Files
lean4/tests/elab/6655.lean
Garmelon 08eb78a5b2 chore: switch to new test/bench suite (#12590)
This PR sets up the new integrated test/bench suite. It then migrates
all benchmarks and some related tests to the new suite. There's also
some documentation and some linting.

For now, a lot of the old tests are left alone so this PR doesn't become
even larger than it already is. Eventually, all tests should be migrated
to the new suite though so there isn't a confusing mix of two systems.
2026-02-25 13:51:53 +00:00

120 lines
2.4 KiB
Lean4
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
/-!
# Improve zeta-delta tracking for `simp?`
https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/6655 reports issues with `simp?` where
it would over-report local variables. This comes down to two kinds of issues:
- zeta-delta tracking wasn't being reset, so previous `simp?`s would contribute variables
- `simp?` would report variables that weren't explicitly mentioned,
because `whnf` would be run with different configurations during the tracking.
(e.g. `withInferTypeConfig` enables `zetaDelta`.)
This file tests that it resets the tracking and filters the list.
-/
set_option linter.unusedSimpArgs false
/-!
Example from #6655. This used to suggest `simp only [e, d]`.
-/
/--
info: Try this:
[apply] simp only [e]
---
trace: α : Type
c : αα
x : α
d : αα := c
e : αα := d
⊢ d x = x
---
warning: declaration uses `sorry`
-/
#guard_msgs in
example {α : Type} (c : α α) (x : α) : c x = x := by
let d := c
let e := d
change e x = x
simp? [e]
trace_state
sorry
/-!
Example from #6655. This used to suggest `simp only [d]`.
-/
/--
info: Try this:
[apply] simp only
---
warning: declaration uses `sorry`
-/
#guard_msgs in
example {α : Type} (c : α α) (x : α) : c x = x := by
let d := c
change d x = x
simp [d]
have : x = x := by
simp?
sorry
/-!
Example from comments of #6655. This used to suggest `simp only [Int.add_sub_cancel, p]`.
(N.B. the goal at that point does not have `p` in it!)
-/
/--
info: Try this:
[apply] simp only [Int.add_sub_cancel]
-/
#guard_msgs in
example (a b : Int) : a + b - b = a := by
let p := 1
have h : p = 1 := by
simp only [p]
simp?
/-!
Example from https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/7539 by JovanGerb.
This used to suggest `simp only [a, b] ` and `simp only [a, b]`
-/
/--
info: Try this:
[apply] simp only [a]
---
info: Try this:
[apply] simp only
-/
#guard_msgs in
example : True := by
let a := 1
let b := 2
have : b = 2 := by simp [a,b]
have : a = 1 := by simp? [a]
have : 1 = 1 := by simp?
trivial
/-!
Test that there is still a deficiency. This should say `simp only [e]`.
-/
/--
info: Try this:
[apply] simp only [e, c]
---
trace: α : Type
b : αα
x : α
c : αα := b
d : αα := c
e : αα := d
⊢ d x = x
---
warning: declaration uses `sorry`
-/
#guard_msgs in
example {α : Type} (b : α α) (x : α) : b x = x := by
let c := b
let d := c
let e := d
change e x = x
simp? [e, c]
trace_state
sorry