplying `x` with the first `s` bits of `y` is the
 same as truncating `y` to `s` bits, then zero extending to the original length,
 and performing the multplication. -/
-theorem mulRec_eq_mul_signExtend_truncate (x y : BitVec w) (s : Nat) :
-    mulRec x y s = x * ((y.truncate (s + 1)).zeroExtend w) := by
+theorem mulRec_eq_mul_signExtend_setWidth (x y : BitVec w) (s : Nat) :
+    mulRec x y s = x * ((y.setWidth (s + 1)).setWidth w) := by
   induction s
   case zero =>
     simp only [mulRec_zero_eq, ofNat_eq_ofNat, Nat.reduceAdd]
     by_cases y.getLsbD 0
     case pos hy =>
-      simp only [hy, ↓reduceIte, truncate, zeroExtend_one_eq_ofBool_getLsb_zero,
+      simp only [hy, ↓reduceIte, setWidth_one_eq_ofBool_getLsb_zero,
         ofBool_true, ofNat_eq_ofNat]
-      rw [zeroExtend_ofNat_one_eq_ofNat_one_of_lt (by omega)]
+      rw [setWidth_ofNat_one_eq_ofNat_one_of_lt (by omega)]
       simp
     case neg hy =>
-      simp [hy, zeroExtend_one_eq_ofBool_getLsb_zero]
+      simp [hy, setWidth_one_eq_ofBool_getLsb_zero]
   case succ s' hs =>
     rw [mulRec_succ_eq, hs]
     have heq :
@@ -350,16 +366,23 @@ theorem mulRec_eq_mul_signExtend_truncate (x y : BitVec w) (s : Nat) :
         (x * (y &&& (BitVec.twoPow w (s' + 1)))) := by
       simp only [ofNat_eq_ofNat, and_twoPow]
       by_cases hy : y.getLsbD (s' + 1) <;> simp [hy]
-    rw [heq, ← BitVec.mul_add, ← zeroExtend_truncate_succ_eq_zeroExtend_truncate_add_twoPow]
+    rw [heq, ← BitVec.mul_add, ← setWidth_setWidth_succ_eq_setWidth_setWidth_add_twoPow]
+
+@[deprecated mulRec_eq_mul_signExtend_setWidth (since := "2024-09-18"),
+  inherit_doc mulRec_eq_mul_signExtend_setWidth]
+abbrev mulRec_eq_mul_signExtend_truncate := @mulRec_eq_mul_signExtend_setWidth
 
 theorem getLsbD_mul (x y : BitVec w) (i : Nat) :
     (x * y).getLsbD i = (mulRec x y w).getLsbD i := by
-  simp only [mulRec_eq_mul_signExtend_truncate]
-  rw [truncate, ← truncate_eq_zeroExtend, ← truncate_eq_zeroExtend,
-    truncate_truncate_of_le]
+  simp only [mulRec_eq_mul_signExtend_setWidth]
+  rw [setWidth_setWidth_of_le]
   · simp
   · omega
 
+theorem getElem_mul {x y : BitVec w} {i : Nat} (h : i < w) :
+    (x * y)[i] = (mulRec x y w)[i] := by
+  simp [mulRec_eq_mul_signExtend_setWidth]
+
 /-! ## shiftLeft recurrence for bitblasting -/
 
 /--
@@ -402,22 +425,22 @@ theorem shiftLeft_or_of_and_eq_zero {x : BitVec w₁} {y z : BitVec w₂}
 `shiftLeftRec x y n` shifts `x` to the left by the first `n` bits of `y`.
 -/
 theorem shiftLeftRec_eq {x : BitVec w₁} {y : BitVec w₂} {n : Nat} :
-    shiftLeftRec x y n = x <<< (y.truncate (n + 1)).zeroExtend w₂ := by
+    shiftLeftRec x y n = x <<< (y.setWidth (n + 1)).setWidth w₂ := by
   induction n generalizing x y
   case zero =>
     ext i
-    simp only [shiftLeftRec_zero, twoPow_zero, Nat.reduceAdd, truncate_one,
-      and_one_eq_zeroExtend_ofBool_getLsbD]
+    simp only [shiftLeftRec_zero, twoPow_zero, Nat.reduceAdd, setWidth_one,
+      and_one_eq_setWidth_ofBool_getLsbD]
   case succ n ih =>
     simp only [shiftLeftRec_succ, and_twoPow]
     rw [ih]
     by_cases h : y.getLsbD (n + 1)
     · simp only [h, ↓reduceIte]
-      rw [zeroExtend_truncate_succ_eq_zeroExtend_truncate_or_twoPow_of_getLsbD_true h,
+      rw [setWidth_setWidth_succ_eq_setWidth_setWidth_or_twoPow_of_getLsbD_true h,
         shiftLeft_or_of_and_eq_zero]
       simp [and_twoPow]
     · simp only [h, false_eq_true, ↓reduceIte, shiftLeft_zero']
-      rw [zeroExtend_truncate_succ_eq_zeroExtend_truncate_of_getLsbD_false (i := n + 1)]
+      rw [setWidth_setWidth_succ_eq_setWidth_setWidth_of_getLsbD_false (i := n + 1)]
       simp [h]
 
 /--
@@ -430,6 +453,385 @@ theorem shiftLeft_eq_shiftLeftRec (x : BitVec w₁) (y : BitVec w₂) :
   · simp [of_length_zero]
   · simp [shiftLeftRec_eq]
 
+/-! # udiv/urem recurrence for bitblasting
+
+In order to prove the correctness of the division algorithm on the integers,
+one shows that `n.div d = q` and `n.mod d = r` iff `n = d * q + r` and `0 ≤ r < d`.
+Mnemonic: `n` is the numerator, `d` is the denominator, `q` is the quotient, and `r` the remainder.
+
+This *uniqueness of decomposition* is not true for bitvectors.
+For `n = 0, d = 3, w = 3`, we can write:
+- `0 = 0 * 3 + 0` (`q = 0`, `r = 0 < 3`.)
+- `0 = 2 * 3 + 2 = 6 + 2 ≃ 0 (mod 8)` (`q = 2`, `r = 2 < 3`).
+
+Such examples can be created by choosing different `(q, r)` for a fixed `(d, n)`
+such that `(d * q + r)` overflows and wraps around to equal `n`.
+
+This tells us that the division algorithm must have more restrictions than just the ones
+we have for integers. These restrictions are captured in `DivModState.Lawful`.
+The key idea is to state the relationship in terms of the toNat values of {n, d, q, r}.
+If the division equation `d.toNat * q.toNat + r.toNat = n.toNat` holds,
+then `n.udiv d = q` and `n.umod d = r`.
+
+Following this, we implement the division algorithm by repeated shift-subtract.
+
+References:
+- Fast 32-bit Division on the DSP56800E: Minimized nonrestoring division algorithm by David Baca
+- Bitwuzla sources for bitblasting.h
+-/
+
+private theorem Nat.div_add_eq_left_of_lt {x y z : Nat} (hx : z ∣ x) (hy : y < z) (hz : 0 < z) :
+    (x + y) / z = x / z := by
+  refine Nat.div_eq_of_lt_le ?lo ?hi
+  · apply Nat.le_trans
+    · exact div_mul_le_self x z
+    · omega
+  · simp only [succ_eq_add_one, Nat.add_mul, Nat.one_mul]
+    apply Nat.add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt
+    · apply Nat.le_of_eq
+      exact (Nat.div_eq_iff_eq_mul_left hz hx).mp rfl
+    · exact hy
+
+/-- If the division equation `d.toNat * q.toNat + r.toNat = n.toNat` holds,
+then `n.udiv d = q`. -/
+theorem udiv_eq_of_mul_add_toNat {d n q r : BitVec w} (hd : 0 < d)
+    (hrd : r < d)
+    (hdqnr : d.toNat * q.toNat + r.toNat = n.toNat) :
+    n.udiv d = q := by
+  apply BitVec.eq_of_toNat_eq
+  rw [toNat_udiv]
+  replace hdqnr : (d.toNat * q.toNat + r.toNat) / d.toNat = n.toNat / d.toNat := by
+    simp [hdqnr]
+  rw [Nat.div_add_eq_left_of_lt] at hdqnr
+  · rw [← hdqnr]
+    exact mul_div_right q.toNat hd
+  · exact Nat.dvd_mul_right d.toNat q.toNat
+  · exact hrd
+  · exact hd
+
+/-- If the division equation `d.toNat * q.toNat + r.toNat = n.toNat` holds,
+then `n.umod d = r`. -/
+theorem umod_eq_of_mul_add_toNat {d n q r : BitVec w} (hrd : r < d)
+    (hdqnr : d.toNat * q.toNat + r.toNat = n.toNat) :
+    n.umod d = r := by
+  apply BitVec.eq_of_toNat_eq
+  rw [toNat_umod]
+  replace hdqnr : (d.toNat * q.toNat + r.toNat) % d.toNat = n.toNat % d.toNat := by
+    simp [hdqnr]
+  rw [Nat.add_mod, Nat.mul_mod_right] at hdqnr
+  simp only [Nat.zero_add, mod_mod] at hdqnr
+  replace hrd : r.toNat < d.toNat := by
+    simpa [BitVec.lt_def] using hrd
+  rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt hrd] at hdqnr
+  simp [hdqnr]
+
+/-! ### DivModState -/
+
+/-- `DivModState` is a structure that maintains the state of recursive `divrem` calls. -/
+structure DivModState (w : Nat) : Type where
+  /-- The number of bits in the numerator that are not yet processed -/
+  wn : Nat
+  /-- The number of bits in the remainder (and quotient) -/
+  wr : Nat
+  /-- The current quotient. -/
+  q : BitVec w
+  /-- The current remainder. -/
+  r : BitVec w
+
+
+/-- `DivModArgs` contains the arguments to a `divrem` call which remain constant throughout
+execution. -/
+structure DivModArgs (w : Nat) where
+  /-- the numerator (aka, dividend) -/
+  n : BitVec w
+  /-- the denumerator (aka, divisor)-/
+  d : BitVec w
+
+/-- A `DivModState` is lawful if the remainder width `wr` plus the numerator width `wn` equals `w`,
+and the bitvectors `r` and `n` have values in the bounds given by bitwidths `wr`, resp. `wn`.
+
+This is a proof engineering choice: an alternative world could have been
+`r : BitVec wr` and `n : BitVec wn`, but this required much more dependent typing coercions.
+
+Instead, we choose to declare all involved bitvectors as length `w`, and then prove that
+the values are within their respective bounds.
+
+We start with `wn = w` and `wr = 0`, and then in each step, we decrement `wn` and increment `wr`.
+In this way, we grow a legal remainder in each loop iteration.
+-/
+structure DivModState.Lawful {w : Nat} (args : DivModArgs w) (qr : DivModState w) : Prop where
+  /-- The sum of widths of the dividend and remainder is `w`. -/
+  hwrn : qr.wr + qr.wn = w
+  /-- The denominator is positive. -/
+  hdPos : 0 < args.d
+  /-- The remainder is strictly less than the denominator. -/
+  hrLtDivisor : qr.r.toNat < args.d.toNat
+  /-- The remainder is morally a `Bitvec wr`, and so has value less than `2^wr`. -/
+  hrWidth : qr.r.toNat < 2^qr.wr
+  /-- The quotient is morally a `Bitvec wr`, and so has value less than `2^wr`. -/
+  hqWidth : qr.q.toNat < 2^qr.wr
+  /-- The low `(w - wn)` bits of `n` obey the invariant for division. -/
+  hdiv : args.n.toNat >>> qr.wn = args.d.toNat * qr.q.toNat + qr.r.toNat
+
+/-- A lawful DivModState implies `w > 0`. -/
+def DivModState.Lawful.hw {args : DivModArgs w} {qr : DivModState w}
+    {h : DivModState.Lawful args qr} : 0 < w := by
+  have hd := h.hdPos
+  rcases w with rfl | w
+  · have hcontra : args.d = 0#0 := by apply Subsingleton.elim
+    rw [hcontra] at hd
+    simp at hd
+  · omega
+
+/-- An initial value with both `q, r = 0`. -/
+def DivModState.init (w : Nat) : DivModState w := {
+  wn := w
+  wr := 0
+  q := 0#w
+  r := 0#w
+}
+
+/-- The initial state is lawful. -/
+def DivModState.lawful_init {w : Nat} (args : DivModArgs w) (hd : 0#w < args.d) :
+    DivModState.Lawful args (DivModState.init w) := by
+  simp only [BitVec.DivModState.init]
+  exact {
+    hwrn := by simp only; omega,
+    hdPos := by assumption
+    hrLtDivisor := by simp [BitVec.lt_def] at hd ⊢; assumption
+    hrWidth := by simp [DivModState.init],
+    hqWidth := by simp [DivModState.init],
+    hdiv := by
+      simp only [DivModState.init, toNat_ofNat, zero_mod, Nat.mul_zero, Nat.add_zero];
+      rw [Nat.shiftRight_eq_div_pow]
+      apply Nat.div_eq_of_lt args.n.isLt
+  }
+
+/--
+A lawful DivModState with a fully consumed dividend (`wn = 0`) witnesses that the
+quotient has been correctly computed.
+-/
+theorem DivModState.udiv_eq_of_lawful {n d : BitVec w} {qr : DivModState w}
+    (h_lawful : DivModState.Lawful {n, d} qr)
+    (h_final  : qr.wn = 0) :
+    n.udiv d = qr.q := by
+  apply udiv_eq_of_mul_add_toNat h_lawful.hdPos h_lawful.hrLtDivisor
+  have hdiv := h_lawful.hdiv
+  simp only [h_final] at *
+  omega
+
+/--
+A lawful DivModState with a fully consumed dividend (`wn = 0`) witnesses that the
+remainder has been correctly computed.
+-/
+theorem DivModState.umod_eq_of_lawful {qr : DivModState w}
+    (h : DivModState.Lawful {n, d} qr)
+    (h_final  : qr.wn = 0) :
+    n.umod d = qr.r := by
+  apply umod_eq_of_mul_add_toNat h.hrLtDivisor
+  have hdiv := h.hdiv
+  simp only [shiftRight_zero] at hdiv
+  simp only [h_final] at *
+  exact hdiv.symm
+
+/-! ### DivModState.Poised -/
+
+/--
+A `Poised` DivModState is a state which is `Lawful` and furthermore, has at least
+one numerator bit left to process `(0 < wn)`
+
+The input to the shift subtractor is a legal input to `divrem`, and we also need to have an
+input bit to perform shift subtraction on, and thus we need `0 < wn`.
+-/
+structure DivModState.Poised {w : Nat} (args : DivModArgs w) (qr : DivModState w)
+  extends DivModState.Lawful args qr : Type where
+  /-- Only perform a round of shift-subtract if we have dividend bits. -/
+  hwn_lt : 0 < qr.wn
+
+/--
+In the shift subtract input, the dividend is at least one bit long (`wn > 0`), so
+the remainder has bits to be computed (`wr < w`).
+-/
+def DivModState.wr_lt_w {qr : DivModState w} (h : qr.Poised args) : qr.wr < w := by
+  have hwrn := h.hwrn
+  have hwn_lt := h.hwn_lt
+  omega
+
+/-! ### Division shift subtractor -/
+
+/--
+One round of the division algorithm, that tries to perform a subtract shift.
+Note that this should only be called when `r.msb = false`, so we will not overflow.
+-/
+def divSubtractShift (args : DivModArgs w) (qr : DivModState w) : DivModState w :=
+  let {n, d} := args
+  let wn := qr.wn - 1
+  let wr := qr.wr + 1
+  let r' := shiftConcat qr.r (n.getLsbD wn)
+  if r' < d then {
+    q := qr.q.shiftConcat false, -- If `r' < d`, then we do not have a quotient bit.
+    r := r'
+    wn, wr
+  } else {
+    q := qr.q.shiftConcat true, -- Otherwise, `r' ≥ d`, and we have a quotient bit.
+    r := r' - d -- we subtract to maintain the invariant that `r < d`.
+    wn, wr
+  }
+
+/-- The value of shifting right by `wn - 1` equals shifting by `wn` and grabbing the lsb at `(wn - 1)`. -/
+theorem DivModState.toNat_shiftRight_sub_one_eq
+    {args : DivModArgs w} {qr : DivModState w} (h : qr.Poised args) :
+    args.n.toNat >>> (qr.wn - 1)
+    = (args.n.toNat >>> qr.wn) * 2 + (args.n.getLsbD (qr.wn - 1)).toNat := by
+  show BitVec.toNat (args.n >>> (qr.wn - 1)) = _
+  have {..} := h -- break the structure down for `omega`
+  rw [shiftRight_sub_one_eq_shiftConcat args.n h.hwn_lt]
+  rw [toNat_shiftConcat_eq_of_lt (k := w - qr.wn)]
+  · simp
+  · omega
+  · apply BitVec.toNat_ushiftRight_lt
+    omega
+
+/--
+This is used when proving the correctness of the divison algorithm,
+where we know that `r < d`.
+We then want to show that `((r.shiftConcat b) - d) < d` as the loop invariant.
+In arithmetic, this is the same as showing that
+`r * 2 + 1 - d < d`, which this theorem establishes.
+-/
+private theorem two_mul_add_sub_lt_of_lt_of_lt_two (h : a < x) (hy : y < 2) :
+    2 * a + y - x < x := by omega
+
+/-- We show that the output of `divSubtractShift` is lawful, which tells us that it
+obeys the division equation. -/
+theorem lawful_divSubtractShift (qr : DivModState w) (h : qr.Poised args) :
+    DivModState.Lawful args (divSubtractShift args qr) := by
+  rcases args with ⟨n, d⟩
+  simp only [divSubtractShift, decide_eq_true_eq]
+  -- We add these hypotheses for `omega` to find them later.
+  have ⟨⟨hrwn, hd, hrd, hr, hn, hrnd⟩, hwn_lt⟩ := h
+  have : d.toNat * (qr.q.toNat * 2) = d.toNat * qr.q.toNat * 2 := by rw [Nat.mul_assoc]
+  by_cases rltd : shiftConcat qr.r (n.getLsbD (qr.wn - 1)) < d
+  · simp only [rltd, ↓reduceIte]
+    constructor <;> try bv_omega
+    case pos.hrWidth => apply toNat_shiftConcat_lt_of_lt <;> omega
+    case pos.hqWidth => apply toNat_shiftConcat_lt_of_lt <;> omega
+    case pos.hdiv =>
+      simp [qr.toNat_shiftRight_sub_one_eq h, h.hdiv, this,
+        toNat_shiftConcat_eq_of_lt (qr.wr_lt_w h) h.hrWidth,
+        toNat_shiftConcat_eq_of_lt (qr.wr_lt_w h) h.hqWidth]
+      omega
+  · simp only [rltd, ↓reduceIte]
+    constructor <;> try bv_omega
+    case neg.hrLtDivisor =>
+      simp only [lt_def, Nat.not_lt] at rltd
+      rw [BitVec.toNat_sub_of_le rltd,
+        toNat_shiftConcat_eq_of_lt (hk := qr.wr_lt_w h) (hx := h.hrWidth),
+        Nat.mul_comm]
+      apply two_mul_add_sub_lt_of_lt_of_lt_two <;> bv_omega
+    case neg.hrWidth =>
+      simp only
+      have hdr' : d ≤ (qr.r.shiftConcat (n.getLsbD (qr.wn - 1))) :=
+        BitVec.not_lt_iff_le.mp rltd
+      have hr' : ((qr.r.shiftConcat (n.getLsbD (qr.wn - 1)))).toNat < 2 ^ (qr.wr + 1) := by
+        apply toNat_shiftConcat_lt_of_lt <;> bv_omega
+      rw [BitVec.toNat_sub_of_le hdr']
+      omega
+    case neg.hqWidth =>
+      apply toNat_shiftConcat_lt_of_lt <;> omega
+    case neg.hdiv =>
+      have rltd' := (BitVec.not_lt_iff_le.mp rltd)
+      simp only [qr.toNat_shiftRight_sub_one_eq h,
+        BitVec.toNat_sub_of_le rltd',
+        toNat_shiftConcat_eq_of_lt (qr.wr_lt_w h) h.hrWidth]
+      simp only [BitVec.le_def,
+        toNat_shiftConcat_eq_of_lt (qr.wr_lt_w h) h.hrWidth] at rltd'
+      simp only [toNat_shiftConcat_eq_of_lt (qr.wr_lt_w h) h.hqWidth, h.hdiv, Nat.mul_add]
+      bv_omega
+
+/-! ### Core division algorithm circuit -/
+
+/-- A recursive definition of division for bitblasting, in terms of a shift-subtraction circuit. -/
+def divRec {w : Nat} (m : Nat) (args : DivModArgs w) (qr : DivModState w) :
+    DivModState w :=
+  match m with
+  | 0 => qr
+  | m + 1 => divRec m args <| divSubtractShift args qr
+
+@[simp]
+theorem divRec_zero (qr : DivModState w) :
+    divRec 0 args qr = qr := rfl
+
+@[simp]
+theorem divRec_succ (m : Nat) (args : DivModArgs w) (qr : DivModState w) :
+    divRec (m + 1) args qr =
+      divRec m args (divSubtractShift args qr) := rfl
+
+/-- The output of `divRec` is a lawful state -/
+theorem lawful_divRec {args : DivModArgs w} {qr : DivModState w}
+    (h : DivModState.Lawful args qr) :
+    DivModState.Lawful args (divRec qr.wn args qr) := by
+  generalize hm : qr.wn = m
+  induction m generalizing qr
+  case zero =>
+    exact h
+  case succ wn' ih =>
+    simp only [divRec_succ]
+    apply ih
+    · apply lawful_divSubtractShift
+      constructor
+      · assumption
+      · omega
+    · simp only [divSubtractShift, hm]
+      split <;> rfl
+
+/-- The output of `divRec` has no more bits left to process (i.e., `wn = 0`) -/
+@[simp]
+theorem wn_divRec (args : DivModArgs w) (qr : DivModState w) :
+    (divRec qr.wn args qr).wn = 0 := by
+  generalize hm : qr.wn = m
+  induction m generalizing qr
+  case zero =>
+    assumption
+  case succ wn' ih =>
+    apply ih
+    simp only [divSubtractShift, hm]
+    split <;> rfl
+
+/-- The result of `udiv` agrees with the result of the division recurrence. -/
+theorem udiv_eq_divRec (hd : 0#w < d) :
+    let out := divRec w {n, d} (DivModState.init w)
+    n.udiv d = out.q := by
+  have := DivModState.lawful_init {n, d} hd
+  have := lawful_divRec this
+  apply DivModState.udiv_eq_of_lawful this (wn_divRec ..)
+
+/-- The result of `umod` agrees with the result of the division recurrence. -/
+theorem umod_eq_divRec (hd : 0#w < d) :
+    let out := divRec w {n, d} (DivModState.init w)
+    n.umod d = out.r := by
+  have := DivModState.lawful_init {n, d} hd
+  have := lawful_divRec this
+  apply DivModState.umod_eq_of_lawful this (wn_divRec ..)
+
+theorem divRec_succ' (m : Nat) (args : DivModArgs w) (qr : DivModState w) :
+    divRec (m+1) args qr =
+    let wn := qr.wn - 1
+    let wr := qr.wr + 1
+    let r' := shiftConcat qr.r (args.n.getLsbD wn)
+    let input : DivModState _ :=
+      if r' < args.d then {
+        q := qr.q.shiftConcat false,
+        r := r'
+        wn, wr
+      } else {
+        q := qr.q.shiftConcat true,
+        r := r' - args.d
+        wn, wr
+      }
+    divRec m args input := by
+  simp [divRec_succ, divSubtractShift]
+
 /- ### Arithmetic shift right (sshiftRight) recurrence -/
 
 /--
@@ -466,18 +868,18 @@ theorem sshiftRight'_or_of_and_eq_zero {x : BitVec w₁} {y z : BitVec w₂}
     toNat_add_of_and_eq_zero h, sshiftRight_add]
 
 theorem sshiftRightRec_eq (x : BitVec w₁) (y : BitVec w₂) (n : Nat) :
-    sshiftRightRec x y n = x.sshiftRight' ((y.truncate (n + 1)).zeroExtend w₂) := by
+    sshiftRightRec x y n = x.sshiftRight' ((y.setWidth (n + 1)).setWidth w₂) := by
   induction n generalizing x y
   case zero =>
     ext i
-    simp [twoPow_zero, Nat.reduceAdd, and_one_eq_zeroExtend_ofBool_getLsbD, truncate_one]
+    simp [twoPow_zero, Nat.reduceAdd, and_one_eq_setWidth_ofBool_getLsbD, setWidth_one]
   case succ n ih =>
     simp only [sshiftRightRec_succ_eq, and_twoPow, ih]
     by_cases h : y.getLsbD (n + 1)
-    · rw [zeroExtend_truncate_succ_eq_zeroExtend_truncate_or_twoPow_of_getLsbD_true h,
+    · rw [setWidth_setWidth_succ_eq_setWidth_setWidth_or_twoPow_of_getLsbD_true h,
         sshiftRight'_or_of_and_eq_zero (by simp [and_twoPow]), h]
       simp
-    · rw [zeroExtend_truncate_succ_eq_zeroExtend_truncate_of_getLsbD_false (i := n + 1)
+    · rw [setWidth_setWidth_succ_eq_setWidth_setWidth_of_getLsbD_false (i := n + 1)
         (by simp [h])]
       simp [h]
 
@@ -529,20 +931,20 @@ theorem ushiftRight'_or_of_and_eq_zero {x : BitVec w₁} {y z : BitVec w₂}
   simp [← add_eq_or_of_and_eq_zero _ _ h, toNat_add_of_and_eq_zero h, shiftRight_add]
 
 theorem ushiftRightRec_eq (x : BitVec w₁) (y : BitVec w₂) (n : Nat) :
-    ushiftRightRec x y n = x >>> (y.truncate (n + 1)).zeroExtend w₂ := by
+    ushiftRightRec x y n = x >>> (y.setWidth (n + 1)).setWidth w₂ := by
   induction n generalizing x y
   case zero =>
     ext i
     simp only [ushiftRightRec_zero, twoPow_zero, Nat.reduceAdd,
-      and_one_eq_zeroExtend_ofBool_getLsbD, truncate_one]
+      and_one_eq_setWidth_ofBool_getLsbD, setWidth_one]
   case succ n ih =>
     simp only [ushiftRightRec_succ, and_twoPow]
     rw [ih]
     by_cases h : y.getLsbD (n + 1) <;> simp only [h, ↓reduceIte]
-    · rw [zeroExtend_truncate_succ_eq_zeroExtend_truncate_or_twoPow_of_getLsbD_true h,
+    · rw [setWidth_setWidth_succ_eq_setWidth_setWidth_or_twoPow_of_getLsbD_true h,
         ushiftRight'_or_of_and_eq_zero]
       simp [and_twoPow]
-    · simp [zeroExtend_truncate_succ_eq_zeroExtend_truncate_of_getLsbD_false, h]
+    · simp [setWidth_setWidth_succ_eq_setWidth_setWidth_of_getLsbD_false, h]
 
 /--
 Show that `x >>> y` can be written in terms of `ushiftRightRec`.

src/Init/Data/BitVec/Folds.lean

@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ private theorem iunfoldr.eq_test
     simp only [init, eq_nil]
   case step =>
     intro i
-    simp_all [truncate_succ]
+    simp_all [setWidth_succ]
 
 theorem iunfoldr_getLsbD' {f : Fin w → α → α × Bool} (state : Nat → α)
     (ind : ∀(i : Fin w), (f i (state i.val)).fst = state (i.val+1)) :

src/Init/Data/Bool.lean

@@ -6,16 +6,13 @@ Authors: F. G. Dorais
 prelude
 import Init.NotationExtra
 
-/-- Boolean exclusive or -/
-abbrev xor : Bool → Bool → Bool := bne
 
 namespace Bool
 
-/- Namespaced versions that can be used instead of prefixing `_root_` -/
-@[inherit_doc not] protected abbrev not := not
-@[inherit_doc or]  protected abbrev or  := or
-@[inherit_doc and] protected abbrev and := and
-@[inherit_doc xor] protected abbrev xor := xor
+/-- Boolean exclusive or -/
+abbrev xor : Bool → Bool → Bool := bne
+
+@[inherit_doc] infixl:33 " ^^ " => xor
 
 instance (p : Bool → Prop) [inst : DecidablePred p] : Decidable (∀ x, p x) :=
   match inst true, inst false with
@@ -150,8 +147,8 @@ theorem and_or_distrib_right : ∀ (x y z : Bool), ((x || y) && z) = (x && z ||
 theorem or_and_distrib_left  : ∀ (x y z : Bool), (x || y && z) = ((x || y) && (x || z)) := by decide
 theorem or_and_distrib_right : ∀ (x y z : Bool), (x && y || z) = ((x || z) && (y || z)) := by decide
 
-theorem and_xor_distrib_left  : ∀ (x y z : Bool), (x && xor y z) = xor (x && y) (x && z) := by decide
-theorem and_xor_distrib_right : ∀ (x y z : Bool), (xor x y && z) = xor (x && z) (y && z) := by decide
+theorem and_xor_distrib_left  : ∀ (x y z : Bool), (x && (y ^^ z)) = ((x && y) ^^ (x && z)) := by decide
+theorem and_xor_distrib_right : ∀ (x y z : Bool), ((x ^^ y) && z) = ((x && z) ^^ (y && z)) := by decide
 
 /-- De Morgan's law for boolean and -/
 @[simp] theorem not_and : ∀ (x y : Bool), (!(x && y)) = (!x || !y) := by decide
@@ -257,15 +254,6 @@ theorem beq_eq_decide_eq [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] [DecidableEq α] (a b : α) :
 theorem eq_not : ∀ {a b : Bool}, (a = (!b)) ↔ (a ≠ b) := by decide
 theorem not_eq : ∀ {a b : Bool}, ((!a) = b) ↔ (a ≠ b) := by decide
 
-@[simp] theorem not_eq_not : ∀ {a b : Bool}, ¬a = !b ↔ a = b := by decide
-@[simp] theorem not_not_eq : ∀ {a b : Bool}, ¬(!a) = b ↔ a = b := by decide
-
-/--
-We move `!` from the left hand side of an equality to the right hand side.
-This helps confluence, and also helps combining pairs of `!`s.
--/
-@[simp] theorem not_eq_eq_eq_not : ∀ {a b : Bool}, ((!a) = b) ↔ (a = !b) := by decide
-
 @[simp] theorem coe_iff_coe : ∀{a b : Bool}, (a ↔ b) ↔ a = b := by decide
 
 @[simp] theorem coe_true_iff_false  : ∀{a b : Bool}, (a ↔ b = false) ↔ a = (!b) := by decide
@@ -279,37 +267,37 @@ theorem beq_comm {α} [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] {a b : α} : (a == b) = (b == a) :
 
 /-! ### xor -/
 
-theorem false_xor : ∀ (x : Bool), xor false x = x := false_bne
+theorem false_xor : ∀ (x : Bool), (false ^^ x) = x := false_bne
 
-theorem xor_false : ∀ (x : Bool), xor x false = x := bne_false
+theorem xor_false : ∀ (x : Bool), (x ^^ false) = x := bne_false
 
-theorem true_xor : ∀ (x : Bool), xor true x = !x := true_bne
+theorem true_xor : ∀ (x : Bool), (true ^^ x) = !x := true_bne
 
-theorem xor_true : ∀ (x : Bool), xor x true = !x := bne_true
+theorem xor_true : ∀ (x : Bool), (x ^^ true) = !x := bne_true
 
-theorem not_xor_self : ∀ (x : Bool), xor (!x) x = true := not_bne_self
+theorem not_xor_self : ∀ (x : Bool), (!x ^^ x) = true := not_bne_self
 
-theorem xor_not_self : ∀ (x : Bool), xor x (!x) = true := bne_not_self
+theorem xor_not_self : ∀ (x : Bool), (x ^^ !x) = true := bne_not_self
 
-theorem not_xor : ∀ (x y : Bool), xor (!x) y = !(xor x y) := by decide
+theorem not_xor : ∀ (x y : Bool), (!x ^^ y) = !(x ^^ y) := by decide
 
-theorem xor_not : ∀ (x y : Bool), xor x (!y) = !(xor x y) := by decide
+theorem xor_not : ∀ (x y : Bool), (x ^^ !y) = !(x ^^ y) := by decide
 
-theorem not_xor_not : ∀ (x y : Bool), xor (!x) (!y) = (xor x y) := not_bne_not
+theorem not_xor_not : ∀ (x y : Bool), (!x ^^ !y) = (x ^^ y) := not_bne_not
 
-theorem xor_self : ∀ (x : Bool), xor x x = false := by decide
+theorem xor_self : ∀ (x : Bool), (x ^^ x) = false := by decide
 
-theorem xor_comm : ∀ (x y : Bool), xor x y = xor y x := by decide
+theorem xor_comm : ∀ (x y : Bool), (x ^^ y) = (y ^^ x) := by decide
 
-theorem xor_left_comm : ∀ (x y z : Bool), xor x (xor y z) = xor y (xor x z) := by decide
+theorem xor_left_comm : ∀ (x y z : Bool), (x ^^ (y ^^ z)) = (y ^^ (x ^^ z)) := by decide
 
-theorem xor_right_comm : ∀ (x y z : Bool), xor (xor x y) z = xor (xor x z) y := by decide
+theorem xor_right_comm : ∀ (x y z : Bool), ((x ^^ y) ^^ z) = ((x ^^ z) ^^ y) := by decide
 
-theorem xor_assoc : ∀ (x y z : Bool), xor (xor x y) z = xor x (xor y z) := bne_assoc
+theorem xor_assoc : ∀ (x y z : Bool), ((x ^^ y) ^^ z) = (x ^^ (y ^^ z)) := bne_assoc
 
-theorem xor_left_inj : ∀ {x y z : Bool}, xor x y = xor x z ↔ y = z := bne_left_inj
+theorem xor_left_inj : ∀ {x y z : Bool}, (x ^^ y) = (x ^^ z) ↔ y = z := bne_left_inj
 
-theorem xor_right_inj : ∀ {x y z : Bool}, xor x z = xor y z ↔ x = y := bne_right_inj
+theorem xor_right_inj : ∀ {x y z : Bool}, (x ^^ z) = (y ^^ z) ↔ x = y := bne_right_inj
 
 /-! ### le/lt -/
 
@@ -380,13 +368,14 @@ theorem and_or_inj_left_iff :
 /-- convert a `Bool` to a `Nat`, `false -> 0`, `true -> 1` -/
 def toNat (b : Bool) : Nat := cond b 1 0
 
-@[simp] theorem toNat_false : false.toNat = 0 := rfl
+@[simp, bv_toNat] theorem toNat_false : false.toNat = 0 := rfl
 
-@[simp] theorem toNat_true : true.toNat = 1 := rfl
+@[simp, bv_toNat] theorem toNat_true : true.toNat = 1 := rfl
 
 theorem toNat_le (c : Bool) : c.toNat ≤ 1 := by
   cases c <;> trivial
 
+@[bv_toNat]
 theorem toNat_lt (b : Bool) : b.toNat < 2 :=
   Nat.lt_succ_of_le (toNat_le _)
 
@@ -597,7 +586,7 @@ theorem decide_beq_decide (p q : Prop) [dpq : Decidable (p ↔ q)] [dp : Decidab
 
 end Bool
 
-export Bool (cond_eq_if)
+export Bool (cond_eq_if xor and or not)
 
 /-! ### decide -/
 

src/Init/Data/ByteArray/Basic.lean

@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ On an invalid position, returns `(default : UInt8)`. -/
 @[inline]
 def curr : Iterator → UInt8
   | ⟨arr, i⟩ =>
-    if h:i < arr.size then
+    if h : i < arr.size then
       arr[i]'h
     else
       default

src/Init/Data/Fin/Basic.lean

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ instance coeToNat : CoeOut (Fin n) Nat :=
   ⟨fun v => v.val⟩
 
 /--
-From the empty type `Fin 0`, any desired result `α` can be derived. This is simlar to `Empty.elim`.
+From the empty type `Fin 0`, any desired result `α` can be derived. This is similar to `Empty.elim`.
 -/
 def elim0.{u} {α : Sort u} : Fin 0 → α
   | ⟨_, h⟩ => absurd h (not_lt_zero _)
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ This differs from addition, which wraps around:
 (2 : Fin 3) + 1 = (0 : Fin 3)
 ```
 -/
-def succ : Fin n → Fin n.succ
+def succ : Fin n → Fin (n + 1)
   | ⟨i, h⟩ => ⟨i+1, Nat.succ_lt_succ h⟩
 
 variable {n : Nat}
@@ -39,16 +39,20 @@ variable {n : Nat}
 /--
 Returns `a` modulo `n + 1` as a `Fin n.succ`.
 -/
-protected def ofNat {n : Nat} (a : Nat) : Fin n.succ :=
+protected def ofNat {n : Nat} (a : Nat) : Fin (n + 1) :=
   ⟨a % (n+1), Nat.mod_lt _ (Nat.zero_lt_succ _)⟩
 
 /--
 Returns `a` modulo `n` as a `Fin n`.
 
-The assumption `n > 0` ensures that `Fin n` is nonempty.
+The assumption `NeZero n` ensures that `Fin n` is nonempty.
 -/
-protected def ofNat' {n : Nat} (a : Nat) (h : n > 0) : Fin n :=
-  ⟨a % n, Nat.mod_lt _ h⟩
+protected def ofNat' (n : Nat) [NeZero n] (a : Nat) : Fin n :=
+  ⟨a % n, Nat.mod_lt _ (pos_of_neZero n)⟩
+
+-- We intend to deprecate `Fin.ofNat` in favor of `Fin.ofNat'` (and later rename).
+-- This is waiting on https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5323
+-- attribute [deprecated Fin.ofNat' (since := "2024-09-16")] Fin.ofNat
 
 private theorem mlt {b : Nat} : {a : Nat} → a < n → b % n < n
   | 0,   h => Nat.mod_lt _ h
@@ -141,10 +145,10 @@ instance : ShiftLeft (Fin n) where
 instance : ShiftRight (Fin n) where
   shiftRight := Fin.shiftRight
 
-instance instOfNat {n : Nat} [NeZero n] {i : Nat} : OfNat (Fin (no_index n)) i where
-  ofNat := Fin.ofNat' i (pos_of_neZero _)
+instance instOfNat {n : Nat} [NeZero n] {i : Nat} : OfNat (Fin n) i where
+  ofNat := Fin.ofNat' n i
 
-instance : Inhabited (Fin (no_index (n+1))) where
+instance instInhabited {n : Nat} [NeZero n] : Inhabited (Fin n) where
   default := 0
 
 @[simp] theorem zero_eta : (⟨0, Nat.zero_lt_succ _⟩ : Fin (n + 1)) = 0 := rfl

src/Init/Data/Fin/Iterate.lean

@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ def hIterateFrom (P : Nat → Sort _) {n} (f : ∀(i : Fin n), P i.val → P (i.
   decreasing_by decreasing_trivial_pre_omega
 
 /--
-`hIterate` is a heterogenous iterative operation that applies a
+`hIterate` is a heterogeneous iterative operation that applies a
 index-dependent function `f` to a value `init : P start` a total of
 `stop - start` times to produce a value of type `P stop`.
 
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ Concretely, `hIterate start stop f init` is equal to
   init |> f start _ |> f (start+1) _ ... |> f (end-1) _
 ```
 
-Because it is heterogenous and must return a value of type `P stop`,
+Because it is heterogeneous and must return a value of type `P stop`,
 `hIterate` requires proof that `start ≤ stop`.
 
 One can prove properties of `hIterate` using the general theorem
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ private theorem hIterateFrom_elim {P : Nat → Sort _}(Q : ∀(i : Nat), P i →
 
 /-
 `hIterate_elim` provides a mechanism for showing that the result of
-`hIterate` satisifies a property `Q stop` by showing that the states
+`hIterate` satisfies a property `Q stop` by showing that the states
 at the intermediate indices `i : start ≤ i < stop` satisfy `Q i`.
 -/
 theorem hIterate_elim {P : Nat → Sort _} (Q : ∀(i : Nat), P i → Prop)

src/Init/Data/Fin/Lemmas.lean

@@ -51,10 +51,15 @@ theorem eq_mk_iff_val_eq {a : Fin n} {k : Nat} {hk : k < n} :
 
 theorem mk_val (i : Fin n) : (⟨i, i.isLt⟩ : Fin n) = i := Fin.eta ..
 
-@[simp] theorem val_ofNat' (a : Nat) (is_pos : n > 0) :
-  (Fin.ofNat' a is_pos).val = a % n := rfl
+@[simp] theorem val_ofNat' (n : Nat) [NeZero n] (a : Nat) :
+  (Fin.ofNat' n a).val = a % n := rfl
 
-@[simp] theorem ofNat'_val_eq_self (x : Fin n) (h) : (Fin.ofNat' x h) = x := by
+@[simp] theorem ofNat'_self {n : Nat} [NeZero n] : Fin.ofNat' n n = 0 := by
+  ext
+  simp
+  congr
+
+@[simp] theorem ofNat'_val_eq_self [NeZero n] (x : Fin n) : (Fin.ofNat' n x) = x := by
   ext
   rw [val_ofNat', Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
   exact x.2
@@ -68,6 +73,9 @@ theorem mk_val (i : Fin n) : (⟨i, i.isLt⟩ : Fin n) = i := Fin.eta ..
 @[simp] theorem modn_val (a : Fin n) (b : Nat) : (a.modn b).val = a.val % b :=
   rfl
 
+@[simp] theorem val_eq_zero (a : Fin 1) : a.val = 0 :=
+  Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero <| Nat.le_of_lt_succ a.isLt
+
 theorem ite_val {n : Nat} {c : Prop} [Decidable c] {x : c → Fin n} (y : ¬c → Fin n) :
     (if h : c then x h else y h).val = if h : c then (x h).val else (y h).val := by
   by_cases c <;> simp [*]
@@ -120,7 +128,7 @@ theorem mk_le_of_le_val {b : Fin n} {a : Nat} (h : a ≤ b) :
 
 @[simp] theorem mk_lt_mk {x y : Nat} {hx hy} : (⟨x, hx⟩ : Fin n) < ⟨y, hy⟩ ↔ x < y := .rfl
 
-@[simp] theorem val_zero (n : Nat) : (0 : Fin (n + 1)).1 = 0 := rfl
+@[simp] theorem val_zero (n : Nat) [NeZero n] : ((0 : Fin n) : Nat) = 0 := rfl
 
 @[simp] theorem mk_zero : (⟨0, Nat.succ_pos n⟩ : Fin (n + 1)) = 0 := rfl
 
@@ -167,8 +175,24 @@ theorem rev_eq {n a : Nat} (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : n = a + i) :
 @[simp] theorem rev_lt_rev {i j : Fin n} : rev i < rev j ↔ j < i := by
   rw [← Fin.not_le, ← Fin.not_le, rev_le_rev]
 
+/-! ### last -/
+
 @[simp] theorem val_last (n : Nat) : last n = n := rfl
 
+@[simp] theorem last_zero : (Fin.last 0 : Fin 1) = 0 := by
+  ext
+  simp
+
+@[simp] theorem zero_eq_last_iff {n : Nat} : (0 : Fin (n + 1)) = last n ↔ n = 0 := by
+  constructor
+  · intro h
+    simp_all [Fin.ext_iff]
+  · rintro rfl
+    simp
+
+@[simp] theorem last_eq_zero_iff {n : Nat} : Fin.last n = 0 ↔ n = 0 := by
+  simp [eq_comm (a := Fin.last n)]
+
 theorem le_last (i : Fin (n + 1)) : i ≤ last n := Nat.le_of_lt_succ i.is_lt
 
 theorem last_pos : (0 : Fin (n + 2)) < last (n + 1) := Nat.succ_pos _
@@ -202,10 +226,28 @@ instance subsingleton_one : Subsingleton (Fin 1) := subsingleton_iff_le_one.2 (b
 
 theorem fin_one_eq_zero (a : Fin 1) : a = 0 := Subsingleton.elim a 0
 
+@[simp] theorem zero_eq_one_iff {n : Nat} [NeZero n] : (0 : Fin n) = 1 ↔ n = 1 := by
+  constructor
+  · intro h
+    simp [Fin.ext_iff] at h
+    change 0 % n = 1 % n at h
+    rw [eq_comm] at h
+    simpa using h
+  · rintro rfl
+    simp
+
+@[simp] theorem one_eq_zero_iff {n : Nat} [NeZero n] : (1 : Fin n) = 0 ↔ n = 1 := by
+  rw [eq_comm]
+  simp
+
 theorem add_def (a b : Fin n) : a + b = Fin.mk ((a + b) % n) (Nat.mod_lt _ a.size_pos) := rfl
 
 theorem val_add (a b : Fin n) : (a + b).val = (a.val + b.val) % n := rfl
 
+@[simp] protected theorem zero_add {n : Nat} [NeZero n] (i : Fin n) : (0 : Fin n) + i = i := by
+  ext
+  simp [Fin.add_def, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt i.2]
+
 theorem val_add_one_of_lt {n : Nat} {i : Fin n.succ} (h : i < last _) : (i + 1).1 = i + 1 := by
   match n with
   | 0 => cases h
@@ -329,6 +371,10 @@ theorem succ_succ_ne_one (a : Fin n) : Fin.succ (Fin.succ a) ≠ 1 :=
 
 @[simp] theorem cast_mk (h : n = m) (i : Nat) (hn : i < n) : cast h ⟨i, hn⟩ = ⟨i, h ▸ hn⟩ := rfl
 
+@[simp] theorem cast_refl (n : Nat) (h : n = n) : cast h = id := by
+  ext
+  simp
+
 @[simp] theorem cast_trans {k : Nat} (h : n = m) (h' : m = k) {i : Fin n} :
     cast h' (cast h i) = cast (Eq.trans h h') i := rfl
 
@@ -437,6 +483,10 @@ theorem succ_castSucc {n : Nat} (i : Fin n) : i.castSucc.succ = castSucc i.succ
 
 @[simp] theorem coe_addNat (m : Nat) (i : Fin n) : (addNat i m : Nat) = i + m := rfl
 
+@[simp] theorem addNat_zero (n : Nat) (i : Fin n) : addNat i 0 = i := by
+  ext
+  simp
+
 @[simp] theorem addNat_one {i : Fin n} : addNat i 1 = i.succ := rfl
 
 theorem le_coe_addNat (m : Nat) (i : Fin n) : m ≤ addNat i m :=
@@ -466,7 +516,7 @@ theorem cast_addNat_left {n n' m : Nat} (i : Fin n') (h : n' + m = n + m) :
 
 theorem le_coe_natAdd (m : Nat) (i : Fin n) : m ≤ natAdd m i := Nat.le_add_right ..
 
-theorem natAdd_zero {n : Nat} : natAdd 0 = cast (Nat.zero_add n).symm := by ext; simp
+@[simp] theorem natAdd_zero {n : Nat} : natAdd 0 = cast (Nat.zero_add n).symm := by ext; simp
 
 /-- For rewriting in the reverse direction, see `Fin.cast_natAdd_right`. -/
 theorem natAdd_cast {n n' : Nat} (m : Nat) (i : Fin n') (h : n' = n) :
@@ -504,9 +554,19 @@ theorem cast_addNat {n : Nat} (m : Nat) (i : Fin n) :
 
 @[simp] theorem natAdd_last {m n : Nat} : natAdd n (last m) = last (n + m) := rfl
 
+@[simp] theorem addNat_last (n : Nat) :
+    addNat (last n) m = cast (by omega) (last (n + m)) := by
+  ext
+  simp
+
 theorem natAdd_castSucc {m n : Nat} {i : Fin m} : natAdd n (castSucc i) = castSucc (natAdd n i) :=
   rfl
 
+@[simp] theorem natAdd_eq_addNat (n : Nat) (i : Fin n) : Fin.natAdd n i = i.addNat n := by
+  ext
+  simp
+  omega
+
 theorem rev_castAdd (k : Fin n) (m : Nat) : rev (castAdd m k) = addNat (rev k) m := Fin.ext <| by
   rw [val_rev, coe_castAdd, coe_addNat, val_rev, Nat.sub_add_comm (Nat.succ_le_of_lt k.is_lt)]
 
@@ -522,8 +582,8 @@ theorem rev_succ (k : Fin n) : rev (succ k) = castSucc (rev k) := k.rev_addNat 1
 @[simp] theorem coe_pred (j : Fin (n + 1)) (h : j ≠ 0) : (j.pred h : Nat) = j - 1 := rfl
 
 @[simp] theorem succ_pred : ∀ (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≠ 0), (i.pred h).succ = i
-  | ⟨0, h⟩, hi => by simp only [mk_zero, ne_eq, not_true] at hi
-  | ⟨n + 1, h⟩, hi => rfl
+  | ⟨0, _⟩, hi => by simp only [mk_zero, ne_eq, not_true] at hi
+  | ⟨_ + 1, _⟩, _ => rfl
 
 @[simp]
 theorem pred_succ (i : Fin n) {h : i.succ ≠ 0} : i.succ.pred h = i := by
@@ -572,6 +632,15 @@ theorem pred_add_one (i : Fin (n + 2)) (h : (i : Nat) < n + 1) :
 @[simp] theorem subNat_mk {i : Nat} (h₁ : i < n + m) (h₂ : m ≤ i) :
     subNat m ⟨i, h₁⟩ h₂ = ⟨i - m, Nat.sub_lt_right_of_lt_add h₂ h₁⟩ := rfl
 
+@[simp] theorem subNat_zero (i : Fin n) (h : 0 ≤ (i : Nat)): Fin.subNat 0 i h = i := by
+  ext
+  simp
+
+@[simp] theorem subNat_one_succ (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : 1 ≤ ↑i) : (subNat 1 i h).succ = i := by
+  ext
+  simp
+  omega
+
 @[simp] theorem pred_castSucc_succ (i : Fin n) :
     pred (castSucc i.succ) (Fin.ne_of_gt (castSucc_pos i.succ_pos)) = castSucc i := rfl
 
@@ -582,7 +651,7 @@ theorem pred_add_one (i : Fin (n + 2)) (h : (i : Nat) < n + 1) :
     subNat m (addNat i m) h = i := Fin.ext <| Nat.add_sub_cancel i m
 
 @[simp] theorem natAdd_subNat_cast {i : Fin (n + m)} (h : n ≤ i) :
-    natAdd n (subNat n (cast (Nat.add_comm ..) i) h) = i := by simp [← cast_addNat]; rfl
+    natAdd n (subNat n (cast (Nat.add_comm ..) i) h) = i := by simp [← cast_addNat]
 
 /-! ### recursion and induction principles -/
 
@@ -750,13 +819,13 @@ theorem addCases_right {m n : Nat} {motive : Fin (m + n) → Sort _} {left right
 
 /-! ### add -/
 
-@[simp] theorem ofNat'_add (x : Nat) (lt : 0 < n) (y : Fin n) :
-    Fin.ofNat' x lt + y = Fin.ofNat' (x + y.val) lt := by
+theorem ofNat'_add [NeZero n] (x : Nat) (y : Fin n) :
+    Fin.ofNat' n x + y = Fin.ofNat' n (x + y.val) := by
   apply Fin.eq_of_val_eq
   simp [Fin.ofNat', Fin.add_def]
 
-@[simp] theorem add_ofNat' (x : Fin n) (y : Nat) (lt : 0 < n) :
-    x + Fin.ofNat' y lt = Fin.ofNat' (x.val + y) lt := by
+theorem add_ofNat' [NeZero n] (x : Fin n) (y : Nat) :
+    x + Fin.ofNat' n y = Fin.ofNat' n (x.val + y) := by
   apply Fin.eq_of_val_eq
   simp [Fin.ofNat', Fin.add_def]
 
@@ -765,16 +834,21 @@ theorem addCases_right {m n : Nat} {motive : Fin (m + n) → Sort _} {left right
 protected theorem coe_sub (a b : Fin n) : ((a - b : Fin n) : Nat) = ((n - b) + a) % n := by
   cases a; cases b; rfl
 
-@[simp] theorem ofNat'_sub (x : Nat) (lt : 0 < n) (y : Fin n) :
-    Fin.ofNat' x lt - y = Fin.ofNat' ((n - y.val) + x) lt := by
+theorem ofNat'_sub [NeZero n] (x : Nat) (y : Fin n) :
+    Fin.ofNat' n x - y = Fin.ofNat' n ((n - y.val) + x) := by
   apply Fin.eq_of_val_eq
   simp [Fin.ofNat', Fin.sub_def]
 
-@[simp] theorem sub_ofNat' (x : Fin n) (y : Nat) (lt : 0 < n) :
-    x - Fin.ofNat' y lt = Fin.ofNat' ((n - y % n) + x.val) lt := by
+theorem sub_ofNat' [NeZero n] (x : Fin n) (y : Nat) :
+    x - Fin.ofNat' n y = Fin.ofNat' n ((n - y % n) + x.val) := by
   apply Fin.eq_of_val_eq
   simp [Fin.ofNat', Fin.sub_def]
 
+@[simp] protected theorem sub_self [NeZero n] {x : Fin n} : x - x = 0 := by
+  ext
+  rw [Fin.sub_def]
+  simp
+
 private theorem _root_.Nat.mod_eq_sub_of_lt_two_mul {x n} (h₁ : n ≤ x) (h₂ : x < 2 * n) :
     x % n = x - n := by
   rw [Nat.mod_eq, if_pos (by omega), Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (by omega)]

src/Init/Data/Float.lean

@@ -72,21 +72,35 @@ instance floatDecLt (a b : Float) : Decidable (a < b) := Float.decLt a b
 instance floatDecLe (a b : Float) : Decidable (a ≤ b) := Float.decLe a b
 
 @[extern "lean_float_to_string"] opaque Float.toString : Float → String
-
-/-- If the given float is positive, truncates the value to the nearest positive integer.
-If negative or larger than the maximum value for UInt8, returns 0. -/
+/-- If the given float is non-negative, truncates the value to the nearest non-negative integer.
+If negative or NaN, returns `0`.
+If larger than the maximum value for `UInt8` (including Inf), returns the maximum value of `UInt8`
+(i.e. `UInt8.size - 1`).
+-/
 @[extern "lean_float_to_uint8"] opaque Float.toUInt8 : Float → UInt8
-/-- If the given float is positive, truncates the value to the nearest positive integer.
-If negative or larger than the maximum value for UInt16, returns 0. -/
+/-- If the given float is non-negative, truncates the value to the nearest non-negative integer.
+If negative or NaN, returns `0`.
+If larger than the maximum value for `UInt16` (including Inf), returns the maximum value of `UInt16`
+(i.e. `UInt16.size - 1`).
+-/
 @[extern "lean_float_to_uint16"] opaque Float.toUInt16 : Float → UInt16
-/-- If the given float is positive, truncates the value to the nearest positive integer.
-If negative or larger than the maximum value for UInt32, returns 0. -/
+/-- If the given float is non-negative, truncates the value to the nearest non-negative integer.
+If negative or NaN, returns `0`.
+If larger than the maximum value for `UInt32` (including Inf), returns the maximum value of `UInt32`
+(i.e. `UInt32.size - 1`).
+-/
 @[extern "lean_float_to_uint32"] opaque Float.toUInt32 : Float → UInt32
-/-- If the given float is positive, truncates the value to the nearest positive integer.
-If negative or larger than the maximum value for UInt64, returns 0. -/
+/-- If the given float is non-negative, truncates the value to the nearest non-negative integer.
+If negative or NaN, returns `0`.
+If larger than the maximum value for `UInt64` (including Inf), returns the maximum value of `UInt64`
+(i.e. `UInt64.size - 1`).
+-/
 @[extern "lean_float_to_uint64"] opaque Float.toUInt64 : Float → UInt64
-/-- If the given float is positive, truncates the value to the nearest positive integer.
-If negative or larger than the maximum value for USize, returns 0. -/
+/-- If the given float is non-negative, truncates the value to the nearest non-negative integer.
+If negative or NaN, returns `0`.
+If larger than the maximum value for `USize` (including Inf), returns the maximum value of `USize`
+(i.e. `USize.size - 1`). This value is platform dependent).
+-/
 @[extern "lean_float_to_usize"] opaque Float.toUSize : Float → USize
 
 @[extern "lean_float_isnan"] opaque Float.isNaN : Float → Bool

src/Init/Data/Int/DivModLemmas.lean

@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ theorem fdiv_eq_tdiv {a b : Int} (Ha : 0 ≤ a) (Hb : 0 ≤ b) : fdiv a b = tdiv
 @[simp, norm_cast] theorem ofNat_emod (m n : Nat) : (↑(m % n) : Int) = m % n := rfl
 
 
-/-! ### mod definitiions -/
+/-! ### mod definitions -/
 
 theorem emod_add_ediv : ∀ a b : Int, a % b + b * (a / b) = a
   | ofNat _, ofNat _ => congrArg ofNat <| Nat.mod_add_div ..
@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ theorem tmod_def (a b : Int) : tmod a b = a - b * a.tdiv b := by
 
 theorem fmod_add_fdiv : ∀ a b : Int, a.fmod b + b * a.fdiv b = a
   | 0, ofNat _ | 0, -[_+1] => congrArg ofNat <| by simp
-  | succ m, ofNat n => congrArg ofNat <| Nat.mod_add_div ..
+  | succ _, ofNat _ => congrArg ofNat <| Nat.mod_add_div ..
   | succ m, -[n+1] => by
     show subNatNat (m % succ n) n + (↑(succ n * (m / succ n)) + n + 1) = (m + 1)
     rw [Int.add_comm _ n, ← Int.add_assoc, ← Int.add_assoc,
@@ -289,8 +289,8 @@ theorem fmod_eq_tmod {a b : Int} (Ha : 0 ≤ a) (Hb : 0 ≤ b) : fmod a b = tmod
 
 @[simp] protected theorem ediv_neg : ∀ a b : Int, a / (-b) = -(a / b)
   | ofNat m, 0 => show ofNat (m / 0) = -↑(m / 0) by rw [Nat.div_zero]; rfl
-  | ofNat m, -[n+1] => (Int.neg_neg _).symm
-  | ofNat m, succ n | -[m+1], 0 | -[m+1], succ n | -[m+1], -[n+1] => rfl
+  | ofNat _, -[_+1] => (Int.neg_neg _).symm
+  | ofNat _, succ _ | -[_+1], 0 | -[_+1], succ _ | -[_+1], -[_+1] => rfl
 
 theorem ediv_neg' {a b : Int} (Ha : a < 0) (Hb : 0 < b) : a / b < 0 :=
   match a, b, eq_negSucc_of_lt_zero Ha, eq_succ_of_zero_lt Hb with
@@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ theorem add_mul_ediv_right (a b : Int) {c : Int} (H : c ≠ 0) : (a + b * c) / c
       | _, ⟨k, rfl⟩, -[n+1] => show (a - n.succ * k.succ).ediv k.succ = a.ediv k.succ - n.succ by
         rw [← Int.add_sub_cancel (ediv ..), ← this, Int.sub_add_cancel]
   fun {k n} => @fun
-  | ofNat m => congrArg ofNat <| Nat.add_mul_div_right _ _ k.succ_pos
+  | ofNat _ => congrArg ofNat <| Nat.add_mul_div_right _ _ k.succ_pos
   | -[m+1] => by
     show ((n * k.succ : Nat) - m.succ : Int).ediv k.succ = n - (m / k.succ + 1 : Nat)
     by_cases h : m < n * k.succ
@@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ theorem add_mul_ediv_left (a : Int) {b : Int}
       rw [Int.mul_neg, Int.ediv_neg, Int.ediv_neg]; apply congrArg Neg.neg; apply this
   fun m k b =>
   match b, k with
-  | ofNat n, k => congrArg ofNat (Nat.mul_div_mul_left _ _ m.succ_pos)
+  | ofNat _, _ => congrArg ofNat (Nat.mul_div_mul_left _ _ m.succ_pos)
   | -[n+1], 0 => by
     rw [Int.ofNat_zero, Int.mul_zero, Int.ediv_zero, Int.ediv_zero]
   | -[n+1], succ k => congrArg negSucc <|
@@ -822,14 +822,14 @@ theorem ediv_eq_ediv_of_mul_eq_mul {a b c d : Int}
 unseal Nat.div in
 @[simp] protected theorem tdiv_neg : ∀ a b : Int, a.tdiv (-b) = -(a.tdiv b)
   | ofNat m, 0 => show ofNat (m / 0) = -↑(m / 0) by rw [Nat.div_zero]; rfl
-  | ofNat m, -[n+1] | -[m+1], succ n => (Int.neg_neg _).symm
-  | ofNat m, succ n | -[m+1], 0 | -[m+1], -[n+1] => rfl
+  | ofNat _, -[_+1] | -[_+1], succ _ => (Int.neg_neg _).symm
+  | ofNat _, succ _ | -[_+1], 0 | -[_+1], -[_+1] => rfl
 
 unseal Nat.div in
 @[simp] protected theorem neg_tdiv : ∀ a b : Int, (-a).tdiv b = -(a.tdiv b)
   | 0, n => by simp [Int.neg_zero]
-  | succ m, (n:Nat) | -[m+1], 0 | -[m+1], -[n+1] => rfl
-  | succ m, -[n+1] | -[m+1], succ n => (Int.neg_neg _).symm
+  | succ _, (n:Nat) | -[_+1], 0 | -[_+1], -[_+1] => rfl
+  | succ _, -[_+1] | -[_+1], succ _ => (Int.neg_neg _).symm
 
 protected theorem neg_tdiv_neg (a b : Int) : (-a).tdiv (-b) = a.tdiv b := by
   simp [Int.tdiv_neg, Int.neg_tdiv, Int.neg_neg]

src/Init/Data/Int/Lemmas.lean

@@ -181,12 +181,12 @@ theorem subNatNat_add_negSucc (m n k : Nat) :
       Nat.add_comm]
 
 protected theorem add_assoc : ∀ a b c : Int, a + b + c = a + (b + c)
-  | (m:Nat), (n:Nat), c => aux1 ..
+  | (m:Nat), (n:Nat), _ => aux1 ..
   | Nat.cast m, b, Nat.cast k => by
     rw [Int.add_comm, ← aux1, Int.add_comm k, aux1, Int.add_comm b]
   | a, (n:Nat), (k:Nat) => by
     rw [Int.add_comm, Int.add_comm a, ← aux1, Int.add_comm a, Int.add_comm k]
-  | -[m+1], -[n+1], (k:Nat) => aux2 ..
+  | -[_+1], -[_+1], (k:Nat) => aux2 ..
   | -[m+1], (n:Nat), -[k+1] => by
     rw [Int.add_comm, ← aux2, Int.add_comm n, ← aux2, Int.add_comm -[m+1]]
   | (m:Nat), -[n+1], -[k+1] => by

src/Init/Data/Int/Order.lean

@@ -512,8 +512,8 @@ theorem toNat_add_nat {a : Int} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (n : Nat) : (a + n).toNat = a.toN
 
 @[simp] theorem pred_toNat : ∀ i : Int, (i - 1).toNat = i.toNat - 1
   | 0 => rfl
-  | (n+1:Nat) => by simp [ofNat_add]
-  | -[n+1] => rfl
+  | (_+1:Nat) => by simp [ofNat_add]
+  | -[_+1] => rfl
 
 theorem toNat_sub_toNat_neg : ∀ n : Int, ↑n.toNat - ↑(-n).toNat = n
   | 0 => rfl

src/Init/Data/Int/Pow.lean

@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Deniz Aydin, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
 -/
 prelude
 import Init.Data.Int.Lemmas
+import Init.Data.Nat.Lemmas
 
 namespace Int
 
@@ -35,10 +36,24 @@ theorem pow_le_pow_of_le_right {n : Nat} (hx : n > 0) {i : Nat} : ∀ {j}, i ≤
 theorem pos_pow_of_pos {n : Nat} (m : Nat) (h : 0 < n) : 0 < n^m :=
   pow_le_pow_of_le_right h (Nat.zero_le _)
 
+@[norm_cast]
 theorem natCast_pow (b n : Nat) : ((b^n : Nat) : Int) = (b : Int) ^ n := by
   match n with
   | 0 => rfl
   | n + 1 =>
     simp only [Nat.pow_succ, Int.pow_succ, natCast_mul, natCast_pow _ n]
 
+@[simp]
+protected theorem two_pow_pred_sub_two_pow {w : Nat} (h : 0 < w) :
+    ((2 ^ (w - 1) : Nat) - (2 ^ w : Nat) : Int) = - ((2 ^ (w - 1) : Nat) : Int) := by
+  rw [← Nat.two_pow_pred_add_two_pow_pred h]
+  omega
+
+@[simp]
+protected theorem two_pow_pred_sub_two_pow' {w : Nat} (h : 0 < w) :
+    (2 : Int) ^ (w - 1) - (2 : Int) ^ w = - (2 : Int) ^ (w - 1) := by
+  norm_cast
+  rw [← Nat.two_pow_pred_add_two_pow_pred h]
+  simp [h]
+
 end Int

src/Init/Data/List/Attach.lean

@@ -48,6 +48,8 @@ Unsafe implementation of `attachWith`, taking advantage of the fact that the rep
 
 @[simp] theorem attach_nil : ([] : List α).attach = [] := rfl
 
+@[simp] theorem attachWith_nil : ([] : List α).attachWith P H = [] := rfl
+
 @[simp]
 theorem pmap_eq_map (p : α → Prop) (f : α → β) (l : List α) (H) :
     @pmap _ _ p (fun a _ => f a) l H = map f l := by
@@ -71,7 +73,7 @@ theorem map_pmap {p : α → Prop} (g : β → γ) (f : ∀ a, p a → β) (l H)
   · simp only [*, pmap, map]
 
 theorem pmap_map {p : β → Prop} (g : ∀ b, p b → γ) (f : α → β) (l H) :
-    pmap g (map f l) H = pmap (fun a h => g (f a) h) l fun a h => H _ (mem_map_of_mem _ h) := by
+    pmap g (map f l) H = pmap (fun a h => g (f a) h) l fun _ h => H _ (mem_map_of_mem _ h) := by
   induction l
   · rfl
   · simp only [*, pmap, map]
@@ -81,7 +83,12 @@ theorem attach_congr {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h : l₁ = l₂) :
   subst h
   simp
 
-@[simp] theorem attach_cons (x : α) (xs : List α) :
+theorem attachWith_congr {l₁ l₂ : List α} (w : l₁ = l₂) {P : α → Prop} {H : ∀ x ∈ l₁, P x} :
+    l₁.attachWith P H = l₂.attachWith P fun _ h => H _ (w ▸ h) := by
+  subst w
+  simp
+
+@[simp] theorem attach_cons {x : α} {xs : List α} :
     (x :: xs).attach =
       ⟨x, mem_cons_self x xs⟩ :: xs.attach.map fun ⟨y, h⟩ => ⟨y, mem_cons_of_mem x h⟩ := by
   simp only [attach, attachWith, pmap, map_pmap, cons.injEq, true_and]
@@ -89,6 +96,12 @@ theorem attach_congr {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h : l₁ = l₂) :
   intros a _ m' _
   rfl
 
+@[simp]
+theorem attachWith_cons {x : α} {xs : List α} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ a ∈ x :: xs, p a) :
+    (x :: xs).attachWith p h = ⟨x, h x (mem_cons_self x xs)⟩ ::
+      xs.attachWith p (fun a ha ↦ h a (mem_cons_of_mem x ha)) :=
+  rfl
+
 theorem pmap_eq_map_attach {p : α → Prop} (f : ∀ a, p a → β) (l H) :
     pmap f l H = l.attach.map fun x => f x.1 (H _ x.2) := by
   rw [attach, attachWith, map_pmap]; exact pmap_congr_left l fun _ _ _ _ => rfl
@@ -104,14 +117,18 @@ theorem attach_map_val (l : List α) (f : α → β) : (l.attach.map fun i => f
 theorem attach_map_subtype_val (l : List α) : l.attach.map Subtype.val = l :=
   (attach_map_coe _ _).trans (List.map_id _)
 
-theorem countP_attach (l : List α) (p : α → Bool) :
-    l.attach.countP (fun a : {x // x ∈ l} => p a) = l.countP p := by
-  simp only [← Function.comp_apply (g := Subtype.val), ← countP_map, attach_map_subtype_val]
+theorem attachWith_map_coe {p : α → Prop} (f : α → β) (l : List α) (H : ∀ a ∈ l, p a) :
+    ((l.attachWith p H).map fun (i : { i // p i}) => f i) = l.map f := by
+  rw [attachWith, map_pmap]; exact pmap_eq_map _ _ _ _
+
+theorem attachWith_map_val {p : α → Prop} (f : α → β) (l : List α) (H : ∀ a ∈ l, p a) :
+    ((l.attachWith p H).map fun i => f i.val) = l.map f :=
+  attachWith_map_coe _ _ _
 
 @[simp]
-theorem count_attach [DecidableEq α] (l : List α) (a : {x // x ∈ l}) :
-    l.attach.count a = l.count ↑a :=
-  Eq.trans (countP_congr fun _ _ => by simp [Subtype.ext_iff]) <| countP_attach _ _
+theorem attachWith_map_subtype_val {p : α → Prop} (l : List α) (H : ∀ a ∈ l, p a) :
+    (l.attachWith p H).map Subtype.val = l :=
+  (attachWith_map_coe _ _ _).trans (List.map_id _)
 
 @[simp]
 theorem mem_attach (l : List α) : ∀ x, x ∈ l.attach
@@ -137,7 +154,11 @@ theorem length_pmap {p : α → Prop} {f : ∀ a, p a → β} {l H} : length (pm
   · simp only [*, pmap, length]
 
 @[simp]
-theorem length_attach (L : List α) : L.attach.length = L.length :=
+theorem length_attach {L : List α} : L.attach.length = L.length :=
+  length_pmap
+
+@[simp]
+theorem length_attachWith {p : α → Prop} {l H} : length (l.attachWith p H) = length l :=
   length_pmap
 
 @[simp]
@@ -155,6 +176,15 @@ theorem attach_eq_nil_iff {l : List α} : l.attach = [] ↔ l = [] :=
 theorem attach_ne_nil_iff {l : List α} : l.attach ≠ [] ↔ l ≠ [] :=
   pmap_ne_nil_iff _ _
 
+@[simp]
+theorem attachWith_eq_nil_iff {l : List α} {P : α → Prop} {H : ∀ a ∈ l, P a} :
+    l.attachWith P H = [] ↔ l = [] :=
+  pmap_eq_nil_iff
+
+theorem attachWith_ne_nil_iff {l : List α} {P : α → Prop} {H : ∀ a ∈ l, P a} :
+    l.attachWith P H ≠ [] ↔ l ≠ [] :=
+  pmap_ne_nil_iff _ _
+
 @[deprecated pmap_eq_nil_iff (since := "2024-09-06")] abbrev pmap_eq_nil := @pmap_eq_nil_iff
 @[deprecated pmap_ne_nil_iff (since := "2024-09-06")] abbrev pmap_ne_nil := @pmap_ne_nil_iff
 @[deprecated attach_eq_nil_iff (since := "2024-09-06")] abbrev attach_eq_nil := @attach_eq_nil_iff
@@ -187,7 +217,7 @@ theorem getElem_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : ∀ a, p a → β) {l : List α} (h
     (hn : n < (pmap f l h).length) :
     (pmap f l h)[n] =
       f (l[n]'(@length_pmap _ _ p f l h ▸ hn))
-        (h _ (getElem_mem l n (@length_pmap _ _ p f l h ▸ hn))) := by
+        (h _ (getElem_mem (@length_pmap _ _ p f l h ▸ hn))) := by
   induction l generalizing n with
   | nil =>
     simp only [length, pmap] at hn
@@ -205,34 +235,26 @@ theorem get_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : ∀ a, p a → β) {l : List α} (h :
   simp only [get_eq_getElem]
   simp [getElem_pmap]
 
+@[simp]
+theorem getElem?_attachWith {xs : List α} {i : Nat} {P : α → Prop} {H : ∀ a ∈ xs, P a} :
+    (xs.attachWith P H)[i]? = xs[i]?.pmap Subtype.mk (fun _ a => H _ (getElem?_mem a)) :=
+  getElem?_pmap ..
+
 @[simp]
 theorem getElem?_attach {xs : List α} {i : Nat} :
-    xs.attach[i]? = xs[i]?.pmap Subtype.mk (fun _ a => getElem?_mem a) := by
-  induction xs generalizing i with
-  | nil => simp
-  | cons x xs ih =>
-    rcases i with ⟨i⟩
-    · simp only [attach_cons, Option.pmap]
-      split <;> simp_all
-    · simp only [attach_cons, getElem?_cons_succ, getElem?_map, ih]
-      simp only [Option.pmap]
-      split <;> split <;> simp_all
+    xs.attach[i]? = xs[i]?.pmap Subtype.mk (fun _ a => getElem?_mem a) :=
+  getElem?_attachWith
+
+@[simp]
+theorem getElem_attachWith {xs : List α} {P : α → Prop} {H : ∀ a ∈ xs, P a}
+    {i : Nat} (h : i < (xs.attachWith P H).length) :
+    (xs.attachWith P H)[i] = ⟨xs[i]'(by simpa using h), H _ (getElem_mem (by simpa using h))⟩ :=
+  getElem_pmap ..
 
 @[simp]
 theorem getElem_attach {xs : List α} {i : Nat} (h : i < xs.attach.length) :
-    xs.attach[i] = ⟨xs[i]'(by simpa using h), getElem_mem xs i (by simpa using h)⟩ := by
-  apply Option.some.inj
-  rw [← getElem?_eq_getElem]
-  rw [getElem?_attach]
-  simp only [Option.pmap]
-  split <;> rename_i h' _
-  · simp at h
-    simp at h'
-    exfalso
-    exact Nat.lt_irrefl _ (Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt h' h)
-  · simp only [Option.some.injEq, Subtype.mk.injEq]
-    apply Option.some.inj
-    rw [← getElem?_eq_getElem, h']
+    xs.attach[i] = ⟨xs[i]'(by simpa using h), getElem_mem (by simpa using h)⟩ :=
+  getElem_attachWith h
 
 @[simp] theorem head?_pmap {P : α → Prop} (f : (a : α) → P a → β) (xs : List α)
     (H : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ xs → P a) :
@@ -250,20 +272,112 @@ theorem getElem_attach {xs : List α} {i : Nat} (h : i < xs.attach.length) :
   | nil => simp at h
   | cons x xs ih => simp [head_pmap, ih]
 
+@[simp] theorem head?_attachWith {P : α → Prop} {xs : List α}
+    (H : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ xs → P a) :
+    (xs.attachWith P H).head? = xs.head?.pbind (fun a h => some ⟨a, H _ (mem_of_mem_head? h)⟩) := by
+  cases xs <;> simp_all
+
+@[simp] theorem head_attachWith {P : α → Prop} {xs : List α}
+    {H : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ xs → P a} (h : xs.attachWith P H ≠ []) :
+    (xs.attachWith P H).head h = ⟨xs.head (by simpa using h), H _ (head_mem _)⟩ := by
+  cases xs with
+  | nil => simp at h
+  | cons x xs => simp [head_attachWith, h]
+
 @[simp] theorem head?_attach (xs : List α) :
     xs.attach.head? = xs.head?.pbind (fun a h => some ⟨a, mem_of_mem_head? h⟩) := by
   cases xs <;> simp_all
 
-theorem head_attach {xs : List α} (h) :
+@[simp] theorem head_attach {xs : List α} (h) :
     xs.attach.head h = ⟨xs.head (by simpa using h), head_mem (by simpa using h)⟩ := by
   cases xs with
   | nil => simp at h
   | cons x xs => simp [head_attach, h]
 
+@[simp] theorem tail_pmap {P : α → Prop} (f : (a : α) → P a → β) (xs : List α)
+    (H : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ xs → P a) :
+    (xs.pmap f H).tail = xs.tail.pmap f (fun a h => H a (mem_of_mem_tail h)) := by
+  cases xs <;> simp
+
+@[simp] theorem tail_attachWith {P : α → Prop} {xs : List α}
+    {H : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ xs → P a} :
+    (xs.attachWith P H).tail = xs.tail.attachWith P (fun a h => H a (mem_of_mem_tail h)) := by
+  cases xs <;> simp
+
+@[simp] theorem tail_attach (xs : List α) :
+    xs.attach.tail = xs.tail.attach.map (fun ⟨x, h⟩ => ⟨x, mem_of_mem_tail h⟩) := by
+  cases xs <;> simp
+
+theorem foldl_pmap (l : List α) {P : α → Prop} (f : (a : α) → P a → β)
+  (H : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ l → P a) (g : γ → β → γ) (x : γ) :
+    (l.pmap f H).foldl g x = l.attach.foldl (fun acc a => g acc (f a.1 (H _ a.2))) x := by
+  rw [pmap_eq_map_attach, foldl_map]
+
+theorem foldr_pmap (l : List α) {P : α → Prop} (f : (a : α) → P a → β)
+  (H : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ l → P a) (g : β → γ → γ) (x : γ) :
+    (l.pmap f H).foldr g x = l.attach.foldr (fun a acc => g (f a.1 (H _ a.2)) acc) x := by
+  rw [pmap_eq_map_attach, foldr_map]
+
+/--
+If we fold over `l.attach` with a function that ignores the membership predicate,
+we get the same results as folding over `l` directly.
+
+This is useful when we need to use `attach` to show termination.
+
+Unfortunately this can't be applied by `simp` because of the higher order unification problem,
+and even when rewriting we need to specify the function explicitly.
+-/
+theorem foldl_attach (l : List α) (f : β → α → β) (b : β) :
+    l.attach.foldl (fun acc t => f acc t.1) b = l.foldl f b := by
+  induction l generalizing b with
+  | nil => simp
+  | cons a l ih => rw [foldl_cons, attach_cons, foldl_cons, foldl_map, ih]
+
+/--
+If we fold over `l.attach` with a function that ignores the membership predicate,
+we get the same results as folding over `l` directly.
+
+This is useful when we need to use `attach` to show termination.
+
+Unfortunately this can't be applied by `simp` because of the higher order unification problem,
+and even when rewriting we need to specify the function explicitly.
+-/
+theorem foldr_attach (l : List α) (f : α → β → β) (b : β) :
+    l.attach.foldr (fun t acc => f t.1 acc) b = l.foldr f b := by
+  induction l generalizing b with
+  | nil => simp
+  | cons a l ih => rw [foldr_cons, attach_cons, foldr_cons, foldr_map, ih]
+
 theorem attach_map {l : List α} (f : α → β) :
     (l.map f).attach = l.attach.map (fun ⟨x, h⟩ => ⟨f x, mem_map_of_mem f h⟩) := by
   induction l <;> simp [*]
 
+theorem attachWith_map {l : List α} (f : α → β) {P : β → Prop} {H : ∀ (b : β), b ∈ l.map f → P b} :
+    (l.map f).attachWith P H = (l.attachWith (P ∘ f) (fun _ h => H _ (mem_map_of_mem f h))).map
+      fun ⟨x, h⟩ => ⟨f x, h⟩ := by
+  induction l <;> simp [*]
+
+theorem map_attachWith {l : List α} {P : α → Prop} {H : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ l → P a}
+    (f : { x // P x } → β) :
+    (l.attachWith P H).map f =
+      l.pmap (fun a (h : a ∈ l ∧ P a) => f ⟨a, H _ h.1⟩) (fun a h => ⟨h, H a h⟩) := by
+  induction l with
+  | nil => rfl
+  | cons x xs ih =>
+    simp only [attachWith_cons, map_cons, ih, pmap, cons.injEq, true_and]
+    apply pmap_congr_left
+    simp
+
+/-- See also `pmap_eq_map_attach` for writing `pmap` in terms of `map` and `attach`. -/
+theorem map_attach {l : List α} (f : { x // x ∈ l } → β) :
+    l.attach.map f = l.pmap (fun a h => f ⟨a, h⟩) (fun _ => id) := by
+  induction l with
+  | nil => rfl
+  | cons x xs ih =>
+    simp only [attach_cons, map_cons, map_map, Function.comp_apply, pmap, cons.injEq, true_and, ih]
+    apply pmap_congr_left
+    simp
+
 theorem attach_filterMap {l : List α} {f : α → Option β} :
     (l.filterMap f).attach = l.attach.filterMap
       fun ⟨x, h⟩ => (f x).pbind (fun b m => some ⟨b, mem_filterMap.mpr ⟨x, h, m⟩⟩) := by
@@ -304,6 +418,9 @@ theorem attach_filter {l : List α} (p : α → Bool) :
   ext1
   split <;> simp
 
+-- We are still missing here `attachWith_filterMap` and `attachWith_filter`.
+-- Also missing are `filterMap_attach`, `filter_attach`, `filterMap_attachWith` and `filter_attachWith`.
+
 theorem pmap_pmap {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} (g : ∀ a, p a → β) (f : ∀ b, q b → γ) (l H₁ H₂) :
     pmap f (pmap g l H₁) H₂ =
       pmap (α := { x // x ∈ l }) (fun a h => f (g a h) (H₂ (g a h) (mem_pmap_of_mem a.2))) l.attach
@@ -334,6 +451,12 @@ theorem pmap_append' {p : α → Prop} (f : ∀ a : α, p a → β) (l₁ l₂ :
   congr 1 <;>
   exact pmap_congr_left _ fun _ _ _ _ => rfl
 
+@[simp] theorem attachWith_append {P : α → Prop} {xs ys : List α}
+    {H : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ xs ++ ys → P a} :
+    (xs ++ ys).attachWith P H = xs.attachWith P (fun a h => H a (mem_append_of_mem_left ys h)) ++
+      ys.attachWith P (fun a h => H a (mem_append_of_mem_right xs h)) := by
+  simp only [attachWith, attach_append, map_pmap, pmap_append]
+
 @[simp] theorem pmap_reverse {P : α → Prop} (f : (a : α) → P a → β) (xs : List α)
     (H : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ xs.reverse → P a) :
     xs.reverse.pmap f H = (xs.pmap f (fun a h => H a (by simpa using h))).reverse := by
@@ -344,6 +467,17 @@ theorem reverse_pmap {P : α → Prop} (f : (a : α) → P a → β) (xs : List
     (xs.pmap f H).reverse = xs.reverse.pmap f (fun a h => H a (by simpa using h)) := by
   rw [pmap_reverse]
 
+@[simp] theorem attachWith_reverse {P : α → Prop} {xs : List α}
+    {H : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ xs.reverse → P a} :
+    xs.reverse.attachWith P H =
+      (xs.attachWith P (fun a h => H a (by simpa using h))).reverse :=
+  pmap_reverse ..
+
+theorem reverse_attachWith {P : α → Prop} {xs : List α}
+    {H : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ xs → P a} :
+    (xs.attachWith P H).reverse = (xs.reverse.attachWith P (fun a h => H a (by simpa using h))) :=
+  reverse_pmap ..
+
 @[simp] theorem attach_reverse (xs : List α) :
     xs.reverse.attach = xs.attach.reverse.map fun ⟨x, h⟩ => ⟨x, by simpa using h⟩ := by
   simp only [attach, attachWith, reverse_pmap, map_pmap]
@@ -358,17 +492,6 @@ theorem reverse_attach (xs : List α) :
   intros
   rfl
 
-@[simp]
-theorem getLast?_attach {xs : List α} :
-    xs.attach.getLast? = xs.getLast?.pbind fun a h => some ⟨a, mem_of_getLast?_eq_some h⟩ := by
-  rw [getLast?_eq_head?_reverse, reverse_attach, head?_map, head?_attach]
-  simp
-
-@[simp]
-theorem getLast_attach {xs : List α} (h : xs.attach ≠ []) :
-    xs.attach.getLast h = ⟨xs.getLast (by simpa using h), getLast_mem (by simpa using h)⟩ := by
-  simp only [getLast_eq_head_reverse, reverse_attach, head_map, head_attach]
-
 @[simp] theorem getLast?_pmap {P : α → Prop} (f : (a : α) → P a → β) (xs : List α)
     (H : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ xs → P a) :
     (xs.pmap f H).getLast? = xs.attach.getLast?.map fun ⟨a, m⟩ => f a (H a m) := by
@@ -383,4 +506,173 @@ theorem getLast_attach {xs : List α} (h : xs.attach ≠ []) :
   simp only [getLast_eq_head_reverse]
   simp only [reverse_pmap, head_pmap, head_reverse]
 
+@[simp] theorem getLast?_attachWith {P : α → Prop} {xs : List α}
+    {H : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ xs → P a} :
+    (xs.attachWith P H).getLast? = xs.getLast?.pbind (fun a h => some ⟨a, H _ (mem_of_getLast?_eq_some h)⟩) := by
+  rw [getLast?_eq_head?_reverse, reverse_attachWith, head?_attachWith]
+  simp
+
+@[simp] theorem getLast_attachWith {P : α → Prop} {xs : List α}
+    {H : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ xs → P a} (h : xs.attachWith P H ≠ []) :
+    (xs.attachWith P H).getLast h = ⟨xs.getLast (by simpa using h), H _ (getLast_mem _)⟩ := by
+  simp only [getLast_eq_head_reverse, reverse_attachWith, head_attachWith, head_map]
+
+@[simp]
+theorem getLast?_attach {xs : List α} :
+    xs.attach.getLast? = xs.getLast?.pbind fun a h => some ⟨a, mem_of_getLast?_eq_some h⟩ := by
+  rw [getLast?_eq_head?_reverse, reverse_attach, head?_map, head?_attach]
+  simp
+
+@[simp]
+theorem getLast_attach {xs : List α} (h : xs.attach ≠ []) :
+    xs.attach.getLast h = ⟨xs.getLast (by simpa using h), getLast_mem (by simpa using h)⟩ := by
+  simp only [getLast_eq_head_reverse, reverse_attach, head_map, head_attach]
+
+@[simp]
+theorem countP_attach (l : List α) (p : α → Bool) :
+    l.attach.countP (fun a : {x // x ∈ l} => p a) = l.countP p := by
+  simp only [← Function.comp_apply (g := Subtype.val), ← countP_map, attach_map_subtype_val]
+
+@[simp]
+theorem countP_attachWith {p : α → Prop} (l : List α) (H : ∀ a ∈ l, p a) (q : α → Bool) :
+    (l.attachWith p H).countP (fun a : {x // p x} => q a) = l.countP q := by
+  simp only [← Function.comp_apply (g := Subtype.val), ← countP_map, attachWith_map_subtype_val]
+
+@[simp]
+theorem count_attach [DecidableEq α] (l : List α) (a : {x // x ∈ l}) :
+    l.attach.count a = l.count ↑a :=
+  Eq.trans (countP_congr fun _ _ => by simp [Subtype.ext_iff]) <| countP_attach _ _
+
+@[simp]
+theorem count_attachWith [DecidableEq α] {p : α → Prop} (l : List α) (H : ∀ a ∈ l, p a) (a : {x // p x}) :
+    (l.attachWith p H).count a = l.count ↑a :=
+  Eq.trans (countP_congr fun _ _ => by simp [Subtype.ext_iff]) <| countP_attachWith _ _ _
+
+/-! ## unattach
+
+`List.unattach` is the (one-sided) inverse of `List.attach`. It is a synonym for `List.map Subtype.val`.
+
+We use it by providing a simp lemma `l.attach.unattach = l`, and simp lemmas which recognize higher order
+functions applied to `l : List { x // p x }` which only depend on the value, not the predicate, and rewrite these
+in terms of a simpler function applied to `l.unattach`.
+
+Further, we provide simp lemmas that push `unattach` inwards.
+-/
+
+/--
+A synonym for `l.map (·.val)`. Mostly this should not be needed by users.
+It is introduced as an intermediate step by lemmas such as `map_subtype`,
+and is ideally subsequently simplified away by `unattach_attach`.
+
+If not, usually the right approach is `simp [List.unattach, -List.map_subtype]` to unfold.
+-/
+def unattach {α : Type _} {p : α → Prop} (l : List { x // p x }) := l.map (·.val)
+
+@[simp] theorem unattach_nil {α : Type _} {p : α → Prop} : ([] : List { x // p x }).unattach = [] := rfl
+@[simp] theorem unattach_cons {α : Type _} {p : α → Prop} {a : { x // p x }} {l : List { x // p x }} :
+  (a :: l).unattach = a.val :: l.unattach := rfl
+
+@[simp] theorem length_unattach {α : Type _} {p : α → Prop} {l : List { x // p x }} :
+    l.unattach.length = l.length := by
+  unfold unattach
+  simp
+
+@[simp] theorem unattach_attach {α : Type _} (l : List α) : l.attach.unattach = l := by
+  unfold unattach
+  induction l with
+  | nil => simp
+  | cons a l ih => simp [ih, Function.comp_def]
+
+@[simp] theorem unattach_attachWith {α : Type _} {p : α → Prop} {l : List α}
+    {H : ∀ a ∈ l, p a} :
+    (l.attachWith p H).unattach = l := by
+  unfold unattach
+  induction l with
+  | nil => simp
+  | cons a l ih => simp [ih, Function.comp_def]
+
+/-! ### Recognizing higher order functions on subtypes using a function that only depends on the value. -/
+
+/--
+This lemma identifies folds over lists of subtypes, where the function only depends on the value, not the proposition,
+and simplifies these to the function directly taking the value.
+-/
+@[simp] theorem foldl_subtype {p : α → Prop} {l : List { x // p x }}
+    {f : β → { x // p x } → β} {g : β → α → β} {x : β}
+    {hf : ∀ b x h, f b ⟨x, h⟩ = g b x} :
+    l.foldl f x = l.unattach.foldl g x := by
+  unfold unattach
+  induction l generalizing x with
+  | nil => simp
+  | cons a l ih => simp [ih, hf]
+
+/--
+This lemma identifies folds over lists of subtypes, where the function only depends on the value, not the proposition,
+and simplifies these to the function directly taking the value.
+-/
+@[simp] theorem foldr_subtype {p : α → Prop} {l : List { x // p x }}
+    {f : { x // p x } → β → β} {g : α → β → β} {x : β}
+    {hf : ∀ x h b, f ⟨x, h⟩ b = g x b} :
+    l.foldr f x = l.unattach.foldr g x := by
+  unfold unattach
+  induction l generalizing x with
+  | nil => simp
+  | cons a l ih => simp [ih, hf]
+
+/--
+This lemma identifies maps over lists of subtypes, where the function only depends on the value, not the proposition,
+and simplifies these to the function directly taking the value.
+-/
+@[simp] theorem map_subtype {p : α → Prop} {l : List { x // p x }}
+    {f : { x // p x } → β} {g : α → β} {hf : ∀ x h, f ⟨x, h⟩ = g x} :
+    l.map f = l.unattach.map g := by
+  unfold unattach
+  induction l with
+  | nil => simp
+  | cons a l ih => simp [ih, hf]
+
+@[simp] theorem filterMap_subtype {p : α → Prop} {l : List { x // p x }}
+    {f : { x // p x } → Option β} {g : α → Option β} {hf : ∀ x h, f ⟨x, h⟩ = g x} :
+    l.filterMap f = l.unattach.filterMap g := by
+  unfold unattach
+  induction l with
+  | nil => simp
+  | cons a l ih => simp [ih, hf, filterMap_cons]
+
+@[simp] theorem bind_subtype {p : α → Prop} {l : List { x // p x }}
+    {f : { x // p x } → List β} {g : α → List β} {hf : ∀ x h, f ⟨x, h⟩ = g x} :
+    (l.bind f) = l.unattach.bind g := by
+  unfold unattach
+  induction l with
+  | nil => simp
+  | cons a l ih => simp [ih, hf]
+
+@[simp] theorem unattach_filter {p : α → Prop} {l : List { x // p x }}
+    {f : { x // p x } → Bool} {g : α → Bool} {hf : ∀ x h, f ⟨x, h⟩ = g x} :
+    (l.filter f).unattach = l.unattach.filter g := by
+  induction l with
+  | nil => simp
+  | cons a l ih =>
+    simp only [filter_cons, hf, unattach_cons]
+    split <;> simp [ih]
+
+/-! ### Simp lemmas pushing `unattach` inwards. -/
+
+@[simp] theorem unattach_reverse {p : α → Prop} {l : List { x // p x }} :
+    l.reverse.unattach = l.unattach.reverse := by
+  simp [unattach, -map_subtype]
+
+@[simp] theorem unattach_append {p : α → Prop} {l₁ l₂ : List { x // p x }} :
+    (l₁ ++ l₂).unattach = l₁.unattach ++ l₂.unattach := by
+  simp [unattach, -map_subtype]
+
+@[simp] theorem unattach_join {p : α → Prop} {l : List (List { x // p x })} :
+    l.join.unattach = (l.map unattach).join := by
+  unfold unattach
+  induction l <;> simp_all
+
+@[simp] theorem unattach_replicate {p : α → Prop} {n : Nat} {x : { x // p x }} :
+    (List.replicate n x).unattach = List.replicate n x.1 := by
+  simp [unattach, -map_subtype]
+
 end List

src/Init/Data/List/Basic.lean

@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ The operations are organized as follow:
 * Logic: `any`, `all`, `or`, and `and`.
 * Zippers: `zipWith`, `zip`, `zipWithAll`, and `unzip`.
 * Ranges and enumeration: `range`, `iota`, `enumFrom`, and `enum`.
-* Minima and maxima: `minimum?` and `maximum?`.
+* Minima and maxima: `min?` and `max?`.
 * Other functions: `intersperse`, `intercalate`, `eraseDups`, `eraseReps`, `span`, `groupBy`,
   `removeAll`
   (currently these functions are mostly only used in meta code,
@@ -218,8 +218,8 @@ def get? : (as : List α) → (i : Nat) → Option α
 
 theorem ext_get? : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : List α}, (∀ n, l₁.get? n = l₂.get? n) → l₁ = l₂
   | [], [], _ => rfl
-  | a :: l₁, [], h => nomatch h 0
-  | [], a' :: l₂, h => nomatch h 0
+  | _ :: _, [], h => nomatch h 0
+  | [], _ :: _, h => nomatch h 0
   | a :: l₁, a' :: l₂, h => by
     have h0 : some a = some a' := h 0
     injection h0 with aa; simp only [aa, ext_get? fun n => h (n+1)]
@@ -1464,30 +1464,34 @@ def enum : List α → List (Nat × α) := enumFrom 0
 
 /-! ## Minima and maxima -/
 
-/-! ### minimum? -/
+/-! ### min? -/
 
 /--
 Returns the smallest element of the list, if it is not empty.
-* `[].minimum? = none`
-* `[4].minimum? = some 4`
-* `[1, 4, 2, 10, 6].minimum? = some 1`
+* `[].min? = none`
+* `[4].min? = some 4`
+* `[1, 4, 2, 10, 6].min? = some 1`
 -/
-def minimum? [Min α] : List α → Option α
+def min? [Min α] : List α → Option α
   | []    => none
   | a::as => some <| as.foldl min a
 
-/-! ### maximum? -/
+@[inherit_doc min?, deprecated min? (since := "2024-09-29")] abbrev minimum? := @min?
+
+/-! ### max? -/
 
 /--
 Returns the largest element of the list, if it is not empty.
-* `[].maximum? = none`
-* `[4].maximum? = some 4`
-* `[1, 4, 2, 10, 6].maximum? = some 10`
+* `[].max? = none`
+* `[4].max? = some 4`
+* `[1, 4, 2, 10, 6].max? = some 10`
 -/
-def maximum? [Max α] : List α → Option α
+def max? [Max α] : List α → Option α
   | []    => none
   | a::as => some <| as.foldl max a
 
+@[inherit_doc max?, deprecated max? (since := "2024-09-29")] abbrev maximum? := @max?
+
 /-! ## Other list operations
 
 The functions are currently mostly used in meta code,
@@ -1588,6 +1592,14 @@ such that adjacent elements are related by `R`.
   | []    => []
   | a::as => loop as a [] []
 where
+  /--
+  The arguments of `groupBy.loop l ag g gs` represent the following:
+
+  - `l : List α` are the elements which we still need to group.
+  - `ag : α` is the previous element for which a comparison was performed.
+  - `g : List α` is the group currently being assembled, in **reverse order**.
+  - `gs : List (List α)` is all of the groups that have been completed, in **reverse order**.
+  -/
   @[specialize] loop : List α → α → List α → List (List α) → List (List α)
   | a::as, ag, g, gs => match R ag a with
     | true  => loop as a (ag::g) gs

src/Init/Data/List/BasicAux.lean

@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ def mapMono (as : List α) (f : α → α) : List α :=
 
 /-! ## Additional lemmas required for bootstrapping `Array`. -/
 
-theorem getElem_append_left (as bs : List α) (h : i < as.length) {h'} : (as ++ bs)[i] = as[i] := by
+theorem getElem_append_left {as bs : List α} (h : i < as.length) {h'} : (as ++ bs)[i] = as[i] := by
   induction as generalizing i with
   | nil => trivial
   | cons a as ih =>
@@ -163,12 +163,14 @@ theorem getElem_append_left (as bs : List α) (h : i < as.length) {h'} : (as ++
     | zero => rfl
     | succ i => apply ih
 
-theorem getElem_append_right (as bs : List α) (h : ¬ i < as.length) {h' h''} : (as ++ bs)[i]'h' = bs[i - as.length]'h'' := by
+theorem getElem_append_right {as bs : List α} {i : Nat} (h₁ : as.length ≤ i) {h₂} :
+    (as ++ bs)[i]'h₂ =
+      bs[i - as.length]'(by rw [length_append] at h₂; exact Nat.sub_lt_left_of_lt_add h₁ h₂) := by
   induction as generalizing i with
   | nil => trivial
   | cons a as ih =>
-    cases i with simp [get, Nat.succ_sub_succ] <;> simp [Nat.succ_sub_succ] at h
-    | succ i => apply ih; simp [h]
+    cases i with simp [get, Nat.succ_sub_succ] <;> simp [Nat.succ_sub_succ] at h₁
+    | succ i => apply ih; simp [h₁]
 
 theorem get_last {as : List α} {i : Fin (length (as ++ [a]))} (h : ¬ i.1 < as.length) : (as ++ [a] : List _).get i = a := by
   cases i; rename_i i h'
@@ -233,8 +235,8 @@ theorem sizeOf_get [SizeOf α] (as : List α) (i : Fin as.length) : sizeOf (as.g
 theorem le_antisymm [LT α] [s : Antisymm (¬ · < · : α → α → Prop)] {as bs : List α} (h₁ : as ≤ bs) (h₂ : bs ≤ as) : as = bs :=
   match as, bs with
   | [],    []    => rfl
-  | [],    b::bs => False.elim <| h₂ (List.lt.nil ..)
-  | a::as, []    => False.elim <| h₁ (List.lt.nil ..)
+  | [],    _::_ => False.elim <| h₂ (List.lt.nil ..)
+  | _::_, []    => False.elim <| h₁ (List.lt.nil ..)
   | a::as, b::bs => by
     by_cases hab : a < b
     · exact False.elim <| h₂ (List.lt.head _ _ hab)

src/Init/Data/List/Count.lean

@@ -115,6 +115,13 @@ theorem IsPrefix.countP_le (s : l₁ <+: l₂) : countP p l₁ ≤ countP p l₂
 theorem IsSuffix.countP_le (s : l₁ <:+ l₂) : countP p l₁ ≤ countP p l₂ := s.sublist.countP_le _
 theorem IsInfix.countP_le (s : l₁ <:+: l₂) : countP p l₁ ≤ countP p l₂ := s.sublist.countP_le _
 
+-- See `Init.Data.List.Nat.Count` for `Sublist.le_countP : countP p l₂ - (l₂.length - l₁.length) ≤ countP p l₁`.
+
+theorem countP_tail_le (l) : countP p l.tail ≤ countP p l :=
+  (tail_sublist l).countP_le _
+
+-- See `Init.Data.List.Nat.Count` for `le_countP_tail : countP p l - 1 ≤ countP p l.tail`.
+
 theorem countP_filter (l : List α) :
     countP p (filter q l) = countP (fun a => p a && q a) l := by
   simp only [countP_eq_length_filter, filter_filter]
@@ -207,6 +214,13 @@ theorem IsPrefix.count_le (h : l₁ <+: l₂) (a : α) : count a l₁ ≤ count
 theorem IsSuffix.count_le (h : l₁ <:+ l₂) (a : α) : count a l₁ ≤ count a l₂ := h.sublist.count_le _
 theorem IsInfix.count_le (h : l₁ <:+: l₂) (a : α) : count a l₁ ≤ count a l₂ := h.sublist.count_le _
 
+-- See `Init.Data.List.Nat.Count` for `Sublist.le_count : count a l₂ - (l₂.length - l₁.length) ≤ countP a l₁`.
+
+theorem count_tail_le (a : α) (l) : count a l.tail ≤ count a l :=
+  (tail_sublist l).count_le _
+
+-- See `Init.Data.List.Nat.Count` for `le_count_tail : count a l - 1 ≤ count a l.tail`.
+
 theorem count_le_count_cons (a b : α) (l : List α) : count a l ≤ count a (b :: l) :=
   (sublist_cons_self _ _).count_le _
 

src/Init/Data/List/Erase.lean

@@ -52,9 +52,9 @@ theorem eraseP_of_forall_not {l : List α} (h : ∀ a, a ∈ l → ¬p a) : l.er
 theorem eraseP_ne_nil {xs : List α} {p : α → Bool} : xs.eraseP p ≠ [] ↔ xs ≠ [] ∧ ∀ x, p x → xs ≠ [x] := by
   simp
 
-theorem exists_of_eraseP : ∀ {l : List α} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a),
+theorem exists_of_eraseP : ∀ {l : List α} {a} (_ : a ∈ l) (_ : p a),
     ∃ a l₁ l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬p b) ∧ p a ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.eraseP p = l₁ ++ l₂
-  | b :: l, a, al, pa =>
+  | b :: l, _, al, pa =>
     if pb : p b then
       ⟨b, [], l, forall_mem_nil _, pb, by simp [pb]⟩
     else
@@ -109,6 +109,10 @@ protected theorem Sublist.eraseP : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁.eraseP p <+ l₂.eraseP
 theorem length_eraseP_le (l : List α) : (l.eraseP p).length ≤ l.length :=
   l.eraseP_sublist.length_le
 
+theorem le_length_eraseP (l : List α) : l.length - 1 ≤ (l.eraseP p).length := by
+  rw [length_eraseP]
+  split <;> simp
+
 theorem mem_of_mem_eraseP {l : List α} : a ∈ l.eraseP p → a ∈ l := (eraseP_subset _ ·)
 
 @[simp] theorem mem_eraseP_of_neg {l : List α} (pa : ¬p a) : a ∈ l.eraseP p ↔ a ∈ l := by
@@ -164,8 +168,8 @@ theorem eraseP_append_left {a : α} (pa : p a) :
 
 theorem eraseP_append_right :
     ∀ {l₁ : List α} l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬p b) → eraseP p (l₁++l₂) = l₁ ++ l₂.eraseP p
-  | [],      l₂, _ => rfl
-  | x :: xs, l₂, h => by
+  | [],     _, _ => rfl
+  | _ :: _, _, h => by
     simp [(forall_mem_cons.1 h).1, eraseP_append_right _ (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2]
 
 theorem eraseP_append (l₁ l₂ : List α) :
@@ -332,6 +336,10 @@ theorem IsPrefix.erase (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h : l₁ <+: l₂) : l₁
 theorem length_erase_le (a : α) (l : List α) : (l.erase a).length ≤ l.length :=
   (erase_sublist a l).length_le
 
+theorem le_length_erase [LawfulBEq α] (a : α) (l : List α) : l.length - 1 ≤ (l.erase a).length := by
+  rw [length_erase]
+  split <;> simp
+
 theorem mem_of_mem_erase {a b : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l.erase b) : a ∈ l := erase_subset _ _ h
 
 @[simp] theorem mem_erase_of_ne [LawfulBEq α] {a b : α} {l : List α} (ab : a ≠ b) :
@@ -452,13 +460,22 @@ end erase
 
 /-! ### eraseIdx -/
 
-theorem length_eraseIdx : ∀ {l i}, i < length l → length (@eraseIdx α l i) = length l - 1
-  | [], _, _ => rfl
-  | _::_, 0, _ => by simp [eraseIdx]
-  | x::xs, i+1, h => by
-    have : i < length xs := Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h
-    simp [eraseIdx, ← Nat.add_one]
-    rw [length_eraseIdx this, Nat.sub_add_cancel (Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.zero_le _) this)]
+theorem length_eraseIdx (l : List α) (i : Nat) :
+    (l.eraseIdx i).length = if i < l.length then l.length - 1 else l.length := by
+  induction l generalizing i with
+  | nil => simp
+  | cons x l ih =>
+    cases i with
+    | zero => simp
+    | succ i =>
+      simp only [eraseIdx, length_cons, ih, add_one_lt_add_one_iff, Nat.add_one_sub_one]
+      split
+      · cases l <;> simp_all
+      · rfl
+
+theorem length_eraseIdx_of_lt {l : List α} {i} (h : i < length l) :
+    (l.eraseIdx i).length = length l - 1 := by
+  simp [length_eraseIdx, h]
 
 @[simp] theorem eraseIdx_zero (l : List α) : eraseIdx l 0 = tail l := by cases l <;> rfl
 
@@ -468,6 +485,8 @@ theorem eraseIdx_eq_take_drop_succ :
   | a::l, 0 => by simp
   | a::l, i + 1 => by simp [eraseIdx_eq_take_drop_succ l i]
 
+-- See `Init.Data.List.Nat.Erase` for `getElem?_eraseIdx` and `getElem_eraseIdx`.
+
 @[simp] theorem eraseIdx_eq_nil {l : List α} {i : Nat} : eraseIdx l i = [] ↔ l = [] ∨ (length l = 1 ∧ i = 0) := by
   match l, i with
   | [], _
@@ -499,6 +518,13 @@ theorem eraseIdx_eq_self : ∀ {l : List α} {k : Nat}, eraseIdx l k = l ↔ len
 theorem eraseIdx_of_length_le {l : List α} {k : Nat} (h : length l ≤ k) : eraseIdx l k = l := by
   rw [eraseIdx_eq_self.2 h]
 
+theorem length_eraseIdx_le (l : List α) (i : Nat) : length (l.eraseIdx i) ≤ length l :=
+  (eraseIdx_sublist l i).length_le
+
+theorem le_length_eraseIdx (l : List α) (i : Nat) : length l - 1 ≤ length (l.eraseIdx i) := by
+  rw [length_eraseIdx]
+  split <;> simp
+
 theorem eraseIdx_append_of_lt_length {l : List α} {k : Nat} (hk : k < length l) (l' : List α) :
     eraseIdx (l ++ l') k = eraseIdx l k ++ l' := by
   induction l generalizing k with
@@ -520,7 +546,7 @@ theorem eraseIdx_append_of_length_le {l : List α} {k : Nat} (hk : length l ≤
 theorem eraseIdx_replicate {n : Nat} {a : α} {k : Nat} :
     (replicate n a).eraseIdx k = if k < n then replicate (n - 1) a else replicate n a := by
   split <;> rename_i h
-  · rw [eq_replicate_iff, length_eraseIdx (by simpa using h)]
+  · rw [eq_replicate_iff, length_eraseIdx_of_lt (by simpa using h)]
     simp only [length_replicate, true_and]
     intro b m
     replace m := mem_of_mem_eraseIdx m

src/Init/Data/List/Find.lean

@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ theorem find?_eq_some : xs.find? p = some b ↔ p b ∧ ∃ as bs, xs = as ++ b
           simp only [cons_append] at h₁
           obtain ⟨rfl, -⟩ := h₁
           simp_all
-    · simp only [ih, Bool.not_eq_true', exists_and_right, and_congr_right_iff]
+    · simp only [ih, Bool.not_eq_eq_eq_not, Bool.not_true, exists_and_right, and_congr_right_iff]
       intro pb
       constructor
       · rintro ⟨as, ⟨⟨bs, rfl⟩, h₁⟩⟩
@@ -620,6 +620,18 @@ theorem IsPrefix.findIdx_eq_of_findIdx_lt_length {l₁ l₂ : List α} {p : α
   · rfl
   · simp_all
 
+theorem findIdx_le_findIdx {l : List α} {p q : α → Bool} (h : ∀ x ∈ l, p x → q x) : l.findIdx q ≤ l.findIdx p := by
+  induction l with
+  | nil => simp
+  | cons x xs ih =>
+    simp only [findIdx_cons, cond_eq_if]
+    split
+    · simp
+    · split
+      · simp_all
+      · simp only [Nat.add_le_add_iff_right]
+        exact ih fun _ m w => h _ (mem_cons_of_mem x m) w
+
 /-! ### findIdx? -/
 
 @[simp] theorem findIdx?_nil : ([] : List α).findIdx? p i = none := rfl
@@ -803,7 +815,7 @@ theorem findIdx?_join {l : List (List α)} {p : α → Bool} :
     simp only [replicate, findIdx?_cons, Nat.zero_add, findIdx?_succ, zero_lt_succ, true_and]
     split <;> simp_all
 
-theorem findIdx?_eq_enum_findSome? {xs : List α} {p : α → Bool} :
+theorem findIdx?_eq_findSome?_enum {xs : List α} {p : α → Bool} :
     xs.findIdx? p = xs.enum.findSome? fun ⟨i, a⟩ => if p a then some i else none := by
   induction xs with
   | nil => simp
@@ -814,6 +826,30 @@ theorem findIdx?_eq_enum_findSome? {xs : List α} {p : α → Bool} :
     · simp_all only [enumFrom_cons, ite_false, Option.isNone_none, findSome?_cons_of_isNone, reduceCtorEq]
       simp [Function.comp_def, ← map_fst_add_enum_eq_enumFrom, findSome?_map]
 
+theorem findIdx?_eq_fst_find?_enum {xs : List α} {p : α → Bool} :
+    xs.findIdx? p = (xs.enum.find? fun ⟨_, x⟩ => p x).map (·.1) := by
+  induction xs with
+  | nil => simp
+  | cons x xs ih =>
+    simp only [findIdx?_cons, Nat.zero_add, findIdx?_start_succ, enum_cons]
+    split
+    · simp_all
+    · simp only [Option.map_map, enumFrom_eq_map_enum, Bool.false_eq_true, not_false_eq_true,
+        find?_cons_of_neg, find?_map, *]
+      congr
+
+-- See also `findIdx_le_findIdx`.
+theorem findIdx?_eq_none_of_findIdx?_eq_none {xs : List α} {p q : α → Bool} (w : ∀ x ∈ xs, p x → q x) :
+    xs.findIdx? q = none → xs.findIdx? p = none := by
+  simp only [findIdx?_eq_none_iff]
+  intro h x m
+  cases z : p x
+  · rfl
+  · exfalso
+    specialize w x m z
+    specialize h x m
+    simp_all
+
 theorem Sublist.findIdx?_isSome {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) :
     (l₁.findIdx? p).isSome → (l₂.findIdx? p).isSome := by
   simp only [List.findIdx?_isSome, any_eq_true]
@@ -878,7 +914,7 @@ theorem lookup_eq_some_iff {l : List (α × β)} {k : α} {b : β} :
   simp only [lookup_eq_findSome?, findSome?_eq_some_iff]
   constructor
   · rintro ⟨l₁, a, l₂, rfl, h₁, h₂⟩
-    simp only [beq_iff_eq, ite_some_none_eq_some] at h₁
+    simp only [beq_iff_eq, Option.ite_none_right_eq_some, Option.some.injEq] at h₁
     obtain ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ := h₁
     simp at h₂
     exact ⟨l₁, l₂, rfl, by simpa using h₂⟩

src/Init/Data/List/Impl.lean

@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ The following operations are still missing `@[csimp]` replacements:
 The following operations are not recursive to begin with
 (or are defined in terms of recursive primitives):
 `isEmpty`, `isSuffixOf`, `isSuffixOf?`, `rotateLeft`, `rotateRight`, `insert`, `zip`, `enum`,
-`minimum?`, `maximum?`, and `removeAll`.
+`min?`, `max?`, and `removeAll`.
 
 The following operations were already given `@[csimp]` replacements in `Init/Data/List/Basic.lean`:
 `length`, `map`, `filter`, `replicate`, `leftPad`, `unzip`, `range'`, `iota`, `intersperse`.

src/Init/Data/List/Lemmas.lean

@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ See also
 * `Init.Data.List.Erase` for lemmas about `List.eraseP` and `List.erase`.
 * `Init.Data.List.Find` for lemmas about `List.find?`, `List.findSome?`, `List.findIdx`,
   `List.findIdx?`, and `List.indexOf`
-* `Init.Data.List.MinMax` for lemmas about `List.minimum?` and `List.maximum?`.
+* `Init.Data.List.MinMax` for lemmas about `List.min?` and `List.max?`.
 * `Init.Data.List.Pairwise` for lemmas about `List.Pairwise` and `List.Nodup`.
 * `Init.Data.List.Sublist` for lemmas about `List.Subset`, `List.Sublist`, `List.IsPrefix`,
   `List.IsSuffix`, and `List.IsInfix`.
@@ -109,6 +109,9 @@ theorem cons_eq_cons {a b : α} {l l' : List α} : a :: l = b :: l' ↔ a = b
 theorem exists_cons_of_ne_nil : ∀ {l : List α}, l ≠ [] → ∃ b L, l = b :: L
   | c :: l', _ => ⟨c, l', rfl⟩
 
+theorem singleton_inj {α : Type _} {a b : α} : [a] = [b] ↔ a = b := by
+  simp
+
 /-! ### length -/
 
 theorem eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero (_ : length l = 0) : l = [] := match l with | [] => rfl
@@ -188,7 +191,7 @@ theorem get?_eq_some : l.get? n = some a ↔ ∃ h, get l ⟨n, h⟩ = a :=
   ⟨fun e =>
     have : n < length l := Nat.gt_of_not_le fun hn => by cases get?_len_le hn ▸ e
     ⟨this, by rwa [get?_eq_get this, Option.some.injEq] at e⟩,
-  fun ⟨h, e⟩ => e ▸ get?_eq_get _⟩
+  fun ⟨_, e⟩ => e ▸ get?_eq_get _⟩
 
 theorem get?_eq_none : l.get? n = none ↔ length l ≤ n :=
   ⟨fun e => Nat.ge_of_not_lt (fun h' => by cases e ▸ get?_eq_some.2 ⟨h', rfl⟩), get?_len_le⟩
@@ -200,6 +203,9 @@ theorem get?_eq_none : l.get? n = none ↔ length l ≤ n :=
 
 @[simp] theorem get_eq_getElem (l : List α) (i : Fin l.length) : l.get i = l[i.1]'i.2 := rfl
 
+theorem getElem?_eq_some {l : List α} : l[i]? = some a ↔ ∃ h : i < l.length, l[i]'h = a := by
+  simpa using get?_eq_some
+
 /--
 If one has `l.get i` in an expression (with `i : Fin l.length`) and `h : l = l'`,
 `rw [h]` will give a "motive it not type correct" error, as it cannot rewrite the
@@ -263,9 +269,15 @@ theorem get!_len_le [Inhabited α] : ∀ {l : List α} {n}, length l ≤ n → l
 theorem getElem?_eq_some_iff {l : List α} : l[n]? = some a ↔ ∃ h : n < l.length, l[n] = a := by
   simp only [← get?_eq_getElem?, get?_eq_some, get_eq_getElem]
 
+theorem some_eq_getElem?_iff {l : List α} : some a = l[n]? ↔ ∃ h : n < l.length, l[n] = a := by
+  rw [eq_comm, getElem?_eq_some_iff]
+
 @[simp] theorem getElem?_eq_none_iff : l[n]? = none ↔ length l ≤ n := by
   simp only [← get?_eq_getElem?, get?_eq_none]
 
+@[simp] theorem none_eq_getElem?_iff {l : List α} {n : Nat} : none = l[n]? ↔ length l ≤ n := by
+  simp [eq_comm (a := none)]
+
 theorem getElem?_eq_none (h : length l ≤ n) : l[n]? = none := getElem?_eq_none_iff.mpr h
 
 theorem getElem?_eq (l : List α) (i : Nat) :
@@ -480,9 +492,9 @@ theorem getElem?_of_mem {a} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) : ∃ n : Nat, l[n]? = s
 theorem get?_of_mem {a} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) : ∃ n, l.get? n = some a :=
   let ⟨⟨n, _⟩, e⟩ := get_of_mem h; ⟨n, e ▸ get?_eq_get _⟩
 
-theorem getElem_mem : ∀ (l : List α) n (h : n < l.length), l[n]'h ∈ l
+@[simp] theorem getElem_mem : ∀ {l : List α} {n} (h : n < l.length), l[n]'h ∈ l
   | _ :: _, 0, _ => .head ..
-  | _ :: l, _+1, _ => .tail _ (getElem_mem l ..)
+  | _ :: l, _+1, _ => .tail _ (getElem_mem (l := l) ..)
 
 theorem get_mem : ∀ (l : List α) n h, get l ⟨n, h⟩ ∈ l
   | _ :: _, 0, _ => .head ..
@@ -524,7 +536,7 @@ theorem forall_getElem {l : List α} {p : α → Prop} :
       · simpa
       · apply w
         simp only [getElem_cons_succ]
-        exact getElem_mem l n (lt_of_succ_lt_succ h)
+        exact getElem_mem (lt_of_succ_lt_succ h)
 
 @[simp] theorem decide_mem_cons [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] {l : List α} :
     decide (y ∈ a :: l) = (y == a || decide (y ∈ l)) := by
@@ -706,9 +718,9 @@ theorem set_eq_of_length_le {l : List α} {n : Nat} (h : l.length ≤ n) {a : α
 theorem set_comm (a b : α) : ∀ {n m : Nat} (l : List α), n ≠ m →
     (l.set n a).set m b = (l.set m b).set n a
   | _, _, [], _ => by simp
-  | n+1, 0, _ :: _, _ => by simp [set]
-  | 0, m+1, _ :: _, _ => by simp [set]
-  | n+1, m+1, x :: t, h =>
+  | _+1, 0, _ :: _, _ => by simp [set]
+  | 0, _+1, _ :: _, _ => by simp [set]
+  | _+1, _+1, _ :: t, h =>
     congrArg _ <| set_comm a b t fun h' => h <| Nat.succ_inj'.mpr h'
 
 @[simp]
@@ -729,6 +741,45 @@ theorem mem_or_eq_of_mem_set : ∀ {l : List α} {n : Nat} {a b : α}, a ∈ l.s
 
 -- See also `set_eq_take_append_cons_drop` in `Init.Data.List.TakeDrop`.
 
+/-! ### BEq -/
+
+@[simp] theorem reflBEq_iff [BEq α] : ReflBEq (List α) ↔ ReflBEq α := by
+  constructor
+  · intro h
+    constructor
+    intro a
+    suffices ([a] == [a]) = true by
+      simpa only [List.instBEq, List.beq, Bool.and_true]
+    simp
+  · intro h
+    constructor
+    intro a
+    induction a with
+    | nil => simp only [List.instBEq, List.beq]
+    | cons a as ih =>
+      simp [List.instBEq, List.beq]
+      exact ih
+
+@[simp] theorem lawfulBEq_iff [BEq α] : LawfulBEq (List α) ↔ LawfulBEq α := by
+  constructor
+  · intro h
+    constructor
+    · intro a b h
+      apply singleton_inj.1
+      apply eq_of_beq
+      simp only [List.instBEq, List.beq]
+      simpa
+    · intro a
+      suffices ([a] == [a]) = true by
+        simpa only [List.instBEq, List.beq, Bool.and_true]
+      simp
+  · intro h
+    constructor
+    · intro a b h
+      simpa using h
+    · intro a
+      simp
+
 /-! ### Lexicographic ordering -/
 
 protected theorem lt_irrefl [LT α] (lt_irrefl : ∀ x : α, ¬x < x) (l : List α) : ¬l < l := by
@@ -830,6 +881,20 @@ theorem foldr_map' {α β : Type u} (g : α → β) (f : α → α → α) (f' :
   · simp
   · simp [*, h]
 
+theorem foldl_assoc {op : α → α → α} [ha : Std.Associative op] :
+    ∀ {l : List α} {a₁ a₂}, l.foldl op (op a₁ a₂) = op a₁ (l.foldl op a₂)
+  | [], a₁, a₂ => rfl
+  | a :: l, a₁, a₂ => by
+    simp only [foldl_cons, ha.assoc]
+    rw [foldl_assoc]
+
+theorem foldr_assoc {op : α → α → α} [ha : Std.Associative op] :
+    ∀ {l : List α} {a₁ a₂}, l.foldr op (op a₁ a₂) = op (l.foldr op a₁) a₂
+  | [], a₁, a₂ => rfl
+  | a :: l, a₁, a₂ => by
+    simp only [foldr_cons, ha.assoc]
+    rw [foldr_assoc]
+
 theorem foldl_hom (f : α₁ → α₂) (g₁ : α₁ → β → α₁) (g₂ : α₂ → β → α₂) (l : List β) (init : α₁)
     (H : ∀ x y, g₂ (f x) y = f (g₁ x y)) : l.foldl g₂ (f init) = f (l.foldl g₁ init) := by
   induction l generalizing init <;> simp [*, H]
@@ -890,6 +955,38 @@ def foldrRecOn {motive : β → Sort _} : ∀ (l : List α) (op : α → β →
         x (mem_cons_self x l) :=
   rfl
 
+/--
+We can prove that two folds over the same list are related (by some arbitrary relation)
+if we know that the initial elements are related and the folding function, for each element of the list,
+preserves the relation.
+-/
+theorem foldl_rel {l : List α} {f g : β → α → β} {a b : β} (r : β → β → Prop)
+    (h : r a b) (h' : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ l → ∀ (c c' : β), r c c' → r (f c a) (g c' a)) :
+    r (l.foldl (fun acc a => f acc a) a) (l.foldl (fun acc a => g acc a) b) := by
+  induction l generalizing a b with
+  | nil => simp_all
+  | cons a l ih =>
+    simp only [foldl_cons]
+    apply ih
+    · simp_all
+    · exact fun a m c c' h => h' _ (by simp_all) _ _ h
+
+/--
+We can prove that two folds over the same list are related (by some arbitrary relation)
+if we know that the initial elements are related and the folding function, for each element of the list,
+preserves the relation.
+-/
+theorem foldr_rel {l : List α} {f g : α → β → β} {a b : β} (r : β → β → Prop)
+    (h : r a b) (h' : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ l → ∀ (c c' : β), r c c' → r (f a c) (g a c')) :
+    r (l.foldr (fun a acc => f a acc) a) (l.foldr (fun a acc => g a acc) b) := by
+  induction l generalizing a b with
+  | nil => simp_all
+  | cons a l ih =>
+    simp only [foldr_cons]
+    apply h'
+    · simp
+    · exact ih h fun a m c c' h => h' _ (by simp_all) _ _ h
+
 /-! ### getLast -/
 
 theorem getLast_eq_getElem : ∀ (l : List α) (h : l ≠ []),
@@ -897,8 +994,8 @@ theorem getLast_eq_getElem : ∀ (l : List α) (h : l ≠ []),
       match l with
       | [] => contradiction
       | a :: l => exact Nat.le_refl _)
-  | [a], h => rfl
-  | a :: b :: l, h => by
+  | [_], _ => rfl
+  | _ :: _ :: _, _ => by
     simp [getLast, get, Nat.succ_sub_succ, getLast_eq_getElem]
 
 @[deprecated getLast_eq_getElem (since := "2024-07-15")]
@@ -924,11 +1021,15 @@ theorem getLast_eq_getLastD (a l h) : @getLast α (a::l) h = getLastD l a := by
 theorem getLast!_cons [Inhabited α] : @getLast! α _ (a::l) = getLastD l a := by
   simp [getLast!, getLast_eq_getLastD]
 
-theorem getLast_mem : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), getLast l h ∈ l
+@[simp] theorem getLast_mem : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), getLast l h ∈ l
   | [], h => absurd rfl h
   | [_], _ => .head ..
   | _::a::l, _ => .tail _ <| getLast_mem (cons_ne_nil a l)
 
+theorem getLast_mem_getLast? : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), getLast l h ∈ getLast? l
+  | [], h => by contradiction
+  | _ :: _, _ => rfl
+
 theorem getLastD_mem_cons : ∀ (l : List α) (a : α), getLastD l a ∈ a::l
   | [], _ => .head ..
   | _::_, _ => .tail _ <| getLast_mem _
@@ -999,6 +1100,11 @@ theorem head?_eq_getElem? : ∀ l : List α, head? l = l[0]?
   | [] => rfl
   | a :: l => by simp
 
+theorem head_eq_getElem (l : List α) (h : l ≠ []) : head l h = l[0]'(length_pos.mpr h) := by
+  cases l with
+  | nil => simp at h
+  | cons _ _ => simp
+
 theorem head_eq_iff_head?_eq_some {xs : List α} (h) : xs.head h = a ↔ xs.head? = some a := by
   cases xs with
   | nil => simp at h
@@ -1013,7 +1119,7 @@ theorem head?_eq_some_iff {xs : List α} {a : α} : xs.head? = some a ↔ ∃ ys
 @[simp] theorem head?_isSome : l.head?.isSome ↔ l ≠ [] := by
   cases l <;> simp
 
-theorem head_mem : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), head l h ∈ l
+@[simp] theorem head_mem : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), head l h ∈ l
   | [], h => absurd rfl h
   | _::_, _ => .head ..
 
@@ -1026,6 +1132,10 @@ theorem mem_of_mem_head? : ∀ {l : List α} {a : α}, a ∈ l.head? → a ∈ l
     cases h
     exact mem_cons_self a l
 
+theorem head_mem_head? : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), head l h ∈ head? l
+  | [], h => by contradiction
+  | _ :: _, _ => rfl
+
 theorem head?_concat {a : α} : (l ++ [a]).head? = l.head?.getD a := by
   cases l <;> simp
 
@@ -1055,6 +1165,55 @@ theorem tail_eq_tail? (l) : @tail α l = (tail? l).getD [] := by simp [tail_eq_t
 theorem mem_of_mem_tail {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ tail l) : a ∈ l := by
   induction l <;> simp_all
 
+theorem ne_nil_of_tail_ne_nil {l : List α} : l.tail ≠ [] → l ≠ [] := by
+  cases l <;> simp
+
+@[simp] theorem getElem_tail (l : List α) (i : Nat) (h : i < l.tail.length) :
+    (tail l)[i] = l[i + 1]'(add_lt_of_lt_sub (by simpa using h)) := by
+  cases l with
+  | nil => simp at h
+  | cons _ l => simp
+
+@[simp] theorem getElem?_tail (l : List α) (i : Nat) :
+    (tail l)[i]? = l[i + 1]? := by
+  cases l <;> simp
+
+@[simp] theorem set_tail (l : List α) (i : Nat) (a : α) :
+    l.tail.set i a = (l.set (i + 1) a).tail := by
+  cases l <;> simp
+
+theorem one_lt_length_of_tail_ne_nil {l : List α} (h : l.tail ≠ []) : 1 < l.length := by
+  cases l with
+  | nil => simp at h
+  | cons _ l =>
+    simp only [tail_cons, ne_eq] at h
+    exact Nat.lt_add_of_pos_left (length_pos.mpr h)
+
+@[simp] theorem head_tail (l : List α) (h : l.tail ≠ []) :
+    (tail l).head h = l[1]'(one_lt_length_of_tail_ne_nil h) := by
+  cases l with
+  | nil => simp at h
+  | cons _ l => simp [head_eq_getElem]
+
+@[simp] theorem head?_tail (l : List α) : (tail l).head? = l[1]? := by
+  simp [head?_eq_getElem?]
+
+@[simp] theorem getLast_tail (l : List α) (h : l.tail ≠ []) :
+    (tail l).getLast h = l.getLast (ne_nil_of_tail_ne_nil h) := by
+  simp only [getLast_eq_getElem, length_tail, getElem_tail]
+  congr
+  match l with
+  | _ :: _ :: l => simp
+
+theorem getLast?_tail (l : List α) : (tail l).getLast? = if l.length = 1 then none else l.getLast? := by
+  match l with
+  | [] => simp
+  | [a] => simp
+  | _ :: _ :: l =>
+    simp only [tail_cons, length_cons, getLast?_cons_cons]
+    rw [if_neg]
+    rintro ⟨⟩
+
 /-! ## Basic operations -/
 
 /-! ### map -/
@@ -1172,11 +1331,16 @@ theorem map_eq_iff : map f l = l' ↔ ∀ i : Nat, l'[i]? = l[i]?.map f := by
 theorem map_eq_foldr (f : α → β) (l : List α) : map f l = foldr (fun a bs => f a :: bs) [] l := by
   induction l <;> simp [*]
 
-@[simp] theorem set_map {f : α → β} {l : List α} {n : Nat} {a : α} :
-    (map f l).set n (f a) = map f (l.set n a) := by
-  induction l generalizing n with
+@[simp] theorem map_set {f : α → β} {l : List α} {i : Nat} {a : α} :
+    (l.set i a).map f = (l.map f).set i (f a) := by
+  induction l generalizing i with
   | nil => simp
-  | cons b l ih => cases n <;> simp_all
+  | cons b l ih => cases i <;> simp_all
+
+@[deprecated "Use the reverse direction of `map_set`." (since := "2024-09-20")]
+theorem set_map {f : α → β} {l : List α} {n : Nat} {a : α} :
+    (map f l).set n (f a) = map f (l.set n a) := by
+  simp
 
 @[simp] theorem head_map (f : α → β) (l : List α) (w) :
     head (map f l) w = f (head l (by simpa using w)) := by
@@ -1302,7 +1466,7 @@ theorem map_filter_eq_foldr (f : α → β) (p : α → Bool) (as : List α) :
 
 @[simp] theorem filter_append {p : α → Bool} :
     ∀ (l₁ l₂ : List α), filter p (l₁ ++ l₂) = filter p l₁ ++ filter p l₂
-  | [], l₂ => rfl
+  | [], _ => rfl
   | a :: l₁, l₂ => by simp [filter]; split <;> simp [filter_append l₁]
 
 theorem filter_eq_cons_iff {l} {a} {as} :
@@ -1507,10 +1671,16 @@ theorem filterMap_eq_cons_iff {l} {b} {bs} :
 
 /-! ### append -/
 
-theorem getElem_append : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : List α} (n : Nat) (h : n < l₁.length),
-    (l₁ ++ l₂)[n]'(length_append .. ▸ Nat.lt_add_right _ h) = l₁[n]
-| a :: l, _, 0, h => rfl
-| a :: l, _, n+1, h => by simp only [get, cons_append]; apply getElem_append
+@[simp] theorem nil_append_fun : (([] : List α) ++ ·) = id := rfl
+
+@[simp] theorem cons_append_fun (a : α) (as : List α) :
+    (fun bs => ((a :: as) ++ bs)) = fun bs => a :: (as ++ bs) := rfl
+
+theorem getElem_append {l₁ l₂ : List α} (n : Nat) (h) :
+    (l₁ ++ l₂)[n] = if h' : n < l₁.length then l₁[n] else l₂[n - l₁.length]'(by simp at h h'; exact Nat.sub_lt_left_of_lt_add h' h) := by
+  split <;> rename_i h'
+  · rw [getElem_append_left h']
+  · rw [getElem_append_right (by simpa using h')]
 
 theorem getElem?_append_left {l₁ l₂ : List α} {n : Nat} (hn : n < l₁.length) :
     (l₁ ++ l₂)[n]? = l₁[n]? := by
@@ -1520,7 +1690,7 @@ theorem getElem?_append_left {l₁ l₂ : List α} {n : Nat} (hn : n < l₁.leng
 
 theorem getElem?_append_right : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : List α} {n : Nat}, l₁.length ≤ n →
   (l₁ ++ l₂)[n]? = l₂[n - l₁.length]?
-| [], _, n, _ => rfl
+| [], _, _, _ => rfl
 | a :: l, _, n+1, h₁ => by
   rw [cons_append]
   simp [Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub, getElem?_append_right (Nat.lt_succ.1 h₁)]
@@ -1536,12 +1706,13 @@ theorem get?_append_right {l₁ l₂ : List α} {n : Nat} (h : l₁.length ≤ n
     (l₁ ++ l₂).get? n = l₂.get? (n - l₁.length) := by
   simp [getElem?_append_right, h]
 
-theorem getElem_append_right' {l₁ l₂ : List α} {n : Nat} (h₁ : l₁.length ≤ n) (h₂) :
-    (l₁ ++ l₂)[n]'h₂ =
-      l₂[n - l₁.length]'(by rw [length_append] at h₂; exact Nat.sub_lt_left_of_lt_add h₁ h₂) :=
-  Option.some.inj <| by rw [← getElem?_eq_getElem, ← getElem?_eq_getElem, getElem?_append_right h₁]
+/-- Variant of `getElem_append_left` useful for rewriting from the small list to the big list. -/
+theorem getElem_append_left' (l₂ : List α) {l₁ : List α} {n : Nat} (hn : n < l₁.length) :
+    l₁[n] = (l₁ ++ l₂)[n]'(by simpa using Nat.lt_add_right l₂.length hn) := by
+  rw [getElem_append_left] <;> simp
 
-theorem getElem_append_right'' (l₁ : List α) {l₂ : List α} {n : Nat} (hn : n < l₂.length) :
+/-- Variant of `getElem_append_right` useful for rewriting from the small list to the big list. -/
+theorem getElem_append_right' (l₁ : List α) {l₂ : List α} {n : Nat} (hn : n < l₂.length) :
     l₂[n] = (l₁ ++ l₂)[n + l₁.length]'(by simpa [Nat.add_comm] using Nat.add_lt_add_left hn _) := by
   rw [getElem_append_right] <;> simp [*, le_add_left]
 
@@ -1552,7 +1723,7 @@ theorem get_append_right_aux {l₁ l₂ : List α} {n : Nat}
   exact Nat.sub_lt_left_of_lt_add h₁ h₂
 
 set_option linter.deprecated false in
-@[deprecated getElem_append_right' (since := "2024-06-12")]
+@[deprecated getElem_append_right (since := "2024-06-12")]
 theorem get_append_right' {l₁ l₂ : List α} {n : Nat} (h₁ : l₁.length ≤ n) (h₂) :
     (l₁ ++ l₂).get ⟨n, h₂⟩ = l₂.get ⟨n - l₁.length, get_append_right_aux h₁ h₂⟩ :=
   Option.some.inj <| by rw [← get?_eq_get, ← get?_eq_get, get?_append_right h₁]
@@ -1584,8 +1755,8 @@ theorem append_of_mem {a : α} {l : List α} : a ∈ l → ∃ s t : List α, l
 
 theorem append_inj :
     ∀ {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : List α}, s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂ → length s₁ = length s₂ → s₁ = s₂ ∧ t₁ = t₂
-  | [], [], t₁, t₂, h, _ => ⟨rfl, h⟩
-  | a :: s₁, b :: s₂, t₁, t₂, h, hl => by
+  | [], [], _, _, h, _ => ⟨rfl, h⟩
+  | _ :: _, _ :: _, _, _, h, hl => by
     simp [append_inj (cons.inj h).2 (Nat.succ.inj hl)] at h ⊢; exact h
 
 theorem append_inj_right (h : s₁ ++ t₁ = s₂ ++ t₂) (hl : length s₁ = length s₂) : t₁ = t₂ :=
@@ -1644,7 +1815,7 @@ theorem get_append_left (as bs : List α) (h : i < as.length) {h'} :
   simp [getElem_append_left, h, h']
 
 @[deprecated getElem_append_right (since := "2024-06-12")]
-theorem get_append_right (as bs : List α) (h : ¬ i < as.length) {h' h''} :
+theorem get_append_right (as bs : List α) (h : as.length ≤ i) {h' h''} :
     (as ++ bs).get ⟨i, h'⟩ = bs.get ⟨i - as.length, h''⟩ := by
   simp [getElem_append_right, h, h', h'']
 
@@ -1840,7 +2011,7 @@ theorem map_eq_append_iff {f : α → β} :
     map f l = L₁ ++ L₂ ↔ ∃ l₁ l₂, l = l₁ ++ l₂ ∧ map f l₁ = L₁ ∧ map f l₂ = L₂ := by
   rw [← filterMap_eq_map, filterMap_eq_append_iff]
 
-theorem append_eq_map_iff (f : α → β) :
+theorem append_eq_map_iff {f : α → β} :
     L₁ ++ L₂ = map f l ↔ ∃ l₁ l₂, l = l₁ ++ l₂ ∧ map f l₁ = L₁ ∧ map f l₂ = L₂ := by
   rw [eq_comm, map_eq_append_iff]
 
@@ -2238,11 +2409,21 @@ theorem map_eq_replicate_iff {l : List α} {f : α → β} {b : β} :
 @[simp] theorem map_const (l : List α) (b : β) : map (Function.const α b) l = replicate l.length b :=
   map_eq_replicate_iff.mpr fun _ _ => rfl
 
+@[simp] theorem map_const_fun (x : β) : map (Function.const α x) = (replicate ·.length x) := by
+  funext l
+  simp
+
 /-- Variant of `map_const` using a lambda rather than `Function.const`. -/
 -- This can not be a `@[simp]` lemma because it would fire on every `List.map`.
 theorem map_const' (l : List α) (b : β) : map (fun _ => b) l = replicate l.length b :=
   map_const l b
 
+@[simp] theorem set_replicate_self : (replicate n a).set i a = replicate n a := by
+  apply ext_getElem
+  · simp
+  · intro i h₁ h₂
+    simp [getElem_set]
+
 @[simp] theorem append_replicate_replicate : replicate n a ++ replicate m a = replicate (n + m) a := by
   rw [eq_replicate_iff]
   constructor
@@ -2323,6 +2504,47 @@ theorem bind_replicate {β} (f : α → List β) : (replicate n a).bind f = (rep
 @[simp] theorem isEmpty_replicate : (replicate n a).isEmpty = decide (n = 0) := by
   cases n <;> simp [replicate_succ]
 
+/-- Every list is either empty, a non-empty `replicate`, or begins with a non-empty `replicate`
+followed by a different element. -/
+theorem eq_replicate_or_eq_replicate_append_cons {α : Type _} (l : List α) :
+    (l = []) ∨ (∃ n a, l = replicate n a ∧ 0 < n) ∨
+      (∃ n a b l', l = replicate n a ++ b :: l' ∧ 0 < n ∧ a ≠ b) := by
+  induction l with
+  | nil => simp
+  | cons x l ih =>
+    right
+    rcases ih with rfl | ⟨n, a, rfl, h⟩ | ⟨n, a, b, l', rfl, h⟩
+    · left
+      exact ⟨1, x, rfl, by decide⟩
+    · by_cases h' : x = a
+      · subst h'
+        left
+        exact ⟨n + 1, x, rfl, by simp⟩
+      · right
+        refine ⟨1, x, a, replicate (n - 1) a, ?_, by decide, h'⟩
+        match n with | n + 1 => simp [replicate_succ]
+    · right
+      by_cases h' : x = a
+      · subst h'
+        refine ⟨n + 1, x, b, l', by simp [replicate_succ], by simp, h.2⟩
+      · refine ⟨1, x, a, replicate (n - 1) a ++ b :: l', ?_, by decide, h'⟩
+        match n with | n + 1 => simp [replicate_succ]
+
+/-- An induction principle for lists based on contiguous runs of identical elements. -/
+-- A `Sort _` valued version would require a different design. (And associated `@[simp]` lemmas.)
+theorem replicateRecOn {α : Type _} {p : List α → Prop} (m : List α)
+    (h0 : p []) (hr : ∀ a n, 0 < n → p (replicate n a))
+    (hi : ∀ a b n l, a ≠ b → 0 < n → p (b :: l) → p (replicate n a ++ b :: l)) : p m := by
+  rcases eq_replicate_or_eq_replicate_append_cons m with
+    rfl | ⟨n, a, rfl, hn⟩ | ⟨n, a, b, l', w, hn, h⟩
+  · exact h0
+  · exact hr _ _ hn
+  · have : (b :: l').length < m.length := by
+      simpa [w] using Nat.lt_add_of_pos_left hn
+    subst w
+    exact hi _ _ _ _ h hn (replicateRecOn (b :: l') h0 hr hi)
+termination_by m.length
+
 /-! ### reverse -/
 
 @[simp] theorem length_reverse (as : List α) : (as.reverse).length = as.length := by
@@ -2485,7 +2707,7 @@ theorem bind_reverse {β} (l : List α) (f : α → List β) : (l.reverse.bind f
 @[simp] theorem reverse_replicate (n) (a : α) : reverse (replicate n a) = replicate n a :=
   eq_replicate_iff.2
     ⟨by rw [length_reverse, length_replicate],
-     fun b h => eq_of_mem_replicate (mem_reverse.1 h)⟩
+     fun _ h => eq_of_mem_replicate (mem_reverse.1 h)⟩
 
 /-! #### Further results about `getLast` and `getLast?` -/
 
@@ -2690,7 +2912,7 @@ theorem head?_dropLast (xs : List α) : xs.dropLast.head? = if 1 < xs.length the
 
 theorem getLast_dropLast {xs : List α} (h) :
    xs.dropLast.getLast h =
-     xs[xs.length - 2]'(match xs, h with | (a :: b :: xs), _ => Nat.lt_trans (Nat.lt_add_one _) (Nat.lt_add_one _)) := by
+     xs[xs.length - 2]'(match xs, h with | (_ :: _ :: _), _ => Nat.lt_trans (Nat.lt_add_one _) (Nat.lt_add_one _)) := by
   rw [getLast_eq_getElem, getElem_dropLast]
   congr 1
   simp; rfl
@@ -2714,8 +2936,8 @@ theorem dropLast_cons_of_ne_nil {α : Type u} {x : α}
 
 theorem dropLast_concat_getLast : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), dropLast l ++ [getLast l h] = l
   | [], h => absurd rfl h
-  | [a], h => rfl
-  | a :: b :: l, h => by
+  | [_], _ => rfl
+  | _ :: b :: l, _ => by
     rw [dropLast_cons₂, cons_append, getLast_cons (cons_ne_nil _ _)]
     congr
     exact dropLast_concat_getLast (cons_ne_nil b l)
@@ -2754,6 +2976,12 @@ theorem dropLast_append_cons : dropLast (l₁ ++ b :: l₂) = l₁ ++ dropLast (
     dropLast (a :: replicate n a) = replicate n a := by
   rw [← replicate_succ, dropLast_replicate, Nat.add_sub_cancel]
 
+@[simp] theorem tail_reverse (l : List α) : l.reverse.tail = l.dropLast.reverse := by
+  apply ext_getElem
+  · simp
+  · intro i h₁ h₂
+    simp [Nat.add_comm i, Nat.sub_add_eq]
+
 /-!
 ### splitAt
 

src/Init/Data/List/MinMax.lean

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ prelude
 import Init.Data.List.Lemmas
 
 /-!
-# Lemmas about `List.minimum?` and `List.maximum?.
+# Lemmas about `List.min?` and `List.max?.
 -/
 
 namespace List
@@ -16,24 +16,24 @@ open Nat
 
 /-! ## Minima and maxima -/
 
-/-! ### minimum? -/
+/-! ### min? -/
 
-@[simp] theorem minimum?_nil [Min α] : ([] : List α).minimum? = none := rfl
+@[simp] theorem min?_nil [Min α] : ([] : List α).min? = none := rfl
 
--- We don't put `@[simp]` on `minimum?_cons`,
+-- We don't put `@[simp]` on `min?_cons`,
 -- because the definition in terms of `foldl` is not useful for proofs.
-theorem minimum?_cons [Min α] {xs : List α} : (x :: xs).minimum? = foldl min x xs := rfl
+theorem min?_cons [Min α] {xs : List α} : (x :: xs).min? = foldl min x xs := rfl
 
-@[simp] theorem minimum?_eq_none_iff {xs : List α} [Min α] : xs.minimum? = none ↔ xs = [] := by
-  cases xs <;> simp [minimum?]
+@[simp] theorem min?_eq_none_iff {xs : List α} [Min α] : xs.min? = none ↔ xs = [] := by
+  cases xs <;> simp [min?]
 
-theorem minimum?_mem [Min α] (min_eq_or : ∀ a b : α, min a b = a ∨ min a b = b) :
-    {xs : List α} → xs.minimum? = some a → a ∈ xs := by
+theorem min?_mem [Min α] (min_eq_or : ∀ a b : α, min a b = a ∨ min a b = b) :
+    {xs : List α} → xs.min? = some a → a ∈ xs := by
   intro xs
   match xs with
   | nil => simp
   | x :: xs =>
-    simp only [minimum?_cons, Option.some.injEq, List.mem_cons]
+    simp only [min?_cons, Option.some.injEq, List.mem_cons]
     intro eq
     induction xs generalizing x with
     | nil =>
@@ -49,12 +49,12 @@ theorem minimum?_mem [Min α] (min_eq_or : ∀ a b : α, min a b = a ∨ min a b
 
 -- See also `Init.Data.List.Nat.Basic` for specialisations of the next two results to `Nat`.
 
-theorem le_minimum?_iff [Min α] [LE α]
+theorem le_min?_iff [Min α] [LE α]
     (le_min_iff : ∀ a b c : α, a ≤ min b c ↔ a ≤ b ∧ a ≤ c) :
-    {xs : List α} → xs.minimum? = some a → ∀ {x}, x ≤ a ↔ ∀ b, b ∈ xs → x ≤ b
+    {xs : List α} → xs.min? = some a → ∀ {x}, x ≤ a ↔ ∀ b, b ∈ xs → x ≤ b
   | nil => by simp
   | cons x xs => by
-    rw [minimum?]
+    rw [min?]
     intro eq y
     simp only [Option.some.injEq] at eq
     induction xs generalizing x with
@@ -67,46 +67,46 @@ theorem le_minimum?_iff [Min α] [LE α]
 
 -- This could be refactored by designing appropriate typeclasses to replace `le_refl`, `min_eq_or`,
 -- and `le_min_iff`.
-theorem minimum?_eq_some_iff [Min α] [LE α] [anti : Antisymm ((· : α) ≤ ·)]
+theorem min?_eq_some_iff [Min α] [LE α] [anti : Antisymm ((· : α) ≤ ·)]
     (le_refl : ∀ a : α, a ≤ a)
     (min_eq_or : ∀ a b : α, min a b = a ∨ min a b = b)
     (le_min_iff : ∀ a b c : α, a ≤ min b c ↔ a ≤ b ∧ a ≤ c) {xs : List α} :
-    xs.minimum? = some a ↔ a ∈ xs ∧ ∀ b, b ∈ xs → a ≤ b := by
-  refine ⟨fun h => ⟨minimum?_mem min_eq_or h, (le_minimum?_iff le_min_iff h).1 (le_refl _)⟩, ?_⟩
+    xs.min? = some a ↔ a ∈ xs ∧ ∀ b, b ∈ xs → a ≤ b := by
+  refine ⟨fun h => ⟨min?_mem min_eq_or h, (le_min?_iff le_min_iff h).1 (le_refl _)⟩, ?_⟩
   intro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
   cases xs with
   | nil => simp at h₁
   | cons x xs =>
     exact congrArg some <| anti.1
-      ((le_minimum?_iff le_min_iff (xs := x::xs) rfl).1 (le_refl _) _ h₁)
-      (h₂ _ (minimum?_mem min_eq_or (xs := x::xs) rfl))
+      ((le_min?_iff le_min_iff (xs := x::xs) rfl).1 (le_refl _) _ h₁)
+      (h₂ _ (min?_mem min_eq_or (xs := x::xs) rfl))
 
-theorem minimum?_replicate [Min α] {n : Nat} {a : α} (w : min a a = a) :
-    (replicate n a).minimum? = if n = 0 then none else some a := by
+theorem min?_replicate [Min α] {n : Nat} {a : α} (w : min a a = a) :
+    (replicate n a).min? = if n = 0 then none else some a := by
   induction n with
   | zero => rfl
-  | succ n ih => cases n <;> simp_all [replicate_succ, minimum?_cons]
+  | succ n ih => cases n <;> simp_all [replicate_succ, min?_cons]
 
-@[simp] theorem minimum?_replicate_of_pos [Min α] {n : Nat} {a : α} (w : min a a = a) (h : 0 < n) :
-    (replicate n a).minimum? = some a := by
-  simp [minimum?_replicate, Nat.ne_of_gt h, w]
+@[simp] theorem min?_replicate_of_pos [Min α] {n : Nat} {a : α} (w : min a a = a) (h : 0 < n) :
+    (replicate n a).min? = some a := by
+  simp [min?_replicate, Nat.ne_of_gt h, w]
 
-/-! ### maximum? -/
+/-! ### max? -/
 
-@[simp] theorem maximum?_nil [Max α] : ([] : List α).maximum? = none := rfl
+@[simp] theorem max?_nil [Max α] : ([] : List α).max? = none := rfl
 
--- We don't put `@[simp]` on `maximum?_cons`,
+-- We don't put `@[simp]` on `max?_cons`,
 -- because the definition in terms of `foldl` is not useful for proofs.
-theorem maximum?_cons [Max α] {xs : List α} : (x :: xs).maximum? = foldl max x xs := rfl
+theorem max?_cons [Max α] {xs : List α} : (x :: xs).max? = foldl max x xs := rfl
 
-@[simp] theorem maximum?_eq_none_iff {xs : List α} [Max α] : xs.maximum? = none ↔ xs = [] := by
-  cases xs <;> simp [maximum?]
+@[simp] theorem max?_eq_none_iff {xs : List α} [Max α] : xs.max? = none ↔ xs = [] := by
+  cases xs <;> simp [max?]
 
-theorem maximum?_mem [Max α] (min_eq_or : ∀ a b : α, max a b = a ∨ max a b = b) :
-    {xs : List α} → xs.maximum? = some a → a ∈ xs
+theorem max?_mem [Max α] (min_eq_or : ∀ a b : α, max a b = a ∨ max a b = b) :
+    {xs : List α} → xs.max? = some a → a ∈ xs
   | nil => by simp
   | cons x xs => by
-    rw [maximum?]; rintro ⟨⟩
+    rw [max?]; rintro ⟨⟩
     induction xs generalizing x with simp at *
     | cons y xs ih =>
       rcases ih (max x y) with h | h <;> simp [h]
@@ -114,40 +114,57 @@ theorem maximum?_mem [Max α] (min_eq_or : ∀ a b : α, max a b = a ∨ max a b
 
 -- See also `Init.Data.List.Nat.Basic` for specialisations of the next two results to `Nat`.
 
-theorem maximum?_le_iff [Max α] [LE α]
+theorem max?_le_iff [Max α] [LE α]
     (max_le_iff : ∀ a b c : α, max b c ≤ a ↔ b ≤ a ∧ c ≤ a) :
-    {xs : List α} → xs.maximum? = some a → ∀ {x}, a ≤ x ↔ ∀ b ∈ xs, b ≤ x
+    {xs : List α} → xs.max? = some a → ∀ {x}, a ≤ x ↔ ∀ b ∈ xs, b ≤ x
   | nil => by simp
   | cons x xs => by
-    rw [maximum?]; rintro ⟨⟩ y
+    rw [max?]; rintro ⟨⟩ y
     induction xs generalizing x with
     | nil => simp
     | cons y xs ih => simp [ih, max_le_iff, and_assoc]
 
 -- This could be refactored by designing appropriate typeclasses to replace `le_refl`, `max_eq_or`,
 -- and `le_min_iff`.
-theorem maximum?_eq_some_iff [Max α] [LE α] [anti : Antisymm ((· : α) ≤ ·)]
+theorem max?_eq_some_iff [Max α] [LE α] [anti : Antisymm ((· : α) ≤ ·)]
     (le_refl : ∀ a : α, a ≤ a)
     (max_eq_or : ∀ a b : α, max a b = a ∨ max a b = b)
     (max_le_iff : ∀ a b c : α, max b c ≤ a ↔ b ≤ a ∧ c ≤ a) {xs : List α} :
-    xs.maximum? = some a ↔ a ∈ xs ∧ ∀ b ∈ xs, b ≤ a := by
-  refine ⟨fun h => ⟨maximum?_mem max_eq_or h, (maximum?_le_iff max_le_iff h).1 (le_refl _)⟩, ?_⟩
+    xs.max? = some a ↔ a ∈ xs ∧ ∀ b ∈ xs, b ≤ a := by
+  refine ⟨fun h => ⟨max?_mem max_eq_or h, (max?_le_iff max_le_iff h).1 (le_refl _)⟩, ?_⟩
   intro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
   cases xs with
   | nil => simp at h₁
   | cons x xs =>
     exact congrArg some <| anti.1
-      (h₂ _ (maximum?_mem max_eq_or (xs := x::xs) rfl))
-      ((maximum?_le_iff max_le_iff (xs := x::xs) rfl).1 (le_refl _) _ h₁)
+      (h₂ _ (max?_mem max_eq_or (xs := x::xs) rfl))
+      ((max?_le_iff max_le_iff (xs := x::xs) rfl).1 (le_refl _) _ h₁)
 
-theorem maximum?_replicate [Max α] {n : Nat} {a : α} (w : max a a = a) :
-    (replicate n a).maximum? = if n = 0 then none else some a := by
+theorem max?_replicate [Max α] {n : Nat} {a : α} (w : max a a = a) :
+    (replicate n a).max? = if n = 0 then none else some a := by
   induction n with
   | zero => rfl
-  | succ n ih => cases n <;> simp_all [replicate_succ, maximum?_cons]
+  | succ n ih => cases n <;> simp_all [replicate_succ, max?_cons]
 
-@[simp] theorem maximum?_replicate_of_pos [Max α] {n : Nat} {a : α} (w : max a a = a) (h : 0 < n) :
-    (replicate n a).maximum? = some a := by
-  simp [maximum?_replicate, Nat.ne_of_gt h, w]
+@[simp] theorem max?_replicate_of_pos [Max α] {n : Nat} {a : α} (w : max a a = a) (h : 0 < n) :
+    (replicate n a).max? = some a := by
+  simp [max?_replicate, Nat.ne_of_gt h, w]
+
+@[deprecated min?_nil (since := "2024-09-29")] abbrev minimum?_nil := @min?_nil
+@[deprecated min?_cons (since := "2024-09-29")] abbrev minimum?_cons := @min?_cons
+@[deprecated min?_eq_none_iff (since := "2024-09-29")] abbrev mininmum?_eq_none_iff := @min?_eq_none_iff
+@[deprecated min?_mem (since := "2024-09-29")] abbrev minimum?_mem := @min?_mem
+@[deprecated le_min?_iff (since := "2024-09-29")] abbrev le_minimum?_iff := @le_min?_iff
+@[deprecated min?_eq_some_iff (since := "2024-09-29")] abbrev minimum?_eq_some_iff := @min?_eq_some_iff
+@[deprecated min?_replicate (since := "2024-09-29")] abbrev minimum?_replicate := @min?_replicate
+@[deprecated min?_replicate_of_pos (since := "2024-09-29")] abbrev minimum?_replicate_of_pos := @min?_replicate_of_pos
+@[deprecated max?_nil (since := "2024-09-29")] abbrev maximum?_nil := @max?_nil
+@[deprecated max?_cons (since := "2024-09-29")] abbrev maximum?_cons := @max?_cons
+@[deprecated max?_eq_none_iff (since := "2024-09-29")] abbrev maximum?_eq_none_iff := @max?_eq_none_iff
+@[deprecated max?_mem (since := "2024-09-29")] abbrev maximum?_mem := @max?_mem
+@[deprecated max?_le_iff (since := "2024-09-29")] abbrev maximum?_le_iff := @max?_le_iff
+@[deprecated max?_eq_some_iff (since := "2024-09-29")] abbrev maximum?_eq_some_iff := @max?_eq_some_iff
+@[deprecated max?_replicate (since := "2024-09-29")] abbrev maximum?_replicate := @max?_replicate
+@[deprecated max?_replicate_of_pos (since := "2024-09-29")] abbrev maximum?_replicate_of_pos := @max?_replicate_of_pos
 
 end List

src/Init/Data/List/Monadic.lean

@@ -51,6 +51,27 @@ theorem mapM'_eq_mapM [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α → m β) (l : List α)
 @[simp] theorem mapM_append [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α → m β) {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
     (l₁ ++ l₂).mapM f = (return (← l₁.mapM f) ++ (← l₂.mapM f)) := by induction l₁ <;> simp [*]
 
+/-- Auxiliary lemma for `mapM_eq_reverse_foldlM_cons`. -/
+theorem foldlM_cons_eq_append [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α → m β) (as : List α) (b : β) (bs : List β) :
+    (as.foldlM (init := b :: bs) fun acc a => return ((← f a) :: acc)) =
+      (· ++ b :: bs) <$> as.foldlM (init := []) fun acc a => return ((← f a) :: acc) := by
+  induction as generalizing b bs with
+  | nil => simp
+  | cons a as ih =>
+    simp only [bind_pure_comp] at ih
+    simp [ih, _root_.map_bind, Functor.map_map, Function.comp_def]
+
+theorem mapM_eq_reverse_foldlM_cons [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α → m β) (l : List α) :
+    mapM f l = reverse <$> (l.foldlM (fun acc a => return ((← f a) :: acc)) []) := by
+  rw [← mapM'_eq_mapM]
+  induction l with
+  | nil => simp
+  | cons a as ih =>
+    simp only [mapM'_cons, ih, bind_map_left, foldlM_cons, LawfulMonad.bind_assoc, pure_bind,
+      foldlM_cons_eq_append, _root_.map_bind, Functor.map_map, Function.comp_def, reverse_append,
+      reverse_cons, reverse_nil, nil_append, singleton_append]
+    simp [bind_pure_comp]
+
 /-! ### forM -/
 
 -- We use `List.forM` as the simp normal form, rather that `ForM.forM`.
@@ -66,4 +87,16 @@ theorem mapM'_eq_mapM [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (f : α → m β) (l : List α)
     (l₁ ++ l₂).forM f = (do l₁.forM f; l₂.forM f) := by
   induction l₁ <;> simp [*]
 
+/-! ### allM -/
+
+theorem allM_eq_not_anyM_not [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (p : α → m Bool) (as : List α) :
+    allM p as = (! ·) <$> anyM ((! ·) <$> p ·) as := by
+  induction as with
+  | nil => simp
+  | cons a as ih =>
+    simp only [allM, anyM, bind_map_left, _root_.map_bind]
+    congr
+    funext b
+    split <;> simp_all
+
 end List

src/Init/Data/List/Nat.lean

@@ -10,3 +10,5 @@ import Init.Data.List.Nat.Range
 import Init.Data.List.Nat.Sublist
 import Init.Data.List.Nat.TakeDrop
 import Init.Data.List.Nat.Count
+import Init.Data.List.Nat.Erase
+import Init.Data.List.Nat.Find

src/Init/Data/List/Nat/Basic.lean

@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, M
 -/
 prelude
 import Init.Data.List.Count
+import Init.Data.List.Find
 import Init.Data.List.MinMax
 import Init.Data.Nat.Lemmas
 
@@ -18,6 +19,26 @@ open Nat
 
 namespace List
 
+/-! ### dropLast -/
+
+theorem tail_dropLast (l : List α) : tail (dropLast l) = dropLast (tail l) := by
+  ext1
+  simp only [getElem?_tail, getElem?_dropLast, length_tail]
+  split <;> split
+  · rfl
+  · omega
+  · omega
+  · rfl
+
+@[simp] theorem dropLast_reverse (l : List α) : l.reverse.dropLast = l.tail.reverse := by
+  apply ext_getElem
+  · simp
+  · intro i h₁ h₂
+    simp only [getElem_dropLast, getElem_reverse, length_tail, getElem_tail]
+    congr
+    simp only [length_dropLast, length_reverse, length_tail] at h₁ h₂
+    omega
+
 /-! ### filter -/
 
 theorem length_filter_lt_length_iff_exists {l} :
@@ -37,7 +58,8 @@ theorem getElem_eq_getElem_reverse {l : List α} {i} (h : i < l.length) :
 
 /-- The length of the List returned by `List.leftpad n a l` is equal
   to the larger of `n` and `l.length` -/
-@[simp]
+-- We don't mark this as a `@[simp]` lemma since we allow `simp` to unfold `leftpad`,
+-- so the left hand side simplifies directly to `n - l.length + l.length`.
 theorem leftpad_length (n : Nat) (a : α) (l : List α) :
     (leftpad n a l).length = max n l.length := by
   simp only [leftpad, length_append, length_replicate, Nat.sub_add_eq_max]
@@ -64,26 +86,26 @@ theorem mem_eraseIdx_iff_getElem? {x : α} {l} {k} : x ∈ eraseIdx l k ↔ ∃
     obtain ⟨h', -⟩ := getElem?_eq_some_iff.1 h
     exact ⟨h', h⟩
 
-/-! ### minimum? -/
+/-! ### min? -/
 
--- A specialization of `minimum?_eq_some_iff` to Nat.
-theorem minimum?_eq_some_iff' {xs : List Nat} :
-    xs.minimum? = some a ↔ (a ∈ xs ∧ ∀ b ∈ xs, a ≤ b) :=
-  minimum?_eq_some_iff
+-- A specialization of `min?_eq_some_iff` to Nat.
+theorem min?_eq_some_iff' {xs : List Nat} :
+    xs.min? = some a ↔ (a ∈ xs ∧ ∀ b ∈ xs, a ≤ b) :=
+  min?_eq_some_iff
     (le_refl := Nat.le_refl)
-    (min_eq_or := fun _ _ => by omega)
-    (le_min_iff := fun _ _ _ => by omega)
+    (min_eq_or := fun _ _ => Nat.min_def .. ▸ by split <;> simp)
+    (le_min_iff := fun _ _ _ => Nat.le_min)
 
 -- This could be generalized,
 -- but will first require further work on order typeclasses in the core repository.
-theorem minimum?_cons' {a : Nat} {l : List Nat} :
-    (a :: l).minimum? = some (match l.minimum? with
+theorem min?_cons' {a : Nat} {l : List Nat} :
+    (a :: l).min? = some (match l.min? with
     | none => a
     | some m => min a m) := by
-  rw [minimum?_eq_some_iff']
+  rw [min?_eq_some_iff']
   split <;> rename_i h m
   · simp_all
-  · rw [minimum?_eq_some_iff'] at m
+  · rw [min?_eq_some_iff'] at m
     obtain ⟨m, le⟩ := m
     rw [Nat.min_def]
     constructor
@@ -97,26 +119,73 @@ theorem minimum?_cons' {a : Nat} {l : List Nat} :
         specialize le b h
         split <;> omega
 
-/-! ### maximum? -/
+theorem foldl_min
+    {α : Type _} [Min α] [Std.IdempotentOp (min : α → α → α)] [Std.Associative (min : α → α → α)]
+    {l : List α} {a : α} :
+    l.foldl (init := a) min = min a (l.min?.getD a) := by
+  cases l with
+  | nil => simp [Std.IdempotentOp.idempotent]
+  | cons b l =>
+    simp only [min?]
+    induction l generalizing a b with
+    | nil => simp
+    | cons c l ih => simp [ih, Std.Associative.assoc]
 
--- A specialization of `maximum?_eq_some_iff` to Nat.
-theorem maximum?_eq_some_iff' {xs : List Nat} :
-    xs.maximum? = some a ↔ (a ∈ xs ∧ ∀ b ∈ xs, b ≤ a) :=
-  maximum?_eq_some_iff
+theorem foldl_min_right {α β : Type _}
+    [Min β] [Std.IdempotentOp (min : β → β → β)] [Std.Associative (min : β → β → β)]
+    {l : List α} {b : β} {f : α → β} :
+    (l.foldl (init := b) fun acc a => min acc (f a)) = min b ((l.map f).min?.getD b) := by
+  rw [← foldl_map, foldl_min]
+
+theorem foldl_min_le {l : List Nat} {a : Nat} : l.foldl (init := a) min ≤ a := by
+  induction l generalizing a with
+  | nil => simp
+  | cons c l ih =>
+    simp only [foldl_cons]
+    exact Nat.le_trans ih (Nat.min_le_left _ _)
+
+theorem foldl_min_min_of_le {l : List Nat} {a b : Nat} (h : a ≤ b) :
+    l.foldl (init := a) min ≤ b :=
+  Nat.le_trans (foldl_min_le) h
+
+theorem min?_getD_le_of_mem {l : List Nat} {a k : Nat} (h : a ∈ l) :
+    l.min?.getD k ≤ a := by
+  cases l with
+  | nil => simp at h
+  | cons b l =>
+    simp [min?_cons]
+    simp at h
+    rcases h with (rfl | h)
+    · exact foldl_min_le
+    · induction l generalizing b with
+      | nil => simp_all
+      | cons c l ih =>
+        simp only [foldl_cons]
+        simp at h
+        rcases h with (rfl | h)
+        · exact foldl_min_min_of_le (Nat.min_le_right _ _)
+        · exact ih _ h
+
+/-! ### max? -/
+
+-- A specialization of `max?_eq_some_iff` to Nat.
+theorem max?_eq_some_iff' {xs : List Nat} :
+    xs.max? = some a ↔ (a ∈ xs ∧ ∀ b ∈ xs, b ≤ a) :=
+  max?_eq_some_iff
     (le_refl := Nat.le_refl)
-    (max_eq_or := fun _ _ => by omega)
-    (max_le_iff := fun _ _ _ => by omega)
+    (max_eq_or := fun _ _ => Nat.max_def .. ▸ by split <;> simp)
+    (max_le_iff := fun _ _ _ => Nat.max_le)
 
 -- This could be generalized,
 -- but will first require further work on order typeclasses in the core repository.
-theorem maximum?_cons' {a : Nat} {l : List Nat} :
-    (a :: l).maximum? = some (match l.maximum? with
+theorem max?_cons' {a : Nat} {l : List Nat} :
+    (a :: l).max? = some (match l.max? with
     | none => a
     | some m => max a m) := by
-  rw [maximum?_eq_some_iff']
+  rw [max?_eq_some_iff']
   split <;> rename_i h m
   · simp_all
-  · rw [maximum?_eq_some_iff'] at m
+  · rw [max?_eq_some_iff'] at m
     obtain ⟨m, le⟩ := m
     rw [Nat.max_def]
     constructor
@@ -130,4 +199,58 @@ theorem maximum?_cons' {a : Nat} {l : List Nat} :
         specialize le b h
         split <;> omega
 
+theorem foldl_max
+    {α : Type _} [Max α] [Std.IdempotentOp (max : α → α → α)] [Std.Associative (max : α → α → α)]
+    {l : List α} {a : α} :
+    l.foldl (init := a) max = max a (l.max?.getD a) := by
+  cases l with
+  | nil => simp [Std.IdempotentOp.idempotent]
+  | cons b l =>
+    simp only [max?]
+    induction l generalizing a b with
+    | nil => simp
+    | cons c l ih => simp [ih, Std.Associative.assoc]
+
+theorem foldl_max_right {α β : Type _}
+    [Max β] [Std.IdempotentOp (max : β → β → β)] [Std.Associative (max : β → β → β)]
+    {l : List α} {b : β} {f : α → β} :
+    (l.foldl (init := b) fun acc a => max acc (f a)) = max b ((l.map f).max?.getD b) := by
+  rw [← foldl_map, foldl_max]
+
+theorem le_foldl_max {l : List Nat} {a : Nat} : a ≤ l.foldl (init := a) max := by
+  induction l generalizing a with
+  | nil => simp
+  | cons c l ih =>
+    simp only [foldl_cons]
+    exact Nat.le_trans (Nat.le_max_left _ _) ih
+
+theorem le_foldl_max_of_le {l : List Nat} {a b : Nat} (h : a ≤ b) :
+    a ≤ l.foldl (init := b) max :=
+  Nat.le_trans h (le_foldl_max)
+
+theorem le_max?_getD_of_mem {l : List Nat} {a k : Nat} (h : a ∈ l) :
+    a ≤ l.max?.getD k := by
+  cases l with
+  | nil => simp at h
+  | cons b l =>
+    simp [max?_cons]
+    simp at h
+    rcases h with (rfl | h)
+    · exact le_foldl_max
+    · induction l generalizing b with
+      | nil => simp_all
+      | cons c l ih =>
+        simp only [foldl_cons]
+        simp at h
+        rcases h with (rfl | h)
+        · exact le_foldl_max_of_le (Nat.le_max_right b a)
+        · exact ih _ h
+
+@[deprecated min?_eq_some_iff' (since := "2024-09-29")] abbrev minimum?_eq_some_iff' := @min?_eq_some_iff'
+@[deprecated min?_cons' (since := "2024-09-29")] abbrev minimum?_cons' := @min?_cons'
+@[deprecated min?_getD_le_of_mem (since := "2024-09-29")] abbrev minimum?_getD_le_of_mem := @min?_getD_le_of_mem
+@[deprecated max?_eq_some_iff' (since := "2024-09-29")] abbrev maximum?_eq_some_iff' := @max?_eq_some_iff'
+@[deprecated max?_cons' (since := "2024-09-29")] abbrev maximum?_cons' := @max?_cons'
+@[deprecated le_max?_getD_of_mem (since := "2024-09-29")] abbrev le_maximum?_getD_of_mem := @le_max?_getD_of_mem
+
 end List

src/Init/Data/List/Nat/Count.lean

@@ -28,4 +28,59 @@ theorem count_set [BEq α] (a b : α) (l : List α) (i : Nat) (h : i < l.length)
     (l.set i a).count b = l.count b - (if l[i] == b then 1 else 0) + (if a == b then 1 else 0) := by
   simp [count_eq_countP, countP_set, h]
 
+/--
+The number of elements satisfying a predicate in a sublist is at least the number of elements satisfying the predicate in the list,
+minus the difference in the lengths.
+-/
+theorem Sublist.le_countP (s : l₁ <+ l₂) (p) : countP p l₂ - (l₂.length - l₁.length) ≤ countP p l₁ := by
+  match s with
+  | .slnil => simp
+  | .cons a s =>
+    rename_i l
+    simp only [countP_cons, length_cons]
+    have := s.le_countP p
+    have := s.length_le
+    split <;> omega
+  | .cons₂ a s =>
+    rename_i l₁ l₂
+    simp only [countP_cons, length_cons]
+    have := s.le_countP p
+    have := s.length_le
+    split <;> omega
+
+theorem IsPrefix.le_countP (s : l₁ <+: l₂) : countP p l₂ - (l₂.length - l₁.length) ≤ countP p l₁ :=
+  s.sublist.le_countP _
+
+theorem IsSuffix.le_countP (s : l₁ <:+ l₂) : countP p l₂ - (l₂.length - l₁.length) ≤ countP p l₁ :=
+  s.sublist.le_countP _
+
+theorem IsInfix.le_countP (s : l₁ <:+: l₂) : countP p l₂ - (l₂.length - l₁.length) ≤ countP p l₁ :=
+  s.sublist.le_countP _
+
+/--
+The number of elements satisfying a predicate in the tail of a list is
+at least one less than the number of elements satisfying the predicate in the list.
+-/
+theorem le_countP_tail (l) : countP p l - 1 ≤ countP p l.tail := by
+  have := (tail_sublist l).le_countP p
+  simp only [length_tail] at this
+  omega
+
+variable [BEq α]
+
+theorem Sublist.le_count (s : l₁ <+ l₂) (a : α) : count a l₂ - (l₂.length - l₁.length) ≤ count a l₁ :=
+  s.le_countP _
+
+theorem IsPrefix.le_count (s : l₁ <+: l₂) (a : α) : count a l₂ - (l₂.length - l₁.length) ≤ count a l₁ :=
+  s.sublist.le_count _
+
+theorem IsSuffix.le_count (s : l₁ <:+ l₂) (a : α) : count a l₂ - (l₂.length - l₁.length) ≤ count a l₁ :=
+  s.sublist.le_count _
+
+theorem IsInfix.le_count (s : l₁ <:+: l₂) (a : α) : count a l₂ - (l₂.length - l₁.length) ≤ count a l₁ :=
+  s.sublist.le_count _
+
+theorem le_count_tail (a : α) (l) : count a l - 1 ≤ count a l.tail :=
+  le_countP_tail _
+
 end List

src/Init/Data/List/Nat/Erase.lean

@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+/-
+Copyright (c) 2024 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
+Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
+Authors: Kim Morrison
+-/
+prelude
+import Init.Data.List.Nat.TakeDrop
+import Init.Data.List.Erase
+
+namespace List
+
+theorem getElem?_eraseIdx (l : List α) (i : Nat) (j : Nat) :
+    (l.eraseIdx i)[j]? = if j < i then l[j]? else l[j + 1]? := by
+  rw [eraseIdx_eq_take_drop_succ, getElem?_append]
+  split <;> rename_i h
+  · rw [getElem?_take]
+    split
+    · rfl
+    · simp_all
+      omega
+  · rw [getElem?_drop]
+    split <;> rename_i h'
+    · simp only [length_take, Nat.min_def, Nat.not_lt] at h
+      split at h
+      · omega
+      · simp_all [getElem?_eq_none]
+        omega
+    · simp only [length_take]
+      simp only [length_take, Nat.min_def, Nat.not_lt] at h
+      split at h
+      · congr 1
+        omega
+      · rw [getElem?_eq_none, getElem?_eq_none] <;> omega
+
+theorem getElem?_eraseIdx_of_lt (l : List α) (i : Nat) (j : Nat) (h : j < i) :
+    (l.eraseIdx i)[j]? = l[j]? := by
+  rw [getElem?_eraseIdx]
+  simp [h]
+
+theorem getElem?_eraseIdx_of_ge (l : List α) (i : Nat) (j : Nat) (h : i ≤ j) :
+    (l.eraseIdx i)[j]? = l[j + 1]? := by
+  rw [getElem?_eraseIdx]
+  simp only [dite_eq_ite, ite_eq_right_iff]
+  intro h'
+  omega
+
+theorem getElem_eraseIdx (l : List α) (i : Nat) (j : Nat) (h : j < (l.eraseIdx i).length) :
+    (l.eraseIdx i)[j] = if h' : j < i then
+        l[j]'(by have := length_eraseIdx_le l i; omega)
+      else
+        l[j + 1]'(by rw [length_eraseIdx] at h; split at h <;> omega) := by
+  apply Option.some.inj
+  rw [← getElem?_eq_getElem, getElem?_eraseIdx]
+  split <;> simp
+
+theorem getElem_eraseIdx_of_lt (l : List α) (i : Nat) (j : Nat) (h : j < (l.eraseIdx i).length) (h' : j < i) :
+    (l.eraseIdx i)[j] = l[j]'(by have := length_eraseIdx_le l i; omega) := by
+  rw [getElem_eraseIdx]
+  simp only [dite_eq_left_iff, Nat.not_lt]
+  intro h'
+  omega
+
+theorem getElem_eraseIdx_of_ge (l : List α) (i : Nat) (j : Nat) (h : j < (l.eraseIdx i).length) (h' : i ≤ j) :
+    (l.eraseIdx i)[j] = l[j + 1]'(by rw [length_eraseIdx] at h; split at h <;> omega) := by
+  rw [getElem_eraseIdx, dif_neg]
+  omega

src/Init/Data/List/Nat/Find.lean

@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+/-
+Copyright (c) 2024 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
+Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
+Authors: Kim Morrison
+-/
+prelude
+import Init.Data.List.Nat.Range
+import Init.Data.List.Find
+
+namespace List
+
+theorem findIdx?_eq_some_le_of_findIdx?_eq_some {xs : List α} {p q : α → Bool} (w : ∀ x ∈ xs, p x → q x) {i : Nat}
+    (h : xs.findIdx? p = some i) : ∃ j, j ≤ i ∧ xs.findIdx? q = some j := by
+  simp only [findIdx?_eq_findSome?_enum] at h
+  rw [findSome?_eq_some_iff] at h
+  simp only [Option.ite_none_right_eq_some, Option.some.injEq, ite_eq_right_iff, reduceCtorEq,
+    imp_false, Bool.not_eq_true, Prod.forall, exists_and_right, Prod.exists] at h
+  obtain ⟨h, h₁, b, ⟨es, h₂⟩, ⟨hb, rfl⟩, h₃⟩ := h
+  rw [enum_eq_enumFrom, enumFrom_eq_append_iff] at h₂
+  obtain ⟨l₁', l₂', rfl, rfl, h₂⟩ := h₂
+  rw [eq_comm, enumFrom_eq_cons_iff] at h₂
+  obtain ⟨a, as, rfl, h₂, rfl⟩ := h₂
+  simp only [Nat.zero_add, Prod.mk.injEq] at h₂
+  obtain ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ := h₂
+  simp only [findIdx?_append]
+  match h : findIdx? q l₁' with
+  | some j =>
+    refine ⟨j, ?_, by simp⟩
+    rw [findIdx?_eq_some_iff_findIdx_eq] at h
+    omega
+  | none =>
+    refine ⟨l₁'.length, by simp, by simp_all⟩

src/Init/Data/List/Nat/Range.lean

@@ -109,7 +109,8 @@ theorem range'_eq_append_iff : range' s n = xs ++ ys ↔ ∃ k, k ≤ n ∧ xs =
 @[simp] theorem find?_range'_eq_some {s n : Nat} {i : Nat} {p : Nat → Bool} :
     (range' s n).find? p = some i ↔ p i ∧ i ∈ range' s n ∧ ∀ j, s ≤ j → j < i → !p j := by
   rw [find?_eq_some]
-  simp only [Bool.not_eq_true', exists_and_right, mem_range'_1, and_congr_right_iff]
+  simp only [Bool.not_eq_eq_eq_not, Bool.not_true, exists_and_right, mem_range'_1,
+    and_congr_right_iff]
   simp only [range'_eq_append_iff, eq_comm (a := i :: _), range'_eq_cons_iff]
   intro h
   constructor
@@ -153,7 +154,7 @@ theorem erase_range' :
 /-! ### range -/
 
 theorem reverse_range' : ∀ s n : Nat, reverse (range' s n) = map (s + n - 1 - ·) (range n)
-  | s, 0 => rfl
+  | _, 0 => rfl
   | s, n + 1 => by
     rw [range'_1_concat, reverse_append, range_succ_eq_map,
       show s + (n + 1) - 1 = s + n from rfl, map, map_map]
@@ -176,7 +177,7 @@ theorem pairwise_le_range (n : Nat) : Pairwise (· ≤ ·) (range n) :=
 theorem take_range (m n : Nat) : take m (range n) = range (min m n) := by
   apply List.ext_getElem
   · simp
-  · simp (config := { contextual := true }) [← getElem_take, Nat.lt_min]
+  · simp (config := { contextual := true }) [getElem_take, Nat.lt_min]
 
 theorem nodup_range (n : Nat) : Nodup (range n) := by
   simp (config := {decide := true}) only [range_eq_range', nodup_range']
@@ -258,6 +259,9 @@ theorem nodup_iota (n : Nat) : Nodup (iota n) :=
   | zero => simp at h
   | succ n => simp
 
+@[simp] theorem tail_iota (n : Nat) : (iota n).tail = iota (n - 1) := by
+  cases n <;> simp
+
 @[simp] theorem reverse_iota : reverse (iota n) = range' 1 n := by
   induction n with
   | zero => simp
@@ -272,15 +276,15 @@ theorem nodup_iota (n : Nat) : Nodup (iota n) :=
   rw [getLast_eq_head_reverse]
   simp
 
-theorem find?_iota_eq_none {n : Nat} (p : Nat → Bool) :
+theorem find?_iota_eq_none {n : Nat} {p : Nat → Bool} :
     (iota n).find? p = none ↔ ∀ i, 0 < i → i ≤ n → !p i := by
   simp
 
 @[simp] theorem find?_iota_eq_some {n : Nat} {i : Nat} {p : Nat → Bool} :
     (iota n).find? p = some i ↔ p i ∧ i ∈ iota n ∧ ∀ j, i < j → j ≤ n → !p j := by
   rw [find?_eq_some]
-  simp only [iota_eq_reverse_range', reverse_eq_append_iff, reverse_cons, append_assoc,
-    singleton_append, Bool.not_eq_true', exists_and_right, mem_reverse, mem_range'_1,
+  simp only [iota_eq_reverse_range', reverse_eq_append_iff, reverse_cons, append_assoc, cons_append,
+    nil_append, Bool.not_eq_eq_eq_not, Bool.not_true, exists_and_right, mem_reverse, mem_range'_1,
     and_congr_right_iff]
   intro h
   constructor
@@ -354,17 +358,6 @@ theorem map_enumFrom (f : α → β) (n : Nat) (l : List α) :
     map (Prod.map id f) (enumFrom n l) = enumFrom n (map f l) := by
   induction l generalizing n <;> simp_all
 
-@[simp]
-theorem enumFrom_map_fst (n) :
-    ∀ (l : List α), map Prod.fst (enumFrom n l) = range' n l.length
-  | [] => rfl
-  | _ :: _ => congrArg (cons _) (enumFrom_map_fst _ _)
-
-@[simp]
-theorem enumFrom_map_snd : ∀ (n) (l : List α), map Prod.snd (enumFrom n l) = l
-  | _, [] => rfl
-  | _, _ :: _ => congrArg (cons _) (enumFrom_map_snd _ _)
-
 theorem snd_mem_of_mem_enumFrom {x : Nat × α} {n : Nat} {l : List α} (h : x ∈ enumFrom n l) : x.2 ∈ l :=
   enumFrom_map_snd n l ▸ mem_map_of_mem _ h
 
@@ -387,10 +380,6 @@ theorem mem_enumFrom {x : α} {i j : Nat} {xs : List α} (h : (i, x) ∈ xs.enum
       x = xs[i - j]'(by have := le_fst_of_mem_enumFrom h; have := fst_lt_add_of_mem_enumFrom h; omega) :=
   ⟨le_fst_of_mem_enumFrom h, fst_lt_add_of_mem_enumFrom h, snd_eq_of_mem_enumFrom h⟩
 
-theorem enumFrom_cons' (n : Nat) (x : α) (xs : List α) :
-    enumFrom n (x :: xs) = (n, x) :: (enumFrom n xs).map (Prod.map (· + 1) id) := by
-  rw [enumFrom_cons, Nat.add_comm, ← map_fst_add_enumFrom_eq_enumFrom]
-
 theorem enumFrom_map (n : Nat) (l : List α) (f : α → β) :
     enumFrom n (l.map f) = (enumFrom n l).map (Prod.map id f) := by
   induction l with
@@ -407,22 +396,39 @@ theorem enumFrom_append (xs ys : List α) (n : Nat) :
     rw [cons_append, enumFrom_cons, IH, ← cons_append, ← enumFrom_cons, length, Nat.add_right_comm,
       Nat.add_assoc]
 
-theorem enumFrom_eq_zip_range' (l : List α) {n : Nat} : l.enumFrom n = (range' n l.length).zip l :=
-  zip_of_prod (enumFrom_map_fst _ _) (enumFrom_map_snd _ _)
+theorem enumFrom_eq_cons_iff {l : List α} {n : Nat} :
+    l.enumFrom n = x :: l' ↔ ∃ a as, l = a :: as ∧ x = (n, a) ∧ l' = enumFrom (n + 1) as := by
+  rw [enumFrom_eq_zip_range', zip_eq_cons_iff]
+  constructor
+  · rintro ⟨l₁, l₂, h, rfl, rfl⟩
+    rw [range'_eq_cons_iff] at h
+    obtain ⟨rfl, -, rfl⟩ := h
+    exact ⟨x.2, l₂, by simp [enumFrom_eq_zip_range']⟩
+  · rintro ⟨a, as, rfl, rfl, rfl⟩
+    refine ⟨range' (n+1) as.length, as, ?_⟩
+    simp [enumFrom_eq_zip_range', range'_succ]
 
-@[simp]
-theorem unzip_enumFrom_eq_prod (l : List α) {n : Nat} :
-    (l.enumFrom n).unzip = (range' n l.length, l) := by
-  simp only [enumFrom_eq_zip_range', unzip_zip, length_range']
+theorem enumFrom_eq_append_iff {l : List α} {n : Nat} :
+    l.enumFrom n = l₁ ++ l₂ ↔
+      ∃ l₁' l₂', l = l₁' ++ l₂' ∧ l₁ = l₁'.enumFrom n ∧ l₂ = l₂'.enumFrom (n + l₁'.length) := by
+  rw [enumFrom_eq_zip_range', zip_eq_append_iff]
+  constructor
+  · rintro ⟨w, x, y, z, h, h', rfl, rfl, rfl⟩
+    rw [range'_eq_append_iff] at h'
+    obtain ⟨k, -, rfl, rfl⟩ := h'
+    simp only [length_range'] at h
+    obtain rfl := h
+    refine ⟨y, z, rfl, ?_⟩
+    simp only [enumFrom_eq_zip_range', length_append, true_and]
+    congr
+    omega
+  · rintro ⟨l₁', l₂', rfl, rfl, rfl⟩
+    simp only [enumFrom_eq_zip_range']
+    refine ⟨range' n l₁'.length, range' (n + l₁'.length) l₂'.length, l₁', l₂', ?_⟩
+    simp [Nat.add_comm]
 
 /-! ### enum -/
 
-theorem enum_cons : (a::as).enum = (0, a) :: as.enumFrom 1 := rfl
-
-theorem enum_cons' (x : α) (xs : List α) :
-    enum (x :: xs) = (0, x) :: (enum xs).map (Prod.map (· + 1) id) :=
-  enumFrom_cons' _ _ _
-
 @[simp]
 theorem enum_eq_nil {l : List α} : List.enum l = [] ↔ l = [] := enumFrom_eq_nil
 
@@ -448,6 +454,9 @@ theorem getElem_enum (l : List α) (i : Nat) (h : i < l.enum.length) :
     l.enum.getLast? = l.getLast?.map fun a => (l.length - 1, a) := by
   simp [getLast?_eq_getElem?]
 
+@[simp] theorem tail_enum (l : List α) : (enum l).tail = enumFrom 1 l.tail := by
+  simp [enum]
+
 theorem mk_mem_enum_iff_getElem? {i : Nat} {x : α} {l : List α} : (i, x) ∈ enum l ↔ l[i]? = x := by
   simp [enum, mk_mem_enumFrom_iff_le_and_getElem?_sub]
 

src/Init/Data/List/Nat/TakeDrop.lean

@@ -36,23 +36,23 @@ theorem length_take_of_le (h : n ≤ length l) : length (take n l) = n := by sim
 
 /-- The `i`-th element of a list coincides with the `i`-th element of any of its prefixes of
 length `> i`. Version designed to rewrite from the big list to the small list. -/
-theorem getElem_take (L : List α) {i j : Nat} (hi : i < L.length) (hj : i < j) :
+theorem getElem_take' (L : List α) {i j : Nat} (hi : i < L.length) (hj : i < j) :
     L[i] = (L.take j)[i]'(length_take .. ▸ Nat.lt_min.mpr ⟨hj, hi⟩) :=
-  getElem_of_eq (take_append_drop j L).symm _ ▸ getElem_append ..
+  getElem_of_eq (take_append_drop j L).symm _ ▸ getElem_append_left ..
 
 /-- The `i`-th element of a list coincides with the `i`-th element of any of its prefixes of
 length `> i`. Version designed to rewrite from the small list to the big list. -/
-theorem getElem_take' (L : List α) {j i : Nat} {h : i < (L.take j).length} :
+@[simp] theorem getElem_take (L : List α) {j i : Nat} {h : i < (L.take j).length} :
     (L.take j)[i] =
     L[i]'(Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h (length_take_le' _ _)) := by
-  rw [length_take, Nat.lt_min] at h; rw [getElem_take L _ h.1]
+  rw [length_take, Nat.lt_min] at h; rw [getElem_take' L _ h.1]
 
 /-- The `i`-th element of a list coincides with the `i`-th element of any of its prefixes of
 length `> i`. Version designed to rewrite from the big list to the small list. -/
-@[deprecated getElem_take (since := "2024-06-12")]
+@[deprecated getElem_take' (since := "2024-06-12")]
 theorem get_take (L : List α) {i j : Nat} (hi : i < L.length) (hj : i < j) :
     get L ⟨i, hi⟩ = get (L.take j) ⟨i, length_take .. ▸ Nat.lt_min.mpr ⟨hj, hi⟩⟩ := by
-  simp [getElem_take _ hi hj]
+  simp
 
 /-- The `i`-th element of a list coincides with the `i`-th element of any of its prefixes of
 length `> i`. Version designed to rewrite from the small list to the big list. -/
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ length `> i`. Version designed to rewrite from the small list to the big list. -
 theorem get_take' (L : List α) {j i} :
     get (L.take j) i =
     get L ⟨i.1, Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le i.2 (length_take_le' _ _)⟩ := by
-  simp [getElem_take']
+  simp [getElem_take]
 
 theorem getElem?_take_eq_none {l : List α} {n m : Nat} (h : n ≤ m) :
     (l.take n)[m]? = none :=
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ theorem getLast?_take {l : List α} : (l.take n).getLast? = if n = 0 then none e
 
 theorem getLast_take {l : List α} (h : l.take n ≠ []) :
     (l.take n).getLast h = l[n - 1]?.getD (l.getLast (by simp_all)) := by
-  rw [getLast_eq_getElem, getElem_take']
+  rw [getLast_eq_getElem, getElem_take]
   simp [length_take, Nat.min_def]
   simp at h
   split
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ theorem dropLast_take {n : Nat} {l : List α} (h : n < l.length) :
 theorem take_prefix_take_left (l : List α) {m n : Nat} (h : m ≤ n) : take m l <+: take n l := by
   rw [isPrefix_iff]
   intro i w
-  rw [getElem?_take_of_lt, getElem_take', getElem?_eq_getElem]
+  rw [getElem?_take_of_lt, getElem_take, getElem?_eq_getElem]
   simp only [length_take] at w
   exact Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le (Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le w (Nat.min_le_left _ _)) h
 
@@ -219,8 +219,9 @@ dropping the first `i` elements. Version designed to rewrite from the big list t
 theorem getElem_drop' (L : List α) {i j : Nat} (h : i + j < L.length) :
     L[i + j] = (L.drop i)[j]'(lt_length_drop L h) := by
   have : i ≤ L.length := Nat.le_trans (Nat.le_add_right _ _) (Nat.le_of_lt h)
-  rw [getElem_of_eq (take_append_drop i L).symm h, getElem_append_right'] <;>
-    simp [Nat.min_eq_left this, Nat.add_sub_cancel_left, Nat.le_add_right]
+  rw [getElem_of_eq (take_append_drop i L).symm h, getElem_append_right]
+  · simp [Nat.min_eq_left this, Nat.add_sub_cancel_left]
+  · simp [Nat.min_eq_left this, Nat.le_add_right]
 
 /-- The `i + j`-th element of a list coincides with the `j`-th element of the list obtained by
 dropping the first `i` elements. Version designed to rewrite from the big list to the small list. -/
@@ -267,9 +268,9 @@ theorem mem_take_iff_getElem {l : List α} {a : α} :
   constructor
   · rintro ⟨i, hm, rfl⟩
     simp at hm
-    refine ⟨i, by omega, by rw [getElem_take']⟩
+    refine ⟨i, by omega, by rw [getElem_take]⟩
   · rintro ⟨i, hm, rfl⟩
-    refine ⟨i, by simpa, by rw [getElem_take']⟩
+    refine ⟨i, by simpa, by rw [getElem_take]⟩
 
 theorem mem_drop_iff_getElem {l : List α} {a : α} :
     a ∈ l.drop n ↔ ∃ (i : Nat) (hm : i + n < l.length), l[n + i] = a := by
@@ -478,7 +479,7 @@ theorem false_of_mem_take_findIdx {xs : List α} {p : α → Bool} (h : x ∈ xs
     · simp only [take_succ_cons, findIdx?_cons]
       split
       · simp
-      · simp [ih, Option.guard_comp]
+      · simp [ih, Option.guard_comp, Option.bind_map]
 
 @[simp] theorem min_findIdx_findIdx {xs : List α} {p q : α → Bool} :
     min (xs.findIdx p) (xs.findIdx q) = xs.findIdx (fun a => p a || q a) := by

src/Init/Data/List/Perm.lean

@@ -98,8 +98,8 @@ theorem Perm.append_cons (a : α) {h₁ h₂ t₁ t₂ : List α} (p₁ : h₁ ~
   perm_middle.trans <| by rw [append_nil]
 
 theorem perm_append_comm : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : List α}, l₁ ++ l₂ ~ l₂ ++ l₁
-  | [], l₂ => by simp
-  | a :: t, l₂ => (perm_append_comm.cons _).trans perm_middle.symm
+  | [], _ => by simp
+  | _ :: _, _ => (perm_append_comm.cons _).trans perm_middle.symm
 
 theorem perm_append_comm_assoc (l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α) :
     Perm (l₁ ++ (l₂ ++ l₃)) (l₂ ++ (l₁ ++ l₃)) := by
@@ -248,6 +248,10 @@ theorem countP_eq_countP_filter_add (l : List α) (p q : α → Bool) :
 theorem Perm.count_eq [DecidableEq α] {l₁ l₂ : List α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) (a) :
     count a l₁ = count a l₂ := p.countP_eq _
 
+/-
+This theorem is a variant of `Perm.foldl_eq` defined in Mathlib which uses typeclasses rather
+than the explicit `comm` argument.
+-/
 theorem Perm.foldl_eq' {f : β → α → β} {l₁ l₂ : List α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂)
     (comm : ∀ x ∈ l₁, ∀ y ∈ l₁, ∀ (z), f (f z x) y = f (f z y) x)
     (init) : foldl f init l₁ = foldl f init l₂ := by
@@ -264,6 +268,28 @@ theorem Perm.foldl_eq' {f : β → α → β} {l₁ l₂ : List α} (p : l₁ ~
     refine (IH₁ comm init).trans (IH₂ ?_ _)
     intros; apply comm <;> apply p₁.symm.subset <;> assumption
 
+/-
+This theorem is a variant of `Perm.foldr_eq` defined in Mathlib which uses typeclasses rather
+than the explicit `comm` argument.
+-/
+theorem Perm.foldr_eq' {f : α → β → β} {l₁ l₂ : List α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂)
+    (comm : ∀ x ∈ l₁, ∀ y ∈ l₁, ∀ (z), f y (f x z) = f x (f y z))
+    (init) : foldr f init l₁ = foldr f init l₂ := by
+  induction p using recOnSwap' generalizing init with
+  | nil => simp
+  | cons x _p IH =>
+    simp only [foldr]
+    congr 1
+    apply IH; intros; apply comm <;> exact .tail _ ‹_›
+  | swap' x y _p IH =>
+    simp only [foldr]
+    rw [comm x (.tail _ <| .head _) y (.head _)]
+    congr 2
+    apply IH; intros; apply comm <;> exact .tail _ (.tail _ ‹_›)
+  | trans p₁ _p₂ IH₁ IH₂ =>
+    refine (IH₁ comm init).trans (IH₂ ?_ _)
+    intros; apply comm <;> apply p₁.symm.subset <;> assumption
+
 theorem Perm.rec_heq {β : List α → Sort _} {f : ∀ a l, β l → β (a :: l)} {b : β []} {l l' : List α}
     (hl : l ~ l') (f_congr : ∀ {a l l' b b'}, l ~ l' → HEq b b' → HEq (f a l b) (f a l' b'))
     (f_swap : ∀ {a a' l b}, HEq (f a (a' :: l) (f a' l b)) (f a' (a :: l) (f a l b))) :

src/Init/Data/List/Range.lean

@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, M
 -/
 prelude
 import Init.Data.List.Pairwise
+import Init.Data.List.Zip
 
 /-!
 # Lemmas about `List.range` and `List.enum`
@@ -35,11 +36,16 @@ theorem range'_succ (s n step) : range' s (n + 1) step = s :: range' (s + step)
 theorem range'_ne_nil (s : Nat) {n : Nat} : range' s n ≠ [] ↔ n ≠ 0 := by
   cases n <;> simp
 
-@[simp] theorem range'_zero : range' s 0 = [] := by
+@[simp] theorem range'_zero : range' s 0 step = [] := by
   simp
 
 @[simp] theorem range'_one {s step : Nat} : range' s 1 step = [s] := rfl
 
+@[simp] theorem tail_range' (n : Nat) : (range' s n step).tail = range' (s + step) (n - 1) step := by
+  cases n with
+  | zero => simp
+  | succ n => simp [range'_succ]
+
 @[simp] theorem range'_inj : range' s n = range' s' n' ↔ n = n' ∧ (n = 0 ∨ s = s') := by
   constructor
   · intro h
@@ -86,7 +92,7 @@ theorem map_add_range' (a) : ∀ s n step, map (a + ·) (range' s n step) = rang
 
 theorem range'_append : ∀ s m n step : Nat,
     range' s m step ++ range' (s + step * m) n step = range' s (n + m) step
-  | s, 0, n, step => rfl
+  | _, 0, _, _ => rfl
   | s, m + 1, n, step => by
     simpa [range', Nat.mul_succ, Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_comm]
       using range'_append (s + step) m n step
@@ -125,7 +131,7 @@ theorem range'_eq_cons_iff : range' s n = a :: xs ↔ s = a ∧ 0 < n ∧ xs = r
 /-! ### range -/
 
 theorem range_loop_range' : ∀ s n : Nat, range.loop s (range' s n) = range' 0 (n + s)
-  | 0, n => rfl
+  | 0, _ => rfl
   | s + 1, n => by rw [← Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_right_comm n s 1]; exact range_loop_range' s (n + 1)
 
 theorem range_eq_range' (n : Nat) : range n = range' 0 n :=
@@ -153,6 +159,9 @@ theorem range'_eq_map_range (s n : Nat) : range' s n = map (s + ·) (range n) :=
 theorem range_ne_nil {n : Nat} : range n ≠ [] ↔ n ≠ 0 := by
   cases n <;> simp
 
+@[simp] theorem tail_range (n : Nat) : (range n).tail = range' 1 (n - 1) := by
+  rw [range_eq_range', tail_range']
+
 @[simp]
 theorem range_sublist {m n : Nat} : range m <+ range n ↔ m ≤ n := by
   simp only [range_eq_range', range'_sublist_right]
@@ -205,9 +214,9 @@ theorem enumFrom_eq_nil {n : Nat} {l : List α} : List.enumFrom n l = [] ↔ l =
 @[simp]
 theorem getElem?_enumFrom :
     ∀ n (l : List α) m, (enumFrom n l)[m]? = l[m]?.map fun a => (n + m, a)
-  | n, [], m => rfl
-  | n, a :: l, 0 => by simp
-  | n, a :: l, m + 1 => by
+  | _, [], _ => rfl
+  | _, _ :: _, 0 => by simp
+  | n, _ :: l, m + 1 => by
     simp only [enumFrom_cons, getElem?_cons_succ]
     exact (getElem?_enumFrom (n + 1) l m).trans <| by rw [Nat.add_right_comm]; rfl
 
@@ -219,6 +228,12 @@ theorem getElem_enumFrom (l : List α) (n) (i : Nat) (h : i < (l.enumFrom n).len
   simp only [getElem?_enumFrom, getElem?_eq_getElem h]
   simp
 
+@[simp]
+theorem tail_enumFrom (l : List α) (n : Nat) : (enumFrom n l).tail = enumFrom (n + 1) l.tail := by
+  induction l generalizing n with
+  | nil => simp
+  | cons _ l ih => simp [ih, enumFrom_cons]
+
 theorem map_fst_add_enumFrom_eq_enumFrom (l : List α) (n k : Nat) :
     map (Prod.map (· + n) id) (enumFrom k l) = enumFrom (n + k) l :=
   ext_getElem? fun i ↦ by simp [(· ∘ ·), Nat.add_comm, Nat.add_left_comm]; rfl
@@ -227,4 +242,47 @@ theorem map_fst_add_enum_eq_enumFrom (l : List α) (n : Nat) :
     map (Prod.map (· + n) id) (enum l) = enumFrom n l :=
   map_fst_add_enumFrom_eq_enumFrom l _ _
 
+theorem enumFrom_cons' (n : Nat) (x : α) (xs : List α) :
+    enumFrom n (x :: xs) = (n, x) :: (enumFrom n xs).map (Prod.map (· + 1) id) := by
+  rw [enumFrom_cons, Nat.add_comm, ← map_fst_add_enumFrom_eq_enumFrom]
+
+@[simp]
+theorem enumFrom_map_fst (n) :
+    ∀ (l : List α), map Prod.fst (enumFrom n l) = range' n l.length
+  | [] => rfl
+  | _ :: _ => congrArg (cons _) (enumFrom_map_fst _ _)
+
+@[simp]
+theorem enumFrom_map_snd : ∀ (n) (l : List α), map Prod.snd (enumFrom n l) = l
+  | _, [] => rfl
+  | _, _ :: _ => congrArg (cons _) (enumFrom_map_snd _ _)
+
+theorem enumFrom_eq_zip_range' (l : List α) {n : Nat} : l.enumFrom n = (range' n l.length).zip l :=
+  zip_of_prod (enumFrom_map_fst _ _) (enumFrom_map_snd _ _)
+
+@[simp]
+theorem unzip_enumFrom_eq_prod (l : List α) {n : Nat} :
+    (l.enumFrom n).unzip = (range' n l.length, l) := by
+  simp only [enumFrom_eq_zip_range', unzip_zip, length_range']
+
+/-! ### enum -/
+
+theorem enum_cons : (a::as).enum = (0, a) :: as.enumFrom 1 := rfl
+
+theorem enum_cons' (x : α) (xs : List α) :
+    enum (x :: xs) = (0, x) :: (enum xs).map (Prod.map (· + 1) id) :=
+  enumFrom_cons' _ _ _
+
+theorem enum_eq_enumFrom {l : List α} : l.enum = l.enumFrom 0 := rfl
+
+theorem enumFrom_eq_map_enum (l : List α) (n : Nat) :
+    enumFrom n l = (enum l).map (Prod.map (· + n) id) := by
+  induction l generalizing n with
+  | nil => simp
+  | cons x xs ih =>
+    simp only [enumFrom_cons, ih, enum_cons, map_cons, Prod.map_apply, Nat.zero_add, id_eq, map_map,
+      cons.injEq, map_inj_left, Function.comp_apply, Prod.forall, Prod.mk.injEq, and_true, true_and]
+    intro a b _
+    exact (succ_add a n).symm
+
 end List

src/Init/Data/List/Sort/Impl.lean

@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ def mergeSortTR (l : List α) (le : α → α → Bool := by exact fun a b => a
 where run : {n : Nat} → { l : List α // l.length = n } → List α
   | 0, ⟨[], _⟩ => []
   | 1, ⟨[a], _⟩ => [a]
-  | n+2, xs =>
+  | _+2, xs =>
     let (l, r) := splitInTwo xs
     mergeTR (run l) (run r) le
 
@@ -136,13 +136,13 @@ where
   run : {n : Nat} → { l : List α // l.length = n } → List α
   | 0, ⟨[], _⟩ => []
   | 1, ⟨[a], _⟩ => [a]
-  | n+2, xs =>
+  | _+2, xs =>
     let (l, r) := splitRevInTwo xs
     mergeTR (run' l) (run r) le
   run' : {n : Nat} → { l : List α // l.length = n } → List α
   | 0, ⟨[], _⟩ => []
   | 1, ⟨[a], _⟩ => [a]
-  | n+2, xs =>
+  | _+2, xs =>
     let (l, r) := splitRevInTwo' xs
     mergeTR (run' r) (run l) le
 

src/Init/Data/List/Sort/Lemmas.lean

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 /-
 Copyright (c) 2024 Lean FRO. All rights reserved.
 Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-Authors: Kim Morrison
+Authors: Kim Morrison, Eric Wieser, François G. Dorais
 -/
 prelude
 import Init.Data.List.Perm
@@ -114,31 +114,40 @@ theorem enumLE_trans (trans : ∀ a b c, le a b → le b c → le a c)
   · simp_all
   · simp_all
 
-theorem enumLE_total (total : ∀ a b, !le a b → le b a)
-    (a b : Nat × α) : !enumLE le a b → enumLE le b a := by
+theorem enumLE_total (total : ∀ a b, le a b || le b a)
+    (a b : Nat × α) : enumLE le a b || enumLE le b a := by
   simp only [enumLE]
   split <;> split
-  · simpa using Nat.le_of_lt
+  · simpa using Nat.le_total a.fst b.fst
   · simp
   · simp
-  · simp_all [total a.2 b.2]
+  · have := total a.2 b.2
+    simp_all
 
 /-! ### merge -/
 
-theorem merge_stable : ∀ (xs ys) (_ : ∀ x y, x ∈ xs → y ∈ ys → x.1 ≤ y.1),
-    (merge xs ys (enumLE le)).map (·.2) = merge (xs.map (·.2)) (ys.map (·.2)) le
-  | [], ys, _ => by simp [merge]
-  | xs, [], _ => by simp [merge]
-  | (i, x) :: xs, (j, y) :: ys, h => by
-    simp only [merge, enumLE, map_cons]
-    split <;> rename_i w
-    · rw [if_pos (by simp [h _ _ (mem_cons_self ..) (mem_cons_self ..)])]
-      simp only [map_cons, cons.injEq, true_and]
-      rw [merge_stable, map_cons]
-      exact fun x' y' mx my => h x' y' (mem_cons_of_mem (i, x) mx) my
-    · simp only [↓reduceIte, map_cons, cons.injEq, true_and, reduceCtorEq]
-      rw [merge_stable, map_cons]
-      exact fun x' y' mx my => h x' y' mx (mem_cons_of_mem (j, y) my)
+theorem cons_merge_cons (s : α → α → Bool) (a b l r) :
+    merge (a::l) (b::r) s = if s a b then a :: merge l (b::r) s else b :: merge (a::l) r s := by
+  simp only [merge]
+
+@[simp] theorem cons_merge_cons_pos (s : α → α → Bool) (l r) (h : s a b) :
+    merge (a::l) (b::r) s = a :: merge l (b::r) s := by
+  rw [cons_merge_cons, if_pos h]
+
+@[simp] theorem cons_merge_cons_neg (s : α → α → Bool) (l r) (h : ¬ s a b) :
+    merge (a::l) (b::r) s = b :: merge (a::l) r s := by
+  rw [cons_merge_cons, if_neg h]
+
+@[simp] theorem length_merge (s : α → α → Bool) (l r) :
+    (merge l r s).length = l.length + r.length := by
+  match l, r with
+  | [], r => simp
+  | l, [] => simp
+  | a::l, b::r =>
+    rw [cons_merge_cons]
+    split
+    · simp_arith [length_merge s l (b::r)]
+    · simp_arith [length_merge s (a::l) r]
 
 /--
 The elements of `merge le xs ys` are exactly the elements of `xs` and `ys`.
@@ -158,16 +167,37 @@ theorem mem_merge {a : α} {xs ys : List α} : a ∈ merge xs ys le ↔ a ∈ xs
         apply or_congr_left
         simp only [or_comm (a := a = y), or_assoc]
 
+theorem mem_merge_left (s : α → α → Bool) (h : x ∈ l) : x ∈ merge l r s :=
+  mem_merge.2 <| .inl h
+
+theorem mem_merge_right (s : α → α → Bool) (h : x ∈ r) : x ∈ merge l r s :=
+  mem_merge.2 <| .inr h
+
+theorem merge_stable : ∀ (xs ys) (_ : ∀ x y, x ∈ xs → y ∈ ys → x.1 ≤ y.1),
+    (merge xs ys (enumLE le)).map (·.2) = merge (xs.map (·.2)) (ys.map (·.2)) le
+  | [], ys, _ => by simp [merge]
+  | xs, [], _ => by simp [merge]
+  | (i, x) :: xs, (j, y) :: ys, h => by
+    simp only [merge, enumLE, map_cons]
+    split <;> rename_i w
+    · rw [if_pos (by simp [h _ _ (mem_cons_self ..) (mem_cons_self ..)])]
+      simp only [map_cons, cons.injEq, true_and]
+      rw [merge_stable, map_cons]
+      exact fun x' y' mx my => h x' y' (mem_cons_of_mem (i, x) mx) my
+    · simp only [↓reduceIte, map_cons, cons.injEq, true_and, reduceCtorEq]
+      rw [merge_stable, map_cons]
+      exact fun x' y' mx my => h x' y' mx (mem_cons_of_mem (j, y) my)
+
 -- We enable this instance locally so we can write `Pairwise le` instead of `Pairwise (le · ·)` everywhere.
 attribute [local instance] boolRelToRel
 
 /--
-If the ordering relation `le` is transitive and total (i.e. `le a b ∨ le b a` for all `a, b`)
+If the ordering relation `le` is transitive and total (i.e. `le a b || le b a` for all `a, b`)
 then the `merge` of two sorted lists is sorted.
 -/
 theorem sorted_merge
     (trans : ∀ (a b c : α), le a b → le b c → le a c)
-    (total : ∀ (a b : α), !le a b → le b a)
+    (total : ∀ (a b : α), le a b || le b a)
     (l₁ l₂ : List α) (h₁ : l₁.Pairwise le) (h₂ : l₂.Pairwise le) : (merge l₁ l₂ le).Pairwise le := by
   induction l₁ generalizing l₂ with
   | nil => simpa only [merge]
@@ -188,9 +218,10 @@ theorem sorted_merge
       · apply Pairwise.cons
         · intro z m
           rw [mem_merge, mem_cons] at m
+          simp only [Bool.not_eq_true] at h
           rcases m with (⟨rfl|m⟩|m)
-          · exact total _ _ (by simpa using h)
-          · exact trans _ _ _ (total _ _ (by simpa using h)) (rel_of_pairwise_cons h₁ m)
+          · simpa [h] using total y z
+          · exact trans _ _ _ (by simpa [h] using total x y) (rel_of_pairwise_cons h₁ m)
           · exact rel_of_pairwise_cons h₂ m
         · exact ih₂ h₂.tail
 
@@ -234,7 +265,7 @@ theorem mergeSort_perm : ∀ (l : List α) (le), mergeSort l le ~ l
         (Perm.of_eq (splitInTwo_fst_append_splitInTwo_snd _)))
 termination_by l => l.length
 
-@[simp] theorem mergeSort_length (l : List α) : (mergeSort l le).length = l.length :=
+@[simp] theorem length_mergeSort (l : List α) : (mergeSort l le).length = l.length :=
   (mergeSort_perm l le).length_eq
 
 @[simp] theorem mem_mergeSort {a : α} {l : List α} : a ∈ mergeSort l le ↔ a ∈ l :=
@@ -243,13 +274,13 @@ termination_by l => l.length
 /--
 The result of `mergeSort` is sorted,
 as long as the comparison function is transitive (`le a b → le b c → le a c`)
-and total in the sense that `le a b ∨ le b a`.
+and total in the sense that `le a b || le b a`.
 
 The comparison function need not be irreflexive, i.e. `le a b` and `le b a` is allowed even when `a ≠ b`.
 -/
 theorem sorted_mergeSort
     (trans : ∀ (a b c : α), le a b → le b c → le a c)
-    (total : ∀ (a b : α), !le a b → le b a) :
+    (total : ∀ (a b : α), le a b || le b a) :
     (l : List α) → (mergeSort l le).Pairwise le
   | [] => by simp [mergeSort]
   | [a] => by simp [mergeSort]
@@ -317,7 +348,7 @@ termination_by _ l => l.length
 
 theorem mergeSort_cons {le : α → α → Bool}
     (trans : ∀ (a b c : α), le a b → le b c → le a c)
-    (total : ∀ (a b : α), !le a b → le b a)
+    (total : ∀ (a b : α), le a b || le b a)
     (a : α) (l : List α) :
     ∃ l₁ l₂, mergeSort (a :: l) le = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ mergeSort l le = l₁ ++ l₂ ∧
       ∀ b, b ∈ l₁ → !le a b := by
@@ -376,7 +407,7 @@ then `c` is still a sublist of `mergeSort le l`.
 -/
 theorem sublist_mergeSort
     (trans : ∀ (a b c : α), le a b → le b c → le a c)
-    (total : ∀ (a b : α), !le a b → le b a) :
+    (total : ∀ (a b : α), le a b || le b a) :
     ∀ {c : List α} (_ : c.Pairwise le) (_ : c <+ l),
     c <+ mergeSort l le
   | _, _, .slnil => nil_sublist _
@@ -407,8 +438,45 @@ then `[a, b]` is still a sublist of `mergeSort le l`.
 -/
 theorem pair_sublist_mergeSort
     (trans : ∀ (a b c : α), le a b → le b c → le a c)
-    (total : ∀ (a b : α), !le a b → le b a)
+    (total : ∀ (a b : α), le a b || le b a)
     (hab : le a b) (h : [a, b] <+ l) : [a, b] <+ mergeSort l le :=
   sublist_mergeSort trans total (pairwise_pair.mpr hab) h
 
 @[deprecated (since := "2024-09-02")] abbrev mergeSort_stable_pair := @pair_sublist_mergeSort
+
+theorem map_merge {f : α → β} {r : α → α → Bool} {s : β → β → Bool} {l l' : List α}
+    (hl : ∀ a ∈ l, ∀ b ∈ l', r a b = s (f a) (f b)) :
+    (l.merge l' r).map f = (l.map f).merge (l'.map f) s := by
+  match l, l' with
+  | [], x' => simp
+  | x, [] => simp
+  | x :: xs, x' :: xs' =>
+    simp only [List.forall_mem_cons] at hl
+    simp only [forall_and] at hl
+    simp only [List.map, List.cons_merge_cons]
+    rw [← hl.1.1]
+    split
+    · rw [List.map, map_merge, List.map]
+      simp only [List.forall_mem_cons, forall_and]
+      exact ⟨hl.2.1, hl.2.2⟩
+    · rw [List.map, map_merge, List.map]
+      simp only [List.forall_mem_cons]
+      exact ⟨hl.1.2, hl.2.2⟩
+
+theorem map_mergeSort {r : α → α → Bool} {s : β → β → Bool} {f : α → β} {l : List α}
+    (hl : ∀ a ∈ l, ∀ b ∈ l, r a b = s (f a) (f b)) :
+    (l.mergeSort r).map f = (l.map f).mergeSort s :=
+  match l with
+  | [] => by simp
+  | [x] => by simp
+  | a :: b :: l => by
+    simp only [mergeSort, splitInTwo_fst, splitInTwo_snd, map_cons]
+    rw [map_merge (fun a am b bm => hl a (mem_of_mem_take (by simpa using am))
+      b (mem_of_mem_drop (by simpa using bm)))]
+    rw [map_mergeSort (s := s) (fun a am b bm => hl a (mem_of_mem_take (by simpa using am))
+      b (mem_of_mem_take (by simpa using bm)))]
+    rw [map_mergeSort (s := s) (fun a am b bm => hl a (mem_of_mem_drop (by simpa using am))
+      b (mem_of_mem_drop (by simpa using bm)))]
+    rw [map_take, map_drop]
+    simp
+  termination_by length l

src/Init/Data/List/Sublist.lean

@@ -667,7 +667,7 @@ theorem IsSuffix.length_le (h : l₁ <:+ l₂) : l₁.length ≤ l₂.length :=
 theorem IsPrefix.getElem {x y : List α} (h : x <+: y) {n} (hn : n < x.length) :
     x[n] = y[n]'(Nat.le_trans hn h.length_le) := by
   obtain ⟨_, rfl⟩ := h
-  exact (List.getElem_append n hn).symm
+  exact (List.getElem_append_left hn).symm
 
 -- See `Init.Data.List.Nat.Sublist` for `IsSuffix.getElem`.
 
@@ -725,16 +725,25 @@ theorem infix_iff_suffix_prefix {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ <:+: l₂ ↔ ∃ t
 theorem IsInfix.eq_of_length (h : l₁ <:+: l₂) : l₁.length = l₂.length → l₁ = l₂ :=
   h.sublist.eq_of_length
 
+theorem IsInfix.eq_of_length_le (h : l₁ <:+: l₂) : l₂.length ≤ l₁.length → l₁ = l₂ :=
+  h.sublist.eq_of_length_le
+
 theorem IsPrefix.eq_of_length (h : l₁ <+: l₂) : l₁.length = l₂.length → l₁ = l₂ :=
   h.sublist.eq_of_length
 
+theorem IsPrefix.eq_of_length_le (h : l₁ <+: l₂) : l₂.length ≤ l₁.length → l₁ = l₂ :=
+  h.sublist.eq_of_length_le
+
 theorem IsSuffix.eq_of_length (h : l₁ <:+ l₂) : l₁.length = l₂.length → l₁ = l₂ :=
   h.sublist.eq_of_length
 
+theorem IsSuffix.eq_of_length_le (h : l₁ <:+ l₂) : l₂.length ≤ l₁.length → l₁ = l₂ :=
+  h.sublist.eq_of_length_le
+
 theorem prefix_of_prefix_length_le :
     ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α}, l₁ <+: l₃ → l₂ <+: l₃ → length l₁ ≤ length l₂ → l₁ <+: l₂
-  | [], l₂, _, _, _, _ => nil_prefix
-  | a :: l₁, b :: l₂, _, ⟨r₁, rfl⟩, ⟨r₂, e⟩, ll => by
+  | [], _, _, _, _, _ => nil_prefix
+  | _ :: _, b :: _, _, ⟨_, rfl⟩, ⟨_, e⟩, ll => by
     injection e with _ e'; subst b
     rcases prefix_of_prefix_length_le ⟨_, rfl⟩ ⟨_, e'⟩ (le_of_succ_le_succ ll) with ⟨r₃, rfl⟩
     exact ⟨r₃, rfl⟩
@@ -829,6 +838,24 @@ theorem isPrefix_iff : l₁ <+: l₂ ↔ ∀ i (h : i < l₁.length), l₂[i]? =
       rw (config := {occs := .pos [2]}) [← Nat.and_forall_add_one]
       simp [Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff, eq_comm]
 
+theorem isPrefix_iff_getElem {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
+    l₁ <+: l₂ ↔ ∃ (h : l₁.length ≤ l₂.length), ∀ x (hx : x < l₁.length),
+      l₁[x] = l₂[x]'(Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le hx h) where
+  mp h := ⟨h.length_le, fun _ _ ↦ h.getElem _⟩
+  mpr h := by
+    obtain ⟨hl, h⟩ := h
+    induction l₂ generalizing l₁ with
+    | nil =>
+      simpa using hl
+    | cons _ _ tail_ih =>
+      cases l₁ with
+      | nil =>
+        exact nil_prefix
+      | cons _ _ =>
+        simp only [length_cons, Nat.add_le_add_iff_right, Fin.getElem_fin] at hl h
+        simp only [cons_prefix_cons]
+        exact ⟨h 0 (zero_lt_succ _), tail_ih hl fun a ha ↦ h a.succ (succ_lt_succ ha)⟩
+
 -- See `Init.Data.List.Nat.Sublist` for `isSuffix_iff` and `ifInfix_iff`.
 
 theorem isPrefix_filterMap_iff {β} {f : α → Option β} {l₁ : List α} {l₂ : List β} :

src/Init/Data/List/Zip.lean

@@ -16,83 +16,6 @@ open Nat
 
 /-! ## Zippers -/
 
-/-! ### zip -/
-
-theorem zip_map (f : α → γ) (g : β → δ) :
-    ∀ (l₁ : List α) (l₂ : List β), zip (l₁.map f) (l₂.map g) = (zip l₁ l₂).map (Prod.map f g)
-  | [], l₂ => rfl
-  | l₁, [] => by simp only [map, zip_nil_right]
-  | a :: l₁, b :: l₂ => by
-    simp only [map, zip_cons_cons, zip_map, Prod.map]; constructor
-
-theorem zip_map_left (f : α → γ) (l₁ : List α) (l₂ : List β) :
-    zip (l₁.map f) l₂ = (zip l₁ l₂).map (Prod.map f id) := by rw [← zip_map, map_id]
-
-theorem zip_map_right (f : β → γ) (l₁ : List α) (l₂ : List β) :
-    zip l₁ (l₂.map f) = (zip l₁ l₂).map (Prod.map id f) := by rw [← zip_map, map_id]
-
-theorem zip_append :
-    ∀ {l₁ r₁ : List α} {l₂ r₂ : List β} (_h : length l₁ = length l₂),
-      zip (l₁ ++ r₁) (l₂ ++ r₂) = zip l₁ l₂ ++ zip r₁ r₂
-  | [], r₁, l₂, r₂, h => by simp only [eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero h.symm]; rfl
-  | l₁, r₁, [], r₂, h => by simp only [eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero h]; rfl
-  | a :: l₁, r₁, b :: l₂, r₂, h => by
-    simp only [cons_append, zip_cons_cons, zip_append (Nat.succ.inj h)]
-
-theorem zip_map' (f : α → β) (g : α → γ) :
-    ∀ l : List α, zip (l.map f) (l.map g) = l.map fun a => (f a, g a)
-  | [] => rfl
-  | a :: l => by simp only [map, zip_cons_cons, zip_map']
-
-theorem of_mem_zip {a b} : ∀ {l₁ : List α} {l₂ : List β}, (a, b) ∈ zip l₁ l₂ → a ∈ l₁ ∧ b ∈ l₂
-  | _ :: l₁, _ :: l₂, h => by
-    cases h
-    case head => simp
-    case tail h =>
-    · have := of_mem_zip h
-      exact ⟨Mem.tail _ this.1, Mem.tail _ this.2⟩
-
-@[deprecated of_mem_zip (since := "2024-07-28")] abbrev mem_zip := @of_mem_zip
-
-theorem map_fst_zip :
-    ∀ (l₁ : List α) (l₂ : List β), l₁.length ≤ l₂.length → map Prod.fst (zip l₁ l₂) = l₁
-  | [], bs, _ => rfl
-  | _ :: as, _ :: bs, h => by
-    simp [Nat.succ_le_succ_iff] at h
-    show _ :: map Prod.fst (zip as bs) = _ :: as
-    rw [map_fst_zip as bs h]
-  | a :: as, [], h => by simp at h
-
-theorem map_snd_zip :
-    ∀ (l₁ : List α) (l₂ : List β), l₂.length ≤ l₁.length → map Prod.snd (zip l₁ l₂) = l₂
-  | _, [], _ => by
-    rw [zip_nil_right]
-    rfl
-  | [], b :: bs, h => by simp at h
-  | a :: as, b :: bs, h => by
-    simp [Nat.succ_le_succ_iff] at h
-    show _ :: map Prod.snd (zip as bs) = _ :: bs
-    rw [map_snd_zip as bs h]
-
-theorem map_prod_left_eq_zip {l : List α} (f : α → β) :
-    (l.map fun x => (x, f x)) = l.zip (l.map f) := by
-  rw [← zip_map']
-  congr
-  simp
-
-theorem map_prod_right_eq_zip {l : List α} (f : α → β) :
-    (l.map fun x => (f x, x)) = (l.map f).zip l := by
-  rw [← zip_map']
-  congr
-  simp
-
-/-- See also `List.zip_replicate` in `Init.Data.List.TakeDrop` for a generalization with different lengths. -/
-@[simp] theorem zip_replicate' {a : α} {b : β} {n : Nat} :
-    zip (replicate n a) (replicate n b) = replicate n (a, b) := by
-  induction n with
-  | zero => rfl
-  | succ n ih => simp [replicate_succ, ih]
-
 /-! ### zipWith -/
 
 theorem zipWith_comm (f : α → β → γ) :
@@ -229,6 +152,7 @@ theorem drop_zipWith : (zipWith f l l').drop n = zipWith f (l.drop n) (l'.drop n
 
 @[deprecated drop_zipWith (since := "2024-07-26")] abbrev zipWith_distrib_drop := @drop_zipWith
 
+@[simp]
 theorem tail_zipWith : (zipWith f l l').tail = zipWith f l.tail l'.tail := by
   rw [← drop_one]; simp [drop_zipWith]
 
@@ -248,6 +172,65 @@ theorem zipWith_append (f : α → β → γ) (l la : List α) (l' lb : List β)
       simp only [length_cons, Nat.succ.injEq] at h
       simp [ih _ h]
 
+theorem zipWith_eq_cons_iff {f : α → β → γ} {l₁ : List α} {l₂ : List β} :
+    zipWith f l₁ l₂ = g :: l ↔
+      ∃ a l₁' b l₂', l₁ = a :: l₁' ∧ l₂ = b :: l₂' ∧ g = f a b ∧ l = zipWith f l₁' l₂' := by
+  match l₁, l₂ with
+  | [], [] => simp
+  | [], b :: l₂ => simp
+  | a :: l₁, [] => simp
+  | a' :: l₁, b' :: l₂ =>
+    simp only [zip_cons_cons, cons.injEq, Prod.mk.injEq]
+    constructor
+    · rintro ⟨⟨rfl, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
+      refine ⟨a', l₁, b', l₂, by simp⟩
+    · rintro ⟨a, l₁, b, l₂, ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, rfl, rfl⟩
+      simp
+
+theorem zipWith_eq_append_iff {f : α → β → γ} {l₁ : List α} {l₂ : List β} :
+    zipWith f l₁ l₂ = l₁' ++ l₂' ↔
+      ∃ w x y z, w.length = y.length ∧ l₁ = w ++ x ∧ l₂ = y ++ z ∧ l₁' = zipWith f w y ∧ l₂' = zipWith f x z := by
+  induction l₁ generalizing l₂ l₁' with
+  | nil =>
+    simp
+    constructor
+    · rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
+      exact ⟨[], [], [], by simp⟩
+    · rintro ⟨_, _, _, -, ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, _, rfl, rfl, rfl⟩
+      simp
+  | cons x₁ l₁ ih₁ =>
+    cases l₂ with
+    | nil =>
+      constructor
+      · simp only [zipWith_nil_right, nil_eq, append_eq_nil, exists_and_left, and_imp]
+        rintro rfl  rfl
+        exact ⟨[], x₁ :: l₁, [], by simp⟩
+      · rintro ⟨w, x, y, z, h₁, _, h₃, rfl, rfl⟩
+        simp only [nil_eq, append_eq_nil] at h₃
+        obtain ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ := h₃
+        simp
+    | cons x₂ l₂ =>
+      simp only [zipWith_cons_cons]
+      rw [cons_eq_append_iff]
+      constructor
+      · rintro (⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨l₁'', rfl, h⟩)
+        · exact ⟨[], x₁ :: l₁, [], x₂ :: l₂, by simp⟩
+        · rw [ih₁] at h
+          obtain ⟨w, x, y, z, h, rfl, rfl, h', rfl⟩ := h
+          refine ⟨x₁ :: w, x, x₂ :: y, z, by simp [h, h']⟩
+      · rintro ⟨w, x, y, z, h₁, h₂, h₃, rfl, rfl⟩
+        rw [cons_eq_append_iff] at h₂
+        rw [cons_eq_append_iff] at h₃
+        obtain (⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨w', rfl, rfl⟩) := h₂
+        · simp only [zipWith_nil_left, true_and, nil_eq, reduceCtorEq, false_and, exists_const,
+          or_false]
+          obtain (⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨y', rfl, rfl⟩) := h₃
+          · simp
+          · simp_all
+        · obtain (⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨y', rfl, rfl⟩) := h₃
+          · simp_all
+          · simp_all [zipWith_append, Nat.succ_inj']
+
 /-- See also `List.zipWith_replicate` in `Init.Data.List.TakeDrop` for a generalization with different lengths. -/
 @[simp] theorem zipWith_replicate' {a : α} {b : β} {n : Nat} :
     zipWith f (replicate n a) (replicate n b) = replicate n (f a b) := by
@@ -255,6 +238,113 @@ theorem zipWith_append (f : α → β → γ) (l la : List α) (l' lb : List β)
   | zero => rfl
   | succ n ih => simp [replicate_succ, ih]
 
+/-! ### zip -/
+
+theorem zip_eq_zipWith : ∀ (l₁ : List α) (l₂ : List β), zip l₁ l₂ = zipWith Prod.mk l₁ l₂
+  | [], _ => rfl
+  | _, [] => rfl
+  | a :: l₁, b :: l₂ => by simp [zip_cons_cons, zip_eq_zipWith l₁ l₂]
+
+theorem zip_map (f : α → γ) (g : β → δ) :
+    ∀ (l₁ : List α) (l₂ : List β), zip (l₁.map f) (l₂.map g) = (zip l₁ l₂).map (Prod.map f g)
+  | [], _ => rfl
+  | _, [] => by simp only [map, zip_nil_right]
+  | _ :: _, _ :: _ => by
+    simp only [map, zip_cons_cons, zip_map, Prod.map]; constructor
+
+theorem zip_map_left (f : α → γ) (l₁ : List α) (l₂ : List β) :
+    zip (l₁.map f) l₂ = (zip l₁ l₂).map (Prod.map f id) := by rw [← zip_map, map_id]
+
+theorem zip_map_right (f : β → γ) (l₁ : List α) (l₂ : List β) :
+    zip l₁ (l₂.map f) = (zip l₁ l₂).map (Prod.map id f) := by rw [← zip_map, map_id]
+
+@[simp] theorem tail_zip (l₁ : List α) (l₂ : List β) :
+    (zip l₁ l₂).tail = zip l₁.tail l₂.tail := by
+  cases l₁ <;> cases l₂ <;> simp
+
+theorem zip_append :
+    ∀ {l₁ r₁ : List α} {l₂ r₂ : List β} (_h : length l₁ = length l₂),
+      zip (l₁ ++ r₁) (l₂ ++ r₂) = zip l₁ l₂ ++ zip r₁ r₂
+  | [], r₁, l₂, r₂, h => by simp only [eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero h.symm]; rfl
+  | l₁, r₁, [], r₂, h => by simp only [eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero h]; rfl
+  | a :: l₁, r₁, b :: l₂, r₂, h => by
+    simp only [cons_append, zip_cons_cons, zip_append (Nat.succ.inj h)]
+
+theorem zip_map' (f : α → β) (g : α → γ) :
+    ∀ l : List α, zip (l.map f) (l.map g) = l.map fun a => (f a, g a)
+  | [] => rfl
+  | a :: l => by simp only [map, zip_cons_cons, zip_map']
+
+theorem of_mem_zip {a b} : ∀ {l₁ : List α} {l₂ : List β}, (a, b) ∈ zip l₁ l₂ → a ∈ l₁ ∧ b ∈ l₂
+  | _ :: l₁, _ :: l₂, h => by
+    cases h
+    case head => simp
+    case tail h =>
+    · have := of_mem_zip h
+      exact ⟨Mem.tail _ this.1, Mem.tail _ this.2⟩
+
+@[deprecated of_mem_zip (since := "2024-07-28")] abbrev mem_zip := @of_mem_zip
+
+theorem map_fst_zip :
+    ∀ (l₁ : List α) (l₂ : List β), l₁.length ≤ l₂.length → map Prod.fst (zip l₁ l₂) = l₁
+  | [], _, _ => rfl
+  | _ :: as, _ :: bs, h => by
+    simp [Nat.succ_le_succ_iff] at h
+    show _ :: map Prod.fst (zip as bs) = _ :: as
+    rw [map_fst_zip as bs h]
+  | _ :: _, [], h => by simp at h
+
+theorem map_snd_zip :
+    ∀ (l₁ : List α) (l₂ : List β), l₂.length ≤ l₁.length → map Prod.snd (zip l₁ l₂) = l₂
+  | _, [], _ => by
+    rw [zip_nil_right]
+    rfl
+  | [], b :: bs, h => by simp at h
+  | a :: as, b :: bs, h => by
+    simp [Nat.succ_le_succ_iff] at h
+    show _ :: map Prod.snd (zip as bs) = _ :: bs
+    rw [map_snd_zip as bs h]
+
+theorem map_prod_left_eq_zip {l : List α} (f : α → β) :
+    (l.map fun x => (x, f x)) = l.zip (l.map f) := by
+  rw [← zip_map']
+  congr
+  simp
+
+theorem map_prod_right_eq_zip {l : List α} (f : α → β) :
+    (l.map fun x => (f x, x)) = (l.map f).zip l := by
+  rw [← zip_map']
+  congr
+  simp
+
+@[simp] theorem zip_eq_nil_iff {l₁ : List α} {l₂ : List β} :
+    zip l₁ l₂ = [] ↔ l₁ = [] ∨ l₂ = [] := by
+  simp [zip_eq_zipWith]
+
+theorem zip_eq_cons_iff {l₁ : List α} {l₂ : List β} :
+    zip l₁ l₂ = (a, b) :: l ↔
+      ∃ l₁' l₂', l₁ = a :: l₁' ∧ l₂ = b :: l₂' ∧ l = zip l₁' l₂' := by
+  simp only [zip_eq_zipWith, zipWith_eq_cons_iff]
+  constructor
+  · rintro ⟨a, l₁, b, l₂, rfl, rfl, h, rfl, rfl⟩
+    simp only [Prod.mk.injEq] at h
+    obtain ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ := h
+    simp
+  · rintro ⟨l₁', l₂', rfl, rfl, rfl⟩
+    refine ⟨a, l₁', b, l₂', by simp⟩
+
+theorem zip_eq_append_iff {l₁ : List α} {l₂ : List β} :
+    zip l₁ l₂ = l₁' ++ l₂' ↔
+      ∃ w x y z, w.length = y.length ∧ l₁ = w ++ x ∧ l₂ = y ++ z ∧ l₁' = zip w y ∧ l₂' = zip x z := by
+  simp [zip_eq_zipWith, zipWith_eq_append_iff]
+
+/-- See also `List.zip_replicate` in `Init.Data.List.TakeDrop` for a generalization with different lengths. -/
+@[simp] theorem zip_replicate' {a : α} {b : β} {n : Nat} :
+    zip (replicate n a) (replicate n b) = replicate n (a, b) := by
+  induction n with
+  | zero => rfl
+  | succ n ih => simp [replicate_succ, ih]
+
 /-! ### zipWithAll -/
 
 theorem getElem?_zipWithAll {f : Option α → Option β → γ} {i : Nat} :
@@ -284,12 +374,16 @@ theorem head?_zipWithAll {f : Option α → Option β → γ} :
       | none, none => .none | a?, b? => some (f a? b?) := by
   simp [head?_eq_getElem?, getElem?_zipWithAll]
 
-theorem head_zipWithAll {f : Option α → Option β → γ} (h) :
+@[simp] theorem head_zipWithAll {f : Option α → Option β → γ} (h) :
     (zipWithAll f as bs).head h = f as.head? bs.head? := by
   apply Option.some.inj
   rw [← head?_eq_head, head?_zipWithAll]
   split <;> simp_all
 
+@[simp] theorem tail_zipWithAll {f : Option α → Option β → γ} :
+    (zipWithAll f as bs).tail = zipWithAll f as.tail bs.tail := by
+  cases as <;> cases bs <;> simp
+
 theorem zipWithAll_map {μ} (f : Option γ → Option δ → μ) (g : α → γ) (h : β → δ) (l₁ : List α) (l₂ : List β) :
     zipWithAll f (l₁.map g) (l₂.map h) = zipWithAll (fun a b => f (g <$> a) (h <$> b)) l₁ l₂ := by
   induction l₁ generalizing l₂ <;> cases l₂ <;> simp_all
@@ -336,9 +430,9 @@ theorem zip_unzip : ∀ l : List (α × β), zip (unzip l).1 (unzip l).2 = l
 
 theorem unzip_zip_left :
     ∀ {l₁ : List α} {l₂ : List β}, length l₁ ≤ length l₂ → (unzip (zip l₁ l₂)).1 = l₁
-  | [], l₂, _ => rfl
-  | l₁, [], h => by rw [eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero (Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero h)]; rfl
-  | a :: l₁, b :: l₂, h => by
+  | [], _, _ => rfl
+  | _, [], h => by rw [eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero (Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero h)]; rfl
+  | _ :: _, _ :: _, h => by
     simp only [zip_cons_cons, unzip_cons, unzip_zip_left (le_of_succ_le_succ h)]
 
 theorem unzip_zip_right :
@@ -358,6 +452,12 @@ theorem zip_of_prod {l : List α} {l' : List β} {lp : List (α × β)} (hl : lp
     (hr : lp.map Prod.snd = l') : lp = l.zip l' := by
   rw [← hl, ← hr, ← zip_unzip lp, ← unzip_fst, ← unzip_snd, zip_unzip, zip_unzip]
 
+theorem tail_zip_fst {l : List (α × β)} : l.unzip.1.tail = l.tail.unzip.1 := by
+  simp
+
+theorem tail_zip_snd {l : List (α × β)} : l.unzip.2.tail = l.tail.unzip.2 := by
+  simp
+
 @[simp] theorem unzip_replicate {n : Nat} {a : α} {b : β} :
     unzip (replicate n (a, b)) = (replicate n a, replicate n b) := by
   ext1 <;> simp

src/Init/Data/Nat/Basic.lean

@@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ protected theorem add_mul (n m k : Nat) : (n + m) * k = n * k + m * k :=
   Nat.right_distrib n m k
 
 protected theorem mul_assoc : ∀ (n m k : Nat), (n * m) * k = n * (m * k)
-  | n, m, 0      => rfl
+  | _, _, 0      => rfl
   | n, m, succ k => by simp [mul_succ, Nat.mul_assoc n m k, Nat.left_distrib]
 instance : Std.Associative (α := Nat) (· * ·) := ⟨Nat.mul_assoc⟩
 
@@ -514,6 +514,10 @@ protected theorem add_lt_add_left {n m : Nat} (h : n < m) (k : Nat) : k + n < k
 protected theorem add_lt_add_right {n m : Nat} (h : n < m) (k : Nat) : n + k < m + k :=
   Nat.add_comm k m ▸ Nat.add_comm k n ▸ Nat.add_lt_add_left h k
 
+protected theorem lt_add_of_pos_left (h : 0 < k) : n < k + n := by
+  rw [Nat.add_comm]
+  exact Nat.add_lt_add_left h n
+
 protected theorem lt_add_of_pos_right (h : 0 < k) : n < n + k :=
   Nat.add_lt_add_left h n
 
@@ -630,6 +634,8 @@ theorem lt_succ_of_lt (h : a < b) : a < succ b := le_succ_of_le h
 
 theorem lt_add_one_of_lt (h : a < b) : a < b + 1 := le_succ_of_le h
 
+@[simp] theorem lt_one_iff : n < 1 ↔ n = 0 := Nat.lt_succ_iff.trans <| by rw [le_zero_eq]
+
 theorem succ_pred_eq_of_ne_zero : ∀ {n}, n ≠ 0 → succ (pred n) = n
   | _+1, _ => rfl
 
@@ -718,7 +724,7 @@ protected theorem zero_ne_one : 0 ≠ (1 : Nat) :=
 
 theorem succ_ne_zero (n : Nat) : succ n ≠ 0 := by simp
 
-instance {n : Nat} : NeZero (succ n) := ⟨succ_ne_zero n⟩
+instance instNeZeroSucc {n : Nat} : NeZero (n + 1) := ⟨succ_ne_zero n⟩
 
 /-! # mul + order -/
 

src/Init/Data/Nat/Bitwise.lean

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 /-
 Copyright (c) 2024 Lean FRO, LLC. All rights reserved.
 Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-Authors: Scott Morrison
+Authors: Kim Morrison
 -/
 prelude
 import Init.Data.Nat.Bitwise.Basic

src/Init/Data/Nat/Bitwise/Lemmas.lean

@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ private theorem two_mul_sub_one {n : Nat} (n_pos : n > 0) : (2*n - 1) % 2 = 1 :=
 /-! ### Preliminaries -/
 
 /--
-An induction principal that works on divison by two.
+An induction principal that works on division by two.
 -/
 noncomputable def div2Induction {motive : Nat → Sort u}
     (n : Nat) (ind : ∀(n : Nat), (n > 0 → motive (n/2)) → motive n) : motive n := by
@@ -226,18 +226,18 @@ private theorem succ_mod_two : succ x % 2 = 1 - x % 2 := by
     simp [Nat.mod_eq (x+2) 2, p, hyp]
     cases Nat.mod_two_eq_zero_or_one x with | _ p => simp [p]
 
-private theorem testBit_succ_zero : testBit (x + 1) 0 = not (testBit x 0) := by
+private theorem testBit_succ_zero : testBit (x + 1) 0 = !(testBit x 0) := by
   simp [testBit_to_div_mod, succ_mod_two]
   cases Nat.mod_two_eq_zero_or_one x with | _ p =>
     simp [p]
 
-theorem testBit_two_pow_add_eq (x i : Nat) : testBit (2^i + x) i = not (testBit x i) := by
+theorem testBit_two_pow_add_eq (x i : Nat) : testBit (2^i + x) i = !(testBit x i) := by
   simp [testBit_to_div_mod, add_div_left, Nat.two_pow_pos, succ_mod_two]
   cases mod_two_eq_zero_or_one (x / 2 ^ i) with
   | _ p => simp [p]
 
 theorem testBit_mul_two_pow_add_eq (a b i : Nat) :
-    testBit (2^i*a + b) i = Bool.xor (a%2 = 1) (testBit b i) := by
+    testBit (2^i*a + b) i = (a%2 = 1 ^^ testBit b i) := by
   match a with
   | 0 => simp
   | a+1 =>
@@ -570,7 +570,7 @@ theorem or_div_two : (a ||| b) / 2 = a / 2 ||| b / 2 := by
 /-! ### xor -/
 
 @[simp] theorem testBit_xor (x y i : Nat) :
-    (x ^^^ y).testBit i = Bool.xor (x.testBit i) (y.testBit i) := by
+    (x ^^^ y).testBit i = ((x.testBit i) ^^ (y.testBit i)) := by
   simp [HXor.hXor, Xor.xor, xor, testBit_bitwise ]
 
 @[simp] theorem zero_xor (x : Nat) : 0 ^^^ x = x := by

src/Init/Data/Nat/Div.lean

@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ decreasing_by apply div_rec_lemma; assumption
 protected def mod : @& Nat → @& Nat → Nat
   /-
   Nat.modCore is defined by well-founded recursion and thus irreducible. Nevertheless it is
-  desireable if trivial `Nat.mod` calculations, namely
+  desirable if trivial `Nat.mod` calculations, namely
   * `Nat.mod 0 m` for all `m`
   * `Nat.mod n (m+n)` for concrete literals `n`
   reduce definitionally.
@@ -134,6 +134,19 @@ theorem mod_eq_of_lt {a b : Nat} (h : a < b) : a % b = a :=
     if_neg h'
   (mod_eq a b).symm ▸ this
 
+@[simp] theorem one_mod_eq_zero_iff {n : Nat} : 1 % n = 0 ↔ n = 1 := by
+  match n with
+  | 0 => simp
+  | 1 => simp
+  | n + 2 =>
+    rw [mod_eq_of_lt (by exact Nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ rfl)]
+    simp only [add_one_ne_zero, false_iff, ne_eq]
+    exact ne_of_beq_eq_false rfl
+
+@[simp] theorem Nat.zero_eq_one_mod_iff {n : Nat} : 0 = 1 % n ↔ n = 1 := by
+  rw [eq_comm]
+  simp
+
 theorem mod_eq_sub_mod {a b : Nat} (h : a ≥ b) : a % b = (a - b) % b :=
   match eq_zero_or_pos b with
   | Or.inl h₁ => h₁.symm ▸ (Nat.sub_zero a).symm ▸ rfl
@@ -157,6 +170,13 @@ theorem mod_lt (x : Nat) {y : Nat} : y > 0 → x % y < y := by
     rw [mod_eq_sub_mod h₁]
     exact h₂ h₃
 
+@[simp] protected theorem sub_mod_add_mod_cancel (a b : Nat) [NeZero a] : a - b % a + b % a = a := by
+  rw [Nat.sub_add_cancel]
+  cases a with
+  | zero => simp_all
+  | succ a =>
+    exact Nat.le_of_lt (mod_lt b (zero_lt_succ a))
+
 theorem mod_le (x y : Nat) : x % y ≤ x := by
   match Nat.lt_or_ge x y with
   | Or.inl h₁ => rw [mod_eq_of_lt h₁]; apply Nat.le_refl
@@ -197,7 +217,6 @@ decreasing_by apply div_rec_lemma; assumption
 theorem div_eq_sub_div (h₁ : 0 < b) (h₂ : b ≤ a) : a / b = (a - b) / b + 1 := by
  rw [div_eq a, if_pos]; constructor <;> assumption
 
-
 theorem mod_add_div (m k : Nat) : m % k + k * (m / k) = m := by
   induction m, k using mod.inductionOn with rw [div_eq, mod_eq]
   | base x y h => simp [h]
@@ -250,7 +269,7 @@ protected theorem div_div_eq_div_mul (m n k : Nat) : m / n / k = m / (n * k) :=
 
 theorem div_mul_le_self : ∀ (m n : Nat), m / n * n ≤ m
   | m, 0   => by simp
-  | m, n+1 => (le_div_iff_mul_le (Nat.succ_pos _)).1 (Nat.le_refl _)
+  | _, _+1 => (le_div_iff_mul_le (Nat.succ_pos _)).1 (Nat.le_refl _)
 
 theorem div_lt_iff_lt_mul (Hk : 0 < k) : x / k < y ↔ x < y * k := by
   rw [← Nat.not_le, ← Nat.not_le]; exact not_congr (le_div_iff_mul_le Hk)

src/Init/Data/Nat/Lemmas.lean

@@ -84,9 +84,6 @@ protected theorem add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le {a b c d : Nat} (hlt : a < b) (hle : c
     a + c < b + d :=
   Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.add_le_add_left hle _) (Nat.add_lt_add_right hlt _)
 
-protected theorem lt_add_of_pos_left : 0 < k → n < k + n := by
-  rw [Nat.add_comm]; exact Nat.lt_add_of_pos_right
-
 protected theorem pos_of_lt_add_right (h : n < n + k) : 0 < k :=
   Nat.lt_of_add_lt_add_left h
 
@@ -233,6 +230,17 @@ instance : Std.Associative (α := Nat) min := ⟨Nat.min_assoc⟩
 @[simp] protected theorem min_self_assoc' {m n : Nat} : min n (min m n) = min n m := by
   rw [Nat.min_comm m n, ← Nat.min_assoc, Nat.min_self]
 
+@[simp] theorem min_add_left {a b : Nat} : min a (b + a) = a := by
+  rw [Nat.min_def]
+  simp
+@[simp] theorem min_add_right {a b : Nat} : min a (a + b) = a := by
+  rw [Nat.min_def]
+  simp
+@[simp] theorem add_left_min {a b : Nat} : min (b + a) a = a := by
+  rw [Nat.min_comm, min_add_left]
+@[simp] theorem add_right_min {a b : Nat} : min (a + b) a = a := by
+  rw [Nat.min_comm, min_add_right]
+
 protected theorem sub_sub_eq_min : ∀ (a b : Nat), a - (a - b) = min a b
   | 0, _ => by rw [Nat.zero_sub, Nat.zero_min]
   | _, 0 => by rw [Nat.sub_zero, Nat.sub_self, Nat.min_zero]
@@ -287,6 +295,17 @@ protected theorem max_assoc : ∀ (a b c : Nat), max (max a b) c = max a (max b
   | _+1, _+1, _+1 => by simp only [Nat.succ_max_succ]; exact congrArg succ <| Nat.max_assoc ..
 instance : Std.Associative (α := Nat) max := ⟨Nat.max_assoc⟩
 
+@[simp] theorem max_add_left {a b : Nat} : max a (b + a) = b + a := by
+  rw [Nat.max_def]
+  simp
+@[simp] theorem max_add_right {a b : Nat} : max a (a + b) = a + b := by
+  rw [Nat.max_def]
+  simp
+@[simp] theorem add_left_max {a b : Nat} : max (b + a) a = b + a := by
+  rw [Nat.max_comm, max_add_left]
+@[simp] theorem add_right_max {a b : Nat} : max (a + b) a = a + b := by
+  rw [Nat.max_comm, max_add_right]
+
 protected theorem sub_add_eq_max (a b : Nat) : a - b + b = max a b := by
   match Nat.le_total a b with
   | .inl hl => rw [Nat.max_eq_right hl, Nat.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.mpr hl, Nat.zero_add]
@@ -586,6 +605,9 @@ theorem add_mod (a b n : Nat) : (a + b) % n = ((a % n) + (b % n)) % n := by
     | zero => simp_all
     | succ k => omega
 
+@[simp] theorem mod_mul_mod {a b c : Nat} : (a % c * b) % c = a * b % c := by
+  rw [mul_mod, mod_mod, ← mul_mod]
+
 /-! ### pow -/
 
 theorem pow_succ' {m n : Nat} : m ^ n.succ = m * m ^ n := by
@@ -748,6 +770,16 @@ protected theorem two_pow_pred_mod_two_pow (h : 0 < w) :
   rw [mod_eq_of_lt]
   apply Nat.pow_pred_lt_pow (by omega) h
 
+protected theorem pow_lt_pow_iff_pow_mul_le_pow {a n m : Nat} (h : 1 < a) :
+    a ^ n < a ^ m ↔ a ^ n * a ≤ a ^ m := by
+  rw [←Nat.pow_add_one, Nat.pow_le_pow_iff_right (by omega), Nat.pow_lt_pow_iff_right (by omega)]
+  omega
+
+@[simp]
+theorem two_pow_pred_mul_two (h : 0 < w) :
+    2 ^ (w - 1) * 2 = 2 ^ w := by
+  simp [← Nat.pow_succ, Nat.sub_add_cancel h]
+
 /-! ### log2 -/
 
 @[simp]
@@ -842,15 +874,15 @@ theorem shiftLeft_succ_inside (m n : Nat) : m <<< (n+1) = (2*m) <<< n := rfl
 
 /-- Shiftleft on successor with multiple moved to outside. -/
 theorem shiftLeft_succ : ∀(m n), m <<< (n + 1) = 2 * (m <<< n)
-| m, 0 => rfl
-| m, k + 1 => by
+| _, 0 => rfl
+| _, k + 1 => by
   rw [shiftLeft_succ_inside _ (k+1)]
   rw [shiftLeft_succ _ k, shiftLeft_succ_inside]
 
 /-- Shiftright on successor with division moved inside. -/
 theorem shiftRight_succ_inside : ∀m n, m >>> (n+1) = (m/2) >>> n
-| m, 0 => rfl
-| m, k + 1 => by
+| _, 0 => rfl
+| _, k + 1 => by
   rw [shiftRight_succ _ (k+1)]
   rw [shiftRight_succ_inside _ k, shiftRight_succ]
 

src/Init/Data/Nat/Mod.lean

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 /-
 Copyright (c) 2024 Lean FRO, LLC. All rights reserved.
 Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-Authors: Scott Morrison
+Authors: Kim Morrison
 -/
 prelude
 import Init.Omega
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ in particular
 and its corollary
 `Nat.mod_pow_succ : x % b ^ (k + 1) = x % b ^ k + b ^ k * ((x / b ^ k) % b)`.
 
-It contains the necesssary preliminary results relating order and `*` and `/`,
+It contains the necessary preliminary results relating order and `*` and `/`,
 which should probably be moved to their own file.
 -/
 

src/Init/Data/NeZero.lean

@@ -35,4 +35,4 @@ theorem neZero_iff {n : R} : NeZero n ↔ n ≠ 0 :=
   ⟨fun h ↦ h.out, NeZero.mk⟩
 
 @[simp] theorem neZero_zero_iff_false {α : Type _} [Zero α] : NeZero (0 : α) ↔ False :=
-  ⟨fun h ↦ h.ne rfl, fun h ↦ h.elim⟩
+  ⟨fun _ ↦ NeZero.ne (0 : α) rfl, fun h ↦ h.elim⟩

src/Init/Data/Option.lean

@@ -8,3 +8,5 @@ import Init.Data.Option.Basic
 import Init.Data.Option.BasicAux
 import Init.Data.Option.Instances
 import Init.Data.Option.Lemmas
+import Init.Data.Option.Attach
+import Init.Data.Option.List

src/Init/Data/Option/Attach.lean

@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
+/-
+Copyright (c) 2024 Lean FRO. All rights reserved.
+Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
+Authors: Kim Morrison
+-/
+prelude
+import Init.Data.Option.Basic
+import Init.Data.Option.List
+import Init.Data.List.Attach
+import Init.BinderPredicates
+
+namespace Option
+
+/--
+Unsafe implementation of `attachWith`, taking advantage of the fact that the representation of
+`Option {x // P x}` is the same as the input `Option α`.
+-/
+@[inline] private unsafe def attachWithImpl
+    (o : Option α) (P : α → Prop) (_ : ∀ x ∈ o, P x) : Option {x // P x} := unsafeCast o
+
+/-- "Attach" a proof `P x` that holds for the element of `o`, if present,
+to produce a new option with the same element but in the type `{x // P x}`. -/
+@[implemented_by attachWithImpl] def attachWith
+    (xs : Option α) (P : α → Prop) (H : ∀ x ∈ xs, P x) : Option {x // P x} :=
+  match xs with
+  | none => none
+  | some x => some ⟨x, H x (mem_some_self x)⟩
+
+/-- "Attach" the proof that the element of `xs`, if present, is in `xs`
+to produce a new option with the same elements but in the type `{x // x ∈ xs}`. -/
+@[inline] def attach (xs : Option α) : Option {x // x ∈ xs} := xs.attachWith _ fun _ => id
+
+@[simp] theorem attach_none : (none : Option α).attach = none := rfl
+@[simp] theorem attachWith_none : (none : Option α).attachWith P H = none := rfl
+
+@[simp] theorem attach_some {x : α} :
+    (some x).attach = some ⟨x, rfl⟩ := rfl
+@[simp] theorem attachWith_some {x : α} {P : α → Prop} (h : ∀ (b : α), b ∈ some x → P b) :
+    (some x).attachWith P h = some ⟨x, by simpa using h⟩ := rfl
+
+theorem attach_congr {o₁ o₂ : Option α} (h : o₁ = o₂) :
+    o₁.attach = o₂.attach.map (fun x => ⟨x.1, h ▸ x.2⟩) := by
+  subst h
+  simp
+
+theorem attachWith_congr {o₁ o₂ : Option α} (w : o₁ = o₂) {P : α → Prop} {H : ∀ x ∈ o₁, P x} :
+    o₁.attachWith P H = o₂.attachWith P fun x h => H _ (w ▸ h) := by
+  subst w
+  simp
+
+theorem attach_map_coe (o : Option α) (f : α → β) :
+    (o.attach.map fun (i : {i // i ∈ o}) => f i) = o.map f := by
+  cases o <;> simp
+
+theorem attach_map_val (o : Option α) (f : α → β) :
+    (o.attach.map fun i => f i.val) = o.map f :=
+  attach_map_coe _ _
+
+@[simp]
+theorem attach_map_subtype_val (o : Option α) :
+    o.attach.map Subtype.val = o :=
+  (attach_map_coe _ _).trans (congrFun Option.map_id _)
+
+theorem attachWith_map_coe {p : α → Prop} (f : α → β) (o : Option α) (H : ∀ a ∈ o, p a) :
+    ((o.attachWith p H).map fun (i : { i // p i}) => f i.val) = o.map f := by
+  cases o <;> simp [H]
+
+theorem attachWith_map_val {p : α → Prop} (f : α → β) (o : Option α) (H : ∀ a ∈ o, p a) :
+    ((o.attachWith p H).map fun i => f i.val) = o.map f :=
+  attachWith_map_coe _ _ _
+
+@[simp]
+theorem attachWith_map_subtype_val {p : α → Prop} (o : Option α) (H : ∀ a ∈ o, p a) :
+    (o.attachWith p H).map Subtype.val = o :=
+  (attachWith_map_coe _ _ _).trans (congrFun Option.map_id _)
+
+@[simp] theorem mem_attach : ∀ (o : Option α) (x : {x // x ∈ o}), x ∈ o.attach
+  | none, ⟨x, h⟩ => by simp at h
+  | some a, ⟨x, h⟩ => by simpa using h
+
+@[simp] theorem isNone_attach (o : Option α) : o.attach.isNone = o.isNone := by
+  cases o <;> simp
+
+@[simp] theorem isNone_attachWith {p : α → Prop} (o : Option α) (H : ∀ a ∈ o, p a) :
+    (o.attachWith p H).isNone = o.isNone := by
+  cases o <;> simp
+
+@[simp] theorem isSome_attach (o : Option α) : o.attach.isSome = o.isSome := by
+  cases o <;> simp
+
+@[simp] theorem isSome_attachWith {p : α → Prop} (o : Option α) (H : ∀ a ∈ o, p a) :
+    (o.attachWith p H).isSome = o.isSome := by
+  cases o <;> simp
+
+@[simp] theorem attach_eq_none_iff (o : Option α) : o.attach = none ↔ o = none := by
+  cases o <;> simp
+
+@[simp] theorem attach_eq_some_iff {o : Option α} {x : {x // x ∈ o}} :
+    o.attach = some x ↔ o = some x.val := by
+  cases o <;> cases x <;> simp
+
+@[simp] theorem attachWith_eq_none_iff {p : α → Prop} (o : Option α) (H : ∀ a ∈ o, p a) :
+    o.attachWith p H = none ↔ o = none := by
+  cases o <;> simp
+
+@[simp] theorem attachWith_eq_some_iff {p : α → Prop} {o : Option α} (H : ∀ a ∈ o, p a) {x : {x // p x}} :
+    o.attachWith p H = some x ↔ o = some x.val := by
+  cases o <;> cases x <;> simp
+
+@[simp] theorem get_attach {o : Option α} (h : o.attach.isSome = true) :
+    o.attach.get h = ⟨o.get (by simpa using h), by simp⟩ := by
+  cases o
+  · simp at h
+  · simp [get_some]
+
+@[simp] theorem get_attachWith {p : α → Prop} {o : Option α} (H : ∀ a ∈ o, p a) (h : (o.attachWith p H).isSome) :
+    (o.attachWith p H).get h = ⟨o.get (by simpa using h), H _ (by simp)⟩ := by
+  cases o
+  · simp at h
+  · simp [get_some]
+
+@[simp] theorem toList_attach (o : Option α) :
+    o.attach.toList = o.toList.attach.map fun ⟨x, h⟩ => ⟨x, by simpa using h⟩ := by
+  cases o <;> simp
+
+theorem attach_map {o : Option α} (f : α → β) :
+    (o.map f).attach = o.attach.map (fun ⟨x, h⟩ => ⟨f x, mem_map_of_mem f h⟩) := by
+  cases o <;> simp
+
+theorem attachWith_map {o : Option α} (f : α → β) {P : β → Prop} {H : ∀ (b : β), b ∈ o.map f → P b} :
+    (o.map f).attachWith P H = (o.attachWith (P ∘ f) (fun a h => H _ (mem_map_of_mem f h))).map
+      fun ⟨x, h⟩ => ⟨f x, h⟩ := by
+  cases o <;> simp
+
+theorem map_attach {o : Option α} (f : { x // x ∈ o } → β) :
+    o.attach.map f = o.pmap (fun a (h : a ∈ o) => f ⟨a, h⟩) (fun a h => h) := by
+  cases o <;> simp
+
+theorem map_attachWith {o : Option α} {P : α → Prop} {H : ∀ (a : α), a ∈ o → P a}
+    (f : { x // P x } → β) :
+    (o.attachWith P H).map f =
+      o.pmap (fun a (h : a ∈ o ∧ P a) => f ⟨a, h.2⟩) (fun a h => ⟨h, H a h⟩) := by
+  cases o <;> simp
+
+theorem attach_bind {o : Option α} {f : α → Option β} :
+    (o.bind f).attach =
+      o.attach.bind fun ⟨x, h⟩ => (f x).attach.map fun ⟨y, h'⟩ => ⟨y, mem_bind_iff.mpr ⟨x, h, h'⟩⟩ := by
+  cases o <;> simp
+
+theorem bind_attach {o : Option α} {f : {x // x ∈ o} → Option β} :
+    o.attach.bind f = o.pbind fun a h => f ⟨a, h⟩ := by
+  cases o <;> simp
+
+theorem pbind_eq_bind_attach {o : Option α} {f : (a : α) → a ∈ o → Option β} :
+    o.pbind f = o.attach.bind fun ⟨x, h⟩ => f x h := by
+  cases o <;> simp
+
+theorem attach_filter {o : Option α} {p : α → Bool} :
+    (o.filter p).attach =
+      o.attach.bind fun ⟨x, h⟩ => if h' : p x then some ⟨x, by simp_all⟩ else none := by
+  cases o with
+  | none => simp
+  | some a =>
+    simp only [filter_some, attach_some]
+    ext
+    simp only [mem_def, attach_eq_some_iff, ite_none_right_eq_some, some.injEq, some_bind,
+      dite_none_right_eq_some]
+    constructor
+    · rintro ⟨h, w⟩
+      refine ⟨h, by ext; simpa using w⟩
+    · rintro ⟨h, rfl⟩
+      simp [h]
+
+theorem filter_attach {o : Option α} {p : {x // x ∈ o} → Bool} :
+    o.attach.filter p = o.pbind fun a h => if p ⟨a, h⟩ then some ⟨a, h⟩ else none := by
+  cases o <;> simp [filter_some]
+
+end Option

src/Init/Data/Option/Basic.lean

@@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ result.
 instance (α) [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] : LawfulBEq (Option α) where
   rfl {x} :=
     match x with
-    | some x => LawfulBEq.rfl (α := α)
+    | some _ => LawfulBEq.rfl (α := α)
     | none => rfl
   eq_of_beq {x y h} := by
     match x, y with

src/Init/Data/Option/Lemmas.lean

@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ Authors: Mario Carneiro
 prelude
 import Init.Data.Option.BasicAux
 import Init.Data.Option.Instances
+import Init.Data.BEq
 import Init.Classical
 import Init.Ext
 
@@ -13,7 +14,7 @@ namespace Option
 
 theorem mem_iff {a : α} {b : Option α} : a ∈ b ↔ b = some a := .rfl
 
-@[simp] theorem mem_some {a b : α} : a ∈ some b ↔ b = a := by simp [mem_iff]
+theorem mem_some {a b : α} : a ∈ some b ↔ b = a := by simp
 
 theorem mem_some_self (a : α) : a ∈ some a := mem_some.2 rfl
 
@@ -137,6 +138,10 @@ theorem bind_eq_none' {o : Option α} {f : α → Option β} :
     o.bind f = none ↔ ∀ b a, a ∈ o → b ∉ f a := by
   simp only [eq_none_iff_forall_not_mem, not_exists, not_and, mem_def, bind_eq_some]
 
+theorem mem_bind_iff {o : Option α} {f : α → Option β} :
+    b ∈ o.bind f ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ o ∧ b ∈ f a := by
+  cases o <;> simp
+
 theorem bind_comm {f : α → β → Option γ} (a : Option α) (b : Option β) :
     (a.bind fun x => b.bind (f x)) = b.bind fun y => a.bind fun x => f x y := by
   cases a <;> cases b <;> rfl
@@ -230,10 +235,28 @@ theorem isSome_filter_of_isSome (p : α → Bool) (o : Option α) (h : (o.filter
     o.isSome := by
   cases o <;> simp at h ⊢
 
-@[simp] theorem filter_eq_none (p : α → Bool) :
-    Option.filter p o = none ↔ o = none ∨ ∀ a, a ∈ o → ¬ p a := by
+@[simp] theorem filter_eq_none {p : α → Bool} :
+    o.filter p = none ↔ o = none ∨ ∀ a, a ∈ o → ¬ p a := by
   cases o <;> simp [filter_some]
 
+@[simp] theorem filter_eq_some {o : Option α} {p : α → Bool} :
+    o.filter p = some a ↔ a ∈ o ∧ p a := by
+  cases o with
+  | none => simp
+  | some a =>
+    simp [filter_some]
+    split <;> rename_i h
+    · simp only [some.injEq, iff_self_and]
+      rintro rfl
+      exact h
+    · simp only [reduceCtorEq, false_iff, not_and, Bool.not_eq_true]
+      rintro rfl
+      simpa using h
+
+theorem mem_filter_iff {p : α → Bool} {a : α} {o : Option α} :
+    a ∈ o.filter p ↔ a ∈ o ∧ p a := by
+  simp
+
 @[simp] theorem all_guard (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (a : α) :
     Option.all q (guard p a) = (!p a || q a) := by
   simp only [guard]
@@ -247,7 +270,7 @@ theorem isSome_filter_of_isSome (p : α → Bool) (o : Option α) (h : (o.filter
 theorem bind_map_comm {α β} {x : Option (Option α)} {f : α → β} :
     x.bind (Option.map f) = (x.map (Option.map f)).bind id := by cases x <;> simp
 
-@[simp] theorem bind_map {f : α → β} {g : β → Option γ} {x : Option α} :
+theorem bind_map {f : α → β} {g : β → Option γ} {x : Option α} :
     (x.map f).bind g = x.bind (g ∘ f) := by cases x <;> simp
 
 @[simp] theorem map_bind {f : α → Option β} {g : β → γ} {x : Option α} :
@@ -307,8 +330,8 @@ theorem guard_comp {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {f : β → α} :
 theorem liftOrGet_eq_or_eq {f : α → α → α} (h : ∀ a b, f a b = a ∨ f a b = b) :
     ∀ o₁ o₂, liftOrGet f o₁ o₂ = o₁ ∨ liftOrGet f o₁ o₂ = o₂
   | none, none => .inl rfl
-  | some a, none => .inl rfl
-  | none, some b => .inr rfl
+  | some _, none => .inl rfl
+  | none, some _ => .inr rfl
   | some a, some b => by have := h a b; simp [liftOrGet] at this ⊢; exact this
 
 @[simp] theorem liftOrGet_none_left {f} {b : Option α} : liftOrGet f none b = b := by
@@ -349,6 +372,8 @@ end choice
 
 @[simp] theorem toList_none (α : Type _) : (none : Option α).toList = [] := rfl
 
+-- See `Init.Data.Option.List` for lemmas about `toList`.
+
 @[simp] theorem or_some : (some a).or o = some a := rfl
 @[simp] theorem none_or : none.or o = o := rfl
 
@@ -411,27 +436,42 @@ variable [BEq α]
 @[simp] theorem some_beq_none (a : α) : ((some a : Option α) == none) = false := rfl
 @[simp] theorem some_beq_some {a b : α} : (some a == some b) = (a == b) := rfl
 
+@[simp] theorem reflBEq_iff : ReflBEq (Option α) ↔ ReflBEq α := by
+  constructor
+  · intro h
+    constructor
+    intro a
+    suffices (some a == some a) = true by
+      simpa only [some_beq_some]
+    simp
+  · intro h
+    constructor
+    · rintro (_ | a) <;> simp
+
+@[simp] theorem lawfulBEq_iff : LawfulBEq (Option α) ↔ LawfulBEq α := by
+  constructor
+  · intro h
+    constructor
+    · intro a b h
+      apply Option.some.inj
+      apply eq_of_beq
+      simpa
+    · intro a
+      suffices (some a == some a) = true by
+        simpa only [some_beq_some]
+      simp
+  · intro h
+    constructor
+    · intro a b h
+      simpa using h
+    · intro a
+      simp
+
 end beq
 
 /-! ### ite -/
 section ite
 
-@[simp] theorem mem_dite_none_left {x : α} [Decidable p] {l : ¬ p → Option α} :
-    (x ∈ if h : p then none else l h) ↔ ∃ h : ¬ p, x ∈ l h := by
-  split <;> simp_all
-
-@[simp] theorem mem_dite_none_right {x : α} [Decidable p] {l : p → Option α} :
-    (x ∈ if h : p then l h else none) ↔ ∃ h : p, x ∈ l h := by
-  split <;> simp_all
-
-@[simp] theorem mem_ite_none_left {x : α} [Decidable p] {l : Option α} :
-    (x ∈ if p then none else l) ↔ ¬ p ∧ x ∈ l := by
-  split <;> simp_all
-
-@[simp] theorem mem_ite_none_right {x : α} [Decidable p] {l : Option α} :
-    (x ∈ if p then l else none) ↔ p ∧ x ∈ l := by
-  split <;> simp_all
-
 @[simp] theorem dite_none_left_eq_some {p : Prop} [Decidable p] {b : ¬p → Option β} :
     (if h : p then none else b h) = some a ↔ ∃ h, b h = some a := by
   split <;> simp_all
@@ -464,6 +504,22 @@ section ite
     some a = (if p then b else none) ↔ p ∧ some a = b := by
   split <;> simp_all
 
+theorem mem_dite_none_left {x : α} [Decidable p] {l : ¬ p → Option α} :
+    (x ∈ if h : p then none else l h) ↔ ∃ h : ¬ p, x ∈ l h := by
+  simp
+
+theorem mem_dite_none_right {x : α} [Decidable p] {l : p → Option α} :
+    (x ∈ if h : p then l h else none) ↔ ∃ h : p, x ∈ l h := by
+  simp
+
+theorem mem_ite_none_left {x : α} [Decidable p] {l : Option α} :
+    (x ∈ if p then none else l) ↔ ¬ p ∧ x ∈ l := by
+  simp
+
+theorem mem_ite_none_right {x : α} [Decidable p] {l : Option α} :
+    (x ∈ if p then l else none) ↔ p ∧ x ∈ l := by
+  simp
+
 @[simp] theorem isSome_dite {p : Prop} [Decidable p] {b : p → β} :
     (if h : p then some (b h) else none).isSome = true ↔ p := by
   split <;> simpa

src/Init/Data/Option/List.lean

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+/-
+Copyright (c) 2024 Lean FRO. All rights reserved.
+Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
+Authors: Kim Morrison
+-/
+prelude
+import Init.Data.List.Lemmas
+
+namespace Option
+
+@[simp] theorem mem_toList {a : α} {o : Option α} : a ∈ o.toList ↔ a ∈ o := by
+  cases o <;> simp [eq_comm]
+
+end Option

src/Init/Data/Repr.lean

@@ -51,6 +51,12 @@ instance [Repr α] : Repr (id α) :=
 instance [Repr α] : Repr (Id α) :=
   inferInstanceAs (Repr α)
 
+/-
+This instance allows us to use `Empty` as a type parameter without causing instance synthesis to fail.
+-/
+instance : Repr Empty where
+  reprPrec := nofun
+
 instance : Repr Bool where
   reprPrec
     | true, _  => "true"

src/Init/Data/String/Basic.lean

@@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ theorem lt_next (s : String) (i : Pos) : i.1 < (s.next i).1 :=
 
 theorem utf8PrevAux_lt_of_pos : ∀ (cs : List Char) (i p : Pos), p ≠ 0 →
     (utf8PrevAux cs i p).1 < p.1
-  | [], i, p, h =>
+  | [], _, _, h =>
     Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.zero_le _)
       (Nat.zero_lt_of_ne_zero (mt (congrArg Pos.mk) h))
   | c::cs, i, p, h => by

src/Init/Data/UInt/Basic.lean

@@ -290,11 +290,17 @@ instance (a b : UInt64) : Decidable (a ≤ b) := UInt64.decLe a b
 instance : Max UInt64 := maxOfLe
 instance : Min UInt64 := minOfLe
 
+-- This instance would interfere with the global instance `NeZero (n + 1)`,
+-- so we only enable it locally.
+@[local instance]
+private def instNeZeroUSizeSize : NeZero USize.size := ⟨add_one_ne_zero _⟩
+
+@[deprecated (since := "2024-09-16")]
 theorem usize_size_gt_zero : USize.size > 0 :=
   Nat.zero_lt_succ ..
 
 @[extern "lean_usize_of_nat"]
-def USize.ofNat (n : @& Nat) : USize := ⟨Fin.ofNat' n usize_size_gt_zero⟩
+def USize.ofNat (n : @& Nat) : USize := ⟨Fin.ofNat'  _ n⟩
 abbrev Nat.toUSize := USize.ofNat
 @[extern "lean_usize_to_nat"]
 def USize.toNat (n : USize) : Nat := n.val.val

src/Init/GetElem.lean

@@ -156,11 +156,11 @@ theorem getElem?_neg [GetElem? cont idx elem dom] [LawfulGetElem cont idx elem d
 theorem getElem!_pos [GetElem? cont idx elem dom] [LawfulGetElem cont idx elem dom]
     [Inhabited elem] (c : cont) (i : idx) (h : dom c i) [Decidable (dom c i)] :
     c[i]! = c[i]'h := by
-  simp only [getElem!_def, getElem?_def, h]
+  simp [getElem!_def, getElem?_def, h]
 
 theorem getElem!_neg [GetElem? cont idx elem dom] [LawfulGetElem cont idx elem dom]
     [Inhabited elem] (c : cont) (i : idx) (h : ¬dom c i) [Decidable (dom c i)] : c[i]! = default := by
-  simp only [getElem!_def, getElem?_def, h]
+  simp [getElem!_def, getElem?_def, h]
 
 namespace Fin
 

src/Init/Meta.lean

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ Additional goodies for writing macros
 -/
 prelude
 import Init.MetaTypes
-import Init.Data.Array.Basic
+import Init.Data.Array.GetLit
 import Init.Data.Option.BasicAux
 
 namespace Lean
@@ -862,7 +862,7 @@ partial def decodeRawStrLitAux (s : String) (i : String.Pos) (num : Nat) : Strin
 /--
 Takes the string literal lexical syntax parsed by the parser and interprets it as a string.
 This is where escape sequences are processed for example.
-The string `s` is is either a plain string literal or a raw string literal.
+The string `s` is either a plain string literal or a raw string literal.
 
 If it returns `none` then the string literal is ill-formed, which indicates a bug in the parser.
 The function is not required to return `none` if the string literal is ill-formed.

src/Init/Omega.lean

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 /-
 Copyright (c) 2023 Lean FRO, LLC. All rights reserved.
 Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-Authors: Scott Morrison
+Authors: Kim Morrison
 -/
 prelude
 import Init.Omega.Int

src/Init/Omega/Coeffs.lean

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 /-
 Copyright (c) 2023 Lean FRO, LLC. All rights reserved.
 Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-Authors: Scott Morrison
+Authors: Kim Morrison
 -/
 prelude
 import Init.Omega.IntList

src/Init/Omega/Constraint.lean

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 /-
 Copyright (c) 2023 Lean FRO, LLC. All rights reserved.
 Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-Authors: Scott Morrison
+Authors: Kim Morrison
 -/
 prelude
 import Init.Omega.LinearCombo

src/Init/Omega/Int.lean

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 /-
 Copyright (c) 2023 Lean FRO, LLC. All rights reserved.
 Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-Authors: Scott Morrison
+Authors: Kim Morrison
 -/
 prelude
 import Init.Data.Int.DivMod

src/Init/Omega/IntList.lean

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 /-
 Copyright (c) 2023 Lean FRO, LLC. All rights reserved.
 Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-Authors: Scott Morrison
+Authors: Kim Morrison
 -/
 prelude
 import Init.Data.List.Zip

src/Init/Omega/LinearCombo.lean

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 /-
 Copyright (c) 2023 Lean FRO, LLC. All rights reserved.
 Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-Authors: Scott Morrison
+Authors: Kim Morrison
 -/
 prelude
 import Init.Omega.Coeffs

src/Init/Omega/Logic.lean

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 /-
 Copyright (c) 2023 Lean FRO, LLC. All rights reserved.
 Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
-Authors: Scott Morrison
+Authors: Kim Morrison
 -/
 prelude
 import Init.PropLemmas

src/Init/Prelude.lean

@@ -754,10 +754,11 @@ infer the proof of `Nonempty α`.
 noncomputable def Classical.ofNonempty {α : Sort u} [Nonempty α] : α :=
   Classical.choice inferInstance
 
-instance (α : Sort u) {β : Sort v} [Nonempty β] : Nonempty (α → β) :=
+instance {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} [Nonempty β] : Nonempty (α → β) :=
   Nonempty.intro fun _ => Classical.ofNonempty
 
-instance (α : Sort u) {β : α → Sort v} [(a : α) → Nonempty (β a)] : Nonempty ((a : α) → β a) :=
+instance Pi.instNonempty {α : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v} [(a : α) → Nonempty (β a)] :
+    Nonempty ((a : α) → β a) :=
   Nonempty.intro fun _ => Classical.ofNonempty
 
 instance : Inhabited (Sort u) where
@@ -766,7 +767,8 @@ instance : Inhabited (Sort u) where
 instance (α : Sort u) {β : Sort v} [Inhabited β] : Inhabited (α → β) where
   default := fun _ => default
 
-instance (α : Sort u) {β : α → Sort v} [(a : α) → Inhabited (β a)] : Inhabited ((a : α) → β a) where
+instance Pi.instInhabited {α : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v} [(a : α) → Inhabited (β a)] :
+    Inhabited ((a : α) → β a) where
   default := fun _ => default
 
 deriving instance Inhabited for Bool
@@ -1014,7 +1016,7 @@ with `Or : Prop → Prop → Prop`, which is the propositional connective).
 It is `@[macro_inline]` because it has C-like short-circuiting behavior:
 if `x` is true then `y` is not evaluated.
 -/
-@[macro_inline] def or (x y : Bool) : Bool :=
+@[macro_inline] def Bool.or (x y : Bool) : Bool :=
   match x with
   | true  => true
   | false => y
@@ -1025,7 +1027,7 @@ with `And : Prop → Prop → Prop`, which is the propositional connective).
 It is `@[macro_inline]` because it has C-like short-circuiting behavior:
 if `x` is false then `y` is not evaluated.
 -/
-@[macro_inline] def and (x y : Bool) : Bool :=
+@[macro_inline] def Bool.and (x y : Bool) : Bool :=
   match x with
   | false => false
   | true  => y
@@ -1034,10 +1036,12 @@ if `x` is false then `y` is not evaluated.
 `not x`, or `!x`, is the boolean "not" operation (not to be confused
 with `Not : Prop → Prop`, which is the propositional connective).
 -/
-@[inline] def not : Bool → Bool
+@[inline] def Bool.not : Bool → Bool
   | true  => false
   | false => true
 
+export Bool (or and not)
+
 /--
 The type of natural numbers, starting at zero. It is defined as an
 inductive type freely generated by "zero is a natural number" and
@@ -1208,7 +1212,7 @@ class HDiv (α : Type u) (β : Type v) (γ : outParam (Type w)) where
   * For most types like `Nat`, `Int`, `Rat`, `Real`, `a / 0` is defined to be `0`.
   * For `Nat`, `a / b` rounds downwards.
   * For `Int`, `a / b` rounds downwards if `b` is positive or upwards if `b` is negative.
-    It is implemented as `Int.ediv`, the unique function satisfiying
+    It is implemented as `Int.ediv`, the unique function satisfying
     `a % b + b * (a / b) = a` and `0 ≤ a % b < natAbs b` for `b ≠ 0`.
     Other rounding conventions are available using the functions
     `Int.fdiv` (floor rounding) and `Int.div` (truncation rounding).
@@ -1362,7 +1366,7 @@ class Pow (α : Type u) (β : Type v) where
   /-- `a ^ b` computes `a` to the power of `b`. See `HPow`. -/
   pow : α → β → α
 
-/-- The homogenous version of `Pow` where the exponent is a `Nat`.
+/-- The homogeneous version of `Pow` where the exponent is a `Nat`.
 The purpose of this class is that it provides a default `Pow` instance,
 which can be used to specialize the exponent to `Nat` during elaboration.
 
@@ -2063,7 +2067,7 @@ The size of type `USize`, that is, `2^System.Platform.numBits`, which may
 be either `2^32` or `2^64` depending on the platform's architecture.
 
 Remark: we define `USize.size` using `(2^numBits - 1) + 1` to ensure the
-Lean unifier can solve contraints such as `?m + 1 = USize.size`. Recall that
+Lean unifier can solve constraints such as `?m + 1 = USize.size`. Recall that
 `numBits` does not reduce to a numeral in the Lean kernel since it is platform
 specific. Without this trick, the following definition would be rejected by the
 Lean type checker.
@@ -2566,7 +2570,9 @@ structure Array (α : Type u) where
   /--
   Converts a `List α` into an `Array α`.
 
-  At runtime, this constructor is implemented by `List.toArray` and is O(n) in the length of the
+  You can also use the synonym `List.toArray` when dot notation is convenient.
+
+  At runtime, this constructor is implemented by `List.toArrayImpl` and is O(n) in the length of the
   list.
   -/
   mk ::
@@ -2580,6 +2586,9 @@ structure Array (α : Type u) where
 attribute [extern "lean_array_to_list"] Array.toList
 attribute [extern "lean_array_mk"] Array.mk
 
+@[inherit_doc Array.mk, match_pattern]
+abbrev List.toArray (xs : List α) : Array α := .mk xs
+
 /-- Construct a new empty array with initial capacity `c`. -/
 @[extern "lean_mk_empty_array_with_capacity"]
 def Array.mkEmpty {α : Type u} (c : @& Nat) : Array α where
@@ -2707,7 +2716,10 @@ def Array.extract (as : Array α) (start stop : Nat) : Array α :=
   let sz' := Nat.sub (min stop as.size) start
   loop sz' start (mkEmpty sz')
 
-/-- Auxiliary definition for `List.toArray`. -/
+/--
+Auxiliary definition for `List.toArray`.
+`List.toArrayAux as r = r ++ as.toArray`
+-/
 @[inline_if_reduce]
 def List.toArrayAux : List α → Array α → Array α
   | nil,       r => r
@@ -2723,7 +2735,7 @@ def List.redLength : List α → Nat
 -- This function is exported to C, where it is called by `Array.mk`
 -- (the constructor) to implement this functionality.
 @[inline, match_pattern, pp_nodot, export lean_list_to_array]
-def List.toArray (as : List α) : Array α :=
+def List.toArrayImpl (as : List α) : Array α :=
   as.toArrayAux (Array.mkEmpty as.redLength)
 
 /-- The typeclass which supplies the `>>=` "bind" function. See `Monad`. -/

src/Init/PropLemmas.lean

@@ -352,10 +352,10 @@ theorem not_forall_of_exists_not {p : α → Prop} : (∃ x, ¬p x) → ¬∀ x,
 @[simp] theorem exists_or_eq_left' (y : α) (p : α → Prop) : ∃ x : α, y = x ∨ p x := ⟨y, .inl rfl⟩
 @[simp] theorem exists_or_eq_right' (y : α) (p : α → Prop) : ∃ x : α, p x ∨ y = x := ⟨y, .inr rfl⟩
 
-@[simp] theorem exists_prop' {p : Prop} : (∃ _ : α, p) ↔ Nonempty α ∧ p :=
+theorem exists_prop' {p : Prop} : (∃ _ : α, p) ↔ Nonempty α ∧ p :=
   ⟨fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨⟨a⟩, h⟩, fun ⟨⟨a⟩, h⟩ => ⟨a, h⟩⟩
 
-theorem exists_prop : (∃ _h : a, b) ↔ a ∧ b :=
+@[simp] theorem exists_prop : (∃ _h : a, b) ↔ a ∧ b :=
   ⟨fun ⟨hp, hq⟩ => ⟨hp, hq⟩, fun ⟨hp, hq⟩ => ⟨hp, hq⟩⟩
 
 @[simp] theorem exists_apply_eq_apply (f : α → β) (a' : α) : ∃ a, f a = f a' := ⟨a', rfl⟩
@@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ theorem Decidable.imp_iff_not_or [Decidable a] : (a → b) ↔ (¬a ∨ b) :=
 theorem Decidable.imp_iff_or_not [Decidable b] : b → a ↔ a ∨ ¬b :=
   Decidable.imp_iff_not_or.trans or_comm
 
-theorem Decidable.imp_or [h : Decidable a] : (a → b ∨ c) ↔ (a → b) ∨ (a → c) :=
+theorem Decidable.imp_or [Decidable a] : (a → b ∨ c) ↔ (a → b) ∨ (a → c) :=
   if h : a then by
     rw [imp_iff_right h, imp_iff_right h, imp_iff_right h]
   else by

src/Init/SimpLemmas.lean

@@ -231,8 +231,21 @@ instance : Std.Associative (· || ·) := ⟨Bool.or_assoc⟩
 @[simp] theorem Bool.not_false : (!false) = true := by decide
 @[simp] theorem beq_true  (b : Bool) : (b == true)  =  b := by cases b <;> rfl
 @[simp] theorem beq_false (b : Bool) : (b == false) = !b := by cases b <;> rfl
-@[simp] theorem Bool.not_eq_true'  (b : Bool) : ((!b) = true) = (b = false) := by cases b <;> simp
-@[simp] theorem Bool.not_eq_false' (b : Bool) : ((!b) = false) = (b = true) := by cases b <;> simp
+
+
+/--
+We move `!` from the left hand side of an equality to the right hand side.
+This helps confluence, and also helps combining pairs of `!`s.
+-/
+@[simp] theorem Bool.not_eq_eq_eq_not {a b : Bool} : ((!a) = b) ↔ (a = !b) := by
+  cases a <;> cases b <;> simp
+
+@[simp] theorem Bool.not_eq_not {a b : Bool} : ¬a = !b ↔ a = b := by
+  cases a <;> cases b <;> simp
+theorem Bool.not_not_eq {a b : Bool} : ¬(!a) = b ↔ a = b := by simp
+
+theorem Bool.not_eq_true'  (b : Bool) : ((!b) = true) = (b = false) := by simp
+theorem Bool.not_eq_false' (b : Bool) : ((!b) = false) = (b = true) := by simp
 
 @[simp] theorem Bool.not_eq_true (b : Bool) : (¬(b = true)) = (b = false) := by cases b <;> decide
 @[simp] theorem Bool.not_eq_false (b : Bool) : (¬(b = false)) = (b = true) := by cases b <;> decide

src/Init/Tactics.lean

@@ -149,26 +149,27 @@ syntax (name := assumption) "assumption" : tactic
 
 /--
 `contradiction` closes the main goal if its hypotheses are "trivially contradictory".
+
 - Inductive type/family with no applicable constructors
-```lean
-example (h : False) : p := by contradiction
-```
+  ```lean
+  example (h : False) : p := by contradiction
+  ```
 - Injectivity of constructors
-```lean
-example (h : none = some true) : p := by contradiction  --
-```
+  ```lean
+  example (h : none = some true) : p := by contradiction  --
+  ```
 - Decidable false proposition
-```lean
-example (h : 2 + 2 = 3) : p := by contradiction
-```
+  ```lean
+  example (h : 2 + 2 = 3) : p := by contradiction
+  ```
 - Contradictory hypotheses
-```lean
-example (h : p) (h' : ¬ p) : q := by contradiction
-```
+  ```lean
+  example (h : p) (h' : ¬ p) : q := by contradiction
+  ```
 - Other simple contradictions such as
-```lean
-example (x : Nat) (h : x ≠ x) : p := by contradiction
-```
+  ```lean
+  example (x : Nat) (h : x ≠ x) : p := by contradiction
+  ```
 -/
 syntax (name := contradiction) "contradiction" : tactic
 
@@ -363,31 +364,24 @@ syntax (name := fail) "fail" (ppSpace str)? : tactic
 syntax (name := eqRefl) "eq_refl" : tactic
 
 /--
-`rfl` tries to close the current goal using reflexivity.
-This is supposed to be an extensible tactic and users can add their own support
-for new reflexive relations.
-
-Remark: `rfl` is an extensible tactic. We later add `macro_rules` to try different
-reflexivity theorems (e.g., `Iff.rfl`).
+This tactic applies to a goal whose target has the form `x ~ x`,
+where `~` is equality, heterogeneous equality or any relation that
+has a reflexivity lemma tagged with the attribute @[refl].
 -/
-macro "rfl" : tactic => `(tactic| case' _ => fail "The rfl tactic failed. Possible reasons:
-- The goal is not a reflexive relation (neither `=` nor a relation with a @[refl] lemma).
-- The arguments of the relation are not equal.
-Try using the reflexivity lemma for your relation explicitly, e.g. `exact Eq.refl _` or
-`exact HEq.rfl` etc.")
-
-macro_rules | `(tactic| rfl) => `(tactic| eq_refl)
-macro_rules | `(tactic| rfl) => `(tactic| exact HEq.rfl)
+syntax "rfl" : tactic
 
 /--
-This tactic applies to a goal whose target has the form `x ~ x`,
-where `~` is a reflexive relation other than `=`,
-that is, a relation which has a reflexive lemma tagged with the attribute @[refl].
+The same as `rfl`, but without trying `eq_refl` at the end.
 -/
 syntax (name := applyRfl) "apply_rfl" : tactic
 
+-- We try `apply_rfl` first, beause it produces a nice error message
 macro_rules | `(tactic| rfl) => `(tactic| apply_rfl)
 
+-- But, mostly for backward compatibility, we try `eq_refl` too (reduces more aggressively)
+macro_rules | `(tactic| rfl) => `(tactic| eq_refl)
+-- Als for backward compatibility, because `exact` can trigger the implicit lambda feature (see #5366)
+macro_rules | `(tactic| rfl) => `(tactic| exact HEq.rfl)
 /--
 `rfl'` is similar to `rfl`, but disables smart unfolding and unfolds all kinds of definitions,
 theorems included (relevant for declarations defined by well-founded recursion).
@@ -405,6 +399,19 @@ example (a b c d : Nat) : a + b + c + d = d + (b + c) + a := by ac_rfl
 -/
 syntax (name := acRfl) "ac_rfl" : tactic
 
+/--
+`ac_nf` normalizes equalities up to application of an associative and commutative operator.
+```
+instance : Associative (α := Nat) (.+.) := ⟨Nat.add_assoc⟩
+instance : Commutative (α := Nat) (.+.) := ⟨Nat.add_comm⟩
+
+example (a b c d : Nat) : a + b + c + d = d + (b + c) + a := by
+ ac_nf
+ -- goal: a + (b + (c + d)) = a + (b + (c + d))
+```
+-/
+syntax (name := acNf) "ac_nf" : tactic
+
 /--
 The `sorry` tactic closes the goal using `sorryAx`. This is intended for stubbing out incomplete
 parts of a proof while still having a syntactically correct proof skeleton. Lean will give
@@ -456,7 +463,7 @@ syntax (name := change) "change " term (location)? : tactic
 
 /--
 * `change a with b` will change occurrences of `a` to `b` in the goal,
-  assuming `a` and `b` are are definitionally equal.
+  assuming `a` and `b` are definitionally equal.
 * `change a with b at h` similarly changes `a` to `b` in the type of hypothesis `h`.
 -/
 syntax (name := changeWith) "change " term " with " term (location)? : tactic
@@ -773,8 +780,9 @@ macro_rules
 macro "refine_lift' " e:term : tactic => `(tactic| focus (refine' no_implicit_lambda% $e; rotate_right))
 /-- Similar to `have`, but using `refine'` -/
 macro "have' " d:haveDecl : tactic => `(tactic| refine_lift' have $d:haveDecl; ?_)
-/-- Similar to `have`, but using `refine'` -/
+set_option linter.missingDocs false in -- OK, because `tactic_alt` causes inheritance of docs
 macro (priority := high) "have'" x:ident " := " p:term : tactic => `(tactic| have' $x:ident : _ := $p)
+attribute [tactic_alt tacticHave'_] «tacticHave'_:=_»
 /-- Similar to `let`, but using `refine'` -/
 macro "let' " d:letDecl : tactic => `(tactic| refine_lift' let $d:letDecl; ?_)
 
@@ -793,7 +801,7 @@ syntax inductionAlt  := ppDedent(ppLine) inductionAltLHS+ " => " (hole <|> synth
 After `with`, there is an optional tactic that runs on all branches, and
 then a list of alternatives.
 -/
-syntax inductionAlts := " with" (ppSpace tactic)? withPosition((colGe inductionAlt)+)
+syntax inductionAlts := " with" (ppSpace colGt tactic)? withPosition((colGe inductionAlt)+)
 
 /--
 Assuming `x` is a variable in the local context with an inductive type,
@@ -1588,7 +1596,7 @@ macro "get_elem_tactic" : tactic =>
       There is a proof embedded in the right-hand-side, and we want it to be just `hi`.
       If `omega` is used to "fill" this proof, we will have a more complex proof term that
       cannot be inferred by unification.
-      We hardcoded `assumption` here to ensure users cannot accidentaly break this IF
+      We hardcoded `assumption` here to ensure users cannot accidentally break this IF
       they add new `macro_rules` for `get_elem_tactic_trivial`.
 
       TODO: Implement priorities for `macro_rules`.
@@ -1598,7 +1606,7 @@ macro "get_elem_tactic" : tactic =>
     | get_elem_tactic_trivial
     | fail "failed to prove index is valid, possible solutions:
   - Use `have`-expressions to prove the index is valid
-  - Use `a[i]!` notation instead, runtime check is perfomed, and 'Panic' error message is produced if index is not valid
+  - Use `a[i]!` notation instead, runtime check is performed, and 'Panic' error message is produced if index is not valid
   - Use `a[i]?` notation instead, result is an `Option` type
   - Use `a[i]'h` notation instead, where `h` is a proof that index is valid"
    )